Podcasts about fake app

Plus, TikTok's Jacob Knowles takes us from lobster traps to social media fame. Get the scoop on Apple's "Scary Fast" event. Boston Dynamics' robotic dog turns into a chatty tour guide with ChatGPT, and hackers solve a $200 million Bitcoin riddle.

Plus, TikTok's Jacob Knowles takes us from lobster traps to social media fame. Get the scoop on Apple's "Scary Fast" event. Boston Dynamics' robotic dog turns into a chatty tour guide with ChatGPT, and hackers solve a $200 million Bitcoin riddle.

Plus, TikTok's Jacob Knowles shares his journey from lobsterman to social media star. I've got the lowdown on Apple's "Scary Fast" event. Boston Dynamics' robotic dog now serves as a talking tour guide, courtesy of ChatGPT, and hackers crack a $200 million Bitcoin puzzle.

Plus, TikTok's Jacob Knowles shares his journey from lobsterman to social media star. I've got the lowdown on Apple's "Scary Fast" event. Boston Dynamics' robotic dog now serves as a talking tour guide, courtesy of ChatGPT, and hackers crack a $200 million Bitcoin puzzle.

In Operation Trojan Shield an FBI-led alliance of national security services used ANOM, a fake EncroChat-style communication network, to capture 800 criminals in possibly the biggest undercover cyber-sting ever. They netted over 32 tons of drugs and more than $148 million in cash. But why could this coup be a bit of an own goal for the authorities? International security expert Dr Binoy Kampmark of RMIT University in Melbourne tells Nina Schick what the sting means – and how US law enforcement tours the world for countries with “back doors” into private data. “The problem is that these criminals will now go back to Apple – because Apple fights for privacy.” “Governments want to control the tech companies – but they also like the way those companies act.” Presented by Nina Schick. Produced by Andrew Harrison. Assistant producers: Jacob Archbold and Jelena Sofronijevic. Music by Kenny Dickinson. Audio production by Alex Rees. THE BUNKER is a Podmasters Production See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The guys re-air part of their entertaining interview with the late, great Larry King, who passed away over the weekend. Mychal Thompson returns for a round of “Real or Fake App,” which gives Jorge a win in Game of Games. Plus, quick Lakers-Cavs predictions before the pregame show.

Unitevi a noi nella celebrazione del centesimo episodio del BIP SHOW!Dopo aver "sbocciato" vi parliamo di cosa sono i wrapped Bitcoin, di due gravi episodi di fishing, uno che riguarda direttamente un noto wallet ed un altro che vede BTC accusato ingiustamente, vi raccontiamo del futuro della guerra dei miner e del legame (assurdo) tra bitcoiner e carne rossa.Per la centesima volta... Lift off!I MECENATE dell’episodio sono ALESSANDRO CASINI e GIORGIO GEROLDI: grazie di cuore Giorgio e Alessandro!Regalati la t-shirt natalizia del vero bitcoiner. Una meraviglia!: https://amzn.to/2Ia2yvIKindle Unlimited gratis? Clicca qui: https://is.gd/BStKbUVuoi 3 mesi GRATIS di Amazon Music Unlimited? Clicca qui: https://is.gd/36COemNOTE DELLA PUNTATA:- Samourai ci mette in guardia su una Fake APP nel Play Store: https://is.gd/FBPy3W- La truffa coi Vip attribuita a Bitcoin: https://is.gd/hHaT8O- Cosa sono i wrapped Bitcoin: https://is.gd/xQZjPa- La risposta di A. Antonopoulos sulla guerra dei miner: https://is.gd/RlDo46- Il culto della bistecca: https://is.gd/HYYPtN- I benefici del digiuno intermittente: https://is.gd/vXtmzHRegalati un hardware wallet usando i nostri link sponsorizzati:– Trezor Model One: https://amzn.to/2NS6mQP- Trezor Model T: https://amzn.to/35LhxnC– Ledger NANO X: https://amzn.to/36GU5Yf– Ledger NANO S: https://amzn.to/2PVx7GRSei un ascoltatore studente e vuoi goderti 90 giorni di Amazon Prime gratis + l’abbonamento annuale al 50% di sconto? Lo puoi fare supportando il BIP SHOW e utilizzando questo link: http://www.amazon.it/joinstudent?tag=bitcoinitalia-21Il Bitcoin Italia Podcast è una piccola voce libera ed indipendente. Per mantenerla tale ci serve il tuo aiuto. Supportaci per mantenerci sicuri, decentralizzati, immutabili e trasparenti.Come?1- Semplicemente condividi il BIP show con tutti i tuoi amici e parenti.2- Lasciaci una recensione (possibilmente da 5 stelle!) su iTunes e Apple podcast!3- Visita il nostro sito https://www.bitcoinitaliapodcast.it/support/ e supportaci con una donazione!

On this episode Hollywood: Orwell, RoboCop, Detroit and Beverly Hills Cop. Man on the hunt for DEEPFAKES, JUNK NEWS, using The Junk News Aggregator, animal farm game released On steam, dell driver malware, and Singapore's law to institute a fake. News law, computational propaganda, bot nets and malware news, Social Media Disinformation Campaigns, algorithms and the manipulation of information, Content Analysis of Press and Television News and using DEEPFAKE to information warfare, misleading public opinion, manipulating stock prices or getting electoral support. Deepfake: A portmanteau of "deep learning" and "fake", deepfakes refer to any photo-realistic audiovisual content produced with the aid of deep learning. Blog... leave a Voicemail to 313-MAN-0231 and we will air it on the next episode. Forum Training [Guide] Extraction - A Workflow Linux Install Guide ImageOnline Tech Tips › cool-websites 7 Best Deepfake Apps And Websites - Online Tech Tips Aug 24, 2020 — Today anyone can download deepfake software or even use the web ... Faceswap runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux. People also ask What software is used for Deepfakes? Is there a Deepfake app? Can you still download FakeApp? Is Deepfake easy? Feedback ImageBeebom › Apps Web results 8 Best Deepfake Apps and Websites You Can Try in 2020 | Beebom DeepFaceLab is a Windows program that allows you to create deepfake videos. It's primarily built for researchers and students of ... ImageGitHub › iperov › DeepFaceLab iperov/DeepFaceLab: DeepFaceLab is the leading ... - GitHub DeepFaceLab is the leading software for creating deepfakes. ... torrent client to download. Windows (Mega.nz), Contains new and prev releases. Videos Video result for Deepfake software Windows11:24 Deepfakes Tutorial | Episode One | Overview YouTube · derpfakes Jan 14, 2019 In this video 5 key moments From 01:01 Duration From 01:53 Download Our Software From 05:18 Face Extraction From 07:18 Training From 10:30 Deep Fakes Triangle Video result for Deepfake software Windows PREVIEW PREVIEW 10:45 deepfakes guide:Fake App 2 2 Tutorial. installation(totally ... YouTube · tech 4tress Feb 21, 2018 In this video 5 key moments Video result for Deepfake software Windows PREVIEW PREVIEW 2:17 Face-swapping app "Zao" amazes and alarms with deepfake capabilities YouTube · CGTN America Sep 11, 2019 More videos Feedback ImageBBC.com › news › technology-... Web results Deepfake detection tool unveiled by Microsoft - BBC News - BBC.com Sep 1, 2020 — Microsoft has developed a tool to spot deepfakes ... The software analyses photos and videos to give a confidence ... Imageawesomeopensource.com › iperov Deepfacelab DeepFaceLab is the leading software for creating deepfakes. ... torrent client to download. Windows (Mega.nz), Contains new and prev releases. Rating 4.9 (20,994) Imagewww.malavida.com › ... › Editors FakeApp 2.2.0 - Download for PC Free - Malavida Oct 5, 2020 — A Reddit user called deepfakes has managed to develop an application called FakeApp that allows us, by means of AI training ... Imagewww.deepfakestate.com › deepfake-... Deepfake Tools - The Deepfake State This page tracks all of the tools used to make deepfake videos. ... FakeApp (Windows) - Simplified user-friendly interface for making deepfakes, does not ... Lyrebird - Voice synthesis software. ImageFatec Franca › br › grh › deepfake-s... Deepfake software windows - GRH FATEC Franca deepfake software windows It 39 s primarily built for researchers and students of computer vision. 2. This deepfake audio detector model is a deep neural network

On this episode MSM: Misinformation, event 201 Angelina Jolie and Facebook Deepfakes such as the Kardashian come back from the dead deepfake and election misinfo and cdensorship on social media YouTube and twitter : deepfakes are synthetic media in which a person in an existing image or video is replaced with someone else's likeness, Deepfakes (a portmanteau of "deep learning" and "fake" where faces and audio are swapped to trick the viewer for some nefarious end. Web results Faceswap: Welcome Faceswap is the leading free and Open Source multi-platform Deepfakes software. Screenshots. Powered by Tensorflow, Keras and Python; Faceswap will run on Windows, macOS and Linux. Download Windows Install Guide Blog Forum Training [Guide] Extraction - A Workflow Linux Install Guide ImageOnline Tech Tips › cool-websites 7 Best Deepfake Apps And Websites - Online Tech Tips Aug 24, 2020 — Today anyone can download deepfake software or even use the web ... Faceswap runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux. People also ask What software is used for Deepfakes? Is there a Deepfake app? Can you still download FakeApp? Is Deepfake easy? Feedback ImageBeebom › Apps Web results 8 Best Deepfake Apps and Websites You Can Try in 2020 | Beebom DeepFaceLab is a Windows program that allows you to create deepfake videos. It's primarily built for researchers and students of ... ImageGitHub › iperov › DeepFaceLab iperov/DeepFaceLab: DeepFaceLab is the leading ... - GitHub DeepFaceLab is the leading software for creating deepfakes. ... torrent client to download. Windows (Mega.nz), Contains new and prev releases. Videos Video result for Deepfake software Windows11:24 Deepfakes Tutorial | Episode One | Overview YouTube · derpfakes Jan 14, 2019 In this video 5 key moments From 01:01 Duration From 01:53 Download Our Software From 05:18 Face Extraction From 07:18 Training From 10:30 Deep Fakes Triangle Video result for Deepfake software Windows PREVIEW PREVIEW 10:45 deepfakes guide:Fake App 2 2 Tutorial. installation(totally ... YouTube · tech 4tress Feb 21, 2018 In this video 5 key moments Video result for Deepfake software Windows PREVIEW PREVIEW 2:17 Face-swapping app "Zao" amazes and alarms with deepfake capabilities YouTube · CGTN America Sep 11, 2019 More videos Feedback ImageBBC.com › news › technology-... Web results Deepfake detection tool unveiled by Microsoft - BBC News - BBC.com Sep 1, 2020 — Microsoft has developed a tool to spot deepfakes ... The software analyses photos and videos to give a confidence ... Imageawesomeopensource.com › iperov Deepfacelab DeepFaceLab is the leading software for creating deepfakes. ... torrent client to download. Windows (Mega.nz), Contains new and prev releases. Rating 4.9 (20,994) Imagewww.malavida.com › ... › Editors FakeApp 2.2.0 - Download for PC Free - Malavida Oct 5, 2020 — A Reddit user called deepfakes has managed to develop an application called FakeApp that allows us, by means of AI training ... Imagewww.deepfakestate.com › deepfake-... Deepfake Tools - The Deepfake State This page tracks all of the tools used to make deepfake videos. ... FakeApp (Windows) - Simplified user-friendly interface for making deepfakes, does not ... Lyrebird - Voice synthesis software. ImageFatec Franca › br › grh › deepfake-s... Deepfake software windows - GRH FATEC Franca deepfake software windows It 39 s primarily built for researchers and students of computer vision. 2. This deepfake audio detector model is a deep neural network

June 29, 2020: Doomscrolling is Ruining Us, Fake App goes Viral, NBA Returns, Microsoft Shuts Down There is enough business news today to confuse and overwhelm anyone, but these are the headlines that caught our attention, so join us every weekday at noon for your 2nd cup! Episode Recap: 3:27 Doomscrolling Is Slowly Eroding Your Mental Health 9:43 Microsoft to permanently close all of its retail stores 15:56 A fake app hyped on Twitter turned into a fundraiser for racial justice causes 20:42 NBA Set to Return: "No choice but to learn to live with this virus." 25:30 GoFundeMe Campaign Update & Thank You Club Want to be a guest on The 2nd Cup? Start here: https://renzlermedia.typeform.com/to/yBvwbo Subscribe to my Digital Digest: https://bit.ly/SIDigitalDigest

Qualcosa non va. Ma tanti stanno facendo

Panel: Dave Kimura Eric Berry Nathan Hopkins David Richards Special Guest: Jason Swett In this episode of Ruby Rogues, the panel talks with Jason Swett who is a host of the podcast show, Ruby Testing! Jason also teaches Rails testing at CodeWithJason.com. He currently resides in the Michigan area and works for Ben Franklin Labs. Check-out today’s episode where the panelists and the guest discuss testing topics. Show Topics: 0:00 – Sentry.IO – Advertisement! Check out the code: DEVCHAT @ Sentry.io. 1:07 – I am David Kimura and here is the panel! Tell us what is going on? 1:38 – Jason: I started my own podcast, and have been doing that for the past few months. That’s one thing. I started a new site with CodeWithJason.com. 2:04 – You released a course? 2:10 – Jason: Total flop and it doesn’t exist, but I am doing something else. 2:24 – I bet you learned a lot by creating the course? 2:34 – Jason: The endeavor of TEACHING it has helped me a lot. 2:50 – Tell us why we should drink the Koolaid? 3:02 – Jason: What IS testing? Good question. Whether is it is manual testing or automated testing. We might was well automate it. 3:25 – If we are testing our code what does that look like? 3:34 – Jason: Not sure what you mean, but I am doing tests at a fine grain vs. coarser grain. 4:00 – Show of hands who has...? 4:19 – What different tests are there? 4:20 – Jason: Good question. One term that one person uses is different to a different person. Let’s start with unit tests vs. integration tests. Jason dives into the similarities and differences between these 2 tests (see above). There are different tests, such as: featured tests, acceptance tests, etc. 5:45 – What tests are THE best? 5:50 – Jason: Good question. The kind of tests you are writing depends on what type of coverage you are going for. If I had a sign-up page for a user, I would... 7:36 – What anti-patterns are you seeing? What is your narrative in teaching people how to use them? 8:07 – Jason talks first about his background and his interaction with one of his colleagues. 8:58 – Question. 9:00 – Jason continues with his answers from 8:07. 9:32 – Jason: Feel free to chime-in. What have you done? 9:42 – I often ignore it until I feel bad and then I say: wait-a-minute I am a professional. Then I realize I ignored the problem because I was acting cowardly. 10:29 – For me it depends on the test that it is. One gem that I found is: RSpec RETRY. 11:16 – Jason: The test is flapping because of something is wrong with the database or something else. Since you asked about anti-patterns let’s talk about that! Rails and Angular are mentioned. 13:10 – Do you find that you back off of your unit testing when you are using integration? 13:22 – Jason: It depends on the context we are talking about. Jason talks about featured testing, model-level testing, and more. 13:58 – What is your view on using MOCKS or FAKES. What should we be doing there? 14:10 – Jason: Going to the Angular world I understand Mocks better than now. There was a parable that I think is applicable here about the young and the old fish. 16:23 – Jason continues talking about testing things in isolation. 16:36 – Question.  16:39 – I have been looking for an area to specialize in and I wrote an eBook. (Check out here to see the articles and books that Jason has authored.) Then I was looking around and I wanted to see what people’s issues are with Rails? They have a hard time with testing. I wanted to help them feel competent with it. 18:03 – In your course you have how to choose a framework. I know Ruby has several options on that front – how do you choose? 18:24 – Jason: There are 2 factors to consider. Jason tells us what those two factors are. Jason: Angular, React and Vue. 19:52 – Panelist: I had a conversation with a beginner and we were talking about the different tests. He said the DSL really appealed to him. The surface area of the AI made it approachable for him. 20:27 – Jason: I wished I had figured out DSL out a little better. Understanding the concept of a block. The IT is just a function and you can put parentheses in different areas and... 21:01 – That makes sense. Let’s revisit the Tweet you wrote. 21:35 – Jason: There are certain use cases where it makes sense. Where Gmail was the thing out there. At some point the Internet formed the opinion that... 22:39 – Old saying: Nobody gets fired for using Microsoft and then it was IBM. Nothing wrong with those things if that’s what you are trying to do. Sometimes we make decisions to not be criticized. We try to grab big frameworks and big codes so we are not criticized for. 23:48 – Jason: I think developers have this idea that OLD is OUTDATED. Not so. I think it’s mature, not necessarily outdated. I think it’s a pervasive idea. 24:31 – I think it suffers a bit when all the mind shares get lumped into one thing. The panelist continues... 24:53 – Jason: I don’t know if I like this analogy. 26:00 – I agree with that sentiment. It’s crazy that the complexity has become so pervasive. 26:18 – I think of SPAs as... 26:37 – Jason: Going back to the Tweet I wrote, I am pulling in JavaScript but I am preferring to sprinkle Java into Rails. 27:02 – Absolutely. I think that’s where we agree on. Late in 2017 we had the guest... “Use JavaScript sprinkles.” 27:49 – Panelist chimes-in. 28:37 – Jason: That make sense. Use your preexisting... I am afraid of committing to a single framework. I don’t have anything against JavaScript but I am afraid of using only one thing when something else becomes fashionable. 29:30 – Have you found that Java sparkle approach is easy to test? 29:38 – Jason: I think it’s easier. Client server architecture... 30:10 – Advertisement: Get A Coder Job! 30:41 – Shout-out to the Rails team! What other testing frameworks are there? What if you are not the developer but you are the Quality Assurance (QA) person. They have been given the task of testing on the application. 31:30 – Jason: So someone who is not a developer and they want to test the application. I don’t want to get out of my role of expertise. I did talk to a QA engineer and I asked them: What do you do? All of his tests are manual. He does the same stuff as a Rails developer would do. 32:52 – Panelist talks about pseudo code. 34:07 – Jason: I am curious, Dave, about the non-programmer helping with tests what is the team structure? 34:23 – Dave: You will have one QA per three developers. 34:44 – Jason: If you have a QA person he is integrated within the team – that’s what has been the case for me. 35:02 – Dave: It’s a nice thing to have because we need to crank out some features and we have a good idea what is wrong with the app. We can go in there and see if our application is good, but they are combining different scenarios to do the unit tests and see what they are lacking. They are uncovering different problems that we hadn’t thought of. 36:07 – The organization has to have the right culture for that to work. 36:35 – If it’s a small team then it will help to see what everyone is doing – it’s that engagement level. If the team is too large then it could be a problem. 37:15 – Jason: Engagement between whom? 37:27 – Both. Panelist goes into detail about different engagement levels throughout the team. 38:10 – Jason: Yeah that’s a tough thing. 38:49 – It’s interesting to see the things that are being created. Testing seems to help that out. We are getting bugs in that area or se didn’t design it well there... We see that we need some flexibility and getting that input and having a way to solve the problems. 39:32 – Jason: Continuous deployment – let’s segue into this topic. 41:17 – Panelist: Do you have recommendations on how often we should be deploying in that system per day/week? 41:40 – Jason: We would deploy several times a day, which was great. The more the better because the more frequently you are deploying the fewer things will go wrong. 42:21 – More frequently the better and more people involved. 42:45 – Jason continues this conversation. 42:51 – Panelist: Continuous integration – any time you were say to forgo tests or being less rigid? 43:14 – Jason: I don’t test everything. I don’t write tests for things that have little risks. 43:56 – I think it is a good segue into how you write your code. If you write a code that is like spaghetti then it will be a mess. Making things easier to test. 44:48 – Jason: This is fresh in my mind because I am writing an app called Green Field. 46:32 – Uniqueness Validations, is mentioned by Jason. 47:00 – Anything else to add to testing a Rails application? 47:08 – Jason: Let’s talk about 2 things: walking skeleton and small stories. This book is a great resource for automated testing. Last point that I want to talk about is small stories: continues deployment and continuous delivery. If you make your stories smaller then you are making your stories crisply defined. Have some bullet points to make it really easy to answer the question. Answer the question: is this story done or not done? Someone should be able to run through the bullet points and answer that question. 50:02 – I am in favor of small stories, too. Makes you feel more productive, too. 50:14 – Work tends to lend itself to these types of stories and running a sprint. 51:22 – You don’t have to carry that burden when you go home. You might have too big of a chunk – it carries too much weight to it. 51:47 – Book the Phoenix Project. Work in progress is a bad thing. That makes sense. You want to have fewer balls in the air. 52:17 – Anything else? 52:22 – Jason: You can find me at: CodewithJason.com also Twitter!  52:45 – Advertisement – Fresh Books! 1:01:50 – Cache Fly! Links: Get a Coder Job Course Erlang Ruby Ruby Motion Ruby on Rails Angular Single Page Application (SPA) RSpec – Retry Ruby Testing Podcast The Feynman Technique Model Book: Growing Object-Oriented Software, Guided by Tests (1st edition) Jason Swett’s Twitter Jason Swett’s LinkedIn Parable: Young Fish and Old Fish – What is Water? Jason’s articles and eBook Jason’s Website Sponsors: Sentry Get a Coder Job Course Fresh Books Cache Fly Picks: David This is Water The Feynman Technique Model Nate Taking some time off Pry Test Eric Fake App Ruby Hack Conference Dave Brooks Shoes Jason The Food Lab Growing Object-Oriented Software

Panel: Dave Kimura Eric Berry Nathan Hopkins David Richards Special Guest: Jason Swett In this episode of Ruby Rogues, the panel talks with Jason Swett who is a host of the podcast show, Ruby Testing! Jason also teaches Rails testing at CodeWithJason.com. He currently resides in the Michigan area and works for Ben Franklin Labs. Check-out today’s episode where the panelists and the guest discuss testing topics. Show Topics: 0:00 – Sentry.IO – Advertisement! Check out the code: DEVCHAT @ Sentry.io. 1:07 – I am David Kimura and here is the panel! Tell us what is going on? 1:38 – Jason: I started my own podcast, and have been doing that for the past few months. That’s one thing. I started a new site with CodeWithJason.com. 2:04 – You released a course? 2:10 – Jason: Total flop and it doesn’t exist, but I am doing something else. 2:24 – I bet you learned a lot by creating the course? 2:34 – Jason: The endeavor of TEACHING it has helped me a lot. 2:50 – Tell us why we should drink the Koolaid? 3:02 – Jason: What IS testing? Good question. Whether is it is manual testing or automated testing. We might was well automate it. 3:25 – If we are testing our code what does that look like? 3:34 – Jason: Not sure what you mean, but I am doing tests at a fine grain vs. coarser grain. 4:00 – Show of hands who has...? 4:19 – What different tests are there? 4:20 – Jason: Good question. One term that one person uses is different to a different person. Let’s start with unit tests vs. integration tests. Jason dives into the similarities and differences between these 2 tests (see above). There are different tests, such as: featured tests, acceptance tests, etc. 5:45 – What tests are THE best? 5:50 – Jason: Good question. The kind of tests you are writing depends on what type of coverage you are going for. If I had a sign-up page for a user, I would... 7:36 – What anti-patterns are you seeing? What is your narrative in teaching people how to use them? 8:07 – Jason talks first about his background and his interaction with one of his colleagues. 8:58 – Question. 9:00 – Jason continues with his answers from 8:07. 9:32 – Jason: Feel free to chime-in. What have you done? 9:42 – I often ignore it until I feel bad and then I say: wait-a-minute I am a professional. Then I realize I ignored the problem because I was acting cowardly. 10:29 – For me it depends on the test that it is. One gem that I found is: RSpec RETRY. 11:16 – Jason: The test is flapping because of something is wrong with the database or something else. Since you asked about anti-patterns let’s talk about that! Rails and Angular are mentioned. 13:10 – Do you find that you back off of your unit testing when you are using integration? 13:22 – Jason: It depends on the context we are talking about. Jason talks about featured testing, model-level testing, and more. 13:58 – What is your view on using MOCKS or FAKES. What should we be doing there? 14:10 – Jason: Going to the Angular world I understand Mocks better than now. There was a parable that I think is applicable here about the young and the old fish. 16:23 – Jason continues talking about testing things in isolation. 16:36 – Question.  16:39 – I have been looking for an area to specialize in and I wrote an eBook. (Check out here to see the articles and books that Jason has authored.) Then I was looking around and I wanted to see what people’s issues are with Rails? They have a hard time with testing. I wanted to help them feel competent with it. 18:03 – In your course you have how to choose a framework. I know Ruby has several options on that front – how do you choose? 18:24 – Jason: There are 2 factors to consider. Jason tells us what those two factors are. Jason: Angular, React and Vue. 19:52 – Panelist: I had a conversation with a beginner and we were talking about the different tests. He said the DSL really appealed to him. The surface area of the AI made it approachable for him. 20:27 – Jason: I wished I had figured out DSL out a little better. Understanding the concept of a block. The IT is just a function and you can put parentheses in different areas and... 21:01 – That makes sense. Let’s revisit the Tweet you wrote. 21:35 – Jason: There are certain use cases where it makes sense. Where Gmail was the thing out there. At some point the Internet formed the opinion that... 22:39 – Old saying: Nobody gets fired for using Microsoft and then it was IBM. Nothing wrong with those things if that’s what you are trying to do. Sometimes we make decisions to not be criticized. We try to grab big frameworks and big codes so we are not criticized for. 23:48 – Jason: I think developers have this idea that OLD is OUTDATED. Not so. I think it’s mature, not necessarily outdated. I think it’s a pervasive idea. 24:31 – I think it suffers a bit when all the mind shares get lumped into one thing. The panelist continues... 24:53 – Jason: I don’t know if I like this analogy. 26:00 – I agree with that sentiment. It’s crazy that the complexity has become so pervasive. 26:18 – I think of SPAs as... 26:37 – Jason: Going back to the Tweet I wrote, I am pulling in JavaScript but I am preferring to sprinkle Java into Rails. 27:02 – Absolutely. I think that’s where we agree on. Late in 2017 we had the guest... “Use JavaScript sprinkles.” 27:49 – Panelist chimes-in. 28:37 – Jason: That make sense. Use your preexisting... I am afraid of committing to a single framework. I don’t have anything against JavaScript but I am afraid of using only one thing when something else becomes fashionable. 29:30 – Have you found that Java sparkle approach is easy to test? 29:38 – Jason: I think it’s easier. Client server architecture... 30:10 – Advertisement: Get A Coder Job! 30:41 – Shout-out to the Rails team! What other testing frameworks are there? What if you are not the developer but you are the Quality Assurance (QA) person. They have been given the task of testing on the application. 31:30 – Jason: So someone who is not a developer and they want to test the application. I don’t want to get out of my role of expertise. I did talk to a QA engineer and I asked them: What do you do? All of his tests are manual. He does the same stuff as a Rails developer would do. 32:52 – Panelist talks about pseudo code. 34:07 – Jason: I am curious, Dave, about the non-programmer helping with tests what is the team structure? 34:23 – Dave: You will have one QA per three developers. 34:44 – Jason: If you have a QA person he is integrated within the team – that’s what has been the case for me. 35:02 – Dave: It’s a nice thing to have because we need to crank out some features and we have a good idea what is wrong with the app. We can go in there and see if our application is good, but they are combining different scenarios to do the unit tests and see what they are lacking. They are uncovering different problems that we hadn’t thought of. 36:07 – The organization has to have the right culture for that to work. 36:35 – If it’s a small team then it will help to see what everyone is doing – it’s that engagement level. If the team is too large then it could be a problem. 37:15 – Jason: Engagement between whom? 37:27 – Both. Panelist goes into detail about different engagement levels throughout the team. 38:10 – Jason: Yeah that’s a tough thing. 38:49 – It’s interesting to see the things that are being created. Testing seems to help that out. We are getting bugs in that area or se didn’t design it well there... We see that we need some flexibility and getting that input and having a way to solve the problems. 39:32 – Jason: Continuous deployment – let’s segue into this topic. 41:17 – Panelist: Do you have recommendations on how often we should be deploying in that system per day/week? 41:40 – Jason: We would deploy several times a day, which was great. The more the better because the more frequently you are deploying the fewer things will go wrong. 42:21 – More frequently the better and more people involved. 42:45 – Jason continues this conversation. 42:51 – Panelist: Continuous integration – any time you were say to forgo tests or being less rigid? 43:14 – Jason: I don’t test everything. I don’t write tests for things that have little risks. 43:56 – I think it is a good segue into how you write your code. If you write a code that is like spaghetti then it will be a mess. Making things easier to test. 44:48 – Jason: This is fresh in my mind because I am writing an app called Green Field. 46:32 – Uniqueness Validations, is mentioned by Jason. 47:00 – Anything else to add to testing a Rails application? 47:08 – Jason: Let’s talk about 2 things: walking skeleton and small stories. This book is a great resource for automated testing. Last point that I want to talk about is small stories: continues deployment and continuous delivery. If you make your stories smaller then you are making your stories crisply defined. Have some bullet points to make it really easy to answer the question. Answer the question: is this story done or not done? Someone should be able to run through the bullet points and answer that question. 50:02 – I am in favor of small stories, too. Makes you feel more productive, too. 50:14 – Work tends to lend itself to these types of stories and running a sprint. 51:22 – You don’t have to carry that burden when you go home. You might have too big of a chunk – it carries too much weight to it. 51:47 – Book the Phoenix Project. Work in progress is a bad thing. That makes sense. You want to have fewer balls in the air. 52:17 – Anything else? 52:22 – Jason: You can find me at: CodewithJason.com also Twitter!  52:45 – Advertisement – Fresh Books! 1:01:50 – Cache Fly! Links: Get a Coder Job Course Erlang Ruby Ruby Motion Ruby on Rails Angular Single Page Application (SPA) RSpec – Retry Ruby Testing Podcast The Feynman Technique Model Book: Growing Object-Oriented Software, Guided by Tests (1st edition) Jason Swett’s Twitter Jason Swett’s LinkedIn Parable: Young Fish and Old Fish – What is Water? Jason’s articles and eBook Jason’s Website Sponsors: Sentry Get a Coder Job Course Fresh Books Cache Fly Picks: David This is Water The Feynman Technique Model Nate Taking some time off Pry Test Eric Fake App Ruby Hack Conference Dave Brooks Shoes Jason The Food Lab Growing Object-Oriented Software

Panel: Dave Kimura Eric Berry Nathan Hopkins David Richards Special Guest: Jason Swett In this episode of Ruby Rogues, the panel talks with Jason Swett who is a host of the podcast show, Ruby Testing! Jason also teaches Rails testing at CodeWithJason.com. He currently resides in the Michigan area and works for Ben Franklin Labs. Check-out today’s episode where the panelists and the guest discuss testing topics. Show Topics: 0:00 – Sentry.IO – Advertisement! Check out the code: DEVCHAT @ Sentry.io. 1:07 – I am David Kimura and here is the panel! Tell us what is going on? 1:38 – Jason: I started my own podcast, and have been doing that for the past few months. That’s one thing. I started a new site with CodeWithJason.com. 2:04 – You released a course? 2:10 – Jason: Total flop and it doesn’t exist, but I am doing something else. 2:24 – I bet you learned a lot by creating the course? 2:34 – Jason: The endeavor of TEACHING it has helped me a lot. 2:50 – Tell us why we should drink the Koolaid? 3:02 – Jason: What IS testing? Good question. Whether is it is manual testing or automated testing. We might was well automate it. 3:25 – If we are testing our code what does that look like? 3:34 – Jason: Not sure what you mean, but I am doing tests at a fine grain vs. coarser grain. 4:00 – Show of hands who has...? 4:19 – What different tests are there? 4:20 – Jason: Good question. One term that one person uses is different to a different person. Let’s start with unit tests vs. integration tests. Jason dives into the similarities and differences between these 2 tests (see above). There are different tests, such as: featured tests, acceptance tests, etc. 5:45 – What tests are THE best? 5:50 – Jason: Good question. The kind of tests you are writing depends on what type of coverage you are going for. If I had a sign-up page for a user, I would... 7:36 – What anti-patterns are you seeing? What is your narrative in teaching people how to use them? 8:07 – Jason talks first about his background and his interaction with one of his colleagues. 8:58 – Question. 9:00 – Jason continues with his answers from 8:07. 9:32 – Jason: Feel free to chime-in. What have you done? 9:42 – I often ignore it until I feel bad and then I say: wait-a-minute I am a professional. Then I realize I ignored the problem because I was acting cowardly. 10:29 – For me it depends on the test that it is. One gem that I found is: RSpec RETRY. 11:16 – Jason: The test is flapping because of something is wrong with the database or something else. Since you asked about anti-patterns let’s talk about that! Rails and Angular are mentioned. 13:10 – Do you find that you back off of your unit testing when you are using integration? 13:22 – Jason: It depends on the context we are talking about. Jason talks about featured testing, model-level testing, and more. 13:58 – What is your view on using MOCKS or FAKES. What should we be doing there? 14:10 – Jason: Going to the Angular world I understand Mocks better than now. There was a parable that I think is applicable here about the young and the old fish. 16:23 – Jason continues talking about testing things in isolation. 16:36 – Question.  16:39 – I have been looking for an area to specialize in and I wrote an eBook. (Check out here to see the articles and books that Jason has authored.) Then I was looking around and I wanted to see what people’s issues are with Rails? They have a hard time with testing. I wanted to help them feel competent with it. 18:03 – In your course you have how to choose a framework. I know Ruby has several options on that front – how do you choose? 18:24 – Jason: There are 2 factors to consider. Jason tells us what those two factors are. Jason: Angular, React and Vue. 19:52 – Panelist: I had a conversation with a beginner and we were talking about the different tests. He said the DSL really appealed to him. The surface area of the AI made it approachable for him. 20:27 – Jason: I wished I had figured out DSL out a little better. Understanding the concept of a block. The IT is just a function and you can put parentheses in different areas and... 21:01 – That makes sense. Let’s revisit the Tweet you wrote. 21:35 – Jason: There are certain use cases where it makes sense. Where Gmail was the thing out there. At some point the Internet formed the opinion that... 22:39 – Old saying: Nobody gets fired for using Microsoft and then it was IBM. Nothing wrong with those things if that’s what you are trying to do. Sometimes we make decisions to not be criticized. We try to grab big frameworks and big codes so we are not criticized for. 23:48 – Jason: I think developers have this idea that OLD is OUTDATED. Not so. I think it’s mature, not necessarily outdated. I think it’s a pervasive idea. 24:31 – I think it suffers a bit when all the mind shares get lumped into one thing. The panelist continues... 24:53 – Jason: I don’t know if I like this analogy. 26:00 – I agree with that sentiment. It’s crazy that the complexity has become so pervasive. 26:18 – I think of SPAs as... 26:37 – Jason: Going back to the Tweet I wrote, I am pulling in JavaScript but I am preferring to sprinkle Java into Rails. 27:02 – Absolutely. I think that’s where we agree on. Late in 2017 we had the guest... “Use JavaScript sprinkles.” 27:49 – Panelist chimes-in. 28:37 – Jason: That make sense. Use your preexisting... I am afraid of committing to a single framework. I don’t have anything against JavaScript but I am afraid of using only one thing when something else becomes fashionable. 29:30 – Have you found that Java sparkle approach is easy to test? 29:38 – Jason: I think it’s easier. Client server architecture... 30:10 – Advertisement: Get A Coder Job! 30:41 – Shout-out to the Rails team! What other testing frameworks are there? What if you are not the developer but you are the Quality Assurance (QA) person. They have been given the task of testing on the application. 31:30 – Jason: So someone who is not a developer and they want to test the application. I don’t want to get out of my role of expertise. I did talk to a QA engineer and I asked them: What do you do? All of his tests are manual. He does the same stuff as a Rails developer would do. 32:52 – Panelist talks about pseudo code. 34:07 – Jason: I am curious, Dave, about the non-programmer helping with tests what is the team structure? 34:23 – Dave: You will have one QA per three developers. 34:44 – Jason: If you have a QA person he is integrated within the team – that’s what has been the case for me. 35:02 – Dave: It’s a nice thing to have because we need to crank out some features and we have a good idea what is wrong with the app. We can go in there and see if our application is good, but they are combining different scenarios to do the unit tests and see what they are lacking. They are uncovering different problems that we hadn’t thought of. 36:07 – The organization has to have the right culture for that to work. 36:35 – If it’s a small team then it will help to see what everyone is doing – it’s that engagement level. If the team is too large then it could be a problem. 37:15 – Jason: Engagement between whom? 37:27 – Both. Panelist goes into detail about different engagement levels throughout the team. 38:10 – Jason: Yeah that’s a tough thing. 38:49 – It’s interesting to see the things that are being created. Testing seems to help that out. We are getting bugs in that area or se didn’t design it well there... We see that we need some flexibility and getting that input and having a way to solve the problems. 39:32 – Jason: Continuous deployment – let’s segue into this topic. 41:17 – Panelist: Do you have recommendations on how often we should be deploying in that system per day/week? 41:40 – Jason: We would deploy several times a day, which was great. The more the better because the more frequently you are deploying the fewer things will go wrong. 42:21 – More frequently the better and more people involved. 42:45 – Jason continues this conversation. 42:51 – Panelist: Continuous integration – any time you were say to forgo tests or being less rigid? 43:14 – Jason: I don’t test everything. I don’t write tests for things that have little risks. 43:56 – I think it is a good segue into how you write your code. If you write a code that is like spaghetti then it will be a mess. Making things easier to test. 44:48 – Jason: This is fresh in my mind because I am writing an app called Green Field. 46:32 – Uniqueness Validations, is mentioned by Jason. 47:00 – Anything else to add to testing a Rails application? 47:08 – Jason: Let’s talk about 2 things: walking skeleton and small stories. This book is a great resource for automated testing. Last point that I want to talk about is small stories: continues deployment and continuous delivery. If you make your stories smaller then you are making your stories crisply defined. Have some bullet points to make it really easy to answer the question. Answer the question: is this story done or not done? Someone should be able to run through the bullet points and answer that question. 50:02 – I am in favor of small stories, too. Makes you feel more productive, too. 50:14 – Work tends to lend itself to these types of stories and running a sprint. 51:22 – You don’t have to carry that burden when you go home. You might have too big of a chunk – it carries too much weight to it. 51:47 – Book the Phoenix Project. Work in progress is a bad thing. That makes sense. You want to have fewer balls in the air. 52:17 – Anything else? 52:22 – Jason: You can find me at: CodewithJason.com also Twitter!  52:45 – Advertisement – Fresh Books! 1:01:50 – Cache Fly! Links: Get a Coder Job Course Erlang Ruby Ruby Motion Ruby on Rails Angular Single Page Application (SPA) RSpec – Retry Ruby Testing Podcast The Feynman Technique Model Book: Growing Object-Oriented Software, Guided by Tests (1st edition) Jason Swett’s Twitter Jason Swett’s LinkedIn Parable: Young Fish and Old Fish – What is Water? Jason’s articles and eBook Jason’s Website Sponsors: Sentry Get a Coder Job Course Fresh Books Cache Fly Picks: David This is Water The Feynman Technique Model Nate Taking some time off Pry Test Eric Fake App Ruby Hack Conference Dave Brooks Shoes Jason The Food Lab Growing Object-Oriented Software

SMOOTH COOL CONTEXT WARNING : DO NOT LISTEN TO THIS EPISODE UNLESS YOU'VE LISTENED TO EPISODE 253! It's butter time, people! We're talking about the weird herd-mentality that happens in traffic when flashing lights are visible, being passive-aggressive in the most aggressive ways, a solution for casting our movie in a perfect world with Fake App, and then another full two-hour conversation further fleshing out the details of our new film, Smooth Cool Walkings!

In dieser Folge Hashtag-Rewind geht es für Snapchat erst bergauf, dann wieder bergab. Der Politik ist E-Sport in Deutschland egal, dann aber doch nicht. Und Apple tauscht euren Akku aus… oder nicht? Wenigstens dieser Podcast ist noch das, was er scheint und garantiert kein Fake oder deepfake. Präsentiert von Justin Patchett und Carlo Sarsky.