Podcasts about prosecution

On this episode of Jury Duty: The Trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, host Kary Antholis is joined once again by Abbe Smith who serves as Professor of Law and Director of the Criminal Defense and Prisoner Advocacy Clinic at Georgetown University. Together, they explore a number of the issues that were raised in the trial this week, including a sidebar conversation regarding character evidence about Anthony Huber and the testimonies of Sahil and Anmol Khindri, Officer Pep Moretti, and Officer Jason Krueger.You can also find out more information about each of the trials covered by Jury Duty at CrimeStory.com.Or at these dedicated links...The Trial of Kyle RittenhouseThe Killing of Ahmaud ArberyThe Trial of Robert Durst See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

THE THESIS: Leftist Party States have let illegal immigrants and other non-citizens vote in elections. Any who is paying attention can see what has become of former states like Washington, California, Oregon and New York with all leftist governments. They are a drain on the entire Country and their policies are cancers that eat into the Nation's laws. It is absolute sophistry to pretend municipal elections do not effect the Country and equally simple-minded to pretend the Leftist portion of The Party is using Open Borders and elections where illegals can vote to drive their Cultural Revolution.  THE SCRIPTURE & SCRIPTURAL RESOURCES:  Leviticus 19:35-36 35 “‘Do not use dishonest standards when measuring length, weight or quantity. 36 Use honest scales and honest weights, an honest ephah and an honest hin. I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt. Titus 1:7-14 For an overseer, as God's steward, must be above reproach. He must not be arrogant or quick-tempered or a drunkard or violent or greedy for gain, but hospitable, a lover of good, self-controlled, upright, holy, and disciplined. He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it. For there are many who are insubordinate, empty talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision party. They must be silenced, since they are upsetting whole families by teaching for shameful gain what they ought not to teach. … THE NEWS & COMMENT: BLOCK 1 Sussmann-Durham trial: Prosecution says Clinton lawyer used FBI to create an 'October surprise' against Trump; The prosecution and defense delivered opening arguments in the case against Sussmann on Tuesday The Shape-Shifting DC Dark Money Group Disguising Liberal Campaigns Across the Country The AP is effectively the same thing: “Republicans aiming to retake control of Congress have blamed Democrats for high inflation, expensive gas, migrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border and violent crime. Now, the baby formula shortage is becoming the GOP's latest attack on President Biden.” [AUDIO] - Jerry Nadler accidentally admits the truth: they are importing people who will vote for more China-model Corporate Communism [AUDIO] -  Colbert Declares Half of Republicans Agree With Buffalo Shooter [AUDIO] -  O'Donnell: Murdoch Did More Damage to U.S. Than Any Immigrant in The World BLOCK 2 [AUDIO] - The racist woman who believes the 2016 election was stolen and who has her job as White House Press Secretary because she is same-sex attracted and black, struggles to answer a question Peter Doocey asked about inflation [AUDIO] -  Nina Jankowicz appears with Dmitri Alperovich of Crowdstrike Russiagate infamy.  Nina claims Trump curries favor with Putin and trusts Putin over his own intel staff and is a huge worry for the election.  Plus Dmitri on DNC and Vaccine hacks etc. [AUDIO] -  Wasn't it CrowdStrike that was part of Hillary Clinton's Dark-Opps tech team? BLOCK 3 [AUDIO] - Whoopi says people who want election integrity use racist code-words Like this, Whoopi? [AUDIO] -  Soros-Funded Aspen Institute Guest: Post-Roe Women Will Be Subject to ‘Uterus Surveillance' See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In October 2021, the House of Representatives voted to find Trump associate Steve Bannon in contempt of Congress after Bannon refused to comply with a subpoena from the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection. In November 2021, the Justice Department indicted Bannon, and the trial is currently scheduled to begin this summer. So what's been happening in the interim?To catch up, Quinta Jurecic spoke with Lawfare senior editors Roger Parloff and Jonathan David Shaub. Roger has been following the Bannon prosecution closely and wrote about it in a recent Lawfare article—and Jonathan has written a great deal on Lawfare about the Office of Legal Counsel's positions on executive privilege, including how they might affect prosecutions for contempt of Congress. Bannon recently filed a motion to dismiss, making the argument that he believed Donald Trump's supposed invocation of executive privilege made it unnecessary for him to comply with the subpoena—relying heavily on memos from OLC. What should we make of Bannon's arguments? How is the Justice Department navigating a legally tricky situation? And what, if anything, might this case tell us about the other contempt of Congress cases coming out of the Jan. 6 committee, which the Justice Department has yet to bring?Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — On May 11, the prosecution and defense teams in Joshua Duggar's child pornography case each submitted sentencing memorandums in the Western District of Arkansas Federal Court in Fayetteville, outlining the reasoning behind their respective sentencing recommendations. ‘A deep-seated, pervasive, and violent sexual interest in children: Prosecution recommends 20-year sentence for Josh Duggar The prosecution shed light on a host of details that it felt warranted enhancements that would demand a sentence of 30 years to life in prison, although the maximum allowable in this case is 20 years. Conversely, the defense highlighted the defendant's character and lack of criminal history in asking for a five-year sentence. True Crime Today is a daily EXTRA feature of Dark Side Of. If you like Dark Side Of - Be sure to search and subscribe to "Dark Side Of" wherever you download podcasts! Apple Podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/dark-side-of-wikipedia-true-crime-dark-history/id1504280230?uo=4 Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/0GYshi6nJCf3O0aKEBTOPs Stitcher http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/real-ghost-stories-online-2/dark-side-of-wikipedia-true-crime-disturbing-stories iHeart https://www.iheart.com/podcast/270-Dark-Side-of-Wikipedia-Tru-60800715 Amazon https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/565dc51b-d214-4fab-b38b-ae7c723cb79a/Dark-Side-of-Wikipedia-True-Crime-Dark-History Google Podcasts https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hdWRpb2Jvb20uY29tL2NoYW5uZWxzLzUwMDEyNjAucnNz Or Search "Dark Side Of" for the best in True Crime ANYWHERE you get podcasts! Support the show at http://www.darksidepod.com

This season of Jury Duty explores the murder trial of Kyle Rittenhouse. In The Trial of Kyle Rittenhouse: Anthony Huber Character Evidence Sidebar, we examine a sidebar conversation involving Prosecutor James Kraus, Defense Attorney Corey Chirafisi, and Judge Bruce Schroeder regarding character evidence introduced by the Prosecution relating to Anthony Huber.You can also find out more information about each of the trials covered by Jury Duty at CrimeStory.com.Or at these dedicated links...The Trial of Kyle RittenhouseThe Killing of Ahmaud ArberyThe Trial of Robert Durst See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The National Prosecuting Authority says the death of the first witness to arrive at the Senzo Meyiwa murder scene will not jeopardize the prosecution. The NPA says several other witnesses will give relevant evidence on the merits of the case, and they are confident that there's sufficient evidence to ensure a successful prosecution in the case. Retired former provisional head of SAPS Brigadier Philani Ndlovu was one of the first senior police officers to arrive at the scene of Meyiwa's murder in Vosloorus, East of Johannesburg, in 2014. To further discuss this Elvis Presslin spoke to Afriforum's Head of Prosecutions, Advocate Gerrie Nel

Executive Director of the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism, Harvard-educated attorney, and former Miss America, Erika Harold joined WGN Radio’s Karen Conti to discuss her time in the Miss America Pageant, the opportunities it provided her and other women, her thoughts on the negative opinions on the pageant, and more! Later, she addressed what […]

Cook County Circuit Court Judge Debra Walker joined WGN Radio’s Karen Conti to discuss the judicial elections occurring on June 28th. Judge Walker explained the qualities that we should look for in a judicial candidate and the process of submitting an absentee ballot. Later, Walker elaborated on what she personally experiences as a judge for […]

In this look back episode...In court filings, the prosecution has asked to withhold the names of uncharged Co-Conspirators who are involved in the case.This filing opens many doors that need exploring. Today, we begin that journey.(commercial at 19:22)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/prosecutors-ask-judge-to-withhold-the-names-of-ghislaine-maxwell-e2-80-99s-e2-80-98uncharged-co-conspirators-e2-80-99-from-her/ar-AANvolt?

In this look back episode...In court filings, the prosecution has asked to withhold the names of uncharged Co-Conspirators who are involved in the case.This filing opens many doors that need exploring. Today, we begin that journey.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/prosecutors-ask-judge-to-withhold-the-names-of-ghislaine-maxwell-e2-80-99s-e2-80-98uncharged-co-conspirators-e2-80-99-from-her/ar-AANvolt?

Dr. Sofia Stolk's The Opening Statement of the Prosecution in International Criminal Trials: A Solemn Tale of Horror (Routledge, 2021) addresses the discursive importance of the prosecution's opening statement before an international criminal tribunal. Opening statements are considered to be largely irrelevant to the official legal proceedings but are simultaneously deployed to frame important historical events. They are widely cited in international media as well as academic texts; yet have been ignored by legal scholars as objects of study in their own right. Dr. Stolk aims to remedy this neglect, by analysing the narrative that is articulated in the opening statements of different prosecutors at different tribunals in different times. This book aims to magnify the story of the opening statement where it becomes ambiguous, circular, repetition, self-referential, incomplete, and inescapable. It aims to uncover the specificities of a discourse that is built on and rebuilds paradoxes, to illuminate some of the absurdities that mark the foundations of the opening statements' celebration of reason. More generally, it aims to show how the contradticion in the opening statement reflects foundational tensions that are productive and constituative of the field of international criminal law more broadly. Above all, [this book] shows how the opening statement aims to provide certainty where there is none. The book takes an interdisciplinary approach and looks at the meaning of the opening narrative beyond its function in the legal process in a strict sense, discussing the ways in which the trial is situated in time and space and how it portrays the main characters. Dr. Stolk shows how perpetrators and victims, places and histories, are juridified in a narrative that, whilst purporting to legitimise the trial, the tribunal and international criminal law itself, is beset with tensions and contradictions. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/genocide-studies

Dr. Sofia Stolk's The Opening Statement of the Prosecution in International Criminal Trials: A Solemn Tale of Horror (Routledge, 2021) addresses the discursive importance of the prosecution's opening statement before an international criminal tribunal. Opening statements are considered to be largely irrelevant to the official legal proceedings but are simultaneously deployed to frame important historical events. They are widely cited in international media as well as academic texts; yet have been ignored by legal scholars as objects of study in their own right. Dr. Stolk aims to remedy this neglect, by analysing the narrative that is articulated in the opening statements of different prosecutors at different tribunals in different times. This book aims to magnify the story of the opening statement where it becomes ambiguous, circular, repetition, self-referential, incomplete, and inescapable. It aims to uncover the specificities of a discourse that is built on and rebuilds paradoxes, to illuminate some of the absurdities that mark the foundations of the opening statements' celebration of reason. More generally, it aims to show how the contradticion in the opening statement reflects foundational tensions that are productive and constituative of the field of international criminal law more broadly. Above all, [this book] shows how the opening statement aims to provide certainty where there is none. The book takes an interdisciplinary approach and looks at the meaning of the opening narrative beyond its function in the legal process in a strict sense, discussing the ways in which the trial is situated in time and space and how it portrays the main characters. Dr. Stolk shows how perpetrators and victims, places and histories, are juridified in a narrative that, whilst purporting to legitimise the trial, the tribunal and international criminal law itself, is beset with tensions and contradictions. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Dr. Sofia Stolk's The Opening Statement of the Prosecution in International Criminal Trials: A Solemn Tale of Horror (Routledge, 2021) addresses the discursive importance of the prosecution's opening statement before an international criminal tribunal. Opening statements are considered to be largely irrelevant to the official legal proceedings but are simultaneously deployed to frame important historical events. They are widely cited in international media as well as academic texts; yet have been ignored by legal scholars as objects of study in their own right. Dr. Stolk aims to remedy this neglect, by analysing the narrative that is articulated in the opening statements of different prosecutors at different tribunals in different times. This book aims to magnify the story of the opening statement where it becomes ambiguous, circular, repetition, self-referential, incomplete, and inescapable. It aims to uncover the specificities of a discourse that is built on and rebuilds paradoxes, to illuminate some of the absurdities that mark the foundations of the opening statements' celebration of reason. More generally, it aims to show how the contradticion in the opening statement reflects foundational tensions that are productive and constituative of the field of international criminal law more broadly. Above all, [this book] shows how the opening statement aims to provide certainty where there is none. The book takes an interdisciplinary approach and looks at the meaning of the opening narrative beyond its function in the legal process in a strict sense, discussing the ways in which the trial is situated in time and space and how it portrays the main characters. Dr. Stolk shows how perpetrators and victims, places and histories, are juridified in a narrative that, whilst purporting to legitimise the trial, the tribunal and international criminal law itself, is beset with tensions and contradictions. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Dr. Sofia Stolk's The Opening Statement of the Prosecution in International Criminal Trials: A Solemn Tale of Horror (Routledge, 2021) addresses the discursive importance of the prosecution's opening statement before an international criminal tribunal. Opening statements are considered to be largely irrelevant to the official legal proceedings but are simultaneously deployed to frame important historical events. They are widely cited in international media as well as academic texts; yet have been ignored by legal scholars as objects of study in their own right. Dr. Stolk aims to remedy this neglect, by analysing the narrative that is articulated in the opening statements of different prosecutors at different tribunals in different times. This book aims to magnify the story of the opening statement where it becomes ambiguous, circular, repetition, self-referential, incomplete, and inescapable. It aims to uncover the specificities of a discourse that is built on and rebuilds paradoxes, to illuminate some of the absurdities that mark the foundations of the opening statements' celebration of reason. More generally, it aims to show how the contradticion in the opening statement reflects foundational tensions that are productive and constituative of the field of international criminal law more broadly. Above all, [this book] shows how the opening statement aims to provide certainty where there is none. The book takes an interdisciplinary approach and looks at the meaning of the opening narrative beyond its function in the legal process in a strict sense, discussing the ways in which the trial is situated in time and space and how it portrays the main characters. Dr. Stolk shows how perpetrators and victims, places and histories, are juridified in a narrative that, whilst purporting to legitimise the trial, the tribunal and international criminal law itself, is beset with tensions and contradictions. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/world-affairs

Dr. Sofia Stolk's The Opening Statement of the Prosecution in International Criminal Trials: A Solemn Tale of Horror (Routledge, 2021) addresses the discursive importance of the prosecution's opening statement before an international criminal tribunal. Opening statements are considered to be largely irrelevant to the official legal proceedings but are simultaneously deployed to frame important historical events. They are widely cited in international media as well as academic texts; yet have been ignored by legal scholars as objects of study in their own right. Dr. Stolk aims to remedy this neglect, by analysing the narrative that is articulated in the opening statements of different prosecutors at different tribunals in different times. This book aims to magnify the story of the opening statement where it becomes ambiguous, circular, repetition, self-referential, incomplete, and inescapable. It aims to uncover the specificities of a discourse that is built on and rebuilds paradoxes, to illuminate some of the absurdities that mark the foundations of the opening statements' celebration of reason. More generally, it aims to show how the contradticion in the opening statement reflects foundational tensions that are productive and constituative of the field of international criminal law more broadly. Above all, [this book] shows how the opening statement aims to provide certainty where there is none. The book takes an interdisciplinary approach and looks at the meaning of the opening narrative beyond its function in the legal process in a strict sense, discussing the ways in which the trial is situated in time and space and how it portrays the main characters. Dr. Stolk shows how perpetrators and victims, places and histories, are juridified in a narrative that, whilst purporting to legitimise the trial, the tribunal and international criminal law itself, is beset with tensions and contradictions. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/language

Dr. Sofia Stolk's The Opening Statement of the Prosecution in International Criminal Trials: A Solemn Tale of Horror (Routledge, 2021) addresses the discursive importance of the prosecution's opening statement before an international criminal tribunal. Opening statements are considered to be largely irrelevant to the official legal proceedings but are simultaneously deployed to frame important historical events. They are widely cited in international media as well as academic texts; yet have been ignored by legal scholars as objects of study in their own right. Dr. Stolk aims to remedy this neglect, by analysing the narrative that is articulated in the opening statements of different prosecutors at different tribunals in different times. This book aims to magnify the story of the opening statement where it becomes ambiguous, circular, repetition, self-referential, incomplete, and inescapable. It aims to uncover the specificities of a discourse that is built on and rebuilds paradoxes, to illuminate some of the absurdities that mark the foundations of the opening statements' celebration of reason. More generally, it aims to show how the contradticion in the opening statement reflects foundational tensions that are productive and constituative of the field of international criminal law more broadly. Above all, [this book] shows how the opening statement aims to provide certainty where there is none. The book takes an interdisciplinary approach and looks at the meaning of the opening narrative beyond its function in the legal process in a strict sense, discussing the ways in which the trial is situated in time and space and how it portrays the main characters. Dr. Stolk shows how perpetrators and victims, places and histories, are juridified in a narrative that, whilst purporting to legitimise the trial, the tribunal and international criminal law itself, is beset with tensions and contradictions. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law

On this episode of Jury Duty: The Trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, host Kary Antholis is joined once again by Abbe Smith who serves as Professor of Law and Director of the Criminal Defense and Prisoner Advocacy Clinic at Georgetown University. Together, they explore a number of the issues that were raised by the testimony of several of the State witnesses called, including Jason Lackowski, one of the armed individuals with Rittenhouse on the night of the shooting; DNA Analyst, Amber Rasmussen; Sarah Hughes, a great aunt of Anthony Huber; and Kariann Swart, the fiancée of the late Joseph Rosenbaum.You can also find out more information about each of the trials covered by Jury Duty at CrimeStory.com.Or at these dedicated links...The Trial of Kyle RittenhouseThe Killing of Ahmaud ArberyThe Trial of Robert Durst See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

NTD Evening News—05/10/2022 1. Congress on Track To Pass $40B in Ukraine Aid 2. Biden Vows To Fight Inflation, Attacks GOP 3. U.N. Chief on the Future of Fossil Fuels 4. Immigrants Influencing U.S. Elections 5. Protests Outside Justice Samuel Alito's Home

Prominent journalist and reporter Barry Bateman recently announced that he has AfriForum's Private Prosecution Unit. Bateman sat down with Rian van Heerden for a candid interview.

The hags dance around the question of milk and meat. Halloween costumes, pre-school, dining. Childhood is probed. Acting class exercises and acting teachers, skirt suits and 90's indie film. How to get in at a restaurant and send one's compliments to the chef.   . . . . . This episode was edited and engineered by C. Tweedie. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #DevinNunes: John Durham reveals a Fusion GPS insider as (immunized) witness for the prosecution.  @DevinNunes  #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety

WGN’s Karen Conti is joined by Stop Predatory Gambling’s Zach Stallard to discuss the plans for a new casino in Chicago. What could be the downside of a state-sponsored gambling site in River North? If you or someone you know struggles with a gambling addiction visit Stop Predatory Gambling’s website or weknowthefeeling.org.

WGN’s Karen Conti is joined by psychologist Dr. Oren Amitay to discuss the details of the Alabama corrections officer who ran away with an inmate she is suspected of having a relationship with. Plus, they talk about what personality disorders are, how they come to be, and how the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial […]

dwyercrime.blog

Coming Up on VOA's Africa News Tonight: ➡️ Guinea's military government this week announced plans to prosecute ousted President Alpha Conde and 26 of his former officials for murder, rape, kidnapping, and other crimes. VOA analyzes the significance of the charges; AND.... Experts argue abuse of local workers in Africa is quickly becoming uncommon, following a series of reports over the years, across the continent, amongst them a recent viral video of a Chinese employer whipping a Rwandan employee, which led to a 20-year jail sentence. ➡️ For this and more, stay tuned to VOA's Africa News Tonight!

On this episode of Jury Duty: The Trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, host Kary Antholis is joined once again by Abbe Smith who serves as Professor of Law and Director of the Criminal Defense and Prisoner Advocacy Clinic at Georgetown University. Together, they explore a number of the issues that were raised by the testimony of Ryan Balch, one of the armed individuals that was with Kyle Rittenhouse on the night of the shootings.You can also find out more information about each of the trials covered by Jury Duty at CrimeStory.com.Or at these dedicated links...The Trial of Kyle RittenhouseThe Killing of Ahmaud ArberyThe Trial of Robert Durst See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Transcripts reveal what took place during Oral Arguments on May 4th, 2022 in the Durham Prosecution of Michael Sussmann. Judge Cooper heard efforts by Hillary Clinton, FusionGPS, and Rodney Joffe on why their documents should not be disclosed to the Court for judicial review.Follow @TechnoFog for More Great Sussmann AnalysisMore: https://linktr.ee/robertgouveiaCharged in AZ? https://rrlawaz.com/schedule-appointment/#Sussmann #Durham #HillaryClinton

He made a name for himself in swashbuckling, sword and sandal movies, but Tyrone Power wanted to be more than a romantic hero. After his military service, he sought to leave the fencing of Zorro behind and embraced darker, more complex roles in movies like Nightmare Alley and Witness for the Prosecution. We'll hear him as a man accused of a murder he didn't commit in "The Guilty Always Run" (originally aired on CBS on March 29, 1954). Then, he joins Jack Benny and Mary Livingstone for an evening at a Paris nightclub in The Jack Benny Program (originally aired on CBS on December 4, 1949).

The Sussmann trial is starting with jury selection in just over a week. Judge Cooper ordered Hillary Clinton, FusionGPS and others to disclose documents related to the Durham Prosecution to the Judge for review. In this video, criminal defense lawyer Robert Gouveia reviews the Michael Sussman court docket, the Sussmann Mindmap, and the upcoming trial schedule.More: https://linktr.ee/robertgouveiaCharged in AZ? https://rrlawaz.com/schedule-appointment/#Sussmann #Durham #Clinton

Hour 1 of The Drew Mariani Show on 5-4-22 Andrew McCarthy joins us for some discussion around the fallout from the Dobbs SCOTUS draft leak - and investigations into who leaked it

Last updated : 2022.05.03 The latest news from home and abroad, with a close eye on Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula in particular

What can you do when government abuses their powers? I've talked before about the right to petition the government for a redress of grievance and how the judicial precedent of sovereign immunity violates that right. But what happens when law enforcement or the justice department abuses their prosecutorial powers? How do you seek redress for a malicious prosecution? For years it has been extremely hard to do so, but a recent Supreme Court opinion may balance the scales.

WGN Radio’s Karen Conti is joined by jury consultant Dave Zehner to discuss the continued defamation trial of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard and to provide a view from the jury’s perspective. He assessed psychologist Dr. Shannon Curry’s testimony as well as the odder moments in the trial. Later, he addressed what Amber Heard might […]

Dr. Ernesto Verdeja, Associate Professor of Political Science and Peace Studies at University of Notre Dame, joined WGN Radio’s Karen Conti to discuss the war crimes continuing as a result of the war between Ukraine and Russia. Dr. Verdeja defined war crimes, crimes against humanity, crimes of aggression, and genocide and whether or not the […]

Professor Richard Garnett, Professor at the University of Notre Dame Law School, joined WGN Radio’s Karen Conti to address the Supreme Court case regarding high school football coach Joseph Kennedy, in Washington, being fired for kneeling at the 50 yard line after every game and saying a prayer. Professor Garnett assessed whether this actually violated […]

In this video, we review the Oral Arguments that took place in the Durham Prosecution against Michael Sussmann for lying to the FBI. Judge Cooper took the matter under advisement but made a bench ruling precluding Hillary's tweets from evidence.H/T @TechnoFog for the TranscriptMore: https://linktr.ee/robertgouveiaCharged in AZ? https://rrlawaz.com/schedule-appointment/#DurhamProsecution #MichaelSussmann #HillaryClinton

Tonight's special guest is Jennifer (Jenny) Murphy from Fort Meyers, Florida, a returning NAASCA family member and a Child & Family Therapist, Child Advocate, CSA & Sex Trafficking expert who was last with us in 2016. We were both surprised it had been that long and Jenny says she's done lots of things since then." I've been working with Sex Crimes victims/Survivors & offenders since 1987 throughout North America," she said. "There are many layers to the work we do locally and globally for kids & families in our communities." Jenny's work sounds surprisingly like NAASCA's, and includes  Prevention, Protection and Prosecution. "Behind the scenes we do a lot of work to get laws changed or passed. We carry out investigations and call out the frauds, liars, and thieves." She goes on, "We have no currency. We are aligned with no one. We don't ask or beg for moneysom we can not be bought. We do this work because it is what was asked of us." Jenny explains, " We are currently focused on our End Demand Initiatives which includes 3 comprehensive End Demand .. Clinical, Educational & Social Programs." The three are  1. Sex Trafficking Offender Program or (STOP) for traffickers & repeat offenders.  2. Sex Crimes Offender Program Education or (SCOPE) which is a restorative justice behavior modification program to be used as a Diversion Program for 1st or 2nd time Misdemeanor sex buyers and  3. Sex Therapy & Education for Men (STEM) a therapeutic intervention for men trying to rid themselves of sex and/or addiction. Jenny says, "Until we address demand we will continue to have more and more victims."

Last updated : 2022.04.27 The latest news from home and abroad, with a close eye on Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula in particular

Dallas DA hands off prosecution of pastor Rickie Rush; Dallas redistricting commission moving forward with two maps that could shift council representation; Dallas police officer accused of sexual assault while on duty, placed on administrative leave; STAAR quickly approaching for Texas students; Can whistleblowers sue Texas elected officials?

A Brockville man convicted after a biker gang raid in 2018 has been sentenced to seven years and three months in jail, roughly half the time recommended by the prosecution. Justice Brian Abrams said in Brockville court Monday that while Tom Bell chose a lifestyle of organized crime, he accepted Bell's remorse was genuine.Help us get to 10,000 subscribers on www.instagram.com/BlackDragonBikerTV on Instagram. Thank you!Follow us on TikTok www.tiktok.com/@blackdragonbikertv Subscribe to our new discord server https://discord.gg/dshaTSTGet 20% off Gothic biker rings by using my special discount code: blackdragon go to http://gthic.com?aff=147Subscribe to our online news magazine www.bikerliberty.comBuy Black Dragon Merchandise, Mugs, Hats, T-Shirts Books: https://blackdragonsgear.comDonate to our cause with Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/BlackDragonNP Donate to our cause with PayPal https://tinyurl.com/yxudso8z Subscribe to our Prepper Channel “Think Tactical”: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-WnkPNJLZ2a1vfis013OAgSUBSCRIBE TO Black Dragon Biker TV YouTube https://tinyurl.com/y2xv69buKEEP UP ON SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/blackdragonbikertvTwitter: https://www.twitter.com/jbunchiiFacebook : https://www.facebook.com/blackdragonbiker

WGN Radio’s Karen Conti is joined by Founder of Stoltmann Law Offices, Andrew Stoltmann, to discuss the lottery and how to not get cheated by financial professionals. After, he answered listener questions regarding finances.

Chief of Forensic Science Division of the Cook County Public Defender's Office, Brendan Max, joined WGN Radio’s Karen Conti to celebrate DNA Day and discuss forensic science and the use of genealogy technology in order to solve cold cases. They also talked about the ShotSpotter technology and the purpose it serves within the criminal justice […]

Criminal defense lawyer Patrick Campanelli joined WGN Radio’s Karen Conti to discuss the continuation of the Johnny Depp trial. They addressed his testimony claiming violence enacted upon him by Amber Heard, the texts he sent others in regards to Amber Heard, and whether or not either of them should be depicted as the victim in […]

On this edition of the evening update, we once again take a look at the NPA that Epstein weaseled himself and his friends into and we hear from prosecutors and lawyers who have worked these kinds of cases for decades and none of them could ever recall anyone getting a deal such as this. So, how was Epstein able to cash in? (commercial at 11:00)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.floridabulldog.org/2021/04/jeffrey-epstein-cushy-federal-deal-one-of-a-kind/

On this episode of Jury Duty: The Trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, host Kary Antholis is joined once again by Abbe Smith who serves as Professor of Law and Director of the Criminal Defense and Prisoner Advocacy Clinic at Georgetown University. Together they discuss a number of the issues that were raised by the courtroom events that we covered this past week, including the manner in which the Prosecution made use of their last two witnesses and how Prosecutor Thomas Binger could have presented a more compelling case against Kyle Rittenhouse.You can also find out more information about each of the trials covered by Jury Duty at CrimeStory.com.Or at these dedicated links...The Trial of Kyle RittenhouseThe Killing of Ahmaud ArberyThe Trial of Robert Durst See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Eric Lesh, Executive Director of the LGBT Bar of NY and Professor Art Leonard of New York Law School, discuss three important cases from the April edition of LGBT Law Notes.  Plaintiffs Win Summary Judgment Against Former Rowan County (Kentucky) Clerk Kim Davis in Marriage License Case Texas Court Blocks Investigation or Prosecution of Parents and Doctors for Providing Gender-Affirming Treatment for Transgender Youths District Court Judge Rules on Summary Judgment Motions After HIV-Positive Man Was Denied A Job As A Security Officer For Fear Of Spreading HIV To Patients.

Episode 2082 - BEST OF: Journalist and author Marika Sboros () joins Vinnie for a third time to talk about more conspiratorial evidence that had surfaced since the publication of her new book with Dr. Tim Noakes The , which details the world-famous trial in South Africa designed to discredit him. https://vinnietortorich.com/2022/04/best-of-the-lore-of-nutrition-marika-sboros-episode-2082 PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS THE LORE OF NUTRTION She has been on this show twice before. And now, Marika also has a book with the famous Dr. Noakes. Check it out at the link above. He knows tons about nutrition. Famous author, great doctor. Marika is a strong believer that eating right (low carb high fat) can fix or alleviate many health issues. "Let Food be Your Medicine." Eating right has numerous benefits. Check out her website for many Has many LCHF resources on her site. Since the publish of the new book, the critics have gotten angrier. It does not serve their interests for the truth about nutrition to come out. They are conspiracists. TIMOTHY NOAKES TRIAL  Dr. Noakes is a doctor in South Africa. He was facing trial because he prescribed LCHF diet for a breastfeeding mother on Twitter. Sugar and grain industry use their influence to strike again. He was found NOT GUILTY of professional misconduct, thank goodness. However, the fact that he even faced trial for years is ridiculous. Noakes was just trying to show that the popular held believe (low fat, lots of carbs) is BS. Prosecution and persecution for his views on nutrition. He tore out pages from his book which recommended high carb diets and carbo-loading for athletes. The Lore of Running. The best and smartest people are those who own up to their mistakes, and tell the truth when they learn of it. PURCHASE BEYOND IMPOSSIBLE The documentary launched this week on January 11! Order it TODAY! This is Vinnie's third documentary in just over three years. Get it now on Apple TV (iTunes) and/or Amazon Video! Link to the film on Apple TV (iTunes):  Share this link with friends, too! Link to the film on Amazon Video: It's also now available on Amazon (USA only for now)!  Visit my new Documentaries HQ to find my films everywhere: REVIEWS: Please submit your REVIEW after you watch my films. Your positive REVIEW does matter! FAT: A DOCUMENTARY 2 (2021) Visit my new Documentaries HQ to find my films everywhere: Please share my fact-based, health-focused documentary series with your friends and family. The more views, the better it ranks, so please watch it again with a new friend! REVIEWS: Please submit your REVIEW after you watch my films. Your positive REVIEW does matter! FAT: A DOCUMENTARY (2019) Visit my new Documentaries HQ to find my films everywhere: Please share my fact-based, health-focused documentary series with your friends and family. The more views, the better it ranks, so please watch it again with a new friend! REVIEWS: Please submit your REVIEW after you watch my films. Your positive REVIEW does matter!               FAT DOC 2 IS AVAILABLE ON iTUNES and AMAZON Please also share it with family and friends! Buy it and watch it now on iTunes to get it to the top of the charts. We need it to get big for people to see it. Here's the (BLUERAY, DVD, PRIME) (MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE YET ACROSS THE POND). And the And the https://amzn.to/3rxHuB9   PLEASE DON'T FORGET TO REVIEW the film AFTER YOU WATCH!   FAT DOC 1 IS ALSO OUT Go watch it now! We need people to buy and review for it to stay at the top of iTunes pages. Available for both rental and purchase. You can also buy hardcopy or watch online at Amazon. YOU CAN NOW STREAM FOR FREE ON AMAZON PRIME IF YOU HAVE IT!  

David and Sarah talk about a fascinating Supreme Court case that no one is discussing, unleash again on Yale Law School, and then spend the last few minutes on Sarah's game show idea—a revolutionary combination of social science and dating advice. Plus, book recommendations! Show Notes:-Louisiana v. American Rivers-Thompson v. Clark-“Rethinking Sex: A Provocation” by Christine Emba-David in The Atlantic: “Consent Was Never Enough”-Christine Emba: “Consent is not enough. We need a new sexual ethic.”-“Powers and Thrones: A New History of the Middle Ages” by Dan Jones