Podcast appearances and mentions of catherine shu

"When I wrote about it, in addition to assuming that all Asia tech companies, particularly in China, were copycats of Western companies, I think there are also a lot of misperceptions about how easy it is to enter a market, especially when they're an Asian market, especially when there are incumbent players already. For example, Uber failed. Basically, they failed. That's a harsh word, but they failed in both China and Southeast Asia, where they were acquired by Didi in China and Grab in Southeast Asia. And then Facebook really fell flat on its face with a lot of markets with free basics, it undermined Net Neutrality and also assumed that consumers just because maybe they had to be price conscious, were willing to access only a handful of sites as opposed to having access to a free Internet. I think people also underestimate the influence that Asia has had in other parts of the world." - Catherine Shu Fresh out of the studio, Catherine Shu reflects on her 12 years at TechCrunch, chronicling the evolution of Asian tech from China to India. She highlights the rise of Chinese apps such as WeChat and TikTok's global impact and the shifting international views on Chinese tech. She explores India's rising tech scene, South Korea's startup growth with the rise of Coupang and Southeast Asia's expanding tech influence, with a focus on Grab. Shu offers her advice for journalists covering Asia's dynamic tech landscape and articulating what great looks like for Asia Tech in the future. Fresh out of the studio, Catherine Shu reflects on her 12 years at TechCrunch, chronicling the evolution of Asian tech from China to India. She highlights the rise of Chinese apps such as WeChat and TikTok's global impact and the shifting international views on Chinese tech. She explores India's rising tech scene, South Korea's startup growth with the rise of Coupang and Southeast Asia's expanding tech influence, with a focus on Grab. Shu offers her advice for journalists covering Asia's dynamic tech landscape and articulating what great looks like for Asia Tech in the future. Audio Episode Highlights: [0:40] Quote of the Day #QOTD by Catherine Shu. [1:38] Introduction: Catherine Shu, former senior reporter for TechCrunch. [2:50] Her thoughts on the TechCrunch recent layoff. [5:04] Catherine's future plans. [6:34] Catherine shares lessons from her career journey. [8:07] Inspiration behind her last article on TechCrunch: Don't Ignore Asia Tech. [9:30] Western Perceptions Change on Asia Tech over the decade. [11:02] Early misconceptions about Asia Tech in the West. [12:44] Evolution of Asia Tech from Catherine's perspective. [15:14] Tech Coverage in Taiwan. [17:17] The one thing about Asia tech Catherine knows but very few do. [19:41] Why China succeeded with WeChat as the super app. [23:26] The rise in TikTok globally for Chinese Tech. [26:40] Perspectives on TikTok recent potential ban. [27:26] What the West learned from the super app revolution in China. [28:52] Why China was caught flatfooted with OpenAI's ChatGPT in AI. [30:14] The future of Chinese startups. [34:01] How the Indian tech market evolved over the past decade. [35:58] South Korean Startup Ecosystem. [39:00] Is there really a Southeast Asia tech story? [42:34] Advice for future correspondents covering Asia Tech. [44:32] What does great look like for Asia Tech? [46:30] Closing. Podcast Information: Bernard Leong hosts and produces the show. Proper credits for the intro and end music: "Energetic Sports Drive" and the episode is mixed & edited in both video and audio format by G. Thomas Craig Analyse Asia Main Site: https://analyse.asia Analyse Asia Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1kkRwzRZa4JCICr2vm0vGl Analyse Asia Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/analyse-asia-with-bernard-leong/id914868245 Analyse Asia YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@AnalyseAsia Analyse Asia LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/analyse-asia/ Analyse Asia X (formerly known as Twitter): https://twitter.com/analyseasia Analyse Asia Threads: https://www.threads.net/@analyseasia Sign Up for Our This Week in Asia Newsletter: https://www.analyse.asia/#/portal/signup Subscribe Newsletter on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/build-relation/newsletter-follow?entityUrn=7149559878934540288

Go online to PeerView.com/PUM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy now a new standard of care in resected stage I-III EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), what are the implications and considerations for the multidisciplinary, multimodal management of these patients? A panel of specialists in thoracic surgery and medical oncology consider this question as they discuss the importance of biomarker testing in early-stage lung cancer, the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy, and its potential expansion into the neoadjuvant setting, as well as other targeted therapies showing promise in perioperative settings. In addition, the panel demonstrates strategies for achieving better partnerships among thoracic surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, and other key specialists to facilitate predictive testing, clinical decision-making, and the optimal incorporation of EGFR-targeted therapy into treatment plans for eligible patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Select patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational, targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/PUM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy now a new standard of care in resected stage I-III EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), what are the implications and considerations for the multidisciplinary, multimodal management of these patients? A panel of specialists in thoracic surgery and medical oncology consider this question as they discuss the importance of biomarker testing in early-stage lung cancer, the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy, and its potential expansion into the neoadjuvant setting, as well as other targeted therapies showing promise in perioperative settings. In addition, the panel demonstrates strategies for achieving better partnerships among thoracic surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, and other key specialists to facilitate predictive testing, clinical decision-making, and the optimal incorporation of EGFR-targeted therapy into treatment plans for eligible patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Select patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational, targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/PUM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy now a new standard of care in resected stage I-III EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), what are the implications and considerations for the multidisciplinary, multimodal management of these patients? A panel of specialists in thoracic surgery and medical oncology consider this question as they discuss the importance of biomarker testing in early-stage lung cancer, the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy, and its potential expansion into the neoadjuvant setting, as well as other targeted therapies showing promise in perioperative settings. In addition, the panel demonstrates strategies for achieving better partnerships among thoracic surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, and other key specialists to facilitate predictive testing, clinical decision-making, and the optimal incorporation of EGFR-targeted therapy into treatment plans for eligible patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Select patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational, targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/PUM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy now a new standard of care in resected stage I-III EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), what are the implications and considerations for the multidisciplinary, multimodal management of these patients? A panel of specialists in thoracic surgery and medical oncology consider this question as they discuss the importance of biomarker testing in early-stage lung cancer, the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy, and its potential expansion into the neoadjuvant setting, as well as other targeted therapies showing promise in perioperative settings. In addition, the panel demonstrates strategies for achieving better partnerships among thoracic surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, and other key specialists to facilitate predictive testing, clinical decision-making, and the optimal incorporation of EGFR-targeted therapy into treatment plans for eligible patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Select patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational, targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/PUM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy now a new standard of care in resected stage I-III EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), what are the implications and considerations for the multidisciplinary, multimodal management of these patients? A panel of specialists in thoracic surgery and medical oncology consider this question as they discuss the importance of biomarker testing in early-stage lung cancer, the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy, and its potential expansion into the neoadjuvant setting, as well as other targeted therapies showing promise in perioperative settings. In addition, the panel demonstrates strategies for achieving better partnerships among thoracic surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, and other key specialists to facilitate predictive testing, clinical decision-making, and the optimal incorporation of EGFR-targeted therapy into treatment plans for eligible patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Select patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational, targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/PUM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy now a new standard of care in resected stage I-III EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), what are the implications and considerations for the multidisciplinary, multimodal management of these patients? A panel of specialists in thoracic surgery and medical oncology consider this question as they discuss the importance of biomarker testing in early-stage lung cancer, the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy, and its potential expansion into the neoadjuvant setting, as well as other targeted therapies showing promise in perioperative settings. In addition, the panel demonstrates strategies for achieving better partnerships among thoracic surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, and other key specialists to facilitate predictive testing, clinical decision-making, and the optimal incorporation of EGFR-targeted therapy into treatment plans for eligible patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Select patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational, targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/GQW860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Patients with early-stage lung cancer frequently experience disease recurrence within 1 year of receiving curative-intent surgery, representing a significant unmet medical need. Individualized management of patients with NSCLC is based on a number of considerations, including the molecular profile of the patient's tumor and the benefits and limitations of therapeutic options in the context of the latest evidence. Continued advances with targeted therapies have sparked substantial interest in expanding their use into earlier disease settings, and adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in early-stage NSCLC, leading to the first regulatory approval of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy after resection in patients with NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations. In addition, results from studies in the neoadjuvant setting are emerging now, as perioperative use of EGFR-targeted therapy continues to demonstrate improved outcomes. Thoracic surgeons are key members of the multidisciplinary care team, playing an essential role in collaborating and coordinating with other specialists to determine the best treatment plan, including incorporating EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal management strategies. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR-targeted therapy in perioperative settings and provides practical guidance for optimally integrating targeted therapies in practice or clinical trials. Multidisciplinary discussions on the latest practice-changing data highlight important implications of utilizing EGFR-targeted therapy as part of multimodal treatment for surgeons and the broader lung cancer care team. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Discuss the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Identify patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/GQW860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Patients with early-stage lung cancer frequently experience disease recurrence within 1 year of receiving curative-intent surgery, representing a significant unmet medical need. Individualized management of patients with NSCLC is based on a number of considerations, including the molecular profile of the patient's tumor and the benefits and limitations of therapeutic options in the context of the latest evidence. Continued advances with targeted therapies have sparked substantial interest in expanding their use into earlier disease settings, and adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in early-stage NSCLC, leading to the first regulatory approval of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy after resection in patients with NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations. In addition, results from studies in the neoadjuvant setting are emerging now, as perioperative use of EGFR-targeted therapy continues to demonstrate improved outcomes. Thoracic surgeons are key members of the multidisciplinary care team, playing an essential role in collaborating and coordinating with other specialists to determine the best treatment plan, including incorporating EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal management strategies. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR-targeted therapy in perioperative settings and provides practical guidance for optimally integrating targeted therapies in practice or clinical trials. Multidisciplinary discussions on the latest practice-changing data highlight important implications of utilizing EGFR-targeted therapy as part of multimodal treatment for surgeons and the broader lung cancer care team. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Discuss the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Identify patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/GQW860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Patients with early-stage lung cancer frequently experience disease recurrence within 1 year of receiving curative-intent surgery, representing a significant unmet medical need. Individualized management of patients with NSCLC is based on a number of considerations, including the molecular profile of the patient's tumor and the benefits and limitations of therapeutic options in the context of the latest evidence. Continued advances with targeted therapies have sparked substantial interest in expanding their use into earlier disease settings, and adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in early-stage NSCLC, leading to the first regulatory approval of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy after resection in patients with NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations. In addition, results from studies in the neoadjuvant setting are emerging now, as perioperative use of EGFR-targeted therapy continues to demonstrate improved outcomes. Thoracic surgeons are key members of the multidisciplinary care team, playing an essential role in collaborating and coordinating with other specialists to determine the best treatment plan, including incorporating EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal management strategies. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR-targeted therapy in perioperative settings and provides practical guidance for optimally integrating targeted therapies in practice or clinical trials. Multidisciplinary discussions on the latest practice-changing data highlight important implications of utilizing EGFR-targeted therapy as part of multimodal treatment for surgeons and the broader lung cancer care team. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Discuss the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Identify patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/GQW860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Patients with early-stage lung cancer frequently experience disease recurrence within 1 year of receiving curative-intent surgery, representing a significant unmet medical need. Individualized management of patients with NSCLC is based on a number of considerations, including the molecular profile of the patient's tumor and the benefits and limitations of therapeutic options in the context of the latest evidence. Continued advances with targeted therapies have sparked substantial interest in expanding their use into earlier disease settings, and adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in early-stage NSCLC, leading to the first regulatory approval of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy after resection in patients with NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations. In addition, results from studies in the neoadjuvant setting are emerging now, as perioperative use of EGFR-targeted therapy continues to demonstrate improved outcomes. Thoracic surgeons are key members of the multidisciplinary care team, playing an essential role in collaborating and coordinating with other specialists to determine the best treatment plan, including incorporating EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal management strategies. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR-targeted therapy in perioperative settings and provides practical guidance for optimally integrating targeted therapies in practice or clinical trials. Multidisciplinary discussions on the latest practice-changing data highlight important implications of utilizing EGFR-targeted therapy as part of multimodal treatment for surgeons and the broader lung cancer care team. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Discuss the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Identify patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/GQW860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Patients with early-stage lung cancer frequently experience disease recurrence within 1 year of receiving curative-intent surgery, representing a significant unmet medical need. Individualized management of patients with NSCLC is based on a number of considerations, including the molecular profile of the patient's tumor and the benefits and limitations of therapeutic options in the context of the latest evidence. Continued advances with targeted therapies have sparked substantial interest in expanding their use into earlier disease settings, and adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in early-stage NSCLC, leading to the first regulatory approval of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy after resection in patients with NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations. In addition, results from studies in the neoadjuvant setting are emerging now, as perioperative use of EGFR-targeted therapy continues to demonstrate improved outcomes. Thoracic surgeons are key members of the multidisciplinary care team, playing an essential role in collaborating and coordinating with other specialists to determine the best treatment plan, including incorporating EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal management strategies. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR-targeted therapy in perioperative settings and provides practical guidance for optimally integrating targeted therapies in practice or clinical trials. Multidisciplinary discussions on the latest practice-changing data highlight important implications of utilizing EGFR-targeted therapy as part of multimodal treatment for surgeons and the broader lung cancer care team. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Discuss the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Identify patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/GQW860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Patients with early-stage lung cancer frequently experience disease recurrence within 1 year of receiving curative-intent surgery, representing a significant unmet medical need. Individualized management of patients with NSCLC is based on a number of considerations, including the molecular profile of the patient's tumor and the benefits and limitations of therapeutic options in the context of the latest evidence. Continued advances with targeted therapies have sparked substantial interest in expanding their use into earlier disease settings, and adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in early-stage NSCLC, leading to the first regulatory approval of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy after resection in patients with NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations. In addition, results from studies in the neoadjuvant setting are emerging now, as perioperative use of EGFR-targeted therapy continues to demonstrate improved outcomes. Thoracic surgeons are key members of the multidisciplinary care team, playing an essential role in collaborating and coordinating with other specialists to determine the best treatment plan, including incorporating EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal management strategies. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR-targeted therapy in perioperative settings and provides practical guidance for optimally integrating targeted therapies in practice or clinical trials. Multidisciplinary discussions on the latest practice-changing data highlight important implications of utilizing EGFR-targeted therapy as part of multimodal treatment for surgeons and the broader lung cancer care team. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Discuss the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Identify patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/GQW860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Patients with early-stage lung cancer frequently experience disease recurrence within 1 year of receiving curative-intent surgery, representing a significant unmet medical need. Individualized management of patients with NSCLC is based on a number of considerations, including the molecular profile of the patient's tumor and the benefits and limitations of therapeutic options in the context of the latest evidence. Continued advances with targeted therapies have sparked substantial interest in expanding their use into earlier disease settings, and adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in early-stage NSCLC, leading to the first regulatory approval of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy after resection in patients with NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations. In addition, results from studies in the neoadjuvant setting are emerging now, as perioperative use of EGFR-targeted therapy continues to demonstrate improved outcomes. Thoracic surgeons are key members of the multidisciplinary care team, playing an essential role in collaborating and coordinating with other specialists to determine the best treatment plan, including incorporating EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal management strategies. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR-targeted therapy in perioperative settings and provides practical guidance for optimally integrating targeted therapies in practice or clinical trials. Multidisciplinary discussions on the latest practice-changing data highlight important implications of utilizing EGFR-targeted therapy as part of multimodal treatment for surgeons and the broader lung cancer care team. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Discuss the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Identify patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/GQW860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Patients with early-stage lung cancer frequently experience disease recurrence within 1 year of receiving curative-intent surgery, representing a significant unmet medical need. Individualized management of patients with NSCLC is based on a number of considerations, including the molecular profile of the patient's tumor and the benefits and limitations of therapeutic options in the context of the latest evidence. Continued advances with targeted therapies have sparked substantial interest in expanding their use into earlier disease settings, and adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in early-stage NSCLC, leading to the first regulatory approval of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy after resection in patients with NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations. In addition, results from studies in the neoadjuvant setting are emerging now, as perioperative use of EGFR-targeted therapy continues to demonstrate improved outcomes. Thoracic surgeons are key members of the multidisciplinary care team, playing an essential role in collaborating and coordinating with other specialists to determine the best treatment plan, including incorporating EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal management strategies. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR-targeted therapy in perioperative settings and provides practical guidance for optimally integrating targeted therapies in practice or clinical trials. Multidisciplinary discussions on the latest practice-changing data highlight important implications of utilizing EGFR-targeted therapy as part of multimodal treatment for surgeons and the broader lung cancer care team. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Discuss the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Identify patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Guest host Dr. Vamsi Velcheti, of the NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, and Dr. Brian Henick, of the Columbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, discuss advances in KRAS-mutated lung cancer in the KRYSTAL-1 trial, and the association of ctDNA with overall survival in the NADIM trial, as well as other key advances in lung cancer presented at the 2022 ASCO Annual Meeting.   TRANSCRIPT   Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: Hello, everyone! This is Dr. Vamsi Velcheti, I'm your guest host for the ASCO Daily News podcast, today. I'm an associate professor and medical director for the Thoracic Oncology Program at Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health. My guest today is Dr. Brian Henick, an associate director of the Experimental Therapeutics Program, and assistant professor of Medicine at Columbia University's Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center. We'll be discussing key abstracts in lung cancer that were featured at the 2022 ASCO Annual Meeting. Our full disclosures are available in the notes and disclosures of all guests on the podcast can be found on the transcripts at asco.org/podcasts. Brian, it's great to speak with you today. Dr. Brain Henick: Thank you so much, Vamsi, and ASCO Daily News for letting me join you to discuss these abstracts. Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: So, let's dive in. So, it's an exciting ASCO Annual Meeting. And I hope you had a great time at the Meeting. So, let's start off with the LBA9009 and KRYSTAL-1 clinical trial. The study showed the activity of adagrasib in patients with KRAS-G12C mutant non-small cell lung cancer and active untreated brain mets. So, what is the key takeaway from this trial? Dr. Brain Henick: Well, Dr. Sabari presented some encouraging data on this important population. As we know, patients with active central nervous system (CNS) metastases represent a population of unmet medical need who are often excluded from clinical trials. So, it's a credit to the investigators for including this cohort. As Dr. Sabari noted, and as Dr. Goldberg emphasized in her discussion of the abstract, the measured CNS penetration of adagrasib compares favorably with other CNS active compounds from other settings. The overall response rate was 35%, with a disease control rate of 80%. But impressively, the median duration of intracranial response and progression-free survival (PFS) wasn't reached. This certainly seems to be a CNS active compound, and we'll need to see how sotorasib stacks up in their comparable cohort. Ideally, we'd have randomized data to prove superiority over the standard of care, but we may be a few steps away from that. Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: So, Brian, in terms of CNS mets, how big of a problem is it in patients with KRAS G12C mutant lung cancers? Dr. Brian Henick: We know that CNS metastases are a big problem for G12C mutant lung cancer. The rates have been quoted as high as up to 42% of patients. And in particular, as you know, Vamsi, a lot of times trials often don't include, specifically, cohorts with active untreated brain metastases. And so, this is a very unique cohort in that sense. Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: I just want to highlight that we really don't know the differential efficacy of sotorasib and adagrasib in the CNS met population because the trials were CodeBreak 100 and other trials and data readouts from sotorasib did not include patients with untreated brain mets. We did, however, [see] CNS progression-free survival data that go in line with sotorasib. So, it's really important to see that data from sotorasib. Dr. Brain Henick: I definitely look forward to seeing that. Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: So, let's talk about Abstract 8501. The primary endpoint that was presented at ASCO [Annual Meeting] was the pathologic complete response to chemotherapy and nivo vs. chemotherapy as a new adjuvant treatment for resectable stage 3, a non-small cell lung cancer. This was the phase 2 NADIM trial. So, what do you think about this study? And what's your key takeaway from the study? Dr. Brain Henick: Dr. Provencio from Spain presented data from this randomized study as you said, of nivo plus carbo taxol compared to carbo taxol as neoadjuvant therapy for potentially resectable stage 3-A and B non-small cell lung cancer. So, I did want to compare this to the randomized data that we have from Checkmate 816, which interestingly allowed for earlier-stage disease as low as 1-B. And they also allowed for more flexibility in the choice of platinum doublet regimens. This study, NADIM 2, employs 2:1 versus 1:1 randomization, which we saw in Checkmate 816. Another important difference was that NADIM 2 required adjuvant nivolumab for 6 months in the study arm, whereas Checkmate 816 didn't include any immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting, but they allowed for a standard of care chemotherapy. In NADIM 2, the control arm didn't include any adjuvant therapy. In keeping with the impressive improvements over historical pathologic complete response rates of about 5%, this chemotherapy-IO regimen yielded a path complete response (CR) rate of 36.8%. It also showed a major pathological response, which again is defined as less than 10% viable tumor of 52.6%, and an overall response rate of 75.4%. So, it looks like there's a benefit that's happening upfront with the immunotherapy and chemotherapy as opposed to this just being an adjuvant phenomenon. This is also in keeping with data that we saw with Checkmate 816, as well as neoadjuvant atezo plus chemotherapy in the phase 2 study that was led by Catherine Shu and colleagues here at Columbia a few years ago. Overall, this is more encouraging data for the neoadjuvant use of immunotherapy. The earlier immunotherapy marches into the treatment course of patients with lung cancer, the greater the cost of toxicity. So, I think an important thing for us to focus on going forward is trying to develop strategies to better identify the patients that are most likely to benefit. Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: So, Brian, I think from a practical standpoint, now that we have approval for neoadjuvant immunotherapy and adjuvant immunotherapy, we have some practical challenges in terms of how we manage our patients. Of course, the new adjuvant is very appealing because it's only 3 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, but the challenge though, is a majority of the patients don't have a CR, or a significant proportion of the patients have an ongoing response or significant residual disease at the time of surgery. So, the question then would be what do you do after surgery if they're having an ongoing response? Do you think 3 cycles of immunotherapy are inadequate systemic therapy for these patients? Dr. Brian Henick: It's a really important question, Vamsi. I think until the data is mature, we're just kind of limited by the extent of what the data tells us so far, and then we have to kind of do our best as the treating doctor to navigate the patient's situation. So, tools that we'd still have available to us in the adjuvant setting that are approved are things like chemotherapy and radiation, leveraging things like circulating tumor DNA, I think maybe a promising path forward, as well to help guide strategies there, but I think until the data is mature, it has to be highly patient-focused to figure out what seems to be most appropriate there. How are you navigating those situations, Vamsi? Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: Yeah, as you said, it is very challenging. I think we need more data. And of course, the challenge now is like, if you use immunotherapy in the new adjuvant setting, it's very likely you're not going to get insurance authorization for 1 year of adjuvant atezolizumab. So, we really need studies to optimize treatment paradigms here. As you suggested, maybe circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based approaches to look at residual disease, I think, that would be one great way to do it. Let's move on to the next abstract, Brian. I found Abstract 9001 really interesting. It's a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pooled analysis that looked at outcomes of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors, with or without chemotherapy based on the KRAS mutation status and PD-L1 expression. So, what is your take on this abstract and how do you think this is going to impact our practice? Dr. Brian Henick: So, Dr. Nakajima and colleagues explored the observation from individual trials that patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancer seem to have better responses than wild type with immunotherapy (IO) alone. But the favorability of these responses seems to be abrogated with chemotherapy-IO. We know that KRAS accounts for 25% of oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer predominantly at amino acid 12. And with the emergence of direct inhibitors of G12C, understanding the clinical features of these tumors may be critical to inform optimal integration of this new class of drugs and also to make sure that we've optimized treatment algorithms for KRAS patients in general. So, this study's authors at the FDA pulled data from 12 registrational clinical trials that were investigating first-line checkpoint inhibitor-containing regimens and they found no significant difference between KRAS wild type and mutant for overall survival regardless of the regimen used. The best outcomes were seen with chemoimmunotherapy regardless of KRAS status. This retrospective analysis does suggest that the notion of there being lesser benefit from chemoimmunotherapy from Dr. Gadgeel's study might not hold up in the overall population, but I think it raises important questions, like, are all KRAS mutations alike? The absence of KRAS mutation status for a majority of patients included in these studies limits the interpretation of the data. And also, the absence of commutation status makes it a little harder to interpret. And other important questions remain such as how G12C inhibitors will factor in? What were your thoughts, Vamsi? Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: No, I completely agree with you, Brian. I think we need more data and we know that commutation status is a very important aspect in terms of KRAS-directed therapies. And of course, with a lot of promising data from these KRAS inhibitors, there's an interest in moving these drugs into the front-line therapy for patients with KRAS mutations. But I think it's going to be quite challenging to incorporate them into the front-line therapies and we clearly will need better characterization of these patients with KRAS mutant [lung cancer] to further personalize treatment in the frontline setting for these patients. So, let's move on to the next abstract. This is the lung map study, Abstract 9004. This is a study sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the lung map study, looking at overall survival from a phase 2 randomized study of ramucirumab and pembrolizumab, what's the standard of care in patients with advanced non—small cell lung cancer previously treated with immunotherapy. So, what were your key takeaway points here from this study? Dr. Brian Henick: So first of all, it's very exciting to see data from this very ambitious long map sub-study yield a positive result. Whereas many of the arms of this study were biomarker-guided, Dr. Reckamp presented the results from pembro plus ramucirumab as compared to the standard of care in unmarked patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had progressed after prior treatment with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The data seems to suggest that pembro plus ramucirumab may be better tolerated than the standard of care chemo-containing regimens, as the experimental regimen had fewer serious adverse events. Pembro plus ramucirumab had a median overall survival of 14.6 months as compared to 11.6 months in the control arm and this was statistically significant. The PFS difference wasn't significant, but there was a late divergence in the curves. Dr. Bestvina nicely summarized some of the study's limitations such as the mixture of control regimens used, and there were really interesting signals that were found on subgroup analysis, such as benefit in those with mixed histology tumors, STK11 mutant tumors, and those who received chemotherapy prior to immunotherapy. The subgroups deserve further attention in the future. For now, this regimen may be an appealing option as an alternative to chemotherapy for the right patients. What do you think? Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: Yeah, I agree, Brian. I think it's a really promising combination. We've always seen some synergy with VEGF inhibitors and immunotherapy in multiple studies and multiple tumor types. So, we really need to develop better ways to select patients for VEGF combination-based approaches in lung cancer. So, let's move on to another interesting study. This is Abstract 9000. This explores the outcomes of anti-PD-L1 therapy with or without chemotherapy for first-line, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with a PD-L1 score of greater than 50%. So, this is an FDA pooled analysis. So, what were your key takeaways from this abstract? Dr. Brain Henick: I thought this question was really well suited for a large pooled retrospective analysis and our colleagues at the FDA didn't let us down here. The question really was what's the optimal approach for patients with non-small cell lung cancer with greater than 50% PD-L1 in view of the absence of direct comparisons between these arms in prospective studies? I thought one of the most striking findings from Dr. Akinboro's presentation was the dismally low rate of underrepresented minority patients that were included in these registration trials. As far as the findings for the patients who were studied, although the Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival showed early separation, the difference wasn't statistically significant. Subgroup analysis revealed a trend towards better outcomes for immunotherapy alone among patients who are [age] 75 and above, suggesting that this may need to be parsed out as a unique population in subsequent studies. But in all, our equipoise as a field on whether to include chemoimmunotherapy-based first-line regimens should persist and should be guided, in my opinion, largely by clinical considerations. Can the patient tolerate chemotherapy? Do you need a rapid response? Are there other things that you thought in hearing all this, Vamsi? Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: Yeah, absolutely. I think I am still struggling with the decision of whether to add chemotherapy for patients with greater than 50%. To a large extent, it's actually a clinical decision. In some patients who have a large disease burden, I tend to kind of opt for adding chemotherapy to immunotherapy in the front-line setting. But of course, we need more data here. And this is actually a very helpful piece of information from the FDA. And as you pointed out briefly, Brian, I think the fact that there are very few underrepresented patients in the pooled analysis, I think kind of speaks to the need for addressing increased diversity in clinical trial accruals. I think this is a great segue to also talk about Abstract 9012, talking about disparities in access to immunotherapy globally. This is a study from India looking at 15,000 patients who were checkpoint inhibitor eligible and who have very low rates of uptake of immunotherapy. This is something that reflects the global team of the ASCO Annual Meeting talking about disparities and improving access to treatments in underserved minority populations here in the United States, and also globally, in the developing world, the disparities in terms of access to care are humongous. So, what are your thoughts, Brian? And also, if you could highlight some of the work that you're doing at Columbia about disparities, I think that would be great. Dr. Brain Henick: Absolutely! I think access to medications is a really humbling topic for those of us who are involved in developmental therapeutics, particularly with the transformational impact we've seen with the advent of immunotherapy over the last decade-plus. Dr. Ravikrishna's presentation is therefore extremely important. He described very low rates of uptake of immunotherapy by indication. And perhaps most strikingly, the discrepancy in uptake by patients' ability to pay for therapy with the vast majority of immunotherapy received by those who are private is very concerning. Even if the definition of restricted access was permissive, for example, I didn't see mention of the cancer stage as an eligibility factor, the fact that this represents a single referral center's data doesn't bode well for uptake elsewhere. So, I think we need to continue to work as a field on prioritizing strategies to help overcome these gaps, but good quality data such as this study is an important first step. And to that point, Vamsi, I'm very excited to be working with you in collaboration on an observational study for patients with lung cancer from underserved minority populations with lung cancer in New York City so that we can better characterize access to care, efficacy, and toxicity in this population. Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: Thank you, Brian. I'd really like to thank you for sharing your valuable insights with us today on the ASCO Daily News Podcast. We really appreciate it. Brian, thank you so much for joining us. Dr. Brain Henick: My pleasure. Thanks for having me. Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: And thank you to all our listeners for joining in today. You will find links to all the abstracts discussed today in the transcript of this episode. Finally, if you value the insights that you hear on the ASCO Daily News Podcast, please take a moment to rate, review and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Thank you so much.     Disclosures: Dr. Vamsi Velcheti: Honoraria: Honoraria Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Foundation Medicine, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Novartis, Lilly, EMD Serono, GSK, Amgen Research Funding (Inst.): Genentech, Trovagene, Eisai, OncoPlex Diagnostics, Alkermes, NantOmics, Genoptix, Altor BioScience, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Atreca, Heat Biologics, Leap Therapeutics, RSIP Vision, GlaxoSmithKline Dr. Brain Henick: None disclosed. Disclaimer: The purpose of this podcast is to educate and inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.

In this episode of Lung Cancer Considered, hosts Dr. Narjust Duma and Dr. Stephen Liu discuss the recently completed ASCO meeting with colleagues Dr. Catherine Shu and Dr. Jack West. Dr. Shu is a board-certified medical oncologist specializing in the treatment of thoracic cancers, especially lung cancer, at Columbia University's Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center. Dr. West is a medical oncologist at City of Hope Cancer Center and is the founder of the Global Resource for Advancing Cancer Education, a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing timely, free, credible information to patients and caregivers around the world.

Host Morra Aarons-Mele speaks with veteran tech journalist Catherine Shu, of TechCrunch, about improving mental health culture in Silicon Valley. And Shu shares her own journey with depression, including the time she spent in a psychiatric ward as a teenager, and how she found her way from there into tech journalism.

This week, we're joined by Catherine Shu to review "Always Be My Maybe," a new romantic comedy on Netflix starring Ali Wong and Randall Park. If you want to skip ahead, here's how the episode breaks down: 0:00 Introduction and discussion of upcoming TV shows 10:18 Spoiler-free review of "Always Be My Maybe" 26:14 spoiler discussion

This week Megan Rose Dickey and I welcome Tiana Kara, the head of partnerships and growth at #builtbygirls (which, like TechCrunch, is owned by Verizon Media Group). The organization connects girls and women between the ages of 15 and 22 with mentors of all stripes in the tech industry based on their interests. The idea here is that not all tech jobs include coding, and #builtbygirls wants all young girls who want in the industry to know that. We also take a look at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her near-perfect ability to troll the GOP through her social media presence. Sparking our conversation, and Catherine Shu’s look into Ocasio-Cortez’s internet prowess, was a story about AOC voicing her support of transgender youth group Mermaids on Twitch. And we already knew that the algorithms of some of those DNA services can yield different results. But it’s harder to take when they’re twins. Your hosts: Megan Rose Dickey Henry Pickavet

This week, we're joined by Sarah Perez and Catherine Shu show to discuss the Netflix show "Tidying Up With Marie Kondo" and how it's already affecting our own cleaning habits. We also recap the drama around dueling Fyre Festival documentaries on Hulu and Netflix. Links: [Hulu unexpectedly releases ‘Fyre Fraud’ days before Netflix’s competing documentary][1] [Fyre Fight: The Inside Story of How We Got Two Warring Fyre Festival Documentaries in the Same Week][2] [1]:https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/14/hulu-unexpectedly-releases-fyre-fraud-days-before-netflixs-competing-documentary/ [2]:https://www.theringer.com/movies/2019/1/15/18183308/fyre-festival-documentary-netflix-hulu-billy-mcfarland-pay

This week, we're joined by Catherine Shu to review the first two seasons of "The Crown" on Netflix. We also discuss recently-revealed details about "The Mandalorian," a.k.a. the first Star Wars show for Disney's streaming service, as well as plans for an interactive episode of "Black Mirror." Links: ['Star Wars': Jon Favreau's TV Series Details Revealed][1] [Netflix is planning a choose-your-own-adventure episode of ‘Black Mirror’][2] [1]:https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/star-wars-jon-favreaus-tv-series-details-revealed-1149194 [2]:https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/01/netflix-is-planning-a-choose-your-own-adventure-episode-of-black-mirror/

Negative / Visible / Social: Sexism in the tech industry Show Notes We look at the tech industry’s persistent habit of treating women badly – both overtly, in terms of sexual harassment, and less overtly, in terms of simply hiring and mentoring fewer women. What can we do to improve matters? What is the responsibility of individuals? Of companies? Of culture at large? Of the government? Links Recent examples of sexism in the tech industry: “Reflecting On One Very, Very Strange Year At Uber” – Susan J. Fowler, with the piece that plunged Uber into its current, very much deserved, hot mess by explaining just how sexist its internal practices were. “The fall of 500 Startups CEO Dave McClure” – Marisa Kendall, writing for the Mercury News, on Dave McClure of 500 Startups, who was forced to resign after (apparently well-founded) allegations of sexual harassment. Binary Capital “Women in Tech Speak Frankly on Culture of Harassment” – Katie Benner, writing for the New York Times, on women harassed by Justin Caldbeck of Binary Capital. “Binary Accused of Post-Resignation Harassment by Ex-Employee” – Emily Chang and Sarah McBride, writing for Bloomberg, on Justin Caldbeck’s threats to a woman who had stopped working with Binary Capital on account of pervasive sexism. “The long-term cost of sexual harassment” – Catherine Shu, writing for TechCrunch, with a description of her own experience of being harassed and the way it affected her long term. “Can Venture Capital Be Saved?” – Mitch and Freada Kapor, making a case for their own VC fund’s approach, with a clear recognition that (awful as it is) sexual harassment is a symptom of yet deeper problems with VC culture: How can the industry celebrate people who glory in breaking all the rules, ask forgiveness not permission, and then be surprised when people are predatory, abusive and pursue their own desires at the expense and over the objection of others? “I’m a startup founder and I had sex with an investor — and I am sorry” – Perri Chase, writing for Business Insider, with a really thoughtful reflection on the current state of affairs, including a frank admission of her own choices and how they have played into things, but without blaming victims (a hard line to walk). Previously on the show: Season 3 – many reflections on business success by way of taking the slow road. 3.07: One Size Does Not Fit All – Amazon’s workplace culture as a view into corporate ethics and responsibility. Music “Jonah 2” by The Jonah Project. Used by permission. “Winning Slowly Theme” by Chris Krycho. Sponsors Many thanks to the people who help us make this show possible by their financial support! This month’s sponsors: Andrew Fallows Kurt Klassen Jeremy W. Sherman If you’d like to support the show, you can make a pledge at Patreon or give directly via Square Cash. Respond We love to hear your thoughts. Hit us up via Twitter, Facebook, or email!

Catherine Shu (@catherineshu) from TechCrunch shares with us her perspectives on the state of Northeast Asia (China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan & Hong Kong) from interesting companies to startups. In the discussion, we analysed the BAT (Baidu-Alibaba-Tencent) companies in China and the emerging Xiaomi gearing to step out globally out of China. We also deep dived The post Episode 14: State of North East Asia & Taiwan appeared first on Analyse Asia.