Podcasts about digital evidence

Today, I'm sharing something deeply personal and serious—my stalker story. For over a year, Timothy C. (we can share his full name soon if need be) has been physically stalking me, and his digital harassment goes back even further. Law enforcement is now involved, but I wanted to update you all in case anything happens to me—so there's no question about who did it. This episode isn't just about my experience; it's also about the reality of stalking, the dangers of obsession, and the importance of taking threats seriously. Stay aware, stay safe, and let's talk about it all, shall we?—https://noblegoldinvestments.com

Send us a textThe boundary between tool-dependent analysis and true forensic expertise grows increasingly blurred as AI enters the digital forensics landscape. Alexis Brignoni and Heather Charpentier reunite after a month-long hiatus to sound the alarm on a concerning trend: the integration of generative AI into forensic tools without adequate safeguards for verification and validation.Drawing from Stacey Eldridge's firsthand experience, they reveal how AI outputs can be dangerously inconsistent, potentially creating false positives (or missing critical evidence) while providing no reduction in examination time if proper verification procedures are followed. This presents investigators with a troubling choice: trust AI results and save time but risk severe legal and professional consequences, or verify everything and negate the promised efficiency benefits. The hosts warn that as AI becomes ubiquitous in forensic tools, it dramatically expands the attack surface for challenging evidence in court—especially when there's no traceability of AI prompts, responses, or error rates.Beyond the AI discussion, the episode delivers practical insights for investigators, including an in-depth look at the Android gallery trash functionality. When users delete photos, these files remain in a dedicated trash directory for 30 days with their original paths and deletion timestamps fully preserved in the local DB database—a forensic goldmine for cases where suspects attempt to eliminate evidence shortly before investigators arrive. Other highlights include recent updates to the Unfurl tool for URL analysis, Parse SMS for recovering edited and unsent iOS messages, and Josh Hickman's research on Apple CarPlay forensics.Whether you're investigating distracted driving cases, analyzing group calls on iOS, or simply trying to navigate the increasingly complex digital evidence landscape, this episode offers both cautionary wisdom and practical techniques to enhance your forensic capabilities. Join the conversation as we explore what it truly means to be a digital forensic expert in an age of increasing automation.Ready to strengthen your digital investigation skills? Subscribe now for more insights from the front lines of digital forensics.Notes:Magnet Virtual Summit Presentationshttps://www.magnetforensics.com/magnet-virtual-summit-2025-replays/https://www.stark4n6.com/2025/03/magnet-virtual-summit-2025-ctf-android.htmlparse_smsdbhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/alberthui_ios-16-allows-for-imessagesmsmmsrcs-message-activity-7279586088988413952-xHWlhttps://github.com/h4x0r/parse_sms.db/tree/mainAre you a DF/IR Expert Witness or Just a Useful Pawn?https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dfir-training_a-pawn-moves-where-its-told-a-dfir-expert-activity-7292981112463572992-c3wd/Unfurlhttps://dfir.blog/unfurl-parses-obfuscated-ip-addresses/https://github.com/obsidianforensics/unfurlAI to Summarize Chat Logs and Audio from Seized Mobile Phoneshttps://www.404media.co/cellebrite-is-using-ai-to-summarize-chat-logs-and-audio-from-seized-mobile-phones/Ridin' With Apple CarPlay 2https://thebinaryhick.blog/2025/02/19/ridin-with-apple-carplay-2/Hello Who is on the Line?https://metadataperspective.com/2025/02/05/hello-who-is-on-the-line/

Judge Denies Defense Motions in Bryan Kohberger Case, Allowing Key DNA and Digital Evidence at Trial An Idaho judge ruled against Bryan Kohberger's defense team in a series of motions challenging critical evidence, a significant setback for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022. Judge Steven Hippler denied multiple motions to suppress evidence, including DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene, cell phone and email records, surveillance footage, and Kohberger's past Amazon purchases. Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student, was arrested in December 2022 and charged with the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin in their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho. His attorneys argued that law enforcement violated his constitutional rights in obtaining evidence, but the court ruled otherwise. One of the most significant rulings upheld the use of DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene. Investigators identified Kohberger as a suspect after submitting DNA from the knife sheath to public ancestry websites to generate a list of possible matches. Authorities then obtained a DNA sample from trash collected outside Kohberger's parents' home in Pennsylvania, which matched DNA found on the sheath. The defense had argued that this investigative genetic genealogy technique violated Kohberger's rights, but Hippler disagreed. He ruled that Kohberger “exposed his DNA to the public by leaving it on the sheath, thus forfeiting any reasonable expectation of privacy.” The judge also upheld the trash collection, stating, “by throwing away an item of trash containing his DNA, the defendant cannot object to testing of that DNA.” In a prior hearing, Hippler had expressed skepticism about suppressing DNA evidence, saying, “when there's a DNA match between the DNA and the sheath and Mr. Kohberger, isn't that probable cause every day and twice on Sunday?” The defense also sought to challenge the validity of the search warrants that led to the seizure of Kohberger's digital records, including phone data from AT&T, Google, Apple, and Amazon, as well as evidence from a USB drive. Kohberger's attorneys claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights. However, Hippler ruled that the evidence was lawfully obtained through search warrants and the third-party doctrine, which limits privacy rights over information shared with service providers. Another motion sought a Franks hearing, which would have allowed the defense to challenge the credibility of the probable cause affidavits used to obtain search warrants. The defense alleged that law enforcement omitted key information regarding investigative genetic genealogy and misrepresented statements made by a surviving roommate who was inside the house at the time of the murders. The judge rejected these claims, ruling that the genetic genealogy information “would have only bolstered probable cause” and that the surviving roommate's statements were consistent. He noted that while the defense may raise these points during trial, there was no evidence of misrepresentation in the warrant applications. The decisions were welcomed by the family of Kaylee Goncalves, one of the victims. “All the motions to suppress and Franks motion have been denied! It's always a double edge sword waiting. You want the right decisions to be made but you also want them to be made quickly. We are thankful to the Court for a timely decision and appreciate the work prosecution has put in thus far. In the big picture of life justice is just moments away,” the family said. Kohberger's trial is scheduled to begin on August 11. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #DNAEvidence #UniversityOfIdaho #JusticeForTheVictims #LegalRuling Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

An Idaho judge ruled against Bryan Kohberger's defense team in a series of motions challenging critical evidence, a significant setback for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022. Judge Steven Hippler denied multiple motions to suppress evidence, including DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene, cell phone and email records, surveillance footage, and Kohberger's past Amazon purchases. Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student, was arrested in December 2022 and charged with the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin in their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho. His attorneys argued that law enforcement violated his constitutional rights in obtaining evidence, but the court ruled otherwise. One of the most significant rulings upheld the use of DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene. Investigators identified Kohberger as a suspect after submitting DNA from the knife sheath to public ancestry websites to generate a list of possible matches. Authorities then obtained a DNA sample from trash collected outside Kohberger's parents' home in Pennsylvania, which matched DNA found on the sheath. The defense had argued that this investigative genetic genealogy technique violated Kohberger's rights, but Hippler disagreed. He ruled that Kohberger “exposed his DNA to the public by leaving it on the sheath, thus forfeiting any reasonable expectation of privacy.” The judge also upheld the trash collection, stating, “by throwing away an item of trash containing his DNA, the defendant cannot object to testing of that DNA.” In a prior hearing, Hippler had expressed skepticism about suppressing DNA evidence, saying, “when there's a DNA match between the DNA and the sheath and Mr. Kohberger, isn't that probable cause every day and twice on Sunday?” The defense also sought to challenge the validity of the search warrants that led to the seizure of Kohberger's digital records, including phone data from AT&T, Google, Apple, and Amazon, as well as evidence from a USB drive. Kohberger's attorneys claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights. However, Hippler ruled that the evidence was lawfully obtained through search warrants and the third-party doctrine, which limits privacy rights over information shared with service providers. Another motion sought a Franks hearing, which would have allowed the defense to challenge the credibility of the probable cause affidavits used to obtain search warrants. The defense alleged that law enforcement omitted key information regarding investigative genetic genealogy and misrepresented statements made by a surviving roommate who was inside the house at the time of the murders. The judge rejected these claims, ruling that the genetic genealogy information “would have only bolstered probable cause” and that the surviving roommate's statements were consistent. He noted that while the defense may raise these points during trial, there was no evidence of misrepresentation in the warrant applications. The decisions were welcomed by the family of Kaylee Goncalves, one of the victims. “All the motions to suppress and Franks motion have been denied! It's always a double edge sword waiting. You want the right decisions to be made but you also want them to be made quickly. We are thankful to the Court for a timely decision and appreciate the work prosecution has put in thus far. In the big picture of life justice is just moments away,” the family said. Kohberger's trial is scheduled to begin on August 11. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #DNAEvidence #UniversityOfIdaho #JusticeForTheVictims #LegalRuling Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

An Idaho judge ruled against Bryan Kohberger's defense team in a series of motions challenging critical evidence, a significant setback for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022. Judge Steven Hippler denied multiple motions to suppress evidence, including DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene, cell phone and email records, surveillance footage, and Kohberger's past Amazon purchases. Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student, was arrested in December 2022 and charged with the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin in their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho. His attorneys argued that law enforcement violated his constitutional rights in obtaining evidence, but the court ruled otherwise. One of the most significant rulings upheld the use of DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene. Investigators identified Kohberger as a suspect after submitting DNA from the knife sheath to public ancestry websites to generate a list of possible matches. Authorities then obtained a DNA sample from trash collected outside Kohberger's parents' home in Pennsylvania, which matched DNA found on the sheath. The defense had argued that this investigative genetic genealogy technique violated Kohberger's rights, but Hippler disagreed. He ruled that Kohberger “exposed his DNA to the public by leaving it on the sheath, thus forfeiting any reasonable expectation of privacy.” The judge also upheld the trash collection, stating, “by throwing away an item of trash containing his DNA, the defendant cannot object to testing of that DNA.” In a prior hearing, Hippler had expressed skepticism about suppressing DNA evidence, saying, “when there's a DNA match between the DNA and the sheath and Mr. Kohberger, isn't that probable cause every day and twice on Sunday?” The defense also sought to challenge the validity of the search warrants that led to the seizure of Kohberger's digital records, including phone data from AT&T, Google, Apple, and Amazon, as well as evidence from a USB drive. Kohberger's attorneys claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights. However, Hippler ruled that the evidence was lawfully obtained through search warrants and the third-party doctrine, which limits privacy rights over information shared with service providers. Another motion sought a Franks hearing, which would have allowed the defense to challenge the credibility of the probable cause affidavits used to obtain search warrants. The defense alleged that law enforcement omitted key information regarding investigative genetic genealogy and misrepresented statements made by a surviving roommate who was inside the house at the time of the murders. The judge rejected these claims, ruling that the genetic genealogy information “would have only bolstered probable cause” and that the surviving roommate's statements were consistent. He noted that while the defense may raise these points during trial, there was no evidence of misrepresentation in the warrant applications. The decisions were welcomed by the family of Kaylee Goncalves, one of the victims. “All the motions to suppress and Franks motion have been denied! It's always a double edge sword waiting. You want the right decisions to be made but you also want them to be made quickly. We are thankful to the Court for a timely decision and appreciate the work prosecution has put in thus far. In the big picture of life justice is just moments away,” the family said. Kohberger's trial is scheduled to begin on August 11. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #DNAEvidence #UniversityOfIdaho #JusticeForTheVictims #LegalRuling Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Judge Denies Defense Motions in Bryan Kohberger Case, Allowing Key DNA and Digital Evidence at Trial An Idaho judge ruled against Bryan Kohberger's defense team in a series of motions challenging critical evidence, a significant setback for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022. Judge Steven Hippler denied multiple motions to suppress evidence, including DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene, cell phone and email records, surveillance footage, and Kohberger's past Amazon purchases. Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student, was arrested in December 2022 and charged with the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin in their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho. His attorneys argued that law enforcement violated his constitutional rights in obtaining evidence, but the court ruled otherwise. One of the most significant rulings upheld the use of DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene. Investigators identified Kohberger as a suspect after submitting DNA from the knife sheath to public ancestry websites to generate a list of possible matches. Authorities then obtained a DNA sample from trash collected outside Kohberger's parents' home in Pennsylvania, which matched DNA found on the sheath. The defense had argued that this investigative genetic genealogy technique violated Kohberger's rights, but Hippler disagreed. He ruled that Kohberger “exposed his DNA to the public by leaving it on the sheath, thus forfeiting any reasonable expectation of privacy.” The judge also upheld the trash collection, stating, “by throwing away an item of trash containing his DNA, the defendant cannot object to testing of that DNA.” In a prior hearing, Hippler had expressed skepticism about suppressing DNA evidence, saying, “when there's a DNA match between the DNA and the sheath and Mr. Kohberger, isn't that probable cause every day and twice on Sunday?” The defense also sought to challenge the validity of the search warrants that led to the seizure of Kohberger's digital records, including phone data from AT&T, Google, Apple, and Amazon, as well as evidence from a USB drive. Kohberger's attorneys claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights. However, Hippler ruled that the evidence was lawfully obtained through search warrants and the third-party doctrine, which limits privacy rights over information shared with service providers. Another motion sought a Franks hearing, which would have allowed the defense to challenge the credibility of the probable cause affidavits used to obtain search warrants. The defense alleged that law enforcement omitted key information regarding investigative genetic genealogy and misrepresented statements made by a surviving roommate who was inside the house at the time of the murders. The judge rejected these claims, ruling that the genetic genealogy information “would have only bolstered probable cause” and that the surviving roommate's statements were consistent. He noted that while the defense may raise these points during trial, there was no evidence of misrepresentation in the warrant applications. The decisions were welcomed by the family of Kaylee Goncalves, one of the victims. “All the motions to suppress and Franks motion have been denied! It's always a double edge sword waiting. You want the right decisions to be made but you also want them to be made quickly. We are thankful to the Court for a timely decision and appreciate the work prosecution has put in thus far. In the big picture of life justice is just moments away,” the family said. Kohberger's trial is scheduled to begin on August 11. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #DNAEvidence #UniversityOfIdaho #JusticeForTheVictims #LegalRuling Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Every day, each of us produce more data that ends up in the hands of third parties: browsing data, shopping data, stored images, writings, and communications.  And each of us expects a certain degree of privacy and protections. But when that data can play a critical role in criminal justice, our regulations have struggled to balance the need for personal privacy while also serving the fair and equal pursuit of justice.Join us as we explore the intersection of data privacy, evidence law, and criminal defense with Professor Rebecca Wexler. Discover the challenges of accessing digital evidence, the evolving legal landscape, and the potential wide-ranging impacts of Snap v. Pina on data privacy laws. And learn how you, as a law student, can play a role in redefining how our laws manage data in the future.Additional Resources:Snap v. PinaCourt of Appeal DecisionDocket(00:00) - Introduction (04:00) - Why Every Lawyer Needs to Understand Data Privacy (06:24) - How The Law Has Adapted to Digital Evidence (08:54) - Unequal Access to Digital Data in Criminal Cases (12:50) - Understanding Snap v Pina (18:36) - The Intersection of Intellectual Property and Data Privacy (22:47) - How Law Students Can Impact the Law (26:43) - Host Discussion Click here to view the episode transcript.

Send us a textUnlock the secrets to mastering cybersecurity and prepare yourself for the CISSP exam with our latest episode of the CISSP Cyber Training Podcast. Ever wondered how a simple API misstep could lead to a major breach? We dive into a recent incident involving the Department of Treasury and Beyond Trust, showcasing the critical importance of API security. As we navigate through domain 1.6, we promise to enhance your understanding of key concepts like the preponderance of evidence in civil investigations and the main objectives of regulatory probes. This episode is packed with insights that are not only essential for your exam preparation but also invaluable for your cybersecurity strategy.Join us as we unravel the complexities of legal and regulatory investigations. From understanding why reviewing an organization's policies is the cornerstone of internal administrative investigations to dissecting the GDPR framework for data protection, we cover it all. Learn the nuances between civil and criminal investigations and how insider trading is scrutinized by financial regulators while non-compete violations are typically handled administratively. Whether you're gearing up for the CISSP exam or looking to bolster your cybersecurity knowledge, this episode offers comprehensive insights that will certainly enrich your perspective and expertise.Gain exclusive access to 360 FREE CISSP Practice Questions delivered directly to your inbox! Sign up at FreeCISSPQuestions.com and receive 30 expertly crafted practice questions every month for the next 12 months—completely free! Don't miss this valuable opportunity to strengthen your CISSP exam preparation and boost your chances of certification success. Join now and start your journey toward CISSP mastery today!

Send us a textUnlock the secrets to mastering the CISSP exam with insights that could transform your cybersecurity career. Have you ever considered how failing to change a default router password could be your greatest vulnerability? Join me, Sean Gerber, as I guide you through the essential topics that every aspiring security professional needs to understand as we step into 2025. From administrative to regulatory investigations, this episode covers the diverse landscape of investigation types and underscores the importance of staying vigilant against cyber threats like man-in-the-middle attacks and DDoS attacks. In this episode, we unravel the complexities of digital evidence and the crucial role of e-discovery in legal proceedings. Learn about the Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) and how it serves as a cornerstone for managing electronic evidence. We dive into the nuances of maintaining evidence integrity, the legalities of digital forensics, and the critical importance of a robust data retention strategy. As we dissect computer crimes and their impacts, you'll gain a deeper appreciation for the challenges and intricacies involved in handling cybersecurity incidents.Concluding with a rich discussion on ethical and legal investigation procedures, we highlight key regulatory frameworks such as GDPR and CCPA. Understand the importance of obtaining consent for monitoring and maintaining a chain of custody for evidence. With practical tips and resources, including those from ReduceCyberRisk.com, this episode equips you with the knowledge to not only pass the CISSP exam but to thrive in an ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape. Whether you're a seasoned professional or new to the field, you'll find valuable insights to bolster your defense against the relentless advance of cyber threats.Gain exclusive access to 360 FREE CISSP Practice Questions delivered directly to your inbox! Sign up at FreeCISSPQuestions.com and receive 30 expertly crafted practice questions every month for the next 12 months—completely free! Don't miss this valuable opportunity to strengthen your CISSP exam preparation and boost your chances of certification success. Join now and start your journey toward CISSP mastery today!

In this episode of the Carl Jackson Show, host Carl Jackson and criminologist Dr. Curry Myers delve into the assassination of a United Healthcare CEO in Manhattan. They analyze the details of the case, including the video of the incident, the profile of the shooter, and the investigative steps law enforcement will take. The discussion also covers potential motives behind the assassination, the importance of digital footprints in solving the case, and the implications for healthcare executives in light of this violent act. Dr. Myers shares his extensive experience in criminology to provide insights into the investigation process and the factors that could lead to such a crime. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshow  http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.com NEW!!!! THE CARL JACKSON SHOW MERCH IS HERE. SUPPORT THE PODCAST GETTING A T-SHIRT NOW!  https://carljacksonmerch.itemorder.com  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the Carl Jackson Show, host Carl Jackson and criminologist Dr. Curry Myers delve into the assassination of a United Healthcare CEO in Manhattan. They analyze the details of the case, including the video of the incident, the profile of the shooter, and the investigative steps law enforcement will take. The discussion also covers potential motives behind the assassination, the importance of digital footprints in solving the case, and the implications for healthcare executives in light of this violent act. Dr. Myers shares his extensive experience in criminology to provide insights into the investigation process and the factors that could lead to such a crime. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshow  http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.com NEW!!!! THE CARL JACKSON SHOW MERCH IS HERE. SUPPORT THE PODCAST GETTING A T-SHIRT NOW!  https://carljacksonmerch.itemorder.com  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

SummaryIn this episode of Forensic Fix, host Adam Firman speaks with Brent Jordan, a Crime and Intelligence Analyst Manager at the San Diego County Sheriff's Office. They discuss Brent's career path, the daily responsibilities of a crime analyst, the integration of AI in law enforcement, and the challenges faced in digital forensics. Brent shares valuable insights on the importance of training, patience, and continuous learning in the field, as well as his personal interests outside of work.TakeawaysBrent emphasizes the importance of having the right tools for analysts.AI is seen as a powerful tool but comes with responsibilities.Law enforcement often lags behind in technology advancements.Patience is crucial when dealing with digital evidence.Continuous training is essential for both sworn and non-sworn personnel.Analysts need to be subject matter experts in their field.External training and vendor communication are vital for staying updated.Digital evidence is becoming increasingly complex and varied.Understanding the tech behind tools is necessary for effective use.Personal interests and hobbies help maintain work-life balance.Chapters00:00 Introduction to Digital Forensics and Brent's Background06:13 A Day in the Life of a Crime Analyst11:58 The Role of AI in Law Enforcement18:02 Challenges in Digital Forensics23:47 Advice for New Analysts in Digital Forensics29:58 Training and Continuous Learning in the Field36:05 The Future of Digital Evidence and Technology41:50 Personal Insights and Hobbies   Thank you for listening to Forensic Fix - a podcast brought to you from MSAB. To contact us about the show please visit Forensic Fix - MSAB

Could a mishandled investigation mean an innocent man is sitting behind bars? Robin Dreeke dives deep into the chaotic evidence and questionable tactics surrounding the interrogation of Richard Allen in this baffling case. When investigators ask Allen how a bullet matching his gun ended up at the crime scene, his response feels more exasperated than evasive, almost like a man shoved into a corner rather than one hiding in the shadows. Dreeke highlights how the officers could have taken a more strategic approach, building trust rather than alienating Allen by showing him his “shame” instead of pushing him into a defensive posture. This episode doesn't just question the integrity of the case against Allen—it suggests that the real culprits might still be at large, hidden behind the curtain of a botched investigation and untested suspects. Are we chasing the wrong man? And what does this mean for the victims' families as they await real answers? #HiddenKillers #RichardAllenCase #CrimeInvestigation #TrueCrimeToday #Evidence #JusticeForLibbyAndAbby #UnansweredQuestions Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Could a mishandled investigation mean an innocent man is sitting behind bars? Robin Dreeke dives deep into the chaotic evidence and questionable tactics surrounding the interrogation of Richard Allen in this baffling case. When investigators ask Allen how a bullet matching his gun ended up at the crime scene, his response feels more exasperated than evasive, almost like a man shoved into a corner rather than one hiding in the shadows. Dreeke highlights how the officers could have taken a more strategic approach, building trust rather than alienating Allen by showing him his “shame” instead of pushing him into a defensive posture. This episode doesn't just question the integrity of the case against Allen—it suggests that the real culprits might still be at large, hidden behind the curtain of a botched investigation and untested suspects. Are we chasing the wrong man? And what does this mean for the victims' families as they await real answers? #HiddenKillers #RichardAllenCase #CrimeInvestigation #TrueCrimeToday #Evidence #JusticeForLibbyAndAbby #UnansweredQuestions Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Could a mishandled investigation mean an innocent man is sitting behind bars? Robin Dreeke dives deep into the chaotic evidence and questionable tactics surrounding the interrogation of Richard Allen in this baffling case. When investigators ask Allen how a bullet matching his gun ended up at the crime scene, his response feels more exasperated than evasive, almost like a man shoved into a corner rather than one hiding in the shadows. Dreeke highlights how the officers could have taken a more strategic approach, building trust rather than alienating Allen by showing him his “shame” instead of pushing him into a defensive posture. This episode doesn't just question the integrity of the case against Allen—it suggests that the real culprits might still be at large, hidden behind the curtain of a botched investigation and untested suspects. Are we chasing the wrong man? And what does this mean for the victims' families as they await real answers? #HiddenKillers #RichardAllenCase #CrimeInvestigation #TrueCrimeToday #Evidence #JusticeForLibbyAndAbby #UnansweredQuestions Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Could a mishandled investigation mean an innocent man is sitting behind bars? Robin Dreeke dives deep into the chaotic evidence and questionable tactics surrounding the interrogation of Richard Allen in this baffling case. When investigators ask Allen how a bullet matching his gun ended up at the crime scene, his response feels more exasperated than evasive, almost like a man shoved into a corner rather than one hiding in the shadows. Dreeke highlights how the officers could have taken a more strategic approach, building trust rather than alienating Allen by showing him his “shame” instead of pushing him into a defensive posture. This episode doesn't just question the integrity of the case against Allen—it suggests that the real culprits might still be at large, hidden behind the curtain of a botched investigation and untested suspects. Are we chasing the wrong man? And what does this mean for the victims' families as they await real answers? #HiddenKillers #RichardAllenCase #CrimeInvestigation #TrueCrimeToday #Evidence #JusticeForLibbyAndAbby #UnansweredQuestions Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Investigators Find ZERO Digital Evidence Linking Richard Allen To Delphi Murders Did the pressure to close the Delphi case lead investigators to rush to judgment? As the trial of Richard Allen unfolds, it seems like more questions than answers are emerging. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer shares insights on the shaky grounds of this case, highlighting the lack of DNA evidence, conflicting witness accounts, and a digital footprint that remains eerily empty. And what about the so-called “bullet science” tying Allen to the crime scene? With doubts swirling around the evidence, it feels as if the system is leaning on gut feeling over hard proof. As this high-stakes trial unfolds, the real question becomes: Are we willing to settle for a suspect rather than find the truth? #HiddenKillers #DelphiMurders #TrueCrimeToday #JusticeOrClosure #RichardAllenTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #MononHighBridge Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Investigators Find ZERO Digital Evidence Linking Richard Allen To Delphi Murders Did the pressure to close the Delphi case lead investigators to rush to judgment? As the trial of Richard Allen unfolds, it seems like more questions than answers are emerging. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer shares insights on the shaky grounds of this case, highlighting the lack of DNA evidence, conflicting witness accounts, and a digital footprint that remains eerily empty. And what about the so-called “bullet science” tying Allen to the crime scene? With doubts swirling around the evidence, it feels as if the system is leaning on gut feeling over hard proof. As this high-stakes trial unfolds, the real question becomes: Are we willing to settle for a suspect rather than find the truth? #HiddenKillers #DelphiMurders #TrueCrimeToday #JusticeOrClosure #RichardAllenTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #MononHighBridge Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Investigators Find ZERO Digital Evidence Linking Richard Allen To Delphi Murders Did the pressure to close the Delphi case lead investigators to rush to judgment? As the trial of Richard Allen unfolds, it seems like more questions than answers are emerging. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer shares insights on the shaky grounds of this case, highlighting the lack of DNA evidence, conflicting witness accounts, and a digital footprint that remains eerily empty. And what about the so-called “bullet science” tying Allen to the crime scene? With doubts swirling around the evidence, it feels as if the system is leaning on gut feeling over hard proof. As this high-stakes trial unfolds, the real question becomes: Are we willing to settle for a suspect rather than find the truth? #HiddenKillers #DelphiMurders #TrueCrimeToday #JusticeOrClosure #RichardAllenTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #MononHighBridge Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Did the pressure to close the Delphi case lead investigators to rush to judgment? As the trial of Richard Allen unfolds, it seems like more questions than answers are emerging. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer shares insights on the shaky grounds of this case, highlighting the lack of DNA evidence, conflicting witness accounts, and a digital footprint that remains eerily empty. And what about the so-called “bullet science” tying Allen to the crime scene? With doubts swirling around the evidence, it feels as if the system is leaning on gut feeling over hard proof. As this high-stakes trial unfolds, the real question becomes: Are we willing to settle for a suspect rather than find the truth? #HiddenKillers #DelphiMurders #TrueCrimeToday #JusticeOrClosure #RichardAllenTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #MononHighBridge Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In episode 168, Coffey talks with Noel Kersh about protecting company information and digital forensics.They discuss the role of digital forensics in investigations; the importance of preserving digital evidence; challenges with personal devices and cloud computing in the workplace; policies for managing company data on personal devices; the emerging role of AI tools like ChatGPT in investigations; and best practices for preserving digital evidence post-investigation.You can hear more from Noel at The HR Southwest Conference on October 13th through the 16th. And you can hear Mike and previous guest Jim Zadeh discuss artificial intelligence during the Legal Exchange at the HR Southwest Conference. You can review the entire HR Southwest 2024 agenda at https://hrsouthwest.comGood Morning, HR is brought to you by Imperative—Bulletproof Background Checks. For more information about our commitment to quality and excellent customer service, visit us at https://imperativeinfo.com. If you are an HRCI or SHRM-certified professional, this episode of Good Morning, HR has been pre-approved for half a recertification credit. To obtain the recertification information for this episode, visit https://goodmorninghr.com. About our Guest:Noel has extensive experience in conducting digital forensics acquisitions and analysis on a variety of cases involving business and employment disputes, compliance with discovery requests, family law, harassment, in-house investigations for large corporations, copyright infringement and criminal cases. He also has handled large-scale E-Discovery matters.Noel leads Crowe LLP's national digital forensics practice. Prior to joining Crowe LLP, Noel spent over 12 years leading Pathway Forensics where he was responsible for overseeing every aspect of the company, established the digital forensic lab operational policies and procedures, and provided leadership and mentoring for Pathway Forensics staff. Prior to joining Pathway, Noel helped lead two initiatives to receive a distinguished laboratory accreditation given by the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board (ASCLD/LAB). This accreditation demonstrates that a computer forensics laboratory's operating standards meet quality standards set by ASCLD/LAB. Accreditation criteria include personnel, technical procedures, equipment, and physical facilities. Noel has provided expert testimony over 40 times in trials, hearings, and depositions on matters before both state and federal courts on matters involving digital forensics. Finally, he has presented over 100 times on digital forensics topics and appeared as an expert panelist on CNN, ABC, Headline News, CourtTV and the Discovery network.Noel Kersh can be reached athttps://www.crowe.com/services/advisory/forensic-services/digital-forensics https://www.linkedin.com/in/noelkersh/ About Mike Coffey:Mike Coffey is an entrepreneur, licensed private investigator, business strategist, HR consultant, and registered yoga teacher.In 1999, he founded Imperative, a background investigations and due diligence firm helping risk-averse clients make well-informed decisions about the people they involve in their business.Imperative delivers in-depth employment background investigations, know-your-customer and anti-money laundering compliance, and due diligence investigations to more than 300 risk-averse corporate clients across the US, and, through its PFC Caregiver & Household Screening brand, many more private estates, family offices, and personal service agencies.Imperative has been named the Texas Association of Business' small business of the year and is accredited by the Professional Background Screening Association. Mike shares his insight from 25 years of HR-entrepreneurship on the Good Morning, HR podcast, where each week he talks to business leaders about bringing people together to create value for customers, shareholders, and community.Mike has been recognized as an Entrepreneur of Excellence by FW, Inc. and has twice been recognized as the North Texas HR Professional of the Year. Mike is a member of the Fort Worth chapter of the Entrepreneurs' Organization and is a volunteer leader with the SHRM Texas State Council and the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce.Mike is a certified Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR) through the HR Certification Institute and a SHRM Senior Certified Professional (SHRM-SCP). He is also a Yoga Alliance registered yoga teacher (RYT-200).Mike and his very patient wife of 27 years are empty nesters in Fort Worth.Learning Objectives:Implement proper digital evidence preservation protocols to maintain the integrity of data for potential investigations or litigation.Develop comprehensive policies for managing company data on personal devices and cloud storage platforms to protect sensitive information.Establish clear procedures for handling digital evidence during employee exits and internal investigations to ensure legal compliance and protect company interests.

In this episode of The Backup Wrap-Up, we delve into the crucial world of ransomware forensics with cybersecurity expert Mike Saylor. We explore the essential steps and tools used in forensic analysis during a cyber attack, highlighting the importance of preserving evidence and navigating the complexities of both traditional and mobile device forensics.From log preservation to forensic imaging, we discuss how organizations can prepare for and respond to ransomware incidents. Mike shares insights on the different forensic tools available, their applications, and the challenges faced in modern cybersecurity investigations. We also touch on the importance of having a forensic response plan in place before an attack occurs.Whether you're an IT professional or simply interested in cybersecurity, this episode offers valuable knowledge about the forensic processes that help unravel cyber attacks and protect valuable data. Tune in to enhance your understanding of ransomware forensics and strengthen your organization's cyber defenses.

Jon Hill and Ben Parrish from Genetec join the latest episode of the Rail Technology Magazine Podcast. The pair explain the current inefficiencies in the rail industry when it comes to retrieving security footage and discuss Genetec's Digital Evidence Management System (DEMS), Clearance, which helps to streamline the process.Jon explains how the manual method of sharing footage on DVDs and USBs presents serious security issues, while Ben discusses the challenge presented by having a 30-day window to respond to subject access requests, given current inefficiencies.The pair discuss how Clearance has helped operators such as Scotrail to communicate better internally and increase efficiency when handling video requests. They present Clearance as a transformative solution for the rail industry, improving security operations and efficiency while complying with data and compliance regulations.

Laura takes a more in-depth look at the available evidence of what life was like for Mica using the lens and framework of coercive control and stalking.   Join the conversation on social media and in the Crime Analyst Squad www.patreon.com/CrimeAnalyst #MicaFrancis #MicaMiller #JusticeForMica #CrimeAnalyst #Expert #Analysis #TrueCrime #Podcast #Crime #CoerciveControl #Stalking   Clips https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsuI0VyRFPY   Sources https://www.abcnews4.com/newsletter-daily/mica-millers-family-press-conference-suicide-lumber-river-state-park-robeson-county-death-investigation-fbi-john-paul-pastor-solid-rock-church-estate-documents-abuse-hide-assets-sierra-nathaniel-francis-911-call-security-footage-timeline https://www.facebook.com/therobbieharvey/posts/heres-the-full-text-exchange-between-charlotte-mica-miller-and-john-paul-miller-/484282057505382/   Link to Cross Over episode with Mandy and Laura on Cup of Justice Ep #86: Apple Link:  https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/coj-86-crime-analyst-expert-laura-richards-joins-mandy/id1668668400?i=1000659373717 Spotify Link https://open.spotify.com/episode/10P6t5LmMxF3YHUdgxPcm9?si=e3832e105dc1430d Thank you to the wonderful Crime Analyst Sponsor:     JOIN the Crime Analyst Squad: www.patreon.com/CrimeAnalyst   REGISTER For Laura's 2024 Masterclasses: https://shoutout.wix.com/so/0fOy_yFBC?languageTag=en   More Training Info: www.dashriskchecklist.com www.thelaurarichards.com   YouTube, Socials and Website YouTube @crimeanalyst Instagram @crimeanalyst @laurarichards999 Twitter @thecrimeanalyst @laurarichards99 TikTok @crimeanalystpod Website www.crime-analyst.com Leave a Review https://www.crime-analyst.com/reviews/new/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Today most people around the world are using digital gadgets. These enable us to communicate instantaneously, pursue our daily work, and entertain ourselves through streaming videos and songs. But what happens when our past digital activities become evidence in criminal investigations? How are the data that mediate our lives turned into legal arguments?An anthropologist searches for answers.Onur Arslan is a Ph.D. candidate in anthropology at the University of California, Davis, who works at the intersections of science and technology studies, visual anthropology, law, and social studies. He graduated from Istanbul University with a B.A. in political science and international relations, and from Bilgi University with an M.A. in philosophy and social thought. For his Ph.D. research, he is investigating how digital technologies reshape the production of legal knowledge in terrorism trials. Through focusing on Turkish counterterrorism, he examines cultural, political, and technoscientific implications of evidence-making practices. His field research is supported by the National Science Foundation, Social Science Research Council, and American Research Institute in Turkey.Check out these related resources: “The Power of Criminal Prosecutors” “How Bureaucracy Conceals Obligations to Afghan Refugees” “How Rumors Tap and Fuel Anxieties in the Internet Age”

Alex Murdaugh was sunk by a totality of the evidence against him, but some of the most damning evidence that was presented was the digital evidence that was collected by the investigators and then rebuilt into a timeline showing exactly where Murdaugh was during the time of the murder. When added with the other evidence, such as the video where his voice was heard in the background, it led to a conviction. In Idaho there is a very similar thing taking place behind the scenes as the investigators there have filed over sixty digital warrants already and more expected to come. When you look at the evidence that they had against Alex Murdaugh and you compare it with the evidence collected against Bryan Kohberger, there are many similarities with how the investigations have unfolded.In this episode we take a look at those investigations and see where they are similar and what that might mean for Bryan Kohberger at his trial. (commercial at 8:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Crucial clue in both Bryan Kohberger and killer dad Alex Murdaugh cases may determine verdict in Idaho murders trial | The US Sun (the-sun.com)

Bryan Kohberger introduced his Alibi as evidence to the court recently and with that evidence he plans on calling an expert to explain why the digital evidence collected against him is not evidence at all.   In this episode, we learn more about that expert, Sy Ray.A digital data investigator in criminal investigations plays a crucial role in gathering and analyzing digital evidence, particularly from cell phones. Here's what they typically do:Evidence Collection: They work on obtaining digital evidence from cell phones seized during investigations. This can involve physically seizing the device, requesting data from service providers, or using specialized tools to extract data from the device.Data Extraction: Once the device is in their possession, they use forensic software and tools to extract various types of data from the phone. This includes call logs, text messages, emails, photos, videos, browsing history, GPS location data, app usage data, and more.Data Analysis: After extracting the data, they analyze it thoroughly to identify relevant information related to the case. This could involve looking for communication patterns, identifying contacts, analyzing timestamps, and establishing timelines of events.Report Generation: They create detailed reports documenting their findings, including how the data was collected, the methods used for analysis, and their conclusions. These reports are often submitted as evidence in court proceedings.Expert Testimony: In some cases, digital data investigators may be called upon to testify in court as expert witnesses to explain their findings and the methods used to collect and analyze the digital evidence.(commercial at 9:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:University of Idaho murder suspect's alibi defense puts spotlight on cellphone data analyst (nbcnews.com)

Bryan Kohberger introduced his Alibi as evidence to the court recently and with that evidence he plans on calling an expert to explain why the digital evidence collected against him is not evidence at all.   In this episode, we learn more about that expert, Sy Ray.A digital data investigator in criminal investigations plays a crucial role in gathering and analyzing digital evidence, particularly from cell phones. Here's what they typically do:Evidence Collection: They work on obtaining digital evidence from cell phones seized during investigations. This can involve physically seizing the device, requesting data from service providers, or using specialized tools to extract data from the device.Data Extraction: Once the device is in their possession, they use forensic software and tools to extract various types of data from the phone. This includes call logs, text messages, emails, photos, videos, browsing history, GPS location data, app usage data, and more.Data Analysis: After extracting the data, they analyze it thoroughly to identify relevant information related to the case. This could involve looking for communication patterns, identifying contacts, analyzing timestamps, and establishing timelines of events.Report Generation: They create detailed reports documenting their findings, including how the data was collected, the methods used for analysis, and their conclusions. These reports are often submitted as evidence in court proceedings.Expert Testimony: In some cases, digital data investigators may be called upon to testify in court as expert witnesses to explain their findings and the methods used to collect and analyze the digital evidence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:University of Idaho murder suspect's alibi defense puts spotlight on cellphone data analyst (nbcnews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Bryan Kohberger introduced his Alibi as evidence to the court recently and with that evidence he plans on calling an expert to explain why the digital evidence collected against him is not evidence at all.   In this episode, we learn more about that expert, Sy Ray.A digital data investigator in criminal investigations plays a crucial role in gathering and analyzing digital evidence, particularly from cell phones. Here's what they typically do:Evidence Collection: They work on obtaining digital evidence from cell phones seized during investigations. This can involve physically seizing the device, requesting data from service providers, or using specialized tools to extract data from the device.Data Extraction: Once the device is in their possession, they use forensic software and tools to extract various types of data from the phone. This includes call logs, text messages, emails, photos, videos, browsing history, GPS location data, app usage data, and more.Data Analysis: After extracting the data, they analyze it thoroughly to identify relevant information related to the case. This could involve looking for communication patterns, identifying contacts, analyzing timestamps, and establishing timelines of events.Report Generation: They create detailed reports documenting their findings, including how the data was collected, the methods used for analysis, and their conclusions. These reports are often submitted as evidence in court proceedings.Expert Testimony: In some cases, digital data investigators may be called upon to testify in court as expert witnesses to explain their findings and the methods used to collect and analyze the digital evidence.(commercial at 9:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:University of Idaho murder suspect's alibi defense puts spotlight on cellphone data analyst (nbcnews.com)

Technology has become a weapon for perpetrators of abuse. And, in our digitally intertwined lives, cyber forensics has become an essential step in almost all aspects of criminal investigation, particularly cases involving child exploitation and family violence.  Cyber forensic expert, Rose MacDonald, has made it her life's mission to combat this insidious form of abuse. Her work ensures the complex process of evidence preservation of spyware-infested devices and encrypted apps brings these offenders to justice.  This episode contains references to intimate partner violence, coercive control, and child abuse, for support, dial 1800 RESPECT on 1800 737 732.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Several shots fired, a body in a driveway, and an abandoned meat cleaver. How does forensics piece together the scene and catch the killer?  Angus Newton is one of Oceania's most respected ballistic experts. His career has seen him take on hundreds of intense and complex cases - spanning from discrete robberies to violent and devastating killings.  Unpack his work with host Kathryn Fox, as Angus walks her through the strange case of Operation Blue.  If this content affected you, the number for Life Line is 13 11 14. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The trial of Jennifer Crumbley, the mother of the Oxford High School shooter, continues with testimony, marked by debates over potential testimony from the shooter and his psychiatrists. Defense attorney Shannon Smith sought permission for them to testify due to the introduction of specific text messages as evidence during the trial. These messages were exchanges between the shooter and a friend, in which he revealed his mental health struggles and expressed frustration over his parents' failure to provide the necessary assistance. During the shooter's Miller hearing, he acknowledged that his parents had no knowledge of his mental health issues or his intentions regarding the shooting. Smith argued, "I agree with this court, there's no case law, and that's why I am asking this court to make the decision to not allow these statements, pursuant to the court rule because I have no way to defend them." The day's proceedings delved into the family's digital footprint, as the prosecution aimed to demonstrate that Jennifer Crumbley ignored warning signs that could have prevented the tragic mass shooting, which claimed the lives of four students. Prosecutors emphasized that their case was not about criminalizing bad parenting but rather establishing a pattern leading up to the shooting. During this period, the convicted shooter repeatedly informed his mother of his need for help, yet no action was taken. Ed Wagrowski, a computer crimes expert, testified about the data retrieved from the seven phones collected from the shooter and his parents. The prosecution focused on messages sent in March 2021, where the shooter expressed fear and anxiety, claiming he heard strange sounds and saw demons while home alone. His parents, however, seemingly ignored these distressing messages as they were occupied with other activities. Despite the prosecution's efforts to establish a neglectful pattern, the defense contested this narrative. In the afternoon session, the jury was shown Jennifer Crumbley's actions in the aftermath of the mass shooting, including her deletion of several messages while she and her husband were on the run. The trial began with opening statements from both the prosecution and defense, with four witnesses testifying on the first day. Among them were Molly Darnell, a teacher who made eye contact with the shooter before shots were fired, and Kristy Gibson-Marshall, an Oxford assistant principal who encountered one of the victims after being shot. Additionally, the manager of the store where James Crumbley purchased the gun used in the shooting testified, as did Special Agent Brett Brandon of the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Defense attorney Shannon Smith started her opening statement by referencing Taylor Swift's song "Bad Blood" and suggested that the prosecution's approach was akin to applying a Band-Aid to a bullet hole. She argued that Jennifer Crumbley had no way of foreseeing the shooting and claimed that school officials allowed her son to remain at school on the day of the tragedy. The prosecution is expected to call 20-25 witnesses over the next two weeks of the trial. Jury selection concluded with a 17-person jury comprising 10 women and seven men. Jennifer and James Crumbley face four counts of involuntary manslaughter for their role in the tragic Oxford High School shooting in November 2021. Prosecutors allege that the parents purchased the gun used in the shooting and failed to provide their son with the necessary help. The shooter was sentenced to life in prison without parole in December 2023. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The trial of Jennifer Crumbley, the mother of the Oxford High School shooter, continues with testimony, marked by debates over potential testimony from the shooter and his psychiatrists. Defense attorney Shannon Smith sought permission for them to testify due to the introduction of specific text messages as evidence during the trial. These messages were exchanges between the shooter and a friend, in which he revealed his mental health struggles and expressed frustration over his parents' failure to provide the necessary assistance. During the shooter's Miller hearing, he acknowledged that his parents had no knowledge of his mental health issues or his intentions regarding the shooting. Smith argued, "I agree with this court, there's no case law, and that's why I am asking this court to make the decision to not allow these statements, pursuant to the court rule because I have no way to defend them." The day's proceedings delved into the family's digital footprint, as the prosecution aimed to demonstrate that Jennifer Crumbley ignored warning signs that could have prevented the tragic mass shooting, which claimed the lives of four students. Prosecutors emphasized that their case was not about criminalizing bad parenting but rather establishing a pattern leading up to the shooting. During this period, the convicted shooter repeatedly informed his mother of his need for help, yet no action was taken. Ed Wagrowski, a computer crimes expert, testified about the data retrieved from the seven phones collected from the shooter and his parents. The prosecution focused on messages sent in March 2021, where the shooter expressed fear and anxiety, claiming he heard strange sounds and saw demons while home alone. His parents, however, seemingly ignored these distressing messages as they were occupied with other activities. Despite the prosecution's efforts to establish a neglectful pattern, the defense contested this narrative. In the afternoon session, the jury was shown Jennifer Crumbley's actions in the aftermath of the mass shooting, including her deletion of several messages while she and her husband were on the run. The trial began with opening statements from both the prosecution and defense, with four witnesses testifying on the first day. Among them were Molly Darnell, a teacher who made eye contact with the shooter before shots were fired, and Kristy Gibson-Marshall, an Oxford assistant principal who encountered one of the victims after being shot. Additionally, the manager of the store where James Crumbley purchased the gun used in the shooting testified, as did Special Agent Brett Brandon of the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Defense attorney Shannon Smith started her opening statement by referencing Taylor Swift's song "Bad Blood" and suggested that the prosecution's approach was akin to applying a Band-Aid to a bullet hole. She argued that Jennifer Crumbley had no way of foreseeing the shooting and claimed that school officials allowed her son to remain at school on the day of the tragedy. The prosecution is expected to call 20-25 witnesses over the next two weeks of the trial. Jury selection concluded with a 17-person jury comprising 10 women and seven men. Jennifer and James Crumbley face four counts of involuntary manslaughter for their role in the tragic Oxford High School shooting in November 2021. Prosecutors allege that the parents purchased the gun used in the shooting and failed to provide their son with the necessary help. The shooter was sentenced to life in prison without parole in December 2023. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The trial of Jennifer Crumbley, the mother of the Oxford High School shooter, continues with testimony, marked by debates over potential testimony from the shooter and his psychiatrists. Defense attorney Shannon Smith sought permission for them to testify due to the introduction of specific text messages as evidence during the trial. These messages were exchanges between the shooter and a friend, in which he revealed his mental health struggles and expressed frustration over his parents' failure to provide the necessary assistance. During the shooter's Miller hearing, he acknowledged that his parents had no knowledge of his mental health issues or his intentions regarding the shooting. Smith argued, "I agree with this court, there's no case law, and that's why I am asking this court to make the decision to not allow these statements, pursuant to the court rule because I have no way to defend them." The day's proceedings delved into the family's digital footprint, as the prosecution aimed to demonstrate that Jennifer Crumbley ignored warning signs that could have prevented the tragic mass shooting, which claimed the lives of four students. Prosecutors emphasized that their case was not about criminalizing bad parenting but rather establishing a pattern leading up to the shooting. During this period, the convicted shooter repeatedly informed his mother of his need for help, yet no action was taken. Ed Wagrowski, a computer crimes expert, testified about the data retrieved from the seven phones collected from the shooter and his parents. The prosecution focused on messages sent in March 2021, where the shooter expressed fear and anxiety, claiming he heard strange sounds and saw demons while home alone. His parents, however, seemingly ignored these distressing messages as they were occupied with other activities. Despite the prosecution's efforts to establish a neglectful pattern, the defense contested this narrative. In the afternoon session, the jury was shown Jennifer Crumbley's actions in the aftermath of the mass shooting, including her deletion of several messages while she and her husband were on the run. The trial began with opening statements from both the prosecution and defense, with four witnesses testifying on the first day. Among them were Molly Darnell, a teacher who made eye contact with the shooter before shots were fired, and Kristy Gibson-Marshall, an Oxford assistant principal who encountered one of the victims after being shot. Additionally, the manager of the store where James Crumbley purchased the gun used in the shooting testified, as did Special Agent Brett Brandon of the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Defense attorney Shannon Smith started her opening statement by referencing Taylor Swift's song "Bad Blood" and suggested that the prosecution's approach was akin to applying a Band-Aid to a bullet hole. She argued that Jennifer Crumbley had no way of foreseeing the shooting and claimed that school officials allowed her son to remain at school on the day of the tragedy. The prosecution is expected to call 20-25 witnesses over the next two weeks of the trial. Jury selection concluded with a 17-person jury comprising 10 women and seven men. Jennifer and James Crumbley face four counts of involuntary manslaughter for their role in the tragic Oxford High School shooting in November 2021. Prosecutors allege that the parents purchased the gun used in the shooting and failed to provide their son with the necessary help. The shooter was sentenced to life in prison without parole in December 2023. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

For a full transcript of this episode, click here. I thought I would encore this show after coming back from the 2023 NODE Conference held in the Microsoft building in New York City, which I always enjoy. NODE stands for Network of Digital Evidence. Why is evidence so important? Here's the NODE answer to this question: It is so smart purchasing decisions can be made by consumers, health systems, and payers so devices and software that improve patient experience, provide actionable insights, and save time and money become part of care delivery so trust is built between industry and healthcare. No matter what direction you come at this from, evidence for care delivery endeavors is sorely needed. What's always interesting to me is kind of the context of this said evidence, however the “who said” evidence is evaluated by and to what end. It was a really interesting juxtaposition, frankly, to hit up the NODE conference—which is attended mainly by digital health entrepreneurs and health system execs—right on the heels of me going to multiple events with self-insured employer types like the PBGH (Pittsburgh Business Group on Health) summit in early December, for example. What Emily Kagan Trenchard, my guest on this encore, talks about today is very much not a nice-to-have from the employer/purchaser point of view. It's a must-have from their perspective because all of these care delivery, technological, and organizational inefficiencies that Emily alludes to … yeah, it's all defined as expensive waste from the standpoint of the employers or other self-insured entities. These self-insured entities are the ones paying for fragmented and unsupported patient journeys with their escalating commercial rates, after all. In sum, I like how Joseph Wu, MD, PhD, who is the current president of the AHA (American Heart Association), put it at the recent AHA Scientific Sessions in Philadelphia last month, which I was honored to attend. Dr. Wu said during his presidential address, “Work hard, work smart, work together.” Emphasis on all of the above, especially the work together. That's what the Relentless Health Value Tribe is all about, after all; so thanks so much for being a part of it. So, a few things to remind everybody. First of all, don't forget EHRs (electronic health records) were purpose built originally for billing. This is no secret. People quite openly have called EHR systems glorified cash registers. If I want to be generous, maybe I would restate this to say that EHRs were designed to document patient interactions. This is what their core architecture was built to achieve. But today, there's a lot that goes on that isn't a traditional patient interaction. First of all, me even calling it, frankly, a patient interaction should give longtime listeners a clue where this is headed. I mean, say you're sitting at home on your couch. I don't know. You're probably not considering yourself a patient. You're considering yourself a person sitting on your couch. However, say you're sitting on your couch and you haven't taken your COPD maintenance therapy. Potentially that is something of clinical significance that maybe should get figured out and noted somewhere—potentially prior to the acute event going down. Or, still talking about things that are relevant to patient health but which don't naturally tuck into an EHR system's native architecture, maybe we have social workers and nutritionists and all kinds of people who are not doctors or nurses or PAs (physician assistants) in this mix. Most of the time, these people don't even have access to the EHR. In sum, what is happening between codes getting written in patient health records? Where's all that information going? My guest in this healthcare podcast, Emily Kagan Trenchard, makes a super point about all of this that I haven't heard made so succinctly or so eloquently. She talks about identifying the core functionalities, the centers of gravity that are needed to bring together providers and patients and everybody else in the mix. She talks about the four platforms that she feels are very necessary to underpin or be the chassis to best support helping providers and others help patients and people in and out of the clinic. She calls each platform a tentpole. These four platforms are: 1.    The EHR 2.    A CRM (customer relationship manager). And, by the way, when Emily says CRM, she's talking about more than software. It's more like a philosophy or a whole approach around relationship building with patients/people/customers. 3.    A cloud platform for data and analytics 4.    A data exchange One last takeaway, for me at least. Emily has talked about two basic facts that inform her thinking: (1) Providers and patients alike are increasingly not tolerant of friction. (2) What is easiest is the most likely to happen. Something that we don't get into in this show but certainly bears considering is the larger context here. Yeah, we got Amazon, we got Google—not only what they are doing alone but also what they are investing in. They have platforms that are purpose built to remove friction and to be really, really easy … one-click easy. So, let's talk about the WIIFM (the “what's in it for me?”) here for health systems to get a move on. When Merrill Goozner was on the show a few weeks ago (EP388), he says that when patients and employers and taxpayers start crying uncle on both healthcare prices as well as just bad friction-filled experiences and also when, at the same time, technology and new competitors move in on the supply side, he says what's gonna happen then is older incumbents like hospitals could find themselves getting their lunches eaten, especially as we contemplate the stuff that Mike Thompson was talking about in episode 389 about how there is increasingly data out there which identifies hospitals who are very inefficiently run. Also, I would be remiss not to mention that non–purpose-built, dare I say bad, technology causes bad clinician burnout, which causes bad turnover, which is really expensive. Arshad Rahim, MD, MBA, FACP, talks about this in episode 323. Emily is SVP and chief of consumer digital solutions over at Northwell Health. Northwell, in case you haven't heard of this health system, is very large: 21 hospitals, 850 outpatient clinics, 300,000 patients a year. Yeah, it's big. Also mentioned in this episode are NODE.Health; Pittsburgh Business Group on Health; Joseph C. Wu, MD, PhD; American Heart Association; Merrill Goozner; Mike Thompson; Arshad Rahim, MD, MBA, FACP; and Megan Antonelli. You can learn more at northwell.edu and connect with Emily on LinkedIn.   Emily Kagan Trenchard offers a unique perspective from within the American medical system: A spoken-word-poet-turned-healthcare-executive, she is on a mission to remix the human in healthcare, challenging entrenched assumptions about what it means to give and receive care in the digital age.  As senior vice president, chief of consumer digital solutions, for New York state's largest health system, Northwell Health, Emily leads product strategy, analytics, research, and design for Northwell's digital ecosystem of patient-facing Web sites, apps, and digital channels. She started Northwell's first user experience department to advance the use of design to care for people in a digital world. Passionate about creating seamless experiences steeped in humanity, Emily now serves as the executive sponsor for Northwell's enterprise CRM program. In prior roles, Emily has led Web systems for New York City's famed Lenox Hill Hospital, spearheaded the consolidation of Northwell's 60+ Web sites onto a single Web platform, and transformed Northwell's Web, social, and digital signage properties. Most recently, Emily co-led an agile, interdisciplinary start-up within Northwell charged to rapidly create a seamless digital front door experience. Within 18 months, that team delivered an award-winning mobile app, launched Northwell's consumer identity program, and created the first unified online booking and bill payment capabilities for the health system. Emily holds a master's degree in science writing and communication from MIT. Her executive training was at the Yale School of Management.   07:08 How does customer digital solutions fit into the larger technology infrastructure in healthcare? 09:07 “Where else do you have centers of gravity that you should respect in the architecture?” 09:25 “There is a constellation of need here.” 11:05 “We interact with way more than just patients.” 13:42 “We have to be able to understand the network of relationships in a population.” 14:25 How do EHRs and CRMs interact as two tentpoles in healthcare? 16:45 “The question is, where does a human being work?” 19:07 How are patients staying on a nonfragmented care journey in a proactive way? 23:00 “Anybody who's a consumer of our digital offerings has a relationship with us.” 28:46 “The medicine is being practiced not only on our physical bodies but on our digital bodies.”   You can learn more at northwell.edu and connect with Emily on LinkedIn.   @ektrenchard of @NorthwellHealth discusses #EHRs and #CRMs on our #healthcarepodcast. #healthcare #podcast #EHR #CRM #healthcareleadership #healthcaretransformation #healthcareinnovation   Recent past interviews: Click a guest's name for their latest RHV episode! Cora Opsahl (Encore! EP372), Jodilyn Owen, Ge Bai, Andreas Mang, Karen Root (Encore! EP381), Mark Cuban and Ferrin Williams, Dan Mendelson (Encore! EP385), Josh Berlin, Dr Adam Brown, Rob Andrews  

Si and Desi interview Lee Reiber, CEO of Oxygen Forensics. Lee provides an overview of Oxygen's tools for extracting data from mobile devices, cloud services, and computers to aid digital investigations. He talks about Oxygen's training program that is now included with their software to train examiners to become skilled investigators. Lee also shares insights on overcoming hurdles like encryption and multifactor authentication in mobile forensics. He stresses that there is always a way to get needed data from mobile devices. Lee additionally talks about the vetting process Oxygen uses to ensure their tools are used ethically and explains how Oxygen adapts quickly to help law enforcement with urgent cases.

In a riveting episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delved into the mysteries surrounding Kohberger's decision to study in Pullman, Washington, with Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University Joseph Scott Morgan.   Their conversation began with Brueski's questioning the peculiar choice of Pullman for Kohberger's education. Morgan speculated that answers might soon surface from the forensic analysis of Kohberger's digital devices, revealing potential premeditated tracking or stalking of the victims.   Morgan commented, "I think that it's going to be a treasure trove more than likely." He emphasized the importance of physical evidence in his work but showed equal enthusiasm for the discoveries digital forensics might offer.   Brueski recalled media footage that highlighted the seizure of a tower computer from Kohberger's residence, wondering about Kohberger's activities during the late hours. The focus, Morgan noted, shouldn't be on message boards but rather on search histories. These could provide a comprehensive understanding of Kohberger's intentions and actions leading up to the alleged crime.   Interestingly, Morgan made it clear that despite speculations, Kohberger was no "criminal mastermind from a forensic standpoint," essentially only as educated as one might be from watching YouTube videos. This statement perhaps sought to highlight the significant difference between actual forensic expertise and superficial knowledge from online sources.   Brueski then shifted the conversation towards Kohberger's alibi, sarcastically noting its predictability: driving around at night. The major evidence against this alibi is the cell phone triangulation data, which placed Kohberger at the crime scene.   Morgan elaborated on the accuracy of cell phone data, noting its terrifying precision, "everywhere we go, we are tracked." The data essentially serves as the "DNA of the phone," he mused, pointing out its undeniable reliability in linking individuals to specific locations.   With Kohberger's defense arguing that he frequently drove that route as a night owl and PhD student looking to clear his mind, the prosecution faces the challenge of proving that on the particular night in question, something was different. This might be where the fact that Kohberger's cell phone is connected to the victim's Wi-Fi becomes pivotal.   "If he is following this same route that ends up going by the house... Does that show more likely that he did this?" pondered Brueski.   Morgan suggested that the "totality of circumstances" would be a central argument. The prosecution would need to combine various pieces of evidence to paint a convincing picture of Kohberger's guilt, while the defense would try to poke holes in their narrative.   The podcast episode hinted at an intense legal battle ahead, especially concerning electronic evidence. Apart from the triangulation data, Kohberger's digital searches, social media interactions, and potential aliases would be under scrutiny.   Morgan concluded with a profound thought on the complexity of the case, especially in the realm of electronics, suggesting it would be an area of contention. He stated, "There's so many different ways, Tony, that we can go in this particular circumstance, just in this one area of electronics, that it's a bit overwhelming."   This gripping episode sheds light on the modern challenges and intricacies of forensic investigation, making it clear that in the digital age, our electronic footprints might speak louder than any other evidence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a riveting episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delved into the mysteries surrounding Kohberger's decision to study in Pullman, Washington, with Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University Joseph Scott Morgan.   Their conversation began with Brueski's questioning the peculiar choice of Pullman for Kohberger's education. Morgan speculated that answers might soon surface from the forensic analysis of Kohberger's digital devices, revealing potential premeditated tracking or stalking of the victims.   Morgan commented, "I think that it's going to be a treasure trove more than likely." He emphasized the importance of physical evidence in his work but showed equal enthusiasm for the discoveries digital forensics might offer.   Brueski recalled media footage that highlighted the seizure of a tower computer from Kohberger's residence, wondering about Kohberger's activities during the late hours. The focus, Morgan noted, shouldn't be on message boards but rather on search histories. These could provide a comprehensive understanding of Kohberger's intentions and actions leading up to the alleged crime.   Interestingly, Morgan made it clear that despite speculations, Kohberger was no "criminal mastermind from a forensic standpoint," essentially only as educated as one might be from watching YouTube videos. This statement perhaps sought to highlight the significant difference between actual forensic expertise and superficial knowledge from online sources.   Brueski then shifted the conversation towards Kohberger's alibi, sarcastically noting its predictability: driving around at night. The major evidence against this alibi is the cell phone triangulation data, which placed Kohberger at the crime scene.   Morgan elaborated on the accuracy of cell phone data, noting its terrifying precision, "everywhere we go, we are tracked." The data essentially serves as the "DNA of the phone," he mused, pointing out its undeniable reliability in linking individuals to specific locations.   With Kohberger's defense arguing that he frequently drove that route as a night owl and PhD student looking to clear his mind, the prosecution faces the challenge of proving that on the particular night in question, something was different. This might be where the fact that Kohberger's cell phone is connected to the victim's Wi-Fi becomes pivotal.   "If he is following this same route that ends up going by the house... Does that show more likely that he did this?" pondered Brueski.   Morgan suggested that the "totality of circumstances" would be a central argument. The prosecution would need to combine various pieces of evidence to paint a convincing picture of Kohberger's guilt, while the defense would try to poke holes in their narrative.   The podcast episode hinted at an intense legal battle ahead, especially concerning electronic evidence. Apart from the triangulation data, Kohberger's digital searches, social media interactions, and potential aliases would be under scrutiny.   Morgan concluded with a profound thought on the complexity of the case, especially in the realm of electronics, suggesting it would be an area of contention. He stated, "There's so many different ways, Tony, that we can go in this particular circumstance, just in this one area of electronics, that it's a bit overwhelming."   This gripping episode sheds light on the modern challenges and intricacies of forensic investigation, making it clear that in the digital age, our electronic footprints might speak louder than any other evidence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In last month's landmark settlement, the City of New York agreed to pay over $13 million to a group of 1,380 protestors who “were arrested and/or subjected to force by N.Y.P.D. officers” in Manhattan and Brooklyn in the summer of 2020. The proposed settlement marks “the largest total payout to protesters in a class-action suit in the United States,” according to Akela Lacy at The Intercept. The plaintiffs won the case, at least in part, thanks to the work of SITU Research, a group that conducts visual investigations and “merges data and design to create new pathways for justice.” SITU Research's work supports activists, advocates, and lawyers, bridging the gap between digital evidence and the communities that can best deploy them towards justice and accountability. Lawfare Managing Editor Tyler McBrien sat down with Brad Samuels, a founding partner at SITU who has overseen the team's visual investigations for legal and advocacy organizations including The International Criminal Court, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, The Associated Press, Frontline, The United Nations, and many others. They discussed why forensic reconstructions and other visual investigations are so useful in the pursuit of justice for war crimes and other abuses, how Samuels and his colleagues build them, and some of the pushback they get. They also talked about the thorny new questions these new technologies raise, including the dangers of retraumatizing victims. Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

One of the key pieces of evidence that the authorities offered in the PCA was the cell phone records of Bryan Kohberger. Using this data, investigators say that they were able to recreate Bryan Kohberger's movements on the morning in question by using the pings his cellphone made from the towers it connected to. How strong is that evidence though?In this episode, we hear from Ben Levitan, a telecommunications expert, who says that while the technology is helpful to build a case, it's not the kind of evidence that will convince a jury.(commercial at 6:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Expert: Cell records can't pinpoint someone's exact location | Idaho Statesman

BellaCiao is malware from Iran's IRGC, while PingPull is malware used by the Chinese government affiliated Tarus Group. Ransomware continues to be a pervasive international threat. An overview of hacktivism. Our guest is CyberMindz founder Peter Coroneos, discussing the importance of mental health in cybersecurity. Johannes Ullrich shares insights from his RSAC panel discussions. And Ukraine continues to collect evidence of Russian war crimes. For links to all of today's stories check out our CyberWire daily news briefing: https://thecyberwire.com/newsletters/daily-briefing/12/80 Selected reading. Unpacking BellaCiao: A Closer Look at Iran's Latest Malware (Bitdefender Blog) Chinese Alloy Taurus Updates PingPull Malware (Unit 42) Abuse of the Service Location Protocol May Lead to DoS Attacks (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA) #RSAC: Ransomware Poses Growing Threat to Five Eyes Nations (Infosecurity Magazine) Hacktivism Unveiled, April 2023 Insights into the footprints of hacktivists (Radware) FBI aiding Ukraine in collection of digital and physical war crime evidence (CyberScoop)

As the week comes to a close, it's time to reflect on some of the most captivating moments from the cases that have been making headlines. From gripping court testimonies to shocking new developments, this has been a week filled with twists and turns that have kept us on the edge of our seats. Whether you are a seasoned legal expert or simply a curious observer, there is no denying that the cases we have been following have been nothing short of enthralling. With every new piece of information that comes to light, it becomes clearer that the truth is never as straightforward as it seems. The stories we have been covering this week are a testament to the complexity and unpredictability of the legal system and the people who navigate it every day. So, let's take a moment to look back at some of the most compelling moments of the week, and see what they can teach us about the power of human nature, the flaws in our justice system, and the importance of a fair trial. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases:     Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://availableon.com/universityofidahomurderspodcast4killedforwhat Chad & Lori Daybell -   https://availableon.com/demiseofthedaybellsthelorichaddaybellstory   The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://availableon.com/findinganathisdisappearanceofanawalshe Alex Murdaugh - https://availableon.com/thetrialofalexmurdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://availableon.com/theidahomurdersthecaseagainstbryankohberger True Crime Today (All Cases & EXTRA Commentary) - https://availableon.com/truecrimetodayatruecrimepodcast  Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133

As the week comes to a close, it's time to reflect on some of the most captivating moments from the cases that have been making headlines. From gripping court testimonies to shocking new developments, this has been a week filled with twists and turns that have kept us on the edge of our seats. Whether you are a seasoned legal expert or simply a curious observer, there is no denying that the cases we have been following have been nothing short of enthralling. With every new piece of information that comes to light, it becomes clearer that the truth is never as straightforward as it seems. The stories we have been covering this week are a testament to the complexity and unpredictability of the legal system and the people who navigate it every day. So, let's take a moment to look back at some of the most compelling moments of the week, and see what they can teach us about the power of human nature, the flaws in our justice system, and the importance of a fair trial. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases:     Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://availableon.com/universityofidahomurderspodcast4killedforwhat Chad & Lori Daybell -   https://availableon.com/demiseofthedaybellsthelorichaddaybellstory   The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://availableon.com/findinganathisdisappearanceofanawalshe Alex Murdaugh - https://availableon.com/thetrialofalexmurdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://availableon.com/theidahomurdersthecaseagainstbryankohberger True Crime Today (All Cases & EXTRA Commentary) - https://availableon.com/truecrimetodayatruecrimepodcast  Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133

Today we're joined by Senior Digital Forensic Examiner Giovanni Masucci to discuss the case against Alex Murdaugh and just how damning his digital footprint may be to his defense. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases:   Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://availableon.com/universityofidahomurderspodcast4killedforwhat The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://availableon.com/findinganathisdisappearanceofanawalshe Alex Murdaugh - https://availableon.com/thetrialofalexmurdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://availableon.com/theidahomurdersthecaseagainstbryankohberger True Crime Today (All Cases & EXTRA Commentary) - https://availableon.com/truecrimetodayatruecrimepodcast Chad & Lori Daybell - (Coming Soon) Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133023

Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases:   Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://availableon.com/universityofidahomurderspodcast4killedforwhat The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://availableon.com/findinganathisdisappearanceofanawalshe Alex Murdaugh - https://availableon.com/thetrialofalexmurdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://availableon.com/theidahomurdersthecaseagainstbryankohberger True Crime Today (All Cases & EXTRA Commentary) - https://availableon.com/truecrimetodayatruecrimepodcast Chad & Lori Daybell - (Coming Soon) Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133023

Now that the Affadavit has been released, we have learned a lot more about the way the investigators went about building the evidence against Bryan Koberger. Especially evidence of the digital variety.In this episode, we hear how Bryan Kohberger's phone pinged to the house where he allegedly murdered Kaylee, Madison, Ethan and Xana 12 times previously, going all the way back to August of last year. Not only that, he returned to the scene of the crime, according to cell phone data, the next morning at around 9 am where he lurked for roughly ten minutes before leaving. Let's unpack it. (commercial at 6:50)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's phone pinged at Idaho murder scene hours after killings,12 times prior: investigators | Fox News

Now that the Affadavit has been released, we have learned a lot more about the way the investigators went about building the evidence against Bryan Koberger. Especially evidence of the digital variety.In this episode, we hear how Bryan Kohberger's phone pinged to the house where he allegedly murdered Kaylee, Madison, Ethan and Xana 12 times previously, going all the way back to August of last year. Not only that, he returned to the scene of the crime, according to cell phone data, the next morning at around 9 am where he lurked for roughly ten minutes before leaving. Let's unpack it. (commercial at 6:50)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's phone pinged at Idaho murder scene hours after killings,12 times prior: investigators | Fox News