Podcast appearances and mentions of eric faddis

Prosecutors say Kouri Richins murdered her husband Eric with a fentanyl-laced Moscow mule. But those copper mugs were never tested for fentanyl. The nanny washed them the next morning.That's the kind of evidentiary gap that's emerging in week one of this Utah murder trial—and defense attorney Eric Faddis explains why it matters.The crime scene wasn't properly secured. The kitchen where the drinks were made wasn't searched. White specks on Eric's nightstand—visible in photos—were never analyzed. The medical examiner testified the manner of death is still "undetermined" on the death certificate. Chelsea Gipson, the crime scene tech, found no drugs on her initial visit, but investigators kept searching the home over four years, finding more evidence each time.The defense is building a case around what wasn't done, what wasn't tested, and what can't be proven. Faddis, who has worked as both prosecutor and defense attorney, breaks down why circumstantial evidence—even overwhelming circumstantial evidence—might not be enough when the physical proof is missing.Can the prosecution's motive evidence survive these investigative failures?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #TrueCrimeToday #FentanylPoisoning #UtahMurderTrial #EricFaddis #ReasonableDoubt #TrueCrime #ChainOfCustody

Whoever is responsible for Nancy Guthrie's disappearance is sitting on a decision that will shape the rest of their life.The evidence released so far doesn't suggest a mastermind. It suggests someone who cased the house, came back, and got surprised by a doorbell camera they didn't know existed. Someone who improvised with plants from a pot to cover the lens. Someone who may not have intended for an 84-year-old woman to die—but is now three and a half weeks into hiding the result.Eric Faddis was a felony prosecutor. Now he's a criminal defense attorney. He's seen what happens on both sides when cases like this finally land in a courtroom.Arizona's felony murder statute doesn't require intent to kill. If Nancy Guthrie died during a burglary, that's a murder charge. Add body concealment, evidence tampering, and weeks of flight, and the legal exposure is already catastrophic.But there's still a fork in the road.Faddis explains what walking into a police station with a lawyer and the location of the body actually buys—versus getting caught cold through genetic genealogy or a tip. One scenario gives the defense leverage for negotiation. The other lets prosecutors paint a portrait of someone who hid, lied, and let a family suffer while they calculated their odds.The hardest part: without the body, neither side can prove how Nancy died. The defense can't establish it was accidental. Prosecutors can't establish it wasn't. And the person who created that evidentiary black hole is the one who hid her.Faddis gives the honest answer on what the range of outcomes looks like now—and how fast that range is narrowing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeToday #FelonyMurder #SavannahGuthrie #ArizonaCrime #LegalAnalysis #CriminalDefense #Prosecution #TrueCrime

Defense attorney Kathy Nester told the jury something remarkable in her opening statement: after four years of investigation, prosecutors have "zero evidence" showing how fentanyl got into Eric Richins' body.This week's testimony proved her point.The Moscow mule cups at the heart of the prosecution's theory were never tested—the nanny washed them the next morning. Deputy Nguyen didn't secure the kitchen. White specks on Eric's nightstand, visible in crime scene photos, were never analyzed. Crime scene tech Chelsea Gipson found no drugs in the home on her initial visit, but evidence kept turning up in subsequent searches over four years. The medical examiner testified the manner of death remains "undetermined."Eric Faddis, a former prosecutor turned defense attorney, breaks down the defense strategy taking shape in the Kouri Richins trial. What happens when prosecutors have strong motive evidence—the texts, the searches, the debt, the boyfriend—but can't connect the defendant to the actual act?The defense is betting everything on reasonable doubt. Faddis explains why that bet might pay off.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #FentanylPoisoning #ReasonableDoubt #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #UtahTrial #EricFaddis #DefenseStrategy

This wasn't a professional job. The evidence says so.The suspect visited Nancy Guthrie's home before the night she disappeared. When he came back, he didn't know about the doorbell camera. Tried to disable it and failed. Grabbed weeds to cover the lens. That's improvisation. That's someone who thought they had it figured out—and didn't.If this was a burglary that turned into something the perpetrator never intended, what's waiting for them on the other side?Eric Faddis spent years as a felony prosecutor before becoming a defense attorney. He's seen cases like this from both sides of the courtroom. And he's clear about what this person faces.Arizona's felony murder statute doesn't care about intent. If someone dies during the commission of a burglary, that's murder. Add concealment of a body. Add twenty-five days of hiding while the FBI chases 55,000 tips. Add the consciousness of guilt that comes from staying silent while a family begs for answers.The legal exposure is already severe. It gets worse every day.Faddis breaks down what voluntary surrender actually buys—if anything. He explains the difference between coming forward now and getting caught through genetic genealogy later. He addresses the impossible position the defense is in when the body is missing: they can't prove accidental death because their client hid the evidence.And he talks about what happens beyond criminal court. The Guthrie family has resources. Wrongful death is a separate track.For someone sitting with this, Faddis lays out the realistic range. Where cooperation leads. Where getting caught without cooperation leads. The window between those two outcomes is narrowing.This is the legal reality of what's coming.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #FelonyMurder #HiddenKillers #SavannahGuthrie #ArizonaLaw #TrueCrime #BurglaryGoneWrong #CriminalDefense #LegalExplainer

The clock is running for whoever took Nancy Guthrie.Twenty-five days of silence. Twenty-five days of hiding while genetic genealogy labs work through samples and investigators canvass every gun shop in Arizona with photos of that holster. Twenty-five days of exposure compounding.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins us live to break down exactly what the person responsible is facing—and why the decision they make in the next days or weeks will determine the rest of their life.If this was a break-in that ended with a death the perpetrator didn't intend, Arizona law doesn't offer much comfort. Felony murder means intent doesn't matter. A death during a burglary is a murder charge. Full stop. Concealment of the body is a separate crime. So is evidence tampering. So is flight.Faddis explains what surrendering now actually buys versus getting caught later. Walking in with a lawyer and the location of Nancy Guthrie's body is a different conversation than getting pulled in after a DNA hit. One gives the defense something to negotiate with. The other lets prosecutors argue consciousness of guilt to a jury.The problem: whoever hid Nancy also hid the evidence that could support their own defense. If the claim is "I didn't mean to kill her," how do you prove it when there's no body to examine? Both sides are stuck on cause of death—and that's the defendant's fault.We're also covering the civil side. The Guthrie family has resources. Wrongful death doesn't require a conviction. It's a separate track, and it's coming regardless.Bring your questions. Faddis is answering them live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive #FelonyMurder #SavannahGuthrie #LivePodcast #ArizonaLaw #TrueCrime #CriminalDefense #LegalAnalysis

Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live to break down two of the most consequential trials happening in America right now—both asking the same fundamental question from different angles.Kouri Richins goes to trial February 23rd for the alleged fentanyl murder of her husband Eric. The defense has landed blows: recanting drug source, excluded experts, severed charges, intimidation allegations against the lead detective. But the prosecution has a mountain—alleged Valentine's Day poisoning attempt, housekeeper testimony about "the Michael Jackson stuff," Google searches about lethal doses, a jail letter allegedly coaching testimony, and five times the lethal dose in Eric's system.Colin Gray faces 29 felony counts including second-degree murder in Georgia. Prosecutors allege he armed his 14-year-old son with an AR-15 despite an alleged 2021 search for "how to kill your dad," an FBI visit over school shooting threats, a Christmas gift of the rifle, a text allegedly saying "the blood is on your hands," and a bedroom prosecutors describe as a shrine to the Parkland shooter. When officers arrived, Colin allegedly said two words: "I knew it."Eric Faddis walks through both sides of both cases live. The defense's strongest cards in each courtroom. The prosecution's most devastating evidence. The legal theories that make each case unique—and the accountability question that connects them.One case alleges direct action. The other alleges criminal negligence. Both ask jurors to determine when knowing becomes culpable, when enabling becomes murder, when failure to act crosses into criminal liability.Live analysis. Two trials. One veteran prosecutor on what conviction actually requires.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #ParentAccountability #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeLive #LegalAnalysis

Two murder trials happening simultaneously—and both are asking jurors to define the boundaries of accountability.Kouri Richins stands trial February 23rd for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric with fentanyl. The defense has scored pretrial victories: a recanting drug source, excluded expert witnesses, severed financial charges. But the prosecution's evidence remains formidable—an alleged prior Valentine's Day attempt, a housekeeper testifying about fentanyl requests and "the Michael Jackson stuff," Google searches about lethal doses, a jail letter allegedly scripting family testimony, and five times the lethal dose in Eric's system.Colin Gray faces 29 felony counts in Georgia including second-degree murder for allegedly arming his son despite years of warnings. The prosecution's evidence: an alleged 2021 "how to kill your dad" search, an FBI visit over shooting threats, the Christmas gift of the AR-15, a text allegedly reading "the blood is on your hands," and what prosecutors describe as a bedroom shrine to the Parkland shooter. When officers arrived, Colin allegedly said, "I knew it."Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down both cases with the eye of someone who's stood at that table. For Richins: How does the defense exploit a recanting witness? How does the prosecution overcome pretrial losses with volume? For Gray: How does Georgia law support charging a parent for a child's actions? What proves someone "knew" versus "should have known"?Different crimes. Different legal theories. Same fundamental question: When does knowing become culpable? When does failure to act become murder?Eric Faddis gives his honest assessment of where both trials are headed.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #EricRichins #ColtGray #EricFaddis #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #ParentAccountability #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Two trials dominating the news. Two very different theories of murder. One former felony prosecutor explaining what conviction requires in each.Kouri Richins goes to trial February 23rd for the alleged fentanyl poisoning of her husband Eric. The defense scored pretrial wins—a recanting drug source, excluded experts, severed financial charges. But prosecutors have an alleged Valentine's Day 2022 poisoning attempt, a housekeeper who says Kouri asked for fentanyl and later requested "the Michael Jackson stuff," Google searches about lethal doses and luxury prisons, a jail letter allegedly coaching family testimony, and five times the lethal dose in Eric's system.Colin Gray faces 29 felony counts in Georgia including second-degree murder. Prosecutors allege he armed his 14-year-old son despite years of documented warnings: an alleged 2021 search for "how to kill your dad," an FBI visit over school shooting threats in 2023, a Christmas gift of the AR-15, a text allegedly saying "the blood is on your hands," and what prosecutors describe as a bedroom shrine to the Parkland shooter. Colin allegedly told arriving officers: "I knew it."Eric Faddis walks through both cases today. For Richins: How does a recanting witness affect the prosecution's case? What does the remaining evidence prove? For Gray: How does Georgia law support charging a parent with murder for a child's actions? What's the evidentiary threshold?Different crimes—alleged poisoning versus alleged negligent enabling. But the same question at the center: What does criminal accountability look like? When does knowing become culpable?Eric Faddis gives his honest assessment of where each trial is headed.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #ParentAccountability #MurderTrial #ColtGray #EricRichins

The Kouri Richins trial begins February 23rd—and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down exactly what both sides are bringing to that courtroom.The defense has landed significant pretrial blows. The drug source recanted. Expert witnesses were excluded. Financial charges were severed from the murder trial. There are witness intimidation allegations against the lead detective. These aren't small wins—they're the foundation of reasonable doubt arguments that will echo through five weeks of testimony.But the prosecution's mountain remains. An alleged prior poisoning attempt on Valentine's Day 2022—Eric allegedly broke out in hives and blacked out after eating a sandwich from his truck. A housekeeper who says Kouri personally requested fentanyl and later asked for "the Michael Jackson stuff." Google searches allegedly about lethal doses and luxury prisons. A jail cell letter allegedly coaching her mother and brother on what to say. Forged signatures on insurance documents. And the toxicology that started it all: more than five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in Eric's system.Eric Faddis walks through how these pieces fit together—and where they don't. How does the defense exploit a recanting witness? How do prosecutors overcome excluded experts with volume of evidence? What do the Google searches actually prove? What does the "Walk the Dog" letter do to a jury?This analysis also examines the Colin Gray case in Georgia—a father facing 29 felony counts for allegedly arming his son despite years of warnings. Different crime, different theory, same question: When does knowing become culpable?Eric Faddis gives his honest assessment of where the Richins trial is headed and what conviction actually requires.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #EricFaddis #FentanylMurder #ValentinesDayAttempt #WalkTheDog #MichaelJacksonStuff #SummitCounty #MurderTrial #HiddenKillers

The South Carolina Supreme Court heard Alex Murdaugh's double murder appeal today. The justices asked sharp, pointed questions — and nearly all of them were aimed at the prosecution. The hearing covered both tracks of the appeal: Becky Hill's alleged jury tampering and whether the trial court committed reversible evidentiary errors. On both, the state was on its heels. Justice James opened by raising the egg juror affidavit Justice Toal excluded. Chief Justice Kittredge pointed out that Toal's written order never addressed the allegation that Hill instructed jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh's testimony. He called the corroboration between juror accounts and independent witnesses "striking." Hill has since been convicted of perjury, obstruction, and misconduct — a development that wasn't part of the record when Toal ruled. Justice Few challenged Waters: how do you characterize someone as "not completely credible" when her own guilty plea proves she's a perjurer? The defense argued Toal used the wrong legal standard entirely. Harpootlian told the court the question isn't whether Hill changed the verdict — it's whether she violated Murdaugh's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury. That distinction changes everything about how the court evaluates the evidence. On the trial record, Kittredge told Waters that 404(b) is a rule of exclusion and said the gate was left wide open — he couldn't find a single financial evidence ruling that went the defense's way. He questioned why emotionally charged victim testimony from Murdaugh's financial crimes was admitted in a murder trial. Waters tried a Fargo reference. Justice Few ended it. Jim Griffin argued the state's underlying case has no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, and no biological transfer evidence from a close-range shotgun blast. If the financial testimony is stripped, the case changes shape. Eric Faddis, criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, dissects the hearing moment by moment — what each justice's questions signal, where the state failed to hold ground, and which of the three possible outcomes the arguments most strongly pointed toward. He also addresses whether a federal Sixth Amendment challenge is viable regardless of how this court rules. Decision expected within sixty days.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughAppeal #BeckyHill #SupremeCourtSC #EricFaddis #CreightonWaters #Rule404b #JuryTampering #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today for a deep dive into two of the most significant criminal trials happening in the country — the Kouri Richins fentanyl murder case and the Colin Gray parental accountability trial.The Richins case begins February 23rd with the defense riding pretrial wins: a recanting drug source, excluded prosecution experts, and severed financial charges. But the state has an alleged prior poisoning attempt, Carmen Lauber's expected testimony that Kouri requested fentanyl and "the Michael Jackson stuff," Google searches allegedly about lethal doses and luxury prisons, forged insurance documents, a jail cell letter allegedly coaching family testimony, and five times the lethal dose in Eric's system.In Georgia, Colin Gray faces 29 felony counts including second-degree murder. Prosecutors say he gave his 14-year-old son an AR-15 despite alleged FBI warnings, school shooting threats, and a text from Colt allegedly saying "the blood is on your hands." Prosecutors allege a Parkland shrine sat in the bedroom. When officers arrived, Colin allegedly said, "I knew it."Faddis analyzes every angle of both cases — defense strategy, prosecution evidence, legal theories, and his honest assessment of where each is headed.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #EricRichins #ColtGray #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Surveillance footage released. Multiple suspects sought. A man detained in Rio Rico and released after eight hours. An imposter ransom arrest in California. Roadside searches eleven days out. And eighteen thousand tips competing with millions of self-appointed body language experts judging the Guthrie family from their phones. The Nancy Guthrie case is being squeezed from every direction — and this episode puts a former prosecutor and a former FBI behavioral analyst on both pressure points. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis starts with what the prosecution actually has. The forty-one-minute gap between the Nest camera going offline at 1:47 a.m. and Nancy's pacemaker losing Bluetooth at 2:28 a.m. is the case's forensic foundation. It proves something happened in that house during that window. But a timeline isn't a defendant. Faddis explains what evidence is still needed to make a charge survive a courtroom. He addresses FBI Director Kash Patel releasing surveillance footage through his personal X account rather than a Bureau press briefing — and whether that gives a defense attorney anything real to work with. At least three ransom notes included specific details about the interior of the Guthrie home. The FBI confirmed no proof of life and no known ongoing communication between the family and suspected kidnappers. With one imposter demand already resulting in an arrest, Faddis breaks down the legal problem of separating real kidnapper communications from fraud — and how defense teams exploit every crack in that distinction. The Rio Rico detention is another exposure point. A man held, questioned, and released. If charges eventually fall on someone else, that eight-hour interrogation becomes a defense exhibit. Evidence recovered from roadways eleven days after the disappearance faces degradation, contamination, and custody questions that limit its prosecutorial value. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, who led the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, confronts the damage coming from outside the investigation. Millions of untrained observers have turned the Guthrie family's public statements into verdict machines — interpreting pauses and gestures as proof of guilt or innocence. Dreeke explains why mass scrutiny distorts how people behave on camera, how investigators manage the flood of amateur theories alongside legitimate tips, and why there is a vast difference between watching a clip online and the years of professional training behind real behavioral assessment. The legal case has gaps. The public is filling them with guesswork. This episode explains why both problems matter.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #RobinDreeke #FBIFootage #RansomNotes #GuthriePacemaker #RioRico #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis takes on two of the biggest criminal cases in the country in one comprehensive interview — the Kouri Richins fentanyl murder trial and the Colin Gray parental accountability case.In the Richins case, the defense has won real pretrial battles: a recanting drug source, excluded experts, severed financial charges, and witness intimidation allegations against the lead detective. But the prosecution has an alleged prior poisoning attempt, a firsthand witness who says Kouri requested fentanyl and "the Michael Jackson stuff," damning Google searches, forged insurance documents, a jail cell letter allegedly coaching testimony, and more than five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in Eric's system.In the Colin Gray trial, prosecutors presented what they allege is years of warning signs — an alleged 2021 search for "how to kill your dad," an FBI visit over school shooting threats in 2023, the alleged Christmas gift of an AR-15, a text allegedly about blood on his hands, a reported Parkland shrine, and Colin's alleged words when officers arrived: "I knew it." The defense says Colt hid his plans. The prosecution says the alleged evidence was visible inside the home.Faddis breaks down both sides of both cases, explains the legal theories at play, and gives his honest assessment of where each trial is headed.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #EricRichins #ColtGray #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #EricFaddis #ProsecutorAnalysis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The FBI released surveillance footage. They're looking for multiple suspects. A man was detained in Rio Rico for eight hours and released. An imposter ransom demand led to a California arrest. And eighteen thousand tips are now competing with millions of amateur verdicts being rendered in comment sections across the internet. Two experts break down why both sides of this equation — the legal case and the public spectacle — are in trouble. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis explains what prosecutors actually have. The forty-one-minute window between the Nest camera going offline at 1:47 a.m. and Nancy Guthrie's pacemaker losing Bluetooth at 2:28 a.m. is the strongest forensic anchor in the case. It proves something happened inside that house. But connecting that timeline to a specific defendant requires evidence that hasn't materialized publicly. Faddis walks through how a prosecutor builds around that gap — and what a defense attorney does to widen it. He addresses the decision by FBI Director Kash Patel to release surveillance footage through his personal X account instead of the Bureau's press office. Whether a defense team could credibly argue that compromised the identification process. The legal chaos created by at least three ransom notes containing details about the inside of Nancy's home — with no proof of life confirmed and one imposter demand already producing an arrest. And the prosecutorial vulnerability of the Rio Rico detention: a man questioned for hours, released, his family insisting the clothing doesn't match. If charges eventually land on someone else, that detention becomes a defense exhibit. Roadside evidence collected eleven days out faces its own problems — weather, contamination, chain of custody. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, who led the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, addresses the damage being done from outside the investigation. The Guthrie family's statements have been dissected by millions of people interpreting body language with no training and total confidence. Dreeke explains why mass observation makes innocent people look guilty, how investigators manage an avalanche of amateur theories, and what the person responsible for Nancy's disappearance experiences while watching strangers analyze them. He confronts the uncomfortable truth most viewers don't want to hear: there is an enormous gap between watching a clip on your phone and the professional expertise required to actually read human behavior. This episode puts the legal fragility and the public pressure side by side — because both are threatening the same case.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #RobinDreeke #FBIFootage #RansomNotes #GuthriePacemaker #RioRico #InternetSleuths #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The South Carolina Supreme Court heard Alex Murdaugh's double murder appeal today, and the state walked into a courtroom that wasn't friendly. The justices pressed prosecutor Creighton Waters on both tracks of the appeal — Becky Hill's jury tampering and the evidentiary errors at trial — and the exchanges revealed a bench that has serious doubts about what happened below. Justice James opened by asking about the egg juror affidavit that Justice Toal excluded from the evidentiary hearing. Chief Justice Kittredge went further, pointing out that Toal's order never addressed the allegation that Hill told jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh's testimony. He described the corroboration between multiple juror accounts and independent witnesses as "striking." Becky Hill is now a convicted perjurer, and that conviction didn't exist when Toal issued her ruling. Justice Few asked Waters directly: how do you call someone "not completely credible" when her guilty plea proves she lied under oath? Dick Harpootlian framed the defense argument around the Sixth Amendment — not whether Hill changed the verdict, but whether she compromised the constitutional right to an impartial jury. That distinction in legal standard may be the most consequential issue the court decides. On evidence, Kittredge told Waters that Rule 404(b) is a rule of exclusion and that he couldn't find a single piece of financial evidence the trial court kept out. He questioned why emotionally charged testimony from victims of Murdaugh's financial crimes was presented in a murder trial. Waters attempted a Fargo analogy. Justice Few cut him off. Jim Griffin argued the core weakness: no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, no biological transfer evidence from a close-range shotgun blast. If the financial testimony is ruled improperly admitted, what's left narrows considerably. Eric Faddis, criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, analyzes every critical moment from the bench — what the questions reveal about each justice's thinking, where the state's arguments failed to land, and which of the three possible outcomes today's hearing most strongly favored. He also addresses whether a federal Sixth Amendment challenge remains an option regardless of the state court's ruling. Decision expected within sixty days.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughAppeal #BeckyHill #SupremeCourtSC #EricFaddis #CreightonWaters #JuryTampering #Rule404b #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The South Carolina Supreme Court heard Alex Murdaugh's double murder appeal today — and the justices came prepared to challenge the state. Across ninety minutes of oral arguments covering jury tampering and evidentiary errors, the bench directed its hardest questions at prosecutor Creighton Waters and gave the defense room to build its case. The jury tampering track opened with Justice James asking whether the court could consider the egg juror's affidavit — testimony Justice Toal excluded during the 2024 hearing. Chief Justice Kittredge escalated, noting that Toal's order failed to address the specific allegation that Becky Hill told jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh's testimony. He described the corroboration between juror accounts and independent witnesses as "striking." Hill is now a convicted perjurer — guilty of perjury, obstruction, and misconduct in charges that weren't part of the record when Toal ruled. Justice Few went straight at Waters: how do you call someone "not completely credible" when her guilty plea is proof she lied under oath? Dick Harpootlian framed the central argument: Justice Toal asked the wrong question. She evaluated whether Hill changed the verdict. The constitutional standard is whether she compromised the right to an impartial jury. Harpootlian argued those are fundamentally different inquiries — and the wrong one was applied. That legal standard dispute may be the fulcrum of the entire appeal. On evidence, Chief Justice Kittredge told Waters that Rule 404(b) is a rule of exclusion, not inclusion, and that the trial court left the gate wide open. He said he couldn't identify a single piece of financial evidence the trial judge excluded. He pressed on why emotionally charged testimony from victims of Murdaugh's financial crimes — people who lost life savings — was placed before a murder jury. Waters attempted to compare the case to the movie Fargo. Justice Few shut the analogy down. Jim Griffin argued what the state's case looks like without the financial testimony: no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, and no biological transfer evidence despite a close-range shotgun blast. If the court rules the 404(b) evidence was improperly admitted, the trial record fundamentally changes. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis provides a full breakdown of the hearing — the specific exchanges that revealed the justices' thinking, the moments Waters struggled to hold ground, and the body language from the bench that tells its own story. He analyzes the three possible outcomes: conviction affirmed, new trial on jury tampering, or new trial on evidentiary grounds. He explains which outcome today's hearing most clearly pointed toward, what the timeline looks like, and whether Murdaugh retains a viable federal Sixth Amendment claim regardless of the state court's ruling. The court took the case under advisement. A decision is expected within sixty days. What happened in that courtroom today suggests this conviction is no longer the certainty it once appeared to be.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughAppeal #BeckyHill #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #CreightonWaters #DickHarpootlian #EricFaddis #JimGriffin #JuryTampering #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Two of the most significant criminal trials in the country are unfolding simultaneously — and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis is here to break down both. The Kouri Richins murder trial begins February 23rd in Summit County, Utah, where prosecutors say she poisoned her husband Eric with a lethal dose of fentanyl mixed into a Moscow Mule. In Georgia, Colin Gray faces 29 felony counts including second-degree murder after prosecutors allege he armed his 14-year-old son with an AR-style rifle despite years of alleged warnings from the FBI, law enforcement, and child welfare officials.In this comprehensive interview, Faddis dismantles both cases from both sides — starting with the Richins defense's strongest pretrial wins and ending with why Colin Gray may be facing an unwinnable fight.The Richins case has been bleeding evidence for months. Robert Crozier, the man prosecutors called their key link in the fentanyl supply chain, has signed a sworn affidavit recanting his police statement — now saying the pills were OxyContin, not fentanyl. They were never recovered or tested. Lead Detective Jeff O'Driscoll faces witness intimidation allegations after text messages allegedly showed him threatening a witness with arrest. Judge Mrazik excluded the prosecution's domestic violence expert, limited FBI profiler Molly Amman's testimony, and twice denied bringing Kouri's 26 financial crime charges into the murder trial.But the prosecution's hand is loaded. They allege a prior Valentine's Day 2022 poisoning attempt where two friends reportedly say Eric called them saying his wife tried to kill him. Housekeeper Carmen Lauber is expected to testify that Kouri directly asked her to buy fentanyl twice — and after the first alleged attempt, requested "the Michael Jackson stuff." Google searches allegedly found on Kouri's phone include queries about lethal fentanyl doses, luxury prisons, insurance payouts, and deleting digital records. A letter found in her jail cell allegedly outlines false testimony for family members. A handwriting expert is prepared to testify that insurance document signatures were forged. And the medical examiner found more than five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in Eric's system.In the Colin Gray trial, prosecutors presented what they allege is years of warning signs: Colt's alleged 2021 search for "how to kill your dad," an FBI visit in 2023 over school shooting threats with instructions to reportedly restrict gun access, the alleged Christmas gift of the rifle seven months later, and by August 2024, Colt allegedly texting his father, "Whenever something happens, just know the blood is on your hands," and asking him to buy 150 rounds of ammunition. Prosecutors allege Colt had a shrine to the Parkland shooter in his bedroom, was reportedly hearing voices, allegedly shoved his mother when she tried to take the gun, and was taking her prescription Zoloft without medical oversight. When officers arrived at the Gray home, Colin allegedly said two words: "I knew it."The defense argues Colt hid his plans. But the prosecution says the evidence was visible inside the home Colin controlled. Faddis explains the Georgia legal framework that charges cruelty to children as the basis for second-degree murder — a higher bar than the Crumbley manslaughter convictions — and gives his honest assessment of both cases as they head toward their most critical phases.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #EricRichins #ColtGray #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #ParentAccountability #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcastJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Two of the most significant criminal trials in the country are unfolding simultaneously — and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis is here to break down both. The Kouri Richins murder trial begins February 23rd in Summit County, Utah, where prosecutors say she poisoned her husband Eric with a lethal dose of fentanyl mixed into a Moscow Mule. In Georgia, Colin Gray faces 29 felony counts including second-degree murder after prosecutors allege he armed his 14-year-old son with an AR-style rifle despite years of alleged warnings from the FBI, law enforcement, and child welfare officials.In this comprehensive interview, Faddis dismantles both cases from both sides — starting with the Richins defense's strongest pretrial wins and ending with why Colin Gray may be facing an unwinnable fight.The Richins case has been bleeding evidence for months. Robert Crozier, the man prosecutors called their key link in the fentanyl supply chain, has signed a sworn affidavit recanting his police statement — now saying the pills were OxyContin, not fentanyl. They were never recovered or tested. Lead Detective Jeff O'Driscoll faces witness intimidation allegations after text messages allegedly showed him threatening a witness with arrest. Judge Mrazik excluded the prosecution's domestic violence expert, limited FBI profiler Molly Amman's testimony, and twice denied bringing Kouri's 26 financial crime charges into the murder trial.But the prosecution's hand is loaded. They allege a prior Valentine's Day 2022 poisoning attempt where two friends reportedly say Eric called them saying his wife tried to kill him. Housekeeper Carmen Lauber is expected to testify that Kouri directly asked her to buy fentanyl twice — and after the first alleged attempt, requested "the Michael Jackson stuff." Google searches allegedly found on Kouri's phone include queries about lethal fentanyl doses, luxury prisons, insurance payouts, and deleting digital records. A letter found in her jail cell allegedly outlines false testimony for family members. A handwriting expert is prepared to testify that insurance document signatures were forged. And the medical examiner found more than five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in Eric's system.In the Colin Gray trial, prosecutors presented what they allege is years of warning signs: Colt's alleged 2021 search for "how to kill your dad," an FBI visit in 2023 over school shooting threats with instructions to reportedly restrict gun access, the alleged Christmas gift of the rifle seven months later, and by August 2024, Colt allegedly texting his father, "Whenever something happens, just know the blood is on your hands," and asking him to buy 150 rounds of ammunition. Prosecutors allege Colt had a shrine to the Parkland shooter in his bedroom, was reportedly hearing voices, allegedly shoved his mother when she tried to take the gun, and was taking her prescription Zoloft without medical oversight. When officers arrived at the Gray home, Colin allegedly said two words: "I knew it."The defense argues Colt hid his plans. But the prosecution says the evidence was visible inside the home Colin controlled. Faddis explains the Georgia legal framework that charges cruelty to children as the basis for second-degree murder — a higher bar than the Crumbley manslaughter convictions — and gives his honest assessment of both cases as they head toward their most critical phases.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #EricRichins #ColtGray #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #ParentAccountability #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcastJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Today the South Carolina Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Alex Murdaugh's appeal of his double murder conviction — and the questions from the bench landed almost entirely on the state. The hearing covered jury tampering and evidentiary errors, and on both fronts, prosecutor Creighton Waters faced sustained pressure he struggled to answer. On jury tampering, Justice James immediately asked about the egg juror affidavit that Justice Toal blocked from the evidentiary hearing. Chief Justice Kittredge noted Toal's order never addressed the claim that Becky Hill told jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh's testimony and called the corroboration across multiple juror accounts "striking." Hill is now convicted of perjury, obstruction, and misconduct — a conviction that didn't exist when Toal ruled. Justice Few pressed Waters on how you describe someone as "not completely credible" when she's pled guilty to lying under oath. Harpootlian argued the legal standard itself was wrong — that Toal asked whether Hill changed the outcome instead of whether she violated Murdaugh's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury. That's the constitutional question the justices will have to resolve. On the evidence, Kittredge told Waters that 404(b) is a rule of exclusion and said he couldn't identify a single piece of financial evidence the trial court excluded. He pressed on why emotional testimony from financial crime victims was put before a murder jury. Waters referenced the movie Fargo. Justice Few shut it down. Griffin reminded the court the state has no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, and no biological transfer evidence from a close-range shotgun blast. Strip the financial testimony, and the evidentiary foundation shrinks fast. Criminal defense attorney Eric Faddis breaks down the hearing exchange by exchange — the tone from the bench, the moments the state lost ground, and what the justices' questions telegraph about the three possible outcomes. He assesses which result today's arguments most clearly favored and whether a federal Sixth Amendment appeal remains viable no matter what the state court decides. The court took the case under advisement. Sixty days.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughAppeal #BeckyHill #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #CreightonWaters #DickHarpootlian #JuryTampering #EricFaddis #MurdaughTrial #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The FBI released surveillance footage and said they're looking for more than one person in the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping. A Rio Rico man was detained eight hours and released without charges. An imposter ransom demand produced an arrest in California. Investigators are searching roadways for evidence eleven days after the disappearance. And millions of people are delivering their own verdicts on the Guthrie family based on video clips and zero training. This episode brings a former prosecutor and a former FBI behavioral expert together on the same case — because the threats to this investigation are coming from both directions. Eric Faddis, criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, breaks down the prosecutorial math. The forty-one-minute window between the Nest camera disconnecting at 1:47 a.m. and Nancy's pacemaker losing Bluetooth connectivity at 2:28 a.m. remains the forensic backbone. But that timeline proves an event — not a defendant. Faddis explains what's still missing to make a case hold. He examines FBI Director Kash Patel's decision to release surveillance footage via his personal X account and whether that creates a real defense argument or just generates headlines. At least three ransom notes contained specific interior details of the Guthrie home. No proof of life has been confirmed. One imposter demand already led to an arrest. Faddis explains how a defense team weaponizes that confusion — and how prosecutors have to untangle legitimate kidnapper communication from opportunistic fraud in a courtroom. The Rio Rico detention looms as another vulnerability. If someone else is charged, a defense attorney will point to a man questioned for hours and released as evidence the investigation had no direction. Roadside evidence recovered nearly two weeks later faces weather degradation, contamination, and chain of custody scrutiny. Robin Dreeke, former FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, addresses the other front. The Guthrie family's video statements have been torn apart by millions of people drawing conclusions from pauses, blinks, and gestures. Dreeke explains why self-consciousness under mass observation makes innocent people appear guilty, how investigators separate useful tips from the noise generated by an entire country convinced it's cracked the case, and why the distance between a social media clip and actual behavioral expertise is one most people drastically underestimate. Two experts. Two threats. One case that's being undermined from the inside and overwhelmed from the outside.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #RobinDreeke #FBIFootage #KashPatel #RansomNotes #GuthriePacemaker #KidnappingProsecution #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis delivers a comprehensive analysis of the Kouri Richins fentanyl murder trial and the Colin Gray parental accountability case — two landmark criminal proceedings testing the boundaries of criminal responsibility.In the Richins case, the defense enters trial with a recanting drug source, excluded prosecution experts, witness intimidation allegations against the lead detective, and severed financial charges. But the prosecution is armed with an alleged prior Valentine's Day 2022 poisoning attempt, Carmen Lauber's expected testimony about Kouri's direct fentanyl requests and her alleged demand for "the Michael Jackson stuff," Google searches allegedly about lethal doses and luxury prisons, forged insurance documents, a jail cell letter allegedly coaching testimony, and the medical examiner's finding of more than five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in Eric's system.The Colin Gray trial brings its own devastating timeline according to prosecutors — an alleged 2021 search for "how to kill your dad," an FBI visit over school shooting threats in 2023 with investigators reportedly instructing Colin to restrict gun access, the alleged Christmas gift of the rifle, a text allegedly about "blood on your hands," a reported Parkland shrine, and Colin's alleged two-word reaction when officers arrived: "I knew it." With 29 felony counts and up to 180 years exposure, Faddis explains why the Georgia second-degree murder framework may be even more effective than the Crumbley model.Faddis gives his honest assessment of both cases — who holds the stronger hand and what the juries are likely to see.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #EricRichins #ColtGray #RichinsTrial #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Kouri Richins goes to trial for the alleged fentanyl murder of her husband Eric in less than a week — and the prosecution's case may not be as airtight as it looked a year ago. The man who was supposed to prove the fentanyl supply chain has recanted. The lead detective faces witness intimidation allegations. Two prosecution experts were excluded. And 26 financial crime charges were severed from the case entirely.Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today to break down what the defense gained before the jury ever sat down. Robert Crozier now says under oath that he sold OxyContin, not fentanyl — and the pills were never recovered or forensically tested. Prosecutors dropped the drug distribution charges after that sworn affidavit. Faddis explains why that gap matters, how Detective O'Driscoll's alleged threats to a witness could undermine the investigation's credibility, and what it means that Judge Mrazik blocked the state's domestic violence expert and limited FBI profiler Molly Amman's role.The defense lost two venue change requests in a county where 85 percent of residents had heard of the case. Jury selection wrapped in two days. Faddis walks through whether that rapid process helps or hurts Kouri — and identifies the single biggest card the defense holds heading into opening statements on February 23rd.#KouriRichins #RichinsTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #TrueCrimeToday #SummitCounty #DefenseStrategy #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Colin Gray is on trial for second-degree murder because prosecutors say he armed a child he allegedly knew was dangerous. Former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the state's case against the father of the Apalachee High School shooter — and explains why the defense may be fighting an unwinnable battle.The prosecution's timeline spans years of alleged warning signs. An alleged 2021 search for "how to kill your dad." An FBI visit in 2023 over school shooting threats, with investigators reportedly instructing Colin to restrict gun access. A Christmas gift of an AR-15-style rifle seven months after that visit, according to prosecutors. And in August 2024, Colt allegedly texted his father, "Whenever something happens, just know the blood is on your hands," and asked him to buy 150 rounds of ammunition.The defense claims Colt led a double life. But prosecutors allege the evidence was inside the home — a reported shrine to the Parkland shooter, reported voices, alleged violence toward his mother, and prescription medication without medical oversight. When officers arrived at the Gray home, Colin allegedly said two words the prosecution may never let the jury forget: "I knew it."With 29 felony counts, up to 180 years exposure, roughly 20 juvenile victims testifying about being shot, and a legal theory that goes beyond what convicted the Crumbleys, Faddis gives his honest take on where this is headed.#ColinGray #ColtGray #ApalacheeHighSchool #SchoolShooting #SecondDegreeMurder #ParentAccountability #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The defense drew blood pretrial. Now the prosecution gets to show the jury what four years of investigation produced — and former prosecutor Eric Faddis says some of this evidence may be unexplainable for the defense.The state's case reportedly begins with Valentine's Day 2022 — an alleged prior poisoning attempt where Kouri Richins is accused of lacing Eric's sandwich with fentanyl. Two friends say he called them saying his wife tried to poison him. A life insurance policy had allegedly gone into effect ten days before. Then came Eric's death months later — more than five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in his system, allegedly mixed into a Moscow Mule Kouri made him.Carmen Lauber, the housekeeper, is expected to testify that Kouri directly asked her to source fentanyl twice and allegedly requested "the Michael Jackson stuff" after the Valentine's Day incident. Unsealed warrants reportedly show Kouri also asked a handyman to procure fentanyl and propofol. Google searches allegedly found on her phone include queries about lethal fentanyl doses, luxury prisons, insurance payout timelines, and deleting digital records.Prosecutors also have a letter allegedly found in her jail cell coaching family on testimony, an orange notebook with her account of the day Eric died that allegedly contradicts other evidence, and a handwriting expert prepared to testify that insurance document signatures were forged. Faddis breaks down how the prosecution ties all of it together — and whether the defense has any answer.#KouriRichins #RichinsTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #CarmenLauber #ProsecutionCase #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Prosecutors say Colin Gray was warned by the FBI, by law enforcement, and by child welfare that his son was a potential threat — and his response was allegedly to buy the kid an AR-15 for Christmas. Now he's facing 29 felony counts including second-degree murder. Former prosecutor Eric Faddis dismantles the case piece by piece.The alleged warning signs prosecutors presented span years. An alleged 2021 search for "how to kill your dad" on a school computer. FBI involvement over school shooting threats in 2023, according to prosecutors. Then, according to the state, the Christmas gift of a SIG Sauer M400 seven months later. By August 2024, Colt allegedly texted his father that "the blood is on your hands" and asked him to buy ammunition.The defense argues Colt hid his plans. But prosecutors allege the bedroom shrine to the Parkland shooter, the reported voices, the alleged violent episode with his mother, and Colin's own alleged words when officers arrived — "I knew it" — tell a different story. Faddis explains why the Georgia legal framework charging cruelty to children as the basis for second-degree murder may be even more effective than the Crumbley manslaughter model, and he gives his honest assessment of Colin Gray's chances with roughly 20 juvenile victims testifying about being shot.#ColinGray #ColtGray #ApalacheeHighSchool #SchoolShooting #SecondDegreeMurder #FBIWarning #ParentAccountability #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The Kouri Richins murder trial starts February 23rd — and the defense has been quietly dismantling the prosecution's case for months. A recanting drug source who now says it wasn't fentanyl. A lead detective accused of threatening witnesses. Two excluded prosecution experts. And 26 financial crime charges the judge refused to let the jury hear.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the defense's strongest arguments heading into trial. Robert Crozier, the man prosecutors called their key link in the fentanyl supply chain, has signed a sworn affidavit saying he sold OxyContin — not fentanyl. The pills were never recovered. Never tested. Prosecutors dropped the drug distribution charges after that recantation, and for the defense, that's a gap in the murder weapon theory that may never close.Faddis explains how Detective Jeff O'Driscoll's alleged witness intimidation could infect the credibility of the entire investigation, why losing both expert witnesses strips the prosecution's narrative of a calculated killer, and how the severed financial charges give the defense room to keep the jury focused on one question: can the state prove poisoning beyond a reasonable doubt? With rapid jury selection in a media-saturated county and the defense holding cards they've been building for years, Faddis reveals what he believes is their single strongest play heading into opening statements.#KouriRichins #RichinsTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #DefenseStrategy #SummitCountyUtah #RobertCrozier #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The pretrial wins belonged to the defense. But the prosecution is walking into the Kouri Richins trial with a case they've spent four years constructing — and it starts with a prior poisoning attempt the jury will hear alongside the murder charge.Former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the state's strongest cards. Prosecutors allege Kouri laced Eric's sandwich with fentanyl on Valentine's Day 2022, months before his death. Two friends reportedly say Eric called them saying his wife tried to poison him. A new life insurance policy had allegedly gone into effect ten days earlier. His sister told authorities Eric said if anything happened to him, Kouri was responsible.Carmen Lauber is expected to testify that Kouri directly asked her to buy fentanyl twice — and after the Valentine's Day incident, allegedly requested "the Michael Jackson stuff." Unsealed warrants reportedly show Kouri also asked a handyman to source fentanyl and propofol. The digital evidence includes Google searches allegedly about lethal fentanyl doses, luxury prisons, insurance payouts, and deleting digital records. A jail cell letter allegedly coached family members on testimony. And a handwriting expert is expected to testify that signatures on insurance documents paying Kouri millions were not Eric's.Faddis explains how the prosecution connects five times the lethal dose, a prior attempt, an insurance timeline, and a Moscow Mule into one narrative — and whether 100-plus witnesses and 1,000 exhibits represent overwhelming evidence or strategic overreach.#KouriRichins #RichinsTrial #EricRichins #CarmenLauber #FentanylMurder #ProsecutionEvidence #MichaelJacksonStuff #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The Kouri Richins murder trial begins February 23rd in Summit County, Utah — nearly four years after Eric Richins was found dead with more than five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in his system. Prosecutors say Kouri mixed it into a Moscow Mule and watched her husband die. The defense says the state's case has been bleeding out before it even reaches a jury.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers to break down what might be the defense's strongest hand heading into trial — and it starts with the man who was supposed to be the state's key link in the drug supply chain.Robert Crozier, the alleged fentanyl source, has now signed a sworn affidavit saying he sold OxyContin — not fentanyl — to housekeeper Carmen Lauber. He claims he was detoxing and disoriented during his 2023 police interview. The pills were never recovered. They were never tested. Prosecutors dropped their drug distribution charges in October 2025 after that recantation. For the defense, that's not just a win — it's a hole in the murder weapon theory that may never be filled.But it doesn't stop there. Weeks before jury selection, the defense released text messages allegedly showing lead Detective Jeff O'Driscoll threatening a witness with arrest and bringing "a catch pole for the dog" if she didn't cooperate. A second witness reportedly said investigator Travis Hopper warned their immunity could be revoked if they didn't meet with prosecutors again. If those allegations stick in jurors' minds, the credibility of the entire investigation could be in play.Then there's what the jury won't hear. Judge Mrazik excluded the prosecution's domestic violence expert and limited FBI profiler Molly Amman's testimony after defense criminologist Bryanna Fox called the "pathway to violence" framework disconnected from science. The judge also denied — twice — the prosecution's attempts to bring Kouri's 26 separate financial crime charges into the murder trial to prove motive. That means the jury won't hear about mortgage fraud, money laundering, or bad checks unless the prosecution finds another door.Eric Faddis walks through every one of these rulings and explains what they mean for reasonable doubt, jury perception, and the defense's ability to keep this trial laser-focused on one question: can the state prove Kouri Richins poisoned her husband beyond a reasonable doubt?With 85 percent of Summit County residents saying they'd heard of this case, jury selection wrapped in two days instead of five, and the defense lost two venue change motions. Faddis breaks down whether rapid jury selection in a media-saturated county helps or hurts Kouri — and what the defense's single biggest card is heading into opening statements.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #RichinsTrial #FentanylMurder #SummitCounty #RobertCrozier #ReasonableDoubt #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcastJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The defense landed pretrial blows. But the prosecution is walking into the Kouri Richins murder trial with over 100 potential witnesses, more than 1,000 exhibits, and five weeks to lay out what they say is an overwhelming case for premeditated murder. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the state's strongest evidence — and explains why some of it may be impossible to overcome.Start with Valentine's Day 2022. Prosecutors allege Kouri laced Eric's sandwich with fentanyl months before his death. He reportedly broke out in hives and lost consciousness. Two friends say Eric called them afterward saying his wife tried to poison him. His sister told authorities he believed Kouri had spiked his drink years earlier in Greece and told family if anything happened to him, she was to blame. A new life insurance policy had gone into effect just ten days before that alleged attempt. If the jury hears all of that alongside the murder charge, prosecutors aren't just alleging one poisoning — they're alleging a pattern.Then there's Carmen Lauber — the housekeeper who says Kouri directly asked her to buy fentanyl twice in early 2022, that she delivered pills to the property, and that after the Valentine's Day attempt, Kouri asked for something stronger — specifically "the Michael Jackson stuff," a reference to propofol. Crozier may have recanted, but Lauber's alleged firsthand account of Kouri's direct requests could be the prosecution's most powerful witness.The digital evidence is staggering. Prosecutors reportedly have Kouri's post-death Google searches including queries about lethal fentanyl doses, luxury prisons, life insurance payout timelines, deleting text messages and iCloud accounts, lie detector tests, and FBI involvement. Unsealed search warrants also allegedly revealed she asked a handyman to procure both fentanyl and propofol weeks before Eric's death — meaning the state may show she was allegedly sourcing drugs from multiple people simultaneously.Add the "Walk the Dog" letter found in Kouri's jail cell — described by prosecutors as outlining false testimony for her mother and brother — and five pages from an orange notebook prosecutors call her "firsthand account" of the day Eric died, with details that allegedly contradict other evidence. Handwriting expert Matt Throckmorton is expected to testify that signatures on insurance and financial documents were not Eric's — potentially merging fraud and murder motive into one narrative.Faddis explains how a prosecutor ties five times the lethal dose of fentanyl, a prior attempt, an insurance timeline, and a Moscow Mule into a closing argument that leaves no other reasonable explanation. The defense made noise pretrial. Now the prosecution gets to show what they've been building for four years.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #RichinsTrial #FentanylMurder #CarmenLauber #ProsecutionEvidence #ValentinesDayPoisoning #ForgedDocuments #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Colin Gray is sitting in a Georgia courtroom facing 29 felony counts — including second-degree murder — because prosecutors say he handed his mentally deteriorating 14-year-old son an AR-style rifle as a Christmas present after what the state describes as a years-long parade of warning signs he allegedly refused to act on. This is only the second major trial in the United States testing whether parents can be held criminally responsible when their children carry out school shootings. Former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down every element of the case and explains why the evidence trail Colin Gray allegedly left behind could bury him.The prosecution's timeline is staggering. In 2021, Colt allegedly searched "how to kill your dad" on a school computer. In May 2023, according to prosecutors, the FBI flagged online threats tied to Colt about a school shooting, and investigators reportedly told Colin to restrict gun access. Seven months later, according to the state, he gave his son an AR-15-style SIG Sauer M400 for Christmas. Then in August 2024, prosecutors allege Colt texted his father, "Whenever something happens, just know the blood is on your hands," and separately asked him to buy 150 rounds of ammunition.The defense argues Colt led a double life and hid his intentions. They point to hidden phone notes allegedly showing Colt planned the attack for February 2025 to coincide with the Parkland anniversary. But prosecutors revealed Colt allegedly had a shrine to Nikolas Cruz in his bedroom. His mother was reportedly aware of his attempts to contact the Parkland shooter in prison. And the defense itself argued she never warned Colin — raising the question of how someone could claim ignorance when the alleged obsession was visible inside the home.The state also alleges Colt shoved his mother to the ground when she tried to take the gun away, was reportedly hearing voices, and was given his mother's prescription Zoloft without ever seeing a doctor. The defense counters that Colin had scheduled a mental health appointment for Colt for the day after the shooting. Faddis explains whether that last-minute appointment helps the defense or actually proves the prosecution's case — that Colin allegedly knew his son was in crisis and still left the weapon accessible.One of the most devastating moments from opening statements was the prosecution describing Colin's alleged reaction when officers arrived at the Gray home. According to prosecutors, he said, "I knew it. My little girl just texted me she's in lockdown. Please tell me your brother didn't do something." Faddis breaks down how those two words — "I knew it" — could define the prosecution's entire case.This case is being compared to the Crumbley trials in Michigan, but Colin Gray faces second-degree murder charges — not involuntary manslaughter. Under Georgia law, the legal theory is that providing the weapon constitutes cruelty to children, and causing a child's death through cruelty qualifies as second-degree murder. Faddis explains whether this is a stronger or weaker framework than what convicted both Crumbley parents. With 25 witnesses testifying on day two alone — including roughly 20 juvenile students who described being shot, seeing blood, and fearing they would die — and Colin facing up to 180 years, Faddis gives his honest assessment of where this trial is headed.#ColinGray #ColtGray #ApalacheeHighSchool #SchoolShooting #SecondDegreeMurder #ParentAccountability #CrumbleyComparison #GeorgiaTrial #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Forget the pretrial wins. The prosecution is walking into this courtroom with over 100 witnesses, more than 1,000 exhibits, and five weeks of trial to present what they say is an airtight case for premeditated murder. Former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down every piece of the state's strongest evidence.It starts with Valentine's Day 2022. Prosecutors allege Kouri tried to kill Eric before — lacing his sandwich with fentanyl months before his death. Two friends reportedly say Eric told them his wife tried to poison him. His sister says he told family Kouri was to blame if anything happened. A new life insurance policy allegedly went into effect ten days before that attempt.Carmen Lauber is expected to testify that Kouri asked her directly — twice — to buy fentanyl, and after the first alleged attempt, requested something stronger: "the Michael Jackson stuff." Warrants reportedly show she also asked a handyman to source fentanyl and propofol. Her Google searches allegedly include lethal fentanyl doses, luxury prisons, insurance payouts, and deleting digital records. A letter found in her jail cell allegedly outlines false testimony for family members. A handwriting expert is prepared to testify that insurance signatures were forged.The medical examiner found more than five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in Eric's system. Prosecutors say Kouri mixed it into a Moscow Mule she made while celebrating a real estate closing. Faddis explains how the state ties toxicology, a prior attempt, forged documents, and digital evidence into one closing argument — and whether the defense has any path through it.#KouriRichins #RichinsTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #CarmenLauber #ForgedInsurance #ProsecutionEvidence #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The murder trial hasn't even started and the defense has already taken pieces off the board. Robert Crozier recanted. Detective O'Driscoll is accused of threatening witnesses. Two prosecution experts were barred. And the 26 financial crime charges the state wanted to use as motive evidence? Severed entirely.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the defense's strongest pretrial wins in the Kouri Richins case. Crozier — the man prosecutors said supplied fentanyl through housekeeper Carmen Lauber — has signed a sworn affidavit saying the pills were OxyContin, not fentanyl. He says he was detoxing and disoriented during his 2023 police interview. The pills were never recovered. Never tested. The state dropped drug distribution charges after that affidavit, and Faddis explains why that creates a gap in the murder weapon theory the prosecution may struggle to close.He walks through the witness intimidation allegations against the lead detective, the strategic impact of losing both expert witnesses, and how the defense can exploit the severed financial charges to keep the jury narrowly focused. With jury selection completing in just two days in a county where 85 percent of residents knew the case, Faddis identifies what he believes is the defense's single biggest advantage heading into February 23rd.#KouriRichins #RichinsTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #RobertCrozier #DefenseWins #SummitCountyUtah #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney Eric Faddis delivers in-depth legal analysis on two high-profile cases — the Alex Murdaugh Supreme Court oral arguments and the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation. During the Murdaugh hearing, the justices came in hot, pressing the state on Becky Hill's perjury conviction, the jury tampering standard Judge Toal applied, and the broad admission of financial crime evidence under Rule 404(b). Chief Justice Kittredge described the corroboration of the tampering claims as “striking,” while Justice Few questioned how the state could continue defending Hill's credibility. Defense attorney Jim Griffin emphasized the lack of direct evidence — no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, no biological transfer. Faddis outlines three potential outcomes and explains why a federal appeal could be on the horizon no matter how the court rules. In the Guthrie case, he details eleven days of documented investigative missteps by the Pima County Sheriff's Department, including the early release of the crime scene, a grounded thermal imaging aircraft, a ten-day delay in surveillance footage later recovered by the FBI, and the family's decision to communicate with alleged kidnappers through Instagram. Prosecutors point to a forty-one-minute pacemaker window as the backbone of the forensic timeline, but connecting that timeline to a specific defendant remains a challenge. Faddis breaks down what must happen next in both cases. #AlexMurdaugh #NancyGuthrie #MurdaughSupremeCourt #EricFaddis #BeckyHillPerjury #GuthrieKidnapping #SheriffNanos #Rule404b #MurdaughCase #TrueCrimeAnalysisJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The full scope of the prosecution's case against Michael McKee is now visible. The affidavit has been unsealed and the Franklin County Coroner has released autopsy reports for Spencer and Monique Tepe. The findings are staggering in their detail and their implications. Monique sustained nine gunshot wounds. Spencer sustained seven. Both had defensive injuries to their hands and arms. They were conscious when the shooting began, and they fought. An entire magazine was emptied into two people in their bedroom while their children slept down the hall. The violence never left that room — but it consumed everything in it. The affidavit establishes an alleged pattern spanning eight years. Surveillance footage captured McKee walking through the Tepe property while Spencer and Monique attended the Big Ten Championship game, days before the killings. Witnesses told investigators McKee made threats throughout and after his marriage to Monique, including that he could "kill her at any time" and that she would "always be his wife." A silver SUV with a distinctive sticker was tracked between McKee's home, his workplace, and the area near the Tepe residence — displaying stolen license plates. After McKee's arrest, fresh scrape marks were found where the sticker had been removed. His cell phone went dark from December 29th through the afternoon of December 30th, a window that covers the estimated time of the murders at approximately 3:50 a.m. Prosecutors will argue that silence was deliberate. The firearm charges are filed in the alternative — automatic weapon or silencer-equipped — which signals the investigation hasn't definitively identified the weapon's exact configuration. That matters for sentencing. McKee is a vascular surgeon with licenses in four states and a decade of advanced medical training. According to prosecutors, he is also someone who allegedly spent years building a documented obsession that culminated in a double homicide that left two children without parents. He waived extradition, entered a not-guilty plea, and reserved the right to address bond. Defense attorney Eric Faddis analyzes how prosecutors build around historical threat evidence, the legal strength and vulnerability of digital silence arguments, how apparent post-offense tampering gets presented at trial, and what McKee's early defense posture signals. Forensic psychologists describe the behavioral profile emerging from this evidence as a "grievance collector" — someone who catalogs perceived wrongs for years before acting with devastating precision. The autopsy confirms what happened. The affidavit allegedly explains why.#MichaelMcKee #SpencerTepe #MoniqueTepe #OhioHomicide #TepeAutopsy #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeToday #DomesticViolence #GrievanceCollector #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Federal agents entered the Tucson home of Annie Guthrie and Tommaso Cioni carrying forensic extraction equipment. Annie and Tommaso were the last people known to have seen Nancy Guthrie, 84, before she was taken. The sheriff maintains this is standard investigative procedure and has warned that labeling anyone a suspect at this point would be reckless and potentially destructive to the case. No suspects or persons of interest have been identified. More than a hundred investigators are assigned. But the evidence trail tells its own story. Ransom notes demanding bitcoin landed at media outlets — TMZ and local news stations — completely bypassing the family. Whoever made that choice created traceable legal exposure, whether they took Nancy or not. DNA evidence at the scene has been confirmed as Nancy's, though the sheriff has declined to specify whether it's blood. That's a legally significant distinction: DNA indicating someone was present carries different prosecutorial weight than DNA indicating someone was harmed. The specific type of biological evidence shapes charging decisions. Pacemaker data shows Nancy went out of range around 2 a.m. Using cardiac device telemetry to establish an abduction timeline is largely uncharted legal ground. How that evidence enters a courtroom — and how a defense team challenges it — could define the case. The sheriff publicly stated to NBC that Nancy "was harmed at the home" before walking it back as a misstatement. In any eventual prosecution, that retraction becomes a tool for the defense. The Guthrie family's video statement has been analyzed by former federal law enforcement professionals, who described it as carefully scripted and strategically staged by authorities. Savannah Guthrie's language — asking for proof of life, humanizing her mother — was designed to serve both public appeal and investigative objectives simultaneously. A fifty-thousand-dollar FBI reward has been posted. Federal resources have been pledged at the presidential level. Tips continue flooding in. Nancy requires medication the sheriff described as potentially fatal to miss, and her age and physical limitations compound both the urgency and the eventual sentencing exposure under state and federal law. Robin Dreeke, former head of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, details how investigators behaviorally evaluate everyone in a victim's orbit without rushing to judgment. Defense attorney Eric Faddis explains what prosecutors need to build a kidnapping case, how medical device evidence gets challenged, and why the choice between Arizona and federal jurisdiction could determine the severity of the outcome.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #TucsonKidnapping #EricFaddis #RobinDreeke #FBI #PacemakerEvidence #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #CriminalLawJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The affidavit is public. The autopsy reports are released. And the Michael McKee case just became one of the most forensically and psychologically layered murder prosecutions in Ohio. Spencer Tepe was shot seven times. Monique Tepe was shot nine times. Both had defensive wounds on their hands and arms — they were awake, aware, and fighting when they were killed in their bedroom while their children slept feet away. A full magazine emptied into two people. The violence stayed contained to one room but was explosive enough to exhaust every round. Forensic psychologists recognize that pattern. It's controlled rage — the kind associated with what experts call a "grievance collector," someone who catalogs perceived slights over years until action becomes inevitable. The affidavit supports that profile. Surveillance footage places McKee in the Tepe yard while Spencer and Monique were at the Big Ten Championship game, days before the murders. Witnesses describe threats stretching back through and beyond McKee's marriage to Monique. He allegedly told her he could "kill her at any time" and that she "will always be his wife." Stolen license plates were linked to his vehicle. A silver SUV with a distinctive sticker was tracked between McKee's address, his workplace, and the Tepe home. After arrest, fresh scrape marks appeared where the sticker had been — evidence prosecutors will frame as post-offense tampering. McKee's phone went silent from December 29th through the afternoon of December 30th, covering the estimated time of the murders at 3:50 a.m. The firearm specifications are charged in the alternative — automatic weapon or silencer-equipped firearm — a prosecutorial hedge that defense attorney Eric Faddis says reveals something about the investigation's current limits. McKee was a vascular surgeon licensed in four states. A decade of medical training. A professional who held lives in his hands daily. And according to prosecutors, a man who allegedly spent eight years building toward the night he emptied a magazine into his ex-wife and her husband. Faddis breaks down how prosecutors use historical threat evidence, where digital silence arguments hold up and where they fracture, how alternative firearm charges affect sentencing strategy, and what McKee's not-guilty plea with reserved bond arguments tells us about the defense approach. The autopsy reveals how they died. The affidavit reveals the alleged architecture behind it.#MichaelMcKee #SpencerTepe #MoniqueTepe #TepeAutopsy #McKeeAffidavit #LibertyTownship #ForensicPsychology #DomesticViolence #HiddenKillers #AggravatedMurderJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Federal agents arrived at the home of Annie Guthrie and Tommaso Cioni with forensic extraction equipment. They were the last people to see Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of Savannah Guthrie, before she was taken from her Tucson residence. Investigators confirmed forced entry, DNA evidence at the scene, and ransom notes demanding bitcoin — routed to media outlets rather than the family. The sheriff says no one is a suspect. No persons of interest have been named. More than a hundred investigators are assigned to the case. But the behavioral and legal landscape is far more complex than those statements suggest. The ransom delivery method — bypassing the family entirely and going to TMZ and local stations — creates significant legal exposure for whoever is responsible, whether or not they physically took Nancy. The DNA confirmed at the scene belongs to Nancy, but the sheriff won't specify whether it's blood. That distinction matters enormously. DNA establishing presence carries different legal weight than DNA establishing harm, and the type of biological evidence recovered shapes what charges prosecutors can bring. Pacemaker sync data is being used to establish that Nancy went out of range around 2 a.m. Medical device evidence in a kidnapping case is new legal territory, and how it gets introduced at trial — and where it's vulnerable to challenge — could define the prosecution's timeline. The sheriff initially told NBC that Nancy "was harmed at the home," then walked it back as a misstatement. Defense attorneys notice contradictions like that. They get used in court. The Guthrie family's video statement drew analysis from former federal law enforcement professionals who described it as heavily scripted and strategically directed by authorities. Savannah asked for proof of life and humanized her mother — every line serving an investigative purpose. Meanwhile, a fifty-thousand-dollar FBI reward is active, the president has pledged federal resources, and tips continue to flood in. Nancy requires medication the sheriff described as potentially fatal to miss. Her age, limited mobility, and medical needs elevate sentencing exposure under both state and federal guidelines. Robin Dreeke, former head of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, breaks down how investigators behaviorally assess everyone in Nancy's orbit without premature conclusions. Defense attorney Eric Faddis explains what a kidnapping prosecution looks like from both sides and why the jurisdiction question between Arizona and federal courts carries dramatically different consequences.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #RobinDreeke #EricFaddis #FBI #TrueCrime #Kidnapping #PimaCouny #CriminalDefense #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Two cases. One attorney who has prosecuted murder and defended against it. Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers to break down the institutional failures in the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation and the aggressive Supreme Court oral arguments in the Alex Murdaugh appeal.In the Guthrie case, eleven days without a suspect have exposed a pattern of decisions by Sheriff Nanos that could compromise any future prosecution — from the premature crime scene release to the five-hour grounding of thermal imaging aircraft to ten days of calling critical footage permanently lost when the FBI found it in backend data. The family is communicating with the alleged kidnappers through Instagram rather than through law enforcement. The FBI released surveillance footage through Director Patel's personal X account. A man was detained in Rio Rico and released without charges. Faddis walks through the legal exposure on both sides — what the investigative failures mean for civil liability and what a prosecutor has to build a chargeable case from.In the Murdaugh appeal, the South Carolina Supreme Court justices directed pointed questioning at the state. Becky Hill's perjury conviction has rewritten the jury tampering issue. The chief justice challenged the state on Rule 404(b) and the unchecked flow of financial crime evidence at trial. With no eyewitnesses, no weapons, and no biological transfer evidence, the defense argues the state's case may not survive if the financial testimony falls. Faddis reads the bench and identifies where this is heading.#NancyGuthrie #AlexMurdaugh #EricFaddis #GuthrieCase #MurdaughAppeal #SheriffNanos #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #HiddenKillersPodcast #InstitutionalFailureJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney Eric Faddis provides complete legal analysis of two major cases — the Alex Murdaugh Supreme Court oral arguments and the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation.The Murdaugh hearing produced aggressive questioning from the bench, with justices pressing the state on Becky Hill's perjury conviction, the jury tampering standard Toal applied, and the unchecked admission of financial crime evidence under Rule 404(b). Chief Justice Kittredge called the corroboration of tampering allegations "striking." Justice Few challenged the state's ability to defend Hill's credibility. Griffin argued there's no direct evidence — no eyewitnesses, no weapons, no biological transfer. Faddis weighs the three possible outcomes and explains why a federal appeal may follow regardless.In the Guthrie case, Faddis breaks down eleven days of documented investigative failures by the Pima County Sheriff's Department — the premature crime scene release, the grounded thermal imaging aircraft, the ten-day gap on footage the FBI ultimately recovered, and the family's decision to communicate with alleged kidnappers through Instagram. On the prosecution side, the forty-one-minute pacemaker window anchors the forensic timeline, but the path from timeline to defendant remains unclear. Faddis identifies what needs to happen next for both cases.#AlexMurdaugh #NancyGuthrie #MurdaughSupremeCourt #EricFaddis #BeckyHillPerjury #GuthrieKidnapping #SheriffNanos #Rule404b #MurdaughCase #TrueCrimeAnalysisJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Criminal defense attorney Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live for a full legal breakdown of both the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation and today's Alex Murdaugh Supreme Court oral arguments.The Guthrie case is eleven days in with no suspects and a mounting list of investigative decisions that could sink a prosecution before it starts — premature scene release, grounded aircraft, ten days of missing footage that wasn't actually missing, and a family that's gone around law enforcement entirely. On the prosecution side, the forty-one-minute pacemaker window is the strongest evidence, but connecting it to a defendant remains the central problem. Faddis assesses what's recoverable and what isn't.In the Murdaugh appeal, the Supreme Court justices aimed their hardest questions at the state. Becky Hill's perjury conviction has changed the calculus. The chief justice challenged the unchecked admission of financial evidence. The defense argues there's no direct evidence at all. Faddis reads the room and explains the most likely outcome.#NancyGuthrie #AlexMurdaugh #EricFaddis #GuthrieKidnapping #MurdaughOralArguments #BeckyHill #SheriffNanos #FBIEvidence #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrimeLegalJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Forensic extraction equipment was brought into the home of Nancy Guthrie's daughter Annie and her husband Tommaso Cioni — the last known people to see the 84-year-old before she disappeared from her Tucson home. The sheriff is clear: no suspects, no persons of interest, and calling anyone a suspect at this stage could damage the investigation. Over a hundred investigators are on the case. But here's what's unfolding beneath the surface. Ransom notes demanding bitcoin were sent to media outlets — TMZ and local stations — not to the family. That deliberate routing creates immediate legal exposure for whoever is behind them, regardless of whether they're the person who physically took Nancy. DNA evidence confirmed at the scene belongs to Nancy, but the sheriff won't say whether it's blood. That's not a minor distinction. The nature of the biological evidence determines what charges can be filed and how prosecutors frame harm versus presence. Investigators are pulling pacemaker sync data to pin down that Nancy went out of range around 2 a.m. Using medical device telemetry as a forensic timeline tool is largely untested legal territory, and both sides of a courtroom will have something to say about its reliability and admissibility. The sheriff told NBC that Nancy "was harmed at the home" before retracting the statement as a misstatement. Law enforcement walking back public comments in a case this high-profile doesn't go unnoticed — by the public or by defense attorneys preparing for what comes next. The Guthrie family released a video statement that former federal law enforcement analysts characterized as heavily scripted and strategically directed. Savannah Guthrie asked for proof of life and personalized her mother — language designed to serve both emotional and investigative functions. The FBI has posted a fifty-thousand-dollar reward. The president has committed federal resources. Tips are pouring in. Nancy requires daily medication the sheriff described as potentially life-threatening to go without, and her age and limited mobility push sentencing exposure higher under both Arizona and federal guidelines. Robin Dreeke, former FBI Special Agent and head of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, explains how investigators separate genuine grief from deception and what forensic extraction reveals beyond raw data. Defense attorney Eric Faddis walks through the prosecution's building blocks — DNA interpretation, jurisdiction strategy, and how every public statement from law enforcement becomes potential ammunition at trial.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #FBIReward #BitcoinRansom #RobinDreeke #EricFaddis #TucsonKidnapping #TrueCrime2026 #HiddenKillers #ForensicEvidenceJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Did the South Carolina Supreme Court just tip its hand in Alex Murdaugh's double murder appeal? During oral arguments, the justices came armed with pointed, highly specific questions — and most of the heat was directed at the prosecution. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down what stood out and what it could signal.Justice James immediately focused on the “egg juror” affidavit that Justice Toal excluded from the evidentiary hearing. Chief Justice Kittredge described the corroboration between jurors and independent witnesses regarding Becky Hill's alleged conduct as “striking,” noting that Toal's order never addressed claims Hill told jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh. The defense maintains Toal applied the wrong legal standard — and based on today's exchange, several justices appeared open to that argument.Hill's subsequent perjury conviction, which occurred after Toal's ruling, loomed large over the discussion. Justice Few challenged the state's characterization of Hill as “not completely credible,” pointing out the obvious tension in relying on a convicted perjurer. On evidentiary issues, Kittredge pushed back on the state's use of Rule 404(b), emphasizing that the rule is designed to limit other-acts evidence, not automatically admit it. He suggested the trial court may have allowed sweeping financial crime testimony without meaningful boundaries.Defense attorney Jim Griffin reiterated that the state's case lacked direct evidence — no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, no biological transfer linking Murdaugh to the killings. If the financial evidence is ultimately deemed improperly admitted, the prosecution's case could narrow significantly. Faddis outlines three possible outcomes and explains why, regardless of the state court's decision, a federal appeal may be next. #AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughHearing #SupremeCourt #BeckyHillPerjury #EricFaddis #JusticeKittredge #CreightonWaters #404bEvidence #MurdaughCase #NewTrialMurdaugh Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

FBI Director Kash Patel bypassed the Bureau's press office and released the Nancy Guthrie surveillance footage through his personal X account. No briefing. No questions. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today to examine whether the release method creates a legitimate legal vulnerability — and to assess everything else a prosecutor is dealing with eleven days into this case.The forensic centerpiece remains the forty-one-minute gap between the Nest camera going dark at 1:47 a.m. and Nancy's pacemaker losing Bluetooth at 2:28 a.m. Faddis explains what that window establishes on its own, what it still needs to become trial-ready evidence, and how a prosecutor would structure a case around it.A man detained in Rio Rico for eight hours was released without charges. At least three ransom notes with insider details were sent to media outlets. An imposter ransom arrest has already occurred. The FBI says there's no proof of life and no ongoing communication with the suspected kidnappers. Faddis breaks down the legal challenge of sorting legitimate evidence from imposter-generated noise — and how defense attorneys would use the confusion to their advantage.Roadside evidence searches eleven days after the disappearance face obvious chain of custody and degradation challenges. Faddis provides a realistic assessment of what late-stage physical recoveries are worth in court and where the prosecution's strongest and weakest positions are right now.#NancyGuthrie #KashPatel #FBIFootage #EricFaddis #GuthrieProsecution #RioRicoDetention #PacemakerEvidence #RansomNotesFraud #TrueCrimeToday #LegalBreakdownJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The legal fallout from the Pima County Sheriff's Department's handling of the Nancy Guthrie disappearance is mounting. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today to analyze the investigative decisions that a courtroom would scrutinize most heavily — and several of them trace directly to Sheriff Chris Nanos.The crime scene was released prematurely and investigators returned multiple times to collect evidence they missed. The department's thermal imaging aircraft was unavailable for five critical hours because the sheriff had reassigned the pilot to patrol over a personal dispute. Doorbell camera footage the department spent ten days calling unrecoverable was ultimately found by the FBI in backend server data. The sheriff made a public statement to NBC News claiming Nancy was "taken from her bed" and retracted it the following day.Faddis explains the legal weight of each decision. Chain of custody fractures from premature scene releases. The negligence threshold for failing to deploy your best search asset when the delay is tied to a documented personnel decision. The impact of ten days of investigative choices made without the case's most critical evidence. The legal risks when a lead investigator makes inaccurate public statements during a nationally covered case — both for investigation integrity and jury pool contamination.The Guthrie family's actions add another layer. They've hired private security, released escalating public videos. Faddis reads that pattern as a former prosecutor and explains what it suggests about the family's relationship with the investigation — and whether it could carry legal consequences later.If this case doesn't end with Nancy coming home alive, Faddis addresses the threshold for civil liability against a sheriff's department for a negligent investigation and whether these documented failures would meet it.#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #SheriffChrisNanos #CrimeSceneRelease #ThermalImaging #NestCamera #FBIRecovery #TrueCrimeToday #GuthrieDisappearance #LegalAnalysisJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

When Justice Toal denied Alex Murdaugh a new trial in January 2024, Becky Hill hadn't been convicted of perjury yet. Now she has — and the South Carolina Supreme Court justices made it clear today that fact matters. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down today's oral arguments and what the bench's aggressive questioning of the state signals about the likely outcome.Justice Few asked Creighton Waters directly how you can label someone "not completely credible" when her own guilty plea proves she's a liar. Chief Justice Kittredge pointed out that Toal's order never addressed the allegation that Hill told jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh's testimony. He called the corroboration between juror accounts and independent witnesses "striking." The defense argues the wrong legal standard was applied — and from the bench, it appeared multiple justices agreed.Kittredge also pressed hard on the financial evidence, telling Waters that Rule 404(b) is a rule of exclusion and that the trial court couldn't seem to find a reason to keep anything out. Jim Griffin argued this case has no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, and no biological transfer evidence. If the financial testimony falls, the state's case gets very thin.Faddis reads the room and explains which of the three possible outcomes — affirm, new trial, or remand — today's hearing most strongly pointed toward.#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHillPerjury #MurdaughSupremeCourt #JuryTampering #EricFaddis #JusticeKittredge #Rule404b #JimGriffin #HiddenKillersPodcast #MurdaughNewTrialJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Eleven days into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie and the Pima County Sheriff's Department is being questioned from every direction — by its own deputies' union, by county supervisors, and by the Guthrie family itself. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the legal damage created by a cascade of documented investigative decisions.The crime scene was released prematurely. Sheriff Nanos admitted it publicly. His department returned to the home multiple times after the initial release to collect additional evidence — each re-entry creating chain of custody problems that Faddis says any defense attorney would seize on at trial. Evidence recovered after a scene is released and potentially accessed by civilians carries a contamination question mark that never fully disappears.The department's thermal imaging aircraft, equipped to detect body heat across the Arizona desert, was grounded for five hours after Nancy was reported missing. The pilot had been reassigned to street patrol by the sheriff months earlier over a personal dispute. The union opposed the move. For an eighty-four-year-old woman potentially in the desert, that five-hour gap is not administrative — it's potentially catastrophic. Faddis explains the legal standard for negligence and whether this specific delay, tied to a specific decision by a specific official, could meet that threshold.The Nest doorbell footage that authorities spent ten days calling permanently unrecoverable was ultimately produced by the FBI from backend server data. Faddis walks through how a defense team would frame that ten-day blind spot — and what it means for every investigative choice made while the department believed its best evidence was gone.The sheriff told NBC News that Nancy was "taken from her bed" and retracted it the next day. Faddis addresses both the legal risks of inaccurate public statements by the lead investigator and what the family's decision to go around the department tells him about the state of this investigation.#NancyGuthrie #GuthrieCase #SheriffNanos #CrimeSceneError #EricFaddis #ThermalImaging #NestCameraFootage #PimaCountySheriff #HiddenKillersPodcast #TrueCrimeTodayJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Between 1:47 a.m. and 2:28 a.m., something happened inside Nancy Guthrie's home. The doorbell camera went offline at one end. The pacemaker lost Bluetooth connectivity at the other. That forty-one-minute window is the hardest forensic evidence in this case — and criminal defense attorney Eric Faddis explains what it proves, what it doesn't, and what a prosecutor still needs to connect it to a defendant.The FBI released surveillance footage and says they're searching for more than one individual. Director Kash Patel posted it to his personal X account — no press conference, no briefing, no Q&A. A man was detained in Rio Rico for eight hours and released without charges. His family says the clothing doesn't match. An imposter ransom demand already led to a separate arrest in California. Investigators are now combing roadways near the Guthrie home for items that may have been discarded — eleven days after the disappearance.Faddis, who prosecuted first-degree murder before switching to criminal defense, walks through what a prosecutor is watching for at this stage. The ransom notes sent to media outlets with insider crime scene details create a legal tangle: separating genuine evidence from imposter noise becomes a central challenge, and the defense will exploit every piece of confusion. The Rio Rico detention gives the defense a narrative about misdirected investigators. Late-stage roadside recoveries face weather degradation and chain of custody attacks.Faddis identifies the single most important thing that needs to happen next for a viable prosecution — and the single biggest obstacle in the way.#NancyGuthrie #PacemakerEvidence #41MinuteWindow #EricFaddis #FBISurveillance #KashPatel #RioRicoDetention #RansomNotes #HiddenKillersPodcast #GuthrieCaseJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Today's oral arguments in Alex Murdaugh's double murder appeal may have revealed more about the outcome than anyone expected. The South Carolina Supreme Court justices came in with sharp, specific questions — and the overwhelming majority of the pressure went to the prosecution. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis provides a complete breakdown.Justice James immediately asked about the egg juror affidavit that Justice Toal blocked from the evidentiary hearing. Chief Justice Kittredge called the corroboration between juror accounts and independent witnesses about Becky Hill's conduct "striking" — and noted that Toal's order never even addressed the allegation that Hill told jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh. The defense argues Toal applied the wrong standard. From the bench today, it looked like the justices may agree.Hill's perjury conviction — which didn't exist when Toal ruled — fundamentally changes the landscape. Justice Few pressed Waters on the absurdity of calling a convicted perjurer "not completely credible." On the evidence side, Kittredge told the state that Rule 404(b) is supposed to exclude evidence, not rubber-stamp it, and that the trial court let every piece of financial crime testimony in without apparent limitation.Jim Griffin argued there's no direct evidence — no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, no biological transfer evidence. If the financial testimony is ruled improperly admitted, the state's case shrinks considerably. Faddis assesses the three paths forward and explains why a federal appeal may be coming regardless of the state court's decision.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughHearing #SupremeCourt #BeckyHillPerjury #EricFaddis #JusticeKittredge #CreightonWaters #404bEvidence #MurdaughCase #NewTrialMurdaughJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

A man questioned for eight hours in Rio Rico. Released without charges. His family says the clothing doesn't match the surveillance footage. Meanwhile the FBI says they're looking for more than one person, and Director Kash Patel dropped the footage on his personal X account instead of through official channels. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live to assess what a prosecutor can actually build from what exists right now.The forty-one-minute window between the camera going offline at 1:47 a.m. and Nancy's pacemaker losing Bluetooth at 2:28 a.m. remains the forensic backbone of this case. But as Faddis explains, establishing that something happened and proving who did it are entirely different legal problems. A prosecutor needs to bridge that gap with evidence that connects the timeline to a specific individual — and that evidence hasn't surfaced publicly.Multiple ransom notes with insider crime scene details were sent to media outlets. One imposter demand already led to an arrest. The FBI says there's been no proof of life and no continued communication with the suspected kidnappers. For a prosecution, the noise surrounding the ransom notes becomes a defense weapon — every piece of unverified communication muddies the evidentiary picture.Faddis also takes on the manner of the footage release, the realistic evidentiary value of roadside recoveries eleven days after the crime, and what the Rio Rico detention means for any future defense strategy. He answers the question from both sides: what needs to happen next, and what's standing in the way.#NancyGuthrie #RioRico #FBIFootageRelease #KashPatel #EricFaddis #GuthrieKidnapping #PacemakerTimeline #ImposterRansom #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrimeAnalysisJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The investigation into Nancy Guthrie's disappearance is now generating as many questions as the crime itself. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers Live to break apart the investigative decisions that could define — or destroy — any future prosecution.Sheriff Nanos released the crime scene early and sent his team back in days later. His thermal imaging Cessna — the single best tool for locating a person in the Arizona desert — sat on the ground for five hours because the pilot had been pulled from the unit months earlier as punishment in a dispute with the sheriff. The deputies' union president has gone on record criticizing the department's response. A county supervisor has publicly questioned the handling of the case. The sheriff was photographed at an Arizona Wildcats basketball game during the active search.For ten days, the department told the family and the public that the Nest doorbell camera footage was permanently unrecoverable. Then the FBI pulled it from backend data. If the most important piece of evidence in the case existed the entire time and the department didn't know it, every decision made during that window is now suspect.Faddis draws on years of prosecuting first-degree murder and defending criminal cases to explain where honest investigative mistakes end and actionable negligence begins. He addresses the legal consequences of the premature scene release, the chain of custody problems created by multiple re-entries, the sheriff's retracted statement to NBC News, and — bypassing law enforcement entirely — reveals about their confidence in the people running this case.This is an investigation being second-guessed in real time by the people closest to it. Faddis explains what that means if this case ever reaches a courtroom.#NancyGuthrie #GuthrieKidnapping #SheriffNanos #InvestigativeFailure #EricFaddis #GroundedAircraft #FBIFootage #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #CatalinaFoothillsJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.