Podcasts about communications decency act cda

Haley McNamara (NCOSE Senior VP of Programs and Initiatives) and Dani Pinter (Senior VP and Director at the NCOSE Law Center) talk about Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and why it's essential for it to end. They also discuss the history of the Dirty Dozen List and what led to this unique version of the list in 2025. Since its inception in 1996, Section 230 has effectively provided blanket immunity to big tech companies for harms facilitated on their platforms. It's time to call for a full repeal of CDA Section 230! Learn more and take action here: www.DirtyDozenList.org Watch the video version of this episode here: https://youtu.be/G7VZVJ1QRUc

The Communications Decency Act (CDA) is Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which was enacted when the internet was just making its way into US homes. 26 words […] The post SCOTUS cases explained: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act appeared first on WORT-FM 89.9.

Sam is coming to us LIVE from the Mass Torts Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada! Sam is coming to us LIVE from the Mass Torts Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada! He and Emma quickly run through updates on the $1 Billion in damages for Sandy Hook parents suing Alex Jones and his recent appearance on Crowder detailing why he thinks it won't matter. Then, Sam has three separate sit-downs with tort lawyers from the law firm Levin Papantonio Rafferty to discuss what cases they're bringing against what corporations, and how they plan to argue against these businesses' feigned ignorance. First, Kimberly Adams joins as she dives into her defense of human trafficking victims against the businesses that consciously profited off of their exploitation, including hotel and motel chains and social media companies like Twitter and Snapchat. Adams then tackles how these businesses get wrapped up in the trade of human beings, how it becomes a consistent source of profit, and how she plans to establish that there is truly no reason these companies would have been ignorant of the ongoing violence against minors and other humans, before wrapping up by walking through the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and how social media platforms use it to shield themselves from accountability for the content they profit off of. Next, Sam is joined by Chelsie Green as she contextualizes her case against the manufacturers of Pure Follical Substances (PFoS, known as a “forever chemical”) within her firm's history of challenging this public health issue that was known about internally since as early as the 1970s. They also tackle the mass proliferation of the use of these chemicals over the next few decades, particularly in the firefighting and military industries, before concluding by discussing the long-term process that this case will entail and what stages are next up. Lastly, Sam talks with Emmie Paulos about her suit against Meta/Facebook and their side companies like Instagram (though also likely to involve other platforms in the future) for knowingly channeling children into social media addiction with the knowledge that there were massive long-term detriments to their mental health – from eating disorders and self-harm to suicidal ideation and attempts. Next, they walk through the process through which these companies internally acknowledge the extreme nature of their algorithms and the impact they were having – not to combat it but rather to further exploit it – and the impact of last year's Meta whistle-blower on moving this case forwards. They finish off their discussion with a greater analysis of the CDA and how to combat the exploitation of children by Big Tech. And in the Fun Half: Sam and Emma discuss the astonishingly late news of Tulsi Gabbard's exit from the Democratic Party, appearing on Joe Rogan to discuss the democratic cult insisting on passing nonexistent legislation to trans your kids, Dennis Prager defends incest from secular monsters, and Blake Masters gets questioned by Fox on his election allegiances. They also tackle the wildly ableist bipartisan hit pieces from CNN, MSNBC, and Fox on progressive John Fetterman, watching notoriously anti-progressive Chris Matthews return to NBC to ridicule his auditory processing issues and Tucker Carlson's proclamation that Fetterman will be hacked. Ben Shapiro continues his nuanced takes on anti-semitism from conservatives, plus, your IMs! Become a member at JoinTheMajorityReport.com: https://fans.fm/majority/join Subscribe to the AMQuickie newsletter here: https://am-quickie.ghost.io/ Join the Majority Report Discord! http://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store: https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ Get the free Majority Report App!: http://majority.fm/app Follow the Majority Report crew on Twitter: @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattBinder @MattLech @BF1nn @BradKAlsop Check out Matt's show, Left Reckoning, on Youtube, and subscribe on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/leftreckoning Subscribe to Discourse Blog, a newsletter and website for progressive essays and related fun partly run by AM Quickie writer Jack Crosbie. https://discourseblog.com/ Check out Ava Raiza's music here! https://avaraiza.bandcamp.com/ The Majority Report with Sam Seder - https://majorityreportradio.com/

All over social media are ads for con artists and employment scams. Trip talks about some of these and how it impacts all of us. Social Media Promoting Fake and Misleading Employment and Investment Opportunity Scams Every day Big Tech and Mass Media make it hard to find out what is going on with the internet. The suppression of information is a danger to all of us. Social media attempts to shape news and information by over-amplification of disinformation. This podcast hope to give information and provide insights from Join our community!! Subscribe to the Insecurity Brief podcast now on every platform we can find Follow me on Twitter @trip_elix Links Our Website: https://www.tripelix.com/insecurity/social-media-promoting-fake-and-misleading-employment-and-investment-opportunity-scams/ Youtube: https://youtu.be/77KxWjlDZ3Q Rumble: https://rumble.com/vqb7hz-social-media-promoting-fake-and-misleading-employment-and-investment-opport.html iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/social-media-promoting-fake-misleading-employment-and/id1583788677?i=1000543593013 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/6jrM8nlJbkk6ueifzuJgVY Trip’s books https://www.tripelix.com/merch Hashtags go here 47 U.S. Code § 230 – Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230 Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act 47 U.S.C. § 230, a Provision of the Communication Decency Act Tucked inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 is one of the most valuable tools for protecting freedom of expression and innovation on the Internet: Section 230. https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230

October 26, 2020 Keri co-hosts along with special guest “Mystery Chris," who is off-camera and remains anonymous as he is in the category Joe Biden considers to not be a “real" black person: he voted for Trump in 2016 and plans to do so again. But in Chris' opinion, white SJWs “treat us like pets.” Keri and Chris discuss walking away from the Democrat Party and voting for Trump. They chat about systemic racism - does it exist? They go over Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) being used by Social Media companies acting as publishers while hiding behind the legal protections it offers. How long can they get away with using the platform protections of Section 230 while censoring particular content and effectively acting as publishers? They then discuss how woke big corporations are now embraced by many on the left, the opposite of traditional leftists, and the similarities and differences between SJW ideology and other cults, such as Scientology. Keri highlights the recent Tampax announcement that not all people who have periods and use tampons are women, and the two discuss Chelsea Handler reminding 50 Cent he is black as a way to pressure him into voting for Biden. They contemplate the fact that a college degrees in Heteronormative Writings in 18th Century Literature exists, and finally talk about a women getting her dying Father to vote for Biden as one of his final acts and the left's celebration of the use of one's parents and children to push an ideology. Carter was unavailable today at the last minute due to neighborhood infrastructure problems. His neighborhood had a power outage. This alone doesn't stop him as he has a home generator to handle CA's rolling brownouts. But then a tree fell and took out his cable line, and with both problems he can't get fast enough internet to host. He was in chat however, with a low rate intermittent connection. Welcome to the Democratic People's Republic of California, which seems to have the power grid reliability of a third world country. LINKS REFERENCED IN THE SHOW: CNN article, "Conservatives push to discredit Facebook, Twitter, and Google just days before the election": https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/25/tech/section-230-senate-hearing/index.html Tampax tweet from September: https://twitter.com/Tampax/status/1305952342504767491 Oreo tweet on pronoun "education": https://twitter.com/Oreo/status/1317833513773731840 Thanks for watching! Please don't forget to like, subscribe, and share. Follow us on the following social media channels...at least until we get banned: Twitter: @unsafespace Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/unsafepage Instagram: @_unsafespace Gab: @unsafe Minds: @unsafe Parler: @unsafespace Telegram Chat: https://t.me/joinchat/H4OUclXTz4xwF9EapZekPg Pick up some Unsafe Space merch at unsafespace.com! YouTube link to video version of this episode: https://youtu.be/UUcjW7G-5Eo

October 26, 2020 Keri co-hosts along with special guest “Mystery Chris," who is off-camera and remains anonymous as he is in the category Joe Biden considers to not be a “real" black person: he voted for Trump in 2016 and plans to do so again. But in Chris' opinion, white SJWs “treat us like pets.” Keri and Chris discuss walking away from the Democrat Party and voting for Trump. They chat about systemic racism - does it exist? They go over Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) being used by Social Media companies acting as publishers while hiding behind the legal protections it offers. How long can they get away with using the platform protections of Section 230 while censoring particular content and effectively acting as publishers? They then discuss how woke big corporations are now embraced by many on the left, the opposite of traditional leftists, and the similarities and differences between SJW ideology and other cults, such as Scientology. Keri highlights the recent Tampax announcement that not all people who have periods and use tampons are women, and the two discuss Chelsea Handler reminding 50 Cent he is black as a way to pressure him into voting for Biden. They contemplate the fact that a college degrees in Heteronormative Writings in 18th Century Literature exists, and finally talk about a women getting her dying Father to vote for Biden as one of his final acts and the left’s celebration of the use of one’s parents and children to push an ideology. Carter was unavailable today at the last minute due to neighborhood infrastructure problems. His neighborhood had a power outage. This alone doesn't stop him as he has a home generator to handle CA’s rolling brownouts. But then a tree fell and took out his cable line, and with both problems he can’t get fast enough internet to host. He was in chat however, with a low rate intermittent connection. Welcome to the Democratic People’s Republic of California, which seems to have the power grid reliability of a third world country. LINKS REFERENCED IN THE SHOW: CNN article, "Conservatives push to discredit Facebook, Twitter, and Google just days before the election": https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/25/tech/section-230-senate-hearing/index.html Tampax tweet from September: https://twitter.com/Tampax/status/1305952342504767491 Oreo tweet on pronoun "education": https://twitter.com/Oreo/status/1317833513773731840 Thanks for watching! Please don't forget to like, subscribe, and share. Follow us on the following social media channels...at least until we get banned: Twitter: @unsafespace Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/unsafepage Instagram: @_unsafespace Gab: @unsafe Minds: @unsafe Parler: @unsafespace Telegram Chat: https://t.me/joinchat/H4OUclXTz4xwF9EapZekPg Pick up some Unsafe Space merch at unsafespace.com! YouTube link to video version of this episode: https://youtu.be/UUcjW7G-5Eo

When Twitter first decided to "fact check" one of President Trump's tweets (on the possibility of mail-in voting fraud), the President responded by drafting an executive order (EO) to "regulate" social media entities and the Internet. As part of that order, the President instructed Attorney General William Barr and the Department of Justice to propose new language revising Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA 230). Now the Department of Justice has offered those proposals. Let's dive in. We always operate in good faith...in Virtual Legality. CHECK OUT THE VIDEO AT: https://youtu.be/rfuNf_Zp-0s #President #ExecutiveOrder #230 *** CHAPTERS: 0:00 Introduction 3:23 CDA 230: An Overview 10:55 Trump's Executive Order 15:06 DOJ Summarizes its Position 20:48 The Proposed Revisions (Publishers and Platforms) 25:10 Moderation and Otherwise Objectionable 30:10 Defining Good Faith 36:18 Bad Faith, Actual Notice, and Exclusions 44:26 Broadening the Scope of Liability (Civil Actions) 48:53 Conclusion *** Discussed in this episode: "The Justice Department Unveils Proposed Section 230 Legislation" Department of Justice Press Release - September 23, 2020 https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-unveils-proposed-section-230-legislation "Section 230 Executive Order SIGNED! A Lawyer Re-Reviews Trump's Plan (VL238)" YouTube Video - May 28, 2020 - Hoeg Law https://youtu.be/gmBGFVUjCaI "Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material" 47 USC 230 (CDA 230) https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230 "Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship" White House Website - May 28, 2020 https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-preventing-online-censorship/ "Ramseyer Draft Legislative Reforms to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act" Statutory Redline - DOJ - September 23, 2020 https://www.justice.gov/file/1319331/download "Section by Section" DOJ Guidance on Proposed Revisions https://www.justice.gov/file/1319326/download *** "Virtual Legality" is a continuing series discussing the law, video games, software, and everything digital, hosted by Richard Hoeg, of the Hoeg Law Business Law Firm (Hoeg Law). CHECK OUT THE REST OF VIRTUAL LEGALITY HERE: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1zDCgJzZUy9YAU61GoW-00K0TJOGnPCo DISCUSSION IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE. INDIVIDUALS INTERESTED IN THE LEGAL TOPICS DISCUSSED IN THIS VIDEO SHOULD CONSULT WITH THEIR OWN COUNSEL. *** Twitter: @hoeglaw Web: hoeglaw.com Blog: hoeglaw.wordpress.com STORE: https://teespring.com/stores/hoeg-law-store

Former Vice President Joe Biden, in an interview with the New York Times Editorial Board while seeking its endorsement for his presidential run, called for the immediate revocation (or more accurately, repeal) of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA). But while Section 230 could certainly use clarification (and clarity, as the distinction between service provider and publisher is not without its own ambiguities), Candidate Biden's erroneous reading of the statute, the landscape it creates, and the the liability of tech titans like Facebook, is unfortunately not the only one shared by the political class. And that's without even getting into calling video game folks "creeps". Libel Liability is a Political Liability...in Virtual Legality. #Biden #NYT #CDA230 *** Discussed in this episode: New York Times Editorial Interview - Joe Biden January 17, 2020 https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/17/opinion/joe-biden-nytimes-interview.html "Social Media, Liability Shields, and You: The State of CDA Section 230 (VL72) (Hoeg Law)" YouTube Video - July 12, 2019 - Hoeg Law https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VtQlx5VXXs "Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material" 47 USC 230 (CDA 230) https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230 "Action for libel or slander." MCL 600.2911 http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(fdms3o5l2kvl3azpa2npxura))/mileg.aspx?page=GetObject&objectname=mcl-600-2911 *** FOR MORE CHECK US OUT: On Twitter @hoeglaw At our website: https://hoeglaw.com/ On our Blog, "Rules of the Game", at https://hoeglaw.wordpress.com/

This week I discuss a little bit on the legal side of cybersecurity. As a disclaimer I am not a lawyer and any legal discussion is opinion only and does not constitute any type of legal advice. With that said I cover Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and if this Facebook and other social media sites should lose their protection under this law. This conversation was prompted by two article I found where the Cisco security research group Talos found open and active criminal groups actively operating on Facebook. Is there any maleficence, negligence, wrongdoing, or straight up misconduct on Facebook's part? You will have to listen to the episode to find out! Links: https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-cybercrime-groups-again/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/04/facebook-is-a-popular-venue-for-selling-all-manner-of-cybercrime-services/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/negligence https://www.minclaw.com/legal-resource-center/what-is-section-230-of-the-communication-decency-act-cda/

There's a lot of fake news going on the internet these days, and a lot of it is concentrated in the reviews sections of sites like Yelp!, where people can post whatever they want and damage your personal or professional image. What can you do when someone comes after you like that, however (assuming it's false)? Jason Hartman talks with consumer rights attorney Lenore Albert about just that. The two look at what Internet Service Providers are required to do, what you can do if you've been wronged, and how you can properly go about warning other consumers about situations when you've been wronged. Key Takeaways: [2:44] What is the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and what harm is it currently causing? [6:18] How do you police sites like Yelp that have people reviewing others in order to keep them honest? [8:14] What would the right law be that would allow companies like Yelp to exist and perform their service, but also hold them somewhat accountable for what was written on their site? [13:08] There's a site called The Robing Room that allows you to review judges, but there isn't a lot of action on that site [20:47] What should you do if you're the victim of an unfair defamation on a review site? [25:37] If you need to pause the attacks against you, you're going to need an injunction against the service provider [27:49] How to recognize "paper terrorism" [32:54] What if you're a victim of a rip-off and you want to post and protect fellow consumers? What are your rights?

In this second episode, the Red X Podcast reviews how Congress is making it illegal for internet providers to advertise sex for children online. Also Nacole, the mother of a survivor of sex trafficking and advocate who is featured in the I Am Jane Doe documentary, is interviewed about her fight in bringing down Backpage.com. The Red X Podcast is designed to take the immense issue of human trafficking and help break it into smaller pieces so that the listener is empowered to take action at a local level.   Nicole, the host of the Red X Podcast, introduces friend and fellow advocate, Brooke Burris. Brooke is an attorney who represents the Lynch Foundation for Children, which supports efforts to prevent children becoming trafficking victims. Brooke is a former Miss South Carolina and has worked with private investigators to rescue runaway youth through Saved in America.     Nicole talks about juggling four children with advocacy work and producer of the Red X Podcast and Mayor Lance Olive shares how he got to use the sidewalk sucker to repair Apex’s sidewalks.   Both Nicole and Lance are planning on attending the Peak City Film Festival in which the family film Unbridled was featured. Unbridled was filmed in Apex and presents the story of a young girl who becomes a trafficking victim and finds restoration through her therapy through training an abused horse. The story is based on the work of equine therapy center, Corral which pairs girls who have experienced trauma with abused horses.     Nicole Bernard reports on Congress’s review of the 1996 Communications Decency Act (CDA), which has not been amended since its conception. The CDA was originally enacted when the internet was in its infancy and was meant to protect internet sites from being held liable for content advertised by a third party. As an example, ebay cannot be sued for a person selling a fake baseball card. Although the Act is intended to promote internet economy, at the time that it was written, sex trafficking did not even have a legal definition in the United States. The Act was never intended to allow for internet hosting sites such as craigslist or backpage.com to be allowed to advertise the sell of children for sex. Unfortunately, Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act has supported just that and in spite of valiant efforts and lawsuits to bring it down, backpage.com remains immutable so long as Section 230 is not amended. In 2010, the annual revenue of backpage.com grossed $29 million. By 2014, it burgeoned to $134 million. One estimate found that 80% of sex crimes are advertised on backpage.com. And although major tech companies initially stood with Backpage against advocates who demanded it be taken down, companies like Google and Facebook have now reversed their stance and support the amendment of Section 230 by enacting the Stop Enabling Sex Trafficking Act (SESTA). In North Carolina, both senators have backed SESTA. Find your legislator and ask them to support SESTA.   The Red X Podcast welcomed guest, Nacole, the mother from the I Am Jane Doe documentary. Nacole’s daughter, J. S., was trafficked when she was 15 through Backpage.com and now Nacole has been an advocate for SESTA and preventing child sex trafficking.   Nacole says that J.S. was dealing with some transitions in HS when her older brother left for an Ivey League college in New York. J. S. was active in soccer, wrestled, and was an all star violinist. She was also an honor student. One day she wrote a letter to her family saying she was leaving home. J. S. found herself 30 miles away from her home in a teen homeless shelter. A 22 year old woman who was working for a pimp recruited her to be a part of the sex trade. J.S. then found herself in the hands of a 32 year old trafficker. She was raped and sold on the streets of Seattle After ten days she was able to escape and returned home. Was able to escape. Her parents took her to the hospital but were not given resources to help explain the trauma she had experienced.   At home, J.S. became withdrawn and angry. She left school and became homeschooled. Everything that she took excitement in was gone. Nacole said they later realized that her trafficker had given J. S. a phone and she was still in contact with him. Although her family had surrounded her with love and prayer, they underestimated how traumatized she was and without proper treatment, J.S. returned to her trafficking situation. She didn’t even consider herself a victim until five years after being trafficked. J.S. was sold on Backpage.com. Nacole says you can actually purchase a pizza to be delivered as fast as you can order a child to be delivered to your door for sex, regardless of whether or not you are in the city or the country. The youngest victim advertised on the website was nine. Nacole says she was one of the lucky families. Homicide is the number one leading causes of deaths of people who are trafficked. families is one of the fortunate families. Nacole insists that the way to end trafficking is to start educating people about how to treat each other. Do we want to be a society that allows the sale of children for sex? All of us must recognize that if we have a minor in our home, we also have a potential trafficking victim. Get started by asking your local government what they are doing to combat and prevent trafficking. You can also look up your state’s report card given by Shared Hope International for its effectiveness in combatting sex trafficking of minors. You can also show the film I Am Little Red to your 10-14 year old to help educate them about the dangers of sex trafficking.

Join Cheri Roberts WEDS. July 12 @ 5pPST/8pEST LIVE with "I am Jane Doe" documentary filmmaker, Mary Mazzio, attorney, Erik Bauer, and cybercrime computer forensics expert, Frederick Lane, to discuss Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), an internet freedom law that provides a safe haven for website publishers to advertise underage children for sex. Not-for-profit special interest groups funded by companies including Google have supported Backpage.com's legal battles and provided expert briefs in support of the site. Why does Congress not act? “These are children who are being raped, yet the whole debate around Backpage has become about the rights of internet companies to not get sued?” says Kubiiki, a mother featured in the film now available on Netflix. Children are being bought, sold and raped every day, right here in America. This is real and it could be your child next. Do not miss this show. Please share the link widely (auto archives at same link). WEBSITES:  Follow @ WEBSITE FACEBOOK TWITTER @CTRNewsFeed This SHOW's HASHTAGS: #CTR #IamJaneDoe #sextrafficking #Google #Backpage #SpeakOutFightBack No political endorsements. No corporate dollars. No hype. No lies.

The Social Network Show welcomes Dr. Carrie James in Part 1 and Carrie Goldberg in Part 2 on the November 7, 2014 episode. Part 1 with guest Dr. Carrie James Beyond Online Safety: Teaching Moral and Ethical Decision Making Dr. Carrie James, sociologist, researcher at Harvard's Project Zero, and author of Disconnected: Youth, New Media and the Ethics Gap talks about the impact of growing up digital on our young people and our communities. Dr. James explains the research and shares the results of the interviews they did with youth age 10 to 25.  This valuable and interesting discussion covers the following points and more: Digital life and ones moral and ethical dilemmas Privacy, ownership, codes of conduct and developing norms in the digital realm Consideration of others when making decisions about online actions Blindspots in the thinking of youth when it comes to online actions Concerns among youth about their online life versus what parents are concerned about Carrie James is a sociologist and a researcher at Project Zero at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Her research explores young people's digital, moral, and civic lives.  With Howard Gardner, she co-directs the Good Play Project, a research and educational initiative focused youth, ethics, and the new digital media, and the Good Participation project, a study of how youth “do civics” in the digital age. Carrie is also co-PI of the Out of Eden Learn project, an educational companion to Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Paul Salopek's epic Out of Eden walk. Her publications include Disconnected: Youth, New Media, and the Ethics Gap (The MIT Press, 2014). Carrie has an M.A. and a Ph.D. in Sociology from New York University.   Part 2 with guest, Carrie Goldberg Publisher of Ads Offering Children for Sex Hides Behind Immunity Section 230 of CDA Carrie Goldberg, founding attorney at C.A. Goldberg, PLLC and television legal correspondent talks about the litigations against backpage.com and their aiding and abetting in child sex trafficking. She explains how they are claiming immunity from liability under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) which immunizes websites from liability for content their users post. Carrie Goldberg is the founding attorney at C. A. Goldberg, PLLC in Brooklyn, New York. Carrie litigates in the arenas of Internet privacy, sexual assault, and elder abuse in state and federal courts. Among the trial and appellate cases Founding Attorney Carrie Goldberg has litigated is In the Matter of A. M., the case of first impression in NYS Supreme Court Case transferring end-of-life medical decision-making to responsible family members to promote humane deaths. She has lectured about exploitation, revenge porn and guardianship at numerous law schools and bar associations and repeatedly for the NYS Office of Court Administration. Carrie blogs (www.cagoldberglaw.com/blog) about privacy, the law and sexual victimization and is frequently interviewed about emerging news stories involving sex crimes and nonconsensual sexual exposure online, including by the BBC, The Atlantic's The Wire, Elle, HuffPost Live, Vice News, Fox411. Cosmo featured her as a “Fun Fearless Female” in August 2014 for her “cyber-crusading.” She is a regular television legal correspondent on Fox29. Carrie graduated from Vassar College, Brooklyn Law School and the Bucerius International Business Law Program in Hamburg, Germany. Before opening her practice Carrie worked in nonprofits for 15 years advocating for Holocaust Survivors and lawyering for victims of elder abuse, DV, and asylum-seekers. She managed the legal department at the Vera Institute of Justice, Inc. Guardianship Project until early 2014. Carrie continues to litigate for The Vera Institute of Justice as of counsel. She also represents individual victims of revenge porn, unauthorized sex tapes, child pornography, Title IX discrimination, DV, and sexual assault.