Podcasts about cross examination

In this podcast, Jeff discusses the assassination of Charlie Kirk by yet another deranged leftist shooter. As disturbing as the shooting was, the celebrations from the left — which included professionals, teacher and health care providers — were even more troubling. Jeff discusses what needs to come next if we are to avoid sliding into the abyss as a country.

7 Hours and 59 MinutesPG-13Thomas777 is a revisionist historian and a fiction writer.Here are episodes 17 throught the Livestream Q&A of the World War 2 series with Thomas777 in one audio file.Episode 17: The Nuremberg Proceedings Part 1 w/ Thomas777Episode 18: The Nuremberg Proceedings Part 2 w/ Thomas777Episode 19: The Nuremberg Proceedings Part 3 - The Defendants w/ Thomas777Episode 20: The Trial of Hermann Göring Part 1 w/ Thomas777Episode 21: The Trial of Hermann Göring Part 2 - The Cross-Examination w/ Thomas777Episode 22: The Final Episode in the WW2 Series - The Verdicts at Nuremberg w/ Thomas777Livestream Q&AThomas' SubstackThomas777 MerchandiseThomas' Book "Steelstorm Pt. 1"Thomas' Book "Steelstorm Pt. 2"Thomas on TwitterThomas' CashApp - $7homas777Pete and Thomas777 'At the Movies'Support Pete on His WebsitePete's PatreonPete's SubstackPete's SubscribestarPete's GUMROADPete's VenmoPete's Buy Me a CoffeePete on FacebookPete on TwitterBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-quinones-show--6071361/support.

(00:00-23:32) Jackson was a mature 8. The girl from Mizzou emailed Tim. Explain the dossier to novices. Arrowmen. The Athletic has ranked the top 136 teams in College Football. These rankings are rather shishiwally. Tough week on The Spread Zone. Brian Kelly got run over on the sideline. Stephanie, The Tri Delt. Car washes at ITT Tech. Same family, different feed. The Den of Cross Examination.(23:40-26:37) Fresh cut from Rogers and Hammertoe.(26:47-47:57) Gabe DeArmond of Power Mizzou joins the show and even he wants Tina E playing at Faurot. People fired up for Border War week. All Beau, All The Time. Nabbing a kicker from Northeastern Oklahoma A&M. Looking ahead to the game on Saturday. Jalon Daniels. Expecting Drink to lean into the rivalry aspect. What do you take from Pribula's performance in his first start? We'll know more about this team after this week.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Donna Adelson stands trial for her alleged role in the murder for hire of law professor and her former son-in-law, Dan Markel. Prosecutors allege the murder for hire plot stemmed from a bitter child custody battle between Wendi Adelson and Dan Markel. Hear Wendi's full testimony from 8/25/2025 from the state's case against her own mother. For more on the Murder of Dan Markel, Click Here.Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/FOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE https://www.courttv.com/trials/ HOW TO FIND COURT TV https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/

In this podcast, Jeff talks about his trip to Italy and love of Italians — and notes the many similarities between Italians and Jews and one glaring difference. Italy was great but the constant content making of young people in Capri annoyed him. Only this dopey, lazy mentality could drive the success of Zorhan Mamdani, a Socialist Hamas supporter, in the NYC mayoral race.

In this episode, Jeff returns after a few weeks off — and explains how one press conference in Chicago spiraled into a fabricated international incident with the Mexican government. Representing Ovidio Guzmán (El Chapo's son) became less about legal defense and more about being scapegoated by terrified politicians. In the end, free speech and the truth will always shine through. And the Mexican people?  Jeff notes that his respect for them has grown exponentially.Also covered: Hamas' newest PR strategy — letting Gaza starve while hoarding food in tunnels and filming propaganda videos of emaciated kids (whose fat parents are somehow not starving). The lies grow louder, the propaganda slicker, and yet Western liberal and far-right Jew haters just can't stop blaming Israel and taking it out on Jews. All while the next mayor of NYC will be a Hamas cheerleader who wants government-owned supermarkets and to arrest the Prime Minster of Israel. The downward spiral that began in 2008 nears completion.And finally, Jeff goes full collector mode: a breakdown of the baseball card National Show in Chicago. Too many rooms, too many scammers, but one glorious vintage Orioles cabinet card makes the entire hellscape worth it.

Clement Manyathela and the listeners discuss the cross examination of Judge Selby Mbenenge and the mannerThe Clement Manyathela Show is broadcast on 702, a Johannesburg based talk radio station, weekdays from 09:00 to 12:00 (SA Time). Clement Manyathela starts his show each weekday on 702 at 9 am taking your calls and voice notes on his Open Line. In the second hour of his show, he unpacks, explains, and makes sense of the news of the day. Clement has several features in his third hour from 11 am that provide you with information to help and guide you through your daily life. As your morning friend, he tackles the serious as well as the light-hearted, on your behalf. Thank you for listening to a podcast from The Clement Manyathela Show. Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 09:00 and 12:00 (SA Time) to The Clement Manyathela Show broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/XijPLtJ or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/p0gWuPE Subscribe to the 702 Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/v5mfetc Follow us on social media: 702 on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/Radio702 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On Monday, June 2, 2025, during the ongoing federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, his former assistant, testifying under the pseudonym "Mia," continued her cross-examination. Defense attorney Brian Steel presented the jury with messages and a 2013 video in which Mia expressed admiration for Combs, referring to him as "one of the biggest inspirations in my life." Steel questioned the credibility of Mia's allegations by highlighting these past expressions of affection. Mia responded by explaining that her actions were a result of psychological manipulation and abuse, stating she was "brainwashed" and constantly sought Combs' approval due to the emotionally abusive environment she was in. She emphasized that despite her past messages, her courtroom testimony about the alleged assaults was truthful .The prosecution objected to the defense's line of questioning, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing Steel of conducting a "humiliating" cross-examination that bordered on harassment. Comey argued that such tactics could deter other victims from coming forward. Judge Arun Subramanian acknowledged the concerns but stated he had not observed any misconduct, allowing the cross-examination to proceed. Mia's testimony is central to the prosecution's case, which alleges that Combs operated a criminal enterprise involving abuse, coercion, and exploitation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, and faces a potential life sentence if convicted .On the afternoon of Monday, June 2, 2025, during Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, the prosecution's key witness, known by the pseudonym "Mia," concluded her testimony. Under cross-examination, defense attorney Brian Steel highlighted affectionate messages Mia had sent to Combs after her employment ended in 2017, including a 2019 text describing a dream where Combs rescued her from R. Kelly. Mia explained that she was "brainwashed" during that period, describing her relationship with Combs as one where "the highs were really high and the lows were really low," leading to confusion in trusting her instinctsFollowing Mia's testimony, the prosecution called Sylvia Oken, a custodian at The Beverly Hills Hotel, who testified about additional cleaning fees charged to Combs' hotel account, including a $500 charge for "oil damage." Oken noted that Combs often used aliases such as "Phillip Pines" during his stays . The trial, now in its fourth week, continues with Combs facing multiple charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. If convicted, he could face a life sentence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial live updates: Ex-assistant 'Mia' resumes testimony after sexual assault claimsshow lessCommentsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On the morning of Day 13 of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, his former assistant, testifying under the pseudonym "Mia," continued her testimony detailing alleged abuse and manipulation by Combs. She recounted a 2015 incident where, while in South Africa with Combs's then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, Combs and his chief of staff bombarded her with messages and calls after Ventura discovered his infidelity and refused contact. Mia testified that Combs, appearing irrational and slurring, threatened to ruin her career and pressured her to intervene. She also described how Combs used past assaults to blackmail her and threatened to sabotage her ABC comedy project, which was never aired .Additionally, Mia described the volatile environment while working for Combs over nine years, noting both psychological manipulation and physical abuse, including being thrown against walls and sexually assaulted. She testified that she felt trapped and feared for her safety, stating, "I couldn't tell him 'no' about anything," and that Combs could ruin her future if she left or was fired . Mia's testimony is a key component in the prosecution's effort to establish a pattern of coercion and abuse by Combs.On the afternoon of Day 13 of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal trial, "Mia," a former assistant testifying under a pseudonym, faced cross-examination by the defense. Combs's attorney, Brian Steel, presented jurors with Mia's past social media posts and a scrapbook she created for Combs's 45th birthday, which included affectionate messages like "I love you forever." Steel aimed to challenge Mia's allegations of abuse by highlighting these positive depictions of their relationship. Mia responded that these gestures were made under psychological duress, explaining that she was in a "very confusing" situation and feared for her safety, stating that creating the scrapbook was "a lot more complicated on all levels."Further questioning focused on Mia's emotional state after being dismissed from Combs's company in 2016. Text messages presented in court revealed her expressing feelings of devastation and heartbreak, describing her life as "over" and stating she was "going to kill" herself. Mia explained that working for Combs was her entire world, and the sudden loss left her feeling lost and betrayed. When asked directly whether she had fabricated any part of her testimony, Mia firmly stated, "What I said is true. I have not lied to anyone at all." The court adjourned for the day, with Mia's cross-examination set to continue on Monday.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 30, 2025 - Day 13 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Boys are back in court to debate the two hottest films of the nerd universe in 2025: ‘Superman' vs. ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps.' Here to decide which legal team gave the best argument is the honorable judge Sean Fennessey. (0:00) Intro (2:26) Opening Statements (8:45) Cross-Examination (44:45) Closing Statements (49:03) Verdict Hosts: Van Lathan, Charles Holmes, Jomi Adeniran, and Steve Ahlman Guest: Sean Fennessey Producers: Aleya Zenieris and Jade Whaley Additional Production Support: Arjuna Ramgopowell Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On the fifth day of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal trial, Cassie Ventura concluded her emotional four-day testimony. During cross-examination, Ventura detailed the alleged abuse she endured over their 11-year relationship, including being coerced into "freak-offs"—drug-fueled sex parties involving male escorts—at Combs's behest. She testified that these experiences left her feeling "worthless" and likened her involvement to being a "sex worker" due to the preparation and coercion involved. Ventura also recounted physical abuse incidents, such as a 2009 assault witnessed by former Danity Kane member Dawn Richard, and a 2016 hotel hallway attack captured on surveillance footage. Despite the defense's attempts to portray these encounters as consensual, Ventura maintained that her participation was driven by fear and manipulation.Following Ventura's testimony, the prosecution called Homeland Security agent Yasin Binda, who described evidence collected during a 2024 raid on Combs's hotel suite, including drugs and lubricants. The day concluded with testimony from Dawn Richard, who corroborated Ventura's accounts by describing a 2009 incident where Combs allegedly assaulted Ventura over a minor dispute. Richard testified that Combs's behavior created a culture of fear and control, aligning with the prosecution's narrative of a pattern of abuse and exploitation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

On the fourth day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, Cassie Ventura faced intense cross-examination from the defense. Attorney Anna Estevao sought to portray Ventura as a consenting participant in their tumultuous relationship, highlighting text messages and emails that suggested mutual affection and willingness to engage in the so-called "freak-offs"—drug-fueled group sex encounters central to the prosecution's case. The defense emphasized instances where Ventura appeared to plan these events, referencing messages where she expressed anticipation and involvement in organizing them. They also delved into her past relationships, including with rapper Kid Cudi and actor Michael B. Jordan, to suggest mutual jealousy and complexity in her relationship with Combs.Ventura, who is currently eight months pregnant, maintained that her participation in these events was driven by fear and manipulation. She testified that Combs exerted control over her, using threats and violence to coerce her into compliance. When questioned about their drug use, Ventura acknowledged that they both used substances but asserted that Combs became angry if she used drugs without him, indicating a controlling dynamic. She also recounted incidents of violence, including an episode where Combs allegedly threw a wooden hanger at her friend, leading to the end of that friendship. Despite the defense's efforts to challenge her credibility, Ventura remained composed, reiterating that her actions were often a result of coercion and fear.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 15, 2025 - Day 4 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

On the fifth day of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal trial, Cassie Ventura concluded her emotional four-day testimony. During cross-examination, Ventura detailed the alleged abuse she endured over their 11-year relationship, including being coerced into "freak-offs"—drug-fueled sex parties involving male escorts—at Combs's behest. She testified that these experiences left her feeling "worthless" and likened her involvement to being a "sex worker" due to the preparation and coercion involved. Ventura also recounted physical abuse incidents, such as a 2009 assault witnessed by former Danity Kane member Dawn Richard, and a 2016 hotel hallway attack captured on surveillance footage. Despite the defense's attempts to portray these encounters as consensual, Ventura maintained that her participation was driven by fear and manipulation.Following Ventura's testimony, the prosecution called Homeland Security agent Yasin Binda, who described evidence collected during a 2024 raid on Combs's hotel suite, including drugs and lubricants. The day concluded with testimony from Dawn Richard, who corroborated Ventura's accounts by describing a 2009 incident where Combs allegedly assaulted Ventura over a minor dispute. Richard testified that Combs's behavior created a culture of fear and control, aligning with the prosecution's narrative of a pattern of abuse and exploitation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On the fourth day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, Cassie Ventura faced intense cross-examination from the defense. Attorney Anna Estevao sought to portray Ventura as a consenting participant in their tumultuous relationship, highlighting text messages and emails that suggested mutual affection and willingness to engage in the so-called "freak-offs"—drug-fueled group sex encounters central to the prosecution's case. The defense emphasized instances where Ventura appeared to plan these events, referencing messages where she expressed anticipation and involvement in organizing them. They also delved into her past relationships, including with rapper Kid Cudi and actor Michael B. Jordan, to suggest mutual jealousy and complexity in her relationship with Combs.Ventura, who is currently eight months pregnant, maintained that her participation in these events was driven by fear and manipulation. She testified that Combs exerted control over her, using threats and violence to coerce her into compliance. When questioned about their drug use, Ventura acknowledged that they both used substances but asserted that Combs became angry if she used drugs without him, indicating a controlling dynamic. She also recounted incidents of violence, including an episode where Combs allegedly threw a wooden hanger at her friend, leading to the end of that friendship. Despite the defense's efforts to challenge her credibility, Ventura remained composed, reiterating that her actions were often a result of coercion and fear.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 15, 2025 - Day 4 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On the afternoon of June 23, 2025, during the federal sex-trafficking trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, the prosecution continued to present evidence supporting their allegations. Special Agent Joseph Cerciello of Homeland Security Investigations resumed his testimony, detailing the logistics of the so-called "freak-off" events. The jury was shown explicit video clips, text messages, and travel records that depicted Combs's involvement in orchestrating these events. Notably, a voicemail from Combs to his chief of staff, Kristina Khorram, requested 20 bottles of baby oil, highlighting the meticulous planning behind these encounters. Additionally, text messages from Combs to a male escort agency revealed his dissatisfaction with the performance of an escort, further illustrating his role in coordinating these activities.The prosecution also introduced messages from "Jane," a former girlfriend of Combs, who testified under a pseudonym. In these messages, Jane expressed feelings of being used and mistreated, stating, "I don't want to be used and locked in a room to fulfill your fantasies." These communications were pivotal in supporting the government's allegations of coercion and manipulation. As the afternoon session concluded, the prosecution indicated that they expected to rest their case on Tuesday, June 24, with the defense planning to rest without calling any witnesses. Closing arguments are scheduled for Thursday, June 26, with jury deliberations anticipated shortly thereafter.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypress

On the afternoon of June 23, 2025, during the federal sex-trafficking trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, the prosecution continued to present evidence supporting their allegations. Special Agent Joseph Cerciello of Homeland Security Investigations resumed his testimony, detailing the logistics of the so-called "freak-off" events. The jury was shown explicit video clips, text messages, and travel records that depicted Combs's involvement in orchestrating these events. Notably, a voicemail from Combs to his chief of staff, Kristina Khorram, requested 20 bottles of baby oil, highlighting the meticulous planning behind these encounters. Additionally, text messages from Combs to a male escort agency revealed his dissatisfaction with the performance of an escort, further illustrating his role in coordinating these activities.The prosecution also introduced messages from "Jane," a former girlfriend of Combs, who testified under a pseudonym. In these messages, Jane expressed feelings of being used and mistreated, stating, "I don't want to be used and locked in a room to fulfill your fantasies." These communications were pivotal in supporting the government's allegations of coercion and manipulation. As the afternoon session concluded, the prosecution indicated that they expected to rest their case on Tuesday, June 24, with the defense planning to rest without calling any witnesses. Closing arguments are scheduled for Thursday, June 26, with jury deliberations anticipated shortly thereafter.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypressBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this podcast Jeff discusses a moment he never dreamed would occur: Iran's nuclear facilities were destroyed by America and Iran is finally punished for its global terror. Every President from Carter through Biden looked the other way or appeased Iran's terrorism — Trump did not. Jeff eats some crow but points out the MAGA leading voices who sided with the Muslim terror state that tried to kill our President. And an update on Jeff's federal fraud sentencing before his fraternity brother. It was a hoot, it was surreal and it brought back a lot of memories.

Jim Chapman covers the testimony from Friday June 13th including the shocking testimony of yet another assistant to Diddy who details the infamous “King Nights” Chapters:06:14 New Witness: Homeland Security Investigator09:52 Unexpected Guest in Court (Kanye “Ye” West)11:05 Discussion of Combs' Reactions to testimony13:17 Jonathan Perez on Wild King Nights23:49 Cross-Examination of PerezFollow “Crime Wire Weekly” on it's new channel HERE: Apple Podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-crime-wire-weekly/id1815864889Spotify  https://open.spotify.com/show/3zyrgjtW6gLUVbicJaYXV9?si=0dbf4983938344a2Amazon Music  https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/3738411d-828e-4138-9976-223ab5de2c87/the-crime-wire-weekly Source Credits: NBC News Trial Newsletter https://link.nbcnews.com/join/5cj/nbc-news-diddy-newsletter-signup? https://www.cnn.com/entertainment/live-news/diddy-combs-trial-cassie-case-06-06-25 Tags: Sean-Diddy-Combs,legal-proceedings,juror dismissal,Kanye-West,podcast,exposed,trial,testimony,Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/exposed-scandalous-files-of-the-elite--6073723/support.

This week Jeff opens with the long-awaited Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear infrastructure, a dazzling military operation years in the making. But instead of support for Israel, Jeff is stunned by the response: hatred not only from the far left but now pouring out of MAGA's biggest names. Yes, the Trump-right has joined Hamas and the progressive left in their obsessive Jew hatred, and Jeff is seething.Trump, meanwhile, couldn't resist taking credit for the Israeli success after the fact, even though he reportedly tried to block the strike for months. And if he actually helped, why didn't he greenlight American B-52s to finish the job on the underground nuke sites? Why is he trying to make a huge deal when the world's biggest sponsor of terror is on its knees?Also this week: a tale of how a young lawyer buying his first suits comes full circle 30 years later, this time as a man paying cash with 44 tailored suits under his belt. Plus, Jeff faces a federal judge he went to college with and admits, despite all of his own accomplishments, the judge is the better man.As always, Jeff pulls no punches. Not for MAGA. Not for Trump. Not for the far left. And certainly not for anyone siding with the world's worst terror regime.

Extended excerpt from Thursday's debate between the leading Democrats running for the mayoral nomination:  First, the candidates direct questions to each other and then they discuss how they will ensure all New Yorkers feel safe, particularly Jewish and Muslim New Yorkers, in the context of the war in the Middle East. 

In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears.   Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

The second witness using a pseudonym said on the stand that she "currently" loves Combs, even after telling her story of a brutal beating at his hands just one year ago. She then testified that she only participated in what she calls "hotel nights" because she didn't want Combs to feel judged for his sexual desires. And after her sexual performances were complete, she pampered him, including giving him foot rubs and turning on his favorite TV show.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy

Diddy Trial Jane Doe Cross examination Diddy is a confirmed cuckold+ she was jealous of Caresha

During the afternoon session on June 10th, 2025, at the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, the defense team continued its sustained cross-examination of Jane Doe Victim 2. The questioning remained sharply focused on attempting to undermine her credibility before the jury. Defense attorneys zeroed in on alleged inconsistencies between her in-court testimony and prior statements made to law enforcement and in civil litigation. They pressed her on precise dates, locations, and details of the alleged trafficking incidents she described, suggesting that elements of her narrative had shifted over time. The defense also highlighted text messages and communications that they argued were inconsistent with the portrayal of coercion and control presented by the government.Throughout the afternoon, Jane Doe 2 maintained her composure but showed visible signs of fatigue under the lengthy and at times repetitive questioning. The defense probed her connections to other accusers and her interactions with civil attorneys, implying possible coordination or financial motivation. Prosecutors objected at several points to the tone and scope of the questioning, but Judge Subramanian largely allowed the cross-examination to proceed. No new evidence was introduced; the session remained centered on testing the consistency and reliability of Jane Doe 2's testimony. The court adjourned with the cross-examination still ongoing, setting the stage for its conclusion in the next session.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 10, 2025 - Day 20 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

The second witness using a pseudonym said on the stand that she "currently" loves Combs, even after telling her story of a brutal beating at his hands just one year ago. She then testified that she only participated in what she calls "hotel nights" because she didn't want Combs to feel judged for his sexual desires. And after her sexual performances were complete, she pampered him, including giving him foot rubs and turning on his favorite TV show.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy

In the morning session, the defense launched an aggressive cross‑examination of the witness known as “Jane,” who resumed her testimony after three days describing alleged drug-fueled “hotel nights” or “freak‑offs” orchestrated by Combs.   The defense attorney emphasized moments of affection—highlighting a voice note where Jane called Combs “my crack pipe” and texts expressing gratitude for his financial support, including paying her rent and funding a lease.    They pointed out that these interactions suggested love and dependency, questioning whether her involvement had been fully coercive.Judge Subramanian also denied a second mistrial motion, filed by Combs's team, which argued that a previous witness's testimony was false and prejudicial; the judge ruled the trial was proceeding fairly, even going as far as saying that he thought that the defense had a Perry Mason moment during the testimony of Bryana Bongolan.    to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN

Karen Read Trial Testimony - Daniel Wolfe - ARCCA Cross-Examination Watch prosecutor Hank Brennan systematically destroy the credibility of Karen Read's star expert witness in what may be the most devastating cross-examination in recent legal history. This is the complete, unedited testimony that transformed Dr. Daniel Wolfe from potential defense savior into the prosecution's best witness. What begins as routine questioning quickly escalates into a credibility massacre that exposes ethical violations, methodological flaws, and secret coordination between the expert and defense team. Brennan reveals that Wolfe used Signal encrypted messaging to communicate with defense attorney Alan Jackson and admits to deleting text message evidence. The physics destruction continues as Brennan forces Wolfe to confront the devastating implications of his own testing. The dummy arm weighed 9.4 pounds versus John O'Keefe's actual 11.8-pound arm, yet still created damage matching Read's SUV. The cross-examination makes clear that if lighter conditions produced this result, heavier conditions prove guilt. Explosive moments include the Signal app scandal revelation, Wolfe's uncomfortable admission about deleting evidence, systematic destruction of his testing methodology, and exposure of how ARCCA transitioned from FBI contractors to paid defense witnesses while maintaining independence claims. Brennan reveals that ARCCA was retained just days before jury selection began, exposing the rushed timeline that suggests last-minute scrambling rather than objective scientific inquiry. Watch as Wolfe's admission that his methodology lacks peer-reviewed support and should be called "experiments" rather than validated procedures destroys his credibility. The courtroom atmosphere is electric as Judge Beverly Cannone's visible frustration validates her previous concerns about defense violations. Notice the jury's increasing skepticism as ethical lapses are exposed and professional standards crumble under prosecutorial scrutiny. This cross-examination doesn't just destroy Wolfe's credibility - it validates the prosecution's traditional forensic approach and potentially contaminates the defense's remaining expert testimony. Months of defense preparation and substantial financial investment crumble as Brennan demonstrates how ethical violations and methodological flaws can destroy even expensive expert witness preparation. This is courtroom combat at its highest level, where prosecutorial skill meets compromised expert testimony with devastating results. Essential viewing for anyone interested in legal strategy, forensic science, or how expert witnesses can accidentally prove their client's guilt. #KarenRead #HankBrennan #CrossExamination #ARCCADestroyed #ExpertWitnessFail #SignalApp #ForensicScience #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #ProsecutorialSkill Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial Testimony - Daniel Wolfe - ARCCA Cross-Examination Watch prosecutor Hank Brennan systematically destroy the credibility of Karen Read's star expert witness in what may be the most devastating cross-examination in recent legal history. This is the complete, unedited testimony that transformed Dr. Daniel Wolfe from potential defense savior into the prosecution's best witness. What begins as routine questioning quickly escalates into a credibility massacre that exposes ethical violations, methodological flaws, and secret coordination between the expert and defense team. Brennan reveals that Wolfe used Signal encrypted messaging to communicate with defense attorney Alan Jackson and admits to deleting text message evidence. The physics destruction continues as Brennan forces Wolfe to confront the devastating implications of his own testing. The dummy arm weighed 9.4 pounds versus John O'Keefe's actual 11.8-pound arm, yet still created damage matching Read's SUV. The cross-examination makes clear that if lighter conditions produced this result, heavier conditions prove guilt. Explosive moments include the Signal app scandal revelation, Wolfe's uncomfortable admission about deleting evidence, systematic destruction of his testing methodology, and exposure of how ARCCA transitioned from FBI contractors to paid defense witnesses while maintaining independence claims. Brennan reveals that ARCCA was retained just days before jury selection began, exposing the rushed timeline that suggests last-minute scrambling rather than objective scientific inquiry. Watch as Wolfe's admission that his methodology lacks peer-reviewed support and should be called "experiments" rather than validated procedures destroys his credibility. The courtroom atmosphere is electric as Judge Beverly Cannone's visible frustration validates her previous concerns about defense violations. Notice the jury's increasing skepticism as ethical lapses are exposed and professional standards crumble under prosecutorial scrutiny. This cross-examination doesn't just destroy Wolfe's credibility - it validates the prosecution's traditional forensic approach and potentially contaminates the defense's remaining expert testimony. Months of defense preparation and substantial financial investment crumble as Brennan demonstrates how ethical violations and methodological flaws can destroy even expensive expert witness preparation. This is courtroom combat at its highest level, where prosecutorial skill meets compromised expert testimony with devastating results. Essential viewing for anyone interested in legal strategy, forensic science, or how expert witnesses can accidentally prove their client's guilt. #KarenRead #HankBrennan #CrossExamination #ARCCADestroyed #ExpertWitnessFail #SignalApp #ForensicScience #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #ProsecutorialSkill Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu began facing cross-examination by prosecutors in his criminal trial, the majority of Israelis are much more focused on “life-and-death” issues as the Gaza war wears on, Haaretz columnist and public opinion expert Dahlia Scheindlin said on the Haaretz Podcast. The subdued level of public interest “highlights how Israelis have become resigned to the extraordinary situation of their prime minister being on trial for corruption during the longest war and the most devastating war Israel has ever had,” Scheindlin said. While polls show a majority of Israelis frustrated and “furious” over that situation, “they feel helpless to do anything about it,” Scheindlin added. Deeply upset about the continuing hostage crisis and IDF casualties, and with reservists and their families exhausted, the Israeli public has little patience for courtroom banter regarding issues like the size of a Bugs Bunny doll that a Hollywood tycoon gave to the Netanyahu children in the 1990s which, Scheindlin said, “trivializes the proceedings.” In her conversation with host Allison Kaplan Sommer, Scheindlin also analyzes the brewing political crisis in Israel as the ultra-Orthodox party Degel HaTorah threatens to bring down the government over its failure to pass a law exempting Haredi men from military service and assesses the odds as to whether the country will soon be heading into new elections. “When governments fall in Israel, they usually fall over religion and state issues,” she said. Subscribe to Haaretz.com for up-to-the-minute news and analysis from Israel in English. Read more: 'I Did Not Commit a Single Crime': Netanyahu Calls Indictments 'Persecution' on First Day of Cross-examination Explained: Why Is Benjamin Netanyahu on Trial? Yes to Transfer: 82% of Jewish Israelis Back Expelling Gazans A Grim Poll Showed Most Jewish Israelis Support Expelling Gazans. It's Brutal – and It's TrueSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 1 Description: In this critical segment of the trial, the defense begins its cross-examination of Judson Welcher. Attempting to poke holes in Aperture's crash analysis and methodology, Read's attorneys challenge assumptions, question visibility models, and raise issues of expert bias. This is the first round of a highly technical — and tactical — courtroom exchange. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CrossExamination #DefenseStrategy #TrueCrimeCourtroom #ApertureAnalysis #CrashDataDebate #TrialFootage #KarenReadDefense #JohnOKeefeCase Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 2 Description: As cross-examination continues, the defense zeroes in on the reliability of the data and simulation models used by Judson Welcher and Aperture. Welcher is pressed on assumptions, thresholds, and visual representation of impact scenarios — in an attempt to raise doubt about the prosecution's timeline and theory of the case. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #CrossExamination #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcherTestimony #TrueCrimeVideo #VehicleForensics #JohnOKeefe #CourtroomDebate #ForensicScience #TrialDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination & Re-Direct Description: The cross-examination wraps, and the prosecution follows with re-direct to re-establish Judson Welcher's credibility and reinforce his key conclusions. This segment showcases the tug-of-war over expert interpretation and how precise data — or its presentation — can shape a jury's perception in a high-stakes case. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CourtroomDrama #ReDirect #ForensicBattle #CrashAnalysis #ExpertWitnessTestimony #ApertureForensics #TrueCrimeTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 1 Description: In this critical segment of the trial, the defense begins its cross-examination of Judson Welcher. Attempting to poke holes in Aperture's crash analysis and methodology, Read's attorneys challenge assumptions, question visibility models, and raise issues of expert bias. This is the first round of a highly technical — and tactical — courtroom exchange. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CrossExamination #DefenseStrategy #TrueCrimeCourtroom #ApertureAnalysis #CrashDataDebate #TrialFootage #KarenReadDefense #JohnOKeefeCase Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination & Re-Direct Description: The cross-examination wraps, and the prosecution follows with re-direct to re-establish Judson Welcher's credibility and reinforce his key conclusions. This segment showcases the tug-of-war over expert interpretation and how precise data — or its presentation — can shape a jury's perception in a high-stakes case. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CourtroomDrama #ReDirect #ForensicBattle #CrashAnalysis #ExpertWitnessTestimony #ApertureForensics #TrueCrimeTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 2 Description: As cross-examination continues, the defense zeroes in on the reliability of the data and simulation models used by Judson Welcher and Aperture. Welcher is pressed on assumptions, thresholds, and visual representation of impact scenarios — in an attempt to raise doubt about the prosecution's timeline and theory of the case. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #CrossExamination #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcherTestimony #TrueCrimeVideo #VehicleForensics #JohnOKeefe #CourtroomDebate #ForensicScience #TrialDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/IduAs7XWVEUDay 22 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 28, 2025. After a brief Direct Examination by Special Prosecutor, Hank Brennan, of their Accident Reconstructionist, Dr. Welcher, Cross Examination took up the whole day and will continue on Day 23. Defense Attorney, Robert Alessi, ross-examination was rigorous and focused on challenging the credibility, methodology, and conclusions of the Commonwealth's expert witness. Dr. Welcher was repeatedly admonished by the court for looking at his computer and searching for information during the cross-examination, rather than answering directly from memory.Alessi questioned Dr. Welchre about the significant amount his firm, Aperture, was being paid by the Norfolk County District Attorney's Office ($325,000), and the details surrounding the purchase and sale of a Lexus exemplar for testing. The defense sought to highlight potential bias due to financial incentives.Alessi challenged inconsistencies in Dr. Welchre's testimony, such as the distance the Lexus traveled in reverse during a test (initially said to be 53 feet, then 87 feet), and the explanation of the 8 mph threshold for tail light breakage.Alessi delved into Dr. Welcher's use of data and images from Trooper Paul's report, questioning the extent to which Dr. Welcher relied on that information in his analysis. There was a dispute about a drone image and other diagrams, leading to a "Voir dire" (examination outside the presence of the jury) to clarify the sources of these materials.The voir dire aimed to clarify the sources of Dr. Welcher's materials and to determine the extent to which he relied on Trooper Paul's report or other evidence. It highlighted the defense's effort to question the independence of Dr. Welcher's analysis and the Commonwealth's attempt to defend it. The voir dire concluded with plans to continue the cross-examination the following day, with the understanding that time was limited due to a juror's scheduling issue.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

7 Hours and 59 MinutesPG-13Thomas777 is a revisionist historian and a fiction writer.Here are episodes 17 throught the Livestream Q&A of the World War 2 series with Thomas777 in one audio file.Episode 17: The Nuremberg Proceedings Part 1 w/ Thomas777Episode 18: The Nuremberg Proceedings Part 2 w/ Thomas777Episode 19: The Nuremberg Proceedings Part 3 - The Defendants w/ Thomas777Episode 20: The Trial of Hermann Göring Part 1 w/ Thomas777Episode 21: The Trial of Hermann Göring Part 2 - The Cross-Examination w/ Thomas777Episode 22: The Final Episode in the WW2 Series - The Verdicts at Nuremberg w/ Thomas777Livestream Q&AThomas' SubstackThomas777 MerchandiseThomas' Book "Steelstorm Pt. 1"Thomas' Book "Steelstorm Pt. 2"Thomas on TwitterThomas' CashApp - $7homas777Pete and Thomas777 'At the Movies'Support Pete on His WebsitePete's PatreonPete's SubstackPete's SubscribestarPete's GUMROADPete's VenmoPete's Buy Me a CoffeePete on FacebookPete on TwitterBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-quinones-show--6071361/support.

In the second week of Sean “Diddy” Combs' trial witness Danity Kane Singer Dawn Richard returns to stand and today she's up against the Defense in a heated Cross Examination. Welcome to Surviving The Survivor, the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of true crime. In this LIVE Diddy episode STS Host Joel Waldman will break down the very latest testimony and share the most important details about the case. Dawn Richard testified about a 2009 incident where she witnessed Combs allegedly attack his ex, Casandra “Cassie” Ventura, with a frying pan while she was making him eggs. Richard's testimony explains the abuse she saw and the fear instilled in her. Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing five criminal charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy and transportation to engage in prostitution. The music mogul has pleaded not guilty to all charged. Combs' defense team agrees Diddy and Cassie Ventura had a volatile relationship in which both parties were violent. They even claim Combs may be guilty of domestic abuse — but not the crimes he is actually being charged with. So the question remains...will the state prove their case? Is there reasonable doubt? The trial is expected to last eight weeks. Combs also faces more than 70 civil complaints, including one by Richard. He has denied all the allegations against him.⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast

As someone who experienced the good, the bad, and the ugly side of the music industry, Aubrey shares her thoughts on Cassie's cross examination. From the text messages, to the testimony, Aubrey offers Amy and T.J. some eye-opening courtroom context.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As someone who experienced the good, the bad, and the ugly side of the music industry, Aubrey shares her thoughts on Cassie's cross examination. From the text messages, to the testimony, Aubrey offers Amy and T.J. some eye-opening courtroom context.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On Day 4 of Diddy's Trial Defense takes over with an intense and focused cross examination of Diddy's ex, Cassie Ventura. The defense brings in text messages and plays on emotion, hinting that Cassie and Diddy both shared love and jealousy. Welcome to this special episode of Surviving the Survivor, live from NYC, where host Joel Waldman is sitting inside the federal courthouse and will bring us up to date on what's going on in court today. Cameras are not allowed in federal courtrooms. Sean "Diddy" Combs is on trial for charges of sexually assaulting, trafficking and exploiting women over multiple decades. Sean "Diddy" Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura spent two days testifying, revealing graphic details of alleged abuse and sex acts. Her testimony comes after jurors heard from a hotel security manager about the infamous video of Combs beating her in 2016. Prosecutors say this is just the tip of the iceberg but today the defense is digging deeper into Cassie's story and trying to prove that this was love, jealousy and dv--but not case of racketeering or trafficking.⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast

Karen Read faces a jury for the second time, charged with the murder of her boyfriend, Boston Police officer John O'Keefe. Did Read hit O'Keefe with her car, leaving him to die in the snow? Or is she the target of an elaborate cover-up, as she and her supporters have claimed? This episode of the Court TV Podcast features the full testimony of Canton Police Lieutenant Paul Gallagher from 5/5/2025 and 5/6/2025. Hear his detailed account regarding evidence collection and more in this highly divisive case.For more on the case against Karen Read, Click Here.Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/FOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE https://www.courttv.com/trials/ HOW TO FIND COURT TV https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/Fpf2EGgVDzgDay 13 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 9, 2025. Sgt. Yuri Bukhenik is back on the stand with Cross Examination and Defense Attorney Alan Jackson keeps cornering him about Proctor's true involvements. At one point he says that he gave evidence bag to someone but didn't know who. A significant portion of the day involved reading text messages between Brian Higgins and Karen Read into evidence. These texts were described as potentially "flirtatious" and revealed details about Karen's relationship with John O'Keefe, her feelings about children, and the presence of ring cameras at O'Keefe's house. The defense aimed to highlight these texts to suggest the investigation should have looked more closely at Higgins. Trooper Bukhenik was assigned to find the location of the Albert's dog, Chole, who was shortly rehomed after John O'Keefe's death. Chloe is supposed now named Cora but we are not sure if that is the same dog because they were rehomed twice after the Albert's. There were not transfer records, rehoming records, purchase records and the validity of the veterinary records are questioned because the dog's name and current owner were not on the document.Alan Jackson asked if he was aware that there were more than 20 official police reports were not recorded for more than 100 days from the time of the event in question? There were 11 reports that were more than 300 days from the time of the event? Three reports were more than 400 days from the time of the event? Four reports were more than 500 days from the time of the event? The longest delay of any report in this investigation was 581 days? Bukhenik acknowledged that he was not aware of the exact dates and delays. He tried to explain that in a perfect world, reports would be written as events happen but implied there were reasons for the delays.It was revealed during the cross-examination of Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik that there were significant delays in interviewing witnesses from Ricky D'Antuono's truck. While Ryan Nagle, who was also in the truck, was interviewed in February 2022, Ricky D'Antuono, who drove the truck, were not interviewed until September 2023. This is approximately a year and a half later!The defense appears to be anticipating that the Commonwealth will not call certain witnesses (Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, Ricky D'Antuono, and potentially Trooper Proctor), and they are trying to introduce their desired information through Sergeant Bukhenik's testimony. Cross Examination continues on Monday.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/Tag0fJcx9ZIDay 12 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 8, 2025. Sgt. Yuri Bukhenik was the only witness to take the stand as he walked in with bins of evidence. There was confusion regarding John O'Keefe's sneakers being initially misidentified a being the one from from 34 Fairview versus from the hospital. Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan and Bukhenik talked briefly in the beginning about Proctor, calling him Mr. Proctor instead of Trooper Proctor but we know Defense Attorney Alan Jackson will call him Former Trooper Proctor. Sgt. Yuri Bukhenik explained that there was an investigation against him due to failure to properly Supervise Michael Proctor. His punishment was that he lost 5 vacation days. He continues to work in homicide and has not been demoted from Sargent. When Bukhenik read the text message thread from Proctor, which contained horrible messages that he said he acknowledged with a thumbs up emoji, we can only image what was going through the jurors minds.Bukhenik presented a video timeline of Karen Read drinking at CF McCarthy's and The Waterfall before we got to Cross Examination!Sgt. Bukhenik refused to call Proctor the Lead Investigator of this case and said he was only a "Case Agent' and/or "Case Officer." He was questioned about the integrity of the investigation and whether Michael Proctor's involvement tainted it, to which he responded that the investigation was done with honor and integrity. When asked if Proctor handled the case with honor and integrity, Bukhenik relented and only said yes with integrity. Access to evidence, specifically John O'Keefe's clothing, was discussed, noting that "anyone with a key card" had access to the room where it was stored for six days.The timing and documentation of evidence collection, particularly clothing and items from 34 Fairview, were questioned. It was noted that reports about the searches weren't written until November 4th, 2023, despite the events happening in February 2022!RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/QZlJIBMCSsMDay 11 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 7, 2025. It feels like Deja Vu for Emily because it is her birthday and last year she was covering Day 6 of the first Karen Read trial! The Prosecution's case said it would take 3 weeks and half to present their case and they are more than halfway through, but several key witnesses, such as Former Trooper Michael Proctor, have not yet been called.Trooper Connor Keefe took the stand and displayed physical evidence, including pieces of tail light and a shoe, was shown to the jury. There was an issue with the evidence bag containing tail light pieces being marked as "two pieces" when there were actually three. Defense Attorney David Yanetti had an effective Cross Examination and Keefe tried to distance himself from Former Trooper Proctor or even say that he does good work. Yanetti pointed out that Keefe is a junior detective, and he was the only person who attended John O'Keefe's autopsy. It is usually the Lead Investigator that attends the autopsy and the fact that his partner, Trooper Bukhenik, didn't attend either is also strange. The fact that a fallen officer, John O'Keefe, was not treated with respect is baffling. Jessica Hyde, the Digital Forensics Examiner, took the stand to take about the Cellebrite data of Jen McCabe and John O'Keefe's phone. She talked about the various tools she used to decipher the information and her opinion on the "Hos long to die in cold" Google Search began at 6:23:49am because that is when Apple Suggested Term gave her, "How long does it take to digest food." After that, is when other variations of search happens like "how long ti die in cikd" at 6:23:51am, 6:23:57am, 6:24:18am, & 6:24:47am. Hyde also explained that a browser tab cannot be deleted and that Jen McCabe didn't manually delete any calls from her log. The phone has a limitation that it only stores 200 calls records and from Jan 29 to February 1st, when her phone was imaged, she must have made over 200 calls because the older calls were being erased from the phone in order to store new incoming calls. This is believable because we've heard her make 5 calls in 10 mins when the FBI unexpectedly showed up at her house for questing. Another notable instance is that Jessica Hyde noted in her report that John's phone interaction is at 12:20am but Ian Whiffin's report showed that the phone was locked with a button at 12:32am. In Jessica Hyde's testimony indicated that John O'Keefe's phone did not appear to have been secured in a Faraday bag or placed in airplane mode, as evidenced by the fact that SMS messages and ring notifications were still being received on the phone. This raised concerns about whether the phone was properly handled and secured by law enforcement, as new information could potentially still be added to the device.Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan played a clip from ID Docuseries, April 30, 2024, where Karen Read says, "Jen McCabe- It's me or her. Either I'm going down, Jen, or you are!” The implications of these statements and how the jury might interpret them are considered. The Prosecution can infer that Karen is using Jen as a scapegoat and with more videos he will use at his disposal, make it to where she has no choice to take the stand to clarify her statements.The Prosecution is presenting a stronger case in this retrial compared to the previous trial. However, concerns are raised about upcoming testimonies, such as the accident reconstructionist and medical experts.RESOURCESDay 6 of the first Karen Read Trial -

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/r2vEF0vxG2wDay 10 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 6, 2025. We finished up Cross Examination of Lt. Paul Gallagher, along with Re-Directs and Re-Cross. When he was clearing the area with the leaf blower, he never found a hat, a shoe, and red pieces of plastic tail lights. He was also questioned why he never got a search warrant to the premises of 34 Fairview Rd.Meteorologist, Robert Gilman, testified next and talked about the ground being frozen, the amount of snow on the ground, and visibility conditions at the time of the incident. Defense Attorney Robert Alessi used this testimony to highlight the relatively little amount of snow and good visibility when John arrived at 34 Fairview Rd. The Meteorologist also brought up the concept of windchill to argue about the potential effect on O'Keefe's body and to question whether he could have died from the cold outside.Video clips of Karen Read in interviews with media saying she could have clipped John in the leg were played tot he jury.Trooper Nick Guarino was recalled to the stand for the final time to bring in timeline evidence of evidence of Karen Read's communication with John O'Keefe's cell phone around the time they arrived to 34 Fairview Rd. Missed calls, voice messages, and texts messages varied from angry and accusatory around midnight to panicked at towards the morning up until she found John O'Keefe's body. A key piece of evidence is that Karen Read's cell phone automatically connected to John O'Keefe's home Wi-Fi Router at 12:36am.Lt. Charles Rae testified to going to 1 Meadows where John O'Keefe lived to do a wellness check on his niece and nephew. No one answered the door because by the time they arrived their, John's friends and family had already taken care of the kids. He was able to bring in footage from his dash cam showing Karen Read's SUV was at 1 Meadows and had a cracked tail light and some snow inside it.Kevin O'Hara from SERT was brought in to testify about evidence recovery around 5pm on January 29th. Their focus was initially on the area near the road to avoid evidence being plowed away. Five to six pieces of tail light and a shoe were found near the curb line. O'Hara testified that a man in a hoodie from 34 Faireview came outside the house asked "Are you here for what happened earlier?" And O'Hara replied, "Yes." And then the person just went back inside.Today's focus is on foundational testimony and evidence gathering, setting the stage for future discussions from accident reconstructionist. Though it was a less dramatic exchange between attorneys and witnesses than some previous days, how the jury will interpret the information, video clips and timeline presentation will impact the verdict.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/CQm0FID9AXYDay 9 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 5, 2025. We continue with Cross Examination and finishing up the testimony of Hannah Knowles from the Massachusetts State Police Crime Laboratory who explains the blood alcohol conversions and retrograde extrapolation, and how timing is critical in this case. Testimonies from Ryan Nagle, Heather Maxom, and Sarah Levinson provide insights into the events at 34 Fairview, including arrival times and observations of Karen Read's SUV. Sarah Levenson's surprisingly states never seeing the dog, Chloe, at the Albert's residence despite being friends with Brian Albert Jr. for many years.Katie McLaughlin, the female EMT who Jen McCabe stated Karen read said, "I hit him" three time in front of took the said. She also said that she heard Karen read say, "I hit him," but it was four times. Cross-examination by Alan Jackson focused on the timing of these statements and used dashcam video to break down these interactions and how her testimony does match up with what is happening on the video. Unfortunately, Jackson spent a majority of the time trying to get a "gotcha" moment by trying to prove that Katie McLaughlin and Caitlin Albert are close friends but he was unable to recreate that moment from the first trial due Special Prosecutor allowing Katie to explain her acquaintance relationship with Caitlin ahead of the Cross Examination. Jackson did manage to impeach Katie based on her words of first trial where she said that she knew of a girl by the name of Caitlin Albert that went to her school but that victory was short lived because he tried to being in picture evidence that kept being objected and sustained by Judge Cannone. Last witness of the day, Lt. Paul Gallagher, worked for the Canton Police Department at the time of the John O'Keefe's death and was the site supervisor. His testimony reveals issues with evidence handling and a lack of reports. It was his decision to use a leaf blower on the snow to uncover evidence, put blood found in the snow in Red Solo Cup and then transport them in Stop & Shop bags and found and handled the shattered drinking cocktail glass. Lt. Gallagher never wrote a report about his methods or even logged evidence with the blood he transferred. Questions about the chain of custody and why crucial information regarding Karen Read's statements was not relayed to the site supervisor. We also learn that Lieutenant Gallagher was not interviewed until just before the previous trial on April 3, 2024 by the Prosecution. We will resume with Cross Examination on Day 10. Stay tuned as we continue to follow the Karen Read Retrial and provide detailed breakdowns of each day's proceedings.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/W1usvKtssDoDay 8 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 2, 2025. The majority of the day revolved around the continued cross-examination of Jen McCabe by Alan Jackson. Her testimony is described as "incredibly difficult" and "evasive," with her struggling to answer direct questions. I break down what is and isn't a hostile witness since a lot of Law Nerds were wanting to know if it fits this situation.Group text message from Matt McCabe said, "Tell them the guy never came in the house," is highlighted, and Jen McCabe explains that "the guy" refers to John O'Keefe and that the "them" are the news reporters.McCabe is questioned about Google searches, particularly "hos long to die in cold," with discrepancies in her timeline and explanations. The 2:27 AM Google search time is also discussed, and McCabe claims she does not recall doing a search around that time.Jen McCabe was also caught calling her sister, Nicole Albert, the homeowner at 34 Fairview Rd, at 5:07am, after speaking over the phone with John O'Keefe's niece. The call log shows that they spoke for 38 seconds but Jen denies speaking to her. Questions arise about why Jen McCabe did not go inside Brian Albert Sr's house (a first responder with CPR training) for help when John O'Keefe was found, instead making phone calls to her sister, Nicole Albert, after calling 911. Jackson even questioned why she didn't go in the house after finding a John O'Keefe on the lawn because her sister, Nicole, could have been in perils danger and wasn't answering the phone according to Jen. You must check out this episode to this to hear her explanations of this, butt dials, and all of the other discrepancies in her testimony.The Re-Direct Examination, conducted by Special Prosecutor Brennan, focused on humanizing Jen McCabe and addressing claims of collusion among witnesses. In Re-Cross Examination where Alan Jackson brought up the issue of the suspended interview with federal agents. Lastly, testimony of Hannah Knowles from the Massachusetts State Police Crime Laboratory, regarding Karen Read's blood alcohol content (BAC), included the conversion from blood serum and retrograde extrapolation. Cross Examination of this witness will continue on Day 9.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy