Podcasts about GSK

The UK Investor Magazine was delighted to welcome Ed Croft, CEO of Stockopedia, back to the podcast to explore the key drivers of returns in 2025 and look forward to 2026.Register here to learn how to identify stocks with a higher probability of market outperformanceThe podcast explores Stockopedia's NAPS (No-Admin Portfolio System) portfolio, which has achieved remarkable returns of 345% since inception, approximately 15% annualised, over 11 years.The 2025 portfolio generated a 32% return with a 75% hit rate (15 winners out of 20 positions), outperforming 208 out of 209 fund managers in the IA UK All Companies sector, according to Stockopedia data.This success was achieved with just one hour of work per year, focusing on unloved UK value stocks rather than chasing popular US tech stocks.The discussion centred on moving investors from being “gamblers” chasing story stocks to becoming “craftsmen” following systematic, rules-based approaches. The NAPS strategy uses Stockopedia's StockRanks system, which evaluates stocks from 0-100 based on three factors: Quality (profitability), Value (cheapness), and Momentum (price strength).The portfolio employs a “3D Process” – Drivers (high-ranking stocks), Diversity (20 stocks across 10 sectors using a “Noah's Ark” approach), and Discipline (annual rebalancing).The 2025 portfolio's success stories included gold stocks Serabi Gold and Metals Exploration (both up over 160%), and several takeover targets like Alliance Pharma (+41%). The podcast emphasised that good, cheap stocks attract buyers, particularly in the unloved UK market where low valuations create abundant takeover activity. Even the portfolio's worst performer, Hikma Pharmaceuticals (-25%), didn't sink overall returns due to proper diversification.Register here to learn how to identify stocks with a higher probability of market outperformanceThe podcast concluded by teasing the 2026 NAPS portfolio, due for publication on January 1st, which features takeover-candidate recovery stocks with an average 3.7% yield, including household names like Vodafone and GSK alongside small-cap turnarounds. A webinar was announced for January to teach the 3D process in detail, reinforcing the message that systematic, evidence-based investing should be “fun, profitable, and less emotional.” Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

For episode 659 of the BlockHash Podcast, host Brandon Zemp is joined by Vijit Katta, CEO & Co-founder of Tria. Vijit Katta is the CEO and Co-founder of Tria, with over a decade of experience across entrepreneurship, commercial strategy, and early-stage investing. He built Polygon's in-house accelerator, funding early-stage projects; founded a healthtech startup in Austria, and led commercial strategy for multiple 9-figure portfolios at GSK and AstraZeneca; he holds a CS degree from BITS Pilani and an MBA from INSEAD. Tria is a self-custodial neobank that unifies spending, trading, and earning across all chains — without bridges, gas, or custodians. Built for both humans and AI, Tria makes money programmable, enabling anyone or any agent to transact natively on-chain. Powered by its interoperability layer, BestPath AVS, Tria abstracts away the complexity of crypto to deliver instant, global, and autonomous finance. 

Good morning from Pharma Daily: the podcast that brings you the most important developments in the pharmaceutical and biotech world. Today, we delve into a series of groundbreaking advancements, revealing a landscape rich with scientific innovation and strategic maneuvers poised to impact patient care and the drug development pipeline.Let's start with Johnson & Johnson's recent FDA approval for a subcutaneous version of Rybrevant, their lung cancer medication. This new formulation offers a more convenient administration method compared to AstraZeneca's Tagrisso, intensifying competition in the non-small cell lung cancer market. The shift towards more patient-friendly delivery systems underscores the industry's commitment to enhancing treatment adherence and convenience. In contrast, Insmed faced a setback with its phase 2 trial for Brinsupri in treating chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps. The discontinuation of this program highlights the unpredictable nature of clinical trials and emphasizes the need for rigorous scientific validation before advancing therapeutic candidates.Meanwhile, Lilly has shown promising results with its oral obesity pill, marking significant progress in weight management therapies. Patients transitioning from injectable GLP-1 therapies to Lilly's oral drug candidate maintained substantial weight loss, positioning Lilly favorably against Novo Nordisk's Wegovy. The potential for oral formulations to revolutionize treatment paradigms in chronic conditions cannot be understated. Lilly's progress in obesity treatment with its oral medication orforglipron further cements its competitive edge. Participants in their Phase III clinical trial maintained weight loss after switching from Wegovy or Zepbound to orforglipron, suggesting an efficacious oral alternative to injectable treatments and potentially enhancing patient adherence.On the regulatory front, the Biosecure Act's progression within a major defense spending bill could impose new challenges for life sciences companies with Chinese affiliations. This legislative shift reflects geopolitical tensions impacting global pharmaceutical collaborations and underscores the importance of regulatory compliance in international partnerships. Similarly, Intercept Pharmaceuticals' restructuring following the withdrawal of Ocaliva from the U.S. market is indicative of strategic pivots in response to regulatory hurdles and evolving market dynamics.In dermatology, Takeda's successful phase 3 trials for Zasocitinib highlight the competitive nature of drug development as multiple players vie for market share within therapeutic areas. Their anticipated 2026 FDA filing underscores the prolonged timelines involved in bringing novel therapies to market despite successful clinical outcomes.Public-private collaborations continue to play a crucial role in vaccine development, as evidenced by Moderna's pandemic influenza vaccine advancement into phase 3 trials with support from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). This $54 million investment illustrates ongoing efforts to bolster pandemic preparedness through innovative mRNA technologies. Meanwhile, Moderna's $54 million funding from CEPI to advance its bird flu vaccine highlights resilience amidst fluctuating governmental support. This endeavor leverages Moderna's mRNA technology platform, emphasizing mRNA's versatility across various infectious diseases.Shifting our focus slightly, medical groups have expressed opposition to changes in hepatitis B vaccination recommendations by the CDC for newborns. Such policy debates have significant implications for public health strategies and highlight ongoing discussions within medical communities regarding optimal vaccination protocols.GSK's strategic collaboration with Camp4 Therapeutics marks another key industry development. With an investment exceeding $400 million, GSK aims to Support the show

Landmark is a ground-breaking research programme aimed at accelerating the search for new treatments by applying cutting edge techniques to gain a new level of insight at cellular level into the changes Parkinson's causes in the brain. Principal investigator Professor Michael Johnson from Imperial College London explains the need across the global research community for the new high quality datasets his team will produce.  The project will use tissue samples from the Parkinson's UK Brain Bank, which was set up 22 years ago as a result of the remarkable foresight of Professor David Dexter, who is now the charity's Director of Research. He explains what it was like to see his vision come to fruition when Landmark was launched.  The three year research programme brings together a Parkinson's UK led consortium of four major pharmaceutical companies - GSK, Novartis, Roche, and UCB, plus Imperial College London, which was made possible with £4m of funding from the Gatsby charitable foundation.  https://profiles.imperial.ac.uk/m.johnson    

Antikörpertherapien gehören heute zu den wichtigsten modernen Behandlungsmöglichkeiten gegen Krebs. Um diese zu verstehen, tauchen wir deshalb in den nächsten zwei Folgen ein in die Welt des Immunsystems. Auf unserem Weg begegnen wir frisierten Töfflis, trojanischen Pferden, Antikörpern mit Boxhandschuhen und solchen mit Stoppschildern. Wir lernen, welche verschiedenen Antikörpertherapien es gibt und warum sie für so viele Menschen neue Hoffnung bedeuten.In dieser Folge stehen im Fokus: Monoklonale Antikörper und ADC's (Antibody-Drug-Conjugates).Diese Folge wird ermöglicht dank der Unterstützung von Amgen, AstraZeneca und GSK. Mit ihrer kontinuierlichen Forschung setzen sie sich für neue, wirksamere Krebstherapien ein und arbeiten daran, die Lebensqualität von Patientinnen und Patienten zu verbessern.Wir freuen uns sehr über Rückmeldungen, Ideen und Themenvorschläge für unseren Podcast. Schreib uns gerne auf Instagram (@lebenmitkrebs_ch), Facebook (@LebenmitKrebsSchweiz) oder via E-Mail auf info@lebenmitkrebs.ch. Alles Liebe Nadine & Sandra Disclaimer:Gekennzeichnete Folgen wurden mit finanzieller Unterstützung der jeweiligen Unternehmen erstellt. Die Unternehmen haben keinen Einfluss auf den finalen Inhalt der Folgen. Die Unternehmen sowie die Produzentin übernehmen keine Verantwortung für wiedergegebenen Meinungen und Aussagen von Interviewpartnern in den jeweiligen Folgen. Die unterstützenden Unternehmen und die Redaktion geben ebenso wenig individuelle Empfehlungen in Bezug auf die Diagnose oder den Behandlungsplan von Patienten und Patientinnen. Diese Fragen sind mit den behandelnden Ärzt*innen zu besprechen.

Good morning from Pharma Daily: the podcast that brings you the most important developments in the pharmaceutical and biotech world. Today, we're diving deep into the latest breakthroughs, regulatory updates, and industry trends shaping the future of healthcare.Let's start with Johnson & Johnson's recent achievement in precision oncology. They've secured a second FDA approval for Akeega, a combination therapy that merges J&J's Zytiga with GSK's Zejula. This innovative approach targets BRCA2-mutated metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer, marking a significant advancement in personalized medicine. This approval not only highlights the progress in tailored treatment strategies but also sets a new benchmark for therapeutic innovation in this particular cancer subset.Moving on to cardiovascular health, Cincinnati's LIB Therapeutics has introduced Lerochol, a third-generation PCSK9 inhibitor designed to lower cholesterol. Unlike its predecessors, Lerochol offers simplified administration, potentially improving patient adherence and outcomes. This approval is part of a broader effort to refine lipid-lowering therapies and better address cardiovascular diseases.In a groundbreaking development for heart rhythm disorders, Milestone Pharmaceuticals has received FDA approval for Cardamyst, a nasal spray that patients can self-administer to manage paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). This novel treatment option empowers patients with an on-demand solution to control their heart rhythms, significantly enhancing their quality of life.Turning to infectious diseases, Innoviva's Nuzolvence has been approved as a much-needed new treatment for gonorrhea, the first in over three decades following GSK's Blujepa. This marks an essential step forward in combating antibiotic-resistant sexually transmitted infections and highlights the urgency of developing new antimicrobial agents.However, not all ventures have met with success. Argenx recently halted studies of its drug Vyvgart in thyroid eye disease after disappointing trial results. This decision underscores the inherent challenges and risks involved in drug development, particularly when tackling complex autoimmune conditions.Sanofi has faced its own hurdles with Tolebrutinib after experiencing both FDA delays and trial misses in non-relapsing secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. These setbacks emphasize the intricacies of bringing innovative therapies to market and the critical importance of robust clinical trial design and regulatory strategy.Strategic collaborations are also playing a pivotal role in the industry. Adaptive Biotechnologies has partnered with Pfizer to leverage its T-cell receptor discovery technology. Meanwhile, Dren Bio is expanding its collaboration with Sanofi to develop next-generation B-cell depleting therapies for autoimmune diseases. These alliances reflect an increasing trend towards collaborative innovation to harness cutting-edge technologies.Another strategic move comes from Sobi, which has acquired Arthrosi Therapeutics for $950 million to bolster its portfolio with phase 3 gout treatments. This acquisition bypasses traditional IPO routes and showcases evolving deal-making strategies within biopharma.In another exciting development, Kyverna Therapeutics is on the verge of securing the first-in-class CAR-T therapy approval for autoimmune diseases following promising trial results with its CD19 agent. This could herald a new era in autoimmune disease management through cellular therapies.In regulatory news beyond pharmaceuticals, former President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing a unified federal framework for artificial intelligence (AI). This aims to streamline AI regulation across states and could accelerate AI integration into various sectors, including healthcare.These developments collectively represent pivotal moments in the pharmaceutical and Support the show

Co-hosts Ryan Piansky, a graduate student and patient advocate living with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic asthma, and Holly Knotowicz, a speech-language pathologist living with EoE who serves on APFED's Health Sciences Advisory Council, interview Fei Li Kuang, MD, PhD, an allergist and immunologist, at Northwestern Medicine, about receiving two APFED HOPE on the Horizon Grants. Disclaimer: The information provided in this podcast is designed to support, not replace, the relationship between listeners and their healthcare providers. Opinions, information, and recommendations shared in this podcast are not a substitute for medical advice. Decisions related to medical care should be made with your healthcare provider. Opinions and views of guests and co-hosts are their own.   Key Takeaways: [:50] Co-host Ryan Piansky introduces this episode, brought to you thanks to the support of Education Partners GSK, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Takeda. Ryan introduces co-host Holly Knotowicz.   [1:14] Holly introduces today's topic, two APFED HOPE on the Horizon Pilot Grant Projects and today's guest, Fei Li Kuang, MD, PhD, an Assistant Professor in the Division of Allergy and Immunology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois.   [1:42] Dr. Kuang is a physician-scientist who takes care of patients with eosinophilic disorders and also performs laboratory research on these disorders in her lab, often using patient samples. Holly thanks Dr. Kuang for joining us.   [2:05] As a child, Dr. Kuang always wanted to be a scientist. She is so grateful to live out her childhood dream, and it's because of the amazing people who have supported her, most importantly, her parents.   [2:29] In graduate school, Dr. Kuang studied B cells. When she went on to do an allergy fellowship, she thought she would study B cells and care for patients with B cell problems. Instead, she fell in love with allergy and eosinophilic disorders.   [2:50] Dr. Kuang is here, in part, because of the different mentors she has had, and in large part, because of the patients she has met along the way.   [3:20] Dr. Kuang had the opportunity to work with Amy Klion at the NIH in a clinical trial to treat patients with a drug that gets rid of eosinophils. She says it was a dream come true after her training.   [4:02] She says she learned so much about eosinophils, their unusual biology, and the mystery behind what they are here for. She got hooked.   [4:15] Dr. Kuang thinks the patients you meet in a clinical trial in a special place like NIH occupy a space in your heart that makes you want to keep working on the subject area.   [4:34] Patients in a clinical trial have given up a bunch of their time to travel to Bethesda, Maryland. For the trial Dr. Kuang participated in as a Fellow, it was a good year of their time to come out and do it.   [4:47] Dr. Kuang felt there were so many interesting questions, from an intellectual point of view, but there was also a real need from patients with chronic conditions. It was a beautiful opportunity to marry scientists with physicians in training.   [5:36] Dr. Kuang shares some knowledge about eosinophils. They are white blood cells that are in all of us. They have little pink packages or granules that "jumped out" in the light microscope almost 200 years ago, when we first identified them.   [6:00] Dr. Kuang says that animals, dating back to reptiles, and different species of dolphins, all have eosinophils. A veterinary scientist, Dr. Nicole Stacy of the University of Florida, has taken photos of eosinophils from all these different species.   [6:21] They've been around for a long time. What are they good for? What we know is that they are associated with disease conditions, such as asthma and others, including leukemia. Those were the classic first studies of eosinophils.   [6:42] Now, we have a different mindset about eosinophils from work by the late James Lee at Mayo Clinic, Arizona.   [6:58] Dr. Kuang credits Dr. Lee with suggesting that eosinophils not just cause us problems but also help treat parasitic infections, maintain tissue homeostasis, help wound healing, and tissue repair. That's a new area we are beginning to appreciate.   [7:41] Dr. Kuang says we need to be open-minded that in some circumstances, eosinophils may be helpful or innocent. Now we have tools to start to understand some of that. We need to collect information from patients being treated with medicines.   [8:10] Ryan tells of being diagnosed as a kid. Doctors explained to him that eosinophils fight parasites, but in some people, they get confused and attack the esophagus. That's EoE. That was easy to understand, but he knew that the researchers knew more.   [8:53] Ryan is grateful to the patient population around eosinophilic esophagitis, and is proud of APFED's support of patients and caregivers with HOPE Grants. APFED has the HOPE on the Horizon Research Program, entirely funded by community donations.   [9:13] To date, APFED has directed more than $2 million toward eosinophilic disease research initiatives through various grant programs. As a patient advocacy organization, APFED works with fantastic researchers who submit innovative research ideas.   [9:32] These research ideas go through an extensive and competitive peer-review process, supported by researchers and clinicians in the APFED community.   [9:42] Today, we're going to discuss two different projects supported by HOPE Pilot Grants with Dr. Kuang.   [10:00] Dr. Kuang thinks there are two ways these grant programs are important to patients. One is advancing research by nurturing seedling investigators. Dr. Kuang got her first grant when she was a Fellow. It was an incredible opportunity.   [10:25] These grant programs also nurture seedling ideas that don't have enough evidence yet to garner the larger NIH grants, and so forth. There are other sources for grants: pharmaceutical companies. The grant programs are for seeds.   [10:49] Patients need to know that there are new things that are given some chance of being tested out. Research takes some time, and the FDA process of getting a drug approved is long.   [11:04] For the newly diagnosed patient, it can feel overwhelming. It feels like there's a loss of control. Sometimes, participating in something like APFED, being part of a community, gives back a sense of control that is lost when you're handed a diagnosis.   [11:45] For patients who have had it for a long time, when they participate in research and become engaged in organizations like APFED, they know they may not directly benefit today, they may benefit later, but they hope future patients will benefit.   [12:21] That gives them a sense of control and hope that things will be better for the next generation. We all want that, especially in medicine, in something that we don't have a very deep understanding of.   [12:58] Dr. Kuang received two HOPE Pilot Grants, one in 2018 and one in 2022. The first grant was awarded when she was a Fellow at the NIH.   [13:05] That first grant explored some effects of eosinophilic depletion of pathogenic lymphocytes in hypereosinophilic syndrome and overlaps with EGIDs. Ryan asks for a broad overview of that research.   [13:25] When Dr. Kuang was a Fellow at the NIH, they were doing a Phase 2 clinical trial, looking at "blowing up" eosinophils in patients who have a lot of them, hypereosinophilic syndrome patients.   [13:39] They included patients who had eosinophilic GI disease, often beyond the esophagus. They may have esophageal involvement, but sometimes their stomach is impacted, sometimes their large bowel is impacted, with related symptoms.   [13:57] What Dr. Kuang and the team noticed in the trial was that just within that little group of patients, there were people who did well, and people who did much better than before, but would have recurrent symptoms, and with no eosinophils in their GI tissues.    [14:16] The researchers wanted to know what was causing these problems for the patient. If you take eosinophils away, what other factors will impact the immune system of the patient, semi-long-term?   [14:32] Their focus was on these groups of patients who had different responses. They looked at the white blood cells that had been previously described as being the responsible, "bad" T cells that lead to eosinophils in the gut.   [14:49] They found that the patients who had recurrent flares of the disease had more of the bad T cells, and the patients who responded well and never complained again about symptoms did not.   [15:03] That allowed researchers to identify that there were subsets of patients with the disease that they were calling the same thing.   [15:18] Dr. Kuang says that work also led them to find that those cells were being reported in patients who had food allergies for which they needed an epinephrine auto-injector.   [15:27] The researchers were curious whether that was just a food allergy issue, or only applied if you had food allergies and eosinophilic GI disease. That HOPE project allowed them to do a pilot study to look at food allergy patients, too. They did, and published it.   [15:45] They published that in patients who have a food allergy and have these T cells, the insides of those cells make different messages for the immune system than the ones that the researchers had previously described.   [16:01] In looking for why there were differences in those responses, they accidentally found that there were differences inside these cells in a completely different disease, which also had these T cells.   [16:21] Dr. Kuang says that the finding was kind of a surprise. If they had found anything in the eosinophilic GI disease patients, that would have been good. They also looked at the epithelial cells and the structure of the GI lining.   [16:42] Even though there were no eosinophils in the GI lining in the patients who had been treated with a biologic that depleted eosinophils, their GI lining still looked like the GI lining of patients who had eosinophilic GI disease.   [16:55] Dr. Kuang asked what was creating those spots. Our gut lining sheds, so there should have been an opportunity for the GI lining to turn over and look new. Something was there, making signals to create these spots. They did a different publication on that.   [17:21] The data from the HOPE Pilot study allowed Dr. Kuang to apply for larger grants. It allowed her to propose to the company that made this drug, when they did the Phase 3 trial, to insert into that special study the study on eosinophilic GI disease.   [17:48] Do patients with eosinophilic GI disease do better or worse on this drug, and how do the T cells look in that trial? That HOPE Grant gave Dr. Kuang the data to ask the drug company to give her money to study it in an international cohort of patients.   [18:17] There were only 20 patients in that first NIH trial, who gave a year of their life, coming to NIH all the time. They continued to be in the study until the drug was approved for asthma.   [18:28] Dr. Kuang says the main reason the company did the Phase 3 trial, which is expensive, and the market share is not huge because it's a rare disease, is that two of the patients went to bat for this disease population.   [18:47] The two patients went and showed the business people what they looked like before, what the drug had done for them, and how their lives had changed. It wasn't the doctors or the great paper from the trial, but the patients who convinced the company.   [19:01] Dr. Kuang says she was so floored by that and moved by what they did for the community. She is grateful.   [19:24] Since the Phase 3 trial, Dr. Kuang and the other researchers realized they had not fully studied the eosinophils. They had studied them in part. They found differences in response. This inspired the second APFED HOPE Pilot Grant.   [21:19] In 2022, Dr. Kuang received a two-year APFED HOPE Pilot Grant to examine how blood eosinophils in Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases differ from those of other eosinophilic diseases and how T cells in EGIDs differ from those in food allergies.   [21:49] Dr. Kuang says normally, the biggest place of residence for eosinophils is the GI tract. That's where they are normally seen in people who do not have eosinophilic disorders.   [21:59] People who have eosinophilic disorders that attack other parts of the body, asthma, and rarely, the heart. Dr. Kuang was curious to know why one person and not the other?   [22:15] Patients who have eosinophilic GI disease often ask, How do you know this high level in the blood is not going to attack my heart or my lungs in the future? Dr. Kuang does not know.   [22:29] Dr. Kuang says, looking at the cohort at the NIH, that for many patients who have both GI organ involvement and some other space, when they first went to see a provider, their first complaint was a GI condition.   [22:54] If the doctor had only diagnosed a GI condition, nothing else, that would have been wrong. Those patients may not have been monitored as well. A third of the patients originally presented like that.   [23:11] What that meant was that we should be paying attention to patients who have GI disease who have lots of eosinophils in their blood. Moving forward, if there are new complaints, we need to investigate. We can't forget they have that.   [23:27] Dr. Kuang asks, Wouldn't it be great if we had a better tool than needing to wait? Wouldn't it be great if we had a biomarker that said the eosinophils have switched their target location and are going somewhere else?   [23:41] One way to do that is to take different groups of eosinophils and look for differences between those that never target the GI tract and those that do. In patients who have EoE, the eosinophils only target or cause problems in the esophagus.   [23:58] Are their eosinophils any different than those of a healthy person, with none of these conditions? That was the goal of that study.   [24:10] T cells are another type of white blood cell. They contain a memory of foreign things they have encountered, which allows them to glom onto flu, COVID, peanuts, pollen, that kind of thing. They remember.   [24:32] Dr. Kuang says they learned that T cells, at least in the mouse model, are required in the development of eosinophilic esophagitis. The mice in the old study, where mice were forced to develop EoE, did not get EoE if you removed their T cells.   [24:50] In the first APFED HOPE grant study, Dr. Kuang found T cells in the blood and tissue of both EGIDs and food allergy patients, but the insides of the T cells were different. The food allergy patients were children recruited by a pediatric allergist.   [25:19] In the second APFED HOPE grant study, at Northwestern, Dr. Kuang recruited her adult food allergy patients. That was a way to validate what they found in the first study and move further to better characterize those T cells in the two different diseases.   [25:47] Dr. Kuang says we're at a point where we've recruited a lot of people. She says it's amazing what people are willing to do. It's very humbling.   [26:06] Dr. Kuang's team in the lab is really great, too. To accommodate patients, they would see them after work, if that's what they had to do to isolate eosinophils. So they did that, and now they are in the process of analyzing that data. It's really exciting.   [26:28] What's exciting is that they are seeing results that show that eosinophilic GI disease patients have circulating eosinophils that are different from the eosinophils of people who don't have GI involvement, and from people who have EoE.   [26:46] The EoE patients have eosinophils different from those of healthy donors. Dr. Kuang says there's a lot of promise for perhaps unique signatures that could help define these conditions; maybe someday without biopsying, but that's a long time away.   [27:16] Dr. Kuang says they will focus on some candidate targets and try to recreate some of that in a dish with eosinophils from healthy people.   [27:26] What are the signals that lead eosinophils to do this, and can we translate that back to available drugs that target certain cytokines or other pathways, and maybe give some insight to develop drugs that target other pathways for these diseases?   [28:17] Ryan thinks it's exciting that this research is narrowing in on not only the different symptoms, but also how the eosinophils are acting differently in these populations.    [28:44] Dr. Kuang is super excited about this research. You could imagine that all eosinophils are the same, but you don't know until you look. When they looked, using the newest technology, they found there were differences.   [29:33] Dr. Kuang says it is thought that T cells respond to triggers. We don't think eosinophils have a memory for antigens. T cells do. That's one of their definitions. When T cells react to a trigger, they give out messages through cytokines or by delivery.   [30:20] Those are the messages that recruit eosinophils and other cells to come and stir up some trouble.   [30:28] In the mouse model, where you don't have the T cells, and you don't get eosinophilic esophagitis in the particular way they made it happen in a mouse, that middle messenger is gone, so the eosinophils don't know where to go.   [30:44] With drugs that take out eosinophils, you think that you've gotten rid of the cell that creates all the problems. It shouldn't matter what the message says because there's no cell there to cause the damage.   [30:58] What Dr. Kuang learned is that, at least in certain eosinophilic GI diseases, that's not true. You erase the eosinophils from the picture, but that message is still coming.   [31:10] Who's carrying out the orders? Or is that message maintaining the wall of epithelial cells in a certain way that we didn't appreciate because the eosinophils were also there?   [31:24] It's important to study both, because one is the messenger and the other is one of the actors. Whether all of the actions taken by eosinophils are bad, or maybe some of them were meant to be good, we have yet to learn.   [31:40] At the moment, we're using it as a marker for disease activity, and that may change in the future, as we learn more about the roles of these cells in the process.   [31:50] We have drugs now that target eosinophils and drugs that target T cells. Dr. Kuang thinks it's important to study both and to study the impact of these drugs on these cells.   [32:02] You could theoretically use these drugs to understand whether, if someone responds to it, what happens to these cells, and if someone doesn't respond to it, what happens to these cells, and how this disease manifests in this flavor of patients.   [32:54] Dr. Kuang says, Often in science, we take a model. We think this works this way. Then, if this works this way, we expect that if we remove this, these things should happen. We did that with the first clinical trial, with NIH patients.   [33:10] It didn't quite happen the way we thought, so we had to go looking for explanations. These were unusual setbacks. Sometimes you have unusual findings, like the food allergy part.   [33:24] When Dr. Kuang went to Northwestern, she saw different cohorts of patients than she saw at NIH. She saw people who were seen every day, which is a different spectrum than those who are selected to be enrolled in a study protocol at the NIH.   [33:42] That broadened her viewpoint. It's maybe not all food-triggered. They were seeing adults who'd never had food allergies or asthma their whole life, and they had eosinophilic esophagitis suddenly as a 50-year-old. There's a significant group of them.   [34:10] What Dr. Kuang learned and tries to be open-minded about is that where you train, what sorts of patients you see, really shape your viewpoint and thinking about the disease process and the management process.   [34:24] Dr. Kuang says she was so lucky to have experienced that at a quaternary care referral center like the NIH and at an academic center like Northwestern, where there are fantastic gastroenterologists who see so many of these patients.   [34:56] Dr. Kuang and an Allergy Fellow knew they were going to get a wonderful data set from the NIH patients they had recruited, so they thought they had better look deeply at what had been learned before with older technology, with mice and people.   [35:13] They decided to gather previous research, and that ultimately got published as an article. From that research, they learned that people did things in many different ways because there was no standard. They didn't know what the standard should be.   [35:28] Different things you do to try to get eosinophils out of tissue impact how they look, in terms of transcript, gene expression, and what messages they make to define themselves as an eosinophil.   [35:43] They also learned that because eosinophils are hard to work with, they die easily, and you can't freeze them and work on them the next day; you can introduce issues in there that have to be accounted for.   [35:59] They learned that as an eosinophil research community, they ought to come up with some standards so that they can compare future studies with each other. Dr. Kuang says it was impossible to compare the old studies that used different premises.   [36:50] Dr. Kuang says we need to be proactive in creating the datasets in a standard way so that we can compare and have a more fruitful and diverse community of data. It's hard to use the old data.   [37:57] Dr. Kuang says they get fresh blood from patients, and because eosinophils are finicky, they need to be analyzed within four hours, or preserved in a way to save whatever fragile molecules are to be studied.   [38:19] If you let it sit, it starts dying, so you won't have as many of them, and they start changing because they're not in the body. Dr. Kuang experimented with putting a tube of blood on the bench and checking it with the same test every two hours. It changes.   [38:38] Four hours is a standard to prevent the eosinophils from dying. Patients need treatment. If a patient is hospitalized and needs treatment, Dr. Kuang's team needs to be there to get a sample before treatment is started.   [39:03] The treatment impacts it, changing the situation. Much of the treatment, initially, is steroids. When you give lots of steroids, the eosinophils go away. It's no good to draw their blood then.   [39:27] Dr. Kuang also gets a urine sample. The granules of the eosinophils can get into the urine. As they study people with active disease, they want to capture granule proteins in the urine as a less invasive way to monitor activity in different disease states.   [40:04] The patient just needs to give Dr. Kuang either arm and a urine sample.   [41:04] Dr. Kuang explains, you can count your eosinophils after four hours, but to study them, they have different flags of different colors and shapes. Those colors and shapes may mean that it's an activated eosinophil, or they may have other meanings.   [41:41] Dr. Kuang focused on markers that look at whether it's going to spill its granules and some traditional markers of activation.     [41:50] Everyone chooses a different marker of activation. So they decided to look at as many as they could. One marker is not sufficient. They seem to be different in different conditions. The markers are on the surface; you need to analyze them right away.   [42:20] Then, Dr. Kuang breaks open the eosinophils and grabs the messenger RNA. They preserve it to do sequencing to read out the orders to see what this eosinophil is telling itself to make. RNA chops up messages.   [43:00] When you open an eosinophil, a protein you find is RNA, which chops up messages, destroying parts of the cell. You want to save the message. There's a brief time to analyze the eosinophil. Dr. Kuang works to preserve and read the message.   [44:04] Dr. Kuang hopes someday to run a tube of blood, look at the flags on the eosinophils, and say, "I think your eosinophilic GI disease is active," or "You have a kind of eosinophilic GI disease we need to monitor more frequently for organ damage."   [44:38] If another patient doesn't have those flags, Dr. Kuang could say, "I think the chances that you're going to have involvement elsewhere are low." That can give reassurance to folks who are worried.   [45:15] Dr. Kuang hopes that someday we can understand better why some people have food allergies vs. eosinophilic GI disease. They both have T cells, but the T cells have different packages inside with messages to deliver.   [45:34] Every day, Dr. Kuang has to tell patients she doesn't have that answer. Someday, she hopes she can tell a patient she does have that answer.   [46:35] Dr. Kuang tells about an NIH grant she's excited about and the patients she recruits after therapy, or elimination diets, to examine eosinophils and T cells, to see the impacts their treatments or diets have had on eosinophilic GI disease.   [47:18] Dr. Kuang believes there will be predictors of who will respond to an elimination diet and who will respond to steroid therapy. She hopes one day to have that, rather than going through rounds of six to eight weeks followed by a scope.   [47:34] If you have an elimination diet for six to eight weeks, every time you add back a food, you have to do a scope. Dr. Kuang says it would be great if you could be more precise ahead of time for therapy.   [47:48] Dr. Kuang says these wonderful drugs selectively take out parts of the pathway in the immune system. They provide real-life opportunities to ask, why is this important in human biology and the human immune system?   [48:15] Dr. Kuang finds the knowledge itself fascinating and useful. She hopes it informs how we choose future drugs or therapeutic avenues to get the best we can out of what we've learned, so we have more targeted ways of treating specific diseases.   [48:48] Ryan is grateful for all the research happening for the eosinophilic disease community and all the patients participating in the research. He asks Dr. Kuang how a patient can participate in research.   [49:12] There are lots of ways to be involved in research. Dr. Kuang says her patients come away from participating in research feeling good about having done it.   [49:22] Answer a survey, if that's what you have bandwidth for. Where therapies are changing, being a part of a community is good for the community, for the future, but it's good for you, too. It's healing in ways that are not steroids or biologics.   [49:58] Being part of a community is healing in ways we all need when we feel alone and bewildered. You're not alone.   [50:12] There are many ways to participate: APFED, CEGIR, individual institutions, and clinical trials. They all have different amounts of involvement. It's worthwhile to participate, not only for future patients but for yourself. They're fantastic!   [50:56] Dr. Kuang talks about the privilege as a physician of working with APFED and other organizations to do this work.   [51:09] Holly thanks Dr. Kuang for sharing all of this research and exciting information.   [51:25] Dr. Kuang is excited about what her group is doing and is hopeful. Besides showing up for this disease, we have to show up for research, in general, in this country. It's a dark time for NIH research funding.   [51:55] Dr. Kuang asks the young listeners who are thinking of choosing a field to see the potential and get into it, study this, and believe that there's going to be a future with a more nurturing research environment.   [52:36] Dr. Kuang would hate to lose generations of scientists. She says that once she was a little girl who was trying to be a scientist. Her parents had no connections with scientists or doctors, but she was able to get into research, and she thinks you can, too.   [53:48] As a graduate student, Ryan has always been interested in trying to improve things, and he sees hope on the horizon. He's very grateful to the APFED community for supporting these research HOPE Pilot Grants.   [54:17] Ryan is very grateful to Dr. Kuang for joining us today.   [54:22] For our listeners who want to learn more about eosinophilic disorders, we encourage you to visit apfed.org and check out the links in the show notes.   [54:28] If you're looking to find a specialist who treats eosinophilic disorders, we encourage you to use APFED's Specialist Finder at apfed.org/specialist.   [54:37] If you'd like to connect with others impacted by eosinophilic diseases, please join APFED's online community on the Inspire Network at apfed.org/connections.   [54:57] Dr. Kuang thanks Ryan and Holly and says she enjoyed the conversation. Holly also thanks APFED's Education Partners GSK, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Takeda for supporting this episode.   Mentioned in This Episode: Fei Li Kuang, MD, PhD, Allergist and Immunologist, Northwestern Medicine   Grants and publications discussed: Apfed.org/blog/apfed-announces-2018-hope-apfed-hope-pilot-grant-recipient/ Apfed.org/blog/fei-li-kuang-hope-pilot-grant-award/  Pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39213186/ Pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37487654/   APFED on YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram Real Talk: Eosinophilic Diseases Podcast apfed.org/specialist apfed.org/connections apfed.org/research/clinical-trials   Education Partners: This episode of APFED's podcast is brought to you thanks to the support of GSK, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Takeda.   Tweetables:   "I think the patients that you meet in a clinical trial, especially in a special place like NIH, occupy a space in your heart — I don't mean to be all too emotional about this — that makes you want to keep working on the subject area." — Fei Li Kuang, MD, PhD   "When I was a Fellow at the NIH, we were doing a Phase 2 clinical trial, looking at, for want of a better word, "blowing up" eosinophils in patients who have a lot of them, hypereosinophilic syndrome patients." — Fei Li Kuang, MD, PhD   "We're at a point where we've recruited a lot of people. I've had patients drive from the northern part of Illinois … come down and give me blood. It's amazing what people want to do and are willing to do. It's very humbling, actually." — Fei Li Kuang, MD, PhD   "You erase the eosinophils from the picture, but that message is still coming. Who's carrying out the orders? Or is that message maintaining the wall of epithelial cells in a certain way that we didn't appreciate because the eosinophils were also there?" — Fei Li Kuang, MD, PhD   "We need to be proactive in creating the datasets in a standard way so that we can compare and have a more fruitful and diverse community of data." — Fei Li Kuang, MD, PhD   "I think it's worthwhile to participate [in a clinical trial], not only for the future people but for yourself." — Fei Li Kuang, MD, PhD   Guest Bio: Fei Li Kuang, MD, PhD, is currently an Assistant Professor in the Division of Allergy and Immunology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, IL. She is a graduate of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Medical Scientist Training Program with both a PhD in Cell Biology/Immunology and an MD.  She completed her Internal Medicine Residency at Columbia University, New York Presbyterian Hospital in New York City, she did her Fellowship in Allergy and Immunology at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) in Bethesda, Maryland. She is a physician-scientist who takes care of patients with eosinophilic disorders and also performs laboratory research on these disorders in her lab, often using patient samples.

For more information regarding this CME/CE activity and to complete the CME/CE requirements and claim credit for this activity, visit:https://www.mycme.com/courses/responding-to-the-science-biologics-in-practice-in-copd-10511SummaryThis enduring podcast activity provides pulmonologists and clinicians managing COPD with timely updates on the evolving role of biologics management. Featuring expert discussions, the program explores recent GOLD guideline revisions, the integration of new and emerging biologic therapies, and evidence-based decision-making based on clinical trial data and real-world practice.Covering guidelines, clinical trials, and clinical scenario, this activity emphasizes the translation of complex data into practical strategies. Learners will gain improved knowledge and competence related to patient selection, eosinophil thresholds, and clinical decision making.This podcast was recorded and is being used with permission of the presenters.Learning ObjectivesDiscuss recent evidence surrounding the use of biologic agents in the management of patients with COPD, including patient populations and outcomesIntegrate the use of biologic agents into the management of patients with COPD based on guidelines and clinical evidence for new and emerging agentsThis activity is accredited for CME/CE CreditThe National Association for Continuing Education is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The National Association for Continuing Education designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.The National Association for Continuing Education is accredited by the American Association of Nurse Practitioners as an approved provider of nurse practitioner continuing education. Provider number: 121222. This activity is approved for 0.25 contact hours (which includes 0.25 hours of pharmacology).For additional information about the accreditation of this program, please contact NACE at info@naceonline.com.Summary of Individual DisclosuresPlease review faculty and planner disclosures here. Disclosure of Commercial SupportThis educational activity is supported by an independent medical education grant from GSK and an independent educational grant from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc and Sanofi.Please visit http://naceonline.com to engage in more live and on demand CME/CE content.

Sean Farrington looks at the US Federal Reserve's decision to cut interest rates and what that could mean for the Bank of England.We talk to the outgoing boss of GSK on why they're focusing investment in the US over the UK.And finally, we look at ticket prices for next year's World Cup.

This episode of Health on the Line tackles the issue of worsening health inequalities across the UK and the urgent action required to address them. With the theme of tackling these disparities running throughout the government's NHS 10 Year Health Plan, there is an opportunity now to realign healthcare with this goal. To discuss the topic in relation to respiratory disease and vaccine preventable diseases, Matthew Taylor is joined by Sarah Sleet, chief executive of Asthma + Lung UK, and Dr Tom Nutt, chief executive of Meningitis Now. The trio explore how community-based respiratory programmes can improve early diagnosis and treatment access, while expanding vaccine cohorts and raising awareness can help increase coverage against vaccine-preventable disease. They also consider what kind of practical approaches can help bridge gaps to improve health outcomes and reduce health inequalities more broadly across the healthcare system. Matthew is also joined by Sonia Nosheen, assistant director for the Acute Network at the NHS Confederation, to hear about the Confederation's work supporting members in the area of ophthalmology. The new programme aims to help members deliver care closer to where patients live and work. This episode is non-promotional, sponsored by GSK and developed in partnership with the NHS Confederation. Health on the Line is an NHS Confederation podcast, produced by HealthCommsPlus. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Dame Emma Walmsley, Chief Executive one of Britain's biggest pharmaceutical companies GSK (GlaxoSmithKline), says the company is prioritising the United States for product launches and investment, citing its scale, commercial opportunities and favourable business environment. She confirms GSK will invest four times more in the US than in the UK over the coming years, making America the company's primary growth and innovation focus.Explaining GSK's investment strategy, Dame Emma Walmsley points to the US market's scale and competitiveness, boosted by recent government policy. She welcomes a new UK-US agreement removing tariffs and recognising pharmaceutical innovation, but warns of challenges for Britain's life sciences sector. Despite the UK's strong scientific heritage, she notes it accounts for just 2% of GSK's sales, compared with more than half in the US.Dame Emma Walmsley stresses the UK must stay competitive to attract foreign investment, warning that other countries increasingly treat life sciences as a strategic industry. She confirms the UK will pay more for medicines under the new agreement, with NHS costs for new drugs expected to rise by 25%. While medicines make up only 9% of NHS spending—lower than in many countries—she acknowledges budget pressures and the need for careful prioritisation.Dame Emma Walmsley also reveals GSK is close to winning approval for the world's first six-monthly asthma drug, expected to cut the most severe attacks requiring hospitalisation by more than 70%. She calls the breakthrough a major advance for patients and healthcare systems, with the potential to deliver significant cost savings and improve quality of life for millions worldwide. She also comments on the surge in obesity and weight-loss treatments, noting GSK is not a major player but admires the scientific progress. Instead, the company is focusing on high-burden diseases such as liver disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with trials under way and hopes for further breakthroughs.Finally, Dame Emma Walmsley reflects on a turbulent period when activist investors questioned her leadership and forced her to reapply for her own job, amid concerns over GSK's share price performance versus rivals.Presenter: Simon Jack Producer: Ollie Smith/ Olie D'Albertanson00:00 Sean Farrington and BBC Business Editor Simon Jack intro pod 03:00 Dame Emma Walmsley joins the pod 03:53 Change agenda & US market focus and investment 07:18 New asthma drug approval on the horizon 08:19 GSK's scale and global impact 12:03 GSK to invest four times more in the US than the UK 14:54 UK to pay more for drugs after UK-US deal 16:56 GSK new asthma drug breakthrough 19:48 GSK's approach to obesity and weight loss drugs 28:23 Women in leadership at GSK 32:47 Shareholder revolt and leadership challenges

The 2025 Medical Innovation Olympics featured one of the most memorable and personal interviews with Amber Salzman, CEO at Epicrispr Biotechnologies, an extraordinary leader with unparalleled sense of purpose, urgency, PhD in mathematics and illustrious track record of success as a pharmaceutical industry executive with over 30 years of experience that included growing revenue, shareholder value, and accelerating innovative treatments. She began her career leading R & D at GSK with a clinical pipeline responsibility for $1.25 billion, prior to serving as CEO at Cardiokine, CEO at Avalanche, co-founder of Annapurna, SAS, CEO of Adverum, Ohana Biosciences. She currently serves on the Osler Diagnostics (UK) and AviadoBio (UK) Boards. In addition to advocating for patients living with rare diseases, Dr. Salzman leads the Stop ALD Foundation, a non-profit medical research foundation focused on developing.In this interview Amber speaks about her personal and family's struggle with neurodegenerative rare diseases and the critical new discoveries in gene regulation to switch genes on and off rather than cut DNA which she has guided and accelerated with the support of an extraordinary team of Nobel Prize laureates and scientists at Epicrispr. 0:00 - Highlight 1 - Amber's Family's Personal Struggle with Rare Neurodegenerative Disease1:02 - Highlight 2 - Patient's Real-World Story from the 9/11 tragedy2:31 - Highlight 3 - Vision & Stamina Needed to Address Unpredictability of Human Biology 4:03 - Speaker Introduction7:19 - Keys to Transition from R & D to CEO/Commercial Leader10:22 - Approach to decision-making as a leader with urgency & purpose14:00 - Epigenetic Editing and How it is different from CRISPR16:36 - Challenges on the journey to Epicrispr's discovery18:14 - Second challenge - finding a gene modulator with which to fuse it 18:49 - Patients vary significantly in how they express their symptoms19:52 - Springbuck Analytics Partnership - Whole Body Imaging21:14 - Recent disappointments from Sarepta in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy25:48 - How Amber's personal family experiences with Genetic Diseases impacted her leadership journey29:47 - When could FSHD patients finally access this new treatment?31:27 - What other disease conditions is Epicrispr considering in its development program?33:27 - Amber's Lessons: Stay focused on patients, learn, and co-develop treatments together

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/QKQ865. CME/MOC/AAPA credit will be available until December 7, 2026.Toward Functional Cure in Chronic HBV: Monitoring, Serological Markers, and Evolving Therapy In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis educational activity is supported by an independent medical education grant from GSK.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.

A história do Pedro foi contada em uma parceria do Histórias de Ter.a.pia com a GSK, para conscientizar sobre a importância da vacinação contra a meningite meningocócica. Material dirigido ao público em geral. Por favor, consulte o seu médico. *publiNP-BR-MNU-BRF-250018 - Outubro/2025 

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/QKQ865. CME/MOC/AAPA credit will be available until December 7, 2026.Toward Functional Cure in Chronic HBV: Monitoring, Serological Markers, and Evolving Therapy In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis educational activity is supported by an independent medical education grant from GSK.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/QKQ865. CME/MOC/AAPA credit will be available until December 7, 2026.Toward Functional Cure in Chronic HBV: Monitoring, Serological Markers, and Evolving Therapy In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis educational activity is supported by an independent medical education grant from GSK.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.

On this episode of the AJ Bell Money & Markets podcast, Dan Coatsworth and Danni Hewson discuss the ongoing fallout from last week's Budget including the resignation of the head of the OBR. [2:00] They discuss the OECD's judgement of the impact tax and spending will have on the UK economy over the next few years. The pair also chat about a new warning about AI and how a bubble bursting could have a significant impact on global growth. [10:55] The Bank of England has proposed the biggest rule change for UK banks since the financial crash. [17:15] A zero-tariff deal has been struck between the UK and US on pharmaceuticals but what's in the small print and what might it mean for companies like GSK and AstraZeneca? [19:30] Luxury goods maker Prada has bagged itself a Black Friday bargain, picking up Versace at a fraction of what its previous owner paid for it. [25:00] Plus, the latest on Netflix bid speculation for Warner Bros Discovery [26:45] and not one but two guest interviews: John Lamb from Capital Group with interesting thoughts on where interest rates might go in Europe [31:53] and friend of the pod, Ben Rogoff from Polar Capital Technology Trust on Google's AI breakthrough. [36:30]

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/QKQ865. CME/MOC/AAPA credit will be available until December 7, 2026.Toward Functional Cure in Chronic HBV: Monitoring, Serological Markers, and Evolving Therapy In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis educational activity is supported by an independent medical education grant from GSK.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.

This episode covers: Cardiology This Week: A concise summary of recent studies DAPT: how short is too short Obesity and atrial fibrillation Milestones: COURAGE  Host: Emer Joyce Guests: Carlos Aguiar, Steffen Massberg, Prash Sanders Want to watch that episode? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2178 Want to watch that extended interview on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and shortening its optimal duration, go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2178?resource=interview   Disclaimer  ESC TV Today is supported by Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis through an independent funding. The programme has not been influenced in any way by its funding partners. This programme is intended for health care professionals only and is to be used for educational purposes. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) does not aim to promote medicinal products nor devices. Any views or opinions expressed are the presenters' own and do not reflect the views of the ESC. The ESC is not liable for any translated content of this video. The English language always prevails.   Declarations of interests Stephan Achenbach, Yasmina Bououdina, Emer Joyce, Nicolle Kraenkel and Steffen Massberg have declared to have no potential conflicts of interest to report. Carlos Aguiar has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: personal fees for consultancy and/or speaker fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BiAL, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, Takeda, Tecnimede. John-Paul Carpenter has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: stockholder MyCardium AI. Davide Capodanno has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Aventis, Novo Nordisk, Terumo. Konstantinos Koskinas has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: honoraria from MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi. Steffen Petersen has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: consultancy for Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Prashanthan Sanders has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: advisory board representative University of Adelaide, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, CathRx, Abbott and Pacemate as well as research grants for University of Adelaide: Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Becton Dickson. Emma Svennberg has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers, Squibb-Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson.

Momentum is building behind New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) that offer stronger human relevance than traditional animal testing. The FDA issued on December 2 a draft guidance outlining specific product types for which the agency believes six-month non-human primate toxicity testing can be eliminated or reduced.  The guidance followed a proposed agency template for NAMs in April. There is also an initiative called the Validation and Qualification Network, with dozens of partners from regulators, like the FDA and European Commission, to Big Pharmas and CROs, such as Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, GSK and Charles River Laboratories, that had a July meeting. In addition, Reuters reported in September that AI-driven drug discovery picks up as FDA pushes to reduce animal testing.In this episode of Denatured, Jennifer C. Smith-Parker speaks to Stacey Adam, PhD, Vice President of Science Partnerships at the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health and Patrick Smith, Senior Vice President, Translational Science at Certara, to discuss the latest regulatory news and the future for NAMs development.HostJennifer Smith-Parker, Director of Insights, BioSpaceGuestsPatrick Smith, Senior Vice President, Translational Science, CertaraStacey Adam, PhD, Vice President of Science Partnerships, Foundation for the National Institutes of HealthDisclaimer: The views expressed in this discussion by guests are their own and do not represent those of their organizations.

Synopsis: This episode is proudly sponsored by Quartzy. In this far-reaching conversation, Rahul Chaturvedi speaks with John Lepore, CEO & President of ProFound Therapeutics and CEO-Partner at Flagship Pioneering, tracing a career shaped by a deep commitment to understanding the causal machinery of human disease. John shares how a Harvard-trained physician-scientist evolved into a biotech leader building one of the industry's most ambitious platform companies. Reflecting on 17 years at GSK — from academic cardiologist to running global research — John describes the moment he realized traditional target discovery had reached its limits. That insight propelled him into Flagship's venture-creation ecosystem and ultimately into leading ProFound Therapeutics, where the team is uncovering tens of thousands of previously unknown human proteins that could fundamentally reshape drug discovery and unlock true first-in-class opportunities. John also offers a candid look at today's biotech leadership realities: navigating capital-tight markets, fostering high-trust pharma partnerships, making disciplined early kill decisions, and using AI to extract causal insights from vast proteomic datasets. Together, he and Rahul explore why the expanded human proteome may be medicine's next great frontier — and what it takes, scientifically and psychologically, to lead a company bold enough to pursue it. Biography: John Lepore, M.D., is CEO and President of ProFound Therapeutics and CEO-Partner at Flagship Pioneering, where he is leading a new era of drug discovery by harnessing the expanded proteome to build a pipeline of first-in-class medicines. A physician-scientist and accomplished pharma executive, he joined ProFound following a 17-year career at GSK, where he was most recently SVP, Head of Research, leading a 2,500+ person global team and driving a renewed focus on immunology and human genetics across target discovery and validation, modality platforms, drug discovery, and clinical translation. He also chaired GSK's Research Review and Investment Board, guiding capital allocation and R&D strategy. Under his leadership, GSK advanced 15 Phase 1 programs with first- or best-in-class potential and executed $1B+ in strategic R&D deals. Before joining the biopharma industry, Dr. Lepore was a faculty cardiologist and research investigator at the University of Pennsylvania, where his lab investigated the transcription regulation of cardiovascular development. He currently serves on the boards of ProFound, KSQ Therapeutics, and the Innovation Growth Board of Mass General Brigham. Dr. Lepore received his B.S. in Biology from the University of Scranton and his M.D. from Harvard Medical School, after which he completed his residency and post-doctoral training at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Harvard School of Public Health.

In der heutigen Folge sprechen die Finanzjournalisten Anja Ettel und Holger Zschäpitz über drohenden Ärger für Moderna, einen Kurskracher bei MongoDB und fiese Japan-Vibes. Außerdem geht es um Moderna, BioNTech, Novavax, Pfizer, GSK, MongoDB, Cleanspark, Coinbase, Robinhood, Strategy, Bitcoin, Ether, Bayer, Synopsis, Nvidia und The Magnum Ice Cream Company. Die aktuelle "Alles auf Aktien"-Umfrage findet Ihr unter: https://www.umfrageonline.com/c/mh9uebwm Wir freuen uns an Feedback über aaa@welt.de. Noch mehr "Alles auf Aktien" findet Ihr bei WELTplus und Apple Podcasts – inklusive aller Artikel der Hosts und AAA-Newsletter.[ Hier bei WELT.](https://www.welt.de/podcasts/alles-auf-aktien/plus247399208/Boersen-Podcast-AAA-Bonus-Folgen-Jede-Woche-noch-mehr-Antworten-auf-Eure-Boersen-Fragen.html.) [Hier] (https://open.spotify.com/playlist/6zxjyJpTMunyYCY6F7vHK1?si=8f6cTnkEQnmSrlMU8Vo6uQ) findest Du die Samstagsfolgen Klassiker-Playlist auf Spotify! Disclaimer: Die im Podcast besprochenen Aktien und Fonds stellen keine spezifischen Kauf- oder Anlage-Empfehlungen dar. Die Moderatoren und der Verlag haften nicht für etwaige Verluste, die aufgrund der Umsetzung der Gedanken oder Ideen entstehen. Hörtipps: Für alle, die noch mehr wissen wollen: Holger Zschäpitz können Sie jede Woche im Finanz- und Wirtschaftspodcast "Deffner&Zschäpitz" hören. +++ Werbung +++ Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? [**Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte!**](https://linktr.ee/alles_auf_aktien) Impressum: https://www.welt.de/services/article7893735/Impressum.html Datenschutz: https://www.welt.de/services/article157550705/Datenschutzerklaerung-WELT-DIGITAL.html

We love to hear from our listeners. Send us a message. On this week's episode of the Business of Biotech, Dan Schmitt, President and CEO at Actuate Therapeutics, talks about building a company around elraglusib, a GSK-3β inhibitor for cancer. Dan describes his fast-fail approach to early product testing and development, using basket trials to evaluate chemotherapy combinations, and choosing pancreatic cancer as a lead program. He also talks about surviving an IPO during a brutal funding cycle for biotech, building lean teams and efficient operations, and potentially onshoring API in response to changing U.S. policy. Access this and hundreds of episodes of the Business of Biotech videocast under the Business of Biotech tab at lifescienceleader.com. Subscribe to our monthly Business of Biotech newsletter. Get in touch with guest and topic suggestions: ben.comer@lifescienceleader.comFind Ben Comer on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bencomer/

Thien Ho, the current district attorney of Sacramento County, delivers the first official account of the investigation, capture and prosecution of Joseph DeAngelo, one of America's most notorious serial predators. Known by many chilling names over the years, including the Visalia Ransacker, the East Area Rapist, the Original Nightstalker, and finally the Golden State Killer, DeAngelo terrorized California communities for more than a decade—and then disappeared without a trace for more than 30 years. It's a tale Ho recounts in his new book The People vs. the Golden State Killer, from Third State Books. As the lead prosecutor on the case, Ho recounts the exhilarating and harrowing experience of bringing a cold-case killer to justice and putting him behind bars for life. Rather than focusing solely on the criminal and the crimes, Ho's narrative centers the dedicated law-enforcement teams who never gave up their pursuit, and the courageous survivors of the GSK's crimes who fought to heal and regain control of their lives. Ho has hundreds of never-before-revealed details and firsthand insights, and this is the first time the public hears directly from the lead prosecutor who helped close the case. A portion of the book's proceeds will benefit Phyllis's Garden, a nonprofit that honors a GSK survivor and champions victims' rights. Ho, who comes to Commonwealth Club World Affairs for a discussion with award-winning journalist Dion Lim, will also share his compelling personal story: a Vietnamese refugee whose family fled Saigon at the end of the Vietnam War; he arrived in the United States knowing no English. He rose from being an intern to being elected Sacramento County district attorney in 2022, becoming one of only 10 Asian American district attorneys out of 2,400 nationwide. Commonwealth Club World Affairs of California is a nonprofit public forum; we welcome donations made during registration to support the production of our programming. See more  Michelle Meow Show programs at Commonwealth Club World Affairs of California. Photos courtesy the speakers. Commonwealth Club World Affairs is a public forum. Any views expressed in our programs are those of the speakers and not of Commonwealth Club World Affairs. This program contains EXPLICIT language. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Molecule to Market, you'll go inside the outsourcing space of the global drug development sector with Dr. Fozia Saleem, Chief Executive Officer at Magnitude Biosciences. Your host, Raman Sehgal, speaks with Fozia about the pharmaceutical and biotechnology supply chain, including: How her early roles shaped her focus on applying science and innovation in a practical way The contrast between working in tobacco and vape R&D and traditional pharma research How a post-COVID reckoning led her to a CEO role at a university spin-out The commercial potential of worms, the WormGazer® technology platform, and why Magnitude Biosciences is far from a cookie-cutter CRO Fundraising, tripling the team, doubling lab space, and navigating the life of a scrappy CRO How the company is helping clients with novel therapies get better insights earlier and faster amid a tough market environment Dr. Fozia Saleem is the CEO of Magnitude Biosciences, a leading contract research organisation serving the pharmaceutical, health, and nutrition sectors to better understand the effects of drugs and nutraceuticals on healthy ageing, longevity, and neurodegeneration. With more than 15 years of experience across the FMCG and pharmaceutical industries — including leadership roles at GSK, BAT, and Broughton — Fozia has led global product launches, driven high-growth commercial strategies, and delivered transformative organisational change. Beyond her role at Magnitude Biosciences, Fozia is a passionate advocate for women's leadership and inclusive innovation. She previously co-chaired The Lifted Project – Newcastle Board, supporting high-growth female founders, and was named on the We Are Power Future List 2024 in recognition of her business leadership.   Molecule to Market is sponsored by Bora Pharmaceuticals and Charles River Laboratories, and supported by Lead Candidate. Please subscribe, tell your industry colleagues, and help us celebrate the value of the global life science outsourcing space. We'd also appreciate a positive rating!

Tenías que saberlo te ofrece, de la mano de GSK y Mediaset, tips para ayudarte a conocer mejor el virus respiratorio sincitial (VRS) y otra información que seguramente desconocías. Contenido patrocinado por GSK. Para más información consulta con tu profesional sanitario. NP-ES-RSA-VID-250001 (v1) 11/2025

Cliquez ici pour accéder gratuitement aux articles lus de Mediapart : https://m.audiomeans.fr/s/P-UmoTbNLs Les victimes du Requip, le médicament anti-Parkinson aux effets secondaires catastrophiques (pulsions sexuelles, addiction au jeu), espèrent que le procès qui opposera jeudi 27 novembre Stéphane Grange au laboratoire GSK marquera le début d'une reconnaissance de leurs vies brisées. Un article de Rozenn Le Saint publié mardi 25 novembre et lu par Christine Pâris. Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Send us a textGood morning from Pharma Daily: the podcast that brings you the most important developments in the pharmaceutical and biotech world. Today, we dive into a series of significant stories shaping the future of healthcare, from innovative financing strategies to groundbreaking scientific advancements.The biotech industry in 2025 has experienced a notable shift in funding strategies, particularly through the rising trend of royalty financing. This approach, involving the exchange of future drug revenue for immediate capital, has surged to approximately $3.5 billion in disclosed upfront volume in just the first half of the year. According to health economist Julien Willard, this represents a transformative shift from a niche option to a mainstream strategy amid challenging equity and credit markets. Royalty financing provides biotech companies with a lifeline, allowing them to avoid the pitfalls of equity dilution or high-interest debt while retaining control over their clinical developments. Firms like Royalty Pharma and Healthcare Royalty Partners are at the forefront, offering upfront cash for future sales royalties, typically ranging from 2.5% to 7.5%.This trend has accelerated due to economic pressures like low stock valuations and rising interest rates, making traditional funding routes less viable. A closer look at this year's deals reveals a cautious approach among investors, who are focusing on phase 3 trials or candidates awaiting FDA approval rather than early-stage assets. Oncology takes center stage as the leading therapeutic area, accounting for about 70% of total disclosed funding, thanks to its potential for large revenue streams. Other areas like rare genetic diseases and immunology also attract significant attention.Interestingly, even large pharmaceutical companies such as Biogen have ventured into royalty financing—an unconventional move for well-capitalized firms. Biogen's collaboration with Royalty Pharma for lupus drug development illustrates innovative financial engineering by transferring clinical trial risk through milestone-tied payments. As this strategy gains traction globally, especially in cash-strapped regions like Asia, it serves as a crucial tool for companies prioritizing survival and continued innovation amidst financial uncertainties.Turning now to regulatory dynamics and strategic shifts within the industry. The legal controversy between GSK's subsidiary Tesaro and AnaptysBio over Jemperli highlights complexities in collaborative agreements within drug development. Such disputes could reshape how companies negotiate intellectual property rights and revenue sharing in future co-development deals.The FDA's investigation into Takeda's Adzynma following a pediatric patient's death underscores the critical role of post-market surveillance in drug safety. This incident could potentially impact Takeda's market position while emphasizing the need for robust adverse event monitoring systems across biopharmaceutical firms.In Australia, the government's decision to block Cosette's proposed $430 million acquisition of Mayne Pharma reflects increasing scrutiny on foreign investments in healthcare companies, prioritizing national interest. This move signals a growing trend that could reshape global M&A strategies within the sector.Meanwhile, Moderna's strategic financial maneuvering is noteworthy. By securing a $1.5 billion loan aimed at supporting its commercial and R&D endeavors with an eye on breaking even by 2028, Moderna demonstrates its commitment to diversifying its mRNA technology applications beyond COVID-19 vaccines—a move likely to influence innovation trajectories across biotech landscapes. Additionally, Moderna's decision to discontinue three clinical mRNA programs showcases strategic pipeline management amidSupport the show

What if you could help someone completely transform their career in just 45 minutes, not by training them to be someone they're not, but by revealing who they've always been? In this episode, Steve Woodruff, author of "Clarity Wins" and "The Point," shares his unexpected journey from Vanderbilt astronomy student dreaming of becoming an astronaut to becoming the "King of Clarity" who's spent 20 years helping professionals discover and communicate their true identity. Through a pivotal relationship with a manager-friend who made one simple observation ("Let Steve run with sales and Rob run with service because that's what you're good at"), Steve discovered that fitting people into their strengths, not training them to overcome weaknesses, is the ultimate key to success.  From consulting with pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer, Novartis, and GSK to leading 100 emerging leaders globally during the pandemic to transforming his own pastor's preaching, Steve has developed the Clarity Fuel Formula, a brain science-backed framework that helps anyone cut through noise and connect powerfully. His philosophy is simple but revolutionary: "You can't read the label of the jar you're in." We need someone on the outside to reveal who we really are. Steve reveals how he helps people experience that jaw-dropping moment when someone finally sees them (and they see themselves), why the first 15 seconds of any interaction matter most, how "memory darts" beat elevator pitches every time, and why his biggest professional thrill is attaching the right words to someone's identity and watching their entire career trajectory transform.   [00:03:59] The Journey: From Aspiring Astronaut to King of Clarity Childhood dream: becoming an astronaut Started at Vanderbilt University studying astronomy Hit a wall with calculus and physics, realized he loved words more than numbers Shifted to psychology, fascinated by how the human mind and communication work Moved into business sales and marketing [00:07:39] What Steve Does: Revealing Who People Really Are Works with corporations (pharma/biotech primarily) on communication training Developed the Clarity Fuel Formula: framework for clear communication in every format Real passion: entrepreneurs, solos, small businesses, and individuals Specializes in helping people discover their identity, purpose, and how to articulate it [00:09:23] Most Impactful Result: The Infrastructure Builder Met Jason, a sales training manager at pharma company, for networking lunch Through conversation, Steve identified Jason's core strength: infrastructure building Gave Jason the exact words to describe his superpower Jason found perfect role at training organization in disarray [00:12:00] Pandemic Pivot: Training 100 Leaders Globally via Zoom Companies forced to move training online during COVID Steve led personal branding workshop for 100 emerging leaders globally All done from his desk via Zoom, no travel for days required [00:14:38] What Inspires Steve: The Jaw-Drop Moment Most people (including himself for years) are only half-aware of who they really are People are guessing, trying different things without true north Has unique ability to ask questions and see themes emerge quickly The magic moment: 45-60 minutes in, holds up "figurative mirror" [00:17:04] The Relationship That Changed Everything During first 10-year career job, Steve and colleague split country for sales/service One person better at sales, other better at service, but both trying to do both This insight plus reading StrengthsFinder completely revolutionized Steve's view of work [00:21:41] Recent Impact: Transforming His Pastor's Preaching Steve's work applies 100% to church settings, not just business Pastor came to dinner, Steve discussed "memory darts" concept Memory darts: short, vivid ideas using analogies, illustrations, or stories instead of elevator pitches Pastor wanted to improve preaching and asked Steve for help [00:23:58] Where to Find Steve & His Resources Company: Clarity Fuel (clarityfuel.com redirects to stevewoodruff.com) Most active on LinkedIn with newsletter and regular posts about clarity Two books: "Clarity Wins" (branding, niches, pigeonholes) and "The Point" (universal framework for clear communication) The challenge: "The Point" is for 8 billion people, anyone, any role, any place, anytime [00:26:40] The First 15 Seconds: Why They Matter Most Success boils down to the first 15 seconds of any interaction Must earn attention with something interesting, relevant, and compelling Get rid of the elevator pitch (telling and selling) Learn to answer "What do you do?" in 15 seconds that makes people say "Huh? Tell me more" Biggest problem: TMI (Too Much Information)   KEY QUOTES  "You can't read the label of the jar you're in. We are not able to be objective about ourselves. We need someone on the outside who can look at us and say, this is really who you are." - Steve Woodruff "I'm not here to train people to become what they're not. I'm here to reveal to them who they are. When you try to train people to be what they're not, you're setting yourself and them up for a world of hurt." - Steve Woodruff "We have stewardship over our lives. We have one life. If we're wasting it, even with good intentions doing the wrong thing, that's a terrible shame." - Steve Woodruff "People don't need information. They need to know why they should care." - Steve Woodruff "Nobody wants to hear your monologue. They want to hear something that makes them say, 'What in the world are you talking about? Tell me about it.' And we're off and running." - Steve Woodruff CONNECT WITH STEVE WOODRUFF 

Research shows that women remain woefully underrepresented at the highest levels of leadership in the life sciences industry. Those who have broken through that glass ceiling, however, are not only doing groundbreaking work in pharma, biotech, medtech and beyond but also reframing what it means to be a leader in the sector—as evidenced by the often-unconventional career paths and management philosophies of the 10 women featured in this year’s Fiercest Women in Life Sciences report. In this week’s episode of “The Top Line,” Fierce’s Andrea Park and Gabrielle Masson dive into the report, highlighting several honorees’ paradigm-busting approaches to leadership, mentorship and building inclusive teams. To learn more about the topics in this episode: 2025's Fiercest Women in Life Sciences 4 reasons life sciences still fail women at the top, despite a female-majority workforce: report GSK's Emma Walmsley to step down as CEO in shock move, giving way to commercial lead Luke Miels Merck KGaA, grappling with geopolitical tensions, ⁠reveals CEO transition Takeda taps Julie Kim to take over for retiring CEO Christophe Weber See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us a textGood morning from Pharma Daily: the podcast that brings you the most important developments in the pharmaceutical and biotech world. Today, we delve into a landscape marked by significant scientific advancements, regulatory approvals, and strategic shifts that are reshaping the industry.Starting with Regeneron, the company's ophthalmic drug Eylea HD has recently secured two FDA approvals. These endorsements not only grant a new indication but also introduce a more flexible dosing regimen. This positions Eylea HD competitively against Roche's Vabysmo, highlighting the importance of regulatory navigation and strategic positioning in the pharmaceutical sector. These approvals come after extensive negotiations with both the FDA and third-party manufacturers, emphasizing the intricate processes involved in bringing a drug to market.In oncology, Bayer has achieved an accelerated FDA approval for Hyrnuo, a treatment targeting HER2-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. This move allows Bayer to challenge Boehringer Ingelheim's Hernexeos, underscoring the fiercely competitive nature of the oncology market. Such advancements are driven by innovative treatments that address specific genetic mutations in cancer patients, reflecting a broader trend towards precision medicine.Meanwhile, Moderna is investing heavily in mRNA production capabilities with a new $140 million facility in Norwood, Massachusetts. This development underscores Moderna's commitment to mRNA technology, which gained significant attention during the COVID-19 pandemic. The facility aims to establish robust domestic manufacturing infrastructures to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities—a critical move considering recent global disruptions.Novartis is also making headlines with its plans for a flagship production hub in North Carolina. This expansion is expected to create 700 jobs and expand its manufacturing footprint by 700,000 square feet, highlighting Novartis's strategic emphasis on scaling up operations to meet growing demands and enhance production efficiency.In another strategic collaboration, Antheia has joined forces with Teva's TAPI division to enhance the commercialization prospects for its biosynthetic pipeline. This alliance marks a significant step toward advancing biologically derived pharmaceuticals, promising to revolutionize drug production through more sustainable and scalable alternatives to traditional chemical synthesis.On the regulatory front, Merck has received broad EU approval for a subcutaneous formulation of Keytruda. This development could significantly expand Keytruda's market reach across Europe, demonstrating how regulatory agility can extend drug lifecycles and maximize therapeutic impact across diverse patient populations.Compliance challenges remain prevalent, as illustrated by Pfizer and Tris Pharma's settlement of allegations related to ADHD medication Quillivant's quality control issues for $41.5 million. This case highlights ongoing efforts to ensure stringent quality standards within pharmaceutical manufacturing processes.Abbott is expanding its diagnostics portfolio through a $23 billion acquisition of Exact Sciences, known for its Cologuard colorectal cancer test. This acquisition indicates a strategic shift towards enhancing diagnostic capabilities alongside therapeutic offerings—a trend increasingly evident in holistic healthcare solutions.GSK is embarking on a $7 billion collaboration with biotechs Quotient and Profound through Flagship Pioneering. This partnership aims to leverage novel protein and genomic technologies to drive innovation in drug discovery and development, illustrating the industry's focus on integrating advanced biotechnological insights into traditional pharmaceutical frameworks.These developments collectively underscore crSupport the show

Far from a future add-on, artificial intelligence is already embedded in the cycle of drug safety, from case processing to signal detection. Versatile generative AI models have raised the bar of possibilities but also increased the stakes. How do we use them without losing trust and where do we set the limits?In this two-part episode, Niklas Norén, head of Research at Uppsala Monitoring Centre, unpacks how artificial intelligence can add value to pharmacovigilance and where it should – or shouldn't – go next.Tune in to find out:How to keep up with rapid developments in AI technologyWhy model and performance transparency both matterHow to protect sensitive patient data when using AIWant to know more?Listen to the first part of the interview here.In May 2025, the CIOMS Working Group XIV drafted guidelines for the use of AI in pharmacovigilance. The draft report received more than a thousand comments during public consultation and is now being finalised.Earlier this year, the World Health Organization issued guidance on large multi-modal models – a type of generative AI – when used in healthcare.Niklas has spoken extensively on the potential and risks of AI in pharmacovigilance, including in this presentation at the University of Verona and in this Uppsala Reports article.Other recent UMC publications cited in the interview or relevant to the topic include:a pre-print on the revised vigiMatch algorithm for duplicate detectionan article on the pitfalls of disproportionality analysisa pre-print on critically appraising AI applications for rare-event recognitionFor more on the ‘black box' issue and maintaining trust in AI, revisit this interview with GSK's Michael Glaser from the Drug Safety Matters archive. Join the conversation on social mediaFollow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, X, or Bluesky and share your thoughts about the show with the hashtag #DrugSafetyMatters.Got a story to share?We're always looking for new content and interesting people to interview. If you have a great idea for a show, get in touch!About UMCRead more about Uppsala Monitoring Centre and how we promote safer use of medicines and vaccines for everyone everywhere.

This episode covers: Cardiology This Week: A concise summary of recent studies 'ChatGPT, MD?' - Large Language Models at the Bedside Management decisions in myocarditis Statistics Made Easy: Mendelian randomisation Host: Emer Joyce Guests: Carlos Aguiar, Folkert Asselbergs, Massimo Imazio Want to watch that episode? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2179 Want to watch that extended interview on 'ChatGPT, MD?': Large Language Models at the Bedside? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2179?resource=interview Disclaimer: ESC TV Today is supported by Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis through an independent funding. The programme has not been influenced in any way by its funding partners. This programme is intended for health care professionals only and is to be used for educational purposes. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) does not aim to promote medicinal products nor devices. Any views or opinions expressed are the presenters' own and do not reflect the views of the ESC. The ESC is not liable for any translated content of this video. The English language always prevails. Declarations of interests: Stephan Achenbach, Folkert Asselbergs, Yasmina Bououdina, Massimo Imazio, Emer Joyce, and Nicolle Kraenkel have declared to have no potential conflicts of interest to report. Carlos Aguiar has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: personal fees for consultancy and/or speaker fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BiAL, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, Takeda, Tecnimede. John-Paul Carpenter has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: stockholder MyCardium AI. Davide Capodanno has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Aventis, Novo Nordisk, Terumo. Konstantinos Koskinas has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: honoraria from MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi. Steffen Petersen has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: consultancy for Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.  Emma Svennberg has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers, Squibb-Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson.

Host: Emer Joyce Guest: Folkert Asselbergs Want to watch that episode? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2179 Want to watch that extended interview on 'ChatGPT, MD?': Large Language Models at the Bedside? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2179?resource=interview Disclaimer: ESC TV Today is supported by Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis through an independent funding. The programme has not been influenced in any way by its funding partners. This programme is intended for health care professionals only and is to be used for educational purposes. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) does not aim to promote medicinal products nor devices. Any views or opinions expressed are the presenters' own and do not reflect the views of the ESC. The ESC is not liable for any translated content of this video. The English language always prevails.  Declarations of interests: Stephan Achenbach, Folkert Asselbergs, Yasmina Bououdina, Emer Joyce, and Nicolle Kraenkel have declared to have no potential conflicts of interest to report. Carlos Aguiar has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: personal fees for consultancy and/or speaker fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BiAL, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, Takeda, Tecnimede. John-Paul Carpenter has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: stockholder MyCardium AI. Davide Capodanno has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Aventis, Novo Nordisk, Terumo. Konstantinos Koskinas has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: honoraria from MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi. Steffen Petersen has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: consultancy for Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. E mma Svennberg has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers, Squibb-Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson. Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers, Squibb-Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson.

Co-hosts Ryan Piansky, a graduate student and patient advocate living with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic asthma, and Holly Knotowicz, a speech-language pathologist living with EoE who serves on APFED's Health Sciences Advisory Council, interview Evan S. Dellon, MD, and Elizabeth T. Jensen, PhD, about a paper they published on predictors of patients receiving no medication for treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Disclaimer: The information provided in this podcast is designed to support, not replace, the relationship between listeners and their healthcare providers. Opinions, information, and recommendations shared in this podcast are not a substitute for medical advice. Decisions related to medical care should be made with your healthcare provider. Opinions and views of guests and co-hosts are their own.   Key Takeaways: [:52] Co-host Ryan Piansky introduces the episode, brought to you thanks to the support of Education Partners GSK, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Takeda. Ryan introduces co-host Holly Knotowicz.   [1:14] Holly introduces today's topic, predictors of not using medication for EoE, and today's guests, Dr. Evan Dellon and Dr. Elizabeth Jensen.   [1:29] Dr. Dellon is an Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine in Chapel Hill. He is also the Director of the UNC Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.   [1:42] Dr. Dellon's main research interest is in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic GI diseases (EGIDs).   [1:55] Dr. Jensen is a Professor of Epidemiology with a specific expertise in reproductive, perinatal, and pediatric epidemiology. She has appointments at both Wake Forest University School of Medicine and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.   [2:07] Her research primarily focuses on etiologic factors in the development of pediatric immune-mediated chronic diseases, including understanding factors contributing to disparities in health outcomes.   [2:19] Both Dr. Dellon and Dr. Jensen also serve on the Steering Committee for EGID Partners Registry.   [2:24] Ryan thanks Dr. Dellon and Dr. Jensen for joining the podcast today.   [2:29] Dr. Dellon was the first guest on this podcast. It is wonderful to have him back for the 50th episode! Dr. Dellon is one of Ryan's GI specialists. Ryan recently went to North Carolina to get a scope with him.   [3:03] Dr. Dellon is an adult gastroenterologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He directs the Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing. Clinically and research-wise, he is focused on EoE and other eosinophilic GI diseases.   [3:19] His research interests span the entire field, from epidemiology, diagnosis, biomarkers, risk factors, outcomes, and a lot of work, more recently, on treatments.   [3:33] Dr. Jensen has been on the podcast before, on Episode 27. Holly invites Dr. Jensen to tell the listeners more about herself and her work with eosinophilic diseases.   [3:46] Dr. Jensen has been working on eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases for about 15 years. She started some of the early work around understanding possible risk factors for the development of disease.   [4:04] She has gone on to support lots of other research projects, including some with Dr. Dellon, where they're looking at gene-environment interactions in relation to developing EoE.   [4:15] She is also looking at reproductive factors as they relate to EoE, disparities in diagnosis, and more. It's been an exciting research trajectory, starting with what we knew very little about and building to an increasing understanding of why EoE develops.   [5:00] Dr. Dellon explains that EoE stands for eosinophilic esophagitis, a chronic allergic condition of the esophagus.   [5:08] You can think of EoE as asthma of the esophagus or eczema of the esophagus, although in general, people don't grow out of EoE, like they might grow out of eczema or asthma. When people have EoE, it is a long-term condition.   [5:24] Eosinophils are a type of white blood cell, specializing in allergy responses. Normally, they are not in the esophagus. When we see them there, we worry about an allergic process. When that happens, that's EoE.   [5:40] Over time, the inflammation seen in EoE and other allergic cell activity causes swelling and irritation in the esophagus. Early on, this often leads to a range of upper GI symptoms — including poor growth or failure to thrive in young children, abdominal pain, nausea, and symptoms that can mimic reflux.   [5:58] In older kids, symptoms are more about trouble swallowing. That's because the swelling that happens initially, over time, may turn into scar tissue. So the esophagus can narrow and cause swallowing symptoms like food impaction.   [6:16] Ryan speaks of living with EoE for decades and trying the full range of treatment options: food elimination, PPIs, steroids, and, more recently, biologics.   [6:36] Dr. Dellon says Ryan's history is a good overview of how EoE is treated. There are two general approaches to treating the underlying condition: using medicines and/or eliminating foods that we think may trigger EoE from the diet.   [6:57] For a lot of people, EoE is a food-triggered allergic condition.   [7:01] The other thing that has to happen in parallel is surveying for scar tissue in the esophagus. If that's present and people have trouble swallowing, sometimes stretching the esophagus is needed through esophageal dilation.   [7:14] There are three categories of medicines used for treatment. Proton pump inhibitors are reflux meds, but they also have an anti-allergy effect in the esophagus.   [7:29] Topical steroids are used to coat the esophagus and produce an anti-inflammatory effect. The FDA has approved a budesonide oral suspension for that.   [7:39] Biologics, which are generally systemic medications, often injectable, can target different allergic factors. Dupilumab is approved now, and there are other biologics that are being researched as potential treatments.   [7:51] Even though EoE is considered an allergic condition, we don't have a test to tell people what they are allergic to. If it's a food allergy, we do an empiric elimination diet because allergy tests aren't accurate enough to tell us what the EoE triggers are.   [8:10] People will eliminate foods that we know are the most common triggers, like milk protein, dairy, wheat, egg, soy, and other top allergens. You can create a diet like that and then have a response to the diet elimination.   [8:31] Dr. Jensen and Dr. Dellon recently published an abstract in the American Journal of Gastroenterology about people with EoE who are not taking any medicine for it. Dr. Jensen calls it a real-world data study, leveraging electronic health record patient data.   [8:51] It gives you an impression of what is actually happening, in terms of treatments for patients, as opposed to a randomized control trial, which is a fairly selected patient population. This is everybody who has been diagnosed, and then what happens with them.   [9:10] Because of that, it gives you a wide spectrum of patients. Some patients are going to be relatively asymptomatic. It may be that we arrived at their diagnosis while working them up for other potential diagnoses.   [9:28] Other patients are going to have rather significant impacts from the disease. We wanted to get an idea of what is actually happening out there with the full breadth of the patient population that is getting diagnosed with EoE.   [9:45] Dr. Jensen was not surprised to learn that there are patients who had no pharmacologic treatment.   [9:58] Some patients are relatively asymptomatic, and others are not interested in pursuing medications initially or are early in their disease process and still exploring dietary treatment options.   [10:28] Holly sees patients from infancy to geriatrics, and if they're not having symptoms, they wonder why bother treating it.   [10:42] Dr. Jensen says it's a point of debate on the implications of somebody who has the disease and goes untreated. What does that look like long-term? Are they going to develop more of that fibrostenotic pattern in their esophagus without treatment?   [11:07] This is a question we're still trying to answer. There is some suggestion that for some patients who don't manage their disease, we very well may be looking at a food impaction in the future.   [11:19] Dr. Dellon says we know overall for the population of EoE patients, but it's hard to know for a specific patient. We have a bunch of studies now that look at how long people have symptoms before they're diagnosed. There's a wide range.   [11:39] Some people get symptoms and get diagnosed right away. Others might have symptoms for 20 or 30 years that they ignore, or don't have access to healthcare, or the diagnosis is missed.   [11:51] What we see consistently is that people who may be diagnosed within a year or two may only have a 10 or 20% chance of having that stricture and scar tissue in the esophagus, whereas people who go 20 years, it might be 80% or more.   [12:06] It's not everybody who has EoE who might end up with that scar tissue, but certainly, it's suggested that it's a large majority.   [12:16] That's before diagnosis. We have data that shows that after diagnosis, if people go a long time without treatment or without being seen in care, they also have an increasing rate of developing strictures.    [12:29] In general, the idea is yes, you should treat EoE, because on average, people are going to develop scar tissue and more symptoms. For the patient in front of you with EoE but no symptoms, what are the chances it's going to get worse? You don't know.   [13:04] There are two caveats with that. The first is what we mean by symptoms. Kids may have vomiting and growth problems. Adults can eat carefully, avoiding foods that hang up in the esophagus, like breads and overcooked meats, sticky rice, and other foods.   [13:24] Adults can eat slowly, drink a lot of liquid, and not perceive they have symptoms. When someone tells Dr. Dellon they don't have symptoms, he will quiz them about that. He'll even ask about swallowing pills.    [13:40] Often, you can pick up symptoms that maybe the person didn't even realize they were having. In that case, that can give you some impetus to treat.   [13:48] If there really are no symptoms, Dr. Dellon thinks we're at a point where we don't really know what to do.   [13:54] Dr. Dellon just saw a patient who had a lot of eosinophils in their small bowel with absolutely no GI symptoms. He said, "I can't diagnose you with eosinophilic enteritis, but you may develop symptoms." People like that, he will monitor in the clinic.   [14:14] Dr. Dellon will discuss it with them each time they come back for a clinic visit.   [14:19] Holly is a speech pathologist, but also sees people for feeding and swallowing. The local gastroenterologist refers patients who choose not to treat their EoE to her. Holly teaches them things they should be looking out for.   [14:39] If your pills get stuck or if you're downing 18 ounces during a mealtime, maybe it's time to treat it. People don't see these coping mechanisms they use that are impacting their quality of life. They've normalized it.   [15:30] Dr. Dellon says, of these people who aren't treated, there's probably a subset who appropriately are being observed and don't have a medicine treatment or are on a diet elimination.   [15:43] There's also probably a subset who are inappropriately not on treatment. It especially can happen with students who were under good control with their pediatric provider, but moved away to college and didn't transfer to adult care.   [16:08] They ultimately come back with a lot of symptoms that have progressed over six to eight years.   [16:18] Ryan meets newly diagnosed adult patients at APFED's conferences, who say they have no symptoms, but chicken gets caught in their throat. They got diagnosed when they went to the ER with a food impaction.   [16:38] Ryan says you have to wonder at what point that starts to get reflected in patient charts. Are those cases documented where someone is untreated and now has EoE?   [16:49] Ryan asks in the study, "What is the target EGID Cohort and why was it selected to study EoE? What sort of patients were captured as part of that data set?"   [16:58] Dr. Jensen said they identified patients with the ICD-10 code for a diagnosis of EoE. Then they looked to see if there was evidence of symptoms or complications in relation to EoE. This was hard; some of these are relatively non-specific symptoms.   [17:23] These patients may have been seeking care and may have been experiencing some symptoms that may or may not have made it into the chart. That's one of the challenges with real-world data analyses.   [17:38] Dr. Jensen says they are using data that was collected for documenting clinical care and for billing for clinical care, not for research, so it comes with some caveats when doing research with this data.   [18:08] Research using electronic health records gives a real-world perspective on patients who are seeking care or have a diagnosis of EoE, as opposed to a study trying to enroll a patient population that potentially isn't representative of the breadth of individuals living with EoE.   [18:39] Dr. Dellon says another advantage of real-world data is the number of patients. The largest randomized controlled trials in EoE might have 400 patients, and they are incredibly expensive to do.   [18:52] A study of electronic health records (EHR) is reporting on the analysis of just under 1,000. The cohort, combined from three different centers, has more than 1,400 people, a more representative, larger population.    [19:16] Dr. Dellon says when you read the results, understand the limitations and strengths of a study of health records, to help contextualize the information.   [19:41] Dr. Dellon says it's always easier to recognize the typical presentations. Materials about EoE and studies he has done that led to medicine approvals have focused on trouble swallowing. That can be relatively easily measured.   [20:01] Patients often come to receive care with a food impaction, which can be impactful on life, and somewhat public, if in a restaurant or at work. Typical symptoms are also the ones that get you diagnosed and may be easier to treat.   [20:26] Dr. Dellon wonders if maybe people don't treat some of the atypical symptoms because it's not appreciated that they can be related to EoE.   [20:42] Holly was diagnosed as an adult. Ryan was diagnosed as a toddler. Holly asks what are some of the challenges people face in getting an EoE diagnosis.   [20:56] Dr. Jensen says symptoms can sometimes be fairly non-specific. There's some ongoing work by the CEGIR Consortium trying to understand what happens when patients come into the emergency department with a food bolus impaction.   [21:28] Dr. Jensen explains that we see there's quite a bit of variation in how that gets managed, and if they get a biopsy. You have to have a biopsy of the esophagus to get a diagnosis of EoE.   [21:45] If you think about the steps that need to happen to get a diagnosis of EoE, that can present barriers for some groups to ultimately get that diagnosis.   [21:56] There's also been some literature around a potential assumption about which patients are more likely to be at risk. Some of that is still ongoing. We know that EoE occurs more commonly in males in roughly a two-to-one ratio. Not exclusively in males, obviously, but a little more often in males.   [22:20] We don't know anything about other groups of patients that may be at higher risk. That's ongoing work that we're still trying to understand. That in itself can also be a barrier when there are assumptions about who is or isn't likely to have EoE.   [23:02] Dr. Dellon says that in adolescents and adults, the typical symptoms are trouble swallowing and food sticking, which have many causes besides EoE, some of which are more common.   [23:18] In that population, heartburn is common. Patients may report terrible reflux that, on questioning, sounds more like trouble swallowing than GERD. Sometimes, with EoE, you may have reflux that doesn't improve. Is it EoE, reflux, or both?   [24:05] Some people will have chest discomfort. There are some reports of worsening symptoms with exercise, which brings up cardiac questions that have to be ruled out first.   [24:19] Dr. Dellon mentions some more atypical symptoms. An adult having pain in the upper abdomen could have EoE. In children, the symptoms could be anything in the GI tract. Some women might have atypical symptoms with less trouble swallowing.   [24:58] Some racial minorities may have those kinds of symptoms, as well. If you're not thinking of the condition, it's hard to make the diagnosis.   [25:08] Dr. Jensen notes that there are different cultural norms around expressing symptoms and dietary patterns, which may make it difficult to parse out a diagnosis.   [25:27] Ryan cites a past episode where access to a GI specialist played a role in diagnosing patients with EoE. Do white males have more EoE, or are their concerns just listened to more seriously?   [25:57] Ryan's parents were told when he was two that he was throwing up for attention. He believes that these days, he'd have a much easier time convincing a doctor to listen to him. From speaking to physicians, Ryan believes access is a wide issue in the field.   [26:23] Dr. Dellon tells of working with researchers at Mayo in Arizona and the Children's Hospital of Phoenix. They have a large population of Hispanic children with EoE, much larger than has been reported elsewhere. They're working on characterizing that.   [26:49] Dr. Dellon describes an experience with a visiting trainee from Mexico City, where there was not a lot of EoE reported. The trainee went back and looked at the biopsies there, and it turned out they were not performing biopsies on patients with dysphagia in Mexico City.   [27:13] When he looked at the patients who ended up getting biopsies, they found EoE in 10% of patients. That's similar to what's reported out of centers in the developed world. As people are thinking about it more, we will see more detection of it.   [27:30] Dr. Dellon believes those kinds of papers will be out in the next couple of months, to a year.   [27:36] Holly has had licensure in Arizona for about 11 years. She has had nine referrals recently of children with EoE from Arizona. Normally, it's been one or two that she met at a conference.   [28:00] Ryan asks about the research on patients not having their EoE treated pharmacologically. Some treat it with food avoidance and dietary therapy. Ryan notes that he can't have applesauce, as it is a trigger for his EoE.   [28:54] Dr. Jensen says that's one of the challenges in using the EHR data. That kind of information is only available to the researchers through free text. That's a limitation of the study, assessing the use of dietary elimination approaches.   [29:11] Holly says some of her patients have things listed as allergies that are food sensitivities. Ryan says it's helpful for the patients to have their food sensitivities listed along with their food allergies, but it makes records more difficult to parse for research.   [30:14] Dr. Dellon says they identify EoE by billing code, but the codes are not always used accurately. Natural Language Processing can train a computer system to find important phrases. Their collaborators working on the real-world data are using it.   [30:59] Dr. Dellon hopes that this will be a future direction for this research to find anything in the text related to diet elimination.   [31:32] Dr. Jensen says that older patients were less likely to seek medication therapy. She says it's probably for a couple of reasons. First, older patients may have been living with the disease for a long time and have had compensatory mechanisms in place.   [32:03] The other reason may be senescence or burnout of the disease, long-term. Patients may be less symptomatic as they get older. That's a question that remains to be answered for EoE. It has been seen in some other disease processes.   [32:32] Dr. Dellon says there's not much data specifically looking at EoE in the older population. Dr. Dellon did work years ago with another doctor, and they found that older patients had a better response to some treatments, particularly topical steroids.   [32:54] It wasn't clear whether it was a milder aspect of the disease, easier to treat, or because they were older and more responsible, taking their medicines as prescribed, and having a better response rate. It's the flip side of work in the pediatric population.   [33:16] There is an increasingly aging population with EoE. Young EoE patients will someday be over 65. Dr. Dellon hopes there will be a cure by that point, but it's an expanding population now.   [33:38] Dr. Jensen says only a few sites are contributing data, so they hope to add additional sites to the study. For some of the less common outcomes, they need a pretty large patient sample to ask some of those kinds of questions.   [33:55] They will continue to follow up on some of the work that this abstract touched on and try to understand some of these issues more deeply.   [34:06] Dr. Dellon mentions other work within the cohort. Using Natural Language Processing, they are looking at characterizing endoscopy information and reporting it without a manual review of reports and codes. You can't get that from billing data.   [34:29] Similarly, they are trying to classify patient severity by the Index of Severity with EoE, and layer that on looking at treatments and outcomes based on disease severity. Those are a couple of other directions where this cohort is going.   [34:43] Holly mentions that this is one of many research projects Dr. Jensen and Dr. Dellon have collaborated on together. They also collaborate through EGID Partners. Holly asks them to share a little bit about that.   [34:53] Dr. Jensen says EGID Partners is an online registry where individuals, caregivers, and parents of children affected with EGIDs can join.   [35:07] EGID Partners also needs people who don't live with an EGID to join, as controls. That gives the ability to compare those who are experiencing an EGID relative to those who aren't.   [35:22] When you join EGID Partners, they provide you with a set of questionnaires to complete. Periodically, they push out a few more questionnaires.   [35:33] EGID Partners has provided some really great information about patient experience and answered questions that patients want to know about, like joint pain and symptoms outside the GI tract.   [36:04] To date, there are close to 900 participants in the registry from all over the world. As it continues to grow, it will give the ability to look at the patient experience in different geographical areas.   [36:26] Dr. Dellon says we try to have it be interactive, because it is a collaboration with patients. The Steering Committee works with APFED and other patient advocacy groups from around the world.    [36:41] The EGID Partners website shows general patient locations anonymously. It shows the breakdown of adults with the condition and caregivers of children with the condition, the symptom distribution, and the treatment distribution.   [37:03] As papers get published and abstracts are presented, EGID Partners puts them on the website. Once someone joins, they can suggest a research idea. Many of the studies they have done have come from patient suggestions.   [37:20] If there's an interesting idea for a survey, EGID Partners can push out a survey to everybody in the group and answer questions relatively quickly.   [37:57] Dr. Dellon says a paper came out recently about telehealth. EoE care, in particular, is a good model for telehealth because it can expand access for patients who don't have providers in their area.   [38:22] EoE is a condition where care involves a lot of discussion but not a lot of need for physical exams and direct contact, so telehealth can make things very efficient.    [38:52] EGID Partners surveyed patients about telehealth. They thought it was efficient and saved time, and they had the same kind of interactions as in person. In general, in-state insurance covered it. Patients were happy to do those kinds of visits again.   [39:27] Holly says Dr. Furuta, herself, and others were published in the Gastroenterology journal in 2019 about starting to do telehealth because patients coming to the Children's Hospital of Colorado from out of state had no local access to feeding therapy.   [39:50] Holly went to the board, and they allowed her to get licensure in different states. She started with some of the most impacted patients in Texas and Florida in 2011 and 2012. They collected data. They published in 2019 about telehealth's positive impact.   [40:13] When 2020 rolled around, Holly had trained a bunch of people on how to do feeding therapy via telehealth. You have to do all kinds of things, like make yourself disappear, to keep the kids engaged and in their chairs!   [40:25] Now it is Holly's primary practice. She has licenses in nine states. She sees people all over the country. With her diagnosis, her physicians at Mass General have telehealth licensure in Maine. She gets to do telehealth with them instead of driving two hours.   [40:53] Dr. Jensen tells of two of the things they hope to do at EGID Partners. One is trying to understand more about reproductive health for patients with an EGID diagnosis. Only a few studies have looked at this question, and with very small samples.   [41:15] As more people register for EGID Partners, Dr. Jensen is hoping to be able to ask some questions related to reproductive health outcomes.   [41:27] The second goal is a survey suggested by the Student Advisory Committee, asking questions related to the burden of disease specific to the teen population.   [41:48] This diagnosis can hit that population particularly hard, at a time when they are trying to build and sustain friendships and are transitioning to adult care and moving away from home. This patient population has a unique perspective we wanted to hear.   [42:11] Dr. Jensen and Dr. Dellon work on all kinds of other projects, too.   [42:22] Dr. Dellon says they have done a lot of work on the early-life factors that may predispose to EoE. They are working on a large epidemiologic study to get some insight into early-life factors, including factors that can be measured in baby teeth.   [42:42] That's outside of EGID Partners. It's been ongoing, and they're getting close, maybe over the next couple of years, to having some results.   [43:03] Ryan says all of those projects sound so interesting. We need to have you guys back to dive into those results when you have something finalized.   [43:15] For our listeners who want to learn more about eosinophilic disorders, we encourage you to visit apfed.org and check out the links in the show notes below.   [43:22] If you're looking to find specialists who treat eosinophilic disorders, we encourage you to use APFED's Specialist Finder at apfed.org/specialist.   [43:31] If you'd like to connect with others impacted by eosinophilic diseases, please join APFED's online community on the Inspire Network at apfed.org/connections.   [43:41] Ryan thanks Dr. Dellon and Dr. Jensen for joining us today. This was a fantastic conversation. Holly also thanks APFED's Education Partners GSK, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Takeda for supporting this episode.   Mentioned in This Episode: Evan S. Dellon, MD, MPH, Academic Gastroenterologist, University of North Carolina School of Medicine   Elizabeth T. Jensen, MPH, PhD, Epidemiologist, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   Predictors of Patients Receiving No Medication for Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in the United States: Data from the TARGET-EGIDS Cohort   Episode 15: Access to Specialty Care for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)   APFED on YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram Real Talk: Eosinophilic Diseases Podcast apfed.org/specialist apfed.org/connections apfed.org/research/clinical-trials   Education Partners: This episode of APFED's podcast is brought to you thanks to the support of GSK, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Takeda.   Tweetables:   "I've been working on eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases for about 15 years. I started some of the early work around understanding possible risk factors for the development of disease. I've gone on to support lots of other research projects." — Elizabeth T. Jensen, MPH, PhD   "You can think of EoE as asthma of the esophagus or eczema of the esophagus, although in general, people don't grow out of EoE, like they might grow out of eczema or asthma. When people have it, it really is a long-term condition." — Evan S. Dellon, MD, MPH   "There are two general approaches to treating the underlying condition, … using medicines and/or eliminating foods from the diet that we think may trigger EoE. I should say, for a lot of people, EoE is a food-triggered allergic condition." — Evan S. Dellon, MD, MPH   "I didn't find it that surprising [that there are patients who had no treatment]. Some patients are relatively asymptomatic, and others are not interested in pursuing medications initially or are … still exploring dietary treatment options." — Elizabeth T. Jensen, MPH, PhD   "We have a bunch of studies now that look at how long people have symptoms before they're diagnosed. There's a wide range. Some people get symptoms and are diagnosed right away. Other people might have symptoms for 20 or 30 years." — Evan S. Dellon, MD, MPH   "EGID Partners is an online registry where individuals, caregivers, and parents of children affected with EGIDs can join. EGID Partners also needs people who don't live with an EGID to join, as controls." — Elizabeth T. Jensen, MPH, PhD

What's on your mind? Let CX Passport know...Pharma and CX… not exactly two words you hear together often. But what happens when customer experience thinking meets healthcare? Silvi Haldipur has lived it. From personal experience to transforming patient, provider, and payer experiences at GSK and Merck, she's proving that empathy and data can coexist to truly save lives.5 Insights from This Episode • CX in pharma isn't impossible… it's essential. Silvi shares how she turned a deeply personal healthcare experience into her mission for better patient outcomes. • Beyond ads and emails… why support, not slogans, is what patients really need. • What pharma can learn from design thinking, ethnography, and on-the-ground empathy. • How “wraparound programs” simplify post-prescription chaos and actually improve outcomes. • The rise of the Chief Customer Experience Officer in pharma… and why it's long overdue.

In The People vs. the Golden State Killer, Thien Ho, the current District Attorney of Sacramento, recounts his harrowing and exhilarating experience as the lead prosecutor responsible for capturing and prosecuting Joseph DeAngelo. Referred to at various times by law enforcement and the media as the Visalia Ransacker, the East Bay Rapist, the Original Nightstalker, and finally the Golden State Killer, DeAngelo, a former policeman, is widely considered “one of the most notorious serial predators in American history.”Ho's book is the first official account of how the Golden State Killer was apprehended and put behind bars for life. Ho led an elite team of law enforcement from six California prosecutor's offices, using a newly developed tool known as “investigative genetic genealogy” to connect DeAngelo to multiple cold cases stretching back nearly a half century.Many previous narratives about DeAngelo, including two bestselling books and multiple documentaries, focused largely on the killer and his heinous crimes. This book not only provides hundreds of facts and details never revealed to the public about the Golden State Killer's crimes, it also presents the real-life story of the people who worked tirelessly to bring DeAngelo to justice. It also offers the unprecedented authorized perspective of three survivors of DeAngelo's crimes who courageously turned their pain into empowerment and activism. A portion of the book's proceeds will be donated both by the author and Third State Books to Phyllis's Garden, a nonprofit advocating for victims' rights begun in honor of a GSK survivor.The People vs. the Golden State Killer also recounts Ho's fascinating personal journey, from escaping communist Vietnam with his family as a child to working his way up from an internship to an elite homicide division and eventually becoming one of only ten Asian American district attorneys out of 2,400 nationwide.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/houseofmysteryradio. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This guy did it all. Moving the goal post, dodging the question, Red herrings, strawman, putting words in my mouth, self contradiction, arguing with himself about prior arguments he had with other people and not listening to anything i said, and of course running to Ai. It was amazing. This is what Ziobots do.As promised I a write up on SudanThe RSF (Rapid Support Forces) are led by Mohamed Hamadan Dagalo AKA Hemedti. The SAF Sudanese Armed Forces are led by Abdul Fattah al-Burhan also not a saint. Of the two he is the lessor evil one could say. RSF controls Western Sudan where most of the gold mines are located. They control more now with the fall of El Fasher. Hemedti and his brother have an account in Abudhabi National Bank in the UAE. The UAE's national Security Advisor Tahnoon bin Zayed acts as the middleman for Hemedti's gold for mercenaries trade. UAE imports 99.2% of Sudan's gold with 80% of that done illegally. Gold is moved through Tradive General Trading a UAE company. The registered owner is Abdul Rahim Dagalo, Hemedti's brother. TGT has purchased vehicles for the RSF mercenaries. Another front called GSK registered in Sudan is run by Hemedti's other brother Algoney Dagalo. It wasn't hard to look all this up. Takes maybe two days once you know the players. It is just that almost no one cares. The clowns at the forefront of social media attention currently don't do research. They wait for others to do it and then they swipe it, water it down and screw it up. Consider subbing for real news and analysis. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.ryandawson.org/subscribe

In The People vs. the Golden State Killer, Thien Ho, the current District Attorney of Sacramento, recounts his harrowing and exhilarating experience as the lead prosecutor responsible for capturing and prosecuting Joseph DeAngelo. Referred to at various times by law enforcement and the media as the Visalia Ransacker, the East Bay Rapist, the Original Nightstalker, and finally the Golden State Killer, DeAngelo, a former policeman, is widely considered “one of the most notorious serial predators in American history.Ho's book is the first official account of how the Golden State Killer was apprehended and put behind bars for life. Ho led an elite team of law enforcement from six California prosecutor's offices, using a newly developed tool known as “investigative genetic genealogy” to connect DeAngelo to multiple cold cases stretching back nearly a half century.Many previous narratives about DeAngelo, including two bestselling books and multiple documentaries, focused largely on the killer and his heinous crimes. This book not only provides hundreds of facts and details never revealed to the public about the Golden State Killer's crimes, it also presents the real-life story of the people who worked tirelessly to bring DeAngelo to justice. It also offers the unprecedented authorized perspective of three survivors of DeAngelo's crimes who courageously turned their pain into empowerment and activism. A portion of the book's proceeds will be donated both by the author and Third State Books to Phyllis's Garden, a nonprofit advocating for victims' rights begun in honor of a GSK survivor.The People vs. the Golden State Killer also recounts Ho's fascinating personal journey, from escaping communist Vietnam with his family as a child to working his way up from an internship to an elite homicide division and eventually becoming one of only ten Asian American district attorneys out of 2,400 nationwide. THE PEOPLE vs THE GOLDEN STATE KILLER: Sacramento District Attorney—Thien Ho

This episode covers: Cardiology this Week: A concise summary of recent studies Lp(a) - What to expect in the very near future Myocardial infarction in older and frail adults Mythbusters: is beetroot good for your heart? Host: Rick Grobbee Guests: JP Carpenter, Vijay Kunadian, Erik Stroes Want to watch that episode? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2177 Want to watch that extended interview on Lp(a), go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2177?resource=interview   Disclaimer  ESC TV Today is supported by Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis through an independent funding. The programme has not been influenced in any way by its funding partners. This programme is intended for health care professionals only and is to be used for educational purposes. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) does not aim to promote medicinal products nor devices. Any views or opinions expressed are the presenters' own and do not reflect the views of the ESC. The ESC is not liable for any translated content of this video. The English language always prevails.    Declarations of interests Stephan Achenbach, Yasmina Bououdina, Rick Grobbee, Nicolle Kraenkel, Vijay Kunadian and Erik Stroes have declared to have no potential conflicts of interest to report. Carlos Aguiar has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: personal fees for consultancy and/or speaker fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BiAL, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, Takeda, Tecnimede. John-Paul Carpenter has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: stockholder MyCardium AI. Davide Capodanno has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Aventis, Novo Nordisk, Terumo. Konstantinos Koskinas has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: honoraria from MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi. Steffen Petersen has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: consultancy for Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Emma Svennberg has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers, Squibb-Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson.

In this episode of Tank Talks, host Matt Cohen sits down with Roberto Bellini, Co-Founder of BSQUARED Capital and former CEO of Bellus Health, for a powerful conversation about family, legacy, and resilience in the world of biotech.Originally recorded just two weeks before the passing of his father, Dr. Francesco Bellini, one of the founding giants of Canadian biotech, this re-recorded episode serves as a moving tribute to the man known as “Mr. Biotech Canada.” Roberto opens up about what it was like growing up under the guidance of such a visionary figure and how that experience shaped his own path as an entrepreneur and leader.He reflects on the highs and lows of leading Bellus Health, from moments of near collapse to its remarkable $2 billion acquisition by GSK, sharing lessons on risk-taking, perseverance, and the importance of staying grounded through uncertainty. Roberto also offers his perspective on the future of Canadian biotech, highlighting the need for stronger late-stage funding and how BSquared Capital is helping to cultivate the next generation of innovators.This episode isn't just about business success; it's about honoring a legacy, learning through adversity, and discovering what it truly means to build something that endures.The Legacy of Dr. Francesco Bellini (00:02:52)* Francesco Bellini's incredible immigrant story: from arriving in Canada with nothing to a $6B biotech exit.* Business was the family's dinner table conversation, and attending AGMs as a child.* The founding of Biochem Pharma and the discovery of the groundbreaking HIV treatment.* “He was a visionary... he saw things before other people saw them.”Growing Up in Biotech (00:06:30)* Roberto's early memories of board meetings and dinner-table business lessons* How being “in the room” shaped his entrepreneurial mindset* Watching a $6B biotech deal become part of family historyThe Rise, Fall, and Rebirth of Bellus Health (00:08:27)* Roberto's journey from family office analyst to a 30-year-old, first-time CEO of a public company.* The devastating failure of the phase three trial for a rare kidney disease.* Inside a Biotech Failure: The intense, weekend-long “war room” process of unblinding clinical trial data and preparing for a public announcement.The Second Act: Finding the Cough Drug (00:13:47)* Discovering a promising molecule through the NeoMed Institute* Betting the company's future on a last-chance asset* Raising $20M when no one believed and turning it into a $2B successNegotiating the GSK Deal (00:24:45)* The strategic shift from “build-to-sell” to “build-to-scale”, positioning the company for a premium acquisition.* The M&A Playbook: Why you should never lead with a desire to sell; the importance of building for independence.* The high-stakes negotiation with GSK: going from an $11 offer to $14.75, almost losing the deal, and the “mellow tone” that saved it.* The entrepreneur's dilemma: “Every single entrepreneur I've met that sold their company, there's always a moment of not wanting to do it.”Building Canada's Biotech Future (00:30:11)* Why Canada has the innovation but lacks the enduring biotech giants.* The critical gap: The need for more late-stage capital and the role of Canadian pension funds.* The “Gilead of the North” vision: Creating a virtuous cycle of capital, entrepreneurs, and translational science.* Upcoming trends: The convergence of AI and drug discovery to de-risk development and lower costs.Beyond the Lab: Leadership, Risk, and Legacy (00:46:20)* Learning to embrace risk and find joy in reinvention* The best advice from Dr. B: “Spend your money, it'll make you want to earn more.”* Why true success isn't just building a company, but building peopleAbout Roberto BelliniFounder & Managing Partner, BSQUARED CapitalRoberto Bellini is a second-generation biotech entrepreneur and investor. As the former CEO of Bellus Health, he led the company's dramatic turnaround and eventual $2 billion acquisition by GSK. Drawing on his deep operational experience in drug development, he now co-manages BSQUARED Capital, a family office focused on investing in and supporting promising biotech ventures. He is a passionate advocate for building a stronger, more resilient biotech ecosystem in Canada.Connect with Roberto Bellini on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/robertobellini/Visit BSQUARED Capital Website: https://bsq-c.com/Connect with Matt Cohen on LinkedIn: https://ca.linkedin.com/in/matt-cohen1Visit the Ripple Ventures website: https://www.rippleventures.com/ This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit tanktalks.substack.com

Synopsis: Jim Tananbaum, Founder & CEO of Foresite Capital, joins Rahul Chaturvedi to dissect the patterns driving biotech innovation, the role of macroeconomic cycles in venture performance, and how disciplined science fuels enduring investment success. Drawing from three decades across entrepreneurship and venture leadership, Jim reflects on his path from co-founding drug discovery startups with Harvard collaborators to building one of the most respected investment firms in life sciences. He unpacks how interest rate environments shape fund vintages, why AI is emerging as the next transformative platform, and how investors can identify enduring opportunities amid volatility. Their discussion spans valuation compression, AI-driven discovery, CNS and Alzheimer's innovation, and the geopolitical forces influencing biotech globally. Jim's perspective offers a masterclass in balancing scientific rigor with strategic foresight — and in positioning capital where breakthrough innovation meets sustainable impact. “Lean into areas where there's likely to be immense change,” Jim advises — a principle as relevant to biotech investing as it is to shaping the future of healthcare itself. Biography: Jim is the founder and CEO of Foresite Capital, a healthcare investment firm founded in 2011 that has approximately $3.5B in assets under management. Jim assembles the people, ideas, and money needed to launch products that save lives and improve healthcare. During the last three decades, Jim has been a thought partner for some of the fastest-growing companies of their generation, including 10x Genomics (Nasdaq: TXG), Amerigroup (Nasdaq: ANTM), and Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: JAZZ). Jim's entrepreneurial experience began at Harvard Business School when he co-founded GelTex Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq:GENZ). With less than $80M in funding, GelTex brought two drugs to market, and the company was acquired in 1999 for $1.4B. Jim was also the founding chief executive of Theravance, Inc. Under his tenure, he raised over $350M. Theravance has since split into two parts, one of which is now part of GSK's respiratory franchise through a joint venture, Innoviva (Nasdaq: INVA), and the other was spun out into Theravance Biopharma, Inc. (Nasdaq: TBPH). Together, they achieved a market capitalization that exceeded $4B. Jim's investment experience includes co-founding Prospect Ventures and, earlier in his career, being a partner of Sierra Ventures, where he established its healthcare services investment practice. Jim graduated from Yale with a BS and BSEE in Applied Math and Electrical Engineering/Computer Science. He then earned an MD from Harvard, graduating from the Harvard/MIT HST Program. He also earned an MBA from Harvard while playing rugby.

Welcome to Season 5, Episode 44! Our guest today is Thien Ho, the Sacramento District attorney and long time prosecutor. He's also the author of the upcoming book, The People vs. The Golden State Killer which will be published by Third State Books and releases on November 11th. This true crime memoir follows Thien's experience as the lead prosecutor on the case against Joseph DeAngelo, one of the most notorious serial killers of the 20th century. It covers never-before published details about the investigation, capture, and trial that put DeAngelo behind bars. At the same time, the book is a memoir that follows Thien's personal story escaping war-torn Vietnam as a young boy and working his way up the law enforcement system to becoming the lead prosecutor in the case. Ho has gone on to become the Sacramento District Attorney, one of only 10 API District Attorneys in the country (there are 2400 total DAs).  We loved how the book also highlights the experiences of three key survivors of DeAngelo's crimes, something that other books on the Golden State Killer haven't done to any significant extent… and this gives power to the survivors. In fact, a portion of the book's proceeds will be donated both by the author and Third State Books to Phyllis's Garden, a nonprofit advocating for victims' rights begun in honor of a GSK survivor.  To get a copy of the book, we encourage you to purchase through the links on thienho.org because you'll be supporting small businesses.  If you like what we do, please share, follow, and like us in your podcast directory of choice or on Instagram @AAHistory101. For previous episodes and resources, please visit our site at https://asianamericanhistory101.libsyn.com or our links at http://castpie.com/AAHistory101. If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, email us at info@aahistory101.com.

APAC stocks were predominantly in the green following the tech strength on Wall St, most indices extended to record highs.US President Trump said he had a great trip so far and expects to lower fentanyl-linked tariffs on China. China said to have made soybean purchase.European equity futures indicate a marginally lower cash market open with Euro Stoxx 50 future down 0.1% after the cash index closed with losses of 0.1% on Tuesday.USD is broadly firmer vs. peers with GBP still under pressure. AUD leads as hot Aus CPI dashes hopes of an RBA rate cut next month.Israeli planes launched strikes on Gaza City. US VP Vance said he thinks peace in the Middle East will hold despite skirmishes.Looking ahead, highlights US Pending Homes (Sep), FOMC & BoC Policy Announcements, US President Trump to meet South Korea's Leader, Fed Chair Powell & BoC's Macklem, Supply from UK, Germany & US.Earnings from Meta, Microsoft, Alphabet, Google, Starbucks, eBay, Verizon, Boeing, CVS, Caterpillar, Phillips 66, UBS, BASF, Mercedes-Benz, Deutsche Bank, Equinor, Santander, GSK & Airbus.Read the full report covering Equities, Forex, Fixed Income, Commodites and more on Newsquawk

This episode covers: Cardiology This Week: A concise summary of recent studies Arrhythmias in cardiac amyloidosis Taking the 'O' out of HOCM: managing LVOT obstruction Snapshots Host: Susanna Price Guests: Carlos Aguiar, Stephanie Schwarting, Ahmad Masri Want to watch that episode? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2176 Want to watch that extended interview on Arrhythmias in Cardiac Amyloidosis? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2176?resource=interview Disclaimer: ESC TV Today is supported by Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis through an independent funding. The programme has not been influenced in any way by its funding partners. This programme is intended for health care professionals only and is to be used for educational purposes. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) does not aim to promote medicinal products nor devices. Any views or opinions expressed are the presenters' own and do not reflect the views of the ESC. The ESC is not liable for any translated content of this video. The English language always prevails. Declarations of interests: Stephan Achenbach, Yasmina Bououdina, Nicolle Kraenkel and Susanna Price have declared to have no potential conflicts of interest to report. Carlos Aguiar has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: personal fees for consultancy and/or speaker fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BiAL, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, Takeda, Tecnimede. John-Paul Carpenter has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: stockholder Mycardium AI. Davide Capodanno has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Aventis, Novo Nordisk, Terumo. Konstantinos Koskinas has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: honoraria from MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi. Ahmad Masri has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: research grants from Pfizer, Ionis, Attralus, Cytokinetics and Janssen. Consulting fees from Cytokinetics, BMS, BridgeBio, Pfizer, Ionis, Lexicon, Attralus, Alnylam, Haya, Alexion, Akros, Edgewise, Rocket, Lexeo, Prothena, BioMarin, AstraZeneca, Avidity, Neurimmune, and Tenaya. Steffen Petersen has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: consultancy for Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Stephanie Schwarting has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: advisory board for Alnylam, Bayer, Pfizer; principal investigator in trials sponsored by Alexion, Novo Nordisk and Intellia. Emma Svennberg has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers, Squibb-Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson.

True Crime Tuesday presents The People Vs. The Golden State Killer with Attorney/District Attorney of Sacremento/Author, Thien Ho! In The People vs. the Golden State Killer, Thien Ho, the current District Attorney of Sacramento, recounts his harrowing and exhilarating experience as the lead prosecutor responsible for capturing and prosecuting Joseph DeAngelo. Referred to at various times by law enforcement and the media as the Visalia Ransacker, the East Bay Rapist, the Original Nightstalker, and finally the Golden State Killer, DeAngelo, a former policeman, is widely considered “one of the most notorious serial predators in American history.” Ho's book is the first official account of how the Golden State Killer was apprehended and put behind bars for life. Ho led an elite team of law enforcement from six California prosecutor's offices, using a newly developed tool known as “investigative genetic genealogy” to connect DeAngelo to multiple cold cases stretching back nearly a half century. Many previous narratives about DeAngelo, including two bestselling books and multiple documentaries, focused largely on the killer and his heinous crimes. This book not only provides hundreds of facts and details never revealed to the public about the Golden State Killer's crimes, it also presents the real-life story of the people who worked tirelessly to bring DeAngelo to justice. It also offers the unprecedented authorized perspective of three survivors of DeAngelo's crimes who courageously turned their pain into empowerment and activism. A portion of the book's proceeds will be donated both by the author and Third State Books to Phyllis's Garden, a nonprofit advocating for victims' rights begun in honor of a GSK survivor. On Today's True Crime Tuesday, we talk to Thien Ho about how he and his family fled from Vietnam in the early 70's, and how he went from not even knowing English when he came to this country, to wanting to defend his fellow citizens from the worst of the worst!  We talk about how he got the case of Joseph DeAngelo assigned to him, the challenges he had to overcome to get an indictment and then a conviction, and then justice for the victims that, for the first time in his career, he made a PROMISE that he would deliver a guilty verdict to!   PLUS AN ALL-NEW DUMB CRIMES/STUPID CRIMINALS W/TRAVIS THORPE! See the video of the trio that tried to break down the door of an Alexandria family while wearing Halloween costumes! :  https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/virginia/trio-halloween-masks-caught-on-camera-alexandria/65-48684b04-8dea-47ed-9b07-1aa6a65ae6dc?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark# Pre-Order your copy of  "The People Vs. The Golden State Killer" here:  https://bit.ly/4hnzBIH Sign up to go with Dacre Stoker and Mysterious Universe Tours to Romania here:  https://www.mysteriousadventurestours.com/darkness_radio/ Want to attend JUST Dracula's Vampire Ball at Bran Castle? Click this link to find out how: https://www.mysteriousadventurestours.com/darkness_radio/ Travel with Brian J. Cano to Ireland for Halloween for 11 days and get 100 dollars off and break it into 10 easy payments here:  https://www.mysteriousadventurestours.com/darkness_radio/ Make sure you update your Darkness Radio Apple Apps! and subscribe to the Darkness Radio You Tube page:  https://www.youtube.com/@DRTimDennis There are new and different (and really cool) items all the time in the Darkness Radio Online store at our website! . check out the Darkness Radio Store!   https://www.darknessradioshow.com/store/ #crime #truecrime #truecrimepodcasts #truecrimetuesday #thienho #thepeoplevsthegoldenstatekiller #goldenstatekiller #thirdstatebooks #murder #serialkillers #truecrimebooks #joesphdeangelo #visaliaransacker #eastarearapist #originalnightstalker #sacremento #murderinvestigation #orangecounty #rape #sexualassault #phyllissgarden #dumbcrimesstupidcriminals #TimDennis #travisthorpe #combatrev #floridaman #drugcrimes #foodcrimes #stupidcrimes #funnycrimes  #sexcrimes 

Next-generation platforms and technologies are getting closer to cracking one of biopharma's biggest problems: delivering medicines, and mAbs in particular, to the brain. On the latest BioCentury This Week podcast, BioCentury's Selina Koch details the latest innovations in blood-brain-barrier shuttles and how the technologies could transform the treatment of neurological diseases.BioCentury's Lauren Martz discusses her conversation with Tony Wood, CSO of GSK, which included the pharma's strategy for indication expansion, why it prefers RNA modalities over AAV-based gene therapies, and how its quest for causal biology has evolved over the years.Washington Editor Steve Usdin discusses the first set of FDA's new commissioner's national priority review vouchers, and why the voucher program is unlikely to function as an incentive capable of steering future behavior. Usdin also discusses the potential impact of FDA staffing reductions on the sector. This episode of BioCentury This Week is sponsored by Evotec.View full story: https://www.biocentury.com/article/657326#BloodBrainBarrier #Neurology #DrugDelivery #MonoclonalAntibodies #RNAtherapeutics #CausalBiology #FDA00:01 - Sponsor Message: Evotec01:57 - Brain Shuttles13:57 - GSK Q&A20:08 - FDA VouchersTo submit a question to BioCentury's editors, email the BioCentury This Week team at podcasts@biocentury.com.Reach us by sending a text

Te dejo aquí el enlace para votar a La Teoria de la Mente para los premios Ivoox: https://go.ivoox.com/wv/premios25?c=4271 ¿Cómo puede ser que invirtamos más que nunca en salud mental y, sin embargo, cada vez estemos peor? En este impactante análisis, basado en el libro "Sedados" de James Davies, exploramos cómo la psiquiatría moderna ha sido moldeada más por intereses económicos que por la evidencia científica o el bienestar de los pacientes. Acompáñanos en este viaje revelador donde desmantelamos el sistema actual de salud mental: desde los escándalos de la industria farmacéutica hasta la medicalización de la vida cotidiana, pasando por el estigma, la ideología neoliberal y los mecanismos que nos han convertido, literalmente, en una sociedad sedada. Descubrirás cómo grandes farmacéuticas como Pfizer, GSK o Abbott han sido multadas por prácticas fraudulentas, cómo se han inventado enfermedades para expandir mercados, y cómo el sufrimiento humano se ha transformado en una mercancía rentable. Mientras los avances médicos han salvado millones de vidas físicas, la salud mental ha permanecido estancada o incluso ha retrocedido. Y no es por falta de fármacos o diagnósticos… es porque el sistema está diseñado para mantenernos funcionales, no felices. Analizamos también los mecanismos ocultos: El auge del modelo biomédico y su compatibilidad con el capitalismo. La patologización de emociones humanas normales. El conflicto de interés entre psiquiatría y farmacéuticas. La despolitización del sufrimiento y su uso como herramienta de control social. Este video no es antipsiquiatría, es un llamado urgente a cuestionar un modelo que cosifica el sufrimiento, individualiza la culpa y silencia la posibilidad de cambio estructural. ️ Como dice James Davies, quizá nuestro malestar no sea una disfunción, sino una señal de que el mundo necesita transformarse. Si alguna vez has sentido que algo no encaja con el tratamiento que se le da a la salud mental... este video es para ti. Enlaces importantes Nuestra escuela de ansiedad: www.escuelaansiedad.com Nuestro nuevo libro: www.elmapadelaansiedad.com Visita nuestra página web: http://www.amadag.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Asociacion.Agorafobia/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amadag.psico/ ▶️ YouTube AMADAG TV: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC22fPGPhEhgiXCM7PGl68rw Palabras clave (keywords SEO) James Davies,sedados libro,psiquiatría crítica,big pharma,industria farmacéutica,salud mental y capitalismo,medicalización de la vida,DSM diagnóstico,crítica salud mental,ansiedad y sistema,modelo biomédico,antidepresivos fraude,glaxosmithkline paxil,pfizer y salud mental,enfermedades inventadas,estigmatización salud mental,antipsiquiatría moderna,neoliberalismo y salud,sistema de salud mental,sufrimiento emocional,sociedad sedada,marketing farmacéutico,desequilibrio químico,problemas estructurales,comodificación del sufrimiento Hashtags para posicionamiento #SaludMental #BigPharma #PsicologíaCrítica #Sedados #IndustriaFarmacéutica #JamesDavies

The 5 things you need to know before the stock market opens today: Jeep-maker Stellantis has a new CFO, the CEO of British drugmaker GSK is stepping down, SEC Chair Paul Atkins is moving to fast track President Trump's effort to shift the earnings report schedule for public companies, Vice President JD Vance has spoken publicly about TikTok, and Bad Bunny will headline this February's Super Bowl halftime show.  Squawk Box is hosted by Joe Kernen, Becky Quick and Andrew Ross Sorkin.  Follow Squawk Pod for the best moments, interviews and analysis from our TV show in an audio-first format. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Carl Quintanilla, Jim Cramer and David Faber led off the show with the deal the day: Videogame publisher Electronic Arts has agreed to be taken private by Silver Lake Partners, Affinity Partners and Saudi Arabia's PIF  in a $55 billion buyout. The anchors reacted to comments by Walmart CEO Doug McMillon, who was quoted as saying "It's very clear AI is going to change literally every job." Changes in the C-suite: New CEOs at CSX,  Barrick Mining and GSK, while Comcast named its President Mike Cavanagh to join Brian Roberts as Co-CEO effective January 2026. Also in focus: Markets and government shutdown watch,President Trump reiterates his threat to impose 100% tariffs on movies filmed outside of the U.S., Jim's new book "How To Make Money In Any Market" goes on sale Tuesday. Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC.Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast's planned spinoff of Versant. Squawk on the Street Disclaimer Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.