Podcasts about S3

Thinking Inside the Box – The Gauntlet, part of the NTC Warrior Chronicles, brings you interviews with the United States Army's experts in combined arms maneuver, the Observer Coach Trainers (OC/Ts) of Operations Group, at the National Training Center (NTC), Fort Irwin, California. In this episode, host Col. Ethan Diven sits down with Maj. Tim Lee and Maj. Brent Lanier, the XO and S3 from the 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Armored Division to reflex on their experiences during NTC Rotation 25-07. They discuss lessons learned during the planning, preparation and execution phases of large-scale combat operations; how the NTC experience changed the way they will lead in the future; and give advice to leaders preparing for an NTC Rotation in the future. To stay updated with the latest video from Operations Group, NTC Observer, Coach / Trainers, be sure to like, subscribe, and review us wherever you listen or watch. Stay tuned for more episodes in the future. Thinking Inside the Box Podcast at Thinking Inside the Box on Apple Podcasts Thinking Inside the Box | Podcast on Spotify Thinking Inside the Box | Podcasts on Audible | Audible.com We encourage you to watch our TAC Talk series on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/@tactalks-operationsgroupntc. Follow us on Facebook to see more from Operations Group, NTC https://www.facebook.com/operationsgroupntc Visit us at our Official Unit Webpage: https://home.army.mil/irwin/units-tenants/ntc-operations-group “Thinking Inside the Box and TAC Talks” are products of the Operations Group, National Training Center and part of the NTC Warrior Chronicles. Episode hosted by Col. Ethan Diven and edited by Annette Pritt

Cathy is hosting a weekly mini-series where she'll break down each episode of And Just Like That... S3 with guests - new episodes every Saturday. This week she's joined by Deirdre O'Shaughnessy, opinion editor and podcaster at The Irish Examiner. The article Cathy wrote this week tracking wealth from SATC to AJLT is here. The podcast Cathy mentions about women having affairs is called She Wants More available here. Listen to Deirdre's podcast Cork Crime and Jail Time here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Enjoy this reupload of our coverage of SNW S2E7 ahead of our S3 coverage coming July 23rd! Welcome to Captain's Pod, a Star Trek companion podcast presented by CinemaSins! This week, the crew review Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 2 Episode 7! Join the crew as Ian screams “RIKER”, Deneé predicts some alien-nacelle-suckage, and Aaron recounts some casino trauma.1) Ten Forward - Thoughts on the episode; what did the crew love and what can go out the airlock! (7:06)2) Engineering - ReSINstance is Futile: Everything Wrong With Star Trek in Q minutes or less. (0:55:48)3) Was It In The Trailer? - Well, was it? (1:10:49) 4) The Outtakes- Bloopers and other goodies that didn't make it into the show. Don't tell Section 31! (1:15:07)The show's hailing frequencies are always open by email at captainspod@cinemasins.com Find us on Twitter:The Show - @captainspodcsIan - @whittsinnedDeneé - @deneesaysAaron - @aarondicer Join a community of CinemaSinners and Trekkies on the CinemaSins discord:www.discord.gg/cinemasins  Want extra *holodeck privileges? Join the Sinclub! https://www.patreon.com/CinemaSins And live long and Podsper! *holodeck and ads not includedAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Enjoy this reupload of our coverage of SNW S2E6 ahead of our S3 coverage coming July 23rd! Welcome to Captain's Pod, a Star Trek companion podcast presented by CinemaSins! This week, the crew review Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 2 Episode 6! Join the crew as Ian asks “Why is Kirk?”, Deneé asks “Why is mystery?”, and Aaron asks “Why not emcee a slot machine tournament?”.1) Ten Forward - Thoughts on the episode; what did the crew love and what can go out the airlock! (5:46)2) Engineering - ReSINstance is Futile: Everything Wrong With Star Trek in Q minutes or less. (37:46) 4) The Outtakes- Bloopers and other goodies that didn't make it into the show. Don't tell Section 31! (58:17)The show's hailing frequencies are always open by email at captainspod@cinemasins.com Find us on Twitter:The Show - @captainspodcsIan - @whittsinnedDeneé - @deneesaysAaron - @aarondicer Join a community of CinemaSinners and Trekkies on the CinemaSins discord:www.discord.gg/cinemasins  Want extra *holodeck privileges? Join the Sinclub! https://www.patreon.com/CinemaSins And live long and Podsper! *holodeck and ads not includedAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

In today's episode, we watch Regular Show, S3, E14: Fortune Cookie! Would you want to live in a world where mass-produced musings contained within after-dinner snacks could control the very nature of the universe? Well, uh, Regular Show is exactly that! (Featuring a Warlock!)

Dominica McBride, founder of BECOME, talks about culturally responsive evaluation as social justice and four themes from her book, Becoming Change Makers: The Exquisite Path to Leadership and Liberation for Women of Color.

S3.40 - The Chicago Table - Swift, Unmerciful Violence by Wererat Studios

S3.41 - The Chicago Table - Regicidal Revenge by Wererat Studios

No furtive looks necessary, dearest listener. Our S3E5 Part 1 rewatch is not a thunderbolt from the sky. With a newly engaged Polin busy announcing their happy news, it seems we have much to catch up on indeed. We're in high spirits, despite the one Bridgerton sibling who's even less thrilled about it than Eloise. As word of the betrothal spreads through the ton, we'll be shouting for all of Mayfair to hear as we fry fish with Anthony, take a morning stroll with Benedict and buffer up the bee on Colin's belt. Is there more? Oh, so much more. After a showdown between Catherine the Great and the neighbour boy, we'll be heading to an opera singer's residence to pull down the dust sheets, lay out our furnishings and turn our two blue pools towards a conspicuously placed looking glass. Lie down, dearest listeners. There are other parts we've been dreaming about. And you should see them as well. *Show Notes: Crumbs IG: @BridgertonNetflix Season 4 end of production videoShondaland: Photos from the Season 4 Table ReadThe Hollywood Reporter: Interview with Jonathan BaileyWhat's On Netflix: Bridgerton Adds 12 Supporting Cast MembersDeadline: 5 Songs with Bridgerton Music Supervisor Justin KampsDeadline: Adjoa Andoh at Italian Global Series FestivalCiak Magazine: Interview with Polly WalkerLoungefly: Bridgerton Mini Backpack*Show Notes: Rewatch Writers Guild Foundation Shavelson-Webb Library"Tick Tock." Bridgerton. Written by Azia Squire. Unpublished manuscript (green revisions, no draft date). Writers Guild Foundation Shavelson-Webb Library. Spotify: Bridgerton The Official Podcast: 305 Tick Tock with Claudia Jessie and Jess BrownellReddit: Colin's S3 waistcoat statistics by u/bookmovietvwormIG: @faridaghwedar Penelope's Mirror hair designIG: @jessie_mua Penelope's Mirror make-up designHourglass Cosmetics: Curator eyeshadowYouTube: InStyle interview with Dougie Hawkes*Follow UsPatreon Instagram⁠ ⁠ ⁠TikTok⁠YouTube

Cathy is hosting a weekly mini-series where she'll break down each episode of And Just Like That... S3 with guests - new episodes every Saturday. This week she's joined by Fionnuala Jones , host of the Flop Culture podcast. The sustainable fashion account Fionnuala references at the end of the episode is here. Don't forget to ⁠⁠check out our Patreon⁠⁠ for TV reviews and retro movie reviews ⁠⁠Subscribe to us on Youtube⁠⁠ ⁠⁠Follow us on Bluesky⁠⁠ ⁠⁠Follow us on Letterboxd⁠⁠ ⁠⁠Follow us on Instagram⁠⁠ ⁠⁠Follow us on TikTok Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On May 18, 2025, the Government submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), addressing unresolved issues regarding witnesses for the upcoming trial session. The letter highlights a dispute over the introduction of text communications between Dawn Richard and the defendant, Sean Combs, from 2020 to 2023, which the defense plans to present under the hearsay exception for the declarant's then-existing state of mind (Rule 803(3)). The communications involve Ms. Richard initiating contact with Combs, discussing professional matters, and expressing affection for him. The Government objects to the introduction of these messages, arguing they are irrelevant to her expected testimony, which focuses on events from 2009 to 2011. Additionally, the Government notes that the defense's proffered evidence does not relate to Ms. Richard's state of mind during the relevant time period, nor does it support her testimony.The letter also addresses Kerry Morgan and David James, who are involved in the same issue. The defense seeks to use communications from both of these individuals, but the Government asserts that these too are irrelevant and should be excluded. The Government further argues that the text exchanges between Ms. Richard and Combs cannot be used for impeachment, as they would actually corroborate Ms. Richard's testimony. She is expected to testify that, after leaving her employment with Combs in 2011, she intentionally maintained a professional relationship with him, given his past threats. Therefore, the affectionate nature of the text messages would support, rather than challenge, her testimony. The Government requests that the Court preclude these communications from being introduced as evidence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.355.0.pdf

Spike and Jonny are joined by Zack Klapman from The Smoking Tire Podcast for a three-car extravaganza, reviewing the Alpine A110, Mercedes AMG GT 63 S E Performance, and Audi A3. Highlights include Jonny's hilarious story about his misadventures in Russia with Land Rover, debates on the proper pronunciation of 'Alpine,' and strong opinions on American vs French baguettes. _____________________________________________________

On May 18, 2025, the Government submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), addressing unresolved issues regarding witnesses for the upcoming trial session. The letter highlights a dispute over the introduction of text communications between Dawn Richard and the defendant, Sean Combs, from 2020 to 2023, which the defense plans to present under the hearsay exception for the declarant's then-existing state of mind (Rule 803(3)). The communications involve Ms. Richard initiating contact with Combs, discussing professional matters, and expressing affection for him. The Government objects to the introduction of these messages, arguing they are irrelevant to her expected testimony, which focuses on events from 2009 to 2011. Additionally, the Government notes that the defense's proffered evidence does not relate to Ms. Richard's state of mind during the relevant time period, nor does it support her testimony.The letter also addresses Kerry Morgan and David James, who are involved in the same issue. The defense seeks to use communications from both of these individuals, but the Government asserts that these too are irrelevant and should be excluded. The Government further argues that the text exchanges between Ms. Richard and Combs cannot be used for impeachment, as they would actually corroborate Ms. Richard's testimony. She is expected to testify that, after leaving her employment with Combs in 2011, she intentionally maintained a professional relationship with him, given his past threats. Therefore, the affectionate nature of the text messages would support, rather than challenge, her testimony. The Government requests that the Court preclude these communications from being introduced as evidence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.355.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Enjoy this reupload of our coverage of SNW S2E5 ahead of our S3 coverage coming July 23rd!Welcome to Captain's Pod, a Star Trek companion podcast presented by CinemaSins! This week the crew review Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 2 Episode 5! Join the crew as Ian provides the unauthorized history of the Spock-beanie, Deneé still has a frozen fish, and Aaron promotes his online video request service exclusively for fans…1) Ten Forward - Thoughts on the episode; what did the crew love and what can go out the airlock! (5:55)2) Engineering - ReSINstance is Futile: Everything Wrong With Star Trek in Q minutes or less. (1:02:45)3) Was It In The Trailer? - Well, was it? (1:24:54) 4) The Outtakes- Bloopers and other goodies that didn't make it into the show. Don't tell Section 31! (1:32:48)The show's hailing frequencies are always open by email at captainspod@cinemasins.com Join a community of CinemaSinners and Trekkies on the CinemaSins discord:www.discord.gg/cinemasins  Want extra *holodeck privileges? Join the Sinclub! https://www.patreon.com/CinemaSins And live long and Podsper! *holodeck and ads not includedAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

As we wrap up Season 3 of The extra-Ordinary Leader, I wanted to pull together the most transformational threads from this series—ideas and insights that have helped me grow as a leader and that I believe can do the same for you.This episode explores how we can move from a fixed mindset to a growth mindset in leadership, the power of pausing, mastering stress, building self-awareness, and the paradox of holding authority and authenticity in tandem. You'll hear highlights from brilliant guests including Helen Brocklebank, Gareth Anderson, Cathy O'Dowd, Russell Harvey, Noa Maxwell and Dan Maudhub. I also share personal reflections and leadership tools you can begin using today to become the kind of leader others want to follow.If you've been wondering how to add something extra to your everyday leadership, this episode is for you.Inside This EpisodeHow to spot and shift a fixed mindset in yourself or othersWhy conversations are the gateway to growthA powerful analogy for measuring failure in teamsWhat cognitive overload is doing to your performanceThe link between stress mastery and great decision-makingA practical team exercise using just Post-itsThe difference between knowing your stress habits vs. true self-awarenessWhy authority isn't a dirty word when grounded in good characterHow simple questions can transform team performanceListen to the full episodes mentioned:S3 10: Legacy and Craft: Walpole's Helen Brocklebank on the Mindset of extra-Ordinary LeadershipS3 07: Culture doesn't just happen. Here's how to create it | with Gareth AndersonS3 09: Mountains, Mindsets and Mastery: The Small Steps of an extra-Ordinary Life with Cathy O'DowdS3 01: How To Be A Resilient Leader With Russell HarveyS3 03: How To Tell a Business Story | with Noa MaxwellS3 04: Balancing Creativity, Trust, and Leadership | with Dan MaudhubDon't forget to grab a copy of my book extra-Ordinary Leaders, for more practical insight into becoming the kind of leader people want to follow.

After deciding to attend Uddingston Grammar School, near Glasgow, Cara Murphy has been, not only attending her subject classes but also learning to use braille. RNIB Connect Radio's Allan Russell spoke with Cara over the course of a term to find out how learning the subjects, braille and new assistive technology has helped her progress through the S3 curriculum. If you'd like more info on using, or learning, braille, go to www.rnib.org.uk You can also call the Helpline on 0303 123 9999 or ask Alexa to Call RNIB's Helpline. #RNIBConnect Image shows the Braille 200 logo with 'Braille 200' written at the top in white text on a pink background with a visual Braille representation of the same text below it. Across the bottom is written Powered by RNIB and EBU written in their respective logos.

Cathy is hosting a new weekly mini-series where she'll discuss And Just Like That... S3 with a variety of guests. This week podcaster, author and journalist Rosemary Mac Cabe is back! Find Rosemary on Substack here and find her podcast Not Without My Sister here. Don't forget to ⁠⁠check out our Patreon⁠⁠ for TV reviews and retro movie reviews ⁠⁠Subscribe to us on Youtube⁠⁠ ⁠⁠Follow us on Bluesky⁠⁠ ⁠⁠Follow us on Letterboxd⁠⁠ ⁠⁠Follow us on Instagram⁠⁠ ⁠⁠Follow us on TikTok Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdf

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdf

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Cribl's Field CISO Ed Bailey discusses how customers can manage the quality and quantity of data by providing intelligent controls between data sources and destinations.Topics Include:Cribl company name originCompany helps organizations screen data to find valuable insightsEd Bailey was Cribl's first customer back in 2018Data growth of 25% yearly created seven-figure cost increasesCEOs and CIOs complained about explosive data storage costsUsers demanded more data while budgets remained constrainedBailey discovered Cribl through a random Facebook advertisementCribl Stream sits between data sources and destinationsNo new agents required, uses existing infrastructure connectionsReduced data growth from 28% to 8% within yearDevelopment cycles shortened from six weeks to two weeksBailey managed global security and telemetry data systemsOperated large Splunk instance across forty different countriesTeam spent time collecting data instead of extracting valueCribl provided consistent data control plane for operationsSmart engineers could focus on machine learning solutionsMigrated from terrible SIEM to better security platformData strategy should focus on business requirements firstNot all data has the same business valueTier one: Critical data goes to expensive platformsTier two: Important data stored in cheaper lakesTier three: Compliance data in low-cost object storageSIEM costs around one dollar per gigabyte storedData lakes cost twelve to eighteen cents per gigabyteObject storage costs fractions of pennies per gigabyteAWS partnership provides scalable infrastructure for rapid growthEC2, EKS, and S3 are heavily utilized servicesCribl Search finds data directly in object storageAvoids costly data movement for search and analysisParticipants:Edward Bailey – Field CISO, CriblSee how Amazon Web Services gives you the freedom to migrate, innovate, and scale your software company at https://aws.amazon.com/isv/

Enjoy this reupload of our coverage of SNW S2E4 ahead of our S3 coverage coming July 23rd!Welcome to Captain's Pod, a Star Trek companion podcast presented by CinemaSins! Join the crew as Ian remembers an episode from sixty years ago, Deneé remembers something that didn't happen one year ago, and Aaron forgets to tell a lie decided one day ago. 1) Ten Forward - Thoughts on the episode; what did the crew love and what can go out the airlock! (4:39)2) Engineering - ReSINstance is Futile: Everything Wrong With Star Trek in Q minutes or less. (51:48)3) Was It In The Trailer? - Well, was it? (1:17:49) 4) The Outtakes- Bloopers and other goodies that didn't make it into the show. Don't tell Section 31! (1:21:18)The show's hailing frequencies are always open by email at captainspod@cinemasins.comJoin a community of CinemaSinners and Trekkies on the CinemaSins discord:www.discord.gg/cinemasins Want extra *holodeck privileges? Join the Sinclub! https://www.patreon.com/CinemaSins And live long and Podsper! *holodeck and ads not includedAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Celebrating 100 Years of Innovation with Hayward – Lessons from the Past, Present, and Future of the Pool Industry In this special episode of the Pool Nation Podcast, Edgar, John, and Zac sit down with Justin Butler and Ryan Morson from Hayward Pool Products to celebrate Hayward's incredible 100-year anniversary.

Cathy is hosting a new weekly mini-series where she'll break down each episode of And Just Like That... S3 with guests - new episodes every Saturday. This week she's joined by TV producers and podcasters Dominic Pupa and Chris DeRosa from the Fixing Famous People podcast, because let's face it... this show really needs some fixing. Don't forget to ⁠check out our Patreon⁠ for TV reviews and retro movie reviews ⁠Subscribe to us on Youtube⁠ ⁠Follow us on Bluesky⁠ ⁠Follow us on Letterboxd⁠ ⁠Follow us on Instagram⁠ ⁠Follow us on TikTok Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Search Of… “Jack the Ripper” Recorded: 12 Apr 2025 Edited: 11 Jun 2025 Released: 13 Jun 2025 Links: Solenopsis invicta: Red fire ants, an invasive species with a painful sting, have spread to Europe | CNN Residents sound alarm after invasive red fire ants land over 20 people in hospital, kill puppy: 'They're just everywhere' I Want to Rewatch - In Search of... “Deadly Ants” Jack the Ripper - Wikipedia Dear Boss letter - Wikipedia From Hell letter - Wikipedia Thames Torso Murders - Wikipedia Henry Herbert, 4th Earl of Carnarvon - Wikipedia George Herbert, 5th Earl of Carnarvon - Wikipedia Trust No 1 News Special Report: “The Death of Lord Carnarvon” The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by Jack the Ripper (Amazon) The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by Jack the Ripper (Amazon alternative) Bad Women: The Ripper Retold - Ep. 1: The Ripper Myth - linked to first episode of Season 1 (Ripper Retold) Unobscured, S3 – 1: Temple Mount - linked to first episode of Season 3 (Jack the Ripper) The Enduring Mystery of Jack the Ripper [Video] Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution - Wikipedia From Hell - Wikipedia From Hell (Amazon) They All Love Jack: Busting the Ripper by Bruce Robinson (review) – a huge establishment cover-up I Want to Rewatch - Kolchak: The Night Stalker, Season 1, Episode 1: “The Ripper” Time After Time (1979 film) - Wikipedia Jack the Ripper (miniseries) - Wikipedia Jack's Back - Wikipedia Beforeigners - Wikipedia The Salvation Army - Wikipedia National Donut Day - Wikipedia Optography - Wikipedia Music: “Dark Science” by David Hilowitz “The Truth Is What We Make of It” by The Agrarians All our episodes are at iwtrw.com (or at iwanttorewatch.com, if you want to type more letters for some reason). Links for everything else I Want To Rewatch-related (including our sweet merch) are at I Want To Rewatch | Linktree.

With decisions from the Supreme Court, a new travel ban, and a federally militarized presence in Los Angeles, there are many activities in our world that deserve attention. Amanda and Holly discuss several current events in this episode, including the revival of one of the ugliest policies of the first Trump administration. Plus, they review the unanimous decision in a Supreme Court case about religious exemptions to employment law and discuss the Court's decision not to hear a case involving the protection of sacred land.    SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:37): Recent and still-developing news Holly and Amanda discussed changes in policy about sensitive locations in S6, Episode 10. We discussed the case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia in a special episode released April 21 with Melissa Rogers.  We discussed the harmful school voucher provision in the “big beautiful bill” during their live episode, released May 27. Hear the episode at this link or in your podcast feed, or watch it on YouTube. Join BJC for a webinar on the problems with the budget reconciliation bill on Monday, June 16, at 2:30 p.m. Click here to register for the event, which is hosted by BJC, NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice, and Bread for the World. Read more about the fallout from Rep. Mary Miller referring to a Sikh prayer leader as a “Muslim” and erroneously claiming our country was founded as a “Christian nation” in this article by Andrew Solender for Axios: Rep. Mary Miller faces bipartisan fury over “ignorant” Sikh comment In memory of Dr. Walter Brueggemann, listen to his 2019 conversation with Amanda on our podcast series exploring the dangers of Christian nationalism: Theological view of Christian nationalism with Walter Brueggemann   Segment 2 (starting at 13:17): The new travel ban After President Trump issued his new travel ban on June 4, Amanda released a statement you can read on BJC's website: BJC condemns new travel ban as ‘state-sanctioned discrimination' Visit BJC's website to read more about the case of Trump v. Hawaii and the history of the travel ban. Support the NO BAN Act: Click here to use BJC's form to contact your members of Congress about the legislation.   Segment 3 (starting 20:09): The decision in Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission Supreme Court decisions we are waiting for include: Mahmoud v. Taylor (Hear a discussion of oral arguments in S6, Ep. 15) U.S. v. Skrmetti (Hear a discussion of oral arguments in S6, Ep. 06) The case Apache Stronghold v. U.S. involves the sacred land of Chí'chil Biłdagoteel — loosely translated in English as “Oak Flat.” Read more about the denial of cert on BJC's website: U.S. Supreme Court declines Oak Flat petition, allows for federal transfer of sacred land to mining company. Amanda and Holly talked about this issue on a podcast back in 2022: S3, Ep. 17: Religious freedom and our Indigenous neighbors: Save Oak Flat. Amanda and Holly talked about the oral arguments in Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin in Ep. 12: Back to SCOTUS: Regular business in disturbing times Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC's generous donors. Your gift to BJC is tax-deductible, and you can support these conversations with a gift to BJC.

S3.39 - The Chicago Table - An Assault on a Goblin Encampment by Wererat Studios

S3.38 - The Chicago Table - An Eye Opening Adventure by Wererat Studios

Enjoy this reupload of our coverage of SNW S2E3 ahead of our S3 coverage coming July 23rd!Welcome to Captain's Pod, a Star Trek companion podcast presented by CinemaSins! Join the crew as Ian rejects a retcon, Deneé rejects some chess, and Aaron almost rejects Star Trek entirely.1) Ten Forward - Thoughts on the episode; what did the crew love and what can go out the airlock! (9:32)2) Engineering - ReSINstance is Futile: Everything Wrong With Star Trek in Q minutes or less. (39:48)3) Was It In The Trailer? - Well, was it? (1:00:08)4) The Outtakes- Bloopers and other goodies that didn't make it into the show. Don't tell Section 31! (1:03:58)The show's hailing frequencies are always open by email at captainspod@cinemasins.comJoin a community of CinemaSinners and Trekkies on the CinemaSins discord:www.discord.gg/cinemasins Want extra *holodeck privileges? Join the Sinclub! https://www.patreon.com/CinemaSins And live long and Podsper! *holodeck and ads not includedAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

So . . . how was it? How many did you catch? This is always the question for every fisherman, right? Whether I'm talking to my friends about a fishing trip from last week, or as I walked in the door this evening, my wife asked the same question — how many fish did you catch?It's a fair question. Because that's the goal out there (usually). We go fishing to catch fish. But the answers we give can also reveal a different story.“Well, I caught eight this morning, but I missed another handful underneath. And when I was fishing dry flies, I had a few refusals. While fishing streamers, another three fish slammed my fly but didn't eat it. And I lost the biggest trout of the day when he popped off during the fight.”Every angler has these same kinds of stories.So I think we'd all agree that the primary goal out there — the first and most important goal of fishing — is to fool a fish. To make that trout believe that what you're offering is worthwhile — to trick a trout. Honestly, I think that's a large part of why most of us choose trout fishing in the first place — because as a species, they're picky and hard to fool.So we convince a trout or make them curious enough to eat the fly (or at least almost eat it). But then . . . as we all know, what happens next is variable. Sometimes we're late on the hookset, sometimes trout reject the fly at the last second, or maybe the fish wins a quick battle and spits the fly. But all of those incidentals don't change the fact that we fooled a fish, even though it didn't end up in the net. We achieved that primary goal.I think everyone here counts fish to some extent. But what are we really keeping track of, and why? I like to say that every fisherman counts. I mean, you know if you catch zero, one or two trout, right?I keep track of things as a measurement of what's working and what is not. And to me, the stats are a lot more detailed than just fish to the net. What a trout ate, where he ate it, how he took the fly and how was I fishing the fly when he ate it? Those stats matter too.Long ago, while night fishing, I started keeping track of trout caught, trout lost, and trout missed. I still do this, and as I said a few minutes ago, I think most anglers do this to some extent. The count doesn't need to be perfect or precise. But when we miss a trout, that's good information, because we fooled a fish. And when we lose a trout, we can be even more sure that we gained their interest.So caught, lost and missed. Why do we catch ‘em. And why do we miss or lose some trout? More importantly, what does that tell us, or how does it inform our next change?That's what we're here to talk about tonight.My friends, Matt Grobe, Bill Dell and Josh Darling join me for a great discussion.ResourcesREAD: Troutbitten | Nobody Home, Nobody HungryPODCAST: Troutbitten | Why Do We Miss Fish, and Why Do We Lose Fish on a Fly? S3, Ep11VisitTroutbitten WebsiteTroutbitten InstagramTroutbitten YouTubeTroutbitten Facebook Thanks to TroutRoutes:Use the code TROUTBITTEN for 20% off your membership athttps://maps.troutroutes.com Thanks to SkwalaUse the code, TROUTBITTEN10 for 10% off your order athttps://skwalafishing.com/

Cathy is hosting a new weekly mini-series where she'll break down each episode of And Just Like That... S3 with guests - new episodes every Saturday. This week she's joined by comedians and podcasters Gráinne Maguire and Chantal Feduchin-Pate, hosts of The Way They Were podcast. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's time for some more slippy sloppy Second Helpings as Large Adult Choir Member Jackie Zebrowski brings us up to date on any, and all, things happening with her newest obsession because she's a Choir Girl now, and MJ loves that for her.Then we're jumpin' RIGHT into 'Hereditary' as MJ gives his breakdown on how extra NOT to watch 'Hereditary', with many a SPOILER to beLISTEN from 9:00.279 til around 25:49.522 or so: LISTENER BEWARE, YOU'RE IN FOR A SPOILER SCARY. Jackie highly suggests the Youtube series called 'Hereditary - The Complete Guide (Everything Explained)' by Youtuber Novum, which is a deep dive into the many little easter eggs and such. Eyerolls heard for miles as the genre 'Elevated Horror' enters the chat. MJ and Jackie want to 'BRIIIINNNGGG HHHEERRR BAAACCKKK', even if NO ONE WARNED JACKIE 'BOUT DEAD DAD UP TOP (except everyone totally did, but it was TOOOO LATE!). She's also super salty Henry and Ed got to interview the directors of previously mentioned movie for Side Stories, UGH. 'Eddington' is comin' out soon and it's gettin' weeeeeird reviews, but that won't stop Jackie's watchin' it! Jackie also received a wicked box of Aussie Snackies from some very nice people which leads to a MUTED JACKIE'S INTERNATIONAL SNACKIES @ around 1:10:54.579 til basically the end, but there's not really any munchin' noises. Arnold Schwarzenegger has been dubbed 'a weirdo' for talkin' 'bout his sons MAGNUM DONG as seen in 'The White Lotus' (S3, E1; 56min, 51sec), and MJ can't keep them HAWGS straight. Jackie started the Nick Kroll sitcom on Hulu called 'Adults' and it's makin' her reminisce with a tear in 'er eye, and THAT sends 'em BOTH down an "IM SORRY" bad youth behavior memory road. Then it's time to check in on them bitches from 'Secret Lives of Mormon Wives', AND HOW WILL MOMTOK SURVIVE THIS!!??! TLC's 'Polyfamily' is exactly what everyone expected. Kylie Jenner posted a specyspicy 'Sex and The City' meme 'bout B-Ball 'cause TimTims team lost, which bounces us right into some SPECTATOR SPORTS TALK! AND SO MUCH MOOOOOOOOOORE!!!!Want even more Page 7? Support us on Patreon! Patreon.com/Page7Podcast  Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ to listen to new episodes of Page 7 ad-free.Start a free trial now on Apple Podcasts or by visiting siriusxm.com/podcastsplus.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdf

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdf

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

How do you retrofit a clustered data-processing system to use cheap commodity storage? That's the big question in this episode as we look at one of the many attempts to build a version of Kafka that uses object storage services like S3 as its main disk, sacrificing a little latency for cheap, infinitely-scalable disks.There are several companies trying to walk down that road, and it's clearly big business - one of them recently got bought out for a rumoured $250m. But one of them is actively trying to get those changes back into the community, as are pushing to make Apache Kafka speak object storage natively.Joining me to explain why and how are Josep Prat and Filip Yonov of Aiven. We break down what it takes to make Kafka's storage layer optional on a per-topic basis, how they're making sure it's not a breaking change, and how they plan to get such a foundational feature merged.–Announcement Post: https://aiven.io/blog/guide-diskless-apache-kafka-kip-1150Aiven's (Temporary) Fork, Project Inkless: https://github.com/aiven/inkless/blob/main/docs/inkless/README.mdKafka Improvement Process (KIP) Articles: KIP-1150: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1150%3A+Diskless+Topics KIP-1163: Diskless Core: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1163%3A+Diskless+Core KIP-1164: Topic Based Batch Coordinator: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1164%3A+Topic+Based+Batch+Coordinator KIP-1165: Object Compaction for Diskless: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1165%3A+Object+Compaction+for+DisklessSupport Developer Voices on Patreon: https://patreon.com/DeveloperVoicesSupport Developer Voices on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@developervoices/joinFilip on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/filipyonovJosep on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jlprat/Kris on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/krisajenkins.bsky.socialKris on Mastodon: http://mastodon.social/@krisajenkinsKris on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/krisjenkins/

Welcome to TalkBricks Masters - A LEGO Masters Weekly Recap Podcast! This week Michael (from the LEGO YouTube channel ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TalkBricks⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠) is joined by former contestants, Stephen & Christine "Tacos" (S3 & Holiday Bricktacular) to talk through Episode 3 of Season 5! We break down each of the builds to see which builds soared over the waterfall and which crashed on the rocks!Check out our social media to send along questions for our future guests - @TalkBricks on all social media platforms!

Enjoy this reupload of our coverage of SNW S2E2 ahead of our S3 coverage coming July 23rd!Welcome to Captain's Pod, a Star Trek companion podcast presented by CinemaSins! Join the crew as we find out that Ian loves a courtroom drama, Deneé hates a courtroom drama, and they both talk about a fish for a while.1) Ten Forward - Thoughts on the episode; what did the crew love and what can go out the airlock! - (7:39)2) Was It In The Trailer? - Well, was it? (45:00)3) The Outtakes- Bloopers and other goodies that didn't make it into the show. Don't tell Section 31! (49:01)The show's hailing frequencies are always open by email at captainspod@cinemasins.comJoin a community of CinemaSinners and Trekkies on the CinemaSins discord:www.discord.gg/cinemasins Want extra *holodeck privileges? Join the Sinclub! https://www.patreon.com/CinemaSins And live long and Podsper! *holodeck and ads not includedAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

“Preachers and Preaching in the Pikes Peak Region introduces Pastor Brandon Shupp of StoryChurch. Pastor Brandon is a Colorado Springs native who planted StoryChurch in the middle of Covid in the Southeast neighborhood “KLand” at Circle Dr. and Airport Rd. Jeff and Brandon discuss “God’s Story, Your Story, and Our Story – S3.” We also meet DeAndre of Men of Influence – “bringing local gangs together … to help prevent violence in our community … and safeguard our children and community from gun violence.” Talk about community impact!! www.storychurch.co www.themenofinfluence.com ”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dive into the future of enterprise data with the latest episode of Tech-Driven Business. Mustansir Saifuddin welcomes Shawn Brown, of SAP, for Part 1 of an in-depth exploration of the SAP Business Data Cloud (BDC). If you're navigating the complexities of data management and analytics within the SAP ecosystem, this episode is unmissable. Shawn breaks down the fundamental 'why' behind BDC, revealing how it's engineered to drastically reduce data preparation time, cut costs, and empower businesses to make faster, more accurate decisions. Tune in to understand how you can your team can take advantage of all that BDC offers to SAP customers looking to unlock true value from their data. With over two decades of experience in SAP solutions, Shawn Brown currently serves as Senior Director for SAP's Center of Excellence. Known for expertly identifying customer needs, Mr. Brown excels in presenting tailored solutions involving Business Technology Platform, Business Data Cloud, S4HANA, and Business AI. A proven leader in demand generation and partner relationship management, Mr. Brown has successfully driven initiatives that enhance customer experience and streamline cloud solution adoption. Renowned as a thought leader and strategist, Mr. Brown frequently shares insights with CIOs and business influencers, fostering strong, trust-based relationships across multiple industries.   Connect with Us: LinkedIn: Shawn Brown:  Mustansir Saifuddin:  Innovative Solution Partners  X:  @Mmsaifuddin YouTube or learn more about our sponsor Innovative Solution Partners to schedule a free consultation.    Episode Transcript [00:00:00] Mustansir Saifuddin: Welcome to Tech- Driven Business, brought to you by Innovative Solution Partners. I'm honored to have Sean Brown of SAP join me to kick off an essential two part series to unpack a topic that's on every SAP user's mind. The Business Data Cloud or BDC. If you're looking to understand how BDC can transform your data landscape and drive real business value, you are in the right place. [00:00:32] . [00:00:32] Welcome to Tech- Driven Business, Shawn. How are you? [00:00:35] Shawn Brown: I am good. I'm good. Things are going well, staying busy. [00:00:38] Mustansir Saifuddin: That's awesome. That's awesome. So glad to have you on our show and I'm really excited for the topic that we are going to discuss today. You ready for it? [00:00:47] Shawn Brown: I am. I'm excited as well. [00:00:51] Mustansir Saifuddin: Yeah, so I, I know we had talked in the past a couple of times and right now , the hot topic everybody's talking about from SAP and in general is the whole idea, the concept, and now the actual product called Business Data Cloud and what it really means for SAP customers. I like to use this time to dig deeper into this conversation and have a better understanding of exactly what this brings, what kind of landscapes that are changing with this new product, and to expect, you know, if you're a customer interested into, in going forward with BDC. [00:01:28] Shawn Brown: -. [00:01:28] Sure. That sounds great. Yeah. [00:01:32] Mustansir Saifuddin: Awesome. Okay. So I think every time we, we have this new products, right? And SAP is really good about and talk, people talk about rebranding and all that. Let's talk about the why of why should SAP customers adopt BDC. What is different about BDC that SAP customers should be asking that question. [00:01:53] Why? [00:01:55] Shawn Brown: Yeah, this is, this is my favorite question to start. Anything in the space that is outside of packaged solutions, you know ERP, HR Supply Chain and, and the capabilities we have in those areas because the why is something that it, it should be the driver for everything. Right? And, and for BDC, I would say the first thing we wanna talk about is it's a, it's a new product. [00:02:24] But it's an evolution of everything that we've been doing for years. It's, it's capabilities that our customers already know about. And it's taking all of the capabilities that we have offered over the time that we've been, been in the data and analytics space. And it's the, I call it a next generation, right? [00:02:45] It's the next generation of what was. And so when we get into the why. I would say the first thing that we really gotta say is, is the reason for BDC is it is to short circuit the amount of time it takes to prepare from data to finally analytics and planning and all the steps in between, where we're often times organizations see it as this, this wheel that. [00:03:15] They start with the data that's in the source system. They're gonna extract a, transform it loaded profile it, catalog it you know, press governance on it. Maybe make it in, you know, in a marketplace setting. Organize it so that it can be easily digestible, create some standard analytics, and then now we can actually start analyzing it. [00:03:34] And the why is really about reducing the amount of time it takes to go around that whole wheel of, Data all the way around to analytics and planning and reduce the amount of prep time and increase the amount of analysis time. Because if we think about how much time a person gets to analyze the [00:04:00] data, let's say for example, and this is a, this is actually a number that is, has been verified with numerous customers and with, the analyst firms like Gartner and Forrester and TDWI is that it takes as much as 70% or more of the actual workload and investment to go from data to analytics. That's not, so that means the analytics is just 30% or less of the time. So if we think about how much each question costs. You have to add in all of that cost that even deliver up the analytical or, or deliver up the, the data in a way that it can be analyzed. [00:04:45] So BDCs goal is to shrink that time of preparation and actual delivery of data for the analyst purpose or for the AI purpose, or for any application purpose. Shrink it as much as possible so that, the questions that are asked are cheaper, and essentially we can ask more questions. We don't have to continue to reformat the data, deliver the data in a new way to get to the final answers that we're trying to seek. [00:05:20] So I would say savings and costs. Savings and money. More data, more, more analysis time. That's the why for BDC. [00:05:31] Mustansir Saifuddin: Yeah, it totally makes sense. I think one of the things that while you're talking about this that stuck out for me was, we always talk about time value, right? And, especially when it comes to analytics, It's such a critical part of any organization's path forward and the numbers that you're just sharing from Gartner and other resources, [00:05:51] where if the majority of the time is gone into the data collection, the data refinement, all that, there's no time left or a very minimal time for your analytics part, which makes it really difficult for organizations to make quick decisions. So I think what I'm hearing from you, the why: the time value becomes very important in this case. [00:06:13] Shawn Brown: Correct. Absolutely. [00:06:16] Mustansir Saifuddin: That's good because that kind of takes me into this conversation, like, Hey, benefits. When you have that, why understood, what are some of the benefits that BDC will provide to SAP customers who want to go on the journey? Because benefits is really the reason why it will make sense for them to move forward. [00:06:33] Shawn Brown: For sure, for sure. And this is the one that's always interesting for organizations because they're focused so much on the actual preparation of the data that oftentimes the benefits that they can glean from all of that effort are, are fleeting, so they look at the, the overall effort and they go, oh yeah, there's, there's a lot here that is really based on, on how much it took to get here. [00:07:01] And the faster we can deliver the capabilities for analysis purposes for any AI purposes, the faster we can make decisions. The faster we can adjust based on those decisions. And so when you think about the speed at which organizations operate, to be able to answer those questions faster is probably the number one benefit that you can get. [00:07:27] And then you also get into accuracy. What, what questions are we asking? And if we don't have to go through this rigorous effort of moving data from all of these source systems and joining it all back together, and then building all that business context. Data integrity, is that a, a concern? It is for most organizations, they're concerned about what this looks like at its end state. [00:07:57] And the other thing that still [00:08:00] exists in the world of business, especially in the analytics space, is the typical spread marked problem. Where people just take the data that they're looking for, they extract it out of whatever solution it's been delivered to them. Maybe it's cheap cloud storage on flat files, or maybe it's been all dumped into an ODS, an operational data store, and then they're accessing the data as they like. [00:08:26] If they don't understand the details of the data and the relationships that occur with the data, and they don't have the original business context that the data came from in its source system, then if they do extract it to whatever they like, then somebody can walk into a meeting with one version of the truth and another can walk in with another version of the truth. [00:08:48] They all can believe that they're accurate. They all can argue over why their version of truth is correct and the others is not. So the confidence in the data is the other thing. We take away a lot of those concerns, because when you have it coming from those source systems and the preparation of that data has been provided in this case by SAP, for SAP systems, at a minimum, you're going to have much more confidence that the data [00:09:17] is delivered to you in a way that respects all of the integrity that it came from. That the accuracy of the data is as accurate as it was entered into the business application upon which it was the source. So the speed of delivery, the accuracy of the data. These are, these are major advantages that you get with regards to using BDC versus [00:09:43] the, the older school, I'll call it older school 'cause I'm an old guy. The old days of Bill Inman and star schemas and relational database systems that we created. These massive data warehouses. It's an older school thought, and it was one that was born outta this idea that we had to get the data from those source systems because we couldn't query the source systems at runtime. [00:10:06] All those things contribute to, to today where we're curating the data for you. It's been curated by SAP from all SAP systems, so if you have any questions about the quality of the data, in that case, you then you should have questions about the quality of your data in its source. there's a bigger issue, so speed of delivery, accuracy of data. [00:10:32] Those are probably my, my two top benefits that customers are going to get out of this. [00:10:38] Mustansir Saifuddin: Absolutely. That makes total sense. I think one of the things that really stuck out for me was the whole concept of end-to-end governance . Does BDC do a better job? And how, is that integrated to this whole BDC realm of the different pieces that makes up BDC? How is data governance and security working within those parameters? [00:11:03] Shawn Brown: Yeah. So in BDC, you're getting role level security on all the data. At that point then you're asking questions like, where do I, how do my users access the data? What are they allowed to see? What are they not allowed to see? All those capabilities can be integrated into BDC. You, you can deliver all of those capabilities directly within BDC. [00:11:27] You start off by setting up some broader, who's the, who's the group? What systems are they accessing? So if I'm in finance and I'm looking at finance data, I probably have access to let's say S/4HANA as the backend system that is storing all this data. All the users within the finance team that have access to S/4HANA can have access to that space of data. [00:11:55] And I use that word space because this is a concept that, again, there's nothing [00:12:00] new. We've invited these concepts into our thinking a while ago, and now it's just another generation of what we're doing here. So that idea of a space is I can include the data that is necessary for a line of business hr, finance, supply chain, and that's what they can see. [00:12:20] And if I need to, all of the rest of the data is accessible through BDC. It's just a question of whether I want to provide the rights to access those other data sets to another line of business, for example. So if I said I wanted to join let's say expense information that's in Concur with employee information, that's in success factors, I can easily join those data sets [00:12:48] bring in forward, from one space to another. And decide at a row level and column level, what individual data set I need to join across groups or individuals, if you will. [00:13:06] Mustansir Saifuddin: I think that's super good because that's where a lot of the questions come in. You know, every time you do move your data from one environment to another environment that you need to have your own new set of governance and security and, it can be role level security or whatever else you wanna do, [00:13:21] you have to kind of redefine that. It seems like it's all built into the BDC portfolio. You're leveraging your source system objects and then be able to apply the same rules that you may have built in. [00:13:37] Shawn Brown: Yeah, the, the analogy I always liked was it's kind of like, and I don't know if they're really like this. I mean, maybe there are not. I just remember old movies that you'd have these Japanese styled homes and they were like, the walls that were almost paper thin, that you could, you almost felt like you could just push your hand right through the wall and just grab something that was in the other room. [00:13:57] I liken it a bit like that in terms of spaces. The spaces are separated in that way with a, a level of access that is very simple to provide when necessary, but distinctly in separate spaces, separate areas, so that that's the benefit. That's the simplicity of being able to access data from any LOB or any third party for that matter. [00:14:23] If you wanted to access that third party data in BDC to any other data that's in BDC as well, whether it's finance, hr, supply chain, whatever it may be, warehouse inventory, whatever it may be. [00:14:38] Mustansir Saifuddin: Totally. Now, since we talked about the benefits, let's look into the details. Like what steps are involved if someone wants to take on this journey and move to SAP BDC? [00:14:53] Shawn Brown: Much of that begins with where are they right now? Let's take a few different scenarios? if a customer is, let's say, already using some SAP solutions, I would say, let's go with the most rudimentary that has been around for a while now for SAP. Let's talk about, they're using HANA Enterprise. [00:15:09] They've, they've been taking a lot of data from their SAP systems and dropping it into HANA Enterprise on-prem. This is a natural next step to that on-premise approach where you said, all right, I, I don't necessarily wanna be in the position of housing systems like this myself and my own data centers. [00:15:28] I want to put them into the cloud. This is a simple transition , to take the data from a HANA Enterprise, drop it into BDC and start using that data in essentially what would be a component of BDC, Datasphere. But it's built on HANA Cloud. And HANA Cloud is built on the same technology that HANA Enterprise is built on that in terms of its capabilities, what it can do. [00:15:52] It's a natural transition for that case if you're talking about a customer that's already using let's say another old product from [00:16:00] SAP, BW. Right. BW has been a really challenging one for a lot of organizations because they've had such value and such benefit by using BW to access data in SAP with those BW extractors. [00:16:14] And in many cases, they've built a lot of and invested a lot in BW in the framework itself. Creating their own objects, creating their own cubes, creating asos, DSOs and so forth, depending on what versions of BW you're on. Not necessarily wanting to just abandon that investment. There's another great example of is, once you're, once you're at least BW 7.5 and above, we make it very simple for you to go ahead and take all of that in BW investment and move it directly into BDC in its format, in its same format as a BW environment. [00:16:54] BW for HANA, same thing, move it right into BDC, it would be in a cloud-based environment that way as well. And essentially all of those connections back to the source systems still persist. When we talk about how do we take advantage of the investments you have, that's where you say, all right, well, I can access them through the BDC framework in [00:17:16] BW that is now part of BDC and use it for whatever purpose I leave it in BW in that case, or I can start taking those particular assets that I have in BW and using the data product generator that is now part of BW embedded in BDC, I can then change those assets in BW to data products. Which is the lowest level form of data that we have in BDC, and in this case, just for those that may be listening and wondering, am I copying the data? [00:17:51] Yes . And we can come to this in a minute as to why you're copying the data, but we are copying the data from its source system, and we would be copying the data from BW as well, where we wanted to make it a data product in BDC. And we can talk about why that is in a minute. 'cause it's a shift. It, it's a bit of a shift in terms of what we've talked about in the past with regards to a whole play the data where it lies, federate versus materialize [00:18:18] that data in, what was Datasphere, which is now part of BDC. That idea of moving those assets from BW into BDC as data products, over time allows us to decommission those, those deployments of BW. So that's the benefit is, we now have a path for BW customers to migrate to BDC, [00:18:45] not give up those assets that they've created and leveraged for so many years in BDC, and then over time decommission BW altogether. Or, if you're really interested and you really like using BW, keep it. That's the other benefit of moving a BW 7.5 environment to BDC is, you're gonna get three more years of mainstream maintenance. [00:19:09] And for example, for BW/4HANA, we're pushing that end of life date all the way out to 2040. That's a long time that you can hold onto that BW environment if that's what you choose to do. But the benefit of BDC is that we're going to give you the mechanism to actually migrate it over and then as your backend systems, particularly like S4 changes, [00:19:31] you're gonna need to change a lot of what you're doing from a BW extraction anyway. Don't do it in BW anymore. Do it in BDC. Now, those are some of the SAP scenarios, but some of the ones that I get as well are, we already have a strategy with our SAP data. We're pulling it into S3 buckets. [00:19:55] Azure Data Factory, Snowflake , all of these third [00:20:00] party extraction destinations and why would I go ahead and use BDC in that case? And the reality is, you have to ask yourself this question where we started in the first place. How much time and energy are you spending going from data all the way around that wheel to analytics? [00:20:20] If you're like the typical organization and it's north of 70%, 80%, 90% as a CIO, I heard last week talking about this, 90% of their time is spent just moving data to get it prepared for analysis. How much do you want to continue to do that? And nobody likes to be looked at as a cost center. Everybody likes to be seen as somebody that is providing value to the organization. [00:20:50] If you're part of an organization and you are seen as a cost center, because the amount of energy it takes to get the data from where it sits to where it needs to be is exorbitant, nine tenths maybe of the overall cost of asking those questions. That's not a great place to be. If you can shrink that as much as possible, then you can actually live up to some of those things that everybody would like to say. [00:21:19] Like, data is the new gold, data is the new oil. The value of data is, is immeasurable. We can do so much with our business because of the data. We could be a data-driven organization. All of these things can become possible, but not so easy when nine tenths or eight tenths of the cost, it's just getting the data where it needs to be. [00:21:44] That's the big thing that needs to be focused on as it relates to some of these ideas that let's go ahead and do the, what I still call old school extract, transform, load, model, profile, catalog govern and, create all of the overhead that is necessary to actually deliver those analytics back to the organization. [00:22:07] And if, you're in a part of your organization where you think it's good enough for me to just extract all the data and drop it over here and let the business go have fun, that's another one where you're not providing additional value to the organization. [00:22:19] What the business community really wants is they want curated data that is business context aware, that is in a position to help them answer questions out of the box, push button. An actual software as a service. That's what we've got with BDC. So this idea that of you've already got a strategy in place, [00:22:44] it might be working right now because you did a ton of work to get you where you are. But here's the kicker. It's probably all going to change, maybe not next year, but maybe two years or three years, maybe the next time you do some major upgrade and we've become more efficient in terms of how we store the data in the business applications, or, [00:23:12] any of the other business applications that you use, they change their underlying architecture in how they are actually storing the data in those source systems. Guess what just changed with your data strategy? Potentially everything. And we have customers that this has happened to them. Where I've walked into a huge SAP customer and I had a conversation with him where I said, we're gonna go ahead, and this is before we had two separate entities of BDC and BTP. And I walked into this session with the customer and said, here's what we're gonna do. [00:23:43] We're gonna go ahead and tell you everything that we can do in the space of data and analytics and everything within the platform space. And the customer said, I don't think we really need to hear about your data and analytics strategy, because we're pretty well set on that. And I said, I want to talk to you about all these things and I need to talk to you [00:24:00] about this one as well. [00:24:01] This one's not negotiable. I need whoever's responsible for data and analytics to be in the room to discuss this. And that person did arrive and that person pretty much felt like they had everything figured out. They didn't wanna, engage in the conversation at all. Pretty much arms crossed throughout most of the most of the meeting. [00:24:19] And we finally got to a point where they said, all right, I can see that there's some benefits, you know, to how this works. But I'll tell you, they were on ECC on HANA. And so fast forward six months and they're negotiating the RISE opportunity with S4/HANA in a private cloud and RISE, and they now realize that everything needs to be changed. [00:24:50] It's good that we had this conversation with them about how you can access the SAP data through, at the time, Datasphere, which is now Business Data Cloud, because they now understand that for them to be able to get access to the data in the way they want, the fastest way they want, and for the fact that we're curating all that data for them, and then providing them out of the box insights with our insight apps. [00:25:14] This is pretty much a no brainer in their part. They knew that they had to explore it, and they knew they had to explore it for the SAP centric question, but also for the non SAP centric question where they want to pull smaller data sets to non SAP capabilities because we are gonna curate those scenarios through data products that will allow them to pull that data into those non SAP scenarios. [00:25:40] So this, these are some of the big plays, we've got that existing SAP solutions, we've got that non SAP centric approach. And then, ultimately, if you haven't got to the point that you're deciding what you're going to do or you haven't don't have a very mature data strategy, maybe you're a growing company, at some point you're going to need to go ahead and start asking those data and analytics questions. [00:26:05] Just know that it's very expensive, as I've said before, to move the data from one place to another, place it there, do all of those things that we've talked about in the past, and then deliver analytics, just pull it out of the box. The last comment I'll make is "that pull it out of the box" sometimes that's not as useful as we think it is. [00:26:25] If I said, you have to dig a hole, it's 10 feet deep and you started from ground level, you have 10 feet to dig. But if I gave you something that got you 50% of the way, I dug five feet for you, I dug six feet for you, would you rather just dig five more feet or four more feet, or would you just rather start from ground level and dig 10 feet on your own? [00:26:48] That's the value that we were trying to demonstrate through BDC. [00:26:53] Mustansir Saifuddin: Good explanation. And I think it is really clear that a lot of times conversations come up about SAP customers talking about their on-prem, their legacy systems and how they will benefit from BDC, but your examples went beyond HANA Enterprise to other non SAP solutions where customers have already been on the journey and they don't see the value at least at this point. [00:27:20] But, after seeing the example you use, it's very logical for them to start thinking in those terms. Also saying, Hey, I simplify my landscape? Still get , if not same, at least, the value that whatever else that BDC brings to the table, like the whole AI capability, all of that can be leveraged by adopting this platform. On a personal note how do you stay on top of, you know, this changing technology world, and business at the same time. How you keep up with all this? [00:27:58] Shawn Brown: Yeah, as you [00:28:00] might imagine in the space of SAP, oftentimes it's hard enough just staying on top of all of the different options we have and different things that we have in terms of technology. So one of the ways that I like to keep up in, in the SAP space is called the BTP Talk podcast, which is a pretty good one. [00:28:18] It actually goes to a number of different you know, platform and data analytics related scenarios. Data skeptics is another pretty good podcast that I get a kick out of. There's another one I'm trying to think of that I use from time to time as well. [00:28:32] Analytics Power Hour. That's it. Yeah, the Analytics Power Hour is another good one. And, I've been paying attention to Tech-Driven Business as well too, so I like this one too. But, you know, the thing that I've been finding too is that, these days, things move so quickly and we think we know where we're going and then something comes along and, and change makes us change direction again. [00:28:53] And AI has probably been the biggest driver to that. The thing that I would say that that it's probably most interesting in terms of how I've changed how I operate is I actually ask AI to provide resources for me on particular topics. For example mid early last year there was a lot of talk about vector engines and knowledge graphs. [00:29:14] And the easiest thing I found to really kind of get a little bit more, versed on the topics was AI itself. I started asking for resources and, and I'll use for example, ChatGPT in some cases I like using Grok as well. From time to time they seem to provide a little bit different types of approaches and levels of interaction. [00:29:35] I kinda like how, grok will ask me follow up questions, which is pretty neat as well. But that's a great way to learn about topics that you are wanting to become more versed in or learning where the resources are to find those topics. So those, those are some of the things that I like to use. [00:29:58] Mustansir Saifuddin: Great list of ideas to kind of keep up with the changing, I mean, just everywhere around us. taking from AI to just carries to anything else. A lot of conversations going on so many different directions. How do you even keep up with them? So I'd like your suggestions, and I know we've talked about a lot of different things today. What is the one thing or one takeaway that you want to leave our listeners with? [00:30:24] Shawn Brown: Hmm, probably in, in the audience of that are responsible for data and analytics. If you're a CDAO, or an analyst or somebody that's responsible for enterprise wide analytics: I would focus on two things because these two things are probably the most important to the people that you serve, your business community. [00:30:50] Point number one is, they want analytics quickly. They want to be able to ask questions quickly. They don't wanna wait. They don't want to say this report, these data sets that you've provided me, they look really interesting, but I'd like to add this and this and this, and when can I have that? [00:31:12] If you can't say you can have that now, then you're taking too long. The other point is. We need to stop being looked at as a cost center. We need to stop being looked at as a place that is a necessary evil. We gotta ask questions of the system. We've gotta extract data everywhere and put it in someplace that we can start answering questions or even not even doing to the extent of actually providing the analytics out of the box. [00:31:40] Instead, we're just providing data sets for people to access. We need to be able to offer real value to the business community. Those are the ones that are footing the bill. Those are the ones that are actually paying for everything. So we need to be in a position to deliver it very quickly, [00:32:00] and it needs to not be expensive, and it needs to be accurate. [00:32:06] Mustansir Saifuddin: Absolutely [00:32:07] Shawn Brown: Those are the elements I think are the key takeaways. That's really the foundation of what we're doing with Business Data Cloud. That's the whole purpose behind it. [00:32:16] Mustansir Saifuddin: Absolutely great advice and a great way to sum up the session. It's been a great conversation. There's so much to gain from this product and, and direction, that SAP's taking. I'd like to thank you very much for joining us today in our show, and look forward to having further detailed conversation with you. [00:32:36] Shawn Brown: Thanks, I appreciate your time as well. [00:32:39] Mustansir Saifuddin: Thanks for listening to Tech-Driven Business, brought to you by Innovative Solution Partners. We have covered the critical why behind BDC, the immense time and cost savings it promises, and the tangible benefits like enhanced speed and accuracy for SAP customers. Sean's key takeaway? Focus on delivering analytics quickly to your business community and strive to offer real accurate value moving away from being seen as just a cost center. [00:33:15] . We would love to hear from you. Continue the conversation by connecting with me on LinkedIn or X. Learn more about Innovative Solution Partners and schedule a free consultation by visiting isolutionpartners.com. Never miss a podcast by subscribing to our YouTube channel. Information is in the show notes.

In a letter to Judge Subramanian regarding United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government addresses expected defense objections to specific aspects of testimony from Capricorn Clark. The defense is seeking to exclude Clark's statements related to a 2004 incident in which she was allegedly kidnapped and threatened, as well as testimony concerning statements made to her by Cassie Ventura about an alleged assault committed by Sean Combs.The Government argues that both portions of Clark's testimony should be admitted. They contend the threats made during the kidnapping are directly relevant to demonstrating the scope of the enterprise's coercive tactics and pattern of intimidation, central to the RICO charges. Additionally, Ventura's statements to Clark regarding abuse by Combs are presented as corroborative evidence of the defendant's conduct and the atmosphere of fear maintained within his inner circle. The Government maintains that these statements are admissible under established evidentiary rules, including hearsay exceptions, and are critical to establishing context and intent.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.367.0.pdf

In a letter to Judge Subramanian regarding United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government addresses expected defense objections to specific aspects of testimony from Capricorn Clark. The defense is seeking to exclude Clark's statements related to a 2004 incident in which she was allegedly kidnapped and threatened, as well as testimony concerning statements made to her by Cassie Ventura about an alleged assault committed by Sean Combs.The Government argues that both portions of Clark's testimony should be admitted. They contend the threats made during the kidnapping are directly relevant to demonstrating the scope of the enterprise's coercive tactics and pattern of intimidation, central to the RICO charges. Additionally, Ventura's statements to Clark regarding abuse by Combs are presented as corroborative evidence of the defendant's conduct and the atmosphere of fear maintained within his inner circle. The Government maintains that these statements are admissible under established evidentiary rules, including hearsay exceptions, and are critical to establishing context and intent.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.367.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the prosecution submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian alerting the court to anticipated evidentiary and procedural issues related to the upcoming testimony of Lance Jimenez, a key government witness expected to take the stand as early as Monday, May 27. The letter serves as a preemptive notice to streamline courtroom proceedings and mitigate potential objections or delays during Jimenez's examination. The government likely outlines the scope of Jimenez's testimony, which may touch on sensitive or contested areas, and provides legal justification for the inclusion of certain pieces of evidence or lines of questioning they intend to pursue.The filing also appears to be a tactical move to prevent surprises and bolster the admissibility of what could be pivotal testimony in establishing patterns of behavior or corroborating other witnesses' claims. By addressing these matters in advance, prosecutors aim to minimize disruptions during trial and reinforce the integrity of Jimenez's testimony within the broader evidentiary framework. The letter underscores the government's intent to methodically build its case while anticipating and countering defense efforts to exclude or diminish the impact of Jimenez's statements.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.354.0_2.pdf

Cathy is hosting a new weekly mini-series where she'll discuss And Just Like That... S3 with a variety of guests, starting with podcaster, author and journalist Rosemary Mac Cabe. If you want to hear Cathy and Rosemary talk about S2 first, that's right here. Don't forget to check out our Patreon for TV reviews and retro movie reviews Subscribe to us on Youtube Follow us on Bluesky Follow us on Letterboxd Follow us on Instagram Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the prosecution submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian alerting the court to anticipated evidentiary and procedural issues related to the upcoming testimony of Lance Jimenez, a key government witness expected to take the stand as early as Monday, May 27. The letter serves as a preemptive notice to streamline courtroom proceedings and mitigate potential objections or delays during Jimenez's examination. The government likely outlines the scope of Jimenez's testimony, which may touch on sensitive or contested areas, and provides legal justification for the inclusion of certain pieces of evidence or lines of questioning they intend to pursue.The filing also appears to be a tactical move to prevent surprises and bolster the admissibility of what could be pivotal testimony in establishing patterns of behavior or corroborating other witnesses' claims. By addressing these matters in advance, prosecutors aim to minimize disruptions during trial and reinforce the integrity of Jimenez's testimony within the broader evidentiary framework. The letter underscores the government's intent to methodically build its case while anticipating and countering defense efforts to exclude or diminish the impact of Jimenez's statements.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.354.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

There's a meme I've seen a few times. It says “You never know how toxic something is until you breathe fresher air.” I think it's about how easy it is to get so completely wrapped up in a relationship, or a group dynamic, or a way of thinking that you stop seeing it for what it is. You become less and less tuned in to what's normal. This happens a lot when you get two close friends together—two people who might not be likely to do any damage if left to themselves, but who become like fire and gunpowder together. Pushing each other further and further, with neither one willing to flinch. This can get even scarier when the two friends in question are teenagers with huge egos and a fascination with all things dark and edgy.Join Katie and Whitney, plus the hosts of Last Podcast on the Left, Sinisterhood, and Scared to Death, on the very first CRIMEWAVE true crime cruise! Get your fan code now--tickets go on sale February 7: CrimeWaveatSea.com/CAMPFIRESources:LA Weekly, "Two Against One," Christine Pelisek. January 8, 2004.Redlands Daily Facts: https://www.redlandsdailyfacts.com/2023/07/19/high-profile-killer-of-redlands-teen-granted-release-from-prison/CBS News: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/best-friends-held-in-teens-death/Court transcriptsLA Times Archives: "Teen's Crush Was Fatal," Lance Pugmire, January 2005LMN's "I Killed My BFF," S3, E5Investigation Discovery's "Mean Girl Murders," episode "Goth Girl Gone"Follow us, campers!Patreon (join to get all episodes ad-free, at least a day early, an extra episode a month, and a free sticker!): https://patreon.com/TrueCrimeCampfirehttps://www.truecrimecampfirepod.com/Facebook: True Crime CampfireInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/truecrimecampfire/?hl=enTwitter: @TCCampfire https://twitter.com/TCCampfireEmail: truecrimecampfirepod@gmail.comMERCH! https://true-crime-campfire.myspreadshop.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/true-crime-campfire--4251960/support.

SUMMER TOUR TICKETS -> bit.ly/CITOSUMMER. Kelly Keegs joins the show! (00:00-14:00). JoJo Siwa x ‘Big Brother' drama (14:58-37:02). B.J. Novack & TikToker Delaney Rowe are dating (37:03-44:04). ‘The Summer I Turned Pretty' S3 trailer (45:11-53:41). Sophie Turner sparks breakup rumors with Peregrine Pearson (53:42-1:03:57). Travis Kelce seemingly unfollows Ryan Reynolds on IG (1:03:58-1:11:59). What‘s going on with Bill Belichick & GF Jordon Hudson? (1:13:02-1:31:24). Beyoncé's Cowboy Carter tour kicks off (1:31:25-1:37:47). PopCorner voicemails: Katy Perry's tour struggles, Bethenny Frankel question + more! (1:38:41-2:00:59). Interview with 'People' Editor-in-Chief, Charlotte Triggs - talking her career path, everything behind the scenes at People, the next Sexiest Man Alive + more! (2:02:14-2:24:43). CITO LINKS > barstool.link/chicks-in-the-office.You can find every episode of this show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or YouTube. Prime Members can listen ad-free on Amazon Music. For more, visit barstool.link/chicks-in-the-office