Podcasts about digital evidence

Aubrey converses with Claire Thomson, an attorney in private practice at Witz Inc, a specialist family law practitioner, a trained mediator and a notary public, about “The WhatsApp Divorce: How Digital Evidence Is Changing Family Law”. The Aubrey Masango Show is presented by late night radio broadcaster Aubrey Masango. Aubrey hosts in-depth interviews on controversial political issues and chats to experts offering life advice and guidance in areas of psychology, personal finance and more. All Aubrey’s interviews are podcasted for you to catch-up and listen. Thank you for listening to this podcast from The Aubrey Masango Show. Listen live on weekdays between 20:00 and 24:00 (SA Time) to The Aubrey Masango Show broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj and on CapeTalk between 20:00 and 21:00 (SA Time) https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk Find out more about the show here https://buff.ly/lzyKCv0 and get all the catch-up podcasts https://buff.ly/rT6znsn Subscribe to the 702 and CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/v5mfet Follow us on social media: 702 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/Radio702 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702 CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Day 3 of Lori Vallow Daybell's final murder conspiracy trial revealed devastating digital evidence that could seal her fate forever. Detective Ryan Pillar's explosive testimony exposed how Alex Cox's burner phone created an electronic trail leading directly to the attempted assassination of Brandon Boudreaux on October 2, 2019. This comprehensive analysis breaks down the most damning evidence presented in Phoenix Superior Court, including cell phone records that place Lori and Alex in direct communication during the shooting, vehicle modifications that transformed a Jeep into a mobile hunting platform, and post-crime Google searches that reveal consciousness of guilt. We examine how Brandon Boudreaux immediately identified his attackers, the sophisticated planning behind the failed murder attempt, and Lori's controversial decision to represent herself in court. The forensic evidence is staggering: gunshot residue throughout the Jeep's interior, DNA evidence on multiple surfaces, license plate reader data tracking the vehicle's journey from Idaho to Arizona, and surveillance footage of the defendants removing evidence from storage units. Detective Pillar's testimony revealed Alex Cox's extensive preparation, including researching Brandon's address, studying shooting ranges, calculating trajectory angles, and mapping escape routes. Lori Vallow Daybell's cross-examination strategy exposed genuine investigative gaps while simultaneously demonstrating her understanding of criminal procedure. Her questioning highlighted untested glass fragments, missing bullet casings, absent surveillance footage, and transcription errors in witness interviews. However, her post-shooting internet searches for "man shot in gilbert az" and attempts to track news coverage reveal a defendant aware of and concerned about the crime's outcome. This attempted murder represents the final piece in a broader conspiracy that allegedly eliminated anyone Lori and Chad Daybell viewed as obstacles to their apocalyptic plans. Already serving life sentences for murdering her children JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan, plus conspiracy to murder husband Charles Vallow, this trial marks Lori's last chance to face accountability for the full scope of her alleged crimes. The psychological implications are profound: a mother representing herself in court while facing charges for systematically eliminating family members who opposed her doomsday beliefs. We analyze the courtroom dynamics, Judge Justin Beresky's attempts to maintain order after Friday's dramatic removal, and the prosecution's methodical presentation of circumstantial evidence that builds an overwhelming case for premeditated conspiracy. #LoriVallow #DoomsdayMom #TrueCrime #BrandonBoudreaux #MurderTrial #AlexCox #ChadDaybell #CellPhoneEvidence #ForensicEvidence #CourtAnalysis    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Day 3 of Lori Vallow Daybell's final murder conspiracy trial revealed devastating digital evidence that could seal her fate forever. Detective Ryan Pillar's explosive testimony exposed how Alex Cox's burner phone created an electronic trail leading directly to the attempted assassination of Brandon Boudreaux on October 2, 2019. This comprehensive analysis breaks down the most damning evidence presented in Phoenix Superior Court, including cell phone records that place Lori and Alex in direct communication during the shooting, vehicle modifications that transformed a Jeep into a mobile hunting platform, and post-crime Google searches that reveal consciousness of guilt. We examine how Brandon Boudreaux immediately identified his attackers, the sophisticated planning behind the failed murder attempt, and Lori's controversial decision to represent herself in court. The forensic evidence is staggering: gunshot residue throughout the Jeep's interior, DNA evidence on multiple surfaces, license plate reader data tracking the vehicle's journey from Idaho to Arizona, and surveillance footage of the defendants removing evidence from storage units. Detective Pillar's testimony revealed Alex Cox's extensive preparation, including researching Brandon's address, studying shooting ranges, calculating trajectory angles, and mapping escape routes. Lori Vallow Daybell's cross-examination strategy exposed genuine investigative gaps while simultaneously demonstrating her understanding of criminal procedure. Her questioning highlighted untested glass fragments, missing bullet casings, absent surveillance footage, and transcription errors in witness interviews. However, her post-shooting internet searches for "man shot in gilbert az" and attempts to track news coverage reveal a defendant aware of and concerned about the crime's outcome. This attempted murder represents the final piece in a broader conspiracy that allegedly eliminated anyone Lori and Chad Daybell viewed as obstacles to their apocalyptic plans. Already serving life sentences for murdering her children JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan, plus conspiracy to murder husband Charles Vallow, this trial marks Lori's last chance to face accountability for the full scope of her alleged crimes. The psychological implications are profound: a mother representing herself in court while facing charges for systematically eliminating family members who opposed her doomsday beliefs. We analyze the courtroom dynamics, Judge Justin Beresky's attempts to maintain order after Friday's dramatic removal, and the prosecution's methodical presentation of circumstantial evidence that builds an overwhelming case for premeditated conspiracy. #LoriVallow #DoomsdayMom #TrueCrime #BrandonBoudreaux #MurderTrial #AlexCox #ChadDaybell #CellPhoneEvidence #ForensicEvidence #CourtAnalysis    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Day 3 of Lori Vallow Daybell's final murder conspiracy trial revealed devastating digital evidence that could seal her fate forever. Detective Ryan Pillar's explosive testimony exposed how Alex Cox's burner phone created an electronic trail leading directly to the attempted assassination of Brandon Boudreaux on October 2, 2019. This comprehensive analysis breaks down the most damning evidence presented in Phoenix Superior Court, including cell phone records that place Lori and Alex in direct communication during the shooting, vehicle modifications that transformed a Jeep into a mobile hunting platform, and post-crime Google searches that reveal consciousness of guilt. We examine how Brandon Boudreaux immediately identified his attackers, the sophisticated planning behind the failed murder attempt, and Lori's controversial decision to represent herself in court. The forensic evidence is staggering: gunshot residue throughout the Jeep's interior, DNA evidence on multiple surfaces, license plate reader data tracking the vehicle's journey from Idaho to Arizona, and surveillance footage of the defendants removing evidence from storage units. Detective Pillar's testimony revealed Alex Cox's extensive preparation, including researching Brandon's address, studying shooting ranges, calculating trajectory angles, and mapping escape routes. Lori Vallow Daybell's cross-examination strategy exposed genuine investigative gaps while simultaneously demonstrating her understanding of criminal procedure. Her questioning highlighted untested glass fragments, missing bullet casings, absent surveillance footage, and transcription errors in witness interviews. However, her post-shooting internet searches for "man shot in gilbert az" and attempts to track news coverage reveal a defendant aware of and concerned about the crime's outcome. This attempted murder represents the final piece in a broader conspiracy that allegedly eliminated anyone Lori and Chad Daybell viewed as obstacles to their apocalyptic plans. Already serving life sentences for murdering her children JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan, plus conspiracy to murder husband Charles Vallow, this trial marks Lori's last chance to face accountability for the full scope of her alleged crimes. The psychological implications are profound: a mother representing herself in court while facing charges for systematically eliminating family members who opposed her doomsday beliefs. We analyze the courtroom dynamics, Judge Justin Beresky's attempts to maintain order after Friday's dramatic removal, and the prosecution's methodical presentation of circumstantial evidence that builds an overwhelming case for premeditated conspiracy. #LoriVallow #DoomsdayMom #TrueCrime #BrandonBoudreaux #MurderTrial #AlexCox #ChadDaybell #CellPhoneEvidence #ForensicEvidence #CourtAnalysis    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

How the FBI Used 1,000 Bottles of Baby Oil to Build a RICO Case Against Diddy: Digital Evidence Breakdown  The federal investigation that brought down Sean "Diddy" Combs represents one of the most sophisticated law enforcement operations in entertainment history. This comprehensive analysis examines how federal agents from Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, DEA, and ATF coordinated a multi-agency takedown that began with Cassie Ventura's explosive lawsuit and culminated in RICO charges carrying a potential life sentence. Our investigation reveals the intricate timeline from November 2023 when Cassie filed her $20 million settlement lawsuit to the dramatic March 2024 simultaneous raids on Diddy's Los Angeles and Miami mansions. Federal agents discovered over 1,000 bottles of baby oil allegedly used in "Freak-Off" parties, three AR-15 rifles with defaced serial numbers, and thousands of videos that prosecutors claim Diddy used for blackmail. This video breaks down the digital forensics operation that analyzed over 10,500 terabytes of data from seized phones and computers. We explore how the FBI's Computer Analysis and Response Team, consisting of nearly 500 highly trained agents, extracted evidence even from devices Diddy thought were secure. The investigation utilized cutting-edge cell phone forensics tools, GPS tracking, metadata analysis, and social media enhancement techniques to build an airtight case. The Southern District of New York's prosecution strategy transforms individual allegations into a comprehensive RICO conspiracy case, treating Diddy's business empire as a criminal enterprise. Led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Meredith Foster, Emily Johnson, and their team, prosecutors argue that Bad Boy Entertainment, Combs Enterprises, and related businesses facilitated sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, and witness intimidation. We analyze the legal significance of charging a celebrity under racketeering laws typically reserved for organized crime families. The case demonstrates how modern federal investigators approach complex criminal enterprises in the digital age, using sophisticated analytical tools to map relationships, track communications, and visualize criminal operations spanning decades. Expert commentary from former federal prosecutors explains why this case could result in a life sentence and how it compares to other high-profile RICO prosecutions like R. Kelly and Harvey Weinstein. The investigation's speed—from initial lawsuit to federal indictment in less than a year—reveals either pre-existing intelligence or the extensive nature of the alleged criminal activity. #DiddyInvestigation #FederalRICO #DigitalForensics #LawEnforcement #SouthernDistrictNY #HSIRaids #CelebryJustice #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FederalCharges #CriminalEnterprise    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

How the FBI Used 1,000 Bottles of Baby Oil to Build a RICO Case Against Diddy: Digital Evidence Breakdown  The federal investigation that brought down Sean "Diddy" Combs represents one of the most sophisticated law enforcement operations in entertainment history. This comprehensive analysis examines how federal agents from Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, DEA, and ATF coordinated a multi-agency takedown that began with Cassie Ventura's explosive lawsuit and culminated in RICO charges carrying a potential life sentence. Our investigation reveals the intricate timeline from November 2023 when Cassie filed her $20 million settlement lawsuit to the dramatic March 2024 simultaneous raids on Diddy's Los Angeles and Miami mansions. Federal agents discovered over 1,000 bottles of baby oil allegedly used in "Freak-Off" parties, three AR-15 rifles with defaced serial numbers, and thousands of videos that prosecutors claim Diddy used for blackmail. This video breaks down the digital forensics operation that analyzed over 10,500 terabytes of data from seized phones and computers. We explore how the FBI's Computer Analysis and Response Team, consisting of nearly 500 highly trained agents, extracted evidence even from devices Diddy thought were secure. The investigation utilized cutting-edge cell phone forensics tools, GPS tracking, metadata analysis, and social media enhancement techniques to build an airtight case. The Southern District of New York's prosecution strategy transforms individual allegations into a comprehensive RICO conspiracy case, treating Diddy's business empire as a criminal enterprise. Led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Meredith Foster, Emily Johnson, and their team, prosecutors argue that Bad Boy Entertainment, Combs Enterprises, and related businesses facilitated sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, and witness intimidation. We analyze the legal significance of charging a celebrity under racketeering laws typically reserved for organized crime families. The case demonstrates how modern federal investigators approach complex criminal enterprises in the digital age, using sophisticated analytical tools to map relationships, track communications, and visualize criminal operations spanning decades. Expert commentary from former federal prosecutors explains why this case could result in a life sentence and how it compares to other high-profile RICO prosecutions like R. Kelly and Harvey Weinstein. The investigation's speed—from initial lawsuit to federal indictment in less than a year—reveals either pre-existing intelligence or the extensive nature of the alleged criminal activity. #DiddyInvestigation #FederalRICO #DigitalForensics #LawEnforcement #SouthernDistrictNY #HSIRaids #CelebryJustice #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FederalCharges #CriminalEnterprise    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

How the FBI Used 1,000 Bottles of Baby Oil to Build a RICO Case Against Diddy: Digital Evidence Breakdown  The federal investigation that brought down Sean "Diddy" Combs represents one of the most sophisticated law enforcement operations in entertainment history. This comprehensive analysis examines how federal agents from Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, DEA, and ATF coordinated a multi-agency takedown that began with Cassie Ventura's explosive lawsuit and culminated in RICO charges carrying a potential life sentence. Our investigation reveals the intricate timeline from November 2023 when Cassie filed her $20 million settlement lawsuit to the dramatic March 2024 simultaneous raids on Diddy's Los Angeles and Miami mansions. Federal agents discovered over 1,000 bottles of baby oil allegedly used in "Freak-Off" parties, three AR-15 rifles with defaced serial numbers, and thousands of videos that prosecutors claim Diddy used for blackmail. This video breaks down the digital forensics operation that analyzed over 10,500 terabytes of data from seized phones and computers. We explore how the FBI's Computer Analysis and Response Team, consisting of nearly 500 highly trained agents, extracted evidence even from devices Diddy thought were secure. The investigation utilized cutting-edge cell phone forensics tools, GPS tracking, metadata analysis, and social media enhancement techniques to build an airtight case. The Southern District of New York's prosecution strategy transforms individual allegations into a comprehensive RICO conspiracy case, treating Diddy's business empire as a criminal enterprise. Led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Meredith Foster, Emily Johnson, and their team, prosecutors argue that Bad Boy Entertainment, Combs Enterprises, and related businesses facilitated sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, and witness intimidation. We analyze the legal significance of charging a celebrity under racketeering laws typically reserved for organized crime families. The case demonstrates how modern federal investigators approach complex criminal enterprises in the digital age, using sophisticated analytical tools to map relationships, track communications, and visualize criminal operations spanning decades. Expert commentary from former federal prosecutors explains why this case could result in a life sentence and how it compares to other high-profile RICO prosecutions like R. Kelly and Harvey Weinstein. The investigation's speed—from initial lawsuit to federal indictment in less than a year—reveals either pre-existing intelligence or the extensive nature of the alleged criminal activity. #DiddyInvestigation #FederalRICO #DigitalForensics #LawEnforcement #SouthernDistrictNY #HSIRaids #CelebryJustice #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FederalCharges #CriminalEnterprise    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Vinnie Politan analyzes the testimony of the reconstructionist and other digital evidence in Karen Read's retrial, questioning whether the jury should trust it. #CourtTV - What do YOU think?Catch up on the case against #KarenRead here: https://www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of Vinnie Politan Investigates Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell.

Alex Murdaugh was sunk by a totality of the evidence against him, but some of the most damning evidence that was presented was the digital evidence that was collected by the investigators and then rebuilt into a timeline showing exactly where Murdaugh was during the time of the murder. When added with the other evidence, such as the video where his voice was heard in the background, it led to a conviction. In Idaho there is a very similar thing taking place behind the scenes as the investigators there have filed over sixty digital warrants already and more expected to come. When you look at the evidence that they had against Alex Murdaugh and you compare it with the evidence collected against Bryan Kohberger, there are many similarities with how the investigations have unfolded.In this episode we take a look at those investigations and see where they are similar and what that might mean for Bryan Kohberger at his trial. (commercial at 8:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Crucial clue in both Bryan Kohberger and killer dad Alex Murdaugh cases may determine verdict in Idaho murders trial | The US Sun (the-sun.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Digital evidence presented in court reveals alleged triple murderer Erin Patterson's frustrations with her in-laws months before the deadly mushroom meal. Facebook messages, photos of mushrooms on drying racks, and searches about terminal cancer paint a complex picture in this closely watched murder trial.• Erin Patterson, 50, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder• Facebook messages show Ms Patterson expressing frustration about her in-laws and estranged husband Simon Patterson• Ms Patterson allegedly wrote she was "sick of this shit" and wanted "nothing to do" with Simon's parents• Messages detail disputes over child support and perceived favouritism towards Simon• Digital forensic analyst testified about photos of mushrooms on drying racks and scales found on Ms Patterson's tablet• Evidence extracted from a phone allegedly included internet searches about stage four cancer and brain lymphoma• Defence maintains the poisonings were a terrible accident with no intention to harmThanks for listening. For more information, visit my website. Make sure you subscribe to my newsletter on www.mushroommurdertrial.com, it's jam-packed with news about the trial. Plus I'm on Instagram at Erin underscore pod. You can find me on Facebook. Just search the podcast, the mushroom Murder Trial podcast. I also will put links in the show notes to those social media accounts. And if you were feeling like rewarding me for the thousands of hours I've spent on this work, I have a buy me a coffee membership which allows you to pay $5 as a thanks and I get a coffee. This goes towards the editing, studio hire, liability insurance, equipment, sound and voiceovers. Plus there's exclusive membership material on the site, just for you.Instagram @Erin_PodcastTwitter @lisapodcastsMushroom Murder Trial Website Facebook page

The digital evidence in Karen Read's retrial, including John O'Keefe's last movements, is examined by Vinnie Politan.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?Catch up on the case against #KarenRead here: https://www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of Vinnie Politan Investigates Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell.

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 1 Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 2 Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 3 Description: Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 1 Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense   Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 2 Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 3 Description: Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 1 Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 2 Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 3 Description: Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Are you unknowingly sabotaging your divorce case by collecting the wrong evidence or trusting the wrong assumptions?Divorce is never simple, and the emotional weight is only half the battle. In this episode, Heather Quick and Tanya Helfand dive into the misunderstood legal complexities of infidelity, surveillance, digital evidence, and post-nuptial agreements. If you're navigating a divorce or supporting someone who is, what you don't know can hurt you—legally and emotionally.– Understand how technology is reshaping the rules of divorce litigation– Learn why infidelity might not matter in court—and when it does– Discover how clear communication with your lawyer can protect your rights and peace of mindPress play to gain crucial legal insights that will help you feel empowered, prepared, and protected during your divorce journey.Join us on our podcast as we navigate the complexities of marriage, divorce, separation, and all related legal and emotional aspects, including adultery, alimony, child support, spousal support, timesharing, custody battles, and the financial impact of dissolution of marriage.Interested in working with us? Fill out this form here to get started. Not quite ready? Interact with us on socials! Linktree: https://linktr.ee/FloridaWomensLawGroup Florida Women's Law Group Website: https://www.floridawomenslawgroup.com/Tanya Helfand's Links:Website: https://www.spsk.com/ Facebook: Schenck PriceTwitter: SchenckPriceLinkedIn: Schenck, Price, Smith & King LLPDisclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services. The information provided on this podcast is not intended to be legal advice. You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice. If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer. The views and opinions expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations...

Alex Murdaugh was sunk by a totality of the evidence against him, but some of the most damning evidence that was presented was the digital evidence that was collected by the investigators and then rebuilt into a timeline showing exactly where Murdaugh was during the time of the murder. When added with the other evidence, such as the video where his voice was heard in the background, it led to a conviction. In Idaho there is a very similar thing taking place behind the scenes as the investigators there have filed over sixty digital warrants already and more expected to come. When you look at the evidence that they had against Alex Murdaugh and you compare it with the evidence collected against Bryan Kohberger, there are many similarities with how the investigations have unfolded.In this episode we take a look at those investigations and see where they are similar and what that might mean for Bryan Kohberger at his trial. (commercial at 8:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Crucial clue in both Bryan Kohberger and killer dad Alex Murdaugh cases may determine verdict in Idaho murders trial | The US Sun (the-sun.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Today, I'm sharing something deeply personal and serious—my stalker story. For over a year, Timothy C. (we can share his full name soon if need be) has been physically stalking me, and his digital harassment goes back even further. Law enforcement is now involved, but I wanted to update you all in case anything happens to me—so there's no question about who did it. This episode isn't just about my experience; it's also about the reality of stalking, the dangers of obsession, and the importance of taking threats seriously. Stay aware, stay safe, and let's talk about it all, shall we?—https://noblegoldinvestments.com

Send us a textThe boundary between tool-dependent analysis and true forensic expertise grows increasingly blurred as AI enters the digital forensics landscape. Alexis Brignoni and Heather Charpentier reunite after a month-long hiatus to sound the alarm on a concerning trend: the integration of generative AI into forensic tools without adequate safeguards for verification and validation.Drawing from Stacey Eldridge's firsthand experience, they reveal how AI outputs can be dangerously inconsistent, potentially creating false positives (or missing critical evidence) while providing no reduction in examination time if proper verification procedures are followed. This presents investigators with a troubling choice: trust AI results and save time but risk severe legal and professional consequences, or verify everything and negate the promised efficiency benefits. The hosts warn that as AI becomes ubiquitous in forensic tools, it dramatically expands the attack surface for challenging evidence in court—especially when there's no traceability of AI prompts, responses, or error rates.Beyond the AI discussion, the episode delivers practical insights for investigators, including an in-depth look at the Android gallery trash functionality. When users delete photos, these files remain in a dedicated trash directory for 30 days with their original paths and deletion timestamps fully preserved in the local DB database—a forensic goldmine for cases where suspects attempt to eliminate evidence shortly before investigators arrive. Other highlights include recent updates to the Unfurl tool for URL analysis, Parse SMS for recovering edited and unsent iOS messages, and Josh Hickman's research on Apple CarPlay forensics.Whether you're investigating distracted driving cases, analyzing group calls on iOS, or simply trying to navigate the increasingly complex digital evidence landscape, this episode offers both cautionary wisdom and practical techniques to enhance your forensic capabilities. Join the conversation as we explore what it truly means to be a digital forensic expert in an age of increasing automation.Ready to strengthen your digital investigation skills? Subscribe now for more insights from the front lines of digital forensics.Notes:Magnet Virtual Summit Presentationshttps://www.magnetforensics.com/magnet-virtual-summit-2025-replays/https://www.stark4n6.com/2025/03/magnet-virtual-summit-2025-ctf-android.htmlparse_smsdbhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/alberthui_ios-16-allows-for-imessagesmsmmsrcs-message-activity-7279586088988413952-xHWlhttps://github.com/h4x0r/parse_sms.db/tree/mainAre you a DF/IR Expert Witness or Just a Useful Pawn?https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dfir-training_a-pawn-moves-where-its-told-a-dfir-expert-activity-7292981112463572992-c3wd/Unfurlhttps://dfir.blog/unfurl-parses-obfuscated-ip-addresses/https://github.com/obsidianforensics/unfurlAI to Summarize Chat Logs and Audio from Seized Mobile Phoneshttps://www.404media.co/cellebrite-is-using-ai-to-summarize-chat-logs-and-audio-from-seized-mobile-phones/Ridin' With Apple CarPlay 2https://thebinaryhick.blog/2025/02/19/ridin-with-apple-carplay-2/Hello Who is on the Line?https://metadataperspective.com/2025/02/05/hello-who-is-on-the-line/

Judge Denies Defense Motions in Bryan Kohberger Case, Allowing Key DNA and Digital Evidence at Trial An Idaho judge ruled against Bryan Kohberger's defense team in a series of motions challenging critical evidence, a significant setback for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022. Judge Steven Hippler denied multiple motions to suppress evidence, including DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene, cell phone and email records, surveillance footage, and Kohberger's past Amazon purchases. Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student, was arrested in December 2022 and charged with the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin in their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho. His attorneys argued that law enforcement violated his constitutional rights in obtaining evidence, but the court ruled otherwise. One of the most significant rulings upheld the use of DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene. Investigators identified Kohberger as a suspect after submitting DNA from the knife sheath to public ancestry websites to generate a list of possible matches. Authorities then obtained a DNA sample from trash collected outside Kohberger's parents' home in Pennsylvania, which matched DNA found on the sheath. The defense had argued that this investigative genetic genealogy technique violated Kohberger's rights, but Hippler disagreed. He ruled that Kohberger “exposed his DNA to the public by leaving it on the sheath, thus forfeiting any reasonable expectation of privacy.” The judge also upheld the trash collection, stating, “by throwing away an item of trash containing his DNA, the defendant cannot object to testing of that DNA.” In a prior hearing, Hippler had expressed skepticism about suppressing DNA evidence, saying, “when there's a DNA match between the DNA and the sheath and Mr. Kohberger, isn't that probable cause every day and twice on Sunday?” The defense also sought to challenge the validity of the search warrants that led to the seizure of Kohberger's digital records, including phone data from AT&T, Google, Apple, and Amazon, as well as evidence from a USB drive. Kohberger's attorneys claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights. However, Hippler ruled that the evidence was lawfully obtained through search warrants and the third-party doctrine, which limits privacy rights over information shared with service providers. Another motion sought a Franks hearing, which would have allowed the defense to challenge the credibility of the probable cause affidavits used to obtain search warrants. The defense alleged that law enforcement omitted key information regarding investigative genetic genealogy and misrepresented statements made by a surviving roommate who was inside the house at the time of the murders. The judge rejected these claims, ruling that the genetic genealogy information “would have only bolstered probable cause” and that the surviving roommate's statements were consistent. He noted that while the defense may raise these points during trial, there was no evidence of misrepresentation in the warrant applications. The decisions were welcomed by the family of Kaylee Goncalves, one of the victims. “All the motions to suppress and Franks motion have been denied! It's always a double edge sword waiting. You want the right decisions to be made but you also want them to be made quickly. We are thankful to the Court for a timely decision and appreciate the work prosecution has put in thus far. In the big picture of life justice is just moments away,” the family said. Kohberger's trial is scheduled to begin on August 11. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #DNAEvidence #UniversityOfIdaho #JusticeForTheVictims #LegalRuling Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

An Idaho judge ruled against Bryan Kohberger's defense team in a series of motions challenging critical evidence, a significant setback for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022. Judge Steven Hippler denied multiple motions to suppress evidence, including DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene, cell phone and email records, surveillance footage, and Kohberger's past Amazon purchases. Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student, was arrested in December 2022 and charged with the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin in their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho. His attorneys argued that law enforcement violated his constitutional rights in obtaining evidence, but the court ruled otherwise. One of the most significant rulings upheld the use of DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene. Investigators identified Kohberger as a suspect after submitting DNA from the knife sheath to public ancestry websites to generate a list of possible matches. Authorities then obtained a DNA sample from trash collected outside Kohberger's parents' home in Pennsylvania, which matched DNA found on the sheath. The defense had argued that this investigative genetic genealogy technique violated Kohberger's rights, but Hippler disagreed. He ruled that Kohberger “exposed his DNA to the public by leaving it on the sheath, thus forfeiting any reasonable expectation of privacy.” The judge also upheld the trash collection, stating, “by throwing away an item of trash containing his DNA, the defendant cannot object to testing of that DNA.” In a prior hearing, Hippler had expressed skepticism about suppressing DNA evidence, saying, “when there's a DNA match between the DNA and the sheath and Mr. Kohberger, isn't that probable cause every day and twice on Sunday?” The defense also sought to challenge the validity of the search warrants that led to the seizure of Kohberger's digital records, including phone data from AT&T, Google, Apple, and Amazon, as well as evidence from a USB drive. Kohberger's attorneys claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights. However, Hippler ruled that the evidence was lawfully obtained through search warrants and the third-party doctrine, which limits privacy rights over information shared with service providers. Another motion sought a Franks hearing, which would have allowed the defense to challenge the credibility of the probable cause affidavits used to obtain search warrants. The defense alleged that law enforcement omitted key information regarding investigative genetic genealogy and misrepresented statements made by a surviving roommate who was inside the house at the time of the murders. The judge rejected these claims, ruling that the genetic genealogy information “would have only bolstered probable cause” and that the surviving roommate's statements were consistent. He noted that while the defense may raise these points during trial, there was no evidence of misrepresentation in the warrant applications. The decisions were welcomed by the family of Kaylee Goncalves, one of the victims. “All the motions to suppress and Franks motion have been denied! It's always a double edge sword waiting. You want the right decisions to be made but you also want them to be made quickly. We are thankful to the Court for a timely decision and appreciate the work prosecution has put in thus far. In the big picture of life justice is just moments away,” the family said. Kohberger's trial is scheduled to begin on August 11. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #DNAEvidence #UniversityOfIdaho #JusticeForTheVictims #LegalRuling Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

An Idaho judge ruled against Bryan Kohberger's defense team in a series of motions challenging critical evidence, a significant setback for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022. Judge Steven Hippler denied multiple motions to suppress evidence, including DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene, cell phone and email records, surveillance footage, and Kohberger's past Amazon purchases. Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student, was arrested in December 2022 and charged with the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin in their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho. His attorneys argued that law enforcement violated his constitutional rights in obtaining evidence, but the court ruled otherwise. One of the most significant rulings upheld the use of DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene. Investigators identified Kohberger as a suspect after submitting DNA from the knife sheath to public ancestry websites to generate a list of possible matches. Authorities then obtained a DNA sample from trash collected outside Kohberger's parents' home in Pennsylvania, which matched DNA found on the sheath. The defense had argued that this investigative genetic genealogy technique violated Kohberger's rights, but Hippler disagreed. He ruled that Kohberger “exposed his DNA to the public by leaving it on the sheath, thus forfeiting any reasonable expectation of privacy.” The judge also upheld the trash collection, stating, “by throwing away an item of trash containing his DNA, the defendant cannot object to testing of that DNA.” In a prior hearing, Hippler had expressed skepticism about suppressing DNA evidence, saying, “when there's a DNA match between the DNA and the sheath and Mr. Kohberger, isn't that probable cause every day and twice on Sunday?” The defense also sought to challenge the validity of the search warrants that led to the seizure of Kohberger's digital records, including phone data from AT&T, Google, Apple, and Amazon, as well as evidence from a USB drive. Kohberger's attorneys claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights. However, Hippler ruled that the evidence was lawfully obtained through search warrants and the third-party doctrine, which limits privacy rights over information shared with service providers. Another motion sought a Franks hearing, which would have allowed the defense to challenge the credibility of the probable cause affidavits used to obtain search warrants. The defense alleged that law enforcement omitted key information regarding investigative genetic genealogy and misrepresented statements made by a surviving roommate who was inside the house at the time of the murders. The judge rejected these claims, ruling that the genetic genealogy information “would have only bolstered probable cause” and that the surviving roommate's statements were consistent. He noted that while the defense may raise these points during trial, there was no evidence of misrepresentation in the warrant applications. The decisions were welcomed by the family of Kaylee Goncalves, one of the victims. “All the motions to suppress and Franks motion have been denied! It's always a double edge sword waiting. You want the right decisions to be made but you also want them to be made quickly. We are thankful to the Court for a timely decision and appreciate the work prosecution has put in thus far. In the big picture of life justice is just moments away,” the family said. Kohberger's trial is scheduled to begin on August 11. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #DNAEvidence #UniversityOfIdaho #JusticeForTheVictims #LegalRuling Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Judge Denies Defense Motions in Bryan Kohberger Case, Allowing Key DNA and Digital Evidence at Trial An Idaho judge ruled against Bryan Kohberger's defense team in a series of motions challenging critical evidence, a significant setback for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022. Judge Steven Hippler denied multiple motions to suppress evidence, including DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene, cell phone and email records, surveillance footage, and Kohberger's past Amazon purchases. Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student, was arrested in December 2022 and charged with the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin in their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho. His attorneys argued that law enforcement violated his constitutional rights in obtaining evidence, but the court ruled otherwise. One of the most significant rulings upheld the use of DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene. Investigators identified Kohberger as a suspect after submitting DNA from the knife sheath to public ancestry websites to generate a list of possible matches. Authorities then obtained a DNA sample from trash collected outside Kohberger's parents' home in Pennsylvania, which matched DNA found on the sheath. The defense had argued that this investigative genetic genealogy technique violated Kohberger's rights, but Hippler disagreed. He ruled that Kohberger “exposed his DNA to the public by leaving it on the sheath, thus forfeiting any reasonable expectation of privacy.” The judge also upheld the trash collection, stating, “by throwing away an item of trash containing his DNA, the defendant cannot object to testing of that DNA.” In a prior hearing, Hippler had expressed skepticism about suppressing DNA evidence, saying, “when there's a DNA match between the DNA and the sheath and Mr. Kohberger, isn't that probable cause every day and twice on Sunday?” The defense also sought to challenge the validity of the search warrants that led to the seizure of Kohberger's digital records, including phone data from AT&T, Google, Apple, and Amazon, as well as evidence from a USB drive. Kohberger's attorneys claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights. However, Hippler ruled that the evidence was lawfully obtained through search warrants and the third-party doctrine, which limits privacy rights over information shared with service providers. Another motion sought a Franks hearing, which would have allowed the defense to challenge the credibility of the probable cause affidavits used to obtain search warrants. The defense alleged that law enforcement omitted key information regarding investigative genetic genealogy and misrepresented statements made by a surviving roommate who was inside the house at the time of the murders. The judge rejected these claims, ruling that the genetic genealogy information “would have only bolstered probable cause” and that the surviving roommate's statements were consistent. He noted that while the defense may raise these points during trial, there was no evidence of misrepresentation in the warrant applications. The decisions were welcomed by the family of Kaylee Goncalves, one of the victims. “All the motions to suppress and Franks motion have been denied! It's always a double edge sword waiting. You want the right decisions to be made but you also want them to be made quickly. We are thankful to the Court for a timely decision and appreciate the work prosecution has put in thus far. In the big picture of life justice is just moments away,” the family said. Kohberger's trial is scheduled to begin on August 11. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #DNAEvidence #UniversityOfIdaho #JusticeForTheVictims #LegalRuling Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Every day, each of us produce more data that ends up in the hands of third parties: browsing data, shopping data, stored images, writings, and communications.  And each of us expects a certain degree of privacy and protections. But when that data can play a critical role in criminal justice, our regulations have struggled to balance the need for personal privacy while also serving the fair and equal pursuit of justice.Join us as we explore the intersection of data privacy, evidence law, and criminal defense with Professor Rebecca Wexler. Discover the challenges of accessing digital evidence, the evolving legal landscape, and the potential wide-ranging impacts of Snap v. Pina on data privacy laws. And learn how you, as a law student, can play a role in redefining how our laws manage data in the future.Additional Resources:Snap v. PinaCourt of Appeal DecisionDocket(00:00) - Introduction (04:00) - Why Every Lawyer Needs to Understand Data Privacy (06:24) - How The Law Has Adapted to Digital Evidence (08:54) - Unequal Access to Digital Data in Criminal Cases (12:50) - Understanding Snap v Pina (18:36) - The Intersection of Intellectual Property and Data Privacy (22:47) - How Law Students Can Impact the Law (26:43) - Host Discussion Click here to view the episode transcript.

Send us a textUnlock the secrets to mastering cybersecurity and prepare yourself for the CISSP exam with our latest episode of the CISSP Cyber Training Podcast. Ever wondered how a simple API misstep could lead to a major breach? We dive into a recent incident involving the Department of Treasury and Beyond Trust, showcasing the critical importance of API security. As we navigate through domain 1.6, we promise to enhance your understanding of key concepts like the preponderance of evidence in civil investigations and the main objectives of regulatory probes. This episode is packed with insights that are not only essential for your exam preparation but also invaluable for your cybersecurity strategy.Join us as we unravel the complexities of legal and regulatory investigations. From understanding why reviewing an organization's policies is the cornerstone of internal administrative investigations to dissecting the GDPR framework for data protection, we cover it all. Learn the nuances between civil and criminal investigations and how insider trading is scrutinized by financial regulators while non-compete violations are typically handled administratively. Whether you're gearing up for the CISSP exam or looking to bolster your cybersecurity knowledge, this episode offers comprehensive insights that will certainly enrich your perspective and expertise.Gain exclusive access to 360 FREE CISSP Practice Questions delivered directly to your inbox! Sign up at FreeCISSPQuestions.com and receive 30 expertly crafted practice questions every month for the next 12 months—completely free! Don't miss this valuable opportunity to strengthen your CISSP exam preparation and boost your chances of certification success. Join now and start your journey toward CISSP mastery today!

Send us a textUnlock the secrets to mastering the CISSP exam with insights that could transform your cybersecurity career. Have you ever considered how failing to change a default router password could be your greatest vulnerability? Join me, Sean Gerber, as I guide you through the essential topics that every aspiring security professional needs to understand as we step into 2025. From administrative to regulatory investigations, this episode covers the diverse landscape of investigation types and underscores the importance of staying vigilant against cyber threats like man-in-the-middle attacks and DDoS attacks. In this episode, we unravel the complexities of digital evidence and the crucial role of e-discovery in legal proceedings. Learn about the Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) and how it serves as a cornerstone for managing electronic evidence. We dive into the nuances of maintaining evidence integrity, the legalities of digital forensics, and the critical importance of a robust data retention strategy. As we dissect computer crimes and their impacts, you'll gain a deeper appreciation for the challenges and intricacies involved in handling cybersecurity incidents.Concluding with a rich discussion on ethical and legal investigation procedures, we highlight key regulatory frameworks such as GDPR and CCPA. Understand the importance of obtaining consent for monitoring and maintaining a chain of custody for evidence. With practical tips and resources, including those from ReduceCyberRisk.com, this episode equips you with the knowledge to not only pass the CISSP exam but to thrive in an ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape. Whether you're a seasoned professional or new to the field, you'll find valuable insights to bolster your defense against the relentless advance of cyber threats.Gain exclusive access to 360 FREE CISSP Practice Questions delivered directly to your inbox! Sign up at FreeCISSPQuestions.com and receive 30 expertly crafted practice questions every month for the next 12 months—completely free! Don't miss this valuable opportunity to strengthen your CISSP exam preparation and boost your chances of certification success. Join now and start your journey toward CISSP mastery today!

In this episode of the Carl Jackson Show, host Carl Jackson and criminologist Dr. Curry Myers delve into the assassination of a United Healthcare CEO in Manhattan. They analyze the details of the case, including the video of the incident, the profile of the shooter, and the investigative steps law enforcement will take. The discussion also covers potential motives behind the assassination, the importance of digital footprints in solving the case, and the implications for healthcare executives in light of this violent act. Dr. Myers shares his extensive experience in criminology to provide insights into the investigation process and the factors that could lead to such a crime. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshow  http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.com NEW!!!! THE CARL JACKSON SHOW MERCH IS HERE. SUPPORT THE PODCAST GETTING A T-SHIRT NOW!  https://carljacksonmerch.itemorder.com  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the Carl Jackson Show, host Carl Jackson and criminologist Dr. Curry Myers delve into the assassination of a United Healthcare CEO in Manhattan. They analyze the details of the case, including the video of the incident, the profile of the shooter, and the investigative steps law enforcement will take. The discussion also covers potential motives behind the assassination, the importance of digital footprints in solving the case, and the implications for healthcare executives in light of this violent act. Dr. Myers shares his extensive experience in criminology to provide insights into the investigation process and the factors that could lead to such a crime. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshow  http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.com NEW!!!! THE CARL JACKSON SHOW MERCH IS HERE. SUPPORT THE PODCAST GETTING A T-SHIRT NOW!  https://carljacksonmerch.itemorder.com  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Could a mishandled investigation mean an innocent man is sitting behind bars? Robin Dreeke dives deep into the chaotic evidence and questionable tactics surrounding the interrogation of Richard Allen in this baffling case. When investigators ask Allen how a bullet matching his gun ended up at the crime scene, his response feels more exasperated than evasive, almost like a man shoved into a corner rather than one hiding in the shadows. Dreeke highlights how the officers could have taken a more strategic approach, building trust rather than alienating Allen by showing him his “shame” instead of pushing him into a defensive posture. This episode doesn't just question the integrity of the case against Allen—it suggests that the real culprits might still be at large, hidden behind the curtain of a botched investigation and untested suspects. Are we chasing the wrong man? And what does this mean for the victims' families as they await real answers? #HiddenKillers #RichardAllenCase #CrimeInvestigation #TrueCrimeToday #Evidence #JusticeForLibbyAndAbby #UnansweredQuestions Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Could a mishandled investigation mean an innocent man is sitting behind bars? Robin Dreeke dives deep into the chaotic evidence and questionable tactics surrounding the interrogation of Richard Allen in this baffling case. When investigators ask Allen how a bullet matching his gun ended up at the crime scene, his response feels more exasperated than evasive, almost like a man shoved into a corner rather than one hiding in the shadows. Dreeke highlights how the officers could have taken a more strategic approach, building trust rather than alienating Allen by showing him his “shame” instead of pushing him into a defensive posture. This episode doesn't just question the integrity of the case against Allen—it suggests that the real culprits might still be at large, hidden behind the curtain of a botched investigation and untested suspects. Are we chasing the wrong man? And what does this mean for the victims' families as they await real answers? #HiddenKillers #RichardAllenCase #CrimeInvestigation #TrueCrimeToday #Evidence #JusticeForLibbyAndAbby #UnansweredQuestions Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Could a mishandled investigation mean an innocent man is sitting behind bars? Robin Dreeke dives deep into the chaotic evidence and questionable tactics surrounding the interrogation of Richard Allen in this baffling case. When investigators ask Allen how a bullet matching his gun ended up at the crime scene, his response feels more exasperated than evasive, almost like a man shoved into a corner rather than one hiding in the shadows. Dreeke highlights how the officers could have taken a more strategic approach, building trust rather than alienating Allen by showing him his “shame” instead of pushing him into a defensive posture. This episode doesn't just question the integrity of the case against Allen—it suggests that the real culprits might still be at large, hidden behind the curtain of a botched investigation and untested suspects. Are we chasing the wrong man? And what does this mean for the victims' families as they await real answers? #HiddenKillers #RichardAllenCase #CrimeInvestigation #TrueCrimeToday #Evidence #JusticeForLibbyAndAbby #UnansweredQuestions Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Investigators Find ZERO Digital Evidence Linking Richard Allen To Delphi Murders Did the pressure to close the Delphi case lead investigators to rush to judgment? As the trial of Richard Allen unfolds, it seems like more questions than answers are emerging. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer shares insights on the shaky grounds of this case, highlighting the lack of DNA evidence, conflicting witness accounts, and a digital footprint that remains eerily empty. And what about the so-called “bullet science” tying Allen to the crime scene? With doubts swirling around the evidence, it feels as if the system is leaning on gut feeling over hard proof. As this high-stakes trial unfolds, the real question becomes: Are we willing to settle for a suspect rather than find the truth? #HiddenKillers #DelphiMurders #TrueCrimeToday #JusticeOrClosure #RichardAllenTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #MononHighBridge Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Investigators Find ZERO Digital Evidence Linking Richard Allen To Delphi Murders Did the pressure to close the Delphi case lead investigators to rush to judgment? As the trial of Richard Allen unfolds, it seems like more questions than answers are emerging. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer shares insights on the shaky grounds of this case, highlighting the lack of DNA evidence, conflicting witness accounts, and a digital footprint that remains eerily empty. And what about the so-called “bullet science” tying Allen to the crime scene? With doubts swirling around the evidence, it feels as if the system is leaning on gut feeling over hard proof. As this high-stakes trial unfolds, the real question becomes: Are we willing to settle for a suspect rather than find the truth? #HiddenKillers #DelphiMurders #TrueCrimeToday #JusticeOrClosure #RichardAllenTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #MononHighBridge Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Investigators Find ZERO Digital Evidence Linking Richard Allen To Delphi Murders Did the pressure to close the Delphi case lead investigators to rush to judgment? As the trial of Richard Allen unfolds, it seems like more questions than answers are emerging. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer shares insights on the shaky grounds of this case, highlighting the lack of DNA evidence, conflicting witness accounts, and a digital footprint that remains eerily empty. And what about the so-called “bullet science” tying Allen to the crime scene? With doubts swirling around the evidence, it feels as if the system is leaning on gut feeling over hard proof. As this high-stakes trial unfolds, the real question becomes: Are we willing to settle for a suspect rather than find the truth? #HiddenKillers #DelphiMurders #TrueCrimeToday #JusticeOrClosure #RichardAllenTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #MononHighBridge Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In episode 168, Coffey talks with Noel Kersh about protecting company information and digital forensics.They discuss the role of digital forensics in investigations; the importance of preserving digital evidence; challenges with personal devices and cloud computing in the workplace; policies for managing company data on personal devices; the emerging role of AI tools like ChatGPT in investigations; and best practices for preserving digital evidence post-investigation.You can hear more from Noel at The HR Southwest Conference on October 13th through the 16th. And you can hear Mike and previous guest Jim Zadeh discuss artificial intelligence during the Legal Exchange at the HR Southwest Conference. You can review the entire HR Southwest 2024 agenda at https://hrsouthwest.comGood Morning, HR is brought to you by Imperative—Bulletproof Background Checks. For more information about our commitment to quality and excellent customer service, visit us at https://imperativeinfo.com. If you are an HRCI or SHRM-certified professional, this episode of Good Morning, HR has been pre-approved for half a recertification credit. To obtain the recertification information for this episode, visit https://goodmorninghr.com. About our Guest:Noel has extensive experience in conducting digital forensics acquisitions and analysis on a variety of cases involving business and employment disputes, compliance with discovery requests, family law, harassment, in-house investigations for large corporations, copyright infringement and criminal cases. He also has handled large-scale E-Discovery matters.Noel leads Crowe LLP's national digital forensics practice. Prior to joining Crowe LLP, Noel spent over 12 years leading Pathway Forensics where he was responsible for overseeing every aspect of the company, established the digital forensic lab operational policies and procedures, and provided leadership and mentoring for Pathway Forensics staff. Prior to joining Pathway, Noel helped lead two initiatives to receive a distinguished laboratory accreditation given by the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board (ASCLD/LAB). This accreditation demonstrates that a computer forensics laboratory's operating standards meet quality standards set by ASCLD/LAB. Accreditation criteria include personnel, technical procedures, equipment, and physical facilities. Noel has provided expert testimony over 40 times in trials, hearings, and depositions on matters before both state and federal courts on matters involving digital forensics. Finally, he has presented over 100 times on digital forensics topics and appeared as an expert panelist on CNN, ABC, Headline News, CourtTV and the Discovery network.Noel Kersh can be reached athttps://www.crowe.com/services/advisory/forensic-services/digital-forensics https://www.linkedin.com/in/noelkersh/ About Mike Coffey:Mike Coffey is an entrepreneur, licensed private investigator, business strategist, HR consultant, and registered yoga teacher.In 1999, he founded Imperative, a background investigations and due diligence firm helping risk-averse clients make well-informed decisions about the people they involve in their business.Imperative delivers in-depth employment background investigations, know-your-customer and anti-money laundering compliance, and due diligence investigations to more than 300 risk-averse corporate clients across the US, and, through its PFC Caregiver & Household Screening brand, many more private estates, family offices, and personal service agencies.Imperative has been named the Texas Association of Business' small business of the year and is accredited by the Professional Background Screening Association. Mike shares his insight from 25 years of HR-entrepreneurship on the Good Morning, HR podcast, where each week he talks to business leaders about bringing people together to create value for customers, shareholders, and community.Mike has been recognized as an Entrepreneur of Excellence by FW, Inc. and has twice been recognized as the North Texas HR Professional of the Year. Mike is a member of the Fort Worth chapter of the Entrepreneurs' Organization and is a volunteer leader with the SHRM Texas State Council and the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce.Mike is a certified Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR) through the HR Certification Institute and a SHRM Senior Certified Professional (SHRM-SCP). He is also a Yoga Alliance registered yoga teacher (RYT-200).Mike and his very patient wife of 27 years are empty nesters in Fort Worth.Learning Objectives:Implement proper digital evidence preservation protocols to maintain the integrity of data for potential investigations or litigation.Develop comprehensive policies for managing company data on personal devices and cloud storage platforms to protect sensitive information.Establish clear procedures for handling digital evidence during employee exits and internal investigations to ensure legal compliance and protect company interests.

In this episode of The Backup Wrap-Up, we delve into the crucial world of ransomware forensics with cybersecurity expert Mike Saylor. We explore the essential steps and tools used in forensic analysis during a cyber attack, highlighting the importance of preserving evidence and navigating the complexities of both traditional and mobile device forensics.From log preservation to forensic imaging, we discuss how organizations can prepare for and respond to ransomware incidents. Mike shares insights on the different forensic tools available, their applications, and the challenges faced in modern cybersecurity investigations. We also touch on the importance of having a forensic response plan in place before an attack occurs.Whether you're an IT professional or simply interested in cybersecurity, this episode offers valuable knowledge about the forensic processes that help unravel cyber attacks and protect valuable data. Tune in to enhance your understanding of ransomware forensics and strengthen your organization's cyber defenses.

Laura takes a more in-depth look at the available evidence of what life was like for Mica using the lens and framework of coercive control and stalking.   Join the conversation on social media and in the Crime Analyst Squad www.patreon.com/CrimeAnalyst #MicaFrancis #MicaMiller #JusticeForMica #CrimeAnalyst #Expert #Analysis #TrueCrime #Podcast #Crime #CoerciveControl #Stalking   Clips https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsuI0VyRFPY   Sources https://www.abcnews4.com/newsletter-daily/mica-millers-family-press-conference-suicide-lumber-river-state-park-robeson-county-death-investigation-fbi-john-paul-pastor-solid-rock-church-estate-documents-abuse-hide-assets-sierra-nathaniel-francis-911-call-security-footage-timeline https://www.facebook.com/therobbieharvey/posts/heres-the-full-text-exchange-between-charlotte-mica-miller-and-john-paul-miller-/484282057505382/   Link to Cross Over episode with Mandy and Laura on Cup of Justice Ep #86: Apple Link:  https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/coj-86-crime-analyst-expert-laura-richards-joins-mandy/id1668668400?i=1000659373717 Spotify Link https://open.spotify.com/episode/10P6t5LmMxF3YHUdgxPcm9?si=e3832e105dc1430d Thank you to the wonderful Crime Analyst Sponsor:     JOIN the Crime Analyst Squad: www.patreon.com/CrimeAnalyst   REGISTER For Laura's 2024 Masterclasses: https://shoutout.wix.com/so/0fOy_yFBC?languageTag=en   More Training Info: www.dashriskchecklist.com www.thelaurarichards.com   YouTube, Socials and Website YouTube @crimeanalyst Instagram @crimeanalyst @laurarichards999 Twitter @thecrimeanalyst @laurarichards99 TikTok @crimeanalystpod Website www.crime-analyst.com Leave a Review https://www.crime-analyst.com/reviews/new/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Today most people around the world are using digital gadgets. These enable us to communicate instantaneously, pursue our daily work, and entertain ourselves through streaming videos and songs. But what happens when our past digital activities become evidence in criminal investigations? How are the data that mediate our lives turned into legal arguments?An anthropologist searches for answers.Onur Arslan is a Ph.D. candidate in anthropology at the University of California, Davis, who works at the intersections of science and technology studies, visual anthropology, law, and social studies. He graduated from Istanbul University with a B.A. in political science and international relations, and from Bilgi University with an M.A. in philosophy and social thought. For his Ph.D. research, he is investigating how digital technologies reshape the production of legal knowledge in terrorism trials. Through focusing on Turkish counterterrorism, he examines cultural, political, and technoscientific implications of evidence-making practices. His field research is supported by the National Science Foundation, Social Science Research Council, and American Research Institute in Turkey.Check out these related resources: “The Power of Criminal Prosecutors” “How Bureaucracy Conceals Obligations to Afghan Refugees” “How Rumors Tap and Fuel Anxieties in the Internet Age”

Bryan Kohberger introduced his Alibi as evidence to the court recently and with that evidence he plans on calling an expert to explain why the digital evidence collected against him is not evidence at all.   In this episode, we learn more about that expert, Sy Ray.A digital data investigator in criminal investigations plays a crucial role in gathering and analyzing digital evidence, particularly from cell phones. Here's what they typically do:Evidence Collection: They work on obtaining digital evidence from cell phones seized during investigations. This can involve physically seizing the device, requesting data from service providers, or using specialized tools to extract data from the device.Data Extraction: Once the device is in their possession, they use forensic software and tools to extract various types of data from the phone. This includes call logs, text messages, emails, photos, videos, browsing history, GPS location data, app usage data, and more.Data Analysis: After extracting the data, they analyze it thoroughly to identify relevant information related to the case. This could involve looking for communication patterns, identifying contacts, analyzing timestamps, and establishing timelines of events.Report Generation: They create detailed reports documenting their findings, including how the data was collected, the methods used for analysis, and their conclusions. These reports are often submitted as evidence in court proceedings.Expert Testimony: In some cases, digital data investigators may be called upon to testify in court as expert witnesses to explain their findings and the methods used to collect and analyze the digital evidence.(commercial at 9:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:University of Idaho murder suspect's alibi defense puts spotlight on cellphone data analyst (nbcnews.com)

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The trial of Jennifer Crumbley, the mother of the Oxford High School shooter, continues with testimony, marked by debates over potential testimony from the shooter and his psychiatrists. Defense attorney Shannon Smith sought permission for them to testify due to the introduction of specific text messages as evidence during the trial. These messages were exchanges between the shooter and a friend, in which he revealed his mental health struggles and expressed frustration over his parents' failure to provide the necessary assistance. During the shooter's Miller hearing, he acknowledged that his parents had no knowledge of his mental health issues or his intentions regarding the shooting. Smith argued, "I agree with this court, there's no case law, and that's why I am asking this court to make the decision to not allow these statements, pursuant to the court rule because I have no way to defend them." The day's proceedings delved into the family's digital footprint, as the prosecution aimed to demonstrate that Jennifer Crumbley ignored warning signs that could have prevented the tragic mass shooting, which claimed the lives of four students. Prosecutors emphasized that their case was not about criminalizing bad parenting but rather establishing a pattern leading up to the shooting. During this period, the convicted shooter repeatedly informed his mother of his need for help, yet no action was taken. Ed Wagrowski, a computer crimes expert, testified about the data retrieved from the seven phones collected from the shooter and his parents. The prosecution focused on messages sent in March 2021, where the shooter expressed fear and anxiety, claiming he heard strange sounds and saw demons while home alone. His parents, however, seemingly ignored these distressing messages as they were occupied with other activities. Despite the prosecution's efforts to establish a neglectful pattern, the defense contested this narrative. In the afternoon session, the jury was shown Jennifer Crumbley's actions in the aftermath of the mass shooting, including her deletion of several messages while she and her husband were on the run. The trial began with opening statements from both the prosecution and defense, with four witnesses testifying on the first day. Among them were Molly Darnell, a teacher who made eye contact with the shooter before shots were fired, and Kristy Gibson-Marshall, an Oxford assistant principal who encountered one of the victims after being shot. Additionally, the manager of the store where James Crumbley purchased the gun used in the shooting testified, as did Special Agent Brett Brandon of the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Defense attorney Shannon Smith started her opening statement by referencing Taylor Swift's song "Bad Blood" and suggested that the prosecution's approach was akin to applying a Band-Aid to a bullet hole. She argued that Jennifer Crumbley had no way of foreseeing the shooting and claimed that school officials allowed her son to remain at school on the day of the tragedy. The prosecution is expected to call 20-25 witnesses over the next two weeks of the trial. Jury selection concluded with a 17-person jury comprising 10 women and seven men. Jennifer and James Crumbley face four counts of involuntary manslaughter for their role in the tragic Oxford High School shooting in November 2021. Prosecutors allege that the parents purchased the gun used in the shooting and failed to provide their son with the necessary help. The shooter was sentenced to life in prison without parole in December 2023. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com