Podcast appearances and mentions of John Doe

In Placer County, California, a former MLB pitcher is on trial for allegedly gunning down his in-laws in their home. He says he didn't do it. A new expert testifies at the Karen Read retrial about data pulled from Read's car. He says it nails down the prosecution's timeline of what happened. The defense has a blistering response. Updates on the Menendez brothers and Lori Vallow Daybell. Plus, an attorney talks about witnesses who testify anonymously. Find out more about the cases covered each week here: www.datelinetruecrimeweekly.com

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdf

Plaintiff John Doe, represented by Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, has filed a civil lawsuit against defendant Sean Combs in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges claims against Combs based on actions detailed through the plaintiff's personal knowledge, along with other facts and information. The lawsuit initiates formal litigation, aiming to hold Combs accountable for alleged wrongdoing, though the precise details of the claims are yet to be outlined publicly.The case, brought anonymously under the name "John Doe," suggests sensitivity surrounding the allegations or potential concerns for the plaintiff's safety or privacy. As the legal process advances, further specifics regarding the nature of the allegations and the damages sought are expected to emerge, clarifying the basis for this legal action against Combs.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.637615.1.0_1.pdf

We've got a new song out now!! Thanks for listening and have a great week!

On this week's show we shop the Internet and find you three incredible deals on UHD TVs. We also discuss some of the best plot twists in movies that we have seen. Be forewarned, there will be spoilers. We also read your emails and take a look at the week's news. News: Fox unveils ‘Fox One' as name of new streamer YouTube TV Is Now The 4th Largest TV Provider In the United States Free TV is booming tvOS 18.5 just gave your Apple TV 4K a new feature for Dolby Atmos Three Incredible Deals on a UHD TV As a public service the HT Guys have scoured the internet and found you three incredible deals on UHD TVs. These are not refurbished units and were available at the time of this writing. Samsung 70" Crystal UHD 4K HDR TV (DU7200) Price: $479.99 Retailer: Amazon Details: This is noted as the lowest price ever for this 2024 model. It features Samsung's Crystal UHD with 4K, Motion Xcelerator for reduced lag, and HDR (not Dolby Vision) support. Ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking a large screen from a top brand. Why It's a Good Deal: At under $480 for a 70-inch 4K TV, this is a steal for a 2024 Samsung model, especially with its HDR capabilities. Hisense 85" U6 Mini-LED ULED 4K UHD Google Smart TV Price: $849.99 Retailer: Amazon Details: This is the lowest price ever for this model, featuring a Mini-LED backlight, quantum dot color, and Google TV for a seamless smart interface. It supports HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision, making it great for movies and gaming. Why It's a Good Deal: An 85-inch TV with premium features like Mini-LED and quantum dots at this price is exceptional for large home theater setups. Samsung 55" 4K Crystal UHD DU8000 HDR Smart TV Price: $447.99 Retailer: Amazon Details: Another record-low price for a 2024 Samsung model. It includes HDR (not Dolby Vision), a smart TV interface, and 4K upscaling, suitable for streaming and casual gaming. Why It's a Good Deal: This 55-inch TV offers solid performance for under $500, balancing size and features from a reliable brand. The Best Movie Plot Twists I came across an article that was discussing how a good movie will lead you down one path and then in a “Plot Twist” send you down a different and completely unexpected new path. That got me thinking about what were my most memorable plot twists from movies that I have watched over the years. I have come up with four that have stayed with me. What are your favorites? The Sixth Sense (1999) - The twist redefines the entire story, forcing viewers to rethink every scene. It's iconic for its emotional weight and subtle foreshadowing, often cited as the gold standard of plot twists. In this case you learn that Bruce Willis' character Malcolm Crowe was actually deceased. I hate to admit it but I never saw this coming. The Empire Strikes Back (1980) - The revelation Darth Vader is Luke's Father altered the saga's emotional core and is still one of the most quoted twists ever. Planet of the Apes (1968) - we are talking about the original here with Charlton Heston. The last scene leads up to the final payoff making it one of the most memorable twists in cinema. Se7en (1995) - The climax delivers a horrific surprise that ties the story's themes together. It's a twist that's both brutal and unforgettable, often debated for its boldness. The twist, John Doe played by Kevin Spacey manipulates Mills played by Brad Pitt emotionally to commit the seventh deadly sin. Braden's Pics: Usual Suspects Fight Club Shutter Island Memento

What's better than one unique voice? Do you have to ask? Here in Top Ten Unique Voices That Sound Great Together, our good friend and returning champion Gabe Scalone lays out his vision for an obvious but awesome topic. Here it is in a nutshell - 2 singers that have unmistakable flair and originality, combining forces like the finest chocolate and some amazing peanut butter to create a taste sensation. Two great tastes that taste great together, as Madison Avenue used to say. Picks 10-6 are revealed here in Part 1.We've lowered our prices, but not our standards over at the ATTT Patreon! Those who are kindly contributing $2 a month are receiving an exclusive monthly Emergency Pod episode featuring our favorite guests and utilizing our patent-pending improv format in which we miraculously pull a playlist out of thin air. The Old Boy Himself Ryan Blake joined for May's bonus episode.Find out more at https://www.patreon.com/c/alltimetoptenWe're having a blast chatting it up about music over on the ATTT Facebook Group. Join us and start a conversation!https://www.facebook.com/groups/940749894391295

Sarah Stottlemyer and Rebecca Halberg of Stottlemyer & Associates joined The Locker Room and discussed should parents go to jail for the actions of their children, a Gwinnett Co women who caused about $20,000 worth of damage to a Tesla dealership with a BB gun, the John Doe who is suing the NFL due to the draft fall of Sheduer Sanders and moreSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

¡Por fin hemos resuelto esta historia! Y nos ha dado tiempo a lanzar una nueva: 'Thelma y Louise'. Además, el juzgado de guardia hablamos con Félix Martín de los límites del true crime. 

Send us a textThe Blake Lively v. Justin Baldoni case keeps getting stranger. According to THE DAILY MAIL, something nefarious is afoot.You might remember that Justin Baldoni sued his ex-publicist Stephanie Jones, accusing her of colluding with Lively to obtain damaging texts between Baldoni and his PR firm. Jones argued she merely complied with a subpoena when she handed over Baldoni's private messages. Her lawyers stated she had no choice but to respond to the legal request.Now, thanks to investigative sleuthing, we know the suspicious subpoena originated from a shadowy lawsuit filed under Vanzan Inc. — a company tied to Lively. This entity sued unnamed 'John Doe' defendants solely to secure subpoena power, then abruptly dropped the case after obtaining the messages from Stephanie Jones. Baldoni's team alleges this was all part of a master plan between Jones and Lively to save Jones from Baldoni's countersuit.Give me feedback on IG @THEDISHMASTER

Casi hemos conseguido resolver, pero finalmente hemos dejado la historia a punto de caramelo. Mañana sería el día. Despertamos a nuestro motivador, Francesc Miralles, para hablar sobre la sabiduría de la inseguridad. Con Carol Viciano, como cada madrugada, jugamos a destapar clickbait. 

Es martes y hemos abierto nueva historia. Nuestros detectives no han tardado en participar y avanzar de forma considerable. Despertamos a Raquel Mascaraque para hablar del miedo al que dirán. Con Marta Centella respondemos a una de nuestras detectives junior, Jimena, qué tenía una duda sobre la expresión 'coser y cantar'. Cerramos esta primera hora con Carol Viciano y su lucha incansable contra los clickbait. 

“7 pecados capitales, 7 maneras de morir.” Tras un largo paròn regresamos a los micros para celebrar el 30 Aniversario de la icónica SE7EN de David Fincher, un programa conmemorativo sobre la mítica obra de John Doe. Hablaremos como le ha sentado el paso del tiempo al film de Fincher y tendremos la ilustre participación en forma de audio comentarios de Javier Pérez Campos y Francisco Pérez Caballero del El Señor de los Crímenes. Esperamos que disfrutéis del programa, y como siempre, darle un me gusta, comentar y compartir con quien creáis afín y pueda disfrutar de estas horas de entretenimiento cinematográfico. No olvidéis seguir Webbtertainment en las siguientes plataformas: Twitter X: https://x.com/webbpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/webbtertainment/ Telegram: https://t.me/webbtertainment

White Men Can't Jump was the pinnacle of positive black/white relations in the United States. Fuck Robert Rodriguez and his can-do attitude. I spent the afternoon with a BIG MOVIE STAR, and got 3rddegree burns on my tongue from a fish taco. (Possibly)

​Kristina Khorram, who served as Sean "Diddy" Combs' chief of staff, has been implicated in multiple lawsuits alleging her involvement in Combs' purported criminal activities, including sex trafficking and abuse. In these lawsuits, Khorram is accused of facilitating the procurement of sex workers for Combs and managing operations related to alleged illicit activities. One lawsuit notably compared her role to that of Ghislaine Maxwell in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal network, suggesting she played a pivotal part in the alleged misconduct.In response to these allegations, Khorram has categorically denied any involvement in or condonation of such activities. In a statement to Rolling Stone, she expressed profound distress over the accusations, stating: "I have never condoned or aided and abetted the sexual assault of anyone. Nor have I ever drugged anyone." She further emphasized that the notion of her being implicated in such acts is "beyond upsetting, disturbing, and unthinkable," and expressed confidence that the allegations against her would be proven untrue.Plaintiff John Doe, represented by Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, files this complaint against Defendant Sean Combs. The allegations are based on personal knowledge and information. Plaintiff asserts claims against Combs, detailing specific grievances and legal grounds for action. The complaint outlines the nature of the alleged wrongdoing, including factual and legal bases for holding Combs accountable.This lawsuit seeks relief for the harm allegedly caused by Combs, requesting appropriate legal remedies. The complaint establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting evidence, and sets forth claims that Plaintiff intends to prove in court. Through this action, Plaintiff seeks justice and compensation for the alleged misconduct by Defendant.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.637615.1.0.pdf

​Kristina Khorram, who served as Sean "Diddy" Combs' chief of staff, has been implicated in multiple lawsuits alleging her involvement in Combs' purported criminal activities, including sex trafficking and abuse. In these lawsuits, Khorram is accused of facilitating the procurement of sex workers for Combs and managing operations related to alleged illicit activities. One lawsuit notably compared her role to that of Ghislaine Maxwell in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal network, suggesting she played a pivotal part in the alleged misconduct.In response to these allegations, Khorram has categorically denied any involvement in or condonation of such activities. In a statement to Rolling Stone, she expressed profound distress over the accusations, stating: "I have never condoned or aided and abetted the sexual assault of anyone. Nor have I ever drugged anyone." She further emphasized that the notion of her being implicated in such acts is "beyond upsetting, disturbing, and unthinkable," and expressed confidence that the allegations against her would be proven untrue.Plaintiff John Doe, represented by Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, files this complaint against Defendant Sean Combs. The allegations are based on personal knowledge and information. Plaintiff asserts claims against Combs, detailing specific grievances and legal grounds for action. The complaint outlines the nature of the alleged wrongdoing, including factual and legal bases for holding Combs accountable.This lawsuit seeks relief for the harm allegedly caused by Combs, requesting appropriate legal remedies. The complaint establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting evidence, and sets forth claims that Plaintiff intends to prove in court. Through this action, Plaintiff seeks justice and compensation for the alleged misconduct by Defendant.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.637615.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

A personal trainer, identified as John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging sexual assault and exploitation. The plaintiff claims that in 2018, during a training session at Combs' residence, Combs made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and suggestive remarks. Despite Doe's objections, Combs allegedly persisted, leading to an assault that caused significant emotional and psychological distress.The lawsuit further alleges that Combs leveraged his celebrity status and influence to intimidate Doe into silence, threatening to ruin his professional reputation if he disclosed the incident. This power dynamic, the suit claims, prevented Doe from coming forward sooner. The legal action seeks damages for the alleged assault, emotional suffering, and the impact on Doe's career. Combs' legal team has categorically denied these allegations, describing them as baseless attempts to damage his reputation.(commercial at 9:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy drugged personal trainer and passed him around 'like a party favor' to celeb pals, latest horror lawsuit claims | The Sun

​Kristina Khorram, who served as Sean "Diddy" Combs' chief of staff, has been implicated in multiple lawsuits alleging her involvement in Combs' purported criminal activities, including sex trafficking and abuse. In these lawsuits, Khorram is accused of facilitating the procurement of sex workers for Combs and managing operations related to alleged illicit activities. One lawsuit notably compared her role to that of Ghislaine Maxwell in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal network, suggesting she played a pivotal part in the alleged misconduct.In response to these allegations, Khorram has categorically denied any involvement in or condonation of such activities. In a statement to Rolling Stone, she expressed profound distress over the accusations, stating: "I have never condoned or aided and abetted the sexual assault of anyone. Nor have I ever drugged anyone." She further emphasized that the notion of her being implicated in such acts is "beyond upsetting, disturbing, and unthinkable," and expressed confidence that the allegations against her would be proven untrue.Plaintiff John Doe, represented by Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, files this complaint against Defendant Sean Combs. The allegations are based on personal knowledge and information. Plaintiff asserts claims against Combs, detailing specific grievances and legal grounds for action. The complaint outlines the nature of the alleged wrongdoing, including factual and legal bases for holding Combs accountable.This lawsuit seeks relief for the harm allegedly caused by Combs, requesting appropriate legal remedies. The complaint establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting evidence, and sets forth claims that Plaintiff intends to prove in court. Through this action, Plaintiff seeks justice and compensation for the alleged misconduct by Defendant.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.637615.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This episode explores the lasting impact of  Prison Break, particularly focusing on Bill Kim. Reggie Lee shares anecdotes of being recognized by fans who often remember them from the show immediately. We also discuss the mixed experience with fan interactions, including requests for personalized messages on platforms like Cameo, highlighting the show's significant influence and enduring fan appreciation. 00:00 The Impact of Prison Break 33:53 Recognition and Notoriety 34:28 Joining Cameo 34:37 Struggles with Cameo Requests Leave us your comments, shoot us an email, or leave us a voicemail - we love hearing from all of you! For the FULL Prison Breaking With Sarah & Paul experience, join our very active Patreon community where you can watch our WATCH PARTY episodes, released a day before the podcast episode, where you can re-watch every episode of Prison Break alongside Sarah & Paul's real time commentary (kind of like the DVD director commentary tracks of yore).  You also get access to all of our Fan Fiction episodes and our Discord Server where you can join our active Prison Breaking community, interact with Sarah & Paul's "Ask Me Anything" and join group WATCH PARTIES where you can experience the release of every Watch Party and along with a group chat.   Join our Patreon here: https://patreon.com/user?u=116411884 If you love all the behind-the-scenes Prison Break convo that Sarah & Paul are bringing weekly, then please give us a review and a follow us on all your podcast, social media, and YouTube accounts! Watch the episode on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@PrisonBreakPodcast Follow us on Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/prisonbreakpodcast/ Follow us on TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@prisonbreakpodcast Merch!!! - https://pbmerch.printify.me/products Email us at prisonbreaking@caliber-studio.com And leave us a message with all your burning questions at (401) 3-PBREAK Logo design by John Nunziatto @ Little Big Brands.  If you want one yourself, reach out at https://www.littlebigbrands.com/ and tell him we sent you.   PRISON BREAKING WITH SARAH & PAUL is a Caliber Studio production. 

Episode 143 Doe ID: 'Mentone John Doe' Derrick Burton  In October, 1991, a hunter in the area of Mentone, CA discovered a human skull. The skull was devoid of teeth and a mandible. Based on the size of the skull, it was estimated to be a child's. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's department searched the area for more remains but they didn't find any. However, they found a bag containing a child's clothing, and took it into evidence. An autopsy confirmed initial beliefs that the remains were that of a child; a young boy between 4 & 8 years old. A cause of death could not be determined. The authorities considered local missing persons cases, but didn't link the remains to any of those missing children, and the dead boy was referred to as 'Mentone John Doe'. It wasn't until decades later that the authorities turned to IGG to determine the identity of  Mentone John Doe. He turned out to be, Derrick Burton. Incredibly, Derrick had been reported missing to the San Bernardino County Sheriff's dept when he was four years old  by his mother Patricia Clark in 1991. How the agency failed to make the connection between Mentone John Doe, and Derrick Burton early on is a mystery. Derrick had gone missing while in the care of his stepfather; Christopher Hammond. Hammond did time for charges related to Derrick's abduction, but not his death.  Sadly, it doesn't seem as if there is much movement in the case since Derrick was identified, or how much his death is being investigated. 'Mentone John Doe' now has his name back; it's Derrick Burton, and this is his story.  To listen to every episode of DNA: ID ad-free and get other benefits, simply  visit our channel page on Apple Podcasts to get started with an AbJack Insider subscription. Of course, you can also support DNA: ID with a Patreon subscription. For all things DNA: ID, visit the show's homepage Visit this link to buy DNA ID Merch

#1 ACS #656 (feat. John Doe, Alison Rosen and Bryan Bishop) (2011)#2 ACS #712 (feat. Dana Gould, Alison Rosen and Bryan Bishop) (2011)#3 ACS #723 (feat. Erin Brokovich, Alison Rosen and Bryan Bishop) (2011)Hosted by Superfan GiovanniRequest clips:Classics@adamcarolla.comSubscribe and Watch Clips on YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@AdamCarollaCornerSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Continuing with the Look Back at the Oklahoma City Bombing. Former 710KNUS Host and Reporter (who covered the Bombing Live) Steffan Tubbs joins the Show, along with Mike Connors. Discussion on John Doe #2, Conspiracy Theories, McVeigh's Arrest Story, and much more! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In recent days, Sean "Diddy" Combs has been accused by an aspiring male musician, identified as John Doe, of sexual assault stemming from an incident in 2015. According to the lawsuit, Combs invited Doe to perform at a party, promising potential music opportunities. After the performance, Doe alleges he was given a drink that left him incapacitated, and upon regaining consciousness, he found Combs sexually assaulting him. Fearing retaliation and damage to his burgeoning career, Doe did not report the incident at the time but has now come forward seeking justice and compensation for the trauma endured. This allegation adds to a growing list of legal challenges facing Combs, who is currently detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn on federal charges including sex trafficking and racketeering. The new lawsuit underscores a pattern of alleged misconduct, with multiple individuals accusing Combs of using his influence in the music industry to exploit and abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy lawsuit claims he drugged, groped aspiring male musician in 2015

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdf

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdf

That slick hook and spot-on beat playing over the PA in Target, at Cumberland Farms, in the venue before the headliner takes the stage: WHO IS THAT?  WHAT'S THAT SONG?We all have the Shazam app loaded on our phones, and it's wild to think that for more than half our lives (speaking for the Diarists), we did without it.  Here are four songs Bob, Brad, Mark, and Carla dialed up over Shazam.  Reach out to us with some of your own discoveries on Twitter and Insta.Find the Playlist on Spotify + Apple Music.  If you like what you hear, please share, rate and review us!Credits: Intro/ Outro — the Februarys, "Does Your Father Know"/ "... In a Letter." 

All episodes from 169 onwards are Patreon-only. I explain this on my last public episode. I will continue to update this feed and the website so that people know the Patreon is active. Listen to all episodes 169 and beyond in the Patreon feed. Join the Patreon community from $1 a month here: https://www.patreon.com/unknownpassagepodcastExtra episodes, series and fun awaits!

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Alright. Here's the deal. This episode, we're tearing into SE7EN. Not just talking about it—we're going full deep-dive into this bleak, messed-up world where every corner of the city feels like it's rotting. And yeah, it's all about the seven deadly sins—each one uglier than the last. They thought we were hunting a killer. What we got was a walking sermon with a body count. John Doe? He's not just twisted, he's deliberate. He thinks he's got the moral high ground, and the sickest part? He almost makes you think about it. We break down the murders, the message, the madness—and that ending? Yeah, that ending. We're not holding back. Spoilers? Absolutely. Moral ambiguity? You bet. David Fincher's direction? Dark as hell—and we dig it. So buckle up. Gluttony. Greed. Sloth. Lust. Pride. Envy. Wrath. We've got a lot to say about each. And if you're asking “What's in the box?”—you already know.

​In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the plaintiff, using the pseudonym "John Doe," alleges that in 2022, during a house party in New York City, he was drugged and sexually assaulted by Sean Combs, also known as "P. Diddy." The plaintiff asserts that he blacked out after being administered Rohypnol and later awoke to find Combs assaulting him, resulting in severe emotional distress. Upon filing the complaint on November 20, 2024, the plaintiff sought permission to proceed anonymously, which the court initially granted temporarily.However, after considering factors such as the sensitivity of the matter, potential harm from disclosure, and public interest, the court denied the plaintiff's renewed motion for anonymity on March 28, 2025. The court emphasized the presumption of open judicial proceedings and determined that the circumstances did not warrant overriding this principle. Consequently, the plaintiff was ordered to disclose his identity for the case to proceed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632109.43.0.pdf

​In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the plaintiff, using the pseudonym "John Doe," alleges that in 2022, during a house party in New York City, he was drugged and sexually assaulted by Sean Combs, also known as "P. Diddy." The plaintiff asserts that he blacked out after being administered Rohypnol and later awoke to find Combs assaulting him, resulting in severe emotional distress. Upon filing the complaint on November 20, 2024, the plaintiff sought permission to proceed anonymously, which the court initially granted temporarily.However, after considering factors such as the sensitivity of the matter, potential harm from disclosure, and public interest, the court denied the plaintiff's renewed motion for anonymity on March 28, 2025. The court emphasized the presumption of open judicial proceedings and determined that the circumstances did not warrant overriding this principle. Consequently, the plaintiff was ordered to disclose his identity for the case to proceed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632109.43.0.pdf

​In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the plaintiff, using the pseudonym "John Doe," alleges that in 2022, during a house party in New York City, he was drugged and sexually assaulted by Sean Combs, also known as "P. Diddy." The plaintiff asserts that he blacked out after being administered Rohypnol and later awoke to find Combs assaulting him, resulting in severe emotional distress. Upon filing the complaint on November 20, 2024, the plaintiff sought permission to proceed anonymously, which the court initially granted temporarily.However, after considering factors such as the sensitivity of the matter, potential harm from disclosure, and public interest, the court denied the plaintiff's renewed motion for anonymity on March 28, 2025. The court emphasized the presumption of open judicial proceedings and determined that the circumstances did not warrant overriding this principle. Consequently, the plaintiff was ordered to disclose his identity for the case to proceed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632109.43.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the plaintiff, using the pseudonym "John Doe," alleges that in 2022, during a house party in New York City, he was drugged and sexually assaulted by Sean Combs, also known as "P. Diddy." The plaintiff asserts that he blacked out after being administered Rohypnol and later awoke to find Combs assaulting him, resulting in severe emotional distress. Upon filing the complaint on November 20, 2024, the plaintiff sought permission to proceed anonymously, which the court initially granted temporarily.However, after considering factors such as the sensitivity of the matter, potential harm from disclosure, and public interest, the court denied the plaintiff's renewed motion for anonymity on March 28, 2025. The court emphasized the presumption of open judicial proceedings and determined that the circumstances did not warrant overriding this principle. Consequently, the plaintiff was ordered to disclose his identity for the case to proceed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632109.43.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the plaintiff, using the pseudonym "John Doe," alleges that in 2022, during a house party in New York City, he was drugged and sexually assaulted by Sean Combs, also known as "P. Diddy." The plaintiff asserts that he blacked out after being administered Rohypnol and later awoke to find Combs assaulting him, resulting in severe emotional distress. Upon filing the complaint on November 20, 2024, the plaintiff sought permission to proceed anonymously, which the court initially granted temporarily.However, after considering factors such as the sensitivity of the matter, potential harm from disclosure, and public interest, the court denied the plaintiff's renewed motion for anonymity on March 28, 2025. The court emphasized the presumption of open judicial proceedings and determined that the circumstances did not warrant overriding this principle. Consequently, the plaintiff was ordered to disclose his identity for the case to proceed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632109.43.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the plaintiff, using the pseudonym "John Doe," alleges that in 2022, during a house party in New York City, he was drugged and sexually assaulted by Sean Combs, also known as "P. Diddy." The plaintiff asserts that he blacked out after being administered Rohypnol and later awoke to find Combs assaulting him, resulting in severe emotional distress. Upon filing the complaint on November 20, 2024, the plaintiff sought permission to proceed anonymously, which the court initially granted temporarily.However, after considering factors such as the sensitivity of the matter, potential harm from disclosure, and public interest, the court denied the plaintiff's renewed motion for anonymity on March 28, 2025. The court emphasized the presumption of open judicial proceedings and determined that the circumstances did not warrant overriding this principle. Consequently, the plaintiff was ordered to disclose his identity for the case to proceed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632109.43.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdf

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdf

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In March 2025, a professional photographer filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs in the New York State Supreme Court, alleging sexual battery. The plaintiff, identified as John Doe, claims that during a commercial shoot in late 2022 or early 2023, Combs invited him into his trailer under the pretense of discussing career opportunities. Once inside, Combs allegedly pressured Doe to engage in sexual acts, suggesting that compliance would advance his career. The lawsuit details that after Doe refused, Combs threatened him with physical violence and expelled him from the trailer. Doe asserts that he returned to work, grappling with the trauma of the encounter.Combs' legal team has denied the allegations, stating that he has "never sexually assaulted or sex trafficked anyone—man or woman, adult or minor." They assert confidence in the judicial process and anticipate prevailing in court. This lawsuit adds to a series of legal challenges Combs faces, including multiple allegations of sexual misconduct and assault spanning several decades. As of now, Combs remains incarcerated on unrelated charges, with a trial set for May 2025.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy lawsuit claims he sexually assaulted man with threats to careerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In March 2025, a professional photographer filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs in the New York State Supreme Court, alleging sexual battery. The plaintiff, identified as John Doe, claims that during a commercial shoot in late 2022 or early 2023, Combs invited him into his trailer under the pretense of discussing career opportunities. Once inside, Combs allegedly pressured Doe to engage in sexual acts, suggesting that compliance would advance his career. The lawsuit details that after Doe refused, Combs threatened him with physical violence and expelled him from the trailer. Doe asserts that he returned to work, grappling with the trauma of the encounter.Combs' legal team has denied the allegations, stating that he has "never sexually assaulted or sex trafficked anyone—man or woman, adult or minor." They assert confidence in the judicial process and anticipate prevailing in court. This lawsuit adds to a series of legal challenges Combs faces, including multiple allegations of sexual misconduct and assault spanning several decades. As of now, Combs remains incarcerated on unrelated charges, with a trial set for May 2025.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy lawsuit claims he sexually assaulted man with threats to career

​In March 2025, a professional photographer filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs in the New York State Supreme Court, alleging sexual battery. The plaintiff, identified as John Doe, claims that during a commercial shoot in late 2022 or early 2023, Combs invited him into his trailer under the pretense of discussing career opportunities. Once inside, Combs allegedly pressured Doe to engage in sexual acts, suggesting that compliance would advance his career. The lawsuit details that after Doe refused, Combs threatened him with physical violence and expelled him from the trailer. Doe asserts that he returned to work, grappling with the trauma of the encounter.Combs' legal team has denied the allegations, stating that he has "never sexually assaulted or sex trafficked anyone—man or woman, adult or minor." They assert confidence in the judicial process and anticipate prevailing in court. This lawsuit adds to a series of legal challenges Combs faces, including multiple allegations of sexual misconduct and assault spanning several decades. As of now, Combs remains incarcerated on unrelated charges, with a trial set for May 2025.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy lawsuit claims he sexually assaulted man with threats to careerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

**Special Edition**On February 17, 2025, firefighters in Connecticut arrived at a home in Waterbury in response to a 911 call from Kimberly Sullivan. She told dispatchers that her step-son was inside and that he needed an ambulance. The firefighters were unprepared for the GRIMM discovery within. Kimberly's step-son had collapsed in the house, but it was clear that he was suffering from more than just smoke inhalation, as he was skeletal, dirty and disheveled. In this special episode of GRIMM, Marina covers the unfathomable details surrounding the rescue of 32-year-old "John Doe," after an alleged 20 years behind a door locked by his own family.

Whistleblower exposes gov't occult

Plaintiff John Doe, represented by Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, files this complaint against Defendant Sean Combs. The allegations are based on personal knowledge and information. Plaintiff asserts claims against Combs, detailing specific grievances and legal grounds for action. The complaint outlines the nature of the alleged wrongdoing, including factual and legal bases for holding Combs accountable.This lawsuit seeks relief for the harm allegedly caused by Combs, requesting appropriate legal remedies. The complaint establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting evidence, and sets forth claims that Plaintiff intends to prove in court. Through this action, Plaintiff seeks justice and compensation for the alleged misconduct by Defendant.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.637615.1.0.pdf

Plaintiff John Doe, represented by Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, files this complaint against Defendant Sean Combs. The allegations are based on personal knowledge and information. Plaintiff asserts claims against Combs, detailing specific grievances and legal grounds for action. The complaint outlines the nature of the alleged wrongdoing, including factual and legal bases for holding Combs accountable.This lawsuit seeks relief for the harm allegedly caused by Combs, requesting appropriate legal remedies. The complaint establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting evidence, and sets forth claims that Plaintiff intends to prove in court. Through this action, Plaintiff seeks justice and compensation for the alleged misconduct by Defendant.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.637615.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sunny War (a/k/a Sydney Ward) has lived through quite a few of her nine lives, rising out of substance abuse and poverty on the strength of her musical talent and finely tuned wit. She joins us to discuss her recently released album Armageddon In A Summer Dress (New West Records) which reunites her with her Anarchist Gospel producer Andrija Tokic, and features guests like Steve Ignorant (from the legendary Crass), Tre Burt, Jack Lawrence (Raconteurs), and friends of our show, John Doe and Valerie June. The Record Store Day Podcast is a weekly music chat show written, produced, engineered and hosted by Paul Myers, who also composed the theme music and selected interstitial music.  Executive Producers (for Record Store Day) Michael Kurtz and Carrie Colliton.   Record Store Day 2025 is April 12th. For the most up-to-date news about all things RSD, including The List, visit RecordStoreDay.com) Please consider subscribing to our podcast wherever you get podcasts, and tell your friends, we're here every week and we love making new friends.   This episode dedicated to Brian James (The Damned), and Roy Ayers (RIP) and all the people who make the music. Give them their flowers while they're here, and buy their records at your local store.

A district attorney uses a clever technique - a "John Doe indictment" - to give law enforcement officials the time they need to track down the a serial rapist from Rochester, N. Y. Gabb - Check out Gabb today, just go to Gabb.com/coldcase to get started! Homes.com: We've done your homework. Thrive Market: Go to ThriveMarket.com/coldcase for 30% off your first order, PLUS a free $60 gift! Thuma - Go to THUMA.co/COLDCASE to receive $100 off your first bed purchase!