Podcasts about motions

The prosecution laid out their case. Now the defense has to tear it apart. Michael McKee pleaded not guilty to the aggravated murders of Monique Tepe and Spencer Tepe. His attorneys are now preparing for the pretrial battles that could determine whether a jury ever hears the most damaging evidence against him.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis walks us through the defense's likely strategy. McKee waived his bail hearing—Eric explains why that's a calculated move, not a surrender. The real fight happens in motions.The affidavit includes allegations that McKee strangled Monique and forced unwanted sex on her during the marriage—abuse that was never reported to police or prosecuted. Eric breaks down the motion to exclude that testimony as prejudicial and unproven, and whether it has a realistic chance of succeeding.Then there's the hearsay problem. Witnesses say Monique told them McKee threatened to kill her, said he'd find her and buy the house next door, said she'd "always be his wife." But Monique is dead. The defense will argue those statements can't come in. Eric explains what exceptions might apply and how hard that fight will be.We also examine how the defense might reframe the cell phone going dark—the prosecution calls it consciousness of guilt, but what's the innocent explanation? How do you explain surveillance footage showing your client at the property three weeks before the murders? And if the vehicle evidence seems overwhelming, can the defense separate McKee from the car?If acquittal isn't on the table, what does a defense "win" look like?#MichaelMcKee #MoniqueTepe #SpencerTepe #DefensePlaybook #HearsayFight #ReasonableDoubt #CriminalDefense #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #OhioMurderJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HR3 - If Michael Penix can go through motions during offseason programs that's a win Mike Johnson, Ali Mac, and Beau Morgan quickly touch on some of the biggest headlines around the local and national sports scene, let you hear Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Penix Jr. tell Sports Director of WSB-TV Channel 2 in Atlanta Zach Klein that he'll be ready to play week one, react to what Penix Jr. had to say, and explain why they think Penix Jr.'s previous knee injuries should help him be ready for week one. Then, Mike, Ali, and Beau spend some time with reporter, host, and analyst for CBS Sports Evan Washburn! Mike, Beau, Ali, and Evan discuss how Evan prepared for the cold and snowy AFC Championship game last Sunday, how much the weather affected the AFC Championship game, Bo Nix saying that he does not have a preexisting condition in his right ankle that would have required surgery in the future had he not suffered the fracture in the AFC Championship game, how Evan feels about the Atlanta Falcons hiring Kevin Stefanski as their next Head Coach, the people at CBS missing Matt Ryan but being happy for him and his new role as the Falcons President of Football, what Evan's reaction was when he found out Bill Belichick wasn't a first ballot Hall of Famer, and if he was more surprised that New York Jets Head Coach Aaron Glenn was allowed to basically fire his whole coaching staff, the Buffalo Bills deciding to promote Offensive Coordinator Joe Brady and make him their next Head Coach, or the rumors that Jim Schwartz and Todd Monken could end up being co-head coaches in Cleveland for the Browns. The Morning Shift crew also talks about Onyeka Okongwu losing some teeth in the Atlanta Hawks 117-106 win over the Boston Celtics last night in Boston, explain why they think the Hawks are finally looking like the team they were expected to be and look like in the post Trae Young era, and then close out hour three by answering people's questions about anything in the Morning Mailbag!

Comment aider ses enfants à grandir avec confiance, autonomie et esprit critique dans un monde en mutation permanente, tout en tenant son rôle de femme leader ? Dans cet épisode, Jenny Chammas reçoit Solenne Bocquillon - le Goaziou, fondatrice de Soft Kids, experte des soft skills, pour une conversation à la croisée de la parentalité, du leadership et des grands défis du XXIᵉ siècle.Vous découvrez comment vos compétences professionnelles - confiance en soi, assertivité, sens de la coopération, gestion des émotions - sont aussi les clés d'une parentalité consciente, équilibrée et porteuse.Dans cet épisode :Vous identifiez les soft skills essentielles à transmettre à vos enfants pour les aider à naviguer dans un monde incertain, numérique, et rapide ;Vous explorez comment vos compétences de leader peuvent enrichir votre posture de parent (et vice versa) ;Vous comprenez pourquoi la qualité du lien prévaut sur la quantité de temps passé ensemble ;Vous obtenez des conseils concrets sur les écrans, l'IA, la charge mentale, et comment responsabiliser vos enfants sans culpabilité ;Vous repartez avec une vision plus fluide entre votre rôle de leader et votre rôle de parent : même posture, autres contextes.Un épisode qui réconcilie ambition professionnelle et parentalité, pour toutes celles qui souhaitent aider leurs enfants en transmettant ce qu'elles construisent chaque jour dans leur propre parcours de femme et de leader.Pour bénéficier de la formation "Être parents au 21e siècle", cliquez ici.Vous pouvez suivre Solenne Bocquillon - le Goaziou ici sur Linkedin.***Rejoignez la newsletter Sensées : elle vous donne accès à un concentré de coaching et d'inspiration. Inscrivez-vous gratuitement en cliquant ici. Tout comme sur le podcast Sensées, on y parle de leadership, d'ambition, de confiance en soi, de motivation, de carrière, d'outils de développement personnel, de management, de prise de poste, de prise de parole, et. : bref, de tout ce qui concerne le quotidien des femmes ambitieuses.**Notre guide "10 leviers essentiels pour les décideuses" est un véritable concentré d'outils de coaching et de mentoring, les mêmes que nous utilisons dans le programme Sensées. Il est conçu pour toutes les directrices, dirigeantes et entrepreneures qui sont fatiguées de porter seules les responsabilités. Si vous avez l'impression que votre quotidien vous échappe petit à petit, ce guide est fait pour vous. Cliquez ici pour obtenir votre exemplaire offert !*Vous représentez une entreprise et souhaitez développer le leadership de vos talents féminins ? : cliquez ici.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

durée : 00:25:31 - Léo Warynski, chef de chœur et chef d'orchestre (4/5) - par : Judith Chaine - Léo Warynski revient sur ses débuts professionnels et nous parle des Métaboles, le chœur qu'il a fondé en 2010, entre passion pour le chant a cappella et désir de liberté dans le répertoire, de la musique ancienne aux créations contemporaines. - réalisé par : Pierre Willer Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

Tristan Vincent veut gagner 100 000 € par mois. Tout a commencé par une trahison : un ami, une blessure, et la décision de ne plus jamais être vulnérable. Depuis, il transforme sa solitude en empire business. Comment le culte de l'entrepreneuriat remplace-t-il les relations sincères ? Avec Tristan et la psychologue Niobe Way, on explore la crise silencieuse de l'amitié masculine à l'ère de l'hyper-productivité.Des mecs solides est une mini-série du podcast Emotions. Elle a été écrite et tournée par Bruno Lus et Basile Roze. Solène Moulin est à la réalisation et au mix. Louise Hemmerlé est à la production. Si vous aussi vous voulez nous raconter votre histoire dans Émotions, écrivez-nous en remplissant ce formulaire ou à l'adresse hello@louiemedia.com.Pour avoir des news de Louie, des recos podcasts et culturelles, abonnez-vous à notre newsletter en cliquant ici. Vous souhaitez soutenir la création et la diffusion des projets de Louie Media ? Vous pouvez le faire via le Club Louie.Chaque participation est précieuse. Nous vous proposons un soutien sans engagement, annulable à tout moment, soit en une seule fois, soit de manière régulière. Au nom de toute l'équipe de Louie : MERCI ! Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

When your divorce is dragging because the other side won't respond, it can feel like psychological warfare—especially when kids and money are on the line. In this episode, Morgan Stogsdill and Andrea Rappaport break down what's actually happening when a divorce case stalls, how to tell the difference between normal delays and strategic stalling, and what to do next.You'll learn the practical legal steps attorneys use to create structure—like mediation deadlines, motions to compel, subpoenas, depositions, and discovery strategies—plus the mindset shifts that keep you from spiraling and spending thousands of dollars reacting emotionally. Bottom line: when the time is right, get aggressive—because talk is cheap.Stalling is one of the most common (and most infuriating) divorce experiences, and it happens for a few big reasons:They don't have their shit together (missing documents, incomplete financials, no affidavit, disorganized life)They think you'll panic and settle cheap just to end the painIt's a power play (silence = control, especially with high-conflict people)Their attorney is overwhelmed, under-resourced, or occasionally strategic (timing money events like bonuses, etc.)The good news: stalling isn't a dead end. It's a problem that can be solved with structure, strategy, and sometimes court pressure.The First Question to Ask Your LawyerBefore you go scorched earth, ask this exact question:“Is this delay normal… or is this strategic stalling?”Morgan explains that a good attorney can often tell you:whether the other lawyer is just chronically slow/unorganized, orwhether the other side is intentionally dragging things out to wear you down.These two scenarios require totally different responses.What Judges Respond To: Structure + DeadlinesStalled cases usually move when there's something real on the calendar:court datesmotion hearingstrial datesmediations with firm deadlinesMorgan's most practical advice:If nothing is moving, push for a trial date. Even if the first date doesn't “stick,” a real end date creates pressure—and pressure creates movement.Action Steps: What You Can Do When the Other Side Won't Respond1) Stop guessing. Get clarity.Tell your attorney you're frustrated and ask:Is this normal?What's the standard timeline in this jurisdiction?What steps do we take in order if they don't comply?At what point do we file something?This helps you avoid spending money “going aggressive” too early… only for the judge to give them another two...

Lisa tells us of her frightening Bigfoot encounter and how he tried to gesture her to follow him in the woods! Thanks for listening! Had an encounter and want to talk? Email us at info@cryptidcreatures.co (not.com)

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

In today's podcast episode, we have a quick rule of the Asylum: do not just go through the motions. You should make the effort to make sure every single note shines. I'll show you some examples of how to liven up your strumming and playing.   I talk about some easy ways you can experiment and practise to bring your music to life. It's all about enjoying your playing, but also finding a way to add that wow factor. Give it a listen and discover how you can make your playing sound better!   If you enjoyed this podcast, you can get my free “guitar secrets” video course, which will help all beginners or those who are “stuck”. Get the course for free, exclusively at - https://fingerstyle101.com/secrets/   Like this episode? Your reviews for this podcast mean the world to me, so please let us know what you thought about the Acoustic Asylum!

durée : 00:53:52 - Les informés de franceinfo - Tous les soirs, les informés débattent de l'actualité autour de Victor Matet Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

Pablo Servigne, aest uteur, penseur systémique et biologiste de formation. Il est l'un des premiers à avoir popularisé en France le concept de « collapsologie » avec ses livres devenus cultes, Comment tout peut s'effondrer ou encore Une autre fin du monde est possible. Mais aujourd'hui, Pablo prend ses distances avec cette étiquette. Dans Le réseau des tempêtes, son dernier livre, il trace un sillon nouveau, plus intime, plus incarné, où l'écologie ne peut plus faire l'économie du sensible, de l'émotion, de la relation et de la spiritualité.Cela faisait des années que je voulais inviter Pablo dans Vlan!. Nous avons attendu le bon moment. Et je crois que c'était maintenant. Parce que son message a profondément évolué, et qu'il entre en résonance totale avec mes propres réflexions sur la complexité, sur la joie, sur la nécessité de ralentir, et sur cette capacité à penser contre soi-même.Dans cet épisode, nous parlons de la violence – structurelle, politique, sociale, psychologique – et de comment elle s'insinue dans nos quotidiens. J'ai questionné Pablo sur sa conviction que la violence, à terme, ne résout rien et qu'elle ne fait que repousser les problèmes aux générations suivantes. Ce qu'il propose, c'est une bascule vers l'entraide, vers le lien, vers une autre manière d'habiter le monde – non pas dans l'utopie, mais dans une forme de lucidité joyeuse.Nous avons parlé de la course du temps, de la pression invisible qui nous pousse à toujours aller plus vite, alors même que notre besoin profond est de ralentir. De l'emprise des plateformes numériques sur notre attention. De la désocialisation croissante des jeunes générations. De l'anxiété rampante qui s'installe faute de communautés authentiques.Mais au-delà des constats, ce que propose Pablo, c'est une autre voie. Une voie du cœur et du corps. Une voie de l'enracinement. Une voie qui fait la paix avec nos émotions, nos ombres, nos vulnérabilités. Une voie qui croit encore à la puissance transformatrice du collectif, de la parole vraie, des récits réparateurs.Cet échange m'a profondément nourri. Il donne envie d'agir depuis un endroit plus juste, plus aligné. Citations marquantes« On ne peut pas traverser un effondrement sans passer par le cœur. »« La science ne suffit plus, il faut réintégrer le sensible et le sacré. »« Le vrai courage aujourd'hui, c'est de faire face à l'impermanence. »« Nous avons besoin de récits qui nous rassemblent dans l'incertitude. »« Accepter de ne pas savoir, c'est déjà commencer à guérir. »Idées centrales discutées1. De la collapsologie à l'écologie du lienPablo revient sur son parcours et sur la limite de la collapsologie comme prisme uniquement scientifique. Il évoque un besoin d'aller vers des dimensions plus sensibles et spirituelles.Pourquoi c'est important : Cela montre la nécessité d'un regard holistique sur les crises.~05:002. Le deuil comme passage obligéIl insiste sur l'importance de faire le deuil de l'ancien monde pour mieux accueillir le nouveau.Pourquoi c'est important : Cela permet de transformer la douleur en force de régénération.~12:303. Reconnexion au vivant et aux émotionsIl parle de la place des émotions, du corps, et du rituel dans la transition.Pourquoi c'est important : Cela redonne une place centrale à l'humain dans sa globalité.~19:004. Les limites du discours rationnel dans la crise écologiqueIl critique la foi aveugle dans la raison et la technique pour résoudre les problèmes écologiques.Pourquoi c'est important : Cela pousse à revaloriser l'intuition, l'art et les savoirs ancestraux.~27:005. La joie comme moteur d'actionMalgré la gravité du sujet, Pablo défend une posture de joie active face à l'effondrement.Pourquoi c'est important : Cela ouvre à une écologie de la joie et non de la peur.~38:00Questions posées dans l'interviewPourquoi as-tu arrêté de te revendiquer collapsologue ?Quel a été ton chemin personnel depuis la sortie de Comment tout peut s'effondrer ?Comment faire le deuil d'un monde en train de disparaître ?Quelle place donner aux émotions dans la transition écologique ?Comment réconcilier science, spiritualité et écologie ?De quoi avons-nous le plus peur face à l'effondrement ?Quel est le rôle des récits dans cette transformation collective ?Quelle importance donnes-tu aux rituels et à la communauté ?Est-ce qu'on peut encore espérer dans un monde en crise ?Comment cultiver la joie dans l'incertitude ?Références citées dans l'épisodeLivresComment tout peut s'effondrer – Pablo Servigne et Raphaël Stevens (~01:00)Une autre fin du monde est possible – Pablo Servigne et Gauthier Chapelle (~08:00)Concepts / auteursVandana Shiva – évoquée pour sa vision de l'écologie spirituelle (~20:00)Joanna Macy – travail qui relie (~23:00)Charles Eisenstein – économie sacrée (~30:00)Timestamps clés[00:00] Introduction – Qui est Pablo Servigne ?Un retour sur son parcours, ses engagements, et la naissance de la collapsologie.[05:00] La fin de la collapsologie ?Pourquoi Pablo ne s'identifie plus à ce courant.[12:30] Le processus de deuil collectifComprendre les émotions profondes liées à la crise écologique.[19:00] L'importance du corps, des émotions et des rituelsUn passage par le sensible pour faire face à l'effondrement.[27:00] Critique de la rationalité pureLes limites du discours scientifique dans les transformations sociétales.[38:00] Vers une écologie de la joieComment la joie devient un levier d'action puissant. Suggestion d'autres épisodes à écouter : #240 Marcher séparément mais lutter ensemble? Avec Rejane Senac (https://audmns.com/JCJVxeL) L'individualisme nous tue-t-il a petit feu? partie 1 avec Hugo Paul (https://audmns.com/ntXDwdf) [MOMENT] Transformer la violence de la société actuelle par le soin avec Marie Robert (https://audmns.com/EUxsYiz)Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

Tous les matins, à 7H10 et 9H45, on vous donne les bonnes nouvelles du jour.

Tous les matins, à 7H10 et 9H45, on vous donne les bonnes nouvelles du jour.

Throughout its Epstein-related lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, the U.S. Virgin Islands adopted an openly aggressive litigation posture, repeatedly hammering the bank through a series of sharply worded motions. The USVI accused JPMorgan of enabling and profiting from Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation by ignoring obvious red flags, failing basic anti-money-laundering controls, and continuing to provide banking services long after Epstein's criminal conduct was widely known. Motion after motion, the territory framed JPMorgan not as a passive bystander, but as a sophisticated financial institution that chose profit and client retention over compliance, survivor safety, and the law.In this episode, we revisit those filings to show that the USVI was not merely posturing—it was methodically building a narrative of institutional failure and moral bankruptcy. By dissecting the government's repeated attacks, we examine how the territory used discovery disputes, sanctions motions, and oppositions to expose what it described as JPMorgan's internal awareness of Epstein's activities and its efforts to minimize fallout rather than stop the abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

REDIFF - Paul Delair et Caroline Dublanche abordent la délicate question des émotions négatives après une rupture amoureuse. À travers le témoignage de Louis, confronté à une trahison douloureuse, ils explorent l'importance de reconnaître et d'exprimer des sentiments tels que la colère et la tristesse. Comment gérer ces émotions sans se laisser submerger ? Pourquoi est-il essentiel de ne pas les refouler ? Chaque soir, en direct, Caroline Dublanche accueille les auditeurs pour 2h30 d'échanges et de confidences. Pour participer, contactez l'émission au 09 69 39 10 11 (prix d'un appel local) ou sur parlonsnous@rtl.frHébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

La culpabilité est omniprésente dans la vie de nombreuses femmes. Cette petite voix intérieure, souvent dure et exigeante, vous souffle que vous n'en faites jamais assez : pas assez au travail, pas assez à la maison, pas assez pour les autres, pas assez pour vous-même. Dans cet épisode Best of du podcast Sensées, Jenny Chammas, mastercoach certifiée et fondatrice de Coachappy, décrypte comment la culpabilité s'immisce dans vos choix, influence vos décisions et fragilise votre équilibre de vie, parfois sans même que vous en ayez conscience.La culpabilité peut être visible et assumée, mais elle est le plus souvent inconsciente. Elle devient alors un filtre à travers lequel vous pilotez votre quotidien : vous travaillez plus pour compenser, vous vous imposez des exigences irréalistes, vous renoncez à vos besoins personnels, tout en continuant à vous juger sévèrement. Résultat : même lorsque vous vivez un équilibre de vie que vous avez choisi, celui-ci est pollué par la rumination, la fatigue mentale et une impression persistante de ne jamais être au bon endroit.Dans cet épisode Best of, Jenny vous aide à comprendre pourquoi la culpabilité nuit profondément à votre équilibre, et en quoi elle n'est pas un problème de gestion du temps mais un état d'esprit. Vous découvrirez comment les injonctions sociales, le perfectionnisme et les normes culturelles alimentent ce sentiment, en particulier chez les femmes leaders, mères, entrepreneures ou dirigeantes.Ce que vous saurez faire après écoute :– Identifier les différentes formes de culpabilité présentes dans votre vie quotidienne.– Comprendre comment la culpabilité influence vos comportements et vos décisions.– Distinguer une culpabilité utile, qui peut devenir un signal de réajustement, d'une culpabilité stérile qui vous épuise.– Vous réaligner avec des choix conscients et assumés pour retrouver un équilibre de vie plus serein.– Remplacer le jugement intérieur par plus de compassion et de confiance en vous.Jenny partage également des exemples concrets de décisions personnelles prises pour retrouver un équilibre aligné, ainsi que des pistes de réflexion pour vous aider à vous délester d'une culpabilité devenue envahissante. Cet épisode est une invitation à reprendre votre pouvoir décisionnel, à faire confiance à vos choix et à accepter que l'équilibre de vie est mouvant, imparfait et profondément personnel.

Comme chaque vendredi, un médecin spécialisé répond aux questions des auditrices de Priorité Santé. Cette semaine, nous parlons de la gestion des émotions. Montrer ses réactions en public n'est pas toujours bien considéré et cela peut détériorer une relation, encore plus quand il s'agit du milieu professionnel. (Rediffusion)   Alors, comment apprendre à reconnaitre ses émotions pour mieux les gérer ? Toutes les émotions doivent-elles être cachées ? Comment aborder quelqu'un calmement, en dépit d'un sentiment de la colère ?  Ismahan Soukeyna Diop, maitresse de conférences au département de psychologie et docteure en psychologie clinique à l'Université de Cheikh Anta Diop à Dakar au Sénégal.  La palabre au féminin de Charlie Dupiot. Programmation musicale : ► Stromae - Formidable ► Roselyne Layo feat. Angélique Kidjo - On sera là.

Comme chaque vendredi, un médecin spécialisé répond aux questions des auditrices de Priorité Santé. Cette semaine, nous parlons de la gestion des émotions. Montrer ses réactions en public n'est pas toujours bien considéré et cela peut détériorer une relation, encore plus quand il s'agit du milieu professionnel. (Rediffusion)   Alors, comment apprendre à reconnaitre ses émotions pour mieux les gérer ? Toutes les émotions doivent-elles être cachées ? Comment aborder quelqu'un calmement, en dépit d'un sentiment de la colère ?  Ismahan Soukeyna Diop, maitresse de conférences au département de psychologie et docteure en psychologie clinique à l'Université de Cheikh Anta Diop à Dakar au Sénégal.  La palabre au féminin de Charlie Dupiot. Programmation musicale : ► Stromae - Formidable ► Roselyne Layo feat. Angélique Kidjo - On sera là.

The process of unsealing federal grand jury records is deliberately difficult, wrapped in layers of legal insulation under Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Only a federal judge—not the President, not the Attorney General—can authorize disclosure, and even then, only if the requester demonstrates a “particularized need” that outweighs the default presumption of secrecy. Motions must be surgically precise, narrowly tailored, and supported by compelling legal justification. Even successful requests often result in redacted or restricted disclosures, not public transparency. The system is built to prioritize protection over exposure, and accountability often takes a backseat to process.While the courts claim this structure safeguards the integrity of justice, it frequently appears to serve power over truth—especially when politically sensitive material is involved. The legal mechanisms for disclosure exist on paper but function in reality as bureaucratic gatekeeping. Victims, journalists, and the public are told they can seek access, but few ever get it—and fewer still get anything meaningful. The result is a growing skepticism: that secrecy has become less about shielding the innocent and more about shielding the institution itself. The question is, will the courts continue to protect that secrecy at all costs, or will the demand for real transparency finally break through?to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

durée : 00:59:27 - Le Cours de l'histoire - par : Xavier Mauduit, Maïwenn Guiziou - Le parfum est par nature évanescent. Sous l'effet de la lumière, de l'air et de la chaleur, il est voué à se dégrader puis disparaître. Depuis 1990, l'Osmothèque s'est donné pour mission de conserver ce patrimoine olfactif et de transmettre l'histoire du parfum et de la parfumerie. - réalisation : Thomas Beau, Cassandre Puel - invités : Eugénie Briot Historienne du parfum, responsable de projet "histoire et transmission" pour Givaudan et membre du comité scientifique de l'Osmothèque; Thomas Fontaine Parfumeur et président de l'Osmothèque; Anne-Cécile Pouant Directrice de l'Osmothèque

In this episode, we continue breaking down the State of Idaho's response to Lori Vallow Daybell's appeal, picking up deep into the brief as the State dismantles claims of constitutional violations.The State argues that Lori Vallow failed all three prongs of the fundamental error test — including claims that her Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated and that her due process rights were ignored while she was deemed incompetent.We walk through why the court says Mark Means had the opportunity to respond but chose not to, why this was not a structural error, and why any alleged error would be considered harmless under existing case law.The episode also dives into the key issue of competency, explaining why hearings held in Chad Daybell's separate criminal case did not violate Lori Vallow's rights — including her right not to be prosecuted while incompetent or her right to be physically present.This section of the appeal gives rare insight into what was happening behind the scenes while much of the case was under seal — and why the State is confident none of these arguments will impact her Idaho conviction.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout  - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)00:00 – Intro & Where We Left OffRecap of the series and picking back up in the State's response to Lori Vallow's appeal00:55 – Mark Means & Alleged Right-to-Counsel ViolationState argues Means had the opportunity to respond but chose not to02:17 – Fundamental Error Test: “Error Plainly Exists”Explanation of the second prong of the Perry test and why the State says Vallow fails it04:18 – Misuse of Bodenbach ComparisonWhy the Idaho Supreme Court's Bodenbach ruling does not apply here06:34 – Harmless Error vs Structural ErrorState argues this was not a complete deprivation of counsel08:52 – Hearings Focused on Chad Daybell, Not Lori VallowWhy Means' limited role did not violate Vallow's Sixth Amendment rights10:01 – No Showing of PrejudiceState explains why Vallow's arguments are speculative and unsupported11:19 – New Argument: Due Process & CompetencyWhether Vallow's rights were violated while she was deemed incompetent13:04 – Right Not to Be Prosecuted While IncompetentIdaho law on suspension of proceedings and why it didn't apply here16:37 – Separate Criminal Case ExplainedWhy hearings in Chad Daybell's case did not violate Vallow's rights18:55 – Balancing Competing Constitutional RightsCourt's duty to protect conflict-free counsel and fairness of proceedings21:10 – Mark Means' Actions During IncompetencyWhy the court acted quickly to disqualify Means22:33 – Court Left Door Open After Restoration to CompetencyOpportunity Vallow had to revisit issues later24:01 – Right to Be Present at HearingsWhy due process does not require presence in another defendant's case26:24 – Why Vallow's Presence Would Not Have Changed AnythingCompetency, waiver issues, and harmless error analysis29:39 – Failure to Show Error Plainly Exists (Again)State argues tactical decisions undermine Vallow's claims33:03 – Harmless Error Analysis AppliesWhy prejudice cannot be presumed36:14 – Wrapping Up & What's NextPreview of the next episode and appeal timeline going forwardBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

durée : 00:59:01 - Le Cours de l'histoire - par : Xavier Mauduit, Maïwenn Guiziou - Comment les chansons des premiers troubadours sonnent-elles ? Cette question résonne dans l'esprit des historiens et des historiennes comme une rengaine. Pourtant, les sources relatives à ces auteurs-compositeurs du 12ᵉ siècle sont rares, voire inexistantes. - réalisation : Thomas Beau, Laurence Millet - invités : Katy Bernard Médiéviste, maîtresse de conférences d'occitan à l'Université Bordeaux Montaigne; Xavier Terrasa Musicien-chercheur spécialisé dans l'interprétation des répertoires du Moyen Âge occidental et dans l'organologie médiévale

durée : 00:59:04 - Le Cours de l'histoire - par : Xavier Mauduit, Maïwenn Guiziou - Comment l'art contemporain s'approprie-t-il l'histoire ? Dessin, tapisserie, photographie, les artistes tissent des liens avec les lieux et objets historiques. Des grottes ornées de la Préhistoire au champ de bataille de Verdun, l'art contemporain porte un regard nouveau sur les vestiges du passé. - réalisation : Thomas Beau, Sam Baquiast

durée : 00:59:08 - La Série musicale - par : Zoé Sfez - Suite de notre plongée dans l'épopée musicale des jeux vidéo, à la découverte des années 1990 et 2000. Une époque où la musique n'est plus seulement un décor : désormais, elle fabrique des émotions, construit des souvenirs, provoque des élans physiques et fait entrer le joueur dans le récit. - réalisation : Thomas Jost

Bienvenue sur Sensées, le format audio de ma newsletter hebdomadaire. Chaque semaine, retrouvez des conseils de leadership féminin, des expériences vécues et toute l'énergie dont vous avez besoin pour réussir avec confiance et sérénité. Cette semaine, je vous révèle mon cadeau de Noël, qui concerne les deux compétences clés du leadership pour les femmes.Dans cet épisode de Sensées, j'ai envie de vous parler de ce que j'ai réussi à faire dans une période morose… et surtout des compétences qui m'ont permis de le faire. Ces 4 dernières semaines, j'ai négocié et signé cinq conférences pour les 3 prochains mois et j'ai décroché 2 nouveaux clients. Autour de moi, beaucoup pensent que “c'est impossible en ce moment”. Et pourtant, les résultats sont là.S'il y a bien deux compétences clés du leadership que je maîtrise aujourd'hui, ce sont :savoir vendre la valeur de mon travail (ce qui permet notamment de gagner en visibilité et en reconnaissance)prendre la parole avec confiance (en public, en réunion, en individuel, etc.)Je ne suis pas née avec ces compétences. Je les ai développées dans l'action au fil des années parce que j'étais déterminée à prendre ma place, à gagner de l'argent et à m'épanouir dans mes fonctions. Parce que je crois profondément que donner du pouvoir aux femmes, c'est rendre le monde meilleur (et qu'en ce moment il a plus que besoin de notre aide), j'ai crée depuis 2023 deux formations d'excellence déjà approuvées par des centaines de leaders.✨ Savoir vendre sa valeur professionnelle (cliquez ici)✨ Réussir ses prises de parole (cliquez ici)Pour la première fois depuis leur création - et pour la première fois chez Coachappy - nous faisons une offre exceptionnelle dans le cadre

Le sujet fort de l'actualité foot du jour vu par Jérôme Rothen et la Dream Team.

From the moment she was arrested, Ghislaine Maxwell pursued an aggressive strategy to keep proceedings against her shielded from public view. Her legal team repeatedly sought to seal filings, close hearings, restrict media access, and limit the release of court records, arguing that publicity would prejudice her right to a fair trial and endanger her safety. Motions were filed to keep discovery materials confidential, redact filings referencing third parties, and prevent the unsealing of documents connected to the Epstein network. Maxwell also fought subpoenas and challenged disclosure efforts that could expose names, communications, and financial details beyond the narrow scope of her criminal charges.That secrecy campaign extended beyond trial logistics to the broader record of the case. Maxwell attempted to block the release of grand jury materials, oppose the unsealing of civil deposition transcripts, and resist public access to evidence already referenced in court. Judges repeatedly pushed back, emphasizing the strong presumption of public access in criminal proceedings, particularly in a case of extraordinary public interest. While some limited protections were granted, the courts largely rejected Maxwell's efforts to litigate in the shadows. The result was a steady erosion of her attempt at secrecy, reinforcing the principle that the prosecution of a central figure in one of the most consequential trafficking cases in modern history could not be insulated from public scrutiny simply because exposure was inconvenient or dangerous to powerful interests.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

From the moment she was arrested, Ghislaine Maxwell pursued an aggressive strategy to keep proceedings against her shielded from public view. Her legal team repeatedly sought to seal filings, close hearings, restrict media access, and limit the release of court records, arguing that publicity would prejudice her right to a fair trial and endanger her safety. Motions were filed to keep discovery materials confidential, redact filings referencing third parties, and prevent the unsealing of documents connected to the Epstein network. Maxwell also fought subpoenas and challenged disclosure efforts that could expose names, communications, and financial details beyond the narrow scope of her criminal charges.That secrecy campaign extended beyond trial logistics to the broader record of the case. Maxwell attempted to block the release of grand jury materials, oppose the unsealing of civil deposition transcripts, and resist public access to evidence already referenced in court. Judges repeatedly pushed back, emphasizing the strong presumption of public access in criminal proceedings, particularly in a case of extraordinary public interest. While some limited protections were granted, the courts largely rejected Maxwell's efforts to litigate in the shadows. The result was a steady erosion of her attempt at secrecy, reinforcing the principle that the prosecution of a central figure in one of the most consequential trafficking cases in modern history could not be insulated from public scrutiny simply because exposure was inconvenient or dangerous to powerful interests.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf

Perez-Perez v. Bondi, No. 25-0315 (6th Cir. Nov. 21, 2025)qualifying relative age-out for non LPR cancellation of removal purposes; meaning of the phrase “would result”; Loper Bright; freezing age at time of IJ adjudication Sarkisov v. Bondi, No. 25-0316 (6th Cir. Nov. 21, 2025)extraordinary circumstances for VAWA-based motions to reopen; mixed question of law and fact review; definition of extraordinary circumstances; psychological harm Labrador Gutierrez v. Bondi, No. 25-60646 (5th Cir. Nov. 26, 2025)stay of removal; Nken B.G.S. v. Bondi, No. 23-6862 (2d Cir. Nov. 24, 2025)government acquiesce; MS-13; Guatemala; former gang members; tattoos; prison conditions; Green Light order; prison guard consent; speculation expected with CAT Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years. Eimmigration "Simplifies immigration casework. Legal professionals use it to advance cases faster, delight clients, and grow their practices."Special Link! Gonzales & Gonzales Immigration BondsP: (833) 409-9200immigrationbond.com  EB-5 Support"EB-5 Support is an ongoing mentorship and resource platform created specifically for immigration attorneys."Contact: info@eb-5support.comWebsite: https://eb-5support.com/Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page! CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego Voyager DISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

Ceci est un extrait de l'épisode 40 avec Anne Partridge, qui anime des ateliers Faber et Mazlich.Cet extrait fait suite à l'épisode 281 avec Roselyne Roy. Cette semaine, on va parler ateliers à la parentalité.Anne Partridge, est animatrice Faber et Mazlich, une méthode inventée par 2 mères canadiennes dans les années 70.Le livre support sur lequel on s'appuie, Parler pour que les enfants écoutent, écouter pour que les enfants parlent, est une ressource incroyable d'outils simples à mettre en place à la maison.Anne anime des ateliers depuis 8 ans sur Bordeaux. Elle reçoit des groupes de parents, qui viennent suivre 7 séances qui durent 3 heures.Alors quel intérêt à ces ateliers? Qu'est-ce qu'on y apprend? Pourquoi franchir le pas et venir participer avec d'autres parents ?Pour contextualiser, j'ai assisté en début d'année 2019 à 7 ateliers, et j'en suis ressortir enchantée. Anne est d'une incroyable bienveillance et j'avais envie de connaitre son parcours, par où, elle, en tant que maman, était passée. Et vous allez réaliser que son parcours dans la parentalité est loin d'être simple et linéaire. Elle a donc cette capacité incroyable de connaitre ce que peuvent ressentir les parents qui tatonnent. J'espère que cet épisode vous donnera envie d'aller passer la porte d'un atelier, peu importe lequel, il y en a plein en France. Je suis persuadée que cela vous boostera et vous encouragera dans votre chemin. Très bonne écouteLIENS UTILES :https://www.anne-partridge.comParler pour que les enfants écoutent - écouter pour que les enfants parlent, Adèle Faber, Elaine MazlishSite de Faber et Mazlish- le site de Roseline Roy, ambassadrice de l'approche Faber Mazlish : https://fabermazlish-aep.com- l'annuaire des animatrices/teurs en francophonie : https://rezo.fabermazlish-aep.com/annuaire-des-anim/- tous les ouvrages : https://fabermazlish-aep.com/magasin-en-ligne-livres-faber-mazlish/Création originale : Clémentine SarlatProduction : Clémentine SarlatEnregistrement : Clémentine SarlatHébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

As the one-year mark of Brian Thompson's murder approaches, accused shooter Luigi Mangione is back in court — and this week could change everything. Pre-trial motions will decide whether the gun, backpack, journal and key statements ever reach a jury. Did officers cross the line during Luigi's arrest in Pennsylvania, or were they following the rules with a dangerous fugitive? If the judge suppresses the gun and manifesto-style writings, how much of the case is left? Scott breaks down the motions, the constitutional arguments, what "fruit of the poisonous tree" really means, and how this battle could reshape both the state and federal prosecutions.