POPULARITY
Saving African penguins: Inside the historic fishing ban to protect endangered species | Christina Hagen by Radio Islam
Vi plejer at grine af dem, molboerne. Enfoldige og med lav intelligens. Men virkelighedens molboer holder ikke kun til på Mols, og måske er deres skæbner ikke specielt morsomme, når vi møder dem uden for de vittigheder, vi kender dem fra. I digtsamlingen “Pow Pow Pow” skriver Christina Hagen om at forveksle forskellige former for vold og uforudsigelighed med tryghed, fordi man ikke kender andet. Vært: Mathias Wissing See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Expand your reach by narrowing your focus. Christina Hagen attracted success early on by establishing herself as THE expert in TBI and Trucking cases in Colorado. But winning a client is only half the battle. The real competition lies in creating a transparent and streamlined customer experience. The partner of Hagen Nares Trial Lawyers (@hagennares) is all about leveraging technology to keep her clients informed and connected every step of the way. If you're looking to launch your own practice or enhance the client experience at your firm, this episode is for you! Links Want to hear more from elite personal injury lawyers and industry-leading marketers? Follow us on social media for more. Rankings.io Instagram Chris Dreyer Instagram Rankings.io Twitter Rankings.io Website Christina Hagen LinkedIn Hagen Nares Trial Lawyers Website Hagen Nares Trial Lawyers Instagram Niching Up by Chris Dreyer What's in This Episode: Who is Christina Hagen? How to create a flexible, modern law firm. Why hands-on experience is necessary to elevate any practice. The top conventions and conferences for anyone looking to break into TBI or Trucking. Past Guests Past guests on Personal Injury Mastermind: Brent Sibley, Sam Glover, Larry Nussbaum, Michael Mogill, Brian Chase, Jay Kelley, Alvaro Arauz, Eric Chaffin, Brian Panish, John Gomez, Sol Weiss, Matthew Dolman, Gabriel Levin, Seth Godin, David Craig, Pete Strom, John Ruhlin, Andrew Finkelstein, Harry Morton, Shay Rowbottom, Maria Monroy, Dave Thomas, Marc Anidjar, Bob Simon, Seth Price, John Gomez, Megan Hargroder, Brandon Yosha, Mike Mandell, Brett Sachs, Paul Faust, Jennifer Gore-Cuthbert Additional Episodes You Might Enjoy 80. Mike Papantonio, Levin, Papantonio, & Rafferty — Doing Well by Doing Good 84. Glen Lerner, Lerner and Rowe – A Steady Hand in a Shifting Industry 101. Pratik Shah, EsquireTek — Discovering the Power of Automation 134. Darryl Isaacs, Isaacs & Isaacs — The Hammer: Insights from a Marketing Legend 104. Taly Goody, Goody Law Group — Finding PI Clients on TikTok 63. Joe Fried, Fried Goldberg LLC — How To Become An Expert And Revolutionize Your PI Niche 96. Brian Dean, Backlinko — Becoming a Linkable Source 83. Seth Godin — Differentiation: How to Make Your Law Firm a Purple Cow 73. Neil Patel, Neil Patel — Digital A New Approach to Content and Emerging Marketing Channels
With a team of four seasoned personal injury attorneys at Zinda Law Group, this first episode provides real insight into how each one of these legal minds lost their training wheels to become confident, successful and effective lawyers. New attorneys can listen to this plethora of legal wisdom and breathe a sigh of relief in hearing that a legal passion plus a thirst for fresh legal knowledge is a recipe for professional success.On today's podcast:• Introduction to Zinda Law Group Attorneys, Joseph Caputo, Christina Hagen and Neil Solomon• Do nerves ever end as a new attorney?• Advice for their younger selves as new lawyers• Worst mistakes new attorneys make• Law firm's responsibility to help new attorneys' get better vs new attorneys' responsibility to get better• How to manage stress in a stressful professionDiminishing nervesWhen asked at one point did they feel comfortable as a litigator, the attorneys had the following to say.Senior Attorney, Neil Solomon, who handles severe and catastrophic injury cases at the firm, says when he started fresh out of law school he had no idea what was up from what was down. But, after 5 years of experiencing and learning, he found his legal ‘groove'.On the other hand, Christina Hagen, an attorney with a focus on wrongful death cases, found that for her it was less about the years of practice but more about the ‘types of experiences' she was exposed to that helped diminish her stress as a novice.When asked if the nerves ever really disappear, Partner and Attorney, Joe Caputo advises that “the minute we stop feeling the nerves and the pressure, we've got to get into a different business.” It's important to recognize that there is a lot on the line, and to constantly be pushing yourself out of your comfort zone.Legal passions and skillsLooking back on their time as newly licensed litigators, each attorney gives a piece of advice to their former selves.“Don't be hard on yourself, and understand you don't have to know everything right away,” Chrissy shares.Neil, who practiced law for years with respected defense firms in Texas before becoming a plaintiff's attorney, suggests “trying to figure out what you're passionate about, and what you want to do in your legal career.”They discuss the faux pas that many young lawyers make in chasing money rather than their legal passion. They advise that it is the wrong way around and leads lawyers to be married to an area of law that in the end may not be satisfactory.“Figure out what you love, and the money will follow”, Jack Zinda wisely advises.Be yourselfIn a similar vein, Joe, who was trained to be a ‘balls to walls', aggressive type of lawyer, says he would have told himself to find his own style.“Be yourself. Find out what your style is and mold what you are learning to your style,” Joe shares from personal experience.Altogether, the key message for new attorneys is to find a passion, stay updated on the law and ‘sharpen your tools' by taking advantage of all opportunities available from conferences to mentorships.Learn from your mistakesA common mistake that new attorneys often make is being over-aggressive or over the top. “Our practice is still based in relationships”, advises Neil, “whether it be opposing counsel, the judge and their staff, or the adjustor, building those relationships can generally work out in your favor and your client's favor rather than being aggressive.”As a new litigator, if you're ever worried about making a big mistake, the best advice Joe has is to “learn the rules and learn the laws because that is your safety net.”Work hard, play hardFinally, with some important words of caution, the team address how the high levels of stress inherent to the legal profession can be a killer, cause addiction and overwhelm lives.However, to combat this, they advise that being organized is one of the key tools for lawyers to stay on top and in control of the many competing demands.And, lastly, the resounding message to new attorneys from the Zinda Law Group team, is to get the work-life balance right. This is a profession that demands hard work, but survival for attorneys requires them to work hard but play harder.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Meet Christina, a member of the BirdLife South Africa team and conservationist. Find out more about African Penguins!Connect with me on Twitter, email, or website. Or visit my Etsy site.African PenguinIngredientsA large scoop of Vanilla Ice Cream1 ½ oz milk product1 shot of Amarula Cream LiqueurHershey's Chocolate SauceSplash of Strawberry Syrup (like Monin)Directions1. Prepare glass by drizzling chocolate sauce around inside of glass2. Fill blender with vanilla ice cream, milk product, and Amarula3. Blend and pour into prepared glass4. Top with a splash of strawberry syrup
In this episode, the Zinda Law Group team discusses how to evaluate a case. A lot of the time, it's not the case you take, but the case you don't take, that can make or break your practice. Sharing their thoughts and experience with Jack is his law partner, Joe Caputo, one of the top litigators at the firm, Neil Solomon, and one of their all-stars, Christina Hagen, who litigates cases in Colorado and Texas.How to evaluate a caseDeciding whether or not to take a case is one of the toughest parts of your job - you only have a tiny snippet of information on which you have to base your decision. So, how do you know whether the case is worth taking or not? “When evaluating a case,” Jack says, “I think of liability damages. Is there a source of recovery? What do I think about the client? Who's at fault and why? And damages. Are they hurt enough to warrant pursuing a claim?”Consider also if you're proud to represent the case, whether you'd feel confident working nights and weekends to represent them. Are you going to make a meaningful impact in their life?“Is it going to be worth their while to have us go through our process to try to help them? Evaluating the facts and the circumstances and the damages and the source of recovery. It's just as important that you think about it from the client's perspective.”Sometimes, the best thing you can do for the client is not take the case.Sorting fact from fiction“Trust your instincts,” says Joe, “if it doesn't sound right, it probably isn't.”You don't want to get your hopes up that it's a million dollar case only to wind up disappointed because you didn't ask focused and direct questions: How did you leave the scene? Who was the first one there? Who called the police? The clients aren't out to deceive you, they could simply be mistaken, and if you don't ask the right questions, you could misinterpret information. “A lot of times when you sign up a case, you'll hear information from the client. If you don't verify it, that becomes an assumed fact in your head. And you could get six months, a year, two years into the case, and you never vetted that. And it actually wasn't a fact, it was just someone's opinion or hearsay that someone heard second, third, fourth hand,” says Chrissy.Source of recoveryHow do you identify if a case makes sense from a source recovery standpoint, especially when you don't know much about the case?“The most important thing,” says Neil, “is to confirm the source of recovery, because it will determine your strategy and the timeframe in which you can try to get the case resolved.”Look outside the box too for sources of recovery, don't accept a blank space on a crash report where the insurance policy isn't recorded. “That's also where dash cam and body cam footage can be really helpful too,” adds Chrissy.Walk the sceneAlways go to the scene and do your own investigation. Hire an expert in the field if you aren't familiar with what you're looking for. “Whether it's how to build a hotel, or how the training process is related to operating a truck crane, or how to hang a chandelier, get an expert to talk to you about what could have gone wrong and who the parties are,” says Chrissy.Go at a time when the incident occured so you can see what the situation might have been like - who else might have been there? Potential witnesses? And look for cameras. Deciding whether to take the case“I always approach it with a best case scenario, in terms of liability, damages and source of recovery. And then given that and how much money I can afford to spend on the case, can I file a lawsuit and conduct an investigation without taking a crazy risk?” says Neil. Top tips for new litigators: Always meet the client in person or have Zoom meetings - you need to get a sense of who the person is. Ask focused and direct questions to make an informed decision. Determine the best case outcome. Sometimes turning down a case is the best thing you can do for a client. Be open and honest about how you conduct your investigation. You can't change the facts once you've established them, you need to be able to think on your feet and change your game plan accordingly. On today's podcast: How to evaluate a case Sorting fact from fiction Determine source of recovery Deciding whether to take the case Links: www.zdfirm.com Attorney John C. (Jack) Zinda Christina Hagen Neil Solomon Joseph Caputo
Back together this week, the Zinda Law Group professionals discuss a topic you may haveheard of – the Coronavirus. Attorney, Christina Hagen, Partner, Joseph Caputo and Founder,Jack Zinda reflect on how the pandemic has catalyzed technological change within the legalworld. Remote depositions, mediations and trials have each caused their own set of challengesto be overcome.The COVID-19 realizationFor both Joe and Chrissy, life as personal injury lawyers gave them their COVID-19 wake-upcall. In mid-March, Joe was halfway through his morning coffee, watching the news and wasstruck by a sense of fear that made him opt for a virtual deposition rather than risk an airplanejourney for his scheduled appearance.For Chrissy, it was deposition delays that made her realize the only way to get through thispandemic was to adapt to the unprecedented changes by ‘thinking outside the box'.In Jack's case, a sudden, mid-game NBA cancellation was a surreal experience that triggeredhis realization. In 48 hours, the Zinda Law Group office went from a 60-person environment to a100% remote operation, and since then he has scarcely seen “2 people in the office at any onetime”.What has changed?Well, it is of no surprise that everything now revolves around video conferences, and with thisnew medium comes a whole host of new challenges, including, but not limited to, unexpectedinterruptions, dwindling attention, technology issues and internet glitches.Mitigating these issues, however, is as simple as a dress rehearsal. An additional preparationsession before deposition, for example, will allow you to be proactive about identifying potentialissues before they have the opportunity to become a problem.The Zinda Law Group checklist for preparing clients is: check internet hotspots, ensurebackground settings are video-friendly, make sure laptops are working and, crucially, that theyare paired with a camera.And make sure to ask ‘is anyone else in the room?'Jury trial or no jury trial?And finally, the team put down their bets on the likelihood of jury trials in 2021. From apessimistic Joe to Chrissy and Jack's optimism, ultimately the team remains hopeful about asafe and innovative future for jury trials.On today's podcast: Setting the scene with Zinda Law Group in COVID-19 The moment of realization about COVID-19 Challenges of remote depositions Hurdles of virtual mediations Smooth sailing online court trials Jury trial predictions 2021? Book recommendation: The Andromeda Strain by Michael Crichton Links: https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/john-jack-zinda/ https://www.michaelcrichton.com/the-andromeda-strain/ https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/christina-hagen/ https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/joseph-caputo/
If you are a new attorney and looking for answers to the what, when, where, and why on mediations, the Zinda Law Group team is back with an insightful educational digest. Their professional wisdom fills the knowledge gap left by law school curriculums across the country coupled with valuable tips from the field. For fresh faced attorneys, this podcast will be the solid foundation they need to walk in and out of their first mediation – whether the case reaches resolution or not. What is a mediation? It is an “opportunity to get your case in front of a neutral party”, Personal Injury Attorney, Christina Hagen explains. Essentially, it is an information gathering process. The ultimate aim is to reach a resolution between the parties with a guaranteed outcome. No jury, no judge, just an informal setting with a neutral pair of experienced ears to listen – and, well, mediate. Both sides, the plaintiff and their attorney and the defendant and their attorney, will present their case to the mediator and see if a settlement can be reached – or not, as the outcome may often be. The mediator and their powers If it is an informal affair and the mediator is not a judge, then what powers do they have and what knowledge can they offer to help resolve my case? Often mediators are ex-judges with a wealth of experience on the law and how juries tend to sway when presented with particular sets of evidence. However, that ‘ex' is the operative word when it comes to their powers. “The only real power they have is that they have to be the ones to declare it as an impasse for the day”, Neil Solomon, Senior Attorney, makes clear. When? As a general rule, the Zinda Law Group attorneys advise that a pre-suit mediation is ‘typically' an unwise move since the opposition may be trying to ‘test your metal' and see if they can get off relatively cheap. Rather, mediation is usually most sought-after just before expert designation – in other words, before the real money comes into play. “It's most important to know the value of your case before you decide whether you want to mediate or not,” advises Christina. The objective Unlike the mediator, as an attorney, you have three objectives. Objective number one, gather information and identify what holes the opposition has spotted in your case. Objective number two, estimate what the opposition has valued your case to be – i.e. how much are they willing to pay. And then, only if you've achieved objective number one and two will you aim to resolve the case as your third and final mediation objective – otherwise, feel free to walk out if no one is meeting you halfway. Preparing your client Most importantly, the Zinda Law Group says preparing your client to ‘ease their nerves' is key. Give them a run down on what a mediation is, what it isn't, if your client will speak, and crucially, that the first offer made should be taken with a pinch of salt – however insulting it may be. There are a lot of emotions that can come into these mediations, especially if it is a wrongful death or catastrophic injury case. “It's important to prepare your client mentally for what the day is going to be like,” Jack advises. On today's podcast: ● What is a mediation?● Who is a mediator?● When and when not to mediate?● What are the three objectives of a mediation as an attorney?● Who should attend a mediation?● How to prepare a client● The nuts and bolts of a resolution Links: ● https://www.zdfirm.com/● https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/john-jack-zinda/● https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/christina-hagen/● https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/neil-solomon/ ● https://www.zdfirm.com/nationwide-injury-lawyers/● https://www.zdfirm.com/what-happens-once-i-file-a-personal-injury-lawsuit/● https://www.zdfirm.com/dallas/personal-injury/what-to-expect/
Wouldn't it be great if someone would answer the questions you were too embarrassed to ask? Well, in this episode four experienced personal injury attorneys at Zinda Law Group detail what new attorneys can do to confidently rise to the challenge of their first deposition. From preparatory and procedural tips, to comfort blankets and secret powers against experienced attorneys, this episode is a treasure chest of tried and tested intel for any new attorney who wants the advantage from deposition number one. Depositions – when and why? According to Joe Caputo, Partner at Zinda Law Group, the two main reasons a deposition is typically taken is to pin the deponent on their story and evaluate what the facts are going to be at trial, and to evaluate that person as a witness, including their credibility and whether a jury is likely to believe their story at trial. It's important to know that you do not need to depose everyone you may call at trial, or anyone who has facts about the case. Written discovery, subpoenas, and written or video statements are other great ways to gather information without having to coordinate a deposition. How? Experienced Trial Attorney, Christina Hagen, says the first thing to do is to ‘reach out to the other side', get the dates in the diary and liaise with the court reporter. Then comes the prep. Think through the questions to be asked, the exhibits to be included, and crucially, set out the plan of attack in an attorney's greatest sidekick, the deposition notebook. What is a deposition notebook? The deposition notebook is a tool to keep attorneys on track. Severe and Catastrophic Injury Attorney, Neil Solomon, explains that generally it will include information on the petition, any written discovery from the other side, an outline with key points you want to hit on, and the exhibits you plan on using. On top of that, Joe reveals that having the deposition rules at hand was a ‘kind of a comfort blanket' for his first four years. These are often rules you may need to rely on in regard to deposition objections, instructions not to answer, suspensions of the deposition, and how to handle bringing up exhibits that haven't been produced in discovery prior to the deposition. Additionally, knowing the rules can be a new attorney's greatest defense against overconfident lawyers on the other side. Knowing the rules is a “secret power to rebut a more senior attorney trying to push you around on a case”, Attorney and Presenter, Jack Zinda advises from experience. Witnesses In earnest, the Zinda Law Group team say ‘it depends', as the answer to how long it takes to prepare for a deposition. Most importantly, “The time to start preparing for the deposition is not when you set the deposition,” Joe advises. In many instances, especially in more complicated cases, you should be preparing for the deposition when you send discovery. According to Jack, Depositions can be categorized into four main types: Fact witnesses Party depositions Corporate representatives Expert witness In particular, they agree expert witnesses require the most time. Attorneys should undertake an investigative ‘deep dive' to find out as much intel as possible and become a ‘mini expert' on the opinions of the witness, they advise. Priceless tactics Last, but certainly not least, the attorneys share invaluable tips on how to rock preliminary depositions like a seasoned expert. Firstly, don't be afraid to video record the deposition yourself, even if you don't plan on using it at trial. Secondly, make yourself a voice memo within twelve hours of the deposition of your thoughts, including how the deposition went, what discovery you still need to get out and obtain, and next steps to get the case from A to Z. And thirdly, from the wise Jack Zinda himself, “don't rush, and don't write out all your questions, but instead master the questioning technique. Trust yourself and follow where the answers lead you”. On today's podcast: When do you decide to take a deposition? The step by step process to organize a deposition Deposition notebooks Knowing the rules is the secret weapon How to prepare for an expert witness Tactics – use a video, voice memos and preparing your outline Links: https://www.zdfirm.com/ https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/john-jack-zinda/ https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/joseph-caputo/ https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/neil-solomon/ https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/christina-hagen/ https://www.trialguides.com/products/advanced-depositions-strategy-and-practice
With a team of four seasoned personal injury attorneys at Zinda Law Group, this first episode provides real insight into how each one of these legal minds lost their training wheels to become confident, successful and effective lawyers. New attorneys can listen to this plethora of legal wisdom and breathe a sigh of relief in hearing that a legal passion plus a thirst for fresh legal knowledge is a recipe for professional success. Diminishing nerves When asked at one point did they feel comfortable as a litigator, the attorneys had the following to say. Senior Attorney, Neil Solomon, who handles severe and catastrophic injury cases at the firm, says when he started fresh out of law school he had no idea what was up from what was down. But, after 5 years of experiencing and learning, he found his legal ‘groove'. On the other hand, Christina Hagen, an attorney with a focus on wrongful death cases, found that for her it was less about the years of practice but more about the ‘types of experiences' she was exposed to that helped diminish her stress as a novice. When asked if the nerves ever really disappear, Partner and Attorney, Joe Caputo advises that “the minute we stop feeling the nerves and the pressure, we've got to get into a different business.” It's important to recognize that there is a lot on the line, and to constantly be pushing yourself out of your comfort zone. Legal passions and skills Looking back on their time as newly licensed litigators, each attorney gives a piece of advice to their former selves. “Don't be hard on yourself, and understand you don't have to know everything right away,” Chrissy shares. Neil, who practiced law for years with respected defense firms in Texas before becoming a plaintiff's attorney, suggests “trying to figure out what you're passionate about, and what you want to do in your legal career.” They discuss the faux pas that many young lawyers make in chasing money rather than their legal passion. They advise that it is the wrong way around and leads lawyers to be married to an area of law that in the end may not be satisfactory. “Figure out what you love, and the money will follow”, Jack wisely advises. Be yourself In a similar vein, Joe Caputo, who was trained to be a ‘balls to walls', aggressive type of lawyer, says he would have told himself to find his own style. “Be yourself. Find out what your style is and mold what you are learning to your style,” Joe shares from personal experience. Altogether, the key message for new attorneys is to find a passion, stay updated on the law and ‘sharpen your tools' by taking advantage of all opportunities available from conferences to mentorships. Learn from your mistakes A common mistake that new attorneys often make is being over-aggressive or over the top. “Our practice is still based in relationships”, advises Neil, “whether it be opposing counsel, the judge and their staff, or the adjustor, building those relationships can generally work out in your favor and your client's favor rather than being aggressive.” As a new litigator, if you're ever worried about making a big mistake, the best advice Joe has is to “learn the rules and learn the laws because that is your safety net.” Work hard, play hard Finally, with some important words of caution, the team address how the high levels of stress inherent to the legal profession can be a killer, cause addiction and overwhelm lives. However, to combat this, they advise that being organized is one of the key tools for lawyers to stay on top and in control of the many competing demands. And, lastly, the resounding message to new attorneys from the Zinda Law Group team, is to get the work-life balance right. This is a profession that demands hard work, but survival for attorneys requires them to work hard but play harder. On today's podcast: Introduction to Zinda Law Group Attorneys, Joseph Caputo, Christina Hagen and Neil Solomon Do nerves ever end as a new attorney? Advice for their younger selves as new lawyers Worst mistakes new attorneys make Law firm's responsibility to help new attorneys' get better vs new attorneys' responsibility to get better How to manage stress in a stressful profession Links: https://www.zdfirm.com/ https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/john-jack-zinda/ https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/joseph-caputo/ https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/neil-solomon/ https://www.zdfirm.com/attorney-profiles/christina-hagen/ https://friedmanrubin.com/rules-of-the-road/book4-theelementsoftrial/ https://www.zdfirm.com/the-effective-lawyer/
Ytringsfriheden er igen kommet på bordet i disse år – ikke mindst inden for skønlitteraturen. En af de yngre danske forfattere, der har været med til at slå et slag i kærnemælksdejen for litteraturens ytringsfrihed, er Christina Hagen. I første del af samtalen med lektor Marianne Stidsen diskuterer hun om man egentlig dæmoniseres i større udstrækning, når man som kvinde går ind for total ytringsfrihed, og om der opstår en sær samhørighed blandt kvinder, når kodeordene er sårbarhed, undertrykkelse, overgreb?Sideløbende læser hun op fra sit forfatterskab, herunder fra den nyligt udkomne Korrekthedsbiblen, og diskuterer tendensen til, at al litteratur efterhånden læses som autofiktion, hvorved det bliver tiltagende vanskeligt som forfatter at benytte sig af fiktion og ironi.
Ytringsfriheden er igen kommet på bordet i disse år – ikke mindst inden for skønlitteraturen.I denne anden del af samtale-seancen stiller publikum spørgsmål til Marianne Stidsen og Christina Hagen om forholdet mellem litteratur, stil og forfatterens egen person. Seancen foregik i regi af Blå Tirsdag i november 2019.
Sommerudsendelserne på Skønlitteratur på P1 er sammensat af tidligere programmer på nye måder. I denne udsendelse handler det om krænkelser og om at søge lykken på den anden side af Atlanten. I bogen 'Korrekthedsbibelen' går Christina Hagen amok i satire og sarkasme over alt det, der dominerer debatten i dag: Politisk korrekthed, krænkelseskultur og hensynssyge. Klaus og Nanna mødte hende i en tom teatersal til en underlig samtale om - mange forskellige ting. I Madame Nielsens roman "The Monster" følger vi en ung europæisk mand, som er taget til New York for at arbejde hos den amerikanske teater- og performancegruppe The Wooster Group. Det bringer ham på en rejse gennem New York, fuld af kunst, mareridt, død og kaos. Og ikke mindst en lang række bizarre møder og sammenstød. Værter: Klaus Rothstein og Nanna Mogensen. (Redigeret genudsendelse).
Christina Hagens nye bog, KORREKTHEDSBIBELEN, er en samling af formaninger, henstillinger og rasende skældud. Journalist Mikkel Frey og forfatter Christina Hagen har kendt hinanden i 15 år. I forbindelse med udgivelsen af Christinas nye bog besøger de to fire steder, som på den ene eller den anden måde har betydning for KORREKTHEDSBIBELEN. Det tredje sted er Østjyllands Statsfængsel, hvor Christina en gang besøgte en morder for at forstå sig selv bedre.
Christina Hagens nye bog, KORREKTHEDSBIBELEN, er en samling af formaninger, henstillinger og rasende skældud. Journalist Mikkel Frey og forfatter Christina Hagen har kendt hinanden i 15 år. I forbindelse med udgivelsen af Christinas nye bog besøger de to fire steder, som på den ene eller den anden måde har betydning for KORREKTHEDSBIBELEN. Andet sted på parrets tur er HerningCentret. Et sted som ofte bliver udskammet af parnasset, men lige dér slapper Christina Hagen af.
Christina Hagens nye bog, KORREKTHEDSBIBELEN, er en samling af formaninger, henstillinger og rasende skældud. Journalist Mikkel Frey og forfatter Christina Hagen har kendt hinanden i 15 år. I forbindelse med udgivelsen af Christinas nye bog besøger de to fire steder, som på den ene eller den anden måde har betydning for KORREKTHEDSBIBELEN. I det fjerde afsnit tager podcasten og Christinas forfatterskab en uventet drejning. Afsnittet er optaget den 1. februar, hvor der er reception for KORREKTHEDSBIBELEN på scenen Revolver på Teater Republique på Østerbro i København.
Christina Hagens nye bog, KORREKTHEDSBIBELEN, er en samling af formaninger, henstillinger og rasende skældud. Journalist Mikkel Frey og forfatter Christina Hagen har kendt hinanden i 15 år. I forbindelse med udgivelsen af Christinas nye bog besøger de to fire steder, som på den ene eller den anden måde har betydning for KORREKTHEDSBIBELEN. Det første sted er Christina Hagens gamle folkeskole. En oplevelse i en religionstime har været en drivkraft i skrivningen.
Der er altid nogen, det er synd for. Altid nogen, der ikke har det så godt, som os andre. Altid nogen, der ikke er priviligeret. Nogen der slås med et problem. Så derfor: "Skænker De Pyromanens indre Lidelser en Tanke, når De tænder et Stearinlys for at hygge Dem?". Eller: "Cykler De og Deres Familie rundt i Sommerlandet, bor i Shelter og rister Pølser på Deres medbragte Grill? Sjovt for Dem og Deres Familie sådan at lege Hjemløse; mindre sjovt for dem, der hver Dag lever uden Tag over Hovedet." I sin nye bog, 'Korrekthedsbibelen' går Christina Hagen amok i satire og sarkasme over alt det, der dominerer debatten i dag: politisk korrekthed, krænkelseskultur og hensynssyge. Vi møder hende i en tom teatersal til en underlig samtale om - mange forskellige ting. Værter: Klaus Rothstein og Nanna Mogensen.
I det her program dykker vi ned i Anne Mette Kærulf Lorentzens autofiktive grafiske roman Skamlebben, der handler om en 41-årig kanin, der springer ud som lesbisk. Nana Kofoed Nielsen har inviteret Kærulf Lorentzen og anmelder ved ATLAS magasin Emilie Oksholt i studiet, for at diskutere forhistorien til Skamlebben, hvor vidt man kan spejle sig i en 40-årig fiktionskarakters liv og titlen "Skamlebben" der i måske/måske ikke er en uvedkommende, intern lebbejoke? Bagefter det læser forfatter Christina Hagen op fra sin nye bog Korrekthedsbiblen, der udkommer 1. februar. I redaktionen: Nana Kofoed Nielsen, Josefine Maria Hansen, Astrid Rifbjerg. Produktion: Josefine Maria Hansen. Musik: Sanne Dalgaard Møller.
Christina knows that sometimes the best part of a long day is when that cake perfectly comes out of the pan. As head of the dessert program at Charleston, SC's Hominy Grill, she cranks out the goodies (along with her staff), including Coconut Cake, fruit pies, and the best Chocolate Pudding you're ever likely to have. What makes her tic? How does she feel about the use of real butter? And most importantly, what is her go to dessert for her children's school functions? All are answered when Christina and I sit down to chat.