Podcast appearances and mentions of John Doe

Sean "Diddy" Combs faces serious allegations from multiple individuals, including an incident involving a man identified as "John Doe." According to the lawsuit, in 2008, Combs forcibly assaulted the plaintiff in the stockroom of Macy's flagship store in Manhattan's Herald Square. The plaintiff, who worked as an advisor for Ecko Unltd.—a clothing brand competing with Combs's Sean John line—claims he was violently attacked by Combs's bodyguards, threatened with death, and then compelled to perform oral sex on Combs.After the assault, the plaintiff alleges he reported the incident to Macy's security, but no investigation ensued. Instead, he was barred from the store and subsequently terminated from his position, purportedly due to Macy's executives prioritizing a multimillion-dollar deal with Sean John Clothing.This case is among several legal actions against Combs, with accusations ranging from sexual assault to sex trafficking. Combs has denied all allegations, with his legal team stating that he "categorically denies as false and defamatory any claim that he sexually abused anyone—adult or minor, man or woman."(commercial at 8:07)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-ecko-complaint.pdfIn October 2024, a plaintiff identified as John Doe filed a motion seeking permission to proceed anonymously in a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs. The plaintiff alleges that in 2008, while working at Macy's flagship store in Manhattan, he was sexually assaulted by Combs. The motion to proceed under a pseudonym was submitted to protect the plaintiff's privacy and to prevent potential retaliation or public scrutiny. The court is currently considering this request, balancing the plaintiff's interest in anonymity against the public's right to open judicial proceedings and the defendant's ability to mount a defense. This case is part of a series of legal actions against Combs, who faces multiple allegations of sexual misconduct.(commercial at 8:19)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

During the unsealing of court documents in Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, a number of “John Doe” or anonymous names surfaced—people referenced in depositions, emails, flight logs and other records whose identities had been redacted or withheld. Some of these John Does were mentioned as having visited Epstein or Maxwell properties, flown on Epstein's jet, or otherwise been connected to the network via financial, travel, or social links. Because the documents came out in a defamation suit and related litigation, not all John Does were fully identified or confirmed; many remain placeholders, potential suspects, or persons of interest whose roles and involvements are unclear in public records.These John Does illustrate the depth and reach of Epstein and Maxwell's circle: even before unsealing, observers suspected powerful, anonymous backers and clients were being shielded behind redactions. The fact that so many names were initially hidden (and still are) underscores how legal agreements, confidentiality orders, and sealed records have long protected the identities of those who may have stood behind Epstein's operations. The exposure of some of these John Does triggered renewed calls to unseal more documents and to force accountability for those whose names were buried in silence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Welcome to Season 5, Episode 41! Today's guest is award-winning author Beth Lew-Williams. She's a Professor of History and the Director of the Program in Asian American Studies at Princeton University. She's best known for her work on migration, violence, and ethnic studies. She's also a 2025 winner of the Dan David Prize that honors innovative research on the human past. It's the largest history prize in the world, and only nine people were awarded it in 2025! Her latest book is John Doe Chinaman: A Forgotten History of Chinese Life under American Racial Law is published by Harvard University Press and was released on September 16 of this year (so it's available now)! We love the angle she takes by examining the laws, policies, and various regulations created by Federal, State, and Local leaders that impacted the Chinese in America. She uncovered thousands of laws and policies across the nation that targeted Chinese migrants. She also tells the stories of the Chinese Americans who refused to accept a conditional place in U.S. life. Lew-Williams previous book was The Chinese Must Go: Violence, Exclusion, and the Making of the Alien in America published in 2018 (also by Harvard University Press). In it, she maps the tangled relationships between local racial violence, federal immigration policy, and U.S. imperial ambitions in Asia. The Chinese Must Go won the Ray Allen Billington Prize and the Ellis W. Halley Prize from the Organization of American Historians. John Doe Chinaman isn't just for academia. It's for all those who are interested in reading about a part of America that hasn't been talked about as much. So it's great for all! If you like what we do, please share, follow, and like us in your podcast directory of choice or on Instagram @AAHistory101. For previous episodes and resources, please visit our site at https://asianamericanhistory101.libsyn.com or our links at http://castpie.com/AAHistory101. If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, email us at info@aahistory101.com.

During the unsealing of court documents in Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, a number of “John Doe” or anonymous names surfaced—people referenced in depositions, emails, flight logs and other records whose identities had been redacted or withheld. Some of these John Does were mentioned as having visited Epstein or Maxwell properties, flown on Epstein's jet, or otherwise been connected to the network via financial, travel, or social links. Because the documents came out in a defamation suit and related litigation, not all John Does were fully identified or confirmed; many remain placeholders, potential suspects, or persons of interest whose roles and involvements are unclear in public records.These John Does illustrate the depth and reach of Epstein and Maxwell's circle: even before unsealing, observers suspected powerful, anonymous backers and clients were being shielded behind redactions. The fact that so many names were initially hidden (and still are) underscores how legal agreements, confidentiality orders, and sealed records have long protected the identities of those who may have stood behind Epstein's operations. The exposure of some of these John Does triggered renewed calls to unseal more documents and to force accountability for those whose names were buried in silence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Michael Ejiawoko has filed a civil lawsuit against Sean “Diddy” Combs, Vici Properties Inc., Wynn Resorts Ltd., and Northwood Investors LLC, along with unnamed John Doe and Roe entities. The complaint, Case No. 2:25-cv-6750, alleges that Combs committed sexual battery in violation of California Civil Code §1708.5, and that the corporate defendants knowingly benefited from or facilitated the misconduct. The filing asserts that the defendants participated in or enabled a civil conspiracy that allowed acts of abuse and exploitation to occur under their watch or within their properties. Ejiawoko is seeking damages and has demanded a jury trial, signaling an intent to publicly challenge what he describes as a pattern of predatory conduct and corporate complicity.The complaint further invokes the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. §1595), suggesting that Combs and the associated corporate entities may have violated federal anti-trafficking laws by facilitating or profiting from a network of coercive sexual exploitation. This elevates the case beyond a state-level civil matter into potential federal jurisdiction, where penalties and liabilities are significantly higher. The inclusion of major hospitality and investment corporations such as Wynn Resorts and Vici Properties indicates that Ejiawoko's legal team aims to expose not only individual misconduct but also the broader systems and business relationships that may have enabled Combs's alleged criminal behavior to persist.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. Sexual Battery (Cal. Civ. Code § 1708.5) 2. Civil Conspiracy 3. Violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. § 1595) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:24-cv-07973 is a civil lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, identified only as John Doe, brings serious allegations against music mogul and entrepreneur Sean "Diddy" Combs. This case seeks both compensatory and punitive damages for a sexual assault that allegedly took place during a Cîroc Vodka party in Los Angeles. The event was organized by the Cîroc brand, which was heavily marketed by Combs as its celebrity spokesperson. Combs also claimed to have an ownership stake in the liquor brand, further linking him to the event and its management.Key AllegationsNature of the Assault: The plaintiff asserts that he was targeted and assaulted by Combs during a Cîroc-sponsored party, which was marketed as an exclusive and high-profile event. According to Doe, the assault occurred while he was present at the event for professional reasons, under the impression that he was in a safe, controlled, and celebratory environment. Doe alleges that Combs leveraged his power and influence as host and brand ambassador to initiate and carry out the assault.Cîroc Party Context: Cîroc Vodka parties, including the one where the assault allegedly took place, were widely known for their glamorous reputation. These events were part of a broader marketing strategy that emphasized luxury and exclusivity, often attended by celebrities, socialites, and other high-profile individuals. The plaintiff argues that the event's atmosphere was used by Combs to manipulate the situation and create a sense of safety and familiarity, making it easier for him to commit the alleged assault.Doe's Experience and Damages Sought: John Doe contends that the assault has resulted in severe physical, emotional, and psychological distress, affecting his personal and professional life. He is seeking substantial compensatory damages to address the personal harm suffered and related expenses. Additionally, he is pursuing punitive damages to hold Combs accountable for what he describes as a deliberate, malicious act, meant to both punish the defendant and deter similar behavior in the future.Legal ImplicationsBroader Context of Allegations Against Combs: This lawsuit is part of a growing number of sexual misconduct allegations against Combs, many of which span several years and involve multiple accusers. The claims portray a pattern of alleged sexual violence, intimidation, and abuse of power by Combs within high-profile events and settings that he controlled or influenced.Combs' Response and Defense: Combs has consistently denied all allegations of sexual misconduct, including the claims brought by John Doe in this case. His legal team has publicly criticized the lawsuit, calling it part of a coordinated effort to tarnish Combs' reputation and extort financial settlements. Combs' defense strategy will likely focus on discrediting the plaintiff's claims, disputing the details of the alleged incident, and emphasizing his reputation as a businessman and cultural icon.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630242.1.0_1.pdf

In the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Michael Ejiawoko has filed a civil lawsuit against Sean “Diddy” Combs, Vici Properties Inc., Wynn Resorts Ltd., and Northwood Investors LLC, along with unnamed John Doe and Roe entities. The complaint, Case No. 2:25-cv-6750, alleges that Combs committed sexual battery in violation of California Civil Code §1708.5, and that the corporate defendants knowingly benefited from or facilitated the misconduct. The filing asserts that the defendants participated in or enabled a civil conspiracy that allowed acts of abuse and exploitation to occur under their watch or within their properties. Ejiawoko is seeking damages and has demanded a jury trial, signaling an intent to publicly challenge what he describes as a pattern of predatory conduct and corporate complicity.The complaint further invokes the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. §1595), suggesting that Combs and the associated corporate entities may have violated federal anti-trafficking laws by facilitating or profiting from a network of coercive sexual exploitation. This elevates the case beyond a state-level civil matter into potential federal jurisdiction, where penalties and liabilities are significantly higher. The inclusion of major hospitality and investment corporations such as Wynn Resorts and Vici Properties indicates that Ejiawoko's legal team aims to expose not only individual misconduct but also the broader systems and business relationships that may have enabled Combs's alleged criminal behavior to persist.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. Sexual Battery (Cal. Civ. Code § 1708.5) 2. Civil Conspiracy 3. Violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. § 1595) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Send us a textJono Matt is BACK to get us started for our annual “Spooky Season,” here on the program! We're getting it started with our lust for discussing his choice “SE7EN,” (d. Fincher 1995) Starring: Morgan Freeman, Brad Pitt, and Gwyneth Paltrow.  At times we have a lot of pride in our loud opinions of this movie, at others we become gluttons for information. You may yourself envying the fun we have in this deep dive on the Andrew Kevin Walker written thriller, and greedy for even more by the end! And that's understandable, but please keep your wrath to a minimum. Just relax, lie down, and give into the soothing relaxation provided to you by The Review Review, and don't do a single thing. 9/30!**All episodes contain explicit language**Artwork - Ben McFaddenReview Review Intro/Outro Theme - Jamie Henwood"What Are We Watching" & "Whatcha been up to?" Themes - Matthew Fosket"Fun Facts" Theme - Chris Olds/Paul RootLead-Ins Edited/Conceptualized by - Ben McFaddenProduced by - Ben McFadden & Paul RootConcept - Paul Root

Frank is joined by Phil to break down Peacock's Twisted Metal, from its surprisingly heartfelt character work to the tournament arc and deep cuts that longtime players will recognize. We talk John Doe's search for identity, the show's “happy sociopath” version of Sweet Tooth, how Season 2 levels up the stunts and car combat, and why adding new lore can actually respect the games. If you skipped this one because “cars with guns,” we make the case for why it's worth your time. Timestamps and Topics 00:00 Introductions and why Twisted Metal was the pick for this episode. 00:36 What the show adapts from the games and where it departs, especially with John Doe. 02:11 The core premise: post apocalyptic courier job, a shot at life behind the walls, and the road to San Francisco. 03:29 Game lore 101: Calypso, wishes with a twist, and character specific endings. 07:00 Sweet Tooth as chaos engine, why the Joker style wildcard works on TV. 09:05 Samoa Joe in the suit, Will Arnett on the mic, and why the voice swap lands. 10:58 Axel and other fan favorites enter, with connected backstories that actually pay off. 13:42 Game venues reimagined with in world logic, HUDs and objectives that make sense. 18:48 Car combat talk: practical vs CG, why Season 2's action feels better. 21:07 “Silly” weapons that get smart uses and Chekhov's missile moments. 23:03 Budget glow up from Season 1 to Season 2 and early success on Peacock. 24:04 John and Quiet's chemistry, then the Season 2 relationship reset. 28:05 The sister storyline, tough choices, and consequences after the wish. 30:40 Minion reworked, identity twists, and a setup that begs for Season 3. 33:40 Adaptation philosophy: build new stories that feel like the game. 41:31 What other game adaptations can learn from Twisted Metal. 45:06 Fun facts: ratings, production notes, and stunt work. Key Takeaways Twisted Metal balances weekly mayhem with character arcs, making the world feel lived in instead of gimmicky. Sweet Tooth is written as a charmingly off kilter sociopath, and the Samoa Joe and Will Arnett combo sells the menace and the laughs. Season 2 embraces the tournament and deepens game lore while explaining gamey elements inside the story. Practical stunts plus targeted CG keep the car combat crunchy and readable. Smart departures from canon create stronger relationships without losing the game's tone. Quotes “It's a show about a character trying to find his worth in a post apocalyptic world.” “Sweet Tooth is a happy sociopath. It's off putting and I love him for it.” “They nailed the cross between practical and CG. The car combat was better than I expected.” “Give me new stories that live in the game's world, not a beat for beat retelling.” Call to Action If you enjoyed this breakdown, follow and rate the show. Drop a review on Apple Podcasts, share the episode with a friend who loved the games, and tag us with #ChallengeAcceptedPod so we can shout you out next week. Links and Resources GeekFreaksPodcast.com is our home base and the source of all news discussed on our shows Watch Twisted Metal on Peacock Follow Us Geek Freaks: Facebook, Threads, Twitter, Instagram Challenge Accepted: Instagram, TikTok, Twitter Listener Questions What did the show get right compared to your favorite Twisted Metal entries? Send your thoughts and questions for the next episode, and we will feature a few on air. Apple Podcasts Tags Geek Freaks, Challenge Accepted, Twisted Metal, Peacock, TV review, video game adaptations, Anthony Mackie, Sweet Tooth, car combat, post apocalyptic TV

In 1993, Amarillo attorney and former judge David Glenn Lewis vanished on Super Bowl Sunday, leaving behind turkey sandwiches, laundry in the wash, and a recording of the game on his VCR. Eleven years later, he was shockingly identified as a John Doe found 1,600 miles away in Washington state. How did he get there—and why? Sources: David Glenn Lewis (1953-1993) - Find a Grave Memorial 1993 hit-run victim is finally identified David Glenn Lewis: Cross Country Conundrum Sponsors: AquaTru Head to AquaTru.com now and get 20% off your purifier using promocode CREEPERS. AquaTru even comes with a 30-day best-tasting water guarantee or your money back. Quince Go to quince.com/creepers for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns! Happy Mammoth Right now, you can try Prebiotic Collagen Protein and Hormone Harmony risk-free AND get 15% off your entire first order with code CREEPERS at checkout. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dana and Tom with 5x Club Member, Peterson W. Hill (Co-Host of the War Starts at Midnight podcast) discuss the crime noir thriller, Se7en (1995) for its 30th anniversary: directed by David Fincher, written by Andrew Kevin Walker, cinematography by Darius Khondji, music by Howard Shore, starring Morgan Freeman, Brad Pitt, Gwyneth Paltrow, R. Lee Ermey, John C. McGinley, and Kevin Spacey.Plot Summary: Se7en, directed by David Fincher, is a dark crime thriller about two detectives trying to stop a serial killer. Detective Somerset (Morgan Freeman), an older cop close to retirement, is partnered with Detective Mills (Brad Pitt), a younger officer new to the city. They begin investigating a series of murders where each crime represents one of the seven deadly sins: gluttony, greed, sloth, lust, pride, envy, and wrath.The killer, John Doe, carefully plans each murder as a twisted lesson about human corruption. Somerset and Mills struggle to keep up as the crimes grow more shocking and disturbing. The case takes a personal turn when Doe finally surrenders, leading the detectives to a final trap that tests their morals.The movie explores themes of justice, morality, and the darkness of human nature. Its bleak atmosphere and shocking ending leave a lasting impact, making Seven one of the most powerful crime films of the 1990s.Guest:Peterson W. Hill - Co-Host of the War Starts at Midnight podcast@petersonwhill on IG, Letterboxd, and TwitterPrevious Guest on Gone Girl (2014), Parasite (2019), Fight Club (1999), Ben-Hur (1959), Up in the Air (2009), The Shop Around the Corner (1940), La Dolce Vita (1960), The Social Network (2010) Revisit, Pather Panchali (1955)Chapters:00:00 Introduction, Cast and Background for Se7en04:57 Welcome Back Peterson09:11 The Impact of Se7en on the Crime and Horror Genres17:09 Relationship(s) with Se7en21:52 Plot Summary for Se7en23:10 What is Se7en About?29:41 All-Time Film Twist...

Originally Recorded August 15th, 2025Check out the band Auburn's music: https://www.auburn.org.uk/https://open.spotify.com/artist/1w188ub8juelXd487MgYzUThe song played at the end is “John Doe.” This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit musicallyspeaking.substack.com

John Doe 1 v. NCAA

Det er flere i musikk-Norge som griner på Maiden-konsert. Bli med til øvingsrommet på Rotvoll og møt Stian Lundberg. Blidfisen er ikke den som stikker seg fram veldig ofte. Kanskje mest fordi han, som oftest, sitter bak trommene i utallige band og teaterforestillinger. Johndoe er vel bandet han har spilt i lengst og den gjengen er for tiden i ferd med å røre på seg igjen, til tross for at Stian har oppdrag så det monner. Det er jazz, rock, country, teater, undervisning og what not. Når Motorpsycho trenger vikar er det gjerne Stian de plinger på. Det er også soloprosjekt (sjekk ut "Stian Lundberg" på en strømmetjeneste nær deg), det er Ida Jenshus, det er Charlie Rackstead and the Sticklesbergen Ramblers, Sugarfoot, Moving Oos, Rasmus Rohde og noe jazz her og der. Her viser det seg at Stian og undertegnede har bortimot kliss lik oppvekst når det gjelder Maiden: No Prayer for The Dying, Fear of the Dark, 80-tallskatalogen - deretter en pause i Blaze-æraen før det ble grinings på konsert i 1999. Deler han pallen med kompis Kenneth Kapstad om tittelen "verdens største Nicko-fan"?

This conversation delves into the complexities of conflict of laws, focusing on jurisdiction, choice of law, and the recognition and enforcement of judgments across borders. It highlights the importance of understanding these principles for future legal professionals, especially in an increasingly interconnected world. The discussion contrasts the legal frameworks of the US and EU, explores the nuances of jurisdiction, and emphasizes the practical implications of enforcing judgments internationally.Imagine a scenario where a business dispute arises between parties located in different countries. The question of which country's laws apply and which court has the authority to hear the case becomes crucial. This is where the field of Conflict of Laws steps in, providing a framework to address these complex issues.Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear a case. In cross-border disputes, determining jurisdiction can be challenging. Courts often consider factors such as the location of the parties, the place where the contract was executed, and the nature of the dispute. As legal scholar John Doe notes, "Jurisdiction is the cornerstone of any legal proceeding, especially in international cases."Choice of Law: Once jurisdiction is established, the next step is to determine which country's laws will govern the dispute. This is known as the choice of law. Courts may apply various principles, such as the law of the place where the contract was made or the law of the place where the harm occurred. Jane Smith, a renowned legal expert, emphasizes, "The choice of law can significantly impact the outcome of a case, making it a critical consideration in international disputes."Recognition of Judgments: After a court renders a judgment, the question arises as to whether other jurisdictions will recognize and enforce it. The recognition of judgments is essential for ensuring that legal decisions have practical effects across borders. International treaties and agreements, such as the Hague Convention, play a vital role in facilitating the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.Conclusion: Conflict of Laws is a complex and dynamic field that addresses the challenges of cross-border legal disputes. By understanding the principles of jurisdiction, choice of law, and recognition of judgments, parties can navigate the intricacies of international litigation more effectively. As global interactions continue to increase, the importance of Conflict of Laws will only grow.Subscribe Now: Stay informed about the latest developments in international law by subscribing. Don't miss out on expert insights and analysis!TakeawaysUnderstanding conflict of laws is fundamental for legal professionals.Jurisdiction is the first question a court must answer.Choice of law determines which country's laws apply to a case.Recognition and enforcement of judgments are crucial for justice.The US and EU have different approaches to jurisdiction.Public policy can limit the application of foreign law.Renvoy is a complex but rare concept in English law.Domicile is key in family law matters.The Brussels and Lugano Conventions streamline jurisdiction in Europe.Practical issues like currency and costs affect enforcement.conflict of laws, jurisdiction, choice of law, recognition of judgments, international law, legal principles, US law, EU law, family law, enforcement

This conversation delves into the complex doctrine of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in contract law. It explores its foundational principles, historical development, and practical implications across various contexts, including insurance and employment contracts. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding both the functions and limitations of good faith, as well as the comparative perspectives between US and English law. Practical guidance for law students and legal practitioners is provided, focusing on drafting, advising, and litigation strategies related to good faith claims.In the realm of contract law, the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is a fundamental principle that ensures fairness and honesty in contractual relationships. Imagine entering into a contract with the expectation of mutual benefit, only to find that the other party is acting in bad faith. This covenant serves as a safeguard against such scenarios, promoting trust and integrity.The Essence of the Covenant: The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is not explicitly stated in contracts but is inherently understood to be part of every agreement. It requires parties to act honestly and fairly towards each other, ensuring that neither party undermines the contract's purpose. As legal scholar John Doe notes, "This covenant is the backbone of contractual fairness, preventing parties from exploiting loopholes to the detriment of the other."Real-World Applications: Consider a scenario where a supplier deliberately delays shipments to pressure a buyer into renegotiating terms. Such actions would violate the covenant, as they undermine the contract's intent. Courts often intervene in these cases, emphasizing the importance of good faith in maintaining contractual balance.Understanding the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is crucial for anyone involved in contractual agreements. It not only fosters trust but also ensures that contracts serve their intended purpose without manipulation. As you navigate the complexities of contract law, remember that this covenant is your ally in promoting fairness and integrity.Subscribe Now: Stay informed about the latest in contract law by subscribing.TakeawaysThe implied covenant of good faith is a foundational principle in contract law.Good faith requires parties to act honestly and fairly in their contractual obligations.It is not a subjective moral obligation but a legal standard.Good faith cannot override express terms of a contract.Claims for breach of good faith must be distinct from express breaches.Insurance contracts have a heightened duty of good faith, leading to tort liability.California has unique approaches to good faith in employment contracts.Relational contracts require a higher degree of cooperation and trust.Good faith serves as a gap filler in contracts, addressing unforeseen issues.Documenting everything is crucial for proving or disproving bad faith. contract law, good faith, fair dealing, legal principles, implied covenant, contract disputes, law students, legal analysis, historical context, comparative law

Twisted Metal Season 2: Episode 361 - Get ready for some MAYHEM! Start your engines and get ready to ride, we're hitting the road to talk all things Twisted Metal Season 2! Peacocks number 1 show returns, but does season 2 hit the gas or slam on the breaks? Tune in to Normies Like Us to find out! We are Normies Like Us... and we thank you for playing Twisted Metal. Insta: @NormiesLikeUs https://www.instagram.com/normieslikeus/ @jacob https://www.instagram.com/jacob/ @MikeHasInsta https://www.instagram.com/mikehasinsta/ https://letterboxd.com/BabblingBrooksy/ https://letterboxd.com/hobbes72/ https://letterboxd.com/mikejromans/

"John Doe has the upper hand now!" But does he still?Justin, Jon, and special guest Alia discuss this classic thriller, 30 years after its release. Royalty Free Music: "8 Bit Win!" By HeatleyBros ⁠⁠⁠⁠youtu.be/vX1xq4Ud2z8⁠

The premise is almost deceptively simple: two police detectives - a rookie and a veteran - hunt a serial killer around an unnamed city who has been who has apparently been using the seven deadly sins as his motives for each victim, each one also displayed at the murder scene to signify that one particular sin.  Of course as directed by three-time Oscar-nominee David Fincher (Fight Club, Zodiac, The Social Network, Gone Girl), it became a highly influential phenomenon.....a grisly horror classic featuring one of the most talked-about gut-punch endings of all time.  It also helped that it starred two movie stars at the peak of their powers: Oscar-winner Morgan Freeman as the veteran Detective Somerset and Oscar-winner Brad Pitt as the rookie Detective Mills.  Plus Oscar-winner Gwyneth Paltrow as Tracy Mills....AND Oscar-winner Kevin Spacey as John Doe.  Now approaching this film's thirtieth anniversary, let's join our two intrepid detectives on the trail to find out........WHAT'S IN THE BOX. :o   Host: Geoff GershonEdited By Ella GershonProducer: Marlene GershonSend us a textSupport the showhttps://livingforthecinema.com/Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/Living-for-the-Cinema-Podcast-101167838847578Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/livingforthecinema/Letterboxd:https://letterboxd.com/Living4Cinema/

Let the games begin! Alexis Hejna from Honeysuckle Rose Creations joins Jayson Teasley to look at the second season of the hit adaptation of the video game franchise. Let's see some carnage, cars, and of course, clowns!Twisted Metal is an American post-apocalyptic action comedy television series developed by Rhett Reese, Paul Wernick and Michael Jonathan Smith. Based on the vehicular combat video game franchise published by Sony Interactive Entertainment, the series stars Anthony Mackie, Stephanie Beatriz, Joe Seanoa, Will Arnett, Thomas Haden Church, and Anthony Carrigan.In a post-apocalyptic wasteland, John Doe (portrayed by Mackie), a talkative milkman with amnesia, is given a mission to traverse the desolate United States to deliver a mysterious package with unknown contents. He faces a life-altering opportunity but must confront ruthless marauders in deadly and destructive vehicles to secure a chance at a better future.Development by Sony Pictures Television and PlayStation Productions began in May 2019 with a full season being ordered by Peacock in February 2022. The first season was released on Peacock with all ten episodes on July 27, 2023. In December 2023, the series was renewed for a second season which premiered on July 31, 2025.Disclaimer: The following may contain offensive language, adult humor, and/or content that some viewers may find offensive – The views and opinions expressed by any one speaker does not explicitly or necessarily reflect or represent those of Mark Radulich or W2M Network.Mark Radulich and his wacky podcast on all the things:https://linktr.ee/markkind76alsohttps://www.teepublic.com/user/radulich-in-broadcasting-networkFB Messenger: Mark Radulich LCSWTiktok: @markradulichtwitter: @MarkRadulichInstagram: markkind76RIBN Album Playlist: https://suno.com/playlist/91d704c9-d1ea-45a0-9ffe-5069497bad59 

In the intricate world of law, the doctrines of preclusion play a pivotal role in ensuring judicial efficiency and fairness. Imagine a world where the same case could be tried repeatedly, leading to inconsistent verdicts and wasted resources. This is where claim preclusion and issue preclusion come into play, acting as gatekeepers to prevent such chaos.Claim Preclusion: Claim preclusion, often referred to as "res judicata," prevents parties from relitigating a case that has already been resolved. Once a court has issued a final judgment on the merits, the same parties cannot bring another lawsuit based on the same claim. As legal scholar John Doe notes, "Claim preclusion ensures that a final judgment is truly final, providing closure to the parties involved."Issue Preclusion: Issue preclusion, or "collateral estoppel," is slightly different. It prevents the re-litigation of specific issues that have already been decided in a previous case, even if the current case involves a different claim. Jane Smith, a renowned legal expert, explains, "Issue preclusion focuses on the specific questions that have been conclusively determined, ensuring consistency across different cases."Understanding these doctrines is crucial for anyone navigating the legal system. They not only uphold the integrity of judicial decisions but also save time and resources. As you delve deeper into the legal landscape, remember the importance of these doctrines in maintaining order and justice.Subscribe Now: Stay informed about the latest legal insights and updates. Subscribe for more in-depth articles and expert analyses.preclusion, issue preclusion, claim preclusion, legal analysis, law school, bar exam, judicial economy, fairness factors, mutuality, non-mutual issue preclusion

Today we are honored to share a rare and special conversation with one of Los Angeles' original punk icons - Exene Cervenka of the band X. As the co-lead vocalist, a core songwriter, poet, and artist, Exene has helped define a genre and inspire generations.  X Began shaking up the music scene nearly 50 years ago, and now, after decades of groundbresaking work, they're preparing to take their final bow. Their farewell album, Smoke & Fiction, dropped last year to critical acclaim - and now John Doe, Billy Zoom, DJ Bonebreak and Exene are hitting the road one last time with their final tour kicking off September 19th, joined by the legendary Los Lobos.  Side note: we have two other archived interviews featuring John Doe of X and Steve Berlin of Los Lobos.  Find our show notes and more information on our website: www.rockandrollconfessional.rocks  

Understanding the Importance of Service of Process in Civil LitigationImagine being sued and not even knowing about it until it's too late. This is where the service of process comes into play, ensuring fairness and transparency in civil litigation. In this post, we'll delve into why this legal procedure is crucial for justice.The Role of Service of Process: Service of process is the procedure by which a party to a lawsuit gives appropriate notice of initial legal action to another party, court, or administrative body. This ensures that the party being sued is aware of the proceedings and has the opportunity to present their case. As legal expert John Doe states, "Without proper service, the entire legal process can be compromised."Ensuring Fairness and Due Process: The service of process is a fundamental aspect of due process, a constitutional guarantee that legal proceedings will be fair. It prevents cases from proceeding without the knowledge of all parties involved, thus safeguarding the rights of the defendant. Jane Smith, a seasoned attorney, emphasizes, "Service of process is not just a formality; it's a critical step in upholding justice."Challenges and Considerations: While the concept is straightforward, executing service of process can be complex, especially in cases involving elusive defendants or international parties. Legal professionals must navigate these challenges to ensure compliance with jurisdictional rules and regulations.Understanding the importance of service of process is essential for anyone involved in civil litigation. It upholds the principles of fairness and transparency, ensuring that justice is served. For more insights into legal procedures, subscribe now to stay informed.

In this episode of the Red Eye Report, we discuss the Oklahoma City Bombing and John Doe #2. Sketchy....Also in show the, Teddy nerds out on some Shinobi and Cracker Barrel adopts a bar of soap as their logo. theredeyereport.com facebook.com/redeyereport

Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing three new lawsuits from anonymous male plaintiffs who allege drugging and sexual assault incidents between 2019 and 2022. The lawsuits describe encounters where Combs allegedly provided the men with spiked drinks, leading to unconsciousness and subsequent sexual assaults at various locations, including his East Hampton residence and Manhattan hotels. One plaintiff claims he was assaulted after being drugged during an afterparty at a Manhattan hotel, with parts of the incident reportedly recorded. Another plaintiff, a long-time employee of Combs, alleges he was assaulted during a meeting at a Times Square hotel to discuss unpaid compensation. The third accuser states he was drugged and raped by Combs and associates at a 2020 party at the East Hampton property.Combs' legal team has denied the allegations, calling them fabricated and expressing intent to challenge the claims and seek sanctions against the plaintiffs' attorneys. These lawsuits add to a series of legal challenges for Combs, who is also facing federal charges of sex trafficking and racketeering. Attorney Thomas Giuffra, representing the three plaintiffs, revealed that over 60 individuals have come forward with similar allegations, though only these three cases have been filed after vetting. The plaintiffs are seeking damages and jury trials, with their identities kept confidential due to safety concerns and fears of intimidation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to the federal charges and awaits a trial scheduled for May 2025.(commercial at 8:19)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's 'perverted three word excuse when victim woke up while being raped' | Daily Mail OnlineSean "Diddy" Combs is facing three new lawsuits from anonymous male plaintiffs who allege drugging and sexual assault incidents between 2019 and 2022. The lawsuits describe encounters where Combs allegedly provided the men with spiked drinks, leading to unconsciousness and subsequent sexual assaults at various locations, including his East Hampton residence and Manhattan hotels. One plaintiff claims he was assaulted after being drugged during an afterparty at a Manhattan hotel, with parts of the incident reportedly recorded. Another plaintiff, a long-time employee of Combs, alleges he was assaulted during a meeting at a Times Square hotel to discuss unpaid compensation. The third accuser states he was drugged and raped by Combs and associates at a 2020 party at the East Hampton property.Combs' legal team has denied the allegations, calling them fabricated and expressing intent to challenge the claims and seek sanctions against the plaintiffs' attorneys. These lawsuits add to a series of legal challenges for Combs, who is also facing federal charges of sex trafficking and racketeering. Attorney Thomas Giuffra, representing the three plaintiffs, revealed that over 60 individuals have come forward with similar allegations, though only these three cases have been filed after vetting. The plaintiffs are seeking damages and jury trials, with their identities kept confidential due to safety concerns and fears of intimidation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to the federal charges and awaits a trial scheduled for May 2025.(commercial at 8:19)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's 'perverted three word excuse when victim woke up while being raped' | Daily Mail Online

A skeleton in the woods. A decade-old missing persons case. No clothing, no wallet—just scattered bones, a handgun, and one unusual clue: a custom brass belt buckle engraved with an eagle. It was the one thing friends and family could describe without hesitation, and it was all Dr. Priya Banerjee needed to confirm an identity and bring long-awaited closure. In this episode, Dr. Priya Banerjee joins Sheryl McCollum to explore how jewelry, tattoos, piercings, and other personal effects can crack a case wide open. From thin gold chains to infrared-revealed tattoos, shotgun-damaged accessories to telling purse contents, Dr. Priya recounts cases proving that meticulous documentation isn’t just procedure—it’s often the key to solving cases. Highlights (0:00) "Dead men do tell tales.” —the investigative value of jewelry, piercings, and tattoos (1:45) Purse contents: receipts, bus passes, and the kind of intel you can’t Google (4:00) The thin gold chain that confirmed an identity (5:30) Belt buckles don’t lie: solving a decade-old missing persons case (9:00) A John Doe’s everyday markers: custom belt buckle, company ring, 70s tattoos (10:30) Tattoos and piercings that shout “this is who I am”—from faith and hometown pride to game-day loyalties (17:30) Medical examiners and law enforcement: the investigative dream team About the Hosts Dr. Priya Banerjee is a board-certified forensic pathologist with extensive experience in death investigation, clinical forensics, and courtroom testimony. A graduate of Johns Hopkins, she served for over a decade as Rhode Island’s state medical examiner and now runs a private forensic pathology practice. Her work includes military deaths, NSA cases, and high-profile investigations. Dr. Priya has also been featured as a forensic expert on platforms such as CrimeOnline and Crime Stories with Nancy Grace. She is a dedicated educator, animal lover, and proud mom. Website: anchorforensicpathology.comTwitter/X: @Autopsy_MD Sheryl McCollum is an Emmy Award–winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnline, and the Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace. She works as a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department and is the co-author of the textbook Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. Sheryl is also the founder and director of the Cold Case Investigative Research Institute (CCIRI), a nationally recognized nonprofit that brings together universities, law enforcement, and experts to help solve unsolved homicides, missing persons cases, and kidnappings. Email: coldcase2004@gmail.comTwitter/X: @ColdCaseTipsFacebook: @sheryl.mccollumInstagram: @officialzone7podcast

In a long-overdue act of transparency, a federal judge ordered the names of roughly 170 individuals—once shaded behind the label “John Doe” or “Jane Doe”—to be unsealed in court filings stemming from Virginia Giuffre's defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. The documents revealed luminaries like Bill Clinton (previously “Doe 36”), Prince Andrew (“actually Jane Doe 162” in context of testimony), hedge fund titan Glenn Dubin, modeling mogul Jean-Luc Brunel, and others represented alongside Epstein's victims, employees, and passersby.Rather than simple exposure of identities, this unmasking lifted the curtain on how deeply entrenched Epstein's network was, reaching into the upper echelons of finance, royalty, and politics.But make no mistake: public exposure doesn't mean public accountability. Unsealing the names confirmed countless high‑profile connections, yet it stops short of revealing misconduct or initiating investigations. In many cases, the inclusion in these documents wasn't tied to wrongdoing—people merely appeared in correspondence or witness lists. Still, the moral stain lingers. If Epstein's proximity wasn't disqualifying, what is? That these names remained cloaked so long—until a lawsuit ended in 2024—speaks volumes about the protection privilege continues to afford the powerful.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Over 170 of Jeffrey Epstein's high-profile associates will be NAMED in court documents set to be unsealed in the first days of 2024 | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a long-overdue act of transparency, a federal judge ordered the names of roughly 170 individuals—once shaded behind the label “John Doe” or “Jane Doe”—to be unsealed in court filings stemming from Virginia Giuffre's defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. The documents revealed luminaries like Bill Clinton (previously “Doe 36”), Prince Andrew (“actually Jane Doe 162” in context of testimony), hedge fund titan Glenn Dubin, modeling mogul Jean-Luc Brunel, and others represented alongside Epstein's victims, employees, and passersby.Rather than simple exposure of identities, this unmasking lifted the curtain on how deeply entrenched Epstein's network was, reaching into the upper echelons of finance, royalty, and politics.But make no mistake: public exposure doesn't mean public accountability. Unsealing the names confirmed countless high‑profile connections, yet it stops short of revealing misconduct or initiating investigations. In many cases, the inclusion in these documents wasn't tied to wrongdoing—people merely appeared in correspondence or witness lists. Still, the moral stain lingers. If Epstein's proximity wasn't disqualifying, what is? That these names remained cloaked so long—until a lawsuit ended in 2024—speaks volumes about the protection privilege continues to afford the powerful.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Over 170 of Jeffrey Epstein's high-profile associates will be NAMED in court documents set to be unsealed in the first days of 2024 | Daily Mail Online

In the September 2024 episode of the Lex Fridman Podcast, Donald Trump discussed the ongoing controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's confidential files and client list. He stated that, if re‑elected, he would have “no problem” releasing additional Epstein‑related documents and said he would “probably” make the client list public—positioning the release as a matter of transparency subject to his re‑election.That promise—to “have no problem” unsealing the Epstein files if re-elected, voiced on the Lex Fridman podcast—now rings hollow given his administration's actions. Despite that pledge, no substantive new revelations have been made. The Department of Justice, led by AG Pam Bondi, released heavily redacted materials in February and claimed there's no client list—an assertion that infuriated many supporters and was declared “a lot of redacted nothing” by critics. Even under mounting pressure—including subpoenas from the House Oversight Committee and investigations into Clinton, Comey, and others—the administration has shifted from transparency to deflection, labeling the entire Epstein files saga a “Democratic hoax” and telling supporters not to dwell on it.Also..A Business Insider analysis of unsealed court records revealed that Donald Trump is identified as John Doe 174 in a set of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. These “Doe” placeholders were used to anonymize nearly 200 individuals mentioned in the files—ranging from Epstein's wealthy acquaintances to others referenced in passing. The revelation stemmed from a 2024 court order that unsealed previously redacted information, including the specific identity behind Doe 174.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Trump suggests he'll release Jeffrey Epstein ‘client list' if elected (nypost.com)source:It Sure Looks Like Donald Trump Is Doe 174 in Epstein Documents (businessinsider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

John Doe returns to the Power Chord Hour to talk about the upcoming X and Los Lobos tour, the making of the final X record Smoke & Fiction, what a band looks for in a producer and how that changes later in a bands career, what new songs have translated live the best and much moreJOHN DOEhttp://www.xtheband.comhttps://linktr.ee/theejohndoehttps://xtheband.bandcamp.com/album/smoke-fictionhttps://www.instagram.com/xthebandofficialhttps://www.instagram.com/theejohndoePCHInstagram - www.instagram.com/powerchordhourTwitter - www.twitter.com/powerchordhourFacebook - www.facebook.com/powerchordhourYoutube - www.youtube.com/channel/UC6jTfzjB3-mzmWM-51c8LggSpotify Episode Playlists - https://open.spotify.com/user/kzavhk5ghelpnthfby9o41gnr?si=4WvOdgAmSsKoswf_HTh_MgDonate to help show costs -https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/pchanthonyhttps://cash.app/$anthmerchpowerchordhour@gmail.comCheck out the Power Chord Hour radio show every Friday night at 8 pm est/Tuesday Midnight est on 107.9 WRFA in Jamestown, NY. Stream the station online at wrfalp.com/streaming/ or listen on the WRFA app.

In the September 2024 episode of the Lex Fridman Podcast, Donald Trump discussed the ongoing controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's confidential files and client list. He stated that, if re‑elected, he would have “no problem” releasing additional Epstein‑related documents and said he would “probably” make the client list public—positioning the release as a matter of transparency subject to his re‑election.That promise—to “have no problem” unsealing the Epstein files if re-elected, voiced on the Lex Fridman podcast—now rings hollow given his administration's actions. Despite that pledge, no substantive new revelations have been made. The Department of Justice, led by AG Pam Bondi, released heavily redacted materials in February and claimed there's no client list—an assertion that infuriated many supporters and was declared “a lot of redacted nothing” by critics. Even under mounting pressure—including subpoenas from the House Oversight Committee and investigations into Clinton, Comey, and others—the administration has shifted from transparency to deflection, labeling the entire Epstein files saga a “Democratic hoax” and telling supporters not to dwell on it.Also..A Business Insider analysis of unsealed court records revealed that Donald Trump is identified as John Doe 174 in a set of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. These “Doe” placeholders were used to anonymize nearly 200 individuals mentioned in the files—ranging from Epstein's wealthy acquaintances to others referenced in passing. The revelation stemmed from a 2024 court order that unsealed previously redacted information, including the specific identity behind Doe 174.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Trump suggests he'll release Jeffrey Epstein ‘client list' if elected (nypost.com)source:It Sure Looks Like Donald Trump Is Doe 174 in Epstein Documents (businessinsider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Twisted Metal is Peacock's high-octane post-apocalyptic action comedy based on PlayStation's beloved video game series. Following in the footsteps of The Last of Us, this marks Sony's second major video game adaptation. Season 2 kicked off with three episodes—“PRSRPNT,” “DOLF4C3,” and “T3STDRV”—which premiered on Thursday, July 31. Set months after John Doe's dramatic realization about New San Francisco, the story introduces Anthony Carrigan as Calypso, unveils a new Raven, and finds Quiet allied with Dollface's ruthless gang. Tune in as we discuss standout moments, character developments, interesting production details, as well as our rating. Welcome to Today's Episode!

John Doe v. University of Southern Indiana

It's This Week in Bourbon for July 25th 2025. Luca Mariano files for chapter 11, Kentucky's Attorney General files a lawsuit against Temu, and Sazerac releases Sazerac Rye 100.Show Notes: Luca Mariano Distillery files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Kentucky AG sues Temu over privacy, forced labor, and IP theft, naming Buffalo Trace & Churchill Downs. Sazerac sues "John Doe" for impersonating Master Distiller Harlen Wheatley on social media. Whiskey House of Kentucky inks long-term supply deal with Germany's Berentzen-Gruppe. Buffalo Trace launches Sazerac Rye Whiskey 100 Proof. 15 STARS introduces new First West line with Small Batch, Toasted Oak, and 8-Year-Old Bourbons. Support this podcast on Patreon Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this episode of the podcast, investigative journalist and former “America's Most Wanted” news director Margaret Roberts joins Amanda Head to unravel explosive details surrounding the Oklahoma City bombing. Roberts spotlights disturbing gaps in the FBI's investigation — particularly the mysterious disappearance of “John Doe Number Two,” a man seen with Timothy McVeigh whose identity remains unresolved. Even more shocking: Roberts raises the possibility that the elusive figure may have been a federal asset.The duo discuss the suspicious murder of Kenneth Trentadue — brother of Jesse Trentadue — and how his death might tie into a broader government cover-up. Roberts' new book, “Blowback” digs deep into these connections and what they reveal about the state of modern journalism and government transparency.You can learn more or buy a copy of this great new book at: BlowbackBook.com. You can also follow Margaret on X (formerly Twitter) by searching for her handle: @BlowbackBook.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Can you hear me now? That's the question that I have for the legacy media that has consistently protected Bill Clinton when it comes to his deep ties to Jeffrey Epstein.For over four years we have stood on this mountain top shouting into the wind about Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton and now, finally, after years of tooth and nail struggles, we are about to get the receipts.According to reports, Bill Clinton AKA John Doe 36 will be named over FIFTY times in the court documents that are expected to be unsealed this coming week when the documents hit the docket and once that happens, we will dive into the whole entire lot of them.One thing is for sure:Bill Clinton is now on the clock.(commercial at 10:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bill Clinton 'will be named as John Doe 36' when a list of Jeffrey Epstein associates from court filings are made public next week | Daily Mail Online

Rebel Highway (1994)Episode 6: "Shake, Rattle & Rock!" Original Airdate: 26th August, 1994 Jeff and Cheryl cruise down Rebel Highway with Episode #6, "Shake, Rattle & Rock!" Written by Trish Soodik Directed by Allan Arkush Starring:  Renée Zellweger as Susan  Jenifer Lewis as Amanda  Max Perlich as Tony  John Doe as Lucky  Patricia Childress as Cookie  For Real as Sireena and the SirensLatanyia Baldwin as Sireena  Necia Bray as The Sirens  Josina Elder as The Sirens  Wendi Williams as The Sirens  Mary Woronov as E. Joyce Togar  Stephen Furst as Frank  Ruth Brown as Ella  Gerrit Graham as Lipsky  Dick Miller as Officer Paisley  P. J. Soles as Evelyn Randall  Dey Young as Kate Rambeau Sr  William Schallert as Judge Boone  Nora Dunn as Margo  Howie Mandel as Danny Klay  An Arkoff / Hill / Kutner Production View the Shake, Rattle and Rock trailer here. You can rent Shake, Rattle and Rock on Prime Video, Fandango at Home, or Apple TV+. Visit our website - https://aippod.com/ and follow the American International Podcast on Letterboxd, Instagram and Threads @aip_pod and on Facebook at facebook.com/AmericanInternationalPodcast   Get your American International Podcast merchandise at our store. Our open and close includes clips from the following films/trailers: How to Make a Monster (1958), The Brain That Wouldn't Die (1962), I Was a Teenage Werewolf (1957), High School Hellcats (1958), Beach Blanket Bingo (1965), The Wild Angels (1966), It Conquered the World (1956), The Abominable Dr. Phibes (1971), and Female Jungle (1955)

We're back in the Labyrinth and things are getting… sharp.

Can you hear me now? That's the question that I have for the legacy media that has consistently protected Bill Clinton when it comes to his deep ties to Jeffrey Epstein.For over four years we have stood on this mountain top shouting into the wind about Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton and now, finally, after years of tooth and nail struggles, we are about to get the receipts.According to reports, Bill Clinton AKA John Doe 36 will be named over FIFTY times in the court documents that are expected to be unsealed this coming week when the documents hit the docket and once that happens, we will dive into the whole entire lot of them.One thing is for sure:Bill Clinton is now on the clock.(commercial at 10:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bill Clinton 'will be named as John Doe 36' when a list of Jeffrey Epstein associates from court filings are made public next week | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The greatest Man-on-the-Street interview, MAGA Epstein turmoil, Eli Zaret joins us, Justin Bieber's SWAG, Air India crash, Quarterback on Netflix, Donald Trump v. Rosie O'Donnell, and Maz skipped his workout. Drew has the hiccups again. Eli Zaret drops by to discuss the ‘Big Dumper', the MLB All Star Game, a crazy auto-tune National Anthem before the Baltimore Orioles game, Detroit Tigers struggles, Jacob Misiorowski skips the line, the newest Tiger, Netflix's Quarterback highlights, NCAA Basketball Tourney to 72 teams, RIP Joe Coleman, RIP Lee Elia and his rants, WNBA complaining, Jake Paul vs Piers Morgan, Antonio Brown's best life and more. Tom Mazawey missed a workout and is still sore. Amon-Ra St. Brown's father John Brown is a fan of breeding. Ethan Klein is suing multiple content creators. So they started GoFundMes. Trump News: Jeffrey Epstein's client list debacle may take down Donald Trump. Ghislaine Maxwell may spill. Donald Trump vs Rosie O'Donnell Part 74. Ellen has Rosie's back. Trump overstayed his welcome on stage as Chelsea F.C. won some boring soccer match the FIFA Club World Cup. Secret Service has suspended six after the one year anniversary of Trump's assassination attempt. LA Mayor Karen Bass loves herself some illegal immigrants. Illegal minors are working our California fields. The damn Menendez brothers may be on the verge of getting out of prison… again. X CEO, Linda Yaccarino, has left the company. Hyperbaric Oxygen chambers are killing machines. Pilot error is the cause of the Air India crash. Curtis Jones may be the best man-on-the-street possibly ever. Melinda French Gates is a mean mother. This golf fight has gone super viral. The beaten has apologized for his actions. Candace Cameron vs her body. The Detroit Tigers have lost every game since Maz sat behind home plate. Music: Justin Bieber drops a surprise album: Swag. It sucks. Kanye West bungled a concert in China. John Doe vs the taste of Diddy. Trey Songz attacked a cameraman. Gayle King vacationed with Oprah and Kris Jenner. Barbie has diabetes now. If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley and BranDon).

In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the Combs defendants filed a reply memorandum in further support of their partial motion to dismiss the complaint. They argue that several of the plaintiff's claims—including those related to alleged events occurring outside the statute of limitations—should be dismissed as time-barred. The defense maintains that the plaintiff has failed to provide sufficient factual support to sustain certain causes of action, including claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and various state law allegations. They also contend that the complaint improperly lumps together multiple corporate entities without specific allegations connecting each to the alleged conduct.Additionally, the Combs defendants assert that the complaint is vague and fails to meet the pleading standards required under federal law. They emphasize that the plaintiff has not sufficiently linked Sean Combs or the named corporate entities to actionable misconduct that would justify moving forward on all counts. The reply brief reinforces the argument that certain claims—particularly those not tied to clearly identified actions or dates—lack the specificity needed to survive a motion to dismiss. As such, they request the court to dismiss the relevant portions of the complaint while allowing only properly pleaded claims to proceed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629905.61.0.pdf

In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the Combs defendants filed a reply memorandum in further support of their partial motion to dismiss the complaint. They argue that several of the plaintiff's claims—including those related to alleged events occurring outside the statute of limitations—should be dismissed as time-barred. The defense maintains that the plaintiff has failed to provide sufficient factual support to sustain certain causes of action, including claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and various state law allegations. They also contend that the complaint improperly lumps together multiple corporate entities without specific allegations connecting each to the alleged conduct.Additionally, the Combs defendants assert that the complaint is vague and fails to meet the pleading standards required under federal law. They emphasize that the plaintiff has not sufficiently linked Sean Combs or the named corporate entities to actionable misconduct that would justify moving forward on all counts. The reply brief reinforces the argument that certain claims—particularly those not tied to clearly identified actions or dates—lack the specificity needed to survive a motion to dismiss. As such, they request the court to dismiss the relevant portions of the complaint while allowing only properly pleaded claims to proceed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629905.61.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

An anonymous plaintiff, referred to as John Doe, has filed a lawsuit alleging that in September 2020, during a listening session in L.A. for a Biggie project, Diddy supplied ketamine to attendees. According to the complaint, the gathering took place in a warehouse where items belonging to the late Notorious B.I.G. were stored. The plaintiff says he ended up alone with Diddy, who allegedly watched pornography, pulled a Biggie shirt from the rack, masturbated into it, ejaculated on the garment, then tossed it onto the plaintiff—leaving behind semen and reportedly remarking, “RIP Biggie.” The suit also recalls a separate alleged incident from 2005, where Diddy supposedly forced the plaintiff into unwanted sexual contact. The lawsuit cites sexual battery and emotional distress and seeks damages.Diddy's legal team has strongly denied all allegations, describing them as false and unsubstantiated, and said they intend to vigorously defend him. This disturbing accusation adds to a growing list of similar claims that have emerged amid his ongoing legal saga—including federal sex trafficking convictions and more than 90 other lawsuits alleging sexual misconduct spanning decades.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy Allegedly Masturbated Into Biggie Smalls' Shirt, Lawsuit Claims | Us Weekly

An anonymous plaintiff, referred to as John Doe, has filed a lawsuit alleging that in September 2020, during a listening session in L.A. for a Biggie project, Diddy supplied ketamine to attendees. According to the complaint, the gathering took place in a warehouse where items belonging to the late Notorious B.I.G. were stored. The plaintiff says he ended up alone with Diddy, who allegedly watched pornography, pulled a Biggie shirt from the rack, masturbated into it, ejaculated on the garment, then tossed it onto the plaintiff—leaving behind semen and reportedly remarking, “RIP Biggie.” The suit also recalls a separate alleged incident from 2005, where Diddy supposedly forced the plaintiff into unwanted sexual contact. The lawsuit cites sexual battery and emotional distress and seeks damages.Diddy's legal team has strongly denied all allegations, describing them as false and unsubstantiated, and said they intend to vigorously defend him. This disturbing accusation adds to a growing list of similar claims that have emerged amid his ongoing legal saga—including federal sex trafficking convictions and more than 90 other lawsuits alleging sexual misconduct spanning decades.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy Allegedly Masturbated Into Biggie Smalls' Shirt, Lawsuit Claims | Us WeeklyBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this wide-ranging discussion, the hosts recount the hauntingly similar tragedies along Texas's Guadalupe River—where summer camps repeatedly ignored flood risks, leading to deadly disasters decades apart. They condemn media efforts to pin the floods on political figures and highlight evidence that staffing shortfalls at the National Weather Service were misrepresented. The conversation then pivots to the unresolved mysteries surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's client list, exposing how an anonymous “John Doe” intervened in court to keep names sealed from the public. Together, these stories illustrate a theme of preventable catastrophe, media distortion, and powerful interests shielding the truth.

July 1st: Michelle Garvey Killed (1982) When a Jane or John Doe is identified it is a real win in a case. A chance to give a family closure and a chance to rework a stalled case. On July 1st 1982 the body of a young girl was found. And, though it would take decades to find out who, exactly, she was, her identity gave her grieving family just some of the answers they needed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Michelle_Garvey, https://unidentified-awareness.fandom.com/wiki/Michelle_Garvey, https://www.khou.com/article/news/investigations/investigations-who-killed-michelle/285-408484935, https://www.masslive.com/news/2014/01/female_killed_in_1982_texas_ho.html, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2537464/Connecticut-runaway-14-finally-identified-body-Texas-field-1982-solving-30-year-old-murder-mystery.html Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

John Doe, a former employee of Reign, made serious allegations against Sean Combs, detailing instances of sexual harassment, coercion, and a hostile work environment. Doe claims that Combs engaged in inappropriate behavior during work-related events and meetings, creating an atmosphere of fear and manipulation. The allegations include unwelcome sexual advances, pressure to partake in illicit activities, and retaliation when Doe attempted to resist or report the misconduct.Doe further alleges that Reign's management ignored or dismissed his complaints, allowing Combs' behavior to continue unchecked. He describes a pattern of intimidation, where Combs leveraged his power to silence those who opposed him, including threats to derail careers and reputations. The case underscores the broader issue of systemic abuse of power in the entertainment industry, with John Doe seeking legal action not only for personal justice but to support other victims who may have experienced similar treatment.(commercial at 9:32)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Episode 151 Doe ID: Anthony Gulley In December, 2001, a pair of men cutting firewood in Canton, Ohio made a gruesome discovery not far off into a field from a county road. They found a skeletonized body with no identification. A medical examination concluded that the body was likely that of a young African-American woman between the ages of 22-31, and about 5”7” tall. Later DNA analysis would prove that the victim was actually Male, and not Female. By that point, valuable time and resources had been spent trying to match the victim to case of missing women. DNA and genealogy would also later reveal that the John Doe was actually, a man named Anthony Bernard Gulley who went missing on September 11, 1994 along with his car from Pontiac, Michigan. His vehicle was found burned out the next day over 200 miles away in Akron, Ohio. Police quickly uncovered a suspect in the disappearance of Anthony Gulley; a man he knew named George Frederick Washington who had an extensive criminal record. Washington died via a self inflicted gunshot wound after a shootout with police in 1994. Washington had reportedly told someone that he had killed Anthony Gulley in a hotel room and then dumped his body in a river. When Gulley's unidentified body was found on land, and not water, (and thought to be the remains of a woman), police didn't connect the discovery to Gulley. Now, Anthony Gulley has his name back, and this is his story.     To listen to every episode of DNA: ID ad-free and get other benefits, simply  visit our channel page on Apple Podcasts to get started with an AbJack Insider subscription. Of course, you can also support DNA: ID with a Patreon subscription. Follow us on these social media outlets: Facebook - X FormerlyTwitter - Blue Sky - Tik Tok - Twitch - Youtube - Instagram Find all of our links in one spot at our Linktree:  linktr.ee/dnaidpodcast For all things DNA: ID, visit the show's homepage Visit this link to buy DNA ID Merch

Why are so many boys falling behind—and what's driving them into the darkest corners of the internet? As girls continue to outperform boys in school and college, a growing number of young men are slipping through the cracks—struggling with loneliness, identity, and emotional isolation. Rachel, a single mom, shares how her 11-year-old son was pulled into red-pill ideology by online influencers. Gabriel, a former incel, reveals how rejection and bullying led him to embrace “looksmaxxing,” while "John Doe", a current incel, says he feels invisible and hopeless. Doctoral Researcher of Evolutionary Psychology at the University of Texas, Austin, William Costello, who has interviewed more than 150 incels, says we must look beyond stigma and start addressing the root causes. Dr. Phil breaks down the toxic online culture shaping this generation—and what parents must do now to pull their sons back from the edge.   Thank you to our sponsors! MASA Chips: Visit: https://MASAChips.com/MERIT/  and use code MERIT for 25% off your first order.   Preserve Gold: Visit: https://drphilgold.com/   Get a FREE precious metals guide that contains essential information on how to help protect your accounts. Text “DRPHIL” to 50505 to claim this exclusive offer from Preserve Gold today.   Jase Medical: Get emergency antibiotics at https://Jase.com/  & use code PHIL for a discount   Sombrosa: Visit now: https://sambrosa.com/ and use code "MERIT" for 25% off your first order! Wake up rested and invigorated! 

#1 ACS #656 (feat. John Doe, Alison Rosen and Bryan Bishop) (2011)#2 ACS #712 (feat. Dana Gould, Alison Rosen and Bryan Bishop) (2011)#3 ACS #723 (feat. Erin Brokovich, Alison Rosen and Bryan Bishop) (2011)Hosted by Superfan GiovanniRequest clips:Classics@adamcarolla.comSubscribe and Watch Clips on YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@AdamCarollaCornerSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.