Podcasts about cross examination

Jim Chapman covers the testimony from Friday June 13th including the shocking testimony of yet another assistant to Diddy who details the infamous “King Nights” Chapters:06:14 New Witness: Homeland Security Investigator09:52 Unexpected Guest in Court (Kanye “Ye” West)11:05 Discussion of Combs' Reactions to testimony13:17 Jonathan Perez on Wild King Nights23:49 Cross-Examination of PerezFollow “Crime Wire Weekly” on it's new channel HERE: Apple Podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-crime-wire-weekly/id1815864889Spotify  https://open.spotify.com/show/3zyrgjtW6gLUVbicJaYXV9?si=0dbf4983938344a2Amazon Music  https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/3738411d-828e-4138-9976-223ab5de2c87/the-crime-wire-weekly Source Credits: NBC News Trial Newsletter https://link.nbcnews.com/join/5cj/nbc-news-diddy-newsletter-signup? https://www.cnn.com/entertainment/live-news/diddy-combs-trial-cassie-case-06-06-25 Tags: Sean-Diddy-Combs,legal-proceedings,juror dismissal,Kanye-West,podcast,exposed,trial,testimony,Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/exposed-scandalous-files-of-the-elite--6073723/support.

This week Jeff opens with the long-awaited Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear infrastructure, a dazzling military operation years in the making. But instead of support for Israel, Jeff is stunned by the response: hatred not only from the far left but now pouring out of MAGA's biggest names. Yes, the Trump-right has joined Hamas and the progressive left in their obsessive Jew hatred, and Jeff is seething.Trump, meanwhile, couldn't resist taking credit for the Israeli success after the fact, even though he reportedly tried to block the strike for months. And if he actually helped, why didn't he greenlight American B-52s to finish the job on the underground nuke sites? Why is he trying to make a huge deal when the world's biggest sponsor of terror is on its knees?Also this week: a tale of how a young lawyer buying his first suits comes full circle 30 years later, this time as a man paying cash with 44 tailored suits under his belt. Plus, Jeff faces a federal judge he went to college with and admits, despite all of his own accomplishments, the judge is the better man.As always, Jeff pulls no punches. Not for MAGA. Not for Trump. Not for the far left. And certainly not for anyone siding with the world's worst terror regime.

Extended excerpt from Thursday's debate between the leading Democrats running for the mayoral nomination:  First, the candidates direct questions to each other and then they discuss how they will ensure all New Yorkers feel safe, particularly Jewish and Muslim New Yorkers, in the context of the war in the Middle East. 

In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears.   Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN

In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears.   Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears.   Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears.   Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The second witness using a pseudonym said on the stand that she "currently" loves Combs, even after telling her story of a brutal beating at his hands just one year ago. She then testified that she only participated in what she calls "hotel nights" because she didn't want Combs to feel judged for his sexual desires. And after her sexual performances were complete, she pampered him, including giving him foot rubs and turning on his favorite TV show.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy

Diddy Trial Jane Doe Cross examination Diddy is a confirmed cuckold+ she was jealous of Caresha

During the afternoon session on June 10th, 2025, at the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, the defense team continued its sustained cross-examination of Jane Doe Victim 2. The questioning remained sharply focused on attempting to undermine her credibility before the jury. Defense attorneys zeroed in on alleged inconsistencies between her in-court testimony and prior statements made to law enforcement and in civil litigation. They pressed her on precise dates, locations, and details of the alleged trafficking incidents she described, suggesting that elements of her narrative had shifted over time. The defense also highlighted text messages and communications that they argued were inconsistent with the portrayal of coercion and control presented by the government.Throughout the afternoon, Jane Doe 2 maintained her composure but showed visible signs of fatigue under the lengthy and at times repetitive questioning. The defense probed her connections to other accusers and her interactions with civil attorneys, implying possible coordination or financial motivation. Prosecutors objected at several points to the tone and scope of the questioning, but Judge Subramanian largely allowed the cross-examination to proceed. No new evidence was introduced; the session remained centered on testing the consistency and reliability of Jane Doe 2's testimony. The court adjourned with the cross-examination still ongoing, setting the stage for its conclusion in the next session.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 10, 2025 - Day 20 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

During the afternoon session on June 10th, 2025, at the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, the defense team continued its sustained cross-examination of Jane Doe Victim 2. The questioning remained sharply focused on attempting to undermine her credibility before the jury. Defense attorneys zeroed in on alleged inconsistencies between her in-court testimony and prior statements made to law enforcement and in civil litigation. They pressed her on precise dates, locations, and details of the alleged trafficking incidents she described, suggesting that elements of her narrative had shifted over time. The defense also highlighted text messages and communications that they argued were inconsistent with the portrayal of coercion and control presented by the government.Throughout the afternoon, Jane Doe 2 maintained her composure but showed visible signs of fatigue under the lengthy and at times repetitive questioning. The defense probed her connections to other accusers and her interactions with civil attorneys, implying possible coordination or financial motivation. Prosecutors objected at several points to the tone and scope of the questioning, but Judge Subramanian largely allowed the cross-examination to proceed. No new evidence was introduced; the session remained centered on testing the consistency and reliability of Jane Doe 2's testimony. The court adjourned with the cross-examination still ongoing, setting the stage for its conclusion in the next session.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 10, 2025 - Day 20 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

During the afternoon session on June 10th, 2025, at the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, the defense team continued its sustained cross-examination of Jane Doe Victim 2. The questioning remained sharply focused on attempting to undermine her credibility before the jury. Defense attorneys zeroed in on alleged inconsistencies between her in-court testimony and prior statements made to law enforcement and in civil litigation. They pressed her on precise dates, locations, and details of the alleged trafficking incidents she described, suggesting that elements of her narrative had shifted over time. The defense also highlighted text messages and communications that they argued were inconsistent with the portrayal of coercion and control presented by the government.Throughout the afternoon, Jane Doe 2 maintained her composure but showed visible signs of fatigue under the lengthy and at times repetitive questioning. The defense probed her connections to other accusers and her interactions with civil attorneys, implying possible coordination or financial motivation. Prosecutors objected at several points to the tone and scope of the questioning, but Judge Subramanian largely allowed the cross-examination to proceed. No new evidence was introduced; the session remained centered on testing the consistency and reliability of Jane Doe 2's testimony. The court adjourned with the cross-examination still ongoing, setting the stage for its conclusion in the next session.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 10, 2025 - Day 20 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the morning session, the defense launched an aggressive cross‑examination of the witness known as “Jane,” who resumed her testimony after three days describing alleged drug-fueled “hotel nights” or “freak‑offs” orchestrated by Combs.   The defense attorney emphasized moments of affection—highlighting a voice note where Jane called Combs “my crack pipe” and texts expressing gratitude for his financial support, including paying her rent and funding a lease.    They pointed out that these interactions suggested love and dependency, questioning whether her involvement had been fully coercive.Judge Subramanian also denied a second mistrial motion, filed by Combs's team, which argued that a previous witness's testimony was false and prejudicial; the judge ruled the trial was proceeding fairly, even going as far as saying that he thought that the defense had a Perry Mason moment during the testimony of Bryana Bongolan.    to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN

In the morning session, the defense launched an aggressive cross‑examination of the witness known as “Jane,” who resumed her testimony after three days describing alleged drug-fueled “hotel nights” or “freak‑offs” orchestrated by Combs.   The defense attorney emphasized moments of affection—highlighting a voice note where Jane called Combs “my crack pipe” and texts expressing gratitude for his financial support, including paying her rent and funding a lease.    They pointed out that these interactions suggested love and dependency, questioning whether her involvement had been fully coercive.Judge Subramanian also denied a second mistrial motion, filed by Combs's team, which argued that a previous witness's testimony was false and prejudicial; the judge ruled the trial was proceeding fairly, even going as far as saying that he thought that the defense had a Perry Mason moment during the testimony of Bryana Bongolan.    to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the morning session, the defense launched an aggressive cross‑examination of the witness known as “Jane,” who resumed her testimony after three days describing alleged drug-fueled “hotel nights” or “freak‑offs” orchestrated by Combs.   The defense attorney emphasized moments of affection—highlighting a voice note where Jane called Combs “my crack pipe” and texts expressing gratitude for his financial support, including paying her rent and funding a lease.    They pointed out that these interactions suggested love and dependency, questioning whether her involvement had been fully coercive.Judge Subramanian also denied a second mistrial motion, filed by Combs's team, which argued that a previous witness's testimony was false and prejudicial; the judge ruled the trial was proceeding fairly, even going as far as saying that he thought that the defense had a Perry Mason moment during the testimony of Bryana Bongolan.    to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Karen Read Trial Testimony - Daniel Wolfe - ARCCA Cross-Examination Watch prosecutor Hank Brennan systematically destroy the credibility of Karen Read's star expert witness in what may be the most devastating cross-examination in recent legal history. This is the complete, unedited testimony that transformed Dr. Daniel Wolfe from potential defense savior into the prosecution's best witness. What begins as routine questioning quickly escalates into a credibility massacre that exposes ethical violations, methodological flaws, and secret coordination between the expert and defense team. Brennan reveals that Wolfe used Signal encrypted messaging to communicate with defense attorney Alan Jackson and admits to deleting text message evidence. The physics destruction continues as Brennan forces Wolfe to confront the devastating implications of his own testing. The dummy arm weighed 9.4 pounds versus John O'Keefe's actual 11.8-pound arm, yet still created damage matching Read's SUV. The cross-examination makes clear that if lighter conditions produced this result, heavier conditions prove guilt. Explosive moments include the Signal app scandal revelation, Wolfe's uncomfortable admission about deleting evidence, systematic destruction of his testing methodology, and exposure of how ARCCA transitioned from FBI contractors to paid defense witnesses while maintaining independence claims. Brennan reveals that ARCCA was retained just days before jury selection began, exposing the rushed timeline that suggests last-minute scrambling rather than objective scientific inquiry. Watch as Wolfe's admission that his methodology lacks peer-reviewed support and should be called "experiments" rather than validated procedures destroys his credibility. The courtroom atmosphere is electric as Judge Beverly Cannone's visible frustration validates her previous concerns about defense violations. Notice the jury's increasing skepticism as ethical lapses are exposed and professional standards crumble under prosecutorial scrutiny. This cross-examination doesn't just destroy Wolfe's credibility - it validates the prosecution's traditional forensic approach and potentially contaminates the defense's remaining expert testimony. Months of defense preparation and substantial financial investment crumble as Brennan demonstrates how ethical violations and methodological flaws can destroy even expensive expert witness preparation. This is courtroom combat at its highest level, where prosecutorial skill meets compromised expert testimony with devastating results. Essential viewing for anyone interested in legal strategy, forensic science, or how expert witnesses can accidentally prove their client's guilt. #KarenRead #HankBrennan #CrossExamination #ARCCADestroyed #ExpertWitnessFail #SignalApp #ForensicScience #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #ProsecutorialSkill Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial Testimony - Daniel Wolfe - ARCCA Cross-Examination Watch prosecutor Hank Brennan systematically destroy the credibility of Karen Read's star expert witness in what may be the most devastating cross-examination in recent legal history. This is the complete, unedited testimony that transformed Dr. Daniel Wolfe from potential defense savior into the prosecution's best witness. What begins as routine questioning quickly escalates into a credibility massacre that exposes ethical violations, methodological flaws, and secret coordination between the expert and defense team. Brennan reveals that Wolfe used Signal encrypted messaging to communicate with defense attorney Alan Jackson and admits to deleting text message evidence. The physics destruction continues as Brennan forces Wolfe to confront the devastating implications of his own testing. The dummy arm weighed 9.4 pounds versus John O'Keefe's actual 11.8-pound arm, yet still created damage matching Read's SUV. The cross-examination makes clear that if lighter conditions produced this result, heavier conditions prove guilt. Explosive moments include the Signal app scandal revelation, Wolfe's uncomfortable admission about deleting evidence, systematic destruction of his testing methodology, and exposure of how ARCCA transitioned from FBI contractors to paid defense witnesses while maintaining independence claims. Brennan reveals that ARCCA was retained just days before jury selection began, exposing the rushed timeline that suggests last-minute scrambling rather than objective scientific inquiry. Watch as Wolfe's admission that his methodology lacks peer-reviewed support and should be called "experiments" rather than validated procedures destroys his credibility. The courtroom atmosphere is electric as Judge Beverly Cannone's visible frustration validates her previous concerns about defense violations. Notice the jury's increasing skepticism as ethical lapses are exposed and professional standards crumble under prosecutorial scrutiny. This cross-examination doesn't just destroy Wolfe's credibility - it validates the prosecution's traditional forensic approach and potentially contaminates the defense's remaining expert testimony. Months of defense preparation and substantial financial investment crumble as Brennan demonstrates how ethical violations and methodological flaws can destroy even expensive expert witness preparation. This is courtroom combat at its highest level, where prosecutorial skill meets compromised expert testimony with devastating results. Essential viewing for anyone interested in legal strategy, forensic science, or how expert witnesses can accidentally prove their client's guilt. #KarenRead #HankBrennan #CrossExamination #ARCCADestroyed #ExpertWitnessFail #SignalApp #ForensicScience #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #ProsecutorialSkill Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial Testimony - Daniel Wolfe - ARCCA Cross-Examination Watch prosecutor Hank Brennan systematically destroy the credibility of Karen Read's star expert witness in what may be the most devastating cross-examination in recent legal history. This is the complete, unedited testimony that transformed Dr. Daniel Wolfe from potential defense savior into the prosecution's best witness. What begins as routine questioning quickly escalates into a credibility massacre that exposes ethical violations, methodological flaws, and secret coordination between the expert and defense team. Brennan reveals that Wolfe used Signal encrypted messaging to communicate with defense attorney Alan Jackson and admits to deleting text message evidence. The physics destruction continues as Brennan forces Wolfe to confront the devastating implications of his own testing. The dummy arm weighed 9.4 pounds versus John O'Keefe's actual 11.8-pound arm, yet still created damage matching Read's SUV. The cross-examination makes clear that if lighter conditions produced this result, heavier conditions prove guilt. Explosive moments include the Signal app scandal revelation, Wolfe's uncomfortable admission about deleting evidence, systematic destruction of his testing methodology, and exposure of how ARCCA transitioned from FBI contractors to paid defense witnesses while maintaining independence claims. Brennan reveals that ARCCA was retained just days before jury selection began, exposing the rushed timeline that suggests last-minute scrambling rather than objective scientific inquiry. Watch as Wolfe's admission that his methodology lacks peer-reviewed support and should be called "experiments" rather than validated procedures destroys his credibility. The courtroom atmosphere is electric as Judge Beverly Cannone's visible frustration validates her previous concerns about defense violations. Notice the jury's increasing skepticism as ethical lapses are exposed and professional standards crumble under prosecutorial scrutiny. This cross-examination doesn't just destroy Wolfe's credibility - it validates the prosecution's traditional forensic approach and potentially contaminates the defense's remaining expert testimony. Months of defense preparation and substantial financial investment crumble as Brennan demonstrates how ethical violations and methodological flaws can destroy even expensive expert witness preparation. This is courtroom combat at its highest level, where prosecutorial skill meets compromised expert testimony with devastating results. Essential viewing for anyone interested in legal strategy, forensic science, or how expert witnesses can accidentally prove their client's guilt. #KarenRead #HankBrennan #CrossExamination #ARCCADestroyed #ExpertWitnessFail #SignalApp #ForensicScience #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #ProsecutorialSkill Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu began facing cross-examination by prosecutors in his criminal trial, the majority of Israelis are much more focused on “life-and-death” issues as the Gaza war wears on, Haaretz columnist and public opinion expert Dahlia Scheindlin said on the Haaretz Podcast. The subdued level of public interest “highlights how Israelis have become resigned to the extraordinary situation of their prime minister being on trial for corruption during the longest war and the most devastating war Israel has ever had,” Scheindlin said. While polls show a majority of Israelis frustrated and “furious” over that situation, “they feel helpless to do anything about it,” Scheindlin added. Deeply upset about the continuing hostage crisis and IDF casualties, and with reservists and their families exhausted, the Israeli public has little patience for courtroom banter regarding issues like the size of a Bugs Bunny doll that a Hollywood tycoon gave to the Netanyahu children in the 1990s which, Scheindlin said, “trivializes the proceedings.” In her conversation with host Allison Kaplan Sommer, Scheindlin also analyzes the brewing political crisis in Israel as the ultra-Orthodox party Degel HaTorah threatens to bring down the government over its failure to pass a law exempting Haredi men from military service and assesses the odds as to whether the country will soon be heading into new elections. “When governments fall in Israel, they usually fall over religion and state issues,” she said. Subscribe to Haaretz.com for up-to-the-minute news and analysis from Israel in English. Read more: 'I Did Not Commit a Single Crime': Netanyahu Calls Indictments 'Persecution' on First Day of Cross-examination Explained: Why Is Benjamin Netanyahu on Trial? Yes to Transfer: 82% of Jewish Israelis Back Expelling Gazans A Grim Poll Showed Most Jewish Israelis Support Expelling Gazans. It's Brutal – and It's TrueSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 1 Description: In this critical segment of the trial, the defense begins its cross-examination of Judson Welcher. Attempting to poke holes in Aperture's crash analysis and methodology, Read's attorneys challenge assumptions, question visibility models, and raise issues of expert bias. This is the first round of a highly technical — and tactical — courtroom exchange. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CrossExamination #DefenseStrategy #TrueCrimeCourtroom #ApertureAnalysis #CrashDataDebate #TrialFootage #KarenReadDefense #JohnOKeefeCase Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 2 Description: As cross-examination continues, the defense zeroes in on the reliability of the data and simulation models used by Judson Welcher and Aperture. Welcher is pressed on assumptions, thresholds, and visual representation of impact scenarios — in an attempt to raise doubt about the prosecution's timeline and theory of the case. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #CrossExamination #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcherTestimony #TrueCrimeVideo #VehicleForensics #JohnOKeefe #CourtroomDebate #ForensicScience #TrialDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination & Re-Direct Description: The cross-examination wraps, and the prosecution follows with re-direct to re-establish Judson Welcher's credibility and reinforce his key conclusions. This segment showcases the tug-of-war over expert interpretation and how precise data — or its presentation — can shape a jury's perception in a high-stakes case. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CourtroomDrama #ReDirect #ForensicBattle #CrashAnalysis #ExpertWitnessTestimony #ApertureForensics #TrueCrimeTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 1 Description: In this critical segment of the trial, the defense begins its cross-examination of Judson Welcher. Attempting to poke holes in Aperture's crash analysis and methodology, Read's attorneys challenge assumptions, question visibility models, and raise issues of expert bias. This is the first round of a highly technical — and tactical — courtroom exchange. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CrossExamination #DefenseStrategy #TrueCrimeCourtroom #ApertureAnalysis #CrashDataDebate #TrialFootage #KarenReadDefense #JohnOKeefeCase Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination & Re-Direct Description: The cross-examination wraps, and the prosecution follows with re-direct to re-establish Judson Welcher's credibility and reinforce his key conclusions. This segment showcases the tug-of-war over expert interpretation and how precise data — or its presentation — can shape a jury's perception in a high-stakes case. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CourtroomDrama #ReDirect #ForensicBattle #CrashAnalysis #ExpertWitnessTestimony #ApertureForensics #TrueCrimeTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 2 Description: As cross-examination continues, the defense zeroes in on the reliability of the data and simulation models used by Judson Welcher and Aperture. Welcher is pressed on assumptions, thresholds, and visual representation of impact scenarios — in an attempt to raise doubt about the prosecution's timeline and theory of the case. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #CrossExamination #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcherTestimony #TrueCrimeVideo #VehicleForensics #JohnOKeefe #CourtroomDebate #ForensicScience #TrialDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Eyewitness News team, and ABC news legal contributor Bernarda Villalona dig deeper into the contentious cross examination of a woman who worked as a personal assistant to Sean Combs. The former assistant concluded three days on the witness stand with attorneys for Combs grilling her so intensely that a prosecutor asked the judge to stop the cross examination, calling it "humiliating” and “harassing.”    The witness, testifying under the pseudonym “Mia,” told jurors last week that Combs tormented and sexually assaulted her during her time working as his personal assistant.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On Monday, June 2, 2025, during the ongoing federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, his former assistant, testifying under the pseudonym "Mia," continued her cross-examination. Defense attorney Brian Steel presented the jury with messages and a 2013 video in which Mia expressed admiration for Combs, referring to him as "one of the biggest inspirations in my life." Steel questioned the credibility of Mia's allegations by highlighting these past expressions of affection. Mia responded by explaining that her actions were a result of psychological manipulation and abuse, stating she was "brainwashed" and constantly sought Combs' approval due to the emotionally abusive environment she was in. She emphasized that despite her past messages, her courtroom testimony about the alleged assaults was truthful .The prosecution objected to the defense's line of questioning, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing Steel of conducting a "humiliating" cross-examination that bordered on harassment. Comey argued that such tactics could deter other victims from coming forward. Judge Arun Subramanian acknowledged the concerns but stated he had not observed any misconduct, allowing the cross-examination to proceed. Mia's testimony is central to the prosecution's case, which alleges that Combs operated a criminal enterprise involving abuse, coercion, and exploitation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, and faces a potential life sentence if convicted .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial live updates: Ex-assistant 'Mia' resumes testimony after sexual assault claims

On Monday, June 2, 2025, during the ongoing federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, his former assistant, testifying under the pseudonym "Mia," continued her cross-examination. Defense attorney Brian Steel presented the jury with messages and a 2013 video in which Mia expressed admiration for Combs, referring to him as "one of the biggest inspirations in my life." Steel questioned the credibility of Mia's allegations by highlighting these past expressions of affection. Mia responded by explaining that her actions were a result of psychological manipulation and abuse, stating she was "brainwashed" and constantly sought Combs' approval due to the emotionally abusive environment she was in. She emphasized that despite her past messages, her courtroom testimony about the alleged assaults was truthful .The prosecution objected to the defense's line of questioning, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing Steel of conducting a "humiliating" cross-examination that bordered on harassment. Comey argued that such tactics could deter other victims from coming forward. Judge Arun Subramanian acknowledged the concerns but stated he had not observed any misconduct, allowing the cross-examination to proceed. Mia's testimony is central to the prosecution's case, which alleges that Combs operated a criminal enterprise involving abuse, coercion, and exploitation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, and faces a potential life sentence if convicted .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial live updates: Ex-assistant 'Mia' resumes testimony after sexual assault claimsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On Monday, June 2, 2025, during the ongoing federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, his former assistant, testifying under the pseudonym "Mia," continued her cross-examination. Defense attorney Brian Steel presented the jury with messages and a 2013 video in which Mia expressed admiration for Combs, referring to him as "one of the biggest inspirations in my life." Steel questioned the credibility of Mia's allegations by highlighting these past expressions of affection. Mia responded by explaining that her actions were a result of psychological manipulation and abuse, stating she was "brainwashed" and constantly sought Combs' approval due to the emotionally abusive environment she was in. She emphasized that despite her past messages, her courtroom testimony about the alleged assaults was truthful .The prosecution objected to the defense's line of questioning, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing Steel of conducting a "humiliating" cross-examination that bordered on harassment. Comey argued that such tactics could deter other victims from coming forward. Judge Arun Subramanian acknowledged the concerns but stated he had not observed any misconduct, allowing the cross-examination to proceed. Mia's testimony is central to the prosecution's case, which alleges that Combs operated a criminal enterprise involving abuse, coercion, and exploitation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, and faces a potential life sentence if convicted .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial live updates: Ex-assistant 'Mia' resumes testimony after sexual assault claimsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the prosecution submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian alerting the court to anticipated evidentiary and procedural issues related to the upcoming testimony of Lance Jimenez, a key government witness expected to take the stand as early as Monday, May 27. The letter serves as a preemptive notice to streamline courtroom proceedings and mitigate potential objections or delays during Jimenez's examination. The government likely outlines the scope of Jimenez's testimony, which may touch on sensitive or contested areas, and provides legal justification for the inclusion of certain pieces of evidence or lines of questioning they intend to pursue.The filing also appears to be a tactical move to prevent surprises and bolster the admissibility of what could be pivotal testimony in establishing patterns of behavior or corroborating other witnesses' claims. By addressing these matters in advance, prosecutors aim to minimize disruptions during trial and reinforce the integrity of Jimenez's testimony within the broader evidentiary framework. The letter underscores the government's intent to methodically build its case while anticipating and countering defense efforts to exclude or diminish the impact of Jimenez's statements.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.354.0_2.pdf

On the afternoon of Day 13 of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal trial, "Mia," a former assistant testifying under a pseudonym, faced cross-examination by the defense. Combs's attorney, Brian Steel, presented jurors with Mia's past social media posts and a scrapbook she created for Combs's 45th birthday, which included affectionate messages like "I love you forever." Steel aimed to challenge Mia's allegations of abuse by highlighting these positive depictions of their relationship. Mia responded that these gestures were made under psychological duress, explaining that she was in a "very confusing" situation and feared for her safety, stating that creating the scrapbook was "a lot more complicated on all levels."Further questioning focused on Mia's emotional state after being dismissed from Combs's company in 2016. Text messages presented in court revealed her expressing feelings of devastation and heartbreak, describing her life as "over" and stating she was "going to kill" herself. Mia explained that working for Combs was her entire world, and the sudden loss left her feeling lost and betrayed. When asked directly whether she had fabricated any part of her testimony, Mia firmly stated, "What I said is true. I have not lied to anyone at all." The court adjourned for the day, with Mia's cross-examination set to continue on Monday.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 30, 2025 - Day 13 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

On the afternoon of Day 13 of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal trial, "Mia," a former assistant testifying under a pseudonym, faced cross-examination by the defense. Combs's attorney, Brian Steel, presented jurors with Mia's past social media posts and a scrapbook she created for Combs's 45th birthday, which included affectionate messages like "I love you forever." Steel aimed to challenge Mia's allegations of abuse by highlighting these positive depictions of their relationship. Mia responded that these gestures were made under psychological duress, explaining that she was in a "very confusing" situation and feared for her safety, stating that creating the scrapbook was "a lot more complicated on all levels."Further questioning focused on Mia's emotional state after being dismissed from Combs's company in 2016. Text messages presented in court revealed her expressing feelings of devastation and heartbreak, describing her life as "over" and stating she was "going to kill" herself. Mia explained that working for Combs was her entire world, and the sudden loss left her feeling lost and betrayed. When asked directly whether she had fabricated any part of her testimony, Mia firmly stated, "What I said is true. I have not lied to anyone at all." The court adjourned for the day, with Mia's cross-examination set to continue on Monday.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 30, 2025 - Day 13 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/IduAs7XWVEUDay 22 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 28, 2025. After a brief Direct Examination by Special Prosecutor, Hank Brennan, of their Accident Reconstructionist, Dr. Welcher, Cross Examination took up the whole day and will continue on Day 23. Defense Attorney, Robert Alessi, ross-examination was rigorous and focused on challenging the credibility, methodology, and conclusions of the Commonwealth's expert witness. Dr. Welcher was repeatedly admonished by the court for looking at his computer and searching for information during the cross-examination, rather than answering directly from memory.Alessi questioned Dr. Welchre about the significant amount his firm, Aperture, was being paid by the Norfolk County District Attorney's Office ($325,000), and the details surrounding the purchase and sale of a Lexus exemplar for testing. The defense sought to highlight potential bias due to financial incentives.Alessi challenged inconsistencies in Dr. Welchre's testimony, such as the distance the Lexus traveled in reverse during a test (initially said to be 53 feet, then 87 feet), and the explanation of the 8 mph threshold for tail light breakage.Alessi delved into Dr. Welcher's use of data and images from Trooper Paul's report, questioning the extent to which Dr. Welcher relied on that information in his analysis. There was a dispute about a drone image and other diagrams, leading to a "Voir dire" (examination outside the presence of the jury) to clarify the sources of these materials.The voir dire aimed to clarify the sources of Dr. Welcher's materials and to determine the extent to which he relied on Trooper Paul's report or other evidence. It highlighted the defense's effort to question the independence of Dr. Welcher's analysis and the Commonwealth's attempt to defend it. The voir dire concluded with plans to continue the cross-examination the following day, with the understanding that time was limited due to a juror's scheduling issue.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

The Trial of “Diddy” has wrapped for Tuesday May 27th, 2025 and featured shocking testimony from former assistant Capricorn Clark. She provided numerous new insights regarding Combs including new information regarding the Kid Cudi feud, She alleged Combs made threats regarding 50 Cent, she detailed numerous beatings Cassie Ventura sustained at the hands of Diddy and threats she received herself from the Bad Boy executive. #DIDDYTRIAL #seancombstrial #diddytrialupdates #diddycourtcase #diddytrialnews Chapters01:53 Memorial Day Reflections03:01 Updates from the Diddy Trial03:59 Testimony of Capricorn Clark09:20 Life Under Diddy's Shadow12:32 Confrontations with Kid Cudi15:54 The Aftermath of Violence17:55 Cross-Examination of Capricorn24:42 Shocking Revelations Clark RevealedFollow “Crime Wire Weekly” on it's new channel HERE:Apple Podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-crime-wire-weekly/id1815864889Spotifyhttps://open.spotify.com/show/3zyrgjtW6gLUVbicJaYXV9?si=0dbf4983938344a2Amazon Music https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/3738411d-828e-4138-9976-223ab5de2c87/the-crime-wire-weeklyWelcome to The Trial of Sean Combs. Sean ‘Diddy' Combs had it all. In the 90s and 00s, he produced global hits for the hottest stars in the world, including Biggie, Mary J. Blige and J Lo. Then came the business deals, from vodka to media companies - everything Diddy touched turned to gold. Now, he faces multiple federal charges in New York, including sex trafficking and allegedly running a criminal enterprise.Podcast Disclaimer:  The content of this podcast is for informational and entertainment purposes only.  The views and opinions expressed by the hosts and guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of any affiliated organizations or institutions. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we cannot guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information discussed.   The podcast does not constitute professional advice, and listeners are encouraged to seek guidance from qualified professionals regarding any specific issues or concerns. By listening to this podcast, you acknowledge that you understand and accept these terms.  We are not liable for any actions taken based on the content provided in this podcast.  Further Legal Note:  This Case has not been decided and all persons discussed in this podcast are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The civil charges expressed in this podcast are taken from public record and any commentary discussed are for informational purposes may or may not be the opinion of the host and/or producers of this podcast. For collaborations, promotions, or appearances email Jim at: exposedpodcastfiles@gmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/exposed-scandalous-files-of-the-elite--6073723/support.

In United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the prosecution submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian alerting the court to anticipated evidentiary and procedural issues related to the upcoming testimony of Lance Jimenez, a key government witness expected to take the stand as early as Monday, May 27. The letter serves as a preemptive notice to streamline courtroom proceedings and mitigate potential objections or delays during Jimenez's examination. The government likely outlines the scope of Jimenez's testimony, which may touch on sensitive or contested areas, and provides legal justification for the inclusion of certain pieces of evidence or lines of questioning they intend to pursue.The filing also appears to be a tactical move to prevent surprises and bolster the admissibility of what could be pivotal testimony in establishing patterns of behavior or corroborating other witnesses' claims. By addressing these matters in advance, prosecutors aim to minimize disruptions during trial and reinforce the integrity of Jimenez's testimony within the broader evidentiary framework. The letter underscores the government's intent to methodically build its case while anticipating and countering defense efforts to exclude or diminish the impact of Jimenez's statements.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.354.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 1 Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 2 Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 3 Description: Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 1 Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read's defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle's data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial? Hashtags: #KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense   Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

7 Hours and 59 MinutesPG-13Thomas777 is a revisionist historian and a fiction writer.Here are episodes 17 throught the Livestream Q&A of the World War 2 series with Thomas777 in one audio file.Episode 17: The Nuremberg Proceedings Part 1 w/ Thomas777Episode 18: The Nuremberg Proceedings Part 2 w/ Thomas777Episode 19: The Nuremberg Proceedings Part 3 - The Defendants w/ Thomas777Episode 20: The Trial of Hermann Göring Part 1 w/ Thomas777Episode 21: The Trial of Hermann Göring Part 2 - The Cross-Examination w/ Thomas777Episode 22: The Final Episode in the WW2 Series - The Verdicts at Nuremberg w/ Thomas777Livestream Q&AThomas' SubstackThomas777 MerchandiseThomas' Book "Steelstorm Pt. 1"Thomas' Book "Steelstorm Pt. 2"Thomas on TwitterThomas' CashApp - $7homas777Pete and Thomas777 'At the Movies'Support Pete on His WebsitePete's PatreonPete's SubstackPete's SubscribestarPete's GUMROADPete's VenmoPete's Buy Me a CoffeePete on FacebookPete on TwitterBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-quinones-show--6071361/support.

In the second week of Sean “Diddy” Combs' trial witness Danity Kane Singer Dawn Richard returns to stand and today she's up against the Defense in a heated Cross Examination. Welcome to Surviving The Survivor, the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of true crime. In this LIVE Diddy episode STS Host Joel Waldman will break down the very latest testimony and share the most important details about the case. Dawn Richard testified about a 2009 incident where she witnessed Combs allegedly attack his ex, Casandra “Cassie” Ventura, with a frying pan while she was making him eggs. Richard's testimony explains the abuse she saw and the fear instilled in her. Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing five criminal charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy and transportation to engage in prostitution. The music mogul has pleaded not guilty to all charged. Combs' defense team agrees Diddy and Cassie Ventura had a volatile relationship in which both parties were violent. They even claim Combs may be guilty of domestic abuse — but not the crimes he is actually being charged with. So the question remains...will the state prove their case? Is there reasonable doubt? The trial is expected to last eight weeks. Combs also faces more than 70 civil complaints, including one by Richard. He has denied all the allegations against him.⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast

As someone who experienced the good, the bad, and the ugly side of the music industry, Aubrey shares her thoughts on Cassie's cross examination. From the text messages, to the testimony, Aubrey offers Amy and T.J. some eye-opening courtroom context.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As someone who experienced the good, the bad, and the ugly side of the music industry, Aubrey shares her thoughts on Cassie's cross examination. From the text messages, to the testimony, Aubrey offers Amy and T.J. some eye-opening courtroom context.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.