Podcasts about Herold

Jon Herold opens Friday's episode by addressing the ongoing debate surrounding Kristi Noem's role in the Trump administration, arguing that the latest developments strongly suggest she was effectively fired and repositioned into a lesser role. Jon walks through how Trump historically handles underperforming officials by shifting them into envoy or ambassador style positions rather than outright dismissals, and why some supporters are reluctant to acknowledge that reality. From there, the conversation widens into several developing stories, including continued discussion about the Iran conflict, media narratives surrounding the situation, and broader frustrations about how little verified information the public receives during geopolitical crises. Jon also touches on financial headlines, political maneuvering inside Washington, and the importance of being willing to criticize figures within an administration without abandoning support for the broader movement. The episode blends political analysis with live audience interaction, reinforcing Jon's recurring theme that independent thinking and skepticism are necessary when navigating an information war environment.

Jon Herold hosts a more free flowing Thursday episode, leaning heavily on audience questions while exploring several developing political narratives. Early in the show he discusses reports that President Trump may want influence over selecting Iran's next leader, raising the obvious question of whether that qualifies as regime change and how that squares with official messaging. Jon also revisits the ongoing election integrity debate, emphasizing that reforms like voter ID and proof of citizenship remain central to restoring trust in the system. A major portion of the episode focuses on the SAVE America Act and the political maneuvering surrounding it. Jon analyzes how changes in Senate membership could affect the vote count and speculates that Trump may be strategically “rug pulling” the legislation in order to reshape the political landscape before pushing it forward again. Along the way he critiques establishment media narratives, discusses Big Tech accountability, and invites viewers to help suggest potential interview guests for future episodes. The result is a conversational but sharp breakdown of strategy, skepticism, and the importance of questioning political decisions even from allies.

Jon Herold opens with a skeptical look at recent Texas primary results, cautioning viewers against celebrating political wins before election integrity is actually fixed. He argues that removing disliked politicians does not necessarily mean the system itself has changed, warning that controlled outcomes can easily create the illusion of progress. Jon also dives into the ongoing Iran conflict, questioning shifting timelines and conflicting narratives about military objectives while reminding viewers how little verified information the public actually receives during wartime. The episode turns inward to address growing tensions within the truth community, particularly the rise of purity tests and attacks against anyone who questions prevailing narratives. Jon calls for intellectual honesty, emphasizing that speculation should not be treated as fact and that disagreement should lead to discussion rather than division. He argues that Badlands thrives precisely because its hosts debate openly without demanding ideological conformity. The show closes with discussion on government fraud investigations, Trump policy updates, and the importance of maintaining first principles while navigating an information war environment.

On day four of the Iran war, Jon Herold dives into conflicting narratives coming from the Trump administration about why the strikes happened now. He examines Marco Rubio's comments suggesting Israel's impending action influenced U.S. timing, Trump's denial that Israel forced his hand, and shifting rhetoric around Iran's nuclear capability versus ballistic missile production. Jon questions what was actually destroyed in previous strikes, why contradictions keep surfacing, and whether Americans are being given the full picture. He also explores the broader America First debate, asking whether domestic corruption should be addressed before foreign entanglements, and challenges the growing purity tests inside the movement. The episode closes with discussion on AI surveillance risks, SCOTUS redistricting intervention, and the slippery slope of holding parents criminally liable for a child's crime. A friction-filled, first principles look at war, truth, and accountability.  

Jon Herold opens the week with a highly frictional breakdown of America's involvement in Iran, addressing the backlash he received for refusing to blindly cheerlead foreign war. He walks through his core principle of opposing U.S. involvement in overseas conflicts while still supporting President Trump, arguing that trust does not require agreement. Jon analyzes Trump's stated military objectives, questions surrounding congressional authority, shifting narratives inside the truth community, and the sudden disappearance of other headlines like Epstein amid escalating conflict. He also examines reports of regional alliances, friendly fire incidents, oil price spikes, and Tulsi Gabbard's past comments on acts of war. Throughout the episode, Jon emphasizes thinking independently in an infowar environment and resisting purity tests from either side. It's a candid, unscripted reflection on war, loyalty, skepticism, and staying grounded when narratives move faster than facts.

March 2, 2026 | Season 8 | Episode 5We track a fast-moving conflict in Iran, explain how oil shocks and safe-haven flows hit stocks and bonds, and place the turmoil in a century-spanning Middle East context. Then we shift to earnings, jobs data, AI's pressure on software, utilities' power surge, airlines, and income strategies.• war escalation and immediate market impact• oil spike, gold strength, dollar bid• 10‑year yield dynamics and inflation risk• historical arc from 19th century empires to a reordered Middle East• OPEC supply signals and shipping insurance stress• earnings slate and February jobs setup• AI demand for power and utility growth cases• airline valuation debate amid travel uncertainty• rethinking 60/40 with annuities and global equitiesSubscribe on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, and visit www.heroldlantern.com** For informational and educational purposes only, not intended as investment advice. Views and opinions are subject to change without notice. For full disclosures, ADVs, and CRS Forms, please visit https://heroldlantern.com/disclosure **To learn about becoming a Herold & Lantern Investments valued client, please visit https://heroldlantern.com/wealth-advisory-contact-formFollow and Like Us on Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn | @HeroldLantern

In this Friday edition of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold breaks down the renewed online frenzy surrounding Executive Order 13848 and a circulating 17-page draft executive order claiming Chinese interference in the 2020 election. Jon clarifies what EO 13848 actually does — intelligence assessments, post-election reports, and sanctions authority — and addresses widespread misconceptions about asset seizure and emergency powers. He questions the origins of the draft order and the activists promoting it, examining whether the story represents legitimate movement or another “election squirrel” designed to distract and muddy the waters. Jon also discusses Tulsi Gabbard's ongoing review of election security and what it could mean moving forward. The episode expands into what Jon views as a coordinated psyop attempting to strip Trump of his “peace president” label amid escalating Iran rhetoric. Additional coverage includes Clinton testimony fallout, DHS spyware revelations, and broader concerns about deep state activity. Skeptical but steady, Jon urges viewers to guard their minds, question narratives, and avoid manufactured hysteria.

On the February 26 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold tackles a packed news cycle ranging from election legislation drama to explosive oversight revelations. Jon breaks down the confusion surrounding the SAVE Act, the mechanics of a talking filibuster, and whether Senate leadership actually intends to force Democrats to hold the floor or quietly allow a 60-vote threshold to block the bill. He also covers reports that Hillary Clinton's closed-door Epstein deposition was paused after a leaked photo circulated online, raising questions about transparency and political theater. In addition, Jon analyzes claims that Biden's DOJ obtained call records tied to Kash Patel and Susie Wiles during the Trump investigations, exploring what that means for surveillance powers and accountability. Other topics include Fani Willis receiving a federal grant during her prosecution of Trump, a former U.S. Air Force pilot arrested for training Chinese military pilots, and escalating rhetoric surrounding Iran. Throughout the show, Jon emphasizes discernment, election integrity concerns, and the broader institutional resistance facing President Trump's agenda.

On the February 24 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold opens with a major Badlands Media milestone: after months of review, the @BadlandsMedia YouTube channel has officially been monetized. Jon explains the branding decision behind reclaiming the main handle, what monetization means for the team, and why the mission remains unchanged. From there, he previews President Trump's upcoming State of the Union address, including Democrat boycotts, potential theatrics, and key issues expected to dominate the speech — especially the economy, tariffs, and midterm positioning. Jon reacts to FedEx suing for tariff refunds, discusses inflation versus wage growth, and questions whether Americans are actually feeling economic improvement. The conversation then shifts into a candid back-and-forth with the chat about election integrity, voter participation, the SAVE Act, and whether Congress is capable of real reform. Jon makes clear his skepticism about the current system while expressing hope that meaningful exposure and change are still ahead. A slow news day turns into a wide-ranging discussion on money, media, elections, and the state of the union — both political and personal.   

Jon Herold breaks down President Trump's latest State of the Union, calling it one of his strongest speeches yet, and zeroes in on the viral moment when Democrats refused to stand for protecting American citizens over illegal aliens. Jon analyzes the political optics, midterm messaging, and what it means in a system he argues is riddled with election fraud. He also dives into the renewed push for the SAVE Act, voter ID requirements, and the uphill battle it faces in the Senate. The conversation expands into Trump's announcement of a “war on fraud” led by J.D. Vance, raising questions about government waste, illegal benefits distribution, and why previous efforts haven't fully addressed the issue. Additional topics include Section 702 surveillance renewal, coordination between Fulton County prosecutors and the Biden DOJ, lawsuits targeting misinformation censorship, and concerns about congressional settlement funds. Jon closes with commentary on media narratives, election integrity, and what may lie ahead politically.  

On today's episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold breaks down a packed news cycle that spans Supreme Court rulings, tariff battles, and the ongoing information war surrounding Trump's second term. Jon unpacks President Trump's reaction to the Court's tariff decision, questioning whether the ruling is a setback or a strategic opening. He also addresses renewed controversy over agricultural chemicals following RFK Jr.'s public statement, separating supply chain security from health reform and calling out what he sees as deliberate misrepresentation online. The episode also covers backlash over Kash Patel's presence at the Olympics, violence erupting in Mexico after the death of a cartel leader, and new developments tied to the Russia investigation as Carter Page's case reaches the Supreme Court. Jon weighs in on media narratives surrounding Epstein-related headlines and closes with a broader reflection on election integrity, midterm strategy, and what accountability should really look like moving forward.

Jon Herold reacts live to the Supreme Court's ruling that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize broad presidential tariffs. Surprised by the decision but not shaken, Jon walks through the Court's reasoning, the dissents from Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh, and what the ruling actually changes. President Trump responds immediately in a fiery press conference, criticizing the Court, suggesting foreign influence, and announcing alternative tariff measures under other statutory authorities. Jon breaks down Trump's pivot to new tariff tools, the immediate 10 percent global tariff announcement, and the broader implications for trade, Congress, and executive power. From questions about refunding tariff revenue to claims of economic certainty and national security authority, this episode captures the political, legal, and economic stakes in real time — along with Jon's unfiltered commentary.

In this February 19 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold broadcasts live from Florida and takes aim at what he calls coordinated misinformation campaigns targeting President Trump. He breaks down a recent executive order related to elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides, arguing that critics are misrepresenting the immunity language and ignoring its national security framing tied to domestic production and supply chain stability. Jon walks through Section 707 of the Defense Production Act to clarify what legal protections actually apply, pushing back against claims that Trump granted blanket immunity for cancer-related lawsuits. He emphasizes the importance of pursuing truth consistently, even when narratives fuel confirmation bias. The episode also tackles Prince Andrew's arrest, explaining that the reported charges relate to alleged misconduct in public office tied to trade documents—not sexual crimes connected to Epstein. Jon critiques how headlines are framed to imply otherwise, calling it part of a broader effort to weaponize perception. Throughout the show, he encourages viewers to resist clickbait, question narratives from all sides, and prioritize factual accuracy over emotional reaction.

In this February 18 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold broadcasts live from Florida, blending headline analysis with real-time audience engagement. He reacts to John Solomon's claims that President Trump may soon reveal intelligence showing foreign interference in the 2020 election, potentially shifting Senate dynamics around the SAVE Act and voter ID legislation. Jon questions whether exposure is being used strategically and reiterates his stance that voter ID alone does not go far enough. The show also covers Democratic plans to counter-program Trump's upcoming State of the Union, Kevin O'Leary's clash with CNN over election integrity, rising gold and silver prices, and ongoing debates surrounding illegal voting narratives. Jon examines Trump's statement about the UK's 100-year lease of Diego Garcia, expressing confusion over the geopolitical implications and sovereignty dispute. The episode closes with broader reflections on media credibility, the “truth community,” and the challenges of navigating misinformation while legal battles and political pressure continue behind the scenes.

On this Presidents' Day edition of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold reflects on a quiet news cycle while digging into the cultural and political aftershocks of the Epstein file releases. He breaks down the difference between being “mentioned” in documents and actual wrongdoing, pushing back on clickbait narratives and examining how both mainstream media and influencers are weaponizing incomplete information. Jon also addresses growing frustration within the truth community, the tension between optimism and realism, and the debate over “full control” versus grassroots engagement. He questions whether Americans are being conditioned to sit back and watch rather than act, especially as midterms loom and voter ID rhetoric intensifies. Additional topics include Trump's comments on voter ID, California's independent energy agreement with the UK, DOGE's lack of recent updates, and the overdue National Resilience Strategy tied to Executive Order 14239. It's a candid episode focused on context, accountability, and the responsibility of citizens in an information war that feels increasingly stagnant.

In this February 17 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold addresses growing backlash over his stance on the Epstein files, asking a direct question: have the released documents actually proven the existence of an elite pedophile ring? He breaks down his recent poll results, discusses media framing, and warns that overstating claims without proof may be fueling a narrative being weaponized against President Trump. Jon analyzes coverage from CNN and commentary from figures like Hillary Clinton and Thomas Massie, arguing that the handling of the files, redactions, and political timing are contributing to a broader psyop. He connects this to declining approval polls, impeachment chatter, and what he views as coordinated attempts to define Trump's legacy through negative framing. The episode also touches on ICE enforcement agreements, foreign policy criticism following the Munich Security Conference, government spending failures, SNAP reforms impacting junk food pricing, and concerns about AI and Pentagon contracts. Throughout, Jon urges discernment, transparency, and active participation in the information war rather than blind validation or reaction.

February 17, 2026 | Season 8 | Episode 4We trace how AI fear is hitting tech, why foreign markets are gaining on a weaker dollar, and how history—Greenland negotiations and central bank fights—frames today's headlines. We add actionable ideas in dividend ETFs, Stellantis, and EXOR, and explain Medicare's AI pilot.• AI disruption risk versus productivity upside• dollar trends and global equity flows• Greenland as a strategic bargaining chip• Hamilton to Jackson and the bank wars• Panic of 1837 as policy cautionary tale• futures, earnings, and AI supply chain pressure• dividend ETF options with international tilt• Stellantis valuation, risks, and catalysts• EXOR's NAV discount and Ferrari exposure• GDP drivers: productivity and population• Medicare's AI prior authorization pilot scopeThank you for listening to Mr. Keith LanternThis podcast is available on most platforms, including Apple Podcasts and SpotifyFor more information, please visit our website at www.heroldlantern.com** For informational and educational purposes only, not intended as investment advice. Views and opinions are subject to change without notice. For full disclosures, ADVs, and CRS Forms, please visit https://heroldlantern.com/disclosure **To learn about becoming a Herold & Lantern Investments valued client, please visit https://heroldlantern.com/wealth-advisory-contact-formFollow and Like Us on Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn | @HeroldLantern

Jon Herold went live on Friday the 13th expecting major election bombshells out of Arizona, only to watch what he calls a full-blown rug pull unfold in real time. After hype surrounding a potential Georgia-style election event in Maricopa County, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem instead delivered a press conference centered on promoting the SAVE Act, voter ID requirements, and cleaning up voter rolls. Jon reacts live as the event shifts from anticipated election accountability to what feels like a legislative marketing pitch. He breaks down the optics of holding the press conference in a secure facility, the implications for midterm trust, and the ongoing tension between promised election integrity and actual accountability. Joined briefly by Ashe in America and CannCon, the discussion explores whether Arizona is still on deck for something bigger, or if Americans are being conditioned to accept reform without reconciliation. If you were waiting for fireworks, you're not alone. Jon unpacks the frustration, the strategy, and what this means moving forward.

Jon Herold dives into the media's latest hit piece targeting Kurt Olson, unpacking why the New York Times' renewed focus on “election denialism” signals deeper concern over unfolding investigations into 2020. He examines the implications of federal involvement in Fulton County and what Arizona's emerging developments could mean for broader election integrity efforts. Jon also breaks down the SAVE Act debate, questioning whether voter ID alone can restore confidence in a system plagued by machine concerns, ballot harvesting, and transparency failures. From Russia's rumored return to dollar settlements and what that suggests about global realignment, to Trump's recent Truth Social statements on Epstein, Bondi, and Venezuela, the episode explores the tension between narrative warfare and policy reality. Plus: border laser chaos in El Paso, shifting economic indicators behind the headlines, and why political cheerleading or black-pilling both miss the mark. A measured but candid look at where things stand—and what may be coming next.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon dives headfirst into the political circus surrounding the Epstein files, calling out what he sees as narrative warfare, clickbait hysteria, and weaponized outrage on both sides of the aisle. He breaks down a heated exchange between Pam Bondi and Thomas Massie, questions the sudden bipartisan obsession with Epstein transparency, and walks through a real-world Twitter debate that highlights just how entrenched confirmation bias has become in today's political climate. Jon also shifts gears to a sobering discussion on the federal deficit, citing projections of a $1.7 trillion shortfall and testimony alleging massive fraud tied to terrorism and trafficking. He connects the dots between runaway government spending, bureaucratic dysfunction, and why these issues should unite Americans across party lines. Plus, updates on the Fulton County affidavit, Kurt Olson's renewed access to 2020 election intelligence, federal job cuts under Trump, and a brief look at military activity near the southern border.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold delivers a wide-ranging and increasingly frustrated breakdown of election reform theater, Epstein narrative manipulation, and the deeper coordination behind January 6th. Jon opens by dissecting the Make Elections Great Again Act and the SAVE Act, highlighting delayed implementation timelines and why legislative fixes continue to fail the public. He argues that government actors will never reform systems they benefit from and challenges viewers to name a single federal action that has materially improved their lives. The episode moves into renewed Epstein coverage, focusing on how association is being weaponized as narrative warfare, including scrutiny around Howard Lutnick and selective outrage driven by media pressure. Jon contrasts this with newly surfaced reporting showing Trump's early cooperation with law enforcement on Epstein. A major segment connects FBI tabletop exercises in mid-2020 with the Transition Integrity Project's parallel war-gaming, outlining how disputed-election scenarios were pre-scripted and later used to justify January 6th outcomes. Jon closes with commentary on Steve Bannon, DOJ reversals, institutional corruption, and the growing tension between optimism, accountability, and the reality of political stonewalling.

Jon Herold opens the week with a blunt breakdown of the Super Bowl as pure bread-and-circus, questioning the cultural obsession with halftime spectacles, corporate patriotism, and distraction politics. He digs into the backlash surrounding Bad Bunny, TPUSA's alternative broadcast, and why performative culture wars fail to move the needle. From there, Jon addresses President Trump's executive order designating English as the national language and contrasts it with everyday reality. The episode also tackles a major correction to a Guardian story involving DNI Tulsi Gabbard, reframing it as a “pop-up smear” built on misrepresentation. Jon walks through renewed Epstein narratives, calls for resignations by association, and why the story continues to be weaponized. He covers looming DHS funding issues, midterm maneuvering, speculation around Iran following unusual betting activity, and the growing fatigue inside the information war. A wide-ranging, candid Monday stream focused on distraction, narrative control, and where attention is being intentionally misdirected.

Daniel 11:1-37b. Historical events covered were Persia, Greece, Alexander's four successor generals. The "wilfull king" Herod the Great was partially covered. All of this is the first part of Daniel's Fourth and Last Vision.

In this live, call-in–style episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold opens the floor to the Badlands community for real-time discussion on the stories driving the day. The conversation ranges from Bitcoin's sudden volatility and debates over market manipulation to the arrest of a suspect connected to the Benghazi attack and questions surrounding the timing and motives behind it. Jon and callers dig into skepticism around the SAVE Act, concerns about voter integrity measures, and whether proposed solutions actually address the root problems. The episode also covers the launch of TrumpRx, a new direct-to-consumer platform aimed at lowering prescription drug prices, along with broader concerns about Big Pharma, advertising influence, and healthcare costs. Additional topics include resistance inside the intelligence community to Tulsi Gabbard's investigative initiatives, ICE surveillance practices, civil liberties, and media backlash over a Trump-related meme controversy. With humor, frustration, and sharp analysis, this episode captures a wide-ranging snapshot of where politics, culture, and public trust collide.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold breaks down a rapidly intensifying news cycle centered on election integrity, intelligence developments, and a looming Department of Homeland Security funding battle. The show opens with analysis of a John Solomon interview outlining alleged foreign intrusions into state election systems, including voter database access, fraudulent registration efforts, and the role of state law violations rather than vote flipping. Jon connects these revelations to ongoing developments in Fulton County, Georgia, and discusses why separate investigations may be converging at a critical moment. The episode also covers reports that President Trump is expected to receive an intelligence briefing tied to election interference, alongside media panic surrounding DNI Tulsi Gabbard and whistleblower complaints deemed not credible by inspectors general. Jon then turns to Capitol Hill, where Democrats issue a sweeping list of demands tied to DHS funding, including restrictions on ICE enforcement, sparking the possibility of another partial shutdown. Additional segments touch on redistricting decisions, civil service rule changes, and media reactions as institutional pressure continues to build.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold breaks down a dense news cycle dominated by new developments out of Fulton County and growing scrutiny around election investigations in Georgia. The show walks through sworn testimony from the special grand jury, focusing on claims that compelling evidence of ballot harvesting was presented but never investigated, and the implications of advance notice ahead of the FBI's seizure of election records. Jon also examines Badlands Media's newly obtained grand jury transcripts, highlighting testimony involving the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, the governor's office, and subsequent judicial promotions tied to election-related officials. The episode then shifts to intelligence community developments, including an Inspector General letter addressing a classified complaint involving DNI Tulsi Gabbard, credibility standards, and the handling of highly classified material. Additional segments cover national security issues tied to White House construction, trade and minerals policy, international diplomacy, and the continued media confusion surrounding Epstein-related claims. The episode emphasizes discernment, documentation, and separating verified evidence from narrative noise.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold dives deep into the breaking developments surrounding the FBI's execution of a search warrant in Fulton County and the media firestorm that followed. The show centers on Tulsi Gabbard's formal response to members of Congress, unpacking her statutory authority as Director of National Intelligence and why election security is being framed as a national security issue. Jon walks through the implications of the raid, the intelligence authorities cited under the National Security Act, and the ongoing panic from legacy media figures reacting to renewed scrutiny of election integrity. The episode also revisits longstanding questions around electronic voting systems, cyber vulnerabilities, and why the intelligence community's past assessments remain contested. Throughout the discussion, Jon connects current events to earlier election narratives, executive orders on foreign interference, and the broader implications for public trust, accountability, and the future of U.S. elections. This episode is a focused, document-driven breakdown of why Fulton County matters and why the reaction to it may be just as revealing as the investigation itself.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold opens with a sharp breakdown of the public reaction to the newly released Epstein files, challenging viral claims, online hysteria, and the widespread confusion between allegations, hearsay, and actual proof. He walks through what is and is not present in the documents, calling out how monetized outrage and confirmation bias have distorted public understanding. The show then turns to a developing political narrative surrounding Tulsi Gabbard, examining a highly classified whistleblower complaint that has stalled for months and why its timing, secrecy, and media framing raise red flags. Jon also touches on economic warning signs, including a sharp decline in heavy truck sales, market instability, and broader indicators of a looming recession. Rounding out the episode are updates on government funding disputes, election-related legal battles, media hypocrisy, and the ongoing disconnect between institutional narratives and observable reality.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold works through a fast-moving news cycle dominated by uncertainty, conflicting signals, and institutional dysfunction. The discussion covers renewed government shutdown threats tied to Homeland Security funding, last-minute negotiations in Congress, and the political maneuvering surrounding short-term funding extensions. Jon also examines market volatility, including sharp movements in precious metals, questions around paper versus physical pricing, and reactions to the proposed Federal Reserve chair nomination. Additional analysis touches on election-related developments, Justice Department actions, and the broader implications of narrative management versus structural reality. Throughout the episode, Jon emphasizes skepticism, timing, and the importance of not taking political statements or market moves at face value. The conversation remains grounded in process, authority, and incentives, offering listeners a real-time assessment of how overlapping political, financial, and institutional pressures are colliding as events continue to unfold.

Jon Herold walks through a packed news cycle as developments unfold around the Fulton County election investigation, including details from the search warrant and the statutes at the center of the probe. He breaks down what is known, what remains sealed, and why cautious optimism matters as accountability narratives gain momentum. The episode also covers looming government shutdown negotiations, new federal election proposals, and the broader implications for voter confidence and election integrity. Along the way, Jon reflects on market movements, school choice developments, and the importance of resisting emotional whiplash as long-awaited stories evolve in real time. A grounded, unscripted discussion focused on separating signal from noise while keeping expectations firmly in check.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold opens with breaking news that the FBI is executing a search warrant at a Fulton County election office tied to the 2020 vote. The discussion centers on why this development matters now, what evidence could still exist years later, and how prolonged allegations of election fraud may have desensitized the public to accountability. Jon explores how disclosure, timing, and narrative rollout could shape public reaction if proof is finally presented. The episode also pivots to broader media theatrics, including renewed attention on the Doomsday Clock and how fear-based messaging is used to manufacture urgency and compliance. Additional commentary touches on censorship, nonprofit influence, government spending priorities, and the difficulty of breaking through information fatigue in an environment saturated with conflicting narratives. Throughout, the focus remains on perception, conditioning, and whether meaningful exposure can still move a public that's been told for years to stop paying attention.

In this January 27, 2026 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold unpacks a chaotic news cycle shaped by the aftermath of the Minnesota ICE shooting, media backlash, and competing narratives around border enforcement. Jon walks through legal analysis surrounding the use of force, qualified immunity, and why emotionally charged reactions often ignore how law enforcement decisions are judged under the law. The episode also examines coordinated online operations, influencer-driven outrage, and confusion surrounding Border Patrol command structures, including claims about positions that may not formally exist. Jon addresses accusations of “breaking ranks,” media mischaracterizations, and his own reflections on being labeled “salty,” tying that sentiment back to broader issues within alternative media, loyalty, and information warfare. The discussion closes with analysis of the new National Defense Strategy, nuclear deterrence language, immigration authority, and why optics, process, and patience matter more than viral narratives in moments of institutional stress.

In this January 26, 2026 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold walks through a wide-ranging and unscripted news cycle driven by financial signals, civil unrest, and narrative manipulation. The episode opens with a look at silver reaching historic highs, exploring supply shortages, market suppression, and why precious metals are moving independently of Bitcoin. Jon then turns to unfolding events in Minnesota, including protests, law enforcement confrontations, and the emergence of coordinated Signal chat groups tied to organized action against federal agents. The discussion examines how social media platforms amplify psychological operations, fuel division, and distort public perception. Jon also breaks down government funding battles, the growing likelihood of a shutdown, DHS and ICE funding fights, and broader concerns around legitimacy, election integrity, and institutional trust. Throughout the episode, the focus remains on timing, incentive structures, and how chaos is manufactured, leveraged, and sustained across multiple fronts.

In this episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold is joined by Ashe in America for an in-depth breakdown of developments surrounding Fulton County's 2020 election process. The conversation focuses on testimony and findings from recent Georgia State Election Board and Senate Ethics hearings, including ballot discrepancies, mixed ballot batches, and documented awareness of vote shortfalls weeks after the election. Jon and Ashe walk through what officials knew, when they knew it, and how those facts intersect with later public statements and federal investigations. The episode also examines referrals to the Department of Justice, questions surrounding jurisdiction and oversight, and renewed calls for election reform such as hand-counted paper ballots and single-day voting. Throughout the discussion, the focus remains on accountability, transparency, and the growing pressure on institutions as previously disputed claims are reexamined through official records and sworn testimony.

In this January 22, 2026 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold covers a wide range of developments shaping the current news cycle. The episode opens with updates surrounding arrests tied to a Saint Paul church disruption and questions about the optics and timing of federal involvement. Jon also breaks down signals from financial markets, including sharp movements in silver, gold, and Bitcoin, and what those shifts may indicate about broader economic stress. Additional discussion includes President Trump's negotiations related to Greenland and the Arctic region, testimony from Jack Smith, and renewed scrutiny of DOJ and FBI conduct. The episode further examines government funding battles, the potential for a shutdown, and ongoing concerns over data collection, surveillance, and accountability. Throughout the show, Jon connects these stories through the lens of institutional credibility, public trust, and the growing disconnect between official narratives and observable outcomes.

In this January 21, 2026 episode of The Daily Herold, host Jon Herold breaks down President Trump's address at the World Economic Forum in Davos and examines what it reveals about shifting global power dynamics. The discussion focuses on Trump's direct challenges to globalist institutions, his emphasis on national sovereignty, energy independence, and fair trade, and the broader implications for international cooperation. Jon analyzes how Trump frames economic pressure, war, and diplomacy, while contrasting these positions with the posture of global elites and legacy leadership structures. The episode also explores how messaging from Davos is received by the public versus how it is intended by those in power, highlighting the growing disconnect between global institutions and everyday citizens. Through careful analysis, this episode connects Trump's remarks to the larger struggle over control, accountability, and the future direction of global governance.

Jon Herold breaks down a rapidly shifting political and legal landscape as institutional pressure campaigns, legal maneuvering, and media narratives continue to collide. This episode focuses on the use of lawfare as a political weapon, the strategic timing of court actions and public statements, and the growing disconnect between official narratives and observable reality. Jon examines how power is being exercised through procedural tactics rather than transparency, why certain cases are amplified while others disappear, and how public trust continues to erode as accountability remains uneven. The conversation also touches on broader implications for governance, legitimacy, and the sustainability of systems that rely on perception management rather than truth. With his trademark clarity and skepticism, Jon connects these developments into a larger pattern, urging listeners to stay grounded, recognize leverage points, and understand why the current moment feels increasingly unstable for those attempting to maintain control.

In this episode, Jon Herold opens with reflections on Martin Luther King Jr. Day before diving into the escalating controversy surrounding Don Lemon's involvement in the disruption of a church service in Minneapolis and the broader implications for religious freedom and federal accountability. Jon breaks down why both sides of the uniparty appear eager to bait Donald Trump into invoking the Insurrection Act, explores the timing of recent DOJ statements and presidential messaging on religious liberty, and examines the growing boldness of activists who believe there will be no consequences. The episode also covers Trump's presence at Davos, geopolitical maneuvering involving Putin and Gaza, market movements in gold, silver, and Bitcoin, and the ongoing erosion of trust in elections, institutions, and narrative accountability, all through Jon's sharp, unfiltered lens.

Jon Herold is joined by Ashe in America for an in-depth breakdown of the Colorado appellate hearing in the Tina Peters case, with Ashe reporting directly from the courtroom and walking through what unfolded in real time. The discussion centers on the judges' aggressive questioning of the state, particularly around jury misinstruction, the misdemeanor-versus-felony charging issue, and whether Peters was unlawfully sentenced for crimes the jury was never asked to consider. Ashe explains why the most damaging moments for the prosecution came not from the defense, but from the court itself, including concerns over due process violations, First Amendment implications, and sentencing that relied on uncharged conduct. The episode also explores what remedies are now on the table, from resentencing to a full retrial, how a presidential pardon factors into jurisdictional questions, and why this case has never truly been about election machines despite years of media framing. The conversation closes with analysis of what relief may realistically look like and why the appellate court's posture signals serious trouble for the state's case.

Jon Herold approaches the January 14 episode with an intentionally optimistic lens, reacting to a challenge to focus on positive developments surrounding President Trump and current events. The show opens with viral coverage of Trump flipping off an autoworker during a Ford plant visit and the media fallout that followed, using the moment to critique performative outrage and narrative framing. Jon then pivots to markets, highlighting record highs across Bitcoin, silver, gold, equities, housing prices, and government debt, arguing that simultaneous extremes signal deeper structural issues with fiat systems. The episode covers new nominations replacing Steven Mnuchin at multiple international financial institutions, questions around IMF and World Bank influence, and continued scrutiny of Epstein-related subpoenas involving the Clintons. Internationally, Jon examines Greenland's strategic importance, Danish intelligence warnings, NATO dynamics, and Trump's statements on national security. Additional segments touch on Iran, Venezuela narratives, media credibility, telecom outages, and the broader theme of questioning consensus narratives rather than accepting packaged explanations.

Jon Herold opens the January 13 episode with a wide-ranging discussion that blends market movement, government legitimacy, and growing pressure on centralized power structures. The show focuses heavily on rising silver prices, the designation of critical minerals, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's international meetings aimed at securing supply chains, with Jon questioning whether rare earth access is the true driver behind recent geopolitical maneuvers. The conversation turns to Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve, examining interest rates, inflation data, and whether the Fed is accountable to U.S. law or operates above it. Jon also covers fraud revelations tied to federal spending, particularly in Minnesota, discussing estimates that as much as ten percent of government outlays disappear annually. Additional segments touch on immigration enforcement, Temporary Protected Status, Epstein-related subpoenas, congressional theater versus real accountability, and President Trump's statements on Iran and Greenland, all framed through a broader critique of institutional legitimacy, narrative control, and the cost of unchecked authority.

Baskin & Phelps chat with Jeff Schudel-News Herold about Jim Schwartz and more.

Baskin & Phelps dive into who they see as the right leader for the Browns, talk with Jeff Schudel of News Herold and as always the Moment of the Show + Why am I smarter.

Jon Herold opens the January 12 broadcast by reacting to news that the Department of Justice has issued grand jury subpoenas tied to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's Senate testimony and the costly renovation of the Fed's headquarters. Jon breaks down Powell's public response, the political reaction from current and former Fed officials, and why “lying to Congress” cases rarely deliver meaningful accountability. From there, the show tracks sharp moves in gold, silver, Bitcoin, and mortgage rates, questioning whether official economic messaging matches lived reality. Jon also examines President Trump's call for a temporary cap on credit card interest rates and what that pressure campaign signals for banks and consumers. The episode closes with a deeper discussion on modern lobbying through paid online influencers, foreign governments and PAC money shaping narratives, and why Badlands Media rejects that model entirely, emphasizing transparency, debate, and independent thought.

In this January 9 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold is joined by Ghost for an extended conversation focused on developments surrounding Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro's removal, and what recent statements from President Trump suggest about continuity of government, interim leadership, and U.S. intentions. Ghost shares analysis of constitutional orders signed before Maduro's departure, media mischaracterizations of regime change, and how Colombia, cartels, and regional military activity factor into the broader picture. Jon and Ghost review Trump's comments on oil, prisoners, sanctions, and upcoming meetings with Colombian leadership, while questioning common assumptions about U.S. intervention and long-term targets. The latter portion of the show shifts to domestic discussion, including a White House video on historical resistance, federal fraud enforcement announcements, and a live chat-driven conversation on “black pilling,” dissent, and the role of criticism within the Badlands community. The episode closes with additional headlines, audience interaction, and programming updates.

In this January 8 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold covers a wide range of developments beginning with reactions to the Minneapolis ICE shooting and the competing narratives surrounding use of force, media framing, and political response. Jon walks through the incident, public reaction, and why interference with law enforcement has become a flashpoint, while addressing calls for the National Guard or Insurrection Act depending on how unrest unfolds. The episode then turns to the U.S. Senate vote attempting to restrict President Trump's authority in Venezuela, including debate over the War Powers Act, constitutional authority, and whether the removal of Nicolás Maduro constitutes regime change. Jon analyzes Trump's responses, the senators involved, and the broader implications for executive power. Additional discussion includes Trump's Truth Social posts on defense spending, withdrawals from international organizations, trade deficit improvements, updated federal nutrition guidelines, fraud investigations, and upcoming Badlands Media programming, with live chat interaction throughout.

In this January 7 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold covers a wide-ranging set of developments spanning foreign policy, domestic economics, and media narratives. The show opens with discussion of law enforcement activity in Minneapolis and broader concerns around immigration enforcement and federal response. Jon then turns to Venezuela, examining President Trump's statements on interim authorities, sanctioned oil transfers, and why the situation does not fit traditional definitions of regime change. From there, the episode moves into renewed attention on Greenland, including Denmark's response, media fear narratives, and strategic considerations surrounding Arctic security and resource control. Jon also reviews Trump's announcement on banning large institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes, discussing housing affordability, corporate ownership, and the impact on the American dream. Additional segments touch on foreign funding of U.S. universities, DOJ actions on voter roll data, sanctioned oil seizures, and shifting geopolitical alignments, with live chat interaction throughout.

In this January 6 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold is joined by Ashe in America for an extended discussion covering legal developments, foreign policy narratives, and growing tension within the conservative media space. The show opens with updates on Tina Peters' case, including the state of Colorado's response to her motion to vacate jurisdiction following a presidential pardon, the novel legal arguments involved, and upcoming court proceedings. Jon and Ashe examine media restrictions imposed by Colorado courts and debate their implications for press access and First Amendment protections. The conversation then turns to Venezuela, focusing on differing definitions of regime change, reactions to Nicolás Maduro's removal, and commentary from figures such as John Bolton. Jon and Ashe discuss how narratives surrounding Venezuela are being shaped and challenged in real time. The latter portion of the episode centers on Dan Bongino's return to public commentary, his recent statements targeting internal critics, and the broader issue of dissent versus unity within political movements. Jon closes the show by reviewing additional headlines, audience questions, and market updates before signing off.

In this January 5 episode of The Daily Herold, Jon Herold focuses almost entirely on the reported capture of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro and the reaction to President Trump's announcement. Jon walks through what is known, what remains unverified, and why much of the early reporting should be treated as speculation. He explains his skepticism of mainstream media narratives while also rejecting surface-level explanations centered on oil or drugs. A major portion of the episode is devoted to Jon's opposition to regime change as a principle, even while acknowledging that Maduro is not a good actor and that broader national security considerations may be involved. Jon addresses criticism from viewers who equate disagreement with Trump's actions as disloyalty, arguing that supporting Trump does not require agreement with every decision. The discussion also touches on narrative warfare, legitimacy, consent of the governed, and why Americans should prioritize accountability at home before endorsing foreign interventions. The episode closes with audience interaction, current headlines, and reminders about upcoming programming.