Podcasts about Rico

Sean “Diddy” Combs, also known as Puff Daddy, is at the center of one of the biggest racketeering trials in hip hop history. Accused of running a criminal organization tied to RICO charges, sex trafficking, drug trafficking, bribery, forced labor, kidnapping, and witness tampering, Diddy faces a high-stakes jury deliberation that could bring down his entire empire.Anita Marks and Nevin Shapiro team up with top South Florida criminal defense attorney Mark Eiglarsh to break down every explosive detail of the trial. They explore how federal prosecutors portrayed Diddy as the ruthless leader of a racketeering enterprise, why his legal team chose to call zero defense witnesses, and what the jury must decide next. Could this be the ultimate downfall of Puff Daddy, or will the defense's gamble pay off?If you're following every twist in this case — from the Cassie Ventura settlement to witness intimidation claims — this episode gives you a front-row seat to the legal drama gripping the nation. Stay tuned for our upcoming reaction to the verdict and what it means for the future of hip hop.Timestamps: 00:00 Closing Arguments Wrap 00:20 Jury Set to Deliberate 02:22 Jury Instructions and Legal Standards 03:42 The “Criminal Kingdom” Theory 04:11 RICO and Racketeering Explained 06:24 Prosecution's Performance 09:10 No Defense Witnesses Surprise 10:25 Why Zero Witnesses? 17:56 $100K Hotel Payment — Bribe or Not?Follow the Hosts: Anita Marks: https://www.instagram.com/anita_marks Nevin Shapiro: https://www.instagram.com/nevinshapiro/Produced by: Michael Lazo: https://www.instagram.com/digilazo/

Defense attorney Marc Agnifilo argued that Cassie Ventura was the winner of her relationship with Combs. "She is sitting somewhere in the world with $30 million," he said. "He's in jail." And he tried to make the prosecution of Combs relatable. "They take yellow crime scene tape, figuratively, and they wrap it around his bedroom," he said. "The crime scene is your private sex life." In its rebuttal, the prosecution said the defense "just spent a whole lot of energy trying to blame his victims and the U.S. government for his lies, his threats, and his violence."If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy 

Sean “Diddy” Combs' legal team is facing an uphill battle as they prepare to defend him against explosive federal charges of sex trafficking, drug distribution, and running a criminal enterprise. Prosecutors are expected to call multiple cooperating witnesses—many of them alleged victims and former insiders—whose stories span decades and paint a picture of a carefully controlled web of abuse, coercion, and violence. That cumulative weight makes it difficult for the defense to dismiss the case as opportunistic or fabricated. This isn't just about one accuser—it's about an alleged pattern of criminal conduct, and the government only needs to prove that pattern, not each individual act.Diddy's attorneys are expected to focus heavily on undermining the credibility of the accusers, possibly pointing to inconsistencies or financial motives. But in a federal RICO case, that only gets them so far. The structure of the case allows the government to use broader racketeering evidence to show intent and criminal enterprise, even if some parts are disputed. The defense also faces the court of public opinion, especially after damaging surveillance footage surfaced showing Diddy allegedly assaulting Cassie Ventura—footage that may or may not be admissible, but will almost certainly be on jurors' minds. All of this sets the stage for a high-stakes legal showdown where reputation, freedom, and legacy hang in the balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs defense lawyers face uphill battle in bid to undermine accusers | ReutersBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

"He won't take no for an answer," said prosecutor Christy Slavik. She said it over and over during a summation that lasted more than four hours. She argued that the "common purpose" of Combs and his "inner circle" -- his chief of staff, his bodyguards, and some of his assistants -- was to protect him from bad press and law enforcement. And she recounted the dramatic stories told in the courtroom in the past six weeks: Goodfellas-type scenes of alleged bribery, arson, and kidnapping.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy

Valenti and Rico finished the show giving their final thoughts and taking your final calls on their expectations for the Red Wings tonight and this weekend. Then Riger joined in cross-talk to wrap the week.

Valenti and Rico discuss whether Yzerman should keep or trade the 13th pick in the NHL Draft tonight.

Mike and Rico started the first hour with a reaction to former Islanders defenceman Noah Dobson being traded to the Canadiens for what the guys feel is a minimum return. Then, Kenny joined for an "In Football Today" to wrap the hour.

Mike and Rico started the final show of the week reacting to former Islander Noah Dobson getting traded to the Canadiens. Then, they spent the rest of the show talking about what they want the Red Wings' plans to be tonight during the NHL Draft and in the coming days. They took plenty of your calls and read your ticket texts ahead of the draft.

Mike and Rico continue their Red Wings talk, discussing what they can do tonight to make you disappointed in them.

Mike and Rico take some more of your calls on the Red Wings.

Mike and Rico react to the Canadiens trading for former Islanders defenceman Noah Dobson for a bag of chips. They discuss what this means for the Red Wings' plans.

Valenti and Rico spent the entire second hour posing more Red Wings questions and taking your calls in response.

Rico has a list of numbers in this NBA Draft-centered "By The Numbers".

Diddy Closing Arguments: 5 Damning Hours From Prosecution! The federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs has captivated the nation, laying bare unsettling allegations involving racketeering, sex trafficking, coercion, and interstate prostitution. Federal prosecutors argue that the iconic music mogul orchestrated a sinister criminal enterprise, using his fame and wealth to manipulate, coerce, and exploit vulnerable individuals under the guise of extravagant lifestyle parties. Yet, despite presenting graphic video evidence, explicit text messages, financial documents, and emotionally-charged testimonies from alleged victims such as Cassie Ventura, the prosecution surprisingly dropped significant charges—kidnapping and arson—just before closing arguments. This shocking courtroom twist has raised pressing questions about the strength and integrity of their case. Defense attorneys, in an unexpected and risky maneuver, chose not to call any witnesses—not even Sean Combs himself—to rebut the serious accusations. This bold silence raises intriguing legal and psychological questions: Did the defense confidently bet on prosecutorial overreach, or was this strategic silence a desperate attempt to avoid further incrimination? In this compelling video, we dive deep into the trial's most troubling and confusing aspects. We explore psychological dynamics at play, including coercive control, celebrity influence, and juror biases. Expert analysis from legal insiders sheds light on critical courtroom strategies, jury decision-making processes, and the implications of dropped charges on jury deliberations. Whether Diddy walks free or spends life behind bars hinges on jurors interpreting complex laws like RICO and sex trafficking statutes. Viewers will gain a thorough understanding of the intricate interplay between celebrity privilege, legal accountability, and the psychology behind criminal behavior. Don't miss this comprehensive breakdown of one of the most intriguing celebrity trials in recent history, packed with revelations, mysteries, and profound implications for justice and accountability. Stay tuned and subscribe for updates, expert analysis, and real-time developments from the courtroom. Hashtags: #SeanCombs #DiddyTrial #TrueCrime #FederalTrial #CelebrityCrime #Racketeering #SexTrafficking #CourtroomDrama #LegalAnalysis #PsychologyOfCrime Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

 Was Sean 'Diddy' Combs a Criminal Mastermind or Just Reckless & Rich The federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs exposes unsettling details about power, privilege, and alleged criminal behavior at the pinnacle of fame. But a pivotal question lingers: Was Diddy truly a criminal mastermind, deliberately orchestrating a sophisticated sex trafficking and racketeering enterprise, or was he merely a reckless celebrity whose lavish lifestyle spiraled dangerously out of control? In this comprehensive analysis, expert attorney Eric Faddis, a seasoned legal professional with experience as both a prosecutor and defense attorney, dives into the nuances separating deliberate criminality from reckless excess. Eric walks us through precisely how prosecutors are using the RICO statute—typically reserved for mob bosses and organized crime—to paint Combs as a calculated, sinister figure running a criminal enterprise. Yet, the evidence is not without ambiguity. Eric closely examines testimony and evidence from Combs' trial, highlighting areas of potential weakness for the prosecution, including dropped charges and the critical absence of identified co-conspirators. Could the jury interpret these gaps as proof of a weaker-than-expected case? Faddis unpacks how jurors might distinguish clear criminal intent from reckless indulgence and personal dysfunction. Moreover, Eric explores how the graphic nature of certain evidence might emotionally influence jurors, potentially clouding their interpretation of complex legal standards. He analyzes precisely why proving intent and coordination under RICO law is particularly challenging, discussing whether the prosecution might have stretched their narrative too far. Watch this in-depth discussion for a clear, insightful breakdown of the strategies, strengths, and vulnerabilities in this high-profile case. Is Diddy a calculated criminal leader or simply an irresponsible, wealthy man whose questionable behavior went unchecked for too long? Eric Faddis provides essential context and clarity ahead of the jury's pivotal decision. Hashtags: #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #Racketeering #CriminalEnterprise #TrueCrimeAnalysis #EricFaddis #RecklessOrCriminal #CelebrityTrials #LegalInsights #FederalCharges    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Was Sean 'Diddy' Combs a Criminal Mastermind or Just Reckless & Rich The federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs exposes unsettling details about power, privilege, and alleged criminal behavior at the pinnacle of fame. But a pivotal question lingers: Was Diddy truly a criminal mastermind, deliberately orchestrating a sophisticated sex trafficking and racketeering enterprise, or was he merely a reckless celebrity whose lavish lifestyle spiraled dangerously out of control? In this comprehensive analysis, expert attorney Eric Faddis, a seasoned legal professional with experience as both a prosecutor and defense attorney, dives into the nuances separating deliberate criminality from reckless excess. Eric walks us through precisely how prosecutors are using the RICO statute—typically reserved for mob bosses and organized crime—to paint Combs as a calculated, sinister figure running a criminal enterprise. Yet, the evidence is not without ambiguity. Eric closely examines testimony and evidence from Combs' trial, highlighting areas of potential weakness for the prosecution, including dropped charges and the critical absence of identified co-conspirators. Could the jury interpret these gaps as proof of a weaker-than-expected case? Faddis unpacks how jurors might distinguish clear criminal intent from reckless indulgence and personal dysfunction. Moreover, Eric explores how the graphic nature of certain evidence might emotionally influence jurors, potentially clouding their interpretation of complex legal standards. He analyzes precisely why proving intent and coordination under RICO law is particularly challenging, discussing whether the prosecution might have stretched their narrative too far. Watch this in-depth discussion for a clear, insightful breakdown of the strategies, strengths, and vulnerabilities in this high-profile case. Is Diddy a calculated criminal leader or simply an irresponsible, wealthy man whose questionable behavior went unchecked for too long? Eric Faddis provides essential context and clarity ahead of the jury's pivotal decision. Hashtags: #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #Racketeering #CriminalEnterprise #TrueCrimeAnalysis #EricFaddis #RecklessOrCriminal #CelebrityTrials #LegalInsights #FederalCharges    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Diddy Closing Arguments: 5 Damning Hours From Prosecution! The federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs has captivated the nation, laying bare unsettling allegations involving racketeering, sex trafficking, coercion, and interstate prostitution. Federal prosecutors argue that the iconic music mogul orchestrated a sinister criminal enterprise, using his fame and wealth to manipulate, coerce, and exploit vulnerable individuals under the guise of extravagant lifestyle parties. Yet, despite presenting graphic video evidence, explicit text messages, financial documents, and emotionally-charged testimonies from alleged victims such as Cassie Ventura, the prosecution surprisingly dropped significant charges—kidnapping and arson—just before closing arguments. This shocking courtroom twist has raised pressing questions about the strength and integrity of their case. Defense attorneys, in an unexpected and risky maneuver, chose not to call any witnesses—not even Sean Combs himself—to rebut the serious accusations. This bold silence raises intriguing legal and psychological questions: Did the defense confidently bet on prosecutorial overreach, or was this strategic silence a desperate attempt to avoid further incrimination? In this compelling video, we dive deep into the trial's most troubling and confusing aspects. We explore psychological dynamics at play, including coercive control, celebrity influence, and juror biases. Expert analysis from legal insiders sheds light on critical courtroom strategies, jury decision-making processes, and the implications of dropped charges on jury deliberations. Whether Diddy walks free or spends life behind bars hinges on jurors interpreting complex laws like RICO and sex trafficking statutes. Viewers will gain a thorough understanding of the intricate interplay between celebrity privilege, legal accountability, and the psychology behind criminal behavior. Don't miss this comprehensive breakdown of one of the most intriguing celebrity trials in recent history, packed with revelations, mysteries, and profound implications for justice and accountability. Stay tuned and subscribe for updates, expert analysis, and real-time developments from the courtroom. Hashtags: #SeanCombs #DiddyTrial #TrueCrime #FederalTrial #CelebrityCrime #Racketeering #SexTrafficking #CourtroomDrama #LegalAnalysis #PsychologyOfCrime Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

After lunch, Slavik resumed by delving deeper into the case of the witness known as “Jane,” outlining the four stages of her relationship with Combs—from early “love‑bombing” to repeated “hotel nights” (or “freak‑offs”) orchestrated under Combs's control via lies, threats, and the looming possibility of losing housing or having intimate recordings released.   She emphasized that even a single coerced encounter—if facilitated by his enterprise—met the legal definition of sex trafficking. “You do not need to find that all of the freak‑offs… were force or coercion,” she told jurors; “if there was one time, one single freak‑off, when the defendant knew or recklessly disregarded that [Jane] was participating because of his lies, his threats or his violence—then that's it. He's guilty”Shifting focus, Slavik then tackled the transportation-for-prostitution counts, showing how Combs and his aides paid for male escorts to travel—through flights, hotels, and bank records—to facilitate these encounters.  She dismissed the notion of consensual participation, arguing that it “doesn't matter” whether the escorts consented—the crime lies in transporting them for paid sexual activity. She underscored that the enterprise facilitated this process, reinforcing the RICO charge's breadth. Shortly before the afternoon break, Slavik turned back to Cassie Ventura's situation, pointing to the strategic use of text messages and fear-based threats—recalling that Combs blackmailed her with videos and deployed violence and control tactics—to show the jury how a pattern of coercion extended across relationshipsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:   @innercitypress

Today on the show, we focus on college hockey and welcome St. Thomas Men's Coach Rico Blasi. A brand-new, state-of-the-art arena and a move ahead into the NCHA are discussed, plus much more.    Thanks to Minnesota Masonic Charities (mnmasoniccharities.org/), OnX Maps (onxmaps.com/), Lexus of Wayzata (lexusofwayzata.com/), Lexus of Maplewood (lexusofmaplewood.com/), & 10k Construction (10kconstruction.com)

Diddy Closing Arguments: 5 Damning Hours From Prosecution! The federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs has captivated the nation, laying bare unsettling allegations involving racketeering, sex trafficking, coercion, and interstate prostitution. Federal prosecutors argue that the iconic music mogul orchestrated a sinister criminal enterprise, using his fame and wealth to manipulate, coerce, and exploit vulnerable individuals under the guise of extravagant lifestyle parties. Yet, despite presenting graphic video evidence, explicit text messages, financial documents, and emotionally-charged testimonies from alleged victims such as Cassie Ventura, the prosecution surprisingly dropped significant charges—kidnapping and arson—just before closing arguments. This shocking courtroom twist has raised pressing questions about the strength and integrity of their case. Defense attorneys, in an unexpected and risky maneuver, chose not to call any witnesses—not even Sean Combs himself—to rebut the serious accusations. This bold silence raises intriguing legal and psychological questions: Did the defense confidently bet on prosecutorial overreach, or was this strategic silence a desperate attempt to avoid further incrimination? In this compelling video, we dive deep into the trial's most troubling and confusing aspects. We explore psychological dynamics at play, including coercive control, celebrity influence, and juror biases. Expert analysis from legal insiders sheds light on critical courtroom strategies, jury decision-making processes, and the implications of dropped charges on jury deliberations. Whether Diddy walks free or spends life behind bars hinges on jurors interpreting complex laws like RICO and sex trafficking statutes. Viewers will gain a thorough understanding of the intricate interplay between celebrity privilege, legal accountability, and the psychology behind criminal behavior. Don't miss this comprehensive breakdown of one of the most intriguing celebrity trials in recent history, packed with revelations, mysteries, and profound implications for justice and accountability. Stay tuned and subscribe for updates, expert analysis, and real-time developments from the courtroom. Hashtags: #SeanCombs #DiddyTrial #TrueCrime #FederalTrial #CelebrityCrime #Racketeering #SexTrafficking #CourtroomDrama #LegalAnalysis #PsychologyOfCrime Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

"He won't take no for an answer," said prosecutor Christy Slavik. She said it over and over during a summation that lasted more than four hours. She argued that the "common purpose" of Combs and his "inner circle" -- his chief of staff, his bodyguards, and some of his assistants -- was to protect him from bad press and law enforcement. And she recounted the dramatic stories told in the courtroom in the past six weeks: Goodfellas-type scenes of alleged bribery, arson, and kidnapping.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy https://www.nbcnews.com/diddy-on-trial

After lunch, Slavik resumed by delving deeper into the case of the witness known as “Jane,” outlining the four stages of her relationship with Combs—from early “love‑bombing” to repeated “hotel nights” (or “freak‑offs”) orchestrated under Combs's control via lies, threats, and the looming possibility of losing housing or having intimate recordings released.   She emphasized that even a single coerced encounter—if facilitated by his enterprise—met the legal definition of sex trafficking. “You do not need to find that all of the freak‑offs… were force or coercion,” she told jurors; “if there was one time, one single freak‑off, when the defendant knew or recklessly disregarded that [Jane] was participating because of his lies, his threats or his violence—then that's it. He's guilty”Shifting focus, Slavik then tackled the transportation-for-prostitution counts, showing how Combs and his aides paid for male escorts to travel—through flights, hotels, and bank records—to facilitate these encounters.  She dismissed the notion of consensual participation, arguing that it “doesn't matter” whether the escorts consented—the crime lies in transporting them for paid sexual activity. She underscored that the enterprise facilitated this process, reinforcing the RICO charge's breadth. Shortly before the afternoon break, Slavik turned back to Cassie Ventura's situation, pointing to the strategic use of text messages and fear-based threats—recalling that Combs blackmailed her with videos and deployed violence and control tactics—to show the jury how a pattern of coercion extended across relationshipsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:   @innercitypressBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

La Comisión Australiana de Derechos Humanos publicó Speaking From Experience, un informe basado en más de 300 testimonios de víctimas-survivientes de acoso sexual en el trabajo, que revela las deficiencias en la aplicación de normas para proteger a las víctimas. La Comisionada Anna Cody conversa con SBS Spanish sobre esta realidad.

Today on the show, we focus on college hockey and welcome St. Thomas Men's Coach Rico Blasi. A brand-new, state-of-the-art arena and a move ahead into the NCHA are discussed, plus much more.    Thanks to Minnesota Masonic Charities (mnmasoniccharities.org/), OnX Maps (onxmaps.com/), Lexus of Wayzata (lexusofwayzata.com/), Lexus of Maplewood (lexusofmaplewood.com/), & 10k Construction (10kconstruction.com)

Kirk, Dave and Whitney are live from the Writer Cup. Kirk's producer is leaving Barstool and his old producer applied for a job with "It Girl" (1:40). Barstool Beach house talk (4:45). Alex Bennett is huge now (7:30). Coach Portnoy made a cut to the New York basketball team (9:30). An old pizza review is going viral (12:15). The Dozen final is tonight and Dave thinks he will get boo'd (15:15). Joy Yanks has a new report on Jeff Nadu (17:45). NBA Finals talk (18:45). Bussin' With Boys got to meet Taylor Swift (20:30). Fanatics Fest was this past weekend and Dave DM'd Joe Burrow (21:35). Dave talks never taking the ferry to Nantucket anymore (28:30). Rico was fired up after throwing a ball off of Hannah Montoya (31:30). An update on Dave Portnoy's book (33:00). Dave thinks The Dozen is in Boston to appease Kirk and the Minifans (34:45). No show next week (39:00).You can find every episode of this show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or YouTube. Prime Members can listen ad-free on Amazon Music. For more, visit barstool.link/unnamedshow

Mike and Rico continue their Pistons talk, asking if they can do anything in the second round of the draft tonight that could excite you.

Mike and Rico spend an entire segment trashing ESPN's broadcast of the NBA Draft last night.

Rico has a list of the 5 players he thinks the Pistons can take tonight in the second round of the NBA Draft.

Mike and Rico began the second and final hour of the show asking if there's something the Pistons could do tonight to excite you. Then, they trash ESPN's broadcast last night of the first round before Rico gives a list of some players he thinks Detroit can draft tonight.

Valenti and Rico kicked off this short show following the Tigers' win over the A's talking about their biggest surprises of the Tigers season. They spend the first hour on that before shifting to a conversation about the Pistons and their second-round pick tonight.

Mike and Rico start this short show following Tigers baseball talking about the biggest surprises thus far in the 2025 season.

On June 24, 2025, the prosecution in United States v. Combs submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian outlining its requested revisions to the Court's proposed jury instructions. The Government focused on ensuring that the legal language provided to jurors accurately reflected the elements of the charges and the standards for assessing the evidence presented during trial. These changes were framed as necessary to clarify certain points of law and to avoid confusion or misinterpretation by the jury during deliberations.Specifically, the Government asked for adjustments in how the Court defines terms relevant to the RICO and sex trafficking charges, as well as how jurors are to weigh credibility and determine the presence of coercion or conspiracy. The letter emphasized the importance of precision in explaining legal thresholds such as "reasonable doubt" and the role of predicate acts in establishing a racketeering enterprise. The Government also noted that its suggestions were consistent with Second Circuit model instructions and past precedent, aiming to protect the integrity of the jury's decision-making process in a complex and high-profile case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.422.0.pdf

Federal prosecutors handling Sean “Diddy” Combs' racketeering case informed Judge Arun Subramanian—on June 25, just before closing arguments—that they would no longer pursue three specific predicate charges: attempted kidnapping, attempted arson, and aiding and abetting sex trafficking. These predicates were part of the broader racketeering conspiracy charge. Prosecutors said the decision was aimed at simplifying jury instructions and helping jurors focus on the remaining core allegations.Despite dropping those predicates, the prosecution still pressed ahead with the central charges, including racketeering tied to forced labor, drug offenses, and bribery, as well as two counts of sex trafficking and one count of transportation for prostitution.   The timeline saw the prosecution rest after calling 34 witnesses over 29 days, and the defense surprisingly rested in just over 20 minutes—calling no witnesses and relying on text-message evidenceto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial backtrack on several allegations | Fox News

On June 24, 2025, the prosecution in United States v. Combs submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian outlining its requested revisions to the Court's proposed jury instructions. The Government focused on ensuring that the legal language provided to jurors accurately reflected the elements of the charges and the standards for assessing the evidence presented during trial. These changes were framed as necessary to clarify certain points of law and to avoid confusion or misinterpretation by the jury during deliberations.Specifically, the Government asked for adjustments in how the Court defines terms relevant to the RICO and sex trafficking charges, as well as how jurors are to weigh credibility and determine the presence of coercion or conspiracy. The letter emphasized the importance of precision in explaining legal thresholds such as "reasonable doubt" and the role of predicate acts in establishing a racketeering enterprise. The Government also noted that its suggestions were consistent with Second Circuit model instructions and past precedent, aiming to protect the integrity of the jury's decision-making process in a complex and high-profile case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.422.0.pdf

The government has proposed to remove instructions on the verdict slip for kidnapping, attempted arson, and aiding and abetting sex trafficking- narrowing the charges under the RICO act & focus on core allegations of trafficking and forced labor...Jarrett Ferentino jumps on the live to offer a further breakdown of charges vs acts.Diddy Docket:https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69167625/united-states-v-combs/?page=3Watch the Livestream & see Lauren: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cmVlwBAaEE&t=28s Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In a shocking 11th hour move before closing arguments begin, the prosecution in the Sean "Diddy" Combs sex trafficking trial backpedals on their RICO case. Will this 'dumbing down' of the charges before the final showdown mean a verdict by July 4th? In an unprecedented triumph against evil, Florida authorities, and their federal partners rescue 60 children from the clutches of sex traffickers...making it the largest recovery in U.S history. A 4yr old boy is severely burned in a horrific S'mores mishap at a children's museum. Plus, a date night ends with 'time' behind bars! Jennifer Gould reports. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Federal prosecutors handling Sean “Diddy” Combs' racketeering case informed Judge Arun Subramanian—on June 25, just before closing arguments—that they would no longer pursue three specific predicate charges: attempted kidnapping, attempted arson, and aiding and abetting sex trafficking. These predicates were part of the broader racketeering conspiracy charge. Prosecutors said the decision was aimed at simplifying jury instructions and helping jurors focus on the remaining core allegations.Despite dropping those predicates, the prosecution still pressed ahead with the central charges, including racketeering tied to forced labor, drug offenses, and bribery, as well as two counts of sex trafficking and one count of transportation for prostitution.   The timeline saw the prosecution rest after calling 34 witnesses over 29 days, and the defense surprisingly rested in just over 20 minutes—calling no witnesses and relying on text-message evidenceto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial backtrack on several allegations | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On June 24, 2025, the prosecution in United States v. Combs submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian outlining its requested revisions to the Court's proposed jury instructions. The Government focused on ensuring that the legal language provided to jurors accurately reflected the elements of the charges and the standards for assessing the evidence presented during trial. These changes were framed as necessary to clarify certain points of law and to avoid confusion or misinterpretation by the jury during deliberations.Specifically, the Government asked for adjustments in how the Court defines terms relevant to the RICO and sex trafficking charges, as well as how jurors are to weigh credibility and determine the presence of coercion or conspiracy. The letter emphasized the importance of precision in explaining legal thresholds such as "reasonable doubt" and the role of predicate acts in establishing a racketeering enterprise. The Government also noted that its suggestions were consistent with Second Circuit model instructions and past precedent, aiming to protect the integrity of the jury's decision-making process in a complex and high-profile case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.422.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On June 24, 2025, the prosecution in United States v. Combs submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian outlining its requested revisions to the Court's proposed jury instructions. The Government focused on ensuring that the legal language provided to jurors accurately reflected the elements of the charges and the standards for assessing the evidence presented during trial. These changes were framed as necessary to clarify certain points of law and to avoid confusion or misinterpretation by the jury during deliberations.Specifically, the Government asked for adjustments in how the Court defines terms relevant to the RICO and sex trafficking charges, as well as how jurors are to weigh credibility and determine the presence of coercion or conspiracy. The letter emphasized the importance of precision in explaining legal thresholds such as "reasonable doubt" and the role of predicate acts in establishing a racketeering enterprise. The Government also noted that its suggestions were consistent with Second Circuit model instructions and past precedent, aiming to protect the integrity of the jury's decision-making process in a complex and high-profile case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.422.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

VLOG II June 26 US v Sean Combs midway through US closing, arson (Kid Cudi's car) and kidnapping (Cassie and Capricorn Clark, twice) presented for RICO, then Jane's sobriety "party," defense closing not until tomorrow. Week 6 book: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=rjtnEQAAQBAJ

Today, after calling 34 witnesses over six weeks, federal prosecutors rested their case. After that, the defense put on their case. It took them only a half an hour. They called no witnesses. They did argue that the case should be dismissed because the prosecution didn't meet its burden of proof. But the judge reserved his decision on that, and the trial remains on track for the jury to hear summations on Thursday.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy

Mike and Rico go to the people on the two topics they've presented today.

Mike and Rico start the second hour discussing how they'd rank the 4 Detroit teams in order of their sense of urgency right now.

Valenti and Rico continue their Detroit sports urgency discussion, explaining why their rankings are the way they are.

Mike and Rico rounded out the show finishing their thoughts on their rankings of the Detroit sports teams based on sense of urgency before David joined for the "Big Finish".

Mike and Rico spent the second hour of the show ranking the sense of urgency amongst the 4 major Detroit sports teams.

Valenti and Rico kicked off the show with a discussion about some claims by Jim Costa and other hosts on The Ticket that mischaracterized Valenti's Pistons takes. They spent a few minutes reacting to Dan Campbell's PFF ranking before shifting to a conversation about which of the 4 major Detroit sports teams should be the most urgent right now. They mixed in a couple of NBA Draft-related segments before wrapping the show returning to their sense of urgency topic from before.

On June 24, 2025, Sean “Diddy” Combs' defense team rested its case in his ongoing federal trial, marking a pivotal moment in the proceedings. After weeks of testimony from the prosecution, Diddy's legal team decided against calling any witnesses to counter the government's allegations. This strategic move led many to speculate about the strength of the prosecution's case and whether the defense felt it had sufficiently dismantled the evidence presented. The decision not to present a defense case, especially in a high-profile RICO trial, was a bold one, signaling that the defense believed the prosecution had not met the burden of proof necessary to convict their client.The prosecution had presented a robust case, detailing allegations of sex trafficking, racketeering, and other serious charges against the music mogul. Diddy's decision to rest without calling witnesses may have been a calculated risk, indicating either a lack of faith in the prosecution's evidence or a strategic effort to highlight potential weaknesses in the government's case. It also left the jury to weigh the prosecution's narrative without a direct rebuttal, raising the stakes for the closing arguments to come.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 24, 2025 - Defense and prosecution rest in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

Sean "Diddy" Combs' decision not to present any witnesses at his federal RICO trial could offer several strategic benefits. By resting without calling witnesses, the defense places the burden squarely on the prosecution to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. This tactic forces the jury to rely entirely on the evidence presented by the government, potentially highlighting weaknesses or inconsistencies in the prosecution's narrative. If the defense believes the prosecution's case is weak or circumstantial, they may feel confident that the jury will recognize the gaps in the government's argument, leading to reasonable doubt. Additionally, avoiding cross-examination of witnesses—especially the defendant—reduces the risk of damaging testimony or contradictions that could arise during the defense's case. The silence of the defense might also be interpreted as a confident assertion that the prosecution has failed to meet its burden, potentially shifting the jury's perception toward acquittal.However, this decision also carries significant risks. By not presenting witnesses, the defense forgoes the opportunity to challenge the prosecution's evidence directly or provide a counter-narrative that could weaken the impact of damaging testimonies. The jury might interpret the absence of defense witnesses as a sign of weakness or even an admission of guilt, particularly if the prosecution's case is strong or compelling. In RICO trials, where the charges often involve complex criminal organizations and intricate patterns of behavior, the defense's silence might lead the jury to feel as though the defendant has no rebuttal to the allegations. The decision not to put the defendant on the stand, in particular, could also prevent the jury from hearing a personal defense or any potentially exculpatory explanations. Overall, while the defense may be betting on the prosecution's inability to prove guilt, the absence of a defense case could leave a void that the jury fills with skepticism or suspicion about the defendant's innocence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the last days of the trial, the prosecution played more videos of the sexual encounters at the center of the case. Their summary witness also introduced texts and voice notes in which Combs's staff arranges travel for his girlfriends and Combs himself haggles over the price of escorts. In the morning, the defense announced it won't be calling any witnesses at all.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy