Podcasts about Herold

Jon Herold reacts live to the Supreme Court's ruling that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize broad presidential tariffs. Surprised by the decision but not shaken, Jon walks through the Court's reasoning, the dissents from Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh, and what the ruling actually changes. President Trump responds immediately in a fiery press conference, criticizing the Court, suggesting foreign influence, and announcing alternative tariff measures under other statutory authorities. Jon breaks down Trump's pivot to new tariff tools, the immediate 10 percent global tariff announcement, and the broader implications for trade, Congress, and executive power. From questions about refunding tariff revenue to claims of economic certainty and national security authority, this episode captures the political, legal, and economic stakes in real time — along with Jon's unfiltered commentary.

In this February 19 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold broadcasts live from Florida and takes aim at what he calls coordinated misinformation campaigns targeting President Trump. He breaks down a recent executive order related to elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides, arguing that critics are misrepresenting the immunity language and ignoring its national security framing tied to domestic production and supply chain stability. Jon walks through Section 707 of the Defense Production Act to clarify what legal protections actually apply, pushing back against claims that Trump granted blanket immunity for cancer-related lawsuits. He emphasizes the importance of pursuing truth consistently, even when narratives fuel confirmation bias. The episode also tackles Prince Andrew's arrest, explaining that the reported charges relate to alleged misconduct in public office tied to trade documents—not sexual crimes connected to Epstein. Jon critiques how headlines are framed to imply otherwise, calling it part of a broader effort to weaponize perception. Throughout the show, he encourages viewers to resist clickbait, question narratives from all sides, and prioritize factual accuracy over emotional reaction.

In this February 18 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold broadcasts live from Florida, blending headline analysis with real-time audience engagement. He reacts to John Solomon's claims that President Trump may soon reveal intelligence showing foreign interference in the 2020 election, potentially shifting Senate dynamics around the SAVE Act and voter ID legislation. Jon questions whether exposure is being used strategically and reiterates his stance that voter ID alone does not go far enough. The show also covers Democratic plans to counter-program Trump's upcoming State of the Union, Kevin O'Leary's clash with CNN over election integrity, rising gold and silver prices, and ongoing debates surrounding illegal voting narratives. Jon examines Trump's statement about the UK's 100-year lease of Diego Garcia, expressing confusion over the geopolitical implications and sovereignty dispute. The episode closes with broader reflections on media credibility, the “truth community,” and the challenges of navigating misinformation while legal battles and political pressure continue behind the scenes.

On this Presidents' Day edition of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold reflects on a quiet news cycle while digging into the cultural and political aftershocks of the Epstein file releases. He breaks down the difference between being “mentioned” in documents and actual wrongdoing, pushing back on clickbait narratives and examining how both mainstream media and influencers are weaponizing incomplete information. Jon also addresses growing frustration within the truth community, the tension between optimism and realism, and the debate over “full control” versus grassroots engagement. He questions whether Americans are being conditioned to sit back and watch rather than act, especially as midterms loom and voter ID rhetoric intensifies. Additional topics include Trump's comments on voter ID, California's independent energy agreement with the UK, DOGE's lack of recent updates, and the overdue National Resilience Strategy tied to Executive Order 14239. It's a candid episode focused on context, accountability, and the responsibility of citizens in an information war that feels increasingly stagnant.

In this February 17 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold addresses growing backlash over his stance on the Epstein files, asking a direct question: have the released documents actually proven the existence of an elite pedophile ring? He breaks down his recent poll results, discusses media framing, and warns that overstating claims without proof may be fueling a narrative being weaponized against President Trump. Jon analyzes coverage from CNN and commentary from figures like Hillary Clinton and Thomas Massie, arguing that the handling of the files, redactions, and political timing are contributing to a broader psyop. He connects this to declining approval polls, impeachment chatter, and what he views as coordinated attempts to define Trump's legacy through negative framing. The episode also touches on ICE enforcement agreements, foreign policy criticism following the Munich Security Conference, government spending failures, SNAP reforms impacting junk food pricing, and concerns about AI and Pentagon contracts. Throughout, Jon urges discernment, transparency, and active participation in the information war rather than blind validation or reaction.

Jon Herold went live on Friday the 13th expecting major election bombshells out of Arizona, only to watch what he calls a full-blown rug pull unfold in real time. After hype surrounding a potential Georgia-style election event in Maricopa County, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem instead delivered a press conference centered on promoting the SAVE Act, voter ID requirements, and cleaning up voter rolls. Jon reacts live as the event shifts from anticipated election accountability to what feels like a legislative marketing pitch. He breaks down the optics of holding the press conference in a secure facility, the implications for midterm trust, and the ongoing tension between promised election integrity and actual accountability. Joined briefly by Ashe in America and CannCon, the discussion explores whether Arizona is still on deck for something bigger, or if Americans are being conditioned to accept reform without reconciliation. If you were waiting for fireworks, you're not alone. Jon unpacks the frustration, the strategy, and what this means moving forward.

Jon Herold dives into the media's latest hit piece targeting Kurt Olson, unpacking why the New York Times' renewed focus on “election denialism” signals deeper concern over unfolding investigations into 2020. He examines the implications of federal involvement in Fulton County and what Arizona's emerging developments could mean for broader election integrity efforts. Jon also breaks down the SAVE Act debate, questioning whether voter ID alone can restore confidence in a system plagued by machine concerns, ballot harvesting, and transparency failures. From Russia's rumored return to dollar settlements and what that suggests about global realignment, to Trump's recent Truth Social statements on Epstein, Bondi, and Venezuela, the episode explores the tension between narrative warfare and policy reality. Plus: border laser chaos in El Paso, shifting economic indicators behind the headlines, and why political cheerleading or black-pilling both miss the mark. A measured but candid look at where things stand—and what may be coming next.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon dives headfirst into the political circus surrounding the Epstein files, calling out what he sees as narrative warfare, clickbait hysteria, and weaponized outrage on both sides of the aisle. He breaks down a heated exchange between Pam Bondi and Thomas Massie, questions the sudden bipartisan obsession with Epstein transparency, and walks through a real-world Twitter debate that highlights just how entrenched confirmation bias has become in today's political climate. Jon also shifts gears to a sobering discussion on the federal deficit, citing projections of a $1.7 trillion shortfall and testimony alleging massive fraud tied to terrorism and trafficking. He connects the dots between runaway government spending, bureaucratic dysfunction, and why these issues should unite Americans across party lines. Plus, updates on the Fulton County affidavit, Kurt Olson's renewed access to 2020 election intelligence, federal job cuts under Trump, and a brief look at military activity near the southern border.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold delivers a wide-ranging and increasingly frustrated breakdown of election reform theater, Epstein narrative manipulation, and the deeper coordination behind January 6th. Jon opens by dissecting the Make Elections Great Again Act and the SAVE Act, highlighting delayed implementation timelines and why legislative fixes continue to fail the public. He argues that government actors will never reform systems they benefit from and challenges viewers to name a single federal action that has materially improved their lives. The episode moves into renewed Epstein coverage, focusing on how association is being weaponized as narrative warfare, including scrutiny around Howard Lutnick and selective outrage driven by media pressure. Jon contrasts this with newly surfaced reporting showing Trump's early cooperation with law enforcement on Epstein. A major segment connects FBI tabletop exercises in mid-2020 with the Transition Integrity Project's parallel war-gaming, outlining how disputed-election scenarios were pre-scripted and later used to justify January 6th outcomes. Jon closes with commentary on Steve Bannon, DOJ reversals, institutional corruption, and the growing tension between optimism, accountability, and the reality of political stonewalling.

Jon Herold opens the week with a blunt breakdown of the Super Bowl as pure bread-and-circus, questioning the cultural obsession with halftime spectacles, corporate patriotism, and distraction politics. He digs into the backlash surrounding Bad Bunny, TPUSA's alternative broadcast, and why performative culture wars fail to move the needle. From there, Jon addresses President Trump's executive order designating English as the national language and contrasts it with everyday reality. The episode also tackles a major correction to a Guardian story involving DNI Tulsi Gabbard, reframing it as a “pop-up smear” built on misrepresentation. Jon walks through renewed Epstein narratives, calls for resignations by association, and why the story continues to be weaponized. He covers looming DHS funding issues, midterm maneuvering, speculation around Iran following unusual betting activity, and the growing fatigue inside the information war. A wide-ranging, candid Monday stream focused on distraction, narrative control, and where attention is being intentionally misdirected.

Daniel 11:1-37b. Historical events covered were Persia, Greece, Alexander's four successor generals. The "wilfull king" Herod the Great was partially covered. All of this is the first part of Daniel's Fourth and Last Vision.

In this live, call-in–style episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold opens the floor to the Badlands community for real-time discussion on the stories driving the day. The conversation ranges from Bitcoin's sudden volatility and debates over market manipulation to the arrest of a suspect connected to the Benghazi attack and questions surrounding the timing and motives behind it. Jon and callers dig into skepticism around the SAVE Act, concerns about voter integrity measures, and whether proposed solutions actually address the root problems. The episode also covers the launch of TrumpRx, a new direct-to-consumer platform aimed at lowering prescription drug prices, along with broader concerns about Big Pharma, advertising influence, and healthcare costs. Additional topics include resistance inside the intelligence community to Tulsi Gabbard's investigative initiatives, ICE surveillance practices, civil liberties, and media backlash over a Trump-related meme controversy. With humor, frustration, and sharp analysis, this episode captures a wide-ranging snapshot of where politics, culture, and public trust collide.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold breaks down a rapidly intensifying news cycle centered on election integrity, intelligence developments, and a looming Department of Homeland Security funding battle. The show opens with analysis of a John Solomon interview outlining alleged foreign intrusions into state election systems, including voter database access, fraudulent registration efforts, and the role of state law violations rather than vote flipping. Jon connects these revelations to ongoing developments in Fulton County, Georgia, and discusses why separate investigations may be converging at a critical moment. The episode also covers reports that President Trump is expected to receive an intelligence briefing tied to election interference, alongside media panic surrounding DNI Tulsi Gabbard and whistleblower complaints deemed not credible by inspectors general. Jon then turns to Capitol Hill, where Democrats issue a sweeping list of demands tied to DHS funding, including restrictions on ICE enforcement, sparking the possibility of another partial shutdown. Additional segments touch on redistricting decisions, civil service rule changes, and media reactions as institutional pressure continues to build.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold breaks down a dense news cycle dominated by new developments out of Fulton County and growing scrutiny around election investigations in Georgia. The show walks through sworn testimony from the special grand jury, focusing on claims that compelling evidence of ballot harvesting was presented but never investigated, and the implications of advance notice ahead of the FBI's seizure of election records. Jon also examines Badlands Media's newly obtained grand jury transcripts, highlighting testimony involving the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, the governor's office, and subsequent judicial promotions tied to election-related officials. The episode then shifts to intelligence community developments, including an Inspector General letter addressing a classified complaint involving DNI Tulsi Gabbard, credibility standards, and the handling of highly classified material. Additional segments cover national security issues tied to White House construction, trade and minerals policy, international diplomacy, and the continued media confusion surrounding Epstein-related claims. The episode emphasizes discernment, documentation, and separating verified evidence from narrative noise.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold dives deep into the breaking developments surrounding the FBI's execution of a search warrant in Fulton County and the media firestorm that followed. The show centers on Tulsi Gabbard's formal response to members of Congress, unpacking her statutory authority as Director of National Intelligence and why election security is being framed as a national security issue. Jon walks through the implications of the raid, the intelligence authorities cited under the National Security Act, and the ongoing panic from legacy media figures reacting to renewed scrutiny of election integrity. The episode also revisits longstanding questions around electronic voting systems, cyber vulnerabilities, and why the intelligence community's past assessments remain contested. Throughout the discussion, Jon connects current events to earlier election narratives, executive orders on foreign interference, and the broader implications for public trust, accountability, and the future of U.S. elections. This episode is a focused, document-driven breakdown of why Fulton County matters and why the reaction to it may be just as revealing as the investigation itself.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold opens with a sharp breakdown of the public reaction to the newly released Epstein files, challenging viral claims, online hysteria, and the widespread confusion between allegations, hearsay, and actual proof. He walks through what is and is not present in the documents, calling out how monetized outrage and confirmation bias have distorted public understanding. The show then turns to a developing political narrative surrounding Tulsi Gabbard, examining a highly classified whistleblower complaint that has stalled for months and why its timing, secrecy, and media framing raise red flags. Jon also touches on economic warning signs, including a sharp decline in heavy truck sales, market instability, and broader indicators of a looming recession. Rounding out the episode are updates on government funding disputes, election-related legal battles, media hypocrisy, and the ongoing disconnect between institutional narratives and observable reality.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold works through a fast-moving news cycle dominated by uncertainty, conflicting signals, and institutional dysfunction. The discussion covers renewed government shutdown threats tied to Homeland Security funding, last-minute negotiations in Congress, and the political maneuvering surrounding short-term funding extensions. Jon also examines market volatility, including sharp movements in precious metals, questions around paper versus physical pricing, and reactions to the proposed Federal Reserve chair nomination. Additional analysis touches on election-related developments, Justice Department actions, and the broader implications of narrative management versus structural reality. Throughout the episode, Jon emphasizes skepticism, timing, and the importance of not taking political statements or market moves at face value. The conversation remains grounded in process, authority, and incentives, offering listeners a real-time assessment of how overlapping political, financial, and institutional pressures are colliding as events continue to unfold.

Jon Herold walks through a packed news cycle as developments unfold around the Fulton County election investigation, including details from the search warrant and the statutes at the center of the probe. He breaks down what is known, what remains sealed, and why cautious optimism matters as accountability narratives gain momentum. The episode also covers looming government shutdown negotiations, new federal election proposals, and the broader implications for voter confidence and election integrity. Along the way, Jon reflects on market movements, school choice developments, and the importance of resisting emotional whiplash as long-awaited stories evolve in real time. A grounded, unscripted discussion focused on separating signal from noise while keeping expectations firmly in check.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold opens with breaking news that the FBI is executing a search warrant at a Fulton County election office tied to the 2020 vote. The discussion centers on why this development matters now, what evidence could still exist years later, and how prolonged allegations of election fraud may have desensitized the public to accountability. Jon explores how disclosure, timing, and narrative rollout could shape public reaction if proof is finally presented. The episode also pivots to broader media theatrics, including renewed attention on the Doomsday Clock and how fear-based messaging is used to manufacture urgency and compliance. Additional commentary touches on censorship, nonprofit influence, government spending priorities, and the difficulty of breaking through information fatigue in an environment saturated with conflicting narratives. Throughout, the focus remains on perception, conditioning, and whether meaningful exposure can still move a public that's been told for years to stop paying attention.

In this January 27, 2026 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold unpacks a chaotic news cycle shaped by the aftermath of the Minnesota ICE shooting, media backlash, and competing narratives around border enforcement. Jon walks through legal analysis surrounding the use of force, qualified immunity, and why emotionally charged reactions often ignore how law enforcement decisions are judged under the law. The episode also examines coordinated online operations, influencer-driven outrage, and confusion surrounding Border Patrol command structures, including claims about positions that may not formally exist. Jon addresses accusations of “breaking ranks,” media mischaracterizations, and his own reflections on being labeled “salty,” tying that sentiment back to broader issues within alternative media, loyalty, and information warfare. The discussion closes with analysis of the new National Defense Strategy, nuclear deterrence language, immigration authority, and why optics, process, and patience matter more than viral narratives in moments of institutional stress.

In this January 26, 2026 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold walks through a wide-ranging and unscripted news cycle driven by financial signals, civil unrest, and narrative manipulation. The episode opens with a look at silver reaching historic highs, exploring supply shortages, market suppression, and why precious metals are moving independently of Bitcoin. Jon then turns to unfolding events in Minnesota, including protests, law enforcement confrontations, and the emergence of coordinated Signal chat groups tied to organized action against federal agents. The discussion examines how social media platforms amplify psychological operations, fuel division, and distort public perception. Jon also breaks down government funding battles, the growing likelihood of a shutdown, DHS and ICE funding fights, and broader concerns around legitimacy, election integrity, and institutional trust. Throughout the episode, the focus remains on timing, incentive structures, and how chaos is manufactured, leveraged, and sustained across multiple fronts.

January 26, 2026 | Season 8 | Episode 3We track a fast-moving market where gold and silver surge as currencies wobble, deficits widen, and geopolitical shocks stack up. We connect today's macro stress to Gilded Age echoes and end with a practical take on AI agents reshaping cybersecurity risk and opportunity.• debasement trade lifting gold, silver, and other commodities• dollar, yen, and euro weakness alongside EM currency strength• shutdown risk and tariff threats tilting confidence• Japan's fiscal push echoing Truss-era bond volatility• equities' upside versus bonds' debasement drag• Davos signals and US–Europe friction on trade and security• Gilded Age parallels in tech disruption and inequality• silver's industrial demand, supply constraints, and volatility• earnings calendar and FOMC watch for forward guidance• identity-first cybersecurity in an agent-driven worldFor more information, please visit our website at www.heroldlantern.com** For informational and educational purposes only, not intended as investment advice. Views and opinions are subject to change without notice. For full disclosures, ADVs, and CRS Forms, please visit https://heroldlantern.com/disclosure **To learn about becoming a Herold & Lantern Investments valued client, please visit https://heroldlantern.com/wealth-advisory-contact-formFollow and Like Us on Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn | @HeroldLantern

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold is joined by Ashe in America for an in-depth breakdown of developments surrounding Fulton County's 2020 election process. The conversation focuses on testimony and findings from recent Georgia State Election Board and Senate Ethics hearings, including ballot discrepancies, mixed ballot batches, and documented awareness of vote shortfalls weeks after the election. Jon and Ashe walk through what officials knew, when they knew it, and how those facts intersect with later public statements and federal investigations. The episode also examines referrals to the Department of Justice, questions surrounding jurisdiction and oversight, and renewed calls for election reform such as hand-counted paper ballots and single-day voting. Throughout the discussion, the focus remains on accountability, transparency, and the growing pressure on institutions as previously disputed claims are reexamined through official records and sworn testimony.

In this January 22, 2026 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold covers a wide range of developments shaping the current news cycle. The episode opens with updates surrounding arrests tied to a Saint Paul church disruption and questions about the optics and timing of federal involvement. Jon also breaks down signals from financial markets, including sharp movements in silver, gold, and Bitcoin, and what those shifts may indicate about broader economic stress. Additional discussion includes President Trump's negotiations related to Greenland and the Arctic region, testimony from Jack Smith, and renewed scrutiny of DOJ and FBI conduct. The episode further examines government funding battles, the potential for a shutdown, and ongoing concerns over data collection, surveillance, and accountability. Throughout the show, Jon connects these stories through the lens of institutional credibility, public trust, and the growing disconnect between official narratives and observable outcomes.

In this January 21, 2026 episode of The Daily Herold, host Jon Herold breaks down President Trump's address at the World Economic Forum in Davos and examines what it reveals about shifting global power dynamics. The discussion focuses on Trump's direct challenges to globalist institutions, his emphasis on national sovereignty, energy independence, and fair trade, and the broader implications for international cooperation. Jon analyzes how Trump frames economic pressure, war, and diplomacy, while contrasting these positions with the posture of global elites and legacy leadership structures. The episode also explores how messaging from Davos is received by the public versus how it is intended by those in power, highlighting the growing disconnect between global institutions and everyday citizens. Through careful analysis, this episode connects Trump's remarks to the larger struggle over control, accountability, and the future direction of global governance.

Jon Herold breaks down a rapidly shifting political and legal landscape as institutional pressure campaigns, legal maneuvering, and media narratives continue to collide. This episode focuses on the use of lawfare as a political weapon, the strategic timing of court actions and public statements, and the growing disconnect between official narratives and observable reality. Jon examines how power is being exercised through procedural tactics rather than transparency, why certain cases are amplified while others disappear, and how public trust continues to erode as accountability remains uneven. The conversation also touches on broader implications for governance, legitimacy, and the sustainability of systems that rely on perception management rather than truth. With his trademark clarity and skepticism, Jon connects these developments into a larger pattern, urging listeners to stay grounded, recognize leverage points, and understand why the current moment feels increasingly unstable for those attempting to maintain control.

January 20, 2026 | Season 8 | Episode 2Markets wake to a sharper geopolitical edge as U.S.–Europe tensions rise over Greenland and investors rethink traditional havens. We connect policy moves to asset flows, then share specific stock ideas across payments, biotech, coffee, and energy gear.• Postwar order under strain and shifting spheres of influence• Dollar and Treasuries lose some haven appeal amid deficits• Rotation toward gold, silver, copper, and real estate• Europe's remilitarisation risk and tariff escalation paths• Iran's protests tied to currency collapse and food inflation• Japan's long yields jump and global rate knock-ons• Market tape: futures slide, banks and megacaps under pressure• NYSE explores 24/7 tokenized securities trading• Stock ideas: Shift4 Payments, biotech acquisition targets, Starbucks turnaround• Energy services pick: Cactus and FlexSteel international opportunityThis podcast is available on most platforms, including Apple Podcasts and Spotify. For more information, please visit our website at www.heroldlantern.com** For informational and educational purposes only, not intended as investment advice. Views and opinions are subject to change without notice. For full disclosures, ADVs, and CRS Forms, please visit https://heroldlantern.com/disclosure **To learn about becoming a Herold & Lantern Investments valued client, please visit https://heroldlantern.com/wealth-advisory-contact-formFollow and Like Us on Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn | @HeroldLantern

In this episode, Jon Herold opens with reflections on Martin Luther King Jr. Day before diving into the escalating controversy surrounding Don Lemon's involvement in the disruption of a church service in Minneapolis and the broader implications for religious freedom and federal accountability. Jon breaks down why both sides of the uniparty appear eager to bait Donald Trump into invoking the Insurrection Act, explores the timing of recent DOJ statements and presidential messaging on religious liberty, and examines the growing boldness of activists who believe there will be no consequences. The episode also covers Trump's presence at Davos, geopolitical maneuvering involving Putin and Gaza, market movements in gold, silver, and Bitcoin, and the ongoing erosion of trust in elections, institutions, and narrative accountability, all through Jon's sharp, unfiltered lens.

Jon Herold is joined by Ashe in America for an in-depth breakdown of the Colorado appellate hearing in the Tina Peters case, with Ashe reporting directly from the courtroom and walking through what unfolded in real time. The discussion centers on the judges' aggressive questioning of the state, particularly around jury misinstruction, the misdemeanor-versus-felony charging issue, and whether Peters was unlawfully sentenced for crimes the jury was never asked to consider. Ashe explains why the most damaging moments for the prosecution came not from the defense, but from the court itself, including concerns over due process violations, First Amendment implications, and sentencing that relied on uncharged conduct. The episode also explores what remedies are now on the table, from resentencing to a full retrial, how a presidential pardon factors into jurisdictional questions, and why this case has never truly been about election machines despite years of media framing. The conversation closes with analysis of what relief may realistically look like and why the appellate court's posture signals serious trouble for the state's case.

Jon Herold approaches the January 14 episode with an intentionally optimistic lens, reacting to a challenge to focus on positive developments surrounding President Trump and current events. The show opens with viral coverage of Trump flipping off an autoworker during a Ford plant visit and the media fallout that followed, using the moment to critique performative outrage and narrative framing. Jon then pivots to markets, highlighting record highs across Bitcoin, silver, gold, equities, housing prices, and government debt, arguing that simultaneous extremes signal deeper structural issues with fiat systems. The episode covers new nominations replacing Steven Mnuchin at multiple international financial institutions, questions around IMF and World Bank influence, and continued scrutiny of Epstein-related subpoenas involving the Clintons. Internationally, Jon examines Greenland's strategic importance, Danish intelligence warnings, NATO dynamics, and Trump's statements on national security. Additional segments touch on Iran, Venezuela narratives, media credibility, telecom outages, and the broader theme of questioning consensus narratives rather than accepting packaged explanations.

Jon Herold opens the January 13 episode with a wide-ranging discussion that blends market movement, government legitimacy, and growing pressure on centralized power structures. The show focuses heavily on rising silver prices, the designation of critical minerals, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's international meetings aimed at securing supply chains, with Jon questioning whether rare earth access is the true driver behind recent geopolitical maneuvers. The conversation turns to Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve, examining interest rates, inflation data, and whether the Fed is accountable to U.S. law or operates above it. Jon also covers fraud revelations tied to federal spending, particularly in Minnesota, discussing estimates that as much as ten percent of government outlays disappear annually. Additional segments touch on immigration enforcement, Temporary Protected Status, Epstein-related subpoenas, congressional theater versus real accountability, and President Trump's statements on Iran and Greenland, all framed through a broader critique of institutional legitimacy, narrative control, and the cost of unchecked authority.

Baskin & Phelps chat with Jeff Schudel-News Herold about Jim Schwartz and more.

Baskin & Phelps dive into who they see as the right leader for the Browns, talk with Jeff Schudel of News Herold and as always the Moment of the Show + Why am I smarter.

Jon Herold opens the January 12 broadcast by reacting to news that the Department of Justice has issued grand jury subpoenas tied to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's Senate testimony and the costly renovation of the Fed's headquarters. Jon breaks down Powell's public response, the political reaction from current and former Fed officials, and why “lying to Congress” cases rarely deliver meaningful accountability. From there, the show tracks sharp moves in gold, silver, Bitcoin, and mortgage rates, questioning whether official economic messaging matches lived reality. Jon also examines President Trump's call for a temporary cap on credit card interest rates and what that pressure campaign signals for banks and consumers. The episode closes with a deeper discussion on modern lobbying through paid online influencers, foreign governments and PAC money shaping narratives, and why Badlands Media rejects that model entirely, emphasizing transparency, debate, and independent thought.

In this January 9 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold is joined by Ghost for an extended conversation focused on developments surrounding Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro's removal, and what recent statements from President Trump suggest about continuity of government, interim leadership, and U.S. intentions. Ghost shares analysis of constitutional orders signed before Maduro's departure, media mischaracterizations of regime change, and how Colombia, cartels, and regional military activity factor into the broader picture. Jon and Ghost review Trump's comments on oil, prisoners, sanctions, and upcoming meetings with Colombian leadership, while questioning common assumptions about U.S. intervention and long-term targets. The latter portion of the show shifts to domestic discussion, including a White House video on historical resistance, federal fraud enforcement announcements, and a live chat-driven conversation on “black pilling,” dissent, and the role of criticism within the Badlands community. The episode closes with additional headlines, audience interaction, and programming updates.

In this January 8 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold covers a wide range of developments beginning with reactions to the Minneapolis ICE shooting and the competing narratives surrounding use of force, media framing, and political response. Jon walks through the incident, public reaction, and why interference with law enforcement has become a flashpoint, while addressing calls for the National Guard or Insurrection Act depending on how unrest unfolds. The episode then turns to the U.S. Senate vote attempting to restrict President Trump's authority in Venezuela, including debate over the War Powers Act, constitutional authority, and whether the removal of Nicolás Maduro constitutes regime change. Jon analyzes Trump's responses, the senators involved, and the broader implications for executive power. Additional discussion includes Trump's Truth Social posts on defense spending, withdrawals from international organizations, trade deficit improvements, updated federal nutrition guidelines, fraud investigations, and upcoming Badlands Media programming, with live chat interaction throughout.

In this January 7 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold covers a wide-ranging set of developments spanning foreign policy, domestic economics, and media narratives. The show opens with discussion of law enforcement activity in Minneapolis and broader concerns around immigration enforcement and federal response. Jon then turns to Venezuela, examining President Trump's statements on interim authorities, sanctioned oil transfers, and why the situation does not fit traditional definitions of regime change. From there, the episode moves into renewed attention on Greenland, including Denmark's response, media fear narratives, and strategic considerations surrounding Arctic security and resource control. Jon also reviews Trump's announcement on banning large institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes, discussing housing affordability, corporate ownership, and the impact on the American dream. Additional segments touch on foreign funding of U.S. universities, DOJ actions on voter roll data, sanctioned oil seizures, and shifting geopolitical alignments, with live chat interaction throughout.

In this January 6 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold is joined by Ashe in America for an extended discussion covering legal developments, foreign policy narratives, and growing tension within the conservative media space. The show opens with updates on Tina Peters' case, including the state of Colorado's response to her motion to vacate jurisdiction following a presidential pardon, the novel legal arguments involved, and upcoming court proceedings. Jon and Ashe examine media restrictions imposed by Colorado courts and debate their implications for press access and First Amendment protections. The conversation then turns to Venezuela, focusing on differing definitions of regime change, reactions to Nicolás Maduro's removal, and commentary from figures such as John Bolton. Jon and Ashe discuss how narratives surrounding Venezuela are being shaped and challenged in real time. The latter portion of the episode centers on Dan Bongino's return to public commentary, his recent statements targeting internal critics, and the broader issue of dissent versus unity within political movements. Jon closes the show by reviewing additional headlines, audience questions, and market updates before signing off.

In this January 5 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold focuses almost entirely on the reported capture of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro and the reaction to President Trump's announcement. Jon walks through what is known, what remains unverified, and why much of the early reporting should be treated as speculation. He explains his skepticism of mainstream media narratives while also rejecting surface-level explanations centered on oil or drugs. A major portion of the episode is devoted to Jon's opposition to regime change as a principle, even while acknowledging that Maduro is not a good actor and that broader national security considerations may be involved. Jon addresses criticism from viewers who equate disagreement with Trump's actions as disloyalty, arguing that supporting Trump does not require agreement with every decision. The discussion also touches on narrative warfare, legitimacy, consent of the governed, and why Americans should prioritize accountability at home before endorsing foreign interventions. The episode closes with audience interaction, current headlines, and reminders about upcoming programming.

In this January 2 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold delivers a candid, free-flowing broadcast that blends lighthearted banter with sharp skepticism about politics, media, and public narratives. Jon opens with audience interaction and sponsor reads before diving into financial updates, including national debt figures, Bitcoin pricing, precious metals, and frustration over the long-stagnant DOGE savings tracker, which finally updates with what he views as an underwhelming result. From there, the show moves into critiques of federal agencies, government accountability, and the idea that citizens are expected to be grateful for minimal progress. Jon challenges the notion that “we are the news now,” questioning whether alternative media truly represents the people or simply replaces old gatekeepers with new ones. The episode also covers Trump Truth Social posts, Iran rhetoric, Ukraine peace claims, Venezuela signaling openness to the U.S., activist judges, abortion statistics, tariffs, and cultural commentary. Jon closes by reflecting on Badlands Media programming plans, audience engagement, and ideas for future call-in formats, keeping the tone conversational, skeptical, and grounded.

In this New Year's Day episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold opens 2026 with a candid, free-flowing broadcast that blends reflection, headlines, and philosophical critique. Jon sets the tone by explaining his approach to the show, engaging directly with chat, and revisiting the Badlands New Year's Eve stream before turning to expectations for the year ahead. A central focus of the episode is Chief Justice John Roberts' year-end report on the federal judiciary, which Jon reads through and sharply critiques, questioning claims of judicial independence, fidelity to the Founders' intent, and the modern interpretation of the Declaration of Independence. The discussion expands into the concept of mandate, narrative warfare, and public consent, drawing parallels between Thomas Paine's Common Sense and today's information battles. Jon also touches on Minnesota fraud cases, accountability gaps, national debt, economic indicators, Trump statements, and cultural commentary, closing with an emphasis on tempering expectations, resisting psyops, and staying grounded as 2026 begins.

In this New Year's Eve edition of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold closes out 2025 with a loose but pointed walkthrough of the day's developments, mixing commentary, headlines, and audience interaction. Jon opens with personal banter before digging into a relatively quiet news cycle that still delivers big implications, including national debt climbing to record levels, ongoing Minnesota fraud tied to daycare and food assistance programs, and growing public anger over taxes and government accountability. He reviews President Trump's recent Truth Social posts, vetoes, and statements on fraud, elections, and spending, while questioning contradictions between fiscal rhetoric and massive defense outlays. The show touches on Somali immigration issues, temporary protected status, ActBlue-style funding concerns, and renewed calls for a tax revolt. Jon also reflects on media narratives, psyops, and public frustration, wrapping the episode by previewing the Badlands Media New Year's Eve stream and looking ahead to what 2026 may bring.

Jon Herold opens the show in a sharp, no-nonsense mood, taking aim at the latest wave of political “accountability” narratives dominating the news cycle. He breaks down the sudden outrage over large-scale fraud cases, questioning why government officials and federal agencies are only acting now, after years of silence, and only once independent journalists forced the issue into the public eye. Jon challenges statements from congressional leadership, arguing that performative investigations and press releases do little to address the deeper problem: systemic fiscal irresponsibility and a political class that benefits from the very corruption it claims to oppose. The episode moves through broader concerns about government spending, ballooning national debt, foreign aid priorities, and the recurring pattern of public problem-solving that quietly creates even larger issues behind the scenes. Jon also touches on media hypocrisy, selective enforcement, and the growing disconnect between the government Americans were promised and the one that currently exists. As always, the conversation blends pointed critique, dry humor, and a call for people to stop outsourcing responsibility to institutions that have repeatedly proven they cannot be trusted.

Jon Herold kicks off the week with a wide-ranging Daily Herold that blends market watch, political theater, and cultural absurdity into a familiar Badlands-style rundown. After some behind-the-scenes tech hiccups, Jon dives into movements in silver and gold, questioning mainstream narratives around profit-taking and geopolitics while keeping an eye on broader economic instability. From there, the conversation pivots into viral cultural moments, media propaganda fatigue, and the growing public awareness of systemic fraud, including NGO abuse, entitlement programs, and taxpayer-funded corruption. The episode explores the implications of government waste, ballooning national debt, and the unsustainable structure of modern governance, drawing parallels between failing businesses and a failing state. Jon also breaks down ongoing Ukraine developments, Trump's communications with global leaders, and the repetitive cycle of political “breakthrough” headlines that never quite materialize. As always, the show blends sharp commentary, humor, audience interaction, and skepticism toward institutional narratives, closing with reflections on accountability, civic disengagement, and the slow drip of normalization in an increasingly unserious system.

Jon Herold returns the day after Christmas with a wide-ranging Daily Herold that blends market moves, political signaling, and media absurdity. Jon opens with post-holiday reflections before diving into a sharp rise in silver and gold prices, Bitcoin movement, and why physical metals still matter. He reacts to President Trump's provocative Christmas Truth Social posts, renewed Epstein file disclosures, and mounting questions around missing documents. The episode also covers U.S. strikes against ISIS in Nigeria, media narratives surrounding Africa, and broader national security implications. Jon examines election integrity developments in Georgia, housing market outlooks for 2026, and ongoing Ukraine-Russia peace cycles, all while calling out legacy media framing and hypocrisy. As always, the show mixes news analysis, sarcasm, audience interaction, and cultural commentary, closing with thoughts on decentralization, fraud exposure, and what may lie ahead in the coming year.

On a Christmas Eve edition of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold delivers a wide-ranging, candid stream covering Supreme Court limits on National Guard deployments, presidential authority, the Insurrection Act, and the growing tension between the executive and judiciary. Jon digs into free speech hypocrisy, foreign and domestic censorship, H1B visa rulings, Epstein file confusion, fraud and abuse at the state level, and the illusion of economic stability amid massive government spending. With unscripted rants, live chat interaction, and sharp commentary on accountability, immigration, Ukraine, and institutional rot, this episode reflects on where the system is failing, why exposure matters, and what comes next as the country heads into Christmas.

In this December 23rd episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold walks through a wide-ranging news cycle during Christmas week, focusing on narrative warfare, economic optics, and the latest developments tied to intelligence agencies. The show breaks down newly released Epstein-related documents, why fabricated and unverifiable claims are being weaponized, and how those narratives mirror the Russia collusion playbook. Jon examines GDP growth figures, government spending distortions, inflation messaging, and why official economic metrics often fail to reflect reality. The episode also covers DOGE savings claims, precious metals movement, and the expanding role of AI in government and military operations. Rounding out the discussion are Truth Social posts from President Trump, foreign policy updates, the Smithsonian content review, and confirmation that former CIA Director John Brennan is a target of a Florida grand jury investigation. Throughout the episode, the focus remains on psychological operations, media manipulation, and the tactics used to shape public perception.

In this December 22 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold opens with personal reflections before turning to a sharp breakdown of the day's news through the lens of psychological operations, media manipulation, and political theater. Jon examines Turning Point USA's growing influence within state GOP politics, questioning its role in shaping narratives while avoiding election integrity issues. He critiques the Nicki Minaj appearance as a manufactured psyop, tying it to broader patterns of celebrity messaging and controlled opposition. The episode also covers energy policy shifts, fusion and wind power developments, foreign policy signaling, Epstein file controversies, immigration incentives, and government credibility. Throughout, Jon emphasizes discernment, warning viewers not to fall for emotionally driven narratives designed to divide, distract, or delegitimize President Trump. The episode closes with reflections on psychological warfare doctrine, narrative control, and the importance of recognizing information operations in real time.