Podcasts about Rozzi

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 8:37)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)

In this episode we are diving into the  opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 8:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)

The Dozer is 2 pounds of burger, eight strips of bacon and cheese, and a pound of fries. It has to be eaten in 30 minutes or less.

The situation in Delphi is about as messed up as it could be, with lawyers, judges and justice itself in limbo.Trying to sort some of that out is the Indiana State supreme court who is now tasked with making sense of the madness and fixing the mess that the lower court finds itself in.In this episode, we get some more context on the transcripts and what their release could mean for the trial of Richard Allen as we move forward.(commercial at 8:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi murders trial transcript released on attorneys withdrawal | wthr.com

The circus known as the Richard Allen trial continues to shamble towards the starting gate, there are still many background issues that need to be attended to, including the contempt of court charges slapped on Rozzi and Baldwin.  In this episode, we hear from the lawyer who is representing the lawyers and why he thinks the whole entire process has been tilted against his clients and what he thinks should happen moving forward.(commercial at 9:21)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:FOX59 exclusive: Attorney for Delphi defense team puzzled by court and prosecutor blow back | Fox 59

The situation down in Delphi is the epitome of a mess. With leaked evidence making its way into the public sphere and wild accusations being fired off by Richard Allen's legal team, is it any wonder that the trial is now delayed?In this episode, we take a look at the accusations being made by Brad Rozzi, one of Richard Allen's former lawyers against Judge Fran Gull and what it could mean moving forward. (commercial at 7:47)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:Lawyer for Richard Allen seeks to have judge disqualified (lawandcrime.com)

The circus known as the Richard Allen trial continues to shamble towards the starting gate, there are still many background issues that need to be attended to, including the contempt of court charges slapped on Rozzi and Baldwin.  In this episode, we hear from the lawyer who is representing the lawyers and why he thinks the whole entire process has been tilted against his clients and what he thinks should happen moving forward.(commercial at 7:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:FOX59 exclusive: Attorney for Delphi defense team puzzled by court and prosecutor blow back | Fox 59

The circus known as the Richard Allen trial continues to shamble towards the starting gate, there are still many background issues that need to be attended to, including the contempt of court charges slapped on Rozzi and Baldwin.  In this episode, we hear from the lawyer who is representing the lawyers and why he thinks the whole entire process has been tilted against his clients and what he thinks should happen moving forward.(commercial at 7:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:FOX59 exclusive: Attorney for Delphi defense team puzzled by court and prosecutor blow back | Fox 59Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The situation in Delphi is about as messed up as it could be, with lawyers, judges and justice itself in limbo.Trying to sort some of that out is the Indiana State supreme court who is now tasked with making sense of the madness and fixing the mess that the lower court finds itself in.In this episode, we get some more context on the transcripts and what their release could mean for the trial of Richard Allen as we move forward.(commercial at 8:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi murders trial transcript released on attorneys withdrawal | wthr.com

The legal proceedings surrounding the Delphi murder case have taken a new turn as attorneys for suspect Richard Allen seek clarity on contempt of court allegations brought against them by Carroll County Prosecutor Nicholas McLeland. McLeland filed a motion last month, accusing attorneys Brad Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin of contempt of court, citing actions outside the courtroom that he deemed "indirect contempt of court." The allegations stem from Rozzi and Baldwin's conduct related to the high-profile case involving the abduction and murder of teenagers Libby German and Abby Williams in 2017. Scheduled for a hearing on March 18 in front of Special Judge Frances Gull, the allegations have prompted Rozzi's and Baldwin's legal counsel, represented by attorney David Hennessy, to petition for further clarification on the nature of the contempt charges. Hennessy's petition highlights the lack of specificity in McLeland's motion, particularly regarding what actions were deemed contemptuous. For instance, McLeland referenced a news release issued by Rozzi and Baldwin in November 2022, prior to the imposition of a gag order, without specifying its contemptuous nature. "It seems clear that the State is really attempting to charge indirect criminal contempt," Hennessy stated in the petition, suggesting the possibility of separate criminal contempt proceedings. According to state guidelines, criminal contempt may carry penalties of imprisonment and fines, necessitating a distinct legal process initiated by the state. As of now, McLeland has not initiated separate criminal contempt proceedings, leaving the status of the allegations uncertain. Hennessy's petition also seeks guidance on the nature of the upcoming hearing, questioning whether it will solely involve an advisement of specific allegations or include testimony and evidence presentation. Special Judge Frances Gull, overseeing Allen's murder case, has yet to respond to the petition, leaving both the defense and prosecution awaiting further clarification on the contempt allegations. With the trial of Richard Allen slated for October, the resolution of the contempt issue adds another layer of complexity to an already intricate legal saga, underscoring the importance of procedural clarity and fair adjudication in high-profile cases. As the legal process unfolds, stakeholders await the judge's decision on how to proceed with the contempt allegations, which could have significant implications for the defense and prosecution in the Delphi murder case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The legal proceedings surrounding the Delphi murder case have taken a new turn as attorneys for suspect Richard Allen seek clarity on contempt of court allegations brought against them by Carroll County Prosecutor Nicholas McLeland. McLeland filed a motion last month, accusing attorneys Brad Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin of contempt of court, citing actions outside the courtroom that he deemed "indirect contempt of court." The allegations stem from Rozzi and Baldwin's conduct related to the high-profile case involving the abduction and murder of teenagers Libby German and Abby Williams in 2017. Scheduled for a hearing on March 18 in front of Special Judge Frances Gull, the allegations have prompted Rozzi's and Baldwin's legal counsel, represented by attorney David Hennessy, to petition for further clarification on the nature of the contempt charges. Hennessy's petition highlights the lack of specificity in McLeland's motion, particularly regarding what actions were deemed contemptuous. For instance, McLeland referenced a news release issued by Rozzi and Baldwin in November 2022, prior to the imposition of a gag order, without specifying its contemptuous nature. "It seems clear that the State is really attempting to charge indirect criminal contempt," Hennessy stated in the petition, suggesting the possibility of separate criminal contempt proceedings. According to state guidelines, criminal contempt may carry penalties of imprisonment and fines, necessitating a distinct legal process initiated by the state. As of now, McLeland has not initiated separate criminal contempt proceedings, leaving the status of the allegations uncertain. Hennessy's petition also seeks guidance on the nature of the upcoming hearing, questioning whether it will solely involve an advisement of specific allegations or include testimony and evidence presentation. Special Judge Frances Gull, overseeing Allen's murder case, has yet to respond to the petition, leaving both the defense and prosecution awaiting further clarification on the contempt allegations. With the trial of Richard Allen slated for October, the resolution of the contempt issue adds another layer of complexity to an already intricate legal saga, underscoring the importance of procedural clarity and fair adjudication in high-profile cases. As the legal process unfolds, stakeholders await the judge's decision on how to proceed with the contempt allegations, which could have significant implications for the defense and prosecution in the Delphi murder case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The legal proceedings surrounding the Delphi murder case have taken a new turn as attorneys for suspect Richard Allen seek clarity on contempt of court allegations brought against them by Carroll County Prosecutor Nicholas McLeland. McLeland filed a motion last month, accusing attorneys Brad Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin of contempt of court, citing actions outside the courtroom that he deemed "indirect contempt of court." The allegations stem from Rozzi and Baldwin's conduct related to the high-profile case involving the abduction and murder of teenagers Libby German and Abby Williams in 2017. Scheduled for a hearing on March 18 in front of Special Judge Frances Gull, the allegations have prompted Rozzi's and Baldwin's legal counsel, represented by attorney David Hennessy, to petition for further clarification on the nature of the contempt charges. Hennessy's petition highlights the lack of specificity in McLeland's motion, particularly regarding what actions were deemed contemptuous. For instance, McLeland referenced a news release issued by Rozzi and Baldwin in November 2022, prior to the imposition of a gag order, without specifying its contemptuous nature. "It seems clear that the State is really attempting to charge indirect criminal contempt," Hennessy stated in the petition, suggesting the possibility of separate criminal contempt proceedings. According to state guidelines, criminal contempt may carry penalties of imprisonment and fines, necessitating a distinct legal process initiated by the state. As of now, McLeland has not initiated separate criminal contempt proceedings, leaving the status of the allegations uncertain. Hennessy's petition also seeks guidance on the nature of the upcoming hearing, questioning whether it will solely involve an advisement of specific allegations or include testimony and evidence presentation. Special Judge Frances Gull, overseeing Allen's murder case, has yet to respond to the petition, leaving both the defense and prosecution awaiting further clarification on the contempt allegations. With the trial of Richard Allen slated for October, the resolution of the contempt issue adds another layer of complexity to an already intricate legal saga, underscoring the importance of procedural clarity and fair adjudication in high-profile cases. As the legal process unfolds, stakeholders await the judge's decision on how to proceed with the contempt allegations, which could have significant implications for the defense and prosecution in the Delphi murder case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 8:09)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 8:37)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)

In the heart of Delphi, Indiana, a legal battle as convoluted and mysterious as the murders it seeks to resolve continues to unfold, casting a long shadow over the quest for justice. At the center of this legal labyrinth is Richard Allen, accused of the tragic murders of two young girls, and Judge Frances Gull, whose decisions have sparked intense debate and scrutiny. As the case against Allen twists through motions and appeals, the dynamics between the judiciary and the defense raise critical questions about fairness, bias, and the integrity of the legal process. In an eye-opening episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delves into these complexities with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis, shedding light on the latest legal maneuvers and their implications. The Indiana Supreme Court's decision to reinstate Allen's attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi, has reopened old wounds and reignited tensions, particularly concerning Judge Gull's stance and actions. "Back on the Delphi merry-go-round," Brueski aptly describes the situation, as the judicial and defense sides lock horns once again. With Baldwin and Rozzi's return, the focus shifts back to Judge Gull, who remains a polarizing figure in this legal saga. Her decision to deny a Frank's hearing and several other motions without hearing arguments underscores a pattern of decisions that, to many, seem to favor the prosecution, undermining the defense's efforts to ensure a fair trial for Allen. The motion filed by Baldwin and Rozzi, requesting Judge Gull to recuse herself or be removed, stands as a testament to the defense's growing concerns over judicial impartiality. Faddis articulates the crux of the issue, highlighting the absurdity of allowing a judge to determine their own impartiality in the face of serious allegations. "It just strains the mind," Faddis remarks, pointing out the inherent flaw in a system that allows such self-assessment by a judge accused of bias. The prosecution's countermove, seeking to hold Allen's attorneys in contempt, adds another layer of conflict to an already tumultuous case, signaling a relentless battle over procedural matters that detract from the heart of the case: the pursuit of justice for the murdered girls. Despite these challenges, Faddis sees merit in the defense's motion, emphasizing the unusual and questionable nature of Judge Gull's previous decision to dismiss Baldwin and Rozzi. The ongoing legal skirmish raises doubts about the possibility of an unbiased trial under Gull's supervision, fueling speculation about her motivations and the potential impact on her career aspirations. As Brueski and Faddis explore the psychological underpinnings of the case, the conversation reveals a deeper concern: the human element in judicial decision-making. The specter of negative confirmation bias looms large, suggesting that preconceived notions and personal animosities could cloud judgment and compromise the fairness of the trial. "If you seriously do not like someone, there's nothing they can say that you'll agree with," Faddis points out, illustrating the peril of allowing personal biases to influence judicial decisions. The unfolding drama in Delphi not only captivates but also alarms, serving as a stark reminder of the fragile balance between justice and judicial discretion. As the case progresses, one question hangs in the balance: Can Richard Allen receive a fair trial in the shadow of controversy and bias? As the community and the nation watch closely, the final resolution of this case may offer profound insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the legal system. But for now, the merry-go-round of motions, appeals, and judicial decisions continues to spin, leaving observers to wonder: When will the pursuit of justice take center stage, free from the distractions of legal maneuvering and personal biases? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the heart of Delphi, Indiana, a legal battle as convoluted and mysterious as the murders it seeks to resolve continues to unfold, casting a long shadow over the quest for justice. At the center of this legal labyrinth is Richard Allen, accused of the tragic murders of two young girls, and Judge Frances Gull, whose decisions have sparked intense debate and scrutiny. As the case against Allen twists through motions and appeals, the dynamics between the judiciary and the defense raise critical questions about fairness, bias, and the integrity of the legal process. In an eye-opening episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delves into these complexities with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis, shedding light on the latest legal maneuvers and their implications. The Indiana Supreme Court's decision to reinstate Allen's attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi, has reopened old wounds and reignited tensions, particularly concerning Judge Gull's stance and actions. "Back on the Delphi merry-go-round," Brueski aptly describes the situation, as the judicial and defense sides lock horns once again. With Baldwin and Rozzi's return, the focus shifts back to Judge Gull, who remains a polarizing figure in this legal saga. Her decision to deny a Frank's hearing and several other motions without hearing arguments underscores a pattern of decisions that, to many, seem to favor the prosecution, undermining the defense's efforts to ensure a fair trial for Allen. The motion filed by Baldwin and Rozzi, requesting Judge Gull to recuse herself or be removed, stands as a testament to the defense's growing concerns over judicial impartiality. Faddis articulates the crux of the issue, highlighting the absurdity of allowing a judge to determine their own impartiality in the face of serious allegations. "It just strains the mind," Faddis remarks, pointing out the inherent flaw in a system that allows such self-assessment by a judge accused of bias. The prosecution's countermove, seeking to hold Allen's attorneys in contempt, adds another layer of conflict to an already tumultuous case, signaling a relentless battle over procedural matters that detract from the heart of the case: the pursuit of justice for the murdered girls. Despite these challenges, Faddis sees merit in the defense's motion, emphasizing the unusual and questionable nature of Judge Gull's previous decision to dismiss Baldwin and Rozzi. The ongoing legal skirmish raises doubts about the possibility of an unbiased trial under Gull's supervision, fueling speculation about her motivations and the potential impact on her career aspirations. As Brueski and Faddis explore the psychological underpinnings of the case, the conversation reveals a deeper concern: the human element in judicial decision-making. The specter of negative confirmation bias looms large, suggesting that preconceived notions and personal animosities could cloud judgment and compromise the fairness of the trial. "If you seriously do not like someone, there's nothing they can say that you'll agree with," Faddis points out, illustrating the peril of allowing personal biases to influence judicial decisions. The unfolding drama in Delphi not only captivates but also alarms, serving as a stark reminder of the fragile balance between justice and judicial discretion. As the case progresses, one question hangs in the balance: Can Richard Allen receive a fair trial in the shadow of controversy and bias? As the community and the nation watch closely, the final resolution of this case may offer profound insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the legal system. But for now, the merry-go-round of motions, appeals, and judicial decisions continues to spin, leaving observers to wonder: When will the pursuit of justice take center stage, free from the distractions of legal maneuvering and personal biases? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The last thing Courtney Clenney needs is bad press. Unfortunately for her, that's exactly what she's getting once again.In a new report we are learning about a bizarre incident involving Courtney Clenney and a teenage boy who says that after meeting her while on a walk he was approached by Clenney who struck up a conversation with the young man and then asked him to walk her home. On that walk, they allegedly stopped to sit down and that's where things allegedly went sideways.In our second article...The unfortunate and disgusting circus surrounding the trial of Richard Allen, the man accused of murdering Abby Williams and Libby German, is still at a stand still due to the on going drama between the judge overseeing the case, Judge Frances Gull and the on again off again on again lawyers representing Richard Allen, Rozzi and Baldwin. After the supreme court of Indiana ruled that Judge Gull would remain seated as the Judge overseeing the trial, Richard Allen's lawyers are still not satisfied as they continue to seek the removal of Judge Gull, either by her own free will via a recusal or any other means that might be available to them. According to experts ,they face an uphill climb.(commercial at 7:35)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi suspect Richard Allen wants next hearing vacated (fox59.com)OnlyFans model Courtney Clenney allegedly threatened to burn teen's house for rejecting her: 'She's a menace' (nypost.com)

In the latest chapter of the Delphi murder case, Judge Frances Gull and the reinstated defense attorneys for Richard Allen, Baldwin and Rozzi, continue to navigate a complex legal landscape. This ongoing saga, marked by denied motions and heightened scrutiny, poses critical questions about the balance of justice and judicial discretion. The Indiana Supreme Court's decision to deny a speedy trial request for Allen, while reinstating his chosen attorneys, has thrown the case into further uncertainty. Despite this, Judge Gull maintains her position, immediately rejecting a Frank's hearing that had previously been on the brink of commencement. Bob Motta, a seasoned defense attorney and podcast host, was not surprised by these developments. "I thought that they'd get back on. I thought that they would keep her on, and I thought that the 70-day trial date was of no import to the Supreme Court," Motta stated. Gull's decisions, particularly her swift dismissal of key motions without hearings, have raised eyebrows in the legal community. The lack of a comprehensive record and her seemingly unilateral approach to the case underscore a growing concern about the impartiality of the judicial process. Motta highlighted the peculiar speed of the Supreme Court's order reinstating Baldwin and Rozzi, noting its unusual timing and the absence of a detailed opinion. The case's complexity is further deepened by the fact that Gull's decisions are under intense scrutiny, given her aspirations to join the Indiana Supreme Court. Her actions in the Delphi case could significantly impact her judicial career. Motta pondered whether Gull's ambitions might influence her decisions in the trial. "Everything that she continues to do in this has to be seen as a detriment to her bid to move up to the high court," he observed. Motta also questioned the logic behind Gull's actions following the Supreme Court's order. By denying three major motions - the Frank's hearing, the motion to suppress, and the motion in limine regarding ballistics - without substantial rationale or case law, Gull's approach appears to contrast sharply with the Supreme Court's guidance for a more detailed record. “She's flying from the hip man,” Motta remarked, emphasizing the reckless nature of such decisions in a high-profile case. The contrast between Gull's approach and the attorneys' efforts to represent Allen adequately highlights a significant disconnect. Motta expressed his concern about the potential impact of these judicial decisions on the integrity of the trial and the broader implications for the legal system. As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, questions linger about the balance between judicial discretion and the pursuit of justice. Will Judge Gull's approach to the case stand up to the scrutiny it faces, or will it ultimately prove to be a detriment to her aspirations and the legal process itself? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the Delphi murder case steering towards a resolution, or is it encountering yet another obstacle in its tumultuous journey? This pressing question is at the heart of a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke delve into the latest twists in the case against Richard Allen, accused of the notorious Delphi murders. The case has been a rollercoaster of legal maneuvers and contentious decisions. Judge Gull, a pivotal figure in this saga, remains in position despite earlier dismissing defense attorneys Baldwin and Rozzi, who are now reinstated. This dynamic adds a layer of complexity to an already convoluted case. The judge's recent rulings – denying the defense's motion to suppress evidence from Allen's home and regarding an unspent shell casing – are telling. They hint at the stringent approach she maintains in this high-profile case. Brueski and Dreeke raise critical questions about Judge Gull's impartiality. Dreeke observes, "If you seriously do not like someone, you despise them, there's nothing they can say that you'll agree with." This insight into human psychology and confirmation bias casts doubt on whether any judge, let alone Judge Gull, can remain unbiased in such charged circumstances. The situation is complicated by the fact that despite the defense's reinstatement, the judge's apparent prejudice towards Allen and the attorneys remains a significant concern. The duo also ponders why Judge Gull has not yet recused herself, given the potential for perceived bias. "Why stay even for her own good?" Brueski asks, noting the poor optics of her continued involvement. They speculate about her ambitions and how her role in this case might impact her career trajectory. Amidst these discussions, Dreeke points out a silver lining: the opportunity for all evidence to be thoroughly examined. "If he's truly innocent, there will be no forensic data on that evidence that says he's guilty," he states, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive review in ensuring justice. However, the question of Judge Gull's influence looms large. How much sway does a judge hold in a jury trial? Brueski and Dreeke suggest that her presence and non-verbal cues could significantly impact jurors' perceptions and decision-making processes. They compare this to the Alex Murdaugh case, where the judge's demeanor set a tone of trust in the system – a contrast to the current scenario in the Delphi case. The conversation turns to Allen's treatment in prison, underscoring another troubling aspect of the case. The forthcoming hearing about his potential relocation highlights systemic issues in the treatment of pre-trial detainees. In conclusion, the Delphi murder case remains a complex weave of legal, psychological, and systemic challenges. As Brueski poignantly remarks, the ultimate goal is to bring resolution to the families of the victims. But with each twist and turn, one wonders: Will the pursuit of justice in this case untangle the complexities, or will it further entangle the truth in a web of legal conundrums? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the Delphi murder case steering towards a resolution, or is it encountering yet another obstacle in its tumultuous journey? This pressing question is at the heart of a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke delve into the latest twists in the case against Richard Allen, accused of the notorious Delphi murders. The case has been a rollercoaster of legal maneuvers and contentious decisions. Judge Gull, a pivotal figure in this saga, remains in position despite earlier dismissing defense attorneys Baldwin and Rozzi, who are now reinstated. This dynamic adds a layer of complexity to an already convoluted case. The judge's recent rulings – denying the defense's motion to suppress evidence from Allen's home and regarding an unspent shell casing – are telling. They hint at the stringent approach she maintains in this high-profile case. Brueski and Dreeke raise critical questions about Judge Gull's impartiality. Dreeke observes, "If you seriously do not like someone, you despise them, there's nothing they can say that you'll agree with." This insight into human psychology and confirmation bias casts doubt on whether any judge, let alone Judge Gull, can remain unbiased in such charged circumstances. The situation is complicated by the fact that despite the defense's reinstatement, the judge's apparent prejudice towards Allen and the attorneys remains a significant concern. The duo also ponders why Judge Gull has not yet recused herself, given the potential for perceived bias. "Why stay even for her own good?" Brueski asks, noting the poor optics of her continued involvement. They speculate about her ambitions and how her role in this case might impact her career trajectory. Amidst these discussions, Dreeke points out a silver lining: the opportunity for all evidence to be thoroughly examined. "If he's truly innocent, there will be no forensic data on that evidence that says he's guilty," he states, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive review in ensuring justice. However, the question of Judge Gull's influence looms large. How much sway does a judge hold in a jury trial? Brueski and Dreeke suggest that her presence and non-verbal cues could significantly impact jurors' perceptions and decision-making processes. They compare this to the Alex Murdaugh case, where the judge's demeanor set a tone of trust in the system – a contrast to the current scenario in the Delphi case. The conversation turns to Allen's treatment in prison, underscoring another troubling aspect of the case. The forthcoming hearing about his potential relocation highlights systemic issues in the treatment of pre-trial detainees. In conclusion, the Delphi murder case remains a complex weave of legal, psychological, and systemic challenges. As Brueski poignantly remarks, the ultimate goal is to bring resolution to the families of the victims. But with each twist and turn, one wonders: Will the pursuit of justice in this case untangle the complexities, or will it further entangle the truth in a web of legal conundrums? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest chapter of the Delphi murder case, Judge Frances Gull and the reinstated defense attorneys for Richard Allen, Baldwin and Rozzi, continue to navigate a complex legal landscape. This ongoing saga, marked by denied motions and heightened scrutiny, poses critical questions about the balance of justice and judicial discretion. The Indiana Supreme Court's decision to deny a speedy trial request for Allen, while reinstating his chosen attorneys, has thrown the case into further uncertainty. Despite this, Judge Gull maintains her position, immediately rejecting a Frank's hearing that had previously been on the brink of commencement. Bob Motta, a seasoned defense attorney and podcast host, was not surprised by these developments. "I thought that they'd get back on. I thought that they would keep her on, and I thought that the 70-day trial date was of no import to the Supreme Court," Motta stated. Gull's decisions, particularly her swift dismissal of key motions without hearings, have raised eyebrows in the legal community. The lack of a comprehensive record and her seemingly unilateral approach to the case underscore a growing concern about the impartiality of the judicial process. Motta highlighted the peculiar speed of the Supreme Court's order reinstating Baldwin and Rozzi, noting its unusual timing and the absence of a detailed opinion. The case's complexity is further deepened by the fact that Gull's decisions are under intense scrutiny, given her aspirations to join the Indiana Supreme Court. Her actions in the Delphi case could significantly impact her judicial career. Motta pondered whether Gull's ambitions might influence her decisions in the trial. "Everything that she continues to do in this has to be seen as a detriment to her bid to move up to the high court," he observed. Motta also questioned the logic behind Gull's actions following the Supreme Court's order. By denying three major motions - the Frank's hearing, the motion to suppress, and the motion in limine regarding ballistics - without substantial rationale or case law, Gull's approach appears to contrast sharply with the Supreme Court's guidance for a more detailed record. “She's flying from the hip man,” Motta remarked, emphasizing the reckless nature of such decisions in a high-profile case. The contrast between Gull's approach and the attorneys' efforts to represent Allen adequately highlights a significant disconnect. Motta expressed his concern about the potential impact of these judicial decisions on the integrity of the trial and the broader implications for the legal system. As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, questions linger about the balance between judicial discretion and the pursuit of justice. Will Judge Gull's approach to the case stand up to the scrutiny it faces, or will it ultimately prove to be a detriment to her aspirations and the legal process itself? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is justice being compromised in the Delphi murder case? This question lingers in the air as the case against Richard Allen, accused of the gruesome murders of two young girls, continues to unfold amidst controversial judicial decisions. The most recent twist – the reinstatement of Allen's attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi, by the Indiana Supreme Court – has sparked a new wave of debate and scrutiny, particularly regarding Judge Gull's actions. Former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect the latest developments. Faddis's insights reveal a troubling pattern of judicial decisions that seem to favor the prosecution, raising concerns about the fairness of the trial. Judge Gull's refusal to grant a Franks hearing, along with denying several other defense motions without proper hearings, paints a picture of a judicial system potentially skewed against the defendant. Faddis observed, “When we have time after time, ruling after ruling against one side, without even so much as a hearing, people start to wonder – is this guy really getting a fair trial?” The denial of a Frank's hearing, crucial for challenging the accuracy of information in a warrant, underscores the complexity and contentious nature of this case. Faddis's experience as a prosecutor lends weight to his concern about the judge's seemingly unilateral decision-making process. “All they're asking for is a hearing... The judge is saying, ‘Hey, I'm not even going to hear you out,'” Faddis noted, indicating a potential bias in the courtroom. The defense's struggle to present their case fully is starkly apparent. The denied motions and the lack of hearings have hindered the defense's ability to challenge key pieces of evidence and police conduct. This situation raises significant doubts about the fairness and impartiality of the legal proceedings. Allen's situation is further complicated by his transfer to various incarceration facilities, a move unusual for someone not yet convicted. Faddis expressed concern about this treatment, which seems to add another layer of disadvantage to Allen's case. The discussion also veered into speculation about Judge Gull's motivations. With her known aspirations to join the Supreme Court, some wonder if her hardline stance in this high-profile case is a strategic move to bolster her career. “Is this tough law and order persona more likely to lead to advancement?” Faddis pondered, acknowledging that decisions favoring defendants are often less popular. The case's unusual turns, including the allegations of Odinist affiliations within law enforcement, have caught public attention. The inability of Allen's defense team to delve into these matters in court only fuels public skepticism about the trial's fairness. As the case proceeds, the reinstated defense attorneys face a challenging path ahead. Their ability to navigate this complex legal landscape and counteract the apparent judicial bias will be crucial in ensuring that Richard Allen receives a fair and impartial trial. The Delphi murder case continues to be a test of the American legal system's ability to uphold justice impartially. The actions of Judge Gull and the court's response to Richard Allen's defense team's efforts remain under close scrutiny as the public awaits a fair resolution. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is justice being compromised in the Delphi murder case? This question lingers in the air as the case against Richard Allen, accused of the gruesome murders of two young girls, continues to unfold amidst controversial judicial decisions. The most recent twist – the reinstatement of Allen's attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi, by the Indiana Supreme Court – has sparked a new wave of debate and scrutiny, particularly regarding Judge Gull's actions. Former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect the latest developments. Faddis's insights reveal a troubling pattern of judicial decisions that seem to favor the prosecution, raising concerns about the fairness of the trial. Judge Gull's refusal to grant a Franks hearing, along with denying several other defense motions without proper hearings, paints a picture of a judicial system potentially skewed against the defendant. Faddis observed, “When we have time after time, ruling after ruling against one side, without even so much as a hearing, people start to wonder – is this guy really getting a fair trial?” The denial of a Frank's hearing, crucial for challenging the accuracy of information in a warrant, underscores the complexity and contentious nature of this case. Faddis's experience as a prosecutor lends weight to his concern about the judge's seemingly unilateral decision-making process. “All they're asking for is a hearing... The judge is saying, ‘Hey, I'm not even going to hear you out,'” Faddis noted, indicating a potential bias in the courtroom. The defense's struggle to present their case fully is starkly apparent. The denied motions and the lack of hearings have hindered the defense's ability to challenge key pieces of evidence and police conduct. This situation raises significant doubts about the fairness and impartiality of the legal proceedings. Allen's situation is further complicated by his transfer to various incarceration facilities, a move unusual for someone not yet convicted. Faddis expressed concern about this treatment, which seems to add another layer of disadvantage to Allen's case. The discussion also veered into speculation about Judge Gull's motivations. With her known aspirations to join the Supreme Court, some wonder if her hardline stance in this high-profile case is a strategic move to bolster her career. “Is this tough law and order persona more likely to lead to advancement?” Faddis pondered, acknowledging that decisions favoring defendants are often less popular. The case's unusual turns, including the allegations of Odinist affiliations within law enforcement, have caught public attention. The inability of Allen's defense team to delve into these matters in court only fuels public skepticism about the trial's fairness. As the case proceeds, the reinstated defense attorneys face a challenging path ahead. Their ability to navigate this complex legal landscape and counteract the apparent judicial bias will be crucial in ensuring that Richard Allen receives a fair and impartial trial. The Delphi murder case continues to be a test of the American legal system's ability to uphold justice impartially. The actions of Judge Gull and the court's response to Richard Allen's defense team's efforts remain under close scrutiny as the public awaits a fair resolution. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The trial of Richard Allen has been brought to a complete stop due to allegations that are flying from the Judge and from the former legal team that was representing Allen until there was an egregious leak of evidence from the office of one of the lawyers on the team. That leak initiated the chain of events that has now led us here.Will the Supreme court side with the AG and Judge Gull? Or will they see things the same way as Baldwin and Rozzi?Let's dive in and see what's up!(commercial at 7:31)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi judge, Indiana AG argue against supreme court involvement | wthr.com

Attorneys representing Richard Allen, the suspect in the Delphi murders case, have filed a motion seeking the removal of Special Judge Fran Gull from the proceedings. In a recent legal maneuver, attorneys Andrew Baldwin and Bradley Rozzi argued that Judge Gull should be replaced or should recuse herself from the case.    The motion is the latest development in a series of legal maneuvers surrounding the Delphi murders case. Richard Allen faces charges related to the deaths of Abby Williams and Libby German in February 2017 near the Monon High Bridge in Delphi, Indiana.    Baldwin and Rozzi, who were recently reinstated as Allen's defense team, are now seeking Judge Gull's removal from the case. This move follows Gull's earlier call for their removal, citing a social media leak of evidence as a factor. Although Baldwin and Rozzi initially resigned, they later contended that they did so under pressure. Subsequently, two new attorneys were appointed to represent Allen.    The reinstatement of Baldwin and Rozzi involved a legal battle that reached the Indiana Supreme Court. While the highest court in the state reinstated the defense attorneys, they also denied a motion to remove Judge Gull from the case.    In their latest motion seeking Judge Gull's removal, Baldwin and Rozzi, on behalf of their client Richard Allen, questioned Gull's impartiality and her ability to oversee the case without bias. They expressed concerns that Gull's previous actions had affected their attorney-client relationship.    The motion argued that Gull's recusal would help eliminate any perception of impropriety in the case. It questioned whether Gull, having previously removed the defense attorneys, could make rulings without raising doubts about her impartiality.    During the course of the proceedings, Gull had accused Rozzi and Baldwin of acting negligently and with incompetence in their defense of Allen, alleging violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. She also expressed "grave concerns" about their ability to represent him. The defense attorneys contended that Gull's actions had violated Allen's constitutional right to due process.    In a 22-page affidavit accompanying the motion, Richard Allen accused Judge Gull of misleading the public during the October 19 proceedings when she announced the attorneys' withdrawal from the case. He also claimed that Gull had interfered with his right to a speedy trial.    The affidavit further alleged that Gull had treated the prosecution more favorably than the defense. Allen accused Gull of allowing the prosecution to withhold potentially exculpatory evidence for months, while she had criticized the defense attorneys for their actions.    The motion argued that Judge Gull had interfered with Allen's right to a speedy trial by preventing him from having counsel of his choosing, resulting in trial delays. Additionally, Allen claimed that his confinement at Westville Correctional Facility since his arrest in October 2022 had led to both mental and physical deterioration.    Furthermore, the affidavit asserted that Judge Gull had shielded certain defense documents and records from public view, violating administrative rules from the Indiana Supreme Court and compromising public access.    The motion ultimately called for Judge Gull's removal or recusal from the case, citing concerns about her impartiality and her impact on the attorney-client relationship. It remains to be seen how this latest development will affect the ongoing legal proceedings in the Delphi murders case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Attorneys representing Richard Allen, the suspect in the Delphi murders case, have filed a motion seeking the removal of Special Judge Fran Gull from the proceedings. In a recent legal maneuver, attorneys Andrew Baldwin and Bradley Rozzi argued that Judge Gull should be replaced or should recuse herself from the case.    The motion is the latest development in a series of legal maneuvers surrounding the Delphi murders case. Richard Allen faces charges related to the deaths of Abby Williams and Libby German in February 2017 near the Monon High Bridge in Delphi, Indiana.    Baldwin and Rozzi, who were recently reinstated as Allen's defense team, are now seeking Judge Gull's removal from the case. This move follows Gull's earlier call for their removal, citing a social media leak of evidence as a factor. Although Baldwin and Rozzi initially resigned, they later contended that they did so under pressure. Subsequently, two new attorneys were appointed to represent Allen.    The reinstatement of Baldwin and Rozzi involved a legal battle that reached the Indiana Supreme Court. While the highest court in the state reinstated the defense attorneys, they also denied a motion to remove Judge Gull from the case.    In their latest motion seeking Judge Gull's removal, Baldwin and Rozzi, on behalf of their client Richard Allen, questioned Gull's impartiality and her ability to oversee the case without bias. They expressed concerns that Gull's previous actions had affected their attorney-client relationship.    The motion argued that Gull's recusal would help eliminate any perception of impropriety in the case. It questioned whether Gull, having previously removed the defense attorneys, could make rulings without raising doubts about her impartiality.    During the course of the proceedings, Gull had accused Rozzi and Baldwin of acting negligently and with incompetence in their defense of Allen, alleging violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. She also expressed "grave concerns" about their ability to represent him. The defense attorneys contended that Gull's actions had violated Allen's constitutional right to due process.    In a 22-page affidavit accompanying the motion, Richard Allen accused Judge Gull of misleading the public during the October 19 proceedings when she announced the attorneys' withdrawal from the case. He also claimed that Gull had interfered with his right to a speedy trial.    The affidavit further alleged that Gull had treated the prosecution more favorably than the defense. Allen accused Gull of allowing the prosecution to withhold potentially exculpatory evidence for months, while she had criticized the defense attorneys for their actions.    The motion argued that Judge Gull had interfered with Allen's right to a speedy trial by preventing him from having counsel of his choosing, resulting in trial delays. Additionally, Allen claimed that his confinement at Westville Correctional Facility since his arrest in October 2022 had led to both mental and physical deterioration.    Furthermore, the affidavit asserted that Judge Gull had shielded certain defense documents and records from public view, violating administrative rules from the Indiana Supreme Court and compromising public access.    The motion ultimately called for Judge Gull's removal or recusal from the case, citing concerns about her impartiality and her impact on the attorney-client relationship. It remains to be seen how this latest development will affect the ongoing legal proceedings in the Delphi murders case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a significant twist in the Delphi murder case, the Indiana Supreme Court has reinstated defense attorneys Baldwin and Rozzi to represent Richard Allen. This decision, although positive for Allen, leaves other key motions unresolved, creating a complex legal scenario. "It was a great experience," shares Bob Motta, a defense attorney who witnessed the proceedings. "The courtroom was packed... but Judge Gull did not show up," he adds, highlighting the tension surrounding the case.  Judge Gull, amidst controversy, remains on the case despite motions for her removal. Motta speculates on Gull's aspirations to join the Supreme Court and how her current role could impact her career. "She's made three applications to the court... it's a very political thing," Motta observes, pondering whether Gull might step back to focus on her new responsibilities as Allen County's chief judge.  In a surprising turn, Prosecutor Nicholas McLeland filed additional kidnapping and murder charges against Richard Allen. Motta questions the timing and motive behind this move, suggesting it might be a PR strategy rather than a legal necessity. "Nothing changed factually... it felt like just a PR move more than anything else," Motta explains, expressing skepticism over the legal impact of these new charges.  With Baldwin and Rozzi back in the game, the dynamics of the trial are set to change. Motta anticipates that they will file for a speedy trial, potentially hastening the trial date. However, the unresolved issues with Judge Gull and the new charges complicate the path ahead. "It's going to be tough for the public to not think when she's denying things left and right, that it's not personal," Motta reflects on Gull's involvement.  As the Delphi murder case progresses, it remains mired in legal complexities and personal animosities. The reinstatement of Allen's original defense attorneys marks a significant step, but the unresolved status of Judge Gull and the additional charges filed by the prosecutor add layers of uncertainty. Will these legal maneuvers bring clarity to the case, or will they further entangle it in controversy and doubt?  As the Delphi murder case unfolds, the recent developments pose more questions than answers. With Baldwin and Rozzi back on board and Judge Gull's role still contentious, the path to justice remains unclear. Can the legal system navigate these challenges to bring closure to this high-profile case, or will the complexities continue to hinder the pursuit of truth? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a significant twist in the Delphi murder case, the Indiana Supreme Court has reinstated defense attorneys Baldwin and Rozzi to represent Richard Allen. This decision, although positive for Allen, leaves other key motions unresolved, creating a complex legal scenario. "It was a great experience," shares Bob Motta, a defense attorney who witnessed the proceedings. "The courtroom was packed... but Judge Gull did not show up," he adds, highlighting the tension surrounding the case.  Judge Gull, amidst controversy, remains on the case despite motions for her removal. Motta speculates on Gull's aspirations to join the Supreme Court and how her current role could impact her career. "She's made three applications to the court... it's a very political thing," Motta observes, pondering whether Gull might step back to focus on her new responsibilities as Allen County's chief judge.  In a surprising turn, Prosecutor Nicholas McLeland filed additional kidnapping and murder charges against Richard Allen. Motta questions the timing and motive behind this move, suggesting it might be a PR strategy rather than a legal necessity. "Nothing changed factually... it felt like just a PR move more than anything else," Motta explains, expressing skepticism over the legal impact of these new charges.  With Baldwin and Rozzi back in the game, the dynamics of the trial are set to change. Motta anticipates that they will file for a speedy trial, potentially hastening the trial date. However, the unresolved issues with Judge Gull and the new charges complicate the path ahead. "It's going to be tough for the public to not think when she's denying things left and right, that it's not personal," Motta reflects on Gull's involvement.  As the Delphi murder case progresses, it remains mired in legal complexities and personal animosities. The reinstatement of Allen's original defense attorneys marks a significant step, but the unresolved status of Judge Gull and the additional charges filed by the prosecutor add layers of uncertainty. Will these legal maneuvers bring clarity to the case, or will they further entangle it in controversy and doubt?  As the Delphi murder case unfolds, the recent developments pose more questions than answers. With Baldwin and Rozzi back on board and Judge Gull's role still contentious, the path to justice remains unclear. Can the legal system navigate these challenges to bring closure to this high-profile case, or will the complexities continue to hinder the pursuit of truth? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent development that has stirred the already complex Delphi murder case, the Indiana Supreme Court has reinstated Richard Allen's defense attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi. This decision, while pivotal, leaves other critical motions unresolved. Defense attorney Bob Motta delves into the nuances of this situation and its potential ramifications.  The decision to keep Judge Gull on the case, despite motions for her removal, adds another layer of intrigue. Motta, who was present during the Supreme Court's oral arguments, notes, "The issue of removing Gull wasn't even brought up." With Gull's aspirations to join the Supreme Court, her future decisions in this case will likely be under intense scrutiny. Motta ponders whether this situation will lead Gull to step back voluntarily, considering her recent appointment as the chief judge in Allen County.  Although the court denied the motion for a trial within 70 days, Motta anticipates that Baldwin and Rozzi may file a demand for a speedy trial once the issues surrounding their reinstatement and Judge Gull's involvement are resolved. This move, if executed, would mark a significant shift in the case's timeline. "I anticipate that the trial date will get pushed up again," Motta predicts.  Addressing concerns about a potential delay if a new judge takes over, Motta reassures that it wouldn't necessarily slow down the case. "The judge would be starting at the exact same place that she's currently at," he explains, emphasizing that Judge Gull hasn't made any substantive rulings yet.  Motta clarifies the nuances of a speedy trial demand, highlighting that while it sets a firm trial date, the defense's motions can extend the timeframe without penalty. This aspect is crucial in understanding the defense's strategy and how it might play out in court.  As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the recent rulings and potential strategic moves by the defense paint a picture of a legal battle fraught with complexities. With Richard Allen's attorneys reinstated and the question of Judge Gull's involvement still lingering, the case's trajectory remains unpredictable. Will these legal maneuvers bring the case closer to a resolution, or will they add further twists to an already intricate legal saga?  The return of Baldwin and Rozzi and the unresolved status of Judge Gull's involvement in the Delphi murder case raise critical questions about the pursuit of justice. As the defense prepares its next moves, will the legal system navigate these challenges effectively, or will the complexities of the case further delay the quest for truth? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent development that has stirred the already complex Delphi murder case, the Indiana Supreme Court has reinstated Richard Allen's defense attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi. This decision, while pivotal, leaves other critical motions unresolved. Defense attorney Bob Motta delves into the nuances of this situation and its potential ramifications.  The decision to keep Judge Gull on the case, despite motions for her removal, adds another layer of intrigue. Motta, who was present during the Supreme Court's oral arguments, notes, "The issue of removing Gull wasn't even brought up." With Gull's aspirations to join the Supreme Court, her future decisions in this case will likely be under intense scrutiny. Motta ponders whether this situation will lead Gull to step back voluntarily, considering her recent appointment as the chief judge in Allen County.  Although the court denied the motion for a trial within 70 days, Motta anticipates that Baldwin and Rozzi may file a demand for a speedy trial once the issues surrounding their reinstatement and Judge Gull's involvement are resolved. This move, if executed, would mark a significant shift in the case's timeline. "I anticipate that the trial date will get pushed up again," Motta predicts.  Addressing concerns about a potential delay if a new judge takes over, Motta reassures that it wouldn't necessarily slow down the case. "The judge would be starting at the exact same place that she's currently at," he explains, emphasizing that Judge Gull hasn't made any substantive rulings yet.  Motta clarifies the nuances of a speedy trial demand, highlighting that while it sets a firm trial date, the defense's motions can extend the timeframe without penalty. This aspect is crucial in understanding the defense's strategy and how it might play out in court.  As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the recent rulings and potential strategic moves by the defense paint a picture of a legal battle fraught with complexities. With Richard Allen's attorneys reinstated and the question of Judge Gull's involvement still lingering, the case's trajectory remains unpredictable. Will these legal maneuvers bring the case closer to a resolution, or will they add further twists to an already intricate legal saga?  The return of Baldwin and Rozzi and the unresolved status of Judge Gull's involvement in the Delphi murder case raise critical questions about the pursuit of justice. As the defense prepares its next moves, will the legal system navigate these challenges effectively, or will the complexities of the case further delay the quest for truth? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is justice on the horizon for Richard Allen, the man accused of the Delphi murders? Recent developments in the case present a convoluted picture, as the Indiana Supreme Court reinstates his attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi, while simultaneously denying other critical motions. Defense attorney Bob Motta weighs in on the perplexing state of affairs.  In a striking decision, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled in favor of reinstating Richard Allen's preferred attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi. "It's exactly what I predicted," shares Motta, reflecting on the intense courtroom atmosphere during the oral arguments.  The judges' probing questions and the high stakes of the case made the proceedings a noteworthy experience for legal enthusiasts.  Despite the reinstatement of Allen's attorneys, Judge Gull remains on the case, raising concerns about the trial's impartiality. Motta speculates on the potential for Judge Gull to either hold a hearing regarding the removal of Baldwin and Rozzi or address the motion filed by Rozzi for her recusal. The Supreme Court's forthcoming opinion on these issues is eagerly awaited, as it will shape the future course of action.  Motta emphasizes the strategic nature of the defense's request for a speedy trial within 70 days, a motion ultimately denied by the court. This tactic, aimed at catching prosecutor McLeLand off-guard, highlights the intricate chess game unfolding within the legal framework. Motta anticipates that Allen's defense will file a demand for a speedy trial, potentially advancing the trial date.  The legal community and those closely following the case are now awaiting the Indiana Supreme Court's detailed opinion. This document is expected to shed light on the rationale behind the court's decisions and provide guidance for the next steps. "We need to see the opinion," Motta stresses, indicating that it will be pivotal in determining the case's trajectory.  As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the reinstatement of Richard Allen's attorneys marks a significant, albeit complex, development. With Judge Gull still presiding and key motions denied, the path to justice remains fraught with legal intricacies. Will the upcoming Supreme Court opinion bring clarity and direction, or will it add another layer to this already tangled case?  The Delphi murder case stands at a critical juncture, with the Indiana Supreme Court's decisions introducing new dynamics. As the legal community braces for the court's detailed opinion, questions linger about the fairness of the trial and the fate of Richard Allen. In the quest for justice, will the truth finally emerge from the shadows of legal complexity? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is justice on the horizon for Richard Allen, the man accused of the Delphi murders? Recent developments in the case present a convoluted picture, as the Indiana Supreme Court reinstates his attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi, while simultaneously denying other critical motions. Defense attorney Bob Motta weighs in on the perplexing state of affairs.  In a striking decision, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled in favor of reinstating Richard Allen's preferred attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi. "It's exactly what I predicted," shares Motta, reflecting on the intense courtroom atmosphere during the oral arguments.  The judges' probing questions and the high stakes of the case made the proceedings a noteworthy experience for legal enthusiasts.  Despite the reinstatement of Allen's attorneys, Judge Gull remains on the case, raising concerns about the trial's impartiality. Motta speculates on the potential for Judge Gull to either hold a hearing regarding the removal of Baldwin and Rozzi or address the motion filed by Rozzi for her recusal. The Supreme Court's forthcoming opinion on these issues is eagerly awaited, as it will shape the future course of action.  Motta emphasizes the strategic nature of the defense's request for a speedy trial within 70 days, a motion ultimately denied by the court. This tactic, aimed at catching prosecutor McLeLand off-guard, highlights the intricate chess game unfolding within the legal framework. Motta anticipates that Allen's defense will file a demand for a speedy trial, potentially advancing the trial date.  The legal community and those closely following the case are now awaiting the Indiana Supreme Court's detailed opinion. This document is expected to shed light on the rationale behind the court's decisions and provide guidance for the next steps. "We need to see the opinion," Motta stresses, indicating that it will be pivotal in determining the case's trajectory.  As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the reinstatement of Richard Allen's attorneys marks a significant, albeit complex, development. With Judge Gull still presiding and key motions denied, the path to justice remains fraught with legal intricacies. Will the upcoming Supreme Court opinion bring clarity and direction, or will it add another layer to this already tangled case?  The Delphi murder case stands at a critical juncture, with the Indiana Supreme Court's decisions introducing new dynamics. As the legal community braces for the court's detailed opinion, questions linger about the fairness of the trial and the fate of Richard Allen. In the quest for justice, will the truth finally emerge from the shadows of legal complexity? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a surprising twist in the Delphi murder case, the Indiana Supreme Court reinstates attorneys Baldwin and Rozzi to represent Richard Allen, the man accused of the horrific murders of two young girls. This development brings hope and complexity to a case mired in controversy and legal wrangling. But what does this mean for the pursuit of justice?  Defense attorney and podcast host Bob Motta shares his firsthand experience from the Supreme Court hearing. “It's a different experience,” he notes, describing the intense grilling of attorneys by a panel of judges. This high-stakes environment, he explains, is crucial for ensuring thorough legal scrutiny.  Despite the reinstatement of Allen's preferred attorneys, Judge Gull remains at the helm of the trial, a decision that has stirred debate. Motta expresses concern over her previous actions, questioning whether they were justified or a violation of Allen's constitutional rights. The decision to keep Judge Gull in the case adds another layer of complexity to an already intricate legal battle.  Motta also sheds light on the emotional toll the case is taking on the victims' families, who, he observes, place their trust in the prosecution and law enforcement. Their presence in the courtroom, silent yet palpable, underscores the human cost of the legal proceedings. “They've got to be in a pretty bad place,” Motta empathizes, acknowledging the families' longing for closure and justice.  Motta highlights the importance of having skilled defense attorneys like Baldwin and Rozzi, whose reinstatement could ensure the trial is conducted fairly and competently. He argues that even if one questions their methods, their expertise is vital for a fair trial. “These two guys are really good lawyers,” he asserts, stressing the need for a robust defense to avoid a retrial or the horrifying prospect of the wrong person being convicted.  Richard Allen and the Quest for Justice?  As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the reinstatement of Richard Allen's attorneys marks a crucial juncture. Will this lead to a fair and conclusive trial, or is it merely the latest twist in a labyrinthine legal saga? Only time will tell if justice will be served for the two young victims and their grieving families. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a surprising twist in the Delphi murder case, the Indiana Supreme Court reinstates attorneys Baldwin and Rozzi to represent Richard Allen, the man accused of the horrific murders of two young girls. This development brings hope and complexity to a case mired in controversy and legal wrangling. But what does this mean for the pursuit of justice?  Defense attorney and podcast host Bob Motta shares his firsthand experience from the Supreme Court hearing. “It's a different experience,” he notes, describing the intense grilling of attorneys by a panel of judges. This high-stakes environment, he explains, is crucial for ensuring thorough legal scrutiny.  Despite the reinstatement of Allen's preferred attorneys, Judge Gull remains at the helm of the trial, a decision that has stirred debate. Motta expresses concern over her previous actions, questioning whether they were justified or a violation of Allen's constitutional rights. The decision to keep Judge Gull in the case adds another layer of complexity to an already intricate legal battle.  Motta also sheds light on the emotional toll the case is taking on the victims' families, who, he observes, place their trust in the prosecution and law enforcement. Their presence in the courtroom, silent yet palpable, underscores the human cost of the legal proceedings. “They've got to be in a pretty bad place,” Motta empathizes, acknowledging the families' longing for closure and justice.  Motta highlights the importance of having skilled defense attorneys like Baldwin and Rozzi, whose reinstatement could ensure the trial is conducted fairly and competently. He argues that even if one questions their methods, their expertise is vital for a fair trial. “These two guys are really good lawyers,” he asserts, stressing the need for a robust defense to avoid a retrial or the horrifying prospect of the wrong person being convicted.  Richard Allen and the Quest for Justice?  As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the reinstatement of Richard Allen's attorneys marks a crucial juncture. Will this lead to a fair and conclusive trial, or is it merely the latest twist in a labyrinthine legal saga? Only time will tell if justice will be served for the two young victims and their grieving families. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Indiana Supreme Court was the stage for legal arguments on Thursday as Richard Allen, the individual charged with the 2017 double murders of teenagers Abby Williams and Libby German in Delphi, Indiana, seeks to reinstate his original defense team. Allen was notably absent from the court hearing, despite being the one who initiated the motion. Originally scheduled to stand trial for the double murders this month, Allen's case took an unexpected turn last October. Special Judge Fran Gull dismissed Allen's public defenders, Bradley Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin, following a leak of crime scene evidence online. Judge Gull characterized the attorneys as "grossly negligent" as part of her rationale for their removal. It later came to light that an employee of Baldwin and Rozzi's law office had taken the photos without permission, and they were not leaked by the lawyers themselves. Subsequently, new attorneys were assigned to Allen's case, with Judge Gull stating that his best interests required him to have access to a competent defense team. During Thursday's proceedings, Mark Leeman, counsel for the relator, argued that Judge Gull had not conducted a formal hearing to voice her concerns about alleged negligence and incompetence; instead, she made the decision without a proper discussion. Chief Justice Loretta Rush acknowledged this oversight and wondered if Judge Gull had acted beyond her authority. However, Matt Gutwein, counsel for the respondent, contended that the judge had indeed given Allen's former lawyers the option to continue with a trial, but they had voluntarily stepped down. Chief Justice Rush questioned the transcript from the conversation between Judge Gull and the attorneys, expressing doubts about whether the lawyers were genuinely given a choice regarding the trial. In response to the situation, Richard Allen has made three requests to the Indiana Supreme Court: the reinstatement of Bradley Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin, the appointment of a new judge, and a trial to be held within 70 days. Legal experts have offered differing perspectives on the potential outcome. Dr. Jody Madeira, a law professor at Indiana University, suggested that the judge would likely not be disqualified from the case, and Allen's original counsel might not be reinstated. She anticipated that the trial would move forward with a new defense team under Judge Gull's supervision. However, criminal defense attorney Brian Clayton raised the possibility that the Indiana Supreme Court could allow Allen's original defense team to be reinstated. Clayton emphasized Allen's constitutional right to competent legal counsel and the familiarity of his original lawyers with the intricacies of the case. Allen has expressed his desire for Bradley Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin to represent him. As a result of these legal proceedings, Richard Allen's trial, originally set for this month, has been postponed until October 2024. This delay is intended to provide Allen's new attorneys with sufficient time to review the case thoroughly. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a significant development at the Indiana Statehouse in Indianapolis, the Indiana Supreme Court issued a ruling on Thursday afternoon, reinstating Richard Allen's original attorneys, Andrew Baldwin and Brad Rozzi. This decision came just hours after a hearing, notably held outside of Carroll County, where Allen is accused of the 2017 murders of Delphi teenagers Abby Williams and Libby German.    The court's decision, which was partly based on the written submissions and arguments of counsel, granted the petition to restore Baldwin and Rozzi as Allen's court-appointed counsel. However, the court unanimously denied other requests, including the removal of special judge Frances Gull and the demand for the trial to occur within 70 days.    This ruling follows a controversial dismissal of Baldwin and Rozzi in October by Judge Gull, after a leak of Delphi crime scene photos from Baldwin's law office. Court records reveal that a former employee of Baldwin's firm, who is now facing criminal charges, admitted to taking these photos without Baldwin's permission or knowledge.    Judge Gull had cited this leak and other instances as evidence of Baldwin and Rozzi's gross negligence in defending Allen. She also accused them of making false statements, leading to her decision to replace them with new public defenders.    The reinstatement of Allen's original attorneys raises questions about the potential rescheduling of his trial. Initially set for January, the trial was postponed to October 2024 following the removal of his original defense team.    In response to the court's decision, Allen's attorneys, Mark Leeman and Cara Wieneke, expressed their satisfaction. Wieneke, after speaking with Allen's wife, shared that the family is relieved and happy about the reinstatement of the original defense counsel. The family's reaction underscores the significance of this latest turn in a case that has captured widespread attention. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Indiana Supreme Court was the stage for legal arguments on Thursday as Richard Allen, the individual charged with the 2017 double murders of teenagers Abby Williams and Libby German in Delphi, Indiana, seeks to reinstate his original defense team. Allen was notably absent from the court hearing, despite being the one who initiated the motion. Originally scheduled to stand trial for the double murders this month, Allen's case took an unexpected turn last October. Special Judge Fran Gull dismissed Allen's public defenders, Bradley Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin, following a leak of crime scene evidence online. Judge Gull characterized the attorneys as "grossly negligent" as part of her rationale for their removal. It later came to light that an employee of Baldwin and Rozzi's law office had taken the photos without permission, and they were not leaked by the lawyers themselves. Subsequently, new attorneys were assigned to Allen's case, with Judge Gull stating that his best interests required him to have access to a competent defense team. During Thursday's proceedings, Mark Leeman, counsel for the relator, argued that Judge Gull had not conducted a formal hearing to voice her concerns about alleged negligence and incompetence; instead, she made the decision without a proper discussion. Chief Justice Loretta Rush acknowledged this oversight and wondered if Judge Gull had acted beyond her authority. However, Matt Gutwein, counsel for the respondent, contended that the judge had indeed given Allen's former lawyers the option to continue with a trial, but they had voluntarily stepped down. Chief Justice Rush questioned the transcript from the conversation between Judge Gull and the attorneys, expressing doubts about whether the lawyers were genuinely given a choice regarding the trial. In response to the situation, Richard Allen has made three requests to the Indiana Supreme Court: the reinstatement of Bradley Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin, the appointment of a new judge, and a trial to be held within 70 days. Legal experts have offered differing perspectives on the potential outcome. Dr. Jody Madeira, a law professor at Indiana University, suggested that the judge would likely not be disqualified from the case, and Allen's original counsel might not be reinstated. She anticipated that the trial would move forward with a new defense team under Judge Gull's supervision. However, criminal defense attorney Brian Clayton raised the possibility that the Indiana Supreme Court could allow Allen's original defense team to be reinstated. Clayton emphasized Allen's constitutional right to competent legal counsel and the familiarity of his original lawyers with the intricacies of the case. Allen has expressed his desire for Bradley Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin to represent him. As a result of these legal proceedings, Richard Allen's trial, originally set for this month, has been postponed until October 2024. This delay is intended to provide Allen's new attorneys with sufficient time to review the case thoroughly. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a significant development at the Indiana Statehouse in Indianapolis, the Indiana Supreme Court issued a ruling on Thursday afternoon, reinstating Richard Allen's original attorneys, Andrew Baldwin and Brad Rozzi. This decision came just hours after a hearing, notably held outside of Carroll County, where Allen is accused of the 2017 murders of Delphi teenagers Abby Williams and Libby German.    The court's decision, which was partly based on the written submissions and arguments of counsel, granted the petition to restore Baldwin and Rozzi as Allen's court-appointed counsel. However, the court unanimously denied other requests, including the removal of special judge Frances Gull and the demand for the trial to occur within 70 days.    This ruling follows a controversial dismissal of Baldwin and Rozzi in October by Judge Gull, after a leak of Delphi crime scene photos from Baldwin's law office. Court records reveal that a former employee of Baldwin's firm, who is now facing criminal charges, admitted to taking these photos without Baldwin's permission or knowledge.    Judge Gull had cited this leak and other instances as evidence of Baldwin and Rozzi's gross negligence in defending Allen. She also accused them of making false statements, leading to her decision to replace them with new public defenders.    The reinstatement of Allen's original attorneys raises questions about the potential rescheduling of his trial. Initially set for January, the trial was postponed to October 2024 following the removal of his original defense team.    In response to the court's decision, Allen's attorneys, Mark Leeman and Cara Wieneke, expressed their satisfaction. Wieneke, after speaking with Allen's wife, shared that the family is relieved and happy about the reinstatement of the original defense counsel. The family's reaction underscores the significance of this latest turn in a case that has captured widespread attention. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a significant development in the ongoing legal proceedings surrounding the Delphi murders case, defense attorneys representing Richard Allen have filed a motion for his transfer from the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility. This request, articulated in a six-page document by attorneys Robert Scremin and William Lebrato, underscores the logistical challenges and potential impact on their ability to effectively represent Allen.    Richard Allen, accused of the 2017 murders of Abby Williams and Libby German in Delphi, Indiana, has been in custody for over two years, during which his safekeeping has been a recurring concern. Initially held at the Westville Correctional Facility, Allen was transferred to Wabash Valley Correctional Facility on December 6, 2023. This move, however, has not alleviated the difficulties faced by his legal team.    Scremin and Lebrato, who took over Allen's representation following the dismissal of attorneys Brad Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin, have expressed that the distance between their base in Fort Wayne and the Wabash Valley facility, located 233 miles away in Sullivan County, is excessively burdensome. They describe a visit to Allen on December 22, 2023, as a grueling 10-hour endeavor, involving a meeting in a makeshift visitation room that they likened to a prep-kitchen, with Allen confined to a cell within this space.    The motion also revisits concerns previously raised about the conditions at Westville Correctional Facility, including the treatment of Allen, who was reportedly shackled and chained in a manner reminiscent of the fictional character Hannibal Lecter. Additionally, the attorneys highlighted the presence of Odinism within the facility, noting a guard with face tattoos symbolizing Odin's spear, among other related tattoos.    Scremin, with 25 years of legal practice, emphasized the unprecedented nature of these visitation conditions, advocating for Allen's transfer to either the Allen County Jail or the Adams County Jail to facilitate more effective legal counsel.    The decision on this motion rests with special judge Fran Gull, whose role in the case is itself a subject of deliberation. A hearing scheduled for January 18 by the Supreme Court will address not only Judge Gull's involvement but also the potential reinstatement of Allen's previous attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin. The outcome of this hearing, set for 11 a.m., could significantly influence the course of this high-profile case  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In a significant development in the ongoing legal proceedings surrounding the Delphi murders case, defense attorneys representing Richard Allen have filed a motion for his transfer from the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility. This request, articulated in a six-page document by attorneys Robert Scremin and William Lebrato, underscores the logistical challenges and potential impact on their ability to effectively represent Allen.    Richard Allen, accused of the 2017 murders of Abby Williams and Libby German in Delphi, Indiana, has been in custody for over two years, during which his safekeeping has been a recurring concern. Initially held at the Westville Correctional Facility, Allen was transferred to Wabash Valley Correctional Facility on December 6, 2023. This move, however, has not alleviated the difficulties faced by his legal team.    Scremin and Lebrato, who took over Allen's representation following the dismissal of attorneys Brad Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin, have expressed that the distance between their base in Fort Wayne and the Wabash Valley facility, located 233 miles away in Sullivan County, is excessively burdensome. They describe a visit to Allen on December 22, 2023, as a grueling 10-hour endeavor, involving a meeting in a makeshift visitation room that they likened to a prep-kitchen, with Allen confined to a cell within this space.    The motion also revisits concerns previously raised about the conditions at Westville Correctional Facility, including the treatment of Allen, who was reportedly shackled and chained in a manner reminiscent of the fictional character Hannibal Lecter. Additionally, the attorneys highlighted the presence of Odinism within the facility, noting a guard with face tattoos symbolizing Odin's spear, among other related tattoos.    Scremin, with 25 years of legal practice, emphasized the unprecedented nature of these visitation conditions, advocating for Allen's transfer to either the Allen County Jail or the Adams County Jail to facilitate more effective legal counsel.    The decision on this motion rests with special judge Fran Gull, whose role in the case is itself a subject of deliberation. A hearing scheduled for January 18 by the Supreme Court will address not only Judge Gull's involvement but also the potential reinstatement of Allen's previous attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin. The outcome of this hearing, set for 11 a.m., could significantly influence the course of this high-profile case  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

As the Delphi murder case continues to grip the nation, a pivotal date looms on the horizon: January 18th, 2024. This day marks a significant moment in the legal battle surrounding Richard Allen, the man accused of the notorious Delphi murders. Three critical motions will be argued in front of the Indiana Supreme Court, each carrying the potential to reshape the trajectory of this high-profile case.    Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, joins forces with Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI Special Agent, to dissect the implications of this forthcoming legal showdown. "The Supreme Court in Indiana's decision to hear oral arguments is a positive indication for Richard Allen's camp," Coffindaffer notes, signaling a potentially favorable turn for Allen.    The arguments will focus on three main points: setting the trial within 70 days, reinstating Allen's original attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin, and the potential removal of Judge Gull from the case. "These motions could change the game," Coffindaffer asserts, pointing to the critical nature of the Sixth Amendment in our legal system. "Even unqualified individuals are allowed to represent themselves, highlighting the significance of this right."    The conversation takes a deeper dive into the unusual handling of the case by Judge Gull. "Is she really removed, or can she be a judge that is truly in the middle of the ground? I don't really know anymore," Coffindaffer questions, highlighting the growing uncertainty surrounding Judge Gull's impartiality.    Further adding to the case's complexity is Allen's recent transfer to another maximum-security prison, a move that baffles both Brueski and Coffindaffer. "It's as if there's a playbook for making this look more like a conspiracy," Brueski remarks, pointing to the bizarre decisions that continue to cloud the case.    Coffindaffer brings a unique perspective, drawing parallels with her extensive experience in law enforcement. She suggests that the case might be more a result of a series of bad decisions snowballing rather than a deliberate conspiracy. "Missteps can often look like conspiracies," she explains, "especially when there's so much public scrutiny and involvement from different levels of government."    As the discussion progresses, the focus shifts to the potential outcomes of the oral arguments. "Splitting the baby," as Coffindaffer puts it, could be a plausible outcome, where one attorney might be reinstated while the other remains excluded. This scenario would still present challenges but might offer a compromise to the impasse.    In the midst of this legal labyrinth, the underlying goal remains clear: finding justice for Abby and Libby. "In the midst of all the minutiae, what gets lost are Abby and Libby and justice for them," Coffindaffer poignantly reminds us. As the day of reckoning approaches, the hope for a fair trial and the uncovering of truth looms large.    As the case continues to unfold, one can't help but wonder: will the Indiana Supreme Court's decisions bring us closer to the truth, or will they further entangle the case in a web of legal complexities? The answer to this question hangs in the balance, with the hopes of a nation for justice and closure riding on the outcome. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the Delphi murder case continues to grip the nation, a pivotal date looms on the horizon: January 18th, 2024. This day marks a significant moment in the legal battle surrounding Richard Allen, the man accused of the notorious Delphi murders. Three critical motions will be argued in front of the Indiana Supreme Court, each carrying the potential to reshape the trajectory of this high-profile case.    Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, joins forces with Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI Special Agent, to dissect the implications of this forthcoming legal showdown. "The Supreme Court in Indiana's decision to hear oral arguments is a positive indication for Richard Allen's camp," Coffindaffer notes, signaling a potentially favorable turn for Allen.    The arguments will focus on three main points: setting the trial within 70 days, reinstating Allen's original attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin, and the potential removal of Judge Gull from the case. "These motions could change the game," Coffindaffer asserts, pointing to the critical nature of the Sixth Amendment in our legal system. "Even unqualified individuals are allowed to represent themselves, highlighting the significance of this right."    The conversation takes a deeper dive into the unusual handling of the case by Judge Gull. "Is she really removed, or can she be a judge that is truly in the middle of the ground? I don't really know anymore," Coffindaffer questions, highlighting the growing uncertainty surrounding Judge Gull's impartiality.    Further adding to the case's complexity is Allen's recent transfer to another maximum-security prison, a move that baffles both Brueski and Coffindaffer. "It's as if there's a playbook for making this look more like a conspiracy," Brueski remarks, pointing to the bizarre decisions that continue to cloud the case.    Coffindaffer brings a unique perspective, drawing parallels with her extensive experience in law enforcement. She suggests that the case might be more a result of a series of bad decisions snowballing rather than a deliberate conspiracy. "Missteps can often look like conspiracies," she explains, "especially when there's so much public scrutiny and involvement from different levels of government."    As the discussion progresses, the focus shifts to the potential outcomes of the oral arguments. "Splitting the baby," as Coffindaffer puts it, could be a plausible outcome, where one attorney might be reinstated while the other remains excluded. This scenario would still present challenges but might offer a compromise to the impasse.    In the midst of this legal labyrinth, the underlying goal remains clear: finding justice for Abby and Libby. "In the midst of all the minutiae, what gets lost are Abby and Libby and justice for them," Coffindaffer poignantly reminds us. As the day of reckoning approaches, the hope for a fair trial and the uncovering of truth looms large.    As the case continues to unfold, one can't help but wonder: will the Indiana Supreme Court's decisions bring us closer to the truth, or will they further entangle the case in a web of legal complexities? The answer to this question hangs in the balance, with the hopes of a nation for justice and closure riding on the outcome. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the Delphi murder case more than just a quest for justice for two innocent girls? As the case unfolds, it increasingly appears to be a referendum on the legal and judicial systems of Delphi, Indiana. In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski, joined by defense attorney Bob Motta of the Defense Diaries podcast, delves into the latest perplexing developments in this high-profile case, particularly focusing on Judge Gull's contentious decisions.    The discussion begins with the recent transfer of Richard Allen, the accused, to the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility, a move Motta describes as "totally lateral" and lacking clear justification. "It's almost like people are covering up for covering up, and now it's like there's not really a rhyme or reason to some of it," Motta comments, hinting at a deeper layer of complexity in the case.    The conversation shifts to the bizarre handling of the case by Judge Gull. Motta questions the reasoning behind the initial sealing of the PCA and the subsequent creation of a complicated website to release case documents. "It was fundamentally incorrect in the way that it was done for the system," he remarks, highlighting the potential challenges this could pose for the appellate process.    As Brueski and Motta unravel the case's intricacies, they focus on the dismissal of Allen's defense attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin, by Judge Gull. Motta emphasizes the lack of due process and the violation of Allen's Sixth Amendment rights. He argues that the attorneys were removed without proper notice and a fair hearing, raising significant legal procedural questions. "The defendant's rights are what we're concerned with. It's the defendant getting a fair trial, which is all that matters at this point," Motta asserts.    The podcast also explores the implications of the case on the broader legal landscape. The upcoming oral arguments at the Indiana Supreme Court, scheduled for January 18th, could set a precedent for future cases in Indiana. Motta explains, "This case is now of national significance... It's going to set a precedent for every other case in Indiana regarding the removal process of attorneys."    Further delving into the case, Motta shares his insights on the prosecution's approach and the possibility of a cover-up. He speculates whether the state realized post-arrest that they might not have a solid case against Allen. "What do you do when you're midstream, or beyond that, and you figure out you don't have the guy?" Motta questions, highlighting the ethical dilemma faced by the prosecution.    As the conversation comes to a close, Brueski and Motta ponder the future of the case. If the Supreme Court reinstates Allen's attorneys, the dynamics in the courtroom could shift dramatically, especially if Judge Gull remains on the case. "It's going to be super awkward," Motta predicts, addressing the potential lack of impartiality that could arise.    The Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta concludes with a crucial question: In the Delphi murder case, a legal maze marked by judicial anomalies, can the principles of justice and fair trial prevail? As the nation's eyes remain fixed on the Indiana Supreme Court, the decision could redefine legal precedents in the state and beyond, impacting not just Richard Allen, but the integrity of the judicial system itself. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the Delphi murder case a straightforward criminal investigation or a labyrinth of legal technicalities and ethical questions? This critical query forms the backdrop of a compelling discussion on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, where host Tony Brueski delves deep into the case's complexities with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke.    January 18th marks a crucial day in the legal saga surrounding Richard Allen, the man accused in the Delphi murders. A new hearing is set to review a second writ motion before the Indiana Supreme Court, where three significant points will be argued: the trial date, the reinstatement of Allen's former attorneys, and the request for Judge Gull's removal.    Dreeke, not a lawyer but an experienced investigator, shares his insights: "These two [attorneys] are so dedicated to trying his case... That's who you want on your side." He emphasizes their commitment and the unusual nature of their dismissal, noting, "I've never heard of that before."    The conversation shifts to the violations of Allen's Sixth Amendment rights, with Brueski pointing out the lack of a proper hearing in the attorney's removal. "None of these things were ever addressed," he states, underlining the unusual legal proceedings in this case. Dreeke concurs, expressing his confusion and concern over the judicial decisions made thus far.    The podcast further explores the transfer of Allen to another maximum-security prison, a move Brueski labels as a possible "bad decision snowball." This term captures the essence of the case – a series of questionable decisions that might have exacerbated the situation. Dreeke agrees, preferring the notion of a series of bad decisions over a complex conspiracy theory, given the difficulty in maintaining secrecy with so many involved parties.    As they dissect the case, Brueski and Dreeke ponder the potential implications of the upcoming Supreme Court hearing. They discuss the possibility of Baldwin and Rozzi's knowledge playing a role in their removal and the broader implications of their reinstatement. Dreeke says, "If they're legally barred, practicing lawyers... I don't understand why they can't [be reinstated]."    As the discussion concludes, Brueski reflects on the potential for incompetence rather than conspiracy in the handling of the case. He suggests that the series of legal missteps could result from borderline incompetence, leading to a perception of a cover-up. Dreeke echoes this sentiment, emphasizing the importance of state oversight in investigating and rectifying these missteps.    The "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke leaves listeners with a pivotal question: In the Delphi murder case, where justice for two innocent girls hangs in the balance, can the truth be untangled from a web of legal will not only impact Richard Allen and the Delphi community but also set a precedent for legal proceedings in Indiana and possibly beyond.    The fate of Judge Gull in this case remains a point of intense speculation. Her decisions have been a subject of controversy, and the upcoming hearing will scrutinize her role in this tangled legal affair. "The optics are just a little bit too not so good anymore," Brueski remarks, pointing towards the growing mistrust in the judicial process as it has unfolded in this case.    The role of Baldwin and Rozzi is equally critical. Their willingness to represent Allen pro bono underscores a level of dedication that raises questions about their abrupt removal. "They're above and beyond their job," Dreeke observes, highlighting the anomaly in their dismissal and the potential breach of Allen's constitutional rights.    Moreover, the podcast sheds light on the broader implications of this case for the legal system. It's not just about a single trial but the integrity of the judicial process. Dreeke's expertise in behavioral analysis offers a unique perspective, suggesting that the series of questionable decisions might reflect deeper issues within the legal framework of Delphi, Indiana.    As the conversation winds down, Brueski and Dreeke agree on the importance of transparency and fairness in the legal process, especially in a case as sensitive and high-profile as the Delphi murders. The upcoming Supreme Court hearing is more than a legal proceeding; it's a test of the judicial system's ability to self-correct and uphold the principles of justice.    In conclusion, the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke presents a detailed and thought-provoking analysis of the Delphi murder case. As the Indiana Supreme Court prepares to hear the case, the question lingers: Will justice prevail in the face of legal complexities and ethical dilemmas? Only time will tell, but the implications of this case will resonate far beyond the borders of Delphi, Indiana. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the labyrinth of legal complexities surrounding the Delphi murder case, one question stands out: Can the principles of justice triumph in the face of judicial anomalies? Bob Motta, a renowned defense attorney and host of the Defense Diaries podcast, joined Tony Brueski on the Hidden Killers podcast to dissect the latest developments in the case that has become a national spectacle.   At the heart of the discussion is the controversial handling of the case by Judge Gull and the significant legal procedural questions it has raised. The first point of contention is Judge Gull's approach to the docket and the unusual secrecy surrounding the Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA). Motta, with his extensive legal experience, expresses bewilderment at the initial sealing of the PCA, emphasizing the constitutional mandate for public trials.   The case took an unexpected turn when Judge Gull dismissed Richard Allen's defense attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin. Motta highlights the absence of due process in this decision, pointing out that Allen was not given proper notice, nor was there a hearing that allowed his attorneys to defend their position. "The defendant's rights are what we're concerned with... It's about getting justice for the girls, Abby and Libby, through a fair trial," Motta asserts, stressing the importance of upholding the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights.   As the conversation delves deeper, Brueski and Motta unravel the potential impact of the case on the broader legal landscape. They discuss the upcoming oral arguments scheduled for January 18th at the Indiana Supreme Court, which could set a precedent for future cases in Indiana and beyond. Motta explains, "This case is now of national significance... It's going to set a precedent for every other case in Indiana regarding the removal process of attorneys."   The duo also touches on the dynamics that would emerge should the Supreme Court reinstate Allen's attorneys while keeping Judge Gull on the case. Motta envisions a scenario rife with discomfort and a potential lack of impartiality. "It's going to be super awkward... You can't undermine the public's trust in the system like that," he comments, addressing the importance of maintaining public confidence in the judiciary.    Motta concludes by reflecting on the broader implications of the case. He underscores the criticality of ensuring a fair trial not only for the sake of Allen but also for the families of the victims. "Any victim is not getting justice if the wrong person is convicted... or if the case gets so screwed up during trial that the family has to relive their worst day again," Motta remarks, highlighting the emotional toll on the families involved. The Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta leaves listeners pondering a crucial question: In a case that has evolved into a complex judicial puzzle, can the legal system navigate through its own intricacies to uphold the sanctity of justice for both the accused and the victims? As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the eyes of the nation remain fixed on the Indiana Supreme Court, awaiting a decision that could redefine legal precedents in the state and beyond. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com