Podcast appearances and mentions of libby german

Welcome back to True Crime Tuesdays on Fearsome Fiction. Today we're going deep into one of the most haunting and complicated criminal cases in recent American history—the Delphi murders. It started on a cold February afternoon in 2017 in the small town of Delphi, Indiana. Two best friends, thirteen-year-old Abby Williams and fourteen-year-old Libby German, went for a walk on a popular hiking trail near an old railroad trestle. They never came home. What followed was five years of anguish, dead ends, a viral piece of evidence the whole country watched, and then—finally—an arrest. But the story doesn't end there. Not by a long shot. This one has everything: a small-town mystery, a killer hiding in plain sight, jailhouse confessions, Norse paganism, and an appeal that's heading into court next year. Let's get into it.

Den 13 februari 2017 skakas den lilla staden Delphi i Indiana om av ett dubbelmord. Offren är 14-åriga Libby German och 13-åriga Abby Williams. Två dagar efter mordet går polisen ut med att de har hittat en film i Libbys telefon. En film som fångar mördaren.Manus av Sofie Karlsson. Klippning av Josefine Molén.Reklam. Om du gillar Mördarpodden kan du vara med och sponsra den på Patreon. https://www.patreon.com/user?u=10466265 Som tack får du tillgång till förhandlyssning och alla avsnitt från Richard Chase del 1 och framåt utan reklam. För dig som sponsrar Mördarpodden via Patreon finns samtliga delar i vår serie om Delphi Murders tillgängliga redan nu helt reklamfritt!Vill du som inte redan sponsrar oss via Patreon ta del av serien om Delphi Murders helt reklamfritt så var med och sponsra podden på Patreon med ett valfritt belopp: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=10466265Delphimorden Delphi-morden Delphi mordenVill du höra ett specifikt fall i podden? Önska dina fall i det här formuläret: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfDlQxf9SgZyeGS-qFPaB4BP-L59lQhs7BbZACfwk7xSs-AFw/viewform?fbclid=IwAR0astYAY_SJLcst89FwKaPIeHHV9zlfAxEz6Cmrh37bbMwvMHGc8z5cwg4Det här är en podcast av Dan Hörning och Josefine Molén.Instagram: @mordarpoddenE-post: zimwaypodcast@gmail.comFölj Josefine Molén här:https://www.instagram.com/j.molenFölj Dan Hörning här:X: @danhorningInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/dan_horning/?hl=enYoutube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV2Qb7SmL9mejE5RCv1chwgErik SegerstedtSpotify:https://open.spotify.com/artist/63q3l3pKBpvqEjUM5Vf1TG?si=fYtdOwIvTn6noQJW6ffPwwInstagram: https://instagram.com/e Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

A conservation officer interviewed Richard Allen two days after Abby Williams and Libby German were found murdered. Allen said he'd been on the trail. He gave his name. He answered every question. And then his report was misfiled under the wrong name and sat in a box for five and a half years. That one clerical failure cost the investigation half a decade — time that was spent, according to the defense's appellate filings, losing interviews with suspects who admitted to pagan rituals and owned .40 caliber firearms, declining invitations to review surveillance footage, and marking tips as "cleared" without follow-through. The crime scene itself should have driven the investigation in a different direction. Officers on the ground believed it was too complex for a single perpetrator. The FBI's BAU found elements that couldn't exclude a ritualistic motive. And the only eyewitness who saw Bridge Guy up close described someone who looked nothing like Richard Allen — a young man in his twenties with poofy brown hair. She rated her sketch a perfect 10 for accuracy. The jury that convicted Allen never saw that sketch. They were asked to "fast forward" five years and convict on what remained after the court stripped away every piece of evidence that told a different story. This is the opening chapter of a five-part investigation into the decisions, failures, and institutional breakdowns that produced a conviction built, in my opinion, on a foundation that cannot hold.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#Delphi #RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #AbbyAndLibby #BridgeGuy #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #WrongfulConviction #DelphiCase #JusticeForAbbyAndLibby

The Court of Appeals of Indiana has scheduled oral arguments in the case of Richard Allen, who was convicted of murdering Liberty German and Abigail Williams.Listen to our past discussion of oral arguments with attorney George W. Hicks: https://art19.com/shows/murder-sheet/episodes/45360e81-5ebc-439a-bf17-789b8c5b4879Listen to our past discussion of the oral arguments in this case: https://art19.com/shows/murder-sheet/episodes/d787e682-57e2-4c7c-87da-b1ebcfafc8baCheck out our upcoming book events and get links to buy tickets here: https://murdersheetpodcast.com/eventsPre-order our book on Delphi here: https://bookshop.org/p/books/shadow-of-the-bridge-the-delphi-murders-and-the-dark-side-of-the-american-heartland-aine-cain/21866881?ean=9781639369232Or here: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Shadow-of-the-Bridge/Aine-Cain/9781639369232Or here: https://www.amazon.com/Shadow-Bridge-Murders-American-Heartland/dp/1639369236Join our Patreon here! https://www.patreon.com/c/murdersheetSupport The Murder Sheet by buying a t-shirt here: https://www.murdersheetshop.com/Check out more inclusive sizing and t-shirt and merchandising options here: https://themurdersheet.dashery.com/Send tips to murdersheet@gmail.com.The Murder Sheet is a production of Mystery Sheet LLC.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In a recorded jailhouse call, Richard Allen asked his own father how much longer he could stay lucid. That call was excluded from trial. The jury that convicted him on a 130-year sentence never heard it. But three judges at the Indiana Court of Appeals are now reading the full record — including the calls the jury didn't get and the confessions that don't match the forensic evidence.Allen told a prison psychiatrist he shot Abby Williams and Libby German. The medical examiner determined they were killed with a blade. The State played one jailhouse call for the jury and excluded two others. The voluntariness of Allen's statements is now a question three judges have to answer, and the excluded calls speak directly to his mental state when those statements were made.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski to walk through what the selective admission of Allen's calls means at the appellate level. He also addresses the alternative suspect whose interview was allegedly recorded over by investigators — weapon never collected, phone never searched — and the van timeline the defense says FBI cell data and surveillance footage contradict.Indiana's response brief met most of these challenges with procedural objections rather than factual engagement. Filed wrong. Argued too late. Harmless error. The defense has formally requested oral arguments. Indiana has not. Meanwhile, the search warrant that produced the .40-caliber pistol faces de novo review — no deference owed to the trial judge. If it fails, the weapon is gone from any future proceeding.Allen sits in an Oklahoma prison more than a thousand miles from Indiana. Three judges are reading. A decision is coming.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JailhouseCalls #HarmlessError

In this week’s episode of Zone 7, Sheryl McCollum is joined by former judge, legal analyst, and former Court TV anchor Ashley Willcott to discuss her decades-long career advocating for children in the legal system, her transition from the bench to television, and her new microformat focusing on fast, fact-based case analysis. Sheryl and Ashley also reflect on cases they have carried with them over the years including Abby and Libby in Delphi and Melissa Wolfenbarger in Atlanta. They emphasize the importance of showing up, returning to the facts, and continuing the work on behalf of victims and families. The episode closes with a tribute to the late Captain Dr. Duanne Thompson, honoring his legacy of quiet loyalty, humility, and lifelong commitment to service. Highlights: (0:00) Sheryl McCollum welcomes Ashley Willcott to Zone 7 (1:45) Court TV’s transition, Law & Crime, and the importance of cameras in the courtroom (3:30) The emotional toll of child cases on professionals (4:30) Ashley explains why child welfare became the focus of her legal career (7:15) Sheryl reflects on Ashley’s hands-on work with the Cold Case Investigative Research Institute (9:15) Why showing up, knowing your strengths, and doing the legwork can change case outcomes (11:15) Facts vs. opinions: Ashley explains how judges must separate evidence from assumptions (13:45) Ashley’s new 60-second legal updates and the need for fast, fact-based case analysis (19:30) From the bench to television Ashley’s path through child advocacy, Law & Crime, and Court TV (23:00) “Surround yourself with good”: Ashley and Sheryl discuss learning from people who make you better (25:15) The Delphi case, Abby and Libby, and why going to the scene can change how a case is understood (27:45) Melissa Wolfenbarger, returning to square one, and the importance of boots-on-the-ground cold case work (29:15) Remembering Dr. Henry Lee and the unexpected lesson that took over a crime convention classroom (31:00) Sheryl and Ashley honor Captain Dr. Duanne Thompson and his lifelong commitment to service (35:30) Sheryl shares the story of Duanne sitting in her mother-in-law’s driveway night after night (38:00) Final reflections and Sheryl’s closing quote from Captain Dr. Duanne Thompson: “You know where to find me.” Enjoying Zone 7? Leave a rating and review where you listen to podcasts. Your feedback helps others find the show and supports the mission to educate, engage, and inspire. Ashley Willcott is a former judge, trial attorney, mediator, and Certified Child Welfare Law Specialist with more than 20 years of experience advocating for children in the legal system. She previously served as the Governor-appointed Child Advocate for the state of Georgia before transitioning to television, becoming a trusted legal analyst and anchor known for her work with Court TV and Law & Crime. She also serves as an expert with the Cold Case Investigative Research Institute. Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an active crime scene investigator for a metro Atlanta police department and the director of the Cold Case Investigative Research Institute, which partners with colleges and universities nationwide. With more than four decades of experience, she has worked on thousands of cold cases using her investigative system, The Last 24/361, which integrates evidence, media, and advanced forensic testing. Her work on high-profile cases, including The Boston Strangler, Natalie Holloway, Tupac Shakur and the Moore’s Ford Bridge lynching, led to her Emmy Award for CSI: Atlanta and induction into the National Law Enforcement Hall of Fame in 2023. Social Links: Email: coldcase2004@gmail.com X: @ColdCaseTips Facebook: @sheryl.mccollum Instagram: @officialzone7podcast TikTok: @Sheryl.McCollum Sheryl’s new book, Swans Don’t Swim in a Sewer: Solving the Cold Case of the Flint River Killer’s Daughter, is available now wherever books are sold.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

According to Richard Allen's reply brief, Indiana investigators interviewed an alternative suspect in the Delphi murders, then allegedly recorded over the tape of that interview. His weapon was never collected. His phone was never searched. And at trial, the judge ruled that presenting him as an alternative suspect was speculative.The defense's response to that ruling is a question. How is anything speculative if nobody bothered to investigate it?That is one of three factual problems sitting inside the appellate record that Indiana's response brief refuses to engage with directly. The other two are a van timeline contradicted by FBI cell data and surveillance footage, and a confession in which Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot Abby Williams and Libby German — when the medical examiner concluded the girls were killed with a blade.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski for Part One of a three-part panel on the procedural-versus-factual collision driving the Delphi appeal. They walk through why Indiana built its appellate strategy around harmless error and procedural waiver instead of disputing the underlying record. They explain why the recorded-over interview is more dangerous in an appeal than it was at trial. They get into the selective admission of Allen's jailhouse calls — one heard by the jury, two excluded, including the call in which Allen asks his own father how much longer he can stay lucid.Three judges are reading the full record now. The State spent the appellate brief telling them not to look too closely. Whether three judges with the power to ask any question take that suggestion is the entire ballgame.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AlternativeSuspect #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #TrueCrimeToday #BridgeGuy #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #TrueCrime

The Richard Allen appeal has moved into its final procedural stretch. The defense filed its reply brief at the end of April. The motion for oral arguments was filed alongside it. The case is now fully briefed. Three judges at the Indiana Court of Appeals are reading the record. A decision is coming.This is what is actually on the table.The defense's reply brief identifies a van timeline contradicted by FBI cell data and surveillance footage. It identifies a confession in which Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot Abby Williams and Libby German — when the medical examiner concluded the girls were killed with a blade. It identifies an alternative suspect whose interview was allegedly recorded over by Indiana investigators, whose weapon was never collected, whose phone was never searched. Indiana's response brief leans on waiver, harmless error, and procedural default rather than rebutting any of it.The reply brief also walks through the 13 months Allen spent in solitary confinement at Westville — under an Indiana Department of Correction policy that caps such confinement at 30 days for inmates with serious mental illness. He lost 45 pounds. He stopped knowing whether he was alive. He asked his father how much longer he was going to be lucid. Then he confessed. The State's theory now is religious conversion.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski for a three-part panel on all of it — the procedural-versus-factual collision, the solitary confinement collision, and the strategic oral-arguments collision now sitting in front of three judges with the power to ask any question.Three judges. No more paper. Everything new in the Delphi appeal, in one place.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #TrueCrimeToday #BridgeGuy #SolitaryConfinement #TrueCrime

Indiana's response brief in the Richard Allen appeal does not read like the work of a State that's confident in its conviction. It reads like the work of a State that's worried about its record.The defense brought specifics. A van timeline contradicted by FBI cell data and surveillance footage. A confession from Richard Allen claiming he shot Abby Williams and Libby German, when the medical examiner concluded the girls were killed with a blade. An alternative suspect whose interview was allegedly recorded over by Indiana investigators, whose firearm was never collected, whose phone was never searched.The State did not rebut those points on their merits. The State argued procedure. Harmless error. Waiver. Default. The defense filed the paperwork wrong. The defense argued the wrong way. The defense forfeited the issue.That isn't a defense of the trial. That's an attempt to keep an appellate panel from ever reaching the trial.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski for Part One of a three-part panel on the procedural-versus-factual collision at the center of this appeal. They unpack why a State holding a conviction would build its strategy around stopping the panel at the courthouse door instead of inviting them in. They examine what the recorded-over interview means now that three judges are reading the same record the jury never saw. They get into the cause-of-death mismatch and why a confession to the wrong method of murder is harder to brush off in an appellate brief than it ever was in a closing argument.Three judges. No more paper. The State's procedural firewall is the only thing standing between the panel and the underlying record.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #IndianaAttorneyGeneral #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #HarmlessError #BridgeGuy #TrueCrime

Richard Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot Abby Williams and Libby German. The medical examiner concluded the girls were killed with a blade. That is not a minor inconsistency. That is a confession that does not describe the murders.It is also one of the factual problems Indiana's response brief never directly answers in the Delphi appeal. The State leans on harmless error. The State leans on procedural waiver. The State leans on the trial court's discretion. What the State does not do, across nearly a hundred pages, is explain how a man who confessed to the wrong method of killing can be the killer.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski for Part One of a three-part panel on where the Richard Allen appeal actually stands. They sit with that cause-of-death mismatch and what an appellate panel actually does with it. They walk through the van timeline contradicted by FBI cell data and surveillance footage. They get into the alternative suspect whose interview was allegedly recorded over by investigators, whose weapon was never collected, whose phone was never searched.And they take apart the selective admission of Allen's jailhouse calls. The jury heard one. Within five hours that same day Allen made two more. The defense was barred from playing either. In one of them, Allen asks his own father how much longer he's going to be lucid. The jury was not allowed to hear the man's mind coming apart in the hours surrounding the only call they did hear.Three judges in Indianapolis are now reading the full record. The State is hoping they don't read it too carefully.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #BridgeGuy #VanTimeline #WrongfulConviction #TrueCrime

The Delphi appeal is fully briefed. The defense's reply brief landed in late April. Three judges at the Indiana Court of Appeals are now reading the full written record, and what Richard Allen's appellate team has put in front of them is a record Indiana clearly does not want them to read carefully.The defense laid out the van timeline contradicted by FBI cell data and surveillance footage. They laid out a confession in which Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot Abby Williams and Libby German, when the medical examiner concluded the girls were killed with a blade. They laid out an alternative suspect whose interview was allegedly recorded over by investigators, whose weapon was never collected, whose phone was never searched.The State's response to almost all of it was procedural. Harmless. Waived. Defaulted. The State spent the appellate brief telling three judges the underlying facts do not need to be reached, because the defense filed in the wrong way at the wrong time.That is not the brief of a State confident in its trial record. That is the brief of a State trying to keep three judges from ever opening that record.Defense attorney Bob Motta sits down with Tony Brueski for Part One of a three-part panel on the procedural-versus-factual collision now sitting at the center of the Delphi appeal. They walk through Indiana's strategy, what the recorded-over interview means in front of an appellate panel, why the cause-of-death mismatch survives every procedural argument the State has filed, and what happens when three judges decide to ignore the State's invitation and look anyway.Three judges. No more paper. A decision waiting to happen.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #BridgeGuy #WrongfulConviction #TrueCrime

The investigative record in the Delphi case contains gaps that Richard Allen's defense team argues are not accidental. According to the reply brief filed with the Indiana Court of Appeals, investigators allegedly recorded over an interview with an alternative suspect. That individual's weapon was never collected. His phone was never searched. And the trial court ruled that presenting him as an alternative suspect was “speculative” — a characterization Allen's attorneys challenge by asking how something can be speculative when it was never actually investigated.The brief identifies three categories of constitutional error. First, the search warrant: Allen's attorneys allege law enforcement omitted and altered witness descriptions in the probable cause affidavit to make Allen match the “Bridge Guy” profile captured on Libby German's phone. Second, the confessions: Allen made statements during what his attorneys describe as solitary confinement that produced psychosis and grave disability. The jury was shown video of Allen in confinement but the audio was muted — they could not hear what the defense describes as confused, disjointed screaming while a prosecution psychologist testified the confessions were logical and organized. Third, the excluded evidence: Kegan Kline's catfish account, reportedly the last to contact Libby before she was killed, was ruled a separate investigation.The defense has requested oral arguments before the three-judge appellate panel. The State's position characterizes each alleged error as “harmless.” Allen's attorneys counter that the cumulative effect denied him his Sixth Amendment right to present a complete defense.Robin Dreeke and I address your questions on the investigative gaps, the evidentiary exclusions, and what oral arguments could mean for this conviction.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #Appeal #ConstitutionalRights #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #AbbyAndLibby #IndianaCourt #ListenerQA #ExcludedEvidence

Retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski to analyze the defense's reply brief and motion for oral arguments in the Richard Allen appeal.Allen was convicted in 2024 of murdering thirteen-year-old Abby Williams and fourteen-year-old Libby German and is serving a hundred and thirty years. His appellate attorneys, Stacy Uliana and Mark Leeman, argue the trial court systematically prevented Allen from mounting a complete defense. They've now asked to make that argument in person before a three-judge panel.The motion for oral arguments is significant. Indiana's judicial branch notes that such requests are “frequently granted” but oral arguments remain “relatively rare.” The defense clearly believes this case benefits from being heard rather than read.Dreeke examines the behavioral dimensions of the appeal's central arguments. Allen's confessions came during conditions his attorneys describe as unprecedented. He confessed to shooting the girls — who were never shot. He told his wife he didn't know if his confession was real or a dream. The jury was allowed to see video of Allen in solitary but forced to watch it muted, so they couldn't hear what his attorneys describe as confused screaming while a prosecution psychologist characterized the confessions as organized.Your questions drive this conversation into the territory the trial court allegedly closed off: Brad Holder, whose interview was reportedly recorded over. Kegan Kline, whose catfish account was the last to contact Libby. The composite sketch the jury never saw. And whether the appellate court will give Allen the hearing his defense says the trial court denied him.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DelphiMurders #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillersLive #RichardAllen #Appeal #BehavioralAnalysis #OralArguments #FBI #ListenerQA #TrueCrime

Abby Williams was thirteen. Libby German was fourteen. They were best friends who went to a bridge on a February afternoon in 2017 and never came home. Their families have been living inside this nightmare for over nine years.Richard Allen was convicted. He's serving a hundred and thirty years. And his defense team just told the Indiana Court of Appeals that the jury only heard half the story.Your questions about this case are the kind that keep people awake. You're asking what it means that Allen confessed to shooting girls who were never shot. You're asking why the jury heard a psychologist call his confessions logical but never heard the audio of what his attorneys describe as confused screaming in solitary. You're asking why investigators allegedly recorded over an interview with a potential suspect and never took his weapon.You're asking about Kegan Kline — whose catfish account was reportedly the last to contact Libby — and why that was ruled a separate investigation. You're asking about a composite sketch that was shown to the public for years but never shown to the jury. And you're asking the question that nine years of waiting has earned these families the right to have answered: did the investigation follow every lead, or did it stop when it found Richard Allen?Robin Dreeke and I sit with these questions. Not because the answers are comfortable, but because Abby and Libby's families have waited long enough for someone to ask them out loud.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AbbyAndLibby #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #JusticeForAbbyAndLibby #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ListenerQA #DelphiIndiana #Appeal #NeverForget

The Indiana Attorney General filed its response to Richard Allen's appeal on March 25, 2026 — a ninety-four-page brief arguing that Allen's conviction for the murders of Abby Williams and Libby German should stand. Allen was convicted in November 2024 and sentenced to 130 years. His appellate attorneys raised three constitutional issues: an unconstitutional search warrant built on alleged omissions and altered witness statements, confessions they contend were extracted under coercive conditions during more than thirteen months of pretrial solitary confinement, and the systematic exclusion of defense evidence at trial.The AG's brief responds with a consistent framework. On the search warrant, the State argues that the probable cause affidavit establishes sufficient basis for the search even if challenged statements are excluded. On the confessions, the State argues that conditions of confinement did not constitute coercion and that Allen confessed both before and after his documented period of psychosis — offering a religious conversion as an alternative explanation. On excluded evidence, the State characterizes the alternative suspect theories as speculative and argues that the trial court properly exercised discretion in keeping them from the jury.Defense attorney Bob Motta identifies what the AG's brief does not address. Allen's confession to his prison psychiatrist described killing the victims by shooting. The victims were not shot — they were killed with a blade. The AG's response does not reconcile this discrepancy. Additionally, the defense obtained surveillance footage and FBI cell phone data suggesting the van placed by prosecutors near the Monon High Bridge arrived after Libby German's phone had stopped moving. The AG's response addresses this not on the merits of the data but on procedural grounds — arguing the defense did not properly preserve the issue.The evidentiary record underlying the conviction contains no DNA linking Allen to the crime scene, no recovered murder weapon, and no direct eyewitness identification placing him with the victims. The confessions constitute the primary evidence. The defense argues those confessions were the product of unconstitutional detention and contain factual errors that undermine their reliability.Allen's appellate attorneys have filed their reply brief and requested oral arguments before the Court of Appeals. No timeline for a decision has been established. The case is before a three-judge panel.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #TrueCrimeToday #AbbyAndLibby #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #HarmlessError #BobMotta

The AG's ninety-four-page response to Richard Allen's appeal is built on one word used over and over — harmless. Every excluded witness. Every blocked piece of evidence. Every ruling that went against the defense at trial. Harmless error. But there are two factual problems that word cannot fix — and defense attorney Bob Motta starts there.Problem one: the van timeline. The defense obtained surveillance footage and FBI cell phone data suggesting the van prosecutors placed near the Monon High Bridge arrived after Libby German's phone had already stopped moving. The State's response to this is not that the data is wrong — it is that the defense did not file its paperwork correctly. That is a procedural argument, not a factual one. The data either contradicts the State's timeline or it does not.Problem two: the wrong cause of death. Richard Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot Abby Williams and Libby German. They were not shot. They were killed with a blade. In ninety-four pages, the Indiana Attorney General does not explain why a man confessing to the murders he allegedly committed described a method of killing that did not happen. The confessions were the State's case. No DNA linked Allen to the crime scene. No murder weapon was recovered. No direct eyewitness placed him with the victims. If the confessions are unreliable, there is nothing underneath them.Motta breaks down the full AG response across a three-part panel — the procedural waiver strategy designed to prevent the appeals court from reaching the substance, the State's argument that more than thirteen months in solitary confinement as a pretrial detainee does not constitute coercion, and the religious conversion theory offered to explain why Allen confessed. He examines the evidence the jury never heard — the Bridge Guy sketch, the firearms expert who would have challenged the bullet-matching evidence, the phone calls where Allen questioned his own sanity before and after confessing, and the alternative suspects with documented connections to the case whose interviews were destroyed.Allen's attorneys have filed their reply brief and a motion requesting oral arguments before the appeals court. Three judges are reading documents. Allen is serving 130 years. The families of Abby and Libby were told a verdict meant closure. This appeal is testing whether that verdict was built on evidence or on what the jury was not allowed to see.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BobMotta #FalseConfession #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams

The Indiana Attorney General's response to Richard Allen's appeal uses harmless error the way a contractor uses spackle — applied to every crack in the wall and meant to convince you the structure is sound. Defense attorney Bob Motta reads the ninety-four-page brief as a document designed not to defend the evidence, but to prevent the appeals court from ever reaching it.The procedural strategy is waiver — arguing that the defense failed to properly preserve its objections at trial, which would shut down most of the appeal before substance is addressed. Where the AG does engage on substance, the framework is consistent: even if the trial court was wrong, it did not matter. The eyewitness sketch excluded from the jury — harmless. The firearms expert who would have challenged whether a bullet could be linked to Allen's weapon — harmless. The phone calls where Allen questioned his own sanity minutes before and after confessing — harmless. The confessions themselves — in which Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot the girls, when they were killed with a blade — apparently reliable enough to sustain a 130-year sentence.Motta examines what the AG does not address. The van timeline — surveillance footage and FBI cell phone data obtained by the defense suggesting the van arrived after Libby German's phone stopped moving. The State's response is not that the data is inaccurate. It is that the paperwork was not filed correctly. Motta explains what that distinction means for the appeals court and why a procedural dodge on a factual question is itself a signal.There is no DNA linking Allen to the crime scene. No murder weapon was recovered. No direct eyewitness identification placed him with the victims. The confessions were the case. And the confessions contain a cause of death that did not happen.Motta walks through what comes next — the defense reply brief, the motion for oral arguments, what a partial reversal would mean, and what this process means for the families of Abby Williams and Libby German who were told a verdict meant resolution. He gives an honest answer about the reversal rate and what it actually measures — because the families watching this deserve honesty, not false reassurance in either direction.Allen is serving 130 years. Three judges will decide what happens next.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #HarmlessError #FalseConfession #MononHighBridge

He confessed to killing them. He told his prison psychiatrist he shot Abby Williams and Libby German. They were not shot. They were killed with a blade. And in ninety-four pages, the Indiana Attorney General's response to Richard Allen's appeal does not explain why a man supposedly confessing to the murders he committed described a method of killing that did not happen.That is not a minor inconsistency. That is the foundation of a 130-year sentence — because without the confessions, there is no case. No DNA links Allen to the crime scene. No murder weapon was recovered. No direct eyewitness placed him with the victims. The confessions were everything. And the confessions contain a cause of death that is factually wrong.The AG's response follows the same pattern on every issue the defense raised. The search warrant built on alleged omissions — the State says it still establishes probable cause. The confessions extracted after more than thirteen months of pretrial solitary confinement — the State says the conditions were not coercive and offers a religious conversion as the explanation. The evidence excluded at trial — the eyewitness sketch the jury never saw, the firearms expert who would have challenged the bullet evidence, the phone calls where Allen questioned his own sanity before and after confessing, the alternative suspects with documented ties to the case — the State calls all of it speculative, hearsay, or improperly preserved.Harmless error. Over and over. On everything.Defense attorney Bob Motta breaks down the full response across a three-part panel — the procedural strategy designed to prevent the appeals court from reaching the substance, the two factual problems the State cannot answer, and what comes next. The defense has filed its reply brief and requested oral arguments. Three judges will decide whether the conviction stands.The families of Abby and Libby were told a verdict meant it was over. If the State's evidence is as overwhelming as the AG claims, the question that will not go away is the one Bob keeps asking — why did they need to keep so much of it from the jury to get there?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #AbbyAndLibby #DelphiAppeal #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForAbbyAndLibby #MononHighBridge

The Nancy Guthrie case forced a question that should terrify anyone paying attention: what happens when an investigation is run by the wrong people from the start — and instead of finding the truth, the system builds a case around the most convenient answer?In Tucson, the Guthrie investigation has raised questions about whether underqualified personnel handled the most critical early hours. In Delphi, Indiana, that same kind of failure played out across five years — and may have ended with the wrong man in prison.On February 13, 2017, teenagers Abby Williams and Libby German were murdered near the Monon High Bridge Trail. Libby had the presence of mind to record her killer approaching on her phone. Within three days, a man named Richard Allen walked into a local office and voluntarily placed himself on that trail, at the right time, in the right clothing. That tip was misfiled. It sat in a box for five years while Allen lived in Delphi and worked at the local CVS. The Carroll County Sheriff's Department — a tiny agency that had never handled a double homicide — was overwhelmed from day one.When Allen was finally arrested, he was held in solitary confinement for thirteen months. Mental health evaluators found him gravely disabled. He began confessing — but according to the defense's appeal brief, he told his psychiatrist he shot the girls. They were killed with a blade. No DNA linked him to the scene. No murder weapon was recovered. The judge excluded an alternative suspect theory, a composite sketch that doesn't resemble Allen, and expert testimony challenging the bullet evidence. The jury convicted in under four hours.Just as the Guthrie case raises questions about whether loyalty appointments shaped who was in the room, Delphi forces the question of what happens when the wrong people build momentum in the wrong direction — and the system can't course-correct. Allen's appeal is before the Indiana Court of Appeals. The investigative failures are not in dispute.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #NancyGuthrie #BeyondNancy #AbbyAndLibby #WrongfulConviction #FalseConfession #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski

The Nancy Guthrie case forced a question that should terrify anyone paying attention: what happens when an investigation is run by the wrong people from the start — and instead of finding the truth, the system builds a case around the most convenient answer?In Tucson, the Guthrie investigation has raised questions about whether underqualified personnel handled the most critical early hours. In Delphi, Indiana, that same kind of failure played out across five years — and may have ended with the wrong man in prison.On February 13, 2017, teenagers Abby Williams and Libby German were murdered near the Monon High Bridge Trail. Libby had the presence of mind to record her killer approaching on her phone. Within three days, a man named Richard Allen walked into a local office and voluntarily placed himself on that trail, at the right time, in the right clothing. That tip was misfiled. It sat in a box for five years while Allen lived in Delphi and worked at the local CVS. The Carroll County Sheriff's Department — a tiny agency that had never handled a double homicide — was overwhelmed from day one.When Allen was finally arrested, he was held in solitary confinement for thirteen months. Mental health evaluators found him gravely disabled. He began confessing — but according to the defense's appeal brief, he told his psychiatrist he shot the girls. They were killed with a blade. No DNA linked him to the scene. No murder weapon was recovered. The judge excluded an alternative suspect theory, a composite sketch that doesn't resemble Allen, and expert testimony challenging the bullet evidence. The jury convicted in under four hours.Just as the Guthrie case raises questions about whether loyalty appointments shaped who was in the room, Delphi forces the question of what happens when the wrong people build momentum in the wrong direction — and the system can't course-correct. Allen's appeal is before the Indiana Court of Appeals. The investigative failures are not in dispute.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #NancyGuthrie #BeyondNancy #AbbyAndLibby #WrongfulConviction #FalseConfession #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski

The Indiana Attorney General's response to Richard Allen's appeal relies on a single legal framework to address every contested ruling: harmless error. Each evidentiary exclusion, each procedural decision, each limitation placed on the defense — all characterized as errors, if they were errors at all, that could not have changed the outcome because the remaining evidence was overwhelming. Whether the Court of Appeals accepts that framing will determine whether Allen's 130-year sentence stands.This week's look back at the most consequential legal developments in true crime examines the AG's 94-page brief filed March 26 and the specific arguments it makes — and avoids. On the search warrant, the State argues the probable cause affidavit contained no false statements and that any omissions would not have altered the finding of probable cause. On the confessions, the State argues Allen's statements were voluntary, that conditions of his confinement — 13 months in solitary as a pretrial detainee — did not constitute the level of coercion required to suppress, and that Allen confessed both before and after his documented period of psychosis. On excluded evidence, the State argues the Odinist alternative theory was "speculative" and "a motive in search of a suspect," that the composite sketch and bullet comparison expert were properly excluded, and that the trial court acted within its discretion.The brief does not address the factual content of the confessions. According to the defense's appeal brief, Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot the victims. Abby Williams and Libby German were killed with a blade. The State characterizes the confessions as credible without reconciling this discrepancy. The brief also does not substantively engage with the van timeline — surveillance footage and FBI cell phone data that, according to the defense, show the corroborating vehicle arriving after the victim's phone had stopped transmitting. The State's position on this issue is procedural: the defense failed to properly preserve the argument.Defense attorney Bob Motta examines whether the harmless error standard can bear the weight the State is placing on it when the underlying case rested on confessions with no corroborating DNA, no recovered murder weapon, and no direct eyewitness identification — and when those confessions allegedly contained a fundamental factual error about cause of death.The defense reply brief is due within approximately 15 days. Either party may request oral arguments. Richard Allen is in a prison in Oklahoma. Three appellate judges are reading documents.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #TrueCrimeToday #AbbyAndLibby #HarmlessError #AppellateLaw #LibbyGerman #CriminalJustice #MononHighBridge

The State of Indiana has a phrase for everything that went wrong at Richard Allen's trial: harmless error. The composite sketch the jury never saw — harmless. The bullet comparison that initially came back without a match — harmless. The prison videos played without audio — harmless. The van timeline that doesn't align with the confession — harmless. In 94 pages, the Attorney General's office argues that even if individual rulings were wrong, the overall evidence was so overwhelming that none of it mattered.This week we look back at the most significant legal developments in the Delphi case. The AG filed a formal response to Allen's appeal on March 26, calling his conviction "conclusive and irrefutable" and urging the Court of Appeals to affirm the 130-year sentence. The brief argues the confessions were voluntary, the search of Allen's home was lawful, and the exclusion of alternative suspect theories was proper — calling the Odinist motive theory "speculative" and "a sideshow."What the brief does not address is the factual content of the confessions themselves. According to the defense's appeal brief, Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot the girls. Abby Williams and Libby German were killed with a blade. The State calls the confessions credible and never explains how a man confessing from memory described the wrong cause of death. There was no DNA linking Allen to the scene. No murder weapon was recovered. No direct eyewitness identified him. The confessions were the case — and they contained a fundamental error the State chose not to confront in writing.The defense's appeal also raises the Betsy Blair sketch — a composite based on a witness who reportedly rated her identification a perfect ten, depicting a man in his twenties with curly hair that does not resemble Allen. The jury never saw it. And surveillance footage and FBI cell phone data, according to the defense, suggest the van that corroborates Allen's confession arrived after Libby's phone had already stopped moving. The State's response to that: the paperwork wasn't filed correctly.Defense attorney Bob Motta examines what the harmless error doctrine is designed to do — and whether it's being used here to avoid questions the evidence can't answer.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #HarmlessError #MononHighBridge

Ninety-four pages. Every defense argument countered. Every contested ruling defended. And one glaring omission that defense attorney Bob Motta identifies as the central weakness in the State's position: the man whose confessions built this case told his prison psychiatrist he shot the girls. They were not shot.This week's review of the most critical stories features Motta's full three-part analysis of the Indiana Attorney General's response to Richard Allen's appeal. The AG filed its brief on March 26, calling Allen's conviction "conclusive and irrefutable" and urging the Court of Appeals to affirm the 130-year sentence. The brief addresses three categories of defense arguments: the constitutionality of the home search, the voluntariness of the confessions, and the trial court's evidentiary rulings — including the exclusion of alternative suspect theories, a composite sketch witness, and expert testimony challenging the bullet comparison.Motta breaks down the State's strategy across three sessions. First, the procedural architecture — the waiver arguments designed to eliminate most of the appeal before substance is reached, the assertion that 13 months of solitary confinement as a pretrial detainee doesn't meet the coercion threshold, and the religious conversion explanation offered for why Allen confessed. Second, the two factual problems the brief doesn't solve — the wrong cause of death in the confessions and the van timeline, where surveillance footage and FBI cell phone data obtained by the defense allegedly show the vehicle arriving after Libby German's phone had stopped moving. The State's response to the van issue: the defense didn't file the paperwork correctly. Third, what comes next — the defense reply brief, the potential for oral arguments, what a partial reversal looks like for a man serving 130 years, and what the five percent appellate reversal rate actually measures.No DNA. No murder weapon. No direct eyewitness identification. The confessions were the case. And the State's brief never explains the factual error at their center.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #BobMotta #HiddenKillersLive #AbbyAndLibby #TrueCrime #LibbyGerman #FalseConfession #WrongfulConviction

They used the word "irrefutable." The Indiana Attorney General filed 94 pages telling the appeals court that the case against Richard Allen is so strong, so complete, so beyond question that nothing the defense raises could change the outcome. We read every page. And we found what they left out.This week we look back at the most important development in the Delphi case since the verdict. The man who confessed to killing Abby Williams and Libby German told his prison psychiatrist he shot them. They were not shot. They were killed with a blade. That detail — documented in the defense's appeal brief — appears nowhere in the State's 94-page response. They call the confessions voluntary, credible, and the product of free will. They never explain how a man confessing from memory described the wrong method of death.The composite sketch witness Betsy Blair reportedly rated her identification a perfect ten. She described a man in his twenties with curly hair. It looks nothing like Richard Allen. The jury never saw it. The bullet comparison, according to trial testimony, initially came back without a match before a different methodology was applied. The prison videos documenting Allen's deterioration in solitary confinement were played for the jury on mute — they could see him but couldn't hear a word. And surveillance footage, according to the defense, shows the van that allegedly corroborates Allen's confession arriving significantly later than the State's witness said it did.The State's answer to all of it: harmless error.No DNA tied Allen to the scene. No murder weapon was recovered. No eyewitness directly identified him. The confessions were the entire case. And the State's response asks the court to accept them without addressing the factual error at their core.Defense attorney Bob Motta walks through every major argument in the brief, what it means for the appeal, and what comes next. The defense reply is due soon. Oral arguments may follow. Richard Allen is in a prison in Oklahoma. Three judges are reading. This is not over.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #AbbyAndLibby #DelphiAppeal #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #FalseConfession #WrongfulConviction

Richard Allen was convicted of murdering 13-year-old Abby Williams and 14-year-old Libby German near the Monon High Bridge trail in Delphi, Indiana. He's serving 130 years. His defense has appealed. The Indiana Attorney General has responded. Now three appellate judges have to decide.They won't decide whether he's guilty. That's not what the appeals court does. They'll decide whether the trial that convicted him was constitutionally fair — whether the process met the standard the law requires.In this session, defense attorney Bob Motta explains what that process actually looks like from the inside. What happens now. What the defense's reply brief needs to accomplish. What oral arguments allow that written documents can't. What a partial win looks like in practical terms — because reversal is rarely the single dramatic moment people imagine. What this means for the families of Abby and Libby, who were told a verdict meant it was over.And the question people ask most: less than five percent of convictions get reversed on direct appeal. Does Richard Allen actually have a shot? Bob Motta doesn't give you a talking point. He gives you an honest answer.Richard Allen is in a prison in Oklahoma waiting on three judges. The reply brief is coming. The questions from here are harder than anything that came before. This conversation is about what all of it means.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #TrueCrimeToday #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #WrongfulConviction #DelphiCase

Richard Allen was convicted of murdering 13-year-old Abby Williams and 14-year-old Libby German near the Monon High Bridge trail in Delphi, Indiana. He's serving 130 years. His defense has appealed, raising serious questions about the search warrant, his confessions, and evidence the jury never heard. The Indiana Attorney General just filed their formal response. And defense attorney Bob Motta went through all of it with us.This complete three-part panel is the most thorough picture of where the Richard Allen appeal stands.The State's response calls the evidence "conclusive and irrefutable" — but never addresses the documented fact from the defense's brief that Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot the girls. They were not shot.In the first session, Bob breaks down the State's strategy — procedural waiver, the coercion argument, the religious conversion claim, harmless error on every ruling that went against the defense.In the second session, he goes through the two factual problems at the core of the case. The van the prosecution called the detail only the killer would know — and the surveillance footage and FBI data suggesting it arrived after the timeline ended. And the wrong cause of death in the confession — met with complete silence in the State's 94 pages.In the third session, Bob faces forward. What the reply brief needs to accomplish. What oral arguments allow. What reversal looks like. What this means for the families. And an honest answer about the five percent reversal rate.Whether you've followed this from the beginning or are just catching up — this is where you start.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #TrueCrimeToday #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #WrongfulConviction #MononHighBridge #DelphiCase

Richard Allen was convicted of murdering 13-year-old Abby Williams and 14-year-old Libby German near the Monon High Bridge trail in Delphi, Indiana. He's serving 130 years. His defense has appealed that conviction — and the Indiana Attorney General just filed their formal response.Their position: everything was done right, the trial was fair, and Richard Allen should serve every day of that sentence.Here's the detail that frames this entire conversation. According to the defense's appeal brief, Allen told his prison psychiatrist that he shot the girls. Abby and Libby were not shot. That detail is documented in the record. The State's 94-page response never addresses it. Not once.In this session, defense attorney Bob Motta goes through what the State is actually arguing — and what they're carefully avoiding. Their strategy leads with procedural waiver, arguing that most of the appeal was forfeited at trial. When they do engage the substance, they describe Allen's cell conditions as something less than coercion and point to his religious conversion as an explanation for why he started confessing after 13 months in solitary confinement. And they attach "harmless error" to every ruling that went against Allen's defense.Whether you've been following this case for years or you're hearing about it for the first time, this conversation gives you the clearest picture yet of where the Delphi appeal stands — and what the State's own brief reveals about how confident Indiana actually is.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #TrueCrimeToday #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #WrongfulConviction #MononHighBridge #DelphiCase

In the Richard Allen murder trial, prosecutors told the jury that a detail in Allen's confession proved it was real — he mentioned seeing a van, and a real neighbor really did drive that road at the right time. They called it the detail only the killer would know. It was their most powerful argument.Richard Allen was convicted of murdering 13-year-old Abby Williams and 14-year-old Libby German near the Monon High Bridge trail in Delphi, Indiana. He is serving 130 years. His defense has appealed, and the Indiana Attorney General just filed their formal response.Here's what that response doesn't address. According to the defense's brief, surveillance footage and FBI cell phone analysis suggest the van arrived significantly later than the State's witness testified — after Libby's phone had already stopped registering movement. And according to the same brief, Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot the girls. They were not shot. The State's 94-page response is silent on that detail entirely.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins us to break down what both of those problems mean — the van timeline, the wrong cause of death, and what they tell us about the reliability of confessions made by a man who was found gravely disabled during 13 months of solitary confinement. He also takes us through Dr. Wala — the prison psychiatrist the State built their case around — who admitted she may have been wrong and who destroyed some of her own session notes.If you've been following this case or are just catching up — this is the conversation the State doesn't want had.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #TrueCrimeToday #FalseConfession #VanTimeline #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #WrongfulConviction

The Indiana Attorney General filed their formal answer to the Richard Allen appeal. Ninety-four pages. "Conclusive and irrefutable," they call it.We've read every word. And the thing that stands out most is what those 94 pages choose not to say.According to the defense's appeal brief, Richard Allen told his prison psychiatrist that he shot the girls. Abby Williams and Libby German were not shot. The State's response — all 94 pages of it — never touches that detail. They call the confessions voluntary. They call them credible. They call them the product of free will. And they never explain how a man confessing from memory got the manner of death wrong.In this session, we go inside the State's playbook with defense attorney Bob Motta. We look at how Indiana is using procedural waiver to shut down most of the appeal before it ever reaches substance. We look at their argument that 13 months in solitary confinement as a pretrial detainee simply doesn't constitute coercion. We look at the claim that finding religion in late March 2023 explains the confessions. And we look at harmless error — the phrase that appears attached to every single ruling that went against Allen's defense throughout the entire brief.We've been on this case from the beginning. This conversation is about what the State's response actually reveals — not just what it argues.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #HarmlessError #WrongfulConviction #HiddenKillers #MononHighBridge

The State filed. The defense replies. Three judges decide. And Richard Allen waits in a prison in Oklahoma while the system examines itself.In this session of our three-part panel, defense attorney Bob Motta turns to face forward — and the questions get harder.What does the defense's reply brief need to accomplish? The State left specific openings — places where procedure replaced substance, places where silence on documented facts speaks louder than the 94 pages around it. Bob tells you exactly where those openings are and why they matter to the court.What does a partial win look like? Not the single dramatic moment people imagine. The Court of Appeals can find error on one issue, send something back for specific proceedings, reverse on a narrow ground. Bob walks through what each of those outcomes means in real terms for a man serving 130 years.What does this do to the families of Abby Williams and Libby German, who were told a verdict meant it was over? There's no clean answer to that. Bob doesn't pretend there is.And what does the five percent reversal rate actually mean — and what does it leave out about the specific constitutional questions sitting in front of these three judges?We've covered this case from the beginning. This session is about where it goes from here — and whether the system that convicted Richard Allen is capable of examining what it built.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #WrongfulConviction #HiddenKillers #MononHighBridge

We've been on this case from the beginning. We read the defense's appeal brief. We read the State's 94-page response. And now we're going through all of it — three sessions, one complete picture — with defense attorney Bob Motta.Here's what frames everything. The State calls the evidence against Richard Allen "conclusive and irrefutable." In those 94 pages they never address the documented fact from the defense's appeal brief that Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot the girls. Abby Williams and Libby German were not shot.In the first session, Bob goes through the State's playbook — the procedural waiver strategy, the solitary confinement argument, the religious conversion claim, the harmless error refrain that covers every ruling that went against the defense.In the second session, he goes through the two factual problems at the core of this case. The van the prosecution called proof the confession was real — and the surveillance footage and FBI data suggesting it arrived after the timeline had already ended. And the confession that got the manner of death wrong — with the State's response being complete silence across 94 pages.In the third session, he faces forward. The reply brief. Oral arguments. What a partial win means in real terms. What this does to the families who were told a verdict was the end. And an honest answer about what the five percent reversal rate actually tells us.This is the complete conversation the State's brief was written to avoid.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #FalseConfession #WrongfulConviction #HiddenKillers #MononHighBridge

We've told you about the van. We've told you about the confession that got the cause of death wrong. Now defense attorney Bob Motta tells you exactly what both of those things mean — and why the State's response to the appeal doesn't fix either one.The prosecution's centerpiece argument was a detail they said only the killer would know — that Richard Allen saw a van drive past and it changed his plans. They traced that detail to a real neighbor with a real van. They told the jury it proved the confession was genuine.According to the defense's brief, surveillance footage and FBI cell phone analysis suggest that van arrived significantly later than the State's witness testified — after Libby German's phone had already stopped moving. The State's response is that the defense's paperwork wasn't filed correctly. Not that the data is wrong.And then there's the problem the State never answers anywhere in 94 pages. According to the defense's appeal brief, Allen told his psychiatrist he shot the girls. They were not shot.Bob Motta goes through both of those problems in this session — what they mean legally, what they mean for the appeal, and what they mean for a conviction built entirely on confessions from a man found gravely disabled during 13 months of solitary confinement, who got the manner of death wrong, whose key confessor admitted she may have been wrong and destroyed some of her session notes.This is the conversation the State's brief was written to avoid having.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #FalseConfession #VanTimeline #WrongfulConviction #HiddenKillers

We're going live — and this conversation is about what the Indiana Attorney General's response to the Richard Allen appeal says, what it doesn't say, and what the difference between those two things means.The State filed 94 pages calling the evidence against Richard Allen "conclusive and irrefutable." In those 94 pages, they never address one documented detail from the defense's appeal brief: that Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot the girls. Abby Williams and Libby German were not shot.Defense attorney Bob Motta is here to go through the State's strategy in real time. The procedural waiver argument designed to kill most of the appeal before it reaches substance. The claim that 13 months in solitary confinement as a pretrial detainee doesn't constitute coercion. The religious conversion explanation for why the confessions started. And harmless error — attached to every single ruling that hurt the defense.Bring your questions. We're taking them live. This is where the Delphi appeal stands right now and what it means going forward.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #HiddenKillersLive #HarmlessError #WrongfulConviction #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #DelphiCase

We're going live — and this session is about the two factual problems at the center of the Richard Allen case that Indiana's 94-page response brief simply does not solve.The first is the van. The prosecution called it the detail only the killer would know. According to the defense's brief, surveillance footage and FBI cell phone analysis show that van arriving significantly after Libby German's phone had already stopped moving. The State says the paperwork wasn't filed correctly. Not that the data is wrong.The second problem is the one the State never touches at all. According to the defense's appeal brief, Richard Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot the girls. They were not shot.Defense attorney Bob Motta is here to go through both of those problems live — what they mean legally, what they mean for the appeal, and what they tell us about a conviction built entirely on confessions from a man who was found gravely disabled during 13 months of solitary confinement and got the manner of death wrong.Bring your questions. We're taking them.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #HiddenKillersLive #FalseConfession #VanTimeline #WrongfulConviction #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams

We're going live for the final session of our three-part panel on the Richard Allen appeal — and this one looks forward.The State has filed. The defense reply brief is coming. Three appellate judges will decide whether the trial that convicted Richard Allen of murdering Abby Williams and Libby German was constitutionally sound. They won't be deciding guilt or innocence. They'll be deciding whether the process was fair.Defense attorney Bob Motta is here to walk through what that process actually looks like. What the defense's reply needs to accomplish. What oral arguments would allow that written briefs can't. What a partial win means for a man serving 130 years. What this does to the families who were told a verdict meant closure. And what the five percent reversal rate actually tells us about Richard Allen's real chances.The questions don't get easier from here. Bring yours. We're taking them live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #HiddenKillersLive #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #WrongfulConviction #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #DelphiCase

We're going live with the complete three-part panel on the Richard Allen appeal — and we're taking your questions throughout.Indiana filed 94 pages calling this conviction "conclusive and irrefutable." In those 94 pages they never explain why the man who confessed got the cause of death wrong. According to the defense's appeal brief, Allen told his psychiatrist he shot the girls. Abby Williams and Libby German were not shot.Defense attorney Bob Motta goes through all three sessions with us live. The State's strategy — waiver, coercion arguments, religious conversion, harmless error on every ruling that went against the defense. The two factual problems — the van timeline and the wrong cause of death. And what comes next — the reply brief, oral arguments, what reversal actually looks like, and what this means for the families of Abby Williams and Libby German.Three sessions. One complete picture. Bring your questions. We're taking them all night.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #HiddenKillersLive #FalseConfession #WrongfulConviction #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #DelphiCase

You've been inside these documents. You know the warrant. You know the confessions. You know what the jury never heard. Now the State has filed their formal answer to the appeal — and we're going through every argument they make, and every argument they avoid, in this complete three-part panel with defense attorney Bob Motta.The frame: 94 pages from the Indiana Attorney General calling this conviction "conclusive and irrefutable." Not one of those pages addresses the documented fact from the defense's brief that Allen told his psychiatrist he shot the girls. They were not shot.Session one covers the State's strategy — procedural waiver to front-load the shutdown before substance is ever reached, the coercion standard as applied to 13 months of solitary confinement, the religious conversion argument, and harmless error as a universal cover for every ruling that went against the defense.Session two covers the two factual problems. The van — surveillance footage and FBI cell phone data suggesting it arrived after Libby German's phone stopped registering movement, met in the State's brief by a procedural objection to the paperwork rather than a dispute of the data. And the wrong cause of death — documented, in the record, and answered by the State with complete silence across 94 pages.Session three covers what happens now — the reply brief, oral arguments, what partial reversal means in practical terms, what this does to the families of Abby and Libby, and what the five percent reversal rate actually tells us about a case with these specific constitutional questions in front of these specific judges.For anyone who has been tracking every development in this case — this is the full analytical picture.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #MononHighBridge #WrongfulConviction #BridgeGuy #DelphiCase

The State has filed their response. The defense gets a reply. Three appellate judges will evaluate whether this conviction can stand.In this final session of our three-part panel, defense attorney Bob Motta goes forward. Not backward through the evidence — forward through the process. What does the reply brief need to land on to give the Court of Appeals a reason to move? Where did the State leave the most daylight? What does oral argument change when you have a case this factually complicated and this constitutionally dense?We get into what reversal actually looks like — not the single dramatic moment people picture, but the range of outcomes the court can reach. Error found on one issue. Specific proceedings on remand. Narrow reversal versus full retrial. Bob maps all of it in plain terms.We also go into the harder questions. What does this mean for the families of Abby Williams and Libby German, who were told a verdict was finality? What does the five percent reversal rate on direct appeal actually tell us about this case — and what does it miss about what the defense is specifically arguing?Richard Allen is in a prison in Oklahoma right now. The reply brief is coming. Three judges are going to decide whether what happened in Carroll County met the constitutional standard. For anyone who has been inside these documents — who knows what was excluded, what was muted, what was never put in front of that jury — this conversation is about whether that standard was actually met.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #WrongfulConviction #MononHighBridge #DelphiCase

You know the van timeline. You know the cause of death discrepancy. Now get the legal analysis.The prosecution's most important argument was that Richard Allen's confession contained something only the killer could know — that he saw a van drive past during the attack on Abby Williams and Libby German. They traced it to a real neighbor. They called it corroboration. They called it proof the confession was genuine, not psychotic.According to the defense's brief, surveillance footage shows that van arriving significantly after Libby German's phone stopped registering movement at 2:32 pm. FBI cell phone data points to an even later arrival. The State's response to the appeal doesn't dispute the footage or the data. Their answer is that the defense's paperwork wasn't filed with the correct evidentiary foundation at trial. If you've been inside these documents, you understand exactly what that means — and what it doesn't say.And the State says nothing — zero — about the documented fact in the defense's brief that Allen told his psychiatrist he shot the girls. They were not shot.Defense attorney Bob Motta goes through both of these problems with the precision they deserve. The legal implications of a wrong cause of death in a confession. The evidentiary significance of a timeline that doesn't match the State's witness. Dr. Wala's credibility after admitting she may have been wrong and destroying her notes. And what it means for an appellate court evaluating a conviction with no DNA, no murder weapon, and no direct eyewitness identification of the defendant specifically.This is the detail-level breakdown the Delphi case deserves.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #FalseConfession #VanTimeline #MononHighBridge #WrongfulConviction

Indiana's Attorney General just responded to Richard Allen's appeal in the Delphi murders case — and they want the court to let a 130-year conviction stand without a second look.Richard Allen was convicted in the 2017 killings of 13-year-old Abby Williams and 14-year-old Libby German near the Monon High Bridge trail in Delphi, Indiana. He's been appealing that conviction, and the State just filed their formal rebuttal.Their argument: everything was done right, the evidence was overwhelming, and even the rulings that may have gone wrong were harmless enough not to matter.Here's what caught our attention. The defense's brief documents that Allen, during his confessions, told his prison psychiatrist that he shot the girls. Abby and Libby were not shot. The State's response is 94 pages long. It never once addresses that detail.In this episode, we break down the three pillars of the State's rebuttal — the search warrant, the confessions, and the excluded evidence — and we examine the gaps. The eyewitness sketch that the woman who made it called perfect, depicting someone who looked nothing like Allen, that the jury never saw. The confession from a man who was documented as gravely disabled and who got the cause of death wrong. The van that the State says proves the confession was real — and the footage and data suggesting the timeline may not hold up.If you've been following this case, this episode connects the dots on where the appeal stands. If you're new to Delphi, this is a clear-eyed breakdown of why serious questions remain.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #AbbyAndLibby #TrueCrime #DelphiAppeal #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #TrueCrimeToday #MononHighBridge #WrongfulConviction

This is a "Shortcut" episode. It’s a shortened version of this week’s more detailed full episode, which is also available on our feed. Teenagers Abby Williams and Libby German were dropped off at a popular hiking trail near the Monon High Bridge, just outside their hometown of Delphi, Indiana. About 40 minutes later, Libby posted a picture on her Snapchat account showing Abby carefully walking across the bridge. It was the last time they made contact with the outside world, although it wasn't the last time Libby recorded their surroundings. The girls were reported missing later that afternoon, and community members searched for them through the night. But sadly, their bodies were discovered nearby the following day. in October 2022, a local man was taken into custody. Who is he? Did he know the girls? Is there any truth to the rumors that other people may yet to be charged? The best person to ask these questions is without a doubt, journalist Susan Hendricks. Click here to purchase Susan Hendricks' book, "Down the Hill". Click here to learn more about the Abby and Libby Memorial Park Lifeline on 13 11 14 13 YARN on 13 92 76 (24/7 crisis support phone line for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people) CREDITS: Host: Meshel Laurie Guest: Susan Hendricks Executive Producer: Matthew Tankard Extra content from Inside Edition is used in this episode. GET IN TOUCH:https://www.australiantruecrimethepodcast.com/Follow the show on Instagram @australiantruecrimepodcast and Facebook Email the show at AusTrueCrimePodcast@gmail.com

Teenagers Abby Williams and Libby German were dropped off at a popular hiking trail near the Monon High Bridge, just outside their hometown of Delphi, Indiana. About 40 minutes later, Libby posted a picture on her Snapchat account showing Abby carefully walking across the bridge. It was the last time they made contact with the outside world, although it wasn't the last time Libby recorded their surroundings. The girls were reported missing later that afternoon, and community members searched for them through the night. But sadly, their bodies were discovered nearby the following day. in October 2022, a local man was taken into custody. Who is he? Did he know the girls? Is there any truth to the rumors that other people may yet to be charged? The best person to ask these questions is without a doubt, journalist Susan Hendricks. Click here to purchase Susan Hendricks' book, "Down the Hill". Click here to learn more about the Abby and Libby Memorial Park Lifeline on 13 11 14 13 YARN on 13 92 76 (24/7 crisis support phone line for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people) CREDITS: Host: Meshel Laurie Guest: Susan Hendricks Executive Producer: Matthew Tankard Extra content from Inside Edition is used in this episode. GET IN TOUCH:https://www.australiantruecrimethepodcast.com/Follow the show on Instagram @australiantruecrimepodcast and Facebook Email the show at AusTrueCrimePodcast@gmail.com

Attorney Michael Ausbrook returns to the show to discuss everything we've learned about the murders of Abby Williams and Libby German since the conclusion of Richard Allen's trial. Evidence and documents have been slowly released to the public in the months following the trial, and Michael joins Bob to help break it all down.The majority of the funding of our work comes directly from listeners, through our Patreon community.  To join Patreon, click THIS LINK.  At the $5/month level you'll get access to lots of Patreon Only BONUS EPISODES, Ad Free versions of all episodes, an hour of Patreon Exclusive video content every week, and our new weekly podcast “Pre-Game”, which drops every Wednesday.  Not to mention early access to some episodes and the ability to watch and participate in interviews live.

On February 13, 2017, Richard Allen murdered 14-year-old Libby German and 13-year-old Abby Williams. Today, we remember Abby and Libby. Donate to the park here: https://abbyandlibbymemorialpark.org/Find discounts for Murder Sheet listeners here: https://murdersheetpodcast.com/discountsCheck out our upcoming book events and get links to buy tickets here: https://murdersheetpodcast.com/eventsOrder our book on Delphi here: https://bookshop.org/p/books/shadow-of-the-bridge-the-delphi-murders-and-the-dark-side-of-the-american-heartland-aine-cain/21866881?ean=9781639369232Or here: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Shadow-of-the-Bridge/Aine-Cain/9781639369232Or here: https://www.amazon.com/Shadow-Bridge-Murders-American-Heartland/dp/1639369236Join our Patreon here! https://www.patreon.com/c/murdersheetSupport The Murder Sheet by buying a t-shirt here: https://www.murdersheetshop.com/Check out more inclusive sizing and t-shirt and merchandising options here: https://themurdersheet.dashery.com/Send tips to murdersheet@gmail.com.The Murder Sheet is a production of Mystery Sheet LLC.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Major breaking news out of Indiana today. Judge Frances Gull—the special judge who presided over Richard Allen's trial for the murders of Abby Williams and Libby German—has announced she is retiring from the bench after nearly three decades. Her official press release celebrates her work with veterans and Drug Court, touting her commitment to "second chances, rehabilitation, and redemption."What the press release doesn't mention is Delphi. Not a single word about the case that made her a household name in true crime circles worldwide.That silence is notable because Richard Allen's defense team has filed a 113-page appeal alleging that Gull's rulings systematically denied Allen his constitutional right to present a complete defense. The brief documents exclusion after exclusion: the eyewitness sketch that didn't match Allen, the forensic expert who could have challenged the bullet evidence, the audio from videos showing Allen's mental deterioration, evidence of alternative suspects with pagan ritual connections, and evidence of a bungled investigation.Meanwhile, Gull admitted a Google search conducted mid-trial to salvage the State's timeline.Allen is serving 130 years. Gull is retiring to spend time with her grandchildren. The Indiana Court of Appeals will now review whether the trial she ran meets constitutional standards.Today on True Crime Today, we examine the judicial record Frances Gull leaves behind—and what the appeals court will have to untangle.#JudgeGull #FrancesGull #Delphi #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #AbbyAndLibby #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams #DelphiTrial #WrongfulConvictionJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Richard Allen confessed to molesting his sister. She says it never happened. He confessed to molesting his daughter. She denies it too. He said he shot Abby Williams and Libby German. They weren't shot—they were stabbed.And those are the confessions Indiana used to convict him of murder.According to the 113-page Appellant's Brief now before the Indiana Court of Appeals, Richard Allen's confessions came after five months in maximum-security solitary confinement—a placement that violated Indiana's own 30-day policy for mentally ill inmates. By the time he started confessing, state doctors had declared him "gravely disabled." He'd dropped from 180 to 135 pounds. He was eating his own feces, drinking toilet water, and couldn't remember confessing days after he did it.Before solitary, Allen never broke. Two interrogations. Hours of pressure. Detectives lying about evidence. His own wife brought in as leverage. His response stayed consistent: "I did not murder two little girls. I don't care how stressed out I get, I am not going to admit to something I had nothing to do with."Five months later, he was asking guards if he was already dead.The prosecution called these confessions "logical and organized." They presented them as the unburdening of a guilty soul. But the jury never heard the audio—Judge Gull ordered it muted. They never heard Allen screaming incoherently, rambling about World War III, saying "Rocky Balboa is my favorite actor."They got silence. They got the state's narrative. And Richard Allen got 130 years.Today we break down what these confessions actually looked like—and why the details Allen got wrong may matter more than anything he got right.#RichardAllenTrial #DelphiMurders #TrueCrimeNews #FalseConfessions #AbbyAndLibby #WrongfulConviction #DelphiUpdate #CriminalJustice #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliamsJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISDOES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

In this episode, I sit down with defense attorney and trial analyst Bob Motta to examine two major developments shaking the foundation of the Delphi case: the collapse of the timeline investigators built around the murders of Abby Williams and Libby German, and the sweeping appeal just filed on behalf of Richard Allen. For years, the investigative timeline was treated as immutable. But in deposition after deposition, the structure starts to buckle. Bob and I dissect how key witness descriptions were reframed, how the search-warrant affidavit selectively emphasized certain statements, and how critical timestamps shifted depending on which investigator documented them. One witness described a young man and an older car — yet was later framed as having seen something “consistent” with Richard Allen. FBI involvement remains inconsistent depending on who you ask. Even the time of death varies across sworn testimony. Then we turn to Allen's new 130-page appeal brief — nearly double the usual size — outlining ten issues and nine constitutional claims. The defense argues the jury never heard about alternative suspects, including one who allegedly confessed. They challenge the exclusion of more than 1,200 pages of evidence, the handling of 61 unreliable confessions, the thirteen months Allen spent in solitary confinement, and the toolmark analysis behind the unspent bullet that prosecutors say ties his gun to the crime. No DNA linked Allen to the scene. A volunteer clerk found an error that went unnoticed for five years. And a judge blocked jurors from hearing evidence that law enforcement themselves investigated early on. This episode isn't about guilt or innocence — it's about whether the system followed its own rules, and whether the conviction can stand on the foundation the state built. Full breakdown. Every issue explained. No speculation — just the record. #DelphiCase #RichardAllen #AbbyAndLibby #DelphiTimeline #TrueCrimeNews #LegalAnalysis #DelphiAppeal #CourtRecords #HiddenKillers #JusticeReview Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

In this episode, I sit down with defense attorney and trial analyst Bob Motta to examine two major developments shaking the foundation of the Delphi case: the collapse of the timeline investigators built around the murders of Abby Williams and Libby German, and the sweeping appeal just filed on behalf of Richard Allen. For years, the investigative timeline was treated as immutable. But in deposition after deposition, the structure starts to buckle. Bob and I dissect how key witness descriptions were reframed, how the search-warrant affidavit selectively emphasized certain statements, and how critical timestamps shifted depending on which investigator documented them. One witness described a young man and an older car — yet was later framed as having seen something “consistent” with Richard Allen. FBI involvement remains inconsistent depending on who you ask. Even the time of death varies across sworn testimony. Then we turn to Allen's new 130-page appeal brief — nearly double the usual size — outlining ten issues and nine constitutional claims. The defense argues the jury never heard about alternative suspects, including one who allegedly confessed. They challenge the exclusion of more than 1,200 pages of evidence, the handling of 61 unreliable confessions, the thirteen months Allen spent in solitary confinement, and the toolmark analysis behind the unspent bullet that prosecutors say ties his gun to the crime. No DNA linked Allen to the scene. A volunteer clerk found an error that went unnoticed for five years. And a judge blocked jurors from hearing evidence that law enforcement themselves investigated early on. This episode isn't about guilt or innocence — it's about whether the system followed its own rules, and whether the conviction can stand on the foundation the state built. Full breakdown. Every issue explained. No speculation — just the record. #DelphiCase #RichardAllen #AbbyAndLibby #DelphiTimeline #TrueCrimeNews #LegalAnalysis #DelphiAppeal #CourtRecords #HiddenKillers #JusticeReview Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Richard Allen is serving 130 years for the murders of Abby Williams and Libby German. The jury has spoken. But his defense team just filed something unprecedented—a request to submit an appeal brief nearly double the standard size. Ten issues. Nine constitutional claims. And a roadmap of everything that went wrong in this case. In this episode, we break down the five categories of Allen's appeal and what each one reveals about how this conviction was built. From the alternative suspects the jury never heard about—including a man who allegedly confessed to the killings months after they happened—to the 1,200 pages of evidence that was blocked from trial. From the sixty-one confessions made by a man who was also confessing to crimes that provably never happened, to the thirteen months of solitary confinement that the defense says broke his mind. No DNA linked Richard Allen to the crime scene. The state's own forensic scientist testified to that. The single piece of physical evidence—an unspent bullet—relies on contested toolmark analysis that the defense wasn't fully allowed to challenge. A volunteer clerk caught a filing error that investigators missed for five years. And a judge blocked the jury from hearing about other suspects, erased interview recordings, and an Odinism theory that law enforcement themselves investigated before dropping it without explanation. This isn't about declaring Richard Allen innocent. It's about asking whether the state proved their case—or just closed it. Whether the jury heard what they needed to hear. Whether this was a constitutional trial or a conviction built on broken confessions and blocked evidence. The families of Abby and Libby deserve justice. But justice isn't just an ending. It's the right ending. Full case breakdown. Every appeal issue explained. No speculation—just the facts the defense is putting before the Indiana Court of Appeals. #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #AbbyAndLibby #DelphiCase #TrueCrime #DelphiTrial #RichardAllenAppeal #DelphiUpdate #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Retired FBI agent and criminal profiler Candice DeLong dives into the murders of 14 year-old Libby German and 13 year-old Abigail Williams. After five years, Richard Allen has been arrested for the "delphi murders." Candice also speaks with journalist Susan Hendrix, who covered the case and has written a new book about it entitled, "Down the Hill: My Descent into the Double Murder in Delphi."See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.