Podcasts about imputing

Hello and Greetings Listeners!  We have another great Research Insights Podcast to bring to you today.  Listen to the conversation between Host Dale Hall, Managing Director of Research at the Research Institute and Guests Erica Baird, Principal and Consulting Actuary at Milliman and Joe Long, Consulting Actuary & Data Scientist at Milliman discussing the report "Statistical Methods for Imputing Race and Ethnicity."  After listening to the podcast, visit the landing page to read the report and check out the tutorial. Report Landing Page:  https://www.soa.org/resources/research-reports/2024/stat-methods-imputing-race-ethnicity/ We welcome your feedback!  ResearchInsights@soa.org

Sam Zell has only been gone for a short while yet it appears that many buyers and sellers have already lost track of the art of imputing risk – the necessary element of factoring risk into buying and selling decisions. In this Mobile Home Park Mastery podcast we're going to review the Zell formula on approaching the subject of risk and what some of the issues are when you don't adhere to those principals.

We're back, again! Thanks for continuing to be part of the Divorced & Done Community. We take questions through our podcast email LawyersTalkingAboutDivorce@gmail.com. Jump the que and get your question answered sooner, via voicemails to SpeakPipe.com/DivorcedAndDone See our TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@familylaw_darrenschmidt and Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/divorcedanddone/ Please leave us a review on Spotify, Apple Music, or wherever you get your podcasts. Everything we talk about on this podcast is for your information, but it is not legal opinion or legal advice.

Website: www.PastorTodd.org To give: www.ToddCoconato.com/give   Sin is described in the Bible as transgression of the law of God (1 John 3:4) and rebellion against God (Deuteronomy 9:7; Joshua 1:18). Sin had its beginning with Lucifer, probably the most beautiful and powerful of the angels. Not content with his position, he desired to be higher than God, and that was his downfall, the beginning of sin (Isaiah 14:12-15). Renamed Satan, he brought sin to the human race in the Garden of Eden, where he tempted Adam and Eve with the same enticement, “you shall be like God.” Genesis 3 describes Adam and Eve's rebellion against God and against His command. Since that time, sin has been passed down through all the generations of mankind and we, Adam's descendants, have inherited sin from him. Romans 5:12 tells us that through Adam sin entered the world, and so death was passed on to all men because “the wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23). Through Adam, the inherent inclination to sin entered the human race, and human beings became sinners by nature. When Adam sinned, his inner nature was transformed by his sin of rebellion, bringing to him spiritual death and depravity that would be passed on to all who came after him. We are sinners because we sin and we sin because we are sinners. This passed-on depravity is known as inherited sin. Just as we inherit physical characteristics from our parents, we inherit our sinful natures from Adam. King David lamented this condition of fallen human nature in Psalm 51:5: “Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me.” Another type of sin is known as imputed sin. Used in both financial and legal settings, the Greek word translated “impute” means “to take something that belongs to someone and credit it to another's account.” Before the Law of Moses was given, sin was not imputed to man, although men were still sinners because of inherited sin. After the Law was given, sins committed in violation of the Law were imputed (accounted) to them (Romans 5:13). Even before transgressions of the law were imputed to men, the ultimate penalty for sin (death) continued to reign (Romans 5:14). All humans, from Adam to Moses, were subject to death, not because of their sinful acts against the Mosaic Law (which they did not have), but because of their own inherited sinful nature. After Moses, humans were subject to death both because of inherited sin from Adam and imputed sin from violating the laws of God. God used the principle of imputation to benefit mankind when He imputed the sin of believers to the account of Jesus Christ, who paid the penalty for that sin—death—on the cross. Imputing our sin to Jesus, God treated Him as if He were a sinner, though He was not, and had Him die for the sins of the entire world (1 John 2:2). It is important to understand that sin was imputed to Him, but He did not inherit it from Adam. He bore the penalty for sin, but He never became a sinner. His pure and perfect nature was untouched by sin. He was treated as though He were guilty of all the sins ever committed by the human race, even though He committed none. God then imputed the righteousness of Christ to believers and credited our accounts with His righteousness, just as He had credited our sins to Christ's account (2 Corinthians 5:21). A third type of sin is personal sin, that which is committed every day by every human being. Because we have inherited a sin nature from Adam, we commit individual, personal sins, everything from seemingly innocent untruths to murder. Those who have not placed their faith in Jesus Christ must pay the penalty for these personal sins, as well as inherited and imputed sin. However, believers have been freed from the eternal penalty of sin—hell and spiritual death. We now also have the power to resist sinning. Now we can choose whether or not to commit personal sins because we have the power of the Holy Spirit who dwells within us. When we do sin, the Spirit convicts us (Romans 8:9-11). Once we confess our personal sins to God and ask forgiveness for them, we are restored to perfect fellowship and communion with Him. “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9). We are three times condemned due to inherited sin, imputed sin, and personal sin. The only just penalty for this sin is death (Romans 6:23), not just physical death but eternal death (Revelation 20:11-15). Thankfully, inherited sin, imputed sin, and personal sin have all been crucified on the cross of Jesus, and now by faith in Jesus Christ as the Savior “we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace” (Ephesians 1:7).

This week we're addressing a NEW case out of Alberta on how income can be imputed to payors of child support, P v A 2022 ABCA 347, which can be found online at https://canlii.ca/t/jspml What is imputation of income, and when is it appropriate? Rob and Darren also discuss emerging trends in Alternative Dispute Resolution, and previous case law on imputation of income in Alberta. Find us online at DivorcedAndDone.com and our podcast email LawyersTalkingAboutDivorce@gmail.com, send voicemails to SpeakPipe.com/DivorcedAndDone We're a TOP 10 podcast as ranked by Feedspot, we recently ranked in the top 10 of the Best 100 Divorce Podcasts. Check it out https://blog.feedspot.com/divorce_podcasts/ We're also on TikTok: @familylaw_darrenschmidt and @robert_woodward Instagram: @DivorcedAndDone Don't forget to leave us a review on Spotify, Apple Music, or wherever you get your podcasts. Everything we talk about on this podcast is for your information, but it is not legal opinion or legal advice. Executive Producer/Sound Overlord: Jessica Murphy, https://www.instagram.com/_jessmurphyy/

In this episode, let's talk about what theory of mind is, how it develops and relates to individuals with autism. References: Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”. Cognition, 21(1), 37-46. Callejas, A., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2011). False belief vs. false photographs: a test of theory of mind or working memory?. Frontiers in psychology, 2, 316. Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125(8), 1839-1849. Leslie, A.M. (1987). Pretence and representation: the origins of ‘theory of mind'. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426. Nelson, P. B., Adamson, L. B., & Bakeman, R. (2008). Toddlers' joint engagement experience facilitates preschoolers' acquisition of theory of mind. Developmental science, 11(6), 847-852. Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: Imputing one's own knowledge to others. Psychological bulletin, 125(6), 737. Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A.M. & Leekam, S. (1989). Exploration of the autistic child's theory of mind: Knowledge, belief, and communication. Child Development, 60, 689–700. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?. Behavioral and brain sciences, 1(4), 515-526. Ruhl, C. (2020). Theory of mind. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/theory-of-mind.html Senju, A. (2012). Spontaneous theory of mind and its absence in autism spectrum disorders. The Neuroscientist, 18(2), 108-113. Wellman, H. M., Fang, F., & Peterson, C. C. (2011). Sequential progressions in a theory‐of‐mind scale: Longitudinal perspectives. Child development, 82 (3), 780-792. Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs. Cognition, 13, 103–128. Wing, L. (1997). The autistic spectrum: Oxford: Pergamon. For more information, head over to Aspect Australia - www.autismspectrum.org.au. Disclaimer: I'm not a professional, just a student with a passion for autism.

Not Imputing My Trespasses

I have found that the best way to get another to acquire a virtue is to impute it to them. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/justin-donne/message

How To  Stop Blaming Others This week on Pretty Spiritual Podcast, we’re looking at all the reasons we play the blame game.  Some of us are really quick to place the blame on others (do the words it’s all your fault mean anything to you?). For others, it can feel natural to pick up the blame that others are putting down. Don’t worry, though. We’ve got plenty of experience to go around! So how do you usually play the blame game? Are you someone who habitually makes life problems about someone else? Or maybe you do place a lot of blame, but not on others. Some of us like to place all the blame on ourselves. You might be someone who blames “god” or Fate or some other entity for all the unfortunate things that happen in life. No matter where you land on this spectrum, we welcome you to the conversation. We’ll look at all the different ways we find fault and assign responsibility. But we won’t stop there. We’ll look at all these natural tendencies so that we can identify our habits and look toward spiritual tools for growth. It turns out that blaming others is a pretty natural, human strategy. So why do we do this blame shifting? Blame Makes Sense According to psychologists, there are a few reasons we blame when stressed. Like we said, it’s a great defense mechanism. If it’s not my fault, then I don’t have to change anything about my behavior or attitudes! Duh, makes so much sense. We also pick up blame when we’re on the defensive and in attack mode.  Blame also helps us feel like we are making sense of a world we don’t often understand. It turns out we can’t always explain or make sense of the way we act or the way others act. Imputing motive and assigning responsibility is one way we try to manage a world that is outside our control.  Also, it turns out that people lie when faced with admitting failure and taking self responsibility. Why not just make something up that relieves us of any personal fault or responsibility. Yup, it makes sense. And finally, it’s easier to blame someone else than to take responsibility for your actions. Okay, we get it. Blame makes sense and we all do it. Tools For Self Responsibility Wondering how to be an adult and stop making life’s misfortune someone else’s fault? That’s where the tools come in! We’ll look at how to stop playing the blame game and start taking personal responsibility for ourselves and our lives. It turns out that the stance of self responsibility actually feels better to us. Spiritual tools can feel so counterintuitive in that way! We’ll talk about what it means to take full responsibility for the things that belong to us, as well as what it can look like to set boundaries when people blame us for stuff that actually isn’t ours. Join in the fun now to hear more about the ways we’re shifting our attitudes so that we don’t have to feel so victimized. That’s right, there’s only one thing we do get to take control of: our own attitudes and behaviors. Here’s to owning what’s ours with a sense of humor! What’s blame like in your life? Please share your experiences and tools with us. Find us on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Insight Timer, Google Play, Spotify, Soundcloud, Podbean, and Stitcher (or our Contact page) and share your feelings, thoughts, and anything else.

Launch Sermon Player We weekly sermon podcast of the Apostolic Church of Salem: A church without walls.

In this program, we will discuss: Overview of facts of the case. Understanding the significance of supervisor knowledge. Summary of employer's challenges to ALJ decision and OSHA's defenses. Review of 11th Circuit's decision. What employers should do.

If you ever struggle with feeling that God is mad or angry with you, this is a message you need to listen to. In this message, we will talk about how God used Jesus’ death on the cross to reconcile your ‘spiritual bank account’ so that after you believe in Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior that God removes all wrath that had previously been accredited to you and how God now views you as holy, blameless, and without any accusation against you.

In the depths of the internet there is many an article discussing the infinity of God. Its authors argue that God is infinite and endless and knows no bounds (what the difference is among those attributes is not usually explained). Imputing infinity to God is nothing new – one rarely (if ever) hears of a god that is deemed finite. In his new book, Dot, Dot, Dot: Infinity Plus God Equals Folly (Onus Books, 2013), James Lindsay argues that declaring God to be infinite is no help to the arguments of believers. Infinity is a concept that almost everyone except mathematicians misunderstands, which doesn’t stop apologists from using the adjective to label their god. Arguing against Platonism, Lindsay explains that infinity is an abstraction, and that abstractions are not equal to reality. He has no objection to the notion of God as an abstraction, but decries the point of view that this necessarily implies existence. Words and numbers are abstractions which we use every day, but no one would argue that they are real they way that a table is real. Human beings, Lindsay argues, invented these abstractions in order to make sense of the universe, and they are limited to the human mind. Apologists who use the concept of infinity as a way to argue for their god are, as the author puts it, “confuse the map for the terrain.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In the depths of the internet there is many an article discussing the infinity of God. Its authors argue that God is infinite and endless and knows no bounds (what the difference is among those attributes is not usually explained). Imputing infinity to God is nothing new – one rarely (if ever) hears of a god that is deemed finite. In his new book, Dot, Dot, Dot: Infinity Plus God Equals Folly (Onus Books, 2013), James Lindsay argues that declaring God to be infinite is no help to the arguments of believers. Infinity is a concept that almost everyone except mathematicians misunderstands, which doesn’t stop apologists from using the adjective to label their god. Arguing against Platonism, Lindsay explains that infinity is an abstraction, and that abstractions are not equal to reality. He has no objection to the notion of God as an abstraction, but decries the point of view that this necessarily implies existence. Words and numbers are abstractions which we use every day, but no one would argue that they are real they way that a table is real. Human beings, Lindsay argues, invented these abstractions in order to make sense of the universe, and they are limited to the human mind. Apologists who use the concept of infinity as a way to argue for their god are, as the author puts it, “confuse the map for the terrain.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In the depths of the internet there is many an article discussing the infinity of God. Its authors argue that God is infinite and endless and knows no bounds (what the difference is among those attributes is not usually explained). Imputing infinity to God is nothing new – one rarely (if ever) hears of a god that is deemed finite. In his new book, Dot, Dot, Dot: Infinity Plus God Equals Folly (Onus Books, 2013), James Lindsay argues that declaring God to be infinite is no help to the arguments of believers. Infinity is a concept that almost everyone except mathematicians misunderstands, which doesn’t stop apologists from using the adjective to label their god. Arguing against Platonism, Lindsay explains that infinity is an abstraction, and that abstractions are not equal to reality. He has no objection to the notion of God as an abstraction, but decries the point of view that this necessarily implies existence. Words and numbers are abstractions which we use every day, but no one would argue that they are real they way that a table is real. Human beings, Lindsay argues, invented these abstractions in order to make sense of the universe, and they are limited to the human mind. Apologists who use the concept of infinity as a way to argue for their god are, as the author puts it, “confuse the map for the terrain.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

In this concluding sermon on The Demonstration Of God's Love, Pastor Alan declares the goodness of God and our need for Him to make us good because we can not do it on our own.

A brief tutorial on how to imput multiple images at once into a Microsoft Powerpoint presentation in seconds! For more information on tutorials www.mswyatt.ca/sass