POPULARITY
On April 1, 2024, the first day of Chad Daybell's jury selection commenced in Boise, Idaho, with the goal of seating 18 jurors—12 primary and 6 alternates—for a trial projected to last 8 to 10 weeks. The day began with 16 potential jurors undergoing group questioning (voir dire) led by Judge Steven Boyce, focusing on their familiarity with the case, potential biases, and any hardships that might prevent them from serving. Several jurors were excused due to pre-existing opinions about Daybell's guilt, scheduling conflicts, or personal reservations about the death penalty, which is a possible sentence in this case. By the end of the day, 16 jurors had advanced to the next phase of selection.Throughout the proceedings, both the prosecution, represented by Lindsey Blake and Rob Wood, and the defense, led by John Prior, meticulously questioned jurors on their ability to remain impartial, especially given the extensive media coverage of the case. Discussions also addressed jurors' views on the death penalty, as it remains a sentencing option. The court emphasized the importance of selecting jurors who could set aside preconceived notions and base their verdict solely on evidence presented during the trial. Jury selection is expected to continue over the next two weeks to ensure a fair and unbiased panel is chosen.On April 2, 2024, the second day of Chad Daybell's jury selection in Boise, Idaho, proceedings continued with individual questioning of potential jurors to assess their suitability for the trial. The day began with 16 prospective jurors, and through a series of interviews, several were excused due to pre-existing opinions about the case, personal hardships, or strong views on the death penalty, which remains a potential sentence. Judge Steven Boyce and attorneys focused on ensuring that selected jurors could remain impartial despite extensive media coverage and the trial's anticipated 8 to 10-week duration.Throughout the day, both the prosecution and defense meticulously questioned jurors about their knowledge of the case, media exposure, and personal beliefs regarding capital punishment. By the day's end, the jury pool had expanded, moving closer to the required 50 potential jurors before peremptory challenges could commence. Judge Boyce emphasized the importance of selecting jurors who could set aside preconceived notions and base their judgments solely on the evidence presented during the trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
On April 5, 2024, the fifth day of Chad Daybell's jury selection in Boise, Idaho, the court focused on finalizing the jury pool. Judge Steven Boyce and the attorneys conducted individual voir dire, questioning potential jurors about their knowledge of the case, media exposure, and views on the death penalty, as it remains a possible sentence. By midday, the court had successfully advanced 57 jurors, surpassing the initial goal of 50 to allow for potential contingencies. Judge Boyce announced that peremptory challenges, where both the prosecution and defense can dismiss jurors without stating a cause, would commence on Monday, April 8, 2024, at 10 a.m.The proceedings concluded earlier than anticipated, with the court emphasizing the importance of selecting an impartial jury capable of evaluating evidence objectively, despite extensive media coverage and the trial's expected 8 to 10-week duration. The completion of this phase marked a significant step toward the trial's commencement, with opening statements scheduled to begin on Wednesday, April 10, 2024.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
On April 2, 2024, the second day of Chad Daybell's jury selection in Boise, Idaho, proceedings continued with individual questioning of potential jurors to assess their suitability for the trial. The day began with 16 prospective jurors, and through a series of interviews, several were excused due to pre-existing opinions about the case, personal hardships, or strong views on the death penalty, which remains a potential sentence. Judge Steven Boyce and attorneys focused on ensuring that selected jurors could remain impartial despite extensive media coverage and the trial's anticipated 8 to 10-week duration.Throughout the day, both the prosecution and defense meticulously questioned jurors about their knowledge of the case, media exposure, and personal beliefs regarding capital punishment. By the day's end, the jury pool had expanded, moving closer to the required 50 potential jurors before peremptory challenges could commence. Judge Boyce emphasized the importance of selecting jurors who could set aside preconceived notions and base their judgments solely on the evidence presented during the trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chad Daybell trial: Lori Vallow husband seeks different outcome from ‘cult mom' | Fox Newssource:Chad Daybell trial day 2 - jury selection | ktvb.com
On the 15th day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the defense rested its case without calling any witnesses, asserting that the prosecution had not sufficiently proven its case. Lori confirmed to Judge Boyce that she did not intend to testify. Consequently, the evidence portion of the trial concluded, with closing arguments scheduled to begin the following day.Earlier in the proceedings, FBI analyst Nicole Heideman testified about piecing together the "James and Elena" story—a narrative Chad Daybell had written and sent to Lori in segments via text messages, notes, and emails. This seemingly fictional story bore a remarkable resemblance to Chad and Lori's real-life relationship, suggesting it was a romantic fantasy they shared.to contact me: Bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
On the 15th day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the defense rested its case without calling any witnesses, asserting that the prosecution had not sufficiently proven its case. Lori confirmed to Judge Boyce that she did not intend to testify. Consequently, the evidence portion of the trial concluded, with closing arguments scheduled to begin the following day.Earlier in the proceedings, FBI analyst Nicole Heideman testified about piecing together the "James and Elena" story—a narrative Chad Daybell had written and sent to Lori in segments via text messages, notes, and emails. This seemingly fictional story bore a remarkable resemblance to Chad and Lori's real-life relationship, suggesting it was a romantic fantasy they shared.to contact me: Bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
On the 15th day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the defense rested its case without calling any witnesses, asserting that the prosecution had not sufficiently proven its case. Lori confirmed to Judge Boyce that she did not intend to testify. Consequently, the evidence portion of the trial concluded, with closing arguments scheduled to begin the following day.Earlier in the proceedings, FBI analyst Nicole Heideman testified about piecing together the "James and Elena" story—a narrative Chad Daybell had written and sent to Lori in segments via text messages, notes, and emails. This seemingly fictional story bore a remarkable resemblance to Chad and Lori's real-life relationship, suggesting it was a romantic fantasy they shared.to contact me: Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In what can only be called a bitttersweet ending for the grandparents of JJ Vallow, they are finally going to receive his remains so that they can put him to rest. This comes after an order was signed on Monday by Judge Boyce in Idaho who made the ruling to turn the remains over to the next of kin Lori Vallow recently recieved a life sentence for murdering her children and conspiring to murder Chad Daybell's wife Tammy and she is still facing more charages in Phoenix, including a charge for attempted murder. (commercial at 6:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho judge orders JJ Vallow's body to be released to next of kin (yahoo.com)
The Prosecution in the Chad Daybell trial rested its case on Friday, but not before there was a bit of drama surrounding an amended indictment that had the wrong date for the Murder of JJ Vallow. Daybell's legal team attempted to utilize that clerical error as a way to get the murder charge he's facing for the murder of JJ tossed, but Judge Boyce ruled that it was an obvious clerical error and that there was enough evidence provided by the prosecution that a jury should decide the outcome, not him. In this episode, we take a look at how it all went down and what we should expect from the defense as they begin to present their case.(commercial at 12:01)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge says error on indictment for JJ's murder not grounds for acquittal of murder charge - East Idaho NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The Prosecution in the Chad Daybell trial rested its case on Friday, but not before there was a bit of drama surrounding an amended indictment that had the wrong date for the Murder of JJ Vallow. Daybell's legal team attempted to utilize that clerical error as a way to get the murder charge he's facing for the murder of JJ tossed, but Judge Boyce ruled that it was an obvious clerical error and that there was enough evidence provided by the prosecution that a jury should decide the outcome, not him. In this episode, we take a look at how it all went down and what we should expect from the defense as they begin to present their case.(commercial at 12:01)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge says error on indictment for JJ's murder not grounds for acquittal of murder charge - East Idaho News
In a move to protect the privacy and dignity of the victims' families, Judge Steven Boyce has permanently sealed nearly 100 exhibits from the high-profile Chad Daybell murder trial. The decision, announced after Daybell was sentenced to death for the murders of Tammy Daybell, Joshua “JJ” Vallow, and Tylee Ryan, comes in response to multiple requests for access to the evidence from authors and media members. “Certain requests seek to obtain all of the exhibits in this case, with some expressly requesting the autopsy photos published to the jury,” Judge Boyce explained in his order. “The Court notes that at trial those photos were published to the jurors, the parties, the Court, and in some instances privately to the victims, upon their request. They were not, however, publicly disseminated.” Judge Boyce stressed the importance of balancing the victims' rights with the public's right to information, particularly highlighting the impact on the families involved. He noted that several victim impact statements during the sentencing expressed deep distress over the behavior of individuals claiming to be media. These individuals, Boyce pointed out, have often sensationalized the tragedy, causing ongoing psychological trauma to the families. “The Court was particularly moved by several victim impact statements at sentencing expressly criticizing individuals proclaiming to be ‘media' who, in the course of this case, have disrupted the lives of the families of these victims,” Boyce wrote. “Some of those family members described in detail the psychological trauma they have unfairly been subjected to by the ‘media,' simply because they had some familial relationship to the victims in this case.” Boyce clarified that his reference to “media” does not include established and historically recognized reporting agencies but rather targets "true crime" bloggers and YouTubers who have exploited the case for sensational content. By sealing 97 exhibits, including autopsy photos and images of human remains found on Daybell's property, Boyce aims to protect the families from further distress. “The interests of the victims and their family members to be spared the ongoing trauma of such sensitive or gruesome material being disseminated is not outweighed by the right of public disclosure of this evidence,” Boyce wrote. “Victims Tylee Ryan, JJ Vallow, Tamara Douglas Daybell and their family members' respect, dignity and privacy are best protected by the continued sealing of these exhibits.” This decision underscores the court's commitment to prioritizing the mental health and privacy of those directly affected by the tragic events, ensuring that they are not further victimized by public exposure to graphic evidence. As the legal proceedings surrounding Chad Daybell's case continue to unfold, the court's ruling reflects a broader concern about the ethical responsibilities of media coverage in high-profile criminal cases. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In a move to protect the privacy and dignity of the victims' families, Judge Steven Boyce has permanently sealed nearly 100 exhibits from the high-profile Chad Daybell murder trial. The decision, announced after Daybell was sentenced to death for the murders of Tammy Daybell, Joshua “JJ” Vallow, and Tylee Ryan, comes in response to multiple requests for access to the evidence from authors and media members. “Certain requests seek to obtain all of the exhibits in this case, with some expressly requesting the autopsy photos published to the jury,” Judge Boyce explained in his order. “The Court notes that at trial those photos were published to the jurors, the parties, the Court, and in some instances privately to the victims, upon their request. They were not, however, publicly disseminated.” Judge Boyce stressed the importance of balancing the victims' rights with the public's right to information, particularly highlighting the impact on the families involved. He noted that several victim impact statements during the sentencing expressed deep distress over the behavior of individuals claiming to be media. These individuals, Boyce pointed out, have often sensationalized the tragedy, causing ongoing psychological trauma to the families. “The Court was particularly moved by several victim impact statements at sentencing expressly criticizing individuals proclaiming to be ‘media' who, in the course of this case, have disrupted the lives of the families of these victims,” Boyce wrote. “Some of those family members described in detail the psychological trauma they have unfairly been subjected to by the ‘media,' simply because they had some familial relationship to the victims in this case.” Boyce clarified that his reference to “media” does not include established and historically recognized reporting agencies but rather targets "true crime" bloggers and YouTubers who have exploited the case for sensational content. By sealing 97 exhibits, including autopsy photos and images of human remains found on Daybell's property, Boyce aims to protect the families from further distress. “The interests of the victims and their family members to be spared the ongoing trauma of such sensitive or gruesome material being disseminated is not outweighed by the right of public disclosure of this evidence,” Boyce wrote. “Victims Tylee Ryan, JJ Vallow, Tamara Douglas Daybell and their family members' respect, dignity and privacy are best protected by the continued sealing of these exhibits.” This decision underscores the court's commitment to prioritizing the mental health and privacy of those directly affected by the tragic events, ensuring that they are not further victimized by public exposure to graphic evidence. As the legal proceedings surrounding Chad Daybell's case continue to unfold, the court's ruling reflects a broader concern about the ethical responsibilities of media coverage in high-profile criminal cases. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a move to protect the privacy and dignity of the victims' families, Judge Steven Boyce has permanently sealed nearly 100 exhibits from the high-profile Chad Daybell murder trial. The decision, announced after Daybell was sentenced to death for the murders of Tammy Daybell, Joshua “JJ” Vallow, and Tylee Ryan, comes in response to multiple requests for access to the evidence from authors and media members. “Certain requests seek to obtain all of the exhibits in this case, with some expressly requesting the autopsy photos published to the jury,” Judge Boyce explained in his order. “The Court notes that at trial those photos were published to the jurors, the parties, the Court, and in some instances privately to the victims, upon their request. They were not, however, publicly disseminated.” Judge Boyce stressed the importance of balancing the victims' rights with the public's right to information, particularly highlighting the impact on the families involved. He noted that several victim impact statements during the sentencing expressed deep distress over the behavior of individuals claiming to be media. These individuals, Boyce pointed out, have often sensationalized the tragedy, causing ongoing psychological trauma to the families. “The Court was particularly moved by several victim impact statements at sentencing expressly criticizing individuals proclaiming to be ‘media' who, in the course of this case, have disrupted the lives of the families of these victims,” Boyce wrote. “Some of those family members described in detail the psychological trauma they have unfairly been subjected to by the ‘media,' simply because they had some familial relationship to the victims in this case.” Boyce clarified that his reference to “media” does not include established and historically recognized reporting agencies but rather targets "true crime" bloggers and YouTubers who have exploited the case for sensational content. By sealing 97 exhibits, including autopsy photos and images of human remains found on Daybell's property, Boyce aims to protect the families from further distress. “The interests of the victims and their family members to be spared the ongoing trauma of such sensitive or gruesome material being disseminated is not outweighed by the right of public disclosure of this evidence,” Boyce wrote. “Victims Tylee Ryan, JJ Vallow, Tamara Douglas Daybell and their family members' respect, dignity and privacy are best protected by the continued sealing of these exhibits.” This decision underscores the court's commitment to prioritizing the mental health and privacy of those directly affected by the tragic events, ensuring that they are not further victimized by public exposure to graphic evidence. As the legal proceedings surrounding Chad Daybell's case continue to unfold, the court's ruling reflects a broader concern about the ethical responsibilities of media coverage in high-profile criminal cases. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Demise Of the Daybells | The Lori Vallow Daybell & Chad Daybell Story
In a move to protect the privacy and dignity of the victims' families, Judge Steven Boyce has permanently sealed nearly 100 exhibits from the high-profile Chad Daybell murder trial. The decision, announced after Daybell was sentenced to death for the murders of Tammy Daybell, Joshua “JJ” Vallow, and Tylee Ryan, comes in response to multiple requests for access to the evidence from authors and media members. “Certain requests seek to obtain all of the exhibits in this case, with some expressly requesting the autopsy photos published to the jury,” Judge Boyce explained in his order. “The Court notes that at trial those photos were published to the jurors, the parties, the Court, and in some instances privately to the victims, upon their request. They were not, however, publicly disseminated.” Judge Boyce stressed the importance of balancing the victims' rights with the public's right to information, particularly highlighting the impact on the families involved. He noted that several victim impact statements during the sentencing expressed deep distress over the behavior of individuals claiming to be media. These individuals, Boyce pointed out, have often sensationalized the tragedy, causing ongoing psychological trauma to the families. “The Court was particularly moved by several victim impact statements at sentencing expressly criticizing individuals proclaiming to be ‘media' who, in the course of this case, have disrupted the lives of the families of these victims,” Boyce wrote. “Some of those family members described in detail the psychological trauma they have unfairly been subjected to by the ‘media,' simply because they had some familial relationship to the victims in this case.” Boyce clarified that his reference to “media” does not include established and historically recognized reporting agencies but rather targets "true crime" bloggers and YouTubers who have exploited the case for sensational content. By sealing 97 exhibits, including autopsy photos and images of human remains found on Daybell's property, Boyce aims to protect the families from further distress. “The interests of the victims and their family members to be spared the ongoing trauma of such sensitive or gruesome material being disseminated is not outweighed by the right of public disclosure of this evidence,” Boyce wrote. “Victims Tylee Ryan, JJ Vallow, Tamara Douglas Daybell and their family members' respect, dignity and privacy are best protected by the continued sealing of these exhibits.” This decision underscores the court's commitment to prioritizing the mental health and privacy of those directly affected by the tragic events, ensuring that they are not further victimized by public exposure to graphic evidence. As the legal proceedings surrounding Chad Daybell's case continue to unfold, the court's ruling reflects a broader concern about the ethical responsibilities of media coverage in high-profile criminal cases. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Daybell Evidence Sealed... Judge Boyce's Transparency Act!
We're back back back again with another episode of John Prior's bullshit and again, we're all left wondering how Judge Boyce is so damn patient. We get some tea, we get some laughs, we march forward toward the completion of our coverage of the trial and sweet sweet freedom for Casey. At least until Lori's next trial… Email us at: Strangeunusualpodcast@gmail.com Patreon: Patreon.com/strangeunusual Follow the pod on IG at: @strange_unusual_podcast Twitter: @_strangeunusual Facebook: The Strange and Unusual Podcast 'Elevator' music: Darren Curtis Theme song: rap2h and Calamity Casey
The trial of Chad Daybell continued with significant developments as the prosecution presented its final rebuttal witnesses, bringing the high-profile case closer to conclusion. Key testimonies from medical experts and investigators provided crucial insights into the circumstances surrounding the deaths of Tammy Daybell, JJ Vallow, and Tylee Ryan. Judge Boyce opened the courtroom to the jury and addressed a pending issue about a proposed witness, Janice Olsen, who claimed to have heard Tammy Daybell discussing increasing her life insurance. After deliberation, Boyce decided to exclude Olsen's testimony, citing concerns about its relevance and her potential bias after watching parts of the trial. Dr. Erik Christensen, a retired medical examiner, resumed his testimony, reiterating that Tammy Daybell's death was not accidental, natural, or a suicide. "There were bruises on her arms and chest, but her heart and other organs were normal," Christensen testified, dismissing the possibility of death due to toxicological issues, seizures, or cardiac arrhythmia. He concluded that Tammy's death was caused by asphyxia, labeling it a homicide. Defense attorney John Prior cross-examined Christensen, questioning why certain details, such as minor lung inflammation, were not highlighted in his report. Christensen responded that the inflammation was insignificant and did not contribute to the cause of death. Retired detective David Stubbs took the stand next, presenting evidence from Chad Daybell's Google search history. Stubbs revealed that on January 3, 2019, someone using Chad Daybell's account searched for information on how to turn off location services on an iPhone. "A request was made on August 24, 2019, to delete all GPS history from the chad.daybell account," Stubbs testified, noting that such actions could be indicative of attempts to conceal illicit activities. During cross-examination, Prior suggested that the searches could have been made by Tammy Daybell, who was more tech-savvy and used Apple devices. Stubbs acknowledged the possibility but reiterated that the searches were conducted through Chad's account. Lt. Ray Hermosillo from the Rexburg Police Department provided testimony about the investigation into the disappearance of JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan. He detailed how the children were eventually found buried on Chad Daybell's property. Hermosillo also mentioned that he drove by the Daybell residence frequently, partly because his dry cleaning business was nearby and partly due to the ongoing investigation. Hermosillo recounted seeing Emma Murray, Daybell's daughter, at a gym but noted he did not interact with her. His testimony reinforced the prosecution's narrative of Chad Daybell's involvement in the children's deaths. The prosecution wrapped up its rebuttal witnesses, and Judge Boyce announced the next phase: jury instructions. "Closing arguments will be conducted tomorrow," Boyce stated, signaling the trial's imminent conclusion. The jury was excused for the day, and the courtroom was cleared for administrative actions and further discussions on jury instructions. With the rebuttal witnesses concluded, the Chad Daybell trial is poised for its closing arguments. The testimonies of Dr. Christensen, Detective Stubbs, and Lt. Hermosillo have bolstered the prosecution's case, setting the stage for the jury's deliberations. As the trial progresses, the legal community and public alike are keenly observing the proceedings, awaiting the final verdict in this complex and highly publicized case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The trial of Chad Daybell continued with significant developments as the prosecution presented its final rebuttal witnesses, bringing the high-profile case closer to conclusion. Key testimonies from medical experts and investigators provided crucial insights into the circumstances surrounding the deaths of Tammy Daybell, JJ Vallow, and Tylee Ryan. Judge Boyce opened the courtroom to the jury and addressed a pending issue about a proposed witness, Janice Olsen, who claimed to have heard Tammy Daybell discussing increasing her life insurance. After deliberation, Boyce decided to exclude Olsen's testimony, citing concerns about its relevance and her potential bias after watching parts of the trial. Dr. Erik Christensen, a retired medical examiner, resumed his testimony, reiterating that Tammy Daybell's death was not accidental, natural, or a suicide. "There were bruises on her arms and chest, but her heart and other organs were normal," Christensen testified, dismissing the possibility of death due to toxicological issues, seizures, or cardiac arrhythmia. He concluded that Tammy's death was caused by asphyxia, labeling it a homicide. Defense attorney John Prior cross-examined Christensen, questioning why certain details, such as minor lung inflammation, were not highlighted in his report. Christensen responded that the inflammation was insignificant and did not contribute to the cause of death. Retired detective David Stubbs took the stand next, presenting evidence from Chad Daybell's Google search history. Stubbs revealed that on January 3, 2019, someone using Chad Daybell's account searched for information on how to turn off location services on an iPhone. "A request was made on August 24, 2019, to delete all GPS history from the chad.daybell account," Stubbs testified, noting that such actions could be indicative of attempts to conceal illicit activities. During cross-examination, Prior suggested that the searches could have been made by Tammy Daybell, who was more tech-savvy and used Apple devices. Stubbs acknowledged the possibility but reiterated that the searches were conducted through Chad's account. Lt. Ray Hermosillo from the Rexburg Police Department provided testimony about the investigation into the disappearance of JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan. He detailed how the children were eventually found buried on Chad Daybell's property. Hermosillo also mentioned that he drove by the Daybell residence frequently, partly because his dry cleaning business was nearby and partly due to the ongoing investigation. Hermosillo recounted seeing Emma Murray, Daybell's daughter, at a gym but noted he did not interact with her. His testimony reinforced the prosecution's narrative of Chad Daybell's involvement in the children's deaths. The prosecution wrapped up its rebuttal witnesses, and Judge Boyce announced the next phase: jury instructions. "Closing arguments will be conducted tomorrow," Boyce stated, signaling the trial's imminent conclusion. The jury was excused for the day, and the courtroom was cleared for administrative actions and further discussions on jury instructions. With the rebuttal witnesses concluded, the Chad Daybell trial is poised for its closing arguments. The testimonies of Dr. Christensen, Detective Stubbs, and Lt. Hermosillo have bolstered the prosecution's case, setting the stage for the jury's deliberations. As the trial progresses, the legal community and public alike are keenly observing the proceedings, awaiting the final verdict in this complex and highly publicized case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The trial of Chad Daybell continued with significant developments as the prosecution presented its final rebuttal witnesses, bringing the high-profile case closer to conclusion. Key testimonies from medical experts and investigators provided crucial insights into the circumstances surrounding the deaths of Tammy Daybell, JJ Vallow, and Tylee Ryan. Judge Boyce opened the courtroom to the jury and addressed a pending issue about a proposed witness, Janice Olsen, who claimed to have heard Tammy Daybell discussing increasing her life insurance. After deliberation, Boyce decided to exclude Olsen's testimony, citing concerns about its relevance and her potential bias after watching parts of the trial. Dr. Erik Christensen, a retired medical examiner, resumed his testimony, reiterating that Tammy Daybell's death was not accidental, natural, or a suicide. "There were bruises on her arms and chest, but her heart and other organs were normal," Christensen testified, dismissing the possibility of death due to toxicological issues, seizures, or cardiac arrhythmia. He concluded that Tammy's death was caused by asphyxia, labeling it a homicide. Defense attorney John Prior cross-examined Christensen, questioning why certain details, such as minor lung inflammation, were not highlighted in his report. Christensen responded that the inflammation was insignificant and did not contribute to the cause of death. Retired detective David Stubbs took the stand next, presenting evidence from Chad Daybell's Google search history. Stubbs revealed that on January 3, 2019, someone using Chad Daybell's account searched for information on how to turn off location services on an iPhone. "A request was made on August 24, 2019, to delete all GPS history from the chad.daybell account," Stubbs testified, noting that such actions could be indicative of attempts to conceal illicit activities. During cross-examination, Prior suggested that the searches could have been made by Tammy Daybell, who was more tech-savvy and used Apple devices. Stubbs acknowledged the possibility but reiterated that the searches were conducted through Chad's account. Lt. Ray Hermosillo from the Rexburg Police Department provided testimony about the investigation into the disappearance of JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan. He detailed how the children were eventually found buried on Chad Daybell's property. Hermosillo also mentioned that he drove by the Daybell residence frequently, partly because his dry cleaning business was nearby and partly due to the ongoing investigation. Hermosillo recounted seeing Emma Murray, Daybell's daughter, at a gym but noted he did not interact with her. His testimony reinforced the prosecution's narrative of Chad Daybell's involvement in the children's deaths. The prosecution wrapped up its rebuttal witnesses, and Judge Boyce announced the next phase: jury instructions. "Closing arguments will be conducted tomorrow," Boyce stated, signaling the trial's imminent conclusion. The jury was excused for the day, and the courtroom was cleared for administrative actions and further discussions on jury instructions. With the rebuttal witnesses concluded, the Chad Daybell trial is poised for its closing arguments. The testimonies of Dr. Christensen, Detective Stubbs, and Lt. Hermosillo have bolstered the prosecution's case, setting the stage for the jury's deliberations. As the trial progresses, the legal community and public alike are keenly observing the proceedings, awaiting the final verdict in this complex and highly publicized case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Demise Of the Daybells | The Lori Vallow Daybell & Chad Daybell Story
The trial of Chad Daybell continued with significant developments as the prosecution presented its final rebuttal witnesses, bringing the high-profile case closer to conclusion. Key testimonies from medical experts and investigators provided crucial insights into the circumstances surrounding the deaths of Tammy Daybell, JJ Vallow, and Tylee Ryan. Judge Boyce opened the courtroom to the jury and addressed a pending issue about a proposed witness, Janice Olsen, who claimed to have heard Tammy Daybell discussing increasing her life insurance. After deliberation, Boyce decided to exclude Olsen's testimony, citing concerns about its relevance and her potential bias after watching parts of the trial. Dr. Erik Christensen, a retired medical examiner, resumed his testimony, reiterating that Tammy Daybell's death was not accidental, natural, or a suicide. "There were bruises on her arms and chest, but her heart and other organs were normal," Christensen testified, dismissing the possibility of death due to toxicological issues, seizures, or cardiac arrhythmia. He concluded that Tammy's death was caused by asphyxia, labeling it a homicide. Defense attorney John Prior cross-examined Christensen, questioning why certain details, such as minor lung inflammation, were not highlighted in his report. Christensen responded that the inflammation was insignificant and did not contribute to the cause of death. Retired detective David Stubbs took the stand next, presenting evidence from Chad Daybell's Google search history. Stubbs revealed that on January 3, 2019, someone using Chad Daybell's account searched for information on how to turn off location services on an iPhone. "A request was made on August 24, 2019, to delete all GPS history from the chad.daybell account," Stubbs testified, noting that such actions could be indicative of attempts to conceal illicit activities. During cross-examination, Prior suggested that the searches could have been made by Tammy Daybell, who was more tech-savvy and used Apple devices. Stubbs acknowledged the possibility but reiterated that the searches were conducted through Chad's account. Lt. Ray Hermosillo from the Rexburg Police Department provided testimony about the investigation into the disappearance of JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan. He detailed how the children were eventually found buried on Chad Daybell's property. Hermosillo also mentioned that he drove by the Daybell residence frequently, partly because his dry cleaning business was nearby and partly due to the ongoing investigation. Hermosillo recounted seeing Emma Murray, Daybell's daughter, at a gym but noted he did not interact with her. His testimony reinforced the prosecution's narrative of Chad Daybell's involvement in the children's deaths. The prosecution wrapped up its rebuttal witnesses, and Judge Boyce announced the next phase: jury instructions. "Closing arguments will be conducted tomorrow," Boyce stated, signaling the trial's imminent conclusion. The jury was excused for the day, and the courtroom was cleared for administrative actions and further discussions on jury instructions. With the rebuttal witnesses concluded, the Chad Daybell trial is poised for its closing arguments. The testimonies of Dr. Christensen, Detective Stubbs, and Lt. Hermosillo have bolstered the prosecution's case, setting the stage for the jury's deliberations. As the trial progresses, the legal community and public alike are keenly observing the proceedings, awaiting the final verdict in this complex and highly publicized case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Judge Boyce reminds the jury of their duties and refreshes their knowledge of the case and the case law they must consider.
Judge Boyce reminds the jury of their duties and refreshes their knowledge of the case and the case law they must consider. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lorichadrealstory/support
Part four of Casey's coverage of the Chad Daybell trial. Today we learn about all sorts of things and hear from all sorts of sassy people. We would also like to ask Judge Boyce not to hold us in contempt and wonder if you know that Garth brought Tammy a Quarter Pounder and fries. Email us at: Strangeunusualpodcast@gmail.com Patreon: Patreon.com/strangeunusual Follow the pod on IG at: @strange_unusual_podcast Twitter: @_strangeunusual Facebook: The Strange and Unusual Podcast 'Elevator' music: Darren Curtis Theme song: rap2h and Calamity Casey
Defense calls a cell phone data expert and a local Boise State DNA expert. Tomorrow the defense will call their last witness and rest.There was a hearing after testimony today without the public in attendance where a previous denial by Judge Boyce of calling a co-worker of Tammy's to testify Chad asked Tammy to increase her life insurance will now be allowed in rebuttal based on Emma Murray's testimony. Det Hermasillo will also be called. All links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibis10%off with code Sherlock10Merch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibisDonate: PayPal - prettyliesandalibis@gmail.com Venmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-alibis--4447192/support.
The trial of Chad Daybell took an intriguing turn as forensic pathologist Dr. Kathy Raven testified, asserting that Tammy Daybell's cause of death should be classified as undetermined. This challenges the Utah Medical Examiner's previous ruling of asphyxia. The court session began with prosecutor Wixom addressing a minor inaccuracy in Heather Daybell's testimony regarding her communication with Detective Hope. Both Wixom and defense attorney John Prior agreed it was inconsequential, allowing the court to move forward without further concern. Judge Boyce noted that the defense had two more witnesses scheduled to testify, but they were not present. Until their arrival, the court addressed matters outside the jury's presence, ensuring the trial continued smoothly despite the temporary absence of witnesses. Dr. Kathy Raven, a board-certified forensic pathologist with over 25 years of experience, provided critical testimony. She reviewed Tammy Daybell's autopsy report, photos, toxicology results, and various investigative documents. Raven concluded that the cause of Tammy's death should be classified as undetermined due to the lack of anatomical evidence. “There was no anatomical cause of death found for Tammy Daybell,” Raven testified. “All her organs appeared normal, and the toxicology report was extensive with no positive findings, making poisoning unlikely.” Raven also addressed the bruises found on Tammy's body, describing them as nonspecific and inconclusive in determining the cause of death. “The bruises on her arms were nonspecific and could not definitively point to asphyxia,” Raven explained. Reegen Price, a neighbor of Chad Daybell, testified about hearing a gunshot before September 9 and discussing unusual events with law enforcement. Price mentioned creating a timeline with her husband to make sense of the strange occurrences involving the Daybells. “I contacted law enforcement about a few unusual things I noticed,” Price said. “Hearing the gunshot was just one of many strange events.” In a recent development in the ongoing Chad Daybell trial, a minor inaccuracy in the testimony of Heather Daybell was brought to the court's attention by prosecutor Wixom. Heather Daybell had testified earlier that she did not provide any information to Detective Hope. However, prosecutor Wixom discovered her name in a police report, indicating that she might have had some interaction with the detective. Wixom described the inaccuracy as inconsequential and promptly informed the court. Dr. Kathy Raven's testimony provided a crucial perspective, challenging the previously determined cause of death and emphasizing the lack of concrete anatomical evidence. As the trial progresses, the defense aims to cast doubt on the prosecution's narrative, potentially influencing the jury's perception of the events leading to Tammy Daybell's death. The trial continues with further testimonies and evidence reviews, keeping the courtroom and public engrossed in the unfolding legal drama. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The trial of Chad Daybell took an intriguing turn as forensic pathologist Dr. Kathy Raven testified, asserting that Tammy Daybell's cause of death should be classified as undetermined. This challenges the Utah Medical Examiner's previous ruling of asphyxia. The court session began with prosecutor Wixom addressing a minor inaccuracy in Heather Daybell's testimony regarding her communication with Detective Hope. Both Wixom and defense attorney John Prior agreed it was inconsequential, allowing the court to move forward without further concern. Judge Boyce noted that the defense had two more witnesses scheduled to testify, but they were not present. Until their arrival, the court addressed matters outside the jury's presence, ensuring the trial continued smoothly despite the temporary absence of witnesses. Dr. Kathy Raven, a board-certified forensic pathologist with over 25 years of experience, provided critical testimony. She reviewed Tammy Daybell's autopsy report, photos, toxicology results, and various investigative documents. Raven concluded that the cause of Tammy's death should be classified as undetermined due to the lack of anatomical evidence. “There was no anatomical cause of death found for Tammy Daybell,” Raven testified. “All her organs appeared normal, and the toxicology report was extensive with no positive findings, making poisoning unlikely.” Raven also addressed the bruises found on Tammy's body, describing them as nonspecific and inconclusive in determining the cause of death. “The bruises on her arms were nonspecific and could not definitively point to asphyxia,” Raven explained. Reegen Price, a neighbor of Chad Daybell, testified about hearing a gunshot before September 9 and discussing unusual events with law enforcement. Price mentioned creating a timeline with her husband to make sense of the strange occurrences involving the Daybells. “I contacted law enforcement about a few unusual things I noticed,” Price said. “Hearing the gunshot was just one of many strange events.” In a recent development in the ongoing Chad Daybell trial, a minor inaccuracy in the testimony of Heather Daybell was brought to the court's attention by prosecutor Wixom. Heather Daybell had testified earlier that she did not provide any information to Detective Hope. However, prosecutor Wixom discovered her name in a police report, indicating that she might have had some interaction with the detective. Wixom described the inaccuracy as inconsequential and promptly informed the court. Dr. Kathy Raven's testimony provided a crucial perspective, challenging the previously determined cause of death and emphasizing the lack of concrete anatomical evidence. As the trial progresses, the defense aims to cast doubt on the prosecution's narrative, potentially influencing the jury's perception of the events leading to Tammy Daybell's death. The trial continues with further testimonies and evidence reviews, keeping the courtroom and public engrossed in the unfolding legal drama. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The trial of Chad Daybell took an intriguing turn as forensic pathologist Dr. Kathy Raven testified, asserting that Tammy Daybell's cause of death should be classified as undetermined. This challenges the Utah Medical Examiner's previous ruling of asphyxia. The court session began with prosecutor Wixom addressing a minor inaccuracy in Heather Daybell's testimony regarding her communication with Detective Hope. Both Wixom and defense attorney John Prior agreed it was inconsequential, allowing the court to move forward without further concern. Judge Boyce noted that the defense had two more witnesses scheduled to testify, but they were not present. Until their arrival, the court addressed matters outside the jury's presence, ensuring the trial continued smoothly despite the temporary absence of witnesses. Dr. Kathy Raven, a board-certified forensic pathologist with over 25 years of experience, provided critical testimony. She reviewed Tammy Daybell's autopsy report, photos, toxicology results, and various investigative documents. Raven concluded that the cause of Tammy's death should be classified as undetermined due to the lack of anatomical evidence. “There was no anatomical cause of death found for Tammy Daybell,” Raven testified. “All her organs appeared normal, and the toxicology report was extensive with no positive findings, making poisoning unlikely.” Raven also addressed the bruises found on Tammy's body, describing them as nonspecific and inconclusive in determining the cause of death. “The bruises on her arms were nonspecific and could not definitively point to asphyxia,” Raven explained. Reegen Price, a neighbor of Chad Daybell, testified about hearing a gunshot before September 9 and discussing unusual events with law enforcement. Price mentioned creating a timeline with her husband to make sense of the strange occurrences involving the Daybells. “I contacted law enforcement about a few unusual things I noticed,” Price said. “Hearing the gunshot was just one of many strange events.” In a recent development in the ongoing Chad Daybell trial, a minor inaccuracy in the testimony of Heather Daybell was brought to the court's attention by prosecutor Wixom. Heather Daybell had testified earlier that she did not provide any information to Detective Hope. However, prosecutor Wixom discovered her name in a police report, indicating that she might have had some interaction with the detective. Wixom described the inaccuracy as inconsequential and promptly informed the court. Dr. Kathy Raven's testimony provided a crucial perspective, challenging the previously determined cause of death and emphasizing the lack of concrete anatomical evidence. As the trial progresses, the defense aims to cast doubt on the prosecution's narrative, potentially influencing the jury's perception of the events leading to Tammy Daybell's death. The trial continues with further testimonies and evidence reviews, keeping the courtroom and public engrossed in the unfolding legal drama. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Demise Of the Daybells | The Lori Vallow Daybell & Chad Daybell Story
The trial of Chad Daybell took an intriguing turn as forensic pathologist Dr. Kathy Raven testified, asserting that Tammy Daybell's cause of death should be classified as undetermined. This challenges the Utah Medical Examiner's previous ruling of asphyxia. The court session began with prosecutor Wixom addressing a minor inaccuracy in Heather Daybell's testimony regarding her communication with Detective Hope. Both Wixom and defense attorney John Prior agreed it was inconsequential, allowing the court to move forward without further concern. Judge Boyce noted that the defense had two more witnesses scheduled to testify, but they were not present. Until their arrival, the court addressed matters outside the jury's presence, ensuring the trial continued smoothly despite the temporary absence of witnesses. Dr. Kathy Raven, a board-certified forensic pathologist with over 25 years of experience, provided critical testimony. She reviewed Tammy Daybell's autopsy report, photos, toxicology results, and various investigative documents. Raven concluded that the cause of Tammy's death should be classified as undetermined due to the lack of anatomical evidence. “There was no anatomical cause of death found for Tammy Daybell,” Raven testified. “All her organs appeared normal, and the toxicology report was extensive with no positive findings, making poisoning unlikely.” Raven also addressed the bruises found on Tammy's body, describing them as nonspecific and inconclusive in determining the cause of death. “The bruises on her arms were nonspecific and could not definitively point to asphyxia,” Raven explained. Reegen Price, a neighbor of Chad Daybell, testified about hearing a gunshot before September 9 and discussing unusual events with law enforcement. Price mentioned creating a timeline with her husband to make sense of the strange occurrences involving the Daybells. “I contacted law enforcement about a few unusual things I noticed,” Price said. “Hearing the gunshot was just one of many strange events.” In a recent development in the ongoing Chad Daybell trial, a minor inaccuracy in the testimony of Heather Daybell was brought to the court's attention by prosecutor Wixom. Heather Daybell had testified earlier that she did not provide any information to Detective Hope. However, prosecutor Wixom discovered her name in a police report, indicating that she might have had some interaction with the detective. Wixom described the inaccuracy as inconsequential and promptly informed the court. Dr. Kathy Raven's testimony provided a crucial perspective, challenging the previously determined cause of death and emphasizing the lack of concrete anatomical evidence. As the trial progresses, the defense aims to cast doubt on the prosecution's narrative, potentially influencing the jury's perception of the events leading to Tammy Daybell's death. The trial continues with further testimonies and evidence reviews, keeping the courtroom and public engrossed in the unfolding legal drama. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Prosecution in the Chad Daybell trial rested its case on Friday, but not before there was a bit of drama surrounding an amended indictment that had the wrong date for the Murder of JJ Vallow. Daybell's legal team attempted to utilize that clerical error as a way to get the murder charge he's facing for the murder of JJ tossed, but Judge Boyce ruled that it was an obvious clerical error and that there was enough evidence provided by the prosecution that a jury should decide the outcome, not him. In this episode, we take a look at how it all went down and what we should expect from the defense as they begin to present their case.(commercial at 12:01)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge says error on indictment for JJ's murder not grounds for acquittal of murder charge - East Idaho News
The Prosecution in the Chad Daybell trial rested its case on Friday, but not before there was a bit of drama surrounding an amended indictment that had the wrong date for the Murder of JJ Vallow. Daybell's legal team attempted to utilize that clerical error as a way to get the murder charge he's facing for the murder of JJ tossed, but Judge Boyce ruled that it was an obvious clerical error and that there was enough evidence provided by the prosecution that a jury should decide the outcome, not him. In this episode, we take a look at how it all went down and what we should expect from the defense as they begin to present their case.(commercial at 12:01)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge says error on indictment for JJ's murder not grounds for acquittal of murder charge - East Idaho News
The Prosecution in the Chad Daybell trial rested its case on Friday, but not before there was a bit of drama surrounding an amended indictment that had the wrong date for the Murder of JJ Vallow. Daybell's legal team attempted to utilize that clerical error as a way to get the murder charge he's facing for the murder of JJ tossed, but Judge Boyce ruled that it was an obvious clerical error and that there was enough evidence provided by the prosecution that a jury should decide the outcome, not him. In this episode, we take a look at how it all went down and what we should expect from the defense as they begin to present their case.(commercial at 12:01)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge says error on indictment for JJ's murder not grounds for acquittal of murder charge - East Idaho NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A judge may split a trial between two defendants for several reasons. One common reason is that the defendants have different levels of involvement in the alleged crime, and it would be unfair to try them together. For example, if one defendant was the primary instigator or perpetrator of the crime, while the other was only an accomplice or had a minor role, the judge may split the trial to ensure that each defendant's level of culpability is accurately assessed.Another reason why a judge may split a trial between two defendants is if there is a conflict of interest between them. For instance, if one defendant wishes to plead guilty and cooperate with the prosecution while the other wishes to contest the charges, it may not be appropriate to try them together, as their interests may be diametrically opposed.Additionally, a judge may split a trial if the evidence against one defendant is substantially stronger than the evidence against the other. In such cases, trying them together could lead to confusion and unfairly prejudice the jury against the weaker defendant.Ultimately, the decision to split a trial between two defendants depends on the specific circumstances of the case and is left to the judge's discretion. The judge will weigh various factors, including the interests of justice, fairness to the defendants, and the need for an efficient and orderly trial process.In this episode, we take a look at Judge Boyce decision to split the trial between Lori Vallow and Chad Daybell and what might have motivated him to do so.(commercial at 6:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cult mom Lori Vallow will be tried separately from husband Chad Daybell | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Chad Daybell filed a motion with the court in Idaho attempting to get the death penalty taken off the table once his trial starts this summer. Judge Boyce wasn't interested in that however, and in his most recent order, he makes clear why.In this episode we dive inot that order.(commercial at 8:58)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:121923-Memorandum-Decision-Order-on-Motions.pdf (amazonaws.com)
Chad Daybell filed a motion with the court in Idaho attempting to get the death penalty taken off the table once his trial starts this summer. Judge Boyce wasn't interested in that however, and in his most recent order, he makes clear why.In this episode we dive inot that order.(commercial at 8:58)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:121923-Memorandum-Decision-Order-on-Motions.pdf (amazonaws.com)
A judge may split a trial between two defendants for several reasons. One common reason is that the defendants have different levels of involvement in the alleged crime, and it would be unfair to try them together. For example, if one defendant was the primary instigator or perpetrator of the crime, while the other was only an accomplice or had a minor role, the judge may split the trial to ensure that each defendant's level of culpability is accurately assessed.Another reason why a judge may split a trial between two defendants is if there is a conflict of interest between them. For instance, if one defendant wishes to plead guilty and cooperate with the prosecution while the other wishes to contest the charges, it may not be appropriate to try them together, as their interests may be diametrically opposed.Additionally, a judge may split a trial if the evidence against one defendant is substantially stronger than the evidence against the other. In such cases, trying them together could lead to confusion and unfairly prejudice the jury against the weaker defendant.Ultimately, the decision to split a trial between two defendants depends on the specific circumstances of the case and is left to the judge's discretion. The judge will weigh various factors, including the interests of justice, fairness to the defendants, and the need for an efficient and orderly trial process.In this episode, we take a look at Judge Boyce decision to split the trial between Lori Vallow and Chad Daybell and what might have motivated him to do so.(commercial at 6:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cult mom Lori Vallow will be tried separately from husband Chad Daybell | Daily Mail Online
Chad Daybell filed a motion with the court in Idaho attempting to get the death penalty taken off the table once his trial starts this summer. Judge Boyce wasn't interested in that however, and in his most recent order, he makes clear why.In this episode we dive inot that order.(commercial at 8:58)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:121923-Memorandum-Decision-Order-on-Motions.pdf (amazonaws.com)
Chad Daybell filed a motion with the court in Idaho attempting to get the death penalty taken off the table once his trial starts this summer. Judge Boyce wasn't interested in that however, and in his most recent order, he makes clear why.In this episode we dive inot that order.(commercial at 8:58)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:121923-Memorandum-Decision-Order-on-Motions.pdf (amazonaws.com)
In what can only be called a bitttersweet ending for the grandparents of JJ Vallow, they are finally going to receive his remains so that they can put him to rest. This comes after an order was signed on Monday by Judge Boyce in Idaho who made the ruling to turn the remains over to the next of kin Lori Vallow recently recieved a life sentence for murdering her children and conspiring to murder Chad Daybell's wife Tammy and she is still facing more charages in Phoenix, including a charge for attempted murder. (commercial at 6:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho judge orders JJ Vallow's body to be released to next of kin (yahoo.com)
Lori Vallow has already been convicted of murdering her two children and her husbands former wife. Now, she is in Arizona to face MORE murder charges and several other charges to go along with them. After being extradited from Idaho to Arizona to face those charges, she pleaded not guilty.A date for her trial in Arizona has not been announced.Back in Idaho Judge Steven Boyce, the Judge overseeing the Chad Daybell trial has made a ruling on what venue will serve as the backdrop for the trial and his reasoning for making the decision that he did.So, lets dive in and get caught up!(commercial at 7:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge issues decision on whether Chad Daybell's trial will be moved back to eastern Idaho - East Idaho Newssource:Extradited from Idaho, Lori Daybell enters plea in Arizona | Idaho Statesman
The dive into the Chad Daybell court documents continues as there has been a flurry of activity as of late in regard to the upcoming trial of Chad Daybell.In this episode we are taking a look at the Venue order that just hit the docket.(commercial at 9:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:120823-Order-on-States-Motion-to-Reconsider-Change-of-Venue.pdf (amazonaws.com)
Chad Daybell filed a motion with the court in Idaho attempting to get the death penalty taken off the table once his trial starts this summer. Judge Boyce wasn't interested in that however, and in his most recent order, he makes clear why.In this episode we dive inot that order.(commercial at 8:58)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:121923-Memorandum-Decision-Order-on-Motions.pdf (amazonaws.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
Chad Daybell filed a motion with the court in Idaho attempting to get the death penalty taken off the table once his trial starts this summer. Judge Boyce wasn't interested in that however, and in his most recent order, he makes clear why.In this episode we dive inot that order.(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:121923-Memorandum-Decision-Order-on-Motions.pdf (amazonaws.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
Chad Daybell filed a motion with the court in Idaho attempting to get the death penalty taken off the table once his trial starts this summer. Judge Boyce wasn't interested in that however, and in his most recent order, he makes clear why.In this episode we dive inot that order.(commercial at 8:58)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:121923-Memorandum-Decision-Order-on-Motions.pdf (amazonaws.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
Chad Daybell filed a motion with the court in Idaho attempting to get the death penalty taken off the table once his trial starts this summer. Judge Boyce wasn't interested in that however, and in his most recent order, he makes clear why.In this episode we dive inot that order.(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:121923-Memorandum-Decision-Order-on-Motions.pdf (amazonaws.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
The dive into the Chad Daybell court documents continues as there has been a flurry of activity as of late in regard to the upcoming trial of Chad Daybell. In this episode we are taking a look at the Venue order that just hit the docket. (commercial at 9:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:120823-Order-on-States-Motion-to-Reconsider-Change-of-Venue.pdf (amazonaws.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
Lori Vallow has already been convicted of murdering her two children and her husbands former wife. Now, she is in Arizona to face MORE murder charges and several other charges to go along with them. After being extradited from Idaho to Arizona to face those charges, she pleaded not guilty. A date for her trial in Arizona has not been announced.Back in Idaho Judge Steven Boyce, the Judge overseeing the Chad Daybell trial has made a ruling on what venue will serve as the backdrop for the trial and his reasoning for making the decision that he did. So, lets dive in and get caught up!(commercial at 7:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge issues decision on whether Chad Daybell's trial will be moved back to eastern Idaho - East Idaho Newssource:Extradited from Idaho, Lori Daybell enters plea in Arizona | Idaho StatesmanThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
The dive into the Chad Daybell court documents continues as there has been a flurry of activity as of late in regard to the upcoming trial of Chad Daybell. In this episode we are taking a look at the Venue order that just hit the docket. (commercial at 9:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:120823-Order-on-States-Motion-to-Reconsider-Change-of-Venue.pdf (amazonaws.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
Lori Vallow has already been convicted of murdering her two children and her husbands former wife. Now, she is in Arizona to face MORE murder charges and several other charges to go along with them. After being extradited from Idaho to Arizona to face those charges, she pleaded not guilty. A date for her trial in Arizona has not been announced.Back in Idaho Judge Steven Boyce, the Judge overseeing the Chad Daybell trial has made a ruling on what venue will serve as the backdrop for the trial and his reasoning for making the decision that he did. So, lets dive in and get caught up!(commercial at 7:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge issues decision on whether Chad Daybell's trial will be moved back to eastern Idaho - East Idaho Newssource:Extradited from Idaho, Lori Daybell enters plea in Arizona | Idaho StatesmanThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Demise Of the Daybells | The Lori Vallow Daybell & Chad Daybell Story
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Demise Of the Daybells | The Lori Vallow Daybell & Chad Daybell Story
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Demise Of the Daybells | The Lori Vallow Daybell & Chad Daybell Story
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Demise Of the Daybells | The Lori Vallow Daybell & Chad Daybell Story
In a landmark decision, an Idaho judge has ruled that Chad Daybell's upcoming murder trial will be live-streamed, despite concerns raised by the prosecution about the potential for media attention to turn the proceedings into a "circus." Judge Steven Boyce made this significant ruling following arguments from the defense, local media outlets, and the state, amending a previous camera ban that had been imposed. The decision allows cameras to be present in the courtroom during the trial, scheduled for April 1, 2024, and expected to span 8-10 weeks. However, the trial will be streamed exclusively through the court's cameras, with strict restrictions on media involvement. Chad Daybell is facing murder charges in connection with the deaths of Lori Vallow's children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as his former wife, Tammy Daybell. During Wednesday's hearing, Chad Daybell's attorney, John Prior, argued passionately in favor of allowing cameras, stating, "Cameras keep everybody honest. It keeps the system honest. It keeps the witnesses honest." He emphasized that having cameras would enable Daybell's family members, who may be unable to attend in person due to the trial's location, to watch the proceedings remotely. Judge Boyce recognized the logistical challenges faced by those wishing to attend the trial and agreed with the defense's request. He acknowledged, "The difficulty of moving a trial 350 miles from where we are certainly creates restrictions on individuals who would like to attend." The defense also proposed that the trial be streamed through the media, citing technical issues with the court's system. However, Judge Boyce ultimately ruled in favor of streaming the trial solely through the court's cameras. Prosecutors argued to maintain the camera ban order to match Lori Vallow's trial, which was held without cameras earlier this year, except for the verdict, which was live-streamed on the judge's YouTube page. They expressed concerns that cameras in the courtroom could turn the case, which had already garnered significant media attention, into a "circus." Despite these concerns, Judge Boyce made the decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, but with specific restrictions. The court will broadcast the video and audio feeds on the court's website, and still photography or microphones from any media outlet or third party will not be permitted. In addition to the camera decision, Judge Boyce heard arguments on several pending motions that could potentially impact the upcoming trial, including a motion for a change of venue and the consideration of removing the death penalty as an option. The judge will issue written rulings on these matters at a later date, further shaping the circumstances of Chad Daybell's highly anticipated trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In what can only be called a bitttersweet ending for the grandparents of JJ Vallow, they are finally going to receive his remains so that they can put him to rest. This comes after an order was signed on Monday by Judge Boyce in Idaho who made the ruling to turn the remains over to the next of kin Lori Vallow recently recieved a life sentence for murdering her children and conspiring to murder Chad Daybell's wife Tammy and she is still facing more charages in Phoenix, including a charge for attempted murder. (commercial at 6:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho judge orders JJ Vallow's body to be released to next of kin (yahoo.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
In what can only be called a bitttersweet ending for the grandparents of JJ Vallow, they are finally going to receive his remains so that they can put him to rest. This comes after an order was signed on Monday by Judge Boyce in Idaho who made the ruling to turn the remains over to the next of kin Lori Vallow recently recieved a life sentence for murdering her children and conspiring to murder Chad Daybell's wife Tammy and she is still facing more charages in Phoenix, including a charge for attempted murder. (commercial at 6:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho judge orders JJ Vallow's body to be released to next of kin (yahoo.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
Following the life imprisonment sentence handed down in July, Lori Vallow Daybell's defense is not standing down. Her attorney, Jim Archibald, recently filed an appeal, imploring the Idaho Supreme Court to reevaluate her case, the guilty verdict, and the pronounced sentence. Lori Vallow Daybell was handed a life imprisonment verdict, without the possibility of parole, for the heinous act of killing her two children, 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 16-year-old Tylee Ryan. The charges further expanded to a conspiracy plot to murder Tammy Daybell, the previous wife of her fifth husband. Detailed in the notice of appeal presented on Thursday, Archibald delineated 16 significant issues he believes warrant the Supreme Court's attention: The pivotal question of whether District Judge Steven Boyce made an error in pronouncing Daybell fit for trial, despite her spending a considerable 10 months in a mental institution. The contentious decision of Judge Boyce to decline Archibald's appeal to send Daybell back to the mental institution for further evaluation, instead of proceeding to trial. Archibald also raises concerns about Daybell's constitutional rights to a speedy trial potentially being violated, particularly due to the prosecutor's numerous requests for postponements. Another point of contention is whether Judge Boyce erred in permitting the presentation of evidence from the ongoing Arizona case. This case concerns the alleged crimes surrounding the death of Charles Vallow, Daybell's fourth husband, and the purported attempted murder of Brandon Boudreaux, previously married into Daybell's family. The appeal also questions the discretion of Judge Boyce regarding Daybell's sentence—three consecutive life terms without parole. The court's decision ordering Daybell to pay a whopping $165,018 in fines and court charges, despite her evident indigence and dependence on public defense, is also under scrutiny. Furthermore, Archibald has tabled a request for the appointment of appellate public defenders to oversee the appeal segment of Daybell's case. It is customary for felony convictions, particularly those involving murder charges, to be appealed. Such appeals must be presented within 42 days of the sentencing. Preparations are now underway for the Supreme Court to receive a transcript of Daybell's trial. Archibald, being meticulous in his pursuit of justice for his client, is also in the process of acquiring transcripts from Daybell's previous competency evaluations, the preliminary hearings leading up to the trial, and the sentencing proceedings. However, this appellate process is notorious for its lengthy duration, often spanning several years. In the upcoming phase, the Idaho attorney general will assign a representative for the prosecution. This attorney, in tandem with the defense's appellate lawyer, will draft written briefs. It is also anticipated that both parties will present oral arguments before the state Supreme Court finalizes its judgment. There's a potential hiccup in Daybell's appellate case trajectory. The state of Arizona is gearing up to extradite her, pressing charges of conspiracy to commit Charles Vallow's murder and the alleged attempt on Brandon Boudreaux's life. Barely a month has passed since Daybell's confinement in the Pocatello Women's Correctional Center. Meanwhile, the trial of Chad Daybell, Lori's husband, is on the horizon, set to commence on April 1 in Ada County. While the wheels of justice are in motion, this case serves as a reminder of the intricate dance between the justice system, victims' rights, and the accused's rights. The outcome of this appeal, especially given its high-profile nature, will be closely watched by many across the state and the nation. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Ca
Following the life imprisonment sentence handed down in July, Lori Vallow Daybell's defense is not standing down. Her attorney, Jim Archibald, recently filed an appeal, imploring the Idaho Supreme Court to reevaluate her case, the guilty verdict, and the pronounced sentence. Lori Vallow Daybell was handed a life imprisonment verdict, without the possibility of parole, for the heinous act of killing her two children, 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 16-year-old Tylee Ryan. The charges further expanded to a conspiracy plot to murder Tammy Daybell, the previous wife of her fifth husband. Detailed in the notice of appeal presented on Thursday, Archibald delineated 16 significant issues he believes warrant the Supreme Court's attention: The pivotal question of whether District Judge Steven Boyce made an error in pronouncing Daybell fit for trial, despite her spending a considerable 10 months in a mental institution. The contentious decision of Judge Boyce to decline Archibald's appeal to send Daybell back to the mental institution for further evaluation, instead of proceeding to trial. Archibald also raises concerns about Daybell's constitutional rights to a speedy trial potentially being violated, particularly due to the prosecutor's numerous requests for postponements. Another point of contention is whether Judge Boyce erred in permitting the presentation of evidence from the ongoing Arizona case. This case concerns the alleged crimes surrounding the death of Charles Vallow, Daybell's fourth husband, and the purported attempted murder of Brandon Boudreaux, previously married into Daybell's family. The appeal also questions the discretion of Judge Boyce regarding Daybell's sentence—three consecutive life terms without parole. The court's decision ordering Daybell to pay a whopping $165,018 in fines and court charges, despite her evident indigence and dependence on public defense, is also under scrutiny. Furthermore, Archibald has tabled a request for the appointment of appellate public defenders to oversee the appeal segment of Daybell's case. It is customary for felony convictions, particularly those involving murder charges, to be appealed. Such appeals must be presented within 42 days of the sentencing. Preparations are now underway for the Supreme Court to receive a transcript of Daybell's trial. Archibald, being meticulous in his pursuit of justice for his client, is also in the process of acquiring transcripts from Daybell's previous competency evaluations, the preliminary hearings leading up to the trial, and the sentencing proceedings. However, this appellate process is notorious for its lengthy duration, often spanning several years. In the upcoming phase, the Idaho attorney general will assign a representative for the prosecution. This attorney, in tandem with the defense's appellate lawyer, will draft written briefs. It is also anticipated that both parties will present oral arguments before the state Supreme Court finalizes its judgment. There's a potential hiccup in Daybell's appellate case trajectory. The state of Arizona is gearing up to extradite her, pressing charges of conspiracy to commit Charles Vallow's murder and the alleged attempt on Brandon Boudreaux's life. Barely a month has passed since Daybell's confinement in the Pocatello Women's Correctional Center. Meanwhile, the trial of Chad Daybell, Lori's husband, is on the horizon, set to commence on April 1 in Ada County. While the wheels of justice are in motion, this case serves as a reminder of the intricate dance between the justice system, victims' rights, and the accused's rights. The outcome of this appeal, especially given its high-profile nature, will be closely watched by many across the state and the nation. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Ca
Demise Of the Daybells | The Lori Vallow Daybell & Chad Daybell Story
Following the life imprisonment sentence handed down in July, Lori Vallow Daybell's defense is not standing down. Her attorney, Jim Archibald, recently filed an appeal, imploring the Idaho Supreme Court to reevaluate her case, the guilty verdict, and the pronounced sentence. Lori Vallow Daybell was handed a life imprisonment verdict, without the possibility of parole, for the heinous act of killing her two children, 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 16-year-old Tylee Ryan. The charges further expanded to a conspiracy plot to murder Tammy Daybell, the previous wife of her fifth husband. Detailed in the notice of appeal presented on Thursday, Archibald delineated 16 significant issues he believes warrant the Supreme Court's attention: The pivotal question of whether District Judge Steven Boyce made an error in pronouncing Daybell fit for trial, despite her spending a considerable 10 months in a mental institution. The contentious decision of Judge Boyce to decline Archibald's appeal to send Daybell back to the mental institution for further evaluation, instead of proceeding to trial. Archibald also raises concerns about Daybell's constitutional rights to a speedy trial potentially being violated, particularly due to the prosecutor's numerous requests for postponements. Another point of contention is whether Judge Boyce erred in permitting the presentation of evidence from the ongoing Arizona case. This case concerns the alleged crimes surrounding the death of Charles Vallow, Daybell's fourth husband, and the purported attempted murder of Brandon Boudreaux, previously married into Daybell's family. The appeal also questions the discretion of Judge Boyce regarding Daybell's sentence—three consecutive life terms without parole. The court's decision ordering Daybell to pay a whopping $165,018 in fines and court charges, despite her evident indigence and dependence on public defense, is also under scrutiny. Furthermore, Archibald has tabled a request for the appointment of appellate public defenders to oversee the appeal segment of Daybell's case. It is customary for felony convictions, particularly those involving murder charges, to be appealed. Such appeals must be presented within 42 days of the sentencing. Preparations are now underway for the Supreme Court to receive a transcript of Daybell's trial. Archibald, being meticulous in his pursuit of justice for his client, is also in the process of acquiring transcripts from Daybell's previous competency evaluations, the preliminary hearings leading up to the trial, and the sentencing proceedings. However, this appellate process is notorious for its lengthy duration, often spanning several years. In the upcoming phase, the Idaho attorney general will assign a representative for the prosecution. This attorney, in tandem with the defense's appellate lawyer, will draft written briefs. It is also anticipated that both parties will present oral arguments before the state Supreme Court finalizes its judgment. There's a potential hiccup in Daybell's appellate case trajectory. The state of Arizona is gearing up to extradite her, pressing charges of conspiracy to commit Charles Vallow's murder and the alleged attempt on Brandon Boudreaux's life. Barely a month has passed since Daybell's confinement in the Pocatello Women's Correctional Center. Meanwhile, the trial of Chad Daybell, Lori's husband, is on the horizon, set to commence on April 1 in Ada County. While the wheels of justice are in motion, this case serves as a reminder of the intricate dance between the justice system, victims' rights, and the accused's rights. The outcome of this appeal, especially given its high-profile nature, will be closely watched by many across the state and the nation. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Ca
Lori Vallow Daybell is a woman from the United States who gained national attention in 2019 and 2020 for the disappearance of her two children, Joshua "JJ" Vallow and Tylee Ryan. She was born Lori Norene Cox on June 26, 1973, in San Bernardino, California.Lori Vallow Daybell had a troubled personal life and was married multiple times before marrying her fifth husband, Chad Daybell, in 2019. Her previous husband, Charles Vallow, was killed in July 2019 by her brother, Alex Cox, who claimed self-defense.Cox himself died a few months later of what was initially believed to be natural causes, but was later determined to be due to a pulmonary embolism.Lori Vallow Daybell's children were last seen in September 2019, and she and Chad Daybell were eventually charged with several crimes related to their disappearance. The children's remains were later found on Chad Daybell's property in Idaho in June 2020. Lori Vallow Daybell is currently facing charges including conspiracy to commit murder, murder, and first-degree burglary.After a five week trial, she was found guilty of murdering her two children and conspiring to murder Chad Daybell's wife, Tammy. Now, after requesting a rertrial due to juror error, the Judge has an answer for her.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucciprotonmail.comsource:Judge REJECTS doomsday mom Lori Vallow's request for a retrial | Daily Mail OnlineThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
A judge may split a trial between two defendants for several reasons. One common reason is that the defendants have different levels of involvement in the alleged crime, and it would be unfair to try them together. For example, if one defendant was the primary instigator or perpetrator of the crime, while the other was only an accomplice or had a minor role, the judge may split the trial to ensure that each defendant's level of culpability is accurately assessed.Another reason why a judge may split a trial between two defendants is if there is a conflict of interest between them. For instance, if one defendant wishes to plead guilty and cooperate with the prosecution while the other wishes to contest the charges, it may not be appropriate to try them together, as their interests may be diametrically opposed.Additionally, a judge may split a trial if the evidence against one defendant is substantially stronger than the evidence against the other. In such cases, trying them together could lead to confusion and unfairly prejudice the jury against the weaker defendant.Ultimately, the decision to split a trial between two defendants depends on the specific circumstances of the case and is left to the judge's discretion. The judge will weigh various factors, including the interests of justice, fairness to the defendants, and the need for an efficient and orderly trial process.In this episode, we take a look at Judge Boyce decision to split the trial between Lori Vallow and Chad Daybell and what might have motivated him to do so.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cult mom Lori Vallow will be tried separately from husband Chad Daybell | Daily Mail OnlineThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
Judge Boyce makes his ruling, showing Lori that Idaho will not tolerate her murderous behavior. Kristi and Katie give their final analysis. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lorichadrealstory/support
In a courtroom laden with tension and anticipation, an Idaho judge has ruled in favor of Tammy Daybell's aunt, Vicki Hoban, granting her the right to address the court during the sentencing of Lori Vallow. Lori Vallow, a woman infamous for the gruesome charges against her, awaits her judgment day in a Fremont County, Idaho courtroom. The somber aura of the courtroom is a stark contrast to the tumultuous saga that has transpired. Lori, now 50, was convicted on May 12 for the horrific deeds in 2019. The innocent lives of her children, Joshua 'JJ' Vallow, only seven years old, and Tylee Ryan, 16, were snuffed out in their youth. Additionally, the looming charge of conspiracy to commit murder of her husband Chad Daybell's former wife, Tammy Daybell, added an ominous hue to the already grisly tale. Stepping into this storm of tragedy, Vicki Hoban, Tammy's aunt, had sought to represent her late niece at the sentencing. Initially, Judge Steven Boyce rejected this request. However, following the demise of Tammy's mother in June, Hoban was granted special permission to deliver a victim impact statement. Vallow's defense team submitted a motion on Friday in a move that stirred up more controversy. Their argument was predicated on Idaho law's definition of 'immediate' family members as victims, a category in which an aunt is not included. Despite their request to prevent Hoban from making her statement, the ruling swung in her favor. The stoic courtroom witnessed a rather detached Vallow, visible on camera from the Madison County Jail. A bleak image of the convicted woman was captured as she stared ahead, her fist propped under her chin, speaking no word, simply waiting. Further adding complexity to the already convoluted case, Vallow's attorney, Jim Archibald, contended that the submitted statements of Tammy Daybell's father and sister made Hoban's testimony redundant. As the law excludes aunts, Archibald opined the court's order would be apt if there were no representation from Tammy Daybell's family. However, given the circumstances, Archibald argued, an aunt does not possess the right to represent the family. In a judicious move, Judge Boyce clarified his initial grant to Hoban was under the impression of Tammy's absence of representation. He highlighted that the statute does not specify that a representative can only be appointed under certain circumstances. Therefore, the impending testimony of three other family members does not exclude Hoban's right to represent her late niece. As Vallow's eldest son, Colby Ryan, JJ's grandmother, Kay Woodcock, and the child's designated representative, Summer Shiflet, prepare their statements, the courtroom awaits with bated breath. In a twist of law, Vallow will be granted an opportunity to address the court before her sentence is pronounced. A moment to speak without fear of objection or cross-examination, an opportunity she chose not to take during her trial. Vallow's previous plea for retrial was dismissed last month. Her attorneys had argued that external influences swayed the jury. The accusations against her were severe - Vallow was convicted for killing her children after falling prey to the illusions of the doomsday predictor, Chad Daybell. The defense argued that the instructions to the jury were muddled and contended that some jurors knew about her alleged crimes that were not officially presented as evidence. Vallow's attorneys pointed to an interview one juror gave with East Idaho News, revealing knowledge of information not disclosed during the trial. They also claimed changes in the original indictment that occurred without proper notice from the prosecution as grounds for a new trial. However, Judge Boyce, who had presided over Vallow's initial trial, ruled against this motion. While Vallow stands on the precipice of her fate, her husband, Chad Daybell, awaits his reckoning. With his trial slated for April 1, 2024, Chad watches from the confines of Fremont County Jail. The parallel trials weave a tale of a tormented family facing the stark reality of their actions, each awaiting the heavy hand of justice to pronounce their destinies. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a courtroom laden with tension and anticipation, an Idaho judge has ruled in favor of Tammy Daybell's aunt, Vicki Hoban, granting her the right to address the court during the sentencing of Lori Vallow. Lori Vallow, a woman infamous for the gruesome charges against her, awaits her judgment day in a Fremont County, Idaho courtroom. The somber aura of the courtroom is a stark contrast to the tumultuous saga that has transpired. Lori, now 50, was convicted on May 12 for the horrific deeds in 2019. The innocent lives of her children, Joshua 'JJ' Vallow, only seven years old, and Tylee Ryan, 16, were snuffed out in their youth. Additionally, the looming charge of conspiracy to commit murder of her husband Chad Daybell's former wife, Tammy Daybell, added an ominous hue to the already grisly tale. Stepping into this storm of tragedy, Vicki Hoban, Tammy's aunt, had sought to represent her late niece at the sentencing. Initially, Judge Steven Boyce rejected this request. However, following the demise of Tammy's mother in June, Hoban was granted special permission to deliver a victim impact statement. Vallow's defense team submitted a motion on Friday in a move that stirred up more controversy. Their argument was predicated on Idaho law's definition of 'immediate' family members as victims, a category in which an aunt is not included. Despite their request to prevent Hoban from making her statement, the ruling swung in her favor. The stoic courtroom witnessed a rather detached Vallow, visible on camera from the Madison County Jail. A bleak image of the convicted woman was captured as she stared ahead, her fist propped under her chin, speaking no word, simply waiting. Further adding complexity to the already convoluted case, Vallow's attorney, Jim Archibald, contended that the submitted statements of Tammy Daybell's father and sister made Hoban's testimony redundant. As the law excludes aunts, Archibald opined the court's order would be apt if there were no representation from Tammy Daybell's family. However, given the circumstances, Archibald argued, an aunt does not possess the right to represent the family. In a judicious move, Judge Boyce clarified his initial grant to Hoban was under the impression of Tammy's absence of representation. He highlighted that the statute does not specify that a representative can only be appointed under certain circumstances. Therefore, the impending testimony of three other family members does not exclude Hoban's right to represent her late niece. As Vallow's eldest son, Colby Ryan, JJ's grandmother, Kay Woodcock, and the child's designated representative, Summer Shiflet, prepare their statements, the courtroom awaits with bated breath. In a twist of law, Vallow will be granted an opportunity to address the court before her sentence is pronounced. A moment to speak without fear of objection or cross-examination, an opportunity she chose not to take during her trial. Vallow's previous plea for retrial was dismissed last month. Her attorneys had argued that external influences swayed the jury. The accusations against her were severe - Vallow was convicted for killing her children after falling prey to the illusions of the doomsday predictor, Chad Daybell. The defense argued that the instructions to the jury were muddled and contended that some jurors knew about her alleged crimes that were not officially presented as evidence. Vallow's attorneys pointed to an interview one juror gave with East Idaho News, revealing knowledge of information not disclosed during the trial. They also claimed changes in the original indictment that occurred without proper notice from the prosecution as grounds for a new trial. However, Judge Boyce, who had presided over Vallow's initial trial, ruled against this motion. While Vallow stands on the precipice of her fate, her husband, Chad Daybell, awaits his reckoning. With his trial slated for April 1, 2024, Chad watches from the confines of Fremont County Jail. The parallel trials weave a tale of a tormented family facing the stark reality of their actions, each awaiting the heavy hand of justice to pronounce their destinies. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Demise Of the Daybells | The Lori Vallow Daybell & Chad Daybell Story
In a courtroom laden with tension and anticipation, an Idaho judge has ruled in favor of Tammy Daybell's aunt, Vicki Hoban, granting her the right to address the court during the sentencing of Lori Vallow. Lori Vallow, a woman infamous for the gruesome charges against her, awaits her judgment day in a Fremont County, Idaho courtroom. The somber aura of the courtroom is a stark contrast to the tumultuous saga that has transpired. Lori, now 50, was convicted on May 12 for the horrific deeds in 2019. The innocent lives of her children, Joshua 'JJ' Vallow, only seven years old, and Tylee Ryan, 16, were snuffed out in their youth. Additionally, the looming charge of conspiracy to commit murder of her husband Chad Daybell's former wife, Tammy Daybell, added an ominous hue to the already grisly tale. Stepping into this storm of tragedy, Vicki Hoban, Tammy's aunt, had sought to represent her late niece at the sentencing. Initially, Judge Steven Boyce rejected this request. However, following the demise of Tammy's mother in June, Hoban was granted special permission to deliver a victim impact statement. Vallow's defense team submitted a motion on Friday in a move that stirred up more controversy. Their argument was predicated on Idaho law's definition of 'immediate' family members as victims, a category in which an aunt is not included. Despite their request to prevent Hoban from making her statement, the ruling swung in her favor. The stoic courtroom witnessed a rather detached Vallow, visible on camera from the Madison County Jail. A bleak image of the convicted woman was captured as she stared ahead, her fist propped under her chin, speaking no word, simply waiting. Further adding complexity to the already convoluted case, Vallow's attorney, Jim Archibald, contended that the submitted statements of Tammy Daybell's father and sister made Hoban's testimony redundant. As the law excludes aunts, Archibald opined the court's order would be apt if there were no representation from Tammy Daybell's family. However, given the circumstances, Archibald argued, an aunt does not possess the right to represent the family. In a judicious move, Judge Boyce clarified his initial grant to Hoban was under the impression of Tammy's absence of representation. He highlighted that the statute does not specify that a representative can only be appointed under certain circumstances. Therefore, the impending testimony of three other family members does not exclude Hoban's right to represent her late niece. As Vallow's eldest son, Colby Ryan, JJ's grandmother, Kay Woodcock, and the child's designated representative, Summer Shiflet, prepare their statements, the courtroom awaits with bated breath. In a twist of law, Vallow will be granted an opportunity to address the court before her sentence is pronounced. A moment to speak without fear of objection or cross-examination, an opportunity she chose not to take during her trial. Vallow's previous plea for retrial was dismissed last month. Her attorneys had argued that external influences swayed the jury. The accusations against her were severe - Vallow was convicted for killing her children after falling prey to the illusions of the doomsday predictor, Chad Daybell. The defense argued that the instructions to the jury were muddled and contended that some jurors knew about her alleged crimes that were not officially presented as evidence. Vallow's attorneys pointed to an interview one juror gave with East Idaho News, revealing knowledge of information not disclosed during the trial. They also claimed changes in the original indictment that occurred without proper notice from the prosecution as grounds for a new trial. However, Judge Boyce, who had presided over Vallow's initial trial, ruled against this motion. While Vallow stands on the precipice of her fate, her husband, Chad Daybell, awaits his reckoning. With his trial slated for April 1, 2024, Chad watches from the confines of Fremont County Jail. The parallel trials weave a tale of a tormented family facing the stark reality of their actions, each awaiting the heavy hand of justice to pronounce their destinies. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Judge Boyce makes his ruling, showing Lori that Idaho will not tolerate her murderous behavior. Kristi and Katie give their final analysis.
Lori Vallow Daybell is a woman from the United States who gained national attention in 2019 and 2020 for the disappearance of her two children, Joshua "JJ" Vallow and Tylee Ryan. She was born Lori Norene Cox on June 26, 1973, in San Bernardino, California.Lori Vallow Daybell had a troubled personal life and was married multiple times before marrying her fifth husband, Chad Daybell, in 2019. Her previous husband, Charles Vallow, was killed in July 2019 by her brother, Alex Cox, who claimed self-defense.Cox himself died a few months later of what was initially believed to be natural causes, but was later determined to be due to a pulmonary embolism.Lori Vallow Daybell's children were last seen in September 2019, and she and Chad Daybell were eventually charged with several crimes related to their disappearance. The children's remains were later found on Chad Daybell's property in Idaho in June 2020. Lori Vallow Daybell is currently facing charges including conspiracy to commit murder, murder, and first-degree burglary.After a five week trial, she was found guilty of murdering her two children and conspiring to murder Chad Daybell's wife, Tammy. Now, after requesting a rertrial due to juror error, the Judge has an answer for her.(commercial at 9:37)to contact me:bobbycapucciprotonmail.comsource:Judge REJECTS doomsday mom Lori Vallow's request for a retrial | Daily Mail OnlineThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
Lori Vallow Daybell is a woman from the United States who gained national attention in 2019 and 2020 for the disappearance of her two children, Joshua "JJ" Vallow and Tylee Ryan. She was born Lori Norene Cox on June 26, 1973, in San Bernardino, California.Lori Vallow Daybell had a troubled personal life and was married multiple times before marrying her fifth husband, Chad Daybell, in 2019. Her previous husband, Charles Vallow, was killed in July 2019 by her brother, Alex Cox, who claimed self-defense.Cox himself died a few months later of what was initially believed to be natural causes, but was later determined to be due to a pulmonary embolism.Lori Vallow Daybell's children were last seen in September 2019, and she and Chad Daybell were eventually charged with several crimes related to their disappearance. The children's remains were later found on Chad Daybell's property in Idaho in June 2020. Lori Vallow Daybell is currently facing charges including conspiracy to commit murder, murder, and first-degree burglary.After a five week trial, she was found guilty of murdering her two children and conspiring to murder Chad Daybell's wife, Tammy. Now, after requesting a rertrial due to juror error, the Judge has an answer for her.(commercial at 9:33)to contact me:bobbycapucciprotonmail.comsource:Judge REJECTS doomsday mom Lori Vallow's request for a retrial | Daily Mail OnlineThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
#STSNation,Welcome to Surviving The Survivor the podcast that brings you the best guests in true crime. It's Week 6 of the Lori Vallow Daybell trial…Each side told Judge Boyce they Rest their Case … the Defense called no witness prompting the question: Is Lori Vallow's crime indefensible? Closing arguments are expected Thursday …The trial of the so-called “Doomsday Mom” is the wildly twisted story of a seemingly loving mother, a self-proclaimed devout member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints who clearly veered way off course …. And became involved in the deaths of as many as five people, including her own children. #BestGuests Jean Fisher recently retired after nearly 33 years of service at the Ada County Prosecutor's Office as the Special Crimes Unit Chief. During law school, Jean interned at the prosecutor's office before being hired directly out of law school in 1989. By 1997, she became the supervisor of the Sexual Assault Unit and has focused on those cases ever since.Tara Malek is an Idaho licensed attorney practicing in state and federal Court in business and commercial litigation. Tara has experience in both civil and criminal law. Lisa M. Dadio is a retired police Lieutenant with the New Haven Police Department in Connecticut. She spent approximately 16 years in the detective division. The most high-profile case she investigated was the murder of Annie Le, a Yale graduate student who disappeared just days before she was to be married.Since retiring from the New Haven Police Department in 2012, she has worked in higher education, teaching courses at both the undergraduate and graduate level.Support STS by joining our channel membership or become a patron:Patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor#LoriVallowDaybell #LoriVallow #DoomsdayMom #DoomsdayMother #Boise #TJ #Tylee #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #LoriVallowTrial #LoriVallowDaybellTrialFor Ad-Free & BTS Content ...Support the show ❤️https://www.patreon.com/
#STSNation,Welcome to Surviving The Survivor the podcast that brings you the best guests in true crime. It's Week 6 of the Lori Vallow Daybell trial…Each side told Judge Boyce they Rest their Case … the Defense called no witness prompting the question: Is Lori Vallow's crime indefensible? Closing arguments are expected Thursday …The trial of the so-called “Doomsday Mom” is the wildly twisted story of a seemingly loving mother, a self-proclaimed devout member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints who clearly veered way off course …. And became involved in the deaths of as many as five people, including her own children. #BestGuests Ildiko Tabori was featured in the A&E documentary about another dysfunctional family … the Menendez Brothers. She received her PhD in Clinical Psychology from the California School of Professional Psychology at Los Angeles in 2003 and has been a practicing licensed psychologist and neuropsychologist since 2004. Dr. Roger Rhoades is a Senior Therapist at the P.A.C.E. Center in Greenville, South Carolina specializing in dysfunctional relationships. He's worked with inmates inside prisons. Jim Egelston is a retiredSpecial Agent and Supervisor with the FBI for more than 27 years. Hemaintained a Top Secret security clearance with special access to Sensitive Compartmented Information. Jim was one of the original members of the Arizona Child Abduction Response Team and also a member of the FBI's national Child Abduction Rapid Deployment Team. He's now founder and owner of Baseline Investigations. Support STS by joining our channel membership or become a patron:Patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor#LoriVallowDaybell #LoriVallow #DoomsdayMom #DoomsdayMother #Boise #TJ #Tylee #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #LoriVallowTrial #LoriVallowDaybellTrialFor Ad-Free & BTS Content ...Support the show ❤️https://www.patreon.com/survivingthesurvivor
A judge may split a trial between two defendants for several reasons. One common reason is that the defendants have different levels of involvement in the alleged crime, and it would be unfair to try them together. For example, if one defendant was the primary instigator or perpetrator of the crime, while the other was only an accomplice or had a minor role, the judge may split the trial to ensure that each defendant's level of culpability is accurately assessed.Another reason why a judge may split a trial between two defendants is if there is a conflict of interest between them. For instance, if one defendant wishes to plead guilty and cooperate with the prosecution while the other wishes to contest the charges, it may not be appropriate to try them together, as their interests may be diametrically opposed.Additionally, a judge may split a trial if the evidence against one defendant is substantially stronger than the evidence against the other. In such cases, trying them together could lead to confusion and unfairly prejudice the jury against the weaker defendant.Ultimately, the decision to split a trial between two defendants depends on the specific circumstances of the case and is left to the judge's discretion. The judge will weigh various factors, including the interests of justice, fairness to the defendants, and the need for an efficient and orderly trial process.In this episode, we take a look at Judge Boyce decision to split the trial between Lori Vallow and Chad Daybell and what might have motivated him to do so.(commercial at 6:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cult mom Lori Vallow will be tried separately from husband Chad Daybell | Daily Mail Online
Lori Vallow's legal team had challenged the request made by JJ Vallow's grandparents for them to be allowed to be present during testimony of other witnesses due to the law in Idaho. After reviewing the request and the challenge, Judge Boyce made his decision and that decision will see all the family members, besides the grandfather Larry Woodcock, have full access to testimony. Larry Woodcock will have provisions on the tesitmony he is allowed to sit in on. In this episode, we take a look at the Judges decision and how it might impact the proceedings moving forward.(commercial at 8:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Lori Vallow Daybell loses bid to ban slain son's grandparents from her murder trial | The Independent
A judge may split a trial between two defendants for several reasons. One common reason is that the defendants have different levels of involvement in the alleged crime, and it would be unfair to try them together. For example, if one defendant was the primary instigator or perpetrator of the crime, while the other was only an accomplice or had a minor role, the judge may split the trial to ensure that each defendant's level of culpability is accurately assessed.Another reason why a judge may split a trial between two defendants is if there is a conflict of interest between them. For instance, if one defendant wishes to plead guilty and cooperate with the prosecution while the other wishes to contest the charges, it may not be appropriate to try them together, as their interests may be diametrically opposed.Additionally, a judge may split a trial if the evidence against one defendant is substantially stronger than the evidence against the other. In such cases, trying them together could lead to confusion and unfairly prejudice the jury against the weaker defendant.Ultimately, the decision to split a trial between two defendants depends on the specific circumstances of the case and is left to the judge's discretion. The judge will weigh various factors, including the interests of justice, fairness to the defendants, and the need for an efficient and orderly trial process.In this episode, we take a look at Judge Boyce decision to split the trial between Lori Vallow and Chad Daybell and what might have motivated him to do so.(commercial at 6:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cult mom Lori Vallow will be tried separately from husband Chad Daybell | Daily Mail Online
Lori Vallow's legal team had challenged the request made by JJ Vallow's grandparents for them to be allowed to be present during testimony of other witnesses due to the law in Idaho. After reviewing the request and the challenge, Judge Boyce made his decision and that decision will see all the family members, besides the grandfather Larry Woodcock, have full access to testimony. Larry Woodcock will have provisions on the tesitmony he is allowed to sit in on. In this episode, we take a look at the Judges decision and how it might impact the proceedings moving forward.(commercial at 8:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Lori Vallow Daybell loses bid to ban slain son's grandparents from her murder trial | The Independent
Lori Vallow Trial: Kay Woodcock Can Attend All Trial Proceedings, Judge Boyce Ruled!
Judge Boyce: No De@th for Lori... Let's Talk About It!
We went to Vallow court so that you don't have to! Come hear all about it. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lorichadrealstory/support
We went to Vallow court so that you don't have to! Come hear all about it.
Here are your Evening Headlines for March 2, 2023... Judge Boyce has ruled to split the cases of Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow-Daybell. Plus, police are asking for your help regarding a highway death in western Idaho. Then, two were rescued from a building in Lava Hot Springs. Finally, the Idaho Falls Zoo has announced the date for opening day of the new season.
Will Judge Boyce Split Vallow & Daybell? Let's Talk About It!
Lori Vallow - Chad Daybell: Judge Boyce is Getting Tough... Who Knew!?
Judge Boyce Doesn't Stay Chad Daybell's Case as Prosecutor Requested. What does it mean?
EDIT: Apparently this cannot be challenged by the media. Judge Boyce BANS cameras for pre-trial hearings AND the trial. GiGi reads the ruling. Merch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comDonate: PayPal - prettyliesandalibis@gmail.com Venmo - @prettyliesalibis
Judge Boyce makes his ruling on cameras in the Courtroom!! Melanie P is arrested and charge with a felony in Arizona. We remember JJ on 9/23 and Tylee on her birthday 9/24!!
Vallow-Daybell Matter: Judge Boyce Forced to do What He Should Have Done...!
Vallow Daybell Case: Why is Judge Boyce NOT Acting on Lori Hellis' Motions?
New Orders from Judge Boyce in the Lori Vallow Matter!
GiGi dives in to the ruling from Judge Boyce moving Lori's trial from October 2022 to January 2023.
Two nurses take a deep dive into the Lori and Chad Daybell case, also highlighting other court cases! This week we cover the decision handed down by Judge Boyce on the issue of improper severance and trial date for the Lori and Chad Daybell!! Josh Duggar is finally sentenced in federal court for his conviction on charge pornography possession! After weeks of the Johnny Depp and Amber heard trial, it closing arguments are today and we make our final predictions!
In this episode, we discuss Lori Daybell's arraignment before Judge Boyce, her lack of emotion. She refused to enter a plea, so the court enters the plea for her. How does all of this affect the trial going forward??
Judge Boyce is getting fed up with delays, Prior blames the prosecution, the prosecution isn't getting what they need. The belligerent turd circus rages on!
Judge Boyce is getting fed up with delays, Prior blames the prosecution, the prosecution isn't getting what they need. The belligerent turd circus rages on!
Is Judge Boyce Watching Crime Talk?
Livestream of Judge Boyce's court, discussing the trial date. At this point, they are scheduling Chad and Lori's trial to begin on January 9th, 2023.
Livestream of Judge Boyce's court, discussing the trial date. At this point, they are scheduling Chad and Lori's trial to begin on January 9th, 2023.