Podcasts about motions

In Hour 4 of the Joe Rose Show, Dan Day, Omar Kelly, and Trevor Harris talk about Caitlin Clark and the WNBA taking a whooping. We have from Pro Football Talk, Mike Florio joining Omar Kelly and Dan Day as they talk about the Jalen Ramsey & Jonnu Smith Situations for the Dolphins. Omar Kelly Responds to Mike Florio about his Comments on Mike McDaniel being a head coach. We also talk about Stephen Ross' situation and why he wants to win a Super Bowl, and his hiring practice. We also talk with Florio will the selling of the Lakers going for 10 billion, will it be an NFL team next? Omar Kelly talks about his new piece on the Dolphins in the Miami Herald.

Tatiana, Dominic et Ingrid explorent la frontière floue entre technologie et liberté. Tatiana oscille entre fascination et angoisse face à sa montre intelligente, pendant qu’Ingrid aime être guidée pour sa santé. Dominic, lui, remet en question cette obsession du rendement dictée par des gadgets. Le trio s’interroge aussi sur l’attrait des tout inclus à Mont-Tremblant, sur les dérives de la positivité toxique au travail, sur l’écoute suspecte des téléphones, et sur le piège des achats impulsifs. Une discussion riche et nuancée sur nos comportements modernes, entre confort, contrôle et besoin urgent de reprendre le pouvoir sur nos choix. Voir https://www.cogecomedia.com/vie-privee pour notre politique de vie privée

Hillbilly Rollin’ Stone – The Desert City Ramblers Nashville Traffic – Brother and The Hayes Maybe I Am – Bryan James Goin’ through the Motions – Chris Hennessee A Friend With Weed – Kyle Daniel If I Didn’t Have You – Matt Hillyer Hard Time Blues – Jonathan Parker Don’t Judge This Broken Heart – Swearingen & Kelli Gimme a Guitar – Robert Henry & the Repeaters American Too – The Bullhaulers

Bilan personnalisé OFFERT : https://www.kinecoachsante.fr/bilan

Bilan personnalisé OFFERT : https://www.kinecoachsante.fr/bilan

Au cœur des mémoires transgénérationnelles : comment nos histoires familiales invisibles façonnent nos vies ?Dans cet épisode, Ludivine Morin, spécialiste en analyse transgénérationnelle et sophrologie, nous invite à explorer ces héritages émotionnels et inconscients qui nous habitent sans même que nous en ayons conscience.Comment ces mémoires se transmettent-elles ? Pourquoi reproduisons-nous parfois les mêmes schémas ? Comment les comprendre, les transformer et surtout ne plus en être prisonnières ?Un échange profond et lumineux, pour toutes celles qui se sentent parfois bloquées dans leur vie ou submergées par des émotions qu'elles ne comprennent pas.Parce qu'au cœur de notre santé, il y a aussi ce que nous portons de nos lignées.Instagram En savoir plus Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Send Carla a message!What if you could transform your everyday existence from simply going through motions to actively taking part in creating your life? That's the power of life-preneurship—a fresh approach to living that applies entrepreneurial thinking to life's most important moments.This mindset allows you to innovate solutions to everyday challenges in your relationships, career, parenting, and growth. Just as entrepreneurs invest capital to build businesses, life-preneurs invest energy and time to overcome problems in ways that reflect their unique values and vision.Ready to become the CEO of your own everyday life? Enjoy this episode!Free Workshop 6/22 - Brave Bodies, Bold MindsSave your spot! https://www.trifectapilates.com/bb-signup Learn more about Carla:Website: https:/www.carlareeves.com/Connect on LI: https://www.linkedin.com/in/reevescarla/Connect on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@differentlythepodcastGo to https://carlareeves.com/freeclass to get The Class schedule, sign up, and/or pass it on to a friend. Each month is a new topic. Come hang out and learn with us for FREE! Get your copy of 5 Ways to Manage Your Mind Explore Coaching with Carla: https://bookme.name/carlareeves/lite/explore-coaching If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to share it with a friend. A free way to support our show is by leaving a five-star rating and review on your favorite podcast player. It's a chance to tell us what you love about the show and it helps others discover it, too. Thank you for listening!

Invité: Michel Briand. Les émotions sont façonnées par notre culture et notre histoire. Quelle est leur évolution à travers le langage, l'art et la science? Quelle est leur complexité et leur nature changeante? Pour en parler, Tribu reçoit Michel Briand, professeur émérite à lʹuniversité de Poitiers. Il publie "Émotions histoire culturelle et étymologique de nos sentiments" aux éditions Arkhê.

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Pour cette dernière de saison, Marie-Eve Janvier et Maripier Morin reçoivent leurs papas, Gabriel Morin et Benoît Janvier, pour une discussion pleine de complicité et d’émotions. On découvre deux hommes très actifs et passionnés, avec une nouvelle bromance inattendue qui surprend leurs filles. Benoît partage son parcours de héros municipal et ses défis familiaux, mêlant devoir public et amour paternel. Entre souvenirs de verglas, petits secrets bien gardés, et expressions québécoises savoureuses, l’échange dévoile l’évolution unique de leurs liens père-fille, avec humour et tendresse. Un moment touchant où la sagesse familiale et la folie se croisent, laissant une douce nostalgie et un mystère sur les instants qui ont vraiment marqué leur relation. Un épisode à ne pas manquer !Voir https://www.cogecomedia.com/vie-privee pour notre politique de vie privée

Le fameux "coup de mou" en plein milieu d'un cours de body combat ou au cœur d'une sortie vélo... Qui ne l'a jamais vécu ? On repense alors à cette barre de céréales oubliée, en se demandant si elle aurait tout changé.Mais faut-il vraiment manger pendant l'effort ? Est-ce la solution miracle pour éviter l'hypoglycémie ou le meilleur moyen de gâcher sa séance avec des troubles digestifs ? Stop aux mythes et aux conseils de vestiaire !

This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution's request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims' personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

As Donna Adelson awaits trial in the murder-for-hire plot of Dan Markel, explosive new motions seek to suppress key testimony. Meanwhile, disturbing jail logs suggest a potential mental health breakdown behind bars #STSNation, Welcome to Surviving the Survivor — the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #TrueCrime. Tonight, we break down stunning new developments in the Donna Adelson case: • A motion to suppress testimony from Sara Yousuf, a former friend of Wendi Adelson, who says Donna called Dan “a jerk” shortly after his murder. • A separate legal push to block Stephen Webster, Dan's post-divorce attorney, from testifying about alleged comments and family dynamics. • And perhaps most shocking: new jail logs suggest Donna has been pacing her cell naked and laughing to herself, raising questions about her mental state and trial readiness. The trial is now set for August, but the legal chess match is heating up fast. #BestGuests: • R. Timothy Jansen, famed Tallahassee criminal defense attorney & former federal prosecutor • Professor Jo Potuto, Professor Emerita, University of Nebraska College of Law, constitutional and criminal law expert Join us as we cut through the legal noise and get to the truth behind the headlines.#DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #MurderForHire #FSULaw #JusticeForDanMarkel #CriminalDefense #TrialCoverage #MentalHealth #JailhouseBehavior #LegalAnalysis #SurvivingTheSurvivor⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast

Maxime Smolinski, co-fondateur de l'agence Katall, spécialisée TikTok, décrypte pour nous un phénomène clé : pourquoi et comment la Gen Z utilise aujourd'hui TikTok comme moteur de recherche. Dans cet épisode d'Insight, on explore l'évolution de la plateforme, la perception d'authenticité des contenus, les enjeux de désinformation et les stratégies pour rendre une marque visible sur TikTok en 2025. À quoi ressemblera la recherche sur TikTok demain ? Quel rôle pour l'IA ? Et comment les marques doivent-elles s'adapter ? Maxime nous dit tout !Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Welcome to Season 4 of Based in Fact: A True Crime Podcast. We're your hosts, Lisa O'Brien and Kyle Evans and this is Episode 1, State of Florida v. James Milton Dailey, Part 2. Guest co-host Rick Mullenax joins us to wrap up our look at the case against James Milton Dailey, who was convicted and sentenced to death for the May 5, 1985 murder of teenager Shelly Elizabeth Boggio. We'll pick up where we left off in Part 1 with a look at Dailey's renewed federal habeas efforts and four Motions to Vacate his conviction and sentence pursued in state court. Rick founded Burn After Reading, the YouTube channel that started with a deep dive into the West Memphis Three case and has expanded to shine a light on the shadier aspects of social media coverage of true crime, including the disappearance of Maura Murray and the murders of Libby German and Abby Williams by Richard Allen in Delphi, Indiana.

À demain avec Thomas !

Pastor Mark continues the series of Peter with the three questions asked of him...contrasting Agape/Committed Love with Phileo/Friendship/Brotherly Love.  Which kind of love do we have for the Father, Yeshua and each other?

At a recent motions hearing for Bryan Kohberger, the suspect in the University of Idaho student murders, both sides clashed over critical pieces of evidence and the defense's attempts to challenge the prosecution's case. The judge denied several of the defense's motions, including a bid to dismiss the indictment due to grand jury irregularities. Kohberger's team had argued that the grand jury was misled by an unreliable FBI genetic genealogy analysis and that it violated proper legal standards, but the court found the indictment sufficient to move forward. The defense also tried to suppress certain pieces of evidence, such as cell tower data and body cam footage, claiming they were improperly obtained or prejudicial—efforts that mostly failed.However, not everything went the prosecution's way. The judge did grant the defense more time to scrutinize some of the state's key evidence, particularly DNA and cellphone data that tie Kohberger to the crime scene. These materials were initially withheld or delayed, and the court acknowledged the defense's right to fully analyze them. The ruling opens the door for further challenges to the state's forensic evidence in the future. While the case remains on track for trial, the hearing showed that the defense still has leeway to poke holes in the prosecution's foundation, especially on the scientific evidence front.The question  is, will they be successful?to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:What happened at Bryan Kohberger's hearing? | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​On April 9, 2025, Bryan Kohberger appeared in a Boise, Idaho court for a hearing addressing multiple pre-trial motions ahead of his upcoming trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude several pieces of evidence, including Amazon records allegedly showing Kohberger purchased a Ka-Bar knife and sheath, testimony from a surviving roommate who described an intruder with "bushy eyebrows," 911 call recordings, Kohberger's academic writings on crime scenes, a selfie taken in front of a shower, and weather data potentially undermining his alibi. Additionally, the defense requested the death penalty be removed from consideration, citing Kohberger's autism diagnosisProsecutors, on the other hand, confirmed their intention to call several of Kohberger's family members as witnesses during the trial. They also sought to prevent the defense from suggesting Kohberger was framed and to prohibit portraying the state's pursuit of the death penalty as an attempt to kill him. Judge Steven Hippler addressed these motions, preliminarily ruling that terms like "psychopath," "sociopath," or "murderer" should not be used during the evidentiary phase. He also indicated that Kohberger's autism diagnosis could be presented as a mitigating factor if convicted but not as an aggravating one. Specific rulings on these motions are expected to be issued at a later date.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmal.comsource: Bryan Kohberger makes bombshell claim about TWO Idaho murders killers as judge considers if family will testify | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​On April 9, 2025, Bryan Kohberger appeared in a Boise, Idaho court for a hearing addressing multiple pre-trial motions ahead of his upcoming trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude several pieces of evidence, including Amazon records allegedly showing Kohberger purchased a Ka-Bar knife and sheath, testimony from a surviving roommate who described an intruder with "bushy eyebrows," 911 call recordings, Kohberger's academic writings on crime scenes, a selfie taken in front of a shower, and weather data potentially undermining his alibi. Additionally, the defense requested the death penalty be removed from consideration, citing Kohberger's autism diagnosisProsecutors, on the other hand, confirmed their intention to call several of Kohberger's family members as witnesses during the trial. They also sought to prevent the defense from suggesting Kohberger was framed and to prohibit portraying the state's pursuit of the death penalty as an attempt to kill him. Judge Steven Hippler addressed these motions, preliminarily ruling that terms like "psychopath," "sociopath," or "murderer" should not be used during the evidentiary phase. He also indicated that Kohberger's autism diagnosis could be presented as a mitigating factor if convicted but not as an aggravating one. Specific rulings on these motions are expected to be issued at a later date.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmal.comsource: Bryan Kohberger makes bombshell claim about TWO Idaho murders killers as judge considers if family will testify | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Dans ce nouvel épisode de Ces questions que tout le monde se pose, je lis la lettre de Camille. Camille m'écrit qu'elle n'est pas tendre avec elle-même et qu'elle aimerait parvenir à se libérer des croyances qu'une petite voix passe son temps à lui souffler à l'oreille... "Non, tu n'es pas capable d'y arriver", "Tu n'es pas assez douée pour l'art", "Tu ne mènes jamais tes projets jusqu'au bout". À force d'être ensevelie par ces pensées négatives, Camille finit effectivement par abandonner ses projets et donner raison à ces croyances. Alors à travers l'histoire de Camille, et toujours dans l'espoir d'aider aussi toutes celles et ceux qui écouteront cet épisode, j'essaie aujourd'hui de répondre aux questions que tout le monde se pose… sur comment se libérer de quelque chose d'ancré en nous.N'hésitez pas à vous abonner à ce podcast, me suivre sur les réseaux sociaux sous le nom de Maud Ankaoua, ou consulter mon site internet https://www.maud-ankaoua.com. N'oubliez pas que si vous avez vous-même des questions, ou s'il y a des sujets que vous aimeriez que j'aborde dans un futur épisode, vous pouvez m'écrire ou m'envoyer une note vocale à l'adresse podcast.eyrolles@gmail.com. Vous retrouverez toutes ces informations dans le texte de description de l'épisode. Je serais également ravie de vous retrouver en librairie avec mes trois romans, Kilomètre Zéro, Respire ! Le Plan est toujours parfait et Plus jamais sans moi.Autrice & Animatrice : Maud Ankaoua Production : Éditions EyrollesRéalisation : Margaux Rol & Céline Malvo de l'Atelier ENLMontage & Mixage : Marthe CunyMusique : Martijn De BoerHébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Dans cet épisode que j'ai adoré enregistrer, je te propose une rencontre avec Carène Ponte, autrice feel-good qui n'a pas peur de parler de ses doutes, de ses failles, de ses montagnes russes émotionnelles. (et ca fait du bien !!!!) On a échangé sur ce que c'est qu'être sensible, anxieux, créatif… et surtout sur comment on peut transformer tout ça en quelque chose de vivant et d'inspirant. ✨ Ce que tu vas découvrir en l'écoutant :Pourquoi l'anxiété et l'hypersensibilité ne sont pas des boulets à traînerComment s'entraîner à choisir le bonheur, un petit pas à la foisPourquoi l'humour peut sauver la mise dans les moments sombresComment Carène écrit non pas pour se réparer, mais pour embarquer ses lecteurs et ouvrir des pistes

Jérôme Rothen se chauffe contre un autre consultant, un éditorialiste ou un acteur du foot.

Vous arrive-t-il de vous sentir complètement envahi par une émotion sans pouvoir la maîtriser ? Une remarque, un mail, un client désagréable… et vous voilà glacé, en retrait, ou à cran. Dans cet extrait, je vous parle à cœur ouvert d'un sujet qui me touche profondément : comment mieux gérer ses émotions, ne plus se laisser emporter, et reprendre le contrôle sans tout réprimer.Je partage une prise de conscience essentielle, une métaphore qui m'a marquée, et surtout les découvertes des neurosciences qui expliquent pourquoi nous réagissons souvent trop vite, et comment en sortir.Un avant-goût d'un épisode à ne pas manquer si vous aussi vous voulez avancer avec plus de calme, de clarté, et de liberté intérieure.

durée : 01:48:33 - Comme un samedi - par : Arnaud Laporte - Julien Gosselin, metteur en scène et directeur de l'Odéon–Théâtre de l'Europe, nous propose une carte blanche détonante et étonnante : foot, poésie, cuisine deux étoiles et journalisme dans une même émission ! - réalisation : Alexandre Fougeron - invités : Julien Gosselin Metteur en scène de théâtre; Florence Aubenas Grand reporter pour "Le Monde" et essayiste; Laura Vazquez Poétesse et romancière; Alexandre Gauthier Chef cuisinier; Grégory Schneider Journaliste; Erik Truffaz Trompettiste de jazz français; Abdullah Miniawy Chanteur, poète et compositeur

durée : 00:58:43 - Le Cours de l'histoire - par : Xavier Mauduit, Maïwenn Guiziou - Nos sens, nos passions et nos émotions ont une histoire. Comment retrouver la trace des sensations du passé au travers des archives et par le regard des historiennes et historiens ? - réalisation : Alexandre Manzanares - invités : Hervé Mazurel Historien des affects et des imaginaires, maître de conférences à l'Université de Bourgogne

Merci à Haier, N°1 mondial du gros électroménager*, qui soutient le média sur cette série d'épisodes !Retrouvez leur produits sur : https://bit.ly/Extraterrien-Haier Dans cet épisode, l'ancienne joueuse de tennis professionnelle Alizé Lim nous ouvre les portes de son univers intérieur. Sportive de haut niveau, HPI et hypersensible, elle partage avec sincérité les défis uniques qu'elle a rencontrés tout au long de sa carrière. De la gestion de ses émotions en compétition, en passant par la solitude du circuit et la difficulté à trouver sa place dans un sport aussi exigeant que le tennis… Alizé revient sur les coulisses souvent invisibles du tennis pro.À travers ce témoignage rare et touchant, elle nous parle aussi de pensée en arborescence, d'identité, d'équilibre mental, mais aussi de reconversion, d'écriture et de sa volonté de se réinventer au-delà du court.Un échange profond, inspirant et sans filtre, qui parlera autant aux passionnés de sport qu'à ceux qui s'interrogent sur la place des profils neuro atypiques dans la performance.#tennis #rolandgarros #sport #HPI #tenniswoman*Partenariat ou collaboration commerciale**Source : Euromonitor International LimitedQuestions : Alizé parle très franchement de son haut potentiel intellectuel (HPI) et de sa pensée en arborescence. Selon vous, en quoi ces particularités peuvent-elles être un atout ou un défi dans le sport de haut niveau ?Elle évoque le fait d'avoir sauté des classes très jeune, et que cela ne l'a pas particulièrement isolée. Pensez-vous que l'école française prend bien en charge la précocité intellectuelle chez les enfants sportifs ?Alizé explique qu'une grande partie de ses difficultés sur le terrain viennent de son « infini des possibles » lors des matchs. Peut-on imaginer des parallèles dans d'autres domaines que le sport pour canaliser ce type de profil ?Elle partage aussi sur la méditation et l'écriture comme outils pour canaliser ses pensées. Quels autres moyens pourraient aider à réguler le flot mental chez les sportifs ?L'aspect financier du tennis, l'importance de s'autofinancer, et la difficulté de choisir ses tournois sont éclairés dans la discussion. Cette précarité financière est-elle assez prise en compte quand on parle de sport pro ?Alizé aborde la difficulté de tisser des amitiés sincères sur le circuit face à la concurrence. Qu'est-ce qui pourrait faciliter des relations plus saines dans les sports individuels ?Elle évoque ses aventures et voyages parfois risqués dans sa jeunesse. À quel point ces expériences sont-elles nécessaires, voire formatrices, pour grandir en tant qu'athlète et en tant que personne ?Alizé partage avoir trouvé un meilleur équilibre entre ses différentes activités et le tennis, grâce à une meilleure connaissance d'elle-même. Pourquoi ce genre de poly-activité est-il souvent mal vu dans le sport de haut niveau ?Chapitres : 00:00 Vie personnelle09:27 Souvenirs d'école et besoin d'adaptation15:00 Trouver l'équilibre entre études et passions24:18 Organisation et surcharge mentale chez les HPI32:47 Apprendre à apaiser le mental avec la méditation47:08 Voyager autrement en prenant le temps56:26 Les relations entre femmes dans le sport01:25:19 Explorer ses limites et son identité

More Wine?! Send me a text! Share your thoughts! Whats up guys its YA GIRL...ME!! Its a new season and a whole lot of new feelings, conversations, topics, wine, and so much more! How y'all feeling!? I will never stop thanking the people that are constantly supporting me and listening to my podcast no matter what! Thank you so so much! You the realist. This week we are doing a quick catch up on where I have been, touch on hot topics, the backlash black women face, struggles in social media and influencer culture and so much more along with our vibe check of the week! So go ahead and grab your wine glass or get some MORE WINE PLEASE

Les hommes vieillissent comme le vin, les femmes comme… Je m'arrête là, AU SECOURS ! Quelle femme n'a jamais eu le cerveau infusé de cette vision sexiste du vieillissement ? Il est de changer de prisme et d'état d'esprit, il en va de notre bien-être voire de notre santé mentale ! Vieillir n'est pas une perte, mais un privilège, quel que soit son genre. Chaque ride, chaque cheveu blanc, chaque transformation du corps raconte une histoire de courage, de résilience et d'amour. Dans cet épisode Best of, je vous invite à explorer une autre voie : celle où vieillir devient un acte de puissance, de douceur et d'alignement. Une voie où l'on choisit de s'aimer comme on est, sans honte ni compromis.****Notre guide "10 leviers essentiels pour les décideuses" est un véritable concentré d'outils de coaching et de mentoring, les mêmes que nous utilisons dans le programme Sensées. Il est conçu pour toutes les directrices, dirigeantes et entrepreneures qui sont fatiguées de porter seules les responsabilités. Si vous avez l'impression que votre quotidien vous échappe petit à petit, ce guide est fait pour vous. Cliquez ici pour obtenir votre exemplaire offert !***Sensées, c'est aussi un programme de coaching pour les femmes dirigeantes, top managers et entrepreneures. Au sein du programme Sensées, vous êtes accompagnée en petit groupe ET en individuel dans votre croissance professionnelle. Vous êtes aussi formée et mentorée pour incarner pleinement votre leadership, avec les maîtres mots sérénité, plaisir, hauteur et impact. Intéressée ? Cliquez ici pour en savoir plus.**Vous représentez une entreprise et souhaitez développer le leadership de vos talents féminins ? : cliquez ici.**Chaque semaine, je partage mes conseils au sujet du leadership des femmes dans Sensées, la newsletter. Inscrivez-vous gratuitement en cliquant ici.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

durée : 00:13:09 - Le Congrès du PS débute avec le vote des motions

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Aujourd'hui dans Émotions au travail, on vous propose de découvrir Il était temps, un podcast de La Fondation Covéa.En 2025, plus de 9 millions de français se privent et renoncent parfois à certains repas. Une situation qu'a connue S. pendant plusieurs années avant de croiser la route de l'épicerie solidaire Solidaya du réseau Andès.Ce réseau national, 5ème acteur de l'aide alimentaire en France, propose dans ses épiceries solidaires des denrées saines et variées ainsi que des biens de première nécessité à bas prix, mais offre aussi de l'écoute et du lien social. Des maillons essentiels pour aider à se reconstruire.Aujourd'hui, le réseau compte plus de 630 épiceries solidaires en France hexagonale et en Outre-mer.ll était temps est un podcast produit par Louie Creative, l'agence de Louie Media pour la Fondation Covéa. Sophie Marchand a écrit, présenté et monté cet épisode, Renaud Watine en a fait la réalisation, Arthur Genest la musique. Eloïse Normand en a supervisé la réalisation. L'illustration est de Jérémie Luciani. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Taylor Swift's response is due in court today! In a shocking twist, Justin Baldoni's legal team has withdrawn their subpoena, as Swift's legal team appears to have provided the evidence they were seeking against Blake Lively! Plus, was her dad Scott the one that tipped off Justin Baldoni's team? And Ryan Reynolds now wants sanctions on Baldoni's team! Special guests Lauren Neidigh  @LethalLauren904   from Court of Random Opinion and Leanne Newton  @leannenewton1572   join to weigh-in on the latest legal drama.    9:10 - Kim Kardashian Graduates Law School 10:25 - Travis Kelce's Hairy Back! 15:20 - Blake & Ryan's Motions for Sanctions 21:40 - Taylor Swift's Dad Joins the Fight! 27:45 - Blake Refuses to Participate in Investigation Into Her Claims 47:50 - Baldoni Drops Subpoena After Taylor Turns Over Info   Subscribe to Lauren: https://www.youtube.com/@LethalLauren904    Subscribe to Leanne: https://www.youtube.com/@leannenewton1572    Spike Detox your body! Use code NOFILTER for 15% Off + Free Shipping on every order. www.twc.health/nofilter   Get your tour tickets to see No Filter with Zack Peter LIVE: https://www.x1entertainment.com/zackpeter    Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio   Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb   Listen to The Pop Report: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-pop-report/id1746150111   Watch Disaster Daters: https://open.spotify.com/show/3L4GLnKwz9Uy5dT8Ey1VPi   Join the Zack Pack Community to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs3Zs51YaK-xw2U5ypi5eqg/join   Couldn't get enough? Follow @justplainzack or @nofilterwithzack

In this episode of Surviving The Survivor, Joel & STS #BestGuests explain and dissect the latest motions (now published online), what's happening now and what's next as Donna goes on trial soon for the murder of her ex son-in-law. Matriarch Donna Adelson is charged with first-degree murder, conspiracy and solicitation in the 2014 murder-for-hire of her former son-in-law, Dan Markel. The Florida State law professor was shot and later died the hospital while dealing with an on-going custody battle with his ex-wife, Wendi Adelson AKA Donna's daughter. Since then--Donna's son, Charle Adelson, has gone on trial and was convicted for his involvement in the murder for hire of Dan Markel. Donna Adelson is expected to go on trial this fall after several delays have pushed the original trial date.⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast

Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! In this week's episode, we're focusing on a topic from Civil Procedure -- specifically, motions for judgment as a matter of law and motions for new trial, where the moving party is asking the court to take certain issues away from the jury. In this episode we discuss: The two types of motions for judgment as a matter of law The standard for granting a motion for judgment as a matter of law Filing and granting motions for new trial Analyzing a hypo encompassing the above concepts Resources: "Listen and Learn" series (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/law-school-toolbox-podcast-substantive-law-topics/#listen-learn) Podcast Episode 412: Listen and Learn – Motions for Summary Judgment (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/podcast-episode-412-listen-and-learn-motions-for-summary-judgment/) Download the Transcript  (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/episode-504-listen-and-learn-motions-for-judgment-as-a-matter-of-law-and-motions-for-new-trial-civ-pro/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/law-school-toolbox-podcast/id1027603976) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Law School Toolbox website (http://lawschooltoolbox.com/contact). If you're concerned about the bar exam, check out our sister site, the Bar Exam Toolbox (http://barexamtoolbox.com/). You can also sign up for our weekly podcast newsletter (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/get-law-school-podcast-updates/) to make sure you never miss an episode! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee