Podcasts about Anonymity

Kelsey and Julie both talk to Don and Sam about their recovery from alcoholism and then all four discuss the Hot Topic of Anonymity.You're Invited to the 2025 International Convention of Alcoholics Anonymous. Please visit aa.org/international-convention for information.While we provide the podcast at no charge, we do have expenses. Grapevine is the only AA entity that does not accept contributions, so to support the AA Grapevine Podcast, please subscribe to Grapevine Magazine in print, online, or on the Grapevine app. You can also provide a subscription to someone in need through our "Carry the Message" program or purchase books or other items at aagrapevine.org/storeYou can email us at podcast@aagrapevine.org. To record an Ask-It-Basket question or a recovery-related joke, call 212-870-3418 or email a voice recording to podcast@aagrapevine.org

It's never been easier to tear someone down from behind a screen. But what does that mean for Christians called to speak truth in love—not just in person, but online too?In Episode 99 of the Eyes on Jesus Podcast, Tim and Drew tackle the increasingly urgent topic of social media anonymity and its spiritual implications. In a time when online platforms reward outrage, controversy, and clicks over truth, many believers are losing sight of how to engage with others in a way that reflects the heart of Christ. This episode was sparked by the recent and sobering situation involving ministry leader Josh Buice, who was revealed to have operated multiple anonymous accounts used to slander fellow Christians. His fall serves as a sobering example of how hidden sin can flourish behind the veil of digital anonymity—and how integrity, accountability, and love must remain non-negotiables in our online lives.Anonymity Breeds Temptation:Operating behind a nameless handle makes it easier to say things that would never be said face-to-face—and often, those words cause real damage.Social Media Has Rewired Human Interaction:We are more connected than ever but often more isolated, harsh, and reactive. The lack of real-life interaction leads many to forget there's a person on the other side of the screen.Christian Truth Without Love Becomes Harmful:Even if what's said is “right,” if it's not said with grace, it becomes another clanging symbol in an already noisy world. As Christians, we are called to season our speech and reflect the love of Jesus, even online.Controversy Gets the Clicks:Algorithms promote what is outrageous, not what is edifying. Without intentional boundaries, believers can find themselves more focused on stirring division than sowing peace.Integrity Still Matters—Even When No One Sees:Just because it's anonymous doesn't mean it's harmless. Hidden activity online eventually leads to consequences, personally and publicly.We're Talking to Real People:Bots aside, most of our interactions online are with actual human souls. We're not debating avatars—we're influencing lives, for better or worse.Check Your Motives:Ask yourself: Why am I on social media? Is it to spread hope and truth, or to gain validation and vent frustration?It Might Be Time to Log Off:If your time online leads to more bitterness than growth, it may be time to unplug, regroup, and invite God to reset your heart.We're celebrating a major milestone next week as Tim and Drew are joined by their wives for a personal and heartfelt conversation about life, faith, and family. It's one you won't want to miss!

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdf

In this episode, join my conversation originally aired on Read Between The Signs podcast.We delve into the misconceptions around porn addiction, its subtle yet profound impacts on relationships, intimacy, mental clarity, and physical health. I share my personal journey of overcoming a problematic relationship with porn and emphasizes the importance of community, mindfulness, and vulnerability in the recovery process. We also discuss the societal normalization of porn, the three A's of porn addiction (Affordability, Accessibility, Anonymity), and the role of shame in keeping people stuck in unhealthy habits. Tune in for an eye-opening conversation with valuable insights and practical advice on breaking free from addiction and living a healthier, more fulfilling life.

This episode addresses the recent fall of a prominent pastor and the cancellation of the G3 Conference, using it as a sobering example of the dangers of online anonymity, slander, and spiritual ambition. Dr. Richard Caldwell emphasizes the need for accountability, self-examination, and pastoral integrity. With humility and clarity, he challenges both leaders and believers to guard their hearts and speech, reminding us that faithfulness to Christ requires holiness in both public and private life.

This episode addresses the recent fall of a prominent pastor and the cancellation of the G3 Conference, using it as a sobering example of the dangers of online anonymity, slander, and spiritual ambition. Dr. Richard Caldwell emphasizes the need for accountability, self-examination, and pastoral integrity. With humility and clarity, he challenges both leaders and believers to guard their hearts and speech, reminding us that faithfulness to Christ requires holiness in both public and private life.

A new MP3 sermon from Founders Baptist Church is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: When Pastors Fall: Accountability, Anonymity, and the Dangers of Online Influence Subtitle: 01 Straight Truth Podcast Speaker: Richard Caldwell Jr. Broadcaster: Founders Baptist Church Event: Podcast Date: 5/16/2025 Bible: 1 Timothy 4:6; Psalm 19:14 Length: 22 min.

This podcast is a short daily audio provided by the online recovery group Transitions Daily. The daily distribution consists of different recovery quotes from various resources, including; Twenty-Four Hours a Day, A.A. Thought for the Day, Daily Reflections, Big Book Quote, Just for Today, As Bill Sees It, plus more! Transitions Daily also distributes this same content in a daily email with a secret Facebook group for discussion. Go to www.DailyAAEmails.com for more information.   Do you want to stop drinking? Have you ever listened to sobriety podcasts? Does alcoholism or addiction run in your family? Have you tried Alcoholics Anonymous or the 12 Steps of A.A.? Are you considering how to get sober? Are you seriously thinking about sobriety for the first time? Is alcohol controlling your life as never before? If so, you will definitely want to check out this recovery podcast.

THE IMPORTANCE OF A HOMEGROUP. The Montyman and co-host Roger McDiarmid discuss the significance of home groups in recovery, and emphasize the importance of community support in maintaining sobriety. Roger and The Montyman explore the dynamics of recovery meetings, emphasizing the importance of positivity, community, and deeper relationships within home groups. Closing Song: The Ya-But Habit by Michael Purington. #higherpower #aa #na #alcoholicsanonymous #recovery #recovered #alcoholic #twelvesteps #wedorecover #narcoticsanonymous #addiction #bigbook

THE 12 TRADITIONS. (Are They Necessary?) In this episode of the Came to Believe Recovery Podcast, the hosts delve into the significance of traditions in recovery, particularly focusing on the Twelve Traditions of Alcoholics Anonymous. They discuss listener insights, the importance of maintaining a balance between tradition and flexibility, and the role of these traditions in fostering a supportive recovery community. The conversation emphasizes the need for accountability and the potential for revising traditions to better serve the needs of individuals in recovery. Closing Song: I Turn to You by Randy Stonehill. #higherpower #aa #na #alcoholicsanonymous #recovery #recovered #alcoholic #twelvesteps #wedorecover #narcoticsanonymous #addiction #bigbook

Pathfinder Church | April 27, 2025 | AJ MasticWe all crave to be fully known, but it's so hard to find and maintain truly deep, intimate relationships. It's hard to risk vulnerability, and without vulnerability, how can we ever be fully known?Website | https://pathfinderstl.orgOnline Giving | https://pathfinderstl.org/givePodcasts | https://pathfinderstl.org/podcastsFacebook | https://facebook.com/pathfinderstlInstagram | https://instagram.com/pathfinderstlSt. John School | https://stjls.orgContact Us | churchinfo@pathfinderstl.org

URSULA'S TOP STORIES: The Pope passes // SPD officers appeal to SCOTUS for anonymity // Gunfire near Whidbey Island rally // Seattle Success in the War on Tent Encampments // WE NEED TO TALK. . . WA retirement plans allow pension padding

In 2014, Daniel Krawisz was one of the most prolific Bitcoin writers: he published some excellent articles with the Nakamoto Institute, and most of them are still relevant. Today, he prefers BSV and believes that Craig Wright is Satoshi. What changed? Time stamps: Time stamps: 00:00:50 - Introducing Daniel Krawisz 00:02:40 - Bitcoin Takeover 00:05:30 - Scaling Bitcoin 00:09:30 - Soft Forks vs. Hard Forks 00:14:10 - Running a Bitcoin Node and Privacy 00:18:10 - Verifying Transactions 00:20:00 - Miner Centralization 00:24:40 - Bitcoin Core Ideology 00:29:00 - Fungibility 00:30:30 - Ross Ulbricht 00:38:55 - Bitcoin's Competitive Advantage 00:44:00 - Bitcoin and Legality 00:48:50 - Sound Money and Friendship 00:50:40 - Satoshi Nakamoto's Identity 00:57:20 - Craig Wright's Teachings 01:00:40 - Leaving the Nakamoto Institute 01:03:40 - Investors vs. Entrepreneurs 01:06:00 - The Nature of Bitcoin 01:12:15 - Bitcoin's Value 01:14:40 - Market Efficiency 01:16:20 - Bitcoin vs. Gold 01:21:15 - BSV Adoption 01:24:00 - BSV's Success Metrics 01:28:20 - Hash Rate and Miner Incentives 01:30:30 - Market Efficiency and Truth 01:33:55 - BSV's Future 01:37:00 - BSV vs. BCH 01:40:10 - Mempool 01:42:40 - BSV Mining and Jurisdictions 01:46:45 - BSV vs. CBDC 01:52:35 - Privacy and Mixing in BSV 02:00:03 - Security and Probabilistic Thinking 02:01:21 - Capitalism, Monopoly, and BSV 02:05:01 - Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and BSV 02:07:28 - BSV's Role and Traceability 02:08:14 - Traceable vs. Non-Traceable Money 02:08:54 - Anarcho-Capitalism and Private Services 02:15:07 - Cypherpunk Literature and Privacy vs. Compliance 02:18:12 - Anonymity, Privacy, and Traceability in BSV 02:24:49 - Layer 2 Solutions and Scalability 02:32:35 - Narcissism 02:42:46 - Narcissism and Financial Scammers 02:48:14 - Avoiding Cults and Narcissistic Relationships 02:52:23 - Benefiting from Narcissistic Relationships 02:53:13 - Narcissists in Bitcoin/Crypto 02:54:37 - Relationship with Nakamoto Institute 03:00:14 - Appreciation and Book Recommendations 03:00:48 - Hayao Miyazaki and Narcissism 03:04:40 - Current Reading List 03:39:20 - Stance on 2017 Block Size Wars 03:40:45 - Book Project Idea 03:47:04 - Plato, Socrates, and Propaganda 03:53:07 - Diogenes and Libertarianism 03:55:15 - Final Book Recommendations 04:00:01 - Narcissism and Self-Awareness 04:00:40 - Denouncement of Litecoin, Dogecoin, and Ethereum 04:01:17 - Competition Between Monies 04:02:55 - Changes in the Bitcoin Space 04:04:40 - New Altcoins and Tokens 04:04:54 - Bitcoin Year One Manga 04:05:29 - Podcast Invitation and Appreciation 04:09:08 - Sponsors

Titus Kevalny, VP of Go-to-Market Strategy at Civic, discussed his role in promoting Civic's products, which protect apps from Sybil attacks and ensure KYC compliance. He explained the evolution of Civic from Ethereum to Solana, Civic Pass, a verification tool with over a million passes, and Civic Auth, a simpler authentication method for developers. Kevalny emphasized the importance of multiple authentication methods to combat AI bots and deep fakes.

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdf

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdf

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdf

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdf

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdf

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Secure encryption and online anonymity are now at risk in Switzerland by Nick Espinosa, Chief Security Fanatic

What happens when government spending spirals out of control, free speech gets tested in the digital age, and economic policies shape our daily lives?Rudy Havenstein (@RudyHavenstein), the anonymous yet influential financial commentator behind A Havenstein Moment, returns to Futures Edge with Jim and Bob to explore the impact of the Federal Reserve on the housing market, the complexities of free speech in the digital age, and the growing influence of social media on political discourse.They look into the role of government accountability in spending and foreign aid, and the cultural shift needed to curb corruption. Rudy shares his take on Elon Musk's involvement in government efficiency, the implications of national debt, and the widening economic gap between the wealthy and the average American. They also examine election integrity, regulatory burdens in housing, and how political polarization affects personal relationships.Follow Rudy Havenstein: X: https://x.com/rudyhavenstein?lang=enSubstack: https://rudy.substack.com/ Takeaways:-The Federal Reserve's policies have long-term consequences on housing and economic growth.-Free speech remains a complex and polarizing issue in the age of social media.-Government spending and corruption impact both political parties and public trust.-Elon Musk's role in government raises questions about efficiency and conflicts of interest.-Political discourse is increasingly polarized, affecting friendships and social dynamics.-Election integrity and media narratives shape public perception of democracy.-Market trends, interest rates, and national debt continue to influence economic stability.Chapters:00:00 Introduction to Rudy Haverstein and the Weimar Republic02:54 The Importance of Anonymity in Public Discourse05:51 Political Polarization and Friendships08:58 Government Accountability and the Role of Elon Musk11:51 Foreign Policy and Public Perception14:57 Corruption and Accountability in Government Spending16:00 The Federal Reserve's Impact on Housing Markets16:58 The Role of Twitter in Free Speech22:00 The Complexity of Free Speech25:09 Political Discourse and Media Influence28:03 Election Integrity and Public Perception33:17 Trump's Role in Economic Recovery34:14 Debt and Economic Growth35:45 Winners and Losers in the Economy37:52 Retirement Trends and Economic Health39:31 Government Jobs and Economic Impact41:53 Privatizing Government Functions44:35 Interest Rates and Housing Market Dynamics46:00 The Role of Treasury in Economic Strategy48:20 Regulatory Burdens on Housing50:07 Market Reactions and Economic Predictions

Mike Robinson, Vanessa Beeley, Charles Malet and Sandi Adams with today's UK Column News. Wendy Jane and Steve join us for UK Column News Extra. If you would like to support our independent journalism, please join the community: https://community.ukcolumn.org/ Sources: www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-19th-march-2025 Timestamps: 00:00 Government Allocates £5 Billion to Reduce Welfare Costs Amid Post-Pandemic Surge 07:50 Trump on the Warpath: Pushing for War with Iran and the Wider Resistance Bloc 16:51 Net Zero and GB Energy: A Farce of Hot Air and Empty Promises 24:25 Shady Actions in Bristol: Roadblocks Installed Under Cover of Night 31:57 Cheltenham Event Tickets — UK Column Is Member Funded, Please Join Us 34:48 Ursula von der Leyen's Wild Proposal: Eye-Watering Sums for EU Defence 43:23 The Fallout of the West's Syria Gamble: Replacing Assad with Al-Qaeda Will Not End Well 51:28 Starmer's Not-So-Secret Mission: Brexiting Brexit 53:42 Met Police Lose Bid for Anonymity in Tribunal Over ‘Gender Critical' Beliefs Case

ANONYMITY MISUNDERSTOOD. The Montyman and guest co-host Jack delve into the often-misunderstood concept of anonymity within recovery programs, particularly Alcoholics Anonymous. They explore the origins and significance of anonymity, the balance between personal privacy and public representation, and the importance of respecting individual choices regarding anonymity. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on the Traditions surrounding anonymity and the implications for members in recovery. Closing Song: How to Have a Good Time by Michael Purington. #higherpower #aa #na #alcoholicsanonymous #recovery #recovered #alcoholic #twelvesteps #wedorecover #narcoticsanonymous #addiction #bigbook

Send us a MessageIn this solo episode of Culture Change RX, I discuss the critical concept of psychological safety within healthcare organizations so that employees feel safe to voice their concerns and ideas and freely provide feedback and input. This episode prompts leaders to consider:  Are your employees hiding behind anonymity? If so, this episode outlines practical tactics for leaders to foster psychological safety, including embracing both anonymous and identified feedback, responding to feedback effectively, modeling vulnerability, and celebrating employees who speak up. The conversation highlights the journey towards a culture of trust and continuous improvement in healthcare settings - in essence, a culture where employees are safe to “own their voice.”Low response rates in employee surveys can indicate a lack of psychological safety.Anonymity in feedback can reflect a lack of psychological safety.Leaders can model vulnerability to encourage open communication.Celebrating brave voices fosters a culture of safety.Feedback should be acknowledged and acted upon.Creating a safe environment improves patient care and employee satisfaction.High reliability organizations prioritize psychological safety.Trust in leadership grows when employees see tangible outcomes.Need help improving the culture, performance, and results of your healthcare organization? If so, let's talk:  https://www.capstoneleadership.net/contact-usAre we connected yet on LinkedIn? https://www.linkedin.com/in/suetetzlaff/13th Annual Healthcare Executive Forum - June 18 (afternoon) and June 19 (morning)High Reliability, Just Culture & Psychological Safety Made Simple focuses on breaking down these critical concepts into practical, actionable strategies tailored for senior leaders in small and rural healthcare settings.

Ever felt like everyone in the room hates you, but you're not sure why? Or been told you're “too much” (or not enough)? Today, we're unpacking the cultural obsession with dialing women down, the perception gap, and why your biggest personality might be your biggest asset.

KeywordsBitcoin mining, Adit board, modular systems, open source, community collaboration, heat reuse, project management, market insights, future of mining, Bitcoin, market trends, investment strategies, privacy, KYC, regulatory challenges, Bitcoin mining, community support, educationSummaryThis conversation explores the intersection of fitness technology and Bitcoin mining, discussing personal anecdotes, the AddIt board, modular mining systems, and the importance of open-source standards. The participants share insights on community collaboration, project management, and the future of mining, emphasizing the potential for innovation and growth in the industry. In this conversation, the speakers delve into the cyclical nature of Bitcoin trends, sharing personal experiences with market volatility and investment strategies. They discuss the importance of privacy and anonymity in Bitcoin transactions, the implications of KYC regulations, and the future of privacy tools. The conversation also touches on regulatory challenges facing Bitcoin services, community support for the Samurai Wallet case, innovative uses of Bitcoin mining, and the critical role of communication and education in Bitcoin adoption.TakeawaysThe AddIt board is a USB adapter for Antminer hash boards, enhancing modularity.Modular mining systems allow for customization and flexibility in setups.Open-source standards are crucial for the future of Bitcoin mining.Community collaboration can drive innovation in mining projects.Heat reuse in mining can create new business opportunities.Effective project management is key to successful outcomes in tech projects.Market insights reveal the current state of Bitcoin mining and its challenges.The conversation emphasizes the importance of resilience in the face of market fluctuations. The Bitcoin market is cyclical, with trends changing over time.Personal experiences in the market can shape investment strategies.Long-term investment strategies include automated dollar-cost averaging.Privacy in Bitcoin transactions is crucial to protect user identity.KYC regulations pose challenges for Bitcoin users seeking anonymity.There are always options for those who have used KYC services.The future of privacy tools in Bitcoin is uncertain but necessary.Regulatory challenges can impact the development of Bitcoin services.Community support is vital for projects like Samurai Wallet.Effective communication is essential for educating non-technical users about Bitcoin.Chapters00:00 Introduction to Fitness and Technology03:05 Bar Fight Stories and Personal Anecdotes06:02 Understanding the AddIt Board09:10 Modular Mining Systems and Open Source Standards11:53 The Future of Bitcoin Mining and Heat Reuse15:05 Project Management and Team Dynamics17:58 Community Engagement and Project Updates20:46 Closing Thoughts and Future Directions37:13 Innovative Entrepreneurship in the Bitcoin Era43:22 The Future of Bitcoin Mining and Energy Solutions49:01 Navigating Bitcoin's Price Cycles and Market Psychology55:18 Privacy and Anonymity in the Bitcoin Ecosystem01:08:23 Innovative Heating Solutions for Winter01:10:17 Creative Deck Heating Ideas01:11:57 The Legend of the Massachusetts Teacher01:14:10 Support for the 256 Foundation01:16:40 The Importance of Strategic Communication01:28:39 Bridging the Gap in Understanding Bitcoin01:32:33 Exciting Developments at the 256 Foundation

Tessaveh: Anonymity by Rabbi Avi Harari

Keith Coleman, the VP of product at Twitter/X, and Jay Baxter, the founding ML engineer, are the minds behind Community Notes. Here they reveal how a small, scrappy team built the most trusted crowdsourced information system on the internet—one that's changing the way we understand truth online. What you'll learn:1. How Community Notes actually works—a deep dive into the groundbreaking algorithm that rewards “bridging agreement” instead of majority rule2. The seemingly crazy yet brilliant way this idea survived multiple CEO changes—from Jack to Parag to Elon3. How this project started with a dumpster fire GIF (literally)—the untold backstory of its early launch4. The secret to running ultra-fast, high-impact product teams—no OKRs, no Jira; just one Google Doc5. What Meta's adoption of Community Notes means for the future of online (mis)information—why this open source system is becoming the industry standard—Brought to you by:• WorkOS—Modern identity platform for B2B SaaS, free up to 1 million MAUs• Productboard—Make products that matter• Wix Studio—The web creation platform built for agencies—Find the transcript at: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/how-x-built-the-best-fact-checking-system-on-the-internet—Where to find Keith Coleman:• X: https://x.com/kcoleman• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/keith-coleman-19b12b46/—Where to find Jay Baxter:• X: https://x.com/_jaybaxter_• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jaybaxter/• Website: http://jaybaxter.net/—In this episode, we cover:(00:00) Introduction to Community Notes(06:56) How the “bridging-based” algorithm works(13:33) The impact and scale of Community Notes(17:24) Understanding the note publishing threshold(21:32) Challenges and philosophies(26:26) The effect of notes on re-sharing content(29:41) Origin story(35:46) Embracing small teams for big impact(40:23) The thermal project approach(47:47) Algorithm development and internal competitions(50:34) An inside look at how the team operates(58:56) Working with Elon(01:05:30) Launching Birdwatch(01:10:48) The core principles behind Community Notes(01:26:15) Anonymity and pseudonymity in contributions(01:32:17) Sustaining the project through leadership changes(01:37:57) Future directions for Community Notes(01:42:12) Final thoughts and optimism for the future—Referenced:• Community Notes on X: https://x.com/CommunityNotes• Sign up to be a Community Notes contributor: https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/signing-up• The Making of Community Notes: https://asteriskmag.com/issues/08/the-making-of-community-notes• “Readers added a Community Note to this Tweet”: https://x.com/HelpfulNotes/status/1718103364792205704• Note-ranking algorithm: https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes#matrix-factorization• Study: Community Notes on X could be key to curbing misinformation: https://giesbusiness.illinois.edu/news/2024/11/18/study--community-notes-on-x-could-be-key-to-curbing-misinformation• Study Finds X's (Formerly Twitter's) Community Notes Provide Accurate, Credible Answers to Vaccine Misinformation: https://qi.ucsd.edu/study-finds-xs-formerly-twitters-community-notes-provide-accurate-credible-answers-to-vaccine-misinformation/• Did the Roll-Out of Community Notes Reduce Engagement with Misinformation on X/Twitter?: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686967• Kayvon Beykpour on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kayvz/• Jack Dorsey on X: https://x.com/jack• “Birdwatch gives me the creeps” tweet: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1589454464611540992• Blake Scholl on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/blakescholl/• Creating Truthtelling Incentives with the Bayesian Truth Serum: https://www.eecs.harvard.edu/cs286r/courses/fall12/papers/DW08.pdf• Asana: https://asana.com/• Spaces: https://blog.x.com/en_us/topics/product/2021/spaces-is-here• Amazon MTurk: https://www.mturk.com/• Community notes on GitHub: https://github.com/twitter/communitynotes• What do I think about Community Notes?: https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2023/08/16/communitynotes.html• X's community-led approach: tackling inaccurate and misleading information: https://blog.x.com/en_us/topics/company/2023/xs-community-led-approach-tackling-inaccurate-and-misleading-information• Linda Yaccarino on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindayaccarino/• Messi-Ronaldo rivalry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messi%E2%80%93Ronaldo_rivalry• Supernotes paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.06116v1—Production and marketing by https://penname.co/. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email podcast@lennyrachitsky.com.—Lenny may be an investor in the companies discussed. Get full access to Lenny's Newsletter at www.lennysnewsletter.com/subscribe

Halachah From The Parshah Series: Parshas Terumah - Donation Plaques in Shul- what's best anonymity or publicity? 02/15/2021

Also, live facial recognition cameras - a good idea for safety-or attack on privacy?

2-16-25 Biblical-Literacy Mark taught Lesser-Known Women of the Bible with an emphasis on unnamed but significant women. Anonymity can sometimes speak volumes. Why no name? Various reasons: to prevent embarrassment, the person is unknown or sometimes used as a literary device. Examples of the later could be to 1) elevate a universal significance as with the Shuminite woman, which provided a lesson in hospitality, 2) bring divine action to the foreground or 3) deliver a dose of irony. Today's lesson focused on 3 unnamed women in the Bible: Lot's wife: turned into a pillar of salt. She made a choice that had consequences. Luke 17:32-33 Jephthah's daughter: a rash vow causes his daughter to be a burnt offering. The widow of Nain: Jesus demonstrated compassion for her situation. Points for home: Remember Lot's wife Pursue God Don't be an idiot Never doubt the compassions of God Listen to Mark teach insights into unnamed women in the Bible. Listen to him share the power of faith in the affairs of life. This world is not our home

Launched by a Polish startup in 2017, PimEyes is a powerful facial recognition software tool, which uses reverse image search technology. Just like with Google image search, users can submit an image of a person's face and Pimeyes will find all images of that person online, providing links to the websites where they are located. It can be helpful for locating images that are difficult to find elsewhere, but there are also a host of privacy concerns. Pimeyes has been labelled the “most disturbing website on the internet” and “a stalker's dream”. What is facial recognition? How does PimEyes work in practice? Why is this software problematic ? In under 3 minutes, we answer your questions ! To listen to the latest episodes, click here: Is the fertility cliff real? How can I work better from home? Why do we get bad breath? A Bababam Originals podcast written and realised by Joseph Chance. In partnership with upday UK. First broadcasting 24/05/2023 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In today's episode, you will learn a series of vocabulary words that are connected to a specific topic. This lesson will help you improve your ability to speak English fluently about a specific topic. It will also help you feel more confident in your English abilities.5 Vocabulary WordsEncryption (Noun): The process of converting information or data into a code to prevent unauthorized access.Example Sentences:Encryption is crucial for protecting sensitive information transmitted over the internet.Many messaging apps use end-to-end encryption to ensure that only the sender and receiver can read the messages.Understanding encryption can help users safeguard their online communications.Anonymity (Noun): The state of being not identifiable within a set of subjects; the quality of being anonymous.Example Sentences:Anonymity is often sought by individuals who wish to express their opinions without fear of repercussions.The internet provides various platforms that allow for user anonymity, but this can also lead to misuse.Maintaining anonymity online is a challenge due to the pervasive nature of data tracking.Data Breach (Noun): An incident where unauthorized access to confidential data occurs, often leading to data theft or exposure.Example Sentences:The recent data breach exposed millions of users' personal information to hackers.Companies must implement strong security measures to prevent data breaches and protect customer privacy.After a data breach, organizations are required to notify affected individuals and regulatory bodies.Tracking (Noun): The process of monitoring an individual's online behavior, often through cookies or other tracking technologies.Example Sentences:Online tracking allows companies to gather data about user preferences and habits.Many users are concerned about the extent of tracking conducted by websites and advertisers.Tools that block tracking can help users maintain their privacy while browsing the internet.Consent (Noun): Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something, particularly in the context of data collection and usage.Example Sentences:Websites are now required to obtain explicit consent from users before collecting personal data.Consent should be informed, meaning users must understand what data is being collected and how it will be used.Many privacy regulations emphasize the importance of obtaining user consent to protect individual rights.A Paragraph using the 5 vocabulary wordsOnline privacy is a growing concern as individuals increasingly share personal information online. Consent is a fundamental principle, ensuring users have control over their data. However, tracking technologies often collect data without explicit consent, raising privacy concerns. Data breaches can expose sensitive information, leading to identity theft and financial loss. Anonymity allows users to interact online without revealing their true identity, while encryption protects data by scrambling it, making it difficult for unauthorized individuals to access. Understanding these concepts is essential for protecting online privacy and navigating the digital landscape responsibly.If you want to sign up for the free daily English vocabulary newsletter, go towww.dailyenglishvocabulary.com

Mark Twain. George Sand. Stephen King. George Orwell. Dr. Seuss. J.K. Rowling. Anne Rice. All these authors have at least one thing in common--they all go by (or have gone by) pseudonyms on their bylines. Perhaps you're considering whether to adopt a pen name for your memoir, so should you? Barbara tends to feel that pseudonyms work better for fiction than memoir, but feel free to disagree--listen to this week's episode for her rationale. Links mentioned in this episode: Study: On Twitter, false news travels faster than true stories | MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://news.mit.edu/2018/study-twitter-false-news-travels-faster-true-stories-0308 A potted history of pen names – National Library of Scotland Blog https://blog.nls.uk/a-potted-history-of-pen-names/ Chapters 00:00 The Dilemma of Memoir Writing 00:49 The Impact of Anonymity in Writing 01:45 Historical Context of Pseudonyms 04:26 The Pros and Cons of Using a Pen Name 06:37 Navigating the Challenges of Non-Fiction 09:28 The Importance of Authenticity in Memoir 12:10 Upcoming Conversations and Reflections

In this episode, Elle and Vee recap their friends' holiday party, aka the Naughty Snowball, at which LOTS of naughty fun was had!  Themes/dressing for body confidence (especially after having a baby). (2:23)Prostate play with Daddy: Elle gets a lesson in best practices for milking the prostate, and snowballing cum between five people. (5:22)Rope 101: Vee uses her beginner rope tying skills on Elle! Finding something to do with your hands during the party, and unlocking your inner domme. Reverse Tension; Square Knot Single Column Tie; attaching rope to rope. (11:55)Edging scene while being bound. (18:40)Fisting tips: Vee uses her takeaways from a recent fisting workshop to get wrist-deep with M, two nights in a row. (20:23)Elle: year of the pussy! Double ended dildo strap-on play. Why Elle loves reverse cowgirl. (29:38)Anonymity in a large orgy: at small orgies it feels like there's a spotlight on certain scenes. (40:14)Sexy white elephant gifts: nipple clamps, penis pumps, ejaculating dildo, sexy art, bed straps. (44:11)Woo More Play Here For Great Sex. Natural Sex Products and Tools + Resources + SupportDisclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Where to find us, and how you can support us:Instagram: @girlsgonedeeppod Merch: girlsgonedeep.com/shopContact: girlsgonedeep@gmail.comWHOREible Life: Get 10% off your deck with code GONEDEEP at whoreiblelife.com Instagram: @wlthegameWoo More Play Affiliate Link: Support us while you shop!

Are you a coach, therapist, or support professional looking to create a safe, intimate space for clients navigating grief and trauma? Join us in this episode of Launch Your Private Podcast as we coach Sabrina Fletcher, a pregnancy loss doula, on building a membership site with a private podcast to support individuals healing from termination for medical reasons (TFMR).Timestamps:[0:00] Introduction to the episode and Sabrina's mission to create a trauma-informed membership offering audio courses[3:29] Structuring Content to Reduce Overwhelm[7:02] Private Podcasts as Trauma-Sensitive Tools[9:18] Technical Setup: Feeds, Segmentation, and Membership Design[11:50] Single Feed vs. Multiple Feeds Debate[14:22] Solving Access Issues for Canceled Members[19:08] Automating Access with ActiveCampaign + Hello Audio[23:35] Scaling Gradually: Tech vs. Community Priorities[26:50] Ethical Content Curation for Grieving Audiences[31:15] Privacy and Anonymity in Private Podcasts[38:55] Pricing Strategies for Trauma-Informed Memberships[42:30] Positioning Memberships as Short-Term Healing JourneysLinks Mentioned:http://www.thetfmrdoula.com

The Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Anonymously in case 1:24-cv-07977-VSB argues that the plaintiff should be permitted to proceed under a pseudonym to protect their privacy and avoid potential harm. The plaintiff asserts that disclosing their identity could expose them to severe personal, professional, and reputational risks, particularly given the sensitive and potentially stigmatizing nature of the case. The memorandum outlines legal precedents supporting anonymity in similar circumstances, emphasizing that the plaintiff's right to privacy outweighs any public interest in knowing their identity. It also contends that proceeding anonymously would not prejudice the defendant or impair the fairness of the proceedings, as the court and relevant parties would still have access to the plaintiff's identity under protective measures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.31.0.pdf

The Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Anonymously in case 1:24-cv-07977-VSB argues that the plaintiff should be permitted to proceed under a pseudonym to protect their privacy and avoid potential harm. The plaintiff asserts that disclosing their identity could expose them to severe personal, professional, and reputational risks, particularly given the sensitive and potentially stigmatizing nature of the case. The memorandum outlines legal precedents supporting anonymity in similar circumstances, emphasizing that the plaintiff's right to privacy outweighs any public interest in knowing their identity. It also contends that proceeding anonymously would not prejudice the defendant or impair the fairness of the proceedings, as the court and relevant parties would still have access to the plaintiff's identity under protective measures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.31.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Garza sits down in-person with GAEREA. https://gaerea.com SPONSORS: https://distrokid.com/vip/garza 30% OFF! Sweetwater - https://imp.i114863.net/rnrmVB CHAPTERS: 00:00 - Anonymity & Stalkers 02:41 - Scammers, Cash vs Digital Currency 05:56 - Gateway Bands Into Black Metal 11:36 - Evolving as a Band & Writers 14:03 - Expanding Your Perspective 18:06 - Writing & Interpreting Songs 22:00 - Wearing Masks on Stage 25:08 - Spirituality & Afterlife 30:33 - Thomas Ligotti Books 35:22 - Growing Up in Porto, Portugal 39:44 - Writing an Album in Two Weeks, Pros & Cons 46:02 - Writing & Deleting Riffs 52:30 - Writing New Album, Coma 54:14 - “Hope Shatters” 57:00 - “World Ablaze,” New Musical Direction 1:02:14 - Philosophy 1:09:45 - On Tour With Zeal & Ardor, Zetra 1:13:18 - Playing w/ Black Metal Bands 1:14:48 - 8 Forms of Art 1:16:40 - Jordan Peterson

Why does listening to No Stupid Questions feel like you're hanging out with your best friends? Why did the whole world take it personally when Princess Diana died? And how do “parasocial relationships” affect your mental health? SOURCES:Bradley Bond, professor of communication studies at the University of San Diego.John Cacioppo, professor of psychology at the University of Chicago.Joe Cobbs, professor of marketing at Northern Kentucky University.Nick Epley, professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago.Katy Milkman, professor of operations, information, and decisions at the University of Pennsylvania.Emily Oster, professor of economics at Brown University.Anuj Shah, professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago. RESOURCES:"Knowledge About Others Reduces One's Own Sense of Anonymity," by Anuj K. Shah and Michael LaForest (Nature, 2022)."Tragic but True: How Podcasters Replaced Our Real Friends," by Rachel Aroesti (The Guardian, 2021)."The Development and Influence of Parasocial Relationships With Television Characters: A Longitudinal Experimental Test of Prejudice Reduction Through Parasocial Contact," by Bradley J. Bond (Communication Research, 2020)."A Mind like Mine: The Exceptionally Ordinary Underpinnings of Anthropomorphism," by Nicholas Epley (Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2018)."Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance," by Angela Duckworth (TED, 2013)."How Soap Operas Changed the World," by Stephanie Hegarty (BBC, 2012)."The Power of TV: Cable Television and Women's Status in India," by Robert Jensen and Emily Oster (The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009). EXTRAS:"Can A.I. Companions Replace Human Connection?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."Rivalry," by Tell Me Something I Don't Know (2017).Behavior Change for Good Initiative.Everything Is Alive.The Know Rivalry Project.