Podcasts about mann act

Episode 385 of the John1911 Podcast is now live:   The INEOS Grenadier is here. Website traffic. History of Weapons of War Shuts Down. FN Drops the SCAR rifle. If The Army going LICC? DPRK bans boob jobs. Going to jail for The Mann Act.     Marky John1911.com "Shooting Guns & Having Fun"

After receiving a four-year prison sentence in October 2025, Sean “Diddy” Combs now faces an even more devastating blow: the loss of control. A federal forfeiture order has handed over every piece of digital media tied to his sex trafficking conviction to the FBI—tapes, hard drives, phones, and cameras. What once served as private leverage has now become state-owned evidence. In this breakdown, we dig deep into what civil forfeiture really means—how it works, why the Mann Act was used, and how the government can seize even “consensual” material if it facilitated a crime. We explore the eerie symbolism of the government now owning Diddy's unfiltered archive—the raw footage of a life built on secrecy and control. From Shkreli's Wu-Tang album to Madoff's mansions, this is how power unravels: not in a courtroom, but in an auction house, an evidence vault, and in headlines that strip away brand and leave behind only case numbers.  #DiddyTrial #CivilForfeiture #FreakOffTapes #MannAct #FBIInvestigation #JusticeSystem #DiddySentencing #HiddenKillers #AssetSeizure #CelebrityCrime Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

After receiving a four-year prison sentence in October 2025, Sean “Diddy” Combs now faces an even more devastating blow: the loss of control. A federal forfeiture order has handed over every piece of digital media tied to his sex trafficking conviction to the FBI—tapes, hard drives, phones, and cameras. What once served as private leverage has now become state-owned evidence. In this breakdown, we dig deep into what civil forfeiture really means—how it works, why the Mann Act was used, and how the government can seize even “consensual” material if it facilitated a crime. We explore the eerie symbolism of the government now owning Diddy's unfiltered archive—the raw footage of a life built on secrecy and control. From Shkreli's Wu-Tang album to Madoff's mansions, this is how power unravels: not in a courtroom, but in an auction house, an evidence vault, and in headlines that strip away brand and leave behind only case numbers.  #DiddyTrial #CivilForfeiture #FreakOffTapes #MannAct #FBIInvestigation #JusticeSystem #DiddySentencing #HiddenKillers #AssetSeizure #CelebrityCrime Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Two headlines. Two high-profile cases. One unfiltered breakdown. In this powerful double-segment, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to examine two of the most complex and closely watched stories in true crime right now: the federal sentencing of Sean “Diddy” Combs, and the unsolved death of 15-year-old Celeste Rivas-Hernandez, found deceased in the front trunk of a Tesla linked to musician d4vd.

Two headlines. Two high-profile cases. One unfiltered breakdown. In this powerful double-segment, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to examine two of the most complex and closely watched stories in true crime right now: the federal sentencing of Sean “Diddy” Combs, and the unsolved death of 15-year-old Celeste Rivas-Hernandez, found deceased in the front trunk of a Tesla linked to musician d4vd.

Two headlines. Two high-profile cases. One unfiltered breakdown. In this powerful double-segment, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to examine two of the most complex and closely watched stories in true crime right now: the federal sentencing of Sean “Diddy” Combs, and the unsolved death of 15-year-old Celeste Rivas-Hernandez, found deceased in the front trunk of a Tesla linked to musician d4vd.

After receiving a four-year prison sentence in October 2025, Sean “Diddy” Combs now faces an even more devastating blow: the loss of control. A federal forfeiture order has handed over every piece of digital media tied to his sex trafficking conviction to the FBI—tapes, hard drives, phones, and cameras. What once served as private leverage has now become state-owned evidence. In this breakdown, we dig deep into what civil forfeiture really means—how it works, why the Mann Act was used, and how the government can seize even “consensual” material if it facilitated a crime. We explore the eerie symbolism of the government now owning Diddy's unfiltered archive—the raw footage of a life built on secrecy and control. From Shkreli's Wu-Tang album to Madoff's mansions, this is how power unravels: not in a courtroom, but in an auction house, an evidence vault, and in headlines that strip away brand and leave behind only case numbers.  #DiddyTrial #CivilForfeiture #FreakOffTapes #MannAct #FBIInvestigation #JusticeSystem #DiddySentencing #HiddenKillers #AssetSeizure #CelebrityCrime Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

After receiving a four-year prison sentence in October 2025, Sean “Diddy” Combs now faces an even more devastating blow: the loss of control. A federal forfeiture order has handed over every piece of digital media tied to his sex trafficking conviction to the FBI—tapes, hard drives, phones, and cameras. What once served as private leverage has now become state-owned evidence. In this breakdown, we dig deep into what civil forfeiture really means—how it works, why the Mann Act was used, and how the government can seize even “consensual” material if it facilitated a crime. We explore the eerie symbolism of the government now owning Diddy's unfiltered archive—the raw footage of a life built on secrecy and control. From Shkreli's Wu-Tang album to Madoff's mansions, this is how power unravels: not in a courtroom, but in an auction house, an evidence vault, and in headlines that strip away brand and leave behind only case numbers.  #DiddyTrial #CivilForfeiture #FreakOffTapes #MannAct #FBIInvestigation #JusticeSystem #DiddySentencing #HiddenKillers #AssetSeizure #CelebrityCrime Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Two headlines. Two high-profile cases. One unfiltered breakdown. In this powerful double-segment, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to examine two of the most complex and closely watched stories in true crime right now: the federal sentencing of Sean “Diddy” Combs, and the unsolved death of 15-year-old Celeste Rivas-Hernandez, found deceased in the front trunk of a Tesla linked to musician d4vd.

Is Sean “Diddy” Combs truly done with the justice system—or is this just the eye of the storm? In this high-stakes episode, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to dissect what really happens after sentencing—and whether federal investigators are still keeping a close eye on Diddy from behind bars. Combs is currently serving a 50-month sentence after being convicted under the Mann Act, but the RICO and sex-trafficking charges he was acquitted of haven't cleared the path entirely. With multiple civil suits pending, an enormous trove of digital evidence still being analyzed, and fresh accusers continuing to emerge—this case is far from cold. Coffindaffer walks us through: What prison life actually looks like for someone like Diddy Why in-custody behavior—from witness tampering to illegal communications—can trigger brand-new federal charges How the FBI monitors communications, third-party proxies, and financial trails even after sentencing Whether new victims, previously unrevealed evidence, or in-prison misconduct could open the door to superseding indictments The psychological profile of high-control inmates, and how that can impact behavior behind bars And why celebrity status may make someone more likely—not less—to stay on the FBI's radar If you think Diddy's prison sentence ends the story, think again. This interview lays bare the next chapter—and how the federal government may still be flipping pages.

Two headlines. Two high-profile cases. One unfiltered breakdown. In this powerful double-segment, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to examine two of the most complex and closely watched stories in true crime right now: the federal sentencing of Sean “Diddy” Combs, and the unsolved death of 15-year-old Celeste Rivas-Hernandez, found deceased in the front trunk of a Tesla linked to musician d4vd.

Is Sean “Diddy” Combs truly done with the justice system—or is this just the eye of the storm? In this high-stakes episode, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to dissect what really happens after sentencing—and whether federal investigators are still keeping a close eye on Diddy from behind bars. Combs is currently serving a 50-month sentence after being convicted under the Mann Act, but the RICO and sex-trafficking charges he was acquitted of haven't cleared the path entirely. With multiple civil suits pending, an enormous trove of digital evidence still being analyzed, and fresh accusers continuing to emerge—this case is far from cold. Coffindaffer walks us through: What prison life actually looks like for someone like Diddy Why in-custody behavior—from witness tampering to illegal communications—can trigger brand-new federal charges How the FBI monitors communications, third-party proxies, and financial trails even after sentencing Whether new victims, previously unrevealed evidence, or in-prison misconduct could open the door to superseding indictments The psychological profile of high-control inmates, and how that can impact behavior behind bars And why celebrity status may make someone more likely—not less—to stay on the FBI's radar If you think Diddy's prison sentence ends the story, think again. This interview lays bare the next chapter—and how the federal government may still be flipping pages.

Two headlines. Two high-profile cases. One unfiltered breakdown. In this powerful double-segment, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to examine two of the most complex and closely watched stories in true crime right now: the federal sentencing of Sean “Diddy” Combs, and the unsolved death of 15-year-old Celeste Rivas-Hernandez, found deceased in the front trunk of a Tesla linked to musician d4vd.

Is Sean “Diddy” Combs truly done with the justice system—or is this just the eye of the storm? In this high-stakes episode, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to dissect what really happens after sentencing—and whether federal investigators are still keeping a close eye on Diddy from behind bars. Combs is currently serving a 50-month sentence after being convicted under the Mann Act, but the RICO and sex-trafficking charges he was acquitted of haven't cleared the path entirely. With multiple civil suits pending, an enormous trove of digital evidence still being analyzed, and fresh accusers continuing to emerge—this case is far from cold. Coffindaffer walks us through: What prison life actually looks like for someone like Diddy Why in-custody behavior—from witness tampering to illegal communications—can trigger brand-new federal charges How the FBI monitors communications, third-party proxies, and financial trails even after sentencing Whether new victims, previously unrevealed evidence, or in-prison misconduct could open the door to superseding indictments The psychological profile of high-control inmates, and how that can impact behavior behind bars And why celebrity status may make someone more likely—not less—to stay on the FBI's radar If you think Diddy's prison sentence ends the story, think again. This interview lays bare the next chapter—and how the federal government may still be flipping pages.

SaVon and Alex welcome Ish and Yassy to the show, and kick things off with Patreon member submissions asking why Ish never answers questions directly (4:56) and whether men fear emotional vulnerability or financial instability more (6:56). From there, they unpack Saweetie's escort rumors and transactional culture (15:22), break down the result of the Drake-UMG lawsuit and what might be coming next (27:21), and react to New Orleans fugitive Derrick Groves finally getting caught by authorities (50:32). Later, Ish opens up about the current state of the Joe Budden Podcast (1:05:36) and his construction business and recovery from his achilles tear (1:21:35). The crew closes with Ish's thoughts on Puff's sentencing, the Mann Act, and power dynamics in entertainment (1:40:22). Subscribe to our Patreon for EARLY & EXCLUSIVE access to ad-free episode visuals with music included, exclusive episodes each and every Tuesday, and much more! - www.patreon.com/NeedToKnowPodcast Book your next podcast recording at Need to Know Studios TODAY - https://needtoknowstudios.com/ Join our Twitter/X Community to chop it up with us about all things Need to Know - https://twitter.com/i/communities/1777442897001910433 The Need To Know Podcast Social Handles https://www.instagram.com/needtoknowpod/ https://twitter.com/NeedToKnowPod https://www.tiktok.com/needtoknowpod SaVon https://www.instagram.com/savonslvter/ https://twitter.com/SavonSlvter Alex https://www.instagram.com/balltillwefall/ https://twitter.com/balltillwefall

Federal prosecutors have filed a comprehensive forfeiture list detailing the property seized from Sean “Diddy” Combs' homes in Los Angeles and Miami, which they allege were instrumental in organizing and documenting his so-called “Freak Off” parties. According to court filings and search inventories, agents confiscated more than 1,000 bottles of baby oil and lubricant, along with narcotics, firearms, luxury electronics, and a vast collection of recording devices—including phones, cameras, laptops, and hard drives. Investigators claim these items were used to facilitate, record, or control sexual encounters that are central to the Mann Act and sex trafficking counts in his federal indictment. The materials also include stage lighting, props, and specialized video equipment allegedly used to produce and store illicit recordings.Federal prosecutors have filed a comprehensive forfeiture list detailing the property seized from Sean “Diddy” Combs' homes in Los Angeles and Miami, which they allege were instrumental in organizing and documenting his so-called “Freak Off” parties. According to court filings and search inventories, agents confiscated more than 1,000 bottles of baby oil and lubricant, along with narcotics, firearms, luxury electronics, and a vast collection of recording devices—including phones, cameras, laptops, and hard drives. Investigators claim these items were used to facilitate, record, or control sexual encounters that are central to the Mann Act and sex trafficking counts in his federal indictment. The materials also include stage lighting, props, and specialized video equipment allegedly used to produce and store illicit recordings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.533.0.pdf

On this episode of registry matters…. we unpack a thorny municipal indecent-exposure dilemma—how a charge might ripple into sex-offender registration and why attorneys offered no clear resolution; examine Sean “Diddy” Combs' Mann Act conviction and 50-month sentence amid intricate legal arguments and celebrity controversy; break down how registrants navigating public events in restricted spaces—like churches—must...

Sean “Diddy” Combs' legal team has filed notice of appeal following his conviction on two federal counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. His attorneys argue that the verdict was inconsistent with the sentencing, claiming the judge improperly considered conduct the jury had rejected — particularly allegations of coercion — to impose a harsher penalty. The defense contends this violated Diddy's constitutional right to a fair trial and effectively turned the judge into a “13th juror,” overriding the jury's findings. They are seeking either a full reversal of the conviction or a new trial.The appeal will also challenge several procedural rulings from the eight-week trial, including evidentiary decisions and jury instructions the defense claims were prejudicial. Diddy was sentenced to 50 months in federal prison and fined $500,000 — far less than the 11 years prosecutors had sought, but still viewed by his team as excessive given the acquittals on other charges. The appellate process will now move to the Second Circuit, where his attorneys plan to argue that the sentencing exceeded the lawful scope of the jury's verdict and that key testimony was improperly admitted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Sean “Diddy” Combs' legal team has filed notice of appeal following his conviction on two federal counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. His attorneys argue that the verdict was inconsistent with the sentencing, claiming the judge improperly considered conduct the jury had rejected — particularly allegations of coercion — to impose a harsher penalty. The defense contends this violated Diddy's constitutional right to a fair trial and effectively turned the judge into a “13th juror,” overriding the jury's findings. They are seeking either a full reversal of the conviction or a new trial.The appeal will also challenge several procedural rulings from the eight-week trial, including evidentiary decisions and jury instructions the defense claims were prejudicial. Diddy was sentenced to 50 months in federal prison and fined $500,000 — far less than the 11 years prosecutors had sought, but still viewed by his team as excessive given the acquittals on other charges. The appellate process will now move to the Second Circuit, where his attorneys plan to argue that the sentencing exceeded the lawful scope of the jury's verdict and that key testimony was improperly admitted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this opinion and order, Judge Arun Subramanian of the Southern District of New York addressed post-trial motions filed by Sean “Diddy” Combs following his conviction on two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. After an eight-week trial, the jury found Combs guilty, but before the government rested its case, his defense filed a motion for acquittal under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29, arguing insufficient evidence. The court deferred its ruling at that time and allowed the trial to continue.Following the guilty verdict, Combs renewed his motion for acquittal and separately filed a motion for a new trial under Rule 33, seeking to overturn the jury's decision or secure a retrial. Judge Subramanian reviewed both motions and found no basis to disturb the verdict. The court concluded that the government presented sufficient evidence for a rational jury to convict and that no errors occurred warranting a new trial. Accordingly, both motions were denied, upholding Combs's conviction on both counts.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.518.0.pdf

In this opinion and order, Judge Arun Subramanian of the Southern District of New York addressed post-trial motions filed by Sean “Diddy” Combs following his conviction on two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. After an eight-week trial, the jury found Combs guilty, but before the government rested its case, his defense filed a motion for acquittal under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29, arguing insufficient evidence. The court deferred its ruling at that time and allowed the trial to continue.Following the guilty verdict, Combs renewed his motion for acquittal and separately filed a motion for a new trial under Rule 33, seeking to overturn the jury's decision or secure a retrial. Judge Subramanian reviewed both motions and found no basis to disturb the verdict. The court concluded that the government presented sufficient evidence for a rational jury to convict and that no errors occurred warranting a new trial. Accordingly, both motions were denied, upholding Combs's conviction on both counts.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.518.0.pdf

In this opinion and order, Judge Arun Subramanian of the Southern District of New York addressed post-trial motions filed by Sean “Diddy” Combs following his conviction on two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. After an eight-week trial, the jury found Combs guilty, but before the government rested its case, his defense filed a motion for acquittal under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29, arguing insufficient evidence. The court deferred its ruling at that time and allowed the trial to continue.Following the guilty verdict, Combs renewed his motion for acquittal and separately filed a motion for a new trial under Rule 33, seeking to overturn the jury's decision or secure a retrial. Judge Subramanian reviewed both motions and found no basis to disturb the verdict. The court concluded that the government presented sufficient evidence for a rational jury to convict and that no errors occurred warranting a new trial. Accordingly, both motions were denied, upholding Combs's conviction on both counts.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.518.0.pdf

Linktree: ⁠https://linktr.ee/Analytic⁠Join The Normandy For Additional Bonus Audio And Visual Content For All Things Nme+! Join Here: ⁠https://ow.ly/msoH50WCu0K⁠Join Analytic Dreamz on Notorious Mass Effect for a deep dive into Sean “Diddy” Combs' sentencing on October 3, 2025. At 55, the hip-hop mogul received 4 years and 2 months in federal prison for violating the Mann Act—transporting individuals across state lines for prostitution—after acquittals on racketeering and sex trafficking charges that could have meant life. With 1 year already served, about 3 years remain, plus a $500,000 fine and 5 years supervised release. Judge Arun Subramanian emphasized deterrence, rejecting claims of mere “celebrity lifestyle” amid evidence of violence, including assaults on Cassie Ventura and “Jane.” Prosecutors sought 11+ years, highlighting 34 witnesses' testimonies of abuse, coercion, and “freak-offs” fueled by drugs. Defense pleaded for leniency, citing Combs' trauma from his father's murder, Biggie's death, PTSD, addiction, and philanthropy—framing him as a civil rights leader and devoted father. Six children's emotional pleas underscored family devastation, with daughters crying over losing their mother and now father. Combs apologized profusely, calling his actions “disgusting” and vowing reform as a sober man. Explore the courtroom drama, survivor courage, and implications for accountability in entertainment. Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/analytic-dreamz-notorious-mass-effect/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sean “Diddy” Combs was sentenced to 50 months in federal prison—just over four years—for violating the Mann Act, a century-old law prohibiting the transportation of individuals across state lines for prostitution or immoral purposes. The charges stemmed from multiple incidents where prosecutors alleged Combs used his private jets and security teams to move women across the country for what they described as “commercial sexual activity under coercive conditions.” While prosecutors initially sought an 11-year sentence, citing a pattern of predatory behavior and abuse, the defense pleaded for leniency, pointing to his age, charitable works, and family ties. The judge ultimately “split the difference,” opting for a sentence that reflected both accountability and proportionality, landing closer to the middle of the guideline range.Alongside his prison term, Combs was hit with a $500,000 fine and five years of supervised release following his incarceration, during which he'll face restrictions on travel, mandatory counseling, and drug testing. The judge also ordered him to complete a rehabilitation and behavioral accountability program, emphasizing that this sentence was not just punitive but corrective. Despite avoiding the more severe sex trafficking and racketeering charges—which could have landed him a life sentence—Combs's conviction under the Mann Act marked a significant fall from grace for one of hip-hop's most powerful figures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Sean “Diddy” Combs was sentenced to 50 months in federal prison—just over four years—for violating the Mann Act, a century-old law prohibiting the transportation of individuals across state lines for prostitution or immoral purposes. The charges stemmed from multiple incidents where prosecutors alleged Combs used his private jets and security teams to move women across the country for what they described as “commercial sexual activity under coercive conditions.” While prosecutors initially sought an 11-year sentence, citing a pattern of predatory behavior and abuse, the defense pleaded for leniency, pointing to his age, charitable works, and family ties. The judge ultimately “split the difference,” opting for a sentence that reflected both accountability and proportionality, landing closer to the middle of the guideline range.Alongside his prison term, Combs was hit with a $500,000 fine and five years of supervised release following his incarceration, during which he'll face restrictions on travel, mandatory counseling, and drug testing. The judge also ordered him to complete a rehabilitation and behavioral accountability program, emphasizing that this sentence was not just punitive but corrective. Despite avoiding the more severe sex trafficking and racketeering charges—which could have landed him a life sentence—Combs's conviction under the Mann Act marked a significant fall from grace for one of hip-hop's most powerful figures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sean Diddy Combs was sentenced to 4 years and 2 months in prison following his conviction on two counts of the Mann Act, which are prostitution related charges, he was acquitted on sex trafficking and racketeering. AP correspondent Julie Walker reports from the courthouse.

Diddy is set to be sentenced in NYC after being found guilty of two Mann Act charges for transporting escorts across state lines. Taylor Swift released her 12th studio album The Life of a Showgirl with 12 new tracks. Hosts: Charlie Cotton & Courtney Doucette Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Prosecutors are urging a New York federal judge to sentence Sean “Diddy” Combs to at least 11 years and three months (135 months) in prison following his conviction on two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. They contend that Combs has shown no remorse, calling him “unrepentant,” and stress the lasting damage suffered by his victims, including Cassie Ventura, who described ongoing trauma and fears for her safety. Prosecutors are also seeking a $500,000 fine and are pressing the judge to reject Combs's request for a sentence equal to time served.The sentencing hearing is set for Friday in Manhattan before U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian. While prosecutors are pushing for over a decade in prison, Combs's defense team has asked for a far lighter sentence — no more than 14 months — pointing to the conditions he's already endured behind bars and claiming he has made progress toward rehabilitation. Combs has requested to wear civilian clothes in court and plans to personally address the judge, signaling a direct appeal for leniency. The final decision rests with the judge, who has the discretion to follow or depart from either side's recommendations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors want Sean ‘Diddy' Combs to get 11 years in prison

Prosecutors are urging a New York federal judge to sentence Sean “Diddy” Combs to at least 11 years and three months (135 months) in prison following his conviction on two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. They contend that Combs has shown no remorse, calling him “unrepentant,” and stress the lasting damage suffered by his victims, including Cassie Ventura, who described ongoing trauma and fears for her safety. Prosecutors are also seeking a $500,000 fine and are pressing the judge to reject Combs's request for a sentence equal to time served.The sentencing hearing is set for Friday in Manhattan before U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian. While prosecutors are pushing for over a decade in prison, Combs's defense team has asked for a far lighter sentence — no more than 14 months — pointing to the conditions he's already endured behind bars and claiming he has made progress toward rehabilitation. Combs has requested to wear civilian clothes in court and plans to personally address the judge, signaling a direct appeal for leniency. The final decision rests with the judge, who has the discretion to follow or depart from either side's recommendations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors want Sean ‘Diddy' Combs to get 11 years in prisonBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prosecutors are urging a New York federal judge to sentence Sean “Diddy” Combs to at least 11 years and three months (135 months) in prison following his conviction on two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. They contend that Combs has shown no remorse, calling him “unrepentant,” and stress the lasting damage suffered by his victims, including Cassie Ventura, who described ongoing trauma and fears for her safety. Prosecutors are also seeking a $500,000 fine and are pressing the judge to reject Combs's request for a sentence equal to time served.The sentencing hearing is set for Friday in Manhattan before U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian. While prosecutors are pushing for over a decade in prison, Combs's defense team has asked for a far lighter sentence — no more than 14 months — pointing to the conditions he's already endured behind bars and claiming he has made progress toward rehabilitation. Combs has requested to wear civilian clothes in court and plans to personally address the judge, signaling a direct appeal for leniency. The final decision rests with the judge, who has the discretion to follow or depart from either side's recommendations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors want Sean ‘Diddy' Combs to get 11 years in prisonBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Sean Combs, famously known as Puffy or P Diddy, remains one of the most prominent and controversial figures in music and business, and the past week has been no exception for major headlines. TMZ reports that Diddy's legal saga, which has gripped the public for over a year, is reaching its most dramatic chapter yet. The Bad Boy Records founder is facing a sentencing in October after last month's sensational acquittal on racketeering and sex-trafficking charges. However, listeners, he was found guilty of lesser prostitution-related charges and his lawyers are now mounting a campaign to have him serve any potential sentence in home confinement at his $48.5 million Miami mansion instead of a federal prison. Attorneys for Diddy have argued that he needs intensive therapy for anger and substance abuse issues, care they say is not available in the prison system. They're also pushing to overturn his conviction on the two federal Mann Act counts, claiming voyeurism “doesn't count” as prostitution—a claim they vigorously defended in a New York City courtroom last week according to TMZ.As the October 3rd sentencing hearing approaches, AOL News highlights that Diddy has been on constant suicide watch inside the Metropolitan Detention Center Brooklyn. This has become a key argument for his legal team, who submitted a sentencing packet urging a lighter, 14-month sentence and repeatedly described the conditions as inhumane. Meanwhile, IMDB and FandomWire have covered Diddy's time behind bars, revealing that he's taken to teaching fellow inmates business skills and motivating them with life lessons drawn from his own successes and failures.The ripple effects of Diddy's ordeal extend to his family too. TMZ reveals his son, King Combs, leaned into music as a coping mechanism, releasing the heartfelt track “Lonely Roads,” produced by Kanye West and Stevie J, with a music video as a tribute to his father. Diddy's twin daughters, Jessie and D'Lila, powered through their first-ever New York Fashion Week as adults, maintaining high spirits and expressing confidence that their dad would be proud, even as his fate remains uncertain.Listeners, the Diddy story is still far from over, with his future and his legacy hanging in the balance as his legal team presses relentlessly for leniency and relief in the coming days. Thanks for tuning in and be sure to come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more from me, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

On this episode of Crime Roundup, Sheryl McCollum and Joshua Schiffer return to break down the week’s most talked-about legal and criminal cases. They begin with new developments in the Celeste Revis investigation, where digital footprints, fake ID's, and silence from those who should have spoken up paint a grim picture of what may have happened. Sheryl and Joshua examine the forensic limitations, explore possible motives, and discuss the mounting pressure surrounding a key figure in the case. They then turned their attention to Sean “Diddy” Combs, as Joshua discusses Combs’ latest court appearance, the credibility of character letters, and the legal strategy behind his reported prison rehab efforts ahead of sentencing. Finally, Sheryl and Joshua revisit the Mann Act and its historical and modern application, including how it shaped the case of boxing legend Jack Johnson and the significance of the posthumous pardon Johnson received from President Trump. Highlights: (0:00) Welcome to Crime Roundup with Sheryl McCollum and Joshua Schiffer (0:15) Celeste Rivas case update: fake IDs and the weight of silence (5:15) Forensic challenges: decomposition, timeline gaps, and physical evidence (17:15) Digital trails: social media, delivery records, and phone data, and why a canceled tour raises eyebrows (19:45) What character letters really mean as Sean “Diddy” Combs appears in court (21:15) Rehab educational opportunities: legal strategy or authentic program? (22:45) The Mann Act: what it is, how it works, and how it has been applied (22:15 The case of Jack Johnson, the Mann Act, and the significance of Trump’s posthumous pardon About the Hosts Joshua Schiffer is a veteran trial attorney and one of the Southeast’s most respected legal voices. He is a founding partner at ChancoSchiffer P.C., where he has litigated high-stakes criminal, civil rights, and personal injury cases for over two decades. Known for his bold courtroom presence and ability to clearly explain complex legal issues, Schiffer is a frequent media contributor and a fearless advocate for accountability. Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award-winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnline, a forensic and crime scene expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and co-author of the textbook Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. She is the founder and director of the Cold Case Investigative Research Institute, a national collaboration that advances techniques for solving cold cases and assists families and law enforcement with unsolved homicides, missing persons, and kidnappings.

Diddy is pushing back against federal prosecutors who are challenging his request to overturn his Mann Act conviction.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Donald Trump reignited his feud with Rosie O'Donnell by threatening to revoke her U.S. citizenship, while Rosie hit back by tying him to Epstein survivors' calls for justice. Diddy is seeking an acquittal or new trial, arguing prosecutors misapplied the Mann Act by using a modern definition of prostitution that doesn't match the law's original intent. Justin Bieber shocked fans by announcing his new album Swag II is dropping tonight, coinciding with Hailey Bieber's Sephora launch and sparking talk he upstaged her again. Hosts: Derek Kaufman & Edward Lewis Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Federal prosecutors have submitted court filings urging the judge to swiftly reject Combs's motion to overturn the jury's verdict or to grant a new trial. They argue that the defense mischaracterizes the Mann Act's application—asserting that the statute was neither unduly vague nor in violation of his constitutional rights—and emphasized that the evidence supporting the convictions is “overwhelming.” Prosecutors laid out how Combs is alleged to have orchestrated repeated, drug‑fueled sexual events between 2008 and 2023 involving male escorts, coordinating travel across state lines and using videotaped footage as a means of control—facts they say strongly uphold the jury's guilty verdicts under the Mann Act.Prosecutors also directly countered Combs's defense claims that the encounters were consensual, non-commercial, and protected as private or expressive acts. They highlighted testimony from ex‑girlfriends—including Cassie Ventura and the woman identified as “Jane”—detailing coercion, threats involving the release of videos, and financial manipulation. The government maintains that Combs “masterminded every aspect” of these events, using them for his sexual gratification and, at times, engaging directly himself. With that, prosecutors argue the legal basis for the convictions remains solid and the jury's decision should stand.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' request for acquittal or new trial should be rejected, prosecutors sayBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Federal prosecutors have submitted court filings urging the judge to swiftly reject Combs's motion to overturn the jury's verdict or to grant a new trial. They argue that the defense mischaracterizes the Mann Act's application—asserting that the statute was neither unduly vague nor in violation of his constitutional rights—and emphasized that the evidence supporting the convictions is “overwhelming.” Prosecutors laid out how Combs is alleged to have orchestrated repeated, drug‑fueled sexual events between 2008 and 2023 involving male escorts, coordinating travel across state lines and using videotaped footage as a means of control—facts they say strongly uphold the jury's guilty verdicts under the Mann Act.Prosecutors also directly countered Combs's defense claims that the encounters were consensual, non-commercial, and protected as private or expressive acts. They highlighted testimony from ex‑girlfriends—including Cassie Ventura and the woman identified as “Jane”—detailing coercion, threats involving the release of videos, and financial manipulation. The government maintains that Combs “masterminded every aspect” of these events, using them for his sexual gratification and, at times, engaging directly himself. With that, prosecutors argue the legal basis for the convictions remains solid and the jury's decision should stand.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' request for acquittal or new trial should be rejected, prosecutors say

The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away Sean “Diddy” Combs built an empire on music, fashion, and fame — but behind the glamour, a far darker story has been unfolding for decades. From the explosive 2023 lawsuit filed by Cassie Ventura to the flood of allegations that followed, Diddy's name has been tied to accusations of coercion, S-A, trafficking, intimidation, and a disturbing pattern of exploitation. Raids on his properties revealed illegal weapons, surveillance setups, and evidence tied to his infamous “freak-off” parties — allegations that dozens of civil suits say were anything but consensual. In July 2025, Diddy was convicted on two federal Mann Act charges for transporting individuals for prostitution — though he was acquitted of the more severe trafficking and racketeering charges. He awaits sentencing in October. But now, an even more surreal twist: members of Diddy's camp have confirmed outreach to former President Donald Trump's team about a possible pardon. Trump himself has addressed the rumors, saying Diddy's past criticism makes it “more difficult,” but stopping short of ruling it out entirely. A presidential pardon could erase Diddy's federal convictions, but it wouldn't touch the massive wave of civil lawsuits still in motion. The very idea of clemency in a case like this raises serious questions — about justice, power, and whether fame and political access can still bend reality in America's legal system. In this episode, we break down the full timeline of accusations, the legal battle in court, and the unsettling conversation about whether a man accused of decades of abuse could walk free with one signature. Then, our co-hosts dive into the bigger picture: the victims' perspective, the role of public support, and whether a pardon for Diddy would be the ultimate example of a system that protects the powerful over the vulnerable. #Diddy #TrumpPardon #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #CelebrityScandal #PoliticalPower #PresidentialPardon #CourtCase #HiddenKillers #SeanCombs diddy, sean combs, trump pardon, presidential pardon, cassie ventura, diddy trial, mann act, celebrity crime, true crime podcast, diddy allegations, diddy accusations, trump news, pardon rumors, celebrity justice, hidden killers podcast, music mogul scandal, diddy sentencing, cassie lawsuit, diddy civil suits, diddy raids, trump diddy, celebrity scandal, political influence, justice system flaws, diddy news Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away Sean “Diddy” Combs built an empire on music, fashion, and fame — but behind the glamour, a far darker story has been unfolding for decades. From the explosive 2023 lawsuit filed by Cassie Ventura to the flood of allegations that followed, Diddy's name has been tied to accusations of coercion, S-A, trafficking, intimidation, and a disturbing pattern of exploitation. Raids on his properties revealed illegal weapons, surveillance setups, and evidence tied to his infamous “freak-off” parties — allegations that dozens of civil suits say were anything but consensual. In July 2025, Diddy was convicted on two federal Mann Act charges for transporting individuals for prostitution — though he was acquitted of the more severe trafficking and racketeering charges. He awaits sentencing in October. But now, an even more surreal twist: members of Diddy's camp have confirmed outreach to former President Donald Trump's team about a possible pardon. Trump himself has addressed the rumors, saying Diddy's past criticism makes it “more difficult,” but stopping short of ruling it out entirely. A presidential pardon could erase Diddy's federal convictions, but it wouldn't touch the massive wave of civil lawsuits still in motion. The very idea of clemency in a case like this raises serious questions — about justice, power, and whether fame and political access can still bend reality in America's legal system. In this episode, we break down the full timeline of accusations, the legal battle in court, and the unsettling conversation about whether a man accused of decades of abuse could walk free with one signature. Then, our co-hosts dive into the bigger picture: the victims' perspective, the role of public support, and whether a pardon for Diddy would be the ultimate example of a system that protects the powerful over the vulnerable. #Diddy #TrumpPardon #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #CelebrityScandal #PoliticalPower #PresidentialPardon #CourtCase #HiddenKillers #SeanCombs diddy, sean combs, trump pardon, presidential pardon, cassie ventura, diddy trial, mann act, celebrity crime, true crime podcast, diddy allegations, diddy accusations, trump news, pardon rumors, celebrity justice, hidden killers podcast, music mogul scandal, diddy sentencing, cassie lawsuit, diddy civil suits, diddy raids, trump diddy, celebrity scandal, political influence, justice system flaws, diddy news Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away Sean “Diddy” Combs built an empire on music, fashion, and fame — but behind the glamour, a far darker story has been unfolding for decades. From the explosive 2023 lawsuit filed by Cassie Ventura to the flood of allegations that followed, Diddy's name has been tied to accusations of coercion, S-A, trafficking, intimidation, and a disturbing pattern of exploitation. Raids on his properties revealed illegal weapons, surveillance setups, and evidence tied to his infamous “freak-off” parties — allegations that dozens of civil suits say were anything but consensual. In July 2025, Diddy was convicted on two federal Mann Act charges for transporting individuals for prostitution — though he was acquitted of the more severe trafficking and racketeering charges. He awaits sentencing in October. But now, an even more surreal twist: members of Diddy's camp have confirmed outreach to former President Donald Trump's team about a possible pardon. Trump himself has addressed the rumors, saying Diddy's past criticism makes it “more difficult,” but stopping short of ruling it out entirely. A presidential pardon could erase Diddy's federal convictions, but it wouldn't touch the massive wave of civil lawsuits still in motion. The very idea of clemency in a case like this raises serious questions — about justice, power, and whether fame and political access can still bend reality in America's legal system. In this episode, we break down the full timeline of accusations, the legal battle in court, and the unsettling conversation about whether a man accused of decades of abuse could walk free with one signature. Then, our co-hosts dive into the bigger picture: the victims' perspective, the role of public support, and whether a pardon for Diddy would be the ultimate example of a system that protects the powerful over the vulnerable. #Diddy #TrumpPardon #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #CelebrityScandal #PoliticalPower #PresidentialPardon #CourtCase #HiddenKillers #SeanCombs diddy, sean combs, trump pardon, presidential pardon, cassie ventura, diddy trial, mann act, celebrity crime, true crime podcast, diddy allegations, diddy accusations, trump news, pardon rumors, celebrity justice, hidden killers podcast, music mogul scandal, diddy sentencing, cassie lawsuit, diddy civil suits, diddy raids, trump diddy, celebrity scandal, political influence, justice system flaws, diddy news Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

MUSICRod Stewart has fans divided over his recent tribute to musicians we've lost over the years. https://loudwire.com/rod-stewart-ozzy-tribute/ Beyoncé's done the country thing. Will her next album be a little bit rock and roll? That's what her fans think. https://youtu.be/LwojYvqomhU· Luke Bryan has some very interesting dance moves. And that's putting it kindly. https://theboot.com/ixp/204/p/luke-bryan-moonwalks-injury/ · A federal judge on Monday refused to grant bail to Sean “Diddy” Combs following his conviction on two counts of transportation for prostitution under the Mann Act, ABC News reports. https://abcnews.go.com/US/sean-diddy-combs-denied-bail-awaiting-sentencing/story?id=124359248 Zach Bryan just announced that he'll be dropping ‘Bowery' with Kings of Leon this Friday (August 8th). https://www.whiskeyriff.com/2025/08/03/zach-bryan-confirms-bowery-featuring-kings-of-leon-is-coming-this-week/ QUICK HITSPlayboy is bringing back the Playmate Search. https://pagesix.com/2025/08/04/entertainment/playboy-bouncing-back-with-relaunch-of-playmate-competition/· TVStephen Colbert has found another job after The Late Show was canceled. https://www.tvinsider.com/1206905/stephen-colbert-new-job-elsbeth-late-show-cancellation/ MOVING ON INTO MOVIE NEWS:George Clooney recently did a movie for Netflix called "Jay Kelly". He plays an actor, and Adam Sandler plays his manager. https://variety.com/2025/film/news/george-clooney-defends-adam-sandler-great-actor-1236477728/ · Comedian Matt Rife says he and a friend have purchased the occult museum of late paranormal investigator Dan Rivera, who died last month while on tour with a “haunted” Annabelle doll. https://www.tmz.com/2025/08/01/matt-rife-says-he-purchased-occult-museum/ The iconic Southern California house featured in 1982's 'Poltergeist' is now on Airbnb after a $165,000 interior makeover to turn it into a nearly-identical version of what you see in the terrifying horror film. https://www.tmz.com/2025/08/03/poltergeist-house-transformed-into-airbnb/See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Sean “Diddy” Combs has filed a motion to overturn his July 2025 convictions on two counts of transportation for prostitution under the federal Mann Act. While a jury acquitted him of racketeering and sex‑trafficking charges, it found him guilty of arranging “freak‑off” parties—sex performances involving escorts crossing state lines. His legal team now argues these gatherings were consensual adult events deliberately recorded as choreographed spectacles—essentially homemade pornography—and therefore qualify as protected expression under the First AmendmentIn his lawyers' filing to Judge Arun Subramanian, Combs maintains there was no commercial motive, that no minors or exploitation were involved, and that he himself did not participate in the sex acts, merely serving as a director and observer. They argue that convicting him under a statute from 1910 without any intention of profit or coercion is unprecedented and unconstitutional. If the judge denies acquittal, they are also requesting a retrial limited to evidence specifically admissible under Mann Act charges—excluding prejudicial material from broader sex trafficking claimsto contact me:bobbycapucci@proton.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs asks court for acquittal or new trial, says 'freak offs' protected by First Amendment

Diddy is demanding a new trial because he believes the Mann Act doesn't apply to him. Allegedly Justin Timberlake is contemplating wanting an NSYNC reunion after his own tour is not doing too well. Guess is receiving backlash after using an AI model.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy and T.J. talk about the unexpectedly brief hearing today to set the date for Diddy’s sentencing! After just two minutes, it was over, with the defense agreeing to the judge’s original date of October 3rd. Also, what exactly are the racist origins of the Mann Act that was used to convict Diddy?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy and T.J. talk about the unexpectedly brief hearing today to set the date for Diddy’s sentencing! After just two minutes, it was over, with the defense agreeing to the judge’s original date of October 3rd. Also, what exactly are the racist origins of the Mann Act that was used to convict Diddy?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy and T.J. talk about the unexpectedly brief hearing today to set the date for Diddy’s sentencing! After just two minutes, it was over, with the defense agreeing to the judge’s original date of October 3rd. Also, what exactly are the racist origins of the Mann Act that was used to convict Diddy?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Criminal defense attorney Julia Jayne joins Kate to discuss two major developments in high-profile criminal cases. First, the verdict in the trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs — a mixed decision that acquitted him of racketeering and sex trafficking, but convicted him on two Mann Act charges. Then, a look at the latest in the Bryan Kohberger case. Accused of the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students, Kohberger has agreed to a plea deal to avoid the death penalty. We explore the legal implications, the response from victims' families, and why prosecutors may have chosen to forgo trial. Reality Life with Kate Casey What to Watch List: https://katecasey.substack.com Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/katecasey Twitter: https://twitter.com/katecasey Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/katecaseyca Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@itskatecasey?lang=en Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/113157919338245 Amazon List: https://www.amazon.com/shop/katecasey Like it to Know It: https://www.shopltk.com/explore/katecaseySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.