Podcasts about arguing

On this special edition of the Munk Debates podcast, we're revisiting one of the classic debates from the series' 18-year history: the Munk Debate on Religion, held in 2010 before a sold-out crowd of 3,000 at Toronto's Roy Thomson Hall.The debate resolution was: Be it resolved, religion is a force for good in the world.Arguing for the motion former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, who had recently converted to Catholicism.Arguing against the resolution was the late Christopher Hitchens, an avowed atheist and the author of numerous bestsellers including God Is Not Great.Become a Munk Donor ($50 annually) to get 72-hour advanced access to the full length editions of Friday Focus and Munk Dialogues. Go to www.munkdebates.com to sign up. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ready for a rant? Carl and Richard talk to Billy Hollis about the impact of artificial intelligence on software development. The conversation starts with a listener comment about going all-in on AI to speed up development radically, which raises the question of how much AI is the right amount. What's safe and what is reckless? And how will that position change over time? Are the problems we're having today just growing pains of the tools, or are they systemic to the technology? Lots to debate!

(0:00) The third hour of the show opens with the guys reacting to Willson Contreras arguing with fans after Wednesday's loss.(13:00) Reflections on Wednesday's Red Sox loss against the Diamondbacks.(21:09) Caller reactions to Patriots training camp, Mazz' Tiers, and more.(29:35) Five Questions that have nothing to do with sports with Jim Murray.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Rick Roberts joins us in the Acement. Being a lawyer wasn't keeping him busy enough, so stand up comedy was the obvious choice. Arguing a case or arguing with a heckler, performing for strangers or in front of a room full of lawyers, which one is harder. Imagine what his Funny Bad Gig is... Listen and find out. Check out Rick at https://www.facebook.com/rick.roberts.581525Grow your podcast with Podstatus ⁠https://podstatus.com/a/btfpod⁠Check out Ground Control Radio at ⁠https://www.groundcontrolradio.net/⁠Check out Ace at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.aceaceto.lol/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and Scott at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://scotthigginscomedy.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.buymeacoffee.com/behindthefQ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to buy us a coffee or a bourbon. Get your BTF gear at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://btfpodstore.dashery.com/ 

Kamran Bokhari examines the evolution of the Iranian regime, arguing that the Supreme Leader has become a figurehead for the IRGC and security establishment. He suggests that the war has accelerated a process of internal fragmentation, though the elite remains united by a shared fear of collapse. While public uprisings have gone "underground," the regime continues to conduct mass arrests to prevent a critical mass of resistance. Bokhari describes a "post-clergy" era where the military dominates political life, noting that the regime has evolved into a different entity than it was decades ago. (8)

Website

This special episode features the Munk Debate on the Gene Editing, held before a live audience of 800 students and faculty at Deerfield Academy in April 2026.Arguing in favour of the motion was the biophysicist, best-selling author, biotechnology entrepreneur, and the former director of the Program on Medicine, Technology and Society at UCLA School of Medicine, Gregory Stock. His debate partner was the internationally acclaimed strategic philosopher and pioneering transhumanist Max More. Arguing against the motion was the prominent American bioethicist Ezekiel Emanuel, Special Advisor to the Director General of the WHO and a former founding chair of the Department of Bioethics at the NIH. His debate partner wass the award-winning educator, author, and Professor of Reproductive Science at University College London, Joyce Harper.Become a Munk Donor ($50 annually) to get 72-hour advanced access to the full length editions of Friday Focus and Munk Dialogues. Go to www.munkdebates.com to sign up. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Claims of newly deciphered inscriptions of King Hezekiah made headlines around the world. One called them one of the greatest biblical archaeological discoveries ever. Others urged caution, arguing that extraordinary claims require peer-reviewed evidence before rewriting history.And then they proceeded to attack each other with archeological tools.In this episode, Gary Stevens and Bernie explore the controversy, explain what was actually claimed, why many archaeologists remain skeptical, and what this debate reveals about how archaeology—and good science—really works.Links to the aah-ticalshttps://www.jpost.com/archaeology/article-725074https://www.timesofisrael.com/bible-scholars-sensational-hezekiah-inscription-claims-prompt-researchers-outcry/FAN OF HISTORY Shirts and Stickers are Available NOW! Email Bernie. Bmaopolski@gmail.comGarry's Podcast: History IN the Biblehttps://podfollow.com/986634977PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO WHAT'S NEW IN HISTORY YOUTUBE CHANNELhttps://www.youtube.com/@whatsnewinhistoryThis is a podcast by Dan Hörning and Bernie Maopolski.Contact information:E-mail: zimwaupodcast@gmail.comhttp://facebook.com/fanofhistoryhttps://twitter.com/danhorninghttps://www.instagram.com/dan_horning/Music: “Tudor Theme” by urmymuse.Used here under a commercial Creative Commons license. Find out more at http://ccmixter.org/files/urmymuse/40020 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Do you ever enjoy a good argument? In the scriptures, there are a surprising number of folks who argue with God. This week we'll consider several of the people in the Bible who argued with God, and try to see what motivated them to argue with the Lord and the result of that argument. Receive Fear, insecurity, arrogance, and unbelief are just some of the reasons why people argue with God in the Bible. Maybe you've argued—or are arguing—with God over similar feelings?  As we look at the Bible accounts of Moses, Peter, and Ananias, and times they questioned/argued with God, let's also reflect on the powerful portrait we get of our God for their experiences. God is patient and doesn't simply override our human resistance, but often works through it toward ends that we could never have anticipated. How can you trust God even when you don't understand or agree with your circumstances?  Reflect  Why was Moses arguing with God in Exodus 3–4? How did God respond? Why did Peter argue with Jesus in Matthew 16:22?  In Luke 22:31–34, why did Peter argue with Jesus? What caused Ananias to argue with God in Acts 9:13–14? How did Peter justify arguing with God in Acts 10:14?  Respond (Use this prayer to start a conversation with God) “Dear God, thank You for being so patient with me! Help me not to argue with You when I don't understand or agree with what You're doing in my life. Help me to trust that You have the best plan for my life.”  Discover more about the topics in this episode with these recommended resources Mentioned in this episode: Our Daily Bread Ministries App Listen: The Times of the Judges | Week 1 The Times of the Judges | Week 2 Read: Why Should I Trust God? To the Spiritual Rebels Watch: John 11 - Arguing with God Jeremiah 33:3 - Getting Real with God 

Richard Epstein critiques the contempt of Congress referral against Dr. Anthony Fauci, arguing Fauci made "egregious mistakes" regarding pandemic regulations like masking and social distancing. Epstein contends Fauci was a "lousy scientist" who suppressed alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. He also questions the validity of a "preemptive pardon" issued by President Biden, suggesting it may relate to illegal virus shipments to the Wuhanlaboratory. Moving to politics, Epstein lambasts the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) for their goal of dismantling the U.S. government and their admiration for failed states like Venezuela. He highlights the impracticality of Zohran Mamdani's programs in New York, such as rent stabilization and subsidized grocery stores, predicting they will eventually crater due to economic reality. (2)

Send us Fan MailWe challenge the feel-good pitch of socialism by defining economic systems clearly and following the incentives all the way to real-world outcomes. We argue that value creation, price signals, and limited coercive power explain why capitalism scales and why central planning collapses into force. • Defining economics as tradeoffs rather than just money • Clarifying socialism as state ownership of production and property • Distinguishing fascism as state control with nominal private ownership • Arguing that value is subjective and shaped by scarcity • Reframing work as creating value for other people • Explaining how patents, investors, and entrepreneurs drive progress • Challenging the idea that wealth is inherently “taken” from others • Showing how government intervention can separate consumers from prices in healthcare and college • Using complex systems and environmental analogies to warn about unintended consequences • Explaining why socialism cannot plan demand and tends toward dictatorship and black markets • Debunking the Nordic model as socialism and highlighting the tax tradeoff • Proposing sunset clauses, supermajorities, single-issue bills, lobbying limits, and redistricting reform You can rate in Apple Podcast, and yes, I'm gonna allow Spotify as well. The premium version is you get to listen to the classic episodes, that's three dollars a month as well. Follow Doug Cardell at...His websitehttps://dougcardell.com/LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/doug-cardell-phd-66693336/Support the showFollow your host atYouTube and Rumble for video contenthttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUxk1oJBVw-IAZTqChH70aghttps://rumble.com/c/c-4236474Facebook to receive updateshttps://www.facebook.com/EliasEllusion/LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/eliasmarty/Some free goodiesFree website to help you and me https://thefreewebsiteguys.com/?js=15632463New Paperhttps://thenewpaper.co/refer?r=srom1o9c4glPodMatchhttps://podmatch.com/?ref=1626371560148x762843240939879000

Over 10 million swings have now been captured on the Swing Coach app and one pattern dominates: the club sucked inside on the takeaway, then thrown steep and over the top coming down. Walk any driving range and you'll see this "sledgehammer" move everywhere. In this video we break down why it's so hard to play good golf from there, and exactly how to fix it — starting where it actually begins: the takeaway.We cover why we're "backswing teachers" (organize the backswing and the downswing largely fixes itself), why the pros' simpler moves — arms in front, a decent pivot, nothing too sideways — are the reason they can rely on them, and why chasing outliers like Jim Furyk is a losing bet. Then we walk through the real fix using Swing Coach's instant feedback: why your first true on-plane takeaway will feel like a "10 outside," why you have to push way past what feels right, how to get through the bad shots as your release pattern catches up, and the "parlor trick" of fixing a steep downswing without ever talking about the downswing.You can't afford a tour coach standing next to you every swing — but the app gives you that instant "too much / not enough" feedback so you can finally train your feel on your own.

Mary Kissel analyzes the "stuck" state of global diplomacy, arguing that China and Russia are actively judging the strength of U.S. deterrence in the Strait of Hormuz and Ukraine. She disputes the idea that China is a neutral bystander, noting that Beijing benefits from Russian energy, Iranian markets, and the depletion of U.S. military assets like Patriotmissiles. Kissel asserts that the "merging" of the wars in Ukraine and Iran actually happened years ago through long-standing regime cooperation. She warns that a "halfway house" deal with Iran would only grant the regime more leverage and threaten European population centers with ballistic missiles. NATO must recognize a "condominium of countries"—China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea—that are aligning against Western security. Kissel emphasizes that these regimes' interference in U.S. domestic politics is a strategic tool used to promote their own ends. (9)

Dans ce septième épisode de la série de l'été, direction 2023 pour une soirée pizza-ciné en famille — cette fois avec un film d'Éric Rohmer, Conte de printemps. Le 90 se cache quelque part dans cet épisode — saurez-vous le débusquer ? A Saturday night pizza tradition, a family film club, and a lively debate between a mother and her teenage daughters over an Éric Rohmer classic. This episode captures something wonderfully real: how a French family actually talks about a movie together – the reactions, the disagreements, the running commentary. Along the way, there's a glimpse into an older, slower version of France – landline phones, a very different school grading culture, and a snapshot of everyday Parisian life that feels both familiar and gently out of time. This summer, no pen, no notebook – just listening and speaking. Subscribers receive a podcast letter with this episode: a question to think about before pressing play, cultural markers to go deeper into the episode, natural turns of phrase to notice on a close relisten, and a comprehension question to answer once you've heard the whole story. A different way to make progress in French.

A customer was arguing with Steve at Pitbull Motors about the cost of service, only to find out that he's not mechanic to argue with. Chaz and AJ had the audio of the interaction in Dumb Ass News. (0:00) Speed cameras continue to spread through Connecticut, as Chaz and AJ work to rally the Tribe against their continued use. Attorney John Ray was on the phone from Long Island to talk about the ways many of these cameras and companies are operating in a legal gray area. (3:28)  The Tribe called to share their Petty Pet Peeves, the little, daily annoyances they can't bring up anywhere else. Chaz and AJ will take all the complaints, with no judgement. From copy machine ettiquette, to pressing the walk button at an intersection, and shuffling and dragging feet while walking. (15:26)

This special episode features the full Munk Debate on the Crisis of Liberalism, held before a live audience of 3,000 at Toronto's Roy Thomson Hall in November 2023.Arguing for the motion was the controversial British M.P. and former cabinet minister, Jacob Rees-Mogg. He was joined by the American writer and columnist who has shaped a generation's thinking on the important issues of our time: George F. Will.Opposing the motion was U.K. journalist, self-avowed communist and popular leftist thinker, Ash Sarkar. Her debating partner was the disruptive and thought-provoking American social conservative, Sohrab Ahmari, author of the bestseller Tyranny Inc.: How Private Power Crushed American Liberty.Become a Munk Donor ($50 annually) to get 72-hour advanced access to the full length editions of Friday Focus and Munk Dialogues. Go to www.munkdebates.com to sign up. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

How to Solve Marriage Problems Without ArguingTrying to solve a marriage problem can lead to defensiveness, avoidance, or another argument when one spouse feels pressured to agree or change. Coach Jack explains how to stop relying on convincing and use a conflict-free approach that protects emotional closeness while moving problems toward practical solutions.What You'll LearnHow to decide whether to address a problem together or work on it independentlyHow to invite a spouse's ideas without creating resistanceHow to compare possible solutions and choose one both spouses are willing to tryHow to use Plan A and Plan B so one unsuccessful attempt does not lead to hopelessnessWant to Work With Coach Jack?The Restore a Loving Relationship with a Difficult Spouse Coaching Package can help you replace unproductive conflict patterns with secure, relationship-building behaviors. Coach Jack helps clients develop a practical approach for improving connection, setting appropriate boundaries, and making progress even when a spouse is not ready to work on the marriage together.Key TakeawaysConvincing a spouse often creates resistance rather than cooperation.Shared problem-solving works best when both spouses agree on the problem.Listening and validation should come before presenting solutions.A spouse's proposed solution may be worth trying first.Every initial plan should have a backup plan.Additional ResourcesConnecting Through “Yes!” by Jack Ito PhDRestore a Loving Relationship with a Difficult Spouse coaching package.Work one-on-one with Coach Jack to repair your relationship using small, easy steps that rebuild connection quickly. Visit CoachJackIto.com to learn more about relationship coaching.

Chris Klimek presides over a multiversal showdown between two of the most beloved Spider-Man films: Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 2 and the animated Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse. One is a live-action, early-2000s studio blockbuster that crystallized the modern superhero movie — grounded in practical effects, emotional melodrama, and a deeply human Peter Parker torn between responsibility and desire. The other is a radically stylized animated film that reimagines what superhero storytelling can look like, embracing comic book form itself as its visual language. Arguing for Spider-Man 2 is Matt Singer (Marvel's Spider-Man: From Amazing to Spectacular), who makes the case that Raimi’s film remains the definitive Peter Parker story. Arguing for Spider-Verse is Daisy Rosario, who contends that the film not only updates but expands the Spider-Man mythos. Which one better captures the essence of Spider-Man — and why does that question remain so difficult to answer? Choose your winner at moviedeathmatch.com. More From Matt Official Site | ScreenCrush | “Funny Business” More From Daisy Death, Sex & Money | ICYMISee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

John Tamny, author of The Money John Tamny, author of The Money Confusion: How a Literacy About Currencies and Inflation Sets the Stage for the Crypto Revolution, provides an unconventional analysis of money, arguing that its only purpose is to circulate consumable goods as a product of specialized labor. Drawing on Adam Smith's principles, he asserts that wealth is created through the division of labor and that money is simply an agreement about value between producers. Tamny contends that current fears of "inflation" are misguided; he defines real inflation as a deliberate devaluation of currency by policy choice, such as the 1971 delinking of the dollar from gold. The book argues that the high prices seen after 2020 were caused by the economic destruction of lockdowns, not an excess of money. Tamny is highly critical of the Federal Reserve, claiming it has no real power over growth or interest rates for startups, as true credit always finds talent regardless of central bank fiddling. He uses Elon Musk as a recurring example of an innovator whose success in companies like PayPal and SpaceX was driven by venture capital and risk-takers rather than traditional banks. Tamny envisions a crypto revolution where private, stable money replaces failed government currencies. He suggests that the recent volatility in crypto is a healthy "shaking out" of the market, paving the way for mature, information-based money systems. He speculates that Musk may eventually use Twitter to launch a global, stable cryptocurrency, finally fulfilling the vision of a "global financial supermarket." (5)Confusion: How a Literacy About Currencies and Inflation Sets the Stage for the Crypto Revolution, provides an unconventional analysis of money, arguing that its only purpose is to circulate consumable goods as a product of specialized labor. Drawing on Adam Smith's principles, he asserts that wealth is created through the division of labor and that money is simply an agreement about value between producers. Tamny contends that current fears of "inflation" are misguided; he defines real inflation as a deliberate devaluation of currency by policy choice, such as the 1971 delinking of the dollar from gold. The book argues that the high prices seen after 2020 were caused by the economic destruction of lockdowns, not an excess of money. Tamny is highly critical of the Federal Reserve, claiming it has no real power over growth or interest rates for startups, as true credit always finds talent regardless of central bank fiddling. He uses Elon Musk as a recurring example of an innovator whose success in companies like PayPal and SpaceX was driven by venture capital and risk-takers rather than traditional banks. Tamny envisions a crypto revolution where private, stable money replaces failed government currencies. He suggests that the recent volatility in crypto is a healthy "shaking out" of the market, paving the way for mature, information-based money systems. He speculates that Musk may eventually use Twitter to launch a global, stable cryptocurrency, finally fulfilling the vision of a "global financial supermarket." (5)1870 manhattan                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

Dans ce septième épisode de la série de l'été, direction 2023 pour une soirée pizza-ciné en famille — cette fois avec un film d'Éric Rohmer, Conte de printemps. Le 90 se cache quelque part dans cet épisode — saurez-vous le débusquer ? A Saturday night pizza tradition, a family film club, and a lively debate between a mother and her teenage daughters over an Éric Rohmer classic. This episode captures something wonderfully real: how a French family actually talks about a movie together – the reactions, the disagreements, the running commentary. Along the way, there's a glimpse into an older, slower version of France – landline phones, a very different school grading culture, and a snapshot of everyday Parisian life that feels both familiar and gently out of time. This summer, no pen, no notebook – just listening and speaking. Subscribers receive a podcast letter with this episode: a question to think about before pressing play, cultural markers to go deeper into the episode, natural turns of phrase to notice on a close relisten, and a comprehension question to answer once you've heard the whole story. A different way to make progress in French. D'autres épisodes à écouter aujourd'hui : 2425 — Dimanche soir : une soupe et un débat
https://onethinginafrenchday.podbean.com/e/2425-%e2%80%94-dimanche-soir%c2%a0-une-soupe-et-un-debat-%e2%80%94-lundi%c2%a014%c2%a0octobre-2024/ 2186 — Visite de l'Assemblée nationale
https://onethinginafrenchday.podbean.com/e/2186-%e2%80%94-visite-de-l-assemblee-nationale-%e2%80%94-mercredi-23-novembre-2022/ 2359 — Le Parlement européen de Strasbourg
https://onethinginafrenchday.podbean.com/e/2359-%e2%80%94-le-parlement-europeen-de-strasbourg-%e2%80%94-mercredi%c2%a024%c2%a0avril-2024/ What is Conte de printemps by Éric Rohmer about? Best Éric Rohmer films to watch Classic French cinema recommendations French podcast about family life How French grading system works (bac, notes) What does ‘à la télé' mean vs ‘à la télévision'? French podcast for advanced learners Real French family conversations podcast French movies with English subtitles What is Arte (French TV channel)? 
Conte de printemps · Éric Rohmer · cinéma français · soirée en famille · bac philo · french podcast · real french · french cinema · family life in france · spoken french

Terry Anderson, editor of Adapt and Be Adept: Market Responses to Climate Change, presents a collection of economic and social essays arguing that market-based adaptation is the most practical and effective response to a changing climate. Using Pascal's Wager as a framework, Anderson suggests that preparing for climate impacts is a winning strategy regardless of the underlying causes. A major focus is the physical and economic limits of renewable energy; the book asserts that wind, solar, and battery storage are currently far too expensive and inefficient to replace fossil fuels, which remain the backbone of global specialization and prosperity. Anderson criticizes "top-down" political solutions like carbon taxes and "climate clubs," arguing they often devolve into disguised protectionism—a "bootleggers and baptists" scenario where special interests hide behind environmental rhetoric to secure subsidies or tariffs. Instead, the book promotes "price discovery" through financial and insurance markets as a way to harmonize human behavior with environmental reality. For example, when insurance rates accurately reflect the risk of storm surges, property values in coastal areas like Florida naturally adjust, incentivizing people to move to safer, higher ground. The text also highlights the importance of local knowledge, citing Alaskan native villages where traditional adaptation strategies are frequently hindered by rigid federal regulations that prevent them from following migrating wildlife. Contributors, including Mark Mills and Bjørn Lomborg, advocate for pragmatism over utopianism, suggesting that funds should be spent on tangible improvements like seawalls, better data collection, and poverty reduction rather than inefficient attempts to halt global climate shifts through government mandates. (3)1900 BAKU, AZERBAIJANA

Holly Fretwell, author of Fix America's Forests: Reforms to Restore National Forests and Tackle the Wildfire Crisis, examines the escalating wildfire crisis in the United States, arguing that current forest conditions are the result of over a century of mismanagement and man-made policies. Fretwell highlights the "10 a.m. rule," a historical policy of suppressing all fires, which disrupted natural fire cycles and led to dangerously over-dense forests filled with "fuel" like woody debris and small-diameter timber. Consequently, modern fires burn hotter, faster, and more destructively than in the past. The author describes a cultural shift within the Forest Service, which has evolved from a management-focused agency into a "fire company" dominated by firefighting personnel at the expense of foresters and engineers. The book identifies significant regulatory hurdles to restoration, specifically the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Endangered Species Act, and the Clean Air Act. These laws often lead to "analysis paralysis" and litigation, stalling critical restoration projects for decades even when they aim to protect vital resources like water reservoirs. To address these issues, Fretwell proposes public-private partnerships and innovative funding models, such as forest resilience bonds, to finance restoration work up-front. She also advocates for longer-term stewardship contracts (up to 20 years or more) to provide the certainty needed for private investment in milling infrastructure for small-diameter wood. Ultimately, the goal is to restore forests to a more open, resilient state through active management, prescribed burns, and harvesting, thereby reducing the risk to communities in the growing wildland-urban interface. (1)1952 KING'S CANYON WILDFIRE, CALIFORNIA

Vinny Lingham is a Bitcoin OG who pioneered gift card payments in 2012 with Gyft, served on the board of the Bitcoin Foundation, spearheaded blockchain identity verification with CIvic, and in more recent years moved on to managing risk with Praxos Capital. Thanks to some of his accurate price predictions, Vinny has also received the nickname "The Oracle". In this episode, we talk about his Bitcoin journey and how his views have evolved over the last 14 years. Time stamps: 00:01:06 Intro & sponsors: Vinny Lingham, 15 years in Bitcoin 00:02:04 Gyft: a dozen companies and one gift card problem 00:02:26 Chargebacks, stolen cards & getting attacked by scammers 00:04:13 Why Bitcoin looked like the perfect payment rail 00:04:51 Zero-conf payments and the first-seen rule 00:05:48 The Starbucks and McDonald's signature math 00:06:51 100,000 Bitcoin payments, zero double spends 00:07:13 Civic's Bitcoin patents & the 2017 fee explosion 00:07:37 Blockstream, Adam Back, MIT and the Epstein files 00:08:10 Core keeps pruning dissenting voices 00:08:55 Why Bitcoin still can't be the whitepaper's payment system 00:09:08 Counterparty, Mastercoin & the birth of Ethereum 00:09:34 "Nothing has happened in Bitcoin in five years" 00:10:16 Why he went and backed Solana instead 00:10:23 Sympathy for BIP 110 over Core 00:11:08 Inscriptions can be done many ways 00:12:27 "Lightning will be ready in 18 months" forever 00:13:26 Drivechains, BIP 300 & the Ecash fork paying miners 00:14:44 UX, mainstream users and idiot-proof money 00:15:17 People who don't know you can hold BTC outside an ETF 00:15:27 Is the ETF the real scaling layer? 00:15:37 What Vinny signed up for when he read the whitepaper 00:16:30 Wayne Vaughn in the chat 00:16:48 Saylor's Bitcoin Security Consortium and the $15M 00:17:24 Saylor argues against bigger blocks and covenants 00:17:49 How is this different from the Bitcoin Foundation? 00:18:36 Saylor as systemic risk: crashing the minority fork 00:19:43 Losing SPV and the simplicity of early Bitcoin 00:20:48 When did you last actually use Bitcoin? 00:21:22 Six confirmations vs Apple Pay 00:21:41 Gyft's customers who had no credit cards 00:22:07 Not a store of value: a store of liquidity 00:23:24 So what is a store of value, exactly? 00:26:00 The 100 year test: one ounce of gold buys one suit 00:27:09 Does the whitepaper ever say "digital gold"? 00:27:53 Saylor's redefinition: expensive to move, held by institutions 00:28:08 Privacy, tiny payments and why volume creates stability 00:28:42 Exchanges are layer two, Lightning is layer three 00:29:06 Solana at the World Series of Poker 00:30:07 BSV, Teranode, BCH and who actually handles volume 00:30:58 Does everyone really need to run a node? 00:31:30 Luke Dashjr, 16MB blocks and 50 billion Catholics 00:33:34 Arguing with someone who redefines words 00:34:33 How did Blockstream become so politically powerful? 00:35:40 Reid Hoffman's $20 million 00:36:26 Reading the Epstein files with Bitcoin eyes 00:36:45 Tether won the global south instead 00:37:42 "The community is people who never built anything" 00:38:00 Why Elon Musk walked away from Bitcoin 00:39:07 The ESG excuse & the Bitcoin Mining Council 00:40:05 Elon on bandwidth, latency and second layers 00:41:03 Why Civic started on Bitcoin and left 00:42:05 Multicoin, the Solana seed round & founding Praxos 00:42:29 Why "Civic" and not "Supra" 00:42:46 Nobody wants identity: crypto's actual number one use case 00:44:03 Zcash's comeback, Ironwood & the auditable supply 00:45:34 Delistings and the headwinds facing privacy coins 00:46:06 Why Zcash chose DeFi rails over merchant adoption 00:47:07 How to know you're in a bear market 00:47:25 Elgamarov & how small this world really is 00:48:10 What does Vinny actually hold today? 00:49:27 Praxos: delta neutral, funding rates and volatility 00:51:44 Sponsors: Braiins, Cake Wallet, SideShift, LayerTwo Labs, Orange Rock 00:54:40 Wayne Vaughn's question: will the CLARITY Act pass? 00:56:47 Michael Saylor and the Strategy problem 00:57:14 The GBTC discount scenario 00:58:16 Why August could be a bloodbath 01:01:56 Node counts, sybil attacks and hash rate 01:03:16 The rewritten history of SegWit and SegWit2x 01:04:19 How Bitcoin Cash became the fallback plan 01:04:59 Gavin Andresen and the word "bamboozled" 01:06:00 Was Craig Wright involved at all? 01:08:04 Hal Finney's logs and the Van Nuy, California IP address 01:08:55 GMX, German privacy law and the missing paper trail 01:11:17 Roger Ver, the checksum test and Craig 01:13:00 Asking Claude who Satoshi is 01:14:17 The case for Nick Szabo and the trusted third parties 01:15:31 The counterfactual: what if Bitcoin had scaled? 01:19:35 Tron, USDT and five years of outperforming BTC 01:20:09 Bitcoiners understand supply, not demand 01:20:36 What happens when the block rewards run out 01:21:15 Rentable SHA256 and the state actor attack scenario 01:22:54 Will Vinny claim the August fork airdrops?

2021年9月云南贵州卷听力第一节听下面5段对话。每段对话后有一个小题，从题中所给的 A、B、C 三个选项中选出最佳选项。听完每段对话后，你都有 10 秒钟的时间来回答有关小题和阅读下一小题。每段对话仅读一遍。1. Where is Alice now?A. In New York.B. In London.C. In Chicago.2.What does the woman think of the cake?A.It's not very fresh.B. It's not tasty.C. It's not expensive.3.What will the man do?A.Wait for a few minutes.B. Go to the room upstairs.C.Put off the meeting.4.How many times has the woman seen this movie?A. Twice.B.Three times.C.Four times.5.What is the woman going to do?A.Show photos.B. Goon a trip.C. Attend class.第二节听下面 5 段对话或独白。每段对话或独白后有2--4个小题，从题中所给的 A、B、C三个选项中选出最佳选项。听每段对话或独白前，你将有时间阅读各个小题，每小题5秒钟;听完后，各小题将给出5秒钟的作答时间。每段对话或独白读两遍。听第6段材料，回答第6--7小题。6. What is the danger of eating ice cream according to the man?A. Putting on weight.B. Catching a cold.C.Having a headache.7.What is the probable relationship between the speakers?A.Husband and wife.B.Teacher and student.C.Father and daughter.听第 7 段材料，回答第 8--10小题。7. Where was the boy this morning?A. In the classroom.B. In the art museum.C.At Ms. Green's house.9.How did Ms. Green feel about the boy's painting?A. It was boring.B. It was strange.C. It was pleasing.10.What is the topic of the conversation?A. An oil painting.B. A famous artist.C. An art lesson.听第 8 段材料，回答第 11--13小题。11. What does the woman say about raising a kid while working?A. It's a hard task.B. B.It requires skills.C. C.It keeps her busy.12. What does the woman's husband do at home?A. Do more housework.B.Care more about their kid.C.Spend more time reading.13.What does the woman often do with her kid?A. Do exercise.B.Take pictures.C. Go shopping.听第 9段材料，回答第14 至 17小题。13. What is Jennifer doing?A.Hosting a meeting.B.Serving a customer.C.Having an interview.15.What does Jennifer learn from her previous job?A.Sales techniques.B.Interpersonal skills.C.Language knowledge.16.What was Jennifer's worst experience at work?A.Receiving an unreasonable phone call.B.Arguing with the manager.C.Dealing with a complaint.17.What will Jennifer do next?A.Make a decision.B. Apply for the position.C. Wait for a call.听第 10段材料，回答第 18--20小题。18.What is Mary Glen?A.A lovely shop.B.A holiday place.C.A farmer's market.19.Where does the speaker suggest riding bikes?A.Along the River Dent.B. Along the Soli.C. Along the Evergreen Trail.20.Why does the speaker give the talk?A. To do promotion.B. To introduce the town of Soli.C. To discuss a sport.答案1-5BABAC 6-10 CABAC11-15BAACB 16-20 CCBCA录音材料 Text 1M:Alice! So nice to see you. I thought you went to New York. Why are you still here in London?W: It was my sister who went to New York. And she's in Chicago now. I've been here the whole time.Text 2M:Linda, have a taste of this cake and tell me what you think.W:OK. Hmm… I'm afraid it has gone bad. When did you buy it?Text 3M:Excuse me, isn't the staff meeting at 9:30? I've been waiting here for ten minutes, but nobody showed up.W:You're in the wrong room. It's one floor up.M:Oops! Thank you.Text 4M:Hey, you come to watch the movie again. Weren't you here yesterday?W:Oh, yes. I saw it last week and I saw it again yesterday. I always see my favorite movies four or five times.M:Here's your ticket. Have a nice time.Text 5W:Bob, your trip sounds wonderful, but I have to go now. My biology class starts in a few minutes.M:Oh, sorry, Caroline. I didn't mean to hold you up.Text 6W:It's hot today. I'd like to have some ice cream. Do you want some, dear?M:No, thank you. Do you know the danger you face when eating ice cream?W:Yes, gaining weight.M:No, not that. Have you heard about brain freeze?W:No, what's that?M:For many people, eating ice cream or drinking an icy drink too fast can produce a terrible headache. It usually hits in the front of the brain.People also call it “ice cream headache”.W:Okay. I see. You know what? After all these years, you sound more and more like my father.Text 7W:Mike, what lessons did you have at school this morning?M: We had art, but we didn't go to the classroom. Ms. Green took us to visit the museum in town.W:How come? What did you do there?M: We looked at paintings by famous artists.W: I wish I had been with you. Did anything attract you?M: A lot. But my favorite painting was by Picasso. It looked very strange.W:Did Ms. Green explain something about the paintings?M:Yes, and after that we made pictures for a competition. I drew a picture of Ms.Green. It looked like a Picasso painting.W:Did she like it?M:Ms. Green wasn't very pleased, and she thought it dull. So, I didn't win.Text 8M:Cindy, as a working mother, how do you balance work and family?W: It takes skills. It's an art, I should say. But raising a kid while working is not as hard as most people think.M:You mean it's not difficult?W:No, if you know how to share your responsibilities properly. My husband does more housework, and I take more care of our kid. I try to spend as much time with our kid as possible. She joins me in my daily activities.M:What do you mean?W:Working as a model, I do a lot of exercise every day to stay fit, and I encourage our kid to do it with me. It's like play to her. As a result,I'm fit, she's fit, and we spend time together.M: I see. What else do you do together?W:Things like reading picture books and going to the park.M: I really like your ideas.Text 9M:Nice to meet you, Jennifer. Can you tell us a few things about yourself?Perhaps your work experience.W:I'm a university student in my final year, and I major in English. I've had several part-time jobs, including office work and sales.M:What was your office work about?W: I worked at the reception desk and did some paperwork.M:What did you learn there?W:I received phone calls and met customers most of the time. And I supported staff from different departments at times. So, I learned to deal with various kinds of people.M:Did you apply any of the knowledge you got at university?W:Yes, I think I did use some of the language knowledge.M:What has been your worst experience at work?W:Well, once I met a customer who came to make a complaint. I tried my best,but he was just being unreasonable. I had to refer him to my manager. It was a hard day.M:Okay. Now, do you have any questions for us?W:No, not at the moment.M:Thank you, Jennifer. We have a number of people applying for this position,and we will call you with our decision within two weeks.W:Okay, thank you.Text 10W:Mary Glen, built on a working family farm, is a perfect place for holiday.Here, you'll find everything you need. We have five wooden houses with all modern facilities. Mary Glen is just three miles from the busy town of Soli, where you'll find quite a few lovely shops and great farmers' markets.The area around Mary Glen is great for riding bikes. So, do bring your bikes and try the Evergreen Trail, or you can go running along the River Dent. After a busy day, relax in our game room where there are lots of card games. Try a family holiday at Mary Glen. With prices as low as 425 pounds a week, you can't go wrong.

Send us Fan MailWe debate whether the NBA Western Conference is truly tougher than the Eastern Conference by using recent playoff examples, championship trends, and an era-by-era look at league history. We land on a nuanced answer: the East owns some of the biggest dynasties, but the West has built a modern reputation for depth and a harder playoff road.  • Comparing West versus East perceptions using the 2026 conference finals  • Counting recent NBA champions to frame the parity era  • Breaking down conference strength by decade from the 50s through today  • Arguing why the 2000s and 2010s feel like a West landslide  • Discussing playoff depth and why early-round West series can be brutal  • Questioning how LeBron's Finals run looks if his prime is in the West  • Separating “most decorated” from “deepest top to bottom”  • Considering lifestyle and market factors that may pull stars West  Please make sure to like, subscribe, comment, tell anyone who's anyone about the show.  Support the showhttps://linktr.ee/GetABucketShow for more content!!!

Titus 2:1-10 (ESV)Andrew and Edwin discuss Paul's teaching about slaves. Edwin suggests in this book, Paul is actually making a point about preachers, not merely about household slaves.Read the written devo that goes along with this episode by clicking here.    Let us know what you are learning or any questions you have. Email us at TextTalk@ChristiansMeetHere.org.    Join the Facebook community and join the conversation by clicking here. We'd love to meet you. Be a guest among the Christians who meet on Livingston Avenue. Click here to find out more. Michael Eldridge sang all four parts of our theme song. Find more from him by clicking here.   Thanks for talking about the text with us today.________________________________________________If the hyperlinks do not work, copy the following addresses and paste them into the URL bar of your web browser: Daily Written Devo: https://readthebiblemakedisciples.wordpress.com/?p=26330The Christians Who Meet on Livingston Avenue: http://www.christiansmeethere.org/Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/TalkAboutTheTextFacebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/texttalkMichael Eldridge: https://acapeldridge.com/ 

This special episode features the full Munk Debate on Mainstream Media, held before a live audience of 3,000 at Toronto's Roy Thomson Hall in the fall of 2022.Arguing for the resolution Be it Resolved, don't trust mainstream media, was the associate editor of The Spectator magazine, Fox News contributor, and bestselling author of The War on the West, Douglas Murray. He was be joined by Substack publishing sensation, former Rolling Stone contributing editor, and investigative journalist, Matt Taibbi. Arguing against the motion was the internationally acclaimed author, podcaster and veteran New Yorker staff writer, Malcolm Gladwell. His debate partner was Michelle Goldberg, New York Times columnist, MS Now contributor, former American Prospect senior correspondent and senior writer for The Nation. Become a Munk Donor ($50 annually) to get 72-hour advanced access to the full length editions of Friday Focus and Munk Dialogues. Go to www.munkdebates.com to sign up. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Send us Fan MailLeBron James signing with the Philadelphia 76ers forces a real look at what their starting five and bench could be, and whether they become the best paper roster in the NBA. We lay out roles, stats expectations, title odds in a two-year window, and how Finals MVP and legacy pressure could shape every decision.  • Projecting the starters around Embiid, Jaylen Brown, Tyrese Maxey, LeBron James, and VJ Edgecombe  • Defining each star's role, including LeBron as a playmaking rebounder and matchup defender  • Debating Dean Wade as a spacing option and how Anthony Simons changes the second unit  • Arguing the 76ers as the best starting five on paper and a top title favorite  • Exploring the NBA parity era and why a Sixers title would feel different  • Breaking down Finals MVP paths and what a ring means for Embiid, Brown, Maxey, and LeBron  • Naming the biggest needs as more shooting and keeping egos in check  Please make sure to like, subscribe, comment, tell anyone who's anyone about the show  Support the showhttps://linktr.ee/GetABucketShow for more content!!!

Neil Lanctot covers the winter of 1915–1916, when TR championed the "preparedness" movement, arguing that the U.S.was dangerously vulnerable with only 100,000 men in its army. Wilson, feeling the political pressure, launched a speaking tour through the Midwest to sell a defense buildup, using the analogy that he could not keep "sparks" from a world on fire from hitting the American roof. While TR maneuvered for the 1916 Republican nomination, the peace movement suffered a major blow via Henry Ford's "Peace Ship." Ford funded an expedition of neutrals to Europe to stop the war, but it became a disorganized PR disaster that made pacifism appear foolish to the public. Jane Addams, though intending to go, fell ill and missed the voyage—a stroke of luck that saved her from the ensuing ridicule. Despite the internal chaos of the peace movement, Wilson eventually secured a defense buildup package in the summer of 1916. (4)

The clipboard is OUT. The reading glasses are ON. Big Sal is handing down the official 53-man roster prediction — every name, every spot, laminated and carved in stone. Until somebody has one good preseason game and he denies this episode ever existed. Rosters are Sal's art form, Pack Nation, so sharpen a pencil and stay with him. Here's what you're in for:

The clipboard is OUT. The reading glasses are ON. Big Sal is handing down the official 53-man roster prediction — every name, every spot, laminated and carved in stone. Until somebody has one good preseason game and he denies this episode ever existed. Rosters are Sal's art form, Pack Nation, so sharpen a pencil and stay with him. Here's what you're in for:

Peter Huessy explains "extended deterrence," the U.S. nuclear umbrella protecting allies from aggression. Huessy critiques a proposal to delegate nuclear authority to a "three-key" system involving France and the UK, arguing it would create dangerous indecision during a crisis. He notes that allies increasingly doubt U.S. resolve. Strategy has shifted toward "counterforce" targets, aiming to disable an enemy's leadership and military capability rather than destroying cities, to provide "flexible response" options. (11)1900

Conrad Black disputes Prime Minister Mark Carney's characterization of Canada as a "middle power," arguing the term is obsolete for a G7 nation with a larger economy than Russia. He critiques Carney's attempt to foster ties with China, noting China's "tatters" economy and history of disregarding trade agreements. Black maintains that Canada should prioritize its vital relationship with the U.S. while embracing a more ambitious and patriotic view of its global influence. (15)

FLORIDA FRIDAY - Florida woman stabbed her friend after arguing about drinking beer in their UBER. A Floridaman with a flamethrower barricaded himself inside an RV in a Walmart parking lot. Floridaman arrested living on multiple boats that didnt belong to him AKA Squater Piracy. Floridaman arrested for pepperspraying a family in a pet store for not petting HIM. Weird AF News is the only daily weird news podcast in the world. Weird news 5 days/week and on Friday it's only Floridaman. SUPPORT by joining the Weird AF News Patreon http://patreon.com/weirdafnews - OR buy Jonesy a coffee at http://buymeacoffee.com/funnyjones Buy MERCH: https://weirdafnews.merchmake.com/ - Check out the official website https://WeirdAFnews.com and FOLLOW host Jonesy at http://instagram.com/funnyjones - wants Jonesy to come perform standup comedy in your city? Fill out the form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfvYbm8Wgz3Oc2KSDg0-C6EtSlx369bvi7xdUpx_7UNGA_fIw/viewform Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Send us Fan MailThe tool is only as sharp as the question you bring to it.In this episode, we unpack why so many of us burn an hour fighting with our AI and walk away with nothing, and what that back and forth is quietly costing our focus, our critical thinking, and our mental health. Emilia breaks down the adoption curve that has AI outpacing both the personal computer and the internet, and why cognitive overload is showing up at record levels right alongside it. We get tactical with the decision making matrix, the difference between urgent, important, and significant, and two prompts you can drop straight into your chat window: one to select and break down your highest leverage task for a 50 minute block, and one to debrief afterward so your brain actually registers the win. Plus, Bianca on where the boundaries belong so AI stays an asset instead of becoming a crutch that costs you the skills you cannot afford to lose.Here's a related episode that builds on today's conversation:#462 | How to Set Up Your Workplace for Safety and Success - https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/evolve-ventures/id1511831621?i=1000741806906Learn more about:

Tune in here to this Thursday's edition of the Brett Winterble Show! Brett kicks off the program by talking about the debate over confronting Iran's military ambitions and whether Americans are willing to accept higher energy prices in the name of national security. Arguing that the threat posed by Iran outweighs concerns about the cost of gasoline, Brett criticizes those who oppose a tougher stance because of potential economic consequences, saying the price of fuel is insignificant compared to the dangers of allowing a hostile regime to continue developing its military capabilities. Brett also criticizes lawmakers, media personalities, and anti-war voices he believes are encouraging the United States to retreat from confronting Iran. He argues that strong military action and resolve are necessary to prevent future attacks and deter hostile nations, warning that failing to act now could leave future generations facing even greater dangers. He closes the segment by urging listeners to consider what sacrifices they would be willing to make to protect the country, insisting that temporary economic pain is preferable to the consequences of allowing America's enemies to grow stronger and potentially threaten the United States with far more devastating weapons in the future. Listen here for all of this and more on The Brett Winterble Show! For more from Brett Winterble check out his YouTube channel. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Liz Peek. Peek critiques New York politician Zohran Mamdani for failing to define the working class, arguing the DSAprimarily represents white, college-educated liberals. She also discusses Kevin Warsh's influence and the likelihood of the Federal Reserve maintaining interest rates despite inflationary pressures and global instability in the Middle East. (2)1900

This special episode features the full Munk Debate on Trump's America, held before a live audience of 3,000 at Toronto's Roy Thomson Hall in May 2025.The debate resolution was: Be it Resolved, this is America's golden ageArguing in favour of the motion was the political consultant, pollster and senior counselor to President Trump during his first term in office, Kellyanne Conway. Her debate partner was the President of the right-wing think tank the Heritage Foundation, and the architect of Project 2025, Kevin Roberts. Arguing against the motion was the New York Times columnist, podcaster, bestselling author, and one of America's most influential commentators, Ezra Klein. His debate partner was Ben Rhodes, who served as President Obama's senior advisor and is the co-host of the popular current affairs podcast Pod Save the World.Become a Munk Donor ($50 annually) to get 72-hour advanced access to the full length editions of Friday Focus and Munk Dialogues. Go to www.munkdebates.com to sign up. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hey there, hero!Richard Bach once said, "Argue for your limitations and, sure enough, they're yours."Wow…does that resonate with me.And I hear examples all the time…from my students, my colleagues and my peers.People can convince themselves of almost anything, and they often do.I hope you check on all the assumptions you have taken as gospel, and in this episode, I want to help remind you to question the “facts” you “know” about yourself.Do you question your limiting beliefs? Do you ask whether what you tell yourself is actually true? How do you combat this and give yourself more options? Let me know in the comments below.REQUEST: Please join this video's conversation and see the full episode on VOHeroes, where the comments are moderated and civil, at https://voheroes.com/on-arguing-for-your-limitations/#Acting #Voice #VoiceOver #Performance #Productivity #Tips #Art #Commerce #Science #Mindset #Success #Process #Options #BestPractices #MarketingWant to be a better VO talent, actor or author? Here's how I can help you......become a VO talent (or a more successful one):     https://voheroes.com/start     ...become an audiobook narrator on ACX (if you're an actor or VO talent):     https://acxmasterclass.com/     ...narrate your own book (if you're an author):     https://narrateyourownbook.com/     ...have the most effective pop filter (especially for VO talent):     https://mikesock.com/     ...be off-book faster for on-camera auditions and work (memorize your lines):     https://rehearsal.pro/...master beautiful audiobook and podcast audio in one drag and drop move on your Mac:     https://audiocupcake.com/The VOHeroes Podcast is heroically built with:BuddyBoss | LearnDash | DreamHost | SamCart | TextExpander | Buz...

Head over to http://patreon.com/kindafunny this month to grab a membership and receive exclusive content and ad-free episodes! Is the PS6 a handheld system, Xbox Studio leaders reportedly detest Game Pass, and Steam Machine isn't getting Half Life 3… exclusively. Thank you for the support! Run of Show - 00:00:00 - Start00:09:38 - The PS6 sure sounds like a handheld00:34:27 - Ad00:35:34 - Xbox Studio Leaders Reportedly Detest Game Pass, Arguing it Destroyed the Value of Their $40+ Games Now Available for Pennies00:47:30 - Valve Promises No Steam Machine Exclusives After Months Of Fan Speculation About Half-Life 300:51:10 - Clair Obscur star Jennifer English exits Tides of Annihilation over health concerns00:55:14 - Wee News!00:59:96 - SuperChats & You‘re Wrong Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We spend our time arguing about change. The future may belong instead to the people who quietly build it. Read More: www.WhoWhatWhy.org

Arguing for Your Limitations: 9 Self-Limiting Beliefs Keeping You Stuck in OCD, Anxiety & FearIf you feel like you've been "trying to heal" for years but keep landing in the same place, this episode is for you. Matt Codde, LCSW breaks down the most common ways we unconsciously build a case for why we can't change, grow, or heal, and why admitting "I was wrong" might be the most powerful phrase in your recovery.This isn't about blame. It's about awareness. Matt walks through nine self-limiting beliefs he's seen (and lived through himself) that keep people trapped in OCD, anxiety, fear loops, and chronic suffering, from blaming time and money to hiding behind personality, family, and spirituality.If you or someone you love has been stuck in the OCD or anxiety cycle and can't figure out why nothing seems to stick, this conversation will help you see what's really in the way.

This special episode features the full Munk Debate on Capitalism, held before a live audience of 3,000 at Toronto's Roy Thomson Hall in November 2019.The debate resolution was: Be it Resolved the capitalist system is broken, it's time to try something differentArguing in favour of the resolution was Katrina vanden Heuvel, publisher of The Nation and a Washington Post columnist. Her debate partner was the economist, academic, author, and former finance minister of Greece Yanis Varoufakis. Arguing against the resolution was Arthur Brooks, Harvard professor and bestselling author of The Conservative Heart: How to Build a Fairer, Happier, and More Prosperous America. He was joined by former New York Times columnist, political commentator, and bestselling author, David Brooks. Become a Munk Donor ($50 annually) to get 72-hour advanced access to the full length editions of Friday Focus and Munk Dialogues. Go to www.munkdebates.com to sign up. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Headline: The Myth of Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment Guest: Richard Epstein Professor Richard Epstein analyzes birthright citizenship, arguing the 14th Amendment's original intent excluded foreigners. He critiques the concept of "tourist babies" and suggests the president's plenary naturalization powers could be used to restrict entry for pregnant mothers seeking citizenship for their children. (3)

Arguing over air conditioning.Lena Dunham's book is a curse.Arguing with a 19yo trad wife.Consensual voice message.Dr. Kameelah against the internet.

This week, we're continuing our archive miniseries, Myths That Built Trickle-Down Economics, with the myth that bad economic ideas die once the evidence proves them wrong. They don't. They come back as zombie ideas: tax cuts for the rich sold as growth policy, safety-net cuts sold as responsibility, and market fundamentalism sold as common sense. These ideas have failed again and again, but they keep returning because they still serve the people and institutions with the most power. In this episode, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman joins Nick and Goldy to explain why zombie economics refuses to die, how bad assumptions infected mainstream economic thinking, and why defeating trickle-down economics requires more than better evidence — it requires naming the myths that keep shaping our politics. This episode originally aired on March 31, 2020. Paul Krugman is a Nobel Prize-winning economist, professor, author, and former New York Times columnist. His book Arguing with Zombies: Economics, Politics, and the Fight for a Better Future examines the failed economic ideas that continue to dominate American policy debates. Social Media: @pkrugman.bsky.social Paul Krugman on Substack Further reading:  Arguing with Zombies: Economics, Politics, and the Fight for a Better Future CBO: Estimated Distributional Effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act KFF: Tracking Implementation of the 2025 Reconciliation Law: Medicaid Work Requirements CBPP: The 2017 Trump Tax Law Was Skewed to the Rich, Expensive, and Failed to Deliver EPI: Setting High Standards for a Federal Minimum Wage Tax Foundation: Who Pays Tariffs? Americans Will Bear the Costs of Tariffs Website: http://pitchforkeconomics.com Facebook: Pitchfork Economics Podcast Bluesky: @pitchforkeconomics.bsky.social Instagram: @pitchforkeconomics Threads: pitchforkeconomics TikTok: @pitchfork_econ YouTube: @pitchforkeconomics LinkedIn: Pitchfork Economics Twitter: @PitchforkEcon, @NickHanauer Substack: The Pitch

Welcome to the sophomore installment of Movie Death Match. Host Chris Klimek presides as two Christopher Nolan films go head to head in anticipation of The Odyssey. Arguing for Inception is Bilge Ebiri (Vulture), while Abigail James (@popculturescientist) advocates for Interstellar. Which film offers the more emotionally resonant lead performance and better captures Nolan’s vision of time — its dilation and psychological weight? Vote now at moviedeathmatch.com. Intro (00:00:00-00:12:22) Opening Statements (00:12:23-00:23:21) In Their Time (00:23:22-00:48:11) In Our Time (00:48:12-01:07:36) For All Time (01:07:37-01:22:20) The Verdict / Close (01:22:21-01:29:45) LINKS – ABI -The biggest plot hole in Interstellar? -Can We Escape Gravity? | Interstellar’s Biggest Lie Explained LINKS – BILGE -The Hidden ‘Inception’ Within Inception -When to hit the Bathroom During Inception -Six New Things We Learned From the Inception Blu-ray -How Many Times Each Inception Character Dies -You Can Hate Inception All You Want LINKS – CHRIS -'Interstellar': Stunning And Bold, With Lots Of Corn | NPR, Nov. 6, 2014) -Interstellar’s Scientific Fact-Checker | Air & Space / Smithsonian, Nov. 13, 2014) -Wartime Terror And Valor Thread Together In Nolan's Gripping 'Dunkirk' | NPR, July 20, 2017) -A Degree Absolute! | An Entire Podcast Series About The Prisoner, the cult British spy-fi series Nolan has periodically threatened to adapt for the [very] big screen.)See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Get the 200+ Page Optimal Living Daily Workbook (PDF) — Free. Want to turn today's episode into an actionable plan? Join the Optimal Living Weekly newsletter and I'll send you our 200-page digital workbook immediately. It's packed with the best takeaways from the show, formatted for easy reading and implementation at home. Get your free PDF workbook here: ⁠https://oldpodcast.eo.page/join⁠ Discover all of the podcasts in our network, search for specific episodes and learn more at:⁠ OLDPodcast.com⁠. Episode 3454: Marc Chernoff explores how unrealistic expectations and emotional reactivity fuel unnecessary conflict, and why a simple pause and deep breath can transform the way we respond to difficult people. Through mindful mantras and compassionate perspective shifts, he offers practical ways to reduce stress, improve relationships, and cultivate greater inner peace. Read along with the original article(s) here: https://www.marcandangel.com/2016/06/15/7-powerful-mantras-to-stop-you-from-overreacting-and-arguing-with-people/ Quotes to ponder: "Inner peace and harmony begins the moment you take a deep breath and choose not to allow another person or event to control your thoughts and emotions." "Don't let the silly little dramas of each day get the best of you. Be selective in your battles. Oftentimes peace is better than being right." "Inhale. Exhale. A moment of silence in a moment of anger, can save you from a hundred moments of regret." Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Michael Vorenberg discusses how the government used military tribunals to try Lincoln's conspirators and Andersonville commandant Henry Wirz, arguing a state of war still existed. Secretary of War Stanton hoped to implicate Jefferson Davis in these crimes to justify execution, but Wirz refused to provide such testimony before hanging. (12)1865

Michael Vorenberg examines Richard Henry Dana's "grasp of war" philosophy, arguing the Union should hold the Confederacy until civil rights were secured. This contrasted with Lincoln's "let 'em up easy" approach. Congress used these war powers to extend the Freedman's Bureau and pass reconstruction legislation. (13)1865 PROSECUTORD