Podcasts about mit

Dave Blundin has co-founded 23 companies, co-hosts the Moonshots podcast, runs the VC firm Link Ventures, teaches at MIT, and has been building neural networks since the 1980s. His take: “[AI is] under-hyped. It's absolutely going to change the world in the next couple of years more than any change in human history. There's nothing even vaguely comparable to it.” — (7:37) “Stop sleeping. Rush to everything you do.” (15:16) Why he started building neural nets at MIT in the 1980s (16:19) Should you finish college or start a business? (20:38) Why best friends are the best co-founders (25:00) San Francisco is still king, but Boston is AI startup central (28:06) “The chip shortage is going to be incredibly bad.” (34:26) The AI energy shortage (36:32) Are we in an AI bubble? (55:44) The case for human immortality before 2050 (1:02:00) Advice for first-time founders (and second-time, and 23rd-time) — Want to connect?

Dr. Ranjay Gulati discusses how to resource yourself for courageous action during times of uncertainty.— YOU'LL LEARN — 1) The critical question to ask when you're feeling fear2) The six resources of courageous people3) The simple mental shift that leads to braver actionsSubscribe or visit AwesomeAtYourJob.com/ep1100 for clickable versions of the links below. — ABOUT RANJAY — Ranjay Gulati is the Paul R. Lawrence MBA Class of 1942 Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School. His pioneering work focuses on unlocking organizational and individual potential—embracing courage, nurturing purpose-driven leaders, driving growth, and transforming businesses. He is the recipient of the 2024 CK Prahalad Award for Scholarly Impact on Practice and was ranked as one of the top ten most cited scholars in Economics and Business over a decade by ISI-Incite. The Economist, Financial Times, and the Economist Intelligence Unit have listed him as among the top handful of business school scholars whose work is most relevant to management practice. He is a Thinkers50 top management scholar, speaks regularly to executive audiences, and serves on the board of several entrepreneurial ventures. He holds a PhD from Harvard University and a Master's degree from MIT. He is the author of Deep Purpose (2022) and How to be Bold (2025), both published by Harper Collins. He lives in Newton, Massachusetts with his wife and two children.• Book: How to Be Bold: The Surprising Science of Everyday Courage• LinkedIn: Ranjay Gulati• Website: RanjayGulati.com— RESOURCES MENTIONED IN THE SHOW — • Book: The Power of Story: Change Your Story, Change Your Destiny in Business and in Life by Jim Loehr— THANK YOU SPONSORS! — • Strawberry.me. Claim your $50 credit and build momentum in your career with Strawberry.me/Awesome• Vanguard. Give your clients consistent results year in and year out with vanguard.com/AUDIO• Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/AwesomeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Vaughn Smith is a 26-language polyglot who had his brain scanned at MIT. Discover the man behind the scan and the surprisingly simple ways he learned so many languages. Got a question you want Olly to answer on the podcast? Submit it here: https://storylearning.com/ask_Olly_your_questionGet a 7-day FREE trial to one of my story-based language courses

Nine schools, including MIT and the University of Texas at Austin, are offered preferential access to federal dollars if they sign a compact with the Trump Administration, agreeing to specific commitments on standardized testing, admissions, campus speech, grade inflation, tuition, and more. Are these useful reforms to higher ed? Is this federal overreach? Or is it perhaps both? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Between 1946 and 1953, at a Massachusetts institution called the Walter E. Fernald State School, dozens of boys were recruited into something called a “Science Club.” They were promised special perks — better food, baseball games, trips to the beach. What they weren't told was that their breakfast oatmeal and milk were secretly laced with radioactive iron and calcium. The so-called nutritional study was designed by scientists from MIT, funded in part by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, and co-sponsored by Quaker Oats, which supplied the cereal. The goal was to measure how well the body absorbed minerals from food — but the method violated every basic rule of ethics and consent. The children, many labeled “feebleminded” or “morons” by the state, were wards of Massachusetts — boys without parents, without rights, and without the ability to refuse. Some were even injected with radioactive materials in follow-up experiments. None were told what was happening to them. When the truth came out decades later, public outrage was immediate. Survivors like Fred Boyce came forward, saying the greatest harm wasn't the radiation — it was being treated like an object, not a person. In 1998, MIT and Quaker Oats settled a class-action lawsuit for $1.85 million, and President Bill Clinton issued an apology on behalf of the federal government for Cold War-era human radiation testing. But behind the headlines is a bigger story — about power, secrecy, and the belief that science justifies anything. In this episode, we dig deep into the Fernald radioactive oatmeal experiments — what really happened, who was responsible, what became of the victims, and how it changed human-subject research forever. Hosted by Tony Brueski. Subscribe for more longform true-crime investigations that expose the hidden side of power, psychology, and justice. #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #FernaldExperiment #RadioactiveOatmeal #ColdWarHistory #HumanExperimentation #MIT #QuakerOats #InstitutionalAbuse #ScienceEthics Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Between 1946 and 1953, at a Massachusetts institution called the Walter E. Fernald State School, dozens of boys were recruited into something called a “Science Club.” They were promised special perks — better food, baseball games, trips to the beach. What they weren't told was that their breakfast oatmeal and milk were secretly laced with radioactive iron and calcium. The so-called nutritional study was designed by scientists from MIT, funded in part by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, and co-sponsored by Quaker Oats, which supplied the cereal. The goal was to measure how well the body absorbed minerals from food — but the method violated every basic rule of ethics and consent. The children, many labeled “feebleminded” or “morons” by the state, were wards of Massachusetts — boys without parents, without rights, and without the ability to refuse. Some were even injected with radioactive materials in follow-up experiments. None were told what was happening to them. When the truth came out decades later, public outrage was immediate. Survivors like Fred Boyce came forward, saying the greatest harm wasn't the radiation — it was being treated like an object, not a person. In 1998, MIT and Quaker Oats settled a class-action lawsuit for $1.85 million, and President Bill Clinton issued an apology on behalf of the federal government for Cold War-era human radiation testing. But behind the headlines is a bigger story — about power, secrecy, and the belief that science justifies anything. In this episode, we dig deep into the Fernald radioactive oatmeal experiments — what really happened, who was responsible, what became of the victims, and how it changed human-subject research forever. Hosted by Tony Brueski. Subscribe for more longform true-crime investigations that expose the hidden side of power, psychology, and justice. #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #FernaldExperiment #RadioactiveOatmeal #ColdWarHistory #HumanExperimentation #MIT #QuakerOats #InstitutionalAbuse #ScienceEthics Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Christopher Brock, founder of Primary Hosting and Quantum Proof, joins Jeff Bloomfield for a mind-bending conversation on the rise of sovereign AI, post-quantum encryption, and how generative AI is reshaping both business and personal life. As Chief Information Security Officer for the Piqua Shawnee Tribe of Alabama and creator of the 300,000+ member Facebook group AI for Business and Life, Brock bridges ancient wisdom, advanced math, and cutting-edge tech to explore how AI can protect—not exploit—human identity, culture, and data. AI isn't just changing business—it's redefining the boundaries of human intelligence, creativity, and security. Christopher Brock shows us the future where AI meets quantum computing, tribal sovereignty meets technology, and cybersecurity meets consciousness. Whether you're a CEO, creator, or just curious about the next tech revolution, this episode will change how you see data, privacy, and possibility itself. Sovereign AI is about protection—of identity, culture, and innovation, not just efficiency. Quantum computing could crack modern encryption in seconds, forcing an urgent rethinking of cybersecurity. Quantum Proof aims to make data “unhackable” using a new mathematical model that predicts prime numbers. AI and quantum together are “steroids on steroids”—powerful but potentially perilous if not ethically guided. Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) has become an organized dark-web industry with customer support desks. Data harvesting is happening now—hackers store encrypted data today, waiting for quantum tools to unlock it later. The AI learning curve starts with usage—use the tools yourself before delegating to a tech team. LLMs (like ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini) are modern-day PhDs in your pocket—only valuable if you engage them daily. SEO is dead—AI ranking is here. Businesses must adapt to “AI discoverability” instead of traditional Google search. If you ignore AI, you'll be left behind. Brock says plainly: “Use it—or miss where the world's going.” Time Topic 00:00 Opening banter: building AI platforms and UX importance 03:36 Introduction: Christopher Brock and his work 07:41 Speaking at MIT, launching Quantum Proof 09:21 The rise of AI for Business and Life community (300k+ members) 17:09 Brock's background: from student government to tech startups 23:50 COVID pivot, tribal leadership, and founding Primary Hosting 25:47 The birth of Quantum Proof and post-quantum encryption 28:06 Quantum computing explained (for humans!) 34:58 The math and philosophy behind Brock's new algorithms 35:53 Why today's encryption—and even blockchain—isn't safe 41:19 Ransomware-as-a-Service: the digital mob economy 45:51 How everyday people should start using AI 49:03 Building personalized AI agents and data ecosystems 52:24 The death of SEO and the rise of AI discoverability 54:31 Where to find Chris and what's next in AI & Quantum tech

This week, Granger and AntMan revisit a decades-old prediction that’s resurfacing online — an MIT study from 1972 claiming society could collapse by 2040. The two dig into what that actually means, what the researchers got right and wrong, and how changing population trends might be shaping the future faster than we realize. From the idea of socialism as a global “solution” to declining birth rates and the rise of technology, the conversation moves from history to the present day. Granger shares stories from his travels, including a talk with a Venezuelan Uber driver, as they unpack why grand theories about saving the world always seem to ignore human nature. But the heart of the episode isn’t fear — it’s faith. Granger points back to Scripture, reminding listeners that no matter what predictions come true, God’s plan doesn’t change. Whether the world lasts another fifteen years or a thousand, our mission remains the same: to live for Christ and share His gospel in the time we’re given.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Hoover History Lab held Thinking Historically: A Guide to Statecraft and Strategy, a book talk with the author, Francis J. Gavin on Thursday, October 02, 2025 from 4:00 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. PT in the Shultz Auditorium, George P. Shultz Building. It seems obvious that we should use history to improve policy. If we have a good understanding of the past, it should enable better decisions in the present, especially in the extraordinarily consequential worlds of statecraft and strategy. But how do we gain that knowledge? How should history be used? Sadly, it is rarely done well, and historians and decision-makers seldom interact. But in this remarkable book, Francis J. Gavin explains the many ways historical knowledge can help us understand and navigate the complex, often confusing world around us. Good historical work convincingly captures the challenges and complexities the decisionmaker faces. At its most useful, history is less a narrowly defined field of study than a practice, a mental awareness, a discernment, and a responsiveness to the past and how it unfolded into our present world—a discipline in the best sense of the word. Gavin demonstrates how a historical sensibility helps us to appreciate the unexpected; complicates our assumptions; makes the unfamiliar familiar and the familiar unfamiliar; and requires us, without entirely suspending moral judgment, to try to understand others on their own terms. This book is a powerful argument for thinking historically as a way for readers to apply wisdom in encountering what is foreign to them. FEATURING Francis J. Gavin is the Giovanni Agnelli Distinguished Professor and the director of the Henry A. Kissinger Center for Global Affairs at Johns Hopkins SAIS. Previously, he was the first Frank Stanton Chair in Nuclear Security Policy Studies at MIT and the Tom Slick Professor of International Affairs and the Director of the Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law at the University of Texas. From 2005 until 2010, he directed The American Assembly's multiyear, national initiative, The Next Generation Project: U.S. Global Policy and the Future of International Institutions. He is the founding Chair of the Board of Editors for the Texas National Security Journal. Gavin's writings include Gold, Dollars, and Power: The Politics of International Monetary Relations, 1958-1971; Nuclear Statecraft: History and Strategy in America's Atomic Age ; and Nuclear Weapons and American Grand Strategy (Brookings Institution Press), which was named a 2020 Choice Outstanding Academic Title. His IISS-Adelphi book, The Taming of Scarcity and the Problems of Plenty: Rethinking International Relations and American Grand Strategy in a New Era was published in 2024. In 2025, he published Wonder and Worry: Contemporary History in an Age of Uncertainty with Stolpe Press, 2025 and Thinking Historically – A Guide to Statecraft and Strategy with Yale University Press. MODERATED BY Stephen Kotkin is director of the Hoover History Lab, Kleinheinz Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, and senior fellow at Stanford's Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies. He has been conducting research in the Hoover Library & Archives for more than three decades.

Descripción para YouTube (AMADAG TV): ¿Qué haría un coche autónomo si tuviera que decidir entre atropellar a un grupo de personas o sacrificar a sus propios pasajeros? ¿Y si en ese grupo hay un niño, un anciano… o incluso un perro? En este episodio de AMADAG TV, exploramos uno de los dilemas más polémicos y fascinantes de la inteligencia artificial: el experimento Moral Machine del MIT. Una iniciativa que planteó millones de situaciones reales a personas de todo el mundo para descubrir cómo tomamos decisiones éticas cuando se trata de la vida y la muerte. Pero esto va más allá de la tecnología. Hablamos de moral, ética, sesgos, cultura y naturaleza humana. ¿Es lo mismo lo que consideramos “bueno” en España que en Japón o en América Latina? ¿Juzgarías igual a alguien de tu grupo que a un extraño? ¿Y por qué a veces las personas más éticas cometen actos inmorales? En este vídeo descubrirás: Cómo funciona el experimento Moral Machine y por qué sus resultados sorprendieron al mundo Qué decisiones morales tomamos dependiendo de la cultura, la edad o el rol social Qué revelan los monos capuchinos sobre nuestra percepción de la justicia El papel de la obediencia, el anonimato y la presión del grupo en nuestras decisiones Por qué deberíamos desconfiar de nuestra propia moral y apostar por la ética Además, te contamos cómo los sesgos culturales, el favoritismo intragrupo y nuestras emociones pueden distorsionar nuestras decisiones más importantes. Y lo más inquietante: ¿qué pasará cuando esas decisiones las tomen las máquinas? Si crees que tienes una brújula moral clara, este vídeo puede hacerte replantear todo. Porque la moral humana, cuando se mira de cerca… tiene más agujeros que un colador. Prepárate para cuestionarlo todo. Palabras clave (keywords) moral,máquina moral,dilemas éticos,dilema moral,ética,inteligencia artificial,coche autónomo,MIT moral machine,psicología moral,ética aplicada,sesgos morales,ética en tecnología,favoritismo grupal,obediencia a la autoridad,Milgram experimento,efecto espectador,capuchinos moralidad,cultura y moral,valores humanos,dilema del tranvía,ética en IA,comportamiento moral,justicia social,hipocresía moral,La Teoría de la Mente Hashtags #moralmachine, #éticaenIA, #dilemamoral, #psicologíamoral, #inteligenciaartificial, #AMADAGTV Nuestra escuela de ansiedad: www.escuelaansiedad.com Nuestro nuevo libro: www.elmapadelaansiedad.com Visita nuestra página web: http://www.amadag.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Asociacion.Agorafobia/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amadag.psico/ ▶️ YouTube Amadag TV: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC22fPGPhEhgiXCM7PGl68rw

Hantao Yuan is Co-Founder of Moku, and serves as Moku's marketing growth chief and community strategist. He has been acquiring creators and users for over a decade for game publishers and gaming brands. He has also sold his own esports team through M&A to Overtime sports, and advised 2 other teams through M&A.Moku is backed by a world-class team of AI experts from MIT, IBM, and Johns Hopkins. The company has already built Web3's largest distribution engine, driving over 8 million daily active users across partner launches and more than $7 billion in cumulative fully diluted value (FDV). With this foundation, Moku is uniquely positioned to expand Grand Arena beyond Web3 and into mainstream fantasy sports and interactive wagering markets. Grand Arena is converging the $27B fantasy sports market, the $40B prediction market, and the $50B+ AI gaming sector.In this conversation, we discuss:- Letting users speculate on gaming- AI content is getting out of control - Speculation + daily fantasy + AI - Betting on live matches - Current state of Web3 Gaming - Bridging Web2 & Web3 audiences - Speculation is the future of entertainment - Why Prediction Markets will work - Hantao selling his own esports to Overtime sports - The history of Moku Moku X: @Moku_HQDiscord: discord.gg/mokuYouTube: @MokuHQHantao YuanX: @HantaoLinkedIn: Hantao Yuan---------------------------------------------------------------------------------This episode is brought to you by PrimeXBT.PrimeXBT offers a robust trading system for both beginners and professional traders that demand highly reliable market data and performance. Traders of all experience levels can easily design and customize layouts and widgets to best fit their trading style. PrimeXBT is always offering innovative products and professional trading conditions to all customers.  PrimeXBT is running an exclusive promotion for listeners of the podcast. After making your first deposit, 50% of that first deposit will be credited to your account as a bonus that can be used as additional collateral to open positions. Code: CRYPTONEWS50 This promotion is available for a month after activation. Click the link below: PrimeXBT x CRYPTONEWS50

"Wir waren niemand mehr" (1). Mit den Historikern Gerhard Baumgartner und Herbert Brettl, Autoren des Buches "Einfach weg!" Verschwundene Roma Siedlungen im Burgenland (new academic press). Gestaltung: Rosemarie Burgstaller

On February 6, 2021, Yale grad student Kevin Jiang was driving home when he was rear-ended. But this was no accident. Within seconds, the driver pulled out a gun and shot him eight times.Investigators soon uncovered a disturbing motive. The killer, MIT researcher Qinxuan Pan, was secretly obsessed with Kevin's fiancée, Zion Perry. After the shooting, Pan vanished, sparking a months-long manhunt across multiple states.He was eventually found hiding in Alabama after a suspicious phone call from his mother led police to a hotel. In 2024, Pan pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 35 years in prison with no parole.Does 35 years equal justice for Kevin Jiang's murder, or is it far from enough?Follow True Crime Recaps for the crimes that expose how obsession can turn deadly.

Majdnem zsidó – Virág Gulyás története antiszemitizmustól aktivizmusig | MÓKA Podcast Amerikából   Mi történik, ha egy magyar balettintézeti növendék egyszer csak zsidó ügyekért kezd el kiállni Amerikában? Hogyan lesz valaki a saját előítéleteiből építkező, elismert közéleti szereplő? És milyen lehet zsidónak tűnni, de nem annak lenni – miközben az egész világ az identitásodról vitázik?   Ebben az őszinte és sokszor provokatív beszélgetésben Virág Gulyás volt a vendégem – aktivista, előadó, blogger, a „Majdnem Zsidó” („Almost Jewish”) brand megalkotója, aki ma New Yorkban él, de Budapesten kezdte pályafutását klasszikus balett-táncosként.  

Episode 357 of RevolutionZ presents chapter six of The Wind Cries Freedom plus some personal discussion of publishing priorities and reader/listener choices. From the oral history, Andre Goldman describes his path from academic to organizer and in doing so reveals how a campus boycott became a disciplined, scalable movement. His story has no lone hero; it's built on strategy, solidarity, and a culture that turned participation into a mark of maturity rather than a fringe stance.Along the way Andre refers to lessons he took from reading about the 1960s without romanticizing them: expand with intention, consolidate gains, and keep your organizing transparent if you want participatory democracy to be more than a slogan. Miguel draws out his take on how students in their time exposed militarized research, how campus workers reshaped demands toward shared governance, and how inter-campus coordination converted isolated protests into a coherent force. When administrators leaned on repression, “safety” threats, and prestige, the movement focused on raising the real costs of such behavior—documenting abuses, repeatedly returning stronger, and persistently building sympathy beyond the campus.The biggest obstacle, Andre reports, was not tactical but psychological. Potential allies often agreed on facts and ethics but clung to the belief that victory was impossible or irrelevant. So, to dissent was pointless. Andre uses his experiences to describe the origins of that learned powerlessness and to show how movements undid it by linking small wins to a bigger strategy,, asking questions that stir conscience, and modeling a vision others want to join. Does Andre's discussion of a future struggle as part of this oral history provide provocative, useful insights for campus organizing, anti-militarism, democratic governance, and beating cynicism in our time? Does it reveal what concrete steps, courage, and discipline can accomplish together? If so, I think Miguel and Andre would say okay, in that case refine the insights, adapt them to your many varied situations, beat Trump and militarism. If not, I think Miguel and Andre would say, okay, generate your own more useful insights. If Andre's stories and the lessons he took resonate for you, or even more important, if you think it would resonate for others, perhaps share the episode with a friend who thinks “nothing ever changes,” and perhaps even attach a comment with a lesson you feel you can take into your next action, or a proposed lesson which you instead think is confused or mistaken and needs to be improved or replaced. In other words listen, but then engage.Support the show

Jeff Wetherhold is a change expert with over 15 years of experience helping mission-driven teams evolve with clarity, connection, and measurable impact. As Founder and Principal of MI for Health, Jeff equips organizations to navigate transformation using behavioral science and practical frameworks that sustain real results.From healthcare systems to community initiatives, Jeff's approach bridges the gap between theory and practice—training leaders to engage even the most resistant audiences through evidence-based methods like Motivational Interviewing, Reflective Listening, and Deep Canvassing.A Certified Change Practitioner and Harvard-trained educator, Jeff has partnered with institutions such as MIT, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, and multiple state-level initiatives. His work blends empathy, science, and strategy to help organizations not just manage change—but embody it. https://www.jeffwetherhold.com/  Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/i-am-refocused-radio--2671113/support.Thank you for tuning in to I Am Refocused Radio. For more inspiring conversations, visit IAmRefocusedRadio.com and stay connected with our community.Don't miss new episodes—subscribe now at YouTube.com/@RefocusedRadio

Immer weniger Gletscher in der Schweiz. Das heisst auch: Immer weniger Wasser im Sommer. Wie damit umgehen? Und: Reportage aus dem indischen Spiti Tal, das vom Rückgang der Gletscher betroffen ist. Zudem: Gravitationswellen, was hat man in den letzten zehn Jahren alles gelernt? 00:00 Schlagzeilen 00:42 Pestizide in Schweizer Bächen: Neue Messungen der Eawag zeigen immer wieder hohe Konzentrationen, die Wasserorganismen schädigen können. (Angelika Kren) 04:20 Meldungen: Lebensgrosse Felsgravuren in der Wüste haben den Menschen vermutlich den Weg zu Wasserstellen gewiesen / Zum Tod von Jane Goodall 07:48 Zehn Jahre Forschung an Gravitationswellen: Vor zehn Jahren machten US-Forscher eine bahnbrechende Entdeckung: Sie konnten erstmals Gravitationswellen nachweisen. Dies wurde verglichen mit dem Moment, als Galileo Galilei im 17.Jahrhundert sein Teleskop zum Nachthimmel richtete - und unter anderm das schwache Licht der Eismonde des Jupiters einfing. Gravitationswellen - sind anders geartet als Licht - und sie gehen auch vor allem von nicht-leuchtenden Objekten aus. Albert Einstein hatte diese neuartigen Wellen zwar schon lange vorhergesagt. Doch ihre extrem schwachen Signale zu messen, das gelang erst im Herbst 2015 am Ligo-Observatorium in den USA. Die damals registrierten Gravitationswellen waren eine Art fernes Echo – einer gewaltigen Kollision von zwei massereichen schwarzen Löchern weit weg von der Erde. Mit solchen Messungen werde sich das bisherige Wissen über schwarze Löcher und allgemein übers Universum um Dimensionen erweitern, hiess es damals. Und heute? Was hat man tatsächlich Neues gelernt in den ersten zehn Jahren Gravitationswellenforschung? (Anita Vonmont) 14:10 Schwerpunkt: Gletscherschwund und Wasserverfügbarkeit Himalaya: Auch im Himalaya schmelzen die Gletscher und sorgen für trockenere Sommer. Das hat Auswirkungen auf die sowieso schon eher karge Ernte in den höher gelegenen Gebieten, wie zum Beispiel dem indischen Spiti Tal. (Nicole Graaf) 22:25 Schweiz: Die Schweizer Gletscher haben gemäss der neusten Erhebung in den letzten zehn Jahren einen Viertel ihres Volumens eingebüsst. Und seit 1970 sind bereits über 1000 Gletscher verschwunden. Das bedeutet auch bei uns mittelfristig weniger Wasser vor allem im Sommer. Noch ist die Schweiz aber erst wenig darauf vorbereitet. So werden unsere Stauseen im Winter jeweils fast geleert, weil wir den Winterstrom brauchen oder verkaufen wollen – statt das Wasser für die Sommermonate zurück zu halten. Und auch der Wasserverbrauch ist im Gesamten nicht klar erfasst – es ist nicht bekannt wie viel etwa Industrie und Landwirtschaft aus den Flüssen und Seen nehmen. (Felicitas Erzinger) Links: Pestizide in Schweizer Bächen: eawag.ch/de/info/portal/aktuelles/news/pestizide-in-schweizer-baechen-es-bleibt-noch-viel-zu-tun/ Experimentelle Zellteilung, Nature: nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63454-7 Felsgravuren: nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63417-y Gravitationswellen: journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/kw5g-d732 Sendung zum Tod von Jane Goodall (News Plus, SRF) srf.ch/audio/news-plus/schimpansen-forscherin-jane-goodall-was-hinterlaesst-sie-uns?id=AUDI20251002_NR_0022 Eisverlust 2025, Glamos Studie: doi.glamos.ch/pubs/annualrep/annualrep_2025.pdf Gletscherrückgang, Factsheet vom SCNAT scnat.ch/de/uuid/i/2a5c2522-b48b-5b36-baa5-ac5ff4117af1-Gletscher_der_Schweiz

Der Lange ruft den Kurzen an: Ein Unglück sei geschehen! Aber welches? Ob der Breite mehr weiß? Oder der Schmale? Mit jedem Anruf wird das Unglück größer. Aber stimmt das? Aus der OHRENBÄR-Hörgeschichte: Die ganz alltäglichen Abenteuer des Langen und seiner Freund, 1 (Folge 2 von 7) von Hubert Schirneck. Es liest: Gerd Wameling. ▶ Mehr Hörgeschichten empfohlen ab 4: https://www.ohrenbaer.de/podcast/empfohlen-ab-4.html ▶ Mehr Infos unter https://www.ohrenbaer.de & ohrenbaer@rbb-online.de

Today's Headlines: President Trump has formally declared the U.S. to be in an “armed conflict” with drug cartels, invoking war powers and ordering military strikes on Caribbean boats the administration labels as “terrorist organizations.” Lawmakers in both parties are skeptical of the legal basis but—shocker—seem unlikely to act. Meanwhile, the government shutdown has left 750,000 workers unpaid or furloughed, and the White House is now threatening permanent firings with help from Project 2025 architect Russell Vought. Shutdown propaganda even seeped into federal employees' auto-replies, which were forcibly edited to blame Democrats. The Energy Department axed $7.6 billion in clean energy grants, conveniently targeting states that voted for Kamala Harris. The administration also sent nine universities—including Vanderbilt, MIT, and Brown—a “compact” demanding they overhaul admissions, freeze tuition, and abolish certain departments in exchange for federal funds. Elsewhere, the FDA approved a generic version of the abortion pill mifepristone, sparking predictable outrage despite it being a routine process. Yom Kippur was marred by a deadly terror attack at a synagogue in Manchester, where two worshippers were killed and the attacker was shot dead. And finally, Commerce Secretary Howard “Laughin'” Lutnick, a former neighbor of Jeffrey Epstein, suggested Epstein blackmailed powerful men with videos, casually detonating months of damage control efforts with a single podcast appearance. Resources/Articles mentioned in this episode: AP News: Trump says US is in 'armed conflict' with drug cartels after ordering strikes in the Caribbean WSJ: Lawmakers From Both Sides Pressed Pentagon on Legal Basis for Cartel Boat Strikes Axios: Trump embraces Project 2025 after disavowing it during 2024 campaign Wired: Government Workers Say Their Out-of-Office Replies Were Forcibly Changed to Blame Democrats for Shutdown AP News: Trump administration cuts nearly $8B in clean energy projects in states that backed Harris WSJ: Exclusive | Trump White House Asks Colleges to Sign Sweeping Agreement to Get Funding Advantage AP News: FDA approves another generic abortion pill, prompting outrage from conservatives Reuters: Synagogue attack on Yom Kippur kills two in UK's Manchester; suspect shot dead ABC News: Howard Lutnick believes Jeffrey Epstein may have used blackmail to get a lighter sentence Morning Announcements is produced by Sami Sage and edited by Grace Hernandez-Johnson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This is a replay of my December 2024 conversation with Will Thomson, portfolio manager and founder of Massif Capital. Will Thomson joins the show (for the second time) to discuss the copper market and pitch Zambia as a potential investment jurisdiction. NOTHING YOU HEAR IS INVESTMENT ADVICE. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. THIS IS EDUCATION. ANY STOCK YOU HEAR MAY OR MAY NOT BE OWNED BY THE GUEST OR HOST. Finally, a big thanks to our sponsors for making this episode happen.MitimcoThis episode is brought to you by MIT Investment Management Company, also known as MITIMCo, the investment office of MIT. Each year, MITIMCo invests in a handful of new emerging managers who it believes can earn exceptional long-term returns in support of MIT's mission. To help the emerging manager community more broadly, they created ⁠⁠⁠⁠emergingmanagers.org⁠⁠⁠⁠, a website for emerging manager stockpickers.I highly recommend the site for those looking to start a stock-picking fund or just learning about how others have done it. You'll find essays and interviews by successful emerging managers, service providers used by MIT's own managers, essays MITIMCo has written for emerging managers, and more!TIKRTIKR is THE BEST resource for all stock market data, I use TIKR every day in my process, and I know you will too. Make sure to check them out at ⁠⁠⁠⁠TIKR.com/hive⁠⁠⁠⁠.

Autokraten im Aufschwung. Impfskeptiker am Vormarsch. Kriege und atomares Säbelrasseln. KI droht, uns arbeitslos zu machen. Und die anrollende Klimakatastrophe wird ignoriert. Vielleicht fühlt es sich für Sie auch so an, aber man könnte meinen, die Menschheit ist gerade dabei, sich selbst abzuschaffen. Wie schlimm ist es wirklich? Ist die Menschheit noch zu retten? Darüber sprechen wir mit Autor und Psychologe Christian Stöcker. **Hat Ihnen dieser Podcast gefallen?** Mit einem STANDARD-Abonnement können Sie unsere Arbeit unterstützen und mithelfen, Journalismus mit Haltung auch in Zukunft sicherzustellen. Alle Infos und Angebote gibt es hier: [abo.derstandard.at](https://abo.derstandard.at/?ref=Podcast&utm_source=derstandard&utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=podcast&utm_content=podcast)

Im Oktober 1925 verhandelten Vertreter aus mehreren europäischen Staaten über eine neue Sicherheitsordnung. Mit den Verträgen von Locarno kehrte Deutschland auf die internationale Bühne zurück. Für kurze Zeit herrschte damals Hoffnung auf einen nachhaltigen Frieden in Europa.**********Ihr hört in dieser Folge "Eine Stunde History":10:26 - Yvonne Blomann über über den Ablauf der Verhandlungen in Locarno21:20 - Historiker Ewald Grothe über den Außenminister Gustav Stresemann, der die Locarno-Verträge initiiert hat33:30 - Hans-Christof Kraus über die Außenpolitik Deutschlands in den 1920er und 1930er Jahren**********Mehr zum Thema bei Deutschlandfunk Nova:1920: Der Völkerbund - die Idee vom WeltfriedenVersailler Vertrag: Neue Ordnung für Deutschland und die WeltWeimarer Republik - 1922: Der Vertrag von Rapallo**********Den Artikel zum Stück findet ihr hier.**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: TikTok und Instagram .**********In dieser Folge mit: Moderation: Markus Dichmann Gesprächspartner: Dr. Matthias von Hellfeld , Deutschlandfunk-Nova-Geschichtsexperte Gesprächspartnerin: Yvonne Blomann, Historikerin Gesprächspartner: Ewald Grothe, Historiker Gesprächspartner: Hans-Christof Kraus, Historiker

Nem a külpolitika a 2026-os választás legfontosabb kérdése, de ettől még sok választó döntését befolyásolhatják a geopolitikai folyamatok és a politikusok ezekre adott reakció. A Vétó stúdiójában Bálint és Kamilla Pap Szilárddal, a Partizán szerkesztőjével vitatja meg a kampányt potenciálisan befolyásoló külpolitikai eseményeket, konfliktusokat. Lesz szó a kormány Ukrajnával kapcsolatos kommunikációjáról, Magyarország és az Unió kapcsolatáról, a külpolitikai irányváltás lehetőségeiről, és arról, hogy mit köszönhetünk Donald Trumpnak. De a belpolitika sem marad ki teljesen, a Vétó csapata Lázár János és Orbán Viktor “vitáját”, a felfokozott közhangulatot és a Tisza jelöltállításának elhalasztását is elemzi a stúdióban.Élő Vétó Kisvárdán: https://partizan.funcode.hu/events/132074Pap Szilárd Substack oldala: https://koztes.substack.com/ Legyőzted a populista erősembert? Így NE kormányozz!: https://youtu.be/DTpvOEvlGEo00:00 Felkonf, helyreigazítás01:41 A magyar társadalom kollektív összeomlása06:52 Hány százalékban van kész az ország?15:16 A Tisza jelöltjei17:35 Mennyire fontos a külpolitika a kampányban?34:08 Az ukrán háború lehetséges következményei41:59 Orbán rossz lóra tett Trumppal?54:05 Az EU és Magyarország viszonya1:07:58 Mit kezdhet a Tisza Orbán szövetségeseivel?—A közösség lehetőség, a közösség felelősség.Támogasd a Partizánt!https://cause.lundadonate.org/partizan/adomany—Iratkozz fel!Értesülj elsőként eseményeinkről, akcióinkról, maradjunk kapcsolatban:https://csapat.partizanmedia.hu/forms/maradjunk-kapcsolatban—Legyél önkéntes!Csatlakozz a Partizán önkéntes csapatához:https://csapat.partizanmedia.hu/forms/csatlakozz-te-is-a-partizan-onkenteseihez—Iratkozz fel tematikus hírleveleinkre!—Heti Feledyhttps://csapat.partizanmedia.hu/forms/partizan-heti-feledy—Vétóhttps://csapat.partizanmedia.hu/forms/iratkozz-fel-a-veto-hirlevelere

Zwangsurlaub für rund 750.000 Bundesbeamte, Verzögerungen bei Regierungsprogrammen, Zahlung für U-Bahn-Ausbau in New York gestoppt – die Haushaltssperre in den USA hat begonnen. Mit dem Shutdown können beide Parteien bei ihren Wählern punkten. Ein zentrales Thema ist die Verlängerung der Vergünstigungen von „Obamacare“.

Ein Burschenschafter besetzt das zweithöchste Staatsamt in Österreich: Walter Rosenkranz. Wie der politische Aufstieg des FPÖ-Politikers begann – Folge eins unseres Podcasts über die rechten Männerbünde. Deutschnationale Männerbünde, deren Mitglieder Fechtkämpfe austragen: Burschenschaften wirken aus der Zeit gefallen. In Österreich allerdings sind Verbindungsmänner tief in die Politik vorgedrungen. Dutzende Mitglieder schlagender Studentenverbindungen sitzen für die rechtsradikale FPÖ im Parlament. Und seit 2024 ist mit Walter Rosenkranz ein rechter Burschenschafter österreichischer Nationalratspräsident – das zweithöchste Staatsamt. Übernehmen rechte Verbindungsmänner die Macht in Österreich? Wie gefährlich ist ihr Einfluss auf die Politik? »Inside Austria« durchleuchtet in dieser Serie die Netzwerke der Burschenschaften: Ein Team von SPIEGEL und STANDARD zeichnet nach, wie Walter Rosenkranz vom »Fuchs« in einer Burschenschaft zum Nationalratspräsidenten aufstieg. Ein ehemaliger FPÖ-Politiker berichtet über seine Zeit in einer schlagenden Verbindung. Und eine umstrittene Burschenschaft gibt einen Einblick in ihr Verbindungshaus mitten in Wien. Zu Wort kommen außerdem Expertinnen und Autoren, die seit Jahren zum Verbindungsmilieu recherchieren. In Folge eins erzählen wir, wie Walter Rosenkranz als junger Student zur umstrittenen Burschenschaft Libertas kommt. Und wir treffen einen Aussteiger aus einer schlagenden Verbindung. Wenn ihr jetzt direkt weiterhören möchtet, dann könnt ihr das mit einem SPIEGEL+ Abo. Unter spiegel.de/podcastburschenschaft findet ihr jetzt schon alle fünf Folgen. Dort könnt ihr auch ein Probeabo für 1 Euro pro Woche abschließen. Wenn ihr unter 30 seid, kostet das Probeabo in den ersten 4 Wochen gar nichts. Mit dem Abo hört ihr alle Folgen und könnt das gesamte Angebot von SPIEGEL+ nutzen. Die Macht der Burschenschaften ist eine Produktion von Inside Austria.Moderation, Recherche, Konzept und Skript: Lucia Heisterkamp und Antonia Rauth Sounddesign und Produktion: Philipp Fackler Redaktionelle Mitarbeit: Colette Schmidt, Veronica Habela, Fabian SchmidStorytelling: Käthe BergmannRedigatur: Käthe Bergmann, Zsolt Wilhelm und Benjamin Braden Im Podcast »Inside Austria« rekonstruieren der SPIEGEL und der österreichische STANDARD gemeinsam Fälle, Skandale und politische Abgründe in Österreich. Wenn euch unser Podcast gefällt, folgt uns doch und lasst uns ein paar Sterne da. Kritik, Feedback oder Themenideen gerne an insideaustria@spiegel.de oder an podcast@derstandard.at Den Inside Austria Newsletter findet ihr hier: https://www.spiegel.de/thema/die-lage-inside-austria/+++ Alle Infos zu unseren Werbepartnern finden Sie hier. Die SPIEGEL-Gruppe ist nicht für den Inhalt dieser Seite verantwortlich. +++ Den SPIEGEL-WhatsApp-Kanal finden Sie hier. Alle SPIEGEL Podcasts finden Sie hier. Mehr Hintergründe zum Thema erhalten Sie mit SPIEGEL+. Entdecken Sie die digitale Welt des SPIEGEL, unter spiegel.de/abonnieren finden Sie das passende Angebot. Informationen zu unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

O'zapft is! – Yvonne und Nicole stürzen sich ins Oktoberfest-Abenteuer! In dieser ungewöhnlichen aktuellen Ladylike Podcast-Folge geht's ordentlich rund – mit Maßkrügen, Tracht und dem ganz speziellen Zauber (und Wahnsinn) des Oktoberfests. Für Nicole ist es das allererste Mal auf der Wiesn, und Yvonne sorgt dafür, dass es ein unvergessliches wird. Vom bayerischen Kulturschock am Frühstückstisch über Fahrgeschäfte und Bierpreise bis hin zu echten Wiesn-Geheimtipps – alles ist dabei.Mit viel Humor und einem Hauch von Selbstironie berichten die beiden von schwindelerregenden Achterbahnen, kuriosen Outfits, der magischen Wirkung von Maßbier – und natürlich dem legendären „Kotzhügel“. Warum dort gleichzeitig gekotzt, gevögelt und geplaudert wird, wie es sich anfühlt, im Dirndl durch München zu laufen, und wie es endete, als drei Maß im Spiel waren: Das alles erzählen Yvonne und Nicole so unterhaltsam, als wärst du mittendrin.Ein ehrlicher, feucht-fröhlicher Blick auf Sex, Liebe, Erotik und Rausch im Festzelt – mit einer klaren Botschaft: Tracht ist kein Kostüm, der Biergarten ist der bessere Zeltplatz, und wer ohne Schlüpfer kommt, muss mit allem rechnen.Hört rein und erfahrt, warum das Oktoberfest mehr ist als Bier und Blasmusik...Habt Ihr selbst erotische Erfahrungen, eine Frage oder Story, über die Yvonne & Nicole im Ladylike-Podcast sprechen sollen? Dann schreibt uns gern an @ladylike.show auf Instagram oder kontaktiert uns über unsere Internetseite ladylike.showHört in die Folgen bei RTL+, iTunes oder Spotify rein und schreibt uns gerne eine Bewertung. Außerdem könnt ihr unseren Podcast unterstützen, indem ihr die neuen Folgen auf Euren Kanälen pusht und Euren Freunden davon erzählt.Erotik, S**, Liebe, Freundschaft und die besten Geschichten aus der Ladylike-Community gibt es auch im Buch zum Podcast „Da kann ja jede kommen“! Hier geht's zum Buch: bit.ly/ladylike-buchUnsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://art19.com/privacy. Die Datenschutzrichtlinien für Kalifornien sind unter https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info abrufbar.

00:00:00 - Bekapcsolt mikrofon és a hideg00:01:57 - Aktív a TheVR Gaming TikTok csatorna00:05:16 - Kína a menő?00:08:31 - Autók biztonsági besorolása (NCAP) és fizikai gombok00:16:05 - Rossz funkciók megváltoztatása00:18:53 - Kivehető autórádió és kiegészítők00:21:58 - Új autókból hiányzó funkciók00:27:09 - Elromló dolgok és “hülyének” nézett vásárlók00:31:26 - Üzletekből eltűnt eladók00:32:33 - Mit kezdünk a felszabadult idővel?00:33:58 - Hol nézhetünk utána dolgoknak?00:36:40 - Legjobb ha drága és limitált?00:44:50 - Befejezés és az új COD

Joshua Rovner, Associate Professor in the School of International Service at American University and author of Strategy and Grand Strategy, joins the show to discuss the tension between pursuing military victory and securing a nation.       ▪️ Times     •      01:28 Introduction     •      01:35 MIT      •      05:03 Grand strategy              •      10:45 Peloponnesian War      •      18:05 Spartan strategy             •      22:34 Pericles                •      27:18 A terrible irony         •      32:43 Disastrous victory               •      41:35 British power     •      46:13 Atomic strategy Follow along on Instagram, X @schoolofwarpod, and YouTube @SchoolofWarPodcast Find a transcript of today's episode on our School of War Substack

In this episode of SHE MD, hosts Mary Alice Haney and Dr. Thaïs Aliabadi welcome Dr. Gina Campbell from Myriad Genetics. They explore the importance of genetic testing in women's health and its potential to revolutionize cancer prevention and early detection. The discussion also provides insights into the MyRisk® Hereditary Cancer Test, the BRCA genes, and insurance coverage. Sponsor: Myriad Genetics: To learn more, visit getmyrisk.comWhat you'll learn in this episode:Genetic testing for cancer isn't just about BRCA. Myriad checks 48 cancer-causing genes, with 11 linked to breast cancer risk.Your risk isn't just in your genes. Family history, lifestyle, and even tiny DNA markers all play a role. So using tests like the MyRisk® test and Tyrer-Cuzick score or IBIS model can provide more information.Knowledge is power. Knowing your risk can lead to early screening and prevention strategies.Alcohol is a major, often overlooked cancer risk factor. Even one drink a day can significantly increase breast cancer risk.Timestamps:00:00 Introduction05:23 Genetic testing criteria and insurance coverage11:40 Importance of genetic testing for breast cancer risk16:29 Breast cancer screening recommendations and guidelines20:22 Data privacy concerns and benefits of testing24:48 Future of genetic testing and personalized medicine28:57 Advice for maximizing doctor visits and insurance31:33 How to get the MyRisk® genetic testDr. Gina Campbell's Key Takeaways:

When does comedy become more than a laugh? Ben Mangrum of MIT joins RtB to discuss his new book, The Comedy of Computation: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Obsolescence (Stanford UP, 2025), which in some ways is organized around “the intriguing idea that human knowledge work is our definitive feature and yet the machines we are ourselves made are going to replace us at it.” Comedy has provided a toolbox (Charles Tilly calls them "collective repertoires") for responding to the looming obsolescence of knowledge workers.John's interest in Menippean satire within science fiction leads him to ask about about the sliding meanings of comedy and its pachinko machine capacity; he loves the way Ben uses the word and concept of doubling,; Ben explains how the computer may either queer (in an antisocial way) or get assimilated into romantic heteronormative pairings. John asks about Donna Haraway's 1985 A Cyborg Manifesto and teh way it denaturalizes gender roles and the way new technological affordances (from the Acheulean axe that Malafouris discusses to the Apple watch) redefine human roles. Ben delves into the minstrelsy pre-history of the photo-robots going as far back as the late 19th century. They unpack the distinctively American Leo Marxian optimism of The Machine in the Garden (1964) that spreads back as far as the proto-robots like The Steam Man of the Prairies(1868) and good old Tik-Tok in the Wizard of Oz novels. John asks about double-edged nature of Ben's claim that comic “genericity provides forms for making a computationally mediated social world seem more habitable, even as it also provides Is for criticizing and objecting to that world." First you get description says Ben--and then sometimes critique. John asks about the iterability of the new: how much of what seems new actually New New (in the sense of that great 1999 Michael Lewis book, The New New Thing)? Mentioned in the episode: The Desk Set a play William Marchand and a movie starring Katherine Hepburn. How might a computer be incorporated into the sociability of a couple? Her (Spike Jonze,, 2013) computer meets human makes the rom-com into a coupling machine. WarGames (1983( ends with Matthew Broderick and Ally Sheedy (not Ione Skye—silly John!) paired. But also with Broderick and the formerly deadly computer settling down to “how about a nice game of chess”? Black Mirror as the 2020's version of the same dark satire as the 1950's Twilight Zone. John asks about Stanislaw Lem's Cyberiad, and the comic coupling of Kirk and Spock and the death-as-computer comedy of Douglas Adam's Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (1979). Leo Marx, The Machine in the Garden (1964). Dave Eggers: the joke structure as critique in The Circle and The Every. John Saybrook wrote in the New Yorker about an eye-opening conversation with Bill Gates in 1994. Istvan Csicsery-Ronay's Seven Beauties of Science Fiction on the “fictionalization of everyday life" Recallable Books: Elif Batuman The Idiot (2017) Richard Powers, Plowing the Dark (2000) Sally Rooney, Conversations with Friends (2017) Listen and Read here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

This week's guest is Dr. Angi Acocella, a Research Scientist here at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics and a key member of the MIT FreightLab.   Angi was last on the Freightvine in the fall of 2021 - 4 years ago - when she was a doctoral student.   A lot has changed over that time and after a post-doc in the Netherlands, Angi is back at MIT doing great research exploring shipper-broker-carrier relationships within the full truckload industry.  For this conversation, I have asked Angi to describe some of her more recent work to include the idea of Ghost Lanes, Network segmentation and transportation portfolio management, Predicting truckload market cycles, and, finally, the idea of whether shippers and carriers are Elephants or Goldfish.  That is, do they remember how they were treated in one part of the business cycle after the market turns - or not.  All of Angi's work is both theoretically rigorous and immediately applicable to actual transportation procurement and management.   Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Kevin Werbach interviews Heather Domin, Global Head of the Office of Responsible AI and Governance at HCLTech. Domin reflects on her path into AI governance, including her pioneering work at IBM to establish foundational AI ethics practices. She discusses how the field has grown from a niche concern to a recognized profession, and the importance of building cross-functional teams that bring together technologists, lawyers, and compliance experts. Domin emphasizes the advances in governance tools, bias testing, and automation that are helping developers and organizations keep pace with rapidly evolving AI systems. She describes her role at HCLTech, where client-facing projects across multiple industries and jurisdictions create unique governance challenges that require balancing company standards with client-specific risk frameworks. Domin notes that while most executives acknowledge the importance of responsible AI, few feel prepared to operationalize it. She emphasizes the growing demand for proof and accountability from regulators and courts, and finds the work exciting for its urgency and global impact. She also talks about the new chalenges of agentic AI, and the potential for "oversight agents" that use AI to govern AI.  Heather Domin is Global Head of the Office of Responsible AI and Governance at HCLTech and co-chair of the IAPP AI Governance Professional Certification. A former leader of IBM's AI ethics initiatives, she has helped shape global standards and practices in responsible AI. Named one of the Top 100 Brilliant Women in AI Ethics™ 2025, her work has been featured in Stanford executive education and outlets including CNBC, AI Today, Management Today, Computer Weekly, AI Journal, and the California Management Review. Transcript  AI Governance in the Agentic Era Implementing Responsible AI in the Generative Age - Study Between HCL Tech and MIT

When does comedy become more than a laugh? Ben Mangrum of MIT joins RtB to discuss his new book, The Comedy of Computation: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Obsolescence (Stanford UP, 2025), which in some ways is organized around “the intriguing idea that human knowledge work is our definitive feature and yet the machines we are ourselves made are going to replace us at it.” Comedy has provided a toolbox (Charles Tilly calls them "collective repertoires") for responding to the looming obsolescence of knowledge workers.John's interest in Menippean satire within science fiction leads him to ask about about the sliding meanings of comedy and its pachinko machine capacity; he loves the way Ben uses the word and concept of doubling,; Ben explains how the computer may either queer (in an antisocial way) or get assimilated into romantic heteronormative pairings. John asks about Donna Haraway's 1985 A Cyborg Manifesto and teh way it denaturalizes gender roles and the way new technological affordances (from the Acheulean axe that Malafouris discusses to the Apple watch) redefine human roles. Ben delves into the minstrelsy pre-history of the photo-robots going as far back as the late 19th century. They unpack the distinctively American Leo Marxian optimism of The Machine in the Garden (1964) that spreads back as far as the proto-robots like The Steam Man of the Prairies(1868) and good old Tik-Tok in the Wizard of Oz novels. John asks about double-edged nature of Ben's claim that comic “genericity provides forms for making a computationally mediated social world seem more habitable, even as it also provides Is for criticizing and objecting to that world." First you get description says Ben--and then sometimes critique. John asks about the iterability of the new: how much of what seems new actually New New (in the sense of that great 1999 Michael Lewis book, The New New Thing)? Mentioned in the episode: The Desk Set a play William Marchand and a movie starring Katherine Hepburn. How might a computer be incorporated into the sociability of a couple? Her (Spike Jonze,, 2013) computer meets human makes the rom-com into a coupling machine. WarGames (1983( ends with Matthew Broderick and Ally Sheedy (not Ione Skye—silly John!) paired. But also with Broderick and the formerly deadly computer settling down to “how about a nice game of chess”? Black Mirror as the 2020's version of the same dark satire as the 1950's Twilight Zone. John asks about Stanislaw Lem's Cyberiad, and the comic coupling of Kirk and Spock and the death-as-computer comedy of Douglas Adam's Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (1979). Leo Marx, The Machine in the Garden (1964). Dave Eggers: the joke structure as critique in The Circle and The Every. John Saybrook wrote in the New Yorker about an eye-opening conversation with Bill Gates in 1994. Istvan Csicsery-Ronay's Seven Beauties of Science Fiction on the “fictionalization of everyday life" Recallable Books: Elif Batuman The Idiot (2017) Richard Powers, Plowing the Dark (2000) Sally Rooney, Conversations with Friends (2017) Listen and Read here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Der Urlaub ist vorbei, die Party ist gefeiert und Atze ist endlich wieder ins Arbeitsleben integriert.Nachdem er ausgiebig mit den Leistungsträgern in Hamburg gefeiert hat, ist unser vitaler Rüde endlich wieder auf den Brettern, denen er die Welt bedeutet. Erst mal in Duisburg zu Legenden der Comedy und dann waren ja auch noch die ganzen Previews für die neue Tour. Mit letzter Kraft hat er es geschafft, uns daran teilhaben zu lassen. Schönen Dank auch alter Sack.Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/atzeschroeder_offiziell/?hl=de Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

When does comedy become more than a laugh? Ben Mangrum of MIT joins RtB to discuss his new book, The Comedy of Computation: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Obsolescence (Stanford UP, 2025), which in some ways is organized around “the intriguing idea that human knowledge work is our definitive feature and yet the machines we are ourselves made are going to replace us at it.” Comedy has provided a toolbox (Charles Tilly calls them "collective repertoires") for responding to the looming obsolescence of knowledge workers.John's interest in Menippean satire within science fiction leads him to ask about about the sliding meanings of comedy and its pachinko machine capacity; he loves the way Ben uses the word and concept of doubling,; Ben explains how the computer may either queer (in an antisocial way) or get assimilated into romantic heteronormative pairings. John asks about Donna Haraway's 1985 A Cyborg Manifesto and teh way it denaturalizes gender roles and the way new technological affordances (from the Acheulean axe that Malafouris discusses to the Apple watch) redefine human roles. Ben delves into the minstrelsy pre-history of the photo-robots going as far back as the late 19th century. They unpack the distinctively American Leo Marxian optimism of The Machine in the Garden (1964) that spreads back as far as the proto-robots like The Steam Man of the Prairies(1868) and good old Tik-Tok in the Wizard of Oz novels. John asks about double-edged nature of Ben's claim that comic “genericity provides forms for making a computationally mediated social world seem more habitable, even as it also provides Is for criticizing and objecting to that world." First you get description says Ben--and then sometimes critique. John asks about the iterability of the new: how much of what seems new actually New New (in the sense of that great 1999 Michael Lewis book, The New New Thing)? Mentioned in the episode: The Desk Set a play William Marchand and a movie starring Katherine Hepburn. How might a computer be incorporated into the sociability of a couple? Her (Spike Jonze,, 2013) computer meets human makes the rom-com into a coupling machine. WarGames (1983( ends with Matthew Broderick and Ally Sheedy (not Ione Skye—silly John!) paired. But also with Broderick and the formerly deadly computer settling down to “how about a nice game of chess”? Black Mirror as the 2020's version of the same dark satire as the 1950's Twilight Zone. John asks about Stanislaw Lem's Cyberiad, and the comic coupling of Kirk and Spock and the death-as-computer comedy of Douglas Adam's Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (1979). Leo Marx, The Machine in the Garden (1964). Dave Eggers: the joke structure as critique in The Circle and The Every. John Saybrook wrote in the New Yorker about an eye-opening conversation with Bill Gates in 1994. Istvan Csicsery-Ronay's Seven Beauties of Science Fiction on the “fictionalization of everyday life" Recallable Books: Elif Batuman The Idiot (2017) Richard Powers, Plowing the Dark (2000) Sally Rooney, Conversations with Friends (2017) Listen and Read here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/literary-studies

Andrej Babiš a kapuk előtt – de hogyan került négy évvel ezelőtti bukása után a visszatérés küszöbére? Mit rontott el a nyugatos, konzervatív-liberális kormány, egyáltalán megoldható a feladat, amivel egy illiberalizmust leváltó kormány szembenéz? Ezt a magyar szempontból is elég fontos kérdést vizsgáljuk meg a hétvégi cseh választásokra készülve.Ha csak egy további cseh választásos tartalmat fogyasztanál el, Bukovics Martin és a cseh Tomáš Cirhan beszélgetése legyen az a Gemišten! https://www.gemist.hu/p/miert-nem-cseh-orban-andrej-babis Felhasznált források:Bukovics Martin: Miért nem nevezhető Babiš cseh Orbánnak? Interjú Tomáš Cirhannal a Gemisten.Vastimil Havlík (2019). Technocratic Populism and Political Illiberalism in Central Europe. Problems of Post-Communism, 66(6), 369–384. Who Votes Populists (Back) Into Office, and Why? – Ivan Krasztev előadása a Budapest Forumon, 2025. 09. 17. Ola Cichowlas és Andrew Foxall: Now the Czechs Have an Oligarch Problem, Too. (Már a cseheknek is oligarcha-problémájuk van.) Foreign Policy, 2025.04.10.STEM Institute for Empirical Research: The Czech public feels growing fatigue towards the war in Ukraine, but anti-Ukrainian sentiments are not on the rise (A cseh közvélemény fárad az ukrajnai háborúban, de az ukránellenesség nem nő).Andrej Babis Facebook-oldalaPetr Fiala Facebook-oldalaKiel Institut für Weltwirtschaft

Október elsejétől drasztikusan lecsökkentették a Rudas Gyógyfürdőben a női nap idősávját. Kinek jó ez? A nőknek biztosan nem. Vendégeink: Szalai Edit, Jagielska Marzena és Iványi Kriszta, három törzsvendég. Bővebben: 00:00:20 - Boldog Tyúkólévfordulót! 00:01:30 - Beszélgessünk arról, hogy akkor mi is az a női nap! 00:03:00 - A budapesti fürdőzés több szempontból is különleges, és ezt a kultúrát a fürdőzők teremtik meg. 00:05:40 - A szeparált fürdőzés sokkal relaxáltabb légkört teremt 00:09:40 - Előbb lehet a férfi napról hallani, mint a nőiről… 00:12:25 - A keleti kultúrákban és a nyugatiakban is megjelenik az igény a nőiesség diszkrét megélésére. 00:15:40 - Elhaltak a női közösségek. 00:18:20 - Négyszáz pucér nő elárasztotta Budapestet egy közös ügyért. 00:21:35 - Eleve sokan azért nem mernek elmenni egy női napra, mert fogalmuk sincs, milyen az, és mit kell ott csinálni. 00:24:30 - Mit csinál az egyszeri turista a törökfürdőben? 00:27:50 - Egészségügyileg sem mindegy, hogy miben vagy egy törökfürdőben. 00:29:10 - A hideg víz az értékes víz. 00:31:15 - Fürdőzni egyébként rendszeresen érdemes - ha hagyják. 00:34:15 - Úgy hűlsz le, hogy közben azt érzed, hogy felmelegszel - ez maga a fürdőkultúra! 00:38:15 - A női napoknak óriási szerepe lehetne a test elfogadásában 00:41:30 - A fürdőben a közösségi élmény és az elfogadás a meghatározó. 00:45:30 - Mintha a magyar nők mégsem lennének olyan fontosak, mint a turisták. 00:48:10 - Egy nyereséges cég hoz kívülről anyagi megfontolásúnak tűnő döntéseket. 00:51:50 - A kulturális örökség védelmére kellene fordítani részben a turisztikai bevételt. 00:52:40 - Meddig él a hely szelleme az autentikus közönsége nélkül? 00:55:50 - Magyarország belső tengeréhez az itt élők alig-alig tudnak hozzájutni. 00:57:10 - Magyarországon az egészségügy betegségekkel foglalkozik. A fürdő olyan hely lenne, ahol az egészségvédelemnek jut szerep. 00:58:25 - 2006-ban még volt érdeme petíciót indítani. Ötleteket várunk! 01:02:45 - És... alig várjuk a 11 fokos vizet (de még aludjunk azért erre egyet). Hasznos infók: Facebook-csoport, könnyen dekódolható névvel: Rudas női nap. A Rudas szűkszavú posztja, szeptember 22-én. 2006-ban még így történt. Miért ne viseljünk lehetőség szerint műszálas ruházatot olyankor (se), amikor izzadunk. Podcastunk kéthetente jelentkezik új adással, meghallgatható a 444 Spotify- és Apple-csatornáján is. Korábbi adásaink itt találhatók. Javaslataid, ötleteid, meglátásaid a tyukol@444.hu címre várjuk. Illusztráció: Kiss Bence/444See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Is artifical intelligence truly neutral - or is it quietly reflecting and amplifying society's deepest biases? In this episode of Black Women's Health with Dr. Rahman, we unpack a recent MIT study that shed light on non- clinical determinants of health of clinical decisions in Large Language Models (LLS). You get to determine if it's racist.The Medium is the Message: How Non-Clinical Information Shapes Clinical Decisions in LLMs. Gourabathina A et al. 6/2025

Talent, Training und Mindset multiplizieren sich zum Erfolg – fällt einer aus, bleibt das Ergebnis auf der Strecke. Ex-Sportprofi und Topmanager Michael Ilgner gibt Einblick in die Erfolgsformel, bei der Fleiß allein nicht reicht und Selbstzweifel kein Makel sind. Warum Stärke nur wächst, wenn Regeneration bewusst stattfindet und der Kopf weiterlernt. Eine Episode, die die Mechanik echter Spitzenleistung jenseits von Motivationstricks greifbar macht. Du erfährst... …wie Michael Ilgner die Formel für Erfolg entschlüsselt: Talent, Training, Mindset. …warum gezieltes Training und Regeneration entscheidend für Spitzenleistungen sind. …welche fünf Mindsets laut Michael Ilgner hinter dauerhaftem Erfolg stehen. __________________________ ||||| PERSONEN |||||

Wie starke Sätze dein Marketing unwiderstehlich machen. Erfahre, warum die richtigen Worte den Unterschied ausmachen. Werde Verkaufspsychologie Experte TÜV Zertifiziert: https://matthiasniggehoff.de/tuv-zertifizierung In dieser Folge zeige ich dir, warum prägnante Botschaften der Schlüssel zu erfolgreichem Marketing und Vertrieb sind. Du erfährst, wie magische Sätze im Kopf bleiben und Kunden aktivieren – egal ob auf Webseiten, in Anzeigen oder Social Media. Ich erkläre, warum Einfachheit entscheidend ist und wie du psychologische Filter im Gehirn deiner Zielgruppe überwindest. Mit konkreten Beispielen und der Promille-Strategie bekommst du praxisnahe Impulse, wie du deine Marketingbotschaften auf das nächste Level hebst. Lass dich inspirieren, deine Kommunikation so zu gestalten, dass sie garantiert im Gedächtnis bleibt und messbar wirkt.

Voices is a new mini-series from Humanitarian AI Today. In daily five-minute flashpods we pass the mic to innovators, researchers and practitioners on the humanitarian front lines, delivering real-time news on how they are building, testing and collaborating on uses of artificial intelligence. In this Voices flashpod, Pam Boiros, a Founding Member of Women Applying AI speaks with Sandra Uwantege Hart, a Strategist focusing on Inclusive Innovation and Humanitarian Action from PoliSync, and Brent Phillips, Humanitarian AI Today podcast producer, about the launch of Women Applying AI, a free membership-driven community bringing more women into the field of Artificial Intelligence at all levels of experience. They touch on how AI can empower women, particularly non-technical female founders who can use AI to tackle business, life or world problems. They discuss the AI gender gap, the need for supportive initiatives and mentors for women, and the ways AI can empower female innovators. They also discuss Boston AI Week and touch on MIT's project NANDA. Notes: https://open.substack.com/pub/humanitarianaitoday/p/pam-boiros-on-women-advancing-ai?r=e9cbk&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

Ganz egal, ob Promi oder Lieblingsmensch, Tot oder Lebendig, oder jemand, den du schon ewig nicht mehr gesehen hast: Mit wem würdet ihr gern mal was trinken gehen? Worüber würdet ihr sprechen und warum? Das habt ihr Helena Sigal erzählt. Unser Podcast-Tipp: DER ABSTURZ VON MOIS https://www.ardaudiothek.de/sendung/der-absturz-von-mois/urn:ard:show:b0688a9a92fdab11/

Tässä jaksossa minulla vieraana suomenopettaja Anna Lindgren. Kysyin Annalta nämä kysymykset: 1. Kuka olet ja mitä teet? 2. Miten innostuit Japanista ja japanin kielestä? 3. Millaista oli opiskella japania Helsingissä? 4. Mikä on japanin kielessä helppoa ja vaikeaa? 5. Oletko asunut Japanissa? 6. Mitä teit siellä? 7. Millaista sisältöä teet Instagramiin? 8. Mitä haluaisit kertoa suomalaisille Japanista? 9. Mitä japanilaisia tapoja haluaisit tuoda Suomeen? 10. Missä haluaisit olla viiden tai kymmenen vuoden kuluttua? Annan tilejä sosiaalisessa mediassa: - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/finlandtraveltips/ - Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@finlandtraveltips - Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6SY2QKJjsCRuzWUgQ9w3Ww - Annan japaninkielinen blogi Suomesta: http://blog.livedoor.jp/finrandonikite/ - Annan suomenkielinen blogi Japanista: https://japaninmatkaaja.wordpress.com/

In our last episode of the season (season 2 is in the works), we look at MIT's Media Lab, which long dazzled the public with its bold ideas and groundbreaking projects. But behind that reputation was a secret: much of the lab's funding traced back to Jeffrey Epstein. Read Noam Cohen's reporting: https://www.wired.com/story/for-jeffrey-epstein-mit-was-just-a-safety-school/For a transcript of this episode: https://bit.ly/campusfiles-transcripts To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Epstein scandal exposed how deep corruption runs, but higher academia mostly slipped away untouched. Despite Epstein having offices at Harvard, donations to MIT, and close ties with professors, universities escaped the same scrutiny that crushed others. They played dumb, claimed ignorance, and hid behind words like “research” while pocketing predator money. Meanwhile, they still preach ethics and morality to the rest of us, acting like they're society's conscience while proving they'll side with cash over principle every single time.For working-class folks, the double standard is glaring. Ordinary people get hammered for the smallest mistakes, while billion-dollar institutions with political connections remain untouchable. Justice isn't blind; it looks straight at the bank account before moving. The universities knew what they were doing, yet faced no real punishment. Until someone has the guts to drag academia into the same light as everyone else, it's on us to keep the pressure on, to not forget, and to make sure their role in this rotten system never gets buried.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

(0:00) Intro(1:36) About the podcast sponsor: The American College of Governance Counsel(2:23) Start of interview(3:11) Brad's origin story(4:54) Venture Capital Beginnings(5:39) The Rise of the Internet(8:10) His role in Softbank Technology Ventures and later Mobius Venture Capital. Reference to Heidi Roizen E6, E108 and E116(12:26) Transition to Techstars and Foundry(13:36) Origin and focus of his book Startup Boards. Reference to his blog post: Feld Thoughts. "Boards (and board members) for private companies operate on a bell curve" (some are excellent, some are horrific, and most are average).(15:31) The Evolution of Founder-Friendly Terms(30:06) Effective Board Composition(35:00) Defining a Great Board: the Board as a Team. Reference to Matt Blumberg's Rule of 1s: see E52 (2022)(38:05) "The goal of the board is to get different skill sets around the table" "I think a founder should fight against investors having additional observer seats."(41:13) Why he considers it a red flag when a director claims they're acting out of "fiduciary duty." *Reference to the Startup Litigation Digest(44:50) Governance concerns in the AI Boom(47:37) Books that have greatly influenced his life:Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert Pirsig (1974)The entire pantheon of Neal Stephenson and William Gibson Science fiction written by female writers (as a category)Hyperion Cantos by Dan Simmons(50:05) His mentors: Len Fassler and his uncle, Charlie Feld.(51:55) Quotes that he thinks of often or lives his life by: from his Dad: "If you're not standing on the edge, you're taking up too much space.", from Len: "Brad, they can't kill you and they can't eat you. Suit up."(53:00) An unusual habit or an absurd thing that he loves. "I love philanthropically funding bathrooms." Also, the Banana Lounge at MIT.(55:38) The living person he most admires: his wife Amy Batchelor.Brad Feld has been an early-stage investor and entrepreneur since 1987. He co-founded two venture capital firms, Foundry Group and Mobius Venture Capital, and multiple companies, including Techstars.  You can follow Evan on social media at:X: @evanepsteinLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/ Substack: https://evanepstein.substack.com/__To support this podcast you can join as a subscriber of the Boardroom Governance Newsletter at https://evanepstein.substack.com/__Music/Soundtrack (found via Free Music Archive): Seeing The Future by Dexter Britain is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Danielle Rapson, HBS alum and Co-founder and COO of Mantel, joins Climate Rising to explain how her company is developing a novel molten-based carbon capture system for hard-to-abate industrial sectors. Danielle shares the story of how Mantel spun out of an MIT lab, what sets its technology apart from existing amine-based carbon capture, and why the economics of steam reuse are critical to its efficiency. She also discusses how Mantel's early projects in pulp and paper and oil refining are shaping its path to commercialization, and what policy and regulatory incentives—like 45Q and Canada's carbon tax—mean for scaling carbon removal solutions. This episode is part of our alumni series, which also features Eric Adamson, Robotics Executive at Oishii and co-founder of Tortuga AgTech, and Hui Wen Chan of Crusoe, which uses stranded energy to power AI data centers. Explore the full series at climaterising.org. Resources Mentioned • Mantel – Developing molten material-based carbon capture for industrial emissions • Breakthrough Energy Fellows – A program supporting early-stage climate tech innovators • The Engine – VC firm backing tough tech startups out of MIT • MCJ – "My Climate Journey," a podcast and investor network on climate tech • Kruger– Canadian pulp and paper partner for Mantel's first demonstration project • 45Q Tax Credit (U.S. IRS) – U.S. tax credit for carbon capture and sequestration • Canada's Carbon Tax Policy – A national carbon pricing mechanism incentivizing low-carbon tech Host and Guest Host: Mike Toffel, Professor, Harvard Business School (LinkedIn) Guest: Danielle Rapson, Co-founder & COO, Mantel (LinkedIn)

Mit großer Bestürzung haben wir vom Tod der wundervollen, ikonischen Jane Goodall erfahren

In dieser Episode haben wir Erik zu Gast und beantworten einige eurer sprachlichen Fragen. Wir sprechen über deutsche Lobkultur beim Essen, Redewendungen wie "sturmfrei" und "eine andere Hausnummer" sowie die Liebe der Deutschen zu langen zusammengesetzten Wörtern. Außerdem erklären wir das Suffix "-ich" und teilen Tipps fürs Sprechen in Gruppen.   Transkript und Vokabelhilfe Werde ein Easy German Mitglied und du bekommst unsere Vokabelhilfe, ein interaktives Transkript und Bonusmaterial zu jeder Episode: easygerman.org/membership   Sponsoren Hier findet ihr unsere Sponsoren und exklusive Angebote: easygerman.org/sponsors   Hausmitteilungen Unsere 10 Day Challenge startet am 6. Oktober: easygerman.org/10daychallenge Wir suchen neue Hosts für Easy Spanish und Easy Turkish: easy-languages.org/jobs Wir kommen im November nach Istanbul und brauchen eure Hilfe: easygerman.org/istanbul   Eure Fragen Yoshi aus Japan fragt: Mit welchen Ausdrücken neben "nicht schlecht" sagen Deutsche, dass das Essen gut schmeckt? Alison fragt: Könnt ihr "sturmfrei" und "ganz andere Hausnummer" erklären? etwas ist eine Hausnummer (Redensarten-Index) Tal aus Deutschland fragt: Wie kann ich in deutschen Gruppengesprächen sicherer werden? Es wird dazu kommen, dass wir das Richtige tun (Easy German Podcast 166) Ali aus Ägypten fragt: Warum gibt es so viele zusammengesetzte Wörter im Deutschen? Rindfleischetikettierungsüberwachungsaufgabenübertragungsgesetz (Wikipedia) Tomas fragt: Was bedeuten die Worte mit "-ich"? Hast du eine Frage an uns? Auf easygerman.fm kannst du uns eine Sprachnachricht schicken.   Support Easy German and get interactive transcripts, live vocabulary and bonus content: easygerman.org/membership

"Death in Apartment 603." A preview of the new Hulu docuseries, produced by Dakota and Elle Fanning, goes into detail the mysterious murder of Ellen Greenspan in her Philadelphia apartment. Meet AGNES, the new MIT body suit giving a glimpse of what it would feel like to be 70 or 80 years old with slower movements and impaired vision. Art meets life. Actress Meryl Streep meets fashion icon, Ana Wintour at Paris Fashion week and embodies her famous Devil Wears Prada role. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices