Podcast appearances and mentions of eric faddis

The defense tried to put Eric Richins on trial. They suggested he had a history with drugs and that the fentanyl that killed him may have come from somewhere other than Kouri. Then the judge blocked their most specific drug evidence. Eric's closest friend and business partner looked a jury in the eye and said he never once saw Eric use drugs. So what's left of this theory? This Hidden Killers Week In Review brings in experts from both sides of the courtroom and the psychology behind it all.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks it down. The judge's ruling that gutted their drug evidence. Whether "maybe it came from somewhere else" is enough to create reasonable doubt. The Valentine's Day phone call that directly undercuts the entire theory. The forensic marker in Eric's toxicology pointing to street-grade fentanyl—not a prescription. The open marriage angle the defense floated and the real legal purpose behind it.The uncomfortable question: does blaming the victim for his own death make a jury angrier at your client?Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke examine what Eric's family has carried. By multiple accounts, the moment they walked through the door the night he died, something felt wrong about Kouri. That instinct cost them years, six figures, and nearly a thousand hours of a private investigator's time before they were heard.What happens psychologically when a family sees a dangerous relationship forming and can't stop it? Why does the person inside so often choose their partner? What's it like to sit in a house with the person you suspect, with no evidence, on the worst night of your life?This conversation goes places most true crime coverage doesn't.Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #DefenseStrategy #JudgeRuling #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #FentanylMurder

The defense in the Kouri Richins murder trial tried something that doesn't always work—putting the dead man on trial. They suggested Eric Richins had a history with drugs and that the fentanyl that killed him may have come from somewhere other than Kouri. Then the judge blocked their most specific drug evidence before they could even use it. And Eric's closest friend looked a jury in the eye and said he never once saw Eric use drugs. This Hidden Killers Week In Review examines why this strategy is collapsing—and what Eric's family has endured to get here.Defense attorney Eric Faddis breaks it down. He's been on both sides of this kind of argument and won't sugarcoat what it looks like when a defense team goes after the character of a dead man in front of a grieving jury. The judge's ruling that gutted their drug evidence. Whether "maybe it came from somewhere else" is enough to create reasonable doubt. The Valentine's Day phone call that directly undercuts the entire theory. The forensic marker in Eric's toxicology pointing to street-grade fentanyl—not a prescription.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke examine the family's side. Eric's family didn't need a toxicology report—the moment they walked through the door the night he died, something felt wrong. That instinct cost them years and six figures before they were heard.What happens psychologically when a family sees a dangerous relationship and can't stop it? Why does the person inside so often choose their partner over the people warning them? What's it like to sit in a house with the person you suspect, with no evidence, on the worst night of your life?Does blaming the victim make a jury angrier at your client?Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #DefenseStrategy #EricFaddis #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #BlameTheVictim #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Two people in the same house, both pointing at each other. Before Eric Richins was found dead with five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in his system, he told his family: if I die, look at her. He was secretly meeting with a divorce attorney. Around the same time, Kouri Richins texted a close friend: "If I die, Eric did it." This Hidden Killers Week In Review breaks down the most critical week of testimony yet.The prosecution laid bare Kouri's finances in open court—and the numbers tell a story. Bounced checks. Hard money loans stacking up. A forensic accountant called her real estate business "imploding." By March 5, 2022—the day after Eric died—Kouri was $1.6 million in the red. Even liquidating everything wouldn't dig her out.The mansion timeline is what prosecutors want the jury to remember. Kouri committed to buying a $2.9 million property in December 2021 with no renovation money and high-interest debt coming due. She closed on it the day after Eric died. One week later, she listed it for sale.Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to examine both sides. The prosecution has financial motive, Eric's warning, the fentanyl supply chain testimony, the Valentine's Day poisoning allegation, and the boyfriend's texts. But the defense has ammunition too—an immunized witness with a drug problem, a supplier who changed his story, and a cause of death the medical examiner won't call homicide.Faddis explains how prosecutors turn financial desperation into murder motive, why the defense isn't even contesting Kouri's money problems, and whether betting the jury won't leap from "bad with money" to "killer" is brilliant strategy or catastrophic miscalculation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #UtahMurderTrial #FentanylMurder #EricFaddis #FinancialMotive #MurderTrial #TrueCrime

Twenty-five years of sworn defense. Testimony at the 2005 criminal trial. A memoir declaring innocence. Oprah appearances attacking other accusers. Now the Cascio family—all five siblings—has filed a federal lawsuit alleging Michael Jackson drugged, raped, and trafficked them starting when some were as young as seven. This Hidden Killers Week In Review breaks down the credibility collision that could reshape the Jackson legacy.The Jackson estate is calling it a $200 million extortion scheme. The Cascios already received a settlement reportedly worth over $3 million after "Leaving Neverland" aired—then allegedly came back demanding $213 million more. The estate's attorney Marty Singer points to emails where the Cascio legal team allegedly threatened to leak allegations right as Sony was finalizing a $600 million catalog deal.The Cascios say they were coerced into that 2019 settlement while still processing trauma. They claim watching Wade Robson and James Safechuck finally made them discuss their experiences and discover they had all been abused.Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to examine the legal landscape. How does 25 years of defense testimony affect credibility? What does it take to void a settlement you already collected on? Why does the estate want private arbitration so badly? What does the federal trafficking statute actually require?There's the fake tracks scandal—brother Eddie sold songs that the Jackson family says weren't Michael's voice. Sony removed them in 2022.And the attorney flip: Mark Geragos defended Jackson in 2003, called "Leaving Neverland" an "absolute travesty" in 2021, and now represents the Cascios arguing Jackson was guilty.Michael Jackson was acquitted in 2005 and denied all allegations. His estate continues to deny them.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MichaelJackson #CascioFamily #MichaelJacksonLawsuit #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #MarkGeragos #JacksonEstate #LeavingNeverland #FrankCascio #SexTrafficking

The FBI has moved its command center from Tucson to Phoenix. The massive multi-agency task force has scaled down to a focused homicide and FBI unit. Sheriff Nanos says investigators are "definitely closer" and believes Nancy Guthrie is still alive. This Hidden Killers Week In Review breaks down what all of that actually means—and examines the collateral damage this investigation is leaving behind.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer—who told Newsweek this case is the polar opposite of cold—joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to explain the real difference between an investigation closing the walls on a suspect and one that's simply still moving. She walks through what a command center relocation signals, what investigative capabilities are lost when agents leave the local area, and how a small team triages dozens of open leads.Coffindaffer also weighs in on the United Cajun Navy standoff: 41 pages of operational planning, thermal drones, 25 trained canines, coordinated desert sweeps—and why the Sheriff hasn't approved them.Meanwhile, innocent people are paying the price for a case with no named suspect. One man was detained for hours after SWAT hit his home—released with his attorney saying he has "no link whatsoever" to the kidnapping. An elementary school teacher has been harassed by amateur sleuths. Even the Guthrie family had to be publicly cleared.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis explains what legal recourse exists when you've been dragged into a case you had nothing to do with. What does "cleared" mean legally? Can you sue social media accusers? Does speaking publicly help or hurt? If you've lost work because of false accusations, what recovery is possible?A month in. No arrest. No suspect. And lives already destroyed.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieKidnapping #FBIInvestigation #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #EricFaddis #PimaCounty #FalseAccusations #TucsonKidnapping #MissingPersons

The Nancy Guthrie investigation has no arrest, no named suspect, no person of interest. But that hasn't stopped the destruction. This Hidden Killers Week In Review brings together expert analysis on both the investigation's progress and the innocent people caught in its wake.SWAT executed search warrants on one man's home. He was handcuffed, detained, questioned for hours—then released. His attorney says he has "no link whatsoever" to the kidnapping. An elementary school teacher who plays in a band with Nancy's son-in-law has been harassed by amateur sleuths convinced he matches doorbell footage. Even the Guthrie family had to be publicly cleared by Sheriff Nanos because online attacks wouldn't stop.Former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis explains the legal landscape for people dragged into cases they had nothing to do with. What does "cleared" even mean when you were never charged? Can you sue social media accusers? What about platforms? Does speaking publicly help or hurt a defamation claim? If you've lost your job because of false accusations, what recovery is actually possible?Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer goes inside the investigation itself. The FBI moved its command center from Tucson to Phoenix. The task force scaled down to a focused unit. Sheriff Nanos says they're "definitely closer." Coffindaffer—who told Newsweek this case is the polar opposite of cold—explains what that language really means.She breaks down what a command center relocation signals, how a small team triages dozens of leads, and weighs in on the United Cajun Navy standoff: 41 pages of planning, thermal drones, 25 canines—and why the Sheriff won't approve them.A month in. One suspect unidentified. Lives destroyed by accusations. Where does this investigation actually stand?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieUpdate #FalseAccusations #Defamation #EricFaddis #JenniferCoffindaffer #FBIInvestigation #TucsonKidnapping #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

The Cascio family spent 25 years as Michael Jackson's most vocal defenders. They attacked other accusers. They called themselves his "second family." Frank Cascio declared on Oprah and in his memoir that Jackson's love for children was innocent. Now all five siblings claim Jackson trafficked and sexually abused them starting when some were as young as seven. This Hidden Killers Week In Review examines the legal collision that's testing the limits of credibility and timing.The Jackson estate calls this extortion. The Cascios signed a settlement in 2019—reportedly $690,000 per sibling per year for five years—that included confidentiality, non-disparagement, and mandatory arbitration clauses. They collected on it. Now they're trying to void that agreement, claiming it was signed under duress without proper legal counsel.A hearing will determine whether this case goes to public trial or disappears into private arbitration. The estate wants it sealed. The Cascio lawyers say that's "an illegal tactic to silence victims."Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to break down both sides. How devastating is decades of sworn defense testimony? What does it take to void a settlement you already collected? What does the federal trafficking statute actually require to prove?Then there's the fake tracks scandal. Brother Eddie sold songs to the estate that the Jackson family says weren't Michael's voice. Sony removed them in 2022. And the Cascios' attorney is Mark Geragos—who defended Jackson in 2003 and called "Leaving Neverland" an "absolute travesty" in 2021. Now he's arguing Jackson was guilty.The estate's attorney points to emails where the Cascio legal team allegedly threatened to leak allegations during Sony's $600 million catalog deal. Extortion—or hardball negotiation?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MichaelJackson #CascioFamily #JacksonEstate #FrankCascio #MarkGeragos #LeavingNeverland #EricFaddis #SexTrafficking #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

The prosecution just laid bare Kouri Richins' finances in open court. Bounced checks. Hard money loans stacking up. A real estate business a forensic accountant called "imploding." By March 5, 2022—the day after Eric Richins died with five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in his system—Kouri was $1.6 million in the red. Even liquidating everything wouldn't dig her out. This Hidden Killers Week In Review examines the financial motive prosecutors spent two weeks building—and the warning Eric gave his family before he died.Eric told his family: if I die, look at her. He was secretly meeting with a divorce attorney. He told her not to contact him by email because he was afraid Kouri would read it. Around the same time, Kouri texted a close friend: "If I die, Eric did it." Two people in the same house, both pointing at each other.The timeline prosecutors presented is devastating. Kouri committed to buying a $2.9 million mansion in December 2021 with no money to renovate and high-interest debt coming due. She closed on the property the day after Eric died. One week later, she listed it for sale.Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to break down what the jury just saw. Being terrible with money isn't the same as killing your husband for it—the prosecution has to bridge that gap. Faddis explains how prosecutors turn financial desperation into murder motive, why Kouri's belief about life insurance money matters even though Eric had changed his beneficiaries, and whether stacking 26 fraud charges alongside murder strengthens the case or makes it look circumstantial.The defense isn't contesting the financial disaster. They're betting the jury won't make the leap. Eric Faddis explains why that gamble could go either way.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #FinancialMotive #ForensicAccountant #FentanylMurder #EricFaddis #UtahMurder #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

In true crime, the most damaging evidence is often the kind the defendant created herself. In the Kouri Richins murder trial, the jury has seen phone searches for "fentanyl poisoning" and instructions on deleting messages. They've seen a jailhouse letter where Kouri allegedly tells family members what to say and how to say it. They've heard testimony that the signature on a life insurance policy taken out a month before Eric died likely wasn't his.And they know that minutes after first responders left the house where Eric lay dead, Kouri's phone accessed deleted memes — one captioned "I'm really rich."True Crime Today takes a hard look at what that kind of behavioral and digital record does to a defendant in front of a jury. Tony Brueski and Eric Faddis examine the deception pattern the prosecution has built, what it proves legally, and the impossible choice Kouri now faces — testify and try to explain it, or stay silent and let it speak for itself.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #DigitalEvidence #FentanylPoisoning #CriminalTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #DeceptionEvidence

In the Kouri Richins murder case, the defense isn't just arguing Kouri is innocent — they're arguing the man she's accused of killing may have contributed to his own death. It's a strategy that shows up in true crime cases more than most people realize, and it almost always carries serious risk.Eric Richins' best friend and business partner testified he never saw Eric use drugs in their entire relationship. A toxicologist identified a forensic marker in Eric's system proving the fentanyl was street-grade, not pharmaceutical. And the judge blocked the defense's most direct drug use evidence before the jury ever heard it.On True Crime Today, Tony Brueski sits down with defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis to examine this strategy from both sides — what the defense is trying to accomplish, why it's dangerous, and whether any part of it creates the reasonable doubt Kouri needs.They also dig into the open marriage angle, what it means legally, and the central question this whole theory creates: when a jury has already grown to respect a victim, what happens when you start attacking who he was?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #FentanylPoisoning #CriminalDefense #TrueCrimePodcast #DefenseStrategy #JuryTrial

Three issues define the Kouri Richins murder trial right now — and each one tells you something different about how this verdict could go.The defense argued the fentanyl in Eric Richins' system may not have come from Kouri. The judge blocked their key evidence. The forensics pointed to street-grade fentanyl. The victim's closest friend said the drug-user the defense described wasn't anyone he recognized.The prosecution's case rests on two witnesses who both got immunity deals. Both changed their stories. One contradicted himself on video. A detective's own recorded words were played for the jury as evidence of improper influence.And then there is Kouri's own record. Phone searches for fentanyl poisoning. Deleted memes accessed minutes after first responders left. A jailhouse letter coaching family members. A signature on a life insurance policy that wasn't Eric's. Drug purchases three days after his death, paid for with a disguised check.True Crime Today brings you the full picture with Eric Faddis — a former prosecutor who now defends the accused — and Tony Brueski. This is the Kouri Richins trial analysis built for people who want to understand the case, not just follow it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichins #EricRichins #EricFaddis #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #FentanylPoisoning #ImmunityWitness #CriminalTrial #TrueCrimePodcast

In true crime cases, immunity deals are common. But the Kouri Richins murder trial has a problem that goes beyond any single witness — the prosecution's entire drug supply chain is made up of people who traded their testimony for their freedom.Carmen Lauber, the housekeeper at the center of the case, had her story expand to include fentanyl after detectives told her she was facing serious federal charges. Robert Crozier, the alleged drug supplier, told investigators he sold fentanyl — then told a different story on the stand. A detective's recorded statements, played for the jury by the defense, raised questions about whether investigators shaped the testimony they needed.True Crime Today examines what happens when a murder case depends on witnesses whose motivations are anything but clean. Tony Brueski sits down with Eric Faddis — a former prosecutor who now defends the accused — to break down how immunity deals actually function, what the Richins prosecution is facing in closing arguments, and whether a jury can trust a drug chain where every link had something to gain.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichins #EricRichins #ImmunityWitness #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #FentanylPoisoning #CriminalJustice #TrueCrimePodcast #WitnessTestimony

When you don't have much, do you blame the victim? That's the question at the center of the Kouri Richins defense strategy — and it's one that Eric Faddis, a former prosecutor turned defense attorney, has seen play out in courtrooms more times than he can count.The defense suggested Eric Richins had a drug history. They wanted to show a jury evidence of his alleged high school pill use. The judge said no. What they're left with is a theory built around uncertainty — maybe the fentanyl came from somewhere else, maybe Eric had habits no one knew about, maybe nothing is as simple as the prosecution claims.The problem? Eric's own business partner said he never saw anything. The toxicologist found a forensic marker proving the fentanyl was street-grade. And the judge cut off the defense's most specific evidence before they could even make their case.On this episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski sits down with Eric Faddis to break down whether this defense theory was ever viable — or whether it was always a last resort dressed up as a strategy. They also get into the open marriage angle, the risk of alienating a jury by attacking a dead man, and what a defense attorney actually does when the evidence isn't on your side.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #HiddenKillers #EricRichins #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #CriminalDefense #FentanylMurder #DefenseStrategy #TrueCrimePodcast #CourtTV

Before the Kouri Richins jury ever decides whether she murdered her husband, they've already learned who she is. Phone searches for "fentanyl poisoning." Deleted memes accessed minutes after first responders left — one saying "I'm really rich." A jailhouse letter coaching family on testimony. A forged signature on a life insurance policy a month before Eric died. And three days after his death, a text to her alleged drug source asking if she still had her connection.That's the deception pattern the prosecution has laid in front of the jury. And now Kouri has to either take the stand and explain it — or stay silent and let the jury sit with all of it.On Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski and Eric Faddis examine what a documented pattern of deception actually does in a criminal trial. Eric has prosecuted defendants whose behavior told the story against them, and he's defended clients who had to fight through records that made them look guilty. His read on where Kouri stands right now is worth hearing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#HiddenKillers #KouriRichins #EricRichins #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #FentanylMurder #Deception #CriminalDefense #TrueCrimePodcast #JailhouseLetter

Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis sits down with Tony Brueski for an extended Hidden Killers conversation that goes deeper into the Kouri Richins murder trial than anything you'll hear in a standard legal segment.Three issues. Three conversations. Each one with real stakes.The defense's drug use theory has been gutted by a judicial ruling, contradicted by the people who knew Eric best, and undermined by forensic toxicology. Is there anything left — or is this a strategy built on hope?The prosecution's key witnesses both have immunity deals. Both changed their stories. A detective's recorded words were turned against the state mid-trial. Can a murder conviction survive a drug chain where every link had something to gain?And the deception record. Phone searches. Memes. A jailhouse letter. A forged signature. Three days after Eric died, Kouri was texting for more drugs. How does a defense attorney walk a jury back from a client who left a paper trail like this?Eric Faddis answers every one of these questions with the clarity of someone who's done this job — from both chairs.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#HiddenKillers #KouriRichins #EricFaddis #EricRichins #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #FentanylMurder #CriminalDefense #ImmunityWitness #TrueCrimePodcast

In the Kouri Richins murder trial, the prosecution's drug supply chain runs through two witnesses — and both of them have immunity deals. Both of their stories shifted. One recanted on the stand. The other changed her account of what drug she bought after federal charges appeared on the horizon.It's the kind of evidentiary situation that keeps defense attorneys up at night — and gives them ammunition in closing arguments.On Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski sits down with Eric Faddis — defense attorney and former felony prosecutor — to dissect the structural problem at the heart of the prosecution's case. Not just the credibility of each individual witness, but the combined weight of two compromised testimonies holding up a first-degree murder charge.Eric breaks down what an immunity deal actually requires, where witness preparation ends and improper influence begins, and what a defense attorney does in front of a jury when the prosecution's own detective was caught on tape saying things that don't help the state's case.This is a conversation about how the justice system actually works — and where it can go sideways.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#HiddenKillers #KouriRichins #EricRichins #ImmunityWitness #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #FentanylMurder #CriminalDefense #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeSystem

Tonight we're going deep on the Kouri Richins murder trial with someone who's sat in both chairs — defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski live for the conversation that covers all of it.The defense said the fentanyl might not have come from Kouri. The judge blocked their evidence. The forensics disagreed with their theory. Does anything they've argued actually land with a jury?The prosecution's two most important witnesses both have immunity deals. Both changed their stories. A detective's own recorded words were played against the state in open court. Can a murder conviction survive that?And the record Kouri left behind — phone searches for fentanyl poisoning, a jailhouse letter coaching her family, a forged signature, deleted memes accessed while her husband's body was still in the house. Does she take the stand and face all of it — or stay silent and hope?Eric Faddis has real answers. Not cable news answers — real ones. And tonight he's giving them live.Get in the chat. Your questions are part of the show.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#HiddenKillersLive #KouriRichins #EricFaddis #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeLive #MurderTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #LivePodcast #TrueCrime

Kouri Richins has a deception problem — and it's documented, on tape, and already in front of the jury. Phone searches for fentanyl poisoning. Memes accessed minutes after first responders left. A letter from jail telling family members what to say. A forged signature on a life insurance policy.The question tonight is the one every trial watcher is asking: does she take the stand and try to explain it — or does she stay silent and hope the jury gives her the benefit of the doubt anyway?Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski live to break it down. He's defended clients in situations like this. He knows what a jury does when someone stays silent after a record like Kouri's has been laid out for them. And he's not going to give you a sanitized answer.What do you think — should Kouri testify? Drop it in the chat. This is a live conversation and your questions matter.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#HiddenKillersLive #KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeLive #MurderTrial #EricRichins #WillSheTestify #LivePodcast #TrueCrime #FentanylMurder

The defense said the fentanyl might not have come from Kouri. They suggested Eric had a drug history. The judge blocked their evidence. His business partner contradicted their theory to his face. And the toxicology report pointed straight to illicit street fentanyl.So the question for tonight's live discussion is direct: was this defense strategy ever going to work — or did it make things worse?Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski live to break down the Kouri Richins defense theory in real time. Eric is a former felony prosecutor who now sits on the defense side — he knows exactly how both sides of an argument like this play out in front of a jury. Tonight he pulls no punches.We want to hear from you. Do you think the "maybe Eric sourced it himself" theory creates any reasonable doubt? Does blaming the victim ever work with a jury? Drop your questions and reactions in the live chat — Eric and Tony will take them on.This is the kind of conversation that only happens live. Don't miss it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichinsLive #HiddenKillersLive #KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrimeLive #MurderTrial #FentanylMurder #CriminalDefense #TrueCrime #LivePodcast

Former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis covers three major legal developments in one extended interview.The Kouri Richins trial just heard devastating financial testimony. A forensic accountant told jurors she was $1.6 million in debt the day after Eric Richins died. Her business was "imploding." Checks bounced constantly. The prosecution wants the jury to see financial desperation as murder motive. Eric Faddis explains how that legal argument works, why Kouri's belief about life insurance matters even though Eric had already changed his beneficiaries, and whether 26 fraud charges help or hurt.In the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation, there's no arrest and no suspect—but innocent people have already been named, detained, and harassed. A man questioned for hours was released with his attorney saying he has "no link whatsoever" to the case. A teacher is being targeted at his home by amateur sleuths. Eric Faddis explains what legal recourse exists when you've been dragged into a high-profile case you weren't part of.The Cascio family—who defended Michael Jackson publicly for 25 years, testified at his 2005 trial, and wrote a memoir calling him innocent—are now suing, alleging he drugged, raped, and trafficked them since childhood. The estate calls it extortion. A hearing this week determines whether the case goes public or gets sealed in arbitration. Eric Faddis examines the credibility nightmare, the settlement they already collected, and what federal trafficking law requires.Three cases. Three legal battlegrounds. One conversation covering all of it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #MichaelJackson #CascioFamily #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeToday #MurderMotive #Defamation #Trafficking #TrueCrime

Three cases. Three legal minefields. Former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the week's biggest developments in one extended conversation.Kouri Richins' finances are now on full display for the jury. A forensic accountant testified she was $1.6 million in debt the day after Eric died—business imploding, checks bouncing, hard money loans stacking. The prosecution wants jurors to see premeditation. The defense says it's just reckless spending from someone who was always in over her head. Eric Faddis explains how financial evidence becomes murder motive—and where that argument can fall apart.In the Nancy Guthrie case, there's still no arrest—but innocent people are already suffering. A man was detained, questioned for hours, and released. A schoolteacher is being harassed by amateur investigators convinced he matches doorbell footage. The Guthrie family had to be publicly cleared. Eric Faddis explains what legal recourse exists when you've been named in a case you had nothing to do with.And the Cascio family—who spent 25 years defending Michael Jackson in court, on television, and in print—are now suing, alleging he drugged, raped, and trafficked them since childhood. The estate calls it extortion. A hearing this week determines whether this goes to public trial or sealed arbitration. Eric Faddis breaks down the credibility nightmare, the settlement the Cascios already collected, and what federal trafficking law actually requires.One conversation. Three completely different legal questions.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #MichaelJackson #CascioFamily #EricFaddis #MurderTrial #Defamation #Trafficking #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

Former felony prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live for an extended breakdown of three major legal stories developing right now.In Utah, the prosecution just finished presenting Kouri Richins' financial situation to the jury—and it's ugly. Negative $1.6 million net worth. A business described as "imploding." Checks bouncing constantly. The prosecution wants jurors to connect financial desperation to murder motive. The defense admits she was bad with money—but argues that's not the same as being a killer. Eric Faddis explains the legal standard and where both sides are strongest.In Arizona, the Nancy Guthrie investigation has no arrest and no suspect—but it's already produced innocent victims. A man was detained for hours and released. A teacher is being harassed at his home. The Guthrie family had to be publicly cleared. Eric Faddis explains what legal options exist for people dragged into cases they had nothing to do with—including defamation claims, platform liability under Section 230, and why getting your name back is harder than it should be.In federal court, the Cascio family's lawsuit against the Michael Jackson estate faces a critical hearing this week. After 25 years defending Jackson—testimony, a memoir, national television—all five siblings are now alleging he drugged, raped, and trafficked them since childhood. The estate says it's a $200 million extortion scheme and wants the whole thing sealed in arbitration. Eric Faddis examines the credibility question, the settlement the Cascios already collected, and what happens next.Three cases. One conversation. Every angle covered.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #MichaelJackson #CascioLawsuit #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeLive #MurderTrial #Defamation #Trafficking #HiddenKillersLive

Twenty-five years of sworn statements defending Michael Jackson. Testimony at his 2005 trial. A book. National television appearances. Now all five Cascio siblings are suing, alleging Jackson drugged, raped, and trafficked them since childhood.The estate is calling it extortion. A hearing this week determines whether this case goes public—or gets sealed in arbitration.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today to break down the legal battle, the credibility nightmare, and what happens when longtime defenders become accusers.The Cascios already signed a settlement with the estate in 2019—reportedly $690,000 per sibling per year for five years. It included confidentiality, non-disparagement, and mandatory arbitration clauses. They collected. Now they want out, claiming the agreement was signed under duress without proper legal counsel.The estate wants this in arbitration, where proceedings stay private. The Cascio attorneys say that's "an illegal tactic to silence victims." If the estate wins the hearing, nothing that happens next will be public.Eric Faddis examines the legal standards: what it takes to void a settlement you've cashed, how devastating 25 years of defense testimony is to a credibility argument, and what federal sex trafficking law actually requires when the defendant has been dead since 2009.There's also the question of alleged threats. The estate's attorney claims the Cascio legal team threatened to "expand the circle of knowledge"—leak the allegations—right as Sony was finalizing a $600 million catalog deal. Extortion or negotiation?The Cascios say Leaving Neverland in 2019 "deprogrammed" them. The estate says the timing says everything.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MichaelJackson #CascioFamily #MichaelJacksonLawsuit #FrankCascio #MJEstate #LeavingNeverland #SexTrafficking #Arbitration #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeToday

No suspect. No arrest. No person of interest. But the Nancy Guthrie investigation has already left innocent people facing harassment, detention, and destroyed reputations.One man was handcuffed and questioned for hours after SWAT executed search warrants on his home. Released. His attorney says he has "no link whatsoever" to the kidnapping. An elementary school teacher connected to the Guthrie family through a band has been harassed at his home by amateur sleuths convinced he matches doorbell footage of the masked suspect. Sheriff Nanos publicly cleared the Guthrie family because online accusations kept coming.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today to explain what legal options exist when you've been dragged into a high-profile case you had nothing to do with.A sheriff saying you're "cleared" isn't a court ruling. So what does it actually mean? If you want something official, does that even exist when you were never charged? Can you sue the individuals who accused you online? What about the platforms hosting those accusations—does Section 230 leave anything on the table?Eric Faddis breaks down when defamation claims are worth pursuing, how being named in a famous case can make you a "limited-purpose public figure" and raise the bar for any lawsuit, and what the legal calculus is on speaking publicly versus staying silent.For people who've lost jobs, clients, or peace of mind because of false accusations, the path to recovery is harder than most realize.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieKidnapping #PatSajak #Tucson #FalseAccusations #Defamation #InternetSleuths #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #TrueCrime

A forensic accountant just told jurors that Kouri Richins was $1.6 million in debt the day after her husband Eric died. Her business account was "perpetually in the hole." Checks bounced constantly. Hard money loans with brutal interest rates were stacking up. Even liquidating every asset wouldn't have dug her out.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today to explain how the prosecution uses financial desperation as murder motive—and where the defense can punch holes in that theory.The most damaging testimony centered on timing. In December 2021, Kouri committed to purchasing a $2.9 million mansion despite having no renovation funds and high-interest debt coming due. Eric died March 4, 2022. Kouri closed on the mansion March 5th. She listed it for sale a week later. Prosecutors argue that sequence proves she knew the life insurance money was coming.But there's a wrinkle: Eric had already changed his beneficiaries. He'd set up a living trust in late 2020 that cut Kouri out of a $500,000 policy. She apparently didn't know. So does motive still hold if she only believed she'd get the money?Eric Faddis breaks down why the answer matters, how the defense is using Eric's financial health to counter the desperation narrative, and whether 26 fraud charges stacked alongside murder help the prosecution—or make the whole case feel circumstantial.The defense admits Kouri was a financial disaster. Their bet: the jury won't make the leap to murder.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #MurderMotive #UtahMurder #FinancialFraud #LifeInsurance #EricFaddis #TrueCrime

No arrest. No suspect. No person of interest. A month after Nancy Guthrie was kidnapped from her Tucson home, investigators have nothing public to show—but innocent people are already paying the price.A 37-year-old man living with his elderly mother was handcuffed and questioned for hours after SWAT executed search warrants. He was released. His attorney issued a statement saying he has "no link whatsoever" to the case. A schoolteacher has been harassed at his home because amateur investigators decided he looked like the masked figure in doorbell footage. Sheriff Nanos had to publicly clear the Guthrie family because online accusations wouldn't stop.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers to explain what happens when you're named in a case you had nothing to do with—and what legal options actually exist to get your name back.Being "cleared" by a sheriff isn't a court ruling. So what does it mean legally? Can you sue the people who accused you on TikTok or YouTube? What about the platforms themselves—does Section 230 leave any avenue open? If you've lost your job because of false accusations, is that a separate claim from defamation?Eric Faddis walks through the legal landscape: when defamation cases are worth pursuing, when they're not, what "limited-purpose public figure" status means for your case, and whether cease-and-desist letters and takedown requests actually accomplish anything.For people whose names have been dragged through a case they weren't part of, the path back is harder than it should be.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieCase #PatSajak #TucsonKidnapping #FalseAccusations #InternetSleuths #Defamation #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers

Forensic accounting testimony just painted the clearest picture yet of Kouri Richins' financial situation—and it's worse than anyone knew. Negative $1.6 million net worth. A business account "perpetually in the hole." Checks bouncing constantly. Hard money loans with brutal interest rates coming due.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers to analyze whether financial chaos equals murder motive—or whether the prosecution is asking the jury to make a leap the evidence doesn't support.The timeline prosecutors want jurors to focus on is damning: Kouri commits to a $2.9 million mansion purchase in December 2021. Eric dies March 4, 2022. She closes on the mansion March 5th. She lists it for sale one week later. That sequence looks like someone who knew money was coming.But the defense has counters. Eric was listed as a borrower on that HELOC Kouri allegedly took out behind his back—meaning he could've checked his own balance anytime. His accounts were healthy. His masonry business was solid. The family account always had money. If Kouri was desperate, Eric wasn't.Eric Faddis breaks down the prosecution's burden: how do you get from "she was broke" to "she killed him for money"? He explains why Kouri's belief she'd receive life insurance matters even though Eric had already changed beneficiaries, what post-death spending reveals about motive, and whether 26 fraud charges help or hurt the murder prosecution.The defense admits Kouri was a financial disaster. They're betting that's not enough to convict. Eric Faddis explains the risk.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #MurderMotive #ForensicAccounting #UtahTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #CriminalDefense #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers

For 25 years, the Cascio family was Michael Jackson's shield. They testified at his 2005 trial. Frank Cascio wrote a book defending him. They went on national television saying Jackson never harmed anyone.Now all five Cascio siblings are suing, alleging Jackson drugged, raped, and sexually trafficked them since childhood. The estate says it's a $200 million extortion scheme.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers to break down the most complicated credibility question in recent entertainment law: what happens when your most loyal defenders become your accusers—after decades of sworn statements saying nothing happened?The legal terrain is brutal. The Cascios already signed a settlement in 2019—reportedly $690,000 per sibling per year for five years—with confidentiality, non-disparagement, and arbitration clauses. They collected on it. Now they want it voided, claiming duress and lack of proper legal counsel.A hearing determines whether this goes to public court or private arbitration. The estate wants it sealed. The Cascio attorneys say arbitration is being weaponized to silence abuse victims.Eric Faddis breaks down what it takes to void a settlement you've already cashed, how 25 years of defense testimony affects credibility, what the federal sex trafficking statute actually requires, and whether alleged threats to "expand the circle of knowledge" right before a $600 million Sony deal constitutes extortion—or just aggressive negotiation.The Cascios claim they were "deprogrammed" by watching Leaving Neverland in 2019. The estate says the timing proves opportunism.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MichaelJackson #CascioLawsuit #FrankCascio #MichaelJacksonEstate #MJLawsuit #LeavingNeverland #SexTrafficking #Arbitration #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers

The prosecution just finished presenting what they believe is the heart of their case against Kouri Richins: financial motive. A forensic accountant walked the jury through bounced checks, hard money loans, and a real estate business described as "imploding." By the day Eric Richins died, Kouri was allegedly $1.6 million in debt.Former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live to break down the testimony in real time and explain what it means for both sides.The prosecution's argument centers on timing. Kouri commits to buying a $2.9 million mansion with no renovation money and high-interest loans coming due. Eric dies. She closes the next day. She lists the property a week later. That's not coincidence, prosecutors argue—that's someone who knew the money was coming.Defense attorney Kathy Nester pushed back hard on cross-examination. Eric was listed as a borrower on the disputed HELOC. His accounts were healthy. His masonry business was profitable. If Kouri was in financial ruin, Eric wasn't—and he could've checked his own balances anytime.Eric Faddis explains the legal bridge prosecutors must build to turn "financial desperation" into "murder for money." He analyzes whether Kouri's belief she'd receive life insurance payments matters when Eric had already changed his beneficiaries, how post-death spending factors into motive arguments, and whether stacking 26 fraud charges strengthens or weakens the murder case.The defense concedes Kouri was terrible with money. Can the jury separate "reckless" from "murderer"?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #TrialLive #MurderMotive #TrueCrimeLive #UtahTrial #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive #FinancialFraud

The Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation has produced no arrests and no named suspects—but it's already destroyed innocent people's lives.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live to break down what legal recourse exists when you've been publicly accused in a case you had nothing to do with.One man was detained, handcuffed, and questioned for hours before being released. His attorney says he has "no link whatsoever" to Nancy Guthrie. An elementary school teacher has been harassed at his home by amateur investigators who decided he matched doorbell footage of the masked suspect. He doesn't. He told the New York Times: "I feel like someone's taken my name." The Guthrie family had to be publicly cleared by Sheriff Nanos because accusations against them wouldn't stop.What does being "cleared" actually mean when you were never charged? If you wanted something with more legal weight, does that even exist? Can you sue individuals who accused you online—not media outlets, just regular people on social media? What does that lawsuit look like, and is it worth pursuing?Eric Faddis explains the meaningful differences between being "questioned," "detained," and "named as a suspect"—and what legal cover those distinctions give media outlets even when someone's reputation is destroyed. He breaks down Section 230 protections for platforms, whether you become a "limited-purpose public figure" just by being named in a famous case, and what options actually work outside of courtroom litigation.Getting your name back is harder than it should be.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieUpdate #PatSajak #TucsonKidnapping #Defamation #FalseAccusations #InternetSleuths #TrueCrimeLive #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive

 A hearing this week will decide whether the Cascio family's lawsuit against the Michael Jackson estate goes to public trial—or disappears into private arbitration where no one will ever see it.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live to break down both sides of the most explosive entertainment lawsuit in years.The Cascio family defended Michael Jackson for 25 years. They testified at his 2005 criminal trial. Frank Cascio wrote "My Friend Michael." They told Oprah nothing inappropriate ever happened. Now all five siblings are suing, alleging Jackson drugged, raped, and sexually trafficked them starting when some were as young as seven.The estate calls it a $200 million extortion scheme. They're pointing to a 2019 settlement the Cascios already signed—and collected on—that included mandatory arbitration. The Cascios want that agreement voided, claiming it was signed under duress without proper legal representation.Eric Faddis explains what it legally takes to void a settlement you've already cashed, how 25 years of sworn defense testimony affects a credibility argument, and what the federal sex trafficking statute requires to prove against a defendant who's been dead for 15 years.The estate's attorney Marty Singer alleges the Cascio legal team threatened to leak allegations right as Sony was closing a $600 million catalog deal. Is that extortion? Or hardball negotiation?The Cascios say they were "deprogrammed" by watching Leaving Neverland in 2019. The estate says the documentary—and the Sony deal—explain everything about the timing.This week's hearing could determine whether any of this ever sees daylight.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MichaelJackson #CascioFamily #MJLawsuit #MichaelJacksonEstate #FrankCascio #LeavingNeverland #SexTrafficking #Arbitration #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive

The prosecution just presented what could be the most damaging day of testimony against Kouri Richins: the finances. A forensic accountant walked jurors through a business that was "imploding," a pattern of bounced checks, hard money loans stacking up, and a net worth of negative $1.6 million by the day after Eric Richins died.Former felony prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis analyzes every angle of the financial motive argument and explains where the prosecution is strongest—and where the defense can exploit weaknesses.The timeline is brutal for Kouri. December 2021: she commits to buying a $2.9 million mansion with no renovation money and loans coming due. March 4, 2022: Eric dies. March 5: she closes on the mansion. One week later: she lists it for sale. Prosecutors say that's premeditation written in real estate transactions.But the defense hammered back. Eric was listed on the HELOC Kouri allegedly took out without telling him—he could've checked anytime. His accounts were healthy. His masonry business was solid. The family account always had money. Defense attorney Kathy Nester wants jurors to ask: if things were so desperate, why didn't Eric notice?Eric Faddis explains the legal standard for turning financial evidence into murder motive, why Kouri's belief about life insurance matters even though Eric had changed beneficiaries, and what the $25,000 she allegedly sent to a boyfriend after Eric's death reveals about the case.Twenty-six fraud charges are being tried alongside murder. Is that overkill—or proof?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #KouriRichinsVerdict #KouriRichinsUpdate #FinancialMotive #MurderTrial #Utah #EricFaddis #TrueCrime

Two of the most-watched cases in the country are reaching critical moments.The Kouri Richins murder trial is a battle between devastating motive evidence and investigative gaps. Prosecutors say she killed her husband for $4 million and a fresh start—pointing to five times the lethal fentanyl dose, a forged insurance policy, a boyfriend, internet searches about lethal doses, and Eric's alleged statement two weeks before his death: "I think my wife is trying to poison me."The defense counters with what's missing. The Moscow mule cups were never tested. The kitchen wasn't secured. White specks on Eric's nightstand went unanalyzed. The medical examiner says manner of death remains "undetermined." After ten searches over four years, there's no physical evidence connecting Kouri to the act itself.Which argument wins?Meanwhile, Nancy Guthrie has been missing for twenty-five days. The doorbell footage shows a masked man who cased the house, came back, and didn't know about the camera until he was standing in front of it. If this was a burglary that ended in an unintended death, Arizona's felony murder statute doesn't offer mercy. Intent is irrelevant.Defense attorney Eric Faddis, a former prosecutor, explains the difference between walking into a police station now and getting caught through genetic genealogy later. The person who hid Nancy also hid the evidence that could support their own defense. That clock is running.Two cases. Two legal reckonings. The walls are closing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichinsTrial #FelonyMurder #FentanylPoisoning #SavannahGuthrie #EricFaddis #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrime

Two cases where the evidence tells competing stories. Both reaching moments that will define what comes next.In the Kouri Richins trial, both realities exist at once. The prosecution has motive evidence that stacks to the ceiling: five times the lethal fentanyl dose, a forged life insurance policy, a boyfriend she booked a Caribbean vacation with for the month after Eric's death, texts wishing her husband would "just go away." Two weeks before he died, Eric told a friend he thought his wife was poisoning him.But the defense has something too: four years of investigation and no proof of how fentanyl actually got into Eric's body. Untested cups. Unsecured kitchen. White specks never analyzed. An "undetermined" death certificate. Can overwhelming circumstantial evidence survive when the physical link is missing?Then there's Nancy Guthrie. Twenty-five days. No suspect identified. No body recovered. The evidence pattern suggests a burglar who got surprised—someone who cased the house, came back, didn't know about the camera, and improvised with weeds to cover the lens.Arizona's felony murder statute doesn't care about intent. If Nancy died during a burglary, that's murder. Defense attorney Eric Faddis, a former prosecutor, breaks down what surrender buys versus getting caught, why the person who hid the body also hid their own defense, and how the legal walls are closing daily.Two cases. Two critical moments. The legal reality of what's coming.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #KouriRichinsTrial #FelonyMurder #HiddenKillers #FentanylPoisoning #SavannahGuthrie #EricFaddis #ReasonableDoubt #TrueCrime

Two cases at critical inflection points. We're breaking down both live.The Kouri Richins trial is exposing a war between what prosecutors have and what they're missing. The motive evidence is overwhelming—five times the lethal fentanyl dose, a forged insurance policy, a boyfriend she texted "Love you" the night Eric died, internet searches about lethal doses before and deleted messages after. Two weeks before his death, Eric allegedly said "I think my wife is trying to poison me."But the defense is hammering investigative failures. Untested cups. Unsecured crime scene. White specks never analyzed. A medical examiner who says manner of death is "undetermined." Can circumstantial evidence carry a conviction when the physical proof connecting defendant to act is missing?Then there's Nancy Guthrie—twenty-five days missing, and the evidence suggests this wasn't a professional operation. A suspect who cased the house, came back, didn't know about the camera, and grabbed weeds to cover the lens. If this was a burglary gone wrong, whoever's responsible is facing felony murder in Arizona. Intent doesn't matter.Defense attorney Eric Faddis, a former prosecutor, explains the fork in the road: surrender now with the body's location, or get caught later through genetic genealogy. One gives the defense leverage. The other lets prosecutors paint consciousness of guilt.The window is closing on both cases. We're taking your questions live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #HiddenKillersLive #KouriRichinsTrial #FelonyMurder #SavannahGuthrie #LiveTrial #EricFaddis #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrime

Whoever is responsible for Nancy Guthrie's disappearance is sitting on a decision that will shape the rest of their life.The evidence released so far doesn't suggest a mastermind. It suggests someone who cased the house, came back, and got surprised by a doorbell camera they didn't know existed. Someone who improvised with plants from a pot to cover the lens. Someone who may not have intended for an 84-year-old woman to die—but is now three and a half weeks into hiding the result.Eric Faddis was a felony prosecutor. Now he's a criminal defense attorney. He's seen what happens on both sides when cases like this finally land in a courtroom.Arizona's felony murder statute doesn't require intent to kill. If Nancy Guthrie died during a burglary, that's a murder charge. Add body concealment, evidence tampering, and weeks of flight, and the legal exposure is already catastrophic.But there's still a fork in the road.Faddis explains what walking into a police station with a lawyer and the location of the body actually buys—versus getting caught cold through genetic genealogy or a tip. One scenario gives the defense leverage for negotiation. The other lets prosecutors paint a portrait of someone who hid, lied, and let a family suffer while they calculated their odds.The hardest part: without the body, neither side can prove how Nancy died. The defense can't establish it was accidental. Prosecutors can't establish it wasn't. And the person who created that evidentiary black hole is the one who hid her.Faddis gives the honest answer on what the range of outcomes looks like now—and how fast that range is narrowing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeToday #FelonyMurder #SavannahGuthrie #ArizonaCrime #LegalAnalysis #CriminalDefense #Prosecution #TrueCrime

Whoever is responsible for Nancy Guthrie's disappearance is sitting on a decision that will shape the rest of their life.The evidence released so far doesn't suggest a mastermind. It suggests someone who cased the house, came back, and got surprised by a doorbell camera they didn't know existed. Someone who improvised with plants from a pot to cover the lens. Someone who may not have intended for an 84-year-old woman to die—but is now three and a half weeks into hiding the result.Eric Faddis was a felony prosecutor. Now he's a criminal defense attorney. He's seen what happens on both sides when cases like this finally land in a courtroom.Arizona's felony murder statute doesn't require intent to kill. If Nancy Guthrie died during a burglary, that's a murder charge. Add body concealment, evidence tampering, and weeks of flight, and the legal exposure is already catastrophic.But there's still a fork in the road.Faddis explains what walking into a police station with a lawyer and the location of the body actually buys—versus getting caught cold through genetic genealogy or a tip. One scenario gives the defense leverage for negotiation. The other lets prosecutors paint a portrait of someone who hid, lied, and let a family suffer while they calculated their odds.The hardest part: without the body, neither side can prove how Nancy died. The defense can't establish it was accidental. Prosecutors can't establish it wasn't. And the person who created that evidentiary black hole is the one who hid her.Faddis gives the honest answer on what the range of outcomes looks like now—and how fast that range is narrowing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeToday #FelonyMurder #SavannahGuthrie #ArizonaCrime #LegalAnalysis #CriminalDefense #Prosecution #TrueCrime

Prosecutors say Kouri Richins murdered her husband Eric with a fentanyl-laced Moscow mule. But those copper mugs were never tested for fentanyl. The nanny washed them the next morning.That's the kind of evidentiary gap that's emerging in week one of this Utah murder trial—and defense attorney Eric Faddis explains why it matters.The crime scene wasn't properly secured. The kitchen where the drinks were made wasn't searched. White specks on Eric's nightstand—visible in photos—were never analyzed. The medical examiner testified the manner of death is still "undetermined" on the death certificate. Chelsea Gipson, the crime scene tech, found no drugs on her initial visit, but investigators kept searching the home over four years, finding more evidence each time.The defense is building a case around what wasn't done, what wasn't tested, and what can't be proven. Faddis, who has worked as both prosecutor and defense attorney, breaks down why circumstantial evidence—even overwhelming circumstantial evidence—might not be enough when the physical proof is missing.Can the prosecution's motive evidence survive these investigative failures?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #TrueCrimeToday #FentanylPoisoning #UtahMurderTrial #EricFaddis #ReasonableDoubt #TrueCrime #ChainOfCustody

This wasn't a professional job. The evidence says so.The suspect visited Nancy Guthrie's home before the night she disappeared. When he came back, he didn't know about the doorbell camera. Tried to disable it and failed. Grabbed weeds to cover the lens. That's improvisation. That's someone who thought they had it figured out—and didn't.If this was a burglary that turned into something the perpetrator never intended, what's waiting for them on the other side?Eric Faddis spent years as a felony prosecutor before becoming a defense attorney. He's seen cases like this from both sides of the courtroom. And he's clear about what this person faces.Arizona's felony murder statute doesn't care about intent. If someone dies during the commission of a burglary, that's murder. Add concealment of a body. Add twenty-five days of hiding while the FBI chases 55,000 tips. Add the consciousness of guilt that comes from staying silent while a family begs for answers.The legal exposure is already severe. It gets worse every day.Faddis breaks down what voluntary surrender actually buys—if anything. He explains the difference between coming forward now and getting caught through genetic genealogy later. He addresses the impossible position the defense is in when the body is missing: they can't prove accidental death because their client hid the evidence.And he talks about what happens beyond criminal court. The Guthrie family has resources. Wrongful death is a separate track.For someone sitting with this, Faddis lays out the realistic range. Where cooperation leads. Where getting caught without cooperation leads. The window between those two outcomes is narrowing.This is the legal reality of what's coming.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #FelonyMurder #HiddenKillers #SavannahGuthrie #ArizonaLaw #TrueCrime #BurglaryGoneWrong #CriminalDefense #LegalExplainer

The prosecution's case against Kouri Richins isn't just about fentanyl. It's about a timeline that points to planning.Months before Eric's death: Kouri books an all-inclusive Caribbean vacation for herself and her boyfriend—checking in the month after her husband would be dead.Weeks before: She texts that boyfriend, "If he could just go away and you could just be here, life would be so perfect." She allegedly forges Eric's signature on a $100,000 life insurance policy.Valentine's Day, two weeks before his death: Eric calls a friend and says "I think my wife is trying to poison me" after eating a sandwich she left him.The night he dies: She texts the boyfriend "Love you," then makes her husband a Moscow mule.After his death: Her internet searches include "can cops uncover deleted messages iPhone" and "how long do life insurance companies take to pay."Prosecutor Brad Bloodworth told the jury Eric had five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in his system—"intentional, not accidental." Kouri owed $4.5 million and Eric's estate was worth $4 million.Defense attorney Eric Faddis, a former prosecutor, analyzes how the state is weaving financial desperation, digital evidence, and prior bad acts into a narrative of premeditated murder.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #FentanylMurder #Premeditation #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #UtahTrial #EricFaddis #InsuranceFraud

Defense attorney Kathy Nester told the jury something remarkable in her opening statement: after four years of investigation, prosecutors have "zero evidence" showing how fentanyl got into Eric Richins' body.This week's testimony proved her point.The Moscow mule cups at the heart of the prosecution's theory were never tested—the nanny washed them the next morning. Deputy Nguyen didn't secure the kitchen. White specks on Eric's nightstand, visible in crime scene photos, were never analyzed. Crime scene tech Chelsea Gipson found no drugs in the home on her initial visit, but evidence kept turning up in subsequent searches over four years. The medical examiner testified the manner of death remains "undetermined."Eric Faddis, a former prosecutor turned defense attorney, breaks down the defense strategy taking shape in the Kouri Richins trial. What happens when prosecutors have strong motive evidence—the texts, the searches, the debt, the boyfriend—but can't connect the defendant to the actual act?The defense is betting everything on reasonable doubt. Faddis explains why that bet might pay off.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #FentanylPoisoning #ReasonableDoubt #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #UtahTrial #EricFaddis #DefenseStrategy

The Kouri Richins murder trial is three days in, and the defense is already drawing blood.Untested Moscow mule cups. An unsecured crime scene. White specks on the nightstand that nobody analyzed. A medical examiner who testified the manner of death is still "undetermined." Ten searches of the Richins home over four years—and prosecutors still can't tell the jury how fentanyl got into Eric Richins' body.Defense attorney Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live to break down the defense strategy emerging in real time from the Summit County courtroom. Faddis has prosecuted cases like this and defended them. He knows what jurors see when evidence is missing, when chain of custody fails, and when the prosecution's theory depends on cups that were washed before anyone thought to test them.The prosecution has motive. They have circumstantial evidence. But do they have enough?We're taking your questions and analyzing the trial developments as they happen.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #HiddenKillersLive #FentanylPoisoning #UtahTrial #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #ReasonableDoubt #LiveTrial

Prosecutor Brad Bloodworth is building his case piece by piece. And the pieces are damning.Five times the lethal dose of fentanyl. A forged insurance policy. A boyfriend she texted "Love you" the night Eric died. Internet searches about lethal fentanyl doses and whether cops can recover deleted messages. A Caribbean vacation booked for the month after her husband's death. And a Valentine's Day incident where Eric allegedly told a friend "I think my wife is trying to poison me."Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live to break down the prosecution's strategy in real time. How do you prove premeditation through circumstantial evidence? How do you present financial desperation without the jury thinking "lots of people have debt"? How do you use prior bad acts like the Valentine's Day sandwich incident? And can all of this overcome the defense's attacks on untested evidence and chain of custody failures?We're taking your questions and analyzing what the prosecution needs to prove—and what could still go wrong.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #HiddenKillersLive #FentanylMurder #UtahTrial #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #ProsecutionStrategy #LiveTrial

The clock is running for whoever took Nancy Guthrie.Twenty-five days of silence. Twenty-five days of hiding while genetic genealogy labs work through samples and investigators canvass every gun shop in Arizona with photos of that holster. Twenty-five days of exposure compounding.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins us live to break down exactly what the person responsible is facing—and why the decision they make in the next days or weeks will determine the rest of their life.If this was a break-in that ended with a death the perpetrator didn't intend, Arizona law doesn't offer much comfort. Felony murder means intent doesn't matter. A death during a burglary is a murder charge. Full stop. Concealment of the body is a separate crime. So is evidence tampering. So is flight.Faddis explains what surrendering now actually buys versus getting caught later. Walking in with a lawyer and the location of Nancy Guthrie's body is a different conversation than getting pulled in after a DNA hit. One gives the defense something to negotiate with. The other lets prosecutors argue consciousness of guilt to a jury.The problem: whoever hid Nancy also hid the evidence that could support their own defense. If the claim is "I didn't mean to kill her," how do you prove it when there's no body to examine? Both sides are stuck on cause of death—and that's the defendant's fault.We're also covering the civil side. The Guthrie family has resources. Wrongful death doesn't require a conviction. It's a separate track, and it's coming regardless.Bring your questions. Faddis is answering them live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive #FelonyMurder #SavannahGuthrie #LivePodcast #ArizonaLaw #TrueCrime #CriminalDefense #LegalAnalysis

Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live to break down two of the most consequential trials happening in America right now—both asking the same fundamental question from different angles.Kouri Richins goes to trial February 23rd for the alleged fentanyl murder of her husband Eric. The defense has landed blows: recanting drug source, excluded experts, severed charges, intimidation allegations against the lead detective. But the prosecution has a mountain—alleged Valentine's Day poisoning attempt, housekeeper testimony about "the Michael Jackson stuff," Google searches about lethal doses, a jail letter allegedly coaching testimony, and five times the lethal dose in Eric's system.Colin Gray faces 29 felony counts including second-degree murder in Georgia. Prosecutors allege he armed his 14-year-old son with an AR-15 despite an alleged 2021 search for "how to kill your dad," an FBI visit over school shooting threats, a Christmas gift of the rifle, a text allegedly saying "the blood is on your hands," and a bedroom prosecutors describe as a shrine to the Parkland shooter. When officers arrived, Colin allegedly said two words: "I knew it."Eric Faddis walks through both sides of both cases live. The defense's strongest cards in each courtroom. The prosecution's most devastating evidence. The legal theories that make each case unique—and the accountability question that connects them.One case alleges direct action. The other alleges criminal negligence. Both ask jurors to determine when knowing becomes culpable, when enabling becomes murder, when failure to act crosses into criminal liability.Live analysis. Two trials. One veteran prosecutor on what conviction actually requires.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #ParentAccountability #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeLive #LegalAnalysis

Two murder trials happening simultaneously—and both are asking jurors to define the boundaries of accountability.Kouri Richins stands trial February 23rd for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric with fentanyl. The defense has scored pretrial victories: a recanting drug source, excluded expert witnesses, severed financial charges. But the prosecution's evidence remains formidable—an alleged prior Valentine's Day attempt, a housekeeper testifying about fentanyl requests and "the Michael Jackson stuff," Google searches about lethal doses, a jail letter allegedly scripting family testimony, and five times the lethal dose in Eric's system.Colin Gray faces 29 felony counts in Georgia including second-degree murder for allegedly arming his son despite years of warnings. The prosecution's evidence: an alleged 2021 "how to kill your dad" search, an FBI visit over shooting threats, the Christmas gift of the AR-15, a text allegedly reading "the blood is on your hands," and what prosecutors describe as a bedroom shrine to the Parkland shooter. When officers arrived, Colin allegedly said, "I knew it."Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down both cases with the eye of someone who's stood at that table. For Richins: How does the defense exploit a recanting witness? How does the prosecution overcome pretrial losses with volume? For Gray: How does Georgia law support charging a parent for a child's actions? What proves someone "knew" versus "should have known"?Different crimes. Different legal theories. Same fundamental question: When does knowing become culpable? When does failure to act become murder?Eric Faddis gives his honest assessment of where both trials are headed.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #EricRichins #ColtGray #EricFaddis #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #ParentAccountability #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today for a deep dive into two of the most significant criminal trials happening in the country — the Kouri Richins fentanyl murder case and the Colin Gray parental accountability trial.The Richins case begins February 23rd with the defense riding pretrial wins: a recanting drug source, excluded prosecution experts, and severed financial charges. But the state has an alleged prior poisoning attempt, Carmen Lauber's expected testimony that Kouri requested fentanyl and "the Michael Jackson stuff," Google searches allegedly about lethal doses and luxury prisons, forged insurance documents, a jail cell letter allegedly coaching family testimony, and five times the lethal dose in Eric's system.In Georgia, Colin Gray faces 29 felony counts including second-degree murder. Prosecutors say he gave his 14-year-old son an AR-15 despite alleged FBI warnings, school shooting threats, and a text from Colt allegedly saying "the blood is on your hands." Prosecutors allege a Parkland shrine sat in the bedroom. When officers arrived, Colin allegedly said, "I knew it."Faddis analyzes every angle of both cases — defense strategy, prosecution evidence, legal theories, and his honest assessment of where each is headed.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #EricRichins #ColtGray #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The South Carolina Supreme Court heard Alex Murdaugh's double murder appeal today. The justices asked sharp, pointed questions — and nearly all of them were aimed at the prosecution. The hearing covered both tracks of the appeal: Becky Hill's alleged jury tampering and whether the trial court committed reversible evidentiary errors. On both, the state was on its heels. Justice James opened by raising the egg juror affidavit Justice Toal excluded. Chief Justice Kittredge pointed out that Toal's written order never addressed the allegation that Hill instructed jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh's testimony. He called the corroboration between juror accounts and independent witnesses "striking." Hill has since been convicted of perjury, obstruction, and misconduct — a development that wasn't part of the record when Toal ruled. Justice Few challenged Waters: how do you characterize someone as "not completely credible" when her own guilty plea proves she's a perjurer? The defense argued Toal used the wrong legal standard entirely. Harpootlian told the court the question isn't whether Hill changed the verdict — it's whether she violated Murdaugh's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury. That distinction changes everything about how the court evaluates the evidence. On the trial record, Kittredge told Waters that 404(b) is a rule of exclusion and said the gate was left wide open — he couldn't find a single financial evidence ruling that went the defense's way. He questioned why emotionally charged victim testimony from Murdaugh's financial crimes was admitted in a murder trial. Waters tried a Fargo reference. Justice Few ended it. Jim Griffin argued the state's underlying case has no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, and no biological transfer evidence from a close-range shotgun blast. If the financial testimony is stripped, the case changes shape. Eric Faddis, criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, dissects the hearing moment by moment — what each justice's questions signal, where the state failed to hold ground, and which of the three possible outcomes the arguments most strongly pointed toward. He also addresses whether a federal Sixth Amendment challenge is viable regardless of how this court rules. Decision expected within sixty days.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughAppeal #BeckyHill #SupremeCourtSC #EricFaddis #CreightonWaters #Rule404b #JuryTampering #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Surveillance footage released. Multiple suspects sought. A man detained in Rio Rico and released after eight hours. An imposter ransom arrest in California. Roadside searches eleven days out. And eighteen thousand tips competing with millions of self-appointed body language experts judging the Guthrie family from their phones. The Nancy Guthrie case is being squeezed from every direction — and this episode puts a former prosecutor and a former FBI behavioral analyst on both pressure points. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis starts with what the prosecution actually has. The forty-one-minute gap between the Nest camera going offline at 1:47 a.m. and Nancy's pacemaker losing Bluetooth at 2:28 a.m. is the case's forensic foundation. It proves something happened in that house during that window. But a timeline isn't a defendant. Faddis explains what evidence is still needed to make a charge survive a courtroom. He addresses FBI Director Kash Patel releasing surveillance footage through his personal X account rather than a Bureau press briefing — and whether that gives a defense attorney anything real to work with. At least three ransom notes included specific details about the interior of the Guthrie home. The FBI confirmed no proof of life and no known ongoing communication between the family and suspected kidnappers. With one imposter demand already resulting in an arrest, Faddis breaks down the legal problem of separating real kidnapper communications from fraud — and how defense teams exploit every crack in that distinction. The Rio Rico detention is another exposure point. A man held, questioned, and released. If charges eventually fall on someone else, that eight-hour interrogation becomes a defense exhibit. Evidence recovered from roadways eleven days after the disappearance faces degradation, contamination, and custody questions that limit its prosecutorial value. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, who led the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, confronts the damage coming from outside the investigation. Millions of untrained observers have turned the Guthrie family's public statements into verdict machines — interpreting pauses and gestures as proof of guilt or innocence. Dreeke explains why mass scrutiny distorts how people behave on camera, how investigators manage the flood of amateur theories alongside legitimate tips, and why there is a vast difference between watching a clip online and the years of professional training behind real behavioral assessment. The legal case has gaps. The public is filling them with guesswork. This episode explains why both problems matter.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #RobinDreeke #FBIFootage #RansomNotes #GuthriePacemaker #RioRico #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The South Carolina Supreme Court heard Alex Murdaugh's double murder appeal today, and the state walked into a courtroom that wasn't friendly. The justices pressed prosecutor Creighton Waters on both tracks of the appeal — Becky Hill's jury tampering and the evidentiary errors at trial — and the exchanges revealed a bench that has serious doubts about what happened below. Justice James opened by asking about the egg juror affidavit that Justice Toal excluded from the evidentiary hearing. Chief Justice Kittredge went further, pointing out that Toal's order never addressed the allegation that Hill told jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh's testimony. He described the corroboration between multiple juror accounts and independent witnesses as "striking." Becky Hill is now a convicted perjurer, and that conviction didn't exist when Toal issued her ruling. Justice Few asked Waters directly: how do you call someone "not completely credible" when her guilty plea proves she lied under oath? Dick Harpootlian framed the defense argument around the Sixth Amendment — not whether Hill changed the verdict, but whether she compromised the constitutional right to an impartial jury. That distinction in legal standard may be the most consequential issue the court decides. On evidence, Kittredge told Waters that Rule 404(b) is a rule of exclusion and that he couldn't find a single piece of financial evidence the trial court kept out. He questioned why emotionally charged testimony from victims of Murdaugh's financial crimes was presented in a murder trial. Waters attempted a Fargo analogy. Justice Few cut him off. Jim Griffin argued the core weakness: no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, no biological transfer evidence from a close-range shotgun blast. If the financial testimony is ruled improperly admitted, what's left narrows considerably. Eric Faddis, criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, analyzes every critical moment from the bench — what the questions reveal about each justice's thinking, where the state's arguments failed to land, and which of the three possible outcomes today's hearing most strongly favored. He also addresses whether a federal Sixth Amendment challenge remains an option regardless of the state court's ruling. Decision expected within sixty days.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughAppeal #BeckyHill #SupremeCourtSC #EricFaddis #CreightonWaters #JuryTampering #Rule404b #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.