POPULARITY
54 episodes with Jury selection
43 episodes with Jury selection
42 episodes with Jury selection
38 episodes with Jury selection
41 episodes with Jury selection
45 episodes with Jury selection
42 episodes with Jury selection
34 episodes with Jury selection
10 episodes with Jury selection
20 episodes with Jury selection
9 episodes with Jury selection
11 episodes with Jury selection
7 episodes with Jury selection
6 episodes with Jury selection
6 episodes with Jury selection
9 episodes with Jury selection
5 episodes with Jury selection
6 episodes with Jury selection
6 episodes with Jury selection
3 episodes with Jury selection
7 episodes with Jury selection
6 episodes with Jury selection
11 episodes with Jury selection
3 episodes with Jury selection
4 episodes with Jury selection
5 episodes with Jury selection
5 episodes with Jury selection
3 episodes with Jury selection
4 episodes with Jury selection
2 episodes with Jury selection
4 episodes with Jury selection
5 episodes with Jury selection
4 episodes with Jury selection
4 episodes with Jury selection
2 episodes with Jury selection
4 episodes with Jury selection
3 episodes with Jury selection
4 episodes with Jury selection
5 episodes with Jury selection
2 episodes with Jury selection
3 episodes with Jury selection
5 episodes with Jury selection
4 episodes with Jury selection
3 episodes with Jury selection
2 episodes with Jury selection
5 episodes with Jury selection
2 episodes with Jury selection
2 episodes with Jury selection
6 episodes with Jury selection
2 episodes with Jury selection
3 episodes with Jury selection
2 episodes with Jury selection
4 episodes with Jury selection
5 episodes with Jury selection
OA1270 - A good court thingie! A famous case from 1986 gave us the “Batson rule” that prevents the use of “peremptory strikes” to remove people from juries on the basis of race. To this day, racial discrimination in jury selection continues to be a problem. But the Supreme Court recently reinforced the on-going utility of Batson challenges in two decisions… written by Kavanaugh? Tune in to learn about the history and modern application of this important protection of our rights. Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 (1965) Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994) Flowers v. Mississippi, 588 U.S. 284 (2019) Pitchford v. Cain, 608 U.S. ___ (2026) Batson “Justifications” Catherine M. Grosso & Barbara O'Brien, A Stubborn Legacy: The Overwhelming Importance of Race in Jury Selection in 173 Post-Batson North Carolina Capital Trials, 97 Iowa L. Rev. 1531 (2012). Shamena Anwar, Patrick Bayer, & Randi Hjalmarsson, The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials, 127 Q.J. Econ. 1017 (2011). Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!
The Karmelo Anthony verdict in the fatal stabbing of Austin Metcalf has sparked national debate over justice, race, jury selection, self-defense claims, and how public officials respond when a courtroom decision becomes a cultural flashpoint.In this episode of MX3 Podcast, we discuss the 35-year sentence, the arguments surrounding the case, the reaction from elected officials and commentators, and the bigger question: when people disagree with a verdict, are they questioning justice itself or just the outcome?MX3 Podcast is focused on money, motivation, and relevant events. We dig into the stories people are already talking about and ask the questions that matter.What do you think? Was justice served, or is there more to this case than the verdict? Drop your thoughts in the comments.Visit us at www.mx3.vipSubscribe, comment, and join the conversation.Support the showMX3 Podcast on Youtubewww.youtube.com/@mx3podcastContact MX3 PodcastTweet us: @mx3podcastEmail us: info@mx3.vipLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-w-wright-9397b23a/Thanks for listening & keep on living your life the Wright way!
Stories we're following this morning at Progress Texas:Leaving out Black jurors undermined the "perceived fairness" of the Karmelo Anthony trial: https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/article/karmelo-anthony-trial-black-jurors-22296375.php...Anthony's attorneys have moved quickly to appeal - basing their case on "peremptory strikes" of three Black jurors by the state: https://www.keranews.org/news/2026-06-10/karmelo-anthony-appeals-collin-county-murder-conviction-austin-metcalf-race-criminal-justice-black-frisco-track-meet-stabbing...They will likely base their case on the hich they say violates the SCOTUS case Batson v. Kentucky: https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/educational-activities/sixth-amendment-activities/batson-v-kentucky-and-jeb-v-alabama/facts-and-case-summary-batson-v-kentuckyThe Texas Republican Party Convention is underway in Houston, where party leaders are preaching party unity - just as they've put up their most radical set of nominees ever after a brutal primary: https://www.texastribune.org/2026/06/11/texas-gop-convention-2026-houston-abbott-burrows-unity/A proposed ban on border wall construction in the Big Bend region has failed on party lines: https://www.texastribune.org/2026/06/10/texas-big-bend-national-park-border-wall-ban-house-vote-henry-cuellar/...The Trump administration has also dispensed with a wide range of environmental regulations related to border security in the Big Bend border region: https://www.marfapublicradio.org/news/2026-06-08/trump-administration-will-bypass-environmental-laws-for-border-project-in-big-bend-national-parkWe're excited to see you in Dallas for our 16th anniversary celebration on Tuesday June 16! Make your reservation now: https://act.progresstexas.org/a/anniversary2026Progress Texas is expanding into both broadcast radio - including a new partnership with KPFT-FM in Houston! Make a tax-deductible contribution to our radio initiative HERE, and to our Spanish expansion HERE. Find our web store and other ways to support our important work at https://progresstexas.org.
Jury selection will not begin until August in the federal trial of the Tops mass shooter. Former Erie County DA and current Tonawanda Supervisor John Flynn lends his legal expertise to explain the selection process.
The murder trial of Karmelo Anthony, accused of fatally stabbing 17-year-old Austin Metcalf at a Texas high school track meet, is now underway. As prosecutors argue the killing was senseless and deliberate, Anthony's defense team maintains he acted in self-defense. The case has drawn national attention, sparking debate over race, jury selection, media coverage, and the broader implications for the justice system. Never miss a moment from Buck by subscribing to the Buck Sexton Show Podcast on IHeart Radio, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts! Connect with Buck Sexton:Facebook – / bucksexton X – @bucksexton Instagram – @bucksexton TikTok - @BuckSexton YouTube - @BuckSexton Website – https://www.bucksexton.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
There's been a shakeup in the L-A Mayor race as ballots continue to be counted in last week's primary. President Trump storms off "Meet The Press" after doubling down on claims that California's elections are rigged. The man investigating California's elections says it's a matter of how much, not "if" there's been voter fraud. Plus, more from Morning Edition. Support The L.A. Report by donating at LAist.com/join and by visiting https://laist.comSupport the show: https://laist.com
The trial of Riad Bouchaker got underway today with jury selection.Nine men and three women were sworn in, and the judge gave some details about the accused and how the running of this trial will differ slightly to others because of his circumstances.
Plus, President Trump has made some revisions to the proposed deal to end Operation Epic Fury, and much more!
In this episode Jeff tears apart the latest assassination attempt against Donald Trump and the staggering security failures that allowed it to happen. From an armed suspect getting dangerously close to the president to the laughable claims that the system “worked” Jeff explains why this was a complete disgrace and why the response afterward was even worse. Jeff then breaks down the war with Iran and how what started with clear objectives quickly unraveled. Bad advice, unrealistic expectations and a fundamental misunderstanding of the enemy have led to a situation where Iran is now dictating terms. Trump's focus on markets and public perception over actual victory has turned a position of strength into an avoidable mess. The bigger problem is what this moment represents. Jeff argues this was likely the last real chance to cripple the world's leading terror regime and instead the United States blinked. The result is a stronger more emboldened enemy and a future that looks far more dangerous than it needed to be. Receive new episodes directly in your inbox: https://beyondthelegallimit.com/subscribe
Jury Selection and opening statements, Trial is upon us!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Jury Selection and opening statements, Trial is upon us!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
I never thought I'd be glued to my screen every morning, coffee in hand, watching the latest twists in Donald Trump's endless courtroom saga, but here we are on this crisp March morning, listeners, with the federal election interference trial kicking off right here in Washington, D.C.'s federal courthouse under Judge Tanya Chutkan. It's March 20, 2026, and after years of delays, motions, and appeals, jury selection began yesterday, March 19, pulling in over 300 potential jurors who had to swear they could set aside Trump's bombastic Truth Social posts and decide the case on facts alone.Picture this: Trump's lawyers, John Lauro and Todd Blanche, back in August 2023, boldly asked for a trial delay all the way to April 2026, citing 11.5 million pages of discovery from Special Counsel Jack Smith's team—enough paper, they joked, to stack eight Washington Monuments high. They argued it mirrored the government's two-and-a-half-year probe into the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot and Trump's alleged schemes to overturn his 2020 loss to Joe Biden. Prosecutors, led by Molly Gaston, fired back hard, calling it a misrepresentation since 65 percent of those documents were duplicates, public records from the House January 6 Select Committee, or Trump's own campaign files and Truth Social rants. They pushed for a speedy January 2024 start, front-loading key evidence like National Archives pulls and witness interview transcripts to avoid any rush-to-judgment excuses.Judge Chutkan, the no-nonsense Obama appointee, wasn't buying the delay tactics. She set March 4, 2024, as the original start, denying the 2026 plea outright, as ABC11 reported, emphasizing that inflammatory comments from Trump about her and Smith only sped things up. But oh, the appeals! The Supreme Court waded in last year, granting immunity for official acts but remanding the case back to Chutkan in early 2025, staying pretrial deadlines until October 2024 under the Speedy Trial Act. Justsecurity.org's master calendar tracked it all: motions on statutory grounds due October 3, 2024; Appointments Clause challenges by October 24; and endless briefing on classified evidence.Trump's plate was overflowing—New York hush money trial with DA Alvin Bragg wrapped in May 2024 with a conviction on 34 felony counts over Stormy Daniels payments; Georgia's RICO case under Fani Willis hit March 4, 2024, arraignment after his Fulton County Jail mugshot surrender, though Mark Meadows fought to move it federal; Florida's Mar-a-Lago classified docs case under Judge Aileen Cannon dragged to a May 2024 jury before fizzling on procedural grounds; and civil hits like E. Jean Carroll's defamation suits, with a second appeals court nod in late 2024.Now, as opening statements loom next week, Smith's team accuses Trump of three conspiracies to derail power transfer via fake electors, pressure on Mike Pence, and disinformation floods. Trump's defense screams political persecution, eyeing a potential 2028 run. Protesters clash outside on Pennsylvania Avenue, supporters wave MAGA flags, while inside, the air's thick with history—could this end with conviction on four felony counts, prison time, or another mistrial dodge?Whew, what a whirlwind, listeners. Thanks for tuning in—come back next week for more updates on this legal rollercoaster. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
This is the noon All Local for Wednesday, March 4, 2026
In this podcast, Jeff discusses the attack on the Iranian terror regime by the U.S. and Israel — and the impact on the Middle East and the world. Will loud MAGA voices continue to do all they can to stop the fall of the mullahs of Iran? Or will they put aside their anti-semitism for the sake of America and the free world?
Jury selection starts February 10th. Trial begins February 23rd. And the real fights — Crozier's recantation, O'Driscoll's witness texts, a timeline the defense says is impossible — are just getting started.Judge Richard Mrazik denied the defense's second venue change motion, finding a fair and impartial jury can still be seated in Summit County. Prosecutors pointed to 830 potential jurors who said they hadn't heard of the case or hadn't followed it — nearly half the questionnaire pool. The defense claimed only 72 viable jurors remain. The court disagreed.Kouri Richins is charged with aggravated murder in the 2022 fentanyl death of her husband Eric in Kamas, Utah. Prosecutors allege she spiked his cocktail with five times the lethal amount after a failed attempt on Valentine's Day two weeks earlier. The alleged motive is financial — her realty company owed at least $1.8 million while Eric's estate was worth roughly $5 million.Her case appeared in a January 2026 Department of Homeland Security intelligence bulletin warning law enforcement about domestic partners using chemical and biological toxins to kill. DHS documented seventeen cases since 2014 with at least eleven deaths — substances like cyanide, antifreeze, fentanyl, and eye drops chosen because they mimic natural illness. The bulletin specifically cited Richins' upcoming trial as part of this accelerating national pattern.What makes this case so well-known traces back to the allegations themselves. A children's book about grief written after Eric's death and before her arrest. A six-page jailhouse letter allegedly laying out fabricated testimony. Nearly $2 million in life insurance policies. And Robert Crozier — the drug source who now says under oath he never sold fentanyl at all.Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty to all charges and is presumed innocent until proven guilty.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #RobertCrozier #WalkTheDogLetter #SummitCountyTrial #FentanylPoisoning #JurySelection #DHSWarning #UtahMurderTrialJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
The jury selection process is changing and evolving. Are you willing to be bold and confront jury selection challenges head-on? This was a popular and very actionable conversation that I had with Sharif Gray last year, where we talked about what could be broken with your jury selection. We looked at assumptions and stereotypes that are often made, and I think it's a question worth returning to as we get deeper into 2026, when you may have trials coming up on the horizon. It could be very useful to consider these suggestions and tips when you're making important decisions on selecting, or deselecting, your jury members. Sharif turns the tables on many standard approaches and perspectives, and suggests that instead, we take potential concerns and weaknesses and turn them to our advantage. In so doing, you will demonstrate credibility, authenticity, trust and respect, for the potential jurors, the judge and even the defence. "We're there for fairness. So I'm looking for jurors who are going to do right by my client, but I'm also looking for jurors who are going to do right by the defense. Because it's not justice if you're going to close your eyes and just vote for my side every day of the week." - Sharif Gray. Sharif is a trial lawyer based in Richmond, Virginia, and the host of the Courtroom Stories and Tactics podcast, where he and his guests do deep dives on topics like voir dire, jury selection, the role of the legal system, and one of my favorites: focus groups! I was honored to be a guest on Sharif's show earlier this year. In this episode, you will learn about: Challenges in Traditional Jury Selection Building Credibility with the Jury Starting Jury Selection Right Effective Communication Techniques Building Credibility in the Courtroom Handling Juror Bias and Concerns Follow and Review: We'd love for you to follow us if you haven't yet. Click that purple '+' in the top right corner of your Apple Podcasts app. We'd love it even more if you could drop a review or 5-star rating over on Apple Podcasts. Simply select "Ratings and Reviews" and "Write a Review" then a quick line with your favorite part of the episode. It only takes a second and it helps spread the word about the podcast. Supporting Resources: Guest Sharif Gray of Broughton Injury Law. Find Broughton Injury Law here: graybroughton.com Reach Sharif personally at RVA Trial Lawyers: rvatriallawyers.com Listen to Courtroom Stories and Tactics, by RVA Trial Lawyers: rvatriallawyers.com/podcast/ Find my episode on Sharif's podcast: Mastering Witness Preparation Method and Focus Groups | with Elizabeth Larrick (Trial Consultant) The Voir Dire to Verdict training event is happening again! October 23, 2026. Click here for more info Email Sharif: triallawyers@rvatriallawyers.com You can also watch this episode on YouTube here: Traditional Methods of Jury Selection are Broken! with Sharif Gray (replay) [Ep 159] Have a trial or mediation coming up and want to test with a focus group? Book a free consultation call with Elizabeth to learn more: www.calendly.com/elizabethlarrick Don't miss out on the Trial Lawyer Prep Newsletter that is delivered right to your email with extra tips and 'how to' information. Join the newsletter here: www.larricklawfirm.com/connect
Jury selection finally begins for Kouri Richins who is accused of killing her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. They've set aside 2 weeks and opening are set for later this month.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)
#lawyeryouknow #uvalde
The courtroom doors are open—and the stakes couldn't be higher.In this Week 1 recap of The Heat is On…Big Tech on Trial, we take you inside the very beginning of what some are calling the tobacco trials of our generation: the first case in the social media addiction litigation, where some of the most powerful companies in the world—Meta and YouTube—are facing off against a child.This week was all about jury selection. But don't let the term fool you—some trials are effectively decided here.From the courthouse, hosts Nicki Petrossi (of Scrolling 2 Death) and Sarah Gardner (of Heat Initiative) break down what actually happened during the week, why it matters, and what an “impartial juror” even looks like in a world saturated by social media.We're joined by:Attorney Laura Marquez Garrett (SMVLC), with legal context on jury selection, the TikTok and Snap settlements, and what Big Tech fears most as this trial moves forward.Julianna Arnold, founding member of Parents RISE and mom to Coco, who passed awayat 17 from social media harms—and now a plaintiff in the consolidated case—sharing what it feels like to finally be this close to the truth.In this episode, you'll hear:What stood out emotionally and ethically inside the courtroomHow 450 potential jurors were narrowed down—and why that process can make or break the caseWhy media access is already a fight, with only 10 seats available for pressThe growing comparisons between these trials and Big Tobacco—and what history tells usWhat survivor parents are bracing for as testimony beginsPlus: what's coming next, including opening statements, witness testimony, and the anticipated appearance of Mark Zuckerberg.We're inside the courtroom so parents everywhere don't have to guess what's happening behind closed doors.Because this trial—and the ones that follow—will shape the future of child safety online.Next week: Final jury selection and Opening Statements.Stay with us. Share this episode. And keep paying attention.
When his 13-year-old daughter's 67-year-old rapist kidnapped her again, Aaron Spencer hunted him down, rescued his girl, and shot her rapist to death in the struggle. Rather than giving him a medal, the prosecutor's office instead charged him with murder. As his trial looms, questions have been raised about the judge presiding over the case and procedures for choosing the jury. We discuss.P.S. The Arkansas Supreme Court recently removed the judge. Probably for misspelling Arkansas.P.P.S. For more on this case, check out our article, published here: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/prosecutors-arkansas-father-caught-legal-nightmare-saving-daughter-from-monsterCheck out our new True Crime Substack the True Crime Times Get Prosecutors Podcast Merch Join the Gallery on Facebook Follow us on TwitterFollow us on Instagram Check out our website for case resources: Hang out with us on TikTokSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Thursday – Should restaurants donate extra food? Have you ever seen something you could not explain? Rauce Thoughts on solving racism. Date Night Guide with Dani Meyering with date night ideas including a beer festival, a Harry Potter play, star gazing at Deviant Wolf, a Kitty Fest, and a Valentine' Day preview. Attorney Glenn Klausman with the Case of Jury Selection for Colbert Court. Plus, JCS News, the Froggers Football Forecast, JCS Trivia & You Heard it Here First.
Thursday – Should restaurants donate extra food? Have you ever seen something you could not explain? Rauce Thoughts on solving racism. Date Night Guide with Dani Meyering with date night ideas including a beer festival, a Harry Potter play, star gazing at Deviant Wolf, a Kitty Fest, and a Valentine' Day preview. Attorney Glenn Klausman with the Case of Jury Selection for Colbert Court. Plus, JCS News, the Froggers Football Forecast, JCS Trivia & You Heard it Here First. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Jury selection commenced on Tuesday for the murder trial of Dale Warner, who stands accused of killing his wife, Dee Warner after the missing woman’s body was found inside a fertilizer tank on his property. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
January 22, 2026 ~ Marie Osborne, WJR's Director of Community Affairs and News discusses Desmond Burks pleading guilty to the murder of Devon Hoover during jury selection. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Nicole Moorman, a top criminal defense attorney based in Atlanta, walks through what it's really like working inside the justice system — from defending people in serious felony and federal cases to the pressure of high-stakes trials and courtroom strategy. Born in Chicago and trained in criminal justice and law at Southern Illinois University, Troy University, and Emory University School of Law, Nicole brings a unique perspective shaped by years of legal experience and time spent as a probation officer and task force agent before becoming a lawyer. She explains how she approaches complex defenses, the ethical challenges defenders face, and why protecting the rights of the accused matters so deeply, with insights drawn from real cases and her career as one of Georgia's most respected advocates. _____________________________________________ #CriminalDefenseAttorney #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #LegalReality #DefenseAttorney #RealStories #YouTubePodcast #lawandcrime _____________________________________________ Thank you to FACTOR for sponsoring this episode: Head to https://factormeals.com/lockedin50off and use code lockedin50off to get 50% off your first Factor box PLUS free breakfast for 1 year. Offer only valid for new Factor customers with code and qualifying auto-renewing subscription purchase. Make healthier eating easy with Factor. _____________________________________________ Connect with Nicole Moorman: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/_kingcole_/?hl=en Website: https://moorman-law.com/ _____________________________________________ Hosted, Executive Produced & Edited By Ian Bick: https://www.instagram.com/ian_bick/?hl=en https://ianbick.com/ Shop Locked In Merch: http://www.ianbick.com/shop _____________________________________________ Timestamps: 00:00 Intro: Cooperation, Ethics & the Reality of the Justice System 00:27 Nicole Mormon's Childhood, Family & Early Influences 01:33 Education Path That Led to Criminal Justice 05:44 Why Nicole Chose Criminal Justice 07:01 From Chicago to Atlanta: Becoming a Probation Officer 11:10 First Cases as a Probation Officer & Reality Shock 13:37 Probation, Pretrial Supervision & System Flaws 14:40 Leaving Probation to Attend Law School 16:16 Law School Life & Interning at the DA's Office 17:55 Inside the DA's Office: What Prosecutors Really See 19:58 Starting Her Legal Career & Going Solo 20:35 First Trials, Stress & Emotional Pressure 22:00 Attorney-Client Relationships & Ethical Boundaries 23:38 Choosing Clients & Managing Expectations 24:43 Judges, Prosecutors & Fairness in the Courtroom 26:22 Prosecutor vs Defense Relationships Explained 27:16 State vs Federal Cases: Key Differences 28:53 Target Letters, Indictments & Bond Hearings 31:00 Trial Strategy: When to Push Forward or Slow Down 32:54 Preparing for Trial Mentally & Physically 35:23 Balancing Personal Life During High-Stress Trials 37:32 Trial Tactics, Verdicts & Jury Psychology 40:31 Jury Behavior in High-Profile Cases 42:27 Jury Selection & the Role of Consultants 43:32 Critical Trial Moments & Penalties for Going to Trial 44:53 Sentencing, Judges & the Appeals Process 47:17 Custody Status, Bond & House Arrest Explained 50:48 Biggest Client Misconceptions & Money in the System 53:00 Political Influence on Prosecutors & Charging Decisions 55:46 Diversion Programs, Plea Options & Fairness 57:00 Cooperation, Plea Deals & Informants 59:02 Plea Agreements, Testifying & Subpoenas 01:01:31 Trial Delays & Frustrations with the System 01:02:20 What Nicole Would Change About the Justice System 01:03:10 Advice to Her Younger Self 01:04:28 Life Lessons from a Legal Career 01:05:56 Final Thoughts & Closing Message Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
AP correspondent Valerie Gonzalez reports from Corpus Christi, Texas, where the trial is being held for an officer accused of a slow response during the Uvalde school shooting.
AP correspondent Julie Walker reports on the trial for a former officer accused of failing to protect children during the Uvalde school shooting.
We break down everything currently known about the Sarah Grace Patrick case ahead of jury selection. Sarah is accused of murdering her mother, Kristen Brock, and her stepfather, James Brock, as they slept in their Carroll County, Georgia home.She was indicted on eight felony counts, including malice murder and felony murder, however, very little evidence has been publicly released. Investigators say Sarah's digital footprint is a key part of their case, while the defense argues the evidence is circumstantial and does not place a weapon in her hands.This episode covers:The night of the murdersSarah's behavior and social media activity afterwardHer outreach to prominent true crime creatorsStatements from law enforcement and family membersEmotional bond hearing testimony from both sidesWith jury selection set to begin, this backstory lays the foundation for a closely watched trial. Live coverage and daily recaps begin Monday on the channel.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)
In the episode of the Killer Cross Examination podcast hosted by Neil Rockind, the guest is Samantha Teal, the founder of SMT Litigation Consulting. The discussion focuses on the critical role of strategic litigation consulting in high-stakes trials.Core Themes and InsightsThe Power of Preparation: Teal emphasizes that the foundation of a successful trial is meticulous preparation that begins long before the courtroom. This includes a "deep dive" into case files to identify strengths, weaknesses, and hidden opportunities for strategy refinement.Witness Evaluation and Preparation: A key part of the conversation likely covers her approach to witness evaluation, where she assesses demeanor and credibility to anticipate cross-examination challenges.Narrative and Theme Development: Teal discusses the art of crafting compelling trial narratives that align with evidence and resonate with juries, ensuring the case theory is clear and persuasive.Jury Selection and Voir Dire: The podcast highlights her expertise in identifying juror biases and tailoring voir dire questions to build a panel that is most receptive to the trial strategy.In-Trial Support: Beyond preparation, Teal provides "on-site" support during trials, managing courtroom logistics and helping legal teams stay focused and sharp during the most intense moments of litigation.About Samantha Teal and SMT Litigation ConsultingSamantha Teal has over a decade of experience in litigation consulting and has supported trial teams in achieving significant results, including multimillion-dollar verdicts. Her firm, SMT Litigation Consulting, offers a wide range of specialized services designed to enhance an attorney's effectiveness. About Neil Rockind - Neil Rockind is a trial lawyer. Neil Rockind is often considered a bet the farm/company type of lawyer, taking on cases where the stakes are “all in.” Neil Rockind appears regularly on television and in the news, defends people in serious court cases, is a regular guest on the Law and Crime Network and also discusses popular trials and cases and current events with other top lawyers around the country. Neil Rockind has won just about every award imaginable, has represented athletes, celebrities, musicians, posters and has obtained acquittals in all varieties of cases. His nickname is "The Rockweiler" and he's known for his cross examination style.#neilrockind #crossexamination #samanthateal #litigation #injurylaw #michigan #legal #law #geoffreyfieger #fiegerNeil Rockind:Https://www.X.com/neilrockindlawHttps://www.instagram.com/rockindlaw https://www.rockindlaw.com/http://www.killercrossexamination.com/*************************************Subscribe to Killer Cross Examination® PodcastAPPLE: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/424RIys...GOOGLE PODCASTS: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0...AUDIBLE:https://www.audible.com/pd/Podcast/B0...******************************************Fair Use DoctrineThe contents are under fair use. It may contain copyrighted materials whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This, in our view, is fair use pursuant to section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Fair use allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as for commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship. We retain no rights to that material. To the extent the videos capture images or likenesses, we do not own the rights to those images, likenesses, etc and only use them pursuant to the fair use doctrine.All other rights are reserved.
The secrecy surrounding portions of the jury-selection process in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial became a point of controversy even before opening statements began. Maxwell's legal team pushed aggressively to keep the written juror questionnaires and parts of the voir-dire process sealed from public view, arguing that the overwhelming media coverage and intense global interest could intimidate potential jurors and prevent them from answering truthfully. They claimed that only a private process could protect jurors from harassment and ensure fairness, effectively requesting an unprecedented level of confidentiality for a trial that was already under scrutiny for years of secrecy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's conduct and the government's handling of the case.This request was met with resistance from press organizations and transparency advocates, who argued that sealing juror questionnaires would undermine public trust in the judicial process and contradict the longstanding legal principle that jury selection should be open to public observation. The judge ultimately rejected the bid for an entirely closed process, but aspects of the selection — including the identities of jurors and the contents of certain responses — remained shielded. That decision fueled accusations that secrecy was being selectively deployed, especially after it emerged post-trial that a sitting juror had failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse on his questionnaire. The dispute highlighted the tension between protecting juror privacy and the public's demand for full transparency in a case already marred by distrust and decades of hidden information.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Parker and Landon return to break down the opening days of the high-profile NASCAR lawsuit between 23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports, and NASCAR. They share insider stories from the courtroom, react to financial disclosures—including driver salaries and team losses—and debate the economics of running a NASCAR team. The hosts discuss the challenges of sponsorship, rising costs with the Next Gen car, and the ongoing struggle for teams to turn a profit. They also touch on the F1 championship battle and the controversial V8 Supercars finale. Leave us a voicemail! https://moneylap.com Or email us! friends@themoneylap.com Timestamps: 00:00 - Intro 07:50 - NASCAR Lawsuit Overview & Jury Selection 09:48 - Jury Duty Logistics & Opening Arguments Analysis 13:08 - Testimony Highlights: Denny Hamlin & Bob Jenkins 14:17 - Jury Sequestration Clarification 15:04 - Denny Hamlin's Testimony & Public Perception 18:31 - Driver Salaries & Relevance to Lawsuit 21:01 - Team Financials & Charter System Economics 24:50 - Next Gen Car Costs & Team Spending 28:17 - Nature of Racing Team Economics 33:47 - Cost Cap Debate & F1 Comparison 39:21 - NASCAR's Monopoly & Teams' Options 43:31 - NASCAR Internal Emails & Revenue Split 45:34 - Day Two Trial Update & Legal Proceedings 48:00 - Denny Hamlin's “Zingers” & Charter Agreement 49:43 - Sponsorship Models & Team Risk 55:10 - Prize Money Structure & Utopian Economics 58:41 - NASCAR's Business Model & Team Survival 1:00:56 - NASCAR's Rulemaking Power & Team Expenses 1:06:39 - Xfinity & Lower Series Economics 1:08:13 - Cost Cap History in NASCAR 1:08:56 - Formula 1 Championship Preview 1:11:22 - Australian Supercars Finale Recap 1:12:49 - Listener Q&A & Show Wrap-Up (Timestamps are a rough timing and may require a little scrubbing to find the start of the topic) The Money Lap is the ultimate motorsport show (not a podcast) with Parker Kligerman and Landon Cassill professional racecar drivers and hilarious hosts taking you through the world of motorsports. Covering NASCAR, F1, Indycar, and more, they'll provide the scoop, gossip, laughs, and stories from the racing biz. With over 2400 unique products currently in stock, Spoiler Diecast boasts one of the largest inventories in the industry. We are NASCAR focused, offering a wide range of diecast and apparel options. But that's not all. We've expanded our catalog to include diecast for dirt/sprint cars, Indycar, and F1. As passionate racing fans ourselves, we're constantly growing our offerings to cater to different forms of racing. Use promo code "moneylap" for free shipping. https://www.spoilerdiecast.com/ Copyright 2025, Pixel Racing, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
The secrecy surrounding portions of the jury-selection process in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial became a point of controversy even before opening statements began. Maxwell's legal team pushed aggressively to keep the written juror questionnaires and parts of the voir-dire process sealed from public view, arguing that the overwhelming media coverage and intense global interest could intimidate potential jurors and prevent them from answering truthfully. They claimed that only a private process could protect jurors from harassment and ensure fairness, effectively requesting an unprecedented level of confidentiality for a trial that was already under scrutiny for years of secrecy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's conduct and the government's handling of the case.This request was met with resistance from press organizations and transparency advocates, who argued that sealing juror questionnaires would undermine public trust in the judicial process and contradict the longstanding legal principle that jury selection should be open to public observation. The judge ultimately rejected the bid for an entirely closed process, but aspects of the selection — including the identities of jurors and the contents of certain responses — remained shielded. That decision fueled accusations that secrecy was being selectively deployed, especially after it emerged post-trial that a sitting juror had failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse on his questionnaire. The dispute highlighted the tension between protecting juror privacy and the public's demand for full transparency in a case already marred by distrust and decades of hidden information.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Brian Walshe's mother, Diana Walshe, allegedly hired a private investigator to look into Brian's wife, Ana Walshe, whom he suspected of having an affair. Jury selection begins today in Brian's trial. Curt Andersen charged after killing cleaning lady.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?Binge all episodes of #OpeningStatements here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/opening-statements-with-julie-grant/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/MWR9k5FKYU8Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of the Opening Statements Podcast is hosted by Julie Grant, produced by Eric Goldson, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
The final hearing before the murder trial of Brian Walshe wasn't just a procedural stop — it was a preview of the evidence the jury may hear, the strategies both sides are preparing, and the enormous fight over what parts of Brian Walshe's digital life will be allowed into this courtroom. In this episode of Hidden Killers, we break down exactly what happened inside that Dedham courtroom: the arguments, the evidence battles, the tense moments, and the pieces of the investigation prosecutors say reveal a chilling timeline leading up to and immediately after Ana Walshe vanished. Prosecutors are pushing to admit a massive amount of digital evidence, including the now-infamous Google searches allegedly made in the hours surrounding Ana's disappearance. These searches include questions about decomposition, DNA, dismemberment, body disposal, and even inheritance — all allegedly made on Brian's phone or a child's iPad during the exact window when Ana stopped communicating with anyone. Add to that the physical evidence prosecutors say they recovered: blood in the Walshe home, a damaged knife, surveillance footage of Brian purchasing cleaning supplies, and trash bags recovered from a transfer station containing a hacksaw, a rug, clothing, and personal items linked to Ana. It's the kind of circumstantial mountain that prosecutors believe tells a complete story even without a recovered body. But the defense is pushing back hard, especially on the digital material. They want explicit content removed. They want alleged “cheating-spouse” searches kept away from the jury. They argue the state is trying to inflame emotions rather than prove facts. And they plan to lean into the gaps: no body, no confirmed cause of death, and alternative explanations for some of the evidence. This hearing made one thing clear: when jury selection starts, this trial will revolve around what the jury is allowed to see — and how those decisions shape the story each side tells. Subscribe for more daily breakdowns, expert commentary, and updates as the trial begins. #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #CrimeUpdates #HiddenKillers #CourtHearing #TrialCoverage #TrueCrimeAnalysis #DigitalEvidence #JusticeSystem #TrueCrimeCommunity Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The final hearing before the murder trial of Brian Walshe wasn't just a procedural stop — it was a preview of the evidence the jury may hear, the strategies both sides are preparing, and the enormous fight over what parts of Brian Walshe's digital life will be allowed into this courtroom. In this episode of Hidden Killers, we break down exactly what happened inside that Dedham courtroom: the arguments, the evidence battles, the tense moments, and the pieces of the investigation prosecutors say reveal a chilling timeline leading up to and immediately after Ana Walshe vanished. Prosecutors are pushing to admit a massive amount of digital evidence, including the now-infamous Google searches allegedly made in the hours surrounding Ana's disappearance. These searches include questions about decomposition, DNA, dismemberment, body disposal, and even inheritance — all allegedly made on Brian's phone or a child's iPad during the exact window when Ana stopped communicating with anyone. Add to that the physical evidence prosecutors say they recovered: blood in the Walshe home, a damaged knife, surveillance footage of Brian purchasing cleaning supplies, and trash bags recovered from a transfer station containing a hacksaw, a rug, clothing, and personal items linked to Ana. It's the kind of circumstantial mountain that prosecutors believe tells a complete story even without a recovered body. But the defense is pushing back hard, especially on the digital material. They want explicit content removed. They want alleged “cheating-spouse” searches kept away from the jury. They argue the state is trying to inflame emotions rather than prove facts. And they plan to lean into the gaps: no body, no confirmed cause of death, and alternative explanations for some of the evidence. This hearing made one thing clear: when jury selection starts, this trial will revolve around what the jury is allowed to see — and how those decisions shape the story each side tells. Subscribe for more daily breakdowns, expert commentary, and updates as the trial begins. #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #CrimeUpdates #HiddenKillers #CourtHearing #TrialCoverage #TrueCrimeAnalysis #DigitalEvidence #JusticeSystem #TrueCrimeCommunity Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
In this episode, Jeff points out the ridiculousness of the belief that President Trump has brought peace to the Middle East with the ceasefire agreement he got Israel and Hamas to sign. There is a mountain of evidence which makes clear that this ceasefire is simply a lull until the next war. In the meantime, the leftists/terrorists are making massive inroads into America and our failure to cut off the head of the terror snake will be our country's greatest failure in the not so distant future.In other news, Bruce Cutler has passed, at one point the most famous lawyer in the world. Bruce also was the lawyer who had a large part in getting Jeff to drop Pre-med in college and go to law school. In this podcast, Jeff recounts some very funny Bruce stories from years past. RIP Bruce.
Criminal defense attorney Matthew Tympanick joins me to examine the boundaries of legal strategy in three high-profile cases — Karen Read, Bryan Kohberger and Richard Allen — and low-profile ones as well. Tympanick discusses how jury selection shaped the outcome of the Read trial, the pressures defense attorneys face in the public eye, and the ethical challenges of balancing media presence with legal practice.We also discuss the impact of jury composition on trial outcomes, defense strategies in cases with intense public scrutiny, the role of attorneys in shaping public narratives, client relationship management and Tympanick's approach to transparency and professional boundaries.Contact me at silverliningshandbookpod@gmail.comCheck out the Silver Linings Handbook website at:https://silverliningshandbook.com/Check out our Patreon to support the show at:https://www.patreon.com/thesilverliningshandbookJoin our Facebook Group at:https://www.facebook.com/groups/1361159947820623Visit the Silver Linings Handbook store to support the podcast at:https://www.bonfire.com/store/the-silver-linings-handbook-podcast-storeVisit The True Crime Times Substack at:https://truecrimemessenger.substack.comThe Silver Linings Handbook podcast is a part of the ART19 network. ART19 is a subsidiary of Wondery and Amazon Music.See the Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and the California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Thursday - Filmmaker Cameron Francis on his new film Cover. Darryl Payne and Dr. Worley on women's health. Date Night Guide with Dani Meyering with date night ideas Suds, Pups & Pints, a Twilight inspired market, Astro Single Mix & Mingle, Dog Day at Leu Gardens, National Public Lands Day at Mead Botanical Garden and more. Attorney Glenn Klausman with the Case of Jury Selection for Colbert Court. The Froggers Football Forecast, plus, JCS News, JCS Trivia & You Heard it Here First. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Thursday - Filmmaker Cameron Francis on his new film Cover. Darryl Payne and Dr. Worley on women's health. Date Night Guide with Dani Meyering with date night ideas Suds, Pups & Pints, a Twilight inspired market, Astro Single Mix & Mingle, Dog Day at Leu Gardens, National Public Lands Day at Mead Botanical Garden and more. Attorney Glenn Klausman with the Case of Jury Selection for Colbert Court. The Froggers Football Forecast, plus, JCS News, JCS Trivia & You Heard it Here First.
Are you willing to be bold and confront jury selection challenges head-on? Sharif Gray is here to share his perspective on jury selection, turning the tables on some of the assumptions and stereotypes that we often associate with the process and suggesting that instead, we take potential concerns and weaknesses and turn them to our advantage. In so doing, you will demonstrate credibility, authenticity, trust and respect, for the potential jurors, the judge and even the defence. "We're there for fairness. So I'm looking for jurors who are going to do right by my client, but I'm also looking for jurors who are going to do right by the defense. Because it's not justice if you're going to close your eyes and just vote for my side every day of the week." - Sharif Gray. Sharif is a trial lawyer based in Richmond, Virginia, and the host of the Courtroom Stories and Tactics podcast, where he and his guests do deep dives on topics like voir dire, jury selection, the role of the legal system, and one of my favorites: focus groups! I was honored to be a guest on Sharif's show earlier this year. In this episode, you will learn about: Challenges in Traditional Jury Selection Building Credibility with the Jury Starting Jury Selection Right Effective Communication Techniques Building Credibility in the Courtroom Handling Juror Bias and Concerns Follow and Review: We'd love for you to follow us if you haven't yet. Click that purple '+' in the top right corner of your Apple Podcasts app. We'd love it even more if you could drop a review or 5-star rating over on Apple Podcasts. Simply select “Ratings and Reviews” and “Write a Review” then a quick line with your favorite part of the episode. It only takes a second and it helps spread the word about the podcast. Supporting Resources: Guest Sharif Gray of Broughton Injury Law. Find Broughton Injury Law here: graybroughton.com Reach Sharif personally at RVA Trial Lawyers: rvatriallawyers.com Listen to Courtroom Stories and Tactics, by RVA Trial Lawyers: rvatriallawyers.com/podcast/ Find my episode on Sharif's podcast: Mastering Witness Preparation Method and Focus Groups | with Elizabeth Larrick (Trial Consultant) More info on the Voir Dire to Verdict training event, October 24, 2025 Email Sharif: triallawyers@rvatriallawyers.com You can also watch this episode on YouTube here: Jury Selection: What's Broken With Traditional Methods? with Sharif Gray [Ep 149] Do you have an upcoming trial and want help writing your opening statement? Book a free call with Elizabeth to see how she can help. Don't want to miss an episode? Join the Trial Lawyer Prep Newsletter for resources, tips and episodes by going here: www.larricklawfirm.com/connect
In this podcast, Jeff discusses the assassination of Charlie Kirk by yet another deranged leftist shooter. As disturbing as the shooting was, the celebrations from the left — which included professionals, teacher and health care providers — were even more troubling. Jeff discusses what needs to come next if we are to avoid sliding into the abyss as a country.
Jury selection in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial was a lengthy and complex process, reflecting both the gravity of the charges and the high-profile nature of the case. Prospective jurors were carefully vetted over several weeks, beginning with a large pool that was gradually narrowed down. The court asked detailed questions about potential jurors' knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell, and the extensive media coverage surrounding them. Judges and attorneys probed deeply into biases, media exposure, and personal experiences with sexual abuse or law enforcement to ensure impartiality. This step was crucial, given that Epstein's notoriety had saturated public awareness and risked tainting the jury pool.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Jury selection in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial was a lengthy and complex process, reflecting both the gravity of the charges and the high-profile nature of the case. Prospective jurors were carefully vetted over several weeks, beginning with a large pool that was gradually narrowed down. The court asked detailed questions about potential jurors' knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell, and the extensive media coverage surrounding them. Judges and attorneys probed deeply into biases, media exposure, and personal experiences with sexual abuse or law enforcement to ensure impartiality. This step was crucial, given that Epstein's notoriety had saturated public awareness and risked tainting the jury pool.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/ArCNozStXbQ Donna Adelson's defense attempted to subpoena Wendi Adelson to testify, but her attorneys successfully moved to quash (squash/get rid of) the subpoena. The judge ruled that Wendi Adelson would assert her Fifth Amendment rights if called by the defense, and calling a witness solely to invoke the Fifth Amendment in front of the jury is inappropriate. Wendi Adelson is still subpoenaed by the prosecution, which grants her derivative and use immunity for her testimony. Jury selection began on August 19th, 2025. The process involves individual voir dire, where potential jurors are questioned one-by-one to prevent information about the high-profile case from influencing other jurors. The goal is to find jurors who have not formed an opinion about the case, even if they have heard about it. The judge read a statement of the case and the material part of the indictment to the potential jurors. Donna Adelson is charged with first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit first-degree murder, and solicitation of first-degree murder in the death of Dan Markel on July 18, 2014. These statements are not considered evidence of guilt. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Jury Selection Begins in Donna Adelson's Trial Over Dan Markel's Murder. After Years of Suspicion and Secrets, the Matriarch of the Adelson Family Finally Faces Justice in Court. Today is DAY 1 of Jury Selection and after much speculation about whether they could find an impartial jury in Tallahassee, it appears the trial is moving forward as dozens of potential jurors or asked to come back for the next round of questioning. Welcome to Surviving The Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of true crime. In this episode, STS Host and Emmy Award-Winning Journalist Joel Waldman brings on jury consultants and legal experts to break down today's progress in jury selection. Thanks for supporting the show and being a part of #STSNation!Donate to STS Trial/Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorJoel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLx#truecrimecommunity #newsupdate #donnaadelson #wendiadelson#justicefordanmarkel #murderforhire #murdernews #criminaljustice#crimenews #trial
Donna Adelson is on trial for the murder of Dan Markel, her former son-in-law, in a case tied to a murder-for-hire plot that also sent her son Charlie Adelson to prison. Prosecutors say Donna orchestrated the plan, and her daughter Wendi Adelson may be a key witness in the courtroom drama. This high-profile trial could finally deliver justice for Dan Markel after years of shocking twists and family secrets...but first the state and defense must choose their jury. Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #truecrime. In this LIVE STS episode, Emmy Award-Winning Journalist and Host Joel Waldman takes us inside the Leon County Courtroom to share insider details about the potential jurors, the process and of course--Donna Adelson.Thanks for supporting the show and being a part of #STSNation!Donate to STS Trial/Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorJoel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLx#truecrimecommunity #newsupdate #donnaadelson #wendiadelson#justicefordanmarkel #murderforhire #murdernews #criminaljustice#crimenews #trial
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Donna Adelson Is In Court for a Last-Minute Motion Hearing the Day Before Jury Selection is Set to Begin in the murder trial of her ex-son in law, FSU Law Professor Dan Markel. Welcome to Surviving The Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #truecrime. In this LIVE STS episode, STS gets you up to speed on the last minute motions filed by not only Donna's defense team, but her daughter's too. Donna Adelson is set to face trial for the shocking murder of her former son-in-law, Florida State law professor Dan Markel, with jury selection starting on August 19th. Prosecutors allege that Adelson was deeply involved in the murder-for-hire plot that left Markel dead in his driveway in 2014, a crime that has captivated national attention for more than a decade. Her son, Charlie Adelson, was already convicted for his role in the same case, and now Donna stands accused of orchestrating and financing the plan. This highly anticipated trial is expected to reveal new details about the Adelson family's role in the murder, with testimony from key witnesses including Wendi Adelson, Dan's ex-wife. Stay tuned for the latest breaking updates on the Donna Adelson murder trial as the pursuit of justice for Dan Markel continues.Thanks for supporting the show and being a part of #STSNation!Donate to STS Trial/Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorJoel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLx#truecrimecommunity #newsupdate #donnaadelson #wendiadelson #justicefordanmarkel #murderforhire #murdernews #criminaljustice #crimenews #trial
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/FRAkjqjIHUI Jury selection for Donna Adelson's trial is set for August 19th, with the state's case beginning around August 25th. Once a jury is seated, opening statements will follow quickly. Most motions were addressed, with the court ruling that evidence would be admitted if relevant. Dan Markel, a legal professor, was murdered in 2014 amidst a child custody battle with his ex-wife, Wendi Adelson, Donna's daughter. The prosecution alleges that Donna Adelson and her son, Charlie Adelson, conspired to murder Dan Markel to resolve the custody issue, believing that without a father, the court couldn't force shared custody in Tallahassee. Two gunmen and a "middle person" (who worked at Charlie's dental office and is expected to testify) have already been prosecuted in connection with the murder. Charlie Adelson was also convicted. This will be the fourth time the government has prosecuted a part of this case, with Donna being the last to be charged. Will Charlie Adelson will testify? How will Wendi Adelson will testify. Will Donna testify? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
In this episode of the Cold-Case Christianity Podcast, J. Warner Wallace describes the importance of jury selection in criminal trials and explains why jury selection is also important when we are deciding who we can reach with the Gospel. What are the three most important attributes of a good juror and how do these attributes apply to evangelism?
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
