Podcasts about bad boy entertainment

In the civil case Shareka Sherrod v. Sean Combs et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the Combs Defendants submitted a Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of their Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff's amended complaint. Sherrod accuses Combs and a wide array of his affiliated corporate entities—ranging from Daddy's House Recordings to Bad Boy Entertainment—of serious misconduct, including allegations tied to sexual abuse and trafficking. In response, Combs's legal team argues that the amended complaint remains legally deficient and should be dismissed in full. The reply memorandum asserts that Sherrod's claims fail to meet the pleading standards required by federal law and are either too vague, speculative, or untethered from actionable conduct by the defendants.The defense contends that Sherrod's complaint relies heavily on conclusory statements and lacks specific factual allegations linking Combs or his business entities directly to the alleged misconduct. They also argue that many claims are either time-barred or improperly attempt to impose liability on corporate entities with no demonstrated involvement. Furthermore, the Combs Defendants dispute any basis for piercing the corporate veil or treating the businesses as extensions of Sean Combs personally. The filing reiterates that no further amendments should be permitted and requests that the case be dismissed with prejudice. The request for oral argument signals the defense's desire to reinforce these positions in open court, possibly anticipating broader implications for Combs's growing slate of civil litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.65.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Listeners, this morning brings a pivotal moment in the life and career of Sean Combs, known to many as Puffy, P. Diddy, or Diddy. The hip-hop icon and business mogul awaits the verdict in his highly publicized federal trial in New York. Combs faces serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering, in a case that federal prosecutors argue spans two decades of alleged criminal conduct. According to ABC News, the prosecution called 34 witnesses over six weeks, including former girlfriend Cassie Ventura, who delivered emotional testimony describing years of alleged abuse and exploitation. Ventura's lawsuit against Combs, which included accusations of rape and repeated abuse, was settled for $20 million, but her public allegations set off a wave of additional claims and legal scrutiny against the mogul.The government contends that Combs used his fame, wealth, and power to operate above the law, orchestrating an elaborate scheme involving coercion, drugs, and violence. The defense, led by attorney Marc Agnifilo, cast Combs as the target of overzealous prosecution and challenged the credibility of the evidence, dismissing the case as an unfair attempt to criminalize his personal lifestyle. As the case heads to the jury, the entertainment industry is closely watching, with many insiders commenting on the conspicuous silence from Combs' peers as they await the jury's decision.Beyond the courtroom, Combs' business empire has experienced significant shifts. Once celebrated for shaping hip-hop fashion with his Sean John clothing line and for lucrative ventures like his partnerships with Ciroc Vodka and DeLeón Tequila, Combs has seen some of these relationships unravel. His legal battle with Diageo, the parent company of his spirits brands, ended with a settlement that cut business ties, leaving Diageo as the sole owner. Despite ongoing challenges, his Bad Boy Entertainment label remains active, and Combs continues to pursue ventures in cannabis and media, although he temporarily stepped down from his role at Revolt following the initial allegations.With an estimated net worth near $900 million, Combs' influence has spanned music, fashion, and entrepreneurship. However, his legacy now hinges on the outcome of this trial, which is expected to have far-reaching implications for the music industry and beyond. The verdict, anticipated soon, could mark a defining moment for Sean Combs and the culture he helped shape.

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdf

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdf

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sean Combs, also known as Puff Daddy, Puffy, or P Diddy, is at the center of one of the most high-profile entertainment trials in recent years. Listeners, this week saw dramatic testimony in his Manhattan racketeering and sex-trafficking case, with the sixth former personal assistant, Brendan Paul, taking the stand to decode Combs's private slang and insider references for the jury. Prosecutors pressed Paul to explain terms like "Gucci bag active" and "SEAL Team Six," which referred to Combs's state of readiness, wild behavior, and insider dealings within his organization.Paul, who worked for Combs from 2022 until the mogul's arrest in 2024, detailed to the court how these phrases were used among staff and how they related to the narcotics-distribution, sex-trafficking, and forced-labor charges that could lead to a life sentence for Combs if he's convicted. According to Business Insider, the testimony revealed a world of coded communication and intensive work schedules that prosecutors argue were mechanisms to maintain silence and loyalty among Combs's employees.NBC News reported that on Friday, June 20, prosecutors prepared to rest their case, highlighting corroborating evidence such as Brendan Paul's own arrest for cocaine possession, which prosecutors say ties directly into the drug distribution allegations against Combs. With the prosecution close to finishing, the defense is poised to present its witnesses early next week, and both sides could rest as soon as Wednesday, with closing arguments to follow.The Los Angeles Times reports that federal prosecutors allege Combs ran Bad Boy Entertainment as a criminal enterprise, comparing it to a mob family and accusing it of orchestrating intimidation, violence, forced labor, and other crimes to cover up sexual abuse, trafficking, and prostitution. The indictment describes how Combs and his associates allegedly lured women under the guise of relationships, then used threats, drugs like ketamine and GHB, and a network of enablers to compel participation in so-called “freak-offs”—orgies attended and sometimes observed by Combs. The mogul has publicly and defiantly maintained his innocence since his arrest last September and remains the only one charged so far as the sweeping federal investigation continues.Listeners are reminded that these are allegations, and Combs's legal team continues to contest the narrative, insisting there was no criminal enterprise, only an entertainment company beset by disgruntled former employees and opportunists. The outcome of the trial, with the potential for a life sentence, could have lasting implications for the music and entertainment industry.

After the lunch break on Monday, June 16, 2025, testimony resumed with U.S. Special Agent DeLeassa Penland, who continued detailing travel records and communications tied to alleged “freak‑off” encounters. Specifically, she walked the jury through flight itineraries showing that a male escort—identified as Jules Theodore—flew from Los Angeles to New York in December 2009. These arrangements were allegedly made by Sean Combs and paid for using his American Express card registered to Bad Boy Entertainment. The jury also heard text messages between Combs and Jules coordinating the travel and stay at the London Hotel, underlining the prosecution's argument about the orchestration of these encounters.Following that, the focus shifted to financial documentation: the prosecution introduced credit card statements and travel logs tying Combs's business entity to payments for escorts and hotel bookings. These materials were presented to support the trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges—showing evidence of Combs arranging and funding travel and accommodations for escorts. Court then adjourned for the day, with the testimony set to continue the next dayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 16, 2025 - Day 24 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

After the lunch break on Monday, June 16, 2025, testimony resumed with U.S. Special Agent DeLeassa Penland, who continued detailing travel records and communications tied to alleged “freak‑off” encounters. Specifically, she walked the jury through flight itineraries showing that a male escort—identified as Jules Theodore—flew from Los Angeles to New York in December 2009. These arrangements were allegedly made by Sean Combs and paid for using his American Express card registered to Bad Boy Entertainment. The jury also heard text messages between Combs and Jules coordinating the travel and stay at the London Hotel, underlining the prosecution's argument about the orchestration of these encounters.Following that, the focus shifted to financial documentation: the prosecution introduced credit card statements and travel logs tying Combs's business entity to payments for escorts and hotel bookings. These materials were presented to support the trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges—showing evidence of Combs arranging and funding travel and accommodations for escorts. Court then adjourned for the day, with the testimony set to continue the next dayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 16, 2025 - Day 24 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

After the lunch break on Monday, June 16, 2025, testimony resumed with U.S. Special Agent DeLeassa Penland, who continued detailing travel records and communications tied to alleged “freak‑off” encounters. Specifically, she walked the jury through flight itineraries showing that a male escort—identified as Jules Theodore—flew from Los Angeles to New York in December 2009. These arrangements were allegedly made by Sean Combs and paid for using his American Express card registered to Bad Boy Entertainment. The jury also heard text messages between Combs and Jules coordinating the travel and stay at the London Hotel, underlining the prosecution's argument about the orchestration of these encounters.Following that, the focus shifted to financial documentation: the prosecution introduced credit card statements and travel logs tying Combs's business entity to payments for escorts and hotel bookings. These materials were presented to support the trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges—showing evidence of Combs arranging and funding travel and accommodations for escorts. Court then adjourned for the day, with the testimony set to continue the next dayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 16, 2025 - Day 24 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Joseph Sherman, formerly a bodyguard for Sean "Diddy" Combs, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Thalia Graves and her attorney, Gloria Allred. This legal action follows Graves' allegations that, in 2001, both Combs and Sherman drugged, bound, and raped her at a Bad Boy Entertainment recording studio, recording the assault and distributing it as pornography.In his lawsuit, Sherman asserts that he ceased working for Combs in 1999 and has never met Graves, labeling her claims as "utterly and entirely false." He contends that Graves contacted him in November 2023, seeking his cooperation as a witness against Combs in exchange for excluding him from legal proceedings. Sherman includes alleged messages from Graves in his lawsuit to support this claim.Sherman argues that the accusations have caused significant harm to his reputation and livelihood. His lawsuit includes counts of defamation, emotional distress, negligence, and abuse of process against Graves, Allred, and other associated parties.This countersuit emerges amid a series of legal challenges facing Combs, who was arrested in September 2024 on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering. Graves' lawsuit is among nearly 30 filed against Combs and his associates, with Sherman's countersuit being the first from a defendant in these cases.(commercial at 7:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's ex-bodyguard sues rape accuser for defamation

Listeners, the latest headlines surrounding Sean Combs—known to many as Puffy, P Diddy, or simply Diddy—have been dominated by legal drama and the ongoing federal trial in New York City. As of today, week five of the sex trafficking case against Sean “Diddy” Combs is underway. The courtroom atmosphere remains tense, with jurors reportedly making visible reactions while reviewing incriminating text messages presented as evidence. The testimony has included statements from Diddy's former lover and alleged victim, referred to as “Jane,” as well as his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, who has also testified about her experiences and the events highlighted in a now widely discussed hotel surveillance video from 2016. The prosecution alleges that Combs orchestrated a criminal enterprise involving the manipulation and exploitation of women through drug-fueled parties, sometimes involving male sex workers, with Cassie Ventura's testimony and video evidence playing a central role in the proceedings. Diddy has been held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn since his arrest last September and faces multiple counts stemming from the statements of at least four women, including Ventura.Beyond the courtroom, Combs' business empire is under intense scrutiny. His historic partnership with Diageo for Ciroc vodka and DeLeón tequila, which once generated nearly $1 billion in revenue since its inception in 2007, ended in early 2024 after both parties agreed to resolve legal disputes and sever all business ties. Combs also reclaimed ownership of the Sean John clothing line in 2021 after winning a bidding war, though the brand is not at its former heights. Meanwhile, Bad Boy Entertainment, his legendary record label, continues to operate, but his media company Revolt saw Combs temporarily step down as chairman following civil allegations brought by Cassie Ventura, which have since been settled.Despite the turmoil, P Diddy's financial stature remains enormous. According to financial reporting, his net worth in 2025 is estimated to be around $1 billion, built not just on music but through ventures in fashion, media, technology, and beverages. Diddy's legacy as a business innovator and cultural force is clear, but his future, both financially and legally, hangs heavily in the balance as the trial continues with daily updates from inside the courtroom.

We're one month into the Diddy trial and the questions are pouring in. In today's episode, your hosts, Neama Rahmani and Liana Khachatryan, attorneys at West Coast Trial Lawyers, answer your questions about the case of Sean Combs, in which hip hop mogul and head of “Bad Boy Entertainment” is being tried for racketeering, sex trafficking, bribery, drug trafficking, arson, kidnapping, and more.

Harve Pierre, former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has denied allegations made by singer Dawn Richard in her lawsuit against him and Sean "Diddy" Combs. Richard's lawsuit claims that in December 2010, during an argument at a Manhattan recording studio, Combs' bodyguard forcibly removed her and confined her in a car for several hours, allegedly under Pierre's orders. Pierre's attorney, Scott E. Leemon, has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the claims are baseless and that the 2022 amendment to the Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Act (GMVL) does not apply in this case.In our second segment...While Sean "Diddy" Combs remains incarcerated on sex trafficking and racketeering charges, his $60 million private jet, a Gulfstream G550, has been listed for rent on various private charter websites. The 14-seater aircraft, known as "Air Combs," is available for charter through platforms like Victor, often referred to as the "Uber of Private Jets," which caters to high-profile clients. The jet is based at Van Nuys Airport in Los Angeles and is operated by Silver Air, a rental operator offering a range of luxury aircraft. Rental costs are substantial; for instance, a one-way transatlantic flight is priced at approximately $432,000.This move to rent out his private jet aligns with other financial decisions Combs has made amid his legal challenges. He has also listed his Beverly Hills mansion for sale at $61.5 million. These actions suggest efforts to liquidate assets, possibly to address mounting legal expenses or other financial obligations during this period.(commercial at 8:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Harve Pierre Denies Helping Diddy Lock Dawn Richard In A Car - AllHipHopDiddy is 'renting out his $60m Air Combs private jet & charging $432k for a one-way transatlantic flight' as trial looms | The US Sun

In this filing, plaintiff Anthony Tate submits a Memorandum of Law opposing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss in the civil case against Sean Combs and his affiliated corporate entities, including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and various Bad Boy Entertainment subsidiaries. Tate argues that his complaint sufficiently states claims for relief and that dismissal is unwarranted at this stage. The opposition contends that the complaint provides detailed factual allegations that meet the pleading standards required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), addressing each of the Defendants' arguments for dismissal. Tate emphasizes that the alleged conduct—spanning personal misconduct by Combs and organizational liability through the named corporate entities—is sufficiently documented to move forward to discovery.Furthermore, the memorandum asserts that the corporate defendants should not be dismissed merely because Combs is a named individual defendant; instead, Tate argues that the corporate entities were allegedly used to facilitate or conceal the unlawful acts in question. The opposition also challenges any argument that certain claims are time-barred, asserting that various legal doctrines—including equitable tolling and the discovery rule—preserve the plaintiff's ability to pursue those claims. Ultimately, Tate urges the Court to deny the Motion to Dismiss in full and allow the case to proceed, arguing that the defendants' motion relies heavily on factual disputes inappropriate for resolution at the motion-to-dismiss stage.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.46.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Harve Pierre, former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has denied allegations made by singer Dawn Richard in her lawsuit against him and Sean "Diddy" Combs. Richard's lawsuit claims that in December 2010, during an argument at a Manhattan recording studio, Combs' bodyguard forcibly removed her and confined her in a car for several hours, allegedly under Pierre's orders. Pierre's attorney, Scott E. Leemon, has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the claims are baseless and that the 2022 amendment to the Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Act (GMVL) does not apply in this case.In our second segment...While Sean "Diddy" Combs remains incarcerated on sex trafficking and racketeering charges, his $60 million private jet, a Gulfstream G550, has been listed for rent on various private charter websites. The 14-seater aircraft, known as "Air Combs," is available for charter through platforms like Victor, often referred to as the "Uber of Private Jets," which caters to high-profile clients. The jet is based at Van Nuys Airport in Los Angeles and is operated by Silver Air, a rental operator offering a range of luxury aircraft. Rental costs are substantial; for instance, a one-way transatlantic flight is priced at approximately $432,000.This move to rent out his private jet aligns with other financial decisions Combs has made amid his legal challenges. He has also listed his Beverly Hills mansion for sale at $61.5 million. These actions suggest efforts to liquidate assets, possibly to address mounting legal expenses or other financial obligations during this period.(commercial at 8:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Harve Pierre Denies Helping Diddy Lock Dawn Richard In A Car - AllHipHopDiddy is 'renting out his $60m Air Combs private jet & charging $432k for a one-way transatlantic flight' as trial looms | The US SunBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

How the FBI Used 1,000 Bottles of Baby Oil to Build a RICO Case Against Diddy: Digital Evidence Breakdown  The federal investigation that brought down Sean "Diddy" Combs represents one of the most sophisticated law enforcement operations in entertainment history. This comprehensive analysis examines how federal agents from Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, DEA, and ATF coordinated a multi-agency takedown that began with Cassie Ventura's explosive lawsuit and culminated in RICO charges carrying a potential life sentence. Our investigation reveals the intricate timeline from November 2023 when Cassie filed her $20 million settlement lawsuit to the dramatic March 2024 simultaneous raids on Diddy's Los Angeles and Miami mansions. Federal agents discovered over 1,000 bottles of baby oil allegedly used in "Freak-Off" parties, three AR-15 rifles with defaced serial numbers, and thousands of videos that prosecutors claim Diddy used for blackmail. This video breaks down the digital forensics operation that analyzed over 10,500 terabytes of data from seized phones and computers. We explore how the FBI's Computer Analysis and Response Team, consisting of nearly 500 highly trained agents, extracted evidence even from devices Diddy thought were secure. The investigation utilized cutting-edge cell phone forensics tools, GPS tracking, metadata analysis, and social media enhancement techniques to build an airtight case. The Southern District of New York's prosecution strategy transforms individual allegations into a comprehensive RICO conspiracy case, treating Diddy's business empire as a criminal enterprise. Led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Meredith Foster, Emily Johnson, and their team, prosecutors argue that Bad Boy Entertainment, Combs Enterprises, and related businesses facilitated sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, and witness intimidation. We analyze the legal significance of charging a celebrity under racketeering laws typically reserved for organized crime families. The case demonstrates how modern federal investigators approach complex criminal enterprises in the digital age, using sophisticated analytical tools to map relationships, track communications, and visualize criminal operations spanning decades. Expert commentary from former federal prosecutors explains why this case could result in a life sentence and how it compares to other high-profile RICO prosecutions like R. Kelly and Harvey Weinstein. The investigation's speed—from initial lawsuit to federal indictment in less than a year—reveals either pre-existing intelligence or the extensive nature of the alleged criminal activity. #DiddyInvestigation #FederalRICO #DigitalForensics #LawEnforcement #SouthernDistrictNY #HSIRaids #CelebryJustice #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FederalCharges #CriminalEnterprise    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

How the FBI Used 1,000 Bottles of Baby Oil to Build a RICO Case Against Diddy: Digital Evidence Breakdown  The federal investigation that brought down Sean "Diddy" Combs represents one of the most sophisticated law enforcement operations in entertainment history. This comprehensive analysis examines how federal agents from Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, DEA, and ATF coordinated a multi-agency takedown that began with Cassie Ventura's explosive lawsuit and culminated in RICO charges carrying a potential life sentence. Our investigation reveals the intricate timeline from November 2023 when Cassie filed her $20 million settlement lawsuit to the dramatic March 2024 simultaneous raids on Diddy's Los Angeles and Miami mansions. Federal agents discovered over 1,000 bottles of baby oil allegedly used in "Freak-Off" parties, three AR-15 rifles with defaced serial numbers, and thousands of videos that prosecutors claim Diddy used for blackmail. This video breaks down the digital forensics operation that analyzed over 10,500 terabytes of data from seized phones and computers. We explore how the FBI's Computer Analysis and Response Team, consisting of nearly 500 highly trained agents, extracted evidence even from devices Diddy thought were secure. The investigation utilized cutting-edge cell phone forensics tools, GPS tracking, metadata analysis, and social media enhancement techniques to build an airtight case. The Southern District of New York's prosecution strategy transforms individual allegations into a comprehensive RICO conspiracy case, treating Diddy's business empire as a criminal enterprise. Led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Meredith Foster, Emily Johnson, and their team, prosecutors argue that Bad Boy Entertainment, Combs Enterprises, and related businesses facilitated sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, and witness intimidation. We analyze the legal significance of charging a celebrity under racketeering laws typically reserved for organized crime families. The case demonstrates how modern federal investigators approach complex criminal enterprises in the digital age, using sophisticated analytical tools to map relationships, track communications, and visualize criminal operations spanning decades. Expert commentary from former federal prosecutors explains why this case could result in a life sentence and how it compares to other high-profile RICO prosecutions like R. Kelly and Harvey Weinstein. The investigation's speed—from initial lawsuit to federal indictment in less than a year—reveals either pre-existing intelligence or the extensive nature of the alleged criminal activity. #DiddyInvestigation #FederalRICO #DigitalForensics #LawEnforcement #SouthernDistrictNY #HSIRaids #CelebryJustice #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FederalCharges #CriminalEnterprise    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

In this filing, the plaintiff—identified as John Doe—opposes the defendants' motion to dismiss his civil lawsuit against Sean Combs and a series of related business entities. Doe's opposition argues that the complaint sufficiently alleges multiple counts of sex trafficking, battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress under both federal and state law. The document asserts that the claims are not time-barred under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) or New York's Adult Survivors Act, and that the plaintiff has presented enough factual detail to meet the pleading standards required by federal court. He alleges that Combs used his vast network of companies and affiliates to facilitate, cover up, and enable repeated acts of sexual abuse and psychological coercion.Doe also challenges the defense's attempts to downplay Combs' alleged role in the abuse by arguing that his status as a corporate executive does not shield him from personal liability. The opposition brief emphasizes that Combs maintained direct control over the events in question, and that his affiliated entities—ranging from Bad Boy Entertainment to Combs Global—were tools used to recruit, exploit, and silence victims. The plaintiff's legal team contends that discovery should proceed so the full extent of Combs' alleged criminal enterprise can be examined through the civil process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.62.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this filing, the plaintiff—identified as John Doe—opposes the defendants' motion to dismiss his civil lawsuit against Sean Combs and a series of related business entities. Doe's opposition argues that the complaint sufficiently alleges multiple counts of sex trafficking, battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress under both federal and state law. The document asserts that the claims are not time-barred under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) or New York's Adult Survivors Act, and that the plaintiff has presented enough factual detail to meet the pleading standards required by federal court. He alleges that Combs used his vast network of companies and affiliates to facilitate, cover up, and enable repeated acts of sexual abuse and psychological coercion.Doe also challenges the defense's attempts to downplay Combs' alleged role in the abuse by arguing that his status as a corporate executive does not shield him from personal liability. The opposition brief emphasizes that Combs maintained direct control over the events in question, and that his affiliated entities—ranging from Bad Boy Entertainment to Combs Global—were tools used to recruit, exploit, and silence victims. The plaintiff's legal team contends that discovery should proceed so the full extent of Combs' alleged criminal enterprise can be examined through the civil process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.62.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

How the FBI Used 1,000 Bottles of Baby Oil to Build a RICO Case Against Diddy: Digital Evidence Breakdown  The federal investigation that brought down Sean "Diddy" Combs represents one of the most sophisticated law enforcement operations in entertainment history. This comprehensive analysis examines how federal agents from Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, DEA, and ATF coordinated a multi-agency takedown that began with Cassie Ventura's explosive lawsuit and culminated in RICO charges carrying a potential life sentence. Our investigation reveals the intricate timeline from November 2023 when Cassie filed her $20 million settlement lawsuit to the dramatic March 2024 simultaneous raids on Diddy's Los Angeles and Miami mansions. Federal agents discovered over 1,000 bottles of baby oil allegedly used in "Freak-Off" parties, three AR-15 rifles with defaced serial numbers, and thousands of videos that prosecutors claim Diddy used for blackmail. This video breaks down the digital forensics operation that analyzed over 10,500 terabytes of data from seized phones and computers. We explore how the FBI's Computer Analysis and Response Team, consisting of nearly 500 highly trained agents, extracted evidence even from devices Diddy thought were secure. The investigation utilized cutting-edge cell phone forensics tools, GPS tracking, metadata analysis, and social media enhancement techniques to build an airtight case. The Southern District of New York's prosecution strategy transforms individual allegations into a comprehensive RICO conspiracy case, treating Diddy's business empire as a criminal enterprise. Led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Meredith Foster, Emily Johnson, and their team, prosecutors argue that Bad Boy Entertainment, Combs Enterprises, and related businesses facilitated sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, and witness intimidation. We analyze the legal significance of charging a celebrity under racketeering laws typically reserved for organized crime families. The case demonstrates how modern federal investigators approach complex criminal enterprises in the digital age, using sophisticated analytical tools to map relationships, track communications, and visualize criminal operations spanning decades. Expert commentary from former federal prosecutors explains why this case could result in a life sentence and how it compares to other high-profile RICO prosecutions like R. Kelly and Harvey Weinstein. The investigation's speed—from initial lawsuit to federal indictment in less than a year—reveals either pre-existing intelligence or the extensive nature of the alleged criminal activity. #DiddyInvestigation #FederalRICO #DigitalForensics #LawEnforcement #SouthernDistrictNY #HSIRaids #CelebryJustice #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FederalCharges #CriminalEnterprise    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

For two years, David James ran errands for the head of Bad Boy Entertainment, bought his snacks and packed his prescriptions. And once, he says, he was the driver when Combs went looking for his longtime rival Suge Knight -- with three handguns in his lap. Also on Tuesday, a male stripper whose performs under the name The Punisher testified that during his paid sexual encounters with Combs and Cassie Ventura, he felt like he and Cassie were actors, and Combs was the director. If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy 

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

On November 19, 2024, a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe filed a personal injury lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Sean Combs and several associated entities, including Bad Boy Entertainment and Daddy's House Recordings Inc. The case, docketed as 1:24-cv-08813 and presided over by Judge John G. Koeltl, involves allegations of personal injury under 28 U.S.C. § 1391. The plaintiff has requested permission to proceed anonymously, filing a motion to use the pseudonym "Jane Doe." Judge Koeltl has deferred briefing on this motion until the defendants have been served.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632029.1.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On November 19, 2024, a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe filed a personal injury lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Sean Combs and several associated entities, including Bad Boy Entertainment and Daddy's House Recordings Inc. The case, docketed as 1:24-cv-08813 and presided over by Judge John G. Koeltl, involves allegations of personal injury under 28 U.S.C. § 1391. The plaintiff has requested permission to proceed anonymously, filing a motion to use the pseudonym "Jane Doe." Judge Koeltl has deferred briefing on this motion until the defendants have been served.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632029.1.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On November 19, 2024, a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe filed a personal injury lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Sean Combs and several associated entities, including Bad Boy Entertainment and Daddy's House Recordings Inc. The case, docketed as 1:24-cv-08813 and presided over by Judge John G. Koeltl, involves allegations of personal injury under 28 U.S.C. § 1391. The plaintiff has requested permission to proceed anonymously, filing a motion to use the pseudonym "Jane Doe." Judge Koeltl has deferred briefing on this motion until the defendants have been served.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632029.1.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes during her appearance on Sean "Diddy" Combs' MTV reality show "Making the Band 2," has filed a $60 million lawsuit against Combs and associated entities, including MTV, Viacom, and Bad Boy Entertainment. In her 148-page complaint, Rivers alleges that during her time on the show, she was subjected to sexual harassment, assault, and an abusive work environment. Specific accusations include an incident where Combs allegedly cornered her, made inappropriate physical contact by running his hand across her breasts, and controlled various aspects of her personal life, such as her eating and sleeping schedules. She also claims that Combs publicly humiliated her by mocking her struggles with bulimia and imposed unreasonable demands, exemplified by the infamous "cheesecake incident," where Rivers and her group members were forced to walk from Manhattan to Brooklyn to fetch a dessert for Combs.Beyond the allegations of personal misconduct, Rivers contends that Combs sabotaged her music career by disbanding Da Band abruptly and withholding financial compensation. She asserts that after the group's dissolution, Combs continued to interfere with her professional endeavors, effectively blackballing her in the industry. In response to these allegations, a representative for Combs has categorically denied any wrongdoing, labeling the claims as false and opportunistic. This lawsuit adds to a series of legal challenges currently facing Combs, who has been accused by multiple individuals of sexual misconduct, all of which he has denied.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs sued by male escort over alleged 2012 rapeBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Joseph Sherman, formerly a bodyguard for Sean "Diddy" Combs, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Thalia Graves and her attorney, Gloria Allred. This legal action follows Graves' allegations that, in 2001, both Combs and Sherman drugged, bound, and raped her at a Bad Boy Entertainment recording studio, recording the assault and distributing it as pornography.In his lawsuit, Sherman asserts that he ceased working for Combs in 1999 and has never met Graves, labeling her claims as "utterly and entirely false." He contends that Graves contacted him in November 2023, seeking his cooperation as a witness against Combs in exchange for excluding him from legal proceedings. Sherman includes alleged messages from Graves in his lawsuit to support this claim.Sherman argues that the accusations have caused significant harm to his reputation and livelihood. His lawsuit includes counts of defamation, emotional distress, negligence, and abuse of process against Graves, Allred, and other associated parties.This countersuit emerges amid a series of legal challenges facing Combs, who was arrested in September 2024 on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering. Graves' lawsuit is among nearly 30 filed against Combs and his associates, with Sherman's countersuit being the first from a defendant in these cases.(commercial at 7:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's ex-bodyguard sues rape accuser for defamationBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The newly filed superseding indictment against Sean “Diddy” Combs, dated April 3, 2025, substantially expands the scope of the federal case against him, formally charging him with multiple counts of sex trafficking, obstruction, kidnapping, and drug distribution. The indictment accuses Combs of running a criminal enterprise from 2004 through 2024, with the purpose of recruiting, grooming, and coercing young women and men into commercial sex acts. It outlines a pattern of alleged abuse involving physical assaults, threats, forced drug use, surveillance, and exploitation. The indictment also states that Combs and his associates used his businesses, including Bad Boy Entertainment, as a front to facilitate and conceal the trafficking operation.Notably, the superseding indictment includes vivid allegations involving three victims—identified as Victim-1, Victim-2, and Victim-3—who were allegedly drugged, coerced, and trafficked across state lines for the purpose of commercial sex. It describes specific incidents of violence, including forced sexual acts at parties called “freak-offs,” assaults with deadly weapons, and threats with firearms. Prosecutors allege Combs used private jets, bodyguards, and high-end properties to further the scheme, and that he repeatedly obstructed justice through intimidation, destruction of evidence, and payoffs. The indictment signals the government's intention to portray Combs as the orchestrator of a decades-long pattern of exploitation and criminal conduct, marking a significant escalation in the legal battle he now faces.50 Cent is currently producing a Netflix documentary titled Diddy Do It, focusing on the numerous sexual assault, sex trafficking, and racketeering allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs. This multi-part docuseries aims to uncover the disturbing events surrounding Diddy's infamous "freak-off" parties and the decades of allegations tied to them.The project, which Netflix secured after a competitive bidding war, is being produced by 50 Cent's G-Unit Film & Television and directed by Alexandria Stapleton. The documentary will feature testimonies from former staff, security personnel, and other members of Diddy's inner circle, many of whom are now willing to come forward with details about what really happened at these secretive gatherings. The documentary is intended to give a voice to victims of abuse while exploring the broader impact on hip-hop culture.Production is ongoing, and while no release date has been set, the docuseries is expected to reveal significant new information as more alleged victims continue to step forward​.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's former security and inner circle sign deals with Netflix to 'expose' disgraced star in 50 Cent's documentary | The US Sun (the-sun.com)

The superseding indictment expands the timeline of Combs' alleged criminal activities, now spanning from 2004 to 2024, and introduces additional charges. Combs is accused of operating a criminal enterprise involving racketeering, sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. The indictment details that Combs allegedly coerced multiple women, identified as Victim-1, Victim-2, and Victim-3, into engaging in commercial sex acts through force, fraud, and coercion. It also describes incidents where Combs purportedly used violence and intimidation to control his victims, including an instance in March 2016 where he allegedly assaulted a woman in a Los Angeles hotel, an event reportedly captured on video.Furthermore, the indictment alleges that Combs utilized his business entities, such as Bad Boy Entertainment, to facilitate and conceal these illicit activities. He is accused of orchestrating events termed "freak offs," involving orchestrated sexual performances with male sex workers, and transporting individuals across state lines for prostitution. The indictment also includes charges related to Combs allegedly showing a firearm to a female victim during a kidnapping and dangling a woman over an apartment balcony. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges and remains in custody awaiting trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.209.0_3.pdf