1910 Act of the United States Congress
POPULARITY
3 episodes with mann act
3 episodes with mann act
2 episodes with mann act
2 episodes with mann act
2 episodes with mann act
2 episodes with mann act
3 episodes with mann act
3 episodes with mann act
2 episodes with mann act
Prosecutors are urging a New York federal judge to sentence Sean “Diddy” Combs to at least 11 years and three months (135 months) in prison following his conviction on two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. They contend that Combs has shown no remorse, calling him “unrepentant,” and stress the lasting damage suffered by his victims, including Cassie Ventura, who described ongoing trauma and fears for her safety. Prosecutors are also seeking a $500,000 fine and are pressing the judge to reject Combs's request for a sentence equal to time served.The sentencing hearing is set for Friday in Manhattan before U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian. While prosecutors are pushing for over a decade in prison, Combs's defense team has asked for a far lighter sentence — no more than 14 months — pointing to the conditions he's already endured behind bars and claiming he has made progress toward rehabilitation. Combs has requested to wear civilian clothes in court and plans to personally address the judge, signaling a direct appeal for leniency. The final decision rests with the judge, who has the discretion to follow or depart from either side's recommendations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors want Sean ‘Diddy' Combs to get 11 years in prison
Prosecutors are urging a New York federal judge to sentence Sean “Diddy” Combs to at least 11 years and three months (135 months) in prison following his conviction on two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. They contend that Combs has shown no remorse, calling him “unrepentant,” and stress the lasting damage suffered by his victims, including Cassie Ventura, who described ongoing trauma and fears for her safety. Prosecutors are also seeking a $500,000 fine and are pressing the judge to reject Combs's request for a sentence equal to time served.The sentencing hearing is set for Friday in Manhattan before U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian. While prosecutors are pushing for over a decade in prison, Combs's defense team has asked for a far lighter sentence — no more than 14 months — pointing to the conditions he's already endured behind bars and claiming he has made progress toward rehabilitation. Combs has requested to wear civilian clothes in court and plans to personally address the judge, signaling a direct appeal for leniency. The final decision rests with the judge, who has the discretion to follow or depart from either side's recommendations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors want Sean ‘Diddy' Combs to get 11 years in prisonBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Prosecutors are urging a New York federal judge to sentence Sean “Diddy” Combs to at least 11 years and three months (135 months) in prison following his conviction on two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. They contend that Combs has shown no remorse, calling him “unrepentant,” and stress the lasting damage suffered by his victims, including Cassie Ventura, who described ongoing trauma and fears for her safety. Prosecutors are also seeking a $500,000 fine and are pressing the judge to reject Combs's request for a sentence equal to time served.The sentencing hearing is set for Friday in Manhattan before U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian. While prosecutors are pushing for over a decade in prison, Combs's defense team has asked for a far lighter sentence — no more than 14 months — pointing to the conditions he's already endured behind bars and claiming he has made progress toward rehabilitation. Combs has requested to wear civilian clothes in court and plans to personally address the judge, signaling a direct appeal for leniency. The final decision rests with the judge, who has the discretion to follow or depart from either side's recommendations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors want Sean ‘Diddy' Combs to get 11 years in prisonBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Sean Combs, famously known as Puffy or P Diddy, remains one of the most prominent and controversial figures in music and business, and the past week has been no exception for major headlines. TMZ reports that Diddy's legal saga, which has gripped the public for over a year, is reaching its most dramatic chapter yet. The Bad Boy Records founder is facing a sentencing in October after last month's sensational acquittal on racketeering and sex-trafficking charges. However, listeners, he was found guilty of lesser prostitution-related charges and his lawyers are now mounting a campaign to have him serve any potential sentence in home confinement at his $48.5 million Miami mansion instead of a federal prison. Attorneys for Diddy have argued that he needs intensive therapy for anger and substance abuse issues, care they say is not available in the prison system. They're also pushing to overturn his conviction on the two federal Mann Act counts, claiming voyeurism “doesn't count” as prostitution—a claim they vigorously defended in a New York City courtroom last week according to TMZ.As the October 3rd sentencing hearing approaches, AOL News highlights that Diddy has been on constant suicide watch inside the Metropolitan Detention Center Brooklyn. This has become a key argument for his legal team, who submitted a sentencing packet urging a lighter, 14-month sentence and repeatedly described the conditions as inhumane. Meanwhile, IMDB and FandomWire have covered Diddy's time behind bars, revealing that he's taken to teaching fellow inmates business skills and motivating them with life lessons drawn from his own successes and failures.The ripple effects of Diddy's ordeal extend to his family too. TMZ reveals his son, King Combs, leaned into music as a coping mechanism, releasing the heartfelt track “Lonely Roads,” produced by Kanye West and Stevie J, with a music video as a tribute to his father. Diddy's twin daughters, Jessie and D'Lila, powered through their first-ever New York Fashion Week as adults, maintaining high spirits and expressing confidence that their dad would be proud, even as his fate remains uncertain.Listeners, the Diddy story is still far from over, with his future and his legacy hanging in the balance as his legal team presses relentlessly for leniency and relief in the coming days. Thanks for tuning in and be sure to come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more from me, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
On this episode of Crime Roundup, Sheryl McCollum and Joshua Schiffer return to break down the week’s most talked-about legal and criminal cases. They begin with new developments in the Celeste Revis investigation, where digital footprints, fake ID's, and silence from those who should have spoken up paint a grim picture of what may have happened. Sheryl and Joshua examine the forensic limitations, explore possible motives, and discuss the mounting pressure surrounding a key figure in the case. They then turned their attention to Sean “Diddy” Combs, as Joshua discusses Combs’ latest court appearance, the credibility of character letters, and the legal strategy behind his reported prison rehab efforts ahead of sentencing. Finally, Sheryl and Joshua revisit the Mann Act and its historical and modern application, including how it shaped the case of boxing legend Jack Johnson and the significance of the posthumous pardon Johnson received from President Trump. Highlights: (0:00) Welcome to Crime Roundup with Sheryl McCollum and Joshua Schiffer (0:15) Celeste Rivas case update: fake IDs and the weight of silence (5:15) Forensic challenges: decomposition, timeline gaps, and physical evidence (17:15) Digital trails: social media, delivery records, and phone data, and why a canceled tour raises eyebrows (19:45) What character letters really mean as Sean “Diddy” Combs appears in court (21:15) Rehab educational opportunities: legal strategy or authentic program? (22:45) The Mann Act: what it is, how it works, and how it has been applied (22:15 The case of Jack Johnson, the Mann Act, and the significance of Trump’s posthumous pardon About the Hosts Joshua Schiffer is a veteran trial attorney and one of the Southeast’s most respected legal voices. He is a founding partner at ChancoSchiffer P.C., where he has litigated high-stakes criminal, civil rights, and personal injury cases for over two decades. Known for his bold courtroom presence and ability to clearly explain complex legal issues, Schiffer is a frequent media contributor and a fearless advocate for accountability. Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award-winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnline, a forensic and crime scene expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and co-author of the textbook Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. She is the founder and director of the Cold Case Investigative Research Institute, a national collaboration that advances techniques for solving cold cases and assists families and law enforcement with unsolved homicides, missing persons, and kidnappings.
Diddy is pushing back against federal prosecutors who are challenging his request to overturn his Mann Act conviction.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Donald Trump reignited his feud with Rosie O'Donnell by threatening to revoke her U.S. citizenship, while Rosie hit back by tying him to Epstein survivors' calls for justice. Diddy is seeking an acquittal or new trial, arguing prosecutors misapplied the Mann Act by using a modern definition of prostitution that doesn't match the law's original intent. Justin Bieber shocked fans by announcing his new album Swag II is dropping tonight, coinciding with Hailey Bieber's Sephora launch and sparking talk he upstaged her again. Hosts: Derek Kaufman & Edward Lewis Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Sean Combs, known as Puffy, P Diddy, or simply Diddy, remains at the center of intense public attention as his legal battle continues to unfold. Listeners may be aware that Combs has been embroiled in a high-profile federal trial in Manhattan, facing charges tied to sex trafficking, transportation to engage in prostitution, and racketeering. In a dramatic turn, his legal team confirmed this week that Diddy will not testify in his own defense, nor will his lawyers call any witnesses, opting instead to rely solely on evidence already submitted with the prosecution's agreement, as reported by AOL News. This strategic move means the burden of proof lies entirely on federal prosecutors, and the jury will soon begin deliberations, possibly by week's end.Over a six-week trial, more than 30 witnesses have been called, with allegations ranging from physical assault and sexual coercion to elaborate schemes involving drugs and hush money. Prosecutors continue to argue that Combs engaged in criminal activities over a decade, mobilizing employees to commit acts such as the alleged bombing of Kid Cudi's car and transporting drugs across states. Diddy, who maintains his innocence, could face a life sentence if convicted. His legal team maintains that all women involved were willing participants and are challenging the government's handling of evidence and leaks to the media. In October, his attorneys called for an investigation into these leaks, which included a video showing an alleged assault involving Cassie Ventura, Diddy's ex-girlfriend.Talk of a presidential pardon surfaced following Diddy's conviction on charges of transporting individuals for prostitution. Experts told Billboard and Billboard Insider that while some of Diddy's team are actively pursuing clemency, President Trump has stated he likely wouldn't pardon him, despite past associations. Legal analysts argue that acquittal on the more severe charges of racketeering and sex trafficking leaves room for appeals and clemency claims based on fairness under the old Mann Act.Beyond courtrooms, Diddy's Miami mansion was recently subject to a raid, sparking renewed tabloid interest. Rumors of a secret underground tunnel linking his Star Island property to Gloria and Emilio Estefan's home were dismissed by a Florida judge as “objectively frivolous,” with the Estefans denouncing the claims as both false and impossible, citing Miami's geography—a story detailed by RadarOnline.Social media remains ablaze, with fans dissecting before-and-after photos and even speculating about cloning and AI, as discussed on IMDb and FandomWire. Diddy himself, despite being behind bars, recently broke his silence with an Instagram post reaffirming his commitment to fight the charges, expressing trust in his legal team and the justice system.That's the latest on Sean Combs as of September 1, 2025. Thank you for tuning in and be sure to come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production—listeners who want more should check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.ai
Federal prosecutors have submitted court filings urging the judge to swiftly reject Combs's motion to overturn the jury's verdict or to grant a new trial. They argue that the defense mischaracterizes the Mann Act's application—asserting that the statute was neither unduly vague nor in violation of his constitutional rights—and emphasized that the evidence supporting the convictions is “overwhelming.” Prosecutors laid out how Combs is alleged to have orchestrated repeated, drug‑fueled sexual events between 2008 and 2023 involving male escorts, coordinating travel across state lines and using videotaped footage as a means of control—facts they say strongly uphold the jury's guilty verdicts under the Mann Act.Prosecutors also directly countered Combs's defense claims that the encounters were consensual, non-commercial, and protected as private or expressive acts. They highlighted testimony from ex‑girlfriends—including Cassie Ventura and the woman identified as “Jane”—detailing coercion, threats involving the release of videos, and financial manipulation. The government maintains that Combs “masterminded every aspect” of these events, using them for his sexual gratification and, at times, engaging directly himself. With that, prosecutors argue the legal basis for the convictions remains solid and the jury's decision should stand.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' request for acquittal or new trial should be rejected, prosecutors sayBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Federal prosecutors have submitted court filings urging the judge to swiftly reject Combs's motion to overturn the jury's verdict or to grant a new trial. They argue that the defense mischaracterizes the Mann Act's application—asserting that the statute was neither unduly vague nor in violation of his constitutional rights—and emphasized that the evidence supporting the convictions is “overwhelming.” Prosecutors laid out how Combs is alleged to have orchestrated repeated, drug‑fueled sexual events between 2008 and 2023 involving male escorts, coordinating travel across state lines and using videotaped footage as a means of control—facts they say strongly uphold the jury's guilty verdicts under the Mann Act.Prosecutors also directly countered Combs's defense claims that the encounters were consensual, non-commercial, and protected as private or expressive acts. They highlighted testimony from ex‑girlfriends—including Cassie Ventura and the woman identified as “Jane”—detailing coercion, threats involving the release of videos, and financial manipulation. The government maintains that Combs “masterminded every aspect” of these events, using them for his sexual gratification and, at times, engaging directly himself. With that, prosecutors argue the legal basis for the convictions remains solid and the jury's decision should stand.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' request for acquittal or new trial should be rejected, prosecutors say
The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away Sean “Diddy” Combs built an empire on music, fashion, and fame — but behind the glamour, a far darker story has been unfolding for decades. From the explosive 2023 lawsuit filed by Cassie Ventura to the flood of allegations that followed, Diddy's name has been tied to accusations of coercion, S-A, trafficking, intimidation, and a disturbing pattern of exploitation. Raids on his properties revealed illegal weapons, surveillance setups, and evidence tied to his infamous “freak-off” parties — allegations that dozens of civil suits say were anything but consensual. In July 2025, Diddy was convicted on two federal Mann Act charges for transporting individuals for prostitution — though he was acquitted of the more severe trafficking and racketeering charges. He awaits sentencing in October. But now, an even more surreal twist: members of Diddy's camp have confirmed outreach to former President Donald Trump's team about a possible pardon. Trump himself has addressed the rumors, saying Diddy's past criticism makes it “more difficult,” but stopping short of ruling it out entirely. A presidential pardon could erase Diddy's federal convictions, but it wouldn't touch the massive wave of civil lawsuits still in motion. The very idea of clemency in a case like this raises serious questions — about justice, power, and whether fame and political access can still bend reality in America's legal system. In this episode, we break down the full timeline of accusations, the legal battle in court, and the unsettling conversation about whether a man accused of decades of abuse could walk free with one signature. Then, our co-hosts dive into the bigger picture: the victims' perspective, the role of public support, and whether a pardon for Diddy would be the ultimate example of a system that protects the powerful over the vulnerable. #Diddy #TrumpPardon #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #CelebrityScandal #PoliticalPower #PresidentialPardon #CourtCase #HiddenKillers #SeanCombs diddy, sean combs, trump pardon, presidential pardon, cassie ventura, diddy trial, mann act, celebrity crime, true crime podcast, diddy allegations, diddy accusations, trump news, pardon rumors, celebrity justice, hidden killers podcast, music mogul scandal, diddy sentencing, cassie lawsuit, diddy civil suits, diddy raids, trump diddy, celebrity scandal, political influence, justice system flaws, diddy news Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away Sean “Diddy” Combs built an empire on music, fashion, and fame — but behind the glamour, a far darker story has been unfolding for decades. From the explosive 2023 lawsuit filed by Cassie Ventura to the flood of allegations that followed, Diddy's name has been tied to accusations of coercion, S-A, trafficking, intimidation, and a disturbing pattern of exploitation. Raids on his properties revealed illegal weapons, surveillance setups, and evidence tied to his infamous “freak-off” parties — allegations that dozens of civil suits say were anything but consensual. In July 2025, Diddy was convicted on two federal Mann Act charges for transporting individuals for prostitution — though he was acquitted of the more severe trafficking and racketeering charges. He awaits sentencing in October. But now, an even more surreal twist: members of Diddy's camp have confirmed outreach to former President Donald Trump's team about a possible pardon. Trump himself has addressed the rumors, saying Diddy's past criticism makes it “more difficult,” but stopping short of ruling it out entirely. A presidential pardon could erase Diddy's federal convictions, but it wouldn't touch the massive wave of civil lawsuits still in motion. The very idea of clemency in a case like this raises serious questions — about justice, power, and whether fame and political access can still bend reality in America's legal system. In this episode, we break down the full timeline of accusations, the legal battle in court, and the unsettling conversation about whether a man accused of decades of abuse could walk free with one signature. Then, our co-hosts dive into the bigger picture: the victims' perspective, the role of public support, and whether a pardon for Diddy would be the ultimate example of a system that protects the powerful over the vulnerable. #Diddy #TrumpPardon #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #CelebrityScandal #PoliticalPower #PresidentialPardon #CourtCase #HiddenKillers #SeanCombs diddy, sean combs, trump pardon, presidential pardon, cassie ventura, diddy trial, mann act, celebrity crime, true crime podcast, diddy allegations, diddy accusations, trump news, pardon rumors, celebrity justice, hidden killers podcast, music mogul scandal, diddy sentencing, cassie lawsuit, diddy civil suits, diddy raids, trump diddy, celebrity scandal, political influence, justice system flaws, diddy news Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away Sean “Diddy” Combs built an empire on music, fashion, and fame — but behind the glamour, a far darker story has been unfolding for decades. From the explosive 2023 lawsuit filed by Cassie Ventura to the flood of allegations that followed, Diddy's name has been tied to accusations of coercion, S-A, trafficking, intimidation, and a disturbing pattern of exploitation. Raids on his properties revealed illegal weapons, surveillance setups, and evidence tied to his infamous “freak-off” parties — allegations that dozens of civil suits say were anything but consensual. In July 2025, Diddy was convicted on two federal Mann Act charges for transporting individuals for prostitution — though he was acquitted of the more severe trafficking and racketeering charges. He awaits sentencing in October. But now, an even more surreal twist: members of Diddy's camp have confirmed outreach to former President Donald Trump's team about a possible pardon. Trump himself has addressed the rumors, saying Diddy's past criticism makes it “more difficult,” but stopping short of ruling it out entirely. A presidential pardon could erase Diddy's federal convictions, but it wouldn't touch the massive wave of civil lawsuits still in motion. The very idea of clemency in a case like this raises serious questions — about justice, power, and whether fame and political access can still bend reality in America's legal system. In this episode, we break down the full timeline of accusations, the legal battle in court, and the unsettling conversation about whether a man accused of decades of abuse could walk free with one signature. Then, our co-hosts dive into the bigger picture: the victims' perspective, the role of public support, and whether a pardon for Diddy would be the ultimate example of a system that protects the powerful over the vulnerable. #Diddy #TrumpPardon #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #CelebrityScandal #PoliticalPower #PresidentialPardon #CourtCase #HiddenKillers #SeanCombs diddy, sean combs, trump pardon, presidential pardon, cassie ventura, diddy trial, mann act, celebrity crime, true crime podcast, diddy allegations, diddy accusations, trump news, pardon rumors, celebrity justice, hidden killers podcast, music mogul scandal, diddy sentencing, cassie lawsuit, diddy civil suits, diddy raids, trump diddy, celebrity scandal, political influence, justice system flaws, diddy news Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs
Trump Pardon for Diddy? Inside the Dark Allegations That Won't Go Away Sean “Diddy” Combs built an empire on music, fashion, and fame — but behind the glamour, a far darker story has been unfolding for decades. From the explosive 2023 lawsuit filed by Cassie Ventura to the flood of allegations that followed, Diddy's name has been tied to accusations of coercion, S-A, trafficking, intimidation, and a disturbing pattern of exploitation. Raids on his properties revealed illegal weapons, surveillance setups, and evidence tied to his infamous “freak-off” parties — allegations that dozens of civil suits say were anything but consensual. In July 2025, Diddy was convicted on two federal Mann Act charges for transporting individuals for prostitution — though he was acquitted of the more severe trafficking and racketeering charges. He awaits sentencing in October. But now, an even more surreal twist: members of Diddy's camp have confirmed outreach to former President Donald Trump's team about a possible pardon. Trump himself has addressed the rumors, saying Diddy's past criticism makes it “more difficult,” but stopping short of ruling it out entirely. A presidential pardon could erase Diddy's federal convictions, but it wouldn't touch the massive wave of civil lawsuits still in motion. The very idea of clemency in a case like this raises serious questions — about justice, power, and whether fame and political access can still bend reality in America's legal system. In this episode, we break down the full timeline of accusations, the legal battle in court, and the unsettling conversation about whether a man accused of decades of abuse could walk free with one signature. Then, our co-hosts dive into the bigger picture: the victims' perspective, the role of public support, and whether a pardon for Diddy would be the ultimate example of a system that protects the powerful over the vulnerable. #Diddy #TrumpPardon #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #CelebrityScandal #PoliticalPower #PresidentialPardon #CourtCase #HiddenKillers #SeanCombs diddy, sean combs, trump pardon, presidential pardon, cassie ventura, diddy trial, mann act, celebrity crime, true crime podcast, diddy allegations, diddy accusations, trump news, pardon rumors, celebrity justice, hidden killers podcast, music mogul scandal, diddy sentencing, cassie lawsuit, diddy civil suits, diddy raids, trump diddy, celebrity scandal, political influence, justice system flaws, diddy news Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
MUSICRod Stewart has fans divided over his recent tribute to musicians we've lost over the years. https://loudwire.com/rod-stewart-ozzy-tribute/ Beyoncé's done the country thing. Will her next album be a little bit rock and roll? That's what her fans think. https://youtu.be/LwojYvqomhU· Luke Bryan has some very interesting dance moves. And that's putting it kindly. https://theboot.com/ixp/204/p/luke-bryan-moonwalks-injury/ · A federal judge on Monday refused to grant bail to Sean “Diddy” Combs following his conviction on two counts of transportation for prostitution under the Mann Act, ABC News reports. https://abcnews.go.com/US/sean-diddy-combs-denied-bail-awaiting-sentencing/story?id=124359248 Zach Bryan just announced that he'll be dropping ‘Bowery' with Kings of Leon this Friday (August 8th). https://www.whiskeyriff.com/2025/08/03/zach-bryan-confirms-bowery-featuring-kings-of-leon-is-coming-this-week/ QUICK HITSPlayboy is bringing back the Playmate Search. https://pagesix.com/2025/08/04/entertainment/playboy-bouncing-back-with-relaunch-of-playmate-competition/· TVStephen Colbert has found another job after The Late Show was canceled. https://www.tvinsider.com/1206905/stephen-colbert-new-job-elsbeth-late-show-cancellation/ MOVING ON INTO MOVIE NEWS:George Clooney recently did a movie for Netflix called "Jay Kelly". He plays an actor, and Adam Sandler plays his manager. https://variety.com/2025/film/news/george-clooney-defends-adam-sandler-great-actor-1236477728/ · Comedian Matt Rife says he and a friend have purchased the occult museum of late paranormal investigator Dan Rivera, who died last month while on tour with a “haunted” Annabelle doll. https://www.tmz.com/2025/08/01/matt-rife-says-he-purchased-occult-museum/ The iconic Southern California house featured in 1982's 'Poltergeist' is now on Airbnb after a $165,000 interior makeover to turn it into a nearly-identical version of what you see in the terrifying horror film. https://www.tmz.com/2025/08/03/poltergeist-house-transformed-into-airbnb/See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Sean “Diddy” Combs was denied bail again and will remain at MDC Brooklyn until his October 3 sentencing, with the judge citing evidence of violence and coercion tied to his Mann Act convictions. Justin Timberlake posted an Instagram Story declaring he's “not doing s*** today” after wrapping his tour and revealing his Lyme disease diagnosis, embracing a break from his packed schedule. Calvin Harris announced the birth of his son Micah with a series of photos that included his wife Vick Hope's placenta, sparking surprise and discussion online. Brandi Glanville suffered chemical burns to her face after leaving Nair hair-removal cream on too long in a DIY attempt to treat what she claims is a facial parasite. Amy Bradley's family says they've received thousands of new tips since a Netflix documentary aired, but none have yet been confirmed in the decades-old missing person case. Hosts: Charlie Cotton & Charlie Neff Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Sean “Diddy” Combs has filed a motion to overturn his July 2025 convictions on two counts of transportation for prostitution under the federal Mann Act. While a jury acquitted him of racketeering and sex‑trafficking charges, it found him guilty of arranging “freak‑off” parties—sex performances involving escorts crossing state lines. His legal team now argues these gatherings were consensual adult events deliberately recorded as choreographed spectacles—essentially homemade pornography—and therefore qualify as protected expression under the First AmendmentIn his lawyers' filing to Judge Arun Subramanian, Combs maintains there was no commercial motive, that no minors or exploitation were involved, and that he himself did not participate in the sex acts, merely serving as a director and observer. They argue that convicting him under a statute from 1910 without any intention of profit or coercion is unprecedented and unconstitutional. If the judge denies acquittal, they are also requesting a retrial limited to evidence specifically admissible under Mann Act charges—excluding prejudicial material from broader sex trafficking claimsto contact me:bobbycapucci@proton.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs asks court for acquittal or new trial, says 'freak offs' protected by First AmendmentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Sean “Diddy” Combs has filed a motion to overturn his July 2025 convictions on two counts of transportation for prostitution under the federal Mann Act. While a jury acquitted him of racketeering and sex‑trafficking charges, it found him guilty of arranging “freak‑off” parties—sex performances involving escorts crossing state lines. His legal team now argues these gatherings were consensual adult events deliberately recorded as choreographed spectacles—essentially homemade pornography—and therefore qualify as protected expression under the First AmendmentIn his lawyers' filing to Judge Arun Subramanian, Combs maintains there was no commercial motive, that no minors or exploitation were involved, and that he himself did not participate in the sex acts, merely serving as a director and observer. They argue that convicting him under a statute from 1910 without any intention of profit or coercion is unprecedented and unconstitutional. If the judge denies acquittal, they are also requesting a retrial limited to evidence specifically admissible under Mann Act charges—excluding prejudicial material from broader sex trafficking claimsto contact me:bobbycapucci@proton.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs asks court for acquittal or new trial, says 'freak offs' protected by First Amendment
Sean “Diddy” Combs has filed a motion to overturn his July 2025 convictions on two counts of transportation for prostitution under the federal Mann Act. While a jury acquitted him of racketeering and sex‑trafficking charges, it found him guilty of arranging “freak‑off” parties—sex performances involving escorts crossing state lines. His legal team now argues these gatherings were consensual adult events deliberately recorded as choreographed spectacles—essentially homemade pornography—and therefore qualify as protected expression under the First AmendmentIn his lawyers' filing to Judge Arun Subramanian, Combs maintains there was no commercial motive, that no minors or exploitation were involved, and that he himself did not participate in the sex acts, merely serving as a director and observer. They argue that convicting him under a statute from 1910 without any intention of profit or coercion is unprecedented and unconstitutional. If the judge denies acquittal, they are also requesting a retrial limited to evidence specifically admissible under Mann Act charges—excluding prejudicial material from broader sex trafficking claimsto contact me:bobbycapucci@proton.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs asks court for acquittal or new trial, says 'freak offs' protected by First AmendmentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Diddy is demanding a new trial because he believes the Mann Act doesn't apply to him. Allegedly Justin Timberlake is contemplating wanting an NSYNC reunion after his own tour is not doing too well. Guess is receiving backlash after using an AI model.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Diddy's making a bold move — filing a motion to toss his Mann Act convictions or get a brand new trial. His team says he wasn't trafficking, just watching, filming, and exercising his First Amendment rights. From freak-off footage to claims of unfair prejudice, this episode breaks down Diddy's wild legal Hail Mary. Hosts: Charlie Cotton & Derek Kaufman Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Today on AirTalk, LA Times CEO announces plans to take the newspaper public; California's EV check-in; Sean 'Diddy' Combs convicted under the 'Mann Act'; what is the future of DTLA business, and are you the big spender in the relationship? Today on AirTalk: LA Times will go public next year (00:15) California's EV check-in (18:16) Sean Combs convicted under the 'Mann Act' (37:58) Future of DTLA business (51:15) Are you a big spender? (1:24:35)
Sean “Diddy” Combs now finds himself at a dramatic and irreversible crossroad. On one side lies the prospect of federal incarceration—an outcome already partially realized as he remains held without bail in a detention center, stripped of the image, influence, and power that once shielded him. On the other side, a narrowing path toward limited freedom, constrained by the weight of felony convictions under the Mann Act. Though he was acquitted of the most severe charges, his guilty verdicts have firmly placed him in the federal system's grip. The judge's upcoming sentencing decision will determine whether his future is served behind bars for years or counted through supervised release, probation, or credit for time already served. Every legal maneuver now carries life-altering consequences, not just for his physical freedom but for his empire, reputation, and legacy.As the clock ticks toward his October sentencing, Diddy is in a liminal space—neither free nor formally sentenced, yet deeply aware of the walls closing in. The government is pushing for years of incarceration, arguing that the crimes he was convicted of are part of a broader, disturbing pattern of abuse and control. His legal team, in contrast, is urging the court to consider the nearly ten months he's already spent behind bars as sufficient punishment, emphasizing his past contributions to music and culture. But those arguments may falter in the face of mounting civil lawsuits, new allegations, and a public image that continues to deteriorate with each passing week. Diddy is no longer navigating celebrity scandals—he's on the precipice of becoming a cautionary tale, trapped between what was and what comes next..to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Welcome back to Virgo Season! Ryan and Joyhdae are here—thoroughly unhinged and barely holding it together, per usual. From R&B trivia showdowns to pop culture chaos, this episode has range, baby.[The Jim Jones Ancestry Debate + Poolside Thighs & Meditation Workouts]Joyhdae insists Jim Jones is Guyanese, Ryan brings Google receipts, and chaos ensues. Meanwhile, she's been outside—legs out, spirits high—and Ryan's out here meditating to Jhené Aiko in the gym. Unclear what's happening, but the vibes are vibing.[R&B Trivia Smackdown]Ryan brings a bootleg version of Angie Martinez's “R&B Trivia” to the pod, and let's just say: Joyhdae came to eat. Usher, Tevin Campbell, and Mary J. Blige are all involved. A mess. A musical mess.[Nelly's Parenting Choices, Diddy's Conviction & Why the Internet Is Full of Clowns]Nelly won't get up for his own baby, and it shows. Diddy's guilty under the Mann Act—but somehow dodged the heavier stuff—and folks are STILL defending him. Joyhdae and Ryan go in on America's selective outrage, Cassie's case, and why common sense isn't so common.[Nicki's Tired Rants + J.Lo's Imaginary Soul + the Love Island USA Takeover]Nicki Minaj is mad at everyone except her own team, J.Lo claims she has “soul,” and Joyhdae is NOT having it. Then we dive into Love Island USA and the Black women who are running the villa, hearts, and the voting system. Alexandria Hive, rise up.[Relationship Debriefs & Delulu Dating]From “dominant men with service kinks” to real-life dating red flags, Joyhdae breaks down why some men aren't giving and why she's not here to build the damn table and bring the chairs. Plus, Ryan nearly cries over his daughter learning to swing solo. (Yes, for real.)⸻Subscribe, Like, and Share!Come for the jokes, stay for the truth. Tap that bell, drop a comment, and let us know which R&B lyric lives rent-free in your head. We'll see you in two weeks with more foolishness.Connect With Us:• Email: Virgoseasonshow@gmail.com• Website: Virgoseasonshow.com• YouTube, TikTok & Instagram: @VirgoSeasonShow• Ryan: @OhBlackRyan• Joyhdae: @Joyhdae----CHAPTERS00:00 Intro00:05 Joyhdae's Delusions02:27 "Popcast" Drop03:30 Vibe Check08:29 The Rundown10:24 R&B Trivia Competition15:43 Nelly & Ashanti Nonsense24:21 Diddy Verdict38:33 Someone Find J-Lo A Soul...40:21 Nicki Minaj Needs Help48:54 Trump's Bill...Nevermind!49:17 'Love Island' Thoughts01:06:40 Dad vs Auntie Jokes01:11:07 Find Us On All The Things01:14:05 One More For The Road...01:14:53 Outro
Sean “Diddy” Combs now finds himself at a dramatic and irreversible crossroad. On one side lies the prospect of federal incarceration—an outcome already partially realized as he remains held without bail in a detention center, stripped of the image, influence, and power that once shielded him. On the other side, a narrowing path toward limited freedom, constrained by the weight of felony convictions under the Mann Act. Though he was acquitted of the most severe charges, his guilty verdicts have firmly placed him in the federal system's grip. The judge's upcoming sentencing decision will determine whether his future is served behind bars for years or counted through supervised release, probation, or credit for time already served. Every legal maneuver now carries life-altering consequences, not just for his physical freedom but for his empire, reputation, and legacy.As the clock ticks toward his October sentencing, Diddy is in a liminal space—neither free nor formally sentenced, yet deeply aware of the walls closing in. The government is pushing for years of incarceration, arguing that the crimes he was convicted of are part of a broader, disturbing pattern of abuse and control. His legal team, in contrast, is urging the court to consider the nearly ten months he's already spent behind bars as sufficient punishment, emphasizing his past contributions to music and culture. But those arguments may falter in the face of mounting civil lawsuits, new allegations, and a public image that continues to deteriorate with each passing week. Diddy is no longer navigating celebrity scandals—he's on the precipice of becoming a cautionary tale, trapped between what was and what comes next..to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Amy and T.J. talk about the unexpectedly brief hearing today to set the date for Diddy’s sentencing! After just two minutes, it was over, with the defense agreeing to the judge’s original date of October 3rd. Also, what exactly are the racist origins of the Mann Act that was used to convict Diddy?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Amy and T.J. talk about the unexpectedly brief hearing today to set the date for Diddy’s sentencing! After just two minutes, it was over, with the defense agreeing to the judge’s original date of October 3rd. Also, what exactly are the racist origins of the Mann Act that was used to convict Diddy?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Amy and T.J. talk about the unexpectedly brief hearing today to set the date for Diddy’s sentencing! After just two minutes, it was over, with the defense agreeing to the judge’s original date of October 3rd. Also, what exactly are the racist origins of the Mann Act that was used to convict Diddy?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Amy and T.J. talk about the unexpectedly brief hearing today to set the date for Diddy’s sentencing! After just two minutes, it was over, with the defense agreeing to the judge’s original date of October 3rd. Also, what exactly are the racist origins of the Mann Act that was used to convict Diddy?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this episode of It's Complicated, legal analysts Asha Rangappa and Renato Mariotti break down the Supreme Court's recent decision on universal (a.k.a. nationwide) injunctions. What does it really mean for the future of executive power and birthright citizenship? And how does this tie into Trump's attempts to rewrite the 14th Amendment? The hosts explore the legal nuance behind “complete relief,” class actions, and the Court's growing tendency to centralize power. Plus, they dissect the implications of the Court's language, the shadow docket, and how this decision might unfold in real-world litigation. Later, they shift gears to analyze the surprising outcome in the P. Diddy trial — what the jury's verdict says about prosecutorial overreach, the use of RICO, and the controversial Mann Act convictions. Asha Substack: https://asharangappa.substack.com/ Subscribe to our podcast: https://link.chtbl.com/its-complicated Follow Asha on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/asharangappa.bsky.social Follow Renato on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/renatomariotti.bsky.social Follow Asha on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/asha.rangappa/ Follow Renato on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/renato.mariotti/ Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/@LegalAFMTN?sub_confirmation=1 Legal AF Substack: https://substack.com/@legalaf Follow Legal AF on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/legalafmtn.bsky.social Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/mspopok.bsky.social Subscribe to the Legal AF by MeidasTouch podcast here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-af-by-meidastouch/id1580828595 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Sean Diddy Combs is acquitted of RICO and sex trafficking charges and now after a big win for the defense; his team is asking he walk free today. This is an emotional and shocking day for witnesses as jurors reach a verdict that find Diddy guilty of only the 2 lesser charges that he was facing. Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of true crime and breaking news coverage of the biggest cases. Today we bring you the latest in the Sean Diddy Combs saga. Sean “Diddy” Combs was vindicated on the most serious charges—racketeering conspiracy and sex-trafficking—but a Manhattan jury found him guilty today, July 2, 2025, on two lesser counts of transporting individuals across state lines for prostitution under the Mann Act, exposing him to up to 20 years in prison. Immediately after the verdict, his defense attorneys requested his release on a $1 million bond and travel restrictions, arguing it's inappropriate for him to remain jailed until sentencing; prosecutors opposed, citing concerns over potential danger to witnesses. A bond hearing is scheduled for 5 p.m. ET before Judge Arun Subramanian to decide if Combs will remain in custody or be released pending sentencing, with written filings from both sides due beforehand. Meanwhile, as Diddy news was being reported, supporters have been outside the courthouse celebrating—some playfully drenched in baby oil—chanting “Free Puff!” as the legal drama transitions into the critical phase of bail determination. Diddy's family, including his mom, were seen outside the courthouse giving the crowd a thumbs up and blowing kisses. ⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor#breakingnews #bryankohberger #trial #truecrimecommunity #murdermystery #murdermystery2 #criminaljustice #newsupdateCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast#bestguests #stsnation #survivingthesurvivor #truecrimecommunity #trial #breakingnews #criminaljustice #diddytrial #seandiddycombs #diddy #celebrity #breakingnews
On The Other Side of Midnight, Lionel starts the show talking about how Diddy is being targeted. He talks about the charges against him, due process and the Mann Act. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
On The Other Side of Midnight, Lionel starts the show talking about how Diddy is being targeted. He talks about the charges against him, due process and the Mann Act. Lionel later talks about his experience in the American legal system as he recounts his first case and the many wackier cases to follow. He makes the point that you can expect the unexpected when in the courtroom. Lionel starts the third hour talking about how illegal immigration ruined numerous neighborhoods. He moves on to discuss the dangers of AI and cautions human extinction. Lionel wraps up the show talking about firework stories with callers ahead of the nations birthday. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
In a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian, Sean Combs' legal team requested his release on appropriate conditions under 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) while he awaits sentencing. The defense emphasized that the jury acquitted Combs of the most serious charges—RICO conspiracy and sex trafficking—undermining the government's core allegations that he led a criminal enterprise. They argue that given these acquittals, continued detention is no longer justified.The letter also highlights Combs' conduct since his arrest on September 17, 2024. According to his attorneys, Combs voluntarily surrendered, has fully complied with the court, and maintained exemplary behavior while in custody at MDC. With only two convictions under the Mann Act remaining, and significantly reduced sentencing exposure compared to the initial indictment, the defense contends that release on proposed conditions is now both reasonable and appropriate.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.432.0.pdf
In a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian, Sean Combs' legal team requested his release on appropriate conditions under 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) while he awaits sentencing. The defense emphasized that the jury acquitted Combs of the most serious charges—RICO conspiracy and sex trafficking—undermining the government's core allegations that he led a criminal enterprise. They argue that given these acquittals, continued detention is no longer justified.The letter also highlights Combs' conduct since his arrest on September 17, 2024. According to his attorneys, Combs voluntarily surrendered, has fully complied with the court, and maintained exemplary behavior while in custody at MDC. With only two convictions under the Mann Act remaining, and significantly reduced sentencing exposure compared to the initial indictment, the defense contends that release on proposed conditions is now both reasonable and appropriate.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.432.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Criminal defense attorney Julia Jayne joins Kate to discuss two major developments in high-profile criminal cases. First, the verdict in the trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs — a mixed decision that acquitted him of racketeering and sex trafficking, but convicted him on two Mann Act charges. Then, a look at the latest in the Bryan Kohberger case. Accused of the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students, Kohberger has agreed to a plea deal to avoid the death penalty. We explore the legal implications, the response from victims' families, and why prosecutors may have chosen to forgo trial. Reality Life with Kate Casey What to Watch List: https://katecasey.substack.com Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/katecasey Twitter: https://twitter.com/katecasey Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/katecaseyca Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@itskatecasey?lang=en Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/113157919338245 Amazon List: https://www.amazon.com/shop/katecasey Like it to Know It: https://www.shopltk.com/explore/katecaseySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Pop 3: Diddy was found not guilty on the major charges of sex trafficking and racketeering but convicted on two lesser counts under the Mann Act. Blake Lively reportedly subpoenaed several podcasters, including Candace Owens, who claims she hasn't been served. Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez's lavish Venice wedding drew big names and big backlash for its extravagance. Deep Dive: The SLOMW reunion delivered drama, receipts, and a powerful moment from Connor, who opened up about childhood trauma that reframed his past actions. Demi was a no-show, Jessi dodged questions, and unresolved tensions still linger. Final Thoughts: Love Island USA is falling flat. No one seems in love, the challenges are over-the-top, and Amaya is the only islander putting her heart on the line. *Shop MPT Merch* ► https://shop.hurrdatmedia.com/collections/morgans-pop-talks *Listen to the podcast* ► https://hurrdatmedia.com/network/show/morgans-pop-talks/ *Join my Patreon* for exclusive minisodes each week! ► http://www.patreon.com/morganspoptalks for exclusive minisodes each week! *Subscribe to my weekly newsletter* for reminders, important links, and additional surprises! ► https://www.morganptalks.com/ *About Morgan's Pop Talks* Welcome to Morgan's Pop Talks – your weekly VIP pass into the world of reality TV and pop culture! I'm Morgan, your pop culture bestie, here to dish out all the drama, the twists, and the must-know headlines. Each week, we kick things off with The Pop 3, breaking down the top three stories you can't miss. Then, we dive headfirst into The Deep Dive, where we leave no stone unturned – think juicy timelines, episode breakdowns, and all the drama dissected. Plus, I've got exclusive interviews with your favorite reality stars from The Bachelor franchise, Bravo, Dancing with the Stars, and beyond! Whether you're here for the tea or just love the thrill of reality TV, Morgan's Pop Talks is your new go-to! GEAR WE USE TO MAKE PODCASTS: https://amzn.to/4dg7uZF SOFTWARE WE USE TO MAKE PODCASTS: https://hurrdatmedia.com/our-gear/ This is another Hurrdat Media Production. Hurrdat Media is a podcast network and digital media production company based in Omaha, NE. Find more podcasts on the Hurrdat Media Network by going to HurrdatMedia.com or Hurrdat Media YouTube channel! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/AnalyticBecome A Patron Of The Notorious Mass Effect Podcast For Additional Bonus Audio And Visual Content For All Things Nme! Join Our Patreon Here: https://ow.ly/oPsc50VBOuH Join Analytic Dreamz on Notorious Mass Effect for an in-depth breakdown of Sean "Diddy" Combs' 2025 criminal trial in Segment 1. Explore the 7-week Manhattan Federal Court case, from the split verdict—acquitted on RICO and sex trafficking, convicted on two Mann Act violations—to key evidence like the 2016 Cassie assault video and raid findings. Hear insights on Cassie Ventura's testimony, defense strategies, and the cultural fallout impacting Combs' music, fashion, and media empire. Analytic Dreamz unpacks legal nuances, public reactions, and what's next as Combs awaits sentencing.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/analytic-dreamz-notorious-mass-effect/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
In the federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, the jury delivered a split verdict after three days of deliberation. Combs was found not guilty on the most serious charge of racketeering conspiracy (Count 1) and also acquitted on the sex trafficking charges. These counts had carried the potential for a life sentence had he been convicted. The jury appeared unconvinced that the prosecution met the burden of proving Combs led or participated in an organized criminal enterprise under the RICO statute.However, the jury did find Combs guilty on two counts of violating the Mann Act, specifically for transporting individuals across state lines for the purpose of prostitution. These convictions stem from incidents involving Cassie Ventura and another woman known as "Jane." While not carrying the same weight as the RICO or trafficking charges, these convictions are still felonies and expose Combs to a potential sentence of up to 20 years in federal prison. Sentencing will be scheduled at a later date.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Jurors in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs are set to begin deliberations on Monday, June 30, marking the final and most consequential phase of a case that has gripped both the entertainment world and the legal community. After seven weeks of testimony—including 34 prosecution witnesses, graphic accounts of abuse from women like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” and surveillance footage showing Combs assaulting Cassie in 2016—the case now shifts entirely to the jury's interpretation of the facts. The 12 jurors, made up of eight men and four women, will return to court to receive final legal instructions before beginning deliberations behind closed doors. No witnesses were called by the defense, and Combs himself did not testify. Instead, his team focused on cross-examining the accusers and portraying the case as one built on exaggeration, greed, and consensual behavior taken out of context.The jury now faces the task of evaluating five serious federal charges: racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, and two counts of transporting individuals across state lines for the purpose of prostitution under the Mann Act. Legal analysts note that while the Mann Act charges are more straightforward, the racketeering and trafficking counts involve far more complex determinations—requiring the jury to weigh consent versus coercion, patterns of control, and the credibility of the women who testified. The deliberations could last days or even longer, depending on how sharply divided the panel is on interpreting the law and the evidence. At stake is the question of whether one of the most powerful figures in modern music will face decades—if not life—in prison, or walk away vindicated after one of the most sensational celebrity trials in years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:At the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs Trial, Jurors Are Ready to Deliberate - The New York Times
Sean “Diddy” Combs faces significant difficulty overcoming the Mann Act charges due to the sheer volume and consistency of evidence presented at trial showing he orchestrated interstate travel for the purpose of prostitution. Witness after witness testified that Combs regularly flew in male escorts—referred to in court as dancers or “entertainers”—to participate in so-called “freak-offs,” often involving his partners Cassie Ventura and “Jane.” Multiple former employees confirmed that they were tasked with arranging these flights, booking hotels, and managing logistics, all under Combs's direct instruction. One dancer testified that he was flown in on 8 to 12 separate occasions to have sex with Cassie, and that Combs would often watch or record the encounters. These admissions, paired with digital evidence such as text messages and payment records, established a clear pattern of interstate travel tied to commercial sex acts—meeting the statutory criteria for Mann Act violations.What makes the Mann Act charges particularly dangerous for Combs is that they do not require proof of coercion—only that someone was transported across state lines for the purpose of prostitution. The prosecution's evidence showed that Combs not only arranged these movements but paid for them and facilitated the sexual encounters once travel was complete. Unlike the more nuanced sex trafficking charges, which hinge on consent and coercion, the Mann Act offenses are legally simpler and were supported by hard logistics—flight itineraries, financial transactions, and testimony from both staff and participants. Even if the jury wavers on whether Combs's partners were coerced, they may still find him guilty under the Mann Act based solely on the undeniable fact that he used his resources to transport people for sex. As a result, these may be the hardest charges for the defense to defeat—and they carry serious prison time even without convictions on the other counts.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Experts say where Sean 'Diddy' Combs 'might be cooked' in sex trafficking trial | Fox News
The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial has concluded with both sides resting, leaving the jury to decide whether the music mogul was a charismatic entertainer or the orchestrator of a criminal empire. Over six weeks, the prosecution laid out a chilling case of racketeering, sex trafficking, and prostitution violations, painting Combs as a man who used his fame and power to abuse women, orchestrate drug-fueled “freak-offs,” and silence dissent through intimidation and bribes. Witnesses described a coordinated effort to traffic victims like Cassie Ventura and “Jane,” transport male escorts across state lines, and suppress damaging evidence. The government argued that even one coerced sex act, arranged and concealed as part of a long-standing pattern, was enough to convict. Their narrative was cohesive, graphic, and deeply corroborated.The defense, meanwhile, called no witnesses and leaned entirely on cross-examination and closing arguments to argue that Combs was guilty only of bad behavior—not federal crimes. They insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, that witnesses had financial motives, and that the government was criminalizing a lifestyle. Now, the jury must interpret a trial that balanced disturbing detail with questions of consent, coercion, and credibility. While the Mann Act charges are seen as more straightforward, the RICO and trafficking counts carry heavier weight—and if the jury finds the government met its burden, Combs could face a life-altering conviction. Either way, the trial marks a major reckoning not just for Diddy, but for the unchecked power of celebrity. the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs—a case that has spanned weeks, rocked the music industry, and laid bare allegations that stretch far beyond the headlines. With all the evidence now heard, no more witnesses left to take the stand, and both sides having delivered their closing arguments, this is the moment to step back and assess the damage—and the danger—for Combs. In this episode, we'll go charge by charge, breaking down what the prosecution was able to prove, how the defense responded, and where I believe the jury is most likely to land when that verdict is finally read. From racketeering to sex trafficking, from manipulation to power and fear—this is where it all comes together.In this episode, we're left with our final impressions from the courtroom—after weeks of raw testimony, graphic allegations, and a legal chess match that's now officially over. The evidence is in. The witnesses have spoken. The attorneys have made their last appeals. And now, all that's left is the verdict. So in this episode, we're taking a close, unflinching look at where things truly stand for Sean “Diddy” Combs—not in the court of public opinion, but in the eyes of twelve jurors. We'll walk through each count he's facing, break down the strength of the evidence, and I'll give you my take on whether I think he'll be convicted or walk free. Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Count 4 of the federal indictment against Sean "Diddy" Combs charges him with transporting Victim 1, identified as Cassie Ventura, across state lines with the intent to engage her in prostitution. Prosecutors allege that between 2009 and 2018, Combs orchestrated and facilitated "freak-off" events—drug-fueled sexual encounters involving male escorts—which he directed, filmed, and used to exert control over Ventura. These events reportedly took place in various locations, including New York City, Los Angeles, and Miami. The prosecution argues that Combs used his influence and resources to transport Ventura and other women to these events, where they were coerced into participating in commercial sex acts. Evidence presented includes travel records and communications that suggest the transportation was part of a broader scheme to exploit women for prostitution.In response, Combs' defense team contends that the interactions were consensual and part of a private, non-criminal lifestyle. They argue that Ventura willingly participated in these events and that the transportation was not for the purpose of engaging her in prostitution. The defense also points to the absence of direct evidence linking the transportation to prostitution, suggesting that the charges are based on assumptions rather than concrete proof. The outcome of this count will depend on the jury's assessment of the credibility of the evidence and testimonies presented, including the context of the relationships and the nature of the events in question.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Count 5 of the federal indictment against Sean "Diddy" Combs charges him with transporting Victim 2, referred to as "Jane," and male commercial sex workers across state lines with the intent to engage in prostitution between 2021 and 2024. Prosecutors allege that Combs orchestrated and facilitated "freak-off" events—drug-fueled sexual encounters involving male escorts—which he directed, filmed, and used to exert control over Jane. These events reportedly took place in various locations, including New York City, Los Angeles, and Miami. The prosecution's claim hinges on the idea that Jane was not participating in these acts voluntarily but was instead coerced or manipulated into doing so under duress, a key aspect of the trafficking charge under federal law. If the prosecution's evidence is found to be credible, it would prove that Combs played a central role in exploiting Jane, using his power and influence to subject her to coercive circumstancesIn response, Combs' defense team contends that the interactions were consensual and part of a private, non-criminal lifestyle. They argue that Jane willingly participated in these events and that the transportation was not for the purpose of engaging her in prostitution. The defense also points to the absence of direct evidence linking the transportation to prostitution, suggesting that the charges are based on assumptions rather than concrete proof. The outcome of this count will depend on the jury's assessment of the credibility of the evidence and testimonies presented, including the context of the relationships and the nature of the events in question.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
