Podcasts about Hamburg

In this special international edition of the Royal Blue Podcast, Joe Thomas dials in from Everton's pre-season training camp in Germany to join Chris Beasley for a comprehensive update on the Blues' summer progress. Following a morale-boosting victory over Hamburg, Joe breaks down the standout performers and the glaring tactical gaps—specifically the desperate need for a specialist defensive midfielder and a new right-back. The pair discuss the club's active pursuit of Brentford's Christian Nørgaard and Celtic's Alistair Johnston as sensible, short-term solutions. The conversation then turns to the intense speculation surrounding Illumin Ndiaye. After rejecting new contract offers and returning from extended leave, could a massive bid from a Champions League club or Saudi Arabia force Everton's hand before the transfer window shuts? Finally, they discuss why David Moyes needs to stop playing "square pegs in round holes" and the potential for a marquee "stardust" signing from the Friedkin Group. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Der Widerstand gegen das Rentenpaket wächst in der CDU wie in der SPD, vorangegangen sind die CDU-Ministerpräsidenten Sven Schulze, Mario Voigt und Michael Kretschmer. SPD-Generalsekretär Tim Klüssendorf und Ministerpräsidentin Manuela Schwesig haben sich der Kritik an der Rente ab 63 angeschlossen. DIW-Präsident Marcel Fratzscher hält gerade dieses Element für unverzichtbar, die Koalition hat im Bundestag nur zwölf Stimmen Mehrheit. [02:03]Tobias Krauss, CEO von Mister Spex, treibt den Umbau des Online-Optikers voran und hat in Berlin und Hamburg neue Premium-Stores eröffnet. „Es reicht nicht nur Kosten zu sparen, sondern wir müssen wachsen", sagt Krauss über den Kurs nach der Restrukturierung. 60 Prozent des Umsatzes kommen online, 40 Prozent aus den Filialen – den Abgesang auf den stationären Handel hält er für Quatsch. [06:18]Die Wissenschaftsfreiheit gerät unter Druck, in den USA durch die neue Forschungsstrategie des Weißen Hauses. Politische Beamte sollen dort künftig stärker mitentscheiden, was gefördert wird, das klassische Peer Review tritt zurück. Auch hierzulande wächst die Sorge, etwa weil die AfD in Sachsen-Anhalt Klima- und Genderforschung als ideologisch abtut. [16:22]Table.Briefings - For better informed decisions.Sie entscheiden besser, weil Sie besser informiert sind – das ist das Ziel von Table.Briefings. Wir verschaffen Ihnen mit jedem Professional Briefing, mit jeder Analyse und mit jedem Hintergrundstück einen Informationsvorsprung, am besten sogar einen Wettbewerbsvorteil. Table.Briefings bietet „Deep Journalism“, wir verbinden den Qualitätsanspruch von Leitmedien mit der Tiefenschärfe von Fachinformationen. Professional Briefings kostenlos kennenlernen: table.media/testenHier geht es zu unseren WerbepartnernHol dir deine persönlichen Daten mit Incogni zurück und hol dir 60 % Rabatt auf ein Jahresabo: https://incogni.com/tabletodayImpressum: https://table.media/impressumDatenschutz: https://table.media/datenschutzerklaerungBei Interesse an Audio-Werbung in diesem Podcast melden Sie sich gerne bei Jan Puhlmann: jan.puhlmann@table.media Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Connor O'Neill is joined by Chris Beesley and Gavin Buckland for the latest episode of the Royal Blue Podcast as they break down Everton's 2-1 win in Germany against Hamburg, all the latest transfer developments and Chelsea's “ludicrous” punishment for breaching FA rules!EXCLUSIVE NordVPN Deal ➼ https://nordvpn.com/efc Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee.On Today's Show:Everton 2-1 Hamburg: The Blues win in Germany after Braiden Graham produced the decisive moment, forcing an own goal in stoppage time after Merlin Rohl had put Everton in front earlier on in the matchTransfer Latest: The lads break down all the latest news surrounding Everton's pursuit of Alistair Johnston, Ethan Wheatley's potential move and Christian Norgaard's imminent arrival.Chelsea's FA rule breach: Gav is not happy at how Chelsea have been let off lightly, avoiding a points deduction and only having to pay a £10million fine after the club admitted to multiple historical breaches of regulations.

It is one of the most famous roads in the world: the Reeperbahn on St. Pauli. Today, it stands for nightlife, music, red lights and legendary stories — but its beginnings were completely different. On the 400th anniversary of Hamburg's Kultstraße, we dive into the history of a place between crafts, entertainment, crime and pop culture. - Sie ist eine der berühmtesten Straßen der Welt: die Reeperbahn auf St. Pauli. Heute steht sie für Nachtleben, Musik, Rotlicht und legendäre Geschichten – doch ihre Anfänge waren ganz andere. Zum 400. Geburtstag der Hamburger Kultstraße tauchen wir ein in die Geschichte eines Ortes zwischen Handwerk, Unterhaltung, Verbrechen und Popkultur.

Allen covers Dominion’s $800M tariff hit, Eversource’s 84% profit drop, Nordex’s record quarter, and a looming floating wind vessel shortage. Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTube, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us! Good Monday, everyone. Let us start this week with a number. Eight hundred million dollars. That is what tariffs on steel and aluminum added to Dominion Energy’s Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project. Dominion President Bob Blue shared the damage on a second-quarter earnings call. Two hundred and thirty million dollars … just in the latest quarter alone. That is on top of the five hundred and eighty million from the quarter before. The project is eighty-one percent complete. Thirty-one turbines are already spinning … producing more than four hundred and fifty megawatts. But the finish line just moved. Completion is now expected by the end of twenty twenty-seven. Weather delays. Vessel maintenance. And some particularly complicated turbines to install. Blue says the project will still save customers money. And Dominion expects to pocket more than five hundred million dollars in savings from grid upgrade cost shifts. The total price tag … eleven-point-six billion dollars. Now … if Dominion is feeling the squeeze in Virginia … Eversource up in New England is feeling something worse. The utility’s second-quarter profit dropped eighty-four percent. Net income fell to just fifty-three-point-seven million dollars. Why? A one-hundred-and-sixty-four-million-dollar charge tied to the offshore wind projects they already sold. South Fork Wind. Revolution Wind. Eversource got out of offshore wind back in twenty twenty-four … but the bills keep coming. Higher-than-expected payments to Global Infrastructure Partners are dragging down the bottom line. So one company builds through the pain. Another walks away … and still pays for it. But here is some good news. Over in Hamburg, Germany … Nordex just posted a quarter that would make any CEO smile. Sales up sixteen percent. EBITDA … more than doubled … to two hundred and twenty-four million euros. Margins hit ten-point-three percent. Net income … one hundred and eleven million euros. Up from thirty-one million a year ago. And orders? Up thirty-two percent. Three-point-one gigawatts of new turbine orders in just one quarter. Their total order book now stands at eighteen-point-four billion euros. Nordex CEO José Luis Blanco confirmed the full-year guidance. The onshore wind giant is not just surviving. It is thriving. Now … let us go to sea. Classification society ABS says floating offshore wind is about to create a brand-new problem. Not enough ships. A new report says demand for large anchor-handling vessels and multipurpose support vessels will surge as floating wind projects go from small demonstrations to full commercial scale. Here is the number that tells the story. A single one-gigawatt floating wind farm needs about one hundred and ninety-eight anchors … and nearly two hundred kilometers of mooring lines. That is far more than a single deepwater oil and gas platform. ABS says shortages in certain vessel classes could hit as early as twenty twenty-nine. Global floating wind capacity is expected to grow from about two hundred and seventy megawatts today … to fourteen gigawatts by twenty forty. The race for ships … has begun. And speaking of ships … Japan just finished building one. Mitsui O.S.K. Lines held a naming ceremony in Nagasaki for the Wind Whale. Japan’s first coastal deck carrier built specifically for offshore wind. One hundred and forty-nine meters long. A flush deck designed so that monopiles, towers, blades and nacelles can roll right on from the stern. It even has dynamic positioning … so it can transfer cargo directly to installation vessels at sea. Built in China by Taizhou Sanfu Ship Engineering … the Wind Whale will carry foundations from a factory in Okayama to construction sites around Japan. A country that once built ships for oil … now builds them for wind. And finally … back home in Iowa. The state Supreme Court ruled that the CEO of Global Fiberglass Solutions can be held personally liable for dumping thirteen hundred used wind turbine blades across the state. CEO Donald Lilly and another executive argued they were never in Iowa. The court disagreed. Lilly signed the contracts. Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird put it plainly. They were hired to recycle used wind turbine blades. Instead … they dumped them. Four hundred blades piled up along Interstate 35 near Ellsworth alone. The lesson? You can build an industry on clean energy. But you still have to clean up after yourself. So what does all of this mean … if you work in wind? It means the money is real now. Projects are not getting canceled. They are getting more expensive. And that changes the math for every engineer, every project manager, every supply chain director reading a bid today. Tariffs come and go. But an eleven-billion-dollar project does not stop on a dime. It means the vessels you need may not be there when you need them. If you are planning a floating wind project for the early twenty thirties … your vessel strategy should already be on paper. It means manufacturers who kept their discipline … who held their margins and grew their order books … are the ones writing the next chapter. And it means accountability is coming to every corner of this business. You cannot just build turbines. You have to manage the turbines. This industry asked the world to trust it with the future of energy. That trust comes with responsibility. And that is the state of the wind industry for August 3rd, 2026.

In a bombshell announcement, it has been confirmed this evening that Ariana Grande will not appear in next year's London revival of SUNDAY IN THE PARK WITH GEORGE.The pop star, who was set to make her London musical theatre debut alongside Wicked co-star Jonathan Bailey, will no longer star in the show as she concludes a concert tour and faces increased public commentary.Find out more about the potential reasons behind this decision, as well as its implications for the upcoming revival...sign up to Mickey-Jo's weekly substack newsletter:www.mickeyjotheatre.substack.com•00:00 | introduction02:59 | the announcement07:23 | why has Ariana left?16:23 | the show's future21:23 | conclusionAbout Mickey-Jo:As one of the leading voices in theatre criticism on a social platform, Mickey-Jo is pioneering a new medium for a dwindling field. His YouTube channel: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠MickeyJoTheatre⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ is the largest worldwide in terms of dedicated theatre criticism, where he also share features, news and interviews as well as lifestyle content for over 95,000 subscribers. With a viewership that is largely split between the US and the UK he has been fortunate enough to be able to work with PR, Marketing, and Social Media representatives for shows in New York, London, Edinburgh, Hamburg, Toronto, Sao Pãolo, and Paris. His reviews and features have also been published by WhatsOnStage, for whom he was a panelist to help curate nominees for their 2023 and 2024 Awards as well as BroadwayWorldUK, Musicals Magazine and LondonTheatre.co.uk. Instagram/TikTok/X: @MickeyJoTheatre Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Die Themen von Matthis und Robert am 03.08.26: (00:00:00) Spider-Man: Welchen Rekord der Film zum Start brechen könnte. (00:02:06) Ceuta: Wie viele Migrant:innen die spanische Exklave wieder verlassen haben sollen. (00:08:20) CSD: Wie die Pride in Hamburg war und was Familienministerin Karin Prien jetzt bei Deradikalisierungs-Programmen plant. (00:13:11) Niedrigwasser: Was es bedeutet, wenn wichtige Flüsse wie der Rhein oder die Donau zu wenig Wasser haben. Habt ihr Feedback oder Themenwünsche? Dann meldet euch gerne per (Sprach-)Nachricht an 0151 15071635 oder per Mail an 0630@wdr.de – und kommt in unseren WhatsApp-Channel: https://1.ard.de/0630-bei-Whatsapp Von 0630.

Ut Hamborg und de wiede Welt vun maandaags bet sünnavends: Die aktuellen Nachrichten auf Plattdeutsch.

Italiener weigern sich Fotos von Max auf Tour zu machen? Wie viel Leute dürfen laut Sascha maximal in einem Auto sitzen und Flo möchte wissen, ob man von einer Klimaanlage wirklich krank wird? Daneben gibt es die Meinungen der Jungs zu den neuen Euro-Geldscheinen und eine Diskussion über den Sinn und Unsinn verschiedener Begrüßungsmöglichkeiten. In der Kategorie "Bin ich der Alman?" geht es außerdem um eine Jogginghose in der Sauna, den Verstoß des Ordnungsamtes gegen sich selbst, Musikauswahl in der Öffentlichkeit beim Musikanlagenkauf, unerträgliche Schmatzgeräusche und massig schlechte Bewertungen für Uberfahrer. Es gibt außerdem einen Live-Podcast Termin am 09.10.26 auf der Polaris Con in Hamburg! Tickets: https://tickets.hamburg-messe.de/pc26 Mit Code: "offline" gibt es 10% Rabatt für die Show und die gesamte Messe. Alles Infos rund um den Podcast gibt es hier: https://linktr.ee/offlineundehrlich Fragen für "Bin ich das Arschloch?" und "Mache nur ich das?": fragen@offlineundehrlich.de Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

BIM BIM BIM

Fassung der Sendung vom 27. Juli nur Wort. Weiter gilt: https://www.freie-radios.net/77857 Empfehlung: https://christianbettges.substack.com/p/wessen-freiheit-welche-freiheit

The time seems right. It's now or never. This might be the end. We never know what tomorrow will bring, or next month or next year. Since that is the case, maybe I should start documenting my exploits sooner rather than later.TRANSCRIPTIt's funny...this week I sat down to think about what I was going to talk about, and I realized I don't actually have a lot of exciting training news.Which, I suppose, is exactly the point.I'm still in this maintenance phase. Three rides a week. Two VO₂ max sessions and one endurance ride. That's it.TrainerRoad is predicting I'll lose maybe two or three percent of my FTP over the next week or so. And I'm actually okay with that. If I lose five or six watts over a month, that's a small price to pay for getting some physical and mental recovery after a long season.Because the alternative is doing nothing.And if I stop riding altogether, I know what happens. I lose thirty, forty, maybe even fifty watts. Then it takes me three or four months to earn that fitness back again.So right now my goal isn't to get stronger.It's simply to stay close enough to where I finished this season that, when I start my next training block, I can hit the ground running.Which makes for a pretty boring podcast.There really isn't much to say.The workouts are getting done.Fitness is staying relatively stable.Everything is...fine.But then something happened this week that completely took over my attention.I bought a drone.Well...not just a drone.I bought the new DJI Neo 2.I bought a DJI Osmo Action camera.I picked up a chest harness so I can record rides from my perspective.I already had the DJI Mic Mini, so now I can actually narrate while I'm riding or running without sounding like I'm talking through a hurricane.And ever since these boxes showed up at my house, I've been like a kid with a new toy.I've been testing them.Learning how they work.Figuring out camera angles.Learning how the drone follows me.Seeing what kind of footage I can get while riding and running.And the interesting part is...I don't think this is actually about the cameras.It's about what the cameras allow me to do.For years this podcast has documented what's happening inside my head.You've listened to me talk about races.Training.Self-doubt.Confidence.Injuries.Motivation.Discipline.All of those things work incredibly well in an audio format.But this week I realized something.Audio only tells half the story.I've spent years saying things like..."I had an amazing ride today.""The climb was brutal.""The ocean was calm.""The sunrise was incredible."You hear those words......but you've never actually seen any of it.You've never seen the roads I ride every week.You've never seen the climbs.You've never seen the places where I run.You've never stood beside the ocean where I swim.You've only experienced them through my descriptions.And that's when it hit me.Maybe this journey deserves more than words.Maybe it deserves pictures.Maybe it deserves video.Not because I think video is somehow better than audio.It's just......different.There are things that video can communicate that words simply can't.Imagine watching a drone slowly pull away as I'm climbing one of my local hills.No narration.Just breathing.Wind.The sound of tires on pavement.Sometimes silence tells the story better than words ever could.Or imagine seeing the roads that I've talked about for years.Instead of picturing them in your imagination......you'd actually be there.You'd see where I train.You'd see what I see.You'd experience a little piece of the journey alongside me.And I find that incredibly exciting.Now...I don't know exactly what this becomes.I'm experimenting.I'm learning.I'm making mistakes.I'm trying different shots.Trying different editing styles.Trying to figure out what feels authentic.I don't even know where these videos will eventually live.I'm intentionally not overthinking that part.Right now the important thing is simply documenting.Capturing.Recording.Because I realized something else this week.One day...this version of me won't exist anymore.I'm fifty-eight years old.Hopefully my best race is still ahead of me.Hopefully Germany in 2027 is the peak.That's certainly what I'm training toward.But none of us really know.Maybe Germany will be the highest point of my athletic life.Maybe it won't.Maybe I'll surprise myself.Maybe life has other plans.I honestly don't know.But wouldn't it be incredible to have a visual record of this entire journey?Not just race day.Everybody records race day.I'm talking about the Tuesday morning interval session.The rainy ride when I didn't feel like training.The quiet endurance ride where nothing special happened.The run where I questioned everything.The swim where everything finally clicked.Those ordinary moments...Those are actually the story.The race is just the ending.The story is everything that happens beforehand.And maybe that's really why these cameras excite me so much.Because they're giving me a chance to preserve something that otherwise would disappear.Five years from now...I'll be able to look back and remember exactly where I was.Not because Strava says I rode 82 kilometres.Not because Garmin tells me my average heart rate.But because I'll actually be able to see it.I'll see the roads.The weather.My posture on the bike.The way I moved.The expression on my face.I'll remember things that numbers could never capture.And maybe that's something we all lose sight of as endurance athletes.We're surrounded by data.FTP.Power.Heart rate.Pace.Cadence.VO₂ max.Training Stress Score.Recovery scores.Sleep scores.We measure everything.But the numbers don't remember the experience.The numbers don't remember the sunrise.They don't remember the laughter with training partners.They don't remember the eagle flying overhead during an early morning ride.They don't remember the feeling of finally reaching the top of a climb.The numbers tell us what happened.They don't tell us what it felt like.And maybe...that's what I want these cameras to capture.Not better workouts.Better memories.Because this isn't just a training plan anymore.This is becoming a chapter of my life.It's my road to Germany.Or maybe...my Highway to Hamburg.I haven't decided what to call it yet.But whatever the title ends up being, I know one thing.I don't want to remember this journey only through graphs on Garmin Connect.I want to remember what it looked like.I want to remember what it sounded like.I want to remember how it felt.And maybe, someday, some of you will come along for that ride too.I don't know exactly what this is going to become. Maybe it's a video diary. Maybe it's a documentary. Maybe it's just a collection of moments that only I end up appreciating. But I do know this: if I'm going to spend the next year chasing one of the biggest goals of my athletic life, I don't want to remember it only through numbers on a Garmin screen. I want to remember what the roads looked like, what the water looked like, what the climbs looked like, and maybe even what I looked like. Because one day, this version of me won't exist anymore. And I think it's worth preserving while it does.Until then, I'm not replacing the podcast, not at all. I think audio works formany or you, most of you. It allows you join me on your commute, your own runs, or while doing dishes. Video is simply another window into the same journey.One where you might see a drone image of me cycling from behind up a steep hill, switching to a first person POV as I race down the other side, followed by me stading at a lookout and waxing poetic on the difficulties of rear derailluers or my favourite flavour of carb drink.That's it from me.Until next time, peace.

The time seems right. It's now or never. This might be the end. We never know what tomorrow will bring, or next month or next year. Since that is the case, maybe I should start documenting my exploits sooner rather than later.Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/thelonelytriathleteTRANSCRIPTIt's funny...this week I sat down to think about what I was going to talk about, and I realized I don't actually have a lot of exciting training news.Which, I suppose, is exactly the point.I'm still in this maintenance phase. Three rides a week. Two VO₂ max sessions and one endurance ride. That's it.TrainerRoad is predicting I'll lose maybe two or three percent of my FTP over the next week or so. And I'm actually okay with that. If I lose five or six watts over a month, that's a small price to pay for getting some physical and mental recovery after a long season.Because the alternative is doing nothing.And if I stop riding altogether, I know what happens. I lose thirty, forty, maybe even fifty watts. Then it takes me three or four months to earn that fitness back again.So right now my goal isn't to get stronger.It's simply to stay close enough to where I finished this season that, when I start my next training block, I can hit the ground running.Which makes for a pretty boring podcast.There really isn't much to say.The workouts are getting done.Fitness is staying relatively stable.Everything is...fine.But then something happened this week that completely took over my attention.I bought a drone.Well...not just a drone.I bought the new DJI Neo 2.I bought a DJI Osmo Action camera.I picked up a chest harness so I can record rides from my perspective.I already had the DJI Mic Mini, so now I can actually narrate while I'm riding or running without sounding like I'm talking through a hurricane.And ever since these boxes showed up at my house, I've been like a kid with a new toy.I've been testing them.Learning how they work.Figuring out camera angles.Learning how the drone follows me.Seeing what kind of footage I can get while riding and running.And the interesting part is...I don't think this is actually about the cameras.It's about what the cameras allow me to do.For years this podcast has documented what's happening inside my head.You've listened to me talk about races.Training.Self-doubt.Confidence.Injuries.Motivation.Discipline.All of those things work incredibly well in an audio format.But this week I realized something.Audio only tells half the story.I've spent years saying things like..."I had an amazing ride today.""The climb was brutal.""The ocean was calm.""The sunrise was incredible."You hear those words......but you've never actually seen any of it.You've never seen the roads I ride every week.You've never seen the climbs.You've never seen the places where I run.You've never stood beside the ocean where I swim.You've only experienced them through my descriptions.And that's when it hit me.Maybe this journey deserves more than words.Maybe it deserves pictures.Maybe it deserves video.Not because I think video is somehow better than audio.It's just......different.There are things that video can communicate that words simply can't.Imagine watching a drone slowly pull away as I'm climbing one of my local hills.No narration.Just breathing.Wind.The sound of tires on pavement.Sometimes silence tells the story better than words ever could.Or imagine seeing the roads that I've talked about for years.Instead of picturing them in your imagination......you'd actually be there.You'd see where I train.You'd see what I see.You'd experience a little piece of the journey alongside me.And I find that incredibly exciting.Now...I don't know exactly what this becomes.I'm experimenting.I'm learning.I'm making mistakes.I'm trying different shots.Trying different editing styles.Trying to figure out what feels authentic.I don't even know where these videos will eventually live.I'm intentionally not overthinking that part.Right now the important thing is simply documenting.Capturing.Recording.Because I realized something else this week.One day...this version of me won't exist anymore.I'm fifty-eight years old.Hopefully my best race is still ahead of me.Hopefully Germany in 2027 is the peak.That's certainly what I'm training toward.But none of us really know.Maybe Germany will be the highest point of my athletic life.Maybe it won't.Maybe I'll surprise myself.Maybe life has other plans.I honestly don't know.But wouldn't it be incredible to have a visual record of this entire journey?Not just race day.Everybody records race day.I'm talking about the Tuesday morning interval session.The rainy ride when I didn't feel like training.The quiet endurance ride where nothing special happened.The run where I questioned everything.The swim where everything finally clicked.Those ordinary moments...Those are actually the story.The race is just the ending.The story is everything that happens beforehand.And maybe that's really why these cameras excite me so much.Because they're giving me a chance to preserve something that otherwise would disappear.Five years from now...I'll be able to look back and remember exactly where I was.Not because Strava says I rode 82 kilometres.Not because Garmin tells me my average heart rate.But because I'll actually be able to see it.I'll see the roads.The weather.My posture on the bike.The way I moved.The expression on my face.I'll remember things that numbers could never capture.And maybe that's something we all lose sight of as endurance athletes.We're surrounded by data.FTP.Power.Heart rate.Pace.Cadence.VO₂ max.Training Stress Score.Recovery scores.Sleep scores.We measure everything.But the numbers don't remember the experience.The numbers don't remember the sunrise.They don't remember the laughter with training partners.They don't remember the eagle flying overhead during an early morning ride.They don't remember the feeling of finally reaching the top of a climb.The numbers tell us what happened.They don't tell us what it felt like.And maybe...that's what I want these cameras to capture.Not better workouts.Better memories.Because this isn't just a training plan anymore.This is becoming a chapter of my life.It's my road to Germany.Or maybe...my Highway to Hamburg.I haven't decided what to call it yet.But whatever the title ends up being, I know one thing.I don't want to remember this journey only through graphs on Garmin Connect.I want to remember what it looked like.I want to remember what it sounded like.I want to remember how it felt.And maybe, someday, some of you will come along for that ride too.I don't know exactly what this is going to become. Maybe it's a video diary. Maybe it's a documentary. Maybe it's just a collection of moments that only I end up appreciating. But I do know this: if I'm going to spend the next year chasing one of the biggest goals of my athletic life, I don't want to remember it only through numbers on a Garmin screen. I want to remember what the roads looked like, what the water looked like, what the climbs looked like, and maybe even what I looked like. Because one day, this version of me won't exist anymore. And I think it's worth preserving while it does.Until then, I'm not replacing the podcast, not at all. I think audio works formany or you, most of you. It allows you join me on your commute, your own runs, or while doing dishes. Video is simply another window into the same journey.One where you might see a drone image of me cycling from behind up a steep hill, switching to a first person POV as I race down the other side, followed by me stading at a lookout and waxing poetic on the difficulties of rear derailluers or my favourite flavour of carb drink.That's it from me.Until next time, peace.

Jahrgang 1938, Köchin, Gastgeberin, Caterin & Youtube-Ikone Nicht, dass wir Ihnen oder irgendjemandem wünschen würden, in einem Fahrstuhl stecken zu bleiben. Aber falls das jemals geschehen sollte, dann wäre es schön, wenn unser heutiger Gast neben Ihnen stünde. Möglicherweise kämen Sie dann sogar an den Punkt, gar nicht befreit werden zu wollen, denn die Geschichten, Lebensstationen und Erlebnisse dieser Frau würden und werden Sie begeistern und beeindrucken. Monika Fuchs wurde im März 1938 geboren, anderthalb Jahre, bevor der deutsche Überfall auf Polen den Zweiten Weltkrieg auslöste. Schon als Kind und Jugendliche bekam sie viel Gegenwind, gerade auch von ihren Eltern. Eine harte Zeit war das, Umstände, die sich neu ordnen mussten. Und vielleicht – aber das ist nur eine Mutmaßung – führten diese permanenten Unwägbarkeiten im Leben dieser jungen, empfindsamen Frau dazu, dass sie eine immense Kraft und einen mindestens genau so großen Optimismus entwickelte. Ihr Leben verbrachte sie an der Seite ihrer Familie in verschiedenen Ländern, lernte, las, probierte, improvisierte und stellte sich wirklich jeder Herausforderung. Sie arbeitete als Gastronomin, Romanautorin, Redakteurin, brachte fünf Kinder zur Welt, stürzte sich mit Anfang 50 in das Abenteuer Catering und arbeitete wie eine Wahnsinnige. Heute, mit 85, dreht Monika Fuchs höchst erfolgreich YouTube-Videos, bzw. einer ihrer Söhne dreht sie. Es war gar nicht so einfach, einen Timeslot zu finden, aber irgendwie hat’s doch geklappt, sie von Hamburg zu uns nach Berlin einzuladen. Playlist: Gitte - Ich will alles Edward Grieg - Solveigs Lied Ella Fitzgerald & Louis Armstrong - Cheek to Cheek Shirley Bassey - If you go away Leonard Cohen - Take this Waltz Sigur Ros - Olsen Olsen J.S. Bach - Bist Du bei mir Diese Podcast-Episode steht unter der Creative Commons Lizenz CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Christine Hentschel zu Sicherheit und Aktivismus in katastrophischen Zeiten Future Histories LIVE Das Gespräch mit Christine Hentschel ist Teil des Formats ‚Future Histories LIVE‘. In unregelmäßigen Abständen werden hierbei einzelne Episoden live – soll heißen vor Publikum – aufgezeichnet. Diese Folge Future Histories ist am 12. Juli 2026 auf Einladung des Hamburger Künstler*innenkollektivs Zollo entstanden. Shownotes Christine Hentschel Prof. Dr. Christine Hentschel an der Universität Hamburg: https://www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/fachbereich-sowi/professuren/hentschel/team/hentschel-christine.html DFG Humanities Centre for Advanced Studies “Futures of Sustainability”: https://www.zukuenfte-nachhaltigkeit.uni-hamburg.de zur DFG-Forschungsgruppe "The Promise of Security in Catastrophic Times“: https://www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/en/forschung/verbundprojekte/ru-promise/welcome.html Nina Perkowski zu Reimagining Security: Perkowski, N. (2025). Radical Imagination and Vernacular Security: Creating Spaces for Alternative Security Futures, International Political Sociology, Volume 19, Issue 4.  https://academic.oup.com/ips/article/19/4/olaf033/8255613 Garcés, M. (2024). Versprechen Können. Turia + Kant.  https://www.turia.at/titel/garces3.html zu Tadzio Müller und solidarischem Preppen: Müller, T. (2024) Zwischen friedlicher Sabotage und Kollaps. Wie ich lernte, die Zukunft wieder zu lieben. Mandelbaum. https://www.mandelbaum.at/buecher/tadzio-mueller/zwischen-friedlicher-sabotage-und-kollaps/ https://www.collapseclub.com/blog/five-elements-of-solidarity-prepping/ zur Letzten Generation: https://letztegeneration.org/ zu Just Stop Oil: https://juststopoil.org/ zu ‘Dernière Rénovation' (Riposte Alimentaire): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riposte_Alimentaire Christine Hentschel zu Endzeitaktivismus und Edgework:  Hentschel, C. (2023). Edgework in post/apokalyptischen Zeiten. Soziopolis.  https://www.soziopolis.de/edgework-in-post-apokalyptischen-zeiten.html zur Kollapsbewegung: https://taz.de/Kollapsbewegung-in-der-Klimakrise/!6110821/ zu Heat Strike: https://heatstrike.uk/ zu Les Soulèvements de la Terre: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Soul%C3%A8vements_de_la_Terre Bröckling, U. (2026). Invertierte Zukunft. Konturen der Zuspätmoderne. WestEnd, 23(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.5771/1860-2177-2026-1-3 https://www.inlibra.com/de/document/view/pdf/uuid/dd3d743d-12ac-3db9-8d17-af67ddb150ba?page=1&toc=5916333 Reckwitz, A. (2024). Verlust: Ein Grundproblem der Moderne. Suhrkamp Verlag. https://www.suhrkamp.de/buch/andreas-reckwitz-verlust-t-9783518588222 Folkers, A. (2022). Nach der Nachhaltigkeit: Resilienz und Revolte in der dritten Moderne. Leviathan 50, 239–262. https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-0425-2022-2-239 https://www.jstor.org/stable/27295246?seq=1 zu Mutual Aid: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_aid Christine Hentschel und Susanne Krasmann über gegenwärtige „Collapse Awareness“: Hentschel, C., & Krasmann, S. (2024). Collapse awareness in the face of climate breakdown and urbicide. Critical Studies on Security, 14(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2024.2403795 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21624887.2024.2403795 Vortrag von Christine Hentschel „Vom Retten der Welt zum Vorbereiten auf den Kollaps“ in der Ringvorlesung “Am Scheidepunkt: Zur Krise der Demokratie” in Frankfurt (22.01.2026): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmn7g3vJPKg Marina Garcés zur postumen Kondition und Metapher der Nachspielzeit: Garcés, M. (2019). Neue radikale Aufklärung. Verlag Turia+ Kant. https://www.turia.at/titel/garces.html zu postapokalyptischem Umweltaktivismus: Cassegård, C., & Thörn, H. (2022). Post-Apocalyptic environmentalism. palgrave macmillan.  https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-13203-2 Anaïs Maurer zur postapokalyptischen Agency im Pazifik & ‘fighting for what's left': Maurer, A. (2024). The ocean on fire: Pacific stories from nuclear survivors and climate activists. Duke University Press.  https://www.dukeupress.edu/the-ocean-on-fire zu climate change mitigation: https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-and-stories/what-climate-change-mitigation-and-why-it-urgent Jacob Blumenfeld zu Managing Decline:  Blumenfeld, J. (2024). Managing Decline. Cured Quail. https://www.academia.edu/121062536/Managing_Decline zu Climate Barbarism: Blumenfeld, J. (2023). Climate barbarism: Adapting to a wrong world. Constellations, 30, 162–178.  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-8675.12596 zu Christine Hentschels und Ursula Schröders Forschungsprojekt „Infrastructures of Protection. Planning for Catastrophes to Come“: https://www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/en/forschung/verbundprojekte/ru-promise/research-projects/rp2.html zu Adaptation: https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-and-stories/what-climate-change-adaptation-and-why-it-crucial zum Forschungsprojekt „Extreme Adaptation to Climate Change“ im DFG-Exzellenzcluster CLICCS: https://www.cliccs.uni-hamburg.de/research/projects-themes/projects/a4-extreme-adaptation.html Lacbawan, M. (2025). Escaping the Climate Crisis: Speculative Wealth and the Selling of a Smart City. Journal of Business Anthropology, 14(2), 94-117. https://www.fis.uni-hamburg.de/en/publikationen/detail.html?id=13f172b2-6f23-44cc-adc7-31b42fb376b4 Rothe, D., Boas, I., Farbotko, C., & Kitara, T. (2024). Digital Tuvalu: state sovereignty in a world of climate loss. International Affairs, 100(4), 1491-1509. https://academic.oup.com/ia/article/100/4/1491/7710472 zu Muscular Adaptationism: Carton, W. & Malm, A. (2025). The long heat: climate politics when it's too late. Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/products/3317-the-long-heat?srsltid=AfmBOort8KE2C2ggxjCJE1Q7GTyEoyzLypZO0Wd75hcCmJUTuuW0zGa6 Joshua KaewnetarasForschung zu Wiederaufbau nach der Flutkatastrophe in Valencia: https://urban-future-making.hcu-hamburg.de/research/disrupted-mobilities Solar Geo Engineering: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/unberechenbare-risiken-solares-geoengineering-keine Geoengineering: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/topics/climate-energy/geoengineering zur Securitisation Theory: https://criticallegalthinking.com/2025/03/31/key-concept-securitization-copenhagen-school/ Schröder, U. (2026). Schutz in Krisenzeiten. Piper. https://www.piper.de/buecher/schutz-in-krisenzeiten-isbn-978-3-492-07396-7 zu Sicherheit im Anthropozän:  Rothe, D., Hentschel, C., & Schröder, U. (2025). Recomposing the climate-security nexus: A conceptual introduction. Geoforum, 159, 104195. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002562 Von Redecker, E. (2023). Bleibefreiheit. S. Fischer Verlag. https://www.fischerverlage.de/buch/eva-von-redecker-bleibefreiheit-9783596711260   zum Begriff der Infrastrukturen in der Sicherheitsforschung: Hentschel, C., Schröder, U., 2020. Democratising Security in Turbulent Times: An Infrastructural Lens. S+F 38, 191–194. https://doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2020-4-191 https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27260104.pdf?refreqid=fastly-default%3Abf575832edd748b4b77595527737cd25&ab_segments=&initiator=&acceptTC=1 zu Nina Perkowskis Forschungsprojekt zu „Counter-Communities' Protection Practices and Security Utopias in Catastrophic Times“: https://www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/en/forschung/verbundprojekte/ru-promise/research-projects/rp8.html Staab, P. (2022). Anpassung. Leitmotiv der nächsten Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Berlin. https://www.suhrkamp.de/buch/philipp-staab-anpassung-t-9783518127797 Saito, K. (2026). Am Ende des Fortschritts. Überleben in den Ruinen des Kapitalismus. dtv. https://www.dtv.de/buch/am-ende-des-fortschritts-28534 Garcés, M. (2022). Critical Imagination. Artnodes.  https://www.academia.edu/73676938/Critical_Imagination zum Thüringen Projekt: https://verfassungsblog.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Thueringen-Projekt_Abschlussbericht.pdf zu Verwaltung für Demokratie: https://verwaltung-fuer-demokratie.de/erste-hilfe-kit-demokratie/ zu Zukunftswerkstätten nach Robert Jungk: https://www.sowi-online.de/praxis/methode/zukunftswerkstatt.html_2 zu climate change boredom: Anderson, B. (2023). Boredom and the politics of climate change. Scottish Geographical Journal, 139(1–2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2023.2197869 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14702541.2023.2197869 Christine Hentschel zu „Apokalypse-Indifferenz“ (Günther Anders) im Kontext der Klimakrise: Hentschel, C. (2024). Im Angesicht der planetaren Zerstörung. Soziologische Perspektiven gegen die Indifferenz., in: Lessenich, S., Scheffer, T. (Eds.), Gesellschaften Unter Handlungszwang: Existenzielle Probleme, Normalität Und Kritik, IfS-Aus Der Reihe. Bertz + Fischer, Berlin, pp. 78–92. https://bertz-fischer.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/bertz-fischer-ifs-02-gesellschaften-unter-handlungszwang-9783865056528.pdf zu Verleugnung nach Alenka Zupančič: Zupančič, A.(2024) Disavowal. Polity Books. https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=disavowal--9781509561193 Christine Hentschel zu affectiven investments in den Protesten gegen die Coronamaßnamen Hentschel, C.(2021) »Das große Erwachen«: Affekt und Narrativ in der Bewegung gegen die Corona-Maßnahmen. Leviathan 49, 62–85.  https://www.inlibra.com/de/document/view/pdf/uuid/1ed695c2-d459-32aa-a482-bf64a34a412c zur mobilisierenden Kraft von Wut bei Audre Lorde: Lorde, A. (1997). The uses of anger. Women's Studies Quarterly, 25(1/2), 278-285. https://americanstudies.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Lorde%20-%20The%20Uses%20of%20Anger.pdf zu Everyone hates Elon: https://www.everyonehateselon.com zu strategischem Hass nach Seyda Kurt: Kurt, S. (2023). Hass. Von der Macht eines widerständigen Gefühls. HarperCollins. https://www.harpercollins.de/products/hass-von-der-macht-eines-widerstandigen-gefuhls zum Begriff des Prozesses nach Rahel Jaeggi: https://www.fes.de/asd/buch-essenz/jaeggi-fortschritt-und-regression Jaeggi, R. (2023). Fortschritt und Regression. Suhrkamp. https://www.suhrkamp.de/buch/rahel-jaeggi-fortschritt-und-regression-t-9783518587140 White, J. (2024). In the long run: The future as a political idea. Profile Books. https://www.academia.edu/115206928/In_the_Long_Run_the_Future_as_a_Political_Idea_Profile_Books_2024_ Relevante Future Histories Folgen S04E07 | Kohei Saito, Christoph Sorg and Jan Groos on Creative Construction and the Struggle over Progress https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s04/e07-creative-construction-and-the-struggle-over-progress/ S03E46 | Rahel Jaeggi zur Krise des Liberalismus, Fortschritt als Prozess und sozialistischem Utopisieren https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e46-rahel-jaeggi-zur-krise-des-liberalismus-fortschritt-als-prozess-und-sozialistischem-utopisieren/ S03E33 | Tadzio Müller zu solidarischem Preppen im Kollaps https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e33-tadzio-mueller-zu-solidarischem-preppen-im-kollaps/ S03E32 | Jacob Blumenfeld on Climate Barbarism and Managing Decline https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e32-jacob-blumenfeld-on-climate-barbarism-and-managing-decline/ S03E23 | Andreas Malm on Overshooting into Climate Breakdown https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e23-andreas-malm-on-overshooting-into-climate-breakdown/ S02E56 | Şeyda Kurt zu strategischem Hass https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e56-seyda-kurt-zu-strategischem-hass/ S02E38 | Eva von Redecker zu Bleibefreiheit und Demokratischer Planung https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e38-eva-von-redecker-zu-bleibefreiheit-und-demokratischer-planung/ — Future Histories Kontakt & Unterstützung: Wenn euch Future Histories gefällt, dann erwägt doch bitte eine Unterstützung auf Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/join/FutureHistories Schreibt mir unter: office@futurehistories.today Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/futurehpodcast/ Mastodon: https://mstdn.social/@FutureHistories Website mit allen Folgen: www.futurehistories.today   Episode Keywords #ChristineHentschel, #JanGroos, #Interview, #FutureHistories, #FutureHistoriesLIVE, #Sicherheit, #Aktivismus, #Katastrophe, #Klimakollaps, #Zukunft, #SolidarischesPreppen, #Kollaps, #MutualAid, #Adaptation, #Mitigation, #ExtremeAdaptaion, #Klimaaktivismus, #Klimakrise 

The theatre industry has recently seen casting controversy on either side of the Atlantic, with Boy George departing from his planned stint in the West End revival of Jesus Christ Superstar days before he was scheduled to perform, and Geno Segers announced as Broadway's newest Hades in the Tony Award winning musical Hadestown.While the reaction online to political statements from each actor has been decisive, there is a deeper conversation to be had about how he respond to these situations, what level of reprisal is proportionate, and what would be achieved by their dismissal?Share your thoughts as Mickey-Jo's attempt to share his and find some nuance in this challenging topic.sign up to Mickey-Jo's weekly substack newsletter:www.mickeyjotheatre.substack.com•00:00 | introduction04:25 | Boy George / Jesus Christ Superstar09:50 | Geno Segers / Hadestown16:05 | the problems23:39 | further thoughts28:43 | conclusionAbout Mickey-Jo:As one of the leading voices in theatre criticism on a social platform, Mickey-Jo is pioneering a new medium for a dwindling field. His YouTube channel: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠MickeyJoTheatre⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ is the largest worldwide in terms of dedicated theatre criticism, where he also share features, news and interviews as well as lifestyle content for over 95,000 subscribers. With a viewership that is largely split between the US and the UK he has been fortunate enough to be able to work with PR, Marketing, and Social Media representatives for shows in New York, London, Edinburgh, Hamburg, Toronto, Sao Pãolo, and Paris. His reviews and features have also been published by WhatsOnStage, for whom he was a panelist to help curate nominees for their 2023 and 2024 Awards as well as BroadwayWorldUK, Musicals Magazine and LondonTheatre.co.uk. Instagram/TikTok/X: @MickeyJoTheatre Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Rüter, Anna www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Studio 9

Neue KI-Regeln in Kraft+++Lage nach Ansturm zehntausender Migranten auf Ceuta+++Mehr Menschen als je zuvor bei Hamburger CSD-Demo

22 Staaten fordern nach Ankunft von zehntausender Migranten in spanischer Exklave Ceuta koordinierte Reaktion der EU-Führung, Massive russische Angriffe auf die ukrainische Hauptstadt Kiew, FIFA gibt Plan zur Beteiligung von Investoren bei der Vermarktung von Weltmeisterschaft nach massiver Kritik auf, Hundertausende nehmen an Demonstrationszug zum Christopher Street Day in Hamburg teil, Verbraucher haben Anspruch auf Reparatur von Elektrogeräten, 1. Etappe der Tour de France Femmes, Gold für deutschen Doppel-Vierer der Männer bei Ruder-EM in Varese, Schweres Unwetter und Gewitter in Teilen Deutschlands nach Hitzewelle, Das Wetter Hinweis: Der Beitrag zum Thema "Tour de France Femmes" darf aus rechtlichen Gründen nicht auf tagesschau.de gezeigt werden.

Dave looks back on Everton's 1-2 win away to Hamburg and answers your questions. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

50.000 Migranten kamen nach Ceuta – fast alle sind schon wieder weg. Der britische Premier Andy Burnham hat, was seinem Vorgänger fehlte. Der CSD zieht durch Hamburg, eine Woche nach dem Anschlag von Berlin. Das ist die Lage am Samstagmorgen. Die Artikel zum Nachlesen: Darum wollen so viele Menschen aus Marokko nach Spanien Der neue Premier testet Chips im Pub. Und die Briten feiern ihn dafür CSD-Attentäter stand in Kontakt mit Salafistenprediger +++ Alle Infos zu unseren Werbepartnern finden Sie hier. Die SPIEGEL-Gruppe ist nicht für den Inhalt dieser Seite verantwortlich. +++ Mehr Hintergründe zum Thema erhalten Sie mit SPIEGEL+. Entdecken Sie die digitale Welt des SPIEGEL, unter spiegel.de/abonnieren finden Sie das passende Angebot. Alle SPIEGEL Podcasts finden Sie hier. Den SPIEGEL-WhatsApp-Kanal finden Sie hier. Hier geht es zu unserem SPIEGEL Shop. Alle Newsletter vom SPIEGEL finden Sie hier. Hier geht es zur SPIEGEL Akademie. Sie möchten den SPIEGEL mitgestalten? Registrieren Sie sich bei SPIEGEL Perspektiven. Informationen zu unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Programmvorschau August 2026 Zwei brandneue Folgen Mitte und Ende August HOAXILLA Laberfeuer jeden Dienstag ab 20:00 Uhr Abschiedstour Mittwoch, 12.08.2026 ab 20:00 Uhr Alle bekloppt Donnerstag, 13.08.2026 ab 20:00 Uhr WildMics Summerfestival aus Irland Montag, 17.08. – Sonntag, 23.08.2026 24/7 Livestream Alle bekloppt Donnerstag, 27.08.2026, 20:00 Uhr HOAXILLA bei CampfireFM jeweils als Live-Stream bei den WildMics Und natürlich gibt es viele weitere tolle Live-Streams bei den WildMics Den WildMics-Kanal bei YouTube findet ihr hier Alle bekloppt als Podcast Wie man uns unterstützen kann, könnt ihr hier nachlesen. Zum HOAXILLA Merchandise geht es hier QR-Code für Überweisung:

22 Staaten fordern nach Ankunft von zehntausender Migranten in spanischer Exklave Ceuta koordinierte Reaktion der EU-Führung, Massive russische Angriffe auf die ukrainische Hauptstadt Kiew, FIFA gibt Plan zur Beteiligung von Investoren bei der Vermarktung von Weltmeisterschaft nach massiver Kritik auf, Hundertausende nehmen an Demonstrationszug zum Christopher Street Day in Hamburg teil, Verbraucher haben Anspruch auf Reparatur von Elektrogeräten, 1. Etappe der Tour de France Femmes, Gold für deutschen Doppel-Vierer der Männer bei Ruder-EM in Varese, Schweres Unwetter und Gewitter in Teilen Deutschlands nach Hitzewelle, Das Wetter Hinweis: Der Beitrag zum Thema "Tour de France Femmes" darf aus rechtlichen Gründen nicht auf tagesschau.de gezeigt werden.

Diskussion über europäische Asylpolitik nach Ankunft zehntausender Migranten in spanischer Exklave Ceuta, Hundertausende bei Parade zum Christopher Street Day in Hamburg, FIFA zieht Investoren-Pläne nach massiver Kritik zurück, Klare Kennzeichnung von KI-Inhalten in der EU verpflichtend, Großer Waldbrand im Südwesten Frankreichs unter Kontrolle, Das Wetter

Littmann, Corny www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Fazit

Diskussion über europäische Asylpolitik nach Ankunft zehntausender Migranten in spanischer Exklave Ceuta, Hundertausende bei Parade zum Christopher Street Day in Hamburg, FIFA zieht Investoren-Pläne nach massiver Kritik zurück, Klare Kennzeichnung von KI-Inhalten in der EU verpflichtend, Großer Waldbrand im Südwesten Frankreichs unter Kontrolle, Das Wetter

Die FIFA hat ihre Investorenpläne für die WM wieder zurückgezogen ++ In Hamburg werden Hunderttausende beim Christopher Street Day erwartet

Straehler-Pohl, Jörn www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Studio 9

Diskussion über europäische Asylpolitik nach Ankunft zehntausender Migranten in spanischer Exklave Ceuta, Hundertausende bei Parade zum Christopher Street Day in Hamburg, FIFA zieht Investoren-Pläne nach massiver Kritik zurück, Klare Kennzeichnung von KI-Inhalten in der EU verpflichtend, Großer Waldbrand im Südwesten Frankreichs unter Kontrolle, Das Wetter

Bis zu 60.000 Migranten überqueren Grenze der spanischen Exklave Ceuta, Sorge in Europa hinsichtlich der Lage in Ceuta, Bundesregierung will im Rahmen der Reform des Informationsfreiheitsgesetzes Auskunftsanspruch einschränken, Ausmaß der Waldbrände laut Wissenschaftlern auf Klimawandel zurückzuführen, Laut US-Präsident Trump Einigung auf Entwaffnung der Terrororganisation Hamas, Gegenwind für Investorenpläne von FIFA-Präsident Infantino, "Sternbrücke" mit spektakulärem Schwertransport an Bestimmungsort in Hamburg eingesetzt, Das Wetter

I am Rolf Claessen and my co-host Ken Suzan and I are welcoming you to episode 177 of our podcast IP Fridays! Today's interview guest is Dr. Ernst-Peter Heilein, who is a German and European patent attorney, the founder of HEILEIN IP LAW, and a long-time IP leader at BSH Home Appliances. He is the mastermind behind the BSH v. Electrolux decision of the European Court of Justice about long-arm jurisdiction in Europe that has the whole patent world stirring in Europe at the moment! But before we jump into this fascinating interview, I have news for you! Emboline v. AorticLab (UPC Court of Appeal) The UPC Court of Appeal has clarified for the first time how a conditional revocation counterclaim should be handled, in a dispute over Emboline’s embolic protection patent EP 2 129 425 against AorticLab. A defendant can validly make its revocation counterclaim conditional on infringement being found first, meaning no ruling on the counterclaim is needed if the infringement claim fails, as the Munich Local Division had held. The Court of Appeal also closed a related gap: if the claimant appeals a non-infringement finding, the counterclaimant may conditionally appeal the unresolved counterclaim too. AorticLab missed its own appeal deadline and can now at best seek re-establishment of rights, while Emboline has already appealed the non-infringement finding. FujiFilm v. Kodak (UPC Court of Appeal) Following the closely watched long-arm jurisdiction ruling of June 2, the UPC Court of Appeal, chaired by Rian Kalden, has now granted FujiFilm an injunction against Kodak in a second proceeding. The Court upheld the limited printing plate patent and found that Kodak’s Sonora XTRA 3 plate infringes it. Kodak can no longer sell or use that plate in Germany. OpenAI v. EUIPO (General Court of the EU, T-555/25) The General Court’s Eighth Chamber dismissed OpenAI’s action against the EUIPO decision to partially cancel the OPENAI trademark. The partial refusal for classes 9, 42, and 45 rests decisively on Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR, the descriptiveness ground. For a significant part of the English-speaking public, “OPENAI” directly conveys that the goods or services are provided using freely accessible artificial intelligence. Dental Monitoring v. Align Technology (CAFC) On July 7, 2026, the Federal Circuit confirmed that AI and deep-learning patent claims covering dental image analysis are not patent-eligible under Section 101. Simply training a “deep learning device” on a specific dataset does not amount to a patent-eligible technical solution. Publisher v. Google (Munich I Regional Court) The Munich I Regional Court issued a preliminary injunction barring Google from spreading false factual claims about a publishing company in its AI Overviews. A search query combining the company’s name with the German term for “fraud scheme” had triggered an AI-generated summary containing entirely fabricated accusations of subscription traps. KPN v. Oppo (Federal Court of Justice, X ZR 103/24) On July 1, the Federal Court of Justice dismissed KPN’s appeal against the revocation of a central claim of its LTE patent EP 2 291 033. Oppo had successfully challenged the claim, leaving KPN’s infringement action against Oppo’s German distribution entity without a legal basis for now. BSH v. Electrolux: What the ECJ Ruling Means for Your Company’s Patent Enforcement Strategy A vacuum cleaner from 2001 has reshaped the European patent landscape. That sounds like an overstatement. It isn’t. For IP Fridays, I spoke with Dr. Ernst-Peter Heilein, founder of HEILEIN IP LAW and long-time Senior IP Leader at BSH Home Appliances. He guided the case BSH v. Electrolux from its first strategic idea all the way to the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice, a case that earned the 2025 Managing IP Award as “Europe Impact Case of the Year.” For managing directors, IP heads, and R&D leaders at German Mittelstand companies, this case is not a legal footnote. It changes where you can enforce your patents, and it changes where you yourself can be sued if your company operates across several European markets. That is what this article is about. Background: How a Patent Dispute Became an ECJ Case The invention dates back to 2001 and concerns a new vacuum cleaner technology. In 2006, BSH identified what it believed was an unauthorized use of that invention and contacted Electrolux to clarify the situation. The European patent was granted in 2009 and validated in a number of European countries. Nobody, Heilein says, could have imagined at the time that this matter would eventually reach the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice almost twenty years later. In late 2018, BSH successfully defended the patent through opposition and appeal proceedings before the European Patent Office. In 2019, the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf found that certain Electrolux vacuum cleaner models infringed the patent. A classic milestone win, the kind that occurs regularly in patent practice. Except the patent had been validated in many countries. Winning in Germany did not solve the enforcement problem everywhere else. Heilein describes the starting point in very concrete terms: how do you enforce a patent that exists in many countries without filing a separate lawsuit in every single one? And how do you prevent claims from becoming time-barred while you work that out? Running parallel proceedings in multiple countries is not just legally complex. It consumes time, personnel, and money that a mid-sized company rarely has in that quantity to spare. This is exactly where the real value of this case for you begins. From the outset, this was never an academic debate about jurisdiction. It was a question that every company holding rights in more than one country eventually faces: how do you enforce your rights efficiently without burning your budget on ten parallel proceedings? Brussels Ia Regulation: The Underrated Article 4 While searching for a solution, the BSH team came across Article 4 of the Brussels Ia Regulation. The underlying idea is simple: a person can generally be sued in the country where that person is based. In the BSH case, that pointed toward the Swedish home court, because Electrolux is headquartered in Stockholm. For a long time, this rule played no real role in patent practice. The widely held view was that cross-border patent litigation in Europe was effectively dead the moment a defendant challenged the validity of the patent. Anyone wanting to enforce a patent across several countries appeared to have no choice but to litigate country by country. Heilein and his team questioned that assumption instead of simply accepting it. This is the point I find most instructive: challenging accepted assumptions in your own field is often the difference between a standard solution and a strategic one. In 2020, the team decided to file the action in Sweden, aware that they were looking at a possibility, not a guarantee. Cross-Border Enforcement: The Three Questions Referred to Luxembourg After Electrolux challenged the validity of the patents, the Swedish home court declared itself not competent to hear the case. BSH appealed, and the Swedish Court of Appeal agreed to refer three questions to the European Court of Justice. The first question addressed the core problem: does a home court that would otherwise have jurisdiction over an infringement claim lose that jurisdiction simply because the defendant argues the patent is invalid? The second question concerned a feature common to many legal systems, including Germany’s, where infringement and validity are decided in separate proceedings. The third question originally concerned Turkey. Today, most people immediately think of the United Kingdom, and some even think of US patents. Originally, the question was simpler: do the same jurisdiction rules apply to patents from countries outside the European Union? The fact that the ECJ first assigned the case to a Chamber of seven judges and later referred it to the Grand Chamber of 15 judges already signaled how much weight the Court placed on these questions. The Judgment: What the ECJ Actually Decided A home court does not automatically lose jurisdiction simply because the defendant argues the patent is invalid. For many years, the opposite was widely assumed to be settled law. The ECJ made clear that this reading was too narrow. The court where the defendant is based can generally continue to hear the infringement case. One point matters for how you read this ruling: questions concerning the validity of a European patent still fall to the national courts of the country for which the patent was granted, as provided in Article 24(4) of the Brussels Ia Regulation. What is new is that the infringement case does not automatically collapse the moment validity is challenged. The home court keeps control of the overall proceeding. For patents from EU Member States, the home court does not automatically lose jurisdiction. It assesses the validity challenge. If it looks strong, the home court may stay the infringement case. If it looks weak, the home court may proceed. For patents from non-EU countries, the home court may stay the case if a validity proceeding is already pending there, drawing on Articles 33 and 34 of the Brussels Ia Regulation. The result is a considerably more flexible system than most observers expected . Patents from Outside the EU: Long-Arm Jurisdiction The part of the judgment with the greatest international reach concerns patents from countries outside the EU. The ECJ ruled that the special jurisdiction rule for patent validity generally does not apply to non-European patents. That means the general rule can apply instead, opening the door for infringement claims based on non-European patents to be brought before a home court where the defendant is based in the EU. Commentators quickly started calling this “long-arm jurisdiction.” One clarification matters here, because it tends to get lost in the public discussion: the ECJ did not say that a European home court can revoke or invalidate a foreign patent. That remains a matter for the authorities and courts of the country that granted it. What the ECJ said is that a European home court may assess the claims between the parties. That distinction is essential to how you should read this ruling. Consequences in Practice: Fujifilm, Regeneron, and Onesta Three recent cases show how quickly practice is already adapting to the new possibilities. Fujifilm v. Kodak: the Düsseldorf Local Division of the Unified Patent Court accepted jurisdiction over the UK part of a European patent even before the ECJ delivered its judgment, building on reasoning the Advocate General had already signaled in the BSH case. In June 2026, the UPC Court of Appeal further developed that approach based on the principles confirmed in BSH. Regeneron v. Formycon: the Munich home court applied the BSH framework and granted a Europe-wide injunction based on a European patent, one of the first examples of a national home court putting the BSH logic into practice. Onesta v. BMW: this case shows the debate has moved well beyond Europe. After Onesta attempted to assert two US patents before the Munich home court, BMW obtained an anti-suit injunction from a Texas federal court. Judge Albright took the view that US patents should generally be decided by US courts. The injunction was directed against Onesta, not against the Munich court, and Onesta has appealed the Texas decision. The Munich home court stayed the proceeding but did not reject its own jurisdiction. Whether a European home court can ultimately decide infringement claims based on US patents remains an open question, one that has turned from a European jurisdiction issue into an international jurisdiction conflict. What This Means for Your Company Heilein sums up twenty years of litigation in three lessons, and I share this assessment without reservation when advising my Mittelstand clients. First: patent enforcement has become more international. National litigation still matters, but companies should think across borders from the very beginning, not only once the first cease-and-desist letter has been sent. Second: choice of forum now carries real strategic weight. Where you bring a case can matter just as much as the legal arguments themselves. Third: long-term commitment pays off. Major developments rarely result from a single filing or a single hearing. They come from pursuing a clear strategy consistently over many years. For you as a managing director, R&D lead, or Head of IP at an innovative Mittelstand company, this translates into two concrete points. First, if you hold rights in several European countries and a competitor infringes them, you no longer necessarily have to fund five or six parallel national proceedings. A single action at the infringer’s home base can be the economically smarter option. Second, and this side of the ruling gets less attention in public discussion, if your company is based in Germany and operates across several countries, you can now be sued at your own home base over patent infringement claims tied to activities in other countries. That risk belongs in every freedom-to-operate analysis and in every assessment tied to acquisitions or market entry. Here is the full transcript of the interview: Host Today's interview guest is Dr. Ernst-Peter Heilein. If you don't know Ernst-Peter, he is a German and European patent attorney, the founder of HEILEIN IP LAW, and a long-time IP leader at BSH Home Appliances. Thank you for being on IP Fridays. Answer Yeah, great to be here! BLOCK 1 – THE PERSON BEHIND THE CASE Host When looking at your career, one thing stands out: you never really followed the traditional path of either private practice or industry. Er, how did your professional journey begin, actually? Answer My professional roots are actually in private practice. After qualifying as a Patent Attorney, I worked in private practice and fairly early founded my own law firm, which later became HEILEIN IP LAW. Host So you never completely left private practice behind? Answer Exactly. In 2005, I had the opportunity to take on additional responsibilities on the BSH side. There, I was able to build and lead a new unit within the IP organization. The team was responsible for patents in the small appliances business, as well as global design and trademark protection. At the same time, I helped build an international network of internal and external IP counsel and coordinated their work. Host That still sounds fairly like traditional IP work. When did international disputes become part of your career? Answer Over time, my focus gradually shifted from traditional IP protection to strategic enforcement. That included anti-counterfeiting activities, global trademark and design matters, and cross-border patent disputes. Host So your work became more about enforcing rights rather than simply obtaining and managing them, right? Answer Exactly. And that development eventually led me to play a strategic role in the case BSH Home Appliances versus Electrolux, a case that still accompanies me today. Host Looking back now — from private practice, to building an international IP organization, and eventually becoming involved in a case before the European Court of Justice — did you ever imagine that path? Answer No, not at all. Looking back, this combination of private practice, responsibilities on the business side, and international enforcement experience turned out to be very useful when our case eventually reached the European Court of Justice. BLOCK 2 – HOW IT ALL STARTED Host Yeah, talking about this case. The case BSH versus Electrolux started long before it reached the European Court of Justice. When did the story actually begin? Answer The story actually begins much earlier than most people would expect. The invention itself dates back to 2001 and concerns a new vacuum cleaner technology. In 2006, we identified what we believed to be an unauthorized use of the invention and contacted Electrolux to clarify the situation. The European patent in suit was granted in 2009 and validated in a number of European countries. At the time, nobody could have imagined that this would eventually lead to a decision of the European Court of Justice almost twenty years later. Host Wow, 20 years! That's a long time. So, at first this was simply a normal patent dispute? Answer Yes, absolutely! After many years of opposition and appeal proceedings before the European Patent Office, we were finally able to defend the patent successfully in late 2018. Less than one year later, in the summer of 2019, the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf found that certain Electrolux vacuum cleaner models infringed the patent. Host Er, at that point, one might think, that the patent owner had achieved its goal, right? Answer That is what many people would think. But that judgment did not bring the dispute to an end. A new challenge emerged. The patent had been validated in many European countries. Winning in one country, like Germany, did not automatically solve the enforcement issue in all the other countries. Host What was the practical problem then? Answer We were facing a very simple question: How do we enforce a patent that exists in many countries? And how do we prevent claims from becoming time-barred without filing separate infringement actions in every single country? Doing that would not only be legally complex. It would also require a huge amount of time, effort, and money. Host That sounds less like a major legal question and more like a business problem. Answer Exactly. At the beginning, this was not an academic discussion about jurisdiction. It was a very practical business question. How can we enforce our rights efficiently without running parallel lawsuits all over Europe? That was the real challenge we were trying to solve. BLOCK 3 – THE IDEA OF A CENTRAL ACTION Host So, how did the idea of one central action emerge? Answer While looking for possible solutions, we came across Article 4 of the Brussels Ia Regulation. The idea behind that rule is very simple. In general, a person can be sued in the country where that person is based. In our case, that pointed us toward the Swedish home court because Electrolux is based in Stockholm. Host That sounds like a fairly ordinary jurisdiction rule. Answer Yes. And that was exactly what made it interesting. Article 4 is the general rule. The question was whether that rule could also be used for patent infringement claims covering several countries. Host Was that a common approach at the time? Answer No. Quite the opposite. Many people believed that cross-border patent litigation in Europe was effectively dead. Host That sounds rather dramatic. Why did people think that? Answer Because there was a widely held view that a central patent case could be stopped as soon as the defendant challenged the validity of the patent. As a result, many companies assumed they had no real choice but to litigate country by country. Host Yet you decided to look at the issue differently. Answer Yes. Sometimes it is worth taking a fresh look at accepted assumptions. We felt that Article 4 might play a much more important role than many people believed. Host So at that point, you already saw an opportunity, right? Answer Yes, we saw a possibility! Not a guarantee. But we believed there was a strong legal basis for bringing all claims before the Swedish home court. Host And that eventually led to the lawsuit being filed in Sweden, right? Answer Exactly. In 2020, we decided to file the action in Sweden. That followed our success before the European Patent Office in late 2018 and in the Düsseldorf infringement proceedings in 2019. At that stage, our objective was very practical. We were simply trying to find an efficient way to enforce rights that exist in many countries. Host At that point, you already think the case might end up before the European Court of Justice? Answer No. Not at all. We were focused on solving a business problem. The idea that the case would eventually reach the European Court of Justice came much later. BLOCK 4 – THE OBSTACLE: GAT v. LuK Host You mentioned that, er, many people believed cross-border patent litigation in Europe was no longer a realistic option. Why was that? Answer The main reason was an earlier decision of the European Court of Justice known as GAT versus LuK, decided in 2006. For many years, that decision was understood to mean that a home court could lose its ability to hear a patent infringement case as soon as the defendant challenged the validity of the patent. In practice, that understanding made many cross-border patent cases extremely difficult. As a result, many people believed that cross-border patent litigation was not effective. Host And yet you decided to follow exactly that path, right? Answer Yes. Sometimes it is worth questioning assumptions that have been accepted for many years. We believed that Article 4 of the Brussels Ia Regulation played a more important role than many people thought. That is why, in 2020, we decided to file the case in Sweden. Host And at that point, did you already realize that the case might eventually reach the European Court of Justice? Answer No. Not at all. Our goal was simply to find a practical solution to a real enforcement problem. The idea that this would eventually become a case before the European Court of Justice was far from our minds. BLOCK 5 – THE QUESTIONS REFERRED TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Host So, how did the case eventually reach the European Court of Justice then? Answer After we filed the lawsuit in Sweden in 2020, Electrolux challenged the validity of the patents. The Swedish home court then concluded that it could not hear the case and declared itself not competent to proceed. We appealed that decision, because the issues were important and affected far more than just our case. We suggested that several questions should be referred to the European Court of Justice. The Swedish Court of Appeal agreed and sent those questions to Luxembourg. Host So, what were these main questions? Answer At the heart of the case, there were three questions: First: if a home court has jurisdiction over a patent infringement case, does it lose that jurisdiction simply because the defendant argues that the patent is invalid? Second: Does it make a difference if the national legal system requires validity issues to be decided in a separate proceeding? And third: Do this jurisdiction rules also apply to patents from countries outside the European Union? Host The third question sounds particularly interesting. Answer Yes, at the time, the discussion in our case focused on Turkey. Today, many people immediately think about the United Kingdom, and some even think about US patents. But originally, the question was much simpler. We wanted to know, whether the same jurisdiction rules also apply when patents from non-European countries are involved. Host And, did you realize how important that third question might become? Answer No, certainly not to that extent. At the beginning, most of the discussion focused on the relationship between the different jurisdiction rules within Europe. Only later did it become clear that the European Court of Justice’s answers might have consequences far beyond the European Union. Host So, how did the European Court of Justice react then? Answer That was actually quite interesting. The European Court of Justice first heard the case before a Chamber of seven judges. Later, it referred the case to the Grand Chamber of 15 judges. That already showed that the European Court of Justice considered the issues to be important. And when the judgment finally came out, some of the answers were very different from what many observers had expected. BLOCK 6 – THE DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Host Let’s talk about the European Court of Justice’s answers. What was, in your view, the most important part of the decision? Answer The most important point was this: A home court does not automatically lose jurisdiction just because the defendant argues that the patent is invalid. For many years, many people believed exactly the opposite. The European Court of Justice made it clear that this understanding was too narrow. The home court where the defendant is based can generally continue to hear the infringement case. That is really the key message of the decision. Host Why is that so important? Answer Because it gives new momentum to cross-border patent enforcement in Europe. Before this decision, many people assumed that a defendant could effectively stop a central infringement case simply by challenging the validity of the patent. The European Court of Justice made clear that this is not automatically the case. Host Does that mean the home court hearing the infringement case will now also decide whether the patent is valid? Answer No, and that is a very important point. The European Court of Justice confirmed that questions about the validity of a European patent should still be decided by the national courts of the country for which the patent was granted, as provided for in Article 24(4) of the Brussels Ia Regulation. What is new, is that the infringement case does not automatically fall apart because of a validity challenge. The home court can keep control of the overall case. Host So, how does that work in practice? Answer The European Court of Justice gives the home court some flexibility. For patents from Member States of the European Union, the home court does not automatically lose its power if the defendant says the patent is invalid. The home court can look at the validity challenge. If it seems strong, the home court may stay the infringement case. If it seems weak, the home court may continue the infringement case. For patents from countries outside the European Union, the home court may also stay the case if there is already a validity case pending in that country. In such situations, Articles 33 and 34 of the Brussels Ia Regulation may apply. That creates a much more flexible system than many people expected. Host Er, we have discussed the implications for patents from Member States of the European Union, but a lot of attention has been given to another part of the decision, that we already talked about briefly, namely patents from countries outside the European Union. Answer Absolutely, and that may be the part of the judgment with the biggest international impact. Host Why? Answer Because the European Court of Justice decided that the special jurisdiction rule for patent validity does not generally apply to patents from non-European countries. In simple terms, that means the general rule can still apply. And that opens the possibility of bringing infringement cases based on non-European patents before the home court where the defendant is based in the European Union. Host That sounds like a very far-reaching statement. Answer It is. That is why many commentators started talking about what is often called “long-arm jurisdiction.” In other words, a European home court may, under certain circumstances, deal with infringement claims relating to patents from countries outside the European Union. Host So, many listeners may now wonder: Can a Swedish or a German home court really decide a dispute involving a British or Turkish patent? Answer Ah, we need to be careful here. The European Court of Justice did not say that a European home court can cancel or revoke a foreign patent. That remains a matter for the authorities and national courts of the country that granted the patent. What the European Court of Justice said is that a European home court may assess the claims between the parties in a dispute. That is an important distinction. Host Did you realize during the proceedings how important this part of the decision might become? Answer Not to this extent. We started with a very practical enforcement problem. Only later did it become clear that the European Court of Justice’s answers might have consequences far beyond the original case. Today, the decision is discussed not only in connection with Turkish patents, but also British patents and even possible claims involving US patents. Host If you had to summarize the decision in one sentence, and I know, this is a very difficult task, what would that sentence be? Answer The European Court of Justice did not re-invent cross-border patent enforcement in Europe. But after many years, it clearly gave it much more room to develop. BLOCK 7 – THE REACTION OF THE IP COMMUNITY Host So, how was the decision received after it was published? Answer Ah, the reaction was very strong. It quickly became clear that many people saw the decision as much more than just another patent case. Many articles and commentaries described it as an important development in European patent litigation. Host Did that surprise you? Answer To some extent, yes. Of course, we knew that the questions referred to the European Court of Justice were important. But I was surprised by how quickly the decision became a major topic of discussion across the European patent community. Host Er, you later presented the decision at several conferences yourself, right? Answer Yes. The discussion started right away. I had the opportunity to discuss and present the case at several conferences and events, including the annual VPP conference in Germany and the Ingolstadt Patent Symposium. I recently received an invitation to serve as a panel speaker on cross-border litigation at the AIPPI World Congress 2026 in Hamburg. What struck me most was that both internal and external IP counsel were trying to understand the practice consequences of the decision. Host So, what was the question you were asked most often? Answer Almost always the same one: How far does this decision really go? People wanted to know whether this was simply a correction of earlier case law or whether it marked the beginning of a new phase in cross-border patent enforcement. Host And what did you say? Answer I would describe it as: neither a revolution nor a minor adjustment. The European Court of Justice did not rewrite the system. But it clearly changed the balance between the different jurisdiction rules. That is why I believe the decision will continue to be discussed for many years, both in practice and in academia. Host Er, one year later, the case received the Managing IP Award as the “Europe Impact Case of the Year.” What did that recognition mean to you? Answer First of all, it was a great honor for everyone involved. But for me, the most important thing was the message behind the award. The award showed that the decision affects much more than the parties involved in the case. It has an impact on European patent practice as a whole. And it also shows that the underlying jurisdiction questions reach far beyond patent law. They are relevant whenever companies have to enforce rights across borders in an increasing international world. That is what makes this case special. Host You often describe this case as a team effort. Answer Absolutely. A case of this size is never the work of one person. Many people contributed over many years. On the BSH side, team members from different functions played an important role throughout the proceedings. And we worked closely with external advisors in several countries. So I see the award as recognition of a shared achievement rather than an individual success. Host Looking at the discussions today, would you say the debate is over? Answer Not at all. I actually think we are only at the beginning. There are still many practical questions that home courts will have to answer in the coming years. That is exactly why the decision remains so interesting. BLOCK 8 – WHAT DOES THE DECISION MEAN IN PRACTICE? Host Let’s move from legal theory to practical business implications. What does this decision mean for patent owners and companies? Answer In my view, the biggest change is strategic. Patent owners now have better opportunities to bring cross-border disputes together in one central proceeding. At the same time, companies need to be aware that they may face claims at their European headquarters covering activities in several countries. So the decision creates opportunities, but it also creates new risks. Host That sounds really like a significant shift; right? Answer I would call it a rebalancing rather than a revolution. The European Court of Justice did not create a completely new system. But it made clear that the general rule — suing a defendant where it is based — plays a much bigger role than many people had assumed. As a result, the court at the defendant’s home base becomes much more important strategically. Host In the patent community, people often talk about cases such as Fujifilm v. Kodak, or Regeneron v. Formycon or Onesta v. BMW. Why are those cases attracting so much attention now? Answer Because they show how quickly practice is already adapting to the new possibilities. Fujifilm was important because it was one of the first UPC cases to test the logic that was later confirmed in BSH. At that time, the BSH case was already pending before the European Court of Justice, and the Advocate General had expressed a view that pointed in that direction. Against that background, the Düsseldorf Local Division accepted jurisdiction over the UK part of a European patent even before the European Court of Justice delivered its judgment. In June 2026, based on the principles confirmed in BSH, the UPC Court of Appeal further developed that approach. Host And what happened in Regeneron v. Formycon ? Answer In the Regeneron case, the Munich home court applied the approach confirmed in BSH and granted a Europe-wide injunction based on a European patent. That was one of the first examples of a national home court using the BSH framework in practice. That demonstrates that the decision is not just an academic discussion. It already has practical consequences. Host And what about the Onesta case? Answer The Onesta case shows that the debate has moved beyond Europe. After Onesta attempted to assert two U.S. patents before the Munich home court, BMW obtained an anti-suit injunction from a Texas federal court. Judge Albright took the view that U.S. patents should generally be decided by U.S. courts. The Onesta case therefore illustrates that the limits of the BSH logic are now being tested internationally. Host Did that end the proceedings in Munich? Answer Not necessarily. What makes the case interesting is that the Texas injunction was directed against Onesta, not against the Munich home court. At the same time, Onesta appealed Judge Albright’s decision in the United States. The Munich home court therefore decided to stay the case for the time being. Importantly, however, the Munich home court did not reject its own jurisdiction. So, at least for the moment, the underlying question remains open. Host Can a European home court ultimately decide infringement claims based on U.S. patents? Answer That question has not yet been answered. But the case has already shown that such an attempt can trigger strong reactions outside Europe. In that sense, the debate has moved from a European jurisdiction question to an international jurisdiction conflict. Host For our audience of internal and external IP counsel, what are the main lessons from this decision? Answer For me, there are three key takeaways. First: Patent enforcement has become more international. National litigation remains important, but companies should think across borders from the very beginning. Second: The choice of forum is becoming more important. Where you bring a case may be just as important as the legal arguments themselves. And third: Long-term commitment matters. This case shows that major developments rarely happen because of a single filing or a single hearing. They usually result from pursuing a clear strategy consistently over many years. Host Do you think this decision will also influence the Unified Patent Court, the UPC? Answer Yes, I believe so. The decision fits into a broader trend toward more centralized patent litigation. Both, the UPC and the BSH decision are driven by the same idea: Handling cross-border disputes more efficiently and more consistently. What is interesting is that many of the questions were faced in BSH versus Electrolux are now reappearing in a new form before the UPC. Cases like Fujifilm versus Kodak show that the discussion about jurisdiction, scope, and cross-border effects is far from over. Institutions may be new. But the underlying challenge remains the same: How do we enforce patents effectively across borders? Host Some commentators even see this as a step toward a more independent European patent judiciary. Do you agree? Answer To some extent, yes. Professor Hanns Ullrich, who supervised my doctoral studies on the legal protection of a then new semiconductor technology many years ago, recently observed that the UPC is gradually developing its own European case law.[DH1] I think that is — again — a very accurate observation. If you look at the developments since BSH and the first UPC decisions, you can see that European patent litigation is becoming more connected. National courts will remain important. But at the same time, we are seeing a more integrated European patent system taking shape. How far that development will go remains to be seen. Host Looking back on the entire journey — from a vacuum cleaner patent, through litigation in several countries, all the way to the European Court of Justice and an award-winning decision — what is your personal conclusion? Answer My main conclusion is that innovation needs effective legal protection. But it also requires the willingness to challenge established assumptions and explore new approaches. For me, the BSH versus Electrolux case shows that persistence, teamwork, a willingness to challenge accepted assumptions, and a long-term strategic view can sometimes lead to developments that go far beyond the original dispute. BLOCK 9 – THE PERSON BEHIND THE DECISION Host Ernst-Peter, today we have talked a lot about jurisdiction, patent enforcement, and European case law. When you look back at this journey, which has lasted almost twenty years, what impressed you most? Answer Probably the realization that major developments rarely follow a straight line. When we started thinking about the case, we were dealing with a very practical problem. Nobody said: Let’s create a landmark decision of the European Court of Justice. We were simply looking for a reasonable and practical solution for a company. The fact that this would eventually lead to a decision with Europe-wide impact was something nobody could foresee at the time. Host Were there moments when you thought the case might fail? Answer Of course. Whenever a case lasts many years, there will be setbacks, new questions, and unexpected developments. That is exactly why persistence is so important. In the end, success is often not about one filing or one hearing. It is about staying focused on a clear objective over a long period of time. Host You often talk about teamwork. Is that one of the main lessons from this case? Answer Absolutely. A case of this size requires commitment from many people and institutes over many years. On the BSH side, my role was to help maintain the strategic direction and long-term commitment that such a case requires. At the same time, experts from different functions within BSH contributed technical expertise, testing, documentation, and practical support throughout the proceedings. On the legal side, Roman Sedlmaier and his team at IP-Counsels Gigerich & Sedlmaier (IPCGS) helped develop the cross-border litigation strategy and the overall case architecture. Our Swedish litigation team then carried the arguments through all stages of the proceedings. Looking back, it was the combination of institutional commitment, technical expertise, strategic leadership, well-designed case architecture, and consistent execution that made the difference. Host One final question. What advice would you give to young internal or external IP counsel? Answer Stay curious: Don’t be afraid to question accepted assumptions. Be patient: Intellectual property is usually a marathon, not a sprint. And never forget that every patent dispute involves an invention, a business, and many people who have worked hard to bring that innovation to market. For me, that connection between technology, law, and strategy is what still makes this profession so fascinating today. Host Ernst-Peter, thank you very much for joining us today on IP Fridays. Answer Thank you. It was a pleasure to be here.

Connor O'Neill is joined by Chris Beesley for the latest episode of the Royal Blue Podcast as they break down The Friedkin Group's £38m cash injection into Everton, Alistair Johnston transfer speculation and Iliman Ndiaye's potential move to Al-Hilal! EXCLUSIVE NordVPN Deal ➼ https://nordvpn.com/efc Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee. On Today's Show: The Friedkin Group's £38m cash injection: Everton have received a £38million cash injection from owners The Friedkin Group to cover the club's compensation payment to Burnley after The Clarets claimed damages for losses caused by relegation from the Premier League. Everton's move for Alistair Johnston: The Canadian right-back is thought to be of interest for The Toffees with rumours suggesting that Everton are preparing a bid. Latest on Iliman Ndiaye: Reports suggested that Everton's No.10 had agreed personal terms with Saudi Arabian club Al-Hilal but Iliman Ndiaye's father has since squashed those rumours and revealed that the forward has no intention of leaving Everton. Everton vs Hamburg: The boys look ahead to Everton's trip to Germany and their clash with Hamburg on the weekend, hoping for a better performance than the one we seen at Stoke on Tuesday night.

Bis zu 60.000 Migranten überqueren Grenze der spanischen Exklave Ceuta, Sorge in Europa hinsichtlich der Lage in Ceuta, Bundesregierung will im Rahmen der Reform des Informationsfreiheitsgesetzes Auskunftsanspruch einschränken, Ausmaß der Waldbrände laut Wissenschaftlern auf Klimawandel zurückzuführen, Laut US-Präsident Trump Einigung auf Entwaffnung der Terrororganisation Hamas, Gegenwind für Investorenpläne von FIFA-Präsident Infantino, "Sternbrücke" mit spektakulärem Schwertransport an Bestimmungsort in Hamburg eingesetzt, Das Wetter

Schon oft haben wir uns bei HOAXILLA den Geschichten aus den Appalachen gewidmet. Mothman, die Bell Witch oder auch die Skinwalker seien als Beispiele genannt. Aber was genau macht die Faszination dieser riesigen Bergkette aus, die älter ist als die Ringe des Saturn? Warum gibt es gerade hier so viele unterschiedliche Erzählmotive, und kann man erkennen, aus welchen Kulturen sie stammen? All das haben wir uns angeschaut und dabei auch einen Blick auf die aktuelle sozioökonomische Lage der Appalachen geworfen. Wie man uns unterstützen kann, könnt ihr hier nachlesen. Zum HOAXILLA Merchandise geht es hier QR-Code für Überweisung: Die CampfireFM App findet ihr hier QUELLEN: Story der Woche: SZ: Bergführer wird zweimal vom Blitz getroffen Thema der Woche: Die Appalachen in der deutschen Wikipedia Believing the Bizarre: The Rules of Appalachia: 14 Unwritten Warnings from the Mountains The Collector: 6 Appalachian Folk Stories That Will Keep You Up at Night National Geographic: Real Appalachian ghost stories are scarier—and better—than #hauntedappalachia National Geographic: Why are the Appalachian Mountains home to so many supernatural legends? Appalachian Mmemories: The Mystery Behind Appalachian Folklore: “Don’t Look in the Trees” and Other Tales of the Woods Appalachian Memories: Appalachian Superstitions: A Journey into the Mystical Beliefs of the Mountains Explore: Why Does TikTok Believe The Appalachian Mountains Are Haunted? Podcast: Old Gods of Appalachia: Welcome, family... Hoaxilla: Hoaxilla #62 – Mothman Hoaxilla: Hoaxilla #87 – Bell Witch Hoaxilla: Hoaxilla #337 – The Rake Hoaxilla: Hoaxilla #149 - Skinwalker Ranch YouTube: Why the Appalachian Mountains Are Deceptively Dangerous YouTube: Poorest Region of America* The Mothman Prophecies [Blu-ray]* The Blair Witch Project* The Descent* Cabin Fever* *Affiliate Links

Tausende Migranten erreichen spanische Exklave Ceuta, Sorge und Alarm in Europa wegen der Lage in Ceuta, Polizei bereitet sich auf Christopher Street Day in Hamburg vor, Laut US-Präsident Trump Einigung über Entwaffnung der Terrororganisation Hamas, Weitere Meldungen im Überblick, Recht auf Reparatur von Elektrogeräten, Das Wetter

Tausende Migranten erreichen spanische Exklave Ceuta, Sorge und Alarm in Europa wegen der Lage in Ceuta, Polizei bereitet sich auf Christopher Street Day in Hamburg vor, Laut US-Präsident Trump Einigung über Entwaffnung der Terrororganisation Hamas, Weitere Meldungen im Überblick, Recht auf Reparatur von Elektrogeräten, Das Wetter

Tausende Migranten erreichen spanische Exklave Ceuta, Sorge und Alarm in Europa wegen der Lage in Ceuta, Polizei bereitet sich auf Christopher Street Day in Hamburg vor, Laut US-Präsident Trump Einigung über Entwaffnung der Terrororganisation Hamas, Weitere Meldungen im Überblick, Recht auf Reparatur von Elektrogeräten, Das Wetter

Last week Mickey-Jo saw two of this summer's buzziest cultural arrivals: the new film adaptation of THE ODYSSEY written and directed by Christopher Nolan and the stage adaptation of THE ORESTEIA at the Bridge Theatre written and directed by Simon Stone.Today, Mickey-Jo is sharing his thoughts about each of these creative projects alongside one another, talking through their adaptations, endings, aesthetics, material and performances.Find out how these two ancient stories from Homer and Aeschylus overlap and what Mickey-Jo thought of each of them...sign up to Mickey-Jo's weekly substack newsletter:www.mickeyjotheatre.substack.com•00:00 | introduction02:38 | narrative / adaptation 08:33 | material / design18:38 | performances 29:09 | the endings37:24 | conclusion About Mickey-Jo:As one of the leading voices in theatre criticism on a social platform, Mickey-Jo is pioneering a new medium for a dwindling field. His YouTube channel: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠MickeyJoTheatre⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ is the largest worldwide in terms of dedicated theatre criticism, where he also share features, news and interviews as well as lifestyle content for over 95,000 subscribers. With a viewership that is largely split between the US and the UK he has been fortunate enough to be able to work with PR, Marketing, and Social Media representatives for shows in New York, London, Edinburgh, Hamburg, Toronto, Sao Pãolo, and Paris. His reviews and features have also been published by WhatsOnStage, for whom he was a panelist to help curate nominees for their 2023 and 2024 Awards as well as BroadwayWorldUK, Musicals Magazine and LondonTheatre.co.uk. Instagram/TikTok/X: @MickeyJoTheatre Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

„Moin Hamburg! Schön, dass Sie wieder dabei sind beim Abendblatt News-Podcast. Es ist ein Tag der extremen Gegensätze in unserer Stadt: Während auf den Schienen mal wieder fast nichts mehr geht, feiert Hamburg ein echtes Millimeter-Wunder an der Max-Brauer-Allee. Außerdem blicken wir auf ein bunteres, aber streng bewachtes CSD-Wochenende, schauen auf die Arbeitsmarktzahlen für Juli und schalten zum Wacken Open Air, wo sich das Wetter von seiner ungemütlichen Seite zeigt. Wir haben alle wichtigen Infos für Ihren Tag in knapp fünf Minuten. Los geht's!“

Ut Hamborg und de wiede Welt vun maandaags bet sünnavends: Die aktuellen Nachrichten auf Plattdeutsch.

Viele Migranten kommen in Ceuta an, Recht auf Reparatur bei Elektrogeräten, Fußball: Streit über Pläne von der FIFA, Neue Brücke für Züge in Hamburg, Das Wetter

Männerabend Special – Brazilian International Beer Awards! Dennis welcomes Anna Bettu (BBA International Technical Coordinator) and Matthias Kopp (International Beer Judge & Beer Sommelier) as guests on the podcast. We start the podcast with some words from Develon da Rocha, Founder & CEO of BBA and BBA Zero. As a brewer and maltster as well as co-founder of the German Beer Academy, Anna brings many years of international experience to the discussion. Together, they talk about the Brazilian International Beer Award and this year's inaugural “BBA Zero”, the world's first beer competition dedicated exclusively to non-alcoholic beers. Breweries can still register their beers for the competition until October 1 (September 30 for BBA Zero). What has made the BBA one of the fastest-growing international beer competitions in Latin America? What are the benefits of participating for breweries? Why is an internationally diverse judging panel such a major advantage And in which categories are the beers evaluated? We answer all these questions (and many more), share practical tips for the registration process, and walk you through the timeline leading up to the award ceremony. If you have any questions about the BBA or BBA Zero, Anna will be happy to help. You can reach her at bba@soleventos.net. https://bbabrazil.com Enjoy the episode, and see you soon in Brazil! [Stream] Männerabend – Der Craft Beer Podcast: Spotify – Apple Music – Amazon Music [Social Media] Männerabend – Der Craft Beer Podcast: Instagram – Facebook Download: (Right-click → “Save as…”) Männerabend Special – Brazilian International Beer Awards // (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); // ]] // ]]>

Mickey-Jo headed to the Almeida Theatre, with some nervous anticipation, to see their new production of Sarah Kane's CLEANSED.This play, first seen at the Royal Court Theatre in the late 1990s, is preceded by its reputation for extreme cruelty and graphic violence, prompting audience members to faint, walk out and publicly decry it.Check out what Mickey-Jo thought of his first experience of the play in this new production from Rebecca Frecknall.sign up Mickey-Jo's weekly substack newsletter:www.mickeyjotheatre.substack.com•00:00 | introduction02:48 | the context06:18 | this production14:48 | the meaning20:57 | final thoughtsAbout Mickey-Jo:As one of the leading voices in theatre criticism on a social platform, Mickey-Jo is pioneering a new medium for a dwindling field. His YouTube channel: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠MickeyJoTheatre⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ is the largest worldwide in terms of dedicated theatre criticism, where he also share features, news and interviews as well as lifestyle content for over 95,000 subscribers. With a viewership that is largely split between the US and the UK he has been fortunate enough to be able to work with PR, Marketing, and Social Media representatives for shows in New York, London, Edinburgh, Hamburg, Toronto, Sao Pãolo, and Paris. His reviews and features have also been published by WhatsOnStage, for whom he was a panelist to help curate nominees for their 2023 and 2024 Awards as well as BroadwayWorldUK, Musicals Magazine and LondonTheatre.co.uk. Instagram/TikTok/X: @MickeyJoTheatre Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Thirty-five years ago, Sabine met an 18-year-old dancer in West Africa — talented, a little naïve, and not yet sure she belonged anywhere but the stage. In this episode, that young woman returns as Sabine's guest: Dorina Malcheva, now Artistic Director of MJ – The Michael Jackson Musical in Hamburg, Germany, leading a team of 34.It's a conversation that moves like a memory: the smell of the airport air, the fires along a dark road, the first show they ever built together in an African club. But underneath the nostalgia is a masterclass in becoming. Dorina and Sabine unpack the sacred whisper — that small voice that says "why not?" — and what it costs to actually answer it. They talk honestly about rejection (Vienna said no to both of them, years apart), about the Invisible Stage™ of unseen practice that makes the visible moment possible, and about the goodwill you quietly bank over a career until, one day, someone trusts you with the whole show.And in a world racing toward AI, they land on the one thing no algorithm can replicate: your story, told in your voice, on your stage.Whether you're a performer, an author, a speaker, or an entrepreneur ready to step into your spotlight, this episode is your reminder — try it on, keep going, and connect, connect, connect.Connect with Dorina on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dorinamaltschewa/Connect with Sabine: https://sabinekvenberg.com/resourcesYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/SabineKvenbergIG: https://www.instagram.com/sabinekvenberg/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sabine-kvenberg/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sabine.kvenberg.2025/ ⏱️ Timestamps / Chapters0:00 – Introduction 2:45 – Reconnecting after 35 years 5:30 – Inside MJ: The Michael Jackson Musical 7:50 – The lifespan of an artist's career 8:45 – Dorina's origins: raised among artists 11:25 – "It's a shame if you waste it" — Sabine's turning point 12:50 – The sacred whisper: trying life on like a dress 14:55 – Rejection, resilience, and refusing to quit 16:40 – Becoming a triple threat (and a triple threat entrepreneur) 19:30 – The Invisible Stage: the power of unseen practice 22:10 – Reinvention: stepping into artistic director 25:35 – Good vs. perfect and the goodwill bank account 27:45 – Into Africa: first impressions and open arms 31:15 – AI, connection, and the story only you can tell 36:00 – From the stage to the keynote stage 38:45 – Dorina's parting wisdom: connect, connect, connect

Der Mittagsschlaf ist weg. Und nein, dadurch geht abends niemand früher ins Bett. Wir haben eine steile These, wie man den Schlafrhythmus trotzdem verschiebt – mit dem Kleingedruckten, das keiner hören will: früher ins Bett heißt auch früher wach. Dazu ein Screentime-Geständnis, das wir eigentlich für uns behalten wollten. Brüllendes Baby, Autobahn, Handy. Ruhe. Dann wird's ernst: wie es sich anfühlt, das eigene Haus nicht mehr zeigen zu wollen. „Wie könnt ihr euch das leisten?“ „Wer putzt das alles?“ Wir reden über Neid, Hate-Kommentare – und warum „Wer sich zeigt, muss das abkönnen“ der größte Quatsch ist. Ihr habt eine Geschichte, eine Meinung oder einfach Bock, uns euer Chaos zu erzählen? Schreibt uns bei MOMSPLAINING an fanny@mamaleisa.de. Tickets für die Mama Leisa Live Tour gibt es hier: https://florida-touring.de/artist/mama-leisa Sonntag, 09.05.27, München, Silbersaal, 17:00 Uhr (16:30 Uhr Einlass) Samstag, 22.05.27, Berlin, Peter Edel, 17:00 Uhr (16:00 Uhr Einlass) Samstag, 29.05.27, Köln, BüZe Ehrenfeld, 17:00 Uhr (16:00 Uhr Einlass) Samstag, 05.06.27, Hamburg, Kehrwieder Theater, 17:00 Uhr (16:00 Uhr Einlass) Neu von Fanny: KI für müde Mäuse – verpasst die erste Folge nicht, ab 11. August geht es los: https://open.spotify.com/show/033QFtNt52CkUdwK0xrgth Du bist schwanger und fühlst dich gerade überfordert, unsicher oder allein? Das Hilfetelefon „Schwangere in Not“ ist jederzeit für dich da – anonym, kostenlos und in 19 Sprachen. Du bist nicht allein: www.hilfetelefon-schwangere.de Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte: https://linktr.ee/mama_leisa Du möchtest Werbung in diesem Podcast schalten? Dann erfahre hier mehr über die Werbemöglichkeiten bei Seven.One Audio: https://www.seven.one/portfolio/sevenone-audio

AfD bleibt in Sachsen-Anhalt klar vorn und setzt CDU im Wahlkampf unter Druck, Die Meinung, Hitze verschärft Dürre und gefährdet die Ernte, Nach Anschlag auf Berliner CSD rückt die Prävention gegen Radikalisierung in den Fokus, Neue HIV-Spritze macht Hoffnung auf das Ende der AIDS-Pandemie, Weitere Nachrichten im Überblick, Hamburg feiert spektakulären Transport der neuen Sternbrücke durch die Stadt, Camping wird immer luxuriöser und stellt Betreiber vor neue Herausforderungen, Das Wetter

AfD bleibt in Sachsen-Anhalt klar vorn und setzt CDU im Wahlkampf unter Druck, Die Meinung, Hitze verschärft Dürre und gefährdet die Ernte, Nach Anschlag auf Berliner CSD rückt die Prävention gegen Radikalisierung in den Fokus, Neue HIV-Spritze macht Hoffnung auf das Ende der AIDS-Pandemie, Weitere Nachrichten im Überblick, Hamburg feiert spektakulären Transport der neuen Sternbrücke durch die Stadt, Camping wird immer luxuriöser und stellt Betreiber vor neue Herausforderungen, Das Wetter

Am Morgen des 24. Februar 2023 geht in einem Vorort von Washington D.C. ein Notruf ein, bei dem niemand spricht. Dreizehn Minuten später ein zweiter.Zwei Menschen sterben an diesem Morgen. Doch je länger die Ermittler suchen, desto weniger passt zusammen.In dieser Folge geht es um zwei Versionen desselben Morgens – und darüber, welche nun stimmt.Im Anschluss an die Folge gibt es wie immer die Nachbesprechung. Diesmal geht es um die Frage, die bei Tötungsdelikten in Paarbeziehungen die falsche Frage ist – und darum, warum manche Opfer weniger Anteilnahme bekommen als andere.Triggerwarnung: In dieser Folge geht es um einen Mord, Messergewalt und Vernachlässigung.2026 Live Tour: 17.10.26 Mainz, 23.10. und 24.10.26 Berlin - Tickets unter www.wahreverbrechen-podcast.de*Enthält Werbung*Enthält Affiliate-Links*++++Unser Buch: DIE ZEUGEN - Fiktive Ich-Erzähler berichten über ihre Begegnungen mit der dunklen Seite der Täter.

Im 260. WildMics-Special sprachen wir über Kunst. Was darf Kunst? Ist Kunst immer funktionsfrei oder ohne kommerziellen Hintergedanken? Und wie ist eigentlich unser persönlicher Zugang zu Kunst? Darüber sprachen wir mit dem „Gesamtkunstwerk“ Christian von Aster. Diese Sendung wurde am 18.07.2026 aufgezeichnet. Wie man uns unterstützen kann, könnt ihr hier nachlesen. Zum HOAXILLA Merchandise geht es hier QR-Code für Überweisung: Die CampfireFM App findet ihr hier

Cracked Racquets Editor-in-Chief Alex Gruskin offers his thoughts on a BUSY Championship weekend in the Pro Tennis World. He offers his final thoughts on an exceptional week of action in Bloomfield Hills. He then breaks down a weekend filled with surprise Tour-Level Champions, plus SO much more!! Episode Notes Bloomfield Hills Challenger - 6:40 Tagger takes first title - 21:55 Two unexpected ATP Title Winners emerge - 32:30 Korpatsch wins Hamburg - 42:40 Laurel Springs Ranked among the best online private schools in the United States, Laurel Springs stands out when it comes to support, personalization, community, and college prep. They give their K-12 students the resources, guidance, and learning opportunities they need at each grade level to reach their full potential. Find Cracked Racquets Website: https://www.crackedracquets.com Instagram: https://instagram.com/crackedracquets Twitter: https://twitter.com/crackedracquets Facebook: https://Facebook.com/crackedracquets YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/crackedracquets Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.