POPULARITY
Categories
54 episodes with Shu
23 episodes with Shu
29 episodes with Shu
23 episodes with Shu
26 episodes with Shu
13 episodes with Shu
25 episodes with Shu
10 episodes with Shu
29 episodes with Shu
12 episodes with Shu
6 episodes with Shu
17 episodes with Shu
8 episodes with Shu
22 episodes with Shu
8 episodes with Shu
9 episodes with Shu
7 episodes with Shu
6 episodes with Shu
13 episodes with Shu
11 episodes with Shu
5 episodes with Shu
6 episodes with Shu
9 episodes with Shu
3 episodes with Shu
12 episodes with Shu
3 episodes with Shu
20 episodes with Shu
8 episodes with Shu
5 episodes with Shu
7 episodes with Shu
13 episodes with Shu
5 episodes with Shu
6 episodes with Shu
3 episodes with Shu
16 episodes with Shu
6 episodes with Shu
5 episodes with Shu
3 episodes with Shu
4 episodes with Shu
4 episodes with Shu
2 episodes with Shu
2 episodes with Shu
3 episodes with Shu
2 episodes with Shu
5 episodes with Shu
Věděli jste, že nejpálivější papričkou je Pepper X? Tato speciálně vyšlechtěná odrůda prokazatelně dosahuje přes 2,6 milionu SHU, neboli Scovillových jednotek pálivosti, přičemž odhad je ještě vyšší.
Věděli jste, že nejpálivější papričkou je Pepper X? Tato speciálně vyšlechtěná odrůda prokazatelně dosahuje přes 2,6 milionu SHU, neboli Scovillových jednotek pálivosti, přičemž odhad je ještě vyšší.
Věděli jste, že nejpálivější papričkou je Pepper X? Tato speciálně vyšlechtěná odrůda prokazatelně dosahuje přes 2,6 milionu SHU, neboli Scovillových jednotek pálivosti, přičemž odhad je ještě vyšší.
Věděli jste, že nejpálivější papričkou je Pepper X? Tato speciálně vyšlechtěná odrůda prokazatelně dosahuje přes 2,6 milionu SHU, neboli Scovillových jednotek pálivosti, přičemž odhad je ještě vyšší.
Věděli jste, že nejpálivější papričkou je Pepper X? Tato speciálně vyšlechtěná odrůda prokazatelně dosahuje přes 2,6 milionu SHU, neboli Scovillových jednotek pálivosti, přičemž odhad je ještě vyšší.
Věděli jste, že nejpálivější papričkou je Pepper X? Tato speciálně vyšlechtěná odrůda prokazatelně dosahuje přes 2,6 milionu SHU, neboli Scovillových jednotek pálivosti, přičemž odhad je ještě vyšší.
Segon programa de la cinquena temporada amb el Tito Trifol La seva veu us sonarà per personatges com Shinji d'Evangelion, en Tintin, Koji Kabuto de Mazinger Z, Kenan de Kenan & Kel i també per personatges com en Shu de Bola de Drac Super. No ens oblidem del Dragui, el protagonista de la sèrie animada per BRB "Història de Catalunya". També ha posat veu en sèries com The Boys o en anuncis com el de Zumosol.
From the flames of Red Cliffs to the turmoil of the Sixteen Kingdoms, Part 5 follows China through an age of legendary heroes, fragile reunification, and renewed division. The episode explores the struggles of Cao Cao, Liu Bei, and Sun Quan, the strategies and enduring legends of Zhuge Liang, and the rise of the Sima family that brought the Three Kingdoms to an end.But reunification under the Jin dynasty proves short-lived. Palace intrigue and the War of the Eight Princes plunge the empire into chaos, sending ruling families south as new kingdoms emerge across northern China. Along the way, we encounter the decisive Battle of Fei River, the rise of Liu Yu, and the brutal rulers of Later Zhao. Amid the warfare and upheaval, Buddhism begins putting down deeper roots—a lasting transformation that helps shape China's next chapter.Here's the usual list of Chinese names from this Part 5 episodeCáo Cāo 曹操, Liú Bèi 刘备, Zhūgě Liàng 诸葛亮, Zhūgě Xuán 诸葛玄, Huáng Chéngyàn 黄承彦, Huáng Yuèyīng 黄月英, Sīmǎ Huī 司马徽, Zhāng Fēi 张飞, Guān Yǔ 关羽, Luó Guànzhōng 罗贯中, Huáng Gài 黄盖, Cáo Pī 曹丕, Lù Xùn 陆逊, Cáo Ruì 曹叡, Sīmǎ Yì 司马懿, Mèng Huò 孟获, Cáo Shuǎng 曹爽, Cáo Máo 曹髦, Sīmǎ Shī 司马师, Sīmǎ Zhāo 司马昭, Cáo Huàn 曹奐, Jiāng Wéi 姜维, Liú Shàn 刘禅, Zhūgě Zhàn 诸葛瞻, Liáo Huà 廖化, Zhōng Huì 钟会, Dèng Aī 邓艾, Zhūgě Xù 诸葛绪, Sūn Liàng 孙亮, Zhūgě Kè 诸葛恪, Zhūgě Jīn 诸葛瑾, Sūn Jùn 孙骏, Sūn Xiū 孙休, Sīmǎ Yán 司马炎 / Jìn Wǔdì 晋武帝, Sūn Hào 孙皓, Yáng Hù 羊祜, Dù Yù 杜预, Jiǎ Chōng 贾充, Sīmǎ Zhōng 司马衷 / Emperor Huì 晋惠, Yáng Zhǐ 杨芷, Jiǎ Nánfēng 贾南风, Yáng Jùn 杨骏, Sīmǎ Wēi 司马瑋, Sīmǎ Yù 司马遹., Sīmǎ Guāng 司马光, Sīmǎ Lún 司马伦, Sīmǎ Chì 司马炽 / Jìn Emperor Huái 晋怀帝, Liú Yuān 刘渊, Liú Cōng 刘聪, Sīmǎ Yè 司马业 / Emperor Mǐn 晋敏帝, Sīmǎ Ruì 司马睿 / Jìn Emperor Yuán 晋元帝, Fú Jiān 苻坚, Líu Yù 刘裕, Huán Xuán 桓玄, Emperor An 晋安帝, Jin Emperor Gōng 晋恭帝, Shí Lè 石勒, Shí Hóng 石弘, Shí Hǔ 石虎, Shí Xuān 石宣, Shí Tāo 石韬, Fótú Chéng 佛图澄, Dào'ān 道安, Jiūmóluóshí 鸠摩罗什, Fú Shēng 苻生, Mùróng Jùn 慕容儁, Hèlián Bóbó 赫連勃勃Support me on Patreon to hear the whole series ad-free (22 episodes already posted): https://www.patreon.com/c/TheChinaHistoryPodcastHere's the link for CHP Premium: https://teacupmedia.supercast.com/
From the flames of Red Cliffs to the turmoil of the Sixteen Kingdoms, Part 5 follows China through an age of legendary heroes, fragile reunification, and renewed division. The episode explores the struggles of Cao Cao, Liu Bei, and Sun Quan, the strategies and enduring legends of Zhuge Liang, and the rise of the Sima family that brought the Three Kingdoms to an end.But reunification under the Jin dynasty proves short-lived. Palace intrigue and the War of the Eight Princes plunge the empire into chaos, sending ruling families south as new kingdoms emerge across northern China. Along the way, we encounter the decisive Battle of Fei River, the rise of Liu Yu, and the brutal rulers of Later Zhao. Amid the warfare and upheaval, Buddhism begins putting down deeper roots—a lasting transformation that helps shape China's next chapter.Here's the usual list of Chinese names from this Part 5 episodeCáo Cāo 曹操, Liú Bèi 刘备, Zhūgě Liàng 诸葛亮, Zhūgě Xuán 诸葛玄, Huáng Chéngyàn 黄承彦, Huáng Yuèyīng 黄月英, Sīmǎ Huī 司马徽, Zhāng Fēi 张飞, Guān Yǔ 关羽, Luó Guànzhōng 罗贯中, Huáng Gài 黄盖, Cáo Pī 曹丕, Lù Xùn 陆逊, Cáo Ruì 曹叡, Sīmǎ Yì 司马懿, Mèng Huò 孟获, Cáo Shuǎng 曹爽, Cáo Máo 曹髦, Sīmǎ Shī 司马师, Sīmǎ Zhāo 司马昭, Cáo Huàn 曹奐, Jiāng Wéi 姜维, Liú Shàn 刘禅, Zhūgě Zhàn 诸葛瞻, Liáo Huà 廖化, Zhōng Huì 钟会, Dèng Aī 邓艾, Zhūgě Xù 诸葛绪, Sūn Liàng 孙亮, Zhūgě Kè 诸葛恪, Zhūgě Jīn 诸葛瑾, Sūn Jùn 孙骏, Sūn Xiū 孙休, Sīmǎ Yán 司马炎 / Jìn Wǔdì 晋武帝, Sūn Hào 孙皓, Yáng Hù 羊祜, Dù Yù 杜预, Jiǎ Chōng 贾充, Sīmǎ Zhōng 司马衷 / Emperor Huì 晋惠, Yáng Zhǐ 杨芷, Jiǎ Nánfēng 贾南风, Yáng Jùn 杨骏, Sīmǎ Wēi 司马瑋, Sīmǎ Yù 司马遹., Sīmǎ Guāng 司马光, Sīmǎ Lún 司马伦, Sīmǎ Chì 司马炽 / Jìn Emperor Huái 晋怀帝, Liú Yuān 刘渊, Liú Cōng 刘聪, Sīmǎ Yè 司马业 / Emperor Mǐn 晋敏帝, Sīmǎ Ruì 司马睿 / Jìn Emperor Yuán 晋元帝, Fú Jiān 苻坚, Líu Yù 刘裕, Huán Xuán 桓玄, Emperor An 晋安帝, Jin Emperor Gōng 晋恭帝, Shí Lè 石勒, Shí Hóng 石弘, Shí Hǔ 石虎, Shí Xuān 石宣, Shí Tāo 石韬, Fótú Chéng 佛图澄, Dào'ān 道安, Jiūmóluóshí 鸠摩罗什, Fú Shēng 苻生, Mùróng Jùn 慕容儁, Hèlián Bóbó 赫連勃勃Support me on Patreon to hear the whole series ad-free (22 episodes already posted): https://www.patreon.com/c/TheChinaHistoryPodcastHere's the link for CHP Premium: https://teacupmedia.supercast.com/
Join Luke, Jarrod, Erielle, and Shu in this episode of Checkpoint on JOY where they talk about video game adaptations. Catch the latest episode on Spotify: Giving a 1-Up to diversity in gaming. The post Video game adaptations appeared first on Checkpoint.
Join Luke, Jarrod, Erielle, and Shu in this episode of Checkpoint on JOY where they talk about the latest PAX Aus 2026 lineup. Catch the latest episode on Spotify: Giving a 1-Up to diversity in gaming. The post Up to date: PAX Aus 2026 Expo Floor lineup appeared first on Checkpoint.
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.Also: The Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General painted a deeply troubling picture of FCI Tallahassee, the federal women's prison where Ghislaine Maxwell was housed before her transfer to the minimum-security camp in Bryan, Texas. During an unannounced inspection in May 2023, the OIG found serious problems with basic living conditions, including leaking roofs and windows, deteriorating housing units, worn bedding, rusted lockers, malfunctioning showers and toilets, and black substances on walls and ceilings. The food operation was especially disturbing: inspectors found moldy bread being served, rotting vegetables in food-preparation areas, insects in cereal, warped food containers and what appeared to be rodent droppings and evidence that rodents had chewed through food packaging. Inspectors also found correctional-officer shortages, weaknesses in inmate searches, inadequate security-camera coverage and inconsistent enforcement of rules, with some inmates reporting retaliation and offensive treatment by staff.The OIG also found that staffing shortages were affecting medical care, including changes to when insulin and other medications were distributed that could reduce their effectiveness, along with deficiencies in inmate health screenings. Inspector General Michael Horowitz later described the conditions uncovered at Tallahassee as “glaring and disturbing,” noting that failing infrastructure had become so severe that some women reportedly used feminine-hygiene products to help absorb water leaking into their housing areas. The report was not specifically an investigation of Maxwell and did not conclude that she personally received improper treatment there, but it provided important context for understanding the facility she was later removed from. Tallahassee was not simply an ordinary federal prison functioning smoothly behind the scenes; federal inspectors had documented serious sanitation, infrastructure, staffing, healthcare and security failures there well before Maxwell's unexplained transfer to a dramatically less restrictive facility became its own controversy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVr5MNf7Nt5oCXywsUh-ttA/join Looking to buy used and new games? Use my affiliate link with Noble Knight Games https://www.nobleknight.com/?awid=1459 Hungry is joined by the Cardboard Alchemist himself Peter Vaughan to discuss the upcoming VauhganCon, and talk about the makings of Whisperwood. 0:00 - Intro Recent Plays and next on the table 7:10 - Stuflandet 8:28 - The Crew Journey to the Center of the Earth 10:13 - Dual of Meloch 13:13 - Shu and hs TCG's 19:15 - Sentinels of the Multiverse 25:25 - Obsession 27:18 - Firesiege 29:05 - Fliptoons Season 2 33:30 - Tend 34:33 - Let's Play Games Together 36:39 - Tidal Blades 2 43:43 - Overrated Game Metrics 55:10 - Underrated Game Metrics 1:11:29 Thank you 1:12:14 - Mountain Goats Legacy 1:33:05 - Old Games We Want to Play Again Check out the video version here: https://youtu.be/okLe94UdZFU Check out @GoingAnalogShow here: https://www.goinganalogshow.com/ Get your own copy of Mountain Goats Legacy here: https://www.allplay.com/board-games/mountain-goats-legacy
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Surah Qassas 28 v25-26 Session 9 The Sublime character of the Blessed daughters of Shu'ayb (A.S). Shu'ayb (A.S) loses his sight out of love for Allah (SWT) thus Moosa (A.S) was given as a servant to Shu'ayb (A.S).
Sam is back and the ADHD gang is having a great time. This week we meet the cock-blocking Shu, note that Sadie has two entire situationships, and hunt for the Assassin's Creed/National Treasure fanfic of our dreams.Send us a message through the Duat at oftheeldestgodspod@gmail.com with your thoughts and theories going forward! We would love to hear from you. Make sure to subscribe so you know when our next episode drops and rate and review if you like what we are doing.IG: www.instagram.com/oftheeldestgodspod/Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com/oftheeldestgodspodSUPPORT US ON PATREON: www.patreon.com/oftheeldestgodsBUY OUR MERCH, PLZ: https://www.redbubble.com/people/OfTheEldestGods/shopFollow Sam: linktr.ee/samuelobrienContent and Capable: https://www.instagram.com/contentncapable/Plug: Come From Away, National Treasure, and Spiderman NoirCharlie's IG: www.instagram.com/greenpixie12/ and www.instagram.com/greenpixiedraws/ Charlie's Plug: Babbity KateRaye's Plug: The Amazing Digital Circus: The Last Act
Katy Milkman shares one technique that could keep you exercising for 55% longer. --- Become an FSB member: https://get.fsb.org.uk/nudge/ Unlock the Nudge Vaults: https://www.nudgepodcast.com/vaults Katy's book: https://amzn.to/3RF63xA Katy's podcast: https://www.schwab.com/learn/choiceology Katy's newsletter: https://www.katymilkman.com/newsletter-milkman-delivers Subscribe to my newsletter: https://www.nudgepodcast.com/mailing-list Connect on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/phill-agnew/ --- Today's sources: Gallus, J. (2017). Fostering public good contributions with symbolic awards: A large-scale natural field experiment at Wikipedia. Management Science, 63(12), 3999–4015. Hershfield, H. E., Shu, S., & Benartzi, S. (2020). Temporal reframing and participation in a savings program: A field experiment. Marketing Science, 39(6), 1039-1051. Milkman, K. L., Minson, J. A., & Volpp, K. G. M. (2014). Holding the Hunger Games hostage at the gym: An evaluation of temptation bundling. Management Science, 60(2), 283–299. Rai, A., Sharif, M. A., Chang, E. H., Milkman, K. L., & Duckworth, A. L. (2023). A field experiment on subgoal framing to boost volunteering: The trade-off between goal granularity and flexibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(4), 621–634. Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2016). For the fun of it: Harnessing immediate rewards to increase persistence in long-term goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 952–966.
durée : 00:06:55 - Le masque et la plume - par : Rebecca Manzoni - Pour sa toute première réalisation, l'actrice taïwanaise Shu Qi livre une œuvre autobiographique et sensorielle sur une adolescence taïwanaise meurtrie. Si Le Masque reconnaît une grande maîtrise visuelle, il est partagé sur la violence du récit qui repose sur une esthétisation excessive du trauma. - équipe : Stéphane Le Guennec, Ilinca Negulesco Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France
Can a framework for reducing unnecessary psychological suffering work across different cultures?In Part 1 of this special conversation, Kim Olver welcomes newly certified Mental Freedom® facilitators Dr. Marcella Finnerty from Ireland and Dr. Shu-han Huang, originally from Taiwan, to discuss their experiences leading Mental Freedom Experiences with women in very different cultural settings.Together they explore:Their own Mental Freedom journeysWhat changed for them personallyHow Mental Freedom translated across culturesWorking with women navigating transition, uncertainty, and conflictWhy the framework is invitational rather than prescriptiveYou'll also hear how participants in Ireland, Taiwan, and the Middle East responded to concepts like choice, responsibility, and emotional freedom.If you've ever wondered whether Mental Freedom is simply another Western personal-growth model—or whether it speaks to something more universal—this conversation is a fascinating place to begin.Join us next week for Part 2 as the discussion continues.Apple Description: Can Mental Freedom® work across cultures?In Part 1 of this conversation, Kim Olver is joined by Dr. Marcella Finnerty and Dr. Shu-han Huang to discuss how women in Ireland, Taiwan, and the Middle East experienced the Mental Freedom framework—and what surprised them most along the way.
Welcome to Meeting 66 of the Junto club. On this episode, Shu is a man of many quotes to live by. We discuss the growing interest in peptides, and the conflict in Iran. Our main topic is lead by Matt, who read Capitalist Realism by Mark Fischer. The book argues that capitalism is inconsistent and untenable because of its threat to the environment, workers mental health, and the bureaucracy it has created. The text doesn't offer any real solutions; instead, it's a masterclass in identifying problems that continue to snowball. (Recorded on April 19, 2026)
昨天下午日本熊本發生了非常大的地震...我真的很難過，也很擔心住在熊本的人。如果你住在熊本，希望你和你的家人、朋友都平安，一切都好，也希望熊本可以早日恢復正常的生活。一切平安！脆 Cuì - Threads (Meta's social media app; Taiwanese nickname for Threads)發音 fāyīn - pronunciation推特 Tuītè - Twitter/X帳號 zhànghào - account開放 kāifàng - to open; make available綁定 bǎngdìng - to link/bind accounts togetherpo pō - to post (online)單純 dānchún - simple; purely基本上 jīběn shàng - basically; generally純文字 chún wénzì - text-only; plain text沒有營養 méiyǒu yíngyǎng - meaningless; lacking substance廢文 fèiwén - pointless/useless post抱怨 bàoyuàn - to complain隨便 suíbiàn - casually; freely; whatever發文 fāwén - to post online回覆 huífù - to reply/respond貼文 tiēwén - social media post推薦 tuījiàn - to recommend下載 xiàzài - to download長輩 zhǎngbèi - elders; older generation主管 zhǔguǎn - supervisor; manager身分 shēnfèn - identity; status海巡 hǎixún - slang for celebrities/public figures searching their own names online and replying to posts搜尋 sōuxún - to search提到 tídào - to mention互動 hùdòng - interaction政治人物 zhèngzhì rénwù - political figure蔡英文 Cài Yīngwén - Tsai Ing-wen (former president of Taiwan)陳水扁 Chén Shuǐbiǎn - Chen Shui-bian (former president of Taiwan)市長 shìzhǎng - mayor議員 yìyuán - councilor; legislator立委 lìwěi - legislator; member of parliament反應 fǎnyìng - to respond; reactionFollow me on Instagram: fangfang.chineselearning !
Cris Bazan grew up in Texas, started gang banging as a young teenager, and eventually started his own street gang with his brother before a nine year sentence in the Texas state prison system at 17 years old pulled him into the Texas Syndicate — setting off 20 years of life inside some of the most violent correctional facilities in the country. In this episode of Locked In with Ian Bick, he describes what the Texas prison system looked like in the early 2000s, what starting wars with gangs like Tango Blast actually involved, what getting confirmed and validated as a Texas Syndicate member meant and what getting sent to the SHU after validation really looked like, and how violent the state system was during that era. He also opens up about catching a federal sentence after his release, spending five years in the toughest federal penitentiaries in the United States, and what the difference between state and federal prison as a Texas Syndicate member really revealed about which world was more dangerous. _____________________________________________ #texas #truecrimecommunity #prison _____________________________________________ Connect with Cris Bazan: YouTube: https://youtube.com/@crisbazan956?si=TdKdn0F5XQio-fLu Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/share/1MDHYTuCuD/?mibextid=wwXIfr TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@crisbazan956?_r=1&_t=ZP-97vDdgMbs4N Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/crisbazan956?igsh=MXByeG4xeHppa2l0eA%3D%3D&utm_source=qr _____________________________________________ Hosted, Executive Produced & Edited By Ian Bick: https://www.instagram.com/ian_bick/?hl=en https://ianbick.com/ _____________________________________________ Timestamps: 00:00 Introducing Cris Bazan's Story 01:00 Upbringing, Family, and Early Gangs 05:00 Creating N2P and First Gang Experiences 10:00 Entering Prison and Joining Texas Syndicate 16:00 Prison Politics and Survival Tactics 21:00 Gang Wars, Rivalries, and Institutional Life 27:00 Solitary Confinement and Its Impact 36:00 Transition to Federal Prison Life 41:00 Life and Politics in Federal Prison 46:00 Transfers, Riots, and Prison Hierarchies 52:00 Life After Release & Reintegration Challenges 01:01:00 Family, Regret, and Hopes for the Future 01:09:00 Plans, Reflection, and Final Thoughts _____________________________________________ To advertise on the show, contact sales@advertisecast.com or visit https://advertising.libsyn.com/LockedInWithIanBicka
The OIG/DOJ reviews into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the sweetheart non-prosecution agreement gave the public a mountain of procedure, but not the kind of definitive answers the case demanded. On Epstein's death, the OIG documented serious and undeniable failures at MCC New York: Epstein was left without the cellmate he was supposed to have, required rounds and counts were not done, records were falsified, his cell was not properly searched, and the camera system around the SHU was riddled with failures that left investigators with limited recorded video evidence. The report still accepted the broader conclusion that there was no criminality connected to how Epstein died, but that conclusion rested on a broken record: missing video, falsified paperwork, asleep or negligent guards, institutional chaos, and interviews with people who had every reason to protect themselves. The problem is not that the OIG found no failures; it found plenty. The problem is that the most important questions were filtered through the least reliable environment imaginable — a jail unit full of misconduct, self-preservation, memory holes, and conveniently useless answers.The same weakness hangs over the review of the Epstein NPA. The DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility concluded that Alex Acosta showed “poor judgment” and resolved the federal investigation before key investigative steps were completed, but it stopped short of the kind of institutional reckoning the deal deserved. That matters because the NPA was not some ordinary plea agreement; it ended a federal sex-crimes investigation, shielded Epstein's alleged co-conspirators, kept victims in the dark, and became the central symbol of how power protected Epstein when the government had him dead to rights. The later transcripts and testimony only sharpen the point: when officials and insiders were pressed on what happened, the answers too often collapsed into “I don't recall,” “I don't know,” “I can't speak to that,” and other forms of bureaucratic fog. That is not a reliable foundation for closure. It is the sound of a system investigating itself after the witnesses, lawyers, prosecutors, jail staff, and decision-makers had already learned that the safest answer in the Epstein universe was not the truth — it was amnesia.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Alexander from China Books Review joins us to talk about evolutions in the Chinese book space, upcoming works by notable authors, and his favourite China books you may not have heard of before. He also gives tips on how to read more, what not to read, and how to create a good book club list!Read more from Alexander and the team at Chinabooksreview.com and don't forget to find out more about the Sinobabble bookclub here!Books mentionedThe Shanghai Agents: The Soviet Plot to Start a Revolution in Interwar China by Heather SalterRed Dawn Over China: How Communism Conquered a Quarter of Humanity by Frank DikötterRemembrance of Earth's Past trilogy by Liu CixinThe Highest Exam: How the Gaokao Shapes China by Ruixue Jia, Hongbin Li, Claire CousineauI Deliver Parcels in Beijing by Hu AnyanAdrift in the South by Xiao HaiPrivate Revolutions by Yuan YangSong of Praise for a Flower: One Woman's Journey through China's Tumultuous 20th Century by Fengxian Chu and Charlene ChuFly, Wild Swans by Jung ChangCrazy Rich Asians Series by Kevin KwanTaiwan Travelogue by Yáng Shuāng-ziTo Live 活着 by Yu HuaHunter by Shuang XuetaoTo Rule All under Heaven: A History of Classical China, from Confucius to the First Emperor by Andrew Seth Meyer Uncanny Beliefs: Superstition in Modern Chinese History Edited by Emily Baum and Albert WuWhy China Needs Democracy by Dongxian JiangMake China Great Again: Online Alt-History Fiction and Popular Authoritarianism by Rongbin HanAnyuan: Mining China's Revolutionary Tradition by Elizabeth J. PerryOn the Edge: Feeling Precarious in China by Margaret HillenbrandNegative Exposures: Knowing What Not to Know in Contemporary China by Margaret HillenbrandBuy bookclub books hereBuy me a coffeeLatest Substack postSupport the showSign up for Buzzsprout to launch your podcasting journey: https://www.buzzsprout.com/?referrer_id=162442Subscribe to the Sinobabble Newsletter: https://sinobabble.substack.com/Support Sinobabble on Buy me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Sinobabblepod
The OIG/DOJ reviews into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the sweetheart non-prosecution agreement gave the public a mountain of procedure, but not the kind of definitive answers the case demanded. On Epstein's death, the OIG documented serious and undeniable failures at MCC New York: Epstein was left without the cellmate he was supposed to have, required rounds and counts were not done, records were falsified, his cell was not properly searched, and the camera system around the SHU was riddled with failures that left investigators with limited recorded video evidence. The report still accepted the broader conclusion that there was no criminality connected to how Epstein died, but that conclusion rested on a broken record: missing video, falsified paperwork, asleep or negligent guards, institutional chaos, and interviews with people who had every reason to protect themselves. The problem is not that the OIG found no failures; it found plenty. The problem is that the most important questions were filtered through the least reliable environment imaginable — a jail unit full of misconduct, self-preservation, memory holes, and conveniently useless answers.The same weakness hangs over the review of the Epstein NPA. The DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility concluded that Alex Acosta showed “poor judgment” and resolved the federal investigation before key investigative steps were completed, but it stopped short of the kind of institutional reckoning the deal deserved. That matters because the NPA was not some ordinary plea agreement; it ended a federal sex-crimes investigation, shielded Epstein's alleged co-conspirators, kept victims in the dark, and became the central symbol of how power protected Epstein when the government had him dead to rights. The later transcripts and testimony only sharpen the point: when officials and insiders were pressed on what happened, the answers too often collapsed into “I don't recall,” “I don't know,” “I can't speak to that,” and other forms of bureaucratic fog. That is not a reliable foundation for closure. It is the sound of a system investigating itself after the witnesses, lawyers, prosecutors, jail staff, and decision-makers had already learned that the safest answer in the Epstein universe was not the truth — it was amnesia.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
La pronuncia è spesso l'aspetto più trascurato nello studio dell'italiano — eppure è la prima cosa che un madrelingua nota. Esistono errori legati a caratteristiche dell'italiano che non esistono in molte altre lingue: quasi tutti gli studenti li commettono, ma una volta riconosciuti è possibile correggerli. Non Commettere Questi Errori di Pronuncia in Italiano Errore 1: L'Accento Sbagliato nella Terza Persona Plurale In italiano, l'accento tonico — cioè la sillaba su cui cade il "peso" della parola — cade di norma sulla penultima sillaba. Esiste però una grande eccezione: le terze persone plurali dei verbi, cioè le forme con "loro". Molti studenti, seguendo la regola della penultima sillaba, pronunciano: «loro scrivono» con accento su -vo- → scri-VO-no «loro leggono» con accento su -go- → leg-GO-no La pronuncia corretta è invece: «loro SCRIvono» → accento sulla terzultima sillaba «loro LEGgono» → accento sulla terzultima sillaba La regola: nelle terze persone plurali, l'accento non cade mai sulla penultima sillaba, ma sempre sulla terzultima — o anche prima. Il Trucco: Pensa alla Prima Persona Singolare L'accento nella terza persona plurale cade esattamente nella stessa posizione della prima persona singolare (io): «io SCRIvo» → «loro SCRIvono» «io LEGgo» → «loro LEGgono» «io DORmo» → «loro DORmono» «io PARlo» → «loro PARlano» Esistono anche verbi in cui l'accento alla prima persona singolare cade sulla terzultima sillaba o ancora prima. In questi casi il plurale segue la stessa posizione: «io Àbito» → «loro Àbitano» — non «a-bi-TA-no» «io co-MÙ-ni-co» → «loro co-MÙ-ni-ca-no» — non «co-mu-ni-CA-no» «io DÌ-men-ti-co» → «loro DÌ-men-ti-ca-no» — non «di-men-ti-CA-no» Poiché in italiano non si scrive l'accento grafico su queste parole, non esiste una regola visiva di supporto. L'unico modo per interiorizzare questi accenti è ascoltare tanto italiano e abituare l'orecchio nel tempo. Errore 2: La Lettera Z — Due Suoni in una Sola Lettera La lettera Z è la più imprevedibile dell'alfabeto italiano: può avere due suoni completamente diversi. Z "dura": è la combinazione TS pronunciata in modo fuso, rapidamente — come se T e S diventassero un suono unico. Le corde vocali non vibrano. Z "morbida": è la combinazione DZ pronunciata in modo fuso. Qui le corde vocali vibrano. Per distinguerle, si può appoggiare la mano alla gola: con la Z "morbida" si sente una vibrazione, con la Z "dura" no. È la stessa differenza che esiste tra F (nessuna vibrazione) e V (vibrazione). Esempi con la Z "Dura" (TS fusi) «pizza» → pi-TZa «stazione» → sta-TZIO-ne «grazie» → GRA-tzie «silenzio» → si-LEN-tzio «pazienza» → pa-TZIEN-tza Esempi con la Z "Morbida" (DZ fusi) «zaino» → DZai-no «zero» → DZe-ro «mezzo» → MED-dzo «realizzare» → rea-li-DZZA-re «zona» → DZO-na Regole Utili per Orientarsi Quando la Z è all'inizio di parola, nella maggior parte dei casi è Z "morbida": «zero, zona, zaino, zucchero, zio». Il suffisso -zione vuole sempre la Z "dura": «situazione, conversazione, attenzione, nazione». La sequenza Z + I + vocale vuole la Z "dura": «grazie, pulizia, agenzia, silenzio, anziano». Il suffisso -izzare e tutte le sue forme coniugate vogliono la Z "morbida": «realizzare → io realizzo, lui realizza, loro realizzano» — Z "morbida" in tutte le forme. Eccezione importante: la parola «azienda» sembra seguire la regola della sequenza Z+I+vocale — e quindi dovrebbe avere la Z "dura". Invece no: azienda ha la Z "morbida" → a-DZIEN-da. È un'eccezione da memorizzare a parte. Curiosità: moltissimi stranieri pronunciano «pizza» con la Z "morbida", come «pi-DDZA». La pronuncia corretta è invece «pi-TTZA», con la Z "dura". Anche la parola più famosa d'Italia viene pronunciata male nel mondo intero. Errore 3: Le Lettere che Si Scrivono ma Non Si Pronunciano Uno degli aspetti più insidiosi dell'italiano è la presenza di lettere che si scrivono ma sono completamente mute. Molti studenti le pronunciano perché le vedono scritte — ma si tratta di un errore. I Gruppi CIA/CIO/CIU e GIA/GIO/GIU Nei gruppi CIA, CIO, CIU e GIA, GIO, GIU, la I non si pronuncia. La sua unica funzione è segnalare che la C o la G si pronunciano con suono morbido — come la CH di «cheese» o la J di «jump» in inglese. La I è solo un segnale visivo. «ciao» → si pronuncia CHAO — la I non si sente «cioccolato» → CIOC-co-la-to, con suono morbido CH — I muta «giacca» → JAC-ca — I muta «gioco» → JO-co — I muta «Giovanni» → Jo-VAN-ni — I muta Il Gruppo SCIA/SCIO/SCIU Stesso discorso per SCIA, SCIO, SCIU: la I è muta e serve solo a far pronunciare SC con il suono SH — come «she» o «shower» in inglese. «sciarpa» → SHAR-pa — la I non si pronuncia «sciocco» → SHOC-co — I muta «asciugare» → a-SHU-ga-re — I muta Le I "Storiche" — il Caso Più Insidioso In alcune parole la I si scrive per ragioni storiche: nella parola latina originale si pronunciava, ma in italiano moderno è completamente muta. Non esiste una regola visiva di supporto — bisogna semplicemente saperlo. «scienza» → si pronuncia SHÈN-tza, non SHIÈN-tza — la I non si sente «coscienza» → co-SHÈN-tza — I muta «società» → so-che-TÀ — I muta «igiene» → i-JÈ-ne — I muta «specie» → SPÈ-che — I muta Curiosità: la parola «conoscenza» non ha nessuna I, eppure si pronuncia esattamente come la parte finale di «coscienza». Questo dimostra che quella I in «coscienza» è inutile dal punto di vista della pronuncia — esiste solo per ragioni storiche. Un Caso Speciale: i Plurali in -CIE e -GIE Il plurale di «camicia» è «camicie» — con la I. Quello di «valigia» è «valigie» — ancora con la I. Questa I si pronuncia? No, è muta anche qui. Ma allora perché si scrive? Per una regola ortografica precisa: si scrive la I se la sillaba precedente finisce per vocale. «va-LI-gia» → la sillaba -li- finisce per vocale → plurale: «va-LI-gie» (I scritta, ma muta) «ca-MI-cia» → la sillaba -mi- finisce per vocale → plurale: «ca-MI-cie» (I scritta, ma muta) «a-RAN-cia» → la sillaba -ran- finisce per consonante → plurale: «a-RAN-ce» (senza I) «TOR-cia» → la sillaba -tor- finisce per consonante → plurale: «TOR-ce» (senza I) Questa regola riguarda solo la scrittura, non la pronuncia — ma è utile anche per evitare errori ortografici. Errore 4: I Gruppi GL e GN — Suoni che Non Esistono in Molte Lingue Il Gruppo "GLI" Il gruppo GLI non si pronuncia come G + L + I separatamente: è un unico suono prodotto con la lingua premuta contro il palato. A seconda della propria lingua madre, si può avvicinare a questo suono in modi diversi: Spagnolo castigliano: simile alla LL di «llegar» o «llamar» Portoghese: simile alla LH di «filho» Inglese: il suono centrale di «million» — quel «ly» nel mezzo è molto vicino al GLI italiano Esempi pratici: «figlio» → fi-LYO (lingua sul palato) «famiglia» → fa-MI-lya «aglio» → A-lyo «voglio» → VO-lyo «meglio» → ME-lyo Errore comune: molti pronunciano «figlio» separando le lettere — «fig-lio», con G e L distinte. Il suono deve essere invece unico e fluido. Il Gruppo "GN" Anche GN è un suono unico. Per avvicinarsi a questo suono a partire da diverse lingue: Spagnolo: identico alla Ñ di «mañana» Francese: come la GN di «champagne» Inglese: il suono «ny» nel mezzo di «canyon» Esempi pratici: «gnocchi» → NYOc-chi «bagno» → BA-nyo «signore» → si-NYO-re «cognome» → co-NYO-me «montagna» → mon-TA-nya GN è sempre un suono solo — mai G + N separati. Errore 5: Le Consonanti Doppie In molte lingue, come l'inglese, le lettere doppie si scrivono ma non cambiano il suono. In italiano invece la doppia allunga fisicamente il suono della consonante — e questo non è solo una questione fonetica: la doppia può cambiare completamente il significato della parola. SingolaSignificatoDoppiaSignificatonononumero ordinale 9°nonnopadre del proprio padrepenatristezza, dolorepennastrumento per scriveresetevoglia di beresetteil numero 7caroamato, o costosocarroveicolo trainato da animalicapelloun singolo pelo della testacappellocopricapo La doppia si pronuncia semplicemente allungando il suono della consonante — come se ci fosse una piccola pressione su quella consonante prima di continuare: «pena» → N normale | «penna» → N allungata: pen...na «sete» → T normale | «sette» → T allungata: set...te «caro» → R normale | «carro» → R allungata: car...ro Nota: quando gli italiani parlano velocemente, le doppie si sentono meno. Questo può rendere difficile riconoscerle all'ascolto. Nel parlare, però, è sempre meglio pronunciarle con chiarezza: un madrelingua preferirà sentirle leggermente esagerate piuttosto che non sentirle affatto. Domande Frequenti Come Faccio a Sapere Dove Cade l'Accento nella Terza Persona Plurale? Il modo più efficace è pensare alla prima persona singolare (io): l'accento cade nella stessa posizione. Per esempio, se si sa che si dice «io PARlo», si può dedurre che la forma corretta è «loro PARlano» e non «loro parLAno». Per i verbi meno comuni, l'unica strategia affidabile è ascoltare tanto italiano parlato. Esiste una Regola per Distinguere la Z "Dura" dalla Z "Morbida"? Sì, esistono alcune indicazioni utili: la Z all'inizio di parola è quasi sempre "morbida"; il suffisso -zione vuole sempre la Z "dura"; la sequenza Z+I+vocale vuole la Z "dura"; il suffisso -izzare e tutte le sue forme vogliono la Z "morbida". Fanno eccezione alcune parole come «azienda», che va memorizzata a parte. Perché Alcune I Si Scrivono ma Non Si Pronunciano? Per due motivi diversi. In alcuni casi — come in «ciao» o «gioco» — la I serve come segnale visivo per indicare che la C o la G si pronunciano con suono morbido....
On this episode, Shu introduces us to a new resource for hearing never-ending quotes in case music and white noise don't work for you. Matt goes on a partisan rant. Our main topic of discussion was longevity. We talk about how we will die but how future generations may be able to avoid it through measurement. We close with a way to “immortality” for the modern man with a discussion of legacy.
Liz Oyer, a former DOJ pardon attorney, argues that Todd Blanche and the Trump Justice Department have been hiding the real reason Ghislaine Maxwell was moved from FCI Tallahassee to the minimum-security Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas after Blanche personally interviewed her for roughly nine hours over two days. Maxwell, who is serving 20 years for helping Jeffrey Epstein sexually exploit girls, gave Trump highly favorable statements during that meeting, saying he was “a gentleman” and denying that she ever saw him behave inappropriately with Epstein. Days later, she was moved to a far less restrictive prison camp, despite Bureau of Prisons rules that generally bar convicted sex offenders from minimum-security camps because they carry a “public safety factor” requiring at least low-security confinement.The core accusation is that the DOJ's public explanation does not hold up. BOP claimed Maxwell was moved for safety reasons and that there was no special treatment, but Oyer says safety threats are normally handled through protective custody, SHU placement, or a transfer to another appropriate low-security facility — not by sending a convicted sex trafficker to the least-secure kind of federal prison. The “clear admission,” in her view, is a May 6, 2026 change to BOP policy giving the attorney general power to designate or redesignate where prisoners are held, which she sees as a retroactive attempt to justify what already happened to Maxwell and to give Blanche sweeping power over prisoner placement. Her conclusion is blunt: this looks like preferential treatment for Maxwell, potentially tied to protecting Trump, and it should be a major line of questioning at Blanche's confirmation hearing.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:'Clear admission' Trump DOJ broke rules to help Ghislaine Maxwell uncovered by expert - Raw Story
Liz Oyer, a former DOJ pardon attorney, argues that Todd Blanche and the Trump Justice Department have been hiding the real reason Ghislaine Maxwell was moved from FCI Tallahassee to the minimum-security Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas after Blanche personally interviewed her for roughly nine hours over two days. Maxwell, who is serving 20 years for helping Jeffrey Epstein sexually exploit girls, gave Trump highly favorable statements during that meeting, saying he was “a gentleman” and denying that she ever saw him behave inappropriately with Epstein. Days later, she was moved to a far less restrictive prison camp, despite Bureau of Prisons rules that generally bar convicted sex offenders from minimum-security camps because they carry a “public safety factor” requiring at least low-security confinement.The core accusation is that the DOJ's public explanation does not hold up. BOP claimed Maxwell was moved for safety reasons and that there was no special treatment, but Oyer says safety threats are normally handled through protective custody, SHU placement, or a transfer to another appropriate low-security facility — not by sending a convicted sex trafficker to the least-secure kind of federal prison. The “clear admission,” in her view, is a May 6, 2026 change to BOP policy giving the attorney general power to designate or redesignate where prisoners are held, which she sees as a retroactive attempt to justify what already happened to Maxwell and to give Blanche sweeping power over prisoner placement. Her conclusion is blunt: this looks like preferential treatment for Maxwell, potentially tied to protecting Trump, and it should be a major line of questioning at Blanche's confirmation hearing.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:'Clear admission' Trump DOJ broke rules to help Ghislaine Maxwell uncovered by expert - Raw StoryBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Retired California Department of Corrections Special Agent Chad Hester reveals what really happens inside California prisons after 28 years behind the walls. From Level 1 camps to Level 4 yards, SHU, SNY gang-dropout yards, and internal affairs investigations, Chad shares the untold realities of prison life.In this raw, no-holds-barred interview, Chad reveals:How prison levels 1–4 actually work and who ends up where.The reality of racial politics, shot callers, and prison gangs. Why SNY yards were often even more violent than mainline. Riots, stabbings, homemade weapons, prison-made alcohol, and staff assaults. What happens to sex offenders in different parts of the prison system. How judges, politics, and policy changes reshaped California corrections. The psychological toll on officers and the burden he carried home for decades.A must-watch for anyone interested in true crime, law enforcement, prison reform, or what really happens behind prison walls.Chad's story is one of the most honest and detailed accounts of life inside the California prison system you will ever hear.If you liked this interview, please give us a 5-star review, subscribe, comment, and share.
Former correction officer Tova Noel testified before the House Oversight Committee that she was not the orange-colored shape seen moving near the stairs to Jeffrey Epstein's cell tier around 10:39 p.m. on August 9, 2019, the night before Epstein was found dead at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. Noel said she never returned to the tier at that time, was not carrying anything orange, and did not issue anything orange to anyone in the Special Housing Unit. That denial matters because the Justice Department Inspector General had suggested the shape was likely Noel, while an FBI video log had reportedly described it as possibly an inmate — something that would have been highly unusual at that hour. The footage remains especially important because, due to a hard-drive failure, most cameras in the unit were not recording that night, leaving only a partial camera view of the stairs leading to Epstein's tier.Noel acknowledged that she and fellow officer Michael Thomas failed to conduct required inmate rounds and counts, but she denied having anything to do with Epstein's death or any conspiracy surrounding it. She said she did not know who Epstein was when he arrived in the SHU, was unaware of certain special conditions tied to his confinement, and had not seen the posted notice requiring 30-minute rounds. She also rejected questions about cash deposits, saying the money came from personal savings and had no connection to Epstein, and denied an allegation from released Justice Department records claiming she and Thomas were paid to neglect their duties so someone could enter Epstein's cell and kill him. Her testimony leaves the “orange shape” unresolved and adds another unanswered question to a night already defined by failed checks, broken cameras, missing clarity, and official explanations that continue to leave major gaps.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Correction officer testifies she was not the orange shape seen near Jeffrey Epstein's cell the night he died - CBS News
THE TESTAMENTS – “Secateurs” – While Becka faces the consequences of her actions, Agnes and Daisy must decide how far they're willing to go to protect her. (Disney/Steve Wilkie)LUCY HALLIDAY, CHASE INFINITI, ROWAN BLANCHARD Gilead's history is being re-written, and the resistance is wearing school green. In this jam-packed season finale breakdown, Paul and Caroline dive deep into “Secateurs,” an episode that changes the game for every major player. From high-stakes smuggling operations to heartbreaking sacrifices, we analyze a finale that feels less like an ending and more like the birth of an army. THE TESTAMENTS – “Secateurs” – While Becka faces the consequences of her actions, Agnes and Daisy must decide how far they're willing to go to protect her. (Disney/Steve Wilkie)ELISABETH MOSS
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein's death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution's count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111830.pdf
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
