Podcast appearances and mentions of conor sullivan

Play along at home with Joe, Kristen, and their guests Ross Cuff, Joe McAdam, and Conor Sullivan as they learn (via "Name That Tune") which artists become eligible for the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame this year. It's 2000 debuts, baby! Goingo! Octobuzzy! This show is part of Pantheon Podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's the 2024 Tournament of High Scores!   Ann Vitti, Kevin Tully and Conor Sullivan had the top three scores in the 2024 regular season of The Catered Quiz and one of them will be named The Catered Quiz Champion of 2024. Listen as The Catered Quiz Tournament of High Scores goes round-by-round with our three finalists. Some rules for the Tournament of High Scores: -The regular season scores have been thrown out. -The Required Risk has been removed. -Ann, Kevin and Conor have retained one topic from their regular season episode and also have a brand new topic for The Tournament of High Scores. -The competitors are each unaware of everyone else's performance so they are only focusing on their individual games. It's the thrilling conclusion to the inaugural season of The Catered Quiz! Thank you for listening to the 2024 edition of The Catered Quiz, leave a review for the show and tell your friends about the program.   For more information about the I Have a Dream Foundation visit https://www.ihadla.org   To stream and purchase Telethon's music visit https://telethonband.bandcamp.com   To read He Did The Mash! visit https://hedidthemash.com

It's the 2024 regular season finale of The Catered Quiz! Only one spot remains in the Tournament of High Scores. Can Evan Pilak of the band Peshtigo answer questions about The Simpsons and New Wave Bands well enough to overtake Conor Sullivan for the third and final spot in the Tournament of High Scores. The only way to find out is to listen to this very episode! And when you're done listening to The Catered Quiz, check out Evan's band Peshtigo on Soundcloud or Spotify.

On the 40th episode of The Catered Quiz, writer Conor Sullivan joins the show to answer questions about Green Day and John Hughes! As discussed in the episode, read Conor's script for He Did The Mash! at HeDidTheMash.com Also be sure to check out the recent music video Conor directed: Calvero - “Anything You Want” music video Follow Conor on Instagram ConorLovesTheAngusSoundtrack or on Twitter @@ConorTheConor

In this episode of the Restaurant Rockstars podcast, I speak with Dan & Conor Sullivan, , the brothers behind Bumpa's. Hear their story of leaving corporate jobs to pursue a family-inspired vision, the challenges they faced (including opening during the COVID-19 pandemic), and the key factors that have made Bumpa's a beloved local establishment. From embodying their grandfather's spirit to navigating financial hurdles and creating an inviting atmosphere, discover the elements that contribute to their success in one of America's most competitive food cities. Plus, get a sneak peek into their future plans and community-driven events. Don't miss out on their insightful journey and tips for running a thriving restaurant! Check out my my short but effective mini masterclass: The “Restaurant Profit Maximizer” can do just that and transform your business to money-making powerhouse! www.restaurantrockstars.com/profitmaximizer Connect with our guest: Instagram: @bumpas_chs Facebook: facebook.com/bumpaschs Website: bumpas-chs.com Thank you to our sponsors: The Restaurant Academy: Everything you need to know to optimize profits, maximize sales and train your team in restaurant fundamentals! https://restaurantrockstars.com/joinacademy/ TerraSlate menus are waterproof, rip-proof, antimicrobial and easy to clean. They ship to every state and over a hundred countries with a fast 1 day turnaround and Free overnight shipping. Get your menus from TerraSlate at https://terraslate.com Restaurant Technologies: takes care of your fry oil challenges. They handle everything end-to-end from delivering, filtering monitoring, collecting, and recycling your waste cooking oil. Restaurant Technologies customers save 10-15% on their insurance premiums and even get bonuses for any new customer referrals. https://www.rti-inc.com or call 866-399-3639 to get started today. Restaurant Equippers: Top equipment brands, extensive inventory, everyday low prices, and 60 years serving independent food service operators. Only at https://www.equippers.com/ UberDirect: With Uber Direct, you take orders on your website, app or by phone. Then, drivers from Uber's courier network pick them up from your place and deliver them to your customer's doorstep. Delivery just got better with Uber Direct. Learn more at https://www.uberdirect.com

To celebrate it's 13th anniversary, we are diving into the 2011 documentary series 'Steps Reunion', which followed the band as they celebrated their tenth anniversary since their split. The show led to the 'Ultimate Collection' topping the charts and the sold-out 'Ultimate Tour'. It also inspired the similar show 'The Big Reunion', featuring other pop acts reuniting after their own splits.Despite its success, 'Steps Reunion' stirred up controversy by revealing long-held secrets and rivalries, culminating in a tense dinner scene where the band confronted their issues. While Steps have moved on from the split, the documentary remains a crucial part of their story, contributing to the success of their 2011 reunion and their pursuit of a happy ending.Our guest today, Conor Sullivan, was the production secretary on the documentary and worked closely with the band throughout the entire filming process. Most importantly, he is a Steps enthusiast like ourselves and we know you are going to love some of the incredible behind the scenes stories Conor shares with us from this time.Follow ‘Glitter & Gold: The Original Steps Podcast':Instagram, TikTok & X: @glitterstepspodScott: @stepscollection_Shane: @stepmeisterBrad: @bradszmerlingEmail: glitterstepspod@gmail.com Logo & Brand Design: BvrlyCreative Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Links:1. “Cocaine Codfish: How the War on Drugs Can Inform the Fight Against Illegal Fishing,” by Aaron Delano-Johnson, War on the Rocks (October 16, 2023). 2. “A Plan to Push Back Against China's Fishing Practices” by Aaron Delano-Johnson and Chris Bernotavicus, War on the Rocks (December 2, 2022). 3. Sea Control 219: USCG Commandant Admiral Karl Schultz, CIMSEC (December 27, 2020). 4. Sea Control 256: Reporting From the Sea With Ian Urbina, CIMSEC (June 6, 2021). 5. The Outlaw Ocean Project6. “Memorandum on Combating Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing and Associated Labor Abuses,” The White House (June 27, 2022). 7. “Future IUU Fishing Trends in a Warming World: A global Horizon Scan,” by Lauren Young, Cathy Haenlein and Grace Evans, Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) March 1, 2023.8. Move the IUU Fight Up the Food Chain,” by Conor Sullivan, USNI Proceedings (November 2023). 

Play along with Joe, Kristen, and their guests Nate Fernald and Conor Sullivan as they play "Name That Tune" to reveal who became eligible for the Rock Hall in 2023. It's all artists who debuted in 1998! This show is part of Pantheon Podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome back to The Varsity Breakdown Podcast. On this episode I was fortunate enough to sit down with another great guest, Vista Grande alum and Wisconsin Lutheran College's own Conor Sullivan. Picking up right where we left off with the Summer Camp Podcast series, we talk about Conor's connection to the camp and the importance of being able to give back so soon. We talk about his time at Vista Grande and the changes within that he was able to take part in and ultimately leaving Arizona to head out east. We discuss the culture shock he experienced while being out on his own in Wisconsin and how the area has now changed his favorite food. From his first football experience in middle school to the importance of his family in his recruiting process, we learn all we can from the Warrior in Wisconsin. Special thank you to Jared Miller of the Casa Grande Public Library for his assistance and allowing The Varsity Breakdown in their space. This is episode forty-eight of The Varsity Breakdown Podcast. 

102- Conor Sullivan is the Vice President of Client Excellence at The Endurance Group, a consulting firm that unlocks opportunities for clients by revealing and leveraging authentic relationships. Timestamps: 1:00 - Intro & Conor's professional background; what makes a good podcast episode? 9:00 - Conor's experience working with Teach for America; path to education as a profession23:00 - Social Capital 30:00 - Social Capital Outreach vs Cold Outreach; Importance of Connection Post-Covid42:00 - Being a Good ManThe Endurance GroupConor on LinkedInBro Nouveau on YouTube Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We talk a lot about connecting to nature here on the podcast, but it's usually through the lens of agriculture, cultivating, and farming.But that's just the beginning. Wildcrafting, hunting, and fishing connect us to the natural world in powerful way. I'm thrilled to be joined by author and angler, Conor Sullivan, in this podcast episode. We talk about the similarities between the ocean and the prairie, why fishing may just be your next old-fashioned adventure, how to start fishing as an adult (even if you've never done it before), and his best tried-and-true fish cooking tips.Learn more about Conor Sullivan here: https://www.conorjsullivan.com/ Follow Conor Sullivan's Instagram account here: https://www.instagram.com/sullivanlures/Preorder Old-Fashioned on Purpose now and get exclusive bonuses! http://oldfashionedbook.com/Learn more about the Modern Homestead Conference here: https://modernhomesteading.com/ Have a message you want to share with the world? Apply to be a guest on the Old-Fashioned on Purpose podcast here: https://www.theprairiehomestead.com/podcast-guest-applicationWeekly musings from my homestead: http://theprairiehomestead.com/letterMy essays on an old-fashioned life: www.prairiephilosophy.comMy homesteading tutorials & recipes: www.theprairiehomestead.comOur Wyoming-raised, grass-finished beef: http://genuinebeefco.comJill on Twitter: http://twitter.com/homesteaderJill on Instagram: @jill.wingerJill on Facebook: http://facebook.com/theprairiehomestead

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: A Bias Against Altruism, published by Conor Sullivan on July 23, 2022 on LessWrong. I've noticed a phenomenon in our culture whereby altruistic actions face much more scrutiny than selfish actions. I think we should be aware of this bias effect, especially when discussing incentivizing people to e.g. work on AI alignment instead of ML research. When I say 'our culture', I mean modern WEIRD culture, especially the English-speaking world. Here's what I notice: when I declare that I'm doing something selfishly and avowedly, I get praised. When I do something out of altruism, or do something that is coded as altruistic, my motives and true values get heavily scrutinized. The assumption is that I'm doing good in order to accrue praise and social status, which is called 'ulterior motives.' The thing is, people aren't necessarily misreading my motivations: I do want praise and social status. (Doesn't everyone?) Given the direction of praise and status (selfish ambition is high-status, selfless do-gooding is questionable), my incentives are clear. Personally, I never, ever do anything out of altruism. (Honestly! I don't. Okay, maybe I give change to a homeless person once in a while...) I do have a heart, so I would like to do the right thing, but I don't, because I'd rather not get attacked all the time. I'm sick of the psycho-Kremlinology that we all get subjected to. I'm just not moral enough for that. Sorry. I have a few theories about why this happens: Because modern WEIRD culture is actually an amalgamation of many subcultures, and individuals have leeway to select their subculture, people who are genuinely doing harm with their selfishness are not easy to attack directly. Charles Koch is hated by the political left, but he doesn't care because he's a conservative and only associates with other conservatives. Attacking someone who is transparently doing wrong is boring, and doesn't lead to sustained dialogue. Therefore due to the dynamics of social media, people can't sustain their outrage. However, a person who is a mix of good and bad traits (Elon?) invites endless controversy. That is a sustainable hate train which runs on renewable energy. This is a problem we inherited from Christianity. Christianity was weirdly obsessed with getting people to have the right motives, and didn't care as much about right action. Doing good things, but being rewarded for them, would not get you into heaven. Only sacrifice counted. (This is, by the way, why I personally can't stand Christianity.) Modern culture has a weird obsession with misbegotten social status. Selfishness does not aim at attaining status, and is therefore 'based'; altruism (at least sometimes) aims at attaining status, and is therefore 'cringe'. A Randian individualist is actually hard to criticize, because they've renounced doing good as a way of attaining status. Desiring status is the lowest status thing in our culture. (In my opinion, this is a great sickness that would ultimately doom our society, except that the singularity will happen first.) I don't know if any of these four theories are correct or insightful. I'm not too concerned about the etiology of this problem, to be honest. (I'm worried that discussing the etiology will result in a fruitless political debate in the comments of this post; maybe I should have omitted these theories.) I just want people to be aware of this phenomenon so that real positive behavior gets incentivized again. If you want to encourage people to do good things, consider the following: actually encouraging. We hardly ever celebrate anyone anymore. Yes, there is also the issue of punishing wrongdoing: avowed selfishness strangely avoids criticism, and is in fact praised (i.e. by libertarians). So you might think the solution is to redirect criticism to the right people. But I ...

Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: A Bias Against Altruism, published by Conor Sullivan on July 23, 2022 on LessWrong. I've noticed a phenomenon in our culture whereby altruistic actions face much more scrutiny than selfish actions. I think we should be aware of this bias effect, especially when discussing incentivizing people to e.g. work on AI alignment instead of ML research. When I say 'our culture', I mean modern WEIRD culture, especially the English-speaking world. Here's what I notice: when I declare that I'm doing something selfishly and avowedly, I get praised. When I do something out of altruism, or do something that is coded as altruistic, my motives and true values get heavily scrutinized. The assumption is that I'm doing good in order to accrue praise and social status, which is called 'ulterior motives.' The thing is, people aren't necessarily misreading my motivations: I do want praise and social status. (Doesn't everyone?) Given the direction of praise and status (selfish ambition is high-status, selfless do-gooding is questionable), my incentives are clear. Personally, I never, ever do anything out of altruism. (Honestly! I don't. Okay, maybe I give change to a homeless person once in a while...) I do have a heart, so I would like to do the right thing, but I don't, because I'd rather not get attacked all the time. I'm sick of the psycho-Kremlinology that we all get subjected to. I'm just not moral enough for that. Sorry. I have a few theories about why this happens: Because modern WEIRD culture is actually an amalgamation of many subcultures, and individuals have leeway to select their subculture, people who are genuinely doing harm with their selfishness are not easy to attack directly. Charles Koch is hated by the political left, but he doesn't care because he's a conservative and only associates with other conservatives. Attacking someone who is transparently doing wrong is boring, and doesn't lead to sustained dialogue. Therefore due to the dynamics of social media, people can't sustain their outrage. However, a person who is a mix of good and bad traits (Elon?) invites endless controversy. That is a sustainable hate train which runs on renewable energy. This is a problem we inherited from Christianity. Christianity was weirdly obsessed with getting people to have the right motives, and didn't care as much about right action. Doing good things, but being rewarded for them, would not get you into heaven. Only sacrifice counted. (This is, by the way, why I personally can't stand Christianity.) Modern culture has a weird obsession with misbegotten social status. Selfishness does not aim at attaining status, and is therefore 'based'; altruism (at least sometimes) aims at attaining status, and is therefore 'cringe'. A Randian individualist is actually hard to criticize, because they've renounced doing good as a way of attaining status. Desiring status is the lowest status thing in our culture. (In my opinion, this is a great sickness that would ultimately doom our society, except that the singularity will happen first.) I don't know if any of these four theories are correct or insightful. I'm not too concerned about the etiology of this problem, to be honest. (I'm worried that discussing the etiology will result in a fruitless political debate in the comments of this post; maybe I should have omitted these theories.) I just want people to be aware of this phenomenon so that real positive behavior gets incentivized again. If you want to encourage people to do good things, consider the following: actually encouraging. We hardly ever celebrate anyone anymore. Yes, there is also the issue of punishing wrongdoing: avowed selfishness strangely avoids criticism, and is in fact praised (i.e. by libertarians). So you might think the solution is to redirect criticism to the right people. But I ...

Family roots and doing business abroad! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Reflections on My Own Missing Mood, published by Conor Sullivan on April 21, 2022 on LessWrong. Life on Earth is incredibly precious. Even a tiny p(DOOM) must be taken very seriously. Since we cannot predict the future, and since in a debate we should be epistemically humble, we should give our interlocutors the benefit of the doubt. Therefore, even if on my inside view p(DOOM) is small, I should act like it is a serious concern. If the world does end up going down in flames (or is converted into a giant ball of nanobots), I would not want to be the idiot who said "that's silly, never gonna happen." The problem is my emotional state can really only reflect my inside view and my intuitions. To account for the very real probability that I'm wrong and just an idiot, I can agree to consider, for the purposes of discussion, a p(DOOM) of say, 0.25, which is equivalent to billions of people dying in expected value. However, I can't make myself feel like the world is doomed if I don't actually think it is. This is the origin, I think, of missing moods. For me personally, I have always had an unusually detached grim-o-meter. Even if an unstoppable asteroid were heading to Earth and certainly we all were going to die, I probably would not freak out. I'm just pretty far out on that spectrum of personality. Given that, and given that it makes me a bit reckless in my thinking, I'm very grateful that the world is full of people who do freak out (in appropriate and productive ways) when there is some kind of crisis. Civilization needs some people pointing to problems and fervently making plans to address them, and civilization also (at least occasionally) needs people to say "actually it's going to be okay." Ideally, public consensus will meet in the middle and somewhat close to the truth. I've had three weeks to reflect on EY's post. That post, along with the general hyper-pessimism around alignment, does piss me off somewhat. I've thought about why this pessimistic mood frustrates me, and I've come up with a few reasons. Crisis Fatigue Here is a highly scientific chart of current world crises: My younger sister is quite pessimistic about climate change. Actually scratch that: it's not climate change that she's worried about, it's biosphere collapse. I'm conflicted in my reaction to her worries. This is strikingly similar to my internal conflict over the alignment crisis. On the one hand, I'm very optimistic about new energy technologies saving the day. On the other hand, biosphere collapse is just about the most serious thing one could imagine. Even if p(Dead Earth) = 0.01, that would still be a legitimate case for crisis thinking. With so many crises going on today, and with a media environment that incentivizes hyping up your pet crisis, everyone is a bit fatigued. Therefore, our standards are high for accommodating a new crisis into our mental space. To be taken seriously, a crisis must be 1) plausible, 2) not inevitable and 3) actually have massive consequences if it comes to pass. In my opinion, AGI and the biosphere threat both check all three boxes, but none of the other contender crises fit the bill. Given the seriousness of those two issues, the public would be greatly benefited if all the minor crises and non-crises that we keep hearing about could be demoted until things cool off a bit, please and thank you. To be clear, I'm putting AGI in the "worth freaking out about" category. It's not because of crisis fatigue that I'm frustrated with the pessimistic mood around alignment. It's because... Pessimism is not Productive Given crisis fatigue, people need to be selective about what topics they engage with. If a contender crisis is not likely to happen, we should ignore it. If a contender crisis is likely to happen, but the consequences are not actually all that serious, ...

Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Reflections on My Own Missing Mood, published by Conor Sullivan on April 21, 2022 on LessWrong. Life on Earth is incredibly precious. Even a tiny p(DOOM) must be taken very seriously. Since we cannot predict the future, and since in a debate we should be epistemically humble, we should give our interlocutors the benefit of the doubt. Therefore, even if on my inside view p(DOOM) is small, I should act like it is a serious concern. If the world does end up going down in flames (or is converted into a giant ball of nanobots), I would not want to be the idiot who said "that's silly, never gonna happen." The problem is my emotional state can really only reflect my inside view and my intuitions. To account for the very real probability that I'm wrong and just an idiot, I can agree to consider, for the purposes of discussion, a p(DOOM) of say, 0.25, which is equivalent to billions of people dying in expected value. However, I can't make myself feel like the world is doomed if I don't actually think it is. This is the origin, I think, of missing moods. For me personally, I have always had an unusually detached grim-o-meter. Even if an unstoppable asteroid were heading to Earth and certainly we all were going to die, I probably would not freak out. I'm just pretty far out on that spectrum of personality. Given that, and given that it makes me a bit reckless in my thinking, I'm very grateful that the world is full of people who do freak out (in appropriate and productive ways) when there is some kind of crisis. Civilization needs some people pointing to problems and fervently making plans to address them, and civilization also (at least occasionally) needs people to say "actually it's going to be okay." Ideally, public consensus will meet in the middle and somewhat close to the truth. I've had three weeks to reflect on EY's post. That post, along with the general hyper-pessimism around alignment, does piss me off somewhat. I've thought about why this pessimistic mood frustrates me, and I've come up with a few reasons. Crisis Fatigue Here is a highly scientific chart of current world crises: My younger sister is quite pessimistic about climate change. Actually scratch that: it's not climate change that she's worried about, it's biosphere collapse. I'm conflicted in my reaction to her worries. This is strikingly similar to my internal conflict over the alignment crisis. On the one hand, I'm very optimistic about new energy technologies saving the day. On the other hand, biosphere collapse is just about the most serious thing one could imagine. Even if p(Dead Earth) = 0.01, that would still be a legitimate case for crisis thinking. With so many crises going on today, and with a media environment that incentivizes hyping up your pet crisis, everyone is a bit fatigued. Therefore, our standards are high for accommodating a new crisis into our mental space. To be taken seriously, a crisis must be 1) plausible, 2) not inevitable and 3) actually have massive consequences if it comes to pass. In my opinion, AGI and the biosphere threat both check all three boxes, but none of the other contender crises fit the bill. Given the seriousness of those two issues, the public would be greatly benefited if all the minor crises and non-crises that we keep hearing about could be demoted until things cool off a bit, please and thank you. To be clear, I'm putting AGI in the "worth freaking out about" category. It's not because of crisis fatigue that I'm frustrated with the pessimistic mood around alignment. It's because... Pessimism is not Productive Given crisis fatigue, people need to be selective about what topics they engage with. If a contender crisis is not likely to happen, we should ignore it. If a contender crisis is likely to happen, but the consequences are not actually all that serious, ...

Fishing the Wild Waters is the new book from today's guest Conor Sullivan. He was one of our earliest podcast guests here on WildFed, and at that time he'd mentioned he was writing this book, but it was still an early manuscript. Well, the book is out, and we've had the pleasure of reading it. This book is certainly a proud addition to our fishing library, a genre that we haven't always found very useful. But Conor's book is different. It's part memoir, with really inspiring and informative fishing stories from some of the United States' more remote fisheries. It's also part instructional manual, with several appendices that give detailed descriptions of fishing gear and angling strategies for specific species he writes about. In particular, we really appreciated the appendix called “how to fish like a local” which gives great tips on how to get started in a new fishery. Conor's career in the Coast Guard has taken him all over the wild waters of this incredible country, and he's really taken advantage of that opportunity, honing his angling skills wherever duty has taken him. He's here today to share with us a bit about how we too can become better, more effective anglers ourselves. And to encourage us to ply the wild waters wherever we live. Because there's adventure, fulfillment, and food out there, just waiting for you! View full show notes, including links to resources from this episode here: https://www.wild-fed.com/podcast/127

AD: 24:08 Justin and Kory chat with Conor Sullivan, hunter, angler, lure crafter, and author of Fishing the Wild Waters. They discuss Conor's new book, cod fishing, hunting axis deer, making lures, fighting tuna, guava wood chips, and so much more! - Leave a Review for a chance to win a hat! - Love our content? Buy us a cup of coffee to say thanks! - Learn to Cook Wilder with the Harvesting Nature Supper Club's cooking classes Special Guest: Conor Sullivan: a lifelong outdoorsman, writer, artist, and lure craftsman. He is an officer in the US Coast Guard, serving in numerous leadership positions, including as the Commanding Officer of the North Pacific Regional Fisheries Training Center in Kodiak, Alaska, and as the Captain of a Coast Guard Cutter in the North Atlantic, specializing in fisheries conservation, search and rescue, and maritime law enforcement. He has a new book Fishing the Wild Waters: An Angler's Search for Peace and Adventure in the Wilderness. Follow Conor on Instagram @sullivanlures Follow Conor on Facebook  Buy the Book: Buy on Amazon Buy on Target Buy on Barnes & Noble Buy on Bookshop.org Show Notes: Updates from Justin and Kory Reviews for hats Black powder shortage Podcast: Episode 304, Mountain Men of Pennsylvania Introducing Conor Conor's background Lure craftsman Catching fish with lures and flies that you've made What's in Conor's freezer Smoking deer with guava chips while in Alaska Conor's inspiration for Fishing the Wild Waters The need for fishing adventure stories Fishing with orcas The places and experiences that fishing provides A fight with a tuna in New England The inside of your hand is hollow Vasovagal syncope Where's the clean rag? Cod fishing in New England "Cod" by Mark Kurlansky Catching cod with family  Fishing in Kodiak with bears The world's healthiest protein is the stuff your catching or hunting Axis deer in Hawaii 5 hour fight with a marlin   Poke bowl with yellow fin tuna Where to find the book Follow him on social media Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode Adam Stern, an off-market specialist, talks with Conor Sullivan an on-market specialist about the differences and similarities between the two ways of selling real estate. This episode is meant to help investors and real estate enthusiasts of professions what the off-market means. Giving you a better understanding of what this show is all about. Visit our website to learn more about Strata SFR: https://stratasfr.com/ (https://stratasfr.com) Connect with Adam on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adamstern00/ (https://www.linkedin.com/in/adamstern00/) If you liked our podcast, you can find more of our content at the links below. Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV95RqeF9EqnI0qvCjaf44w (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV95RqeF9EqnI0qvCjaf44w) Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/StrataSFR (https://www.facebook.com/StrataSFR) Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/stratasfr/ (https://www.instagram.com/stratasfr/) Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@stratasfr (https://www.tiktok.com/@stratasfr) LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-sfr

Writer and friend of the show Conor Sullivan returns to the podcast to go deep on (and maybe even defend) the Foo Fighters with Joe & Kristen. The gang really dives into the history of the group, discussing their origins, discography, and many lineup changes. It's FOO-LY, baby! This show is part of Pantheon Podcasts.

Writer and friend of the show Conor Sullivan returns to the podcast to go deep on (and maybe even defend) the Foo Fighters with Joe & Kristen. The gang really dives into the history of the group, discussing their origins, discography, and many lineup changes. It's FOO-LY, baby! This show is part of Pantheon Podcasts.

Writer and friend of the show Conor Sullivan returns to the podcast to go deep on (and maybe even defend) the Foo Fighters with Joe & Kristen. The gang really dives into the history of the group, discussing their origins, discography, and many lineup changes. It's FOO-LY, baby! This show is part of Pantheon Podcasts.

Writer and friend of the show Conor Sullivan returns to the podcast to go deep on (and maybe even defend) the Foo Fighters with Joe & Kristen. The gang really dives into the history of the group, discussing their origins, discography, and many lineup changes. It's FOO-LY, baby! This show is part of Pantheon Podcasts.

The excellent Conor Sullivan (Screenwriter, Music Liker, Ex-Teen) & I discuss movies pretty much the whole time. We talk about Local Hero, Sing Street, Green Card, Rip Torn, Steve McQueen, holiday songs, Adam Sandler, Something Wild, Ray Liotta, Joe vs. The Volcano, video stores & numerous other things. Just a real fun time. @conortheconor on Twitter @conorlovestheangussoundtrack on IG www.conorbait.com/ www.hedidthemash.com/

There is a new restaurant in downtown Charleston. Bumpa's is in a great location at 5 Cumberland Street in the heart of the French Quarter. Brothers Dan and Conor Sullivan started working on a business plan for their first ever restaurant. As fate would have it, all of those years of intense planning led to an opening date in the spring of 2020 during a global pandemic. The opening was put on hold. After a reset to prepare for the realities of COVID-19, Bumpa's opened in June. It's a beautiful, space with a great vibe. They promise a warm greeting and service that will make you feel like home, and never keep you waiting. They promise a bar that their grandfather, Bumpa, would have been loved.

Writer and dear friend of the hosts Conor Sullivan joins Joe and Kristen to talk about the Rock Hall merits of the newly-eligible band Weezer. Also discussed in this episode are the "Rock Against Bush" albums, being a college kid who likes Tom Waits, and the Angus soundtrack. This show is part of Pantheon Podcasts.

Writer and dear friend of the hosts Conor Sullivan joins Joe and Kristen to talk about the Rock Hall merits of the newly-eligible band Weezer. Also discussed in this episode are the "Rock Against Bush" albums, being a college kid who likes Tom Waits, and the Angus soundtrack. This show is part of Pantheon Podcasts.

A man who may or may not be able to communicate with animals bumbles through saving a handful of his friends, and hooks up with his cousin.  Conor Sullivan (stool pigeon) sees through the eyes of 1982's The Beastmaster to reveal a movie that is reckless, dangerous, incompetent, and at times...a total bummer.