Podcasts about witnesses

In a move carrying significant legal weight, Kouri Richins' defense team rested without calling a single witness — concluding three weeks of prosecution testimony in a first-degree murder case built entirely on circumstantial evidence. Former FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski for a listener Q&A examining the evidentiary landscape the jury is now tasked with assessing.From a procedural standpoint, the defense's silence forces jurors to evaluate the prosecution's case on its own terms. That case rests on interconnected pillars: an extensive financial picture — accounts reportedly in the red, failed real estate transactions, outstanding loans — uncontested opportunity evidence, and Carmen Lauber's testimony, which represents the closest thing this case has to a direct statement from Richins about her intentions.Lauber's testimony came with a serious legal complication. A detective allegedly told her she needed to provide "details that ensure Kouri gets convicted." That statement, if accurately reported, represents a significant problem for the prosecution's most important witness — and Dreeke examines how jurors are likely to weigh that disclosure against everything else Lauber put on the record.The defense also left documented evidentiary gaps in the record: cocktail mugs never forensically tested, no warrant executed for a key family member's phone, an uninvestigated report that Eric sought fentanyl from an alternate source. Under reasonable doubt standards, those aren't rhetorical flourishes — they're unresolved evidentiary questions. Dreeke addresses whether they're likely to carry weight in deliberations.The "Walk the Dog" letter — Richins' alleged jail correspondence coaching family members on what to tell investigators — anchors the prosecution's consciousness-of-guilt argument. Dreeke examines what that document does once it's inside a deliberation room.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichinsTrial #LegalAnalysis #EricRichins #CircumstantialEvidence #MurderTrial #UtahMurder #TrueCrime #JuryDeliberations

Jerry AKA Caser Rebel is back with a chilling look at the 1978–1979 encounters around Kaser, North Carolina, near the South Mountains and Carpenter's Knob. Witnesses including Minnie Cook, Sally White, the Price family, and Gay Smith reported a large black, hairy, humanlike figure prowling properties, killing animals, leaving tracks, and unleashing terrifying howls, screams, and strange yodeling wails.Drawing from reports documented by Robert Williams, who helped popularize the name “Knobby,” Jerry explores the possibility that more than one threat was involved, including an oversized black panther and a third track type he believes may point to a Dogman.The episode also dives into the fear of feral people in Appalachia, with accounts of eerie communication, violent encounters, a destroyed 1978 campsite, and a 2021 cave investigation that revealed a barefoot human track and signs of repeated human activity.Rebel's Dark Tales of Appalachia YouTubeEmail BrianGet Our FREE NewsletterGet Brian's Books Leave Us A VoicemailVisit Our WebsiteBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/sasquatch-odyssey--4839697/support.Have you had a Bigfoot encounter, Sasquatch sighting, Dogman experience, or other cryptid or paranormal encounter? We'd love to hear your story. Email brian@paranormalworldproductions.com to be featured on a future episode of Sasquatch Odyssey.Sasquatch Odyssey is a leading Bigfoot and cryptid podcast exploring real encounters, field research, and scientific analysis of the Sasquatch phenomenon.Follow the show and turn on automatic downloads so you never miss an episode.

The prosecution has put nearly forty witnesses on the stand. Two mistrial motions have already been filed. And the defense is about to make their move in one of the most-watched murder trials in the country. This Hidden Killers Week In Review brings together defense attorney Bob Motta, former FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, and host Tony Brueski to break down what the shape of this defense actually tells us.When a defense team starts filing mistrial motions mid-trial, is that legal maneuvering or a tell? Bob Motta goes straight at the questions other coverage won't touch. How do you attack a three-pillar circumstantial case—debt, fentanyl access, and a deteriorating marriage—without looking like you're dismissing each piece individually and hoping the jury doesn't connect the dots?Carmen Lauber came in meth-positive. Robert Crozier contradicted his own sworn affidavit. Both are immunity witnesses the prosecution is leaning on hard. Motta and Dreeke weigh in on exactly how much damage shaky immunity witnesses do to a case already built entirely on circumstantial evidence.Robin addresses the behavioral reality that makes this case so disturbing: Kouri allegedly asked for "the Michael Jackson drug" after the first attempt failed. What does it take for someone to fail and immediately seek something more lethal? She texted that she felt "relieved" after Eric died. Then wrote a children's book about grief. In Robin's FBI career, has he seen a behavioral move that audacious?And the question at the center: Eric suspected something. His friends knew. His sister hired a PI. He'd met with a divorce attorney. He told his family to look at Kouri if anything happened. How does someone walk through all those warnings—and still end up dead?Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1PRE-ORDER Robin's NEW Book! - https://a.co/d/0iR9U8U0Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #DefenseStrategy #MistrialMotion #UtahMurderTrial #CircumstantialEvidence

Forty witnesses. Recorded jail calls. A boyfriend who broke down on the stand. Text messages that are going to be almost impossible to explain away. And a life story Kouri Richins wrote about herself in the third person at a wellness retreat a year before her husband died. This Hidden Killers Week In Review examines not just the legal arguments—but what the jury is actually absorbing.Defense attorney Bob Motta and former FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke go deep on the psychology of this trial. What does a jury do with a self-written document where the defendant describes her marriage as emotionally exhausting and her childhood as unstable—and then the defense puts it in front of them voluntarily? When a witness says Kouri told her it would be "better if Eric were dead," then walks it back, then reaffirms it—does that wobble make the statement more memorable or less?The two texts that will define this case: "If he could just go away" and "If I die, Eric did it." How does any defense attorney argue context around those?The testimony laid out the wreckage prosecutors allege Kouri left behind. A lifelong best friend who lost her entire life savings. A boyfriend on the witness stand. A housekeeper allegedly linked to a fentanyl chain. A family that spent over $100,000 and nearly a thousand hours just to be taken seriously. A husband secretly consulting a divorce attorney—routing communications through his brother-in-law because he believed Kouri was reading his emails.And underneath: $7.5 million in debt, $80,000 in monthly payments, a net worth a forensic accountant described as "imploding."From the forged insurance signature to the Walk the Dog letter written from jail—this is the full accounting.Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #ForensicAccountant #TextEvidence #UtahMurderTrial #TrueCrime

Carmen Lauber came in meth-positive. Robert Crozier contradicted his own sworn affidavit. Both are immunity witnesses the prosecution is leaning on hard—and both changed their accounts under prosecutorial pressure. At what point does that dynamic create more risk for the prosecution than the defense? This Hidden Killers Week In Review brings together former FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, defense attorney Bob Motta, and host Tony Brueski for the panel discussion no one else is having.The prosecution has put nearly forty witnesses on the stand. Two mistrial motions have already been filed. Bob Motta breaks down what the shape of this defense tells us—and whether the strategy makes sense when the evidence is this heavy. How do you attack a three-pillar circumstantial case—debt, fentanyl access, and a deteriorating marriage—without looking like you're dismissing each piece individually and hoping the jury doesn't connect the dots?Robin addresses the behavioral reality of escalation: Kouri allegedly asked for "the Michael Jackson drug" after the first attempt failed. What does it take for someone to fail at something like this and immediately seek a more lethal method? That's not panic—Robin explains what it actually is.He also takes on the children's book. In his FBI career, has he seen a behavioral move that audacious? What does it communicate about how this individual manages her public identity under pressure? If you strip the children's book out of this case entirely, does the defense even look the same?And the human question: Eric Richins suspected something. His friends knew. His sister hired a PI. He'd met with a divorce attorney. He told his family: if I die, look at her. How does someone walk through all those warnings—and still end up dead?Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1PRE-ORDER Robin's NEW Book! - https://a.co/d/0iR9U8U0Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #RobinDreeke #BobMotta #ImmunityWitnesses #CircumstantialEvidence #UtahMurderTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Please hit Subscribe and tell a freind about the show. Click here to go to our Facebook Page. https://www.facebook.com/222paranormal Click here to see Jennifer's new book. https://a.co/d/0975TGJO  Click here to see Joe's book.  https://a.co/d/0chXt3Ag  Click here to save on High-end clothing.  https://poshmark.com/closet/happie22  Click here to see Joe's poshmark Closet. https://poshmark.com/closet/toledojoe    In this chilling episode of the 222 Paranormal Podcast, host Jennifer Shortridge explores one of the most terrifying legends in paranormal lore—Skinwalkers. Originating in Navajo folklore, Skinwalkers are believed to be witches capable of transforming into animals and using dark supernatural powers. Witnesses across the American Southwest have reported disturbing encounters with creatures that move like animals but behave like humans. In this episode we explore: • The origins of Skinwalker legends within the traditions of the Navajo people • Reports of shapeshifting creatures seen in the desert • Terrifying encounters on lonely highways • Stories of voices mimicking loved ones in the night • Witness accounts of animals behaving in unnatural ways • The mysterious paranormal activity surrounding Skinwalker Ranch Are Skinwalkers supernatural shapeshifters? Are they misunderstood folklore? Or could something far stranger be hiding in the deserts of the American Southwest? Turn down the lights and listen closely—because some legends may be more real than we think.   Welcome to the 222 Paranormal Podcast, your gateway to the captivating world of the supernatural. Immerse yourself in our expertly crafted episodes, where we delve deep into a wide range of paranormal phenomena, including ghostly hauntings, cryptid sightings, and unexplained mysteries that defy logic. Each episode is meticulously researched and features engaging discussions with leading experts, seasoned ghost hunters, and renowned paranormal investigators. We cover the latest advancements in ghost hunting technology, offer practical tips for both amateur and experienced investigators, and review essential equipment for your paranormal adventures. Our podcast also explores the rich history of haunted locations, sharing true stories and firsthand accounts that will send chills down your spine. Whether you're a die-hard fan of the paranormal or just curious about the unknown, our content is designed to entertain, inform, and ignite your imagination. Stay tuned as we uncover secrets from the most haunted places around the world and analyze the most intriguing supernatural events. We also provide in-depth interviews with notable figures in the field and explore theories that challenge conventional understanding of reality. By subscribing to our Paranormal Podcast, you'll stay updated with the latest episodes, allowing you to join a community of like-minded individuals who share your fascination with the unexplained. Don't miss out on our exclusive content and special features, which bring you closer to the mysteries that lie beyond our everyday experiences. Dive into the world of the unknown with our Paranormal Podcast and experience the thrill of discovering what lies just beyond the veil of reality.

“Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a huge crowd of witnesses to the life of faith, let us strip off every weight that slows us down, especially the sin that so easily trips us up. And let us run with endurance the race God has set before us. We do this by keeping our eyes on Jesus, the champion who initiates and perfects our faith. Because of the joy awaiting him, he endured the cross, disregarding its shame. Now he is seated in the place of honor beside God’s throne.” (Hebrews 12:1–2 NLT) Over the past two weeks, we’ve looked at several Old Testament characters. In Hebrews 12:1–2, the significance of their lives, their experiences, their struggles, their victories, and their testimonies is brought home to us. One chapter earlier, the author of Hebrews recapped many of their stories in what’s often called the “Faith Hall of Fame.” The placement of the exhortation in Hebrews 12:1–2 seems to suggest that these “hall of famers,” these heroes of the faith—Abraham, Joseph, Moses, Rahab, Gideon, David, Daniel, and others—take a rooting interest in our spiritual race. “Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a huge crowd of witnesses to the life of faith, let us strip off every weight that slows us down, especially the sin that so easily trips us up. And let us run with endurance the race God has set before us. We do this by keeping our eyes on Jesus, the champion who initiates and perfects our faith. Because of the joy awaiting him, he endured the cross, disregarding its shame. Now he is seated in the place of honor beside God’s throne” (NLT). These people of faith who went before us gave us models to follow so that we might live and exercise our faith as they did. Reading about the lives of these men and women who walked with God and trusted Christ and stood strong in the face of trials and persecutions can add steel to our souls. But they didn’t just give us templates to follow. They are also observing us and taking note of our progress in the faith. This “crowd of witnesses” is watching us and cheering us on, if you will. That’s just one interpretation of the passage, of course. We don’t know for certain that there are heavenly grandstands where people monitor the progress of loved ones living out their lives on earth. But it wouldn’t surprise me if that were true. I do, however, know this much: We are in the race of our lives on earth, and none of us knows how long it will last. So, we must make the most of it. We must live our lives to please not the bystanders but the Lord Himself. We must make decisions and interact with others in ways that honor and pique curiosity about Him. We must leave a legacy that inspires other believers—the ones we will cheer on when we join the crowd of witnesses. Reflection question: How does knowing that you have a crowd of witnesses impact your Christian race? Discuss Today's Devo in Harvest Discipleship! — The audio production of the podcast "Greg Laurie: Daily Devotions" utilizes Generative AI technology. This allows us to deliver consistent, high-quality content while preserving Harvest's mission to "know God and make Him known." All devotional content is written and owned by Pastor Greg Laurie. Listen to the Greg Laurie Podcast Become a Harvest PartnerSupport the show: https://harvest.org/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In true crime cases, immunity deals are common. But the Kouri Richins murder trial has a problem that goes beyond any single witness — the prosecution's entire drug supply chain is made up of people who traded their testimony for their freedom.Carmen Lauber, the housekeeper at the center of the case, had her story expand to include fentanyl after detectives told her she was facing serious federal charges. Robert Crozier, the alleged drug supplier, told investigators he sold fentanyl — then told a different story on the stand. A detective's recorded statements, played for the jury by the defense, raised questions about whether investigators shaped the testimony they needed.True Crime Today examines what happens when a murder case depends on witnesses whose motivations are anything but clean. Tony Brueski sits down with Eric Faddis — a former prosecutor who now defends the accused — to break down how immunity deals actually function, what the Richins prosecution is facing in closing arguments, and whether a jury can trust a drug chain where every link had something to gain.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichins #EricRichins #ImmunityWitness #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #FentanylPoisoning #CriminalJustice #TrueCrimePodcast #WitnessTestimony

In the Kouri Richins murder trial, the prosecution's drug supply chain runs through two witnesses — and both of them have immunity deals. Both of their stories shifted. One recanted on the stand. The other changed her account of what drug she bought after federal charges appeared on the horizon.It's the kind of evidentiary situation that keeps defense attorneys up at night — and gives them ammunition in closing arguments.On Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski sits down with Eric Faddis — defense attorney and former felony prosecutor — to dissect the structural problem at the heart of the prosecution's case. Not just the credibility of each individual witness, but the combined weight of two compromised testimonies holding up a first-degree murder charge.Eric breaks down what an immunity deal actually requires, where witness preparation ends and improper influence begins, and what a defense attorney does in front of a jury when the prosecution's own detective was caught on tape saying things that don't help the state's case.This is a conversation about how the justice system actually works — and where it can go sideways.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#HiddenKillers #KouriRichins #EricRichins #ImmunityWitness #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #FentanylMurder #CriminalDefense #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeSystem

The evidentiary phase of the Kouri Richins murder trial is over. The defense rested Thursday without calling a single witness — and Kouri Richins used her only moment to address the court to confirm she would not be testifying.This episode covers the full story of Day 13: Detective Jeff O'Driscoll's final cross-examination, the directed verdict motion, and the extraordinary legal moment where the defense was warned that one line of questioning would blow open previously suppressed evidence against their own client. The judge called it high-stakes poker. The defense folded.Then we examine the question underneath all of it. What really happened in that hour-long recess? The legal strategy argument is real — but there's a human story here that deserves the same scrutiny. When a defendant has spent years managing a carefully constructed image and a courtroom spends three weeks dismantling it in public, the decision to stop the bleeding isn't always purely tactical. We break down the pattern, what it looks like in cases like this one, and what it may tell us about where Kouri Richins' head was on Thursday afternoon.We also go somewhere this coverage rarely goes — the attorneys. Three weeks of a high-profile, live-streamed trial takes a toll on everyone sitting at that defense table. We talk about what sustained public pressure does to people who also have professional identities and reputations on the line.Closing arguments Monday. Deliberations to follow. This one is almost done.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #DefenseRests #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #UtahMurderTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #ClosingArguments #MurderTrial

Peter's keys, the Rosary and Marian apparitions, Jehovah's Witnesses and more on Open Line Friday with Colin Donovan.

August 3, 1980. AuSable Township, Michigan. 20-year old Cherita Thomas borrows her friend's car in order to pick up her daughter from a babysitter, but the vehicle breaks down before she arrives. Witnesses see Cherita climbing into a blue pick-up truck driven by a white male, but she is never heard from again. Jimmie Allen Nelson, the babysitter's brother-in-law, is suspected of harming Cherita in a racially motivated hate crime, and even though Cherita's body is not found, Nelson is charged and convicted of her murder three decades later. However, Nelson's conviction is overturned when newly discovered evidence surfaces which reportedly implicates another suspect, so the murder charge against him is dismissed in 2014. Was Jimmie Allen Nelson actually responsible for Cherita Thomas' disappearance? If not, then what actually happened to her? This week's episode of “The Path Went Chilly” chronicles a convoluted missing persons case which has had a number of surprising twists and turns over the past 40 years.Support the Show: Patreon.com/julesandashleyPatreon.com/thetrailwentcoldAdditional Reading:http://charleyproject.org/case/cherita-janice-thomashttp://www.iosconews.com/news/article_165d5202-3706-5394-8298-92de7a5a7925.htmlhttps://www.macombdaily.com/news/nation-world-news/michigan-court-strikes-murder-conviction-in-case/article_d03714a2-e37b-5665-8ca4-00f7e736789c.htmlhttps://abc7news.com/archive/7771114/http://www.michbar.org/file/opinions/appeals/2012/082312/52533.pdfhttp://www.michbar.org/file/opinions/appeals/2014/022514/56526.pdfhttps://law.justia.com/cases/michigan/court-of-appeals-unpublished/2008/20081223-c271768-41-271768-opn.htmlhttps://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/casedetail.aspx?caseid=4394“True Police Stories of the Strange & Unexplained” by Ingrid P. Dean

Everyone around Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow saw something. The question is why they didn't act.This is Part 4 of "The Chosen Ones" — our deep dive into the psychology of spiritual abuse and religious trauma through the Daybell case. Today we examine the inner circle: the people who participated, enabled, or stayed silent while four people died.We cover:ALEX COX — Lori's brother, who shot Charles Vallow, and who investigators believe killed Tylee and JJ. According to testimony, Alex "100% believed" what Chad Daybell taught. He told his wife to shoot him if he ever became a zombie.MELANIE GIBB — Lori's best friend, the last person to see JJ alive. She participated in castings and heard Chad Daybell's zombie doctrine — but didn't realize she was being used as an alibi until police called.ZULEMA PASTENES — Who married Alex two weeks before he died. She testified about castings, the failed attempt on Tammy, and Lori's rage when it didn't work.CHAD DAYBELL'S CHILDREN — Who testified at their father's murder trial. For the defense.THE WIDER COMMUNITY — The conference circuit, the AVOW network, the families who watched transformations and didn't intervene.This episode is essential context for understanding how Chad Daybell's belief system sustained itself — and why it took so long to collapse.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#ChadDaybell #DaybellCase #AlexCox #MelanieGibb #ZulemaPastenes #LoriVallow #CultComplicity #SpiritualAbuse #ReligiousTrauma #Enablers

"When the light comes to a person they are brought to a place of decision."—Dr. Chris CodyExperience life-changing ministry from God's Word — powerful Bible teaching, faith-filled preaching, and a fresh move of the Holy Spirit to strengthen your walk with Christ. We're so glad you've joined our online church family today!

In April 1977, four witnesses in a quiet Massachusetts suburb encountered something over 26 hours that has never been identified. Every explanation anyone has offered since has a problem with it. So what exactly did they see on those dark Dover roads that night?IN THIS EPISODE: In April 1962, identical twin sisters died in separate wards of a North Carolina psychiatric hospital on the same night, at the same hour, with no medical cause that autopsies, state investigators, or the FBI could identify. The death certificates still read "ill-defined and unknown" — and sixty years of research hasn't changed that. (The Eller Twins | Did They Will Themselves To Die?) *** In October 1988, a poodle fell from a thirteenth-floor balcony in Buenos Aires, and what happened in the minutes that followed turned an ordinary street corner into one of the strangest documented sequences in Argentine history. Every October, the story circulates again — and nobody who hears it ever quite forgets it. (Death By Poodle | A Freak Chain Reaction) *** In April 1977, four witnesses in a quiet Massachusetts suburb encountered something over 26 hours that has never been identified. Every explanation anyone has offered since has a problem with it. So what exactly did they see on those dark Dover roads that night? (The Dover Demon | 3 Witnesses, 2 Nights, No Explanation)CHAPTERS & TIME STAMPS (All Times Approximate)…00:00:00.000 = The Foreboding00:01:39.252 = Show Open00:03:33.161 = The Dover Demon | 3 Witnesses, 2 Nights, No Explanation00:15:11.429 = The Eller Twins | Did They Will Themselves To Die? (Part 1) ***00:31:13.701 = The Eller Twins | Did They Will Themselves To Die? (Part 2) ***00:55:58.425 = Death By Poodle | A Freak Chain Reaction ***01:02:18.277 = Show Close*** = Begins immediately after inserted ad breakHELPFUL LINKS & RESOURCES…https://WeirdDarkness.com/MUSIC = Songs and Videos by our Weird Darkness punk band, #DarkWeirdnesshttps://WeirdDarkness.com/STORE = Tees, Mugs, Socks, Hoodies, Totes, Hats, Kidswear & Morehttps://WeirdDarkness.com/HOPE = Hope For Depression or Thoughts of Self-Harmhttps://WeirdDarkness.com/NEWSLETTER = In-Depth Articles, Memes, Weird DarkNEWS, Videos & Morehttps://WeirdDarkness.com/AUDIOBOOKS = FREE Audiobooks Narrated By Darren Marlar PRINT VERSION to READ or SHARE:The Dover Demon | 3 Witnesses, 2 Nights, No Explanation: https://weirddarkness.com/dover-demon/The Eller Twins | Did They Will Themselves To Die?: https://weirddarkness.com/eller-twins/Death By Poodle | A Freak Chain Reaction: https://weirddarkness.com/deathbypoodle/=====(Over time links may become invalid, disappear, or have different content. I always make sure to give authors credit for the material I use whenever possible. If I somehow overlooked doing so for a story, or if a credit is incorrect, please let me know and I will rectify it in these show notes immediately. Some links included above may benefit me financially through qualifying purchases.)= = = = ="I have come into the world as a light, so that no one who believes in me should stay in darkness." — John 12:46= = = = =WeirdDarkness® is a registered trademark. Copyright ©2026, Weird Darkness.=====Originally aired: March 10, 2026EPISODE PAGE (includes sources): https://weirddarkness.com/DoverDemonABOUT WEIRD DARKNESS: #WeirdDarkness is a true crime and paranormal podcast narrated by professional award-winning voice actor, Darren Marlar. Seven days per week, Weird Darkness focuses on all things strange and macabre such as haunted locations, unsolved mysteries, true ghost stories, supernatural manifestations, urban legends, unsolved or cold cases, conspiracy theories, and more. Weird Darkness has been named one of the “20 Best Storytellers in Podcasting” by Podcast Business Journal. Listeners have described the show as a blend of “Coast to Coast AM”, “The Twilight Zone”, “Unsolved Mysteries”, and “In Search Of”.DISCLAIMER: Stories and content in Weird Darkness can be disturbing for some listeners and intended for mature audiences only. Parental discretion is strongly advised.

The courtroom evidence in the Kouri Richins trial is one thing. What the jury is actually absorbing is another. Bob Motta and Robin Dreeke break down the specific moments and pieces of testimony that are going to follow those twelve jurors into deliberations — and why some of it is going to be nearly impossible to set aside.Two texts are at the center of this discussion. One Kouri sent to her boyfriend roughly two weeks before Eric died: "If he could just go away and you could just be here." One she sent to her friend Chelsea Barney after suspicions arose: "If I die, Eric did it." This panel examines what those texts do to a jury psychologically — and whether any amount of context argument can neutralize them.Also on the table: the retreat journal Kouri wrote about herself in third person, describing a marriage that exhausted her and a life that kept falling apart. The defense put the whole document in front of the jury. What were they hoping it would do — and did it? Plus the Celebration of Life the night after Eric died, where witnesses described the scene as completely normal, and Kouri reportedly tried to open his safe. What does "normal" behavior actually tell a jury in a case like this?Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty to all charges.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTexts #UtahMurderTrial #FentanylMurder #TrueCrime2026 #HiddenKillers #KouriRichinsJury #MurderTrial2026

On today's episode, we discuss the mystery of the Trinity and how Christians have tried to understand “the Father is God, the Son is God, the Spirit is God, and there is only one God.” James, Pastor Jimmy, Pastor Chris, and Glenn trace how early church debates—from the Montanists to Arius and the Council of Nicaea—wrestled with whether Jesus is eternally God or a created being. They explain key questions around Jesus' nature (fully God, fully man, or something in between), how the term “Trinity” emerged historically, and why Jehovah's Witnesses today echo some Arian ideas. The conversation also explores how much of this is philosophical framing versus lived discipleship, noting that faithful prayer, obedience, and service often look similar across traditions. Glenn shares his personal struggle over whether to pray to the Father, Jesus, or the Holy Spirit, and how he's come to address all three while grounding his prayers in the Lord's Prayer. Throughout, the group keeps things accessible with analogies, humor, and an emphasis that believers can debate the mechanics of the Trinity without breaking fellowship or losing sight of following Christ. Don't miss it!

Renue Healthcare https://Renue.Healthcare/ToddYour journey to a better life starts at Renue Healthcare. Visit https://Renue.Healthcare/Todd Bulwark Capital https://KnowYourRiskPodcast.comBe confident in your portfolio with Bulwark! Schedule your free Know Your Risk Portfolio review. Go to KnowYourRiskPodcast.com today. Bonefrog https://BonefrogCoffee.com/ToddGet the new limited release, The Sisterhood, created to honor the extraordinary women behind the heroes. Use code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase and 15% on subscriptions.LISTEN and SUBSCRIBE at:The Todd Herman Show - Podcast - Apple PodcastsThe Todd Herman Show | Podcast on SpotifyWATCH and SUBSCRIBE at: Todd Herman - The Todd Herman Show - YouTubeIf you can't practice tough love, you don't really love. Let's practice tough love and examine why Mike Pence, and establishment Republicans like this who I am calling “Trump 2.0”.Episode Links:Mike Pence loves him some war with Iran BREAKING: Senate Leader John Thune confirms HE'S FORCING A VOTE on the SAVE America Act, he will put Democrats ON THE RECORD opposing the 85-15 issue The Republican Party is protecting Ilhan Omar from accountability. Rep Nancy Mace “I tried to subpoena her immigration records, her brother husband's immigration records, and IT WAS REPUBLICANS that killed my motion” It's a Uniparty. One Big Club.URGENT: Big Pharma wins again; Dr. Vinay Prasad is out as the FDA's chief medical's officer. Not coincidentally, stocks of drug companies are soaring.TRUMP: “You gotta lighten up on this, they might have come into our country illegally but they're good people and they're cheap workers. They're working now on farms, in luncheonettes and hotels. We're just focused on getting the murderers out.” So much for mass deportations.Trump: We'll bring in any Iranian refugees that aid the U.S Military! Trump complained about the Afghan INVADERS and now is doing the same thing. This is how we got invaded with people from the Middle East.HOMELAND: Trump's new pick for Secretary of Homeland recently voted to ALLOW "Refugee" Welfare Programs to continue to be funded at Biden-era levels. Mullin also comforted & HUGGED the cop who shot Ashli Babbitt:  "He was distraught. I gave him a hug & said 'you did what you had to do.'" He also claimed Republican Senators were too "emotional" over Jan 6 to confirm Trump's pick Ed Martin for DC Prosecutor.Rep. Brian Mast: “Let's talk about Rep. Mace's resolution. Victims deserve protection. Witnesses deserve confidentiality. I voted to ensure survivors aren't forced to deal with the fallout of the public release of their sensitive information. I voted to send the resolution to the Ethics Committee so that it can be amended to adequately protect those who've done the brave thing and come forward.”Rep Anna Paulina Luna comes out and says it. She says the American People hate Congress for how corrupt they are. After both parties blocked disclosing slush funds using tax dollars to pay off their sexual assault charges, she loses it. “That's why the American people hate us”

This episode documents the life of Hannah, a young woman who escaped the controlling environment of the Jehovah's Witnesses and the shadow of an abusive stepfather. The narrative explores her "origin story," detailing a childhood defined by social isolation within the faith and a domestic life spent walking on eggshells to avoid her stepfather's volatile temper. A significant turning point occurs when Hannah finds intellectual liberation through science fiction, using themes from Star Trek to recognize the systemic manipulation and "ruse" of her own religious community. Ultimately, this episode serves as a testament to personal resilience, tracing Hannah's journey from a state of "survival mode" and mental health struggles to a new life built on self-education, authentic relationships, and the simple, radical pursuit of kindness. Support the show and get bonuses as well by donating to the cause on our Patreon page, Patreon.com/shunned Are you struggling in some area of life? Feeling stuck? Need an accountability partner or some encouragement? Need to talk to someone that understands cult life? Reach out and let's talk. I have affordable programs to help as a certified life coach with a focus on cult recovery. Click HERE for more information. Want more resources? Go to my other website exjwHelp.com Leave us a review on iTunes Find shunned podcast on Youtube, including new VIDcasts here. Follow us on Twitter and Instagram. You can listen to the Shunned Podcast Spotify playlist here for all of the songs chosen by guests of the show. This podcast was made possible by my original podcast This JW Life. You can find it on any podcast app. It is a 9 part series about life as Jehovah's Witnesses designed to help you understand how it worked in one comprehensive story and to help you process your own if you came from that environment. Read my FREE online book, based on This JW Life, called Becoming Jehovah, in both English and Spanish by clicking here An ExJW podcast and ExJW YouTube Channel

Most Jehovah's Witnesses that leave the 'organization' are left with a complex set of emotional scars, the chief emotion being latent anger. Anger for lost time, potential, poor treatment, abuse and more. How can ex-JW move from open wound to calloused scar? How do you deal with the anger? Does it ever go away?TWITTER: @exjwpodcastINSTAGRAM: survivingparadisepodcast

Both had deals with prosecutors. Both were supposed to build the drug chain that ends with fentanyl in Eric Richins' Moscow mule. And they directly contradicted each other on the most critical question: was it fentanyl, or was it oxycodone?Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down exactly what happens to a prosecution when its two key immunity witnesses tell different stories about the same transaction — and why this isn't just a credibility problem. It is a chain-of-custody problem for the drug at the foundation of the entire case.Coffindaffer explains how FBI investigators typically handle witness contradiction of this magnitude, what options prosecutors have to shore up a chain that's already been undermined from inside their own courtroom, and how juries process the reality that both witnesses on the stand received deals that reduced their personal liability before agreeing to testify.She also breaks down Josh Grossman's testimony — Kouri's alleged boyfriend, visibly emotional at the stand, head in hands as intimate text messages were read aloud, including one asking whether he would marry her if she were divorced right now, sent less than a month before Eric's death. Coffindaffer explains what FBI investigators watch for in a witness's emotional performance — and what that testimony does for the prosecution's narrative of motive.She also gives her read on the back-to-back mistrial motions: deliberate appellate strategy, or genuine concern about what is still coming?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #UtahMurderTrial #TrueCrimeTrial #MurderTrial2026 #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PoisoningCase

Episode 102 In the conclusion of our coverage of the Seton Hall University dorm fire, we return to January of 2000, when flames broke out inside Boland Hall, trapping students behind smoke-filled corridors and turning a college residence hall into the scene of one of the most devastating campus fires in recent memory. In this episode, we walk through the fire investigation itself—how investigators began piecing together what happened that night and why, despite the lack of clear physical evidence, they quickly suspected the fire had been intentionally set. We examine the subtle clues that pointed investigators toward arson, from burn patterns and witness accounts to inconsistencies in the early explanations coming from students who had been in the building that night. But the investigation quickly ran into a wall. Witnesses began clamming up, stories changed, and the tight-knit social circles inside the dorm made it difficult for investigators to get reliable information about what had really happened in the lounge where the fire began. As the case stalled, law enforcement took increasingly aggressive steps to move the investigation forward, including compelling testimony through a grand jury in an effort to break through the silence. Eventually, an unexpected development helped investigators finally connect the dots: the involvement of a notorious mafia hitman who had information that helped push the investigation toward indictments. Those indictments would ultimately reach beyond the two students accused of setting the fire. Prosecutors also charged members of one suspect's family with witness tampering, alleging attempts to interfere with the investigation as authorities worked to determine who was responsible for the fire that night. In the final chapter of this story, we examine how the investigation unfolded, how the case was built despite limited physical evidence, and how the legal consequences spread far beyond the two young men accused of starting the fire. Purchase the book After The Fire that we sourced for this episode here: https://a.co/d/08OUjIBm or watch the documentary on Tubi. The Crime to Burn Patreon - The Cult of Steve - is LIVE NOW! Go join and get all the unhinged you can handle. Click here to be sanctified.  Inner Sanctum Acknowledgments: Eternal gratitude to our Inner Sanctum patrons, Melanie Curtis, Jenny Mercer and Laura Pisciotta, for helping us bring light to the stories others would rather leave in the ashes. Listener discretion is advised. Background music by Not Notoriously Coordinated  Get your Crime to Burn Merch! https://crimetoburn.myspreadshop.com Please follow us on Instagram, X, Facebook, TikTok and Youtube for the latest news on this case. You can email us at crimetoburn@gmail.com We welcome any constructive feedback and would greatly appreciate a 5 star rating and review.  If you need a way to keep your canine contained, you can also support the show by purchasing a Pawious wireless dog fence using our affiliate link and use the code "crimetoburn" at checkout to receive 10% off. Pawious, because our dog Winston needed a radius, not a rap sheet.  SOURCES: After the Fire: A True Story of Friendship and Survival (Robin Gaby Fisher) • Back Bay Books / Little, Brown and Company • 2008 (paperback ed. 2010) After the Fire: A True Story of Heroes & Cowards (dir. Guido Verweyen) • Documentary • 2013 • Featuring Shawn Simons and Alvaro Llanos “Suits filed in Seton Hall dorm fire” • Arizona Daily Sun • Jan 19, 2002 https://azdailysun.com/suits-filed-in-seton-hall-dorm-fire/article_46018ce6-ff78-5daa-b309-879a91f2501e.html “Experts for defense fault Seton Hall in fatal dorm fire” • Chicago Tribune • Aug 18, 2006 (updated Aug 21, 2021) https://www.chicagotribune.com/2006/08/18/experts-for-defense-fault-seton-hall-in-fatal-dorm-fire/ “University community reflects 25 years after the Boland Hall fire” (Thomas Canela) • The Setonian • Feb 27, 2025 https://www.thesetonian.com/article/2025/02/25-years-after-boland-fire “Parole denied for 2 who set Seton Hall dorm fire that killed 3 students in 2000” (David Porter, AP) • tucson.com • Apr 1, 2008 https://tucson.com/news/national/article_ddddebb6-d3b8-554c-85fb-0aa0e6cf0c12.html “After the fire: Seton Hall students tell story” (Greg Watry) • New Jersey Herald • Apr 22, 2015 (updated Apr 25, 2015) https://www.njherald.com/story/news/2015/04/23/after-fire-seton-hall-students/4043405007/ “Seton Hall Arsonists Get 5 Years” • CBS News • Jan 26, 2007 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/seton-hall-arsonists-get-5-years/ “Three Die in Dormitory Fire at Seton Hall University” (John J. Goldman) • Los Angeles Times • Jan 20, 2000 https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-jan-20-mn-55831-story.html “Seton Hall Dorm Arsonist Out on Parole” (Tamara Vostok) • NBC Philadelphia • May 6, 2009 https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/seton-hall-dorm-arsonist/1881069/ “2 Students Charged with Setting Fatal Dorm Fire 3 Years Ago at Seton Hall U.” (Jeffrey R. Young) • The Chronicle of Higher Education • Jun 13, 2003 https://www.chronicle.com/article/2-students-charged-with-setting-fatal-dorm-fire-3-years-ago-at-seton-hall-u/ “Police stage alcohol raid in dorm-fire investigation” • Orlando Sentinel • Feb 21, 2000 (updated Oct 27, 2018) https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2000/02/21/police-stage-alcohol-raid-in-dorm-fire-investigation/ “Seton Hall dorm arsonist gets parole” (Bryan T. Murray / The Star-Ledger) • nj.com • Mar 25, 2009 https://www.nj.com/news/2009/03/seton_hall_dorm_arsonist_gets.html “Students charged years after dorm fire” • Tampa Bay Times • Jun 13, 2003 (updated Sept 1, 2005) https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2003/06/13/students-charged-years-after-dorm-fire/ “Murder Charges In Deadly Dorm Fire” (Dan Collins) • CBS News • Jun 13, 2003 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/murder-charges-in-deadly-dorm-fire/ “Students go on trial for killer dorm fire” (Emanuella Grinberg / Court TV) • CNN • Nov 14, 2006 https://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/11/14/student.arson/ “Grand Jury Misconduct Alleged in Seton Hall Dorm Fire Prosecution” • law.com • May 23, 2005 https://www.law.com/article/almID/900005429568/?slreturn=20260222213434 “3 Seton Hall Funerals Held” • CBS News • Jan 19, 2000 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/3-seton-hall-funerals-held/

Luis and Angelo examine the Rendlesham Forest incident of 1980, often referred to as the “Roswell of the United Kingdom.”  Over several nights near two U.S. Air Force bases in England, military personnel reported encountering a mysterious craft deep in the forest.  Witnesses described strange lights moving through the trees, a glowing triangular object hovering several feet above the ground, and even beams of light being fired toward the base.  One airman claimed he touched the craft and later wrote down a series of binary code messages that allegedly translated into a message from the future.  The guys break down the timeline, the witnesses, and the competing theories behind one of the strangest and most credible UFO incidents in modern history 

This is our Week in Review of the Kouri Richins murder trial—and we're breaking down testimony that's raising more questions than answers.Five days in, the prosecution's drug-chain theory is showing cracks. Carmen Lauber—the housekeeper who claims she bought fentanyl for Kouri four times—was using methamphetamine during the relevant period and received immunity from three jurisdictions before testifying. Her supplier Robert Crozier originally told detectives he sold fentanyl. On the stand, he said it was oxycodone and that he was "detoxing and out of it" when he gave his original statement.Two key witnesses. Two different drugs. That's a problem the prosecution has to solve.Former FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke joins us to assess what's happening in that courtroom. With 21 years at the Bureau including time running the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Dreeke built his career reading people under pressure. He examines Lauber's credibility wounds, Crozier's contradictions, and Kouri's sustained composure through five days of testimony. When behavioral evidence—the searches, the insurance positioning, the coded language—clashes with missing physical evidence, which matters more to a jury?Defense attorney Bob Motta breaks down the most significant fact yet: four years after Eric died with fentanyl in his system, the state's own former Chief Medical Examiner still lists manner of death as "undetermined." Not homicide.The prosecution played a recording of Kouri calling the medical examiner's office asking detailed questions about what killed Eric. Bob analyzes whether that's consciousness of guilt or exactly what a grieving widow would do. He also identifies the Seroquel found in Eric's system that neither side is focusing on—and what has to happen for the prosecution to make this case viable.Over twenty witnesses. Still no proof of how fentanyl got into Eric or that Kouri administered it.Kouri Richins is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichinsLive #RichinsTrialWeekInReview #CarmenLauber #RobinDreeke #BobMotta #EricRichins #FentanylMurderTrial #WitnessCredibility #UtahCourt #HiddenKillersLive

The book of Acts is the narrative of the work of the Spirit among the first century believers when the Kingdom of God expanded from one ethnic group to many. This moment in Church History established the pattern for how God equips and empowers His people to be His witnesses in such a way that engages the culture for its redemption and restoration. 

Deep in the woods of Cannock Chase in Staffordshire, England, one of the most unsettling paranormal mysteries in the world has been unfolding for decades.Police have been called into the forest again and again after reports of a young girl wandering alone in the woods at night. Witnesses consistently describe the same figure: a little girl with dark hair and completely black eyes. But when officers arrive and search the area… they find nothing.Cannock Chase has become infamous for a wide range of strange sightings. Visitors and investigators have reported encounters with Black Eyed Children, shadowy figures moving between the trees, and unexplained paranormal activity throughout the forest. In some cases, drivers claim a child suddenly stepped into the road, forcing them to slam on their brakes — only for the figure to vanish moments later.Over the years, there have even been search operations involving police, dogs, and helicopters after distressed callers reported a child lost in the woods. Each time, authorities found no missing person and no physical evidence to explain the sightings.So what is really happening in Cannock Chase?Watch this episode on Youtube! Click HEREJoin the Membership on Youtube! Click HEREWant this episode EARLY & AD FREE? Join the PATREONBusiness Inquires | averyannross@gmail.comMake sure you are following along for all the latest!INSTAGRAMFACEBOOKTIKTOK 

On the night of March 13, 1997, something extraordinary happened in the skies over Phoenix—and thousands of people saw it.In this episode of Truth Be Told Paranormal, Tony Sweet dives into one of the most famous and controversial UFO sightings in American history: Phoenix Lights.Witnesses across Arizona—and even parts of Nevada—reported a massive V-shaped formation of silent lights slowly gliding across the sky. Some described a craft the size of several football fields. Pilots, police officers, and everyday citizens all reported seeing the same thing. Even then-Governor Fife Symington would later admit he witnessed something he couldn't explain.Was it a top-secret military exercise? Experimental aircraft? Atmospheric flares? Or was it something far more mysterious?Tony explores the timeline of the sightings, the eyewitness testimony, government explanations, and the theories that continue to surround the event nearly three decades later. If you were in Arizona that night, we want to hear from you—did you see the Phoenix Lights?Because thousands saw something… and to this day, no one can fully explain what it was.#TruthBeTold #PhoenixLights #UFO #UFOsighting #UAP #ArizonaMystery #AlienEncounters #UFOHistory #UnsolvedMysteries #ParanormalPodcast #ClubParanormal #TonySweet #Extraterrestrial #MassUFOsighting #DidYouSeeIt

“What kind of God do we serve if grace can't overflow?” Father Lawrence unpacks icons, theosis as healing, and why generosity beats gatekeeping.We explore why icons shape the heart, how salvation heals more than it acquits, and why liturgy needs clarity, reverence, and real preaching. We talk about gracious ecumenism, creativity born from humility, and fiction that nourishes Christian hope.• icons as aids to healthy love and memory• salvation as healing of the heart, not only pardon• liturgical renewal and frequent communion• sermons placed to meet the Gospel• graciousness toward non-Orthodox and grace beyond boundaries• tradition and the Holy Spirit held together• humility, craft, and joy as signs of true creativity• fiction shaping imagination, grief, and hopeWhat if salvation is not a verdict to file away, but a lifelong healing of the heart? That's the thread we pull through this conversation with Father Lawrence as we explore icons, liturgy, theosis, and the generous reach of God's grace. Using the simple image of a grandmother's photo wall, we unpack why icons matter: not as magic, but as love's memory, training our hearts to recognize Christ and his saints in daily life.From there we widen the lens. Salvation, in the New Testament sense, is rescue and restoration—God mending what sin has bent. Father Lawrence speaks pastorally about how forgiveness without transformation leaves homes fractured, and why theosis means becoming who God made us to be through real change of mind and desire. That vision drives us back into the church's worship: preaching that truly follows the Gospel, frequent Communion received with reverence, and language that people can understand. Liturgy is not background noise; it is the clinic where the Physician of souls meets us.We also face a charged question with clear eyes: does grace exist outside Orthodoxy? Father Lawrence answers with confidence and humility—God is not boxed by our boundaries. We honor the church as the fullness of faith while recognizing Christ's work in sincere believers elsewhere, refusing the false choice between tradition and the Holy Spirit. Finally, we turn to creativity and culture. Humility and craft open the door for art that serves truth, while good fiction—think Tolkien and Lewis—can carry hope through grief and awaken courage for the road ahead.If this conversation sparked insight or challenged your assumptions, share it with a friend, subscribe for more thoughtful episodes, and leave a review to help others find the show.Can Orthodoxy hold tradition and the Holy Spirit together? Father Lawrence says yes—and shows how liturgy, art, and fiction shape the heart. Stream the episode and weigh in: what nourishes your faith the most?Questions about Orthodoxy? Please check out our friends at Ghost of Byzantium Discord server: https://discord.gg/JDJDQw6tdhPlease prayerfully consider supporting Cloud of Witnesses: https://www.patreon.com/c/CloudofWitnessesFind Cloud of Witnesses on Instagram, X.com, Facebook, and TikTok.Please leave a comment with your thoughts!

The Kouri Richins trial brings Marie Bramwell, Attorney & Becky Lloyd, C&E Stone Masonry, to the stand in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

Marie Bramwell, Attorney & Becky Lloyd, C&E Stone Masonry, take center stage in the Kouri Richins trial.Kouri Richins stands accused of poisoning her husband Eric Richins with a lethal dose of fentanyl in March 2022—allegedly to collect on a $1.9 million life insurance policy she secretly increased just weeks before his death. What prosecutors describe as a calculated murder-for-profit scheme, the defense calls a tragic accident involving a man who, they claim, had a hidden drug problem.This is gavel-to-gavel coverage of one of the most closely watched trials in Utah history. A children's book author. A grieving widow who wrote about "heaven" for kids while allegedly researching untraceable poisons. A husband who may have been killed in his own bed.Hidden Killers brings you complete trial coverage with expert analysis—no sensationalism, just the facts as they unfold.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #UtahTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #FentanylPoisoning #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeCommunity #Justice

Episode 2.88[Note: We accidentally reference Jehovah's Witness at the beginning, but this episode covers Christian Science.]In this episode, Michael and Zach examine Christian Science using the same framework applied in previous discussions on Mormonism and Jehovah's Witnesses. The question is not about sincerity, charitable work, or moral intent. The question is theological: Does Christian Science fall within historic, creedal Christianity—or does it depart from it at a foundational level?The discussion begins with the origins of the movement under Mary Baker Eddy in the late nineteenth century. Eddy's book Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures functions alongside the Bible as the interpretive authority of the movement, providing the metaphysical framework through which Scripture is understood.From there, the episode explores the system's central philosophical claim: reality is purely spiritual. God is defined as infinite Mind, while matter, disease, evil, and even death are ultimately illusions of mistaken perception. This metaphysical idealism reshapes every major Christian doctrine.We examine how Christian Science redefines key theological categories—including God, Christ, sin, atonement, creation, resurrection, and salvation. Jesus is treated not as God incarnate but as the supreme “Way-shower,” demonstrating humanity's true spiritual nature. Sin is understood as a false belief rather than a moral rupture with God, and salvation becomes an awakening to spiritual truth rather than redemption from real guilt. The resurrection is likewise interpreted spiritually rather than bodily.Along the way, we briefly compare Christian Science with non-dual philosophical traditions found in certain strands of Hinduism and Buddhism. While the systems are not identical, they share a common rejection of material reality that sharply contrasts with historic Christianity's affirmation of real creation, the incarnation of Christ, and the bodily resurrection.The episode concludes that Christian Science differs from Christianity not merely in practice but in metaphysics. By redefining the nature of reality itself, the movement departs from the doctrinal framework that has historically defined the Christian faith.Find our videocast here: https://youtu.be/Zj3BZM6RjM0Merch here: https://take-2-podcast.printify.me/Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):⁠https://uppbeat.io/t/reakt-music/deep-stone⁠License code: 2QZOZ2YHZ5UTE7C8Find more Take 2 Theology content at http://www.take2theology.com

House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Indian and Insular Affairs Legislative Hearing on H.R. 2827, H.R. 6162 and H.R. 7065 Wednesday, March 4, 2026 | 10:15 AM On Wednesday, March 4, 2026, at 10:15 a.m., in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Indian and Insular Affairs will hold a legislative hearing on the following bills: H.R. 2827 (Rep. Cole), To provide for the equitable settlement of certain Indian land disputes regarding land in Illinois, and for other purposes. H.R. 6162 (Rep. Stansbury), “Albuquerque Indian School Act of 2025” H.R. 7065 (Rep. Langworthy), “Seneca Nation Law Enforcement Efficiency Act” Panel I (Members of Congress) The Honorable Tom Cole [H.R.2827] The Honorable Melanie A. Stansbury [H.R.6162] The Honorable Nicholas A. Langworthy [H.R.7065] Panel II (Administration Witnesses) Mr. Bryan Mercier [H.R.2827, H.R.6162, and H.R.7065] Director Bureau of Indian Affairs U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. Panel III (Outside Experts) The Hon. Douglas Lankford [H.R.2827] Chief Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Miami, Oklahoma The Hon. J. C. Seneca [H.R.7065] President Seneca Nation of Indians Irving, New York Ms. Monique Fragua [H.R.6162] (Minority Witness) President and CEO Indian Pueblo Cultural Center Albuquerque, New Mexico More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2026/03/02/house-subcommittee-on-indian-and-insular-affairs-sets-hearing-on-three-bills/

“ There are some who will never be saved without someone interceding for them. ” - Dr. Chris Cody

The prosecution's fentanyl supply chain just hit a major credibility problem in the Kouri Richins trial. Robert Crozier testified he only sold oxycodone to Carmen Lauber—not fentanyl—because "everybody was scared of fentanyl" at the time. That directly contradicts what Lauber told the jury. When your two drug-chain witnesses can't agree on what the drugs actually were, the entire theory starts to crumble.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke sit down with defense attorney Bob Motta to analyze the prosecution's mounting problems. Dr. Erik Christensen—the state's own former Chief Medical Examiner—admitted on the stand that Eric Richins' death certificate still lists manner of death as "undetermined." Not homicide. After four years of investigation, the man who performed the analysis can't definitively say this was murder.The jury heard a nine-minute recording of Kouri calling the medical examiner's office asking about fentanyl levels, how it might have been ingested, and the Seroquel found in Eric's system. The prosecution wants jurors to see consciousness of guilt. Bob Motta explains why the defense sees something entirely different—a grieving widow seeking answers about her husband's death.Motta analyzes the significance of the Midway property timeline, where Carmen Lauber claims she buried fentanyl in a fire pit during a window when the house sat vacant. He examines what the presence of "a lot" of Seroquel in Eric's blood might mean for the case. And he identifies exactly what the prosecution must accomplish in the remaining weeks to make their theory viable.No fentanyl has ever been found in the Richins home. The drug witnesses are contradicting each other. The medical examiner won't call it homicide. Is this case already in trouble?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #CarmenLauber #FentanylTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #UtahCourt #RobinDreeke #TonyBrueski

The defense in the Kouri Richins trial has 35 witnesses ready to testify. But after weeks of devastating cross-examination that exposed investigative failures, witness contradictions, and questions about whether this case was outcome-driven from the start—do they even need them all?Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke welcome defense attorney Bob Motta back to Hidden Killers Live for analysis of where this trial stands. The defense hasn't presented their case yet, but they've already accomplished something significant: establishing that critical forensic tests were never performed, that the prosecution's key witness changed her story after receiving immunity, and that a detective told Carmen Lauber "the goal is to convict Kouri for aggravated murder."Dr. Erik Christensen admitted under cross-examination that hair follicle testing could have determined whether Eric Richins was a long-term fentanyl user—and that those results would have factored into his manner-of-death determination. The test was never done. The copperware from the Moscow Mules was never tested. An empty hydrocodone bottle in Eric's nightstand was never analyzed.The toxicology showed no oxycodone in Eric's system—only fentanyl. The defense hasn't denied Kouri sought pills; attorney Kathy Nester said in opening that Kouri obtained oxycodone at Eric's request for chronic pain. If Carmen provided oxycodone but Eric died of fentanyl, where did the fatal dose come from?Robin Dreeke brings his FBI behavioral expertise to the discussion. Bob Motta breaks down whether reasonable doubt is already established or if the defense risks peaking too early. With 35 witnesses waiting and the prosecution still not finished, this trial could go in multiple directions.What do Nester, Lewis, and Ramos need to accomplish when it's finally their turn?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #BobMotta #HiddenKillersLive #DefenseCase #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #TonyBrueski #UtahMurderTrial #ReasonableDoubt

VLOG 2 of March 4, after US v. Live Nation 1st witnesses John Abbamondi of Barclays (says he was threatened by Rapino) and Helgerson of MN Wild (says threatened by Ticketmaster). Ticketmonster book coming. Inner City Press filed to unseal: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/27752194-unsealing-live-nation-in-live-nation-antitrust-trial-exhibits-withheld-and-testimony-unheard/

Five days of testimony in the Kouri Richins murder trial have produced a credibility war. The prosecution's star witness claims she bought fentanyl for Kouri four times. The defense has exposed her meth use, her immunity deals, and her supplier's reversal. Kouri has maintained composure through it all. Former FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke breaks down who's telling the truth — and how to know.Dreeke served 21 years with the Bureau, including as Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. Reading people in high-stakes environments was his specialty. He understands what behavioral signals indicate reliability despite credibility problems — and what signals indicate performance.Carmen Lauber is the prosecution's key witness. She testified she obtained fentanyl for Kouri multiple times before Eric Richins died. But she was using methamphetamine during the relevant period. She received immunity from Summit County, Salt Lake County, and the federal government. Her own supplier, Robert Crozier, originally told detectives he sold fentanyl — but testified Friday it was oxycodone, blaming his original statement on being "detoxing and out of it."The defense is hammering every inconsistency. The prosecution needs the jury to believe her anyway. Dreeke explains how to assess whether a witness like Lauber is telling the truth despite the baggage — versus constructing a narrative that serves her immunity deal.He also reads Kouri's behavior. Nearly four years of maintaining innocence through investigation, arrest, hearings, and now trial. Sustained composure through testimony describing how she allegedly murdered her husband. What does that level of performance require psychologically — and where do the cracks show?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #FBI #CarmenLauber #RobertCrozier #MurderTrial #BehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillers

Carmen Lauber is the prosecution's star witness in the Kouri Richins murder trial. She claims she bought fentanyl for Kouri four times before Eric Richins died. But she was using meth during that period. She got immunity from three jurisdictions. Her supplier now says he sold oxycodone, not fentanyl. She admitted confusion on the stand. The defense is hammering her credibility. The prosecution needs the jury to believe her anyway. Robin Dreeke explains how to read what's real.Dreeke spent 21 years with the FBI, including serving as Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. His job was detecting deception and assessing credibility in high-stakes situations. He understands how to separate a witness with baggage from a witness who's lying — and the behavioral indicators that reveal which is which.The Richins trial hinges on competing narratives. The prosecution says Kouri positioned insurance policies for years, escalated to sourcing drugs through her housekeeper, and poisoned her husband for money. The defense says no fentanyl was found in the home, the Moscow mule glasses went through the dishwasher, the pill bottle wasn't tested, and the key witness is saying whatever keeps her out of prison.Dreeke breaks down the specific behaviors that would indicate whether Lauber's core testimony is reliable despite the noise. He reads Robert Crozier's reversal — fentanyl in the original statement, oxycodone on the stand. He assesses Kouri's sustained composure through five days of people describing how she allegedly murdered her husband. And he addresses the moment when behavioral patterns become more persuasive than the physical evidence that doesn't exist.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #RobinDreeke #FBI #CarmenLauber #RobertCrozier #MurderTrial #BehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

The prosecution's case against Kouri Richins just hit a wall it built itself. On Day 5, Robert Crozier — the alleged original fentanyl source — testified under three immunity deals that he sold Carmen Lauber oxycodone, not fentanyl, and had no fentanyl connection in early 2022. He pointed out errors in his own affidavit, called the language inaccurate, and said his jail interview with detectives felt like them telling him what he'd done rather than asking.This came hours after Carmen Lauber's second day of cross-examination, where defense attorney Wendy Lewis systematically dismantled her credibility. Lauber admitted her story shifted from three drug purchases to four, that detectives explained events to her during interviews, and that Kouri Richins never asked her for fentanyl. She confirmed Kouri asked for "Michael Jackson stuff" — propofol — an entirely different substance.Anna Isbell testified she overheard Kouri mention the "Michael Jackson drug" and assumed it was a muscle relaxer. The defense revealed texts showing a detective threatened Isbell with a warrant and a catch pole for her dog to force cooperation. Additional testimony covered cell phone data extraction from four devices and an undercover narcotics officer whose testimony required a camera blackout.Judge Mrazik denied a mistrial motion filed during the week and sent jurors home after five days that gave the prosecution the science but handed the defense serious ammunition on the question of how fentanyl allegedly reached Kouri Richins. All individuals discussed are presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #RichinsTrial #HiddenKillers #CarmenLauber #RobertCrozier #EricRichins #TrueCrime #FentanylCase #SummitCounty #MurderTrial

Jehovah's Witnesses claimed to live life based on principles and a handful of Biblical laws... and anything the Governing Body demands of them. They then actively look for 'loopholes' that will make their lives easier. Consider why, as well as some real world examples. Isn't Jehovah watching?TWITTER: @exjwpodcastINSTAGRAM: survivingparadisepodcast

Liza Mundy details how Heidi August witnesses the 1969 Libyan coup and burns out her station, while describing the CIA's restrictive policies forbidding marriage and children for female officers. 2.GAR

In the early 1990s, a strange and controversial excavation project began in the small Bulgarian village of Tsarichina, just northwest of Sofia. What came to be known as the Tsarichina Hole quickly became one of the most mysterious and unsettling events in Eastern Europe's modern paranormal history. The Bulgarian military, without explanation, cordoned off the area and began digging a massive shaft that reportedly stretched over 100 feet deep. Rumors spread rapidly that the military was searching for lost treasure, alien artifacts, or even the remains of an ancient non-human entity. Witnesses claimed to have seen unusual lights, heard unsettling sounds, and felt an oppressive energy around the site. When the project was suddenly abandoned in 1992 without official explanation, locals and researchers alike were left to speculate on what had really been uncovered beneath the ground. Was the Tsarichina Hole a failed treasure hunt, a concealed archaeological discovery, or undeniable evidence of contact with extraterrestrial intelligence? The secrecy surrounding the excavation has fueled decades of theories, connecting the site to UFOs, psychic communication, interdimensional portals, and Bulgaria's hidden history. In this video, we dive deep into the legend of the Tsarichina Hole, separating fact from speculation while analyzing eyewitness accounts, military reports, and paranormal claims. We'll explore the possibility of ancient relics buried beneath Tsarichina, discuss why Bulgarian authorities may have gone to such lengths to seal off the area, and consider how this strange event fits into the broader landscape of UFO sightings, alien encounters, and unexplained phenomena across the world. Whether you believe the Tsarichina Hole was a simple military dig gone wrong, or that it hides one of the greatest secrets ever discovered on Earth, this mystery remains a powerful reminder of how much we still don't know about our planet's past. If you enjoy content about paranormal mysteries, unsolved cases, UFO encounters, alien artifacts, and ancient civilizations, then make sure to watch until the end and subscribe for more deep dives into the strange and unexplained. The truth about the Tsarichina Hole may still be buried underground, but the story continues to haunt researchers, believers, and skeptics to this day. Thank you for watching Roanoke Gaming and I hope you enjoy Bulgaria's Tsarichina Hole is Pure NIGHTMARE Fuel. Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/RoanokeTalesPatreon Merch: Roanokemerch.com #TsarichinaHole #ParanormalMysteries #UnexplainedHistory

On this episode of Expanded Perspectives, Kyle and Cam announce the release of their brand-new book, Glimmer Man: Cloaked Beings That Move Among Us — and take you deep into the mystery that inspired it.What would you do if you came face to face with something that shouldn't exist? In this chilling installment, the guys explore multiple eyewitness encounters involving a bizarre, translucent, human-shaped entity often called the “Glimmer Man.” From darkened bedrooms to remote wilderness trails, from quiet apartment balconies to isolated hunting grounds, the descriptions are strikingly consistent. Witnesses report a tall humanoid figure that appears to bend light around itself — shimmering like heat waves rising off hot pavement — moving with impossible speed, agility, and near-total silence.Spanning decades and reported across North America and even parts of Europe, the pattern is hard to ignore. Those who've seen it describe a being that is: Completely transparent, yet visibly distorted Cloaked like a ripple in reality Able to climb and leap between trees without making a sound Associated with missing time, sudden disorientation, or an eerie silence in the environment Occasionally seen with glowing yellow or red eyes Seemingly intelligent… aware… and watching Is it a spirit? An interdimensional entity? Advanced extraterrestrial technology? Or something far older that has always moved just beyond the edge of our perception?What is it — and what does it want?All of this and more on this installment of Expanded Perspectives.Sponsors:Mars Men: For a limited time, our listeners get 50% off for life plus Free Shipping AND 3 Free Gifts at mengotomars.com. It's a perfect way to kick off the New Year strong. After you purchase, they will ask you where you heard about them. PLEASE support our show and tell them our show sent you!IQBAR: Right now, IQBAR is offering our special podcast listeners 20% off all IQBAR products, plus get FREE shipping. To get your 20% off, text EXPANDED to 64,000. Message and data rates may apply. See terms for details.

The Devil Within Wings of Prophecy — Part Two: The Final Witnesses At 5:04 PM on December 15, 1967, the Silver Bridge collapsed into the Ohio River. In less than a minute, forty-six lives were lost. But in the days leading up to the disaster, the people of Point Pleasant believed they had been watching something — or something had been watching them. In Part Two of Wings of Prophecy, we follow the Mothman legend to its devastating conclusion, tracing the final sightings, the growing sense of unease across the town, and the tragedy that forever linked folklore with one of America's deadliest infrastructure failures.  Mothman 2 As winter closed in, witnesses reported that the sightings were changing. The creature that once appeared suddenly and vanished just as quickly now lingered in plain sight — perched, watching, almost as if standing vigil. One of the final reported encounters came just days before the collapse. By then, Point Pleasant had transformed. National attention brought curiosity seekers, investigators, and skeptics. Businesses leaned into the legend. Others resented the spectacle. Beneath it all, anxiety spread — strange dreams, unusual animal behavior, and a growing sense that something was wrong. Then came the engineering reality. Unseen inside the bridge's structure, a microscopic crack in a critical steel component had been growing for months — invisible to inspections at the time. Each passing vehicle added stress. Each day brought the structure closer to failure. On a December evening filled with Christmas shoppers, commuters, and families heading home, that hidden flaw reached its breaking point. The collapse was sudden. Catastrophic. Irreversible. In this episode:     •    The final reported Mothman sightings before the disaster     •    How Point Pleasant changed during thirteen months of national attention     •    The structural failure that caused the Silver Bridge collapse     •    Eyewitness accounts from the moments before and after the tragedy     •    How folklore and trauma became permanently intertwined in the community In the aftermath, the sightings stopped. The creature was never reported again. But the legend remained — not just as a monster story, but as a way for a grieving community to make sense of sudden, senseless loss. Because sometimes the mystery isn't whether something supernatural happened. Sometimes the mystery is how people survive what did.

Before she vanished, April Grisanti was a young woman trying to find her footing. Then, over the course of one winter night in 1985, she disappeared in plain sight. Witnesses saw her struggle. Police heard her voice asking for help. And yet, April was never seen again.What followed has never felt like justice. No murder charge. No body. No answers. This is a story about incomplete justice, and about a family left carrying questions the investigation has never fully resolved. Over four decades later, the question still hangs in the air. Where is she?If you have information relating to the unsolved disappearance of April Grisanti, please contact the Norwalk Police Department Cold Case Unit at (203) 854-3028 or the anonymous tip line at (203) 854-3111. You can text CRIMES and NPD with your tip in the body of the text message or use the Norwalk Police Department tip submission form.View source material and photos for this episode at: darkdowneast.com/aprilgrisanti Dark Downeast is an Audiochuck and Kylie Media production hosted by Kylie Low.Follow @darkdowneast on Instagram, Facebook, and TikTokTo suggest a case visit darkdowneast.com/submit-case Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The UFO public had high hopes when Congress created AARO to investigate UFO/USO/UAP incidents and report findings to both Congress and the public. Years later, AARO is widely viewed as a complete failure. Its first report was riddled with factual errors and typos. Its first director revealed himself to be a thin-skinned, diehard UFO skeptic, hardly an impartial investigator. Witnesses and whistleblowers say AARO ignored or belittled their testimony. As for transparency, AARO has released very few findings, even fewer UAP images, and a second report, as required by law, is many months overdue. The idea that a small office inside the Pentagon could rigorously investigate its own parent organization - the Department of War - seems preposterous on its face. But has AARO found even a single UFO incident it's been unable to debunk? The answer is yes. British journalist Chris Sharp, editor and publisher of Liberation Times, has demonstrated a remarkable ability to break story after story about UFO matters in both the US and the UK. Now he's wrangled an exclusive interview with AARO's former Deputy Director, Tim Phillips. Sharp's full interview could be published in days. In this episode of WEAPONIZED, Jeremy and George hear what Chris picked up from his extremely candid conversation with Phillips. The revelations are stunning. Phillips admitted AARO identified 40-50 cases showing "utterly bizarre" capabilities the "best and brightest people in the world" couldn't explain - instantaneous acceleration, right-angle turns, maneuvers no human aircraft can achieve. They "conclusively proved" these weren't adversary or friendly tech, yet never released a single video to the public. For the first time, a former AARO official confirmed UAPs detected in space. Some demonstrated "signature management" - actively avoiding detection over sensitive military locations. Despite admitting impossible performance characteristics, Phillips refused to say they're non-human or extraterrestrial. Chris describes it as "describing a dog without calling it a dog." His responses felt scripted and performative. Jeremy coins a new term: "Project Blue Box" - information flows in, nothing comes out. Phillips confirmed AARO approached Glenn Gaffney, the CIA Director George named under oath as blocking transfer of a non-human spacecraft. Shockingly, Phillips claimed he wasn't aware James Clapper admitted on camera the Air Force ran a UAP program above Area 51. How did AARO manage to screw everything up? Has it been an honest arbiter of UFO facts? And is there a future for AARO in light of President Trump's directive to federal agencies to release any and all UFO related files? *Follow Chris Sharp & Liberations Times ⁠https://x.com/ChrisUKSharp⁠ & ⁠https://LiberationTimes.com⁠

Mea Culpa welcomes Dash Dobrofsky a Gen Z political activist, creator and host of the daily podcast, “Uncovering the Truth” which seeks to “abolish corruption injustice, and evil". Dobrofsky is currently a political science major at UCLA and is also featured on the Miedas Touch. His numerous videos can be found on YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok. Also, check out his super active Twitter feed which features over 73,000 followers. Michael and Dash discuss the future of American politics and the youth vote.