Podcasts about true crime today

Neither of these cases will ever answer the question that matters most to the families in them.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent with twenty-one years reading behavior under pressure, cover the Lindsay Clancy trial openings and Bryan Kohberger's petition to withdraw his guilty plea.On Clancy, this works through Patrick Clancy's testimony about the last ordinary day, including the photos traded that morning and his line that she was having one of her best days. It also covers the hospital stay, and the discharge he testified he never knew she had asked for. Cora, Dawson and Callan died in January 2023. Criminal responsibility is the only live question, and the Commonwealth owns that burden.On Kohberger, this covers the handwritten petition filed in Ada County District Court, his claim of actual innocence, and his assertion that he was convinced to falsely confess. It also covers the letter Latah County prosecutors sent the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, promising the plea would spare them decades of post-conviction appeals. There was never a trial and there has never been a motive on the record.In Plymouth, a chain of licensed professionals made every call and faces nothing. In Boise, an office traded away a trial and guaranteed an ending it could not deliver. One family will never hear why. The other is watching a man they were told was finished file paperwork to start it all again.The Clancy trial has weeks to run and the Kohberger petition is still pending, so neither of these ends here. Subscribe to True Crime Today for the next development in each case.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS (10)#LindsayClancy #BryanKohberger #TrueCrimeToday #ClancyTrial #IdahoStudentMurders #PostpartumPsychosis #ActualInnocence #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #PostConvictionRelief

Bryan Kohberger is not blaming the evidence. He is blaming the people who told him to sign.In a handwritten petition for post-conviction relief filed in Ada County District Court, Kohberger claims he received ineffective assistance from his defense team. He says evidence in his favor was never disclosed or reviewed. He says he was convinced to confess to something he did not do. He is representing himself. He told the New York Times his actual innocence is his truth.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and former chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, work through who exactly is being accused here and what that accusation costs.Anne Taylor represented Kohberger at the time of the plea. Her office has declined to comment. She is being blamed in the national press by a former client while her own ethics rules keep her from answering a word of it. That happens to defense lawyers every time a client turns, and almost nobody covers it.The breakdown also covers the rest of the filing. He claims he was given a distorted account of what a life sentence and death row in Idaho would look like. And he says he would welcome prosecutors seeking the death penalty against him again, which is the outcome the plea deal existed to prevent.The four students killed in Moscow in November 2022 were Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. There was never a trial, never a cross-examination, and no motive was ever required of him. Everything the public knows about that night comes from investigators, and Kohberger now calls their account a work of fiction.True Crime Today follows this case through every filing and hearing with the analysis that explains what each one means. Subscribe for coverage of the ruling on this petition and whatever he files next.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS (10)#BryanKohberger #IdahoStudentMurders #TrueCrimeToday #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin #ActualInnocence #TrueCrime #AdaCountyCourt

Someone approved Lindsay Clancy's discharge. That decision has not been on trial, and it may never be.She entered Massachusetts General on New Year's Eve 2022 after telling her husband she was having intrusive thoughts about hurting their children, and was transferred to McLean early on January 1. On January 5, after asking to go home, she was released with an appointment scheduled for the following day.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and former chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, work through what that release was built on.Patrick Clancy testified he did not know his wife had asked to leave. He said he was unaware she had been offered daily one-on-one therapy and unaware she had turned down additional group sessions. He said that from what he saw and heard, it did not seem like she was being treated, with a weekend and an observed holiday delaying her first doctor visit.She reported to providers that the thoughts had passed. Her daughter's fifth birthday party was two days after she got home. Cora died seventeen days after the party.Dreeke spent a career deciding whether people were being honest about their own state of mind. He explains what a clinician can actually confirm, and what every hospital is left guessing at.Cora had just turned five. Dawson was three. Callan was eight months old. Nobody disputes how they died. The only question for this jury is what their mother understood at the time, and the Commonwealth has to prove it.Subscribe to True Crime Today for coverage of the expert testimony ahead in this trial.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS (10)#LindsayClancy #McLeanHospital #TrueCrimeToday #ClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #MaternalMentalHealth #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PsychiatricCare

Before any of it, there was a snowman.Patrick Clancy testified that on the afternoon of January 24, 2023, his wife built one in the yard with their three children and then did art projects with them inside. That morning she had taken five-year-old Cora to a doctor's appointment while he stayed home with the boys, and the two of them had traded photos by text. Three-year-old Dawson had dressed himself for the first time.He told the jury she was having one of her best days.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and former chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, work through what that afternoon is worth to each side.The Commonwealth wants it as proof of a clear mind. Assistant District Attorney Shanan Buckingham told jurors this was not a woman in the throes of psychosis. The defense needs those same hours to point somewhere else.The episode also covers what prosecutors say happened after the art projects. A drive plotted from the house to a restaurant nobody in the family had tried, then on to a pharmacy. A shopping list with dinner on it and children's medicine under it. An errand that emptied the house.Dreeke takes on the behavioral question directly. What does a genuinely good day tell you about the mind having it, and what does it fail to tell you?Cora was five. Dawson was three. Callan was eight months old. Their mother has pleaded not guilty and does not dispute causing their deaths, which leaves a jury of twelve women and six men to decide what she understood while it happened.The trial is expected to run six to eight weeks.Subscribe to True Crime Today for coverage of the expert testimony ahead.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS (10)#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #ClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #DuxburyMassachusetts #CriminalResponsibility

Joseph Duggar's arrest in Bay County, Florida isn't just a new headline for the Duggar family, it's a hinge point that connects a 2015 television confession, a 2003 cover-up, and a completely separate child endangerment case eight hundred miles away in Ohio. Tony Brueski starts with the tape: Joseph Duggar, on camera in December of 2015, describing his brother Josh's secret life and calling it heartbreaking. Then the 2026 affidavit alleging Joseph Duggar asked a nine-year-old girl to sit on his lap on a family trip to Panama City Beach. He's pleaded not guilty and posted a six hundred thousand dollar bond. In between sits 2003, when Jim Bob Duggar took his oldest son to a family friend with a badge instead of the police, a decision that kept the case out of court, made under a family doctrine that treated going outside the chain of command as the real danger. It also matters, a great deal, who that man with the badge turned out to be. This episode also lays the Duggar family's newest legal trouble next to the Siders family of Hamden, Ohio, where sixteen children were removed from a home in June of 2026 and four adults now face sixteen counts each of endangering children. Joseph and Kendra Duggar face a nearly identical set of charges out of Arkansas involving their own four kids. Different last names, same blueprint: children kept off the books, out of classrooms, and away from anyone who might have asked questions. The difference shows up the moment the cameras leave. One family posted bond and went home. The other's patriarch got out of jail because his county couldn't afford to keep him. True Crime Today breaks down what's public, what's alleged, and what still doesn't add up. LINKS & LEGAL FOOTER Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #DuggarFamily #JosephDuggar #TrueCrimeToday #JoshDuggar #SidersFamily #KendraDuggar #JimBobDuggar #19KidsAndCounting #TrueCrime #ChildEndangerment 

Two conspiracy theories have trailed the University of Idaho murders since before Bryan Kohberger was ever arrested, and Tony Brueski tackles both in this combined look at the case for True Crime Today. The first theory ruined an innocent man's life before Kohberger was ever named a suspect in this case. The internet decided a grieving young man who'd just lost the woman he loved was responsible, largely because he called her phone repeatedly that morning, something with a completely innocent explanation once you know the full timeline. We break down why the roommates waiting hours to call 911 isn't the smoking gun people think, what their private writings do and don't show, the theory that they were spared for being involved, and why a judge called the internet's alternate suspects rank speculation. The second theory says Kohberger's DNA was planted on the knife sheath left behind at the scene. The lab that tested it says the amount recovered wasn't a faint trace, it was hundreds of times more genetic material than investigators typically find in a case like this one. We go through the unidentified blood inside the house, the mismatched DNA under a victim's fingernails, the hair people insist was staged, the claim that genetic genealogy was concealed from the court, and the Amazon order for that same knife. No clean motive isn't proof of innocence, and a guilty plea stacked on top of DNA, phone records, car evidence, and scanner data isn't how wrongful conviction cases usually look. We separate the real open questions from the ones the internet invented, and explain why a missing motive never actually pointed at the wrong man here. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrimeToday #KayleeGoncalves #TrueCrime #KnifeSheath #DNAEvidence #GuiltyPlea #TrueCrimePodcast #IdahoFour 

Every red flag in the Celeste Rivas Hernandez case got logged by somebody, and not one of them connected the dots in time. Tony Brueski breaks down the full D4vd case for True Crime Today, starting with a welfare check that should have ended very differently. Celeste was reported missing from Lake Elsinore three times in early 2024. That led Riverside County deputies to musician David Burke's phone number, and LA County deputies to his West Hollywood front door. Burke showed them a yearbook photo and claimed he'd met her only once. Deputies told him plainly that she was thirteen and a runaway, then left without further action. Prosecutors allege what came next was deliberate. Burke is accused of paying one of Celeste's junior high classmates a thousand dollars to hand her a new phone so contact could continue uninterrupted. Over the following year, prosecutors say she traveled with him to Las Vegas, London, and Texas, met his family, got matching tattoos, and had his name on her ring finger, all while still in seventh grade. The case takes an even stranger turn when you look at Burke's own music. His breakout single, the album it's from, and the alter ego he built around both all echo the allegations prosecutors are now making about a Hollywood Hills home. Seven months passed between investigators finding Celeste's remains and Burke's arrest, a stretch that included three grand jury panels, a friend fleeing to Montana to avoid a subpoena, and Burke's family fighting the grand jury in a Texas courtroom. He now faces first-degree murder with special circumstances, including lying in wait, murder for financial gain, and murder of a witness. That financial gain allegation is the piece prosecutors say ties everything back to Burke's career. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #D4vd #DavidBurke #TrueCrimeToday #CelesteRivas #TrueCrime #WelfareCheck #SystemFailure #GrandJury #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeForCeleste 

Nolan Wells' case keeps circling back to one object: the phone his mother opened after his death, looking for the last day of his life. What she found — or didn't — is the thread True Crime Today is pulling apart today, using the Nolan Wells timeline as it's actually been reported, not the version that went viral.The 18-year-old football player from Ocean Springs, Mississippi traveled to Horn Island with friends over the holiday. His friends returned. He was found in the water two days later. From there, the accounts split. A young woman says Nolan told her he was heading back to the boat. His friends say he told them the opposite — that he was staying on the island with her. Someone's account doesn't hold up, and it hasn't been resolved.Former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis joins to unpack what it means that the sheriff declared no foul play before the autopsy, toxicology, and digital evidence were finished — and why the district attorney agreeing to present this case to a grand jury signals more than any press statement did. Messages the family says were deleted from the phone are now with the FBI. A viral video once treated as proof turned out to be something else. And with roughly two hundred people on a remote island with no cameras or cell service, the entire evidence base depends on footage nobody's turned in yet.Tony Brueski, Robin, and Eric Faddis break down the contradictions, the phone, and what a real investigation still owes this family.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NolanWells #HornIsland #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #OceanSprings #MississippiCase #NolanWellsCase #TrueCrimeCommunity #JusticeForNolan #WhatHappenedToNolan

That's the line the Vinton County sheriff used after his deputies walked into a five-room house on Ohmer Street in Hamden, Ohio, looking to serve a misdemeanor warrant and instead found sixteen children living inside. Some couldn't speak. Some couldn't read. None had ever been enrolled in a school.The Ohio Attorney General went further, calling the conditions "pure evil" and saying another day could have ended in deaths. Four adults are now charged with sixty-eight felony counts of child endangerment, with a grand jury still to come and more charges possible. The AG's choice of the word intrafamilial is the kind of detail that tells you the full picture isn't public yet.What's striking is how the system missed this for eighteen years straight. Sixteen children, all born in hospitals, arriving roughly once every thirteen months — and not a single medical professional ever flagged the pattern. Ohio's 2023 rollback of homeschool oversight meant no school system ever came looking either. And Elizabeth Siders, one of the four now facing charges, was married herself at fifteen, with a judge's sign-off, in a state with no minimum marriage age on the books.Tony breaks down the case for the True Crime Today audience: the warrant that accidentally exposed it, the institutions that had every opportunity to catch it sooner, and the uncomfortable question at the center of it — whether the state that approved Elizabeth Siders' marriage at fifteen bears some responsibility for what happened to her children two decades later.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#SidersFamily #GarySiders #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #OhioHouseOfHorrors #VintonCounty #16KidsOhio #ChildEndangerment #ElizabethSiders #SystemFailure

One sheriff declared no foul play before the investigation started. One county had complaints in hand for five years and never found the children. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the Nolan Wells death investigation and the Siders sixteen-kids case together — because the question connecting both cases is the same: what happens when the system fails first and investigates second?On Nolan Wells: what the premature no-foul-play call did to the case trajectory, the contradictions between the friends' statements and the young woman's account, the allegedly deleted messages, the friend who appeared on national television during the active investigation, and the grand jury the DA agreed to for a death publicly called a drowning. On the Siders case: the gag order silencing officials who called it pure evil, the grandfather released because the county couldn't cover his medical costs, the truancy complaints from 2021 that were never served, and Elizabeth Siders — married off at fifteen, mother of all sixteen, facing sixteen felony counts while her own attorney argues she is a victim.Two cases. One conversation. Every failure examined by a former prosecutor. Tony Brueski, Robin, and Eric Faddis on True Crime Today.—Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NolanWells #SidersFamily #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #HornIsland #Ohio #Mississippi #ElizabethSiders #16Kids

There is still no cause of death in the Nolan Wells case — and the accounts meant to explain his final hours on Horn Island keep colliding with each other. A week of public pressure has produced theories, celebrity statements, and outrage, but not the one thing everyone actually wants.The first place that gap showed up was his phone. Nolan recorded almost everything he did, so when his mother searched it for the last day he was alive, what she saw became the detail that made his family stop trusting the easy answer. That's the starting point, and it opens into the entire Nolan Wells timeline.He was a college football player from Ocean Springs, Mississippi. On the Fourth of July he went to Horn Island with high school friends. They came back. He didn't. His body surfaced two days later, and the coroner requested a full autopsy because the circumstances were uncertain. Then the record fractures: a young woman says Nolan told her he was returning to the boat, while his friends say he told them he was staying with her. A widely shared video circulates as proof of a confrontation — and a friend steps forward to say it isn't Nolan at all.We work through the contradictions honestly — the ones that fall apart under a closer look and the ones that stubbornly remain. We cover the "no foul play" statement issued before the autopsy, the family flying the body out of state for an independent exam, the public figures funding it, and the race questions officials tried to close prematurely.It all comes back to a single missing answer: how Nolan Wells died. This is the verified version — no theories, no invented drama, just the timeline, the open questions, and the failures. Subscribe to True Crime Today for the latest.END_LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS: #NolanWells #HornIsland #TrueCrimeToday #OceanSprings #Mississippi #JusticeForNolan #BenCrump #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #Unsolved

A sheriff told the country no foul play was suspected in the death of an eighteen-year-old before the autopsy was finished, before toxicology existed, and before the FBI touched a single piece of digital evidence. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis explains exactly why that matters — and what it costs an investigation when the public call comes before the science.Nolan Wells went to Horn Island on the Fourth of July with friends. His body was found in the water two days later. The friends told investigators he chose to stay on the island to talk to a girl. The young woman reportedly told investigators something different. That contradiction has not been publicly reconciled, and a former prosecutor says the timeline on resolving it matters more than most people realize. Messages were allegedly deleted from Nolan's phone before the family recovered it. The FBI is examining the digital evidence now.Faddis addresses what the independent autopsy needs to show for the investigation to change direction, why the DA's commitment to a grand jury presentation may be the most significant signal in this case, and how an investigation built almost entirely on strangers' cell phone footage from a remote barrier island operates when the physical evidence barely exists. Tony Brueski, Robin, and Eric Faddis on True Crime Today.—Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NolanWells #HornIsland #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #OceanSprings #Mississippi #JusticeForNolan #FourthOfJuly #Investigation

Elizabeth Siders was fifteen years old when she was married off in West Virginia. She became the biological mother of every child found in a twelve-by-twelve room in rural Ohio — sixteen kids, some of whom could not speak, living in conditions investigators compared to livestock. She now faces sixteen felony counts of child endangerment. Her own defense attorney has argued in filings that she is a victim of this family. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down whether the law supports holding both of those positions simultaneously.The case has taken several turns since the arrest. A gag order now covers every official who spoke publicly, filed by the defense after the AG used the phrase pure evil and the sheriff described conditions worse than the animals on the property. The seventy-three-year-old grandfather was released from custody because the county couldn't afford his medical bills, and his competency is being challenged. Faddis addresses whether this man's case ever makes it to trial.Faddis also examines the charge itself — whether child endangerment captures the scope of what happened — and the truancy complaints Gallia County filed in 2021 that were never served because the family couldn't be located. Sixteen children lived off the grid for nearly two decades, and the system that's supposed to prevent this had complaints in hand and couldn't find them. Tony Brueski, Robin, and Eric Faddis on True Crime Today.—Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#SidersFamily #ElizabethSiders #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #Ohio #16Kids #ChildEndangerment #GalliaCounty #VintonCounty

Before the autopsy was finalized, before the FBI finished examining the digital evidence, before the investigation reached any conclusion, one of Nolan Wells' friends went on Good Morning America and then sat down with Rolling Stone to publicly tell his story. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis asks the question that matters: does an innocent person do a national media tour during an active investigation, or does that tell you something about what they're trying to control?The friends have attorneys. The family has Ben Crump. The family is running its own parallel investigation with private forensics examiners and a commissioned autopsy. And one detail that Crump has highlighted shifts the entire frame: the friends didn't voluntarily disclose that they had Nolan's phone and keys after his death. The family tracked the phone with Life360 and recovered it themselves.Faddis walks through every decision being made by every person connected to this case — what the friends should be doing if they genuinely want the truth, what the family's shadow investigation helps and hurts, and what everyone should be preparing for if the investigation ends without charges and a civil lawsuit follows. The Lauren Agee case provides the roadmap. Tony Brueski, Robin, and Eric Faddis on True Crime Today.—Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NolanWells #HornIsland #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #OceanSprings #Mississippi #JusticeForNolan #FourthOfJuly #Investigation

Every part of the Nancy Guthrie case points two ways at once. The notes contradict each other. One round of reporting says the investigation is dead in the water; another says an arrest is almost here. Both cannot be true. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer takes the whole thing on in one conversation.She untangles the notes — a claim the 84-year-old is "buried with nature," a separate TMZ tipster saying "time is no longer of the essence," and a disputed apology. She examines Air Mail's reporting that agents fear an early mistake cost them the case, plus a ransom of millions the kidnapper never touched. And she pressure-tests Maureen O'Connell's claim to Megyn Kelly that investigators are 75 percent of the way to "porch guy."Why do two former agents land in opposite places the same week? And is the case stalled for good or about to crack? All claims are reported and unconfirmed; no one has been charged. A True Crime Today conversation.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PorchGuy #FBI #RansomNote #Tucson #PimaCounty #JenniferCoffindaffer

The Nancy Guthrie case looked stuck — and then a retired FBI agent said it's nearly cracked. Maureen O'Connell told Megyn Kelly her sources indicate investigators are closing in on "porch guy," the masked man caught outside the 84-year-old's home the night she was taken, putting her confidence at 75 percent and promising the floodgates would open once he's named.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer tests whether the optimism is earned. She explains how much a confidence number means from outside the case, the real challenge of identifying a man who erased his own face on camera, and whether one arrest truly breaks a case wide open. She also examines the official reason for the slow pace — building a case to survive a top-tier defense.Is a breakthrough genuinely near, or is this hope without a foundation? And how does it sit against reporting that the case has gone cold? All claims are reported and unconfirmed; no one has been charged. A True Crime Today conversation.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NancyGuthrie #PorchGuy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #FBI #MegynKelly #Tucson #PimaCounty #SavannahGuthrie #JenniferCoffindaffer

There's a version of the Nancy Guthrie story where the hard truth is simple: nobody's close. According to Howard Blum's reporting in Air Mail, the investigators themselves fear an early mistake cost them the chance to solve the abduction of the 84-year-old from her Tucson home. Brian Entin's reporting agrees — the person responsible vanished as cleanly as she did, leaving a task force circling back to the same ransom notes.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer meets it head-on. She explains how to interpret agents conceding doubt, whether endlessly clearing suspects is progress or paralysis, and how a single error on a crypto payment can quietly derail everything. And she wrestles with the contradiction nobody's solved: a man who demanded a fortune and then never collected it.So was the money ever the motive? How do cases this cold usually resolve? And does public silence mean the bureau has nothing — or that it's holding more than it's saying? All claims are reported and unconfirmed; no one has been charged. A True Crime Today conversation.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #FBI #PimaCounty #MissingPerson #Tucson #Bitcoin #JenniferCoffindaffer

The notes in the Nancy Guthrie case were supposed to bring answers. Instead they brought a contradiction nobody can resolve. One reportedly came from the man who took the 84-year-old from her Arizona home and claims she's "buried with nature." Another, from a completely different sender, told TMZ "time is no longer of the essence." And the single most dramatic claim — that the kidnapper apologized for her death — is something one outlet reported and TMZ's founder flatly denies.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer takes the whole mess apart. She walks through how the bureau tries to authenticate anonymous messages, why the death claim reportedly went unverified, and how investigators tell an informant from an opportunist. She examines the contradiction at the core: a ransom demand, then an offer to return Nancy's body for roughly the same money.Is that one unraveling plan or two separate people? Does the gentle phrasing mean something, or nothing? Coffindaffer explains what these notes say — and what they refuse to. All claims are reported and unconfirmed; no one has been charged. A True Crime Today conversation.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RansomNote #PorchGuy #FBI #Tucson #PimaCounty #JenniferCoffindaffer

On paper, Nick Reiner is the sole beneficiary of a trust worth more than $1.5 million. In reality, the newest filing in the Nick Reiner trust fund fight says he petitioned a judge partly so he can buy socks. This one starts with the smallest number in the file — the $300 cap on a jail commissary account at Twin Towers that, per the petition, was promised funding and never received a single deposit — and climbs all the way up to the biggest battle in this case outside the murder charges themselves.The petition accuses the trustee of offering “a shifting series of excuses and justifications” for withholding a payout the trust calls mandatory and unconditional. First he reportedly couldn't access the accounts. Then came “concerns” about Nick's competence — without a court order or a doctor's finding behind them. Then the shadow of California's slayer statute. Meanwhile, the filing claims, the consultant brought in to evaluate Nick is being paid presumably out of Nick's own funds — the fight over the money is literally being billed to the money.We break down everything he's actually asking for — the overdue age-30 distribution plus every dollar of interest since 2023, the age-35 money released early, damages from the trustee for breach of trust — and we're honest about which of those asks the law actually supports. Where it leans his way will surprise you. Where it doesn't might surprise you more. And through all of it, one image refuses to leave: a man staring down possible capital charges, heir on paper to Hollywood money, asking a court for hygiene products. True Crime Today follows the file — even when it goes somewhere nobody's comfortable.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #MicheleReiner #TwinTowers #JailCommissary #TrustFund #CourtFiling #TrueCrimeNews #CelebrityCase

In a typewritten question left for the Wichita Police Department in January of 2005, Dennis Rader asked the cops, in writing, whether a floppy disk could be traced back to him. The question was inside an empty cereal box he had left for them in the bed of a pickup truck at a Home Depot parking lot. He signed it with his self-given initials. He asked them to be honest.The Wichita Police Department answered through a small classified ad in the Wichita Eagle. They told him no. A floppy disk could not be traced.That was not true.In the fifth and final chapter of True Crime Today's BTK investigation, host Tony Brueski walks through the trap Lieutenant Ken Landwehr had been building since March of 2004. The thirteen-year silence Rader broke when he could no longer tolerate being ignored. The eleven separate communications that followed. The eleven months of polite, formal responses through classified ads that fed Rader's hunger for attention while the task force quietly built its case.The episode covers the February 16, 2005, arrival of a purple Memorex floppy disk at KSAS-TV in Wichita. The Microsoft Word file metadata that named Christ Lutheran Church in Park City and a user account named Dennis. The phone call from Wichita Police to Pastor Michael Clark that ended the case in a single conversation. The DNA confirmation from Rader's daughter Kerri Rawson's medical records, obtained under warrant without her knowledge or consent at the time. The February 25, 2005, arrest. The thirty-plus-hour confession.Dennis Rader was not caught by sketches, voice recordings, or FBI profiles. He was caught by his own vanity asking a question and his own ego believing the answer.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BTK #DennisRader #FloppyDisk #TrueCrimeToday #KenLandwehr #BTKArrest #SerialKillers #BTKCase #TrueCrime #Wichita

In August of 2023, the Osage County Sheriff's Office in Oklahoma released a journal entry written in Dennis Rader's own handwriting. The entry described a fantasy of taking a young woman from a laundromat. Rader had a title for it. He had written it on the page. "Bad Wash Day."The reason that journal entry was released matters. On June 23, 1976, a sixteen-year-old Pawhuska, Oklahoma, cheerleader named Cynthia Dawn Kinney finished her shift at her aunt and uncle's laundromat. She was reportedly last seen getting into a car with two women she did not appear to know. She has never been seen alive since. Her body has never been found. Almost half a century later, her family is still waiting.In the fourth chapter of True Crime Today's five-part BTK investigation, host Tony Brueski walks through the thirteen years between Rader's last confirmed Kansas killing in 1991 and his March 2004 resurfacing, and the question that has been driving cold-case investigators in multiple states since 2023. Did Dennis Rader actually stop, or did the system miss him?The episode covers Sheriff Eddie Virden's 2023 task force announcement. The August 2023 excavation of a property near Rader's former Park City home. Dr. Katherine Ramsland's "powering down" framework from a decade of correspondence. The March 2024 ruling out of the Shawna Beth Garber case as Rader's. The continuing disagreement between the Osage County Sheriff's Office, which still names Rader a prime suspect in the Kinney case, and the Osage County District Attorney, who has publicly said the evidence does not support charges.Dennis Rader is eighty-one. The families are aging. The case is not closed.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BTK #DennisRader #CynthiaKinney #TrueCrimeToday #ColdCase #Pawhuska #SerialKillers #BTKKiller #TrueCrime #BTKCase

Mary Capps worked as the only other compliance officer in Park City, Kansas, for more than six years. She reported directly to Dennis Rader. She would later tell the Wichita Eagle that he had never paid her a compliment in six years. That he discriminated against her because she was a woman. That he had created a hostile workplace she could not endure.After Rader's arrest in February of 2005, Mary Capps filed an EEOC complaint and a Kansas Human Rights Commission complaint against the city of Park City for the work environment he had built. She also said, in her own words, the things her coworker had been that nobody had publicly said before. Hateful. Condescending. Egotistical.She was one of at least five people on the record, after the arrest, describing what they had felt about Dennis Rader before anybody knew. A neighbor whose wife watched him film their back yard. A divorced single mother whose dog he killed. A Cub Scout parent who pulled her son from his pack. A neighbor across the street who, after sixteen years of knowing him, called him "definitely two-sided."In the third chapter of True Crime Today's five-part BTK investigation, host Tony Brueski walks through the gap between what people who knew Dennis Rader sensed about him and what nobody was able to put together until after his arrest. The official roles. The community positions. The city paychecks. The institutional letterhead Dennis Rader collected over thirty years.This is the third uncomfortable truth. The cultural picture of a serial killer in 1995 did not include the city compliance officer with the clipboard. The cultural picture was wrong, and the people whose instincts had been correct could not get anybody to listen.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BTK #DennisRader #MaryCapps #ParkCity #TrueCrimeToday #ComplianceOfficer #SerialKillers #ColdCase #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

Kevin Bright was nineteen years old when Dennis Rader shot him twice and left him for dead in his sister Kathryn's house in Wichita on April 4, 1974. Kevin survived. His sister did not. Before Kevin went into surgery, with one of Rader's bullets still inside his head, he gave Wichita detectives a description of the man who had attacked them.A police sketch artist drew the face. On April 23, 1974, that drawing ran on the front page of the Wichita Eagle. Nineteen days after the attack. Dennis Rader was free in Park City, Kansas. He would remain free for the next thirty-one years.In his own 2005 confession, Rader said the sketch was, in his words, uncomfortably close to him. He said no one ever came for him.In the second chapter of True Crime Today's five-part BTK investigation, host Tony Brueski walks through every piece of Dennis Rader that the Wichita Police Department had in evidence rooms during the years he was still operating. A sketch in 1974. A confession letter inside a library book in 1974. A voice tape in 1977. A poem in a sealed package in 1979. A neighbor of his killed in 1985 and one of his own residents killed in his own jurisdiction in 1991.The chase did not close because Wichita Police were incompetent. The chase did not close because Dennis Rader was a mastermind either. The chase did not close because the system, in a small city in the 1970s and 80s, did not yet know how to look at its own data. And the people paying the price for that gap, including a grieving husband suspected of his wife's murder for eighteen years, did not deserve to carry the cost.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BTK #DennisRader #KevinBright #BTKKiller #TrueCrimeToday #SerialKillers #Wichita #ColdCase #TrueCrime #WichitaPD

For half a century, the BTK Killer story has been told the way Dennis Rader wanted it told. Factor X. The Minotaur. The BTK brand. Every term that has anchored his mythology came from a typewriter in his own kitchen in Park City, Kansas. Every term was his.In this first chapter of a five-part investigation from True Crime Today, host Tony Brueski sets the version of Dennis Rader that documentaries have repeated for forty-seven years next to the actual investigative file. The two don't match.The man who wrote the 1978 Factor X letter to KAKE-TV was a thirty-two-year-old husband and father. An alarm installer for ADT in Wichita. A student at Wichita State University working toward a degree in the administration of justice. He had taken courses on profiling. He knew what serial killers were supposed to sound like in the cultural imagination of the late seventies. He typed himself into the role.The press printed his words. The cops filed his words. The country read his words. And for nearly fifty years, when somebody has tried to explain Dennis Rader, they have explained him the way he wanted to be explained.This episode walks through the 1978 letter sentence by sentence. The literary references he borrowed from. The cultural figures he compared himself to. The contradictions inside the letter that read, in retrospect, less like the confession of a possessed killer and more like the audition tape of a man trying out for a role.The series will continue with the chase that didn't close, the official roles that made him invisible, the thirteen-year silence between his confirmed killings, and the floppy disk that ended his thirty-one years of getting away with it. Start here.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BTK #DennisRader #BTKKiller #TrueCrimeToday #FactorX #SerialKillers #Wichita #ParkCity #TrueCrime #ColdCase

Prosecutors spent twelve and a half hours on Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes at the first trial. They gave Blanca Simpson three hours. The Supreme Court said the financial evidence went too far. Nobody said Blanca went far enough.That imbalance is the story of the retrial before it's even started. Because if round two can't rely on a parade of financial devastation to paint Alex as a monster, it has to rely on the evidence that was always there but never got the time it deserved. The timeline. The phone records. The physical evidence at the scene. And the domestic evidence — the kind that only someone who spent twenty years inside that house could carry to a jury.In this three-part exclusive, Blanca goes further than she's ever gone publicly. Part 1 takes you to Maggie's graveside and into the emotional reality of watching a conviction evaporate. Part 2 reveals what Blanca noticed the morning after the murders that nobody in the legal system asked about, what Alex's behavior in the hours and days after really looked like, and what prosecutors should be asking her this time that they didn't ask last time. Part 3 takes on the biggest question: did Alex do this alone? Blanca lays out her theory, confronts the defense team's "other suspects" strategy, and draws a line between Alex's decades of outsourcing risk and the night that ended Maggie and Paul's lives.Three parts. Twenty years of proximity. Evidence, theory, and emotional truth from the person who was closer to this family than almost anyone alive.A True Crime Today exclusive.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughRetrial #MaggieMurdaugh #MurdaughHousekeeper #PaulMurdaugh #MurdaughOverturned #BeckyHill #Moselle #HiddenKillers

Alex Murdaugh never worked alone. Not when he was stealing from clients. Not when he was running pills through Curtis Eddie Smith. Not when he staged his own shooting on the side of a Hampton County road. Every major scheme in his life had other hands on it. Other people carrying the weight. Other names on the checks.So why would the murders be different?That's the question Blanca Simpson keeps coming back to. She spent twenty years watching Alex operate from inside his own household. She saw the relationships. The visitors. The phone calls. The way people moved in and out of Alex's orbit depending on what he needed. And she's built a theory that the night of June 7th, 2021, wasn't a one-step plan.Blanca believes someone else was supposed to be at Moselle. She's called it Plan A. When that person didn't show or the arrangement fell apart, Alex executed Plan B himself. The framework for blaming someone else was already built — he just had to carry the act out on his own and redirect suspicion toward the boat crash families.The defense is now running a parallel track. They went on national television and said they have information about "third parties and potential motives." But their version of third parties means someone other than Alex. Blanca's version means Alex had help.In this interview, Blanca explains the foundation of her theory. She confronts the defense's "other suspects" narrative from the position of someone who watched Alex build and use a network of people for decades. And she names the investigative territory she believes has been overlooked.Part 3 of a three-part True Crime Today exclusive.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughRetrial #MurdaughConspiracy #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #Moselle #MurdaughDefense #CurtisSmith #HiddenKillers

You want to know what went wrong in the first Murdaugh trial? Forget the jury tampering for a second. Forget Becky Hill. Look at the allocation of time. The state spent twelve and a half hours on financial crimes. They gave Blanca Simpson three hours.Blanca is the person who knew that household's daily patterns better than anyone. She knew how Maggie left her things. She knew where the towels went. She knew what the morning routine looked like and what it didn't look like. When she walked into that house the morning after the murders, her eyes caught things that a crime scene unit would have no frame of reference for. Not forensic anomalies. Domestic ones. The kind of details that only land when someone says: that's not how she did it.The Supreme Court's guidance for the retrial essentially forces prosecutors to rebalance the case. Less financial testimony. Which means more weight falls on the physical evidence, the timeline, and the behavioral details. And that's Blanca's territory.In this interview, Blanca goes past her trial testimony for the first time. She talks about what prosecutors didn't ask. What she noticed that morning that she's been carrying for five years without anyone in the legal system asking about it. She explains the moment Alex tried to rewrite the shirt story and what his approach to that conversation told her about how he operated. And she confronts what happens when the most important crime scene in South Carolina true crime history no longer exists.Part 2 of a three-part True Crime Today exclusive.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughRetrial #MurdaughEvidence #MaggieMurdaugh #Moselle #MurdaughTrial #PaulMurdaugh #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers

Everyone has an opinion about Alex Murdaugh's overturned conviction. Legal analysts are breaking down the ruling. Defense attorneys are celebrating on morning shows. Prosecutors are promising a retrial. But nobody is asking the question that matters most to the people closest to Maggie and Paul Murdaugh.Blanca Turrubiate-Simpson isn't a legal analyst. She's the woman who cooked Maggie's last meal. Who fixed Alex's collar that morning and remembered the shirt when investigators didn't think to ask. Who found the wet towel and the khaki pants by the shower and washed them before she understood what she was looking at. She spent twenty years inside that house. She knows what normal looked like — and she knows exactly what didn't look normal the morning after.When the Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling, Blanca drove to Maggie's gravesite and sat alone. She didn't call anyone. She didn't make a statement. She went to her friend. That instinct tells you everything about where Blanca lives in this story — not in the legal arguments, not in the appeals process, but in the human cost of a system that broke at the worst possible moment.In this interview, Blanca talks about the emotional weight of the reversal. Whether she can respect the court and still believe in her own truth. What Becky Hill's actions cost the people who loved Maggie and Paul. And what it means to prepare herself to testify again.Part 1 of a three-part True Crime Today exclusive.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughRetrial #MaggieMurdaugh #MurdaughOverturned #PaulMurdaugh #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers

A retired Pima County detective has raised the possibility that more than one person may have been involved in the alleged abduction of Nancy Guthrie from her Tucson home — potentially part of a theft group that encountered a situation that went catastrophically beyond the original plan. Months into this investigation, with unknown DNA at the FBI crime lab in Quantico and more than fifty thousand tips under review, no arrest has been made. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, who has spent more than thirty years in forensic mental health and behavioral analysis, joins True Crime Today to examine the investigative and psychological dimensions of this case from the perpetrator's perspective. Scott addresses the specific psychological dynamics of shared culpability — whether a co-conspirator who knows the truth creates stability or mutual paranoia, and what determines whether one person breaks first. She examines the post-crime decision cascade — the compounding psychological weight of each choice to conceal evidence, avoid detection, or remain silent — and how months of sustained evasion affect cognitive function and behavioral patterns. She also addresses the unique pressure of genetic genealogy as an investigative tool — a process that works toward identification with scientific certainty but on an unpredictable timeline — and what that specific form of threat does to a suspect compared to traditional investigative methods.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#NancyGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #PimaCounty #GeneticGenealogy #ShavaunScott #ForensicPsychology #Tucson #CriminalInvestigation #TrueCrime #FBI

The federal prosecution of Timothy Hudson for the first-degree murder of his stepsister Anna Kepner is proceeding in the Southern District of Florida, where Hudson has pleaded not guilty and awaits trial. But in a Brevard County family court, a parallel custody battle between Hudson's biological parents is producing a record that illuminates the family dynamics behind the criminal case. Thomas Hudson, Timothy's biological father, filed for emergency sole custody of the couple's nine-year-old daughter, alleging that the Kepner household — where Shauntel Hudson and Christopher Kepner reside — expelled Timothy immediately after Anna's death and has publicly called for punitive outcomes. Court filings include text exchanges in which Thomas alleges Shauntel told him she could not jeopardize her marriage to support their son. The filings also allege that Kepner family social media called for “nails in the coffin” of the accused, and that Shauntel aligned with those statements. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, with more than thirty years in forensic mental health practice, joins True Crime Today to examine the psychological and relational dimensions of this family's collapse. Scott addresses the clinical dynamics of parental abandonment under crisis conditions, the psychological impact on a juvenile defendant whose primary caregiver has publicly aligned against him, and the implications for a minor child being raised in a household where loyalty to one family member requires the explicit rejection of another. She also examines whether Shauntel's position reflects an independent psychological process or one shaped by the conditions of her current marriage.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #TrueCrimeToday #CustodyBattle #ShavaunScott #ForensicPsychology #FederalCase #CarnivalHorizon #BlendedFamily #TrueCrime

David Anthony Burke, known professionally as D4VD, faces first-degree murder charges with special circumstances in the death of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. Prosecutors in Los Angeles County have alleged murder for financial gain and murder of a witness, charges that make Burke eligible for the death penalty. He has pleaded not guilty. The People's filing alleges Burke killed Rivas Hernandez to prevent her from revealing information that would have jeopardized his career. But the psychological and developmental dimensions of this case extend well beyond the alleged criminal act. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, with more than thirty years of forensic mental health practice, joins True Crime Today to examine the conditions that allegedly preceded the charges. Burke was raised in a strictly religious household in Houston where the only permitted music was gospel. He was homeschooled by his mother, who reportedly served as his sole educator and social structure and who allegedly suggested he begin making music. By seventeen, Burke was signed to Darkroom and Interscope Records. He was touring internationally, generating significant income, and operating within an inner circle that consisted entirely of industry professionals whose financial interests were allegedly tied to his output. Scott addresses the clinical significance of that trajectory — religious restriction followed by unrestricted digital and cultural immersion with no intermediary, parental enmeshment followed by industry enmeshment, and the total alleged absence of peer relationships or adult oversight positioned to provide accountability rather than profit from his continued production.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #TrueCrimeToday #DavidBurke #ShavaunScott #ForensicPsychology #MusicIndustry #LACounty #SpecialCircumstances #TrueCrime

Three active criminal matters. Three distinct jurisdictions. One forensic psychotherapist identifying the systemic failures that allegedly allowed each to occur. The Nancy Guthrie disappearance remains unsolved months after the eighty-four-year-old was allegedly abducted from her Tucson home. Unknown DNA is under analysis at the FBI laboratory in Quantico, and genetic genealogy is reportedly being applied. More than fifty thousand tips have been submitted. The investigation continues without a named suspect. In the Anna Kepner case, Timothy Hudson has been charged as an adult in the Southern District of Florida with first-degree murder in connection with his stepsister's death on a Carnival cruise ship. He has pleaded not guilty. Parallel custody proceedings in Brevard County have produced a record of family collapse — parental expulsion, alleged alignment against the accused, and an emergency custody petition filed by the defendant's biological father. In the D4VD case, David Anthony Burke faces first-degree murder charges with special circumstances in Los Angeles County in the alleged killing of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. Prosecutors have alleged murder for financial gain and murder of a witness. Burke has pleaded not guilty. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, with more than three decades in forensic practice, joins True Crime Today to conduct a cross-case analysis examining perpetrator psychology in the Guthrie investigation, the clinical dynamics of family disintegration in the Kepner proceedings, and the developmental trajectory — from religious restriction through industry enmeshment — that allegedly preceded the D4VD charges.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#NancyGuthrie #AnnaKepner #D4VD #TrueCrimeToday #CelesteRivasHernandez #TimothyHudson #ShavaunScott #ForensicPsychology #SystemicFailure #TrueCrime

People are saying it across social media and comment sections: Murdaugh is already locked up, why bother retrying? True Crime Today takes on that argument directly — and explains why the answer is as simple as it is non-negotiable.Maggie Murdaugh was 52. Paul Murdaugh was 22. They were shot to death at close range on their family's property. The Supreme Court erased the murder convictions and life sentences. The legal record says the question of who killed them is open. That's not because the evidence was insufficient. It's because an elected clerk tampered with the jury. The state's obligation to answer that question didn't disappear when the verdict was vacated. It was reset.Murdaugh is serving 40 years for financial crimes. That's punishment for stealing. It is not accountability for two deaths. Calling a financial sentence close enough to a murder conviction tells the families that how Maggie and Paul died doesn't deserve its own answer. It tells the public that the system has a price ceiling on justice.The constitutional argument is clear. The state brought murder charges. The Supreme Court said the trial was unfair, not that the evidence was inadequate. You don't charge double murder, get a conviction, lose it to corruption, and then decide the defendant's other sentence is sufficient. That's not how the system works and it's not a precedent any state wants to set.Financial crime victims who were personally harmed by Murdaugh have said publicly they'll go through the process again. If the people Murdaugh stole from can commit to a retrial, the state of South Carolina can do the same. Maggie and Paul deserve a verdict that holds. A verdict no one can challenge. That's the only acceptable outcome, and the retrial is the only way to get there.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #JusticeForMaggieAndPaul #TrueCrime #SCSupremeCourt #MurderTrial #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers

Kouri Richins didn't shed a single tear while her own children's words filled the courtroom. Not when they described locked doors. Not when they called her by her first name. Not when the youngest said he wants her in prison forever. The tears showed up later — the instant her brother told her he knows "with 100% certainty" she didn't do it.Her sister Renee asked the judge to see "the full human picture." Her mother wrote that the jury's conclusion was wrong. Nobody on Kouri's side of the room mentioned what the children described. Nobody acknowledged the evidence. And Kouri sobbed through all of it.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott explains what that pattern means on True Crime Today — what drives a family to circle the wagons while ignoring the grandchildren's terror, and why Kouri's emotional range in that courtroom tells us everything about what motivates her.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #Sentencing #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #BehaviorAnalysis #Psychology #CourtRoom #TrueCrimeCommunity #Justice

She could have expressed remorse. She could have asked for mercy. She could have addressed even one thing her children described — the locked rooms, the dead animals, the fear that she'd come for them if released. Instead, Kouri Richins used forty-five minutes of courtroom time to tell her sons that the murder of their father is "an absolute lie" and that they've been "influenced" into believing it happened.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the speech on True Crime Today. The repeated instruction to "be like your dad." The simultaneous admission of infidelity and the claim that "our love never failed." The request for her children to ask their caregivers for her letters. The jury dismissed as "eight strangers." And the final line — never apologize for something you didn't do — delivered from the defense table in a jail uniform as coaching for three boys who may carry those words for decades.Shavaun explains what the speech reveals, what it does to the children it was aimed at, and why the private messages tell a different story than the public tears.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #Sentencing #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CourtRoomSpeech #Psych

The prosecution promised speed. The defense wants time. And the decisions being made before a jury is ever seated may matter more than the evidence itself. True Crime Today examines the pre-trial chess match in Alex Murdaugh's retrial and why controlling the calendar is the key strategic battle for both sides.The AG's vow to retry aggressively and quickly is driven by a political reality — Wilson leaves office in January 2027. His team built the first case and carries institutional knowledge that no replacement can replicate overnight. If the trial happens under Wilson, the state is at full strength. If the defense can push past that deadline, a new AG inherits a complex retrial during a leadership change.Every legitimate pre-trial motion eats calendar time. Financial evidence admissibility arguments, venue change requests, expert witness challenges — the defense doesn't need to file a single frivolous motion. The real ones are enough to consume months if managed strategically. And every month that passes dulls public attention, fades witness memories, and moves the case closer to a transition the defense can exploit.The judge assignment shapes everything downstream. The new judge interprets the Supreme Court's guidance on financial evidence. A strict reading constrains the prosecution further. A generous reading opens the door to another appeal. The judge also controls how fast the pre-trial calendar moves, which directly impacts whether the trial falls under Wilson's administration or his successor's.The venue, the AG transition, the evidentiary rulings, the trial date — each decision narrows the possibilities before a single juror is seated. The courtroom is the final act. The real battle is happening before it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #AlanWilson #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #MurderTrial #AttorneyGeneral #MurdaughCase #HiddenKillers

A psychotherapist watched the Kouri Richins sentencing and saw things the rest of us felt but couldn't name. The contempt that overrode self-preservation. The grief that only appeared when the room validated her. The 45-minute speech that functioned as a love letter on the surface and something far more damaging underneath.Shavaun Scott breaks down the full sentencing in three parts on True Crime Today. The visible reactions during victim impact statements — including Kouri's response to her own children describing a childhood spent in survival mode. The dramatic behavioral flip when the defense took over and Kouri's tears appeared for the first time. And the speech: "be like your dad," the affair admission, the denial of the verdict, the request for her children to advocate on her behalf to the family they finally feel safe with, and the closing line coaching three boys to adopt her defiance as their own.Behavioral analysis from a licensed psychotherapist. Three parts. No moment left unexamined.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #Sentencing #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #Psychology #Psychotherapist #BehaviorAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #Justice

The courtroom was told to stay composed. Kouri Richins couldn't do it. While victim impact statements described the destruction she left behind — a father who stayed in a dangerous marriage to protect his sons, a sister who miscarried twins from the stress, three boys who described being locked in rooms and having their pets threatened — Kouri displayed visible contempt on camera.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines what those reactions mean from a clinical standpoint. Not speculation — behavioral analysis from someone trained to read what people reveal when they think no one's watching. Except everyone was watching. And the cameras caught everything.The children stripped her of her title. They called her "Kouri." They asked for life without parole. One said he'd be afraid for his safety if she ever got out. And the woman at the defense table mouthed "what?" and shook her head. Shavaun unpacks what that disconnect reveals on True Crime Today.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #Sentencing #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #VictimImpact #LifeWithoutParole #Psychology #TrueCrimeCommunity #Justice

A psychotherapist watched the Kouri Richins sentencing and saw things the rest of us felt but couldn't name. The contempt that overrode self-preservation. The grief that only appeared when the room validated her. The 45-minute speech that functioned as a love letter on the surface and something far more damaging underneath.Shavaun Scott breaks down the full sentencing in three parts on True Crime Today. The visible reactions during victim impact statements — including Kouri's response to her own children describing a childhood spent in survival mode. The dramatic behavioral flip when the defense took over and Kouri's tears appeared for the first time. And the speech: "be like your dad," the affair admission, the denial of the verdict, the request for her children to advocate on her behalf to the family they finally feel safe with, and the closing line coaching three boys to adopt her defiance as their own.Behavioral analysis from a licensed psychotherapist. Three parts. No moment left unexamined.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #Sentencing #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #Psychology #Psychotherapist #BehaviorAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #Justice

Alex Murdaugh's defense team didn't just get a second chance — they got a court-issued roadmap showing exactly where the prosecution went wrong and how far the next trial judge should limit the state's evidence. True Crime Today examines how Harpootlian and Griffin turn the Supreme Court's ruling into a defense strategy that could produce an acquittal.The financial evidence firewall is built directly from the court's language. Every financial witness the prosecution calls faces a defense objection citing the Supreme Court's explicit finding that the state went too deep into Murdaugh's financial history. The defense doesn't need to exclude everything. They need to exclude enough to prevent the emotional buildup that turned the first jury against Murdaugh before they ever weighed the murder evidence.Whether Murdaugh takes the stand is the strategic decision both sides are already gaming. A recording captured his voice at the scene minutes before the alleged killings, contradicting everything he'd told investigators. He'll likely have to explain that lie again. But this time the jury hasn't spent weeks absorbing his financial crimes before he sits in the witness chair. His credibility starts from a different baseline.The defense's strongest argument may be the simplest: reasonable doubt. No DNA on Murdaugh despite two close-range shootings. No blood. Both weapons still missing after years. No eyewitnesses. A crime scene contaminated within hours. These gaps were present in Trial 1 but got overshadowed by the financial narrative. In Trial 2, with that narrative constrained by the Supreme Court, the physical evidence gaps become the defense's centerpiece. The bar isn't innocence. It's uncertainty. And the defense has three years of preparation aimed at creating exactly that.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #DickHarpootlian #MurdaughDefense #MurdaughRetrial #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #ReasonableDoubt #MurderTrial #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers

A court clerk's ambition destroyed the most consequential murder conviction in South Carolina history. Becky Hill, the elected Clerk of Court in Colleton County, was writing a book about the Murdaugh trial while simultaneously overseeing the jury. The SC Supreme Court found she told jurors to distrust the defense, urged them to watch the defendant's body language, and inserted herself into the process to steer a guilty verdict that would make a better ending for her book.True Crime Today breaks down how one official's conduct triggered the reversal. The Supreme Court called Hill's behavior unprecedented in South Carolina's judicial history. It found her actions were so egregious they created an automatic presumption that the trial was unfair — a presumption the state couldn't overcome when challenged to prove her interference was harmless.The legal mechanics matter. A lower court initially denied Murdaugh a new trial after finding Hill was not credible but ruling the defense hadn't proven her comments changed the outcome. The Supreme Court flipped that analysis. Under its standard, the state bore the burden of proving the interference didn't matter. It couldn't. That's the distinction that erased two life sentences.Hill pled guilty to four charges including perjury and misconduct and received probation. The justices praised everyone else involved — prosecutors, defense counsel, the trial judge — and placed blame squarely and solely on Hill. Her book was pulled before legitimate publication. Her career is over. And the damage she caused is measured in a retrial that will cost millions, take years, and force families to relive the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. All because one person decided fame mattered more than her oath.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BeckyHill #AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughTrial #JuryTampering #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #ColletonCounty #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #SouthCarolina

Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions were overturned unanimously by the SC Supreme Court — and the ruling didn't just vacate the verdict. It told the prosecution exactly where their case went wrong. The court said weeks of financial crimes testimony was excessive, prejudicial, and unnecessary to prove motive. That testimony was the engine of the first conviction. Without it, the state has to rebuild from the ground up.The motive theory itself remains. Murdaugh was facing simultaneous exposure of years of financial fraud on the day Maggie and Paul were killed. The CFO confrontation and the pending hearing that would have unraveled everything — those facts are still admissible. But the court drew a clear line between establishing motive and conducting a character trial. The prosecution crossed that line the first time, and the Supreme Court made sure everyone knows it.True Crime Today looks at what the new trial demands from the prosecution. The state built its first case around making the jury understand what kind of man Murdaugh was. Trial 2 requires making the jury trust the physical evidence on its own terms — the timeline, the lies, the forensic record from the night of the murders. Those are different prosecutorial skills and a different emotional temperature in the courtroom.Jurors from Trial 1 said the financial testimony wasn't the deciding factor. They pointed to the kennel video evidence and Murdaugh's behavior. But whether those jurors reach that same conclusion without weeks of testimony painting Murdaugh as someone capable of anything is the question hanging over every strategic decision the prosecution makes heading into Trial 2. The state says it's committed to retrying. Commitment and capability are about to be tested.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughTrial #MurdaughRetrial #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #MurdaughCase #SouthCarolina #MurderTrial #Prosecution #HiddenKillers

Kouri Richins has been sentenced to Life Without Parole after a Utah jury found her guilty of murdering her husband, Eric Richins, by poisoning him with fentanyl. She faces consecutive sentences for the other four charges.The sentencing marks a major conclusion in a case that captivated true crime audiences across the country. Prosecutors argued Richins killed Eric for insurance money and financial gain, while the defense claimed his death was the result of accidental drug use. After hearing the evidence, the jury rejected that argument and convicted Richins on all major counts, including aggravated murder and attempted murder.In this episode, we break down the sentence, what the judge said in court, how the verdict led to this moment, and what may come next for Kouri Richins as the case moves into the post-conviction phase.True Crime Today covers the cases that matter with courtroom context, legal analysis, and clear breakdowns of the biggest developments in true crime.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. Kouri Richins has been convicted and sentenced in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsSentencing #TrueCrimeToday #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime #FentanylMurder

Christopher Whitcomb's book on the Idaho student murders presents itself as an investigation into unresolved evidence questions. When each major claim is checked against on-the-record responses from law enforcement, prosecutors, and the defense team itself, the foundation doesn't hold.This week's True Crime Today review examines the most consequential Kohberger case developments — a point-by-point analysis of the book's claims, the public disavowal of its primary source, and the civil litigation that represents the actual unresolved accountability in this case.Brent Turvey's chain of custody allegation regarding the Ka-Bar knife sheath centers on a claim about documentation irregularities. Moscow's police chief has stated publicly that the department employs electronic barcodes — not the handwritten log system Turvey's allegation requires. The Othram DNA laboratory involvement that the book characterizes as irregular is a standard component of genetic genealogy investigations. The second-attacker theory is contradicted by Kohberger's own guilty plea as a sole actor — entered with a trial date weeks away and with full awareness that identifying a co-conspirator would have been his most significant leverage for a reduced sentence.Kohberger's defense attorneys — Ann Taylor, Elisa Massoth, and Bicka Barlow — issued a public statement calling Turvey's media conduct "appalling" and stating he was retained exclusively for crime scene analysis. They accuse him of violating his confidentiality agreement and speaking on matters outside his retained expertise. Whitcomb himself told NewsNation the book contains no smoking gun and no secret evidence.Bryan Kohberger had access to every argument this book contains. He had a trial date. He had a defense team prepared to litigate. He entered a guilty plea to four counts of first-degree murder. The families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin have filed suit against Washington State University alleging the institution failed to act on formal stalking complaints. That civil action addresses the systemic failure the criminal case could not — and represents the substantive legal question still outstanding.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #BrentTurvey #AnnTaylor #ChainOfCustody #KnifeSheath #DNAEvidence #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

The People's Brief filed in the case of David Anthony Burke — the musician known as D4VD — lays out a prosecution theory of premeditation and post-offense conduct that extends well beyond the alleged killing of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. Prosecutors allege Burke texted the victim's phone after she was allegedly already dead. They allege he purchased disposal materials including chainsaws, a body bag, and an inflatable pool using the alias "Victoria Mendez." They allege three separate trips to a remote location near Lake Cachuma. And they allege that blue plastic fragments recovered from the victim's remains were forensically matched to that pool by the LAPD lab.This week's True Crime Today review examines the most significant D4VD case developments — the prosecution's evidentiary blueprint, the scope of the investigation, and the legal and behavioral analysis of what the filing reveals.Burke has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder with special circumstances, continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen, and unlawful mutilation of human remains. His defense maintains he did not cause Celeste's death. The People's Brief represents the prosecution's theory — allegations, not established facts. But the specificity of what Beth Silverman laid out across nine pages provides significant insight into how the case is being constructed.Prosecutors allege Burke met Celeste online when she was eleven and that the sexual contact began at thirteen. The filing states she was reported missing on multiple occasions and that law enforcement informed Burke of her age during a welfare check. According to prosecutors, he denied having more than one encounter with her. Fifty-four search warrants were executed — a volume that indicates the investigation's scope extends beyond a single defendant.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer analyzes the prosecution's evidence architecture — what the warrant volume, the alias purchases, and the forensic match tell us about how premeditation and consciousness of guilt are being established. Robin Dreeke addresses listener questions focused on the alleged behavioral patterns, the people who reportedly had proximity to the situation without intervening, and the systemic failures alleged in the timeline.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #DavidAnthonyBurke #CelesteRivasHernandez #PeoplesBrief #BethSilverman #Premeditation #ForensicEvidence #SearchWarrants #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

Rex Heuermann's guilty plea resolved eight murder charges in one proceeding. But the structure of the deal itself raises questions that go beyond the confession. During a confidential session with prosecutors, Heuermann raised the name Karen Vergata — a woman he was never charged with killing. Her case was absorbed into the plea agreement, effectively closing it without a separate prosecution or public evidentiary hearing. The cooperation agreement with the FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit reportedly includes no mechanism to compel truthful participation or penalize refusal.This week's True Crime Today review revisits the most significant Gilgo Beach developments — the legal architecture of the plea, the evidentiary rulings that forced it, and the psychological dimensions revealed through documentary footage.Every defense motion had been denied. Whole genome sequencing — the forensic technique that matched Heuermann's DNA to evidence recovered from victim remains — was ruled admissible. The court ordered all charges tried in a single proceeding, eliminating any possibility of severance. Heuermann's defense had exhausted its options. The plea, framed by his attorney as a calculated pivot, followed a thousand days of maintained innocence.The Peacock documentary captured the private aftermath. Asa Ellerup, Heuermann's ex-wife, heard him describe the killings during a jailhouse visit — including confirmation of dismemberment conducted inside their shared residence. His daughter Victoria confronted him directly about whether the victims registered as human to him. He said they did not. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott analyzes the family dynamics under that level of sustained psychological exposure — the denial structures, the trauma responses, and what Heuermann's clinical detachment during these conversations reveals about how he processed decades of violence.The DA's office has acknowledged reviewing hundreds of cold cases across Suffolk County. Sentencing is pending. Whether this plea represents justice or an engineered exit remains the central unresolved question.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #GilgoBeachKiller #KarenVergata #SuffolkCounty #LISK #GuiltyPlea #SerialKiller #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

Bryan Kohberger entered guilty pleas to four counts of first-degree murder. He waived appellate rights. He is serving four consecutive life sentences without parole. The criminal case is resolved. The public conversation that has erupted since is not — and the substance of it doesn't hold up the way its authors want it to.This week's True Crime Today review examines the most significant Idaho murders developments — specifically, why the forensic claims circulating after the plea don't carry the weight being assigned to them.Brent Turvey, a forensic scientist retained by the defense, has publicly alleged chain of custody irregularities with the Ka-Bar knife sheath — the item carrying Kohberger's touch DNA. He contends documentation was completed retroactively rather than signed contemporaneously by each handler. The defense team publicly condemned his disclosures as a breach of confidentiality. What neither side has addressed is the most revealing fact: the defense did not file a suppression motion based on Turvey's findings before entering the plea. In a case carrying four murder charges where the defendant faced the possibility of death, an actionable evidentiary defect would have been litigated aggressively. It wasn't.Christopher Whitcomb's book packages questions about a case that already produced a confession. That's not forensic analysis — it's publishing.Eric Faddis provides the legal framework — prosecutorial evidence strategy, the calculus behind defense plea decisions, what chain of custody objections actually require to succeed, and why post-conviction forensic disputes almost never alter the outcome they claim to challenge. The families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin received a confession. What's circulating now serves other interests.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #KnifeSheath #ChainOfCustody #BrentTurvey #BrokenPlea #EricFaddis #ForensicEvidence #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

Nick Reiner is being held without bail on two counts of first-degree murder with death penalty eligibility. His parents Rob and Michele Reiner were found stabbed to death in their Brentwood home. He was arrested the same day. And the case has effectively stalled — because the autopsy reports on both victims remain incomplete more than four months after their deaths.This week's True Crime Today review examines the most consequential Reiner case developments — the procedural bottleneck, the emerging defense posture, and the legal analysis of what this timeline means for both sides.The prosecution has identified the autopsies as the final outstanding piece of discovery the defense is awaiting. The defense has requested additional materials. The court date set for September is not a preliminary hearing — it is a hearing to schedule the preliminary hearing. The case has not advanced to the point where either side can begin meaningful litigation.Nick Reiner has a documented psychiatric history including schizoaffective disorder and a prior conservatorship. His courtroom appearance consisted of a single-word response to the judge. Eric Faddis, who has prosecuted and defended cases involving mental health defenses and death penalty eligibility, analyzes what the defense is likely constructing — the legal standards for competency, the distinction between mental illness and legal insanity, and what prosecutors must establish to maintain the death enhancement against a defendant with that documented history.The Reiner siblings — Jake, Romy, and Tracy — have severed contact with Nick and cut financial support. Sources indicate they refer to him in unambiguous terms. Despite this, they are reportedly opposing the death penalty — based on their father's documented opposition to capital punishment. Jake Reiner published a widely read personal essay about his parents that provided an emotional counterpoint to the procedural deadlock. Nick has reportedly expressed interest in writing a tell-all about his parents. The case is moving slowly. The fractures within the family are not.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #BrentwoodMurders #DeathPenalty #ReinerCase #AutopsyDelay #MentalHealthDefense #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

ATI — the educational arm of Bill Gothard's IBLP — shut down in 2021. The organization that spent decades providing curriculum to homeschooling families including the Duggars ceased operations without remediation, without outreach to former students, and without any institutional acknowledgment of the educational gaps it created. The adults it produced are still rebuilding.This week's True Crime Today review examines the most consequential conversations from our series on the Duggar family curriculum — the ideological architecture of the Wisdom Booklets, the institutional reach of the Character First program, and the measurable outcomes for adults who completed the full IBLP educational track.The curriculum's law and government modules framed democratic governance without divine authority as utopianism. The French Revolution was presented as a consequence of collective disobedience to God. Illness was attributed to failures of spiritual submission. The authority structure that governed the entire system concentrated power in a single individual — Bill Gothard — while requiring total compliance from everyone beneath him. The Character First program extended this framework into public school systems by repackaging obedience-based theology as secular character education.The educational outcomes document the cost. Former students report math instruction that ended at fractions. ACT scores achieved without any corresponding GPA that higher education institutions would recognize. Professional credentials — including law degrees obtained through IBLP-adjacent institutions — that proved nonfunctional in practice. Adults who lacked basic understanding of their own physiology into their twenties. The system produced compliance. It did not produce competence. When it shut down, the people who had spent their formative years inside it were left to close the gap on their own — with no institutional support and no public accountability for what was taken from them.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DuggarFamily #IBLP #BillGothard #ATI #WisdomBooklets #EducationalNeglect #CharacterFirst #ATISurvivors #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

There's a reason this story never goes away. Every few years, a new accuser surfaces, a new lawsuit is filed, a new settlement is paid — and the conversation resets to the same two positions: he did it, or they're lying. Neither position accounts for the full evidence. Both positions protect someone's bottom line. And the rest of us are left trying to figure out how to feel about a catalog of music that's woven into the fabric of our lives.This is True Crime Today, and I'm starting a five-part deep dive into the accusations against Michael Jackson. Every case. Every accuser. Every settlement. Every reversal. Every piece of evidence that's been verified and every claim that's been debunked. The biopic just opened to record-breaking numbers. A family that defended Jackson for decades just accused him of assaulting all of their children. A major civil trial is on the calendar. The timing has never been more relevant.What makes this series different is the editorial approach. I'm not telling you what to believe. I'm presenting what's been proven, what's been disproven, and what remains genuinely unresolved — and trusting you to decide for yourself. Because you deserve to hear this case the way a jury would: with all the evidence, not just the version that makes someone money.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MichaelJackson #MJBiopic #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Neverland #LeavingNeverland #CascioFamily #WadeRobson #JamesSafechuck #KingOfPop