Podcasts about we gotta

Intro Song – Victor Wainwright & The Train, “South End Of A North Bound Mule”, Memphis Loud First Set – JD Taylor, “If It Ain't Good”, The Coldwater Sessions Ben Levin, “you Know”, Carryout Or DeliveryForrest McDonald Band, “Blues In The Basement”, Blues In The Bucket Second Set –Linsey Alexander, “My Days Are So Long”, Live At Rosa'sJW Jones ID JW Jones, “Same Mistakes”, Sonic Departures Ben Rice & RB Stone, “Crushin' On The Bartender”, Out Of The BoxJohn Nemeth, “Sweep The Shack”, Stronger Than Strong Third Set – WIB Erin Harpe, “Woman Be Wise”, Meet Me In The Middle, Sippie Wallace cover Crystal Shawanda, “Blame It On The Sugar”, Church House Blues Kat Riggins, “Meet Your Maker”, Cry Out Fourth Set – Bobby Rush, “Garbage Man”, Rawer Than Raw Mick Kolassa, “We Gotta”, If You Can't Be Good, Be Good At It Henry Gray & Bob Corritore, “Javelina Jamboree”, HG & BC Session Vol. 2: Cold Chills

My hot take on the passing of RBG and what republicans should do now and why. Also the latest attack on Trump over the virus. Support the show at https://www.patreon.com/republickeeper 125 - Ruth Bader Ginsburg - Hot Lava Take and Latest attack on Trump 00:00:00 - 00:05:01 Let's see if this works. Welcome Republic podcast Brian O'Kelly I'll be your host for today's adventure. Rod. Casting from the. Forest. Washington just outside of Seattle. My russian-made, A. MT to nineteen might perform. This podcast number one, twenty, five. And hopefully got audio and. Remember him on twitter facebook. and. So on it's Brian Your Bro at the Republican for Dot Com website for the social media connections and more, and we will treat today like every other day and begin the broadcast by thanking God for good health and the ability to be here, sharing with you and thank you again for your time and attention today. Hopefully, we have audio now happening and I guess it wasn't working there the beginning and so. Awesome thank you for the feedback and appreciate it this you know. If, it wasn't for my sister and my mom I don't know of anybody who would listen but I'm so grateful. That my sister is always up at this time and and and help me some feedback. I should probably start. Pannard every time something's wrong and she's sending me a taxed. It's awesome. So thank you carry very much for that for your help. So today, of course, we have the news that Ruth Bader Ginsburg has passed away and. This is of course. has thrown the entire race into a complete change. I, mean wow. What an overnight. You know shift in the dynamic compared to where we had been where it was all about you know. A million other things, and now all of a sudden it's about the court and not that it wasn't about the court because this was on people's mind and it's not a big surprise that repeater Ginsburg has passed away i. do think that it was somewhat expected that she may that she was going to pass away during trump's next administration. She'd been fighting pancreatic cancer for quite some time so. I wanted to. Reflect back on basically what I'm seeing now that this is all passed and just give you. This is kind of a hot lava take. On Ruth Bader Ginsburg I don't think I'm going to make a lot of friends. With with what I'm going to have to say today. Okay so I'M NOT GONNA BE UNKIND. But I, I don't think this is the take. You're going to be hearing a lot of other places. Okay. So that's the kind of the set up here on a play for you. First the president's reaction when he was told about this. The music is on the on the tarmac there. Well. The I didn't know that I just thought it'd be the first time. She let an amazing. What else could you say? She was an amazing woman whether. Or not she was an amazing woman. An amazing life. Imagine. Thank you very much. Monster. Is just a monster. I mean what a monster? To hear it and he said, she led an amazing life. What kind of a man have we put in the White House here? Anyway. So. So here are kind of. My thoughts and these are scattered. I've got a bunch of email her email of audio here from different people, and this is not in any particular order. Okay. So the first thing is. That there's hypocrisy a plenty. To go around on both sides. Back when it was garland. Pushing through all of the Republicans were saying you can't do it an election year and you have to wait for the voice of the people and the Hashtag. Do Your job was a thing on the Democrat side it was do your job do your job your job, and the Republicans were all saying no, you can't do in an election year and so now here we are we've had it flipped. So it just got trump's reaction here is Vice President Biden's we need to de escalate. Escalate. Try Appeal to those few Senate. Republicans. The handful who really will decide what happens. Please, follow your conscience. Don't vote to confirm anyone nominate the circumstances president trump. Incentive McConnell have created. 00:05:02 - 00:10:08 Don't go there. Uphold your constitutional duty. Your conscience. Let the people speak. Cool the flames engulfing our country. We can't keep rewriting history scrambling norms, ignoring our cherry system of checks and balances. Who'll the flames? Cool, the flames he says. Right, go how about we started calling for that months ago Joe. That includes this whole business of releasing a list of potential nominees. That I would put forward. Now same after a after Ruth Bader. GINSBURG passed away. They said Biden should releases list. It's the one in the trump campaign ads that I released list only after she passed away. A game for them? They were asking. Anger. There were asking. lionsgate other than Donald Trump has ever done such a thing. I. The reason is because no presidential candidate other than Donald Trump. Has Ever thought ahead about it. That's the answer Joe. And then he goes into this thing about the that his. Nominees would be attacked pretty judges name on lists like that could influence that person's decision making as a judge and that would be wrong. At least create the perception influenced. Second. Anyone could enlist. Like that, under these circumstances will be subject to unrelenting political attacks. And he's right about that. That's exactly what's going to start happening now to amy conybeare Barrett. That's the next. The next thing that's going to happen Amy Barrett is president trump's choice apparently for the court. Here's a quick a piece that they did on her over on I. Think this was ABC. And at the top of the list we're told is judge Amy Coney American for name sounds familiar. It's because she was on the shortlist when president trump sought to replace Anthony Kennedy and ultimately settled on. Justice. Now Justice Brett Cavanaugh she is a devout Catholic she's considered a superstar of the religious, right? Shoulder has she is an ardent of abortion opponent and there are even Republicans who think that that can be a complicating factor in her confirmation process if she is nominated because you have those republicans like. Susan Murkowski Lisa Murkowski. Susan. Might not be inclined to vote for her. Also on the list you also have Barbara Lagola. She's an appeals judge on the eleventh circuit of her name sounds familiar to anybody is because she represented Elian Gonzales in his asylum case the decades ago she's connected to Florida's Cuban immigrant community. You also see there. Are He's appeals judge on the sixth circuit, and he's considered to be a favourite of Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell. So we could find out as early as this week who the president ultimately has settled. and. So trump a you know has got I mean. He's considering a Catholic woman, a Hispanic woman and a man from an in with an Indian background. What kind of monster have we put in the White House here? Ministers we ought to be embarrassed that this man is our president, right? Maybe, not so Lindsey Graham. Back in the day and you probably all seen this but I wanNA make sure your included here because it's relevant back in the day Lindsay Graham. said that if? If this happened, we could use his words against him. This will stand the test of time. This is the last year. Of. A lame duck president. And if Ted Cruz. DONALD TRUMP GETS TO BE president they've all asked us not to confirm or take up a selection by president. Obama. So if a vacancy occurs in their last year of their first term, guess what you'll use their words against them. I want you to use my words against me. If there's a Republican president in two, thousand, sixteen in a vacancy occurs and the last year of the first term. You can say Lindsey Graham said, let's let the next president who whoever it might be made that nomination and you could use my words against being. You'd be absolutely right. We're setting a precedent here today Republicans are. That in the last year. At least of a lame duck eight-year term, I would say is going to be a four year term that you're not going to fill a vacancy of the Supreme Court. Based on what we're doing here today, that's going to be the new rule when y'all change the rules about appellate judges and district. Court judges to get your way I thought it was a really abuse of power and what you have done here is you've made the caucuses the Republican Democratic caucuses are now not going to have to reach across the aisle when it comes to pellet judges and District Court judges to get input from us or we get input from you. 00:10:08 - 00:15:01 So what does that mean that we're GonNa pick the most hard asked people we can fi And there somebody in the conference to vote against that person? You're going to have the most Liberal members of your caucus pushing you to pick the most liberal judges because she don't need to reach across the out very input and we'll do the same. So, overtime, the judiciary is GONNA be more ideologically driven because the process in the Senate now does not require you to get outside. Your. Own. Party. Here's exactly right. And now he's GonNa be determined whether or not. He's GonNa play the hypocrite. Now what I'm saying when he said I said he's exactly right is he's right and wrong. I think it was right for. President Obama to nominate for justice. I think given that it was a potential switch parties. At the election, which it always is like right now I think it was appropriate for the Senate to wait. To have a confirmation vote. I think if if they're at this point, it would. Be reasonable for the Senate to wait to have confirmation vote. If we were concerned about being fair. Said this is going to be a hot lava take on this. Fairness is not part of the equation. This is a war. Is Not a small skirmish. CINCINATI. A tiny little thing. This is a war. One. Side knows it's a war and treats it like a war. Our side doesn't seem to know that. Let me give you an example. This is only a few hours old outside Senator Rams. House. then. Is this peaceful protesting. Standing outside someone's house like that, and this is what leftist mobs do. They are intimidation squads. They are here to say if you don't do it our way, we are going to disrupt your life threatening you injure you and maybe even kill some of you. Like the man in Portland. This is war. This is not A. Game. This is war and it's a war for the soul of the country. In the case of the Supreme Court nomination if the Republicans become more concern about some headline about fairness than they are about the fate of the unborn than maybe I should just figure out that I can't even participate in politics because there's no one who represents me. This thing is, is a prime example of how selfish the Democrats are. The Democrats knew. Everybody knew the entire country has known for a decade that Ruth Bader Ginsburg was going to go next in fact when Antonin Scalia died everyone was shocked that he went before her. She was so selfish that she couldn't even retire in the first year of Obama's second term. Or. The second year or the third year in the first year he had Harry Reid as the Senate majority leader dear remember. Harry Reid. was the majority leader. Harry Reid could have gotten anybody through. She was so selfish. That she stayed on. And then they were so arrogant and they had so much hubris. In. The fall of two thousand sixteen, there was no way. DONALD TRUMP WAS GONNA win after all they had their insurance policy. and. So she can stay on until Hillary was in and then Hillary could appoint the next one. Speaking of Hillary. Of course, she had to have something to say on this and and you know what I'm not gonNA play her I don't want to. I'm going to play her husband though here's. Here's good bill. Well. 00:15:03 - 00:20:02 Of course it's. Superficially, hypocritical isn't it? I mean Mitch. McConnell wouldn't. Give President Obama's nominee Mary Gallon a hearing. Ten months before the president's election. and. That meant that we went a long time with judges on the court. This is what they do. I. Think they're. Know both for the senator McConnell and president trump I value is. Power and they're trying to take the court would as many. Ideological judges as they can't. Somehow. When he appointed Ruth Bader Ginsburg, he wasn't trying to appointing idiological. Judge. Been Bill Clinton was absolutely looking for someone who would make sure that the slaughter continued. So this idea that somehow there's something inappropriate about Republicans looking to to pack the court with people who matched their ideology. That's what Bill Clinton did. That's what everybody does is packed. The court with somebody matches their ideology. Right. So you know hangs up for a minute I'll be right back. In a minute or two, we will come back and talk about. Some more of this and a little more of my hot take about the weaponization of the death of Ruth. Bader. GINSBURG. Welcome back to the Republic Uber podcast. Thanks again for your time and tension. Again, my name is Brian O'Kelly I appreciate you joining and if you're watching on youtube twitter facebook whichever. On the Vice Rhonda's probably a subscribe button and there is probably a share button. So. If you right now hit that share button at shirt your feed that would be awesome. That'll bring more people into. Doing and for those are new to the broadcast found us through advertising referral whatever. But you know how this works. This is a listener supported broadcast and what that means is there's no big company behind it June me together. And I do the work in you smart show and what that means is I need you to do three things for me. I make three simple requests I. Think they're simple First one is pray for me. The guy needs a lot of stuff to do this. Right Energy Balance Wisdom insight so on. I also asked the listeners to like I say share the show like I was just asking subscribing share do reviews, and then the third thing is to support the show financially there is a link to Patriae on on the website Patriots Dot, com slash republic keeper, and if you just go there and help support the show five bucks a month is a big difference I just kind of think of it as we're going to grab a cup of coffee. Every morning, five days a week. Would you once a month Miami a cup of coffee for five bucks and if you would. Do me favor visit the site and do that because I I do need the support and it does help and it's also A. Sign that this is valuable to people and I know that that's a small thing, your tension matters. But it helps me know that that I'm on the right track with what I'm doing here. So honored with Ruth Bader Ginsburg now. Back to what I was saying it's we have known for a long time that this woman was gonna pass away right and so the idea of being unprepared. For this event is foolishness. So. I can only hope that when I die at creates much of a cluster for everybody as this has I mean good job for her for Web nizing her own debt. And I mean is. Basically, almost set off a nuclear bomb with her death and. You know I mean I respect the game play. You know. I'd say it. Okay. So Here's what I'm thinking. I know this is crazy. Yeah you think I'm really crazy here on say this actually let's just play. Here's here's speaking of crazy. Let's just crazy nancy kit right back to my crazy idea now from the speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi Speaker Pelosi. Thanks for joining us this morning the morning. You wrote Friday that the passing of Justice Ginsburg is an incalculable loss for our democracy. How do you remember her and how will the house honor? I'm so glad that the country is. Providing section outpouring of love and support to honor with Bater Ginsburg. petites tiny in size huge impact, and powerful brilliant brain on the court. She was so remarkable and I can't help. But thinking the good person that she is as we extend condolences to her family, she want us to keep our eye on the ball of the two hundred thousand people. Who will be a probably this weekend will reach. Reached that number this. Challenge that we have is directly. If the president thinks this isn't about the coronavirus it is. 00:20:02 - 00:25:01 It's about healthcare so that the president is rushing to make some kind of a decision because He November tenth is one the our arguments begin on the affordable care act. He doesn't want to crush the virus he wants to crush the affordable care act. Sodas present was crush the affordable care act. Maybe you just want to be constitutional. I know that's crazy idea for it to be constitutional but I think that's what what the president wants now. That's crazy. Nancy now, Chuck Schumer got up on the stand and also had to share something about. The dying wish apparently of the prior justice congresswoman Alexandria Cossio Cortez, and we are here. Because of Ruth Bader GINSBURG's passing. We are here really for three reasons. To show how unified we are. The Democrats are in trying to make sure. That her legacy is protected. And that's the second reason to honor that legacy. She was an amazing woman. Incredible In a male dominated legal establishment, she pushed away through for brains and strength and fortitude and change the world for women long before. The rest of the world caught up. And when she got to the court, she was able to bring that same equality in strength to so many different people of all different types and kinds. And she was an amazing woman and so the first reason we're here is unity and the second is to honor her legacy. To demand. That her lamb wish we're going to demand filled by the Senate. She said, my most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced by until a new president is installed. We believe that. So did the American people today? A Reuters poll came out and said, sixty, two percent of Americans agree with her. Okay let's Reuters poll said sixty, two percent of Americans while I'm glad that her last her dying wish wasn't that a chimpanzee replace her on the court because then we'd have to do that apparently whatever sick old ladies say on their deathbed is what the United States Senate has now compelled to do. What a bunch of garbage. That's Baloney. The US has one job. Advise and consent the president. K and guess what they withheld their consent. From President Obama on Merrick. Garland. And they may very well withhold their consent from President, trump on his pick. That's up up up to them, right And Senator Collins has said she won't Senator Murkowski said she won't. Probably Senator Romney will say he won't. So the Senate will advise and consent, and maybe they won't give their consent. But this is one of the things. One of the strengths of conservatism is that when we put someone forward from a group, first of all I'm GonNa say this. This is bs that the president is putting has said that he's going to put forth a woman. Is this woman seat now? Is Clarence Thomas seat a black seat. When Clarence Thomas dies or retires. Do. We have to appoint a black man. And if he's a conservative black man, will the Democrats say he's not really black. Because if you're black or you're not a conservative, right. You know when? Soda my are. Retires. Or you know passes on when she's not on the court anymore is the president no matter who it is compelled to pick a Latino woman. We gotTA stop. This. We gotTA. Stop it and president trump is doing it. By saying, he'll put a woman on. Okay and and I don't care if it's a woman or a man. I don't care if they're black white Latino Chinese I could care less. GimMe somebody from. Indonesia. WHO UNDERSTANDS THE LAW? I don't care if it's a little Vietnamese guy or Big Samoan? Woman. Yeah I could care less. I want you understand the constitution? And so president trump is joining in this whole idea that. You know it's got to be a woman because. Our BG was a woman. So now you got to put a woman on the court. That's BS in my view now, Ted Cruz has come out and back. When it was. Time for. Garland go forward. Here's what Ted Cruz had to say it has been eight years since the Supreme Court vacancy was nominated and confirmed in an election year. 00:25:01 - 00:30:08 There's a long tradition that you don't do this in an election year. You don't do an election year. Sorry I got to get a drink a cool water there. She should've filled my water bottle up a little bit more than I did but regardless here I am. and. Maybe on the next break, I'll scoot over and fill that up So Ted Cruz we don't do it an election year right? Well, that's super convenient. When you were the guy who was saying no. But now, Ted Cruz is the guy who's saying yes. As Senator Ted Cruz joins us now good morning senator. Thanks for joining us this morning you and your colleagues are pretty clear back in two thousand sixteen to in an election year. A matter for the people decide is it fair for people to conclude right now that you've changed your tune because the President Republican not a Democrat. Well Georgia I'm happy to talk about that but I but I want to start by budget acknowledging the the extraordinary career Justice Ginsburg. Had she was a a trail blazing advocate? One of the finest Supreme Court litigators to have ever lived she she served for nearly three decades on the court I. I Argued Nine Times before Justice Ginsburg on the court she was brilliant justice she was she was her questions were always incisive. She was a careful lawyer. She's lead a a remarkable legacy and. Heidi. And I are prayers are are with her family who are grieving the loss of of someone who led an extraordinary life. Now, when the vacancy occurs that naturally leads to the to the question of what will happen next. And the answer in terms of what's going to happen next as we know now the president is going to make a nomination when I called for the president to make the nomination this coming week he's announced he's going to make the nomination this week, and I believe the right thing to do is for the Senate to take up this nomination and a confirm the nominee before election day now on the question of precedent. We had this fight at the end of the Brock Obama, a term, and and at the time all the Democrats were saying confirm the nominee confirmed the nominee and all the Republicans were saying we're not gonNA confirm the nominee, and so we've got a situation. You just played a quote for me in two thousand sixteen. We can play that game all day long where you can play I. Disagree with the nominee I don't disagree with that's what I'm just trying to get you to concede this is really about who has the votes and who has the power to any given time, right? Correct. No. It isn't if you look at history. One, the precedent is this has happened twenty nine times. Twenty nine times there has been a vacancy in a presidential election. I didn't know that that's residents had made nominations all twenty nine times. That's what presidents do. If there's a vacancy, they make a nomination what is the Senate done and there's a big difference in the Senate with weather the Senate is of the same party of the president or a different party the. President when the Senate has been of the same party of the President of Vacancy Occurs Election Year of the twenty, nine times those are nineteen of them of those nineteen. The Senate has confirmed those nominees seventeen time. So if the parties are the same, the Senate confirms the nominee when the parties are different, that's happened ten times. Merrick. Garland was one of them of those ten. The Senate has confirmed the nominees only twice. Only, twice now, there's a little bit of of learning that can go on here. Would this? The Senate and I talked about this the other day it'd be even before Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed the Senate and the. Court or the least democratic institutions in the whole thing they're the least responsive to democracy. Okay the court is appointed by the president confirmed by the Senate, right? That's how it works. The Senate is on six year term. Not Elected. As, often as the house and the president is not directly elected by the people, it's elected president selected by the Latrell College right and so these are the two least responsive parts of our. System in terms of democratic response. The House of Representatives is the most responsive to the people in terms of. You know the two year terms, right? And it has almost no role in the court other than establishing how many. Seats are on the court, which it may turn out to be an important role that they have. But the reality is that the least constitutional least democratic part of this whole thing is the court. And the second least democratic part is the Senate. And the the idea is that the founding fathers wanted to frustrate the whim of the moment. They wanted to frustrate the analogy. Of different kinds of. Attitudes that happened in society, and so by having these things related to the longer cycles, it meant that the judges were more responsive to the Republic and the constitutional ideas than they were to the whim of the moment, one more from Ted Cruz, and there's a reason for that. 00:30:08 - 00:35:01 It's not just simply your party, my party the reason is it's a question of checks and balances in order for a Supreme Court nomination. To go forward, you have to have the president and the Senate. In this instance, the American people voted elected Donald trump a big part of the reason they elected Donald Trump. Is Because of the Scalia. Vacancy and they wanted principal constitutionalist on the court and a big part of the reason why we have a Republican majority elected in two thousand fourteen reelected twenty, sixteen grown even larger twenty, eighteen a major issue in each of those elections the American people voted and said, we want constitutionalist judges. Right I hear what he said there. We have a majority in two thousand fourteen. The grew in sixteen and grew in eighteen. The Senate has become more Republican with each election. So have governors. Conservatism at the ballot box is succeeding. Don't believe twitter. Don't believe your local media because they're all full of crap they're lying. To you all of these polls, about Joe, Biden up by eight their intended to keep you home. Understand what the mission is. They want you dispirited. That's what they're trying to do. It's it's it's What do they call gas lighting, right? So Now. When we put through as conservatives because of this process when we put someone through this part of a group and back to my rant on groups that I'm not excited about the fact that we're giving in to this idea has to be a woman. But when we do say, let's put a woman candidate through. We put through somebody WHO's a Rockstar? Okay, the difference on the liberal side is they put through whoever screams the loudest. Whoever says I'm a victim with the loudest voice is who gets moved up on the liberal side. On our side because it's harder because you know if you're a black man who is conservative or a black woman who is a conservative Timori classic out there in in Baltimore, you're just going to get hammered for being an uncle Tom or whatever I don't know what they call a a woman on that side of the deal, but the point is that. You know their. It's terrible. The way they treat somebody who's not part of the expected, and so when we put someone forward whose one member one of those groups. There a Rockstar. Every time. Now. Again. Ruth Bader GINSBURG should've retired. Should have retired. In two, thousand, thirteen. Two Thousand Twelve two thousand thirteen when Barack Obama was reelected they had Harry Reid is the majority leader of the Senate they could put through somebody who was thirty seven years old, who would be on the court for fifty years. They didn't. They didn't. And so guess what? That's incompetence. That's long-term party incompetence. It's Hubris. An incompetent since the assumption, the problem with the Obama Administration wasn't wasn't that they were incompetent what they did the problem with the Obama Administration is that they thought they were so competent that no one else could ever compete with them. And so they thought they were permanent. Trump knows not permanent. Trump knows he's got limited time. That's what trump's doing so much so fast. 'cause trump knows if he doesn't get her done. Pretty quick. It could be outright and so. Now what this is. Is a chance for. US to have and by US I. Mean Conservatives People, WanNa keep the republic. For us to have an extinction level event, happen on the left. Literally, level an event that could just completely end their party. and. Here's why I don't care who trump nominates I could care less. I want them confirmed. I want them confirm it and the reason I, want confirmed because I want to watch the left lose their minds. And burn their own. Party down. When they lose their minds. America does see it. In fact, I would go so far as to say that the appointment of a conservative Supreme Court justice may be more important than trump being reelected in the big picture. 00:35:03 - 00:40:00 WHO KNOWS One vote makes a big difference, right? Now. Here's some things I have to say about. Justice GINSBURG. She's a legend right and She was wicked. SMART. wicked. SMART. She understood the law really well. And I wouldn't read some of her decisions. And Review I'd read them as they come out. A Geek. I read too much and it's it's not a good thing always but I do I spent a Lotta time sitting reading in the supreme. Court decisions when they come out a usually read most of them at least have a appear to have a significant import, which is almost all of them because otherwise they don't make the Supreme Court right. So she is a legend. And When you read her opinions and her dissents. You can see the logic flowing through it. Even though it's logic I didn't agree with and she had some premises I. Don't agree with you can see the logic in her arguments. She was a brilliant jurist she's worth studying. Elena Kagan. Sonia or Not so much. Not, so much these guys are ideologues. Who write about how they feel? There's very little logic in what they write about. They just. It's all about how they feel. They don't have liberal legal theories. They have. Theories about. How things work in people's lives and so on and not that that's bad. But that's not the law. Your job isn't to determine how much you like a law. As Supreme Court justice you're determined your job is to determine whether or not the law is constitutional and should be passed. That's your job. And so. Late Kagan. It's kind of funny. She was before she was on the court she was Obama's Solicitor General. LOOK UP HER WIN-LOSS RECORD Elena Kagan lost at the court consistently the arguments that she put in front of the court, the court rejected over and over and over again. So what did Obama do? Well, he put her on the court, the court wouldn't reject her arguments. When someone else made them. Right and so here we have ruth, Bader Ginsburg who is one of the most powerful women in the country who knows because she's wicked smart. She knows what the process is. She knows that if she retires Obama can put somebody in she saw Kagan. And Soda or come in, and here she was best friends with Antonin Scalia. Right? Now and Scalia. Many people think. I'm not sure I'm one of them. I'm just going to say what people think many people think. That Scalia was assassinated. J.. So here you are you're dying your your Ruth Bader Ginsburg you're dying of pancreatic cancer. Your best. Friend. In the law and Scalia. All sudden taken out maybe assassinated. Came and Your. Party. Appoints these these you know? I don't know what else to call them. These mental midgets who are concerned more about how things feel than about the law. She's looking at what the what's on the court and she's saying I can't give Obama another one of these. There's nobody here WHO's a lawyer? Not Saying that. The GINSBURG was some Kinda. Stealth conservative I. Just think that she didn't WanNa give Obama another pick. Maybe not. But I think that's what she did. I think she just said you know what? Screw you guys I'm going to stick it out. And when she saw. Joe. Biden. As the the candidate. I think that it was just all my gosh. They're going to put a dementia patient up here. I don't know I'm just speculating here as to how went down but regardless we're to talk a little bit about the virus in some of the the new attack line on Donald. Trump over the virus when we get back for the race so. Back in just a minute or two and we will. Get into that. Thanks again for your time and attention please visit the website and share the show and become a sponsor that would be awesome nice. Welcome back. Republic podcasts. 00:40:00 - 00:45:04 Thanks for giving me a minute out to a fault, my water bottle and make sure the guy talks for an hour. Your throat gets dry at times. What it is right now anyway. Welcome. Back to the republic keeper podcast. Joining the break. Coming in and the broadcast banks again, remember to hit that share button ensure the show. Live in progresses best if you can. Jewish on the podcast later also please do share the show. Doesn't matter so. So moving on we have. Some the new attack line on President trump has begun. And it is. Of course, you know trump is the worst person ever and apparently now It's it's why it's a couple of attack lines. First one is we have two hundred, thousand people dead and it's trump's fault and if trump had done something different, it would have been less. So the first one is. Here is Dr Sanjay Gupta. This is Vin Gupta. From Seattle I'm at the university. Of Washington. Chuck I. You nailed it without comment. I think it's the message. It sends that that's the loss opportunity in terms of quantification. Everybody's in criticize models because the the output is only as good as the input but there's convincing evidence that probably seventy percent of lives. Could have been saved that have since been lost if we had a early shutdown so two weeks earlier, seventy percent allies would have been saved. If we added masks on top, this is what I can tell chuck. I'm not going to speculate on what we could have done. But if we adopt universal mask and right now, something the president forty eight hours ago continues to to make fun of question the efficacy of if we adopt universal asking right now, we could potentially save up to two hundred thousand lives according to estimates, University of Washington by December one. So this is serious. This isn't going away and on the West Coast at least chuck you know we're talking about masks but well, fitting high-quality masks. That's the issue here is that just put a piece of cloth on your nose and your mouth? What's the type? The NASCAR WE CAN'T? And so Hurry said. Could. Save another two, hundred, thousand lives by December first. So what they're saying is that in the next ten weeks. WE'RE GONNA, lose another as many people's we've lost in the six months. Including the time when we didn't even know how to treat it or what to do that's what he's saying and the seventy percent figure. So the one, ninety, nine, there take seventy percent off there would have been what? Only sixty thousand deaths trump is responsible for one hundred, forty, thousand deaths. It's his fault. He has blood on his hands Donald. Trump is the worst man. Is the new line. Take a listen. It was shocking to see the president saying that the virus was a hoax saying that everything's okay. When we know that it's not the truth is he doesn't actually care about anyone else but himself if the president had taken this virus while seriously he actually made an effort to tell how serious it was. He would have slowed the virus Fred, she would have saved lives. He would have saved lives Donald trump would have saved lives. In fact, you know it's this is amazing. This now woman comments on this ad she says that it's up to half of all the deaths and the role that I had. Government aid for all of the role that I had. I was watching it the effects of the chaos that was happening at the White House and I could tell something really really wrong better respond to hear first-hand first-hand from Libya who is in the room y things were so chaotic that it wasn't just. Inexperienced people with dealing with something novel. And not. Prime. Cool. Not Realizing that they needed to rely on their governments Experts in public health emergency management community, but in fact. It wasn't just incompetence there was designed here. There was a intentional negligence anti here per explain. What she witnessed, it just broke my heart that in in our country that can happen and there a study that came out this week that really this into context why Lydia's testimony matters Brookings Institute looked at other countries around the globe in our country a compared in these are countries that have standards of living way. Ours have access to healthcare like ours and they discovered that because the way that we who've adventurers. Hit influence other countries we have nine, million, nine, million more people working today. And there would be a hundred thousand people not dead. 00:45:04 - 00:50:01 So. We have almost two hundred, thousand dead half of those wives would have been say if the trump administration has followed, the plans that we have in place have had in place for fifteen years and had acted responsibly in the way many other governments across the path. Right and so she says, half of the deaths would have been prevented right and so let me this is where you're going to be a better news consumer by being a Republican podcast listener whenever you hear the brookings. Institution. You should hear dishonest leftist think-tank. Because that's who the Brookings Institution is, they are a dishonest left wing wing think tank that's who they are. That's what they do. They're unreliable at every level. In every way. So. Then they had this presidential historian on our Melber did over on his name is on Michael Beschloss presidential historian and he said trump doesn't actually care but listens to what we're hearing about. This is you know you look elect trump again we they lose our democracy. You know what we were just hearing omen ago in private trump does not care. About those who are suffering dying from covert can you imagine if this were thousand, nine, hundred, forty, four and someone from the Franklin Roosevelt Administration. In closing years of world. War Two said he really doesn't care about the troops behind the scenes. He doesn't have a plan to win the war that would have been draconian. This is something we really haven't seen. Right with something win something we're not seeing now that's not what's happening. You one disgruntled employee who says that and that's not doesn't make it what's happening. Regardless, there was this guy doctor Redlener I guess is the guy's name last clip we have and he's GonNa he's now we've gone six months. And it's one ninety nine they've had on the screen they're right and now this guy is going to have the projection that this is the ultimate fear porn clip ready get beat be afraid be very, very afraid. Yes to call it's really just absolutely horrendous. In fact, if you just take the total number of days between now and the election now on the end of the year and just sit multiplied by thousand, you'll get a pretty good sense of what we're gonna be looking at fatality. Wise. If you carry that through the end of twenty, twenty one if things don't change dramatically and by the way he's he's completely dishonest about the time line for the vaccine and how effective it's going to be. So we have we're looking at hundreds of thousands and I actually had predicted a few months ago in an op Ed that we could be seeing six to eight, hundred, thousand fatalities if. Six to eight hundred, thousand fatalities. Six to eight, hundred, thousand. If what? If we don't do anything through the end of next year and the deaths continue at the pace, they were the worst day get really wild with the pandemic and we don't have the control measures. So what we've learned about him, he's absolutely a pathological liar. We should be remind yourselves about this every day and I'm waiting for the moment when his supporters will will get this and you know he was impeached for. Making a phone call to the Ukraine president. If you think about it now he's going to be responsible for a couple of hundred thousand unnecessary deaths covid nineteen. There's no reason why like other countries we should not have been at this point less than fifty thousand S, and now we're hitting two, hundred thousand. It is really outrageous and if that wasn't enough with the thing about this his attacks of Redfield on Redfield, etc.. All right. That's enough of that. I can't stand anymore of that guy. So the sorry about that but you know the. So this is the new attack line is that president trump is a mass murderer. That he is the worst person ever and he has blood on his hands. One hundred thousand dead Americans because of president trump is what they're saying. And of course, it's not true. and. If you go back to the early press conferences when the president had the charts up and they were doing the Fifty fifteen days or fourteen days to slow the spread. The initial projections? I. Remember I I sent out a tweet that said they're setting us up for the idea that a quarter million dead is a win. And That's exactly right. The projections from the Neil Ferguson and the whatever it is the. Ice. Over whatever it is the U. Dub, they were all in the millions. and. So now here we are this two, hundred thousand is. The truth is when you take out the nursing home patients. It's unbelievably successful. and. So this is just a lie and IT'S A it's a smear and it's designed to. 00:50:02 - 00:50:31 Hurt the president and give Joe Biden an opportunity to occupy the White House one I hope that he never gets. So thanks for listening this morning. I appreciate your time and attention. Do Remember visit the website and support. The show will be back with more tomorrow and. Again thanksgiving risen. Republic. Uber. Dot Com and finding that link to patriotic and become. A sponsor and sharing the show. We'll see you tomorrow.  

Black History Month! We Gotta make fun of Whypipo! Rest up Mountain Lion!

We GOTTA talk about the sketch for Mariah's Vegas show! Also did you know that 9th Avenue in NYC was a thing? Available on iTunes, iHeartRadio, Google Play, and Stitcher. Check out our merch store at www.mariahreportstore.com Support the show and access bonus material for as little as $1 at www.patreon.com/themariahreport Leave us an iTunes review, they help the show grow. https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-mariah-report-a-mariah-carey-fan-podcast/id1031735322?mt=2  Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, or Instagram @themariahreport #themariahreport mariahreport@gmail.com Graphic Designer: Sean Marks www.seanmarks.com.au Theme song 'Gimmie Your Love' produced by Ereezybeatz Music www.ereezybeatz.com Disclaimer: This is a fan podcast and is not affiliated with Mariah Carey or her record label. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

"Your website needs to be about me (the visitor), not you." "Is authenticity marketing an oxymoron?" Christopher Michael, the founder of PXLPod Web Strategy, has been on the show a couple of times. He updated Mark and Patrick on his current thinking about the web, and it's misperceptions. Christopher and Mark met in 2010 while working on TEDxAmericanRiviera. He's now the CTO for TEDxSantaBarbara and works in close collaboration with Mark on various projects, making sure Mark stays out of his own way when it comes to the web. This wide-ranging conversation covered a lot of ground including: What's the real job of your website? -- To welcome the visitor and appeal to them -- To provide the visitor with something with which they can RELATE -- The site needs to communicate that you can heal the visitor's pain or problem -- The visitor needs to feel inspired that they've found a real solution -- The visitor needs to feel confident that you are the person who can successfully apply that solution -- The site needs to build trust and relatedness How important your website has become and how much has changed on the web Why you should look at your site with new eyes The Salesperson and the Conversation ... we talked a lot about the 'conversation' you start on the web with a prospect What's the job of your business card? Your Facebook page? Your Twitter account? We continued to talk about the Tone of Voice of the site - it's all about the visitor - not about YOU Christopher's Common Mistakes people make when putting their web presence together -- Not understanding the process of a sales pipeline -- Failing to realize that people need to be assured. We all need to fee food about solving the problems that get in our way. -- Expecting your site to sell for you. -- Hiding behind WE - Gotta be REAL with people. It's endearing, and people nowadays can smell subterfuge a mile away. -- Trust Trust Trust Trust. There's the filter with which everything needs to be processed. "Would I trust ME, given how I've presented myself on my site?" Why Christophers' motto is, "Give a shit. No really." Is authenticity marketing an oxymoron? Parting advice: "The more myself I can be - the more like-minded customers I can attract." We didn't have time to talk a lot about one of the people he looks to for inspiration. Take a look at Paul Jarvis for that. We also will ask Christopher to come back and talk about his passion for photography. If you'd like to see Santa Barbara, and other locations from a different point of view, check out his site, Misha Media and his most current work on Facebook.

DJ Maynard 'n' Me talk sh!t about a whole bunch crap no-one gives a monkey's F^cK about..... Listen!!! Or else......We Gotta find Milly Sinatra!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Kkkkkkkkkkkuuuuuuuuuuuuuunnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DJ Maynard 'n' Me talk sh!t about a whole bunch crap no-one gives a monkey's F^cK about..... Listen!!! Or else......We Gotta find Milly Sinatra!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Kkkkkkkkkkkuuuuuuuuuuuuuunnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Man Who Voices It All: Richard Epcar So there we were at MTAC Omega, and I (Basil) looked at Kevin and said, “OK, we GOTTA interview Richard Epcar. This is a thing that must occur.” Kevin responded, “Uh, ok! But I have no clue what to say I mean I don’t really follow US voice actors and-” “Kevin,” I then expertly cut him off, ” Trust me. You’ll understand once we do.” I then proceeded to drop kick like 15 ninjas then got a sweet hair cut. Man my hair so light and fluffy now! But the important part of the story  was  the Sunday of MTAC Omega. I sadly I had to educate the masses via pane form while Kevin got to  interview people. We met up afterwards and I asked, “So how did it go?” “Basil.” Kevin gallantly stated, “We GOTTA interview Richard Epcar again. This is a thing that must occur. That man is amazing.” This is that interview.