Podcast appearances and mentions of Dawn Richard

In this letter to Judge Subramanian, the defense opposes the government's plan to introduce certain testimony from Dawn Richard. The defense argues that the government intends to elicit inadmissible and irrelevant testimony regarding alleged statements and purported threats made by Sean Combs and Bad Boy Records President Harve Pierre. They contend that such statements, along with Ms. Richard's subjective understanding of them, fall outside the scope of permissible evidence and would unfairly prejudice the jury.The defense asserts that allowing this line of testimony would improperly introduce speculative and potentially inflammatory material that lacks proper evidentiary foundation. They request that the Court preclude the government from eliciting or offering this evidence through Ms. Richard, maintaining that it does not meet the standards for admissibility and risks distracting the jury from the core issues of the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.398.0.pdf

In this letter to Judge Subramanian, the defense opposes the government's plan to introduce certain testimony from Dawn Richard. The defense argues that the government intends to elicit inadmissible and irrelevant testimony regarding alleged statements and purported threats made by Sean Combs and Bad Boy Records President Harve Pierre. They contend that such statements, along with Ms. Richard's subjective understanding of them, fall outside the scope of permissible evidence and would unfairly prejudice the jury.The defense asserts that allowing this line of testimony would improperly introduce speculative and potentially inflammatory material that lacks proper evidentiary foundation. They request that the Court preclude the government from eliciting or offering this evidence through Ms. Richard, maintaining that it does not meet the standards for admissibility and risks distracting the jury from the core issues of the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.398.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Diddy Trial Bombshells: 15 Most DISTURBING Revelations From 4 Weeks of Federal Testimony Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial has delivered four weeks of explosive testimony that could send the hip-hop mogul to prison for life. This comprehensive breakdown covers every major revelation from Manhattan federal court, where prosecutors are building a RICO case alleging Combs ran a criminal enterprise disguised as a music empire. We analyze the most disturbing testimony from key witnesses including Cassie Ventura's 4-day emotional testimony about "freak-offs," Dawn Richard witnessing violent attacks, anonymous victim "Mia's" assault allegations, and current victim "Jane" describing recent "hotel nights" from 2024. The video breaks down how federal prosecutors are using witness testimony, physical evidence from raids, financial records, and the infamous 2016 hotel assault video to prove decades of alleged criminal activity. This trial breakdown examines the legal strategy behind RICO charges, why Judge Arun Subramanian threatened to remove Combs from his own courtroom, and how defense attorneys Marc Agnifilo and Anna Estevao are fighting back with consent arguments and credibility attacks. We cover the evidence seized during federal raids including 1000+ bottles of baby oil, weapons, drugs, and recording equipment that prosecutors say was used to facilitate sex trafficking. The video explores courtroom drama including gallery disruptions, witness protection issues, and Combs' inappropriate behavior toward jurors. Legal experts explain how this case could reshape accountability in the entertainment industry and what the evidence reveals about power dynamics in celebrity relationships. We analyze financial testimony showing suspicious transactions, hotel security guards admitting to $100K bribes, and federal agents detailing the arrest and evidence collection. With testimony from over 15 prosecution witnesses and weeks of trial still ahead, this case represents one of the most significant celebrity criminal trials in recent history. Subscribe for continued coverage as we track every development in this historic federal prosecution. #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #FederalTrial #SexTrafficking #RICO #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #MusicIndustry #JusticeSystem #CelebScandal Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Diddy Trial Bombshells: 15 Most DISTURBING Revelations From 4 Weeks of Federal Testimony Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial has delivered four weeks of explosive testimony that could send the hip-hop mogul to prison for life. This comprehensive breakdown covers every major revelation from Manhattan federal court, where prosecutors are building a RICO case alleging Combs ran a criminal enterprise disguised as a music empire. We analyze the most disturbing testimony from key witnesses including Cassie Ventura's 4-day emotional testimony about "freak-offs," Dawn Richard witnessing violent attacks, anonymous victim "Mia's" assault allegations, and current victim "Jane" describing recent "hotel nights" from 2024. The video breaks down how federal prosecutors are using witness testimony, physical evidence from raids, financial records, and the infamous 2016 hotel assault video to prove decades of alleged criminal activity. This trial breakdown examines the legal strategy behind RICO charges, why Judge Arun Subramanian threatened to remove Combs from his own courtroom, and how defense attorneys Marc Agnifilo and Anna Estevao are fighting back with consent arguments and credibility attacks. We cover the evidence seized during federal raids including 1000+ bottles of baby oil, weapons, drugs, and recording equipment that prosecutors say was used to facilitate sex trafficking. The video explores courtroom drama including gallery disruptions, witness protection issues, and Combs' inappropriate behavior toward jurors. Legal experts explain how this case could reshape accountability in the entertainment industry and what the evidence reveals about power dynamics in celebrity relationships. We analyze financial testimony showing suspicious transactions, hotel security guards admitting to $100K bribes, and federal agents detailing the arrest and evidence collection. With testimony from over 15 prosecution witnesses and weeks of trial still ahead, this case represents one of the most significant celebrity criminal trials in recent history. Subscribe for continued coverage as we track every development in this historic federal prosecution. #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #FederalTrial #SexTrafficking #RICO #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #MusicIndustry #JusticeSystem #CelebScandal Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Former Danity Kane member Dawn Richard has filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, accusing him of sexual abuse, harassment, and manipulation during her time under his management. Richard claims that Diddy groped her multiple times, threatened her, and once locked her in a car for two hours after a dispute. She also alleges that Diddy used his influence to control her career, offering opportunities based on submission to his demands. The lawsuit describes how he made degrading comments about her appearance and withheld parts of her performances when she resisted.Additionally, Richard claims to have witnessed instances of abuse toward other women, including observing drug-fueled parties and seeing Diddy choke his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. She also recalls seeing Diddy's former partner, Kim Porter, emerge from a studio with visible injuries. Richard's lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, though Diddy has vehemently denied the allegations. His legal team labeled the claims as fabricated and an attempt to gain money, especially considering Richard's continued collaboration with him over the years.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean ‘Diddy' Combs: Former member of Danity Kane accuses Combs of sexual battery in new lawsuit | CNN

Diddy Trial Bombshells: 15 Most DISTURBING Revelations From 4 Weeks of Federal Testimony Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial has delivered four weeks of explosive testimony that could send the hip-hop mogul to prison for life. This comprehensive breakdown covers every major revelation from Manhattan federal court, where prosecutors are building a RICO case alleging Combs ran a criminal enterprise disguised as a music empire. We analyze the most disturbing testimony from key witnesses including Cassie Ventura's 4-day emotional testimony about "freak-offs," Dawn Richard witnessing violent attacks, anonymous victim "Mia's" assault allegations, and current victim "Jane" describing recent "hotel nights" from 2024. The video breaks down how federal prosecutors are using witness testimony, physical evidence from raids, financial records, and the infamous 2016 hotel assault video to prove decades of alleged criminal activity. This trial breakdown examines the legal strategy behind RICO charges, why Judge Arun Subramanian threatened to remove Combs from his own courtroom, and how defense attorneys Marc Agnifilo and Anna Estevao are fighting back with consent arguments and credibility attacks. We cover the evidence seized during federal raids including 1000+ bottles of baby oil, weapons, drugs, and recording equipment that prosecutors say was used to facilitate sex trafficking. The video explores courtroom drama including gallery disruptions, witness protection issues, and Combs' inappropriate behavior toward jurors. Legal experts explain how this case could reshape accountability in the entertainment industry and what the evidence reveals about power dynamics in celebrity relationships. We analyze financial testimony showing suspicious transactions, hotel security guards admitting to $100K bribes, and federal agents detailing the arrest and evidence collection. With testimony from over 15 prosecution witnesses and weeks of trial still ahead, this case represents one of the most significant celebrity criminal trials in recent history. Subscribe for continued coverage as we track every development in this historic federal prosecution. #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #FederalTrial #SexTrafficking #RICO #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #MusicIndustry #JusticeSystem #CelebScandal Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Harve Pierre, former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has denied allegations made by singer Dawn Richard in her lawsuit against him and Sean "Diddy" Combs. Richard's lawsuit claims that in December 2010, during an argument at a Manhattan recording studio, Combs' bodyguard forcibly removed her and confined her in a car for several hours, allegedly under Pierre's orders. Pierre's attorney, Scott E. Leemon, has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the claims are baseless and that the 2022 amendment to the Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Act (GMVL) does not apply in this case.In our second segment...While Sean "Diddy" Combs remains incarcerated on sex trafficking and racketeering charges, his $60 million private jet, a Gulfstream G550, has been listed for rent on various private charter websites. The 14-seater aircraft, known as "Air Combs," is available for charter through platforms like Victor, often referred to as the "Uber of Private Jets," which caters to high-profile clients. The jet is based at Van Nuys Airport in Los Angeles and is operated by Silver Air, a rental operator offering a range of luxury aircraft. Rental costs are substantial; for instance, a one-way transatlantic flight is priced at approximately $432,000.This move to rent out his private jet aligns with other financial decisions Combs has made amid his legal challenges. He has also listed his Beverly Hills mansion for sale at $61.5 million. These actions suggest efforts to liquidate assets, possibly to address mounting legal expenses or other financial obligations during this period.(commercial at 8:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Harve Pierre Denies Helping Diddy Lock Dawn Richard In A Car - AllHipHopDiddy is 'renting out his $60m Air Combs private jet & charging $432k for a one-way transatlantic flight' as trial looms | The US Sun

Harve Pierre, former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has denied allegations made by singer Dawn Richard in her lawsuit against him and Sean "Diddy" Combs. Richard's lawsuit claims that in December 2010, during an argument at a Manhattan recording studio, Combs' bodyguard forcibly removed her and confined her in a car for several hours, allegedly under Pierre's orders. Pierre's attorney, Scott E. Leemon, has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the claims are baseless and that the 2022 amendment to the Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Act (GMVL) does not apply in this case.In our second segment...While Sean "Diddy" Combs remains incarcerated on sex trafficking and racketeering charges, his $60 million private jet, a Gulfstream G550, has been listed for rent on various private charter websites. The 14-seater aircraft, known as "Air Combs," is available for charter through platforms like Victor, often referred to as the "Uber of Private Jets," which caters to high-profile clients. The jet is based at Van Nuys Airport in Los Angeles and is operated by Silver Air, a rental operator offering a range of luxury aircraft. Rental costs are substantial; for instance, a one-way transatlantic flight is priced at approximately $432,000.This move to rent out his private jet aligns with other financial decisions Combs has made amid his legal challenges. He has also listed his Beverly Hills mansion for sale at $61.5 million. These actions suggest efforts to liquidate assets, possibly to address mounting legal expenses or other financial obligations during this period.(commercial at 8:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Harve Pierre Denies Helping Diddy Lock Dawn Richard In A Car - AllHipHopDiddy is 'renting out his $60m Air Combs private jet & charging $432k for a one-way transatlantic flight' as trial looms | The US SunBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The United States government is steadily building a case that positions Sean "Diddy" Combs as the central figure in a sprawling criminal enterprise, using testimony from former employees, associates, and victims to demonstrate a sustained pattern of abuse, coercion, and organized misconduct. Witnesses like Capricorn Clark and Dawn Richard have described not only Diddy's violent and controlling behavior but also how a network of loyal aides and enablers helped facilitate and conceal his actions. The government is drawing a direct connection between Combs' personal vendettas—such as retaliating against Kid Cudi over Cassie—and the systemic use of threats, intimidation, and force to control women and silence dissenters. These accounts contribute to a larger RICO narrative, portraying Combs not as a lone abuser but as the orchestrator of an enterprise that functioned through coordinated illegal acts for his personal and professional gain.What sets this case apart is the way the prosecution is using RICO statutes—typically reserved for organized crime syndicates—to frame Combs' actions as part of a calculated, multi-year operation involving multiple individuals and entities under his control. The government has introduced testimony linking Combs to alleged acts of kidnapping, sexual violence, witness intimidation, and financial manipulation, often carried out with the assistance of subordinates who were rewarded for their loyalty and silence. As more witnesses corroborate each other's accounts and the pattern of behavior becomes harder to dismiss as coincidence or isolated incidents, the prosecution is tightening its argument that Combs' empire wasn't just a music business—it was a command center for a criminal enterprise.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:A 'criminal enterprise' may be emerging in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial

The United States government is steadily building a case that positions Sean "Diddy" Combs as the central figure in a sprawling criminal enterprise, using testimony from former employees, associates, and victims to demonstrate a sustained pattern of abuse, coercion, and organized misconduct. Witnesses like Capricorn Clark and Dawn Richard have described not only Diddy's violent and controlling behavior but also how a network of loyal aides and enablers helped facilitate and conceal his actions. The government is drawing a direct connection between Combs' personal vendettas—such as retaliating against Kid Cudi over Cassie—and the systemic use of threats, intimidation, and force to control women and silence dissenters. These accounts contribute to a larger RICO narrative, portraying Combs not as a lone abuser but as the orchestrator of an enterprise that functioned through coordinated illegal acts for his personal and professional gain.What sets this case apart is the way the prosecution is using RICO statutes—typically reserved for organized crime syndicates—to frame Combs' actions as part of a calculated, multi-year operation involving multiple individuals and entities under his control. The government has introduced testimony linking Combs to alleged acts of kidnapping, sexual violence, witness intimidation, and financial manipulation, often carried out with the assistance of subordinates who were rewarded for their loyalty and silence. As more witnesses corroborate each other's accounts and the pattern of behavior becomes harder to dismiss as coincidence or isolated incidents, the prosecution is tightening its argument that Combs' empire wasn't just a music business—it was a command center for a criminal enterprise.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:A 'criminal enterprise' may be emerging in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trialBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this letter to Judge Subramanian, the government addresses ongoing disputes related to the testimony of Dawn Richard in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs. Both parties have reached an agreement allowing Richard to testify about what she personally witnessed regarding Combs's alleged abuse of Cassie Ventura. However, the defense continues to object to Richard testifying about specific threats allegedly made by Combs toward her in connection with those observations. The government argues that Richard's full testimony, including the threats, is essential to presenting a complete picture of the defendant's coercive conduct and efforts to silence witnesses.The prosecution urges the Court not to reverse its prior ruling that permits Richard to testify about the threats, referencing prior courtroom discussions and specifically citing subparagraph 5(d) of the April 20, 2025 Enterprise Letter. They assert that the testimony is not only relevant but was already subject to thorough judicial review. The government maintains that allowing Richard to share this aspect of her experience is crucial to establishing the broader pattern of intimidation central to the case against Combs, and asks the Court to affirm its original decision from the May 16, 2025 hearing transcript.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.368.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The United States government is steadily building a case that positions Sean "Diddy" Combs as the central figure in a sprawling criminal enterprise, using testimony from former employees, associates, and victims to demonstrate a sustained pattern of abuse, coercion, and organized misconduct. Witnesses like Capricorn Clark and Dawn Richard have described not only Diddy's violent and controlling behavior but also how a network of loyal aides and enablers helped facilitate and conceal his actions. The government is drawing a direct connection between Combs' personal vendettas—such as retaliating against Kid Cudi over Cassie—and the systemic use of threats, intimidation, and force to control women and silence dissenters. These accounts contribute to a larger RICO narrative, portraying Combs not as a lone abuser but as the orchestrator of an enterprise that functioned through coordinated illegal acts for his personal and professional gain.What sets this case apart is the way the prosecution is using RICO statutes—typically reserved for organized crime syndicates—to frame Combs' actions as part of a calculated, multi-year operation involving multiple individuals and entities under his control. The government has introduced testimony linking Combs to alleged acts of kidnapping, sexual violence, witness intimidation, and financial manipulation, often carried out with the assistance of subordinates who were rewarded for their loyalty and silence. As more witnesses corroborate each other's accounts and the pattern of behavior becomes harder to dismiss as coincidence or isolated incidents, the prosecution is tightening its argument that Combs' empire wasn't just a music business—it was a command center for a criminal enterprise.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:A 'criminal enterprise' may be emerging in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trialBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this letter to Judge Subramanian, the government addresses ongoing disputes related to the testimony of Dawn Richard in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs. Both parties have reached an agreement allowing Richard to testify about what she personally witnessed regarding Combs's alleged abuse of Cassie Ventura. However, the defense continues to object to Richard testifying about specific threats allegedly made by Combs toward her in connection with those observations. The government argues that Richard's full testimony, including the threats, is essential to presenting a complete picture of the defendant's coercive conduct and efforts to silence witnesses.The prosecution urges the Court not to reverse its prior ruling that permits Richard to testify about the threats, referencing prior courtroom discussions and specifically citing subparagraph 5(d) of the April 20, 2025 Enterprise Letter. They assert that the testimony is not only relevant but was already subject to thorough judicial review. The government maintains that allowing Richard to share this aspect of her experience is crucial to establishing the broader pattern of intimidation central to the case against Combs, and asks the Court to affirm its original decision from the May 16, 2025 hearing transcript.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.368.0.pdf

In this letter to Judge Subramanian, the government addresses ongoing disputes related to the testimony of Dawn Richard in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs. Both parties have reached an agreement allowing Richard to testify about what she personally witnessed regarding Combs's alleged abuse of Cassie Ventura. However, the defense continues to object to Richard testifying about specific threats allegedly made by Combs toward her in connection with those observations. The government argues that Richard's full testimony, including the threats, is essential to presenting a complete picture of the defendant's coercive conduct and efforts to silence witnesses.The prosecution urges the Court not to reverse its prior ruling that permits Richard to testify about the threats, referencing prior courtroom discussions and specifically citing subparagraph 5(d) of the April 20, 2025 Enterprise Letter. They assert that the testimony is not only relevant but was already subject to thorough judicial review. The government maintains that allowing Richard to share this aspect of her experience is crucial to establishing the broader pattern of intimidation central to the case against Combs, and asks the Court to affirm its original decision from the May 16, 2025 hearing transcript.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.368.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Que from Day 26 & His Mom put Dawn Richard and Diddy on blast+Ex-aide talks about The Kid Cudi Plot

The Combs Defendants have notified the Court of their intent to file a motion to dismiss the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Dawn Richard under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Richard's Complaint asserts 21 causes of action against more than two dozen defendants, alleging a wide-ranging sex trafficking conspiracy. However, the Combs Defendants argue that the claims are baseless, stating that even if the alleged facts were true (which they deny), they do not substantiate the claims made in the Complaint.The Defendants further contend that the claims are insufficiently pled, lack legal merit, and are barred due to being untimely by several years. Additionally, they highlight that contractual releases signed by the Plaintiff preclude these claims. The Defendants characterize the Complaint as an attempt to sensationalize what they describe as a straightforward commercial dispute.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.121.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Laura Richards and co-host Lisa Bilyeu are joined by former CIA spy and intelligence expert Andrew Bustamante to unpack the complex web of evidence, abuse, and control unfolding in the Sean “Diddy” trial. Laura, Lisa and Andrew explore the charges against Combs including that  Combs abused, threatened, and coerced women and others, and led a racketeering conspiracy that engaged in sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice, in comparison with particular testimonies including Regina Ventura, Cassie's mother, Dawn Richard, Kerry Morgan, "The Punisher” and Kid Cudi. Laura highlights how abusers weaponise fear and power to maintain control, and how those in their orbit enable the abuse—whether through silence or active participation. Andrew brings a spy's lens to the case, analyzing Diddy's tactics through the eyes of a trained operative—making powerful connections between psychological warfare and public manipulation. This isn't just about Sean Combs and Cassie Ventura. It's bigger than that. It's about a systemic failure to protect women and girls—and what must change. Listen now. Share it widely. And follow Crime Analyst. Knowledge is power—and this knowledge could save a life. For more expert insight, in-depth conversations, extra episodes and videos, live monthly events with Laura and to be a part a fast growing, dynamic and empowering community join the Crime Analyst Squad: www.patreon.com/CrimeAnalyst     #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #Psychopaths #PowerAndControl #CoerciveControl #FreakOffs #Risk #DASH #Separation #CassieVentura #CrimeAnalyst #TrueCrime #Podcast #KidCudi #Risk #DASHRiskModel #Separation #Risk #Femicide #CrimeAnalyst #TrueCrime #Podcast #CassieVentura #AndrewBustamante #RICO #Sextrafficking   FOLLOW Lisa Bilyeu:   Website: https://lisabilyeu.com/   YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeir7Wbzzfg43c1eL7PSa3g   Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lisabilyeu/?hl=en FOLLOW Andrew Bustamante Former CIA Spy Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everydayspy/?hl=en YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@Andrew-Bustamante Clips https://youtu.be/7XN1cFEpdUw?si=AWaUegDhBhCMUrx0 https://youtu.be/hrn6LT-wpnU?si=s1jZKtN54nsoWah4 Sources    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEXSuztIF2s   www.dashriskchecklist.com    https://www.thelaurarichards.com/my-two-cents/serial-and-high-risk-stalkers-and-domestic-abusers     https://www.thelaurarichards.com/resources/coercivecontrol    https://www.thelaurarichards.com/resources/books     Thank You to Crime Analyst Sponsors Who Make the Show Possible. Please Support The Show Through My Sponsors:  Rula patients typically pay $15 per session when using insurance. Connect with quality therapists and mental health experts who specialize in you at https://www.rula.com/crime #rulapod Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial and start selling today at SHOPIFY.com/crimeanalyst Try your new trusty favorites with an exclusive set for our listeners. New customers can get the Liquid Lash Extensions Mascara and a mini-sized Brilliant Eye Brightener at a special set price with free shipping at thrivecausemetics.com/CRIMEANALYST. Join Laura at CrimeCon London June 2025 https://www.crimecon.co.uk/ Code CRIMEANALYST10 for 10% off!    REGISTER For Laura's 2025 Masterclasses – DASH, DASH Train the Trainer, Coercive Control and Stalking: https://bit.ly/LRMasterclassRegistration    More Training Info: www.dashriskchecklist.com     www.thelaurarichards.com         YouTube, Socials and Website    YouTube @crimeanalyst     Facebook Crime Analyst Podcast    Instagram @crimeanalyst @laurarichards999    Threads @crimeanalyst    X @thecrimeanalyst @laurarichards999     TikTok @crimeanalystpod    Website www.crime-analyst.com     Leave a Review https://www.crime-analyst.com/reviews/new/       Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On Monday, May 19, 2025, the federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs continued with testimony from Dawn Richard, a former member of the girl group Danity Kane. Richard recounted witnessing Combs physically assault his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, on multiple occasions. She described an incident where Combs allegedly attempted to strike Ventura with a skillet during a dispute over breakfast, leading Ventura to cower on the floor as Combs kicked her. Richard also testified about being confined in a room by Combs following the altercation and receiving flowers from him the next day. Under cross-examination, Richard faced questions regarding inconsistencies in her account and her motivations for testifying.Additionally, the court heard from Regina Ventura, Cassie Ventura's mother, who testified about her daughter's experiences during her relationship with Combs. Regina recounted receiving a distressed email from Cassie in December 2011, in which Combs allegedly threatened to release explicit videos of Cassie after discovering her relationship with rapper Kid Cudi. She testified that Combs demanded $20,000 to prevent the video's release, prompting the family to take out a home equity loan to pay him. Regina also stated that she photographed Cassie's injuries to document the alleged abuse. The defense challenged her testimony by questioning the timing of these events and the family's decision to settle a civil lawsuit in 2023.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

On Monday, May 19, 2025, the federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs continued with testimony from Dawn Richard, a former member of the girl group Danity Kane. Richard recounted witnessing Combs physically assault his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, on multiple occasions. She described an incident where Combs allegedly attempted to strike Ventura with a skillet during a dispute over breakfast, leading Ventura to cower on the floor as Combs kicked her. Richard also testified about being confined in a room by Combs following the altercation and receiving flowers from him the next day. Under cross-examination, Richard faced questions regarding inconsistencies in her account and her motivations for testifying.Additionally, the court heard from Regina Ventura, Cassie Ventura's mother, who testified about her daughter's experiences during her relationship with Combs. Regina recounted receiving a distressed email from Cassie in December 2011, in which Combs allegedly threatened to release explicit videos of Cassie after discovering her relationship with rapper Kid Cudi. She testified that Combs demanded $20,000 to prevent the video's release, prompting the family to take out a home equity loan to pay him. Regina also stated that she photographed Cassie's injuries to document the alleged abuse. The defense challenged her testimony by questioning the timing of these events and the family's decision to settle a civil lawsuit in 2023.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Two full days after the start of the “Diddy Trial” - a new lawsuit is filed. A woman is accusing Sean Combs of SA and states that she recalls his private part being an “itty bitty Diddy.”  She includes a photo of a teeny tiny tootsie roll for reference.  This is just one of the many civil lawsuits filed against Sean Combs. Many of the people that have sued him are also showing up to the trial to testify against him. Which begs the question, how many more witnesses will be coming to get justice? Dawn Richards, a former band mate of Sean Combs, shows up in court seemingly ready to take him down. To finally tell her story. She says she watched him attack Cassie with a skillet. That the next morning he threatened her and everyone around them to stay silent. Or else… But once the cross examination by Diddy's attorneys begin - it feels like her entire story starts unraveling. Or is that just what Diddy's attorneys want us to think? This is the truth behind her brutal testimony.    Full show notes at rottenmangopodcast.com

In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state's shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdf

In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state's shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdf

In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state's shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdf

Breaking down the latest, Week 2, in Diddy's federal sex trafficking and racketeering case, featuring Dawn Richard's testimony, a surprising Usher name-drop, Kid Cudi takes the stand and more.Follow real-time daily Diddy Updates on X and YouTube:https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTKyn2Y9p8zz39A-2tSJs_Caloo2uSMWO&si=1BghCgyoP5UqH30ehttps://x.com/conlin_lauren Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On Monday, May 19, 2025, the federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs continued with testimony from Dawn Richard, a former member of the girl group Danity Kane. Richard recounted witnessing Combs physically assault his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, on multiple occasions. She described an incident where Combs allegedly attempted to strike Ventura with a skillet during a dispute over breakfast, leading Ventura to cower on the floor as Combs kicked her. Richard also testified about being confined in a room by Combs following the altercation and receiving flowers from him the next day. Under cross-examination, Richard faced questions regarding inconsistencies in her account and her motivations for testifying.Additionally, the court heard from Regina Ventura, Cassie Ventura's mother, who testified about her daughter's experiences during her relationship with Combs. Regina recounted receiving a distressed email from Cassie in December 2011, in which Combs allegedly threatened to release explicit videos of Cassie after discovering her relationship with rapper Kid Cudi. She testified that Combs demanded $20,000 to prevent the video's release, prompting the family to take out a home equity loan to pay him. Regina also stated that she photographed Cassie's injuries to document the alleged abuse. The defense challenged her testimony by questioning the timing of these events and the family's decision to settle a civil lawsuit in 2023.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state's shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On Monday, May 19, 2025, the federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs continued with testimony from Dawn Richard, a former member of the girl group Danity Kane. Richard recounted witnessing Combs physically assault his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, on multiple occasions. She described an incident where Combs allegedly attempted to strike Ventura with a skillet during a dispute over breakfast, leading Ventura to cower on the floor as Combs kicked her. Richard also testified about being confined in a room by Combs following the altercation and receiving flowers from him the next day. Under cross-examination, Richard faced questions regarding inconsistencies in her account and her motivations for testifying.Additionally, the court heard from Regina Ventura, Cassie Ventura's mother, who testified about her daughter's experiences during her relationship with Combs. Regina recounted receiving a distressed email from Cassie in December 2011, in which Combs allegedly threatened to release explicit videos of Cassie after discovering her relationship with rapper Kid Cudi. She testified that Combs demanded $20,000 to prevent the video's release, prompting the family to take out a home equity loan to pay him. Regina also stated that she photographed Cassie's injuries to document the alleged abuse. The defense challenged her testimony by questioning the timing of these events and the family's decision to settle a civil lawsuit in 2023.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state's shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdf

In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state's shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdf

In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state's shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdf

In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state's shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state's shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state's shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state's shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Dawn Richard filed an amended complaint against Sean "Diddy" Combs on March 10, 2025, as part of Case 1:24-cv-06848-KPF in federal court. The amended filing expands on her original September 2024 lawsuit, adding new allegations of financial misconduct, claiming that Combs misappropriated funds owed to her from Danity Kane and other music ventures. It also provides more specific details regarding her claims of sexual misconduct and abuse, including additional dates, locations, and alleged witnesses. Richard further alleges that Combs engaged in intimidation tactics, using threats and coercion to silence her.In response, Combs' legal team denied all allegations, calling them baseless and an attempt to damage his reputation. They have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing that the claims lack merit and fall outside the statute of limitations. The court has scheduled a hearing in April 2025 to address this motion, with the lawsuit continuing to unfold as part of the larger legal battles Combs is facing.to  contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.128.0.pdf

Dawn Richard filed an amended complaint against Sean "Diddy" Combs on March 10, 2025, as part of Case 1:24-cv-06848-KPF in federal court. The amended filing expands on her original September 2024 lawsuit, adding new allegations of financial misconduct, claiming that Combs misappropriated funds owed to her from Danity Kane and other music ventures. It also provides more specific details regarding her claims of sexual misconduct and abuse, including additional dates, locations, and alleged witnesses. Richard further alleges that Combs engaged in intimidation tactics, using threats and coercion to silence her.In response, Combs' legal team denied all allegations, calling them baseless and an attempt to damage his reputation. They have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing that the claims lack merit and fall outside the statute of limitations. The court has scheduled a hearing in April 2025 to address this motion, with the lawsuit continuing to unfold as part of the larger legal battles Combs is facing.to  contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.128.0.pdf

Aubrey O'Day has a long history with Dawn Richard. In this episode, she takes us from past to present with her former bandmate. From her days with 'Danity Kane' to her recent testimony. Addressing inconsistencies to the celebrity name drops. Aubrey shares her thoughts as the trial continues.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

ICYMI: We have a live show going down in 3 days and some change at Punch Line Philly!! Get your tix ASAP at https://punchlinephilly.com/shows The Diddy trial has the world watching with no actual TV or video coverage. People are hanging on every court report from Inner City Press, Loren Lorosa and any other main stream media publication within reach. Today we cover the first week of trial, Cassie's testimony and how Dawn Richard rocked the defense so badly in 5 mins that the judge called recess for the weekend. All this plus the in depth analysis that only TRPE can provide. 

Dawn Richard filed an amended complaint against Sean "Diddy" Combs on March 10, 2025, as part of Case 1:24-cv-06848-KPF in federal court. The amended filing expands on her original September 2024 lawsuit, adding new allegations of financial misconduct, claiming that Combs misappropriated funds owed to her from Danity Kane and other music ventures. It also provides more specific details regarding her claims of sexual misconduct and abuse, including additional dates, locations, and alleged witnesses. Richard further alleges that Combs engaged in intimidation tactics, using threats and coercion to silence her.In response, Combs' legal team denied all allegations, calling them baseless and an attempt to damage his reputation. They have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing that the claims lack merit and fall outside the statute of limitations. The court has scheduled a hearing in April 2025 to address this motion, with the lawsuit continuing to unfold as part of the larger legal battles Combs is facing.to  contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.128.0.pdf

Dawn Richard filed an amended complaint against Sean "Diddy" Combs on March 10, 2025, as part of Case 1:24-cv-06848-KPF in federal court. The amended filing expands on her original September 2024 lawsuit, adding new allegations of financial misconduct, claiming that Combs misappropriated funds owed to her from Danity Kane and other music ventures. It also provides more specific details regarding her claims of sexual misconduct and abuse, including additional dates, locations, and alleged witnesses. Richard further alleges that Combs engaged in intimidation tactics, using threats and coercion to silence her.In response, Combs' legal team denied all allegations, calling them baseless and an attempt to damage his reputation. They have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing that the claims lack merit and fall outside the statute of limitations. The court has scheduled a hearing in April 2025 to address this motion, with the lawsuit continuing to unfold as part of the larger legal battles Combs is facing.to  contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.128.0.pdf

Week 2 of the Diddy trial is underway and gets darker. Cassie's former best friend takes the stand, detailing a disturbing assault she claims Diddy inflicted on her — and the moment that ended her friendship with Cassie. Dawn Richard of Danity Kane breaks her silence. Meanwhile, Diddy's own family appears to distance themselves in court. Is his inner circle finally cracking?

Cassie Ventura is no longer on the stand, but she was the central character in testimony from three witnesses on Monday in the federal criminal case against Sean “Diddy” Combs. Pop singer Dawn Richard, Ventura's former best friend and one of Combs' former assistants each testified about their interactions with Ventura as the prosecution sought to bolster Ventura's testimony last week that Combs physically abused her and controlled her life for over a decade. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Julie Grant's top story covers Dawn Richard's testimony regarding what she views as threats from music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Plus, John O'Keefe's head injuries are analyzed on this episode of the Opening Statements Podcast.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?Catch up on the case against #KarenRead here: https://www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of the Opening Statements Podcast is hosted by Julie Grant, produced by Eric Goldson, and edited by Autumn Sewell.

The actual charges against Diddy, as per the actual grand jury indictment and whether the prosecution is making its case in the first week of an eight week trial; Cassie is cross-examined; the defense argues Diddy was a vindictive lover who beat Cassie out of jealousy and drug use, not to force her into Freak Offs; Cassie's husband says he didn't rescue her; a Homeland Security Investigator finds Freak-Off evidence— and a woman!—  in Diddy's hotel room the day he was arrested; Dawn Richard of Danity Kane/Dirty Money testifies Diddy tried to hit Cassie with a skillet and threatened Dawn to remain silent; And more.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In the second week of Sean “Diddy” Combs' trial witness Danity Kane Singer Dawn Richard returns to stand and today she's up against the Defense in a heated Cross Examination. Welcome to Surviving The Survivor, the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of true crime. In this LIVE Diddy episode STS Host Joel Waldman will break down the very latest testimony and share the most important details about the case. Dawn Richard testified about a 2009 incident where she witnessed Combs allegedly attack his ex, Casandra “Cassie” Ventura, with a frying pan while she was making him eggs. Richard's testimony explains the abuse she saw and the fear instilled in her. Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing five criminal charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy and transportation to engage in prostitution. The music mogul has pleaded not guilty to all charged. Combs' defense team agrees Diddy and Cassie Ventura had a volatile relationship in which both parties were violent. They even claim Combs may be guilty of domestic abuse — but not the crimes he is actually being charged with. So the question remains...will the state prove their case? Is there reasonable doubt? The trial is expected to last eight weeks. Combs also faces more than 70 civil complaints, including one by Richard. He has denied all the allegations against him.⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast

Dawn Richard, formerly of Danity Kane, took the stand in the ongoing trial against Sean “Diddy” Combs, delivering explosive testimony that she personally witnessed him assault Cassie Ventura in a 2009 incident. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On today’s episode of The Rickey Smiley Morning Show Podcast, the team tackled some of the biggest breaking stories making headlines. Former President Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer that has reportedly spread to his bones. Meanwhile, Dawn Richard, formerly of Danity Kane, took the stand in the ongoing trial against Sean “Diddy” Combs, delivering explosive testimony that she personally witnessed him assault Cassie Ventura in a 2009 incident. Her testimony adds weight to Cassie’s abuse claims, further intensifying the scrutiny around Diddy. Adding to the day’s heavy news, violent storms have swept through the central United States, tragically claiming at least 28 lives across Missouri, Kentucky, and Virginia. The deadly weather continues to wreak havoc, with officials warning of more severe conditions to come. The RSMS crew brings you the facts, commentary, and perspective you won’t hear anywhere else. Website: https://www.urban1podcasts.com/rickey-smiley-morning-show See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Cassie Breaks Down on the Stand: “I'd Give It All Back” in Diddy Trial The fifth day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial took a dark and undeniable turn. After four days of emotional, raw, and disturbing testimony from pop artist Cassie Ventura, prosecutors backed her story with hard evidence and a surprise witness. This video breaks down everything that unfolded on May 17, 2025, in court — and why it may become the most pivotal day of the entire trial. In the first half of the day, Cassie Ventura was pressed by the defense in a relentless cross-examination. They pulled up explicit texts, financial settlements, and the timeline of her accusations. But Cassie didn't waver. Through tears, she responded with chilling calm, telling the jury: “I'd give that money back if I never had to have freak-offs.” That quote alone left the courtroom in silence. She exited the stand, visibly pregnant, broken yet defiant. Then came Special Agent Yasin Binda of Homeland Security. Her testimony connected Cassie's claims to physical evidence. From multiple bottles of baby oil and professional lighting rigs to ketamine, ecstasy, and $9,000 in a fanny pack — the room looked less like a luxury suite and more like a stage for control. Notably, pill bottles were found labeled under the alias “Frank Black” — a name previously associated with Combs. The cherry on top? An external hard drive the prosecution has yet to unlock in court. Just when you thought it couldn't get darker, singer Dawn Richard stepped forward with a 2009 memory: Diddy allegedly attacking Cassie with a skillet, punching her, dragging her by her hair, then warning witnesses, “People who talk go missing.” The judge has yet to decide if her testimony will stay in the record. This isn't just a celebrity trial. It's a forensic, psychological, and deeply disturbing story of power and control. Watch now for the full breakdown of what could be the day that changes everything. #DiddyTrial #CassieVentura #TrueCrime #SexTrafficking #DawnRichard #FreakOffs #FederalTrial #JusticeForVictims #Diddy #BreakingNews Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Cassie Admits to Cheating on Alex, Dawn Richard Testifies + Alex Fine Releases A Statement

Troy and Kelli originally recorded this episode for Patreon only back in September 2024. This week, they wanted to release it to the public because Dawn is taking the stand at some point this week. We stand with Diddy's victims. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices