Podcasts about Anonymity

▶️ START YOU 7 DAY RESET HERE - www.therebuiltman.com/7dayreset   Porn addiction isn't just real—it's one of the most destructive forces keeping men stuck in mediocrity. Worse than drugs. Worse than alcohol.   Why? Because of the 3 A's that make it deadlier than anything else out there:   Affordability. Accessibility. Anonymity.   In this raw and unfiltered episode of The Rebuilt Man, Coach Frank Rich exposes why porn addiction is hitting men harder than anyone wants to admit—and why breaking free requires more than willpower.   If you've ever wondered why you keep relapsing… Why your drive is gone… Why you feel ashamed, stuck, or secretly powerless… This is your wake-up call.  

On this week's Keepin It Real, Cam Marston got some blowback from a social media post this week. He asks us, "How do you deal with haters?" ----- One year ago, I set a goal to paddle board across Mobile Bay. I completed that goal in May. The second part of the goal was to write about the challenge and be paid to have it printed. That was completed last week when the story was carried in Mobile Bay Magazine. I will get a small payment in a week or so. A year's planning, researching, note-taking, exercising, preparing and lots of paddling later, the goal was entirely met. Pretty cool. Yesterday, Mobile Bay magazine made posts about my paddle with links taking readers to the story and I received a good bit of social media attention as a result.  The vast majority of the social media comments were very positive and congratulatory. Today's commentary is about the ones that weren't. No sooner had the magazine posted the story than a handful of people jumped in to denigrate my effort. Some said that my paddle across the Bay wasn't that hard and that they could do it. Essentially, my effort wasn't worthy of the attention I was receiving. Others said they know people who swim across the bay and that my paddle, again, wasn't much of an accomplishment. And let me say again, the vast majority of comments were very positive, but what makes people want to attack other's accomplishments? What triggers haters? There's a type of person that simply can't let others be acknowledged without debasing their achievements. Unfortunately, they're everywhere. They lurk in shadows waiting to leap out and knock down someone's efforts. Is it possible to scroll through social media and NOT attack other's success? Certainly. But some can't. Or won't. What is it about these people? Remarkably, I sat this morning after reading some of these comments and began questioning if my paddle board crossing was truly that hard? Maybe they were right? Did I overblow the effort seeking some sort of vainglory? It didn't take long for me to answer No. All aspects of this goal were a difficult challenge and when I finished crossing the Bay the pain and exhaustion I felt were very real. A superhero athlete could have done it easily. Me? It was a true struggle. Discouragement is a powerful drug. It's meant to stoke the ego of the pusher. And the ego, unchecked, always compares, elevates and separates. It says I've judged you, I'm different and I'm better. It's the motive of the hater. I knew none of the people who tried to devalue my effort. I think none of them knew me. Anonymity is key to haters. If there is a message here, it's one you and I have already heard before - it's to keep achieving. Keep making things happen. Set goals, do bold and audacious things. Let the haters try to knock you down but don't flinch. Don't even turn your head. Accept helpful criticism but ignore the rest. Because when they're judging, evaluating and separating they're dying inside due to their personal weakness. We'll never be rid of them, but we can devalue them.  And maybe, in time, like gnats and mosquitos, they'll go away. I'm Cam Marston and I'm just trying to keep it real.

Welcome to Pretty Private with Eboné—the podcast where silence is broken and stories are set free. Every Tuesday, we explore the untold experiences of women of color who’ve faced it all—childhood trauma, addiction, abuse, incarceration, grief, mental health struggles, and more—and found the strength to make it to the other side. Hosted by your favorite Professional Homegirl, Eboné delivers raw, unfiltered conversations that inspire, empower, and remind you that healing begins with being heard. What sets Pretty Private apart ... Anonymity. Guests share their truth without fear of judgment—free to speak openly in a space created just for them. From survivors and sex workers to professionals and cultural change makers, these powerful interviews will shift your perspective and speak to your soul. Pretty Private isn’t just a podcast—it’s your personal guide for turning storylines into lifelines. Listen here and subscribe to Pretty Private with Eboné on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In today's episode, you will learn a series of vocabulary words that are connected to a specific topic. This lesson will help you improve your ability to speak English fluently about a specific topic. It will also help you feel more confident in your English abilities.5 Vocabulary WordsEncryption (Noun): The process of converting information or data into a code to prevent unauthorized access.Example Sentences:Encryption is crucial for protecting sensitive information transmitted over the internet.Many messaging apps use end-to-end encryption to ensure that only the sender and receiver can read the messages.Understanding encryption can help users safeguard their online communications.Anonymity (Noun): The state of being not identifiable within a set of subjects; the quality of being anonymous.Example Sentences:Anonymity is often sought by individuals who wish to express their opinions without fear of repercussions.The internet provides various platforms that allow for user anonymity, but this can also lead to misuse.Maintaining anonymity online is a challenge due to the pervasive nature of data tracking.Data Breach (Noun): An incident where unauthorized access to confidential data occurs, often leading to data theft or exposure.Example Sentences:The recent data breach exposed millions of users' personal information to hackers.Companies must implement strong security measures to prevent data breaches and protect customer privacy.After a data breach, organizations are required to notify affected individuals and regulatory bodies.Tracking (Noun): The process of monitoring an individual's online behavior, often through cookies or other tracking technologies.Example Sentences:Online tracking allows companies to gather data about user preferences and habits.Many users are concerned about the extent of tracking conducted by websites and advertisers.Tools that block tracking can help users maintain their privacy while browsing the internet.Consent (Noun): Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something, particularly in the context of data collection and usage.Example Sentences:Websites are now required to obtain explicit consent from users before collecting personal data.Consent should be informed, meaning users must understand what data is being collected and how it will be used.Many privacy regulations emphasize the importance of obtaining user consent to protect individual rights.A Paragraph using the 5 vocabulary wordsOnline privacy is a growing concern as individuals increasingly share personal information online. Consent is a fundamental principle, ensuring users have control over their data. However, tracking technologies often collect data without explicit consent, raising privacy concerns. Data breaches can expose sensitive information, leading to identity theft and financial loss. Anonymity allows users to interact online without revealing their true identity, while encryption protects data by scrambling it, making it difficult for unauthorized individuals to access. Understanding these concepts is essential for protecting online privacy and navigating the digital landscape responsibly.If you want to sign up for the free daily English vocabulary newsletter, go towww.dailyenglishvocabulary.com

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Send us a textMeet Cody Keenan—best known as President Barack Obama's longtime speechwriter and author of the bestseller "Grace." The conversation covers Cody's career journey, from his early days working for Senator Ted Kennedy, to his rise as White House Chief Speechwriter, and beyond. Martin opens with humor and heartfelt admiration for Cody's work, setting a warm, conversational tone.Additionally, the episode touches on the creative process behind presidential speechwriting: the intense collaboration, the immense pressure, and the quest for authenticity in political messaging. Cody reflects on some of the standout speeches he's helped create, like the Selma anniversary address, and discusses the value of hope, optimism, and candor when writing for the public.He also gives practical advice to aspiring speechwriters, stressing the importance of clear, conversational language and the dangers of becoming too lofty or detached from everyday people. Personal reflections, pop culture references, and “nerd outs” about superheroes give the episode an accessible, engaging feel.Throughout, Cody and Martin discuss the importance of public service, the shifting nature of media and public discourse, and the power of storytelling to forge a common, uplifting narrative. They close with mutual appreciation and Cody's advice to the next generation: be less cynical, invest in hope, and don't be afraid to fail if you're striving to make things better.Overall, this episode balances behind-the-scenes political insight with relatable and inspiring life lessons, making it a compelling listen whether you're a fan of politics, writing, or personal growth.===Time Codes:00:00 Cody's Notable Speeches and Appearances05:10 Exclusive Interview Highlights07:50 Oval Office Basement Stress Reflections10:46 Legacy of War Silence14:45 Meeting Presidents & Speechwriting Insights15:41 Anonymity's Decline in Public Service21:44 "Obama's Skill: Crafting Resonant Narratives"23:53 Delayed Visit and Unifying Narratives28:29 Envy of White House Advance Team31:16 Visualizing Success Through Preparation35:10 Moonshot Optimism38:31 "Perseverance and Impactful Living"39:11 "Milestone Gratitude Acknowledgment"Connect with Passing The Torch: Facebook and IG: @torchmartin More Amazing Stories: Episode 41: Lee Ellis – Freeing You From Bond That Make You InsecureEpisode 49: Ryan Hawk – Crafting a Legacy of LeadershipEpisode 52: Riley Tejcek – Mission of Empowerment and Endurance

Dr. Ned Nikolov is a Ph.D. Physical Scientist with a broad range of interests in various fields of science including climate, cosmology, astrophysics, nutrition, archaeology, and more. X: https://x.com/NikolovScience Timestamps: 00:00 Trailer 00:44 Introduction 06:21 Reevaluating CO2's climate impact 07:39 Explaining the atmosphere's thermal effect 11:00 Clouds' dominant role in radiation reflection 15:41 Decline in Albedo driving warming 18:49 Pressure's role in Earth's thermal amplification 23:50 Natural cycles and cloud formation 24:44 Cosmic rays, clouds, and climate 30:46 Geoengineering - global bioterrorism or benefit? 33:11 Climate data disputes and misleading narratives 37:58 UN's resolution on greenhouse gases 41:27 Atmospheric warming underestimation 44:04 Anonymity for fair review 46:46 Politically driven scientific paradigms 50:40 Climate science data vs. distorted reality 51:33 Where to Find Ned 53:40 Cattle and climate change misconceptions Join Revero now to regain your health: https://revero.com/YT Revero.com is an online medical clinic for treating chronic diseases with this root-cause approach of nutrition therapy. You can get access to medical providers, personalized nutrition therapy, biomarker tracking, lab testing, ongoing clinical care, and daily coaching. You will also learn everything you need with educational videos, hundreds of recipes, and articles to make this easy for you. Join the Revero team (medical providers, etc): https://revero.com/jobs ‪#Revero #ReveroHealth #shawnbaker  #Carnivorediet #MeatHeals #AnimalBased #ZeroCarb #DietCoach  #FatAdapted #Carnivore #sugarfree Disclaimer: The content on this channel is not medical advice. Please consult your healthcare provider.

Sexual assault survivors are often allowed to proceed anonymously during court trials for several reasons, primarily aimed at protecting their privacy, safety, and well-being:Reducing Trauma: Testifying about sexual assault can be an incredibly traumatic experience for survivors. Allowing them to proceed anonymously can help reduce the additional stress and trauma associated with public exposure and scrutiny.Protecting Privacy: Anonymity shields survivors from unwanted public attention and intrusion into their personal lives. It allows them to maintain a level of privacy and control over their own narrative.Encouraging Reporting: Fear of public exposure can deter survivors from reporting sexual assault or seeking justice. Anonymity can help encourage survivors to come forward and participate in legal proceedings without the fear of being publicly identified and stigmatized.Ensuring Safety: In some cases, survivors may fear retaliation or harassment from the accused or their supporters. Anonymity can provide an added layer of protection and help ensure the safety of the survivor and their loved ones.However, there are also potential problems that may arise from allowing an accuser to remain anonymous:Fairness to the Accused: Anonymity for the accuser can raise concerns about fairness in the legal process. It may limit the accused's ability to fully defend themselves if they cannot know the identity of their accuser or access potentially relevant information about them.Presumption of Innocence: Anonymity may undermine the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" by creating an imbalance in the perception of the case. The accused may face increased scrutiny and presumption of guilt, especially in the absence of transparency regarding the accuser's identity.Potential for False Accusations: Without the accuser's identity being disclosed, there may be concerns about false accusations going unchallenged. Anonymity could make it more difficult for the accused to present evidence or witnesses that could refute the allegations.Impact on Public Confidence: Anonymity can sometimes lead to skepticism or distrust in the legal process, as it may be perceived as favoring one party over the other. This could affect public confidence in the fairness and integrity of the judicial system.In this episode we get a look at the Judge's order denying the request to proceed anonymously for the duration of the proceedings.(commercial at 11:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.611545.49.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sexual assault survivors are often allowed to proceed anonymously during court trials for several reasons, primarily aimed at protecting their privacy, safety, and well-being:Reducing Trauma: Testifying about sexual assault can be an incredibly traumatic experience for survivors. Allowing them to proceed anonymously can help reduce the additional stress and trauma associated with public exposure and scrutiny.Protecting Privacy: Anonymity shields survivors from unwanted public attention and intrusion into their personal lives. It allows them to maintain a level of privacy and control over their own narrative.Encouraging Reporting: Fear of public exposure can deter survivors from reporting sexual assault or seeking justice. Anonymity can help encourage survivors to come forward and participate in legal proceedings without the fear of being publicly identified and stigmatized.Ensuring Safety: In some cases, survivors may fear retaliation or harassment from the accused or their supporters. Anonymity can provide an added layer of protection and help ensure the safety of the survivor and their loved ones.However, there are also potential problems that may arise from allowing an accuser to remain anonymous:Fairness to the Accused: Anonymity for the accuser can raise concerns about fairness in the legal process. It may limit the accused's ability to fully defend themselves if they cannot know the identity of their accuser or access potentially relevant information about them.Presumption of Innocence: Anonymity may undermine the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" by creating an imbalance in the perception of the case. The accused may face increased scrutiny and presumption of guilt, especially in the absence of transparency regarding the accuser's identity.Potential for False Accusations: Without the accuser's identity being disclosed, there may be concerns about false accusations going unchallenged. Anonymity could make it more difficult for the accused to present evidence or witnesses that could refute the allegations.Impact on Public Confidence: Anonymity can sometimes lead to skepticism or distrust in the legal process, as it may be perceived as favoring one party over the other. This could affect public confidence in the fairness and integrity of the judicial system.In this episode we get a look at the Judge's order denying the request to proceed anonymously for the duration of the proceedings.(commercial at 11:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.611545.49.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Nancy and Laurie share a screen from Nancy's home in Umbria and join Ruth in New York for this live and unedited conversation. Their talk ranges from the current state of restaurant criticism to different party throwing styles. Does Ruth really use paper plates? What's Nancy's favorite American cheese for hamburgers. And Laurie explains why sometimes helping out at the grill requires an umbrella. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit threeingredients.substack.com

This week on Beyond the Code, Yitzy sits down with one of the most outspoken minds in crypto law: Gabriel Shapiro. Known for his deep legal chops, unfiltered takes, and pioneering work at the intersection of smart contracts and governance, Gabe takes us through his journey—from tech M&A prodigy to crypto lawyer and decentralization maxi.We dive into:Gabe's early big law career and how Facebook's acquisition of WhatsApp led him down the crypto rabbit hole;The real reason “decentralization” became crypto's favorite legal strategy;Why current DAO structures are flawed—and how MetaLex and the Borg concept aim to fix them;A deep look at on-chain legal engineering: how entities, trusts, and smart contracts can blend into a new governance paradigm;The emergence of $GOR, a meme coin inspired by Gabe himself;The state of crypto regulation in the U.S., Trump's pivot on Bitcoin, and why Gabe's bullish on the new market structure bill;Big law's limitations in crypto and the rise of agile, crypto-native legal shops;Anonymity in crypto—how to build trust without a legal name;And yes—we talk politics, Israel, identity, and whiskey.

This podcast is a short daily audio provided by the online recovery group Transitions Daily. The daily distribution consists of different recovery quotes from various resources, including: Twenty-Four Hours a Day, A.A. Thought for the Day, Daily Reflections, Big Book Quote, Just for Today, As Bill Sees It, plus more! Transitions Daily also distributes this same content in a daily email with a secret Facebook group for discussion. Go to www.DailyAAEmails.com for more information.   Do you want to stop drinking? Have you ever listened to sobriety podcasts? Does alcoholism or addiction run in your family? Have you tried Alcoholics Anonymous or the 12 Steps of A.A.? Are you considering how to get sober? Are you seriously thinking about sobriety for the first time? Is alcohol controlling your life as never before? If so, you will definitely want to check out this recovery podcast.

Allowing an accuser to proceed anonymously in civil lawsuits or criminal proceedings offers several advantages. It protects the individual's privacy, especially in cases involving sensitive matters like sexual assault, thereby reducing potential public scrutiny and emotional distress. Anonymity can also shield the accuser from possible retaliation or harassment, encouraging victims to come forward without fear of personal repercussions. This protection is particularly vital when the accused holds significant power or influence, as it helps balance the scales of justice.However, anonymity in legal proceedings presents notable challenges. It may hinder the defendant's ability to fully investigate the accuser's background and credibility, potentially impacting the fairness of the trial. The public's right to open judicial proceedings is also compromised, as transparency is a cornerstone of the legal system. Moreover, anonymity could inadvertently suggest that the allegations are more severe, potentially biasing jurors or the public against the defendant. Courts must carefully weigh these factors, often requiring compelling reasons to grant anonymity to ensure that justice is served equitably for all parties involved.The debate over anonymity for Sean "Diddy" Combs' accusers centers on balancing the accusers' privacy and safety with the defendant's right to a fair trial and the public's interest in transparent legal proceedings. Some accusers have sought to proceed under pseudonyms to protect themselves from potential harassment and public scrutiny. However, courts have ruled that allegations alone do not justify anonymity, emphasizing the importance of openness in judicial processes and the defendant's ability to investigate the accusers' credibility. This tension highlights the complexities of handling sensitive allegations against high-profile individuals.Let's dive in!(commercial at 9:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Most of Sean ‘Diddy' Combs's Accusers Are Unnamed. Can They Stay That Way? - The New York TimesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdf

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdf

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the amended complaint filed under case number 1:24-cv-07977-VSB, plaintiff Shareka Sherrod accuses Sean Combs and a network of his affiliated companies—including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global, and multiple Bad Boy Entertainment entities—of engaging in a pattern of egregious misconduct that she alleges amounts to sex trafficking, assault, battery, and other civil rights violations. Sherrod claims she was manipulated, exploited, and abused while under the influence and control of Combs and his enterprise, which she describes as operating with a coordinated structure designed to lure, intimidate, and silence victims. The complaint also names numerous “Organizational Does” and “Individual Does,” suggesting additional perpetrators and enablers whose identities may be revealed through discovery.Sherrod's lawsuit demands a jury trial and asserts that the abuse she suffered was not incidental, but part of a broader, systematized operation of exploitation embedded within Combs' business empire. The complaint details alleged psychological and physical harm, and frames her experience as one of many involving women recruited and harmed under similar circumstances. Through this civil action, Sherrod seeks not only monetary damages but legal accountability for what she claims was a deliberate and sustained campaign of abuse and cover-up enabled by corporate infrastructure and protected by power.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jamie tells Don and Sam that learning to accept his anxiety was enough to begin to step away from it. Jamie talks about helping newcomers work the first three Steps, and he discusses the power of the Third Step Prayer. Julia calls in to the Listener Feedback line.You're Invited to the 2025 International Convention of Alcoholics Anonymous. Please visit aa.org/international-convention for information. Come visit the AA Grapevine Podcast at the convention.While we provide the podcast at no charge, we do have expenses. Grapevine is the only AA entity that does not accept direct contributions, so to support the AA Grapevine Podcast, please subscribe to Grapevine Magazine in print, online, or on the Grapevine app. You can also provide a subscription to someone in need through our "Carry the Message" program or purchase books or other items at aagrapevine.org/storeYou can email us at podcast@aagrapevine.org. To record an Ask-It-Basket question or a recovery-related joke, call 212-870-3418 or email a voice recording to podcast@aagrapevine.org

Recent judicial decisions denying anonymity to plaintiffs in sexual assault lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs could significantly influence other pending and future cases against him. In October 2024, U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that a woman accusing Combs of rape in 2004 must reveal her identity to proceed with her lawsuit. The judge emphasized the public's interest in open judicial proceedings and Combs' right to investigate the accuser's background and credibility. This decision sets a precedent that may compel other plaintiffs to disclose their identities, potentially deterring some from pursuing legal action due to fears of public exposure and retaliation. The implications of this ruling extend beyond individual cases, potentially affecting the broader landscape of sexual assault litigation involving high-profile figures. Legal experts suggest that requiring plaintiffs to identify themselves could discourage victims from coming forward, especially when the accused holds significant power and influence. This development may lead to a chilling effect on the filing of similar lawsuits, as potential plaintiffs weigh the personal risks of public identification against seeking justice. Consequently, the balance between a defendant's right to a fair trial and a plaintiff's right to privacy remains a contentious issue in the legal system.Let's dive in!(commercial at 8:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean ‘Diddy' Combs case: What the Jane Doe ruling could mean for the other already-filed cases | CNN

Anonymous scouts critique this year's NBA draft class! What would we see about each lottery prospect (anonymously)! One surprise stat prediction for our favorite cbb teams! The Sleepers Podcast is now available daily with new episodes every Monday-Friday!

Can you imagine building a successful career while staying hidden in the shadows? Join us on the Business Legacy Podcast as we chat with Marsha Layton-Turner, the insightful founder of the Association of Ghostwriters. Marsha shares her unique journey into the world of ghostwriting, where the art of storytelling meets the necessity of anonymity. We uncover the mysterious concept of recognition estrangement and challenge the notion that ghostwriters must always long for the spotlight. Learn why a close-knit community and an abundance mindset are essential for these behind-the-scenes literary architects, and discover how they thrive by embracing collaboration over competition. Peek into the future of ghostwriting as we tackle the delicate balance between maintaining anonymity and building a reputation. Marsha offers her thoughts on the impact of AI technology on the industry, cautioning against its potential pitfalls. She also reveals how human creativity remains irreplaceable in crafting unique, impactful narratives. With Marsha's insights, understand the evolving techniques ghostwriters use to enhance their craft and manage multiple projects with confidence. Whether you're an aspiring writer or a seasoned professional, this episode is packed with invaluable advice and inspiration from the heart of the ghostwriting world. Timestamps 00:00:00 - Introduction and Welcome to Business Legacy Podcast 00:00:09 - Introduction of Marsha Layton-Turner and Her Journey into Ghostwriting 00:01:30 - Founding the Association of Ghostwriters 00:03:15 - Recognition Estrangement in Ghostwriting 00:05:00 - The Importance of Community and Abundance Mindset in Ghostwriting 00:09:14 - Navigating Anonymity and Credibility in Ghostwriting 00:10:30 - Building Reputation in Ghostwriting Without Revealing Specific Works 00:11:45 - The Role of AI in Ghostwriting and Its Potential Downsides 00:15:23 - Evolution of Ghostwriting Techniques and the Impact of AI 00:17:00 - Balancing Efficiency and Craftsmanship in Ghostwriting 00:18:30 - Managing Multiple Projects and Learning from Peers 00:20:00 - Monthly "Office Hours" for Sharing Insights and Strategies 00:22:00 - Encouragement to Join the Association of Ghostwriters for Resources and Networking 00:23:45 - Conclusion and Final Thoughts from Marsha Layton-Turner 00:25:00 - Closing Remarks and Where to Find More Information About the Association of Ghostwriters   Episode Resources: Find out more about Marcia and the association of ghost writers:  https://associationofghostwriters.org/ Legacy Podcast: For more information about the Legacy Podcast and its co-hosts, visit businesslegacypodcast.com. Leave a Review: If you enjoyed the episode, leave a review and rating on your preferred podcast platform. For more information: Visit businesslegacypodcast.com to access the shownotes and additional resources on the episode.

Recent judicial decisions denying anonymity to plaintiffs in sexual assault lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs could significantly influence other pending and future cases against him. In October 2024, U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that a woman accusing Combs of rape in 2004 must reveal her identity to proceed with her lawsuit. The judge emphasized the public's interest in open judicial proceedings and Combs' right to investigate the accuser's background and credibility. This decision sets a precedent that may compel other plaintiffs to disclose their identities, potentially deterring some from pursuing legal action due to fears of public exposure and retaliation. The implications of this ruling extend beyond individual cases, potentially affecting the broader landscape of sexual assault litigation involving high-profile figures. Legal experts suggest that requiring plaintiffs to identify themselves could discourage victims from coming forward, especially when the accused holds significant power and influence. This development may lead to a chilling effect on the filing of similar lawsuits, as potential plaintiffs weigh the personal risks of public identification against seeking justice. Consequently, the balance between a defendant's right to a fair trial and a plaintiff's right to privacy remains a contentious issue in the legal system.Let's dive in!(commercial at 8:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean ‘Diddy' Combs case: What the Jane Doe ruling could mean for the other already-filed cases | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ahead of ‘Marty in the Evening' with the RTÉ Concert Orchestra this September at Dublin's Bord Gáis Energy Theatre, actor and singer Angeline Ball talks to Dearbhail about the five songs that have soundtracked her life so far.

Niall Boylan hears your thoughts,

Alan Niven discusses his experiences as a manager and producer, particularly with Guns N' Roses and Great White. He highlights the challenges of managing Axel Rose's erratic behavior and the impact of losing key members like Izzy Stradlin. Niven emphasizes the importance of maintaining anonymity and the emotional toll of fame. He reflects on the band's decision to release two single albums instead of a double album, citing economic and creative reasons. Niven also touches on the band's struggles with substance abuse and the significance of maintaining a cohesive band dynamic.0:00:00 - Intro0:00:21 - Night Train & Drinking 0:00:58 - Alan's Many Roles in the Music Industry 0:04:15 - Guns 'N Roses, Axl, Songwriting & Emotion 0:09:00 - GnR, Izzy, Axl, Fame, Anonymity & Happiness 0:19:55 - When Axl Didn't Want to Perform 0:26:07 - If Alan Stayed On, Izzy Leaving & Axl's Grudges 0:34:35 - Izzy's Whereabouts and Slash's 50s0:38:30 - Original GnR United, Axl Psychology & Beta 0:43:40 - Sweet Child O' Mine Video & Erin Everly 0:45:20 - Transitioning into the 90s with GnR 0:47:52 - Pressure from David Geffen 0:51:05 - Use Your Illusion Albums & Songs 0:57:15 - Memories, Memorabilia, Happiness & Success1:00:10 - Sound 'n Fury & Wrapping Up 1:02:02 - Outro Sound N Fury book for sale:https://www.amazon.com/Sound-Fury-Rock-Roll-Stories/dp/1770419942Chuck Shute link tree:https://linktr.ee/chuck_shuteSupport the showThanks for Listening & Shute for the Moon!

Episode Notes Lisa Leaheey of RabbitHolePodcasts and Rob learn much about John's career including the time he saved an airport in DC (or was it Chicago?)

Chelsea Lovelace alleges in her civil suit that during her relationship with Sean "Diddy" Combs, he subjected her to repeated acts of coercion, abuse, and sexual assault. According to the complaint, Combs lured her into traveling to see him, administered drugs to her without her consent, and physically assaulted her—including slapping her during violent encounters. Lovelace further claims that she became pregnant during this period and that Combs pressured her into having an abortion; she ultimately suffered a miscarriage. She also alleges that Combs systematically isolated her from friends and family, manipulated her emotionally, and used financial control to keep her dependent—providing an allowance while discouraging her from seeking employment.The suit contends that Combs maintained this coercive dynamic through a pattern of drugging, physical violence, emotional abuse, and economic manipulation, leaving Lovelace trapped in a situation where she was unable to freely make decisions about her own life or body. She claims that Combs employed his staff and associates to further control and monitor her, ensuring compliance with his demands. Lovelace is seeking damages on multiple grounds, including sexual assault, battery, and negligent infliction of emotional distress, asserting that the experience left her with lasting psychological and emotional harm.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy accuser reveals her identity in shocking lawsuit detailing her 'bitten feet' and freak-off fears | Daily Mail Online

Chelsea Lovelace alleges in her civil suit that during her relationship with Sean "Diddy" Combs, he subjected her to repeated acts of coercion, abuse, and sexual assault. According to the complaint, Combs lured her into traveling to see him, administered drugs to her without her consent, and physically assaulted her—including slapping her during violent encounters. Lovelace further claims that she became pregnant during this period and that Combs pressured her into having an abortion; she ultimately suffered a miscarriage. She also alleges that Combs systematically isolated her from friends and family, manipulated her emotionally, and used financial control to keep her dependent—providing an allowance while discouraging her from seeking employment.The suit contends that Combs maintained this coercive dynamic through a pattern of drugging, physical violence, emotional abuse, and economic manipulation, leaving Lovelace trapped in a situation where she was unable to freely make decisions about her own life or body. She claims that Combs employed his staff and associates to further control and monitor her, ensuring compliance with his demands. Lovelace is seeking damages on multiple grounds, including sexual assault, battery, and negligent infliction of emotional distress, asserting that the experience left her with lasting psychological and emotional harm.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy accuser reveals her identity in shocking lawsuit detailing her 'bitten feet' and freak-off fears | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Chelsea Lovelace alleges in her civil suit that during her relationship with Sean "Diddy" Combs, he subjected her to repeated acts of coercion, abuse, and sexual assault. According to the complaint, Combs lured her into traveling to see him, administered drugs to her without her consent, and physically assaulted her—including slapping her during violent encounters. Lovelace further claims that she became pregnant during this period and that Combs pressured her into having an abortion; she ultimately suffered a miscarriage. She also alleges that Combs systematically isolated her from friends and family, manipulated her emotionally, and used financial control to keep her dependent—providing an allowance while discouraging her from seeking employment.The suit contends that Combs maintained this coercive dynamic through a pattern of drugging, physical violence, emotional abuse, and economic manipulation, leaving Lovelace trapped in a situation where she was unable to freely make decisions about her own life or body. She claims that Combs employed his staff and associates to further control and monitor her, ensuring compliance with his demands. Lovelace is seeking damages on multiple grounds, including sexual assault, battery, and negligent infliction of emotional distress, asserting that the experience left her with lasting psychological and emotional harm.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy accuser reveals her identity in shocking lawsuit detailing her 'bitten feet' and freak-off fears | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Allowing an accuser to proceed anonymously in civil lawsuits or criminal proceedings offers several advantages. It protects the individual's privacy, especially in cases involving sensitive matters like sexual assault, thereby reducing potential public scrutiny and emotional distress. Anonymity can also shield the accuser from possible retaliation or harassment, encouraging victims to come forward without fear of personal repercussions. This protection is particularly vital when the accused holds significant power or influence, as it helps balance the scales of justice.However, anonymity in legal proceedings presents notable challenges. It may hinder the defendant's ability to fully investigate the accuser's background and credibility, potentially impacting the fairness of the trial. The public's right to open judicial proceedings is also compromised, as transparency is a cornerstone of the legal system. Moreover, anonymity could inadvertently suggest that the allegations are more severe, potentially biasing jurors or the public against the defendant. Courts must carefully weigh these factors, often requiring compelling reasons to grant anonymity to ensure that justice is served equitably for all parties involved.The debate over anonymity for Sean "Diddy" Combs' accusers centers on balancing the accusers' privacy and safety with the defendant's right to a fair trial and the public's interest in transparent legal proceedings. Some accusers have sought to proceed under pseudonyms to protect themselves from potential harassment and public scrutiny. However, courts have ruled that allegations alone do not justify anonymity, emphasizing the importance of openness in judicial processes and the defendant's ability to investigate the accusers' credibility. This tension highlights the complexities of handling sensitive allegations against high-profile individuals.Let's dive in!(commercial at 9:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Most of Sean ‘Diddy' Combs's Accusers Are Unnamed. Can They Stay That Way? - The New York Times

Allowing an accuser to proceed anonymously in civil lawsuits or criminal proceedings offers several advantages. It protects the individual's privacy, especially in cases involving sensitive matters like sexual assault, thereby reducing potential public scrutiny and emotional distress. Anonymity can also shield the accuser from possible retaliation or harassment, encouraging victims to come forward without fear of personal repercussions. This protection is particularly vital when the accused holds significant power or influence, as it helps balance the scales of justice.However, anonymity in legal proceedings presents notable challenges. It may hinder the defendant's ability to fully investigate the accuser's background and credibility, potentially impacting the fairness of the trial. The public's right to open judicial proceedings is also compromised, as transparency is a cornerstone of the legal system. Moreover, anonymity could inadvertently suggest that the allegations are more severe, potentially biasing jurors or the public against the defendant. Courts must carefully weigh these factors, often requiring compelling reasons to grant anonymity to ensure that justice is served equitably for all parties involved.The debate over anonymity for Sean "Diddy" Combs' accusers centers on balancing the accusers' privacy and safety with the defendant's right to a fair trial and the public's interest in transparent legal proceedings. Some accusers have sought to proceed under pseudonyms to protect themselves from potential harassment and public scrutiny. However, courts have ruled that allegations alone do not justify anonymity, emphasizing the importance of openness in judicial processes and the defendant's ability to investigate the accusers' credibility. This tension highlights the complexities of handling sensitive allegations against high-profile individuals.Let's dive in!(commercial at 9:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Most of Sean ‘Diddy' Combs's Accusers Are Unnamed. Can They Stay That Way? - The New York Times

Want to reach out to us? Want to leave a comment or review? Want to give us a suggestion or berate Anthony? Send us a text by clicking this link!Our digital personas often reveal more about us than we intend, especially when the veil of anonymity gets pulled back. In this provocative episode, we navigate the murky waters of online identity after a Catholic Twitter personality's troubling past came to light through digital detective work.Where do we draw the ethical line between legitimate privacy concerns and accountability for our words and actions? As we examine this case study, we confront an uncomfortable truth: the mask of anonymity may hide our face from others, but not from God. "Being nameless doesn't make you bodiless," as one of our hosts pointedly observes. "It just makes your sins feel separate from you, but it's still you at the end of the day."The conversation expands into broader theological territory as we dissect a controversial video of a deaf priest consecrating the Eucharist through sign language. This unprecedented situation raises profound questions about sacramental validity that traditional Catholic theology never had to address. We also take Apple TV to task for a shockingly blasphemous scene depicting characters treating consecrated hosts as snacks – highlighting the entertainment industry's troubling comfort with disrespecting Catholic traditions.Later, we transition to relationships and marriage, offering a counterpoint to popular Catholic dating advice that often misses the mark. Our candid discussion covers the dynamics of authority in marriage, the importance of masculine leadership, and why maintaining attraction matters in long-term relationships. Whether you're navigating online Catholic spaces or seeking to build a faith-centered relationship, this episode offers both spiritual wisdom and practical guidance for living authentically in a digital age where appearances often overshadow substance.Sponsored by Recusant Cellars, an unapologetically Catholic and pro-life winery from Washington state. Use code BASED at checkout for 10% off! https://recusantcellars.com/Support the showSponsored by Recusant Cellars, an unapologetically Catholic and pro-life winery from Washington state. Use code BASED at checkout for 10% off! https://recusantcellars.com/********************************************************Please subscribe! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKsxnv80ByFV4OGvt_kImjQ?sub_confirmation=1https://www.avoidingbabylon.comLocals Community: https://avoidingbabylon.locals.comRSS Feed for Podcast Apps: https://feeds.buzzsprout.com/1987412.rssRumble: https://rumble.com/c/AvoidingBabylon

Take a trip back in time this week with the boys of Trudge Report. We go back to March of 2020 when the covid pandemic hit. Each of us talk about what we were doing in our lives, our families, where we were living, and working etc. We discuss the impact that covid had on our families, ourselves, as well as the recovery community around us. How the presence of online recovery group meetings was both beneficial and detrimental. What the recovery community scene looks like today in our areas as a result of how things splintered from covid. How online influence, social media, and electronics have infiltrated the recovery world and how each of us look upon this current trend. We look at both the positive and negative sides of this and the potential lasting impacts on a broader scale. “The same God who painted the skies, is still crafting your story.” -Unknown Don't forget to like, share, rate, and download the podcast on all of your listening platforms. Check out and subscribe to our YouTube channel, @trudgrereportpod, for other content surrounding sports and trending topics. Trudge on good people. Contact the Guys:Instagram: @trudgereportpodFacebook: Trudge ReportTikTok: trudgereportpodYouTube: @trudgereportpod

I, Stewart Alsop, am thrilled to welcome Xathil of Poliebotics to this episode of Crazy Wisdom, for what is actually our second take, this time with a visual surprise involving a fascinating 3D-printed Bauta mask. Xathil is doing some truly groundbreaking work at the intersection of physical reality, cryptography, and AI, which we dive deep into, exploring everything from the philosophical implications of anonymity to the technical wizardry behind his "Truth Beam."Check out this GPT we trained on the conversationTimestamps01:35 Xathil explains the 3D-printed Bauta Mask, its Venetian origins, and its role in enabling truth through anonymity via his project, Poliepals.04:50 The crucial distinction between public identity and "real" identity, and how pseudonyms can foster truth-telling rather than just conceal.10:15 Addressing the serious risks faced by crypto influencers due to public displays of wealth and the broader implications for online identity.15:05 Xathil details the core Poliebotics technology: the "Truth Beam," a projector-camera system for cryptographically timestamping physical reality.18:50 Clarifying the concept of "proof of aliveness"—verifying a person is currently live in a video call—versus the more complex "proof of liveness."21:45 How the speed of light provides a fundamental advantage for Poliebotics in outmaneuvering AI-generated deepfakes.32:10 The concern of an "inversion," where machine learning systems could become dominant over physical reality by using humans as their actuators.45:00 Xathil's ambitious project to use Poliebotics for creating cryptographically verifiable records of biodiversity, beginning with an enhanced Meles trap.Key InsightsAnonymity as a Truth Catalyst: Drawing from Oscar Wilde, the Bauta mask symbolizes how anonymity or pseudonyms can empower individuals to reveal deeper, more authentic truths. This challenges the notion that masks only serve to hide, suggesting they can be tools for genuine self-expression.The Bifurcation of Identity: In our digital age, distinguishing between one's core "real" identity and various public-facing personas is increasingly vital. This separation isn't merely about concealment but offers a space for truthful expression while navigating public life.The Truth Beam: Anchoring Reality: Poliebotics' "Truth Beam" technology employs a projector-camera system to cast cryptographic hashes onto physical scenes, recording them and anchoring them to a blockchain. This aims to create immutable, verifiable records of reality to combat the rise of sophisticated deepfakes.Harnessing Light Speed Against Deepfakes: The fundamental defense Poliebotics offers against AI-generated fakes is the speed of light. Real-world light reflection for capturing projected hashes is virtually instantaneous, whereas an AI must simulate this complex process, a task too slow to keep up with real-time verification.The Specter of Humans as AI Actuators: A significant future concern is the "inversion," where AI systems might utilize humans as unwitting agents to achieve their objectives in the physical world. By manipulating incentives, AIs could effectively direct human actions, raising profound questions about agency.Towards AI Symbiosis: The ideal future isn't a human-AI war or complete technological asceticism, but a cooperative coexistence between nature, humanity, and artificial systems. This involves developing AI responsibly, instilling human values, and creating systems that are non-threatening and beneficial.Contact Information*   Polybotics' GitHub*   Poliepals*   Xathil: Xathil@ProtonMail.com

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging that Combs sexually assaulted her at a charity event he co-sponsored in 1991. The plaintiff sought to proceed anonymously, citing the sensitive nature of the allegations and potential harm if her identity were disclosed. Initially, the court granted a temporary order allowing her to proceed under a pseudonym, pending further review.Upon subsequent evaluation, the court applied the ten-factor balancing test from Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant to determine whether the plaintiff could continue anonymously. The court found that while the case involved sensitive personal matters, other factors—such as the significant public interest in the proceedings, potential prejudice to the defendants, and the plaintiff's ability to present her case without anonymity—outweighed the arguments for anonymity. Consequently, the court denied the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, emphasizing the importance of transparency and public access in judicial proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.633975.44.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Support the show!! - https://www.patreon.com/chasedavisFarmer Bill Provisions - https://farmerbillsprovisions.com/ - code FULLPROOF 20%Legacy Profits Club - https://www.skool.com/legacyprofitsclub/about?ref=1b0c2acb5f0d4781be13ed56801c8fbbGo to ionlayer.com and use code FPT to get $100 off your first kit. Lomez on X - https://x.com/L0m3zPassage Press - https://passage.press/SummaryIn this episode, Chase Davis interviews Jonathan Keeperman, formerly known as Lomez, discussing the complexities of online anonymity, the impact of doxxing, and the cultural implications of the 'longhouse' concept. They explore the feminization of public spaces, the role of Christianity in cultural renewal, and the future of right-wing aesthetics. The conversation highlights the need for a reimagined cultural space that embraces traditional values while addressing contemporary challenges.Support the showSign up for the Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/chasedavisFollow Full Proof Theology on Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/fullprooftheology/Follow Full Proof Theology on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/fullprooftheology/

Kelsey and Julie both talk to Don and Sam about their recovery from alcoholism and then all four discuss the Hot Topic of Anonymity.You're Invited to the 2025 International Convention of Alcoholics Anonymous. Please visit aa.org/international-convention for information.While we provide the podcast at no charge, we do have expenses. Grapevine is the only AA entity that does not accept contributions, so to support the AA Grapevine Podcast, please subscribe to Grapevine Magazine in print, online, or on the Grapevine app. You can also provide a subscription to someone in need through our "Carry the Message" program or purchase books or other items at aagrapevine.org/storeYou can email us at podcast@aagrapevine.org. To record an Ask-It-Basket question or a recovery-related joke, call 212-870-3418 or email a voice recording to podcast@aagrapevine.org

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging that Combs sexually assaulted her at a charity event he co-sponsored in 1991. The plaintiff sought to proceed anonymously, citing the sensitive nature of the allegations and potential harm if her identity were disclosed. Initially, the court granted a temporary order allowing her to proceed under a pseudonym, pending further review.Upon subsequent evaluation, the court applied the ten-factor balancing test from Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant to determine whether the plaintiff could continue anonymously. The court found that while the case involved sensitive personal matters, other factors—such as the significant public interest in the proceedings, potential prejudice to the defendants, and the plaintiff's ability to present her case without anonymity—outweighed the arguments for anonymity. Consequently, the court denied the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, emphasizing the importance of transparency and public access in judicial proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.633975.44.0.pdf

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging that Combs sexually assaulted her at a charity event he co-sponsored in 1991. The plaintiff sought to proceed anonymously, citing the sensitive nature of the allegations and potential harm if her identity were disclosed. Initially, the court granted a temporary order allowing her to proceed under a pseudonym, pending further review.Upon subsequent evaluation, the court applied the ten-factor balancing test from Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant to determine whether the plaintiff could continue anonymously. The court found that while the case involved sensitive personal matters, other factors—such as the significant public interest in the proceedings, potential prejudice to the defendants, and the plaintiff's ability to present her case without anonymity—outweighed the arguments for anonymity. Consequently, the court denied the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, emphasizing the importance of transparency and public access in judicial proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.633975.44.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

It's never been easier to tear someone down from behind a screen. But what does that mean for Christians called to speak truth in love—not just in person, but online too?In Episode 99 of the Eyes on Jesus Podcast, Tim and Drew tackle the increasingly urgent topic of social media anonymity and its spiritual implications. In a time when online platforms reward outrage, controversy, and clicks over truth, many believers are losing sight of how to engage with others in a way that reflects the heart of Christ. This episode was sparked by the recent and sobering situation involving ministry leader Josh Buice, who was revealed to have operated multiple anonymous accounts used to slander fellow Christians. His fall serves as a sobering example of how hidden sin can flourish behind the veil of digital anonymity—and how integrity, accountability, and love must remain non-negotiables in our online lives.Anonymity Breeds Temptation:Operating behind a nameless handle makes it easier to say things that would never be said face-to-face—and often, those words cause real damage.Social Media Has Rewired Human Interaction:We are more connected than ever but often more isolated, harsh, and reactive. The lack of real-life interaction leads many to forget there's a person on the other side of the screen.Christian Truth Without Love Becomes Harmful:Even if what's said is “right,” if it's not said with grace, it becomes another clanging symbol in an already noisy world. As Christians, we are called to season our speech and reflect the love of Jesus, even online.Controversy Gets the Clicks:Algorithms promote what is outrageous, not what is edifying. Without intentional boundaries, believers can find themselves more focused on stirring division than sowing peace.Integrity Still Matters—Even When No One Sees:Just because it's anonymous doesn't mean it's harmless. Hidden activity online eventually leads to consequences, personally and publicly.We're Talking to Real People:Bots aside, most of our interactions online are with actual human souls. We're not debating avatars—we're influencing lives, for better or worse.Check Your Motives:Ask yourself: Why am I on social media? Is it to spread hope and truth, or to gain validation and vent frustration?It Might Be Time to Log Off:If your time online leads to more bitterness than growth, it may be time to unplug, regroup, and invite God to reset your heart.We're celebrating a major milestone next week as Tim and Drew are joined by their wives for a personal and heartfelt conversation about life, faith, and family. It's one you won't want to miss!

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdf

In this episode, join my conversation originally aired on Read Between The Signs podcast.We delve into the misconceptions around porn addiction, its subtle yet profound impacts on relationships, intimacy, mental clarity, and physical health. I share my personal journey of overcoming a problematic relationship with porn and emphasizes the importance of community, mindfulness, and vulnerability in the recovery process. We also discuss the societal normalization of porn, the three A's of porn addiction (Affordability, Accessibility, Anonymity), and the role of shame in keeping people stuck in unhealthy habits. Tune in for an eye-opening conversation with valuable insights and practical advice on breaking free from addiction and living a healthier, more fulfilling life.

The post When Pastors Fall: Accountability, Anonymity, and the Dangers of Online Influence appeared first on Straight Truth Podcast.

This episode addresses the recent fall of a prominent pastor and the cancellation of the G3 Conference, using it as a sobering example of the dangers of online anonymity, slander, and spiritual ambition. Dr. Richard Caldwell emphasizes the need for accountability, self-examination, and pastoral integrity. With humility and clarity, he challenges both leaders and believers to guard their hearts and speech, reminding us that faithfulness to Christ requires holiness in both public and private life.

This episode addresses the recent fall of a prominent pastor and the cancellation of the G3 Conference, using it as a sobering example of the dangers of online anonymity, slander, and spiritual ambition. Dr. Richard Caldwell emphasizes the need for accountability, self-examination, and pastoral integrity. With humility and clarity, he challenges both leaders and believers to guard their hearts and speech, reminding us that faithfulness to Christ requires holiness in both public and private life.

A new MP3 sermon from Founders Baptist Church is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: When Pastors Fall: Accountability, Anonymity, and the Dangers of Online Influence Subtitle: 01 Straight Truth Podcast Speaker: Richard Caldwell Jr. Broadcaster: Founders Baptist Church Event: Podcast Date: 5/16/2025 Bible: 1 Timothy 4:6; Psalm 19:14 Length: 22 min.

This podcast is a short daily audio provided by the online recovery group Transitions Daily. The daily distribution consists of different recovery quotes from various resources, including; Twenty-Four Hours a Day, A.A. Thought for the Day, Daily Reflections, Big Book Quote, Just for Today, As Bill Sees It, plus more! Transitions Daily also distributes this same content in a daily email with a secret Facebook group for discussion. Go to www.DailyAAEmails.com for more information.   Do you want to stop drinking? Have you ever listened to sobriety podcasts? Does alcoholism or addiction run in your family? Have you tried Alcoholics Anonymous or the 12 Steps of A.A.? Are you considering how to get sober? Are you seriously thinking about sobriety for the first time? Is alcohol controlling your life as never before? If so, you will definitely want to check out this recovery podcast.