Podcasts about Moderation

In this second installment of the March basketball series, Molly takes the analogy one step further. Last week was about knowing your playbook — recognizing the patterns behind your drinking. This week is about knowing the scoreboard.Because it's not just about how many drinks you had.It's about what the game is costing you.Molly explores the difference between evaluating a single night of drinking and looking at your overall “season record.” One off night may not define you. But trends over time tell a deeper story. Are you moving toward more peace, more energy, and more self-trust? Or are you stuck in negotiation, anxiety, and subtle disappointment?The episode weaves together personal reflection and neuroscience, breaking down how alcohol impacts GABA, glutamate, cortisol, and dopamine. Molly explains the neurological rebound effect behind 3 a.m. wake-ups, how dopamine drives anticipation and craving, and why repeated drinking can increase baseline stress sensitivity over time.This episode isn't about shame or dramatic declarations. It's about clarity. And clarity gives you the power to adjust your strategy mid-season.In This EpisodeWhy the scoreboard matters more than effortThe difference between a single “game” and your season recordThe hidden costs of drinking beyond obvious consequencesHow alcohol increases GABA — and why that calm feeling doesn't lastThe glutamate and cortisol rebound that fuels 3 a.m. wake-upsHow dopamine drives anticipation and cravingWhy repeated dopamine spikes can make normal life feel “flat”The cumulative impact of stress reactivity over timeThe mental and emotional cost of daily negotiationWhy adjusting your strategy mid-season is a sign of maturity, not failureKey TakeawaysThe scoreboard reflects outcome, not intention.Automatic does not mean inevitable.Alcohol may relieve stress temporarily but increase baseline stress over time.Dopamine fuels anticipation more than pleasure.One bad night is a single game. Trends over time are your season record.You are allowed to adjust your strategy mid-season.This Week's PracticeInstead of only tracking drinks, expand what you observe:How did you sleep?Did you wake up at 3 a.m.?How did your anxiety feel the next day?How much mental space did alcohol take up?Did you follow through on your plan?You are not trying to force change. You are gathering data. And clarity reduces ambivalence.Mentioned in This EpisodeThe neurological rebound effect (GABA and glutamate balance)Dopamine and anticipation conditioningSunnyside mindful drinking app (15-day free trial)Work With MollyIf you're ready to go beyond listening and begin applying these tools with support, you can learn more about working with Molly at:www.mollywatts.comYou can also reach out directly at molly@mollywatts.com to explore what level of support is right for you.Low risk drinking guidelines from the NIAAA:Healthy men under 65:No more than 4 drinks in one day and no more than 14 drinks per week.Healthy women (all ages) and healthy men 65 and older:No more than 3 drinks in one day and no more than 7 drinks per week.One drink is defined as 12 ounces of beer, 5 ounces of wine, or 1.5 ounces of 80-proof liquor. So remember that a mixed drink or full glass of wine are probably more than one drink.Abstinence from alcoholAbstinence from alcohol is the best choice for people who take medication(s) that interact with alcohol, have health conditions that could be exacerbated by alcohol (e.g. liver disease), are pregnant or may become pregnant or have had a problem with alcohol or another substance in the past.Benefits of “low-risk” drinkingFollowing these guidelines reduces the risk of health problems such as cancer, liver disease, reduced immunity, ulcers, sleep problems, complications of existing conditions, and more. It also reduces the risk of depression, social problems, and difficulties at school or work. ★ Support this podcast ★

Self-care podcast exploring Why We Binge (It's Not Just Food), Binge Patterns That Aren't Food & Ways to Stop Binging Life and Integrate Moderation.   TOPICS:: ** Why We Binge (It's Not Just Food) (08:27). ** Binge Patterns That Aren't Food (23:38). ** Ways to Stop Binging Life and Integrate Moderation (37:27).   NOTES:: Show notes: amberapproved.ca/podcast/647 Leave me a review at amberapproved.ca/review Email me at info@amberapproved.ca Subscribe to newsletter: https://amber-romaniuk.mykajabi.com/newsletter-sign-up    SHOW LINKS: Click below to schedule a 30 minute Complimentary Body Freedom Consultation https://amberapproved.ca/body-freedom-consultation/  Take my free Emotional Eating Quiz here: http://amberapproved.ca/emotional-eating-quiz Listen to Episode 291 about what it's like to work with me here: http://amberapproved.ca/podcast/291/ Follow me on Instagram www.instagram.com/amberromaniuk Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@amberromaniuk/    MY PARTNERS: HERBAL FACE FOOD Stubborn eczema, red spots, aging spots, or acne on your face, chest, arms, or back from hormones or hard water damage? I have something SO amazing for you. Our mineral-heavy water started impacting my skin the moment we moved, and I had never experienced eczema or skin issues in my life. Hard water can strip natural oils, disrupt the microbiome, and weaken the skin barrier — leaving you inflamed, reactive, and stuck in flare-ups. That's exactly what happened to my neck, and within almost two weeks of using Herbal Face Food, my eczema is almost gone. This stuff is legit — and I only share my favorite things that actually work. Their formulas are made with ultra-potent, organic, whole-plant botanicals rich in antioxidants, polyphenols, and phytonutrients that calm inflammation, rebuild the skin barrier, and fight visible signs of aging instead of masking symptoms. The Cure is their most targeted antioxidant treatment designed to visibly improve stubborn concerns like eczema, melasma, rosacea, scarring, sun damage, and deeper signs of aging. The Cream is a deeply hydrating, ultra-potent botanical moisturizer that firms, smooths, strengthens the skin barrier, and helps reduce fine lines and wrinkles. The Soap gently cleanses without stripping, using powerful plant concentrates to protect, nourish, and support healthy, youthful-looking skin on both the face and body. If your skin has been struggling from hormones, environmental stress, hard water damage, or premature aging, I'm sharing exactly what I'm using and why it's working. Shop through my link in the show notes or visit https://herbalfacefood.com/?ref=AMBER88 and use code AMBER88 at checkout for 30% off your entire order.   MY PARTNERS: DEEP MARINE COLLAGEN By calming the immune system and nourishing the tissues of your joints, skin, gut, hair follicles and nail beds DeepMarine Collagen works from the inside out to produce Pain-Free Joints, Glowing Skin, Thicker Hair, Stronger Nails and a Healthy Gut. Canadian Listeners Use AMBER20 to receive 20% off all regular priced items by visiting deepmarine.ca or click the link https://deepmarine.ca/discount/AMBER20 to have the discount automatically applied to your order. Free Single Serve Sachets with select purchases while supplies last.   USA Listeners You can find DeepMarine Collagen on Amazon.com. Discounts will automatically be applied to select purchases.

Wie ist es, in einem kleinen Fischerboot durch die Mangroven Cartagenas zu fahren? Wie verbunden sind die Menschen vor Ort mit der kolumbianischen Musik? Und wie fühlt und hört es sich an, durch die trubeligen, bunten Gassen der Altstadt zu laufen?In der zweiten Folge der Kolumbienreise ist Janna Olson wieder mit dem Mikro unterwegs - dieses Mal starten wir mit einem Gespräch mit dem Schweiz-Kolumbianischen Musiker Loco Escrito (Nicolás Herzig) über seine kolumbianischen Wurzeln - und darüber, warum er seinen neuen Song Colibri genannt hat. Und dann geht es zum letzten Stopp dieser Reise: Es geht in den Norden Kolumbiens, es geht nach Cartagena. Wir unternehmen eine Bootstour mit Nina durch die Mangroven in La Boquilla, sprechen mit den Menschen vor Ort über ihr Leben in diesem kleinen Fischerort im Norden Cartagenas, erleben die kolumbianischen Trommelrhythmen und folgen Juliana, die uns ihre Heimatstadt zeigt. Es geht um Rum, Streetart und ihre Lieblingsorte!Habt ihr schon Folge 1 der Kolumbienreise gehört?> Kolumbien: Eine Reise durch Millionenstädte, Kaffeeplantagen und kolumbianische Kultur – unterwegs in Bogotá und Medellín mit Janna Olson | WW450Viel Spaß mit dem zweiten und abschließenden Teil dieser Reise durch Kolumbien!Dank an die Schweizer Ferienfluggesellschaft Edelweiss, unser toller Partner in dieser Folge!Camilo Gordillo – dafür, dass du uns deine Stadt gezeigt hast und für die wundervolle (Film-)Begleitung!Loco Escrito/ Nicolás Herzig https://locoescrito.com/ Juliana Medina von https://impulsetravel.co/Nina Schlieper von https://www.alternativetravelcartagena.com/startseite/ Elías Eliecer Manrique von der Fischervereinigung in La BoquillaEsilda Rodriguez von DAMARTES in La Boquilla (Damas y Madres del Arte)Yoel Yesith Londoño Moncaris und Team von der Kultureinrichtung und Trommelschule Batámbora in La Boquilla----------------------------------Recherche, Produktion des begleitenden Filmmaterials und Organisation vor Ort: Camilo GordilloRedaktion, Skript, Aufnahmen, Moderation und Postproduktion: Janna Olson----------------------------------Dieser Podcast wird auch durch unsere Hörerschaft ermöglicht. Wenn du gern zuhörst, kannst du dazu beitragen, dass unsere Show auch weiterhin besteht und regelmäßig erscheint. Zum Dank erhältst du Zugriff auf unseren werbefreien Feed und auf unsere Bonusfolgen. Diese Möglichkeiten zur Unterstützung bestehen:Weltwach Supporters Club bei Steady. Du kannst ihn auch direkt über Spotify ansteuern. Alternativ kannst du bei Apple Podcasts UnterstützerIn werden.----------------------------------WERBEPARTNERhttps://linktr.ee/weltwach Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The episode centers on a structural governance gap within the managed services industry as it attempts to address mental health using relationship-driven models typical of event and community management. This approach is exemplified by the launch of MSPWell, a not-for-profit mental wellness initiative incorporated in Ontario, Canada, targeting participants in the IT channel. The initiative operates as a live community—particularly via Discord—without formalized clinical oversight or published operational guardrails such as moderation standards, crisis escalation protocols, or sponsor influence controls. Evidence for an urgent governance concern is provided by industry data and operational decisions. According to MSPWell, burnout affects significant percentages of the workforce—citing an 82% burnout risk from a Mercer report and 66% from separate research. Despite the recurrence of staffing challenges in the MSP industry, MSPWell's infrastructure is underway with participation at industry events and vendor sponsorship, but formal governance documentation remains incomplete. The initiative explicitly confirms the absence of licensed mental health professionals in published leadership or advisory roles, positioning its support as peer-led. Supporting developments highlight how rapid community launch and sponsor-driven funding amplify risks when core protections are missing. Early coverage focused on recognizable names and event presence, while Dave Sobel emphasizes that, in mental health-adjacent contexts, moderation, privacy, and escalation protocols are not only differentiators but essential safeguards. At present, MSPWell's Discord community operates without visible guidelines or documented procedures, which exposes participants to predictable failure modes such as oversharing, privacy breaches, and harmful peer advice. Operationally, MSPs and IT service providers face heightened liability when participating in or supporting such initiatives without robust controls. Dave Sobel advises operators to request moderation, crisis, and data retention policies before endorsing participation, to treat involvement as networking rather than clinical support, and to monitor for the integration of licensed professionals into governance. The absence of enforceable governance exposes both individuals and sponsoring vendors to reputational and legal risk, and sets problematic precedent for future wellness platforms in the industry. 00:00 MSPWell Builds Mental-Health Platform on Sponsor-Funded Community Model 03:21 Guardrails, Guidelines, and Moderation  06:15 The Consequences 08:09 Why Do We Care? & What to Consider Supported by:  TimeZest   

In dieser Episode geht es um Isabelle Borges, die in Santiago do Bahia in Brasilien geboren wurde und heute in Berlin lebt. Sie war Teil der Hauptausstellung FACT/FAKE vom INTERNATIONALEN FESTIVAL FOTOGRAFISCHER BILDER von Ende November 2025 bis Anfang Februar 2026. Isabelle Borges wurde 1966 in Salvador, Brasilien geboren. Gemeinsam mit ihren Eltern lebte sie in verschiedenen brasilianischen Städten und in verschiedenen Ländern. So lebte sie lange in Brasilia in der Hauptstadt Brasiliens, die sie künstlerisch sehr prägte, und machte ihren Schulabschluss zum Beispiel in Brighton, Großbritannien. Sie studierte dann zunächst Sozialwissenschaften und anschließend Kunst in Rio de Janeiro. 1993 zog sie nach Köln und war u.a. Assistentin von Sigmar Polke. 1995 bis 1997 studierte sie an der Kunstakademie Düsseldorf bei Christian Megert. Ihre Arbeiten wurden bereits sehr zahlreich international ausgestellt. Sie lebt und arbeitet in Berlin. https://www.isabelleborges.com https://festival-fotografischer-bilder.de/ Kommende Ausstellungen: Frank Taal Galerie - Rotterdam Unfolding Voids – Isabelle Borges 1. März bis 18. April 2026 https://franktaal.art/ ++ Art Rotterdam 27. - 29. März 2026 https://www.artrotterdam.com ++ Ab 12 April 2026 Solo Exhibition Entanglement Enlace Art - Galerie , Lima, Peru http://www.enlaceart.com - - - Episoden-Cover-Gestaltung: Andy Scholz Episoden-Cover-Foto: David Hausmann - - - Link zu unserem Newsletter: https://deutscherfotobuchpreis.de/newsletter/ - - - Idee, Produktion, Redaktion, Moderation, Schnitt, Ton, Musik: Andy Scholz Der Podcast ist eine Produktion von STUDIO ANDY SCHOLZ 2020-2025. Andy Scholz wurde 1971 in Varel geboren. Er studierte Philosophie und Medienwissenschaften an der Universität Düsseldorf, Kunst und Design an der HBK Braunschweig und Fotografie/Fototheorie an der Folkwang Universität der Künste in Essen. Er ist freier Künstler, Autor und Dozent. Seit 2012 unterrichtet er an verschiedenen Instituten, u.a.: Universität Regensburg, Fachhochschule Würzburg, North Dakota State University in Fargo (USA), Philipps-Universität Marburg, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Pädagogische Hochschule Ludwigsburg. 2016 wurde er berufenes Mitglied in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Photographie (DGPh). Seit 2016 ist er künstlerischer Leiter und Kurator vom INTERNATIONALEN FESTIVAL FOTOGRAFISCHER BILDER, das er gemeinsam mit Martin Rosner gründete. Im ersten Lockdown im Juni 2020 begann er mit dem Podcast und seit 2022 ist er Organisationsleiter vom Deutschen Fotobuchpreis, der ins INTERNATIONALE FESTIVAL FOTOGRAFISCHER BILDER in Regensburg integriert wurde. Er lebt und arbeitet in Essen (Ruhrgebiet). https://fotografieneudenken.de/ https://www.instagram.com/fotografieneudenken/ https://festival-fotografischer-bilder.de/ https://www.instagram.com/festivalfotografischerbilder/ https://deutscherfotobuchpreis.de/ https://www.instagram.com/deutscher_fotobuchpreis/ https://andyscholz.com/ https://www.instagram.com/scholzandy/

We all have something we keep saying we'll do — take the trip, write the book, make the call, start the business.In this episode, Molly explores why dreaming feels productive (dopamine loves anticipation), but behavior is what actually builds identity. She revisits cognitive dissonance, explains the Zeigarnik effect, and shares a personal story about choosing to prioritize travel in 2025 — and how taking action created momentum.The message is simple: movement builds evidence. Evidence builds identity.In This EpisodeWhy anticipation activates dopamineHow cognitive dissonance quietly reshapes identityWhy behavior resolves tension more than belief doesThe Zeigarnik effect and “open loops” in the brainWhy readiness often follows actionA personal example of turning “someday” travel into real plansKey TakeawaysThe brain builds identity from evidence, not intentionDreaming feels good, but action stabilizes the nervous systemOpen loops consume mental energyConfidence is built through movementYou don't need the whole plan — just the next visible stepBefore Monday rolls around, choose one thing you've been postponing and take one deliberate step toward it.Book it. Open it. Send it. Schedule it.Let your behavior do the convincing. ★ Support this podcast ★

In a special episode of Ctrl-Alt-Speech, Ben and Mike discuss (with apologies to Tay-Tay) the three eras of content moderation in the media and what comes next. Their conversation builds on Ben's essay in the soon-to-be-published Trust, Safety, and the Internet We Share Multistakeholder Insights, a new book looking at the evolution of the Trust & Safety industry and how platform policies decisions are made. The pre-print is available online.Together, they unpack three distinct phases: The Strange Fascination Era (2003–2015), when newsrooms powered platform growth and treated social media as an exciting new frontier; The “We're Watching You” Era (2016–2020), when investigative reporting exposed online harms and pushed platforms to formalise Trust & Safety; and The Mask Off Era (2021–present), as platforms retreat from working with the media and the commitment to moderation waned.We'll be back next week with our regular episode.  Ctrl-Alt-Speech is a weekly podcast from Techdirt and Everything in Moderation. Send us your feedback at podcast@ctrlaltspeech.com and sponsorship enquiries to sponsorship@ctrlaltspeech.com. Thanks for listening.

Learn how soaking, sprouting, and moderation in nuts and seeds can preserve enzymes, reduce inflammation, and improve digestion. #RawFoods #Enzymes #HealthyFats #HealthTalks

In dieser Folge des Podcasts „Kopfsalat“ von Freunde fürs Leben e.V. spricht Moderator Sven Haeusler mit der Instagram-Creatorin Paula Schulze (flowmitpaula) über ihren Alltag auf Social Media. Auf ihrem Account teilt sie persönliche Einblicke in ihr Leben – von Beziehungen und Mutterschaft bis hin zu psychischer Gesundheit und Therapie. Viele Menschen verfolgen den Alltag von Creator:innen wie Paula über Jahre hinweg, obwohl sie sich im echten Leben nicht kennen. „Man ist ja schon ein bisschen wie so eine digitale Freundin“, sagt sie. Über Direktnachrichten komme es dabei immer wieder zu persönlichen Gesprächen mit Follower:innen. Das forme eine besondere Form digitaler Nähe, in der Grenzen zwischen Privatem und Öffentlichkeit sowohl für Creator:innen als auch für ihre Follower:innen verschwimmen. Social Media ist für Paula immer auch Arbeit. Neben Alltagseinblicken und Community-Gefühl gehören auch Kooperationen, Reichweite und Logiken der Plattformen zu ihrer Arbeit. „Der Algorithmus will ja, dass man die ganze Zeit online ist“, sagt sie. Der Druck, sichtbar zu bleiben und das „Richtige“ zu posten, kann dabei auch psychisch belastend sein. Paula arbeitet bewusst ohne festen Content-Plan, teilt Inhalte intuitiv und glaubt, dass diese authentischen Einblicke das Verbundesheitsgefühl stärken. Die Doppelfolge zu Social Media und psychischer Gesundheit wurde von Kolsquare gefördert. Moderation und Redaktion: Sven Haeusler - http://www.svenson-suite.de/cms/ Audio Editor: Julius Hofstädter Musik und Jingle: Bela Brauckmann - https://www.belabrauckmann.com/ Produktion und Redaktion: Diana Doko, Jasmin Hollatz und Vera Colditz von Freunde fürs Leben e.V. – https://www.frnd.de/ Idee: Sonja Koppitz - https://www.sonjakoppitz.de/ Foto: Benno Kraehahn - https://kraehahn.com/portfolio.html Coverdesign: Stefanie Butscheidt - http://www.grafische-requisite.de/kontakt/

Teilzeit ist in Luxemburg Alltag – aber längst nicht immer freiwillig. Während in Deutschland heftig über ein mögliches Ende des Rechts auf Teilzeit gestritten wird, stellt sich hierzulande vor allem eine Frage: Wie viel Wahlfreiheit haben Beschäftigte wirklich? In dieser Folge des LW-Podcasts „Der Pendler Club“ sprechen die Hosts Marc Blasius und Jil Reale mit Wirtschaftsjournalistin Melanie Ptok über ein Thema, das gerade viele betrifft. Melanie hat für ihre Recherche unter anderem mit einer Frau gesprochen, die nach ihrer Rückkehr aus dem Mutterschutz überraschend in eine noch kleinere Teilzeit gedrängt wurde – ein Beispiel, das statistisch kein Einzelfall ist. Warum arbeiten viele Menschen unfreiwillig weniger Stunden, welche Rolle spielen steigende Personalkosten und warum trifft es besonders oft Frauen? Gleichzeitig beleuchtet diese Folge, weshalb fehlende Betreuungsangebote oder starre Homeoffice-Regeln viele Eltern regelrecht in Teilzeit zwingen. Außerdem ordnet Melanie ein, welche Rechte Beschäftigte haben, wohin man sich bei Druck aus dem Unternehmen wenden kann und warum ein Teilzeitmodell nicht automatisch Entlastung bedeutet. ­ Hier die erwähnten Artikel: Unfreiwillig in die Teilzeit gedrängt: „Ich habe dann gekündigt“ (folgt am 6. März) Teilzeit in Luxemburg: Luxus oder Notwendigkeit? Frauen erhalten im Großherzogtum 43,3 Prozent weniger Rente Mütter auf dem Arbeitsmarkt: Die Rückkehr in den Beruf bleibt ein Hindernislauf ­ Hier geht's zum letzten Pendler-Update: Ölpreise, Rente, Sicherheit: Was Pendler jetzt wissen müssen­ Auch interessant: Kurios, rechtswidrig, toxisch? Was in Bewerbungsgesprächen passiert ­ Schreibt uns eure Fragen und Anregungen gerne an pendler@wort.lu! ­ Der Pendler Club ist ein Podcast vom Luxemburger Wort. Mediahuis Luxembourg sind Teil des internationalen Trust Project, das für transparenten und vertrauenswürdigen Journalismus steht. Weitere Informationen dazu gibt es hier. ­ Moderation und Produktion: Marc Blasius & Jil Reale Gästin: Melanie Ptok Redaktion: Luxemburger WortSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Player Driven, host Greg welcomes back industry veteran Sharon Fisher to discuss the rapidly evolving landscape of content moderation. From her early days building moderation at Club Penguin to her current work with AI-driven platforms like Checkstep, Sharon shares her unique perspective as both a trust and safety expert and a concerned parent.Key Discussion PointsThe Evolution of Moderation: Sharon reflects on the shift from manual work and simple keyword blocking 17 years ago to today's complex machine learning and contextual understanding.The Changing Role of the Moderator: Why the rise of AI doesn't mean the extinction of human moderators, but rather their transformation into data analysts who challenge bias and understand culture.The "Wild Wild West" of the Marketplace: Insights into why legacy moderation companies are phasing out while new, AI-first competitors like Checkstep are entering the space.Privacy vs. Safety: Addressing the pushback against age verification and the critical need for better communication and education for parents and caregivers.Bridging the Gap: How integrated technology can finally break down silos between customer support, marketing, and moderation to provide a holistic view of the user.Predictions for 2026 and Beyond: Sharon forecasts a year of "stress and adoption" as companies rush to reduce costs through technology, leading to a eventual search for balance in 2027.About Our Guest: Sharon FisherSharon Fisher is a leading voice in the trust and safety industry. With a career spanning roles at Disney (Club Penguin), Two Hat, and Keywords Studios, she now provides strategic consulting for gaming companies and technology firms like Checkstep. She is also a passionate advocate for digital literacy, frequently speaking to school districts to help parents protect their children online.Notable Quotes"The moderator role becomes even more important because they are who they are—they understand your community, they speak the language, and they live the culture every single day." "Think about that area of your city that you would not go on your own at night time... that's the same that translates into the internet. Know where your kid is playing."Resources MentionedConnect with Sharon: Sharon Fisher on LinkedIn Featured Technology: Checkstep Join The Player Driven Discordhttps://discord.gg/c9YgMctb

Livepodcast am 1. April um 19 Uhr im Sous Soul in Bern: Wer geht denn heute noch aus? Das Berner Nachtleben in der Krise Hier gehts zu den Tickets   «Im Eriz hatte ich eher das Gefühl, dass ich schräg angeschaut werde, wenn ich nicht so bin, wie man es sich vorstellt.» Andrina Wälti ist 27 Jahre alt, arbeitet als Architektin in Zürich und wohnt an der Langstrasse. Sie gehört zur Mehrheit der jungen Menschen, die aus dem Eriz wegziehen. Im Bergdorf, gelegen am Fusse des Hohgant zwischen Thun und dem Emmental, leben heute 480 Personen, früher waren es deren 663. «Mein Grossvater hat den Betrieb in den 60er-Jahren gegründet. Nach meiner Lehre als Landmaschinenmechaniker haben mich meine Eltern angestellt. Über kurz oder lang werde ich die Schmitte übernehmen.» Remo Bühlmann arbeitet nicht nur mit seinen beiden Eltern zusammen, er wohnt auch immer noch im Elternhaus. Der 25-Jährige kann sich zwar durchaus vorstellen, auch mal wegzuziehen – wenn auch nicht weiter als nach Steffisburg – aber von Berufes wegen bloss für eine Weile. Zurück ins Eriz «Mit dem Töffli in den Ausgang war einfach nicht so cool. Ich war immer auf meine älteren Brüder angewiesen. Und so fing ich mit 15 Jahren in Bern eine Ausbildung an und habe das Eriz verlassen.» Dass Anita Spring wieder ländlich wohnen möchte, wenn sie Kinder hat, war für die 35-Jährige zwar klar. Aber dass sie ausgerechnet wieder ins Eriz zurückkehren würde, hätte sie nicht gedacht. Heute schätzt sie die Verbundenheit mit der Natur, die Tiere, den Fluss und den Skilift. Warum ziehen immer mehr Junge weg aus dem Dörfli? Was kann einen dazu bewegen, an einen Ort zurückzukehren, an dem man sich als Kind total unwohl gefühlt hat? Und wie verändert sich das Dorfleben, wenn die Gemeinde immer stiller wird? Darüber spricht Redaktorin Jasmin Jaun. Sie hat eine grosse Reportage über das Eriz geschrieben. Es ist eine von vielen kleinen Gemeinden in Randregionen im Kanton Bern, in denen es immer stiller wird und die Bevölkerungszahl schrumpft. Moderation und Produktion: Sibylle Hartmann Zu Gast: Jasmin Jaun Sounds: Ane Hebeisen und Tobi Holz Der Text zum Podcast ist als Abschlussarbeit der Diplomausbildung Journalismus am MAZ entstanden. Die Autorin ist selbst im Eriz aufgewachsen und bis heute Wochenaufenthalterin. Hier gehts zum Artikel Die Zukunft eines Berner Bergdorfs: «Gott, wie habe ich das Eriz gehasst» – heute lebt Anita Spring wieder dort 3 für 1: Lesen Sie drei Monate, bezahlen Sie nur einenGefällt Ihnen unser «Gesprächsstoff» Podcast? Entdecken Sie dann die besten Recherchen und Hintergründe unserer Journalist:innen. Speziell für Sie haben wir das ‘3 für 1' Angebot konzipiert: 3 Monate lesen, nur 1 Monat bezahlen. Gute Lektüre und viel Spass.https://info.tamedia.ch/gespraechsstoffHabt ihr Feedback, Ideen oder Kritik zu «Gesprächsstoff»? Schreibt uns an podcast.bern@tamedia.ch Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Nach der Eskalation im Nahen Osten steigen die Ölpreise – was das für eure Tankrechnung in Luxemburg bedeutet. Außerdem: Das Statistikamt Statec erwartet die nächste Lohnindexierung schon im Frühjahr 2026 – doch globale Krisen könnten den Zeitpunkt noch verschieben. Weiter gibt es einen Blick auf die Rentenentwicklung sowie ins Bahnhofsviertel, wo bald 110 zusätzliche Kameras für mehr Sicherheit sorgen sollen. Und zum Schluss: Unser Kino-Check in Luxemburg und der Region – wo Grenzgänger am meisten Komfort fürs Geld bekommen. ­ Hier entlang für aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Luxemburger Wirtschaft. Hier geht's zum letzten Pendler-Update: Gedrängte Züge, Luxair-Kritik & Schwalbennot Das war die letzte Talkfolge zum Thema Sicherheit auf den Schienen: Was Zugbegleiter wirklich leisten ­ Schreibt uns eure Fragen und Anregungen gerne an pendler@wort.lu! ­ Der Pendler Club ist ein Podcast vom Luxemburger Wort. Mediahuis Luxembourg sind Teil des internationalen Trust Project, das für transparenten und vertrauenswürdigen Journalismus steht. Weitere Informationen dazu gibt es hier. ­ Moderation und Produktion: Jil Reale Redaktion: Luxemburger WortSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Wir haben sie noch gut in Erinnerung: Sandra Studer, Moderatorin des Eurovision Song Contest 2025 in Basel. Ihre ESC-Geschichte begann jedoch viel früher: 1991 stand sie selbst auf der großen Bühne in Rom und sang sich – damals noch als Sandra Simó – mit „Canzone per te“ auf den fünften Platz. Außerdem sprechen wir über zahlreiche Vorentscheide, unter anderem über das deutsche Finale und Sanremo 2026. Im Interview mit Marco taucht die Schweizerin Sandra Studer in ihre mehrsprachige Kindheit ein, sie erzählt von ihrem ersten ABBA-Konzert in Zürich als Kind, von den Anfängen als Sängerin und von ihrem Auftritt beim Eurovision Song Contest 1991 in Rom. Nach ihrem Erfolg in Rom kamen immer wieder Moderationen im Schweizer Fernsehen. Dafür hat sie ihren Künstlernamen Simó, den Mädchennamen ihrer Mutter, abgelegt und tritt wieder unter ihrem ihren Familiennamen Studer auf. Sie erzählt von den Zukunftsplänen: sie spielt Theater. Nachdem sie von ABBAs Björn den Segen bekommen hat, bereitet sie sich jetzt auf ihre Rolle als Donna in "Mamma Mia" vor – am Tag des Eurovision-Finales hat sie natürlich spielfrei. Die traditionellen Fragen am Schluss darf sie natürlich auch beantworten: Vom letztjährigen Song Contest hat sie "Desocado" von NAPA auf der Playlist. Der portugiesische Beitrag war das Lieblingslied ihrer Töchter und wurde ein Grower für sie. Ihr absolutes Lieblingslied ist von Conchita. Geplaudert wird über den Supersamstag, viele National Finals wurden abgehalten und damit die Acts für Eurovision bestellt. Simon und Marco haben Sanremo gesehen. Sonja und Simon (der, mit den vielen Monitoren gleichzeitig) schalteten sich in Deutschland ein. Daneben gab es National Finals in Bulgarien, Finnland (hat Simon das auch gleichzeitig geschaut), Norwegen, Serbien und Litauen. In der Kleinen Songcontest Geschichte am Schluss erzählt Sonja, wie es zu ihrem letzten Video auf Bleistiftrocker.de zum Thema Frauenfeindlichkeit beim Song Contest kam. Creators: Marco Schreuder & Alkis Vlassakakis & Sonja Riegel & Simon GraserMerci Chérie Online:www.MerciCherie.atFacebook: MerciCheriePodcastInstagram: mercicherie.atTikTok: @merci_cherie_podcastbluesky: @mercicherie.atBitte bewertet uns und schreibt Reviews, wo immer ihr uns hört.

Book your free call to break through your Keto plateau here: https://www.ketobodybuilding.com/callThe path to a powerful physique isn't found in crash diets, it's built through sustainable discipline. Extreme dieting creates a toxic cycle, but you can break free from these myths to build real strength and a resilient mindset.In episode 863 of the Savage Perspective Podcast, host Robert Sikes talks with guest Stephen Covert about their journeys in natural bodybuilding. They explore how intense competition prep can challenge your relationship with food and how Stephen found a deeper connection to his faith during the most difficult parts of training. This honest conversation covers the realities of gaining muscle, the big difference between competing and living a healthy lifestyle, and how fatherhood changes your perspective on fitness and life. Learn why having a strong purpose is the key to lasting success.Register For My FREE Masterclass: https://www.ketobodybuilding.com/registration-2Get Keto Brick: https://www.ketobrick.com/Subscribe to the podcast: https://open.spotify.com/show/42cjJssghqD01bdWBxRYEg?si=1XYKmPXmR4eKw2O9gGCEuQChapters:0:00 - The "Cardiac Arrest" Burger: A Post-Show Diet Disaster1:23 - Faith, Fatherhood & Fitness: How Do You Balance It All?2:05 - The "Nick Bare" Effect: Can You Be Jacked with a Newborn?2:55 - How a Broken Collarbone Led to a Fitness Transformation5:04 - Gaining 40lbs After College: The TikTok That Changed Everything6:24 - What Is Natural Bodybuilding?7:08 - How Bodybuilding Forges Unbreakable Discipline9:55 - The #1 Motivator to Actually Reach Your Fitness Goals10:41 - The Dangers of Extreme Weight Loss (80 lbs in 12 Weeks)12:07 - How Crash Dieting Leads to Disordered Eating14:06 - Why Everyone Should Live Like a Bodybuilder14:48 - Navigating Faith in the "Me First" Fitness Industry16:09 - The Stairmaster Sermon: Finding God During Morning Cardio17:42 - How to Stay Grounded When Social Media Praises You18:38 - Vanity vs. Modesty: A Christian's Guide to Bodybuilding20:54 - How a Brutal Prep Season Can Strengthen Your Faith22:23 - The Ultimate Litmus Test for Your Intentions24:32 - From Partying at a Christian School to a Spiritual Awakening28:27 - Why Every Man Needs a Battle to Fight29:48 - How a Fiancée Reacts to a Bodybuilding Prep33:04 - A Message from Robert Sikes on Keto & The Savage Perspective34:43 - Training with Your Kids: Building a Healthy Family Legacy35:13 - Prepping for a Show with Your Spouse: The Unspoken Challenges37:08 - How Pregnancy Changes a Female Competitor's Mindset38:38 - The Toxic "Bounce Back" Culture for Postpartum Mothers40:59 - The Best Part of Being a New Father43:21 - What Is the Keto Diet?45:20 - Can You Build Muscle Without Carbs? The Truth About Keto Gains47:35 - Should You Try an Ironman?49:06 - The Power of "Suffering Together" to Build Real Connection50:45 - The "Savage Retreat" Mud Run M.E.A.T.up52:37 - Full Circle: Coaching the Brother Who Got You Into Fitness55:09 - Why Having Your Family Is Everything57:53 - Where to Find Stephen Covert58:38 - The Story Behind the Famous "Keto Brick"

In this March kickoff episode, Molly introduces a month-long basketball theme inspired by her childhood love of the game and the five life lessons she previously shared with her community. Drawing from her experience playing basketball she explores how the structure and strategy of the game mirror the patterned nature of drinking habits.The central message: before you can change your drinking, you have to understand your playbook.Molly explains how drinking often feels spontaneous and emotional, but when slowed down, reveals predictable thought patterns. Using personal examples from her own decades-long 6 p.m. “unwind play,” along with a client story about belonging and connection, she illustrates how automatic behaviors are not inevitable—they are practiced.The episode also dives into the neuroscience behind habit formation through the Behavior Map–Results Cycle (Thought → Feeling → Action → Result) and how Alcohol Core Beliefs reinforce repeated patterns. For listeners who grew up with alcohol in the home, Molly discusses how early modeling can shape unconscious associations without conscious awareness.The episode concludes with a guided “game film” exercise to help listeners identify the thoughts that precede their drinking urges and begin building awareness—the first and most essential skill for change.This is where agency begins.Why basketball isn't random—and neither is your drinkingHow “automatic” behaviors differ from “inevitable” onesMolly's personal 6 p.m. unwind pattern and how she rewired itThe Behavior Map–Results Cycle and the neuroscience of habit loopsA client example illustrating how belonging—not wine—was driving behaviorThe unique impact of growing up with an alcoholic parent on your internal playbookA guided reflection exercise to identify the thought that begins your drinking patternWhy awareness—not willpower—is the first step toward lasting changeKey ConceptsDrinking follows a predictable playbookAutomatic means practicedThought creates feeling, feeling drives actionYou cannot change what you do not examineShame is not a useful tool for changeAwareness is the first skillLow risk drinking guidelines from the NIAAA:Healthy men under 65:No more than 4 drinks in one day and no more than 14 drinks per week.Healthy women (all ages) and healthy men 65 and older:No more than 3 drinks in one day and no more than 7 drinks per week.One drink is defined as 12 ounces of beer, 5 ounces of wine, or 1.5 ounces of 80-proof liquor. So remember that a mixed drink or full glass of wine are probably more than one drink.Abstinence from alcoholAbstinence from alcohol is the best choice for people who take medication(s) that interact with alcohol, have health conditions that could be exacerbated by alcohol (e.g. liver disease), are pregnant or may become pregnant or have had a problem with alcohol or another substance in the past.Benefits of “low-risk” drinkingFollowing these guidelines reduces the risk of health problems such as cancer, liver disease, reduced immunity, ulcers, sleep problems, complications of existing conditions, and more. It also reduces the risk of depression, social problems, and difficulties at school or work. ★ Support this podcast ★

    Do you feel you need to me more in order to be better?  More of what?  Explore the depths of possibilities with Verbal Surgery -1143- "Extreme Moderation" and feel good, NOW!  This stuff works!

reference: Sri Aurobindo, Bases of Yoga, Chapter 5, Physical Consciousness — Subconscient — Sleep and Dream — Illness, pp. 105-106This episode is also available as a blog post at https://sriaurobindostudies.wordpress.com/2026/02/27/47811/Video presentations, interviews and podcast episodes are allavailable on the YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/@santoshkrinsky871More information about Sri Aurobindo can be found at www.aurobindo.net  The US editions and links to e-book editions of SriAurobindo's writings can be found at Lotus Press www.lotuspress.com#Sri Aurobindo #yoga #integral yoga #spirituality #illness #health #healing

Wie klingt Bogotá? Wie ist es, mit dem Fahrrad durch die Millionenstadt zu fahren und dabei auch die Geschichte der Gegend zu erkunden? Von welchem Wandel und Lebensgefühl berichten die Frauen von Plogging Colombia - einer Naturschutzorganisation, die sich durch Müllsammelaktionen, verbunden mit sportlicher Aktivität, die Gesundheit aller auf die Fahne geschrieben hat? Wie schmecken die vielen unbekannten Früchte und wie wird kolumbianischer Kaffee produziert? All diesen Fragen ist Janna Olson aus dem Weltwach Team in dieser Reportage-Folge nachgegangen!Erlebt mit ihr den Monserrate Berg in Bogotá, taucht ein mit ihr in die Geschichte der Muisca, begleitet sie nach Medellín und auf eine Kaffeefarm in den Hügeln Antioquias. Dank andie Schweizer Ferienfluggesellschaft Edelweiss, unser toller Partner in dieser Folge!Camilo Gordillo – dafür, dass du uns deine Stadt gezeigt hast und für die wundervolle (Film-)Begleitung!Oscar Díaz von https://lateraltravel.coDougan Villamil von https://www.tourebikes.com/und seine bezaubernde Abuela Carmiña Casallas und seine Tante Marta GómezBibiana und Carolina von Plogging Colombia https://ploggingcolombia.org/Juan Fernando Rodríguez von https://lateraltravel.coNoel Boller von https://www.nobocafe.chund Nikolai Fürst von https://www.desarrolladores.cafe----------------------------------Recherche, Produktion des begleitenden Filmmaterials und Organisation vor Ort: Camilo GordilloRedaktion, Skript, Aufnahmen, Moderation und Postproduktion: Janna Olson----------------------------------Dieser Podcast wird auch durch unsere Hörerschaft ermöglicht. Wenn du gern zuhörst, kannst du dazu beitragen, dass unsere Show auch weiterhin besteht und regelmäßig erscheint. Zum Dank erhältst du Zugriff auf unseren werbefreien Feed und auf unsere Bonusfolgen. Diese Möglichkeiten zur Unterstützung bestehen:Weltwach Supporters Club bei Steady. Du kannst ihn auch direkt über Spotify ansteuern. Alternativ kannst du bei Apple Podcasts UnterstützerIn werden.----------------------------------WERBEPARTNERhttps://linktr.ee/weltwach Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

March walks in like a lion and leaves like a lamb… but first? A sacred edit. Angie lays out the Astrology for March, the Tarot Archetype, and the three sacred earth medicine for the month. What she talks about:Total Lunar Eclipse in VirgoTarot: TemperanceIris, Larimar & Great Blue Heron medicineAries Equinox ignitionThis month is about releasing perfectionism, adjusting the ratio between effort and surrender, and learning to tolerate peace without sabotaging it.Moderation is not boring. It's mastery.

Am 12. April kommt es in Ungarn zum Showdown. Dann entscheidet sich, ob Viktor Orbán ungarischer Ministerpräsident bleibt. Die Wahl ist richtungsweisend für Europa, die USA und Russland. Schließlich ist Orban ein Verbündeter von US-Präsident Donald Trump und dem russischen Machthaber Wladimir Putin. Wie wahrscheinlich ist es, dass er die Wahl gewinnt? Gast? Ákos Hadházy ist parteiloser Oppositionspolitiker, der Korruptionsskandale in Ungarn aufdeckt. Bis 2013 war er neun Jahre lang Mitglied von Orbáns Fidesz-Partei. Text und Moderation? Lea Verstl Sie haben Fragen? Schreiben Sie eine E-Mail an podcasts@ntv.de Sie möchten "Wieder was gelernt" unterstützen? Dann bewerten Sie den Podcast gerne bei Apple Podcasts oder Spotify. Dieser Podcast wird vermarktet von Julep Media: sales@julep.de

In this episode of The Powerlifter's Den, we sit down with Bob Merkh to talk about his new book Moderation for Cowards, now available on Amazon, and the mindset behind a lifetime under the bar. Bob breaks down the philosophy that drove the book, why embracing intensity matters in strength sports, and the lessons learned from decades of competing.We also dive into his final meet, Holy Wars III, reflecting on the preparation, the emotions behind closing out a competitive career, and what it means to go out on your own terms. From old-school lifting stories to hard-earned wisdom, this episode captures the mentality of a lifter who never believed in doing things halfway.If you believe moderation is overrated and commitment is everything, this episode is for you.

When Change Feels Hard: Understanding “Belief Echoes”In this episode of Think Thursday, Molly revisits a powerful concept at the heart of behavior change—belief echoes. If you've ever told yourself, “Change is just hard for me” or “I'm not someone who sticks with things,” this episode will help you understand what's actually happening in your brain—and why you're not broken.Grounded in neuroscience and mindset work, Molly explains why lasting change isn't about willpower. It's about the thoughts you've practiced for years without realizing it.What You'll Learn1. What a “Belief Echo” IsA belief echo is a thought you've repeated so often that it no longer feels like a thought—it feels like truth.Statements like:“This is just who I am.”“I never follow through.”“I'm not consistent.”These aren't facts. They're rehearsed mental patterns.2. Why Your Brain Protects Limiting BeliefsYour brain is a pattern-recognition machine. It craves familiarity—even when that familiarity is painful. Through confirmation bias, it selectively gathers evidence that supports your existing identity.If you believe you “never stick with things,” your brain will:Highlight every time you quitDownplay or ignore times you followed throughStore that “evidence” to reinforce the beliefIt's not sabotage. It's efficiency.3. The Real Reason Change Feels HardChange feels hard because you're asking your brain to:Let go of a familiar identityBelieve something new before you have proofYou must interrupt an old belief before you have evidence of the new one.That gap is where discomfort lives.4. Change Takes Thinking TimeWe often say “change takes time,” but what it really takes is intentional thinking time.New belief → practiced repeatedly → new feelings → new actions → new results.You don't build evidence first. You build belief first.5. A Practical ExampleOld belief: “I never stick with things.” New thought to practice: “I am learning how to follow through.”That subtle shift:Reduces shameCreates possibilityOpens the door to consistent actionSmall, believable thoughts are how identity shifts begin.The Science Behind ItThis episode reinforces foundational Alcohol Minimalist principles found in Breaking the Bottle Legacy , including:The Behavior Map-Results CycleCognitive behavioral principlesConfirmation bias researchThe Think-Feel-Act frameworkAt its core: Your drinking behavior is never random. It is driven by thought.Key TakeawaysYou are not failing at change.You are experiencing the momentum of well-practiced thoughts.Beliefs are not identity—they are rehearsed sentences.Sustainable change starts with choosing a new sentence on purpose.Your brain can learn a new identity—but only through repetition.Reflection QuestionsWhat sentences about yourself are you reinforcing daily?What belief echo might be quietly driving your drinking?What is one small, believable thought you could begin practicing today?Change begins with noticing the story you're telling about who you are.What belief echo do you suspect might be operating in the background of your drinking right now? ★ Support this podcast ★

In this week's roundup of the latest news in online speech, content moderation and internet regulation, Ben is joined by Casey Newton, founder and editor of Platformer and co-host of Hard Fork, a podcast that makes sense of the rapidly changing world of tech. Together, they discuss:After a deadly raid, an AI power struggle erupts at the Pentagon (Washington Post)Following: Anthropic vs. The Pentagon (Platformer)Anthropic Drops Flagship Safety Pledge (TIME)Hackers Expose Age-Verification Software Powering Surveillance Web (The Rage)Discord is delaying its global age verification rollout (The Verge)Reddit fined £14m by UK data watchdog over age verification checks (BBC News)How to evaluate Trust & Safety vendors (Everything in Moderation*)Regulate platforms, not children – Commissioner urges caution over social media bans (Commissioner for Human Rights)MPs reject total ban, want data housed locally (The Star)Exclusive: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere (Reuters)Play along with Ctrl-Alt-Speech's 2026 Bingo Card and get in touch if you win! Ctrl-Alt-Speech is a weekly podcast from Techdirt and Everything in Moderation. Send us your feedback at podcast@ctrlaltspeech.com and sponsorship enquiries to sponsorship@ctrlaltspeech.com. Thanks for listening.

Follow Everyday Encounters with the Lord on Facebook.

Missgunst aus dem Leben streichen, anderen ehrlich Erfolg gönnen, innerlich Frieden suchen – Matthias Killing hat diese Haltungen nicht in Ratgebern gelernt, sondern mitten im Chaos der Medienwelt. Was als strenger Ehrgeiz begann, wuchs zum Verständnis für Geben, Loslassen, Vergeben. Seine Erfahrungen mit zerbrechlichen Familienbändern, existentiellen Zweifeln und echten Brüchen hinterlassen Spuren – und den Mut, im Moment zu leben. Alles wird gut, sagt Köln. Manchmal stimmt das. Du erfährst... …wie Matthias Killing Vertrauen und Authentizität als Schlüssel zum Erfolg sieht …warum das Streichen von Missgunst das Leben entspannter gestaltet …wie der Umgang mit Eltern und die Bedeutung von Familie das Leben prägt __________________________ ||||| PERSONEN |||||

Politische Debatten finden heute nicht nur im Parlament, sondern auch online statt – und gerade Frauen sehen sich dort massiver Gewalt ausgesetzt. Beleidigungen, Drohungen und Hasskampagnen sind keine Randerscheinungen, sondern ein gezieltes Mittel, um Stimmen im digitalen Diskurs zum Schweigen zu bringen. In dieser Folge von Ganz Offen Gesagt spricht Anna-Lisa Bier mit der Digitalexpertin und Autorin Ingrid Brodnig darüber, wie digitale Gewalt funktioniert, warum Politikerinnen häufig intensiver und gezielter attackiert werden als Männer, warum jene Angriffe sexualisiert und entwertend sind und welche Folgen das für den digitalen Umgangston, Selbstzensur und politische Beteiligung hat. Dabei geht es auch um die Plattformen selbst, wie Algorithmen Hass verbreiten, warum die Moderation von Hasskommentaren oft scheitert und welche Rolle traditionelle Medien bei der Verstärkung von Empörungswellen spielen. Außerdem wird klar, welche rechtlichen Möglichkeiten es gibt, wo sie an ihre Grenzen stoßen und warum bestehende Regeln oft nicht konsequent umgesetzt werden. Beratungsangebote: Digitale Gewalt ist kein individuelles Problem, und ihr müsst damit nicht allein bleiben. Wenn ihr selbst oder Menschen in eurem Umfeld von digitaler Gewalt betroffen seid, gibt es unter anderem folgende Meldestellen und Beratungsangebote, die Unterstützung bieten: Österreich:Zara (Online-Beratung bei Hass im Netz) Frauenhelpline (Anonyme Beratung) Rat auf Draht (Beratung für Kinder, Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene, auch für digitale Probleme) BanHate (App, bei der man österreichweit Hasskommentare melden kann) Weisser Ring (Hilfsorganisation für Opfer von Straftaten in Österreich) Deutschland: HateAid (Meldestelle für Betroffene als auch Beobachter*innen von digitaler Gewalt) Bundesweites Hilfetelefon "Gewalt Gegen Frauen" (Anonyme Beratung, eingerichtet vom Bundesamt für Familie und zivilgesellschaftliche Aufgaben) Meldestelle REspect! Im Netz  Weiterführende Inhalte:Buch "Feindbild Frau" von Ingrid Brodnig (Thalia) Die Gemeinschaftsstandards von Meta Mehr zum eXit NDR-Recherche zur Incel-Szene: Zerrwelt der Frauenhasser - Wie die "Incel"-Szene an Bedeutung gewinnt und wie gefährlich sie ist Abschlussbericht des Radical Awarness Network zum Incel-Phänomen: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-08/ran_cn_incel_phenomenon_20210803_de.pdfSafer Internet Jugend Internet Monitor 2026 Wir würden uns sehr freuen, wenn Du "Ganz offen gesagt" auf einem der folgenden Wege unterstützt:Werde Unterstützer:in auf SteadyKaufe ein Premium-Abo auf AppleKaufe Artikel in unserem FanshopSchalte Werbung in unserem PodcastFeedback bitte an redaktion@ganzoffengesagt.atTranskripte und Fotos zu den Folgen findest Du auf podcastradio.at

Alcohol consumption in the United States is declining. Gallup reports that only 54% of Americans now drink — the lowest level recorded in decades — and nearly half of Americans say they are actively trying to drink less.On the surface, this sounds like clear progress.But in this episode, Molly explores an important question raised by Dr. Adi Jaffe in a recent article: Are we truly becoming more emotionally resilient… or are we simply swapping one escape route for another?As cannabis use rises alongside declining alcohol consumption, it's worth examining whether substitution equals transformation — or whether real change requires something deeper.This episode unpacks the cultural shift away from alcohol, the rise in cannabis use, and the critical distinction between behavioral change and emotional growth.In This Episode, You'll Learn:The latest statistics on declining alcohol consumption in the U.S.Why cannabis use is increasing as alcohol use declinesWhat research says about cannabis use and alcohol reductionThe difference between substitution and emotional resilienceWhy simply replacing alcohol doesn't necessarily change your relationship with discomfortHow psychological dependence operates beneath surface-level behavior changeThe core beliefs that often drive alcohol useA simple self-reflection exercise to assess your own coping patternsKey Statistics Discussed54% of Americans report drinking alcohol (Gallup 2025)Nearly half of Americans are trying to drink less65% of Gen Z plans to cut down or abstain from alcoholApproximately 178,000 alcohol-related deaths occur annually in the U.S.41% of young adults report cannabis use in the past year29% report past-month cannabis use10.8% report daily cannabis useAbout 3 in 10 cannabis users are at risk of Cannabis Use DisorderThe Core QuestionReducing alcohol is meaningful.But emotional resilience is something deeper.This episode challenges you to consider:If alcohol disappeared tomorrow, what would you reach for?Are you choosing relaxation — or needing escape?Have your behaviors changed… or have your beliefs changed?True transformation happens when you dismantle the belief that you need something outside of yourself to manage your internal state.Resources MentionedDr. Adi JaffeThe Abstinence Myth by Dr. Adi JaffeUnhooked by Dr. Adi JaffeSunnyside mindful drinking app (15-day free trial available)Monitoring the Future (University of Michigan)CDC Cannabis Use DataHarvard Health on cannabis vs. alcohol risksBrown University study on cannabis and alcohol consumptionLow risk drinking guidelines from the NIAAA:Healthy men under 65:No more than 4 drinks in one day and no more than 14 drinks per week.Healthy women (all ages) and healthy men 65 and older:No more than 3 drinks in one day and no more than 7 drinks per week.One drink is defined as 12 ounces of beer, 5 ounces of wine, or 1.5 ounces of 80-proof liquor. So remember that a mixed drink or full glass of wine are probably more than one drink.Abstinence from alcoholAbstinence from alcohol is the best choice for people who take medication(s) that interact with alcohol, have health conditions that could be exacerbated by alcohol (e.g. liver disease), are pregnant or may become pregnant or have had a problem with alcohol or another substance in the past.Benefits of “low-risk” drinkingFollowing these guidelines reduces the risk of health problems such as cancer, liver disease, reduced immunity, ulcers, sleep problems, complications of existing conditions, and more. It also reduces the risk of depression, social problems, and difficulties at school or work. ★ Support this podcast ★

Harrison Ward, also known as Fell Foodie, drank more than 20 pints a day, smoked like a chimney, battled clinical depression in silence and reached a moment where he believed there were only two ways out. Today I sit down with the man behind the outdoor cooking phenomenon to unpack addiction, withdrawal, mental health and the decision that saved his life. Harrison shares the reality behind addiction, drinking culture and the hidden loneliness of high-masking depression. From working in pubs while drinking heavily to climbing a mountains during withdrawal, this is a raw exploration of what happens when escape stops working and honesty begins.Together they explore why alcohol can feel like medicine before it becomes a prison, how depression can quietly shape behaviour from teenage years onwards, and why many people suffer in silence long before anyone notices. Harrison speaks openly about peer pressure, shame, identity and the fear of speaking honestly about mental health, especially growing up in environments where vulnerability felt impossible.Harrison explains how sobriety allowed him to rediscover purpose through food, nature and creativity, cooking restaurant-quality meals on remote mountainsides and sharing hope with thousands online. Oliver and Harrison also discuss cravings, withdrawal, rebuilding self-worth, going public about sobriety and the practical options available for anyone struggling with alcohol or depression today. If you or someone you love is struggling, this conversation offers honesty without judgement and hope without clichés.Now, over 9 years sober, Harrison has fused his love of food with the healing power of the outdoors. He's hiking the fells of Cumbria and cooking restaurant quality meals on a simple camp stove in the mountains, and sharing his story to show others that recovery is possible.He's been featured on the BBC with Mary Berry, Channel 5's ‘Winter on the Farm', Countryfile Magazine, Men's Fitness, and more. He's a bestselling author, a keynote speaker, and a brand ambassador. Oliver is an ambassador for Alcohol Change UK and you can access support here - https://tinyurl.com/5dt5773e Thank you to Gavin Sisters for sponsoring this episode! Visit -www.gavinsisters.co.uk and use promo code SCHOOLOFROCKBOTTOM for 10% off! T-Shirt from The Recovery Cartel -www.therecoverycartel.co.ukhttps://www.instagram.com/therecoverycartelPodcasting is an expensive passion. To help me keep going, I'd really appreciate it if you could buy me a coffee, thank you! https://buymeacoffee.com/olivermason1Or via PayPal - https://www.paypal.me/olivermason1paypal Topics -0:00 Trailer & Intro 3:30 A rock bottom moment 5:20 Using alcohol to escape 7:30 Depression as a teenager 10:30 Mental health was not talked about before 11:45 Drinking 20 pints a day!16:40 Was Harrison a high functioning alcoholic?19:00 Is high functioning addiction worse?22:50 The moment I decided to stop drinking 28:30 Moderation and doing a geographical 36:00 Withdrawal and depression 40:00 Climbing a mountain in withdrawal!45:20 From hurting to healing 47:40 Dealing with cravings & peer pressure 51:45 Finding passion for cooking 54:00 Going public about sobriety 56:45 Options for help to go sober and fighting depression Follow HarrisonWebsite - https://www.fellfoodie.co.ukInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/fellfoodie Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/fellfoodie/YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/FellFoodieTikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@fellfoodieTwitter - https://twitter.com/FellFoodieFollow OliverInstagram - https://tinyurl.com/2vt29sjvFacebook - https://tinyurl.com/34cwz59rTikTok - https://tinyurl.com/ujw4vxn9LinkedIn - https://tinyurl.com/yuemhnd7Threads - https://tinyurl.com/yk7vdeahX - https://tinyurl.com/3u5mnpds Watch/Listen -YouTube - https://youtu.be/7UW29Hp7rBYSpotify - https://tinyurl.com/djmdvpjrApple - https://tinyurl.com/y3n2chk3 #AddictionRecovery #Sobriety #MentalHealth

In this level of Linux Out Loud, Nate takes player‑one controls with Wendy and Matt as co‑op buddies for a run‑and‑gun through data disasters, platform drama, and hopeful Linux gaming news. Matt kicks things off with a catastrophic cold‑storage failure that turns into a hard‑earned reminder about backups and the limits of data‑recovery tools on both Windows and Linux. Wendy then opens a side‑quest about Discord's upcoming age‑verification changes, why that's a problem for community privacy and moderation, and what it might mean for the future home of the Lobby of Loudness. Nate rounds out the host updates with Linux Saloon going fully independent, moving show notes and polls onto CubicleNate.com so he controls the platform and the ad dollars. For the main mission, the crew dives into GOG calling Linux its “next major frontier” for GOG GALAXY and hiring a senior C++ engineer to help make Linux a first‑class gaming citizen instead of an afterthought. Along the way they talk heroic launchers, Proton and Wine, and what a “good citizen” GOG client on Linux should actually look like for home‑labbed and multi‑PC setups. Show Links: GOG job posting – “Senior Software Engineer (C++ GOG GALAXY)”: https://www.gog.com/en/work/senior-software-engineer-c-gog-galaxy Linux Saloon show notes and polls: https://CubicleNate.com/LinuxSaloon https://CubicleNate.com/polls

Get Fitness Lab (20% off for listeners), the #1 coaching app that adapts to YOUR recovery, YOUR schedule, and YOUR body. Build muscle, lose fat, and get stronger with daily personalized guidance. —Why does “just eat in moderation” fail so often? Why do binge eating and emotional eating feel stronger than your willpower? I'm joined by psychologist and former food industry insider Dr. Glenn Livingston to break down what's actually happening in your brain. We unpack the neuroscience of cravings and why a healthy brain can struggle in a hyperpalatable food environment. You'll learn how food cues override hunger signals and quietly sabotage your nutrition and fitness goals. If you want to build muscle, lose fat, or improve body recomp, you need to understand why rigid calorie cutting and relying on willpower almost always backfire. That's why we talk about engineering your environment instead of fighting yourself. We focus on structure, clear food rules, and reducing decision fatigue so you're not negotiating with cravings all day. You'll walk away with evidence-based strategies that make sustainable weight loss possible without constant mental friction.Today, you'll learn all about:0:00 – What cravings really are6:25 – What causes cravings13:25 – Managing triggers and food cues21:29 – Extinction bursts explained30:45 – Rules vs willpower39:48 – Identity and habit engineering51:50 – Free resources to defeat cravingsEpisode resources:Free Book (and bonuses): Defeat Your Cravings - The Back Door to Weight LossFacebook: facebook.com/profile.php?id=61550719047966LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/drglennlivingston YouTube: @DefeatYourCravings 

Please enjoy this InterGalactic Healing Session using the InterGalactics Healing Method Level 5 Frequencies on Mastery. In this third session we use the InterGalactic Moderation Frequency and the InterGalactics Non-Dual Frequency.We first work with pursuing power and grace in a balanced way.  We keep all our subtle bodies, wants, and needs balanced throughout as we use the InterGalactics Moderation Frequency.  We then move on to utilizing the InterGalactic Non-Dual Frequency to understand reality in a deeper manner.  We look into the nature of mind and the nature of who we really are.

In this week's Think Thursday, Molly builds on last week's conversation about overwhelm and takes it one level deeper—into uncertainty and the brain's fundamental need for coherence.Many people say, “I'm overwhelmed by everything.” But often, what they're describing isn't simply busyness. It's destabilization. The pace of technological change, the relentless news cycle, economic uncertainty, global conflict, and cultural instability create a steady stream of input that the human brain was not designed to process.Our brains evolved for village-level information flow—not constant global exposure in real time.The Brain as a Prediction MachineModern neuroscience describes the brain as a prediction engine. Researchers such as Karl Friston (predictive processing theory) suggest that the brain's primary job is not just to react to reality, but to anticipate it.Your brain is constantly generating internal forecasts about what is likely to happen next. It builds models of what is safe, familiar, and probable. When those models align with experience, the brain operates efficiently. Monitoring decreases. Stress drops. Calm increases.But when prediction fails—when the future feels unstable or unclear—the brain increases vigilance. Cortisol rises. The amygdala becomes more reactive. Monitoring intensifies.Uncertainty is not just emotionally uncomfortable. It is neurologically expensive.Research comparing predictable and unpredictable stressors shows that unpredictable stress can create stronger physiological responses than predictable stress—even when the predictable stressor is objectively worse. The brain often prefers a known negative outcome to an unknown one because predictability allows preparation, and preparation reduces perceived threat.Coherence vs. AmbiguityResearchers such as Travis Proulx and Steven Heine have explored how disruptions in meaning and narrative coherence increase anxiety and motivate the brain to restore order. Coherence stabilizes the nervous system. Ambiguity destabilizes it.When someone says, “I'm overwhelmed by everything,” that word everything represents a collapse of hierarchy and narrative. The brain cannot model everything at once. It cannot prioritize everything simultaneously. So it defaults to alarm.Language plays a powerful role here. Molly revisits her recent quote:“Every time you replace ‘I'm overwhelmed' with ‘I need to decide what matters most and go slow,' your brain stops firing alarm signals and starts organizing information again.”While this shift does not immediately shut down the amygdala, research on cognitive reappraisal by psychologist James Gross shows that reframing increases prefrontal cortex activity and decreases amygdala activation over time. Changing language changes the predictive model the brain uses.Molly also revisits a core Alcohol Minimalist concept: thoughts are both descriptive and prescriptive. Repeating “I'm overwhelmed” reinforces a future expectation. The brain uses repeated thoughts as data. Language influences prediction.Why This Feels Amplified NowThe modern nervous system is metabolizing more information than at any point in human history. Our brains evolved to monitor a small social circle, not global crises, economic forecasts, political unrest, and technological revolutions delivered instantly.When input exceeds the brain's capacity to construct stable models:Uncertainty risesScanning increasesStress increasesCognitive flexibility decreasesThis is not fragility. It is neurobiology.And it has direct implications for behavior change.The brain invests effort when it believes the future is navigable. When the future feels chaotic, it shifts toward short-term safety behaviors—scrolling, avoidance, comfort-seeking, and returning to familiar habits—not because discipline has disappeared, but because predictability feels safer than uncertainty. Coherence builds confidence. Confidence supports effort. Effort sustains behavior change.When coherence drops, consistency often drops with it.Five Ways to Restore CoherenceWhile you cannot eliminate global uncertainty, you can restore local coherence. The brain does not require certainty everywhere. It requires stability somewhere.Here are five actionable steps:Narrow the time horizon.Focus on today or tomorrow rather than the entire month or year. Short predictive loops are easier for the brain to manage.Identify what is controllable.Research shows perceived control reduces amygdala activation. Even one controllable action restores agency.Establish one predictable ritual.A consistent morning routine, defined work block, or nightly wind-down creates stability the brain can model.Limit interpretive overload.Too many possible explanations increase cognitive load. Choose the most useful interpretation instead of entertaining every hypothetical scenario.Build one daily evidence loop.Follow through on one manageable commitment each day. Predictable behavior strengthens the brain's trust in its own forecasting.Each of these steps restores hierarchy. Each reduces prediction error. Each sends a stabilizing signal to the nervous system.You are telling your brain: “The world may be uncertain, but my behavior has structure.”The Bottom LineYour brain does not require absolute certainty in order to function well. It requires enough pattern to feel oriented. Enough structure to reduce constant monitoring. Enough stability to believe its predictions will not be continuously disrupted.You cannot calm the entire world. But you can restore order in your immediate sphere.When coherence returns, clarity follows. ★ Support this podcast ★

How many times have you tried to “just drink less”… only to end up right back where you started? In this episode, I'm talking about the hard but freeing truth behind repeated failed attempts at moderation — and the thinking patterns that keep high-achieving women stuck in the cycle of overdrinking. If you've ever told yourself: • “I'll only drink on weekends.” • “I'll switch to wine.” • “I just need better rules.” • “This time will be different.” …this episode is for you. We're diving into the disordered thinking that protects alcohol instead of protecting you — including moving goalposts, alcohol amnesia, the “just one more try” loop, and the illusion of control that keeps you negotiating instead of deciding. No shame here, just clarity. You'll learn: • How to recognize when moderation isn't working for you • Why your brain keeps convincing you to try again • The difference between perseverance and avoidance • When it might be time to stop managing your drinking and make a clear decision If you're tired of thinking about alcohol all the time…tired of starting over…tired of proving you “should” be able to control it… This Stop Over-drinking and Start Living Podcast episode is a conversation is for women who are sober curious, cutting back on alcohol, taking a break, or exploring a healthier relationship with drinking and with themselves. If you're ready to explore private coaching or attending a Magic House Retreat in Lisbon to transform your relationship with alcohol at a deeper level, you can book a Clarity Call here: https://www.angelamascenik.com/claritycallAnd check out the last 3 spots in the May Magic House Retreat in Lisbon!https://www.angelamascenik.com/magichousefounderscircle

On this episode of The Alcohol Minimalist Podcast, Molly reflects on what would have been her mother's 95th birthday and the years lost not only at the end of her life, but throughout decades spent in active addiction. With compassion and clarity, she explores the difference between alcohol dependence and alcohol reliance, and why that distinction matters more than most people realize.Drawing from her recent conversation with Dr. Charles Knowles , Molly breaks down the difference between the small percentage of adults who are physically dependent on alcohol and the much larger group who fall into gray area drinking or alcohol reliance. She explains how neuroadaptation occurs over time, how reinforced thought patterns shape behavior, and why learned helplessness can quietly keep people stuck.This episode is not about blame. It is about progression, influence, and the hopeful reality that most people questioning their drinking are not powerless. Through science, reflection, and practical questions, Molly invites listeners to examine the beliefs that may be giving alcohol more authority than it actually has.In This Episode:Reflecting on the years lost to active addictionThe difference between alcohol dependence and alcohol relianceThe 2 to 3 percent statistic on physical dependenceThe 20 percent gray area drinking categoryHow neuroadaptation and tolerance develop over timeDopamine as a learning signal, not just a pleasure chemicalCue conditioning and incentive salienceThe psychology of learned helplessnessWhy belief shapes behavior and behavior reinforces beliefAlcohol's health risks, including cancer and sleep disruptionWhy low risk drinking guidelines reduce harm, not riskThe importance of examining your belief system around alcoholKey Takeaways:Physical dependence develops gradually through repeated reinforcement and neuroadaptation.Most people questioning their drinking are not physically dependent but are operating in reinforced patterns.Alcohol influences the brain but does not automatically remove agency unless long term dependence has shifted the baseline.Beliefs such as “Once I start, I can't stop” can strengthen neural expectation and reduce effort.Small cognitive shifts precede behavioral shifts, and repeated behavior reshapes the brain.Questions to Reflect On This Week:What belief about alcohol might you be carrying that deserves closer examination?Is there a sentence you repeat internally such as “I need it to relax” or “It helps me connect” that feels solid and unquestioned?What might happen if you approached that belief with curiosity rather than judgment?What is one small step you can take this week to observe rather than act automatically?Resources Mentioned:Molly's interview with Dr. Charles Knowles Alcohol Truths: How Much Is Too Much?If you are questioning your relationship with alcohol, remember that awareness is the first step. Change does not require a dramatic declaration. It begins with curiosity, clarity, and small shifts practiced steadily over time.Low risk drinking guidelines from the NIAAA:Healthy men under 65:No more than 4 drinks in one day and no more than 14 drinks per week.Healthy women (all ages) and healthy men 65 and older:No more than 3 drinks in one day and no more than 7 drinks per week.One drink is defined as 12 ounces of beer, 5 ounces of wine, or 1.5 ounces of 80-proof liquor. So remember that a mixed drink or full glass of wine are probably more than one drink.Abstinence from alcoholAbstinence from alcohol is the best choice for people who take medication(s) that interact with alcohol, have health conditions that could be exacerbated by alcohol (e.g. liver disease), are pregnant or may become pregnant or have had a problem with alcohol or another substance in the past.Benefits of “low-risk” drinkingFollowing these guidelines reduces the risk of health problems such as cancer, liver disease, reduced immunity, ulcers, sleep problems, complications of existing conditions, and more. It also reduces the risk of depression, social problems, and difficulties at school or work. ★ Support this podcast ★

In dieser Episode erwartet euch ein wilder Fiebertraum zwischen Reality-TV, Kulturkampf im Kommentarbereich und kruden Konzerterlebnissen. Es geht um Dschungel-Nachwehen, modische Fehltritte und die ganz große Frage, wer eigentlich ins Internet darf. Das Dschungelcamp ist vorbei, anredo schläft endlich wieder ohne geballte Faust ein. Aber die Debatte geht weiter. Internetdiskurs vs. Anruf-Mehrheit, wohlgesonnene Moderation, Facebook als Paralleluniversum und die Frage, warum sich rund um Gil plötzlich halb Deutschland in Hobby-Detektive verwandelt hat. Bei #rundfunk17 ziehen BastiMasti und anredo ihr endgültiges Dschungel-Fazit nach der Rückkehr der Dschungelcamper und den gefluteten Kommentarspalten. Nachdem Basti und anredo die Verteidigungsstrategie der Gil-Fans bei Facebook analysiert hat, kommen sie zum Schluss: Wir brauchen ein Social-Media-Verbot für seine Fans. Mit einer Altersgrenze ist es schließlich nicht getan. Die beiden klären, ob Jugendliche dann zumindest weiter auf Social Media unterwegs sein dürfen. Sie diskutieren ihren persönlichen Blick auf Social-Media-Nutzung bei jungen Menschen und das immer lauter geforderte Verbot für Minderjährige. Zwischen Mobbing, Suchtmechanismen und komplett wilden KI-Videos zeigt sich, dass Medienkompetenz kein Generationenthema ist. Parallel eskaliert es modisch bei Basti. Er kauft ein Designer-Shirt mit extrem problematischem Motiv, checkt es aber viel zu spät. Ironisch gemeint, aber nicht ironisch gelesen. Die Reaktionen reichen von irritiert bis fassungslos. Jetzt steht die Frage im Raum, wie man so ein Shirt retten kann, ohne gleich komplett gecancelt zu werden. Währenddessen sitzt anredo auf einem Konzert zwischen 16-jährigen Snapchat-Profis, liest unfreiwillig Chat-Dramen mit und beobachtet eine eigene kleine Welt aus Selfies, Video-Calls und Dauerkommunikation. Ein Abend zwischen Rave-Stimmung und Realitätscheck: Mit 30 plus merkt man plötzlich, wie weit die eigene Jugend schon weg ist… Diese und alle anderen Episoden #rundfunk17 findet ihr unter anderem bei Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Deezer und als RSS-Feed.

In Los Angeles hat ein Prozess gegen die grossen Social-Media-Firmen Meta, Google und Snapchat begonnen. Die Klägerin wirft den Firmen vor, ihre Jugend durch gezielte Suchtmechanismen ruiniert zu haben. Depressionen, Essstörungen und Suizidgedanken – die Vorwürfe wiegen schwer und betreffen eine ganze Generation. Korrespondentin Marie-Astrid Langer erklärt, warum dieser Prozess eine neue Ära einläutet. Es geht nicht mehr nur um die Moderation von Inhalten, sondern um das Design der Plattformen selbst. Interne Dokumente legen nahe, dass sich Mitarbeiter bei Facebook und Instagram ihrer Rolle durchaus bewusst waren. Doch wie stehen die Chancen, dass die Kläger tatsächlich gegen die Tech-Giganten gewinnen? Gast: Marie-Astrid Langer, USA-Korrespondentin Host: Simon Schaffer Den Hintergrund zu diesen Prozessen findest du [hier](https://www.nzz.ch/technologie/der-tabak-moment-von-social-media-junge-erwachsene-beschuldigen-instagram-tiktok-und-co-sie-suechtig-gemacht-zu-haben-ld.1923401). Für ein Probeabo der NZZ gehts [hierlang](https://abo.nzz.ch/25077808-2).

Auf den Färöern leben 55.000 Menschen. Seit Jahrzehnten streben viele von ihnen die komplette Loslösung von Dänemark an. Als Donald Trump seine Fühler nach Grönland ausstreckt, bessert sich die Verhandlungsposition der Färöer. Zumindest in der Theorie. Moderation? Kevin Schulte Sie haben Fragen? Schreiben Sie eine E-Mail an podcasts@ntv.de Sie möchten "Wieder was gelernt" unterstützen? Dann bewerten Sie den Podcast gerne bei Apple Podcasts oder Spotify. Dieser Podcast wird vermarktet von Julep Media: sales@julep.de

Many people are saying the same thing lately: “I'm overwhelmed by everything.”In this Think Thursday episode, Molly explores what overwhelm actually is from a neuroscience perspective. Is it just busyness? Or is something deeper happening in the brain?Drawing from research on the amygdala, stress hormones, working memory, and executive function, Molly explains how overwhelm is not about volume alone. It is about perceived overload and a loss of prioritization. When the brain detects too many competing demands and not enough resources, it shifts from organizing to alarming.This episode also revisits a recent WisdomWednesday quote about replacing “I'm overwhelmed” with “I need to decide what matters most and go slow.” Molly clarifies why that statement is directionally true but not neurologically instant. She explains how language influences prediction, prediction shapes physiology, and physiology drives behavior.What You'll LearnWhy overwhelm is a perception of overload, not simply busynessHow the amygdala flags cognitive threatWhat happens to the prefrontal cortex under stressWhy everything feels urgent when executive function is compromisedThe difference between descriptive and prescriptive thoughtsHow repeating “I'm overwhelmed” reinforces neural prediction loopsWhy prioritization restores cognitive flexibilityHow cognitive reappraisal shifts neural activity over timeKey Concepts ExplainedPerceived Overload Overwhelm occurs when the brain interprets demands as exceeding available resources.Amygdala Activation When ambiguity, uncertainty, and competing priorities rise, the amygdala signals threat, increasing stress hormones like cortisol and norepinephrine.Executive Function The prefrontal cortex is responsible for planning, sequencing, prioritizing, and organizing. Under stress, its efficiency decreases.Descriptive vs Prescriptive Thinking Some thoughts label experience. Others shape future experience. Repeating “I'm overwhelmed” reinforces prediction patterns that sustain the feeling.Cognitive Reappraisal Research shows that reinterpreting a situation increases prefrontal cortex activity and decreases amygdala activation over time.Why Language MattersWhen you repeatedly say “I'm overwhelmed,” your brain begins scanning for confirming evidence. Increased vigilance raises stress. Stress reduces clarity. Reduced clarity reinforces overwhelm.Replacing that statement with a prioritizing phrase does not instantly shut down the alarm system. However, it recruits executive function and begins shifting neural activity toward organization and task-based thinking.Language guides prediction. Prediction guides physiology. Physiology guides behavior.Practical ReframeInstead of:“I'm overwhelmed.”Try:What matters most today?What is the next smallest step?What can wait?This is not positive thinking. It is restoring organizing capacity.Overwhelm signals that prioritization has collapsed. Prioritization is a skill that can be strengthened.Behavior Change ConnectionPeople often abandon habits when they feel overwhelmed, not because they lack discipline, but because executive function is compromised.You cannot build new neural pathways from a chronically alarmed state.Restoring order supports follow-through. ★ Support this podcast ★

In this week's roundup of the latest news in online speech, content moderation and internet regulation, Ben is joined by Dr Blake Hallinan, Professor of Platform Studies in the Department of Media & Journalism Studies at Aarhus University. Together, they discuss:On Section 230's 30th Birthday, A Look Back At Why It's Such A Good Law And Why Messing With It Would Be Bad (Techdirt)An 18-Million-Subscriber YouTuber Just Explained Section 230 Better Than Every Politician In Washington (Techdirt)Discord Launches Teen-by-Default Settings Globally (Discord)Media Literacy Parent's study (GOV.UK)EU says TikTok must disable ‘addictive' features like infinite scroll, fix its recommendation engine (Techcrunch)We Didn't Ask for This Internet with Tim Wu and Cory Doctorow (The New York Times)Despite Meta's ban, Fidesz candidates successfully posted 162 political ads on Facebook in January 9 (Lakmusz.hu)Claude's Constitution Needs a Bill of Rights and Oversight (Oversight Board)Account Closed Without Notice: Debanking Adult Industry Workers in Canada (ResearchGate)Play along with Ctrl-Alt-Speech's 2026 Bingo Card and get in touch if you win! Ctrl-Alt-Speech is a weekly podcast from Techdirt and Everything in Moderation. Send us your feedback at podcast@ctrlaltspeech.com and sponsorship enquiries to sponsorship@ctrlaltspeech.com. Thanks for listening.

The Bowhunter Chronicles Podcast - Episode 388: Digital Deer Camp - Walter Lee - Welcome to the Fire In this episode of The Bowhunter Chronicles, Adam Miller and Walt Lee IV sit down to reflect on the past hunting season and explore what it truly means to be an intentional hunter. From battling cold weather in the whitetail woods to simplifying gear and expectations, the conversation digs into practical lessons learned through real time in the field. Adam and Walt discuss cold weather bowhunting strategies, mindset over gear, and how preparation, experience, and presence matter more than the latest equipment. They also examine how social media and modern marketing have shaped the hunting industry, often creating unrealistic expectations that clash with the realities of public land and everyday hunters. The episode goes deeper into the balance between control and luck in hunting, the importance of setting realistic goals, and why many hunters choose to pass deer others would gladly shoot. Beyond tags filled, the conversation highlights the adventure of hunting and fishing, personal growth through time outdoors, and the value of building a supportive hunting community. The discussion wraps with a look at Digital Deer Camp and its mission to create a positive, respectful space where hunters can learn, connect, and grow together—keeping the focus on enjoying the outdoors and making the most of local hunting opportunities. Topics Covered: Cold weather bowhunting tips and gear considerations Hunting mindset vs. equipment obsession Setting realistic goals and managing expectations The role of luck, control, and preparation in hunting success Social media's impact on the hunting industry Building community through Digital Deer Camp Finding fulfillment beyond the kill Chapters00:00 The Podcast Journey Begins 02:19 Weathering the Cold: Tips and Tricks 05:10 Reflections on the Hunting Season 07:37 Cold Weather Gear: What Works 10:07 Simplifying Hunting Gear and Strategies 12:59 The Mindset of Successful Hunters 15:29 The Balance of Gear and Experience 18:33 Intentional Hunting vs. Aspirational Hunting 33:22 Intentionality vs. Aspiration in Hunting 39:26 The Tale of Two Brothers: Different Hunting Goals 45:21 Reflections on the Hunting Season 54:42 Evolution of Mindset in the Hunting Industry 59:42 The Role of Control and Luck in Hunting 01:04:50 Understanding the Nuances of Hunting Success 01:10:12 Setting Realistic Goals in Hunting 01:16:25 Pursuing a Balanced Outdoor Lifestyle 01:25:54 Building a Positive Hunting Community 01:33:46 Building a Community: The Digital Deer Camp Vision 01:36:49 Moderation and Self-Policing in Digital Spaces 01:39:02 Membership Tiers and Community Engagement 01:42:33 Future Aspirations and Growth of Digital Deer Camp 01:45:10 Marketing Strategies and Word of Mouth 01:47:05 Personal Connections and Hunting Experiences https://www.paintedarrow.com - BHC15 for 15% off https://www.spartanforge.ai (https://www.spartanforge.ai/)  - save 25% with code bowhunter   https://www.latitudeoutdoors.com (https://www.latitudeoutdoors.com/) s https://www.zingerfletches.com (https://www.zingerfletches.com/) https://huntworthgear.com/ https://www.lucky-buck.com (https://www.lucky-buck.com/) https://www.bigshottargets.com (https://www.bigshottargets.com/)   https://genesis3dprinting.com (https://genesis3dprinting.com/) https://vitalizeseed.com (https://vitalizeseed.com/) http://bit.ly/BHCPatreon Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hadley Sorensen didn't stop drinking four years ago because everything fell apart. She quit because something felt off, even though from the outside, her drinking looked completely normal. That intuitive hit led her to do what only 1% of people ever do – write the book she couldn't find: The Dirty Truth on Social Drinking: "Everything in Moderation" and Other BS. Hadley talks about how she is dismantling the toxic narratives around "mommy wine juice culture" which can keep you stuck in shame, and the belief that you need a dramatic reason to quit. You don't need to keep doing something that makes you feel like crap just because everyone else is.   IN THIS EPISODE: Why moderate alcohol use can leave you feeling out of alignment and stuck in shame The surprising discoveries Hadley made about her friendships since ditching alcohol Why Hadley lost followers when she stopped being the "wine-loving fitness mom"  Why she wrote the book she desperately needed and couldn't find anywhere  How mommy wine juice culture is evolving from sippy cups to perimenopause jokes   LINKS/RESOURCES MENTIONED Learn more about Hadley Sorensen's book, The Dirty Truth on Social Drinking. Euphoric the Club is the club where successful women who don't drink (and the women who are becoming them) grow together. Get access to all of my alcohol-free programs and methodology for only $62.  If you know you're meant to help other people change their relationship with alcohol and create a profitable online brand, get on the waitlist for the Empowered AF Coach 5x Certification – and get 5x certified as a world class alcohol-free empowerment coach, mindset coach, success coach, NLP practitioner, and hypnosis practitioner. Join during the month of February and get the early bird rate. Awarded the most empowering book in the sober curious genre, be sure to get your copy of Euphoric: Ditch Alcohol and Gain a Happier, More Confident You today and leave a review. Follow @euphoric.af on Instagram. And as always, rate, review, and subscribe so we can continue spreading our message far and wide.

Learning never ends , refuse to be a sheep, question those unwilling to explain. Hypocrisy works one way. Truth will always set us free   Platonic, the studio, has anyone seen Megan 2.0? Code 3, uncharted, the machine, the unholy trinity, valiant one, hand maidens tale sequel.   What's in lunch meat ? Moderation makes eating easier, water fasting, brocolli chicken pasta. Weeknight butter chicken, cesar supreme salad.   Happy Tuesday stars

summaryIn this episode of Vitality Made Simple, Dr. Debbie Ozment discusses the importance of viewing health through a biblical lens, emphasizing vitality over mere longevity. She explores the benefits of garlic, particularly in its raw and fermented forms, highlighting its medicinal properties and impact on gut health. The conversation also touches on practical strategies for enhancing vitality through simple, natural remedies, and the importance of moderation in consumption.takeawaysVitality encompasses spirit, soul, and body.Health should be viewed through a biblical perspective.It's essential to focus on basic health strategies.Garlic has been used for centuries for its health benefits.Fermented garlic is easier on the stomach than raw garlic.Garlic can improve heart health and lipid profiles.Garlic has antimicrobial properties and can boost immunity.Fermented honey garlic is a delicious and beneficial remedy.Garlic enhances gut health by increasing beneficial bacteria.Moderation is key when consuming garlic and other health foods.Disclaimer: This podcast is for general information and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute medical or dental advice. Any mention of products, services, tests, or supplements is not an endorsement and may include affiliate links. Guest views are their own and may not reflect the views of Dr. Debbie Ozment or this podcast. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional for advice specific to your situation.Visit my website DrDebbieOzment.com for valuable free downloads. Additionally, you will find shopping links which I have curated on the website. Please follow me on instagram at drdebbieozment.

In this special bonus for Ctrl-Alt-Speech listeners, we're cross-posting an episode from the Future Around And Find Out podcast hosted by Dan Blumberg with guest Kwaku Aning.This week Dan and Kwaku dig into: The uncanny valley that is AI agents and Moltbook—the "Reddit" that agents built for themselves to complain about humans, create a religion, and behave in ways that freak humans out Anthropic takes aim at OpenAI with a Super Bowl ad that's spicy (for cubs and cougars alike) We read Claude's "Constitution" and ask: Should AI do what you ask it to do—or what it thinks you really want long-term? Why Dan switched from OpenAI to Claude (and what he learned about tone, capability, and custom projects) OpenAI scrambles; the market stumbles; Jensen Huang acts like Sam Altman is "just someone I used to know" How AEO (AI Engine Optimization) becomes critical in an AI-agent world—and what that means for brand, marketing, and search Why social media is already past (dark social won) Elon's pivot to humanoid robots, data centers in space, and other cool things we definitely need Are we setting higher ethical standards for machines than for tech leaders? Subscribe to FAFO wherever you get your podcasts, or at futurearound.com Ctrl-Alt-Speech is a weekly podcast from Techdirt and Everything in Moderation. Send us your feedback at podcast@ctrlaltspeech.com and sponsorship enquiries to sponsorship@ctrlaltspeech.com. Thanks for listening.

Today we have Lewis. He is 39 years old from Burlington, VT and he took his last rink of alcohol on June 12th, 2025.   This episode is brought to you by:   Sign up and get 10% off: Better Help   August 12th – 16th: Get ready to elevate your alcohol-free life in Big Sky Country. Join RE in Bozeman, Montana for our annual sober summer retreat. Registration opens April 1st. This isn't your typical retreat. We're talking adventure, laughter and deep bonds with people who get it. This retreat will remind you why choosing freedom over booze was the best decision you ever made.   [01:52] Thoughts from Paul:   This week, Paul talks about something that doesn't get discussed enough in recovery: patience and preparation.   Getting sober takes time. Preparing for your new life takes time. Some people are able to spontaneously quit drinking and never look back, but most have to slowly build momentum before trust falling into an alcohol-free life.   Some of you may have been listening to this podcast for years and feeling guilty for still drinking – DON'T. Maybe you think you are failing because you haven't quit yet. You're NOT. You are in preparation mode and intentional preparation is sacred work.   Every time you question whether alcohol is worth it, you're gathering intelligence. Every moment you imagine life without drinking; you're building the mental map you'll need for the actual journey.   This week, give yourself permission to be exactly where you are. If you're still drinking and listening, you're right where you need to be. It doesn't matter if you quit yesterday, last month or several years ago, you're right where you need to be.   [06:46] Paul introduces Lewis:   Lewis is 39 years old and grew up in Australia but now lives in Burlington, VT.  He runs a business. For fun, Lewis likes run and being outdoors snowboarding, surfing, eat good food and hang out with friends.   Lewis grew up with two brothers, who he is still close with, and says they had a great childhood living in a remote area in Western Australia. He tried alcohol for the first time when he was 14 and loved it immediately.   Lewis' drinking took off while attending university in Perth where the social life mainly revolved around alcohol. He didn't realize at the time that he was drinking more than others. He completed his studies in Canada where his drinking escalated because he was away from family and responsibilities. The drinking became a daily habit when he began his career as a bartender while in Greece.   Lewis moved back to Australia and began working in a brewery. He enjoyed that fact that there were less people there judging him. He knew his drinking was problematic when more and more negative things started happening, but he wasn't ready to confront it. There were many attempts to moderate, and he was able to take breaks, but never got it completely under control.   In 2020, Lewis realized he was powerless over alcohol but wasn't ready to accept it. Moderation attempts continued and Lewis moved to Vermont hoping the geographical cure would help him. He was a binge drinker, so daily drinking wasn't a concern for him, but he began having falls and missing work due to his binges.   On his last binge, it finally occurred to him that if he kept going, he was going to lose everything or die. He woke up last June and made the decision to finally stop drinking.   Lewis joined AA and found a great community within it. He started out going to at least five meetings a week and found a sponsor in a friend he had previously met at the gym while he was still drinking. Lewis is very open about his recovery and has found that most people have been very supportive.    Tools that are helpful to Lewis include podcasts, quit-lit, The Phoenix (sober workout community), his higher power and AA. Lewis is learning he can make plans, have goals and follow through with them.   Recovery Elevator You took the elevator down You gotta take the stairs back up. We can do this!       RE Instagram Sobriety Tracker iTunes  RE YouTube Café RE      

Last time we spoke about The Battle of Suixian–Zaoyang-Shatow. Following the brutal 1938 capture of Wuhan, Japanese forces aimed to solidify their hold by launching an offensive against Chinese troops in the 5th War Zone, a rugged natural fortress in northern Hubei and southern Henan. Under General Yasuji Okamura, the 11th Army deployed three divisions and cavalry in a pincer assault starting May 1, 1939, targeting Suixian and Zaoyang to crush Nationalist resistance and secure flanks. Chinese commander Li Zongren, leveraging terrain like the Dabie and Tongbai Mountains, orchestrated defenses with over 200,000 troops, including Tang Enbo's 31st Army Group. By May 23, they recaptured Suixian and Zaoyang, forcing a Japanese withdrawal with heavy losses, over 13,000 Japanese casualties versus 25,000 Chinese, restoring pre-battle lines. Shifting south, Japan targeted Shantou in Guangdong to sever supply lines from Hong Kong. In a massive June 21 amphibious assault, the 21st Army overwhelmed thin Chinese defenses, capturing the port and Chao'an despite guerrilla resistance led by Zhang Fakui. Though losses mounted, Japan tightened its blockade, straining China's war effort amid ongoing attrition.   #188 From Changkufeng to Nomonhan Welcome to the Fall and Rise of China Podcast, I am your dutiful host Craig Watson. But, before we start I want to also remind you this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Perhaps you want to learn more about the history of Asia? Kings and Generals have an assortment of episodes on history of asia and much more  so go give them a look over on Youtube. So please subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry for some more history related content, over on my channel, the Pacific War Channel where I cover the history of China and Japan from the 19th century until the end of the Pacific War. Well hello again, and yes you all have probably guessed we are taking another detour. Do not worry I hope to shorten this one a bit more so than what became a sort of mini series on the battle of Changkufeng or Battle of Lake Khasan. What we are about to jump into is known in the west as the battle of khalkin Gol, by the Japanese the Nomohan incident. But first I need to sort of set the table up so to say. So back on August 10th, 1938 the Litvinov-Shigemitsu agreement established a joint border commission tasked with redemarcating the disputed boundary between the Soviet Union and Japanese-controlled Manchukuo. However, this commission never achieved a mutually agreeable definition of the border in the contested area. In reality, the outcome was decided well before the group's inaugural meeting. Mere hours after the cease-fire took effect on the afternoon of August 11, General Grigory Shtern convened with a regimental commander from Japan's 19th Division to coordinate the disengagement of forces. With the conflict deemed "honorably" concluded, Japan's Imperial General Headquarters mandated the swift withdrawal of all Japanese troops to the west bank of the Tumen River. By the night of August 13, as the final Japanese soldier crossed the river, it effectively became the de facto border. Soviet forces promptly reoccupied Changkufeng Hill and the adjacent heights—a move that would carry unexpected and profound repercussions. Authoritative Japanese military analyses suggest that if negotiations in Moscow had dragged on for just one more day, the 19th Division would likely have been dislodged from Changkufeng and its surrounding elevations. Undoubtedly, General Shtern's infantry breathed a sigh of relief as the bloodshed ceased. Yet, one can't help but question why Moscow opted for a cease-fire at a juncture when Soviet troops were on the cusp of total battlefield triumph. Perhaps Kremlin leaders deemed it wiser to settle for a substantial gain, roughly three-quarters of their objectives, rather than risk everything. After all, Japan had mobilized threatening forces in eastern Manchuria, and the Imperial Army had a history of impulsive, unpredictable aggression. Moreover, amid the escalating crisis over Czechoslovakia, Moscow may have been wary of provoking a broader Asian conflict. Another theory posits that Soviet high command was misinformed about the ground situation. Reports of capturing a small segment of Changkufeng's crest might have been misinterpreted as control over the entire ridge, or an imminent full takeover before midnight on August 10. The unexpected phone call from Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov to the Japanese embassy that night—proposing a one-kilometer Japanese retreat in exchange for a cease-fire along existing lines—hints at communication breakdowns between Shtern's headquarters and the Kremlin. Ironically, such lapses may have preserved Japanese military honor, allowing the 19th Division's evacuation through diplomacy rather than defeat. Both sides endured severe losses. Initial Japanese press reports claimed 158 killed and 740 wounded. However, the 19th Division's medical logs reveal a grimmer toll: 526 dead and 914 injured, totaling 1,440 casualties. The true figure may have climbed higher, possibly to 1,500–2,000. Following the armistice, the Soviet news agency TASS reported 236 Red Army fatalities and 611 wounded. Given Shtern's uphill assaults across open terrain against entrenched positions, these numbers seem understated. Attackers in such scenarios typically suffered two to three times the defenders' losses, suggesting Soviet casualties ranged from 3,000 to 5,000. This aligns with a Soviet Military Council investigation on August 31, 1938, which documented 408 killed and 2,807 wounded. Japanese estimates placed Soviet losses even higher, at 4,500–7,000. Not all victims perished in combat. Marshal Vasily Blyukher, a decorated Soviet commander, former warlord of the Far East, and Central Committee candidate, was summoned to Moscow in August 1938. Relieved of duty in September and arrested with his family in October, he faced charges of inadequate preparation against Japanese aggression and harboring "enemies of the people" within his ranks. On November 9, 1938, Blyukher died during interrogation a euphemism for torture-induced death.Other innocents suffered as well. In the wake of the fighting, Soviet authorities deported hundreds of thousands of Korean rice farmers from the Ussuri region to Kazakhstan, aiming to eradicate Korean settlements that Japanese spies had allegedly exploited. The Changkufeng clash indirectly hampered Japan's Wuhan offensive, a massive push to subdue China. The influx of troops and supplies for this campaign was briefly disrupted by the border flare-up. Notably, Kwantung Army's 2nd Air Group, slated for Wuhan, was retained due to the Soviet threat. Chiang Kai-shek's drastic measure, breaching the Yellow River dikes to flood Japanese advance routes—further delayed the assault. By October 25, 1938, when Japanese forces captured Hankow, Chiang had relocated his capital to distant Chungking. Paradoxically, Wuhan's fall cut rail links from Canton inland, heightening Chiang's reliance on Soviet aid routed overland and by air from Central Asia. Japan secured a tactical win but missed the decisive blow; Chinese resistance persisted, pinning down a million Japanese troops in occupation duties. What was the true significance of Changkufeng? For General Koiso Suetaka and the 19th Division, it evoked a mix of bitterness and pride. Those eager for combat got their share, though not on their terms. To veterans mourning fallen comrades on those desolate slopes, it might have felt like senseless tragedy. Yet, they fought valiantly under dire conditions, holding firm until a retreat that blended humiliation with imperial praise, a bittersweet inheritance. For the Red Army, it marked a crucial trial of resolve amid Stalin's purges. While Shtern's forces didn't shine brilliantly, they acquitted themselves well in adversity. The U.S. military attaché in Moscow observed that any purge-related inefficiencies had been surmounted, praising the Red Army's valor, reliability, and equipment. His counterpart in China, Colonel Joseph Stilwell, put it bluntly: the Soviets "appeared to advantage," urging skeptics to rethink notions of a weakened Red Army. Yet, by World War II's eve, many British, French, German, and Japanese leaders still dismissed it as a "paper tiger." Soviet leaders appeared content, promoting Shtern to command the Transbaikal Military District and colonel general by 1940, while honoring "Heroes of Lake Khasan" with medals. In a fiery November 7, 1938, speech, Marshal Kliment Voroshilov warned that future incursions would prompt strikes deep into enemy territory. Tokyo's views diverged sharply. Many in the military and government saw it as a stain on Imperial Army prestige, especially Kwantung Army, humiliated on Manchukuo soil it swore to protect. Colonel Masanobu Tsuji Inada, however, framed it as a successful reconnaissance, confirming Soviet border defense without broader aggression, allowing the Wuhan push to proceed safely. Critics, including Major General Gun Hashimoto and historians, questioned this. They argued IGHQ lacked contingency plans for a massive Soviet response, especially with Wuhan preparations underway since June. One expert warned Japan had "played with fire," risking Manchuria and Korea if escalation occurred. Yet, Japanese commanders gleaned few lessons, downplaying Soviet materiel superiority and maintaining disdain for Red Army prowess. The 19th Division's stand against outnumbered odds reinforced this hubris, as did tolerance for local insubordination—attitudes that would prove costly. The Kremlin, conversely, learned Japan remained unpredictable despite its China quagmire. But for Emperor Hirohito's intervention, the conflict might have ballooned. Amid purges and the Czech crisis, Stalin likely viewed it as a reminder of eastern vulnerabilities, especially with Munich advancing German threats westward. Both sides toyed with peril. Moderation won in Tokyo, but Kwantung Army seethed. On August 11, Premier Fumimaro Konoye noted the need for caution. Kwantung, however, pushed for and secured control of the disputed salient from Chosen Army by October 8, 1938. Even winter's chill couldn't quench their vengeful fire, setting the stage for future confrontations. A quick look at the regional map reveals how Manchukuo and the Mongolian People's Republic each jut into the other's territory like protruding salients. These bulges could be seen as aggressive thrusts into enemy land, yet they also risked encirclement and absorption by the opposing empire. A northward push from western Manchuria through Mongolia could sever the MPR and Soviet Far East from the USSR's heartland. Conversely, a pincer movement from Mongolia and the Soviet Maritime Province might envelop and isolate Manchukuo. This dynamic highlights the frontier's strategic volatility in the 1930s. One particularly tense sector was the broad Mongolian salient extending about 150 miles eastward into west-central Manchukuo. There, in mid-1939, Soviet-Japanese tensions erupted into major combat. Known to the Japanese as the Nomonhan Incident and to the Soviets and Mongolians as the Battle of Khalkhin Gol, this clash dwarfed the earlier Changkufeng affair in scale, duration, and impact. Spanning four months and claiming 30,000 to 50,000 casualties, it amounted to a small undeclared war, the modern era's first limited conflict between great powers. The Mongolian salient features vast, semiarid plains of sandy grassland, gently rolling terrain dotted with sparse scrub pines and low shrubs. The climate is unforgivingly continental: May brings hot days and freezing nights, while July and August see daytime highs exceeding 38°C (100°F in American units), with cool evenings. Swarms of mosquitoes and massive horseflies necessitate netting in summer. Rainfall is scarce, but dense morning fogs are common in August. Come September, temperatures plummet, with heavy snows by October and midwinter lows dipping to –34°C. This blend of North African aridity and North Dakotan winters supports only sparse populations, mainly two related but distinct Mongol tribes. The Buriat (or Barga) Mongols migrated into the Nomonhan area from the northwest in the late 17th to early 18th centuries, likely fleeing Russian expansion after the 1689 Treaty of Nerchinsk. Organized by Manchu emperors between 1732 and 1735, they settled east of the river they called Khalkhin Gol (Mongolian for "river"), in lands that would later become Manchukuo. The Khalkha Mongols, named for the word meaning "barrier" or "shield," traditionally guarded the Mongol Empire's northern frontiers. Their territories lay west of the Buriats, in what would become the MPR. For centuries, these tribes herded livestock across sands, river crossings, and desert paths, largely oblivious to any formal borders. For hundreds of years, the line dividing the Mongolian salient from western Manchuria was a hazy administrative divide within the Qing Empire. In the 20th century, Russia's detachment of Outer Mongolia and Japan's seizure of Manchuria transformed this vague boundary into a frontline between rival powers. The Nomonhan Incident ignited over this contested border. Near the salient's northeastern edge, the river, called Khalkhin Gol by Mongols and Soviets, and Halha by Manchurians and Japanese, flows northwest into Lake Buir Nor. The core dispute: Was the river, as Japan asserted, the historic boundary between Manchukuo and the MPR? Soviet and MPR officials insisted the line ran parallel to and 10–12 miles east of the river, claiming the intervening strip. Japan cited no fewer than 18 maps, from Chinese and Japanese sources, to support the river as the border, a logical choice in such barren terrain, where it served as the sole natural divider. Yet, Soviets and Mongolians countered with evidence like a 1919 Chinese postal atlas and maps from Japanese and Manchukuoan agencies (1919–1934). Unbeknownst to combatants, in July 1939, China's military attaché in Moscow shared a 1934 General Staff map with his American counterpart, showing the border east of the river. Postwar Japanese studies of 18th-century Chinese records confirm that in 1734, the Qing emperor set a boundary between Buriat and Khalkha Mongols east of the river, passing through the hamlet of Nomonhan—as the Soviets claimed. However, Kwantung Army Headquarters dismissed this as non-binding, viewing it as an internal Qing affair without Russian involvement. Two former Kwantung Army officers offer a pragmatic explanation: From 1931 to 1935, when Soviet forces in the Far East were weak, Japanese and Manchukuoan authorities imposed the river as the de facto border, with MPR acquiescence. By the mid- to late 1930s, as Soviet strength grew, Japan refused to yield, while Mongolians and Soviets rejected the river line, sparking clashes. In 1935, Kwantung Army revised its maps to align with the river claim. From late that year, the Lake Buir Nor–Halha sector saw frequent skirmishes between Manchukuoan and MPR patrols. Until mid-1938, frontier defense in northwestern Manchukuo fell to the 8th Border Garrison Unit , based near Hailar. This 7,000-man force, spread thin, lacked mobility, training, and, in Kwantung Army's eyes, combat readiness. That summer, the newly formed 23rd Division, under Kwantung Army, took station at Hailar, absorbing the 8th BGU under its command, led by Lieutenant General Michitaro Komatsubara. At 52, Komatsubara was a premier Russian specialist in the Imperial Army, with stints as military attaché in the USSR and head of Kwantung's Special Services Agency in Harbin. Standing 5'7" with a sturdy build, glasses, and a small mustache, he was detail-oriented, keeping meticulous diaries, writing lengthy letters, and composing poetry, though he lacked combat experience. Before departing Tokyo in July 1938, Komatsubara received briefings from Colonel Masazumi Inada, AGS Operations Section chief. Amid planning for Changkufeng, Inada urged calm on the Manchukuo-MPR border given China's ongoing campaigns. Guidelines: Ignore minor incidents, prioritize intelligence on Soviet forces east of Lake Baikal, and study operations against the Soviet Far East's western sector. Familiar with the region from his Harbin days, Komatsubara adopted a low-key approach. Neither impulsive nor aggressive, he kept the green 23rd Division near Hailar, delegating patrols to the 8th BGU. An autumn incident underscores his restraint. On November 1, 1938, an 8th BGU patrol was ambushed by MPR forces. Per Japanese accounts, the three-man team, led by a lieutenant, strayed too close to the border and was attacked 50 meters inside Manchukuo. The lieutenant escaped, but his men died. Komatsubara sent an infantry company to secure the site but forbade retaliation. He pursued body recovery diplomatically, protested to MPR and Soviet officials, and disciplined his officers: garrison leaders got five days' confinement for poor troop training, the lieutenant thirty days. Despite this caution, pressures at AGS and KwAHQ were mounting, poised to thrust the 23rd Division into fierce battle. Modern militaries routinely develop contingency plans against potential adversaries, and the mere existence of such strategies doesn't inherently signal aggressive intentions. That said, shifts in Japan's operational planning vis-à-vis the Soviet Union may have inadvertently fueled the Nomonhan Incident. From 1934 to 1938, Japanese war scenarios emphasized a massive surprise assault in the Ussuri River region, paired with defensive holding actions in northwestern Manchuria. However, between mid-1938 and early 1939, a clandestine joint task force from the Army General Staff  and Kwantung Army's Operations Departments crafted a bold new blueprint. This revised strategy proposed containing Soviet forces in the east and north while unleashing a full-scale offensive from Hailar, advancing west-northwest toward Chita and ultimately Lake Baikal. The goal: sever the Transbaikal Soviet Far East from the USSR's core. Dubbed Plan Eight-B, it gained Kwantung Army's endorsement in March 1939. Key architects—Colonels Takushiro Hattori and Masao Terada, along with Major Takeharu Shimanuki—were reassigned from AGS to Kwantung Army Headquarters to oversee implementation. The plan anticipated a five-year buildup before execution, with Hattori assuming the role of chief operations staff officer.  A map review exposes a glaring vulnerability in Plan Eight-B: the Japanese advance would leave its southern flank exposed to Soviet counterstrikes from the Mongolian salient. By spring 1939, KwAHQ likely began perceiving this protrusion as a strategic liability. Notably, at the outbreak of Nomonhan hostilities, no detailed operational contingencies for the area had been formalized. Concurrently, Japan initiated plans for a vital railroad linking Harlun Arshan to Hailar. While its direct tie to Plan Eight-B remains unclear, the route skirted perilously close to the Halha River, potentially heightening KwAHQ's focus on the disputed Mongolian salient. In early 1939, the 23rd Division intensified reconnaissance patrols near the river. Around this time, General Grigory Shtern, freshly appointed commander of Soviet Far Eastern forces, issued a public warning that Japan was gearing up for an assault on the Mongolian People's Republic. As Plan Eight-B took shape and railroad proposals advanced, KwAHQ issued a strikingly confrontational set of guidelines for frontier troops. These directives are often cited as a catalyst for the Nomonhan clash, forging a chain linking the 1937 Amur River incident, the 1938 Changkufeng debacle, and the 1939 conflict.Resentment had festered at KwAHQ over perceived AGS meddling during the Amur affair, which curtailed their command autonomy. This frustration intensified at Changkufeng, where General Kamezo Suetaka's 19th Division endured heavy losses, only for the contested Manchukuoan territory to be effectively ceded. Kwantung Army lobbied successfully to wrest oversight of the Changkufeng salient from Chosen Army. In November 1938, Major Masanobu Tsuji of KwAHQ's Operations Section was sent to survey the site. The audacious officer was dismayed: Soviet forces dominated the land from the disputed ridge to the Tumen River. Tsuji undertook several winter reconnaissance missions. His final outing in March 1939 involved leading 40 men to Changkufeng's base. With rifles slung non-threateningly, they ascended to within 200 yards of Soviet lines, formed a line, and urinated in unison, eliciting amused reactions from the enemy. They then picnicked with obentos and sake, sang army tunes, and left gifts of canned meat, chocolates, and whiskey. This theatrical stunt concealed Tsuji's real aim: covert photography proving Soviet fortifications encroached on Manchukuoan soil. Tsuji was a singular figure. Born of modest means, he embodied a modern samurai ethos, channeling a sharp intellect into a frail, often ailing body through feats of extraordinary daring. A creative tactician, he thrived in intelligence ops, political scheming, aerial scouting, planning, and frontline command—excelling across a tumultuous career. Yet, flaws marred his brilliance: narrow bigotry, virulent racism, and capacity for cruelty. Ever the ambitious outsider, Tsuji wielded outsized influence via gekokujo—Japan's tradition of subordinates steering policy from below. In 1939, he was a major, but his pivotal role at Nomonhan stemmed from this dynamic. Back in Hsinking after his Changkufeng escapade, Tsuji drafted a response plan: negotiate border "rectification" with the Soviets; if talks failed, launch an attack to expel intruders. Kwantung Army adopted it. Deputy Chief of Staff Major General Otozaburo Yano flew to Tokyo with Tsuji's photos, seeking AGS approval. There, he was rebuffed—Changkufeng was deemed settled, and minor violations should be overlooked amid Tokyo's aversion to Soviet conflict. Yano's plea that leniency would invite aggression was countered by notes on Europe's tensions restraining Moscow. Yano's return sparked outrage at KwAHQ, seen as AGS thwarting their imperial duty to safeguard Manchukuo. Fury peaked in the Operations Section, setting the stage for Tsuji's drafting of stringent new frontier guidelines: "Principles for the Settlement of Soviet-Manchukuoan Border Disputes." The core tenet: "If Soviet troops transgress the Manchukuoan frontiers, Kwantung Army will nip their ambitions in the bud by completely destroying them." Specific directives for local commanders included: "If the enemy crosses the frontiers … annihilate him without delay, employing strength carefully built up beforehand. To accomplish our mission, it is permissible to enter Soviet territory, or to trap or lure Soviet troops into Manchukuoan territory and allow them to remain there for some time… . Where boundary lines are not clearly defined, area defense commanders will, upon their own initiative, establish boundaries and indicate them to the forward elements… . In the event of an armed clash, fight until victory is won, regardless of relative strengths or of the location of the boundaries. If the enemy violates the borders, friendly units must challenge him courageously and endeavor to triumph in their zone of action without concerning themselves about the consequences, which will be the responsibility of higher headquarters." Major Tsuji Masanobu later justified the new guidelines by pointing to the "contradictory orders" that had hamstrung frontier commanders under the old rules. They were tasked with upholding Manchukuo's territorial integrity yet forbidden from actions that might spark conflict. This, Tsuji argued, bred hesitation, as officers feared repercussions for decisive responses to incursions. The updated directives aimed to alleviate this "anxiety," empowering local leaders to act boldly without personal liability. In truth, Tsuji's "Principles for the Settlement of Soviet-Manchukuoan Border Disputes" were more incendiary than conciliatory. They introduced provocative measures: authorizing commanders to unilaterally define unclear boundaries, enforce them with immediate force "shoot first, ask questions later", permit pursuits into enemy territory, and even encourage luring adversaries across the line. Such tactics flouted both government policy and official army doctrine, prioritizing escalation over restraint. The proposals sparked intense debate within Kwantung Army's Operations Section. Section chief Colonel Takushiro Hattori and Colonel Masao Terada outranked Tsuji, as did Major Takeharu Shimanuki, all recent transfers from the Army General Staff. Tsuji, however, boasted longer tenure at Kwantung Army Headquarters since April 1936 and in Operations since November 1937, making him the de facto veteran. Hattori and Terada hesitated to challenge the assertive major, whose reputation for intellect, persuasion, and deep knowledge of Manchuria commanded respect. In a 1960 interview, Shimanuki recalled Tsuji's dominance in discussions, where his proactive ideas often swayed the group. Unified, the section forwarded Tsuji's plan to Kwantung Army Command. Commander Lieutenant General Kenkichi Ueda consulted Chief of Staff General Rensuke Isogai and Vice Chief General Otozaburo Yano, seasoned leaders who should have spotted the guidelines' volatility. Yet, lingering grudges from AGS "interference" in past incidents like the Amur River and Changkufeng clouded their judgment. Ueda, Isogai, and Tsuji shared history from the 1932 Shanghai Incident: Tsuji, then a captain, led a company in the 7th Regiment under Colonel Isogai, with Yano as staff officer and Ueda commanding the 9th Division. Tsuji was wounded there, forging bonds of camaraderie. This "clique," which grew to include Hattori, Terada, and Shimanuki, amplified Tsuji's influence. Despite Isogai's initial reservations as the group's moderate voice, the guidelines won approval. Ueda issued them as Kwantung Army Operations Order 1488 on April 25, 1939, during a division commanders' conference at KwAHQ. A routine copy reached AGS in Tokyo, but no formal reply came. Preoccupied with the China War and alliance talks with Germany, AGS may have overlooked border matters. Colonel Masazumi Inada, AGS Operations head, later noted basic acceptance of Order 1488, with an informal expectation—relayed to Hattori and Terada—of prior consultation on violations. KwAHQ dismissed this as another Tokyo intrusion on their autonomy. Some Japanese analysts contend a stern AGS rejection might have prevented Nomonhan's catastrophe, though quelling Kwantung's defiance could have required mass staff reassignments, a disruptive step AGS avoided. Tsuji countered that permitting forceful action at Changkufeng would have deterred Nomonhan altogether, underscoring the interconnectedness of these clashes while implicitly critiquing the 1939 battle's location. Undeniably, Order 1488's issuance on April 25 paved the way for conflict three weeks later. Japanese records confirm that Khalkha Mongols and MPR patrols routinely crossed the Halha River—viewed by them as internal territory, 10 miles from the true border. Such crossings passed uneventfully in March and April 1939. Post-Order 1488, however, 23rd Division commander General Michitaro Komatsubara responded aggressively, setting the stage for escalation. The Nomonhan Incident ignited with a border clash on May 11–12, 1939, that rapidly spiraled into a major conflict. Over a dozen "authoritative" accounts exist, varying in viewpoint, focus, and specifics. After cross-referencing these sources, a coherent timeline emerges. On the night of May 10–11, a 20-man Mongolian People's Republic border patrol crossed eastward over the Halha River (known as Khalkhin Gol to Mongols and Soviets). About 10 miles east, atop a 150-foot sandy hill, lay the tiny hamlet of Nomonhan, a cluster of crude huts housing a few Mongol families. Just south flowed the Holsten River, merging westward into the broader Halha. By morning on May 11, Manchukuoan forces spotted the MPR patrol north of the Holsten and west of Nomonhan. In the MPR/Soviet perspective, Nomonhan Hill marked the Mongolia-Manchuria border. To Manchukuoans and Japanese, it sat 10 miles inside Manchukuo, well east of the Halha. A 40-man Manchukuoan cavalry unit repelled the Mongolians back across the river, inflicting initial casualties on both sides—the Manchukuoans drawing first blood. The MPR patrol leader exaggerated the attackers as 200 strong. The next day, May 12, a 60-man MPR force under Major P. Chogdan evicted the Manchukuoans from the disputed zone, reestablishing positions between the Halha and Nomonhan. The Manchukuoans, in turn, reported facing 700 enemies. Sporadic skirmishes and maneuvering persisted through the week. On May 13, two days post-clash, the local Manchukuoan commander alerted General Michitaro Komatsubara's 23rd Division headquarters in Hailar. Simultaneously, Major Chogdan reported to Soviet military command in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia's capital. What began as a Mongolian-Manchukuoan spat was poised to draw in Soviet and Japanese patrons. Attributing the May 10–11 violation hinges on border interpretations: both sides claimed the Halha-Nomonhan strip. Yet, most accounts concur that Manchukuoan forces initiated the fighting. Post-May 13 notifications to Moscow and Tokyo clarify the record thereafter. Midday on May 13, Komatsubara was leading a staff conference on the newly issued Kwantung Army Operations Order 1488—Major Tsuji Masanobu's aggressive border guidelines. Ironically, the first Nomonhan combat report arrived mid-discussion. Officers present recall Komatsubara deciding instantly to "destroy the invading Outer Mongolian forces" per Order 1488. That afternoon, he informed Kwantung Army Headquarters of the incident and his intent to eradicate the intruders, requesting air support and trucks. General Kenkichi Ueda, Kwantung commander, approved Komatsubara's "positive attitude," dispatching six scout planes, 40 fighters, 10 light bombers, two anti-aircraft batteries, and two motorized transport companies. Ueda added a caveat: exercise "extreme caution" to prevent escalation—a paradoxical blend of destruction and restraint, reflective of KwAHQ's fervent mood. Ueda relayed the details to Tokyo's Army General Staff, which responded that Kwantung should handle it "appropriately." Despite Kwantung's impulsive reputation, Tokyo deferred, perhaps trusting the northern strategic imbalance, eight Japanese divisions versus 30 Soviet ones from Lake Baikal to Vladivostok, would enforce prudence. This faith proved misguided. On May 14, Major Tsuji flew from KwAHQ for aerial reconnaissance over Nomonhan, spotting 20 horses but no troops. Upon landing, a fresh bullet hole in his plane confirmed lingering MPR presence east of the Halha. Tsuji briefed 23rd Division staff and reported to Ueda that the incident seemed minor. Aligning with Order 1488's spirit, Komatsubara deployed a force under Lieutenant Colonel Yaozo Azuma: an armored car company, two infantry companies, and a cavalry troop. Arriving at Nomonhan on May 15, Azuma learned most MPR forces had retreated westward across the Halha the prior night, with only token elements remaining, and those withdrawing. Undeterred, he pursued. The advance met scant resistance, as foes had crossed the river. However, Japanese light bombers struck a small MPR concentration on the west bank, Outpost Number 7, killing two and wounding 15 per MPR reports; Japanese claimed 30–40 kills. All agree: the raid targeted undisputed MPR territory. Hearing of May 15's events, Komatsubara deemed the Mongolians sufficiently rebuked and recalled Azuma to Hailar on May 16. KwAHQ concurred, closing the matter. Soviet leaders, however, saw it differently. Mid-May prompted Soviet support for the MPR under their 1936 Mutual Defense Pact. The Red Army's 57th Corps, stationed in Mongolia, faced initial disarray: Commander Nikolai Feklenko was hunting, Chief of Staff A. M. Kushchev in Ulan Ude with his ill wife. Moscow learned of clashes via international press from Japanese sources, sparking Chief of Staff Boris Shaposhnikov's furious inquiry. Feklenko and Kushchev rushed back to Ulaanbaatar, dispatching a mixed force—a battalion from the 149th Infantry Regiment (36th Division), plus light armor and artillery from the 11th Tank Brigade—to Tamsag Bulak, 80 miles west of the Halha. Led by Major A. E. Bykov, it bolstered the MPR's 6th Cavalry Division. Bykov and Cavalry Commander Colonel Shoaaiibuu inspected the site on May 15, post-Azum's departure. The cavalry arrived two days later, backed by Bykov (ordered to remain west of the river and avoid combat if possible). Some MPR troops recrossed, occupying the disputed zone. Clashes with Manchukuoan cavalry resumed and intensified. Notified of renewed hostilities, Komatsubara viewed it as defiance, a personal affront. Emboldened by Order 1488, he aimed not just to repel but to encircle and annihilate. The incident was on the verge of major expansion. I would like to take this time to remind you all that this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Please go subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry after that, give my personal channel a look over at The Pacific War Channel at Youtube, it would mean a lot to me. The ghosts of the Changufeng incident have come back to haunt both the USSR and Japan. Those like Tsuji Masanobu instigated yet another border clash that would erupt into a full blown battle that would set a precedent for both nations until the very end of WW2. 

Last week marked World Cancer Day, and in this episode, Molly revisits an important—and often misunderstood—topic: the relationship between alcohol and cancer.This is not a new conversation, and it's not a reaction to headlines. Instead, it's part of an ongoing commitment to helping you understand the science well enough to make informed, intentional choices about alcohol—without fear, shame, or all-or-nothing thinking.One reason this topic continues to matter is a striking gap in awareness: while nearly 90% of adults recognize smoking as a cancer risk, fewer than half realize that alcohol is also classified as a carcinogen Project 1 (50). That lack of awareness makes informed choice difficult—and that's what this episode aims to address.In this episode, you'll learn:Why alcohol is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen, and what that designation actually meansThe seven types of cancer that are clearly linked to alcohol use, including breast cancerHow alcohol increases cancer risk at a biological level (acetaldehyde, inflammation, hormones, and nutrient disruption)Why alcohol research in humans is mostly observational, and what that means for how we interpret the dataThe critical difference between relative risk and absolute risk—and why this distinction mattersWhat experts mean when they say there is “no safe level” of alcohol for cancer riskHow to think about cancer risk through an Alcohol Minimalist, harm-reduction lensKey takeaways:Alcohol does increase cancer risk, but risk is dose-dependent and cumulative, not absolute or immediateRelative risk headlines often sound scarier than the actual, absolute numbersYou do not need perfection—or abstinence—to meaningfully reduce riskReducing frequency, quantity, and duration of drinking patterns mattersAlcohol Minimalism is about reducing unnecessary exposure, not eliminating all riskThis episode is about clarity, not commands. Science isn't here to scare you—it's here to inform you.If you've ever felt overwhelmed by alcohol and health messaging, this episode offers a calmer, more grounded way to understand the risks and decide what feels right for you.As always, choose peace.Resources mentioned:TIME Magazine article on alcohol and cancer riskCDC information on alcohol-related cancersAlcohol Minimalist framework for informed, harm-reduction decision makingIf this episode was helpful, consider sharing it with someone who would appreciate a thoughtful, non-alarmist conversation about alcohol and health.Low risk drinking guidelines from the NIAAA:Healthy men under 65:No more than 4 drinks in one day and no more than 14 drinks per week.Healthy women (all ages) and healthy men 65 and older:No more than 3 drinks in one day and no more than 7 drinks per week.One drink is defined as 12 ounces of beer, 5 ounces of wine, or 1.5 ounces of 80-proof liquor. So remember that a mixed drink or full glass of wine are probably more than one drink.Abstinence from alcoholAbstinence from alcohol is the best choice for people who take medication(s) that interact with alcohol, have health conditions that could be exacerbated by alcohol (e.g. liver disease), are pregnant or may become pregnant or have had a problem with alcohol or another substance in the past.Benefits of “low-risk” drinkingFollowing these guidelines reduces the risk of health problems such as cancer, liver disease, reduced immunity, ulcers, sleep problems, complications of existing conditions, and more. It also reduces the risk of depression, social problems, and difficulties at school or work. ★ Support this podcast ★

In this Think Thursday episode, we explore how the human brain evolved to use discomfort as information—and what happens when modern life removes nearly all friction, effort, and delay.Our brains weren't designed for constant comfort. Discomfort once served as critical feedback, helping guide behavior, attention, rest, and problem-solving. But in today's world of instant gratification and instant relief, discomfort is often treated as a problem to eliminate rather than a signal to interpret.This episode unpacks why that shift matters for brain health, motivation, resilience, and long-term satisfaction—and how intentional discomfort can support a hedonic reset.In this episode, we discuss:Why discomfort evolved as a key feedback mechanism in the human brainHow instant relief interrupts the brain's ability to learn from discomfortThe difference between regulation and comfort from a neuroscience perspectiveHow highly concentrated, low-effort rewards shape motivation and satisfactionThe concept of hedonic adaptation and why “enough” keeps movingWhat a hedonic reset actually is (and what it isn't)How intentional discomfort supports nervous system regulationThe role of dopamine, effort, and delay in sustaining motivationWhy distress tolerance is a foundational skill for behavior changeHow identity shifts through repeated, slightly uncomfortable choicesExpert perspectives referenced:Dr. Anna Lembke, author of Dopamine Nation, on pleasure–pain balance and modern reward concentrationDr. Andrew Huberman on dopamine signaling, effort, and motivationJames Clear on identity following behaviorInspiration from a conversation on the Mel Robbins Podcast with Dr. LembkeOne gentle experiment to try this week:Choose one moment per day when you notice mild discomfort—boredom, restlessness, or the urge to distract—and pause instead of fixing it.Examples:Standing in line without reaching for your phoneSitting with boredom for 60–90 secondsLetting an urge rise and fall without reactingNotice:Where you feel the sensation in your bodyWhat thoughts show upWhether the feeling changes on its ownThis isn't about forcing discomfort or pushing through distress. It's about teaching your nervous system that discomfort is tolerable and temporary—and that awareness alone can create change.Key takeaway:Discomfort isn't a problem to solve. It's information to work with.In a culture built around instant relief and effortless reward, intentional discomfort can be a powerful way to restore balance, protect motivation, and support long-term brain health. ★ Support this podcast ★

A vegan diet nearly cost him his life, leading to severe anorexia and chronic Lyme disease. On episode 855 of the Savage Perspective Podcast, host Robert Sikes sits down with Frank Bohne to hear his unbelievable story. Frank shares the truth about his 10 weeks of forced treatment for his eating disorder, how his testosterone plummeted, and his eventual recovery through a raw carnivore diet. This conversation covers his health journey, from malnourishment to butchering and eating his own raw meat.Ready to build a strong and healthy body with a proven method? Join Robert's FREE Bodybuilding Masterclass to learn the exact steps for optimizing your health and physique. Sign up here: https://www.ketobodybuilding.com/registration-2Follow Frank on IG: https://www.instagram.com/instafrank95/Get Keto Brick: https://www.ketobrick.com/Subscribe to the podcast: https://open.spotify.com/show/42cjJssghqD01bdWBxRYEg?si=1XYKmPXmR4eKw2O9gGCEuQChapters:0:00 - How a Vegan Diet Led to Anorexia & Lyme Disease 0:38 - Guest Intro: Frank Bohne's Radical Transformation 2:55 - What Convinced Him to Go Vegan? 4:09 - His Shocking Weight at 6'1" on a Vegan Diet 6:15 - Was He Binging and Purging or Just Malnourished? 6:41 - The Moment He Realized His Health Was Collapsing 8:13 - Inside the "Psychological Warfare" of Anorexia Treatment 9:56 - His Testosterone Levels Were in the Double Digits 12:00 - The Controversial "Everything in Moderation" Treatment Method 15:09 - What Was His Family Life Like During His Decline? 16:29 - How Do They Measure "Progress" in Treatment? 18:15 - Did He Quit Veganism After Leaving the Hospital? 21:00 - What Kind of "Food" Do They Serve in Treatment? 22:39 - From Veganism to a Keto-Carnivore Diet 24:41 - How Did He Get Chronic Lyme Disease? 26:32 - The Joe Rogan Episode That Changed His Life 28:34 - A Word From Our Host: No Ads, Just Value 30:16 - Why He Started Eating Raw Sheep Eyes 32:48 - Does He Eat Primarily Sheep or Beef? 34:36 - Why Lamb is One of the Best Keto-Carnivore Foods 37:00 - How Long Does One Sheep Last Him? 38:25 - How He Stores a Whole Lamb in His Toyota Prius 39:18 - Does He Prefer a Certain Taste or Texture? 42:55 - Is This Lifestyle Another Form of Eating Disorder? 45:32 - How the Vegan Community Reacts to Him Now 48:20 - His Plan to Create More Butchering Content 49:23 - How Much Does It Cost to Buy and Butcher a Whole Sheep? 52:40 - What's the Future Hold for Frank? 55:57 - How Does He Vet Farmers to Avoid Parasites in Raw Meat? 58:09 - Where to Find More From Frank Bohne