Podcasts about motions

Get 15% off OneSkin with the code LAWNERD at https://www.oneskin.co/ #oneskinpod #adThe Karen Read Retrial's Opening statements begin on Tuesday, April 22nd. There's a motion from the Commonwealth to restrict the defense from claiming victim injuries were caused by an animal. The defense wants to show a picture of abrasions on the victim's arm in their opening statement.Diddy's request for a two-month continuance was denied so the trial will move forward as planned. The court denied Warner Brothers' motion to quash a subpoena for unaired footage of interviews. Memoir drafts from "Victim 1" must be turned over to Diddy. Victims 2, 3, and 4 can testify under pseudonyms. Attorney Brian Steele, known from the Young Thug RICO case, has joined Diddy's defense team.A hearing was held for the Menendez Brother's Resentencing, but the District Attorney's office attempted to withdraw a motion for resentencing, which the judge denied. There's now a motion to recuse the DA's office, and the hearing is delayed until May 9th. There are also allegations that the prosecution violated Marsy's Law by showing graphic crime scene photos without warning the family.The Donna Adelson trial is set to begin with jury selection on June 3rd. Motions to recuse the judge were denied.Tom Girardi sentencing is delayed until May 8th as they determine whether he should be committed to a facility instead of prison.RESOURCESLast Podcast Episode - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiVLnPrmBvIMenendez Brothers - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Zdbj_MDU-EBill Cosby Breakdown - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXOzcrSaIQMDiddy Indicted Again - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWWROhF2_2YDiddy Lawyer Quits - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjItfEI1pwYThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

durée : 00:03:12 - 100% Sainté, la chronique

Bilan personnalisé OFFERT : https://www.kinecoachsante.fr/bilan

Bilan personnalisé OFFERT : https://www.kinecoachsante.fr/bilan

Et si l'on pouvait danser une émotion ? Dans cet épisode un peu à part, j'ai proposé à Aurélien Lehmann un défi en deux temps :

Pas de temps de s'échauffer, les "Grandes Gueules du Sport" démarrent fort dès 9h00 : la UNE c'est l'actu brûlante du sport, entre infos, analyses et débats.

The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial in federal civil cases for legal claims, primarily those seeking monetary damages (e.g., torts, contract breaches), as opposed to equitable remedies like injunctions or specific performance.Voir dire is the process of questioning potential jurors to ensure an impartial jury. Challenges for cause allow dismissal for demonstrated bias, while peremptory challenges permit a limited number of removals without stating a reason, though they cannot be discriminatory.A typical civil trial proceeds with opening statements, the plaintiff's case-in-chief (presenting evidence to meet the preponderance of the evidence standard), the defendant's case-in-chief, rebuttal, surrebuttal (if any), closing arguments, and jury instructions before deliberation and verdict.A motion for judgment as a matter of law (Rule 50(a)) argues that the opposing party has not presented sufficient evidence to support a verdict in their favor and can be made after that party has been fully heard. The court considers the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.A motion for a new trial (Rule 59) seeks to restart the trial due to errors or issues that prejudiced the outcome, such as evidentiary errors, misconduct, a verdict against the weight of the evidence, or newly discovered evidence. It differs from Rule 50 in that it doesn't necessarily argue the existing verdict is legally impossible.The entry of judgment formally concludes the trial court proceedings and triggers deadlines for post-judgment remedies and appeals. One ground for relief from judgment under Rule 60 is excusable neglect, generally with a one-year time limit from the entry of judgment.United States Courts of Appeals have jurisdiction over final decisions of district courts under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The general deadline for filing a notice of appeal is within 30 days of the entry of the final judgment.The de novo standard of review means the appellate court reviews legal questions anew without deference to the trial court's ruling. The clear error standard applies to factual findings, which the appellate court will only overturn if a definite and firm mistake is found.Claim preclusion (res judicata) prevents relitigating a claim already decided by a final judgment on the merits. The elements are a final judgment on the merits, identity of the parties (or privity), and the same claim or cause of action.Issue preclusion (collateral estoppel) prevents relitigating specific factual or legal issues already decided in a prior case. A key requirement is that the issue must have been actually litigated and determined, and essential to the prior judgment.

This lecture provides a thorough overview of the concluding phases of federal civil litigation, starting with the fundamental right to a jury trial and the selection process. It then details the structured progression of a trial, including opening statements, presentation of evidence, closing arguments, and jury instructions. The lecture further explains post-trial motions, such as judgments as a matter of law and requests for a new trial, which serve as critical checks on trial outcomes. Finally, it examines the appellate process, covering jurisdictional aspects, filing procedures, standards of review, and the preclusive effects of judgments.

On est arrivées avec une belle brioche dans notre panier et on a été accueillies à bras ouvert dans la ménagerie Damidot. On a rencontré Monsieur... et le petit dernier de la famille, Alfred ! Tout ça dans une magnifique maison pleine de couleurs, d'objets insolites, et surtout pleine de vie, à l'image de Valérie Damidot, une tornade de bonne humeur, et de tendresse, qui a passé sa vie à envoyer valser les diktats, et vous allez voir, ça lui réussit plutôt très bien. On l'a vu mener les chantiers les plus fous dans l'émission Déco pendant dix ans, jouer la comédie et même monter seule en scène à 60 ans avec son spectacle « Valérie Damidot s'expose »Aujourd'hui on peut entendre son franc-parler et son humour à toute épreuve tous les jours sur radio "Ici". Ensemble, on a parlé de télé, de liberté, de l'âge…et bien sur de ménopause.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

The primary purpose of discovery is for parties to exchange information and evidence before trial, ensuring fairness and preventing "trial by ambush" by requiring both sides to have access to relevant facts and witnesses.The three key elements are relevance to a party's claim or defense, non-privileged matter, and proportionality to the needs of the case; proportionality involves balancing factors like the importance of issues, the amount in controversy, access to facts, and the burden of discovery.Discoverable information is any non-privileged matter relevant and proportional to the case, while admissible evidence is information that meets the rules of evidence for presentation at trial; for example, hearsay might be discoverable if it could lead to admissible evidence.Attorney-client privilege protects confidential communications between a lawyer and client made for the purpose of legal advice, while the work product doctrine safeguards materials prepared in anticipation of litigation; these protect the attorney-client relationship and the lawyer's preparation from adversarial scrutiny.Two primary functions are to help each party prepare for discovery by providing a roadmap of key information and to set the stage for potential settlement negotiations by outlining case strengths and weaknesses; an example of required disclosure is the names and contact information of individuals likely to have discoverable information.Expert witness disclosures must include the identity and qualifications of the expert, a summary of their opinions and their factual basis, and any prior testimony; failure to adequately disclose can lead to the exclusion of the expert's testimony at trial.A deposition is a pretrial examination conducted under oath to ask detailed questions of witnesses or parties, while a request for production of documents compels the opposing party to produce relevant documents, electronic files, or tangible items; depositions primarily seek testimonial evidence, while requests for production seek documentary or physical evidence.A party might file a motion to compel if the opposing party fails to respond to discovery requests or provides incomplete or evasive answers; a potential sanction under Rule 37(b) includes ordering that certain facts be taken as established against the non-complying party.The purpose of a protective order is to limit or prohibit the production of information that is overly burdensome, duplicative, or infringing on privacy rights; a court might issue a protective order to limit the scope of a deposition to prevent harassment.Summary judgment is granted if there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; the moving party must demonstrate the absence of a genuine dispute of material fact, and the non-moving party must then come forward with specific evidence showing a triable issue exists.

Dans ce nouvel épisode de Tendances Inno, Marine Adatto et Olivier Senot reçoivent Athénaïs Oslati, fondatrice d'ONTBO, pour explorer l'IA cognitive et empathique. Au programme :- IA empathique : mythe ou réalité ?- Usages concrets et retours d'expérience- Éthique et diversité culturelle dans l'IA- Conseils pour tester et adopter ces nouvelles solutions À travers des échanges concrets et des retours d'expérience, découvrez comment l'intelligence artificielle peut décrypter nos émotions, personnaliser les interactions et redéfinir la relation homme-machine. L'épisode aborde aussi les enjeux éthiques, les différences culturelles et les défis liés à l'intégration de l'IA empathique dans notre quotidien. Un rendez-vous inspirant pour comprendre comment l'innovation technologique peut rendre le numérique plus humain et inclusif. #Tech #Innovation #IA #Empathie #Docaposte #TendancesInno #CognitifHébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

This lecture provides an overview of key pretrial procedures in civil litigation, focusing on discovery, case management, and summary judgment. Discovery is explained as the formal process for exchanging information and evidence between parties to prevent trial surprises. The lecture details various discovery tools, such as depositions and interrogatories, and emphasizes the importance of proportionality and mandatory disclosures. Subsequently, it covers case management and pretrial conferences, highlighting how courts use scheduling orders and meetings to streamline litigation and narrow issues. Finally, the lecture examines summary judgment as a mechanism to resolve cases or specific issues without trial if no genuine factual disputes exist.

Les gérer ? les contrôler ? les maîtriser ?Elles nous embarrassent. Et si c'était le cas uniquement car on se battait contre elles et avec elles ?Dans cet épisode de podcast, j'explore avec mon invitée : Valérie, coach dans le programme Affirme-toi comme une Queen, l'impact de nos émotions sur notre quotidien.Attention, cet épiside va te faire changer radicalement ta perspective sur les émotions...dans le bon sens !

Trop d'organisation tue l'organisation. Trop de flexibilité tue l'organisation aussi. Entre ces deux extrêmes, où se situe le juste équilibre ? Certaines leaders planifient tout à la minute près et paniquent au moindre imprévu. D'autres repoussent, jonglent, et finissent par crouler sous la pression. Dans cet épisode Best of, on explore les pièges du manque de structure ou de l'excès de contrôle et surtout, je vous partage 4 clefs puissantes pour harmoniser organisation et flexibilité selon votre profil… et faire de votre gestion du temps un atout service de votre leadership.****Notre guide "10 leviers essentiels pour les décideuses" est un véritable concentré d'outils de coaching et de mentoring, les mêmes que nous utilisons dans le programme Sensées. Il est conçu pour toutes les directrices, dirigeantes et entrepreneures qui sont fatiguées de porter seules les responsabilités. Si vous avez l'impression que votre quotidien vous échappe petit à petit, ce guide est fait pour vous. Cliquez ici pour obtenir votre exemplaire offert !***Sensées, c'est aussi un programme de coaching pour les femmes dirigeantes, top managers et entrepreneures. Au sein du programme Sensées, vous êtes accompagnée en petit groupe ET en individuel dans votre croissance professionnelle. Vous êtes aussi formée et mentorée pour incarner pleinement votre leadership, avec les maîtres mots sérénité, plaisir, hauteur et impact. Intéressée ? Cliquez ici pour en savoir plus.**Vous représentez une entreprise et souhaitez développer le leadership de vos talents féminins ? : cliquez ici.**Chaque semaine, je partage mes conseils au sujet du leadership des femmes dans Sensées, la newsletter. Inscrivez-vous gratuitement en cliquant ici.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Short-Answer QuizWhat is the fundamental purpose of personal jurisdiction, and what constitutional provision provides its basis?Personal jurisdiction ensures a court has the authority to compel a defendant to appear and litigate in the forum. Its constitutional basis lies in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, preventing individuals from being unfairly haled into court in distant or unconnected locations.Explain the difference between general and specific personal jurisdiction, providing a brief example of how each might arise.General jurisdiction exists when a defendant's contacts with the forum state are so continuous and systematic that they can be sued there for any claim, even if unrelated to those contacts (e.g., a corporation with its headquarters in a state). Specific jurisdiction arises when the lawsuit directly relates to the defendant's specific contacts with the forum state (e.g., a contract dispute stemming from a sale made in the state).What are the two primary bases for subject matter jurisdiction in federal courts, and what is a key requirement for each?The two primary bases are federal question jurisdiction and diversity jurisdiction. For federal question jurisdiction, the plaintiff's claim must arise under federal law and be evident in the well-pleaded complaint. For diversity jurisdiction, the case must be between citizens of different states (or a state and a foreign national) with an amount in controversy exceeding $75,000, and there must be complete diversity of citizenship.How does venue differ from jurisdiction, and what is the primary goal of venue rules?Jurisdiction concerns a court's power to hear a case (either over the person or the subject matter), while venue dictates the specific geographic district where the case should be heard. The primary goal of venue rules is to ensure a convenient and appropriate location for the litigation, considering factors like the parties' residences and where the events occurred.Describe the key elements that must be included in a complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.A complaint must contain a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for the relief sought by the pleader.How have the Twombly and Iqbal Supreme Court decisions impacted the federal pleading standard?These decisions raised the pleading standard beyond mere notice pleading, requiring complaints to contain sufficient factual allegations to state a claim that is plausible on its face. This means the factual narrative must be more detailed and suggest a likelihood of liability, rather than just reciting the elements of a cause of action.What are the two main ways a defendant can respond to a complaint after being served? Briefly explain each.A defendant can file an answer, which requires them to admit or deny each of the plaintiff's allegations and assert any affirmative defenses they may have. Alternatively, a defendant can file a pre-answer motion under Rule 12(b), which raises legal objections to the complaint, such as lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to state a claim.List three examples of affirmative defenses a defendant might assert in their answer.Examples of affirmative defenses include the statute of limitations (the lawsuit was filed after the legal deadline), res judicata (the issue has already been decided by a court), and estoppel (the plaintiff is prevented from asserting a claim due to their prior conduct or statements).Under what circumstances can a party amend their pleading "as a matter of course"?A party can amend their pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days after serving the original pleading, or if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, within 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.

Merci Corentin, et à demain pour l'analyse d'Apolline, accompagnatrice et éducatrice dans le comportement canin ! Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

This lecture on federal civil procedure outlines the initial stages of litigation. It begins by explaining jurisdiction, focusing on the court's power over parties (personal jurisdiction) and the types of cases it can hear (subject matter jurisdiction). The discussion then moves to venue, detailing where a case should be properly filed for trial. The lecture further examines pleadings, covering the initial complaint and the defendant's response, including motions and answers. Finally, it addresses the process of amending pleadings, which allows for changes as a case progresses. The goal is to provide a foundational understanding of these crucial procedural elements.

Feels like Melbourne are just going through the motions and delaying the inevitable change at the helm. Naughtsie and Benny Lee have some real, harsh but honest chats about where the football club is currently at with Simon Goodwin fighting for his job after the 0-5 start to the 2025 campaign. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

En tant qu'être humain, bonne nouvelle, nous avons des émotions… par contre, ces dernières ne sont pas toujours bonnes conseillères et peuvent nous pousser à avoir des comportements qui vont contre nos intérêts professionnels. Il nous est arrivé à toutes et à tous d'avoir des mots qui dépassent nos pensées sous le coup de l'émotion… et de le regretter plus tard. Ce n'est pas une fatalité… ça, c'est l'autre bonne nouvelle. Pour que vos émotions ne vous jouent pas des tours, voici les 5 comportements à ne pas avoir :1️⃣ Ne rien faire2️⃣ Réagir sur l'instant3️⃣ Ne pas se remettre en cause4️⃣ Ne pas analyserEt pour retrouver tous mes contenus, tests, articles, vidéos : www.gchatelain.comSoutenez ce podcast http://supporter.acast.com/happy-work. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Bryan Kohberger had a hearing on April 9th, 2025 to go over Motions in Limine. What was first thought to be a 2 day affair, was completed in 1 day because Judge Hippler runs a tight ship! The Defense and Prosecution were able to go over 25 Motions. Some were decided on the stand, others were taken under advisement. The most intense part of the hearing focused on a dispute over AT&T records.The Defense Attorney, Anne Taylor, made accusations about the Prosecution withholding evidence, leading to a strong rebuke from the judge. Judge Hipper reminded Anne Taylor that she is an "Officer of the Court" and that when he took on this case he doesn't want theatrics or accusations that aren't supported evidence about supposed bad conducts.He said that he respects all of the attorneys and the types of accusations made can get a person disbarred! When Rulings are posted in writing, I will break them down in an upcoming Monday - The Emily Show podcast episode.Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/L_LYXsaPV8ERESOURCESThe Emily Show Podcast - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFdNnRZUqH60WELo6OInNVPU7Fed0d2BzBushy Eyebrow - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHlYOkcFXAwThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

​On April 9, 2025, Bryan Kohberger appeared in a Boise, Idaho court for a hearing addressing multiple pre-trial motions ahead of his upcoming trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude several pieces of evidence, including Amazon records allegedly showing Kohberger purchased a Ka-Bar knife and sheath, testimony from a surviving roommate who described an intruder with "bushy eyebrows," 911 call recordings, Kohberger's academic writings on crime scenes, a selfie taken in front of a shower, and weather data potentially undermining his alibi. Additionally, the defense requested the death penalty be removed from consideration, citing Kohberger's autism diagnosisProsecutors, on the other hand, confirmed their intention to call several of Kohberger's family members as witnesses during the trial. They also sought to prevent the defense from suggesting Kohberger was framed and to prohibit portraying the state's pursuit of the death penalty as an attempt to kill him. Judge Steven Hippler addressed these motions, preliminarily ruling that terms like "psychopath," "sociopath," or "murderer" should not be used during the evidentiary phase. He also indicated that Kohberger's autism diagnosis could be presented as a mitigating factor if convicted but not as an aggravating one. Specific rulings on these motions are expected to be issued at a later date.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmal.comsource: Bryan Kohberger makes bombshell claim about TWO Idaho murders killers as judge considers if family will testify | Daily Mail Online

​On April 9, 2025, Bryan Kohberger appeared in a Boise, Idaho court for a hearing addressing multiple pre-trial motions ahead of his upcoming trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude several pieces of evidence, including Amazon records allegedly showing Kohberger purchased a Ka-Bar knife and sheath, testimony from a surviving roommate who described an intruder with "bushy eyebrows," 911 call recordings, Kohberger's academic writings on crime scenes, a selfie taken in front of a shower, and weather data potentially undermining his alibi. Additionally, the defense requested the death penalty be removed from consideration, citing Kohberger's autism diagnosisProsecutors, on the other hand, confirmed their intention to call several of Kohberger's family members as witnesses during the trial. They also sought to prevent the defense from suggesting Kohberger was framed and to prohibit portraying the state's pursuit of the death penalty as an attempt to kill him. Judge Steven Hippler addressed these motions, preliminarily ruling that terms like "psychopath," "sociopath," or "murderer" should not be used during the evidentiary phase. He also indicated that Kohberger's autism diagnosis could be presented as a mitigating factor if convicted but not as an aggravating one. Specific rulings on these motions are expected to be issued at a later date.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmal.comsource: Bryan Kohberger makes bombshell claim about TWO Idaho murders killers as judge considers if family will testify | Daily Mail Online

​On April 9, 2025, Bryan Kohberger appeared in a Boise, Idaho court for a hearing addressing multiple pre-trial motions ahead of his upcoming trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude several pieces of evidence, including Amazon records allegedly showing Kohberger purchased a Ka-Bar knife and sheath, testimony from a surviving roommate who described an intruder with "bushy eyebrows," 911 call recordings, Kohberger's academic writings on crime scenes, a selfie taken in front of a shower, and weather data potentially undermining his alibi. Additionally, the defense requested the death penalty be removed from consideration, citing Kohberger's autism diagnosisProsecutors, on the other hand, confirmed their intention to call several of Kohberger's family members as witnesses during the trial. They also sought to prevent the defense from suggesting Kohberger was framed and to prohibit portraying the state's pursuit of the death penalty as an attempt to kill him. Judge Steven Hippler addressed these motions, preliminarily ruling that terms like "psychopath," "sociopath," or "murderer" should not be used during the evidentiary phase. He also indicated that Kohberger's autism diagnosis could be presented as a mitigating factor if convicted but not as an aggravating one. Specific rulings on these motions are expected to be issued at a later date.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmal.comsource: Bryan Kohberger makes bombshell claim about TWO Idaho murders killers as judge considers if family will testify | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On April 9, 2025, Bryan Kohberger appeared in a Boise, Idaho court for a hearing addressing multiple pre-trial motions ahead of his upcoming trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude several pieces of evidence, including Amazon records allegedly showing Kohberger purchased a Ka-Bar knife and sheath, testimony from a surviving roommate who described an intruder with "bushy eyebrows," 911 call recordings, Kohberger's academic writings on crime scenes, a selfie taken in front of a shower, and weather data potentially undermining his alibi. Additionally, the defense requested the death penalty be removed from consideration, citing Kohberger's autism diagnosisProsecutors, on the other hand, confirmed their intention to call several of Kohberger's family members as witnesses during the trial. They also sought to prevent the defense from suggesting Kohberger was framed and to prohibit portraying the state's pursuit of the death penalty as an attempt to kill him. Judge Steven Hippler addressed these motions, preliminarily ruling that terms like "psychopath," "sociopath," or "murderer" should not be used during the evidentiary phase. He also indicated that Kohberger's autism diagnosis could be presented as a mitigating factor if convicted but not as an aggravating one. Specific rulings on these motions are expected to be issued at a later date.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmal.comsource: Bryan Kohberger makes bombshell claim about TWO Idaho murders killers as judge considers if family will testify | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Bryan Kohberger will be back in court on April 9th & 10th, 2025 to discuss Motions in Limine and other filings. The State adds another Prosecutor to the team - Attorney Hurwit. An important limine is the AT&T Timing Advance Records. There's a dispute between the Prosecution and Defense regarding access to these records. The prosecution claims the records related to Kohberger timed out and no longer exist due to AT&T's policy of keeping them for only seven days. The defense questions this, suggesting that law enforcement may have seen these records and that the Prosecution might not be fully disclosing information. What's the truth about the 7-day retention policy? This could be a potential for a major issue if the Prosecution had the records and didn't disclose them, versus if AT&T simply stating the records no longer exist.Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/mHlYOkcFXAwThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

durée : 00:07:50 - Ma vie de parent - Dans la famille de Julien Bisson, il y a le sacro-saint rituel du vendredi soir : on allume le vidéoprojecteur, on descend l'écran géant, et on regarde des films de tous genres, de toutes époques, plongés dans le noir et dans la passion commune pour le cinéma.

Pourquoi certains échanges avec les clients renforcent-ils la confiance, tandis que d'autres laissent une impression négative ?  La réponse réside dans le fait que notre cerveau capte bien plus que de simples mots : l'écoute, l'empathie, l'intonation, le rythme… autant d'éléments subtils qui influencent inconsciemment notre perception d'une marque et de la qualité du service reçu.  Comprendre et maîtriser ces mécanismes, c'est réussir à transformer un appel difficile en une expérience apaisante, et à faire d'un simple contact un véritable lien de confiance entre la marque et le client.  Mais l'aspect émotionnel de la relation client ne se construit pas par hasard. Il nécessite une compréhension fine des mécanismes en jeu, un accompagnement adapté et, bien sûr, une mesure précise de son efficacité.  Pour éclairer ce sujet, plusieurs experts partageront leurs expériences et leurs perspectives sur l'impact des émotions dans la relation client : 

RECIT DE MARIAGE REMPLI D'EMOTIONSOn reprend le récit de Sarah & David et j'espère que vous êtes prêts à faire le plein d'émotions  !!! J'ai rarement vu des mariés aussi émus ! Et la famille aussi, les proches et les témoins qui versent leurs larmes à chaque discours… la journée entière était rythmée par ces moments forts en émotions.Alors dans cet épisode, les mariés nous invitent dans leur bulle d'émotions. Ensemble, on revient en détails sur leur cérémonie laïque, les moments symboliques, les rituels, et l'implication de leurs proches avec notamment le gang des mecs à bretelles, et sans oublier les premiers pas de leur fils, en direct de l'allée de cérémonie !Les mariés nous partagent aussi le clou de cette journée, avec la surprise incroyable de Sarah pour David ... Allez, c'est parti ! Je t'invite à rejoindre la suite de notre conversation pleine d'émotions avec Sarah & David … Bonne écoute ! *******Bienvenue DANS LA CONFIDENCE ! le podcast mariage qui aide les futures mariées tout au long de leurs préparatifs !Je suis Laurène, jeune mariée du 15 Juillet 2021, j'ai profité de l'année de report de mon mariage pour lancer ce podcast dédié aux futures mariées. Chaque Mercredi matin, je te donne RDV pour un nouvel épisode inédit ! Je reçois des jeunes mariées qui nous racontent tous leurs préparatifs jusqu'au déroulé de leur jour J. Et j'interviewe des professionnels du mariage pour décrypter au mieux les coulisses de leurs métiers et te faire découvrir des prestataires passionnés.Ce podcast mariage, c'est le meilleur moyen de faire le plein de conseils pratiques, de bons plans et de recommandations de prestataires ! Bref, tout ce dont on a besoin quand on prépare un mariage !*******Pour me contacter par mail : danslaconfidence.podcast@gmail.comRetrouvez toutes les infos de cet épisode sur le compte instagram du podcast  !Montage de cet épisode : Alice KRIEF Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Les émotions - même inconfortables - ne sont pas un problème. Elles sont là, qu'on le veuille ou non et feront toujours partie de la vie. Le vrai défi, c'est de savoir les vivre pleinement, sans qu'elles vous freinent ni vous submergent. Stress, frustration, doute… mais aussi enthousiasme et motivation : tout passe par elles. Et pourtant, la plupart des femmes leaders ne savent pas quoi en faire. Dans l'épisode Best of "Bien vivre ses émotions au travail", je vous parle des 3 réactions émotionnelles les plus fréquentes et des répercussions qu'elles peuvent avoir dans le travail. Puis je vous montre comment reprendre les commandes pour que vos émotions deviennent un levier puissant de leadership plutôt qu'une contrainte au quotidien.*****Votre travail manque de reconnaissance ? Ce manque de visibilité freine votre carrière ou votre business ? Participez à notre Masterclass offerte "3 clefs stratégiques pour mieux valoriser votre travail", le 8 avril de 12h30 à 13h45 (heure de Paris). Inscription gratuite jusqu'au 7 avril sur jennychammas.com/masterclass-valoriser.****Notre guide "10 leviers essentiels pour les décideuses" est un véritable concentré d'outils de coaching et de mentoring, les mêmes que nous utilisons dans le programme Sensées. Il est conçu pour toutes les directrices, dirigeantes et entrepreneures qui sont fatiguées de porter seules les responsabilités. Si vous avez l'impression que votre quotidien vous échappe petit à petit, ce guide est fait pour vous. Cliquez ici pour obtenir votre exemplaire offert !***Sensées, c'est aussi un programme de coaching pour les femmes dirigeantes, top managers et entrepreneures. Au sein du programme Sensées, vous êtes accompagnée en petit groupe ET en individuel dans votre croissance professionnelle. Vous êtes aussi formée et mentorée pour incarner pleinement votre leadership, avec les maîtres mots sérénité, plaisir, hauteur et impact. Intéressée ? Cliquez ici pour en savoir plus.**Vous représentez une entreprise et souhaitez développer le leadership de vos talents féminins ? : cliquez ici.**Chaque semaine, je partage mes conseils au sujet du leadership des femmes dans Sensées, la newsletter. Inscrivez-vous gratuitement en cliquant ici.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Send us a textIt begins! The retrial of Karen Read is underway, approximately 9-10 jurors have been seated so far. A full jury is likely to be seated this week. Judge Bev denied the defense motion for a police policy and procedure expert Mike Easter. The judge says that normal police procedure is within the common knowledge of laypersons? The third party culprit defense has been winnowed down to two potential culprits. Brian Albert and Brian Higgins. Colin Albert can no longer be considered with this dynamic duo. Judge Bev seemingly believed testimony that Colin left Fairview, prior to John's arrival. Had that been definitively determined?WCVB TV-https://bit.ly/42zzuUDNBC Boston-https://bit.ly/4jrFvIRX-bcpbeantown Email-barry@bostonconfidential.net

Avec l’effondrement des marchés et l'hyper volatilité des actions, comment doit-on réagir comme investisseur? Entrevue avec Fabien Major, conseiller en gestion du patrimoine Equipe Major- IA Gestion Privée de plusieurs livres sur la finance.Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

Des restaurateurs réclament un congé permanent de taxes | La bourse en chute libre | Témoignage d'une propriétaire de Tesla incendiée Dans cet épisode intégral du 7 avril, en entrevue : Maximilien Roy, vice-président fédéral et Québec pour Restaurants Canada. Fabien Major, conseiller en gestion du patrimoine Equipe Major- IA Gestion Privée de plusieurs livres sur la finance. Mariela Rodriguez, propriétaire d’une Tesla vandalisée lors d’une manifestation. Une production QUB Avril 2025Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.   Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.   Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.   Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.   Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

1) Zoologie : Tu es ce que tu manges! Lorsque le régime alimentaire de certains animaux leurs donnent des super pouvoir. Parmi les élus du jour : les fous à pieds bleus, les dendrobates, la punaise assassine et lʹelysie Emeraude 2) Insectes 3/3: les émotions des insectes  Un insecte est-il doué d'intelligence? Et si oui comment se manifeste-t-elle? Aurait-il également des émotions, une conscience? Autant de questions auxquelles répond l'éthologue Mathieu Lihoreau dans son dernier livre paru aux éditions Tana "La planète des insectes". 3) Mieux mesurer la sensibilité des organes génitaux féminins pour mieux en soigner les mutilations Jasmine Abdulcadir reçoit le prix Leenards 2025 pour un dispositif mesurant la sensibilité génitale, crucial pour les femmes victimes de mutilations génitales. Ce prix valorise la recherche sur cette problématique mondiale touchant 230 millions de femmes. L'outil permet une évaluation intime et non invasive. 4) Réduire la consommation des médicaments en EMS Comment déprescrire des médicaments auprès des résident.es en EMS? L'opération est complexe. Dans le canton de Vaud et de Fribourg, des interventions conjointes avec pharmaciens, infirmiers et médecins visent à retirer ou diminuer les traitements inappropriés afin d'améliorer la qualité de vie des personnes.

What REALLY Happened To Stefan Stearns In Court Proceedings #stephansterns #attorneys #madelinesoto Get ready for a bombshell as we dive into the shocking courtroom secrets exposed by Stefan Stearns! In this explosive video, we'll uncover the hidden truths and jaw-dropping revelations that will leave you speechless. From behind-the-scenes deals to surprising courtroom tactics, Stefan Stearns is spilling all the tea. Join us as we explore the most shocking courtroom secrets you never knew existed!

Émotions et conflits familiaux : comment éviter l'escalade ?Conférence du samedi 22 mars 2025____________________________________________Après le succès de la précédente conférence, la Mosquée du Mirail a eu le plaisir d'accueillir une nouvelle fois Soumia Ikramallah, psychologue spécialisée en psychologie interculturelle et initiée à la systémie familiale, pour une conférence essentielle sur la gestion des émotions dans les conflits familiaux.Les tensions au sein de la famille sont souvent alimentées par des émotions non maîtrisées : colère, frustration, tristesse... Ces sentiments peuvent aggraver les conflits et rendre le dialogue impossible. Mais alors, comment apprendre à mieux gérer ses émotions pour préserver l'harmonie familiale ?____________________________________________

Comme chaque vendredi, un médecin spécialisé répond aux questions des auditrices de Priorité Santé. Cette semaine, nous parlons de la gestion des émotions. Montrer ses réactions en public n'est pas toujours bien considéré et cela peut détériorer une relation, encore plus quand il s'agit du milieu professionnel.  Alors, comment apprendre à reconnaitre ses émotions pour mieux les gérer ? Toutes les émotions doivent-elles être cachées ? Comment aborder quelqu'un calmement, en dépit d'un sentiment de la colère ?  Ismahan Soukeyna Diop, maitresse de conférences au département de psychologie et docteure en psychologie clinique à l'Université de Cheikh Anta Diop à Dakar au Sénégal.  La palabre au féminin de Charlie Dupiot. Programmation musicale :► Stromae - Formidable► Roselyne Layo feat. Angélique Kidjo - On sera là.

Comme chaque vendredi, un médecin spécialisé répond aux questions des auditrices de Priorité Santé. Cette semaine, nous parlons de la gestion des émotions. Montrer ses réactions en public n'est pas toujours bien considéré et cela peut détériorer une relation, encore plus quand il s'agit du milieu professionnel.  Alors, comment apprendre à reconnaitre ses émotions pour mieux les gérer ? Toutes les émotions doivent-elles être cachées ? Comment aborder quelqu'un calmement, en dépit d'un sentiment de la colère ?  Ismahan Soukeyna Diop, maitresse de conférences au département de psychologie et docteure en psychologie clinique à l'Université de Cheikh Anta Diop à Dakar au Sénégal.  La palabre au féminin de Charlie Dupiot. Programmation musicale :► Stromae - Formidable► Roselyne Layo feat. Angélique Kidjo - On sera là.

We're officially a few months into the year, so it's time for a real talk check-in!

Lori Vallow Battles the Bench: Motions Denied and Tensions High as Trial Nears   Lori Vallow doesn't want to wear the RACC belt. That was the first real moment of tension in court today. She told the judge flat out—if there's an armed guard in the courtroom, why does she need to wear a restraint device under her clothes? The judge didn't budge. He said the belt stays. It's not visible to the jury, it's not negotiable, and it's part of his order. End of discussion. And that set the tone for the rest of the hearing. Lori spent the afternoon pushing hard to get her case thrown out. She claimed prosecutorial misconduct, violations of her rights, missing records, and withheld evidence. One after another, her motions came in hot, and one after another, the judge shut them down. She argued the state intercepted her private messages with her Idaho appellate attorney—conversations she believed were protected by attorney-client privilege. The judge disagreed. He said there was no actual legal advice in the messages, just surface-level stuff like “trying to set up a legal line.” And when Lori pushed back, saying there was confidential information, the judge made it clear: the breach, if any, came from her side. According to him, her appellate attorney used the communication system incorrectly, which is how the messages ended up in the hands of the state. Lori cut in, frustrated. “How was he using it incorrectly?” she asked. The judge, clearly over it, said he'd already explained it five different ways. He wasn't going to do it again. She wasn't done. Lori also said the prosecutor should've never read the messages once they had them. The judge repeated that the messages weren't privileged in the first place—and even if they were, no confidential content was shared. Then came her next line of attack: She claimed the state failed to give her team necessary documents and interfered with her defense. The judge asked the obvious question: Why wasn't this raised months ago? She said it was. But again, there was no new evidence, and the motion was denied. Another big point of contention? Lori said the police department ignored her public records request. The judge responded with a little judicial shrug—there's a process for that, but he's not about to give her a step-by-step guide. She asked him directly, “What is that?” He replied, “I'm not going to give you legal advice.” That one landed with a bit of silence. But perhaps the strangest twist came when Lori accused the prosecutor's office of misconduct again—this time because a member of the prosecution team, Treena Kay, allegedly gave legal advice to someone on the witness list. Lori claimed Treena told that person—me, actually—that they couldn't be in the courtroom. Treena responded, saying that wasn't legal advice, just a procedural heads-up: if someone's on the witness list, they're not allowed in the courtroom until after they testify. Standard stuff. Lori argued that either Treena or I should be forced to testify about that conversation. But the judge reminded her—I'm no longer a witness. So, if she wants to know what I said, her investigator can just call and ask. Still, he wasn't about to reopen the door for testimony on a conversation that didn't violate any rule. Another denial. Courtroom logistics came up too—specifically, seating assignments. The first row on each side is reserved for immediate family and relatives, while the very last rows are saved for media. Everyone else? General public, first-come, first-served in the middle. There was also a quick conversation about evidence handling. Lori wanted to talk about how media exhibits should be submitted. The judge kept it simple: one flash drive per exhibit. Easy. And finally, the court is prepping for jury selection. Preliminary jury instructions have been handed out, and jurors are expected to start showing up tomorrow morning at 10:30. The judge didn't go into details yet, but that discussion's coming once selection begins. So, that's where things stand—Lori still fighting, still frustrated, and the court methodically moving forward despite it all. #LoriVallow #CourtroomInsider #TrueCrime #JusticeInIdaho Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Lori Vallow Battles the Bench: Motions Denied and Tensions High as Trial Nears   Lori Vallow doesn't want to wear the RACC belt. That was the first real moment of tension in court today. She told the judge flat out—if there's an armed guard in the courtroom, why does she need to wear a restraint device under her clothes? The judge didn't budge. He said the belt stays. It's not visible to the jury, it's not negotiable, and it's part of his order. End of discussion. And that set the tone for the rest of the hearing. Lori spent the afternoon pushing hard to get her case thrown out. She claimed prosecutorial misconduct, violations of her rights, missing records, and withheld evidence. One after another, her motions came in hot, and one after another, the judge shut them down. She argued the state intercepted her private messages with her Idaho appellate attorney—conversations she believed were protected by attorney-client privilege. The judge disagreed. He said there was no actual legal advice in the messages, just surface-level stuff like “trying to set up a legal line.” And when Lori pushed back, saying there was confidential information, the judge made it clear: the breach, if any, came from her side. According to him, her appellate attorney used the communication system incorrectly, which is how the messages ended up in the hands of the state. Lori cut in, frustrated. “How was he using it incorrectly?” she asked. The judge, clearly over it, said he'd already explained it five different ways. He wasn't going to do it again. She wasn't done. Lori also said the prosecutor should've never read the messages once they had them. The judge repeated that the messages weren't privileged in the first place—and even if they were, no confidential content was shared. Then came her next line of attack: She claimed the state failed to give her team necessary documents and interfered with her defense. The judge asked the obvious question: Why wasn't this raised months ago? She said it was. But again, there was no new evidence, and the motion was denied. Another big point of contention? Lori said the police department ignored her public records request. The judge responded with a little judicial shrug—there's a process for that, but he's not about to give her a step-by-step guide. She asked him directly, “What is that?” He replied, “I'm not going to give you legal advice.” That one landed with a bit of silence. But perhaps the strangest twist came when Lori accused the prosecutor's office of misconduct again—this time because a member of the prosecution team, Treena Kay, allegedly gave legal advice to someone on the witness list. Lori claimed Treena told that person—me, actually—that they couldn't be in the courtroom. Treena responded, saying that wasn't legal advice, just a procedural heads-up: if someone's on the witness list, they're not allowed in the courtroom until after they testify. Standard stuff. Lori argued that either Treena or I should be forced to testify about that conversation. But the judge reminded her—I'm no longer a witness. So, if she wants to know what I said, her investigator can just call and ask. Still, he wasn't about to reopen the door for testimony on a conversation that didn't violate any rule. Another denial. Courtroom logistics came up too—specifically, seating assignments. The first row on each side is reserved for immediate family and relatives, while the very last rows are saved for media. Everyone else? General public, first-come, first-served in the middle. There was also a quick conversation about evidence handling. Lori wanted to talk about how media exhibits should be submitted. The judge kept it simple: one flash drive per exhibit. Easy. And finally, the court is prepping for jury selection. Preliminary jury instructions have been handed out, and jurors are expected to start showing up tomorrow morning at 10:30. The judge didn't go into details yet, but that discussion's coming once selection begins. So, that's where things stand—Lori still fighting, still frustrated, and the court methodically moving forward despite it all. #LoriVallow #CourtroomInsider #TrueCrime #JusticeInIdaho Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Lori Vallow doesn't want to wear the RACC belt. That was the first real moment of tension in court today. She told the judge flat out—if there's an armed guard in the courtroom, why does she need to wear a restraint device under her clothes? The judge didn't budge. He said the belt stays. It's not visible to the jury, it's not negotiable, and it's part of his order. End of discussion. And that set the tone for the rest of the hearing. Lori spent the afternoon pushing hard to get her case thrown out. She claimed prosecutorial misconduct, violations of her rights, missing records, and withheld evidence. One after another, her motions came in hot, and one after another, the judge shut them down. She argued the state intercepted her private messages with her Idaho appellate attorney—conversations she believed were protected by attorney-client privilege. The judge disagreed. He said there was no actual legal advice in the messages, just surface-level stuff like “trying to set up a legal line.” And when Lori pushed back, saying there was confidential information, the judge made it clear: the breach, if any, came from her side. According to him, her appellate attorney used the communication system incorrectly, which is how the messages ended up in the hands of the state. Lori cut in, frustrated. “How was he using it incorrectly?” she asked. The judge, clearly over it, said he'd already explained it five different ways. He wasn't going to do it again. She wasn't done. Lori also said the prosecutor should've never read the messages once they had them. The judge repeated that the messages weren't privileged in the first place—and even if they were, no confidential content was shared. Then came her next line of attack: She claimed the state failed to give her team necessary documents and interfered with her defense. The judge asked the obvious question: Why wasn't this raised months ago? She said it was. But again, there was no new evidence, and the motion was denied. Another big point of contention? Lori said the police department ignored her public records request. The judge responded with a little judicial shrug—there's a process for that, but he's not about to give her a step-by-step guide. She asked him directly, “What is that?” He replied, “I'm not going to give you legal advice.” That one landed with a bit of silence. But perhaps the strangest twist came when Lori accused the prosecutor's office of misconduct again—this time because a member of the prosecution team, Treena Kay, allegedly gave legal advice to someone on the witness list. Lori claimed Treena told that person—me, actually—that they couldn't be in the courtroom. Treena responded, saying that wasn't legal advice, just a procedural heads-up: if someone's on the witness list, they're not allowed in the courtroom until after they testify. Standard stuff. Lori argued that either Treena or I should be forced to testify about that conversation. But the judge reminded her—I'm no longer a witness. So, if she wants to know what I said, her investigator can just call and ask. Still, he wasn't about to reopen the door for testimony on a conversation that didn't violate any rule. Another denial. Courtroom logistics came up too—specifically, seating assignments. The first row on each side is reserved for immediate family and relatives, while the very last rows are saved for media. Everyone else? General public, first-come, first-served in the middle. There was also a quick conversation about evidence handling. Lori wanted to talk about how media exhibits should be submitted. The judge kept it simple: one flash drive per exhibit. Easy. And finally, the court is prepping for jury selection. Preliminary jury instructions have been handed out, and jurors are expected to start showing up tomorrow morning at 10:30. The judge didn't go into details yet, but that discussion's coming once selection begins. So, that's where things stand—Lori still fighting, still frustrated, and the court methodically moving forward despite it all. #LoriVallow #CourtroomInsider #TrueCrime #JusticeInIdaho Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Columnist Mike Finger and Spurs beat reporters Jeff McDonald and Tom Orsborn discuss the Spurs' lack of effort versus the Warriors, Victor Wembanyama getting surgery and the Grizzlies firing former Austin Toros coach Taylor Jenkins.   Suggested reading: How former Spur Cory Joseph has built a blue-collar NBA career Castle honored as West rookie of month for second time Taylor Jenkins' firing raises eyebrows in San Antonio Johnson lone bright spot in blowout loss Catch us everywhere:  More episodes: https://www.expressnews.com/projects/podcasts/spurs-insider/ Spurs Nation Newsletter: https://www.expressnews.com/newsletters/spurs-nation/ Finger on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/mikefinger Become a subscriber: exne.ws/sub Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! This is the last of three episodes in which we review the substantive Civil Procedure law we've covered on the podcast. We're concluding this series by tracking how a civil lawsuit unfolds, from pleadings to judgment.  In this episode, we discuss: Starting a lawsuit: pleadings and service of process Defendant's response and Rule 12 motions Amendments and pre-trial resolutions Joinder of parties Final judgment and post-judgment motions Resources: Private Bar Exam Tutoring (https://barexamtoolbox.com/private-bar-exam-tutoring/) Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Atlantic_Corp._v._Twombly) Ashcroft v. Iqbal (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Iqbal) Podcast Episode 208: Listen and Learn – Motions to Dismiss a Case (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-208-listen-and-learn-motions-to-dismiss-a-case/) Podcast Episode 286: Listen and Learn – Conclusory Pleadings Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Civ Pro) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-286-listen-and-learn-conclusory-pleadings-under-rule-12b6-civ-pro/) Podcast Episode 203: Listen and Learn – Motions for Summary Judgment (Civ Pro) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-203-listen-and-learn-motions-for-summary-judgment-civ-pro/) Podcast Episode 262: Listen and Learn – Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motions for New Trial (Civ Pro) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-262-listen-and-learn-motions-for-judgment-as-a-matter-of-law-and-motions-for-new-trial-civ-pro/) Podcast Episode 145: Listen and Learn – Permissive Joinder and Required Joinder (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-145-listen-and-learn-permissive-joinder-and-required-joinder/) Podcast Episode 153: Listen and Learn – More Types of Joinder (Civ Pro) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-153-listen-and-learn-more-types-of-joinder-civ-pro/) Podcast Episode 148: Listen and Learn – Claim and Issue Preclusion (Civil Procedure) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-148-listen-and-learn-claim-and-issue-preclusion-civil-procedure/) Download the Transcript (https://barexamtoolbox.com/episode-306-spotlight-on-civil-procedure-part-3-the-civil-lawsuit/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on  Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-pass-bar-exam-less-stress/id1370651486) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Bar Exam Toolbox website (https://barexamtoolbox.com/contact-us/). Finally, if you don't want to miss anything, you can sign up for podcast updates (https://barexamtoolbox.com/get-bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-updates/)! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

New mix!Tracklist:0:00 Mujo - Midnight Sunset1:20 SwuM, Jinsang - Iwasaki3:19 BluntOne - Hoodie Jazz4:48 Mujo - Masked Girl6:25 Ornithology, Hubie - Together Alone9:03 Philanthrope, Leavv - Windows10:45 Philanthrope - METRO12:25 Enluv - gateway14:26 amies, marsquake - Always17:08 Odd Panda, marsquake, No Spirit - Field Trip19:37 Casiio, Kainbeats - Somwhere in the city21:02 Enluv - Within24:06 Knowmadic - Irons in the Fire26:26 Bamf - For You28:16 S N U G - cat from turkey29:53 Nokiaa, Dontcry, nightfall - where i used to go32:13 cxlt., Cloud Break - Evergreen34:28 Mondo Loops - Astral Dreams36:43 Laffey, Ornithology - going back home38:48 Bamf - MotionsFarewell,BamfPlaylists: https://bamf.biglink.to/PlaylistsDiscord: https://discord.com/invite/7MBfHrRs39Instagram/Twitter: itsBamf

Get 15% off OneSkin with the code LAWNERD at https://www.oneskin.co/ #oneskinpod #adKaren Read's Case is scheduled to begin, with Jury Selection on April 1st but will not begin the evidence portion until the end of April. The Commonwealth has filed motions asking for things she said to reporters during interviews and the Discovery ID Docuseries. The Federal Appeal is pending as well as a decision on the Motion to Dismiss the entire case. 911 calls in the Bryan Kohberger case have been revealed as well as Amazon purchases in the Motions in Limine. UMG filed a motion to dismiss Drake's case ultimately stating that he lost a rap battle that he willingly participated in. The concept of defamation in rap music, hyperbole, and opinion versus factual statements are challenged in this filing and it's a great read. The Lively and Baldoni cases have been getting more movement as many parties filed motions to dismiss. We'll see what happens next. RESOURCESKaren Read Post-Mistrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKVEoBmOhzUprvqi3-_6JoZ Drake Sues UMG - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5PlpbIL8EEDrake Filing - https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/drake-UMG-defamation-complaint.pdfYSL Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gLrrA5-0W1pG9P5S7Xk6VpoInterview with Sir Mix-A-Lot - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgL4AT4CYYARoommates Text Messages - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_s7V7y2gpOI911 Calls in Kohberger Case - https://youtu.be/oH7AsdGk7HILast Karen Read hearing - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9e9BfCqOIvsThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy