Podcasts about CDA

Luisteraars! Er hangt een nieuw, radicaal idee in de lucht. Eind oktober kwam de antropoloog Jason Hickel er al over vertellen in de Tweede Kamer, de econoom Kate Raworth schreef er een enorme bestseller over, minister Rob Jetten lijkt er wel wat in te zien en inmiddels is het zelfs aangeslagen in CDA-kringen – zie het nieuwe boek van de econoom en christendemocraat Paul Schenderling. We hebben het natuurlijk over 'degrowth' (letterlijk: 'ontgroei'). De aanhangers van deze beweging geloven dat groene groei ons niet kan redden van de klimaatramp, en dat we simpelweg veel minder moeten consumeren. Of in de woorden van Schenderling: 'Er is geen enkel wetenschappelijk bewijs dat het mogelijk is de economie op een groene manier te laten groeien en tegelijkertijd de milieuschade terug te dringen.' In deze podcast hebben Jesse en ik het over de analyses, feiten, dromen en idealen die de ontgroeiers naar voren brengen. Is 'degrowth' de oplossing voor bijna alles? Is het mogelijk, en zo ja, is het wenselijk? Leesvoer bij deze aflevering Deze aflevering is geïnspireerd door een gesprek dat Rutger had met de Japanse auteur Kohei Saito over zijn nieuwste boek Capital in the Anthropocene (Engelse editie verschijnt in 2023) We noemden het gesprek dat we met Eva Rovers voerden over de staat van de politiek en de effectiviteit van burgerberaden. (https://corr.es/5e7363) Jesse vertelde over de wagenwedloop die ervoor zorgt dat onze auto's steeds duurder, groter en vervuilender worden. Eerder schreef hij daarover het stuk De op een na grootste bron van toegenomen CO2-uitstoot ter wereld? De SUV, ben je meteen helemaal bijgepraat. (https://corr.es/24c035) Ook brachten we eerder een ode aan de filosoof Vaclav Smil. Mocht je dat gemist hebben, beluister de aflevering dan hier. (https://corr.es/a51a93)

Het is werkelijk met geen pen te beschrijven hoe knullig het optreden is van sportminister Conny Helder (VVD) in Qatar. Dat zegt politiek commentator Wouter de Winther in een nieuwe aflevering van Afhameren. De Winther beschrijft hoe er aan alle kanten gefaald is, van de voorafgaande ruzie in de ministerraad tot het oranje Never Mind-sjaaltje. Waarom is Wopke Hoekstra niet naar Qatar gegaan? Daar gaan volgens De Winther veel verhalen over rond. Ondertussen maken CDA'ers zich zorgen over hun partij. Uit recent onderzoek komt naar voren dat het CDA ‘reddeloos verloren' is. Partijleider Hoekstra is door zijn ministerschap te weinig zichtbaar en conservatieve bewindspersonen zijn volledig aangehaakt op de woke-agenda. Wie kan de kar trekken als het resultaat blijft tegenvallen? Volgens De Winther werd er voorzichtig weer naar Hugo de Jonge gekeken. Tot slot, het is een en al kommer en kwel bij de PvdA en de partij weet opnieuw de kranten te halen vanwege ruzie. ,,PvdA will be PvdA.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Er waren weer flink wat kwesties te bespreken in De Stemming van deze week. Denk aan het bezoek van minister Helder aan het WK in Qatar. Welk One Love artikel kwam er uit haar koffer en wie had daar met haar over overlegd?  Ook blikken Joost en Xander terug op de presentatie van de stikstofplannen van het kabinet. Volgens jaar zal volgens die plannen een 'transitiejaar' worden, hoe gaat dat er uit zien?  In de Wandelgangen een historische gebeurtenis; de presentatie van de kandidatenlijsten van PvdA en GroenLinks voor de Eerste Kamer. Twee lijsten, één fractie. De heren vragen de hoofdpersonen van beide partijen of dat wel goed komt... Tijdens de behandeling van de begroting voor Sociale Zaken vlogen de afkortingen en regelingen de heren om de oren. Joost probeert orde en duidelijkheid te scheppen in een ingewikkeld politiek domein. Xander ziet na deze begroting een nieuwe rol voor de, tot nu toe vrij onzichtbare, CDA-minster Van Gennip.  Tot slot de voorspelling, waarin Joost, de zelfbenoemde stuntkip, zich van een tactiek bedient die hij misschien wel van Xander heeft afgekeken. Luister hier naar de nieuwe aflevering van De Stemming!

This week on Shorties!, Kate and Claire update you on the Epinephrine Auto Injector Initiative, Provider Job Opening Posts, and the Capital Region Career Development Center.The Bright Ideas in this episode are brought to you by Vroom and they include  their "Junior Scientist" and "Travel Talk" tip card. Show links:OCFS Dear Provider Letter Email Claire your job openings at csickles@brightsideup.orgEnhanced B5 SUNY/CUNY Early Childhood Workforce Scholarship Event Registration--Home & Classroom is an interview-style podcast featuring child development experts with hosts Rachel & Hannah. Shorties! is a news-style podcast on what's happening at Brightside Up with Claire & Kate.

Il titolo della dodicesima puntata della quinta stagione di J-TACTICS, trae spunto da: "The day after tomorrow", che è un film del 2004, diretto da Roland Emmerich.Protagonista del film è il paleoclimatologo Jack Hall, il quale durante una campagna di ricerche sulla composizione degli strati di ghiaccio antartici giunge ad un'inquietante scoperta. Riportando quanto scoperto ad una conferenza delle Nazioni Unite, egli minaccia l'arrivo di una nuova glaciazione, che porrà fine alla vita umana così come è conosciuta.Un evento che, in modo inequivocabile, sarebbe causato dal surriscaldamento globale e dai cambiamenti climatici causati dall'attività umana. Ciò che Jack non sa, però, è che la sua profezia è destinata ad avverarsi molto prima del previsto.Nel momento in cui la natura inizierà a ribellarsi, allagando e distruggendo intere città, Jack dovrà raggiungere e tentare di salvare il figlio Sam, cercando allo stesso tempo di avvertire le autorità politiche di quanto deve ancora accadere.Facendo la nostra solita trasposizione dalla cinematografia al mondo del calcio, ed in modo particolare alle vicende juventine, potremo utilizzare il titolo e le vicende narrate nella pellicola per analizzare il vero e proprio terremoto che ha sconvolto il mondo bianconero nella serata del 28 novembre.Un'apocalisse proprio come quella descritta nella pellicola da cui trae spunto l'odierna puntata di J-TACTICS.L'intero CdA della Juventus rassegna le dimissioni a seguito della mancata unanimità nel voto per l'approvazione del bilancio.Il consiglio d'amministrazione più burrascoso, come gli eventi climatici descritti dal regista Hemmerich, della recente storia juventina, sancisce letteralmente la fine di un'epoca.28 novembre 2022, nel the day after tomorrow della Juventus è necessario chiedersi: Perché si sono dimessi tutti?Semplicemente perché era necessario questo atto per mettere in sicurezza la società, in definitiva un "gesto di grande responsabilità" dell'intero CdA ed in primis di Andrea Agnelli, a detta di molti.La tempesta in casa bianconera inizia mesi fa esattamente quando la Consob ha reso noti gli esiti della sua indagine sui bilanci della Juventus, riscontrando delle violazioni nei bilanci della in riferimento all'utilizzo delle plusvalenze e alla cosiddetta manovra stipendi risalente al 2020, formulando quindi la richiesta di riscrivere le parti del bilancio non ritenute corrette.La società bianconera dal canto suo in un primo momento non accetta i riscontri della Consob, ribadendo aver agito secondo le regole.Successivamente la dirigenza juventina si adegua alla richiesta dell'organo di vigilanza della Borsa ribadendo tuttavia nel comunicato la sua posizione.Tale atteggiamento non è condiviso però dall'intero Consiglio di Amministrazione, una parte dei sindaci, infatti, ritiene che non sia il caso di andare allo scontro e che più opportuno sarebbe accogliere le osservazioni della Consob.Tale divergenza di vedute sulle modalità d'azione ha l'effetto di aprire una spaccatura all'interno del Consiglio.Una situazione di forte tensione che precipita inevitabilmente lunedì 28.Il consiglio che avrebbe dovuto approvare il bilancio vede invece una delle consigliere indipendenti, Daniela Marilungo, annunciare le proprie dimissioni.Essendo praticamente impossibile ricomporre una tale spaccatura in tempi brevi, Andrea Agnelli e John Elkann (probabilmente più quest'ultimo) hanno quindi deciso che le dimissioni di tutti, con il conseguente azzeramento della dirigenza era la soluzione più celere per dare alla Juve un Consiglio in grado di affrontare le vicende giudiziarie con maggiore serenità.Secondo il pensiero della proprietà le dimissioni di Andrea Agnelli e dell'intero consiglio d'amministrazione della Juventus erano oramai un atto dovuto.Apportare delle modifiche al bilancio infatti sarebbe probabilmente apparso come un'ammissione di colpa per i reati ipotizzati in fase di indagine dagli inquirenti della Procura di Torino per i tre bilanci precedenti posti sotto esame, mentre approvare il bilancio senza alcuna modifica avrebbe fatto probabilmente sorgere una nuova ipotesi di reato.In assenza di un azzeramento, per Andrea Agnelli e ad altri membri del CdA si sarebbe configurata la possibilità di reiterazione del reato, per il quale i pubblici ministeri avevano già chiesto al GIP di disporre gli arresti domiciliari nei confronti del presidente della Juventus e di alcuni componenti della dirigenza, richiesta allora respinta dal giudice per le indagini preliminari.La mossa a sorpresa delle dimissioni era l'unica via percorribile per evitare arresto o interdizioni compromettendo la già delicata situazione della società bianconera.Come detto in precedenza: "gesto di grande responsabilità"."Questa tempesta cambierà il volto del nostro pianeta. A tempesta finita, saremo in una nuova era glaciale".Parafrasando questa frase di uno dei protagonisti del film di Emmerich noi possiamo dire: Questa tempesta cambierà il volto del nostra amata Juventus. A tempesta finita, saremo in una nuova era (si spera non glaciale).Sarà nostro gradito ospite l'amico Cristiano Corbo, collaboratore de: Il Bianconero.com., DAZN e calciomercato.com.Diteci la vostra, interagiremo con voi in chat live! ​ ​Ecco i link dei nostri social:CANALE TELEGRAM:https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAE2Dp-yj5b1N4SNcMQINSTAGRAM:https://instagram.com/jtactics_?igshid=1fg7nrkzhl2mtFACEBOOK:http://m.facebook.com/jtacticsmdn/

Episodio numero duecentotrentadue, bailammoso e sfrigolante come una frittura malsana che spacciano come finger food ma in realtà è solo colesterolo puro. Il menu di una puntata mondiale e globalista, dedicata a Qatar 2022 quasi integralmente se non fosse che, mentre si registrava, è arrivato l'annuncio delle dimissioni del CdA della Juventus: favorite, sorprese, piacevoli conferme e tremende delusioni a livello epidermico; Germania, Spagna, Olanda, Danimarca, Senegal e Arabia Saudita più diverse altre squadre (per il Sudamerica c'è tempo!); dimissioni del CdA bianconero (sorpresi, eh?).

Terremoto nel mondo del calcio italiano: si è dimesso l'intero Cda della Juventus. L'accusadi falso in bilancio nell'indagine chiamata Prisma aperta dalla procura di Torino e le ultime contestazioni della Consob, che hanno spinto a rivedere il progetto di bilancio da approvare e far slittare per due volte l'assemblea degli azionisti (fissata adesso il 27 dicembre), hanno fatto da detonatori all'esplosione della notizia-bomba più fragorosa della recente storia delcalcio italiano.

INTER NEWS - Ecco quanto emerso ieri dal CDA dell'Inter in merito alla spinosa questione main sponsor con Digitalbits

Andrew & Lindsey got snowed in while visiting Lindsey's mom in CDA and chat about the noteworthy things they've been watching, reading, listening to, & playing. This episode's hot topics include…- Where our recycling really goes- An update on Trump's Mar-a-Lago special master- NYC looking for a rat czar- The protests in ChinaBe sure to check out this week's sponsors!Get 10% off the ultimate super blend at KACHAVA.COM/WINETurn your food waste into dirt with the press of a button with Lomi. Use the code WINETHIRTY to save $50 at lomi.com/WINETHIRTY

Nella giornata di lunedì è arrivata la notizia dalle dimissioni di tutto il CdA della Juventus. A pesare sulla decisione il coinvolgimento nell'indagine Prisma, aperta dalla Procura di Torino. La Procura Figc ha chiesto gli atti ai pm torinesi, che sono da poco stati trasmessi.

Ryan Scaggs and Brandon Baney preview the girls basketball season.  There's no shortage of good teams, including: CDA, Lake City, Post Falls, Sandpoint, Timberlake, Grangeville, Lapwai, Prairie, Deary and many others.Follow our North Idaho Prepcast team on Twitter: @idahosports, @brandon_baney, @NIdahoGameNightLike our Facebook pageFor more Idaho high school sports coverage, visit www.idahosports.comSubscribe to our YouTube channel

INTER NEWS - Le ultime ed i temi che verranno trattati oggi nel CDA dell'Inter, a cui il presidente Zhang parteciperà a distanza

La notizia giunta nella serata di ieri ha del clamoroso; anche se per i soliti ben informati era nell'aria, soprattutto alla luce delle indagini sul bilancio della Juventus scattate con l'inchiesta sulle plusvalenze. Sta di fatto che il Consiglio di amministrazione bianconero si è dimesso in blocco.

Het CDA roept op tot een nieuw akkoord van Wassenaar. Bij dat akkoord uit 1982 besloten werkgevers en werknemers tot een loonmatiging. Maar het CDA wil de boel nu omdraaien. Dus geen loonmatiging in ruil voor arbeidsverkorting, maar meer werken tegen een hoger loon. Kortom een Wassenaar 2.0.   Met Haagse verslaggever Leendert Beekman en CDA-Kamerlid Hilde Palland.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Poteva essere una tranquilla serata di Mondiale davanti alla tv, senza troppe sorprese, con il Brasile e poi il Portogallo di CR7 già qualificati agli ottavi...e invece è venuta giù la Juventus, con le dimissioni del Cda e del presidente Agnelli. E ora che succede? Ne parliamo col direttore di Tuttosport Guido Vaciago. Poi, il day after dei tifosi con il bianconero Massimo Giletti. Ma non è stato sacrificato solo un Agnelli sull'altare dei conti e dei risultati di casa Elkann...è ufficiale anche il sacrificio dell'agnello Binotto, in carica in Ferrari fino al 31 dicembre, poi si vedrà...la Pero-Cormano di Leo Turrini non è mai stata così trafficata di dimissionari.

Il nuovo pacchetto su agricoltura e allevamenti intensivi nei Paesi Bassi prevede degli incentivi per gli allevatori a vendere la propria attività, ma se non fossero sufficienti potrebbe subentrare l'obbligo. La norma sta suscitando molte proteste e racchiude molte delle sfide della transizione ecologica. Parliamo ancora della tragedia di Ischia, delle dimissioni di massa del Cda della Juventus, dell'inquinamento legato alla demolizione delle navi in Ghana e di quello da polveri sottili in Europa, infine diamo qualche notizia sull'impressionante crescita delle fonti di energia rinnovabili. INDICE:00:49 - La chiusura degli allevamenti intensivi in Olanda10:17 - Alcuni aggiornamenti sulla tragedia di Ischia12:48 - Si dimette il Cda della Juventus14:16 - L'inquinamento della demolizione delle navi in Ghana17:20 - Le morti da polveri sottili in Europa19:25 - L'impressionante crescita delle rinnovabiliTutte le notizie qui: https://italiachecambia.org/rassegna-stampa/il-governo-olandese-vuole-chiudere-gli-allevamenti-intensivi-fra-le-proteste_______________Abbonati: https://www.italiachecambia.org/abbonati/Seguici su:Telegram - https://t.me/itachecambiaInstagram (Italia che Cambia) - italiachecambiaInstagram (Andrea Degl'Innocenti) - deglinnocentiandreaFacebook - /itachecambia

In deze podcast van De Stemming onder meer een discussie tussen CDA-statenlid Rudy Tegels en wolvendeskundige Ray Dorgelo over de wolf in Limburg

Housing is one of the main issues for internationals. City counselor Mirian Frosi about the priorities for the CDA in Eindhoven and about how experiences in coming to Eindhoven. A short interview recorded by Supriya Vij at the launch of Howdo 31, November 2022 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/podcasts-4-brainport/message

INTER NEWS - Saranno molti gli argomenti da affrontare per il presidente Zhang e i dirigenti dell'Inter durante il prossimo Cda

Abortus staat weer op de politieke agenda. Een aantal politieke partijen wil dat niet alleen abortusklinieken en ziekenhuizen, maar ook huisartsen voortaan de abortuspil mogen verstrekken. De Tweede Kamer heeft al met deze initiatiefwet ingestemd en komende dinsdag debatteert de Eerste Kamer over de aanpassing van de Abortuswet.In deze Haagse Zaken gaat het over die initiatiefwet. Je hoort van Pim van den Dool en Kim Bos over hoe de abortuszorg in Nederland is geregeld, en wat voor vrouwen zou veranderen als de wet wordt aangenomen. En je hoort over de verdeeldheid: niet alleen tussen voor- en tegenstanders van abortus, maar ook tussen voorstanders onderling.@LamyaeA // @pimvandendool // @TweetKimBosLees hier het artikel van Kim Bos en Lineke Nieber over de week waarin zij meekeken in twee abortusklinieken.Presentatie: Lamyae AharouayGasten: Kim Bos en Pim van den DoolRedactie & productie: Ignace SchootMontage: Pieter BakkerHeeft u vragen, suggesties of ideeën over onze journalistiek? Mail dan naar onze ombudsman via ombudsman@nrc.nlZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

De laatste dagen van november 1982 schreven geschiedenis. De jongste premier van de twintigste eeuw trad aan in een dramatische sociaaleconomische en financiële crisis, een energiecrisis en grote spanningen tussen Moskou en het Westen. Het aantreden van Ruud Lubbers en zijn nieuwe kabinet zorgde onmiddellijk voor een van de grootste doorbraken in de historie van de Nederlandse economie: het Akkoord van Wassenaar. Jaap Jansen en PG Kroeger bespreken wat er in die dagen gebeurde achter de schermen, prikken legendes door en trekken lessen voor de crisis van 2022.FNV-voorzitter Wim Kok was er eerlijk over: “Het was een noodsprong." Ondernemersvoorzitter Chris van Veen noemde de plannen van het nieuwe kabinet ‘faliekant verkeerd'. De premier en zijn 'sterke man' in dat kabinet, minister Jan de Koning van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid, vonden dat helemaal niet erg. Dit dwong immers 'de polder' zijn knopen te tellen.De Koning dreigde doodleuk met een 'loonpauze' en het drong al snel door dat hij alle salarissen in de marktsector voor 4 jaar zou bevriezen. “Als het niet kan zoals het moet, dan moet het maar zoals het kan”, was niet voor niets een bekend motto van hem. Kok en Van Veen kropen in paniek bijeen en vonden elkaar vlak voordat Lubbers in de Tweede Kamer zijn regeringsverklaring zou uitspreken. Hoe dat ging is een spannende detective.De gebeurtenissen van deze dagen en weken werden de bron van gevleugelde woorden en ook van mythen. ‘Vanuit een positieve grondhouding' tot ‘inlegvel'. En van het eerste besef van Lubbers' oneindige creativiteit en het eerste moment dat zijn Lubberiaanse toverformules ook zijn collegaministers konden onthutsen. Schatkistbewaarder Onno Ruding was decennia later nog buitengewoon pissig. Sinds 1982 werd de roep om 'een tweede Wassenaar' keer op keer gehoord. Afgelopen week weer in de Eerste Kamer. Jaap en PG analyseren hoezeer de huidige economische crisis exact de omgekeerde is van die van de Lubbers-jaren. Dat maakt zo'n renaissance van Wassenaar een nog spannender gedachte. De ingrediënten liggen zelfs al klaar. De polder dringt dan ook flink aan: “Kabinet ga aan de slag!”***Deze aflevering is mede mogelijk gemaakt met donaties van luisteraars die we hiervoor hartelijk danken. Word ook vriend van de show!Heb jij belangstelling om in onze podcast te adverteren of ons te sponsoren? Dat zou helemaal mooi zijn! Stuur voor informatie een mailtje naar adverteren@dagennacht.nlEen van onze adverteerders is Bamigo. Korting op je eerste bestelling krijg je met code: bron25(en in de Black Friday periode krijg je die korting sowieso!)***Hieronder nog meer informatie. Op Apple kun je soms niet alles lezen. De complete tekst vind je altijd hier***Verder kijkenAndere Tijden: het geheim van Ruud Lubbers (2013)De Wim Kok Tapes (IISG)***Verder luisteren261 - Mariëtte Hamer en de kunst van het voorzitten - een masterclass216 - Crisis op komst: Nederlandse economie loopt vast door tekort aan technisch geschoolde arbeidskrachten213 - Van Agt/Den Uyl/Terlouw (1981), de verschrikkelijkste kabinetsformatie ooitBB 164 - Dries van Agt, eigenzinnig politicus, paradijsvogel, wereldburger127 - De geheime politieke memoires van Ruud LubbersBB 119 - Elke machtsoverdracht in het CDA is een drama110 - Overleggen in crisistijd: Hans de Boer en Han Busker, voorzitters van de Stichting van de ArbeidBB 64 - Wim Kok, een leven op eigen kracht - gesprek met biograaf Marnix KropAfl. 55 – PG: de geboorte van het PoldermodelAfl. 40 – SER-voorzitter Mariëtte Hamer over polder en pensioen09 - Special: leven en werk van Wim Kok. Met Jeltje van Nieuwenhoven, Joop van den Berg, Gijs van Dijk en PG Kroeger***Tijdlijn00:00:00 – Deel 100:43:11 – Deel 200:58:28 – Advertentie Bamigo + Deel 301:23:29 – Einde Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Het demonstratierecht is heilig, maar niet in Staphorst, bleek vorig weekend. Hoe gaan burgemeesters demonstranten beter beschermen? Verder in deze aflevering: de rol van de NPO in de affaire DWDD. Ook de arbeidsvoorwaarden waren daar niet al te best. Moet de publieke omroep niet juist het goede voorbeeld geven? En het CDA mengt zich in het asieldebat en pleit voor het sluiten van grenzen, hoe realistisch is dat? Onze journalistiek steunen? Dat kan het beste met een (digitaal) abonnement op de Volkskrant, daarvoor ga je naar  www.volkskrant.nl/podcastactie Presentatie Elke Dag: Pieter Klok en Sheila SitalsingPresentatie de Kamer van Klok op vrijdag: Gijs GroentemanRedactie: Corinne van Duin, Lotte Grimbergen, Tiemen Hageman en Sofia RobbenMontage: Rinkie Bartels, Daan HofsteeSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bedrijven bij wie niet minstens veertig procent van de bestuursleden vrouw is, kunnen sancties tegemoet zien. Dat heeft het Europees Parlement besloten. De maatregel wordt ingevoerd omdat nog te weinig concerns de ernst van de zaak inzien dat ook vrouwen de kans moeten krijgen mee te besturen. Het aangenomen voorstel geldt niet voor het midden- en kleinbedrijf.  Een meerderheid van de Europarlementariërs keurde vandaag de richtlijn ‘Vrouwen in raden van bestuur' goed. Het quotum komt er nadat daar tien jaar geleden voor het eerst een voorstel over werd gedaan. Bedrijven die niet voldoen aan de regels, krijgen sancties zoals boetes opgelegd. De EU-landen moeten deze zelf uitvoeren. De maatregelen moeten bedrijven afschrikken en motiveren om werk te maken van meer vrouwen in hun bestuur. Een rechter kan de door de onderneming gekozen raad van bestuur ook nietig verklaren als die de regels van de richtlijn schendt. PvdA-Europarlementariër Lara Wolters is co-rapporteur over het onderwerp. Zij is blij dat het voorstel aangenomen is. " Het Europees Parlement heeft een nieuwe wet goedgekeurd waarmee de zogenoemde ‘kritieke infrastructuur' van de EU beter wordt beschermd tegen terreuraanvallen. Het gaat om de verdediging van onder meer energie, vervoer, drink- en afvalwater, het bankwezen en digitale dienstverlening. Door te komen met ‘veerkrachtstrategieën' en beter op elkaar afgestemde communicatie moeten aanvallen worden voorkomen.  Volgens nieuwe regels moeten alle EU-lidstaten eigen veerkrachtstrategieën opstellen, waarmee de weerbaarheid van kritieke infrastructuur wordt gewaarborgd. De door het Europarlement aangenomen wet stelt hiervoor de regels en kaders vast. Naast voor de hierboven genoemde sectoren, geldt de nieuwe wet ook voor de financiële markt, volksgezondheid, het openbaar bestuur en de ruimtevaart. "Essentiële dienstverleners krijgen strengere eisen voor risicobeoordeling en melding opgelegd", aldus de Europarlementariërs. Europarlementariër Tom Berendsen van het CDA is blij met de nieuwe wetgeving. "We hebben gezien hoe kwetsbaar onze energie- en data-infrastructuur kunnen zijn."Al sinds 2004 maakt het Europarlement regels en richtlijnen voor het beschermen van de kritieke infrastructuur tegen bijvoorbeeld terroristen. In de laatste gemaakte richtlijn kwamen alleen de sectoren ‘energie' en ‘vervoer' aan bod. In 2018 riep het Europees Parlement op tot een herziening van de richtlijn. Landen die lid willen worden van de EU moeten tegen 2030 klaar zijn met onderhandelen en daarom moet het uitbreidingsproces anders georganiseerd worden. Dat stelt het Europarlement. Kandidaat-EU-lidstaten moeten beloond en gestraft kunnen worden, zodat duidelijker wordt waar ze staan in het toetredingsproces. Dat beveelt het Europarlement aan bij de Europese Commissie en Europese Raad. Momenteel zitten verschillende landen in de wachtkamer voor het EU-lidmaatschap. Om bij de EU te komen, moeten ze aan criteria voldoen en hervormingen doorvoeren. Daarover moet onderhandeld worden. Bij sommige kandidaten duren deze gesprekken jaren en zodoende komt toetreding niet snel dichterbij. Vandaar dat het Europarlement nu met aanbevelingen komt om dit proces te verbeteren en aan te passen. Volgens Europarlementariër Tineke Strik (GroenLinks) heeft de Russische agressie ‘terecht' geleid tot meer hang naar EU-uitbreiding. De Europese Raad heeft eerder dit jaar Moldavië en Oekraïne de status van kandidaat-EU-lid verleend. De Europarlementariërs verwelkomen dit besluit. Verder raden ze aan om aanvrager Bosnië en Herzegovina eveneens de status van kandidaat-lid te geven. Los van deze landen zijn Servië, Montenegro, Noord-Macedonië, Albanië en Turkije al kandidaat. De eerste vier landen onderhandelen momenteel. Met Turkije zijn de onderhandelingen bevroren. Georgië heeft reeds een aanvraag voor het kandidaat-lidmaatschap ingediend.

Share the podcast with your friends, and rate it 5-stars!iTunes: https://trainerroad.cc/apple2  Spotify: https://trainerroad.cc/spotify2 Google Podcasts: https://trainerroad.cc/google    Hannah's Whole Enchilada FKT: https://youtu.be/oErEWLGdPlI    TOPICS COVERED IN THIS EPISODE   - FKTs without a film crew are just KOMs - Hannah's Whole Enchilada FKT - Stop spending money on your bike and just train more - There's nothing wrong with attacking in the feed zone - If you stop at a gas station during an endurance ride, do you destroy all the benefits? - Socks go under your leg warmers - Fatter can be faster - Training on the rollers is more effective than a static trainer - Everyone would be a better athlete if they went to therapy - We need a better metric for measuring fitness than w/kg or FTP - There's nothing wrong with wearing your bibs 6-8 times before washing them. Fine for me.  - Gravel tires with big lugs make no sense unless you're riding very muddy roads - Commuting in jeans to work on my ebike does not make me less of a person - 1 hour in the weight room is worth more than 2 hours in base/Z1/Z2 riding.  - VO2 max workouts are better without a power meter.  - Aero bars don't belong on bikes with knobby tires - A good result in a crit is 90% luck.  - Body weight exercises are an acceptable substitution for traditional weight training.  - Watts per CdA is more important for most riders than w/kg - Oversized pulley wheels are a waste of money - Pidcock podiums the /23 TdF - MTBrs are sad they aren't the cool kids anymore. That's why they low key hate on gravel - Black mold in your bottle is where all the flavor is at Watch our latest Cycling Science Explained video now! https://youtu.be/_RIl4s2q-rs Subscribe to the Science of Getting Faster Podcast below! Spotify: https://trainerroad.cc/spotifysogf  iTunes: https://trainerroad.cc/itunessogf    TRY TRAINERROAD RISK FREE FOR 30 DAYS! TrainerRoad is the #1 cycling training app. No other cycling app is more effective. Over 13,000 positive reviews, a 4.9 star App Store rating.   Adaptive Training from TrainerRoad uses machine learning and science-based coaching principles to continually assess your performance and intelligently adjust your training plan. It trains you as an individual and makes you a faster cyclist.   Learn more about TrainerRoad: https://trainerroad.cc/3LBb5Ur Learn more about Adaptive Training: https://trainerroad.cc/35Tqtea    ABOUT THE ASK A CYCLING COACH PODCAST Ask a Cycling Coach podcast is a cycling and triathlon training podcast. Each week  USAC/USAT Level I certified coach Chad Timmerman, pro athletes, and other special guests answer your cycling and triathlon questions.   Have a question for the podcast? Ask here: https://trainerroad.cc/3HTFXNi   MORE PODCASTS FROM TRAINERROAD Listen to the Successful Athletes Podcast: https://trainerroad.cc/3JmKrN5 Listen to the Science of Getting Faster Podcast: https://trainerroad.cc/3LpuIhP   STAY IN TOUCH Training Blog: https://trainerroad.cc/3gCdNdN TrainerRoad Forum: https://trainerroad.cc/3uHvLnE Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/trainerroad/ Strava Club: https://www.strava.com/clubs/trainerroad Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TrainerRd Twitter: https://twitter.com/TrainerRoad

Mobiele telefoons moeten worden verboden in klaslokalen van basis- en middelbare scholen, vindt het CDA. Veel scholen hebben al regels om het gebruik van mobieltjes in de klas tegen te gaan, maar dat is nu een lappendeken.  Het gebruik van mobieltjes is slecht voor de concentratie van kinderen, meent CDA-Tweede Kamerlid René Peters, die tijdens de begrotingsbehandeling van onderwijs woensdag zal pleiten voor een verbod. Ook in deze Tech Update: - Bij iPhone-producent Foxconn zijn hevige rellen uitgebroken - De Republikeinen in het Amerikaanse Huis van Afgevaardigden rollen hun mouwen op om TikTok aan te pakkenSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On today's Q&A episode, Sarah is talking with Lorrena Kravitcz, CDA Resource Center Specialist with KCCTO, about the CDA process and how KCCTO can help you achieve your CDA!Click here for more information on the KCCTO training track and scholarship opportunities!Click here to see upcoming offerings of the KCCTO training: Orientation to the Child Development Associate (CDA) Credential.Click here to see upcoming offerings of the KCCTO training: Creating Your Child Development Associate Credential Professional Portfolio.  Cheery Monday by Kevin MacLeodLink: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3495-cheery-mondayLicense: https://filmmusic.io/standard-licenseKids These Days is a co-production of the KCCTO-KITS Infant Toddler Specialist Network (ITSN) and KCCTO Workforce Development (WFD) programs.The KCCTO-KITS Infant-Toddler Specialist Network is a program of the Kansas Child Care Training Opportunities, Inc. (KCCTO) and the university of Kansas Life Span Institute at Parsons. The Workforce Development Project is a program of KCCTO. Each program is supported through a grant from the Kansas Department For Children And Families' Child Care And Early Education Services. However, information or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.To learn more about the Infant Toddler Specialist Network, please visit: http://kskits.org/technical-assistance-0.To learn more about KCCTO and Workforce Development, please visit: https://kccto.org/Contact us via email at – kidsthesedayspod@gmail.comFollow and tag us on Instagram & Facebook @kidsthesedayspod & Twitter @ktdpodMusic credit: Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3843-hackbeat License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Are you a dental professional who may be wasting precious time and resources because of disorganized workspaces?  These situations can make it difficult to help patients efficiently, and result in delays that can cost you time, money and safety.  Our guest in this episode is Brittany Gray, CDA who is a Product & Efficiency Consultant with Zirc Dental Products. In this episode she shares some of her top tips and tricks to help you become more efficient with your time.  Infection Control does not have to be all white and boring. Learn how organizing with color may be just the secret you have been waiting for.   Episode #60 A few of the topics we discuss in this episode are: Infection Control Sharps Safety OSHA Compliance Airhead Friendly No Excuse Efficiency For more information about today's episode, to connect with Brittany and to watch the video version, head on over to rootUon and follow us on YouTube. Thank you for listening to the Dental Alements Podcast and for supporting each other in the dental profession. Cheers! April & Cindy   P.S. Don't forget to listen for the password to enter our Speakeasy room.  shhh!

Dr Kirk Barber is very happy to have Dr Julie Powell on the podcast for a difficult but important conversation, children and cancer. They discuss the article she co-authored in the July-August 2022 issue of the Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery. It's titled: "Pediatric Cutaneous Hematologic Disorders: Cutaneous Lymphoma and Leukemia Cutis—Experience of a Tertiary-Care Pediatric Institution and Review of the Literature."Dr Julie Powell is a clinical professor in both pediatrics and dermatology at the University of Montreal. And she practices at the Ste. Justine University Health Centre. She is also a past president of the Canadian Dermatology Association. For more on the work of the Canadian Dermatology Association, please visit our website at dermatology.ca  JCMS Author Interviews is produced by the CDA and David McGuffin of Explore Podcast Productions in Ottawa.  Our theme music was composed by Lee Rosevere.

Seconda parte dell'intervista che Andrea “il Baffo” Lisi ha tenuto con Béatrice Ferrari - specialista di livello mondiale in brand naming.Nella sua carriera ultra trentennale, Béatrice ha aiutato numerose imprese a creare nomi per marchi poi diventati celebri…e che ancora oggi continuano a demolire record di vendite. (Come Toyota Yaris, per esempio.)Oltre a essere consulente, formatrice e guidare la sua agenzia Synesia, nel 2022 ha pubblicato “Alla ricerca dell'invincibile naming”. (Manuale rivolto a chiunque voglia saperne di più su come creare nomi commerciali che durino nel tempo.)Nella prima parte dell'intervista abbiamo analizzato alcuni casi di aziende che hanno raccolto notevoli benefici grazie a un naming ben ponderato.Ci siamo anche soffermati su una serie di errori ricorrenti che imprenditori e CdA commettono in questo ambito. E abbiamo condiviso consigli strategici per non cadere in trappola.Oggi continuiamo a descriverti altri esempi emblematici, nel bene e nel male.Dunque, puntata da seguire con carta e penna alla mano. Ascoltala per scoprire informazioni chiave che ti aiuteranno nella scelta del nome perfetto per il tuo brand.Potrai così percorrere “corsie preferenziali” che ti semplificheranno il lavoro. E avrai modo di evitare (costosi) errori da principiante.Trovi valore in questa e nelle altre interviste condivise nelle ultime settimane?È ora di passare alla pratica!Scopri come decine di professionisti e imprenditori hanno dato vita alla loro strategia SfornaClienti, dal naming fino al primo funnel.Richiedi accesso alla prossima sessione del nostro Programma più intensivo (con TRIPLA Garanzia di successo):https://www.copypersuasivo.com/programma-sfornaclienti-intensivo/ Ecco una piccola anteprima della puntata di oggi:[2:19] Perché azzardare in questo campo ti mette in pericolo. Ecco come agire nel pieno rispetto della legalità (e del principio di libera concorrenza).[8:52] Quando conviene seguire le mode e quali rischi si corrono? Avere il tuo payoff (e registrarlo) è una scelta “obbligatoria”? Gli esempi di Nike, HP, e Apple.[12:40] Naming tecnico vs naming emotivo: le storie di due giganti hi-tech a confronto.[14:46] Ascolta questo consiglio se stai pensando al tuo cognome per intitolare il tuo brand (Più: un elemento su cui non dovresti MAI basare il tuo naming).[19:58] Quanto costa un servizio di naming? Le 4 fasi indispensabili per cui passa tale lavoro.[24:37] Che differenza c'è tra naming denominativo e figurativo? Quale dei due prevale nella mente del tuo pubblico?[29:42] Cosa è la Brand Identity Timeline? (E perché distinguere tra ciò che piace e ciò che serve è questione di vita o di morte.)Risorse utili:Béatrice Ferrari (sito): https://beatriceferrari.com/ Béatrice Ferrari su LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/beatriceferrari Synesia Branding & Naming (sito): https://www.synesia.com/ Alla ricerca dell'invincibile naming (libro): https://www.flacoedizioni.com/93-brand-naming.htmlIl nome della marca (libro): https://www.amazon.it/NOME-DELLA-MARCA-CREAZIONE-STRATEGIA-ebook/dp/B0170AJNCS ►► Hai comprato libri e corsi di marketing, ma non sei ancora riuscito a impostare un sistema efficace di acquisizione clienti per la tua attività?Ecco come creare e mettere in moto la tua Macchina SfornaClienti in soli 3 mesi:https://www.copypersuasivo.com/programma-sfornaclienti-intensivo/ ►► Hai un'azienda e vuoi smettere di stressarti in azienda 16 ore al giorno, studiare di notte libri e corsi dei “guru” e sprecare tempo con falsi clienti a caccia di sconti?Scarica la nostra Guida Salvavita per Imprenditori Imbruttiti (gratis) su:https://marketingpersuasivo.com/►►Ti piacerebbe fare del copywriting il tuo lavoro, ma non sai da dove partire? Leggi GRATIS la Guida definitiva su come diventare copywriter e renderla un'attività profittevole in meno di 1 anno:https://www.copypersuasivo.com/copywriting-come-imparare/►► Se non segui la Newsletter del “Baffo” Andrea Lisi, rimedia subito. Inserisci i tuoi dati su https://www.copypersuasivo.com/newsletter (riceverai in omaggio anche “24 Modelli Copia Incolla di Scrittura Persuasiva pronti all'uso”)

Nog voor het kerstreces presenteert minister van Binnenlandse Zaken & Koninkrijksrelaties Hanke Bruins Slot de vernieuwde wet op de Politieke Partijen waarin een partijverbod voor politieke partijen wordt opgenomen. Maar hoe moet dat partijverbod eruit gaan zien? En welke grenzen kunnen gesteld worden aan gedragingen van politieke partijen? Martijn de Greve spreekt erover in Haagse Lobby met Eric Janse de Jonge (Lid van de Staatscommissie Parlementair Stelsel en voormalig Eerste Kamerlid van het CDA), Peter Rehwinkel (hij pleitte als Tweede Kamerlid van de PvdA in 1996 voor een partijverbod van de partij CP'86) en Erik Verweij (advocaat en Gemeenteraadslid voor de VVD in Rotterdam). Haagse Lobby is een programma van Omroep WNL. Meer van WNL vind je op onze website en sociale media: ► Website: https://www.wnl.tv ► Nieuwsbrief https://www.wnl.tv/nieuwsbrief ► Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/omroepwnl ► Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/wnlvandaag  ► Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/omroepwnl  ► Steun ons, Word lid! https://www.steunwnl.tv

In French in this CDA S4#25 (Monday online), “Architecture and its unbuilt part", an interview in french with Cédric Petitdidier and Vincent Prioux, founders of PETITDIDIERPRIOUX Architectes (PPX) – In English in this CDA S4#26 (Wednesday online), "A la carte homes in Paris", a text written by PETITDIDIERPRIOUX Architectes and read by Esther.En français dans le CDA S4#25 (lundi en ligne), " L'architecture et sa part non-bâtie ", une interview en français de Cédric Petitdidier et Vincent Prioux, fondateurs de PETITDIDIERPRIOUX Architectes (PPX) – En anglais dans le CDA S4#26 (Mercredi en ligne), "A la carte homes in Paris", un texte écrit par PETITDIDIERPRIOUX Architectes et lu par Esther.___Cédric Petitdidier et Vincent Prioux ont crée PETITDIDIERPRIOUX Architectes (PPX) en 2004. Ils remportent leur premier concours à tout juste vingt-quatre ans, sur le thème « Comment habiterez-vous demain ? » (Archinova). Une trentaine de réalisations plus tard, PPX est reconnue internationalement par de nombreux prix, dont le plus récent : Architizer A+AWARDS, ‘Best Residential Firm' 2022.Leur agence, basée à Paris et à Lyon, compte aujourd'hui une quarantaine de collaborateurs. Son équilibre relève à la fois de la force de travail des grandes structures et de la souplesse du studio. PPX a sa propre expertise dans le domaine de l'habitat, en misant toujours sur une ‘densité conviviale' pour faire cohabiter habitat individuel et habitat collectif, y compris pour les immeubles de grande hauteur. Les projets s'étendent de la France jusqu'à Moscou. PPX a développé de nombreux concepts en logement intermédiaire, notamment celui de maison-plateau — une maison individuelle en habitat collectif. Comment vivre ensemble sans sacrifier l'intimité d'un foyer ? Qu'est-ce qui fait une maison ? Comment travailler le rapport à l'espace public, au seuil ? Au delà des défis techniques, sociaux et environnementaux, PPX s'autorisent à penser les enjeux théoriques. C'est la partie non-bâtie du projet — la vie, les familles, le foyer — une sculpture qui devient une architecture. C'est aussi ce qui influence positivement la ville.Leur but est d'inscrire une démarche innovante dans un contexte réaliste, trouver le lien entre les choses, mettre le bon matériau au bon endroit. Dans ce CDA, Cédric Petitdidier et Vincent Prioux abordent toutes les facettes du métier. Depuis l'approche de l'architecture en promeneur jusqu'au choix de systèmes constructifs, et aux difficultés de céder l'exécution.Bonne semaine et écoute !Portrait teaser © PETITDIDIERPRIOUX ArchitectesIngénierie son : Julien Rebours____Si le podcast COM D'ARCHI vous plaît n'hésitez pas :. à vous abonner pour ne pas rater les prochains épisodes,. à nous laisser des étoiles et un commentaire, :-),. à nous suivre sur Instagram @comdarchipodcast pourretrouver de belles images, toujours choisies avec soin, de manière à enrichirvotre regard sur le sujet.Bonne semaine à tous ! Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Sponsors: FlexiSpot.com  Save $20 on the Pro Plus Standing Desk (E7) at checkout when you use code WSE720 The Easy Home Buyer Follow WSREIP on TikTok Guest: Chad Young Chad runs The Easy Home Buyer, they do about 80 deals a year in the Spokane and CDA market based out of Post Falls. We wholesale, flip and keep long term rentals www.theeasyhomebuyer.com   https://www.facebook.com/chadronyoung  Disclosure: This interview is for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in this interview should be considered tax, legal, or investment advice. You are responsible for consulting your tax, legal, and investment advisors to determine the best course of action for your personal scenario.

Hoe hangt de vlag erbij in Nederland? Die vraag werpt journalist Karel Smouter op in zijn boek Blauw Wit Rood, de boerenopstand als spiegel voor Nederland. In de beleving van boeren en hun aanhangers staat niets minder dan een manier van leven op het spel. Zoals Smouter het beschrijft: ‘Het vanzelfsprekende verbond tussen God, het CDA en de boerderij is opgegeven.‘  De boerenopstand gaat dus over meer dan stikstof, het werpt een interessant licht op de cultuur en ook religie in Nederland. Smouter beschrijft niet alleen de brandhaarden, hij komt ook met bluswater, oplossingen dus.
  David Boogerd in gesprek met NRC-journalist Karel Smouter en vaste gast, theoloog Stefan Paas.

"Een hondenbaan, maar een mooie hondenbaan." Zo noemt Paul Rosenmöller in zijn memoires het werk dat hij deed als aanvoerder van de fractie van GroenLinks in de Tweede Kamer. Veel van zijn collega's van nu zullen hem dit zuchtend nazeggen. Niet in het minst VVD-fractieleider Sophie Hermans, die vorige week hulp nodig had van VVD-premier Mark Rutte nadat ze in haar eentje haar fractie niet kon overtuigen.Jaap Jansen en PG Kroeger bespreken wat een fractievoorzitter succesvol maakt. Ze trekken tien lessen.De parlementaire historie kent voorbeelden van indrukwekkende politieke chefs - van Carl Romme tot Joop den Uyl - maar nog veel meer van hen die die functie niet overleefden. Van Elco Brinkman tot Ad Melkert en recent nog Lilianne Ploumen. Waaraan ontbrak het hen?1] Je moet een schaap met vijf poten zijn. De noodzakelijke eigenschappen zijn een optelsom van kwaliteiten die bijna niemand allemaal tegelijk kan bezitten. Je moet een goede spreker zijn, een briljant onderhandelaar en soms ook een beul. Discipline bevorderen en een wij-gevoel geven. En nog veel meer.2] Je moet vooral je collega-fractieleden laten schitteren en zo je eigen competentie doen glanzen.3] Je moet de onbetwiste tolk van de partijlijn zijn en die rol aan niemand anders toestaan.4] Ze moeten allemaal een beetje bang voor je zijn.5] Hoe minder je uitstraalt dat je vooral bezig bent met je eigen politieke perspectieven (het Torentje!), hoe effectiever je werkt.6] Identificatie van een fractieleider met één politiek thema geeft haar of hem kleur. Je met elk onderwerp bemoeien frustreert de fractie en collega-leiders.7] Een fractievoorzitter moet politiek ‘ademen'. Vis in het water, genieter van het spel, liefhebber van macht en icoon van de democratie willen zijn.8] Je moet geen al te opzichtige hobby's hebben. Maar een eigenzinnigheidje hier en daar geeft je leiderschap kleur.9] "I Demand Loyalty". Een fractieleider moet iets van LBJ hebben.10] Gezag krijg je en dwing je nooit af. Thatcher zei: "Being in power is like being a Lady. If you have to say you are, you're not."Bij elk van die 10 presenteren Jaap en PG talloze voorbeelden van toen en nu, van aanvoerders die daarin uitblonken of juist de mist in gingen.En Sophie Hermans dan? Hoe zij opereerde in de VVD-asielcrisis werd in het licht van deze tien wetten misschien wel helemaal verkeerd begrepen. Dat bleek toen Mark Rutte drie dagen later het woord nam…***Deze aflevering is mede mogelijk gemaakt door donaties van luisteraars die we hiervoor hartelijk danken. Word ook vriend van de show!Heb jij belangstelling om in onze podcast te adverteren of ons te sponsoren? Dat zou helemaal mooi zijn! Stuur voor informatie een mailtje naar adverteren@dagennacht.nlEen van onze adverteerders is Bamigo. Korting op je eerste bestelling krijg je met code: bron25 (en in de Black Friday periode krijg je die korting sowieso!)***Hieronder nog meer informatie. Op Apple kun je soms niet alles lezen. De complete tekst vind je altijd hier***Verder luisteren294 - Algemene Beschouwingen 2022: samenwerking vanuit fundamentele overtuigingen. En: de wappies als verliezer293 - Hoe houd je een boeiende toespraak en wat moet je vooral niet doen?261 - Mariëtte Hamer en de kunst van het voorzitten - een masterclass202 - 4th of July: Joe Biden in het spoor van LBJ173 - Onder de pragmatische Mark Rutte werd de VVD de grootste, maar ook kwetsbaar169 - Vijftien jaar Partij voor de Vrijheid van Geert Wilders145 - Forum voor Democratie en de alleenheerschappij van Thierry Baudet134 - 40 jaar CDA, 10 jaar CDA-congres in de Rijnhal. 'Doe dit ons land niet aan'131 - Het debat van het jaar: Roderik van Grieken over de Algemene BeschouwingenBB 127 – De geheime politieke memoires van Ruud LubbersBB 119 – Elke machtsoverdracht in het CDA is een drama64 - Wim Kok, een leven op eigen kracht - gesprek met biograaf Marnix Krop56 - PG: Tien wetten waaraan een succesvolle partijvoorzitter moet voldoen49 - Algemene Beschouwingen met Roderik van GriekenBB 48 – Wilders gewogen: Gerrit Voerman en Koen Vossen over de PVV***Tijdlijn00:00:00 – Deel 100:41:32 – Deel 200:49:30 – Advertentie Bamigo + Deel 301:29:24 – Einde Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Het was de week waarin een politieke crisis rond asiel ineens dichtbij leek. Mark Rutte -- of zoals VVD-fractievoorzitter Sophie Hermans hem noemt: Mark, premier, partijleider, VVD-man en voorman -- ging dinsdag langs bij de fractie om ze achter de spreidingswet te krijgen. Xander en Joost waren voor de rubriek in de wandelgangen bij deze voor de VVD en de Haagse pers hectische dag. Een crisis werd voorkomen, maar is er een echte oplossing gevonden? Verder ook aandacht voor het CDA-congres. Daar ging het vooral om de woorden ‘samen', ‘polderen' en ‘CDA-vrienden'. De wolf lijkt een politiek probleem te worden. Kan minister Van de Wal voorkomen dat ook dit debat polariseert? En hoe staat het ervoor met het prijsplafond voor energiekosten? Gaat Minister Jetten het lukken dat plafond te regelen voor 1 januari?  

In French in this CDA S4#21 (Monday online), "Drawing possibilities", an interview in french with Céline Bouvier, Jean-Lou Boisseau, Sébastien Krafft, associates architects at LBBA Architecture – In English in this CDA S4#22 (Wednesday online), "Repairing, reconstructing, anticipating", an interview with Céline Bouvier, associate architect at LBBA Architecture.En français dans le CDA S4#21 (lundi en ligne), "Dessiner les possibles", une interview en français de Céline Bouvier, Jean-Lou Boisseau, Sébastien Krafft, architectes associés à LBBA Architecture – En anglais dans le CDA S4#22 (Mercredi en ligne), "Repairing, reconstructing, anticipating", une interview de Céline Bouvier, architecte associée à LBBA Architecture.___L'architecture n'est pas une pratique solitaire. C'est avec cette conviction que LBBA Architecture s'est construite dans le temps tout en assurant la transmission de savoir-faire complexes. Fondée en 1986, par Ludovic Lobjoy, l'agence s'est depuis enrichie de trois associés : Céline Bouvier, Jean-Lou Boisseau et Sébastien Krafft. Une équipe internationale, formée entre Etats-Unis, France et Océan Indien.Dans ce CDA, les associés de LBBA Architecture racontent le métier, fait pour embellir la vie, mais aussi sa diversité, l'apprentissage insatiable au travers de leur LabClimat. Ils sortent des automatismes, évident pour reconstruire un morceau de ville, restructurent le déjà-là. Découvrez trois de leurs réalisations, autant dans le tertiaire que dans le logement, représentatives du vaste éventail de références de l'agence. Trois réalisations on ne peut plus actuelles, qui témoignent d'un goût poussé pour la recherche et l'humain. Car l'architecte travaille sur le réel d'un avenir incertain. Il dessine aujourd'hui des bâtiments qui prendront vie dans trois, cinq ans. Il évite l'obsolescence, assure la cohérence à tous les niveaux du projet, apprécie l'ADN de l'existant. En somme, il dessine des possibles. Le chantier est une machine à voyager dans le temps. Et, si nous n'avons pas de certitudes quant au futur, il faut se donner les moyens de se forger des convictions.Bonne semaine et écoute !Portrait teaser © LBBA ArchitectureIngénierie son : Julien Rebours____Si le podcast COM D'ARCHI vous plaît n'hésitez pas :. à vous abonner pour ne pas rater les prochains épisodes,. à nous laisser des étoiles et un commentaire, :-),. à nous suivre sur Instagram @comdarchipodcast pourretrouver de belles images, toujours choisies avec soin, de manière à enrichirvotre regard sur le sujet.Bonne semaine à tous ! Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Democratie is een kwetsbaar bezit. Joe Biden hield er een vlammende rede over in Philadelphia. En ook in ons land wordt serieus gediscussieerd over bescherming van de democratische rechtsorde vanwege de opkomst van antidemocratische stromingen en partijen van extreemrechts en extreemlinks. Moet er een wet op de politieke partijen komen? Jaap Jansen en PG Kroeger vinden dat nuttig en noodzakelijk. In deze aflevering vertellen ze hoe de Bondsrepubliek Duitsland de rol van partijen stevig invult en bewaakt.In de Nederlandse Grondwet worden politieke partijen niet vermeld. Er is ook geen aparte wettelijke grondslag voor de belangrijkste actoren bij de concrete vormgeving van de parlementaire democratie. Het voornemen - na het advies van de staatscommissie-Remkes om dit te veranderen blijft tot nu toe op de plank liggen. En dat terwijl er alle reden is tot zorg nu er alom geluiden te horen zijn van antidemocratische bewegingen. Onze oosterburen hadden in 1945 hun les geleerd. En daar kunnen wij weer veel van leren.De 'Väter des Grundgesetzes' - onder aanvoering van de SPD-geleerde Carlo Schmid - legden in de grondwet van 1949 nadrukkelijk vast wat de taak is van politieke partijen en hoe antidemocratische groeperingen verboden kunnen worden. Alles om een 'tweede Weimar' te voorkomen. In de beginjaren van de Bondsrepubliek werd soms hard ingegrepen.In 1967 werd de 'Parteiengesetz' ingevoerd. Die wet verfijnde de normen, rechten en plichten waaraan politieke partijen moeten voldoen. En dat strekt van een correcte naam tot rekenschap over werk, inhoud, geldmiddelen, interne structuur met democratische organisatie en besluitvorming. Allemaal garanties en kwaliteitsnormen die in ons land ontbreken.Ging het van een leien dakje langs Rijn en Spree? Nou nee. PG vertelt over de firma Flick, Zwitsers geld voor de AfD, de 'Bimbes' van Helmut Kohl en de wel zeer handige bankier van Konrad Adenauer. De Parteiengesetz is daarom dan ook regelmatig aangescherpt. Er werden harde lessen getrokken uit financiële affaires.Jaap en PG bespreken de meest in het oog springende aspecten van de Duitse regels. Bij duidelijke normering aan partijen als serieuze pijlers van de democratie à la het Duits model zou in ons land het nodige moeten veranderen. De 'businessclubs' van politieke partijen als VVD, D66, CDA en Volt zouden bijvoorbeeld scherp moeten worden bewaakt. Partijen met slechts 1 lid of ondemocratische statuten zouden moeten verdwijnen. Een amateuristische onlineverkiezing zoals bij het CDA of BBB zou afgekeurd worden en helemaal over moeten. Burgerschapsvorming zou voor de partijen een essentiële taak worden en zij zouden daar ook veel geld voor krijgen. De AIVD zou moeten kunnen observeren of signalen over antidemocratische activiteiten kloppen en dan zo nodig fors ingrijpen.Het was Willy Brandt die in zijn eerste rede als Bondskanselier de Duitsers uitdaagde met "Wir wollen mehr Demokratie wagen!" In dat opzicht past Nederland ons tegenover de oosterburen wel enige bescheidenheid, ondanks onze neiging met het vingertje te wijzen naar anderen. Alle reden hier nu dus echt werk van te maken.***Deze aflevering is mede mogelijk gemaakt door donaties van luisteraars die we hiervoor hartelijk danken. Word ook vriend van de show!En met Bamigo werken we ook fijn samen. Korting op je eerste bestelling krijg je met code: bron25Heeft u belangstelling om zelf te adverteren of te sponsoren? Stuur voor informatie een mailtje naar adverteren@dagennacht.nl***Hieronder nog meer informatie. Op Apple kun je soms niet alles lezen. De complete tekst vind je altijd hier***Verder luisteren297 - De kwestie-Arib en de Tweede Kamer als prettig gestoorde anarchie289 - Donald Trump als gevaar voor de democratie - Joe Biden en zijn strijd voor de ziel van Amerika251 - Nederlanders hebben groot vertrouwen in de democratie, veel minder in partijen232 – Kabinetsformatie 2021: Kan de Kamer haar rol wel aan? En wat te doen met antidemocratische partijen?222 - Na de kindertoeslagaffaire. Hoe Nederland rechtsstaat en democratie kan verbeteren. Gesprek met Richard Barrett van de Venetië Commissie210 - Kabinetsformatie 2021: Herman Tjeenk Willink over het verval van de democratische rechtsorde191 - Kabinetsformatie 2021: Hoe krijgen we de balans terug in de trias politica? De Kamer kan zelf al heel veel doen!162 - Pieter Omtzigt over macht en tegenmacht152 - De 19e-eeuwse wortels van Forum voor Democratie145 - Forum voor Democratie en de alleenheerschappij van Thierry BaudetBB 53 - De viering van 40 jaar Deutsche Demokratische RepublikBB 48 - Wilders gewogen: Gerrit Voerman en Koen Vossen over de PVVBB 31 - PG: populisten tot mislukken gedoemdBB 30 – PG Kroeger over de overwinningsspeech van Baudet23 - Ruth Peetoom (CDA) en politicoloog Yascha Mounk over de kwetsbare democratie16 - Johan Remkes wil de democratie reddenBB 6 - Sharon Gesthuizen over haar vertrek bij de SP***Tijdlijn00:00:00 – Deel 100:04:34 - Advertentie voor Bamigo en deel 100:41:14 - Deel 201:25:13 - EindeZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this Hygiene Chat, Kara Vavrosky, RDHEP, sat down with Dr. Emily Boge, EdD, RDH, CDA, to discuss biofilm management using ultrasonic scalers, even with your healthiest patients. Podcast originally posted as a video on Kara RDH's Facebook page on November 1, 2022: https://www.facebook.com/DentalHygieneKaraRDH/videos/2206814892814483 This podcast is sponsored by Dentsply Sirona. Discover the science behind Cavitron Ultrasonic Scalers at https://www.dentsplysirona.com/en-us/discover/discover-by-topic/by-category/preventive/biofilm-beware.html Need CE? Check out the latest courses at https://rdh.tv/ce Get daily dental hygiene articles at https://www.todaysrdh.com Follow Today's RDH on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TodaysRDH/ Follow Kara RDH on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DentalHygieneKaraRDH/ Follow Kara RDH on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kara_rdh/

Dit is weer eentje in onze rubriek: mensen die je moet kennen, over de invloedrijke personen die onze geschiedenis - en ook onze religieuze geschiedenis - bepaald hebben. Er zijn in Nederland maar weinig mensen invloedrijker geweest dan Willem van Oranje: de Vader des Vaderlands. Een charismatische en briljante diplomaat die de basis legt voor het Nederland zoals we het nu graag omschrijven een vrij, verdraagzaam en calvinistisch landje. Willem van Oranje is ook de reden dat we in het Oranje voetballen en het Wilhelmus zingen, wiens rare verzen je na deze podcast ineens veel beter begrijpt.  Te gast in deze podcast is iemand die alles weet van Willem van Oranje, hij heeft naar verluidt 24 dozen met boeken alleen maar over de prins. Hij is historicus, theoloog maar vooral bekend als CDA-bestuurder en burgemeester van Haarlem: Jos Wienen. Een aantal jaar geleden kwam hij in het nieuws omdat hij een half jaar in een safehouse moest wonen vanwege zware bedreigingen vanuit het criminele circuit.  Wat moeten we weten van Willem van Oranje? Hoe heeft hij ons land en onze religie gevormd? En kan hij ons nog steeds inspireren? David Boogerd spreekt Jos Wienen uiteraard samen met vaste gast, theoloog Stefan Paas. Eerdere afleveringen in onze rubriek 'mensen die je moet kennen': #41 - De zeven levens van Abraham Kuyper #63 - Waarom de moderne mens Henri Nouwen nodig heeft #102 - Misschien wel de machtigste Nederlander ooit: paus Adrianus VI  #104 - De religieuze betekenis van Queen Elizabeth II

Minister van binnenlandse zaken Hanke Bruins Slot moet de democratische rechtsorde versterken en vernieuwen in een land vol crisis en polarisatie. Hoe doet deze CDA-politica en oud-militair dat? Luister om 10:00 LIVE naar BNR's Big Five Gasten in BNR's Big Five van de democratie onder druk Sophie van Leeuwen, politiek verslaggever Jerfi Uzman, hoogleraar Staatsrecht aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam Hanke Bruins Slot, minister van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties Eva Rovers, schrijver en historicus Gerdi Verbeet, oud-Kamervoorzitter See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Als zoon van een dominee kreeg minister Hugo de Jonge van kinds af aan stevige preken te verstouwen. Toch heeft hij nooit overwogen om het geloof van zijn vader af te zweren. Ook niet in de periode dat de CDA-politicus een blowende en spijbelende puber was. Voor De Jonge is God geen poppenspeler die achter de schermen aan de touwtjes van de mensheid trekt. Zijn geloof inspireert hem juist om verschil te maken in het leven van anderen. Hij ziet het als een opdracht om het lot ten goede te helpen keren. Bij iedere nieuwe stap in zijn leven voelt De Jonge dat hij het op eigen kracht niet redt. Hij twijfelt dan aan zijn kunnen en is zich bewust van zijn eigen nietigheid.

Allegri e i suoi provano a restare sul treno delle Coppe europee, a partire da questa sera a Lisbona, contro il Benfica che quest'anno ancora non ha mai perso. Anche il Milan è ancora in cerca della qualificazione, sempre in trasferta, contro i croati della Dinamo Zagabria. Entrambe le squadre arrivano dai 4 gol rifilati in campionato ad Empoli e Monza, partite che ha seguito con attenzione il nostro primo convocato di oggi Marco Parolo, ex Lazio, oggi talent di DAZN. Ma la Juve deve affrontare anche altre grane, quelle della procura che riguardano il caso plusvalenze: il gip ha respinto una richiesta di domiciliari per il presidente Agnelli, ma la procura ha notificato i provvedimenti di indagine ad alcuni componenti del Cda e ai dirigenti, incluso l'ex Fabio Paratici. Su questa vicenda, sentiamo l'opinione del procuratore Andrea D'Amico. Con Leo Turrini, sempre in coda sulla Pero-Cormano, diamo il bentornato in Italia alla tigre della Malesia Carlo Pernat, di rientro dal gp di Sepang che ha visto protagonista la coppia Ducati che scoppia, Bagnaia-Bastianini.

Sam is coming to us LIVE from the Mass Torts Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada! Sam is coming to us LIVE from the Mass Torts Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada! He and Emma quickly run through updates on the $1 Billion in damages for Sandy Hook parents suing Alex Jones and his recent appearance on Crowder detailing why he thinks it won't matter. Then, Sam has three separate sit-downs with tort lawyers from the law firm Levin Papantonio Rafferty to discuss what cases they're bringing against what corporations, and how they plan to argue against these businesses' feigned ignorance. First, Kimberly Adams joins as she dives into her defense of human trafficking victims against the businesses that consciously profited off of their exploitation, including hotel and motel chains and social media companies like Twitter and Snapchat. Adams then tackles how these businesses get wrapped up in the trade of human beings, how it becomes a consistent source of profit, and how she plans to establish that there is truly no reason these companies would have been ignorant of the ongoing violence against minors and other humans, before wrapping up by walking through the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and how social media platforms use it to shield themselves from accountability for the content they profit off of. Next, Sam is joined by Chelsie Green as she contextualizes her case against the manufacturers of Pure Follical Substances (PFoS, known as a “forever chemical”) within her firm's history of challenging this public health issue that was known about internally since as early as the 1970s. They also tackle the mass proliferation of the use of these chemicals over the next few decades, particularly in the firefighting and military industries, before concluding by discussing the long-term process that this case will entail and what stages are next up. Lastly, Sam talks with Emmie Paulos about her suit against Meta/Facebook and their side companies like Instagram (though also likely to involve other platforms in the future) for knowingly channeling children into social media addiction with the knowledge that there were massive long-term detriments to their mental health – from eating disorders and self-harm to suicidal ideation and attempts. Next, they walk through the process through which these companies internally acknowledge the extreme nature of their algorithms and the impact they were having – not to combat it but rather to further exploit it – and the impact of last year's Meta whistle-blower on moving this case forwards. They finish off their discussion with a greater analysis of the CDA and how to combat the exploitation of children by Big Tech. And in the Fun Half: Sam and Emma discuss the astonishingly late news of Tulsi Gabbard's exit from the Democratic Party, appearing on Joe Rogan to discuss the democratic cult insisting on passing nonexistent legislation to trans your kids, Dennis Prager defends incest from secular monsters, and Blake Masters gets questioned by Fox on his election allegiances. They also tackle the wildly ableist bipartisan hit pieces from CNN, MSNBC, and Fox on progressive John Fetterman, watching notoriously anti-progressive Chris Matthews return to NBC to ridicule his auditory processing issues and Tucker Carlson's proclamation that Fetterman will be hacked. Ben Shapiro continues his nuanced takes on anti-semitism from conservatives, plus, your IMs! Become a member at JoinTheMajorityReport.com: https://fans.fm/majority/join Subscribe to the AMQuickie newsletter here: https://am-quickie.ghost.io/ Join the Majority Report Discord! http://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store: https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ Get the free Majority Report App!: http://majority.fm/app Follow the Majority Report crew on Twitter: @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattBinder @MattLech @BF1nn @BradKAlsop Check out Matt's show, Left Reckoning, on Youtube, and subscribe on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/leftreckoning Subscribe to Discourse Blog, a newsletter and website for progressive essays and related fun partly run by AM Quickie writer Jack Crosbie. https://discourseblog.com/ Check out Ava Raiza's music here! https://avaraiza.bandcamp.com/ The Majority Report with Sam Seder - https://majorityreportradio.com/

In this week's episode, Randall has Josh Poertner on to talk aerodynamics. In a wide-ranging conversation, the two touch upon Josh's time as Technical Director at Zipp, involvement in the development of computational models for rotating wheels, early collaboration with Cervelo founders Phil White and Gerard Vroomen, founding and leadership of the product brand Silca and The Marginal Gains Podcast, and ongoing consulting work with elite athletes and teams. Silca Website  Marginal Gains Podcast Episode Sponsor: Logos Components  Support the Podcast Join The Ridership  Automated Transcription, please excuse the typos: Silca - Josh Poertner [00:00:00] Craig Dalton: Hello, and welcome to the gravel ride podcast, where we go deep on the sport of gravel cycling through in-depth interviews with product designers, event organizers and athletes. Who are pioneering the sport I'm your host, Craig Dalton, a lifelong cyclist who discovered gravel cycling back in 2016 and made all the mistakes you don't need to make. I approach each episode as a beginner down, unlock all the knowledge you need to become a great gravel cyclist. This week on the show, I'm handing the microphone back to my co-host Randall Jacobs. Who's got Josh Portner, the CEO of Silka on the shout out a wide range in conversation about the sport and high performance. Many of you may be familiar with the storied Silka brand. It's been around for close to a hundred years. But josh took over back in 2013 with a mission of merging the highest quality materials and craftsmanship with cutting edge design and manufacturing When you visit the Silca website, you notice a tagline, the pursuit of perfection, never settling, always improving. And I think that embodies how Josh approaches the sport. . So I'm excited to pass you over to Randall to dig into this conversation. Before we jump in i want to thank this week sponsor logos components Yeah, I've been itching to get back on a set of six 50 B wheels, and I've been waiting for my logo's components, wheels to arrive. They literally just arrived last night and I'm super stoked. But yet disappointed because I have to go away for the weekend and I won't be able to actually ride them until sometime next week. I chose the Atara six 50 B model. As you know, I'm sort of big on the big tires, big fun philosophy. So I've been eager on my unicorn, which I've been riding on a 700 SEASET for a while now. To get into the six 50 bees again and see what a six 50 by 50 combined with that rock shock fork is going to yield for me on the trails here in Marin. You guys may remember. Me sitting down with Randall, talking about what makes a great gravel wheel set and everything that went into these logos component wheels. I encourage you to go back to that conversation because whether or not the logo's wheel set is for you or not. I think Randall does an excellent job of teasing out. All the various considerations. You should be having when considering buying a gravel wheelset, It is no small expense when getting into a carbon wheel set, but the team at logos has endeavored with their direct consumer model. Uh, to make it as affordable as possible and make them as durable and high performing as anything out there on the market. I written wheels designed by Randall for the last three years. So I'm super excited. To see his latest vision come to fruition. With these new wheels and I'll have them underneath me soon enough. I encourage you to check them out@logoscomponents.com. Randall's also an active member of the ridership community. So if you have questions for him, feel free to join us over there at the ridership and connect with other riders. I seen people paying that their wheels have arrived so you can get some real, real people answering your questions. About whether they're enjoying the wheelset and how they perform, et cetera. And I'll have more on this in future additions. At this point. I'm going to hand the microphone over to Randall. And i hope you enjoy this conversation with josh [00:03:30] Randall: Josh Portner, thank you for joining us on the podcast. This is a conversation I've been looking forward to for quite some time. Some deep bike nerdy is probably about to ensue, so, uh, let's dive, let's hope. Dive right into it. [00:03:43] Josh: Well, thank you for having me. Always, always up for some deep bike. Nerdy. I like that. [00:03:49] Randall: So a number of our listeners will already know who you are, but just give folks a high level summary of what you do now. [00:03:55] Josh: Oh gosh. So I own Silca, um, or I own Arrow Mind, which, uh, owns the Silca brand and trademark, um, and, and all that that entails. And then we also have a, uh, we own Marginal Gains, which is a podcast and a YouTube channel. And, um, Yeah, our goal is to, a mind works with a lot of pro riders, pro teams, world tour teams. Um, you know, we do everything, Excuse me. We do everything from, you know, performance consulting, uh, modeling, uh, you know, setting up our record attempts for people or, or helping them design our record attempts. Um, you know, we do tire pressure work with pros. We do equipment choices for teams. We think some of the most interesting stuff we do, um, is around where like, uh, teams or national federations don't trust the equipment they're getting from somebody. And they'll come to us and say, you know, the, you know, bike brand X says that this does this, and our writers don't think so. Can you tell us what's true? And. We'll find a way to make that happen. So we, we've had some pretty interesting ones of those with, uh, particularly around the Olympics with the national federations. You know, no, nobody wants to have another Under Armor speeds skating suit, uh, situation, , right? Where all the, all the athletes think something is true and therefore it becomes true and, and nobody knows. And so, um, you know, so we do a lot of that. Arrow mind does that, essentially. And so that's a lot of the performance work I was doing in my old world. I was technical director at ZIP for almost 15 years. Um, and, and then Silca is the product arm of the company. Uh, that's probably how, you know, most people know us. You know, we make pumps and tools and, and, but we also make a lot of crazy things that people look at me and go, Oh, where the hell did that come from? Well, that probably came from some project or another. We did it in the Arrow Mind side of the business, Um mm-hmm. . So that's how we've gotten into sealants and lubricants and 3D printing and, and all sorts of other craziness. Right? That's sort of how the one flows into the other. And then, you know, Marginal Gains is a podcast and, and YouTube channel where we talk about it all and, and we, we typically with a, a team or a company have like a two year. Secrecy period on a technology. And then after that we can do something with it and, and talk about it and tell the story. So, you know, it's always, it's always fun to go through those periods where like, Oh, thank God we can talk about that now, . Cause you know, we're talking about it internally all the time. And, and you're like, Oh, can we put that in the podcast? I don't know. So, so that, that's what I do now. We, I, I play with bikes basically. [00:06:34] Randall: Very, very cool. And, um, when you talk about the consulting work you do, is this kind of full stack performance consulting, is it very a focused, is it all technical sides, including say, like bearing drag or, or things like this? Is it, um, obviously positioning falls into Arrow Nutrition. Like where, where do you, ooh, where does your domain physiology start? [00:06:57] Josh: And I draw the line at physiology, you know, there's a whole, there, there are people who are, are like my equivalent in that world. And, and my God, I can never even dream to. You know, clean their shoes. So, um, no, you, you need someone to talk physiology, you know, And I'll, I'll pull my phone out and we'll call Allen Li or somebody, you know, Yeah. With a bunch of contacts. But, uh, you know, Alan's one of my favorite go-tos for things like that and be like, Oh dude, I've been over my head help . You know, [00:07:21] Randall: he, he's, um, he's actually been on the pod before, but Craig interviewed him, so I might bring him on in the future to do, you know, my, my more kind of nerdy type of interview. Alan's great. Yeah, no, [00:07:31] Josh: he's, he's a lovely guy. He's a lovely guy. And, and I just love, I mean, he, you know, like I find myself pretty quickly sometimes getting into places where people's eyes just glaze over, like, what the hell is this guy talking about? And, you know, I love that Alan can do that to me in about 30 seconds, you know, we're talking about the stuff that he does. You're like, Oh, whoa, shit, way over my head way. I, I didn't even recognize the last four words that you used in that sentence, . And, uh, so it's, it's awesome to be able to be surrounded by people with that. But no, you know, we. The stuff that they come to us for. I mean, you know, when I left sip and started soak, of course everybody and their brother, you know, came and said, Oh, design us a wheel. I'm like, well, like I can't do that for a couple years. But also I'm kind of just done with that, you know, like I've lived that life. I, you know, it, it was fun. But, you know, we, we continually updated wheels for 15 years, but it, it really is kinda like doing the same thing over and over again, you know? And, and so it just wasn't fun for me. So, you know, they'll come and say, um, you know, help us design this cockpit, or we, we do a lot of, with our, our in-house, uh, 3D titanium printing, we do a lot of custom cockpits for, uh, teams, riders, things like that. You know, where we laser scan the rider, get the position, lock that down to the wind tunnel, design the part, 3D print it, um, you know, stuff like that, that, that's really exciting. We, we'd get a lot of, you know what, um, You know, help us optimize for this time trial at the tour or the Olympics or whatever, where, you know, what tires should we run and we can, we have systems and tools and, and spreadsheets and a million other things that we can, um, Yeah. Help, help them determine. And then a lot of times we, you know, we get companies coming to us, um, really just wanting to know, like, you know, if, like, which of their sponsor products should they use and when should they go off sponsor? You know, you'll see that a lot at like, the tour where, excuse me. Um, you know, like they, they ride the sponsor correct product, you know, 98% of the time, and then they're gonna sneak it in here or there when it's really critical. So, you know, what, what are those really critical points? And then, you know, if, if they're gonna risk getting in trouble or outright get in trouble, like it needs to be worth it, right? And so they might come to us with like, okay, you know, we need. I need a time trial tire for this rider for this day. You know, what should we do? And, and we'll help him with that. But yeah, you know, if you, if you were a, a brand, uh, or a world tour team there, or approach our athlete that wanted to go to the win tunnel, you know, you might pay us to come along. Um, a lot of what I do too is kind of fun is just act as like a fly on the wall in these team to sponsor interactions. You know, I think I was probably at half a dozen wind tunnel tests last year where I really had pretty much nothing to contribute other than being the neutral third party in the room, um mm-hmm. you know, so that everybody was comfortable that everybody was. Comfortable . [00:10:26] Randall: Well, I would imagine there's a mix of the, uh, the political, if you're talking about, you know, what should be using our own sponsors gear versus slipping something else in all the way to, um, balancing the competing goals of say, like comfort and pure power output on the bike versus aerodynamics. Um, if you're talking about a time trial position. Yeah. [00:10:47] Josh: Oh yeah, for sure. And, and I think even down to, you know, and I think as much as we love to talk science and testing and, and try to be as scientific as possible, I mean, this stuff is really, it's emotionally hard. It's politically hard. It's, you know, companies will bring new equipment in, they're with their engineers. I mean, those guys and girls want that stuff to work so bad. And you know, sometimes you just see things coming out where, Oh yeah, that's clearly faster. And you're like, Well, actually, the way I would interpret that is it's probably about. The same, um, or mm-hmm. , you know, let's, let's rerun that test or, um, you know, it's always, I don't know, it, it, they, they like, people like to get themselves in these loops where, you know, Oh, we did this and it's 10 seconds faster and it's that, And I feel like back in the, you know, when I was with zip, we did this a lot during the Lance Armstrong area and he was writing our disc and, and we were coming in as consultants for the first probably five tours or whatever. And um, you know, every wind tunnel test you'd get to the end and they would have this chart that's like, we just made him 90 seconds faster. And it's like, look guys, that. There is no 90 seconds faster. I mean, you know? Mm-hmm. like, like that is not gonna happen. You know, you, you just did a whole bunch of stuff that's not sustainable that he can't hold his head like that. Mm-hmm. that helmet tails gonna come off the back, you know, I mean, cuz he, people do things like, Oh, oh, the helmet tail moved, rerun. You're like, Yep guys, when you ride in the real world, like the tail's gonna move. Like you don't, you know, people like to, they select data, um, without even realize they're selecting data. And so, you know, it is, it's just good always to have a third party in the room. Um, you know, it's kinda like funny story, you know, back to, you know, my zip days, how Firecrest came about, you know, Firecrest was literally the name of the prototype that, that kind of blew all of our minds. And the reason the prototypes had weird bird names was that we had to double blind them across engineers because you just didn't want anybody. Kind of, you know, having an effect on their product, right? I mean, we all, you know, we all fall in love with our children, right? . And, and in this world, like you, you can't love your children. Um, and you have to be willing to kill them when they're not good. And, um, you know, we would do this double blind thing where we would like assign them all a number and then we would assign bird name, these bird names a number, and then we would randomize it and then they would get all put up. And then nobody really knew whose idea was what, when you were in the tunnel. Um, that's necessary, right? Cause you're, you know, you can be your own worst enemy at that stuff. I think we've, you know, we've all been guilty of that a time or two in our lives. But, uh, you see it all the time, particularly in these performance, um, improvement coaching type things where, you know, people just wanna will something into existence even when it's not. Yeah. [00:13:38] Randall: Well, and I can see, um, you know, the marketing oftentimes has it much more, uh, presented, much more like a, you know, this is just, it's physics. It's more, it's more exact, it's more, um, it's more controlled. And, um, there are competing variables, particularly when you have, you know, a monkey in the middle. You have to, this, this, you know, this animal needs to be comfortable. This animal needs to be fueled, This animal needs to be able to control this machine through a varied environment. And that varied environment may be varying in real time if weather changes or things like this. Um, and so there's just all these competing interests. And so when you see, you know, I often laugh at like, You add up all the different arrow benefits that, you know, different companies claim for components and you should be doing. Right. Right. You know, you might be looking at, um, uh, relativistic effects potentially at some of the speeds you'd be able to achieve. Uh, Jen, just like how, how many watts can be saved. Totally. Being a little bit facetious there. [00:14:37] Josh: Yeah. No, no, it's totally true. I mean, and I still have this photo somewhere, I think I even showed it a couple years ago on social media. But as this, this really great photo that I love that ended up, um, on the wall at the Texas A and Wind tunnel, but it's me with next to Lance Armstrong, um, in the, what became the Nike Swift spin suit, um, that had been flown down there from, you know, Seattle. And it's, uh, oh God, the guy in from his book college or whatever he calls him, and then a guy from Nike, so it's the four of us. And I'm kind of standing there like doing, you know, like pointing at something on his back and it, like, a college student took it for the school newspaper and then they had him autograph it and it ended up on the wall. And so like, Oh, that's me. You know, it's kind of funny. But, but the real story there was that suit, you know, they were paying like 3000 bucks a meter for this suit. They'd been putting it on a mannequin in the tunnel. I mean, it was gonna save three minutes per 40 k. And you're just sitting like going, guys, like, I, I mean, just quick doing the math, like three minutes for Lance Armstrong, you know, like the guys already, That's not possible. And, and of course we get it. We put it on him. Um, the whole thing, you know, it, it's, it's cool, it's fancy, it was very red and it does nothing. I mean, it literally, we were, and the Nike people are there and they're like, Oh, that's not possible. It, it can't do nothing like whole. Let's run it again. Okay. Now get 'em out of it. Put 'em in the normal suit. Run that one. You're like, it, it just doesn't do anything. And, and they just kept going. Well run it again. Well do this. Let's, let's close pin it up. Let's tighten it. Let's, do, you know, I mean, I bet we, we lost two hours trying to make that stupid thing look like it would do anything. You know, And again, it's, it's just people being people and we've all done it. But [00:16:21] Randall: I hear like something of stages, of, stages of grief. Like, you have your baby and like first it's denial, and then you, then you have bargaining. Yeah. Yes. Put so much into this. Yeah, that's exactly, [00:16:32] Josh: that is exactly what it is. And, and you know, the, the crazy reality with that one was, you know, three months later at the tour, they launched it anyway, and they said it saved three minutes and he , you know mm-hmm. . And we, we. It, you know, I just had to laugh. I mean, I remember, you know him, you know, winning whatever one of the time, trials by like a minute and like going, No. So Nike's essentially saying he would've lost that time trial by two minutes had it not been, had he not been wearing that suit. Come on guys. Um, yeah. [00:17:00] Randall: Well, and I think that, that maybe that's, um, you know, headline number one from this interview is don't believe everything you read, especially if it's coming from a party, has a financial interest in it. [00:17:10] Josh: That is true. That is true. Yeah. I, I, I tell don't, don't even believe yourself. Right? I mean, truly like you, you are a bad, um, a bad predictor of things and, and you're a bad feeler of things and nobody wants to admit that. Um, but it's just true. You know, that's, I've been preaching that gospel for, for years. But, you know, I mean, 90, I, I would say 90% of the things you. That you feel when you're on your bike. Total, total crap. Um, and, and we know that cuz we, we've done blind testing with riders. I mean, like unbelievable world class rider. And if you blind them to what they're actually riding, they can't tell you almost any Yeah. Um, you know, all that perception, but still, but the stories away, the [00:17:56] Randall: stories we tell ourselves are powerful. There is a strong placebo effect. Oh, for sure. Uh, for sure. But it has to be acknowledged that that is the placebo. And if you actually had those beliefs about things that had genuine benefits, you would get both, You would get the actual [00:18:11] Josh: benefits. Yes. The, the most powerful thing in the world is a placebo that actually works. Right. , where you get, it's like a, it's a double whammy benefit. Um, and so yeah. That, that's where, you know, I mean, in a nutshell that's a lot of what, you know, I've made my career doing right, is trying to help, help sway people towards the, the, the placebos that, that actually do have a, a, a benefit for them. [00:18:34] Randall: So this has the conversation going in a slightly different direction than I was anticipating, which I'm really enjoying. So I've been, I've been diving into this lecture series from this guy Robert Sapolsky at Stanford. It's on, um, the, uh, uh, behavioral biology, and it's looking at all the different ways in which studies go wrong. And so there's like, you know, beliefs about something, uh, for a long period of time, you know, eminence, people in the field, uh, promulgate these, you know, these ideas. And then it's shown that, you know, the study was, was not, uh, taken, uh, done properly or what have you. And so I'm curious, let's dive more into things that go wrong in the study of aerodynamics and, um, maybe kind of the edge of, say, human performance where interfaces with aerodynamics [00:19:17] Josh: Hmm, ooh. Interest. So, I mean, a, a good. I would say career defining for me, example of that was, um, you know, we, from like 2009 to 2012, we were really all in on developing, uh, CFD for the, for bicycle wheels. And it, it just wasn't working right. Everybody was talking about it and showing papers, and, but I mean, it just, the reality was like the CFD just never looked like the wind tunnel. The curve shapes were different. The data was, we're, we're talking It [00:19:47] Randall: wasn't mid, mid [00:19:48] Josh: nineties, right? Oh, no, Mid, mid late two thousands. Yeah. Like mid, late, late [00:19:53] Randall: thousands. Okay. Yeah. And you're not using, you're having to develop something ground up or you're having to, uh, adapt something from Desso or, or one of these bigger [00:20:02] Josh: vendors. Yeah, So I think the question at the time was, you know, how do you, how do you really properly model the spinning wheel in, in flow that's also translating, right? And you look at. You know, all the CFD stuff with aircraft, um, you know, there's no rotational flow, you know, and then you look at, there's special models that people have built to look at, like, um, turbine jet, turbine engine combustion or whatever. But those are incredibly unique. And they're also, you know, there's RO flow rotating, but in a different access and Yeah. [00:20:36] Randall: The F1 guys perpendicular access. [00:20:38] Josh: Yeah, exactly. Exactly. And so, and then you got the F1 guys who weren't really modeling, um, they were modeling the rotation of the wheels, but they were doing it by modeling a rotational component at the surface of the tire. So you were, you weren't essentially like spinning the wheel, you were just saying, Oh, there's a induced rotation a about this surface. Um, which has been in the, the solvers forever. So [00:21:02] Randall: in interesting, this is taught because the, those wheels are traveling so quickly, especially the top of the wheel. If you're doing 200 miles an hour, the top of the tire is traveling at 400. And so you're having sign significant turbulence at that interface, right? Well, [00:21:15] Josh: and you, you have like Magnus effect, right? You're actually getting pressure differential top to bottom, um, you know, from , the direction of the wheel spinning. And so, you know, we, we could do stuff like that pretty accurately, right? You know, you could look at the, you know, a rotating baseball and, and predict the direction that's gonna curve. I mean, things like that were possible. But, you know, every single, and, you know, my God, I used to get, I still do occasionally, but I, I used to probably get 20 PhD papers a year from kids all over the world. Um, you know, Oh, what do you think of my paper on, you know, CFD of bicycle wheel? And we're like, Oh, it's beautiful pictures, but your data's crap. Um, . And it just wasn't figured out. And, and in 2009, I, I met a guy, Matt, uh, Godo, who's a triathlete, but he also worked for a company called FieldView. And they had built all of the CFD automation for, uh, Red Bull F one, um, and probably half the F1 grid, but his, his big account was Red Bull. Um, and he, I met him at Interbike and he had a paper that he was working on. He said, I think, I think I might have figured this out, but I really need to be able to like, Like, build a wind tunnel in the computer and then look at it so we can directly compare them back and forth. And, and so we, we did that. We published a paper at the a I a, which was at MIT that year, and it went over really well and people liked it. And we published another paper the next year, um, at, at the a i A conference. And that went well. And then we got this big grant, like an $80,000 grant from Intel, um, to really tackle this problem. Cause the, the head technologist at Intel at the time was a guy, uh, Bill Fry Rise, and one, one of the coolest guys I ever met. Um, you know, the kind of guy who, whose resume just has like a five year period that says like Los Alamos , like, [00:23:01] Randall: okay, you're cool. You know? Yeah. Yeah. Not, not allowed to talk about it. What do you do? Yes. Uh, yes, exactly. . But, [00:23:08] Josh: uh, but he was a cyclist and he was some senior, somebody at Intel. And, and, um, And they, they gave us this money and we, we, we really went hard at this and we ended up developing a, essentially all of the little nuance details. Uh, we did it in star ccm. We post processed it in field view. I think we processed it on like a thousand cores, which for 2010 was, you know, a lot. Right. [00:23:33] Randall: Um, and these are, these are, um, CPUs and not GPUs for that era. Right. A lot of the stuff of that era GPUs now, right? [00:23:40] Josh: Yeah. Yeah. I remember we, yeah, I mean, that was the beginning of, uh, that was the beginning of the cloud. It was pretty cool, like 2008, 2009, people were still traveling. I remember at one point in that process there was discussion that like, we might have to travel, um, to, Oh God, what is it? The, the university over there in Illinois had a huge, had like a 1200 core machine and they're like, Okay, we, we might have to go there and, and buy, you know, two days of time. And then as that was happening, cloud. Kind of the beginnings of cloud was there. And I remember we, we met a guy who had a cloud thing, and they had just been bought by Dell. And, uh, we were at a conference and he's like, Oh, no, you know, with our, our thing, What was that called? But, uh, with our thing, you, you can just do it like up in the ether. We're like, Whoa. You had never heard of that before. Yeah. Um, it was just exciting times and, and, uh, but, but we, you know, had this great team. We pulled it together. I mean, that's really where Firecrest came from, right? It was, it was largely designed using, um, Hundreds of iterations of capes predicted to be fast, uh, using this cfd. And, and ultimately we won. We, we became like, I think the first non university and non-governmental group to ever win a, uh, uh, innovation excellence award from the Supercomputing Society. So it was pretty cool. Salt Lake City's like this huge super computing conference and you know, it's like darpa, this and university of that. And it was like these four guys from this bike brand and, you know, was, uh, it was a pretty cool experience. But, but in that, so that's like a huge tangent. No, [00:25:17] Randall: no, this is, this is great. And, and just to take a, uh, stop for a second, CFD computational Fluid Dynamics software that is used to model complex multi-variate systems where there's second order effects and, you know, fluids and, and things like this. So anyone who's not, uh, who's not with us on that, like complicated software for complicated system models, in your [00:25:39] Josh: ideal world, it's like a wind tunnel on your laptop, right? In the, in the George Jetson's version of things. It, it's the wind tunnel on the laptop. And in the reality of things, it's kind of more like, eh, it's about as good as guessing most of the time. But, but, but sometimes it's really good at finding certain really specific things. So I won't, uh, I won't knock it too hard, but why the thing I wanna [00:25:59] Randall: dive in a little bit [00:26:00] Josh: here. Oh, go ahead. Yeah, yeah. Well, let me, so let me finish the, the thing that we discovered in this process that was super cool. Um, was that once we had all of these transient, we were solving for all these transients, um, and we really started looking at not just like the, you know, the, the side force or the yaw force or you think of um, you know, the whole thing with like wheels and handling, right? This all came out of this project cuz you could, you could predict the steering torque on the wheel, which, you know, none of the balances being used to test wheels at the time even had torque sensing, right? You had drag side force and lift, but none of them had the rotational components in there. And so that for us at first was like, oh shit, we've never thought about torque cuz we weren't measuring it. Right? It's sort of one of those, yeah, like you've biased your study all along, but then the big one was looking at the predicted, um, data and there were all of these, uh, harmonic effects. and we kind of looked at each other and we're like, Oh my God, every wind tunnel you've ever been in, Right? The first thing everybody discusses is, you know, what's the, what's the, the time across which you're taking the data and at what frequency? And then you're averaging that data, right? Cuz we're all after a data point. And you could look at the tunnel data and the CFD data, and when you pulled them out of their point form into their wave form, essentially you could see the harmonics kind of lined up, the frequencies match when, oh shit, we've been averaging out a really important piece of data for 30 years. You know, this harmonic thing is big. Like what's your, [00:27:39] Randall: your standard? So it's operating on a, it's operating on a frequency that is smaller than the sample rate. Or how [00:27:46] Josh: was it essentially? Essentially we were just idiots and we were just, we were just time averaging the all of that out. Right. I mean, it's, you know, if you need to Okay. Any wind tunnel you, you went to in the world and be like, Oh, well, we'll take, we here, we take data for 30 seconds at, you know, whatever, a hundred hertz, 60 hertz, 120, or whatever it is, and then we'll, we'll take an average. Oh, okay. That, that's fine. Got it. You're averaging out in there is real, um, uh, like amplitude changes, uh, largely due to vortex shedding is, as it turns out with bicycle wheels. But a lot of that high frequency handling stuff, particularly as wheels get deep, um, , sorry, I'm in, uh, I'm in our studio, which is off of our kitchen and somebody's lunchbox just, just leapt off of the top of the [00:28:34] Randall: refrigerator. Um, yeah, sometimes I'll have a niece or nephew come in screaming, so No worries. Yeah. So, but, [00:28:39] Josh: uh, but no, we, we realized there, there was a, a. About a factor of five difference in amplitude between wheels in terms of that, those oscillating effects. Right. Which typically it's just, it's generally vortex shedding. And the CFD can predict that really well, right? Where your little pressure builds up, sheds off, sets off a counter rotation that sheds off. Um, but as a, as a cyclist, you, you feel that as the wheel, you know, kind of oscillating left to right. Um, and we, and let's, let's for 20 years, you know, [00:29:12] Randall: Yeah. So you're just taking the, the lump, you know, 30 seconds averaged out data and saying, Okay, it gives you this amount of benefit and you're not seeing those. Um, I mean, really what we're talking about is, uh, you know, instability that may. Or, you know, otherwise result in, in control issues on the bike. And I want to take a moment to just like, define some terms, uh, because not, you know, many of our listeners are not overly technical. Um, but uh, I think some of these concepts are easy enough to get your head around, like, so, you know, describe at a very high level you're talking about vs. So, you know, maybe describe lader flow and flow attachments and vortices sheddings. How, how does this, how does this, uh, how can you understand this without a, a technical background? [00:29:59] Josh: Oh, those are awesome questions. Okay. So Lader LaMer flow is kind of what you. What the, the world wants you to think of in the wind tunnel. You see the wind tunnel picture and they've got like the, the 10 lines of smoke and they're all kind of flowing together cleanly and beautifully. That's, that's meant to, to evoke lam or flow, right. That if you were to drop a, a smoke or a particle in there, that they would all flow in lamini, you know, like sheets of paper. Um, yeah. Uh, so, so [00:30:29] Randall: it's going in a straight line. Smooth, [00:30:31] Josh: controlled, Predictable, yeah. Flow. And it, it follows the contours of the thing that it's flowing against. So, [00:30:38] Randall: so kinda like water flowing down a river sort of thing. It's not perfectly laminate, but it's all going roughly in the same direction. And there's not a lot of water [00:30:46] Josh: in a pipe disturbance, you know, would be in a pipe better example, presumably pretty laminate, right? And then you start to add stuff, you know, water in the river. Now you're, you're, you know, you've got a rock and now all of a sudden there's a disturbance and it starts to swirl. Um, and so you, you get into, you know, more complicated types of flow. I, I think the, the big ones, you know, for us to think about are, you know, most, so most drag that we deal with comes from, um, uh, pressure related things. So you either have like the, the high pressure on the front of the rider, right? The wind that you're pushing into this when you stick your hand out the car window, right? The mm-hmm. the air you feel hitting your hand, you know, that's, uh, that's a pressure drag, uh, in the positive direction. And then you have the flow, the vacuum in the back. Yeah. The flow will detach off of the object and that'll create a vacuum behind. And so that's a suction drag, um mm-hmm. . And then when you have something like vortex shedding, it's when, uh, the, the. Description I ever have for vortex sheddings. If you've ever driven an old car with, uh, like the metal antenna on the hood, you know, at some speed on the highway, that antenna starts vibrating, oscillating sideways, which is like the last thing on earth you think it would do, right? Like your brain's like, well, it should just keep bending backwards with speed. Mm-hmm. , why is it going sideways? Well, that's that you get this thing where you have a little, uh, a little curl of flow will kind of detach more on one side than the other, and that creates a side force. Mm-hmm. . But in doing so, the suction that that has now left behind will pull a similar vortex from the opposite side. Mm-hmm. . And that creates an opposite side force. And so you get these, see an oscillation, you get these oscillations and uh, you know, that's, it's huge in architecture and mm-hmm. , it, it's why you see so many of those super tall buildings or kind of have pyramid shapes or might have some sort of like, feature that spirals down them to, to kind of break that up. I, I live [00:32:46] Randall: in Boston. We actually have, um, a skyscraper here that was flexing so much, the windows were popping out. This is, you know, decades ago. And, you know, it's still, you know, they have this like funnel of air that's going through there and just the nature of the shape of it and how air gets funneled in, it was causing enough torsion to, um, you know, cause window de bonding. Um, so yeah. That's crazy. Uh, so then, you know, think applying this to the bike and particularly a wheel, um, you know, this is the biggest effect is, is presumably your front wheel where you're having this oscillation, this shift in pressure from one side to the other at a very high, high level, um, that's causing instability. It's making it so that you may lose control of the bike. It's not predictable. [00:33:34] Josh: Yeah. Correct. Correct. And, and the, the other thing we learned through CFD that it was doing, which is not obvious until you think about it, but so you think of the. So you might have, say it that the trailing edge of the front half of the rim, you're, you, you set up a little vortex shedding situation. Mm-hmm. . Um, and so you've got a little side force, but it's kind of at the, the trailing edge of the rim there. Right? So it's got a little bit of leverage on your steering, but the other thing that's happening is that alternating attachment and detachment of flow, um, changing the side force, but you're a side force at an angle. So there's a lift component, right? Which is how the drag is being reduced. And as that happens, what, what's also now changing is what we call like the center of pressure. And the center of pressure. You think of like the wheel from the side, like, like the sum, the aggregate of all the, the arrow forces on that has a center point about which it's balanced. It's kinda like a center of mass. Um, you know, so it's, it'd be center of pressure. Well, that center of pressure when you have. Shedding happening somewhere that's now moving forwards and backwards and very [00:34:40] Randall: rapidly [00:34:41] Josh: as well. Potentially, Yeah. Rather rapidly. I mean, and, and when you really look, look in on it, it, the frequency actually can be quite close to, um, the, uh, speed wobble frequency, right? Which is somewhere in that like three to four hertz range. Uh, which also happens to be really close to the frequency of human, uh, shivering, which is kind of cool's why you're more likely to, to speed wobble when you're really cold. Um, [00:35:05] Randall: and not everyone just push will have experienced speed wobble. But if, you know, if this is basically your, you, you hit a certain resonant frequency of, of the frame based on the frames geometry, uh, the head tube angle, the what are the factors that go into that, [00:35:20] Josh: Uh, it's top tube stiffness is big and so, yeah. Yeah. And it's actually this speed wobble's. Interesting. It's. It starts as a residency issue, but it's really a, it's a hop bifurcation and, um, a hop B. Okay. And so, yeah. And so what you have in a hop, uh, bifurcation is you essentially have two st two stability, um, would be the best way to think of it. And you are jumping from the one to the other. And so like, right up until that, so the [00:35:48] Randall: system wants to be in one state or the other, but not in the middle [00:35:51] Josh: and there's no middle. Right. And, and what's, what's so cool, like, like early in, um, uh, early in covid, you know, we were all talking about this, you know, what is it the are not value, the, you know, like if it's above or below one. And when you, you line that out that are not, when are not crosses one, it's a hop bifurcation that looks just like the speed wobble, bifurcation, I mean the graph. It's amazing how like, cool those things, you know, mathematically you're like, Oh yeah, that's exactly the same as this. It's just here, it's in a, you know, you get the exact same graph if you're looking at, um, Uh, wing flutter in an aircraft, uh, in the wing tunnel. Mm-hmm. , similar bifurcation problem, but yeah. So you, you, you have essentially two states and the system can get tripped from one end into the other. And in the one the bike is stable and wants to go straight, and in the other it wants to oscillate because each oscillation mm-hmm. is setting up the, the counter oscillation. Um, and so like, it, it's, you know, in resonance it's more of like a runaway you, you think of like the, how that's tradition. Yeah. It amplifi forcing. Yeah. It, it just keeps growing and growing and growing. Um, and in this one it just, it, it, it's not growing and growing, but it just trips you into this spot where like it's really bad. Um mm-hmm. and it will just shake the crap outta you at the front end. And um, and in fact motorcycles quite [00:37:07] Randall: scary. The high performance motorcycles will sometimes have a steering damper for this very reason. Um, because you'll, yeah, you'll get these speed wobbles. And so the damper is essentially making it so there's some exponentially increasing resistance. Um, I, I know you know this, I'm explaining it for our, our audience just in, you know, cause again, I wanna keep bringing it back down to earth, but, you know, having just like your, your suspension, you don't just have a a just a spring, you have some sort of damping circuit so it doesn't feel like a pogo stick. Um, which is a related effect. Um, but, uh, very cool. And are not for our listeners as well. [00:37:47] Josh: Funny. I hadn't thought about that. I haven't thought about that in like two years as we were talking like, Oh, I remember now. That was, uh, yeah. Yeah, that was, uh, But what or not was the, um, Oh shit. It was the. The contagion ratio or whatever, like how, how many people, each person would transmit to mm-hmm. And so if it's, which makes sense, right? If every person's gonna transmit it to 1.1, it grows. If you're gonna transmit it to 0.8, it, it dies. Um, [00:38:12] Randall: so the analogy here is that, that the increasing amplitude of that, you know, those pressure differentials, sending it to the, the system to one state or the other and causing that increasing oscillation, Is that a exactly correct characterization? [00:38:26] Josh: Yeah. Yeah, exactly. Like you, you can take it right up to a line, um, and you don't have a problem. And then as soon as you cross the line, you're in a different state. Mm-hmm. . And, and that's where I think, you know, speed wobble for those of you who've experienced it or chase tried chasing it on a bicycle, um, you can solve it sometimes with like, the stupidest stuff. Um, you know, one of the, the common ones is to just put a little bit of like, um, like, like a heavier bar tape or a little bit of lead weight in like your, um, Uh, your plugs. Mm-hmm. . Mm-hmm. . You can oftentimes change it with a tire pressure or a different tire cuz you can add just enough damping at the contact patch. Um, that it just pushes it up high. You know, if, if, cause typically what people will find is like, Oh, it's, I'm totally fine. Then I hit, you know, 38.5 miles an hour and all hell breaks loose. Well. Mm-hmm. , you change the mass at the top of the system a little bit and maybe you've now pushed that point out to 45 miles an. but if you never go 45 miles an hour, you've affected, that's not a problem. Right? Yeah, yeah. Like, oh yeah, I [00:39:28] Randall: fixed it. I think another example that people may have experienced too is like, uh, sometimes you'll have an issue with your car that, you know, won't notice except that certain speeds and it's because of those speeds. There is some, you know, oscillation that's happening. If it's a tire and balance or something in your drive train or the like. Um, you know, I've, I once had a vehicle that was really good up to 60 and then like 60, 61, it was problematic and then it would smooth out a bit after that and it was just like this wobbling effect that would balance out beyond that, that speed. Um, alright, so then bringing things back down to earth. Um, this is delightful by the way. I, I could do this all day, . Um, and I, I hadn't quite appreciated. Um, the, the basic r and d and like basic science and tool building that you were involved in. Uh, so. That's, its its own topic. That's probably not one for, for a podcast of this particular [00:40:22] Josh: def. Yeah. I, I will say on that, I think that's the part that I think never, you know, the marketing never really tells that side of the story cuz it's just too complicated. Yeah. But if you're, if you're out there and you're, you're into this stuff, like that's the fun stuff. Like, I love launching product and, and the product itself. But like, that crazy journey to get there is usually like, that's where all the fun is happening. And, and, and typically cuz we're, you know, you're doing it wrong, like 90% of the time you're like, you know, it's just can be months or years of like, we suck, you know, this doesn't work, we're getting our sasses kicked. And then you, you know, if you persevere long enough, you will come out the other end and it's like, wow, we, we needed all that stuff. Like, we needed to get our heads handed to us over and over again, or we never would've figured this stuff out. Um, Yeah. I really, really enjoy that part of, um, of, of technology development or whatever you wanna call it. [00:41:16] Randall: Yeah. Basic, like real basic r and d right down to building the tools that you need to do the r and d you want to do, um, Right. . Yeah. Very cool. And obviously like the compute power and the, the algorithms available and, you know, the switch to GPUs and all these other things that have, um, changed since you were developing that make it such that today's models are both vastly more powerful and still yet trivial in complexity relative to the system itself. [00:41:44] Josh: Yeah, totally. [00:41:46] Randall: Yeah. Um, well let's dive into some more practical topics. So let's talk about like, alright, so a lot of our listeners we're the Gravel Ride podcast, right? So thinking about that particular experience, um, what should, what are, what is worth, um, a gravel rider thinking about. Uh, with relation to arrow. Uh, so things that can be done that will improve aerodynamics, but then not take away from the ride experience that a lot of riders are after, particularly when they're going to grab, you know, they wanna be comfortable, they wanna have a good time, they wanna have good control over a variety of different terrain and so on. So what are the arrow? Um, and, and they don't wanna look silly, so they might not be, want wanting to wear a skin suit or something like that. Not that it looks silly, but, but you know, a more, a more serious enthusiast type of rider. Uh, what are the Yeah, what are the things to think about? [00:42:36] Josh: Oh, gosh. That's, that's a good question. Um, I mean, I think it really depends on, on what. Th the particular rider, you know, is after, I mean, are you, are you racing? Do you wanna go fast? Do you wanna not get dropped? Mm-hmm. , um, you know, do you need to carry stuff? I mean, I would say one of, one of the big ones that I, I just see and, and you know, we, we make a ton of stuff in our company and one of, one of them being bags. And, you know, we're constantly accused of not making bags that are big enough. And so I've been on this mission for a couple years of like, you know, what is in there, , Like Really? Mm-hmm. what's in there. Yeah. And it is amazing to me just how much crap people are carrying. You know, you, you open some of these monster seat bags, it's like, man, just because you bought it doesn't mean you need to fill it or use it. Um, you know, it, and, and absolutely there's, there's like time and place for it. But, um, you know, I. Some of the stuff like that, like, Oh, okay. You've, you know, do you, you show up on the local gravel right here and you know, people look like they're, they're almost like bike packing, like mm-hmm. , you just don't need, you know, it, it's a 40 mile loop, you know, that starts and ends at a bike shop. Like, you, you don't need to bring a bike [00:43:49] Randall: shop with you. Well, you, you need your coffee grinder, you need your, your mini stove and you need your neuro press. Yeah, Yeah. Um, different experience. You know, let's assume that we're going after like a performance rider who's, um, like doing, doing, you know, a hundred, uh, a hundred mile events than they're, they're training for it and they wanna squeeze out more performance, um, out of their existing setup. Or they're considering, you know, what bike to get, what wheels to get, what, um, how to set it up, even considering bike fit. Yeah. Or, you know, clip on arrow bars and the, like, what are the different things that people can do and what are the compromises and so on. [00:44:24] Josh: Yeah. I mean, the, I, I think certainly for gravel. The one clear cut, no compromise. Better all around product that I can just always recommend is like a, an arrow top drop bar. I mean, it is amazing how much faster those things are than round section bars. I mean, any really, you know, like pro vibe or the zip fuca or whatever, you know, there's, I thi