Podcast appearances and mentions of joyce o'shaughnessy

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/RRR865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until February 9, 2025.Custom Care Compass: Mastering Multifactorial Clinical Decision-Making in High-Risk HR+, HER2- MBC In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.Disclosure PolicyAll relevant conflicts of interest have been mitigated prior to the commencement of the activity.Faculty/Planner DisclosuresChair/PlannerJoyce O'Shaughnessy, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for AbbVie Inc.; Agendia; Amgen Inc.; Aptitude Health; AstraZeneca; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Celgene Corporation; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Duality Biologics; Eisai Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; GRAIL, Inc.; Halozyme, Inc.; Heron Therapeutics, Inc.; Immunomedics, Inc.; Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Myriad Genetics, Inc.; Nektar; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Ontada LLC; Pfizer; Pharmacyclics LLC; Pierre Fabre group; prIME Oncology; Puma Biotechnology, Inc.; Samsung Bioepis; Sanofi; Scorpion Therapeutics, Inc.; Seagen Inc.; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc./The Menarini Group; Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Synthon; Taiho Oncology, Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.Faculty/PlannerSara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for 4D pharma plc; Aadi Bioscience, Inc.; ARC Therapeutics; Artios Pharma; AstraZeneca; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Blueprint Medicines; Bristol Myers Squibb; CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.; Daiichi Sankyo Inc.; eFFECTOR Therapeutics; Eisai Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Incyte; Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Myovant Sciences Ltd.; Natera; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer; Reveal Genomics; Sanofi; Seattle Genetics, Inc.; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc./The Menarini Group; Systimmune; Tango Therapeutics; Umoja Biopharma; Zentalis; Zetagen; and Zymeworks Inc.Grant/Research Support from AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; NanoString Technologies Inc.; Nektar; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer; Sanofi; and Seattle Genetics, Inc.Other Financial or Material Support from Steering committee for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. and OncXerna Therapeutics, Inc.Planning Committee and Reviewer DisclosuresPlanners, independent reviewers, and staff of PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, do not have any relevant financial relationships related to this CE activity unless listed below.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/RRR865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until February 9, 2025.Custom Care Compass: Mastering Multifactorial Clinical Decision-Making in High-Risk HR+, HER2- MBC In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.Disclosure PolicyAll relevant conflicts of interest have been mitigated prior to the commencement of the activity.Faculty/Planner DisclosuresChair/PlannerJoyce O'Shaughnessy, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for AbbVie Inc.; Agendia; Amgen Inc.; Aptitude Health; AstraZeneca; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Celgene Corporation; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Duality Biologics; Eisai Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; GRAIL, Inc.; Halozyme, Inc.; Heron Therapeutics, Inc.; Immunomedics, Inc.; Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Myriad Genetics, Inc.; Nektar; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Ontada LLC; Pfizer; Pharmacyclics LLC; Pierre Fabre group; prIME Oncology; Puma Biotechnology, Inc.; Samsung Bioepis; Sanofi; Scorpion Therapeutics, Inc.; Seagen Inc.; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc./The Menarini Group; Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Synthon; Taiho Oncology, Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.Faculty/PlannerSara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for 4D pharma plc; Aadi Bioscience, Inc.; ARC Therapeutics; Artios Pharma; AstraZeneca; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Blueprint Medicines; Bristol Myers Squibb; CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.; Daiichi Sankyo Inc.; eFFECTOR Therapeutics; Eisai Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Incyte; Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Myovant Sciences Ltd.; Natera; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer; Reveal Genomics; Sanofi; Seattle Genetics, Inc.; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc./The Menarini Group; Systimmune; Tango Therapeutics; Umoja Biopharma; Zentalis; Zetagen; and Zymeworks Inc.Grant/Research Support from AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; NanoString Technologies Inc.; Nektar; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer; Sanofi; and Seattle Genetics, Inc.Other Financial or Material Support from Steering committee for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. and OncXerna Therapeutics, Inc.Planning Committee and Reviewer DisclosuresPlanners, independent reviewers, and staff of PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, do not have any relevant financial relationships related to this CE activity unless listed below.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/RRR865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until February 9, 2025.Custom Care Compass: Mastering Multifactorial Clinical Decision-Making in High-Risk HR+, HER2- MBC In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.Disclosure PolicyAll relevant conflicts of interest have been mitigated prior to the commencement of the activity.Faculty/Planner DisclosuresChair/PlannerJoyce O'Shaughnessy, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for AbbVie Inc.; Agendia; Amgen Inc.; Aptitude Health; AstraZeneca; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Celgene Corporation; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Duality Biologics; Eisai Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; GRAIL, Inc.; Halozyme, Inc.; Heron Therapeutics, Inc.; Immunomedics, Inc.; Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Myriad Genetics, Inc.; Nektar; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Ontada LLC; Pfizer; Pharmacyclics LLC; Pierre Fabre group; prIME Oncology; Puma Biotechnology, Inc.; Samsung Bioepis; Sanofi; Scorpion Therapeutics, Inc.; Seagen Inc.; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc./The Menarini Group; Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Synthon; Taiho Oncology, Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.Faculty/PlannerSara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for 4D pharma plc; Aadi Bioscience, Inc.; ARC Therapeutics; Artios Pharma; AstraZeneca; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Blueprint Medicines; Bristol Myers Squibb; CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.; Daiichi Sankyo Inc.; eFFECTOR Therapeutics; Eisai Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Incyte; Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Myovant Sciences Ltd.; Natera; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer; Reveal Genomics; Sanofi; Seattle Genetics, Inc.; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc./The Menarini Group; Systimmune; Tango Therapeutics; Umoja Biopharma; Zentalis; Zetagen; and Zymeworks Inc.Grant/Research Support from AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; NanoString Technologies Inc.; Nektar; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer; Sanofi; and Seattle Genetics, Inc.Other Financial or Material Support from Steering committee for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. and OncXerna Therapeutics, Inc.Planning Committee and Reviewer DisclosuresPlanners, independent reviewers, and staff of PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, do not have any relevant financial relationships related to this CE activity unless listed below.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/RRR865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until February 9, 2025.Custom Care Compass: Mastering Multifactorial Clinical Decision-Making in High-Risk HR+, HER2- MBC In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.Disclosure PolicyAll relevant conflicts of interest have been mitigated prior to the commencement of the activity.Faculty/Planner DisclosuresChair/PlannerJoyce O'Shaughnessy, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for AbbVie Inc.; Agendia; Amgen Inc.; Aptitude Health; AstraZeneca; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Celgene Corporation; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Duality Biologics; Eisai Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; GRAIL, Inc.; Halozyme, Inc.; Heron Therapeutics, Inc.; Immunomedics, Inc.; Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Myriad Genetics, Inc.; Nektar; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Ontada LLC; Pfizer; Pharmacyclics LLC; Pierre Fabre group; prIME Oncology; Puma Biotechnology, Inc.; Samsung Bioepis; Sanofi; Scorpion Therapeutics, Inc.; Seagen Inc.; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc./The Menarini Group; Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Synthon; Taiho Oncology, Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.Faculty/PlannerSara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for 4D pharma plc; Aadi Bioscience, Inc.; ARC Therapeutics; Artios Pharma; AstraZeneca; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Blueprint Medicines; Bristol Myers Squibb; CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.; Daiichi Sankyo Inc.; eFFECTOR Therapeutics; Eisai Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Incyte; Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Myovant Sciences Ltd.; Natera; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer; Reveal Genomics; Sanofi; Seattle Genetics, Inc.; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc./The Menarini Group; Systimmune; Tango Therapeutics; Umoja Biopharma; Zentalis; Zetagen; and Zymeworks Inc.Grant/Research Support from AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; NanoString Technologies Inc.; Nektar; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer; Sanofi; and Seattle Genetics, Inc.Other Financial or Material Support from Steering committee for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. and OncXerna Therapeutics, Inc.Planning Committee and Reviewer DisclosuresPlanners, independent reviewers, and staff of PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, do not have any relevant financial relationships related to this CE activity unless listed below.

Featuring perspectives from Dr Komal Jhaveri, Dr Kevin Kalinsky, Dr Ian E Krop, Dr Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Dr Hope S Rugo and Prof Peter Schmid, including the following topics: Long-Term Management of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Introduction (0:00) Management of CNS-only disease progression in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (2:27) Synergy between tucatinib and HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (5:24) Management of trastuzumab deruxtecan–related adverse events (7:41) Patient selection for and practical implementation of postadjuvant neratinib (13:23) Faculty presentation: Dr Krop (16:26) Optimizing the Management of ER-Positive Localized Breast Cancer Ovarian function suppression to preserve fertility and prevent premature ovarian insufficiency; interrupting adjuvant hormonal therapy to attempt pregnancy (24:56) Selection of patients for adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy (29:05) Utility of genomic assays in the neoadjuvant setting; management of node-positive disease in postmenopausal patients with low-risk Recurrence Scores® (33:35) Selection between abemaciclib and ribociclib in the adjuvant setting (36:45) Potential utility of circulating tumor DNA assessment in breast cancer (41:58) Faculty presentation: Dr Kalinsky (46:36) Considerations in the Care of Patients with ER-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Preference of CDK4/6 inhibitor in the metastatic setting (56:42) Sequencing of trastuzumab deruxtecan in ER-positive, HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (59:00) Faculty presentation: Dr Jhaveri (1:06:39) Novel and Emerging Strategies for ER-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Selection of therapy for ER-positive metastatic breast cancer progressing on a CDK4/6 inhibitor; future role of capivasertib (1:19:31) Faculty presentation: Dr Rugo (1:30:39) Evolving Clinical Decision-Making for Localized Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Management of localized TNBC; selection of patients for adjuvant Olaparib (1:46:10) PARP inhibitor tolerability (1:51:55) Faculty presentation: Dr O'Shaughnessy (1:55:31) Recent Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) Selection of therapy for triple-negative metastatic breast cancer; sequencing of trastuzumab deruxtecan in ER-negative, HER2-low disease (2:11:08) Faculty presentation: Prof Schmid (2:18:03) CME information and select publications

Featuring perspectives from Dr Joyce O'Shaughnessy, including the following topics: Introduction (0:00) HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer –– Professor Giuseppe Curigliano, MD, PhD (8:04) ASCO 2023 Preview (38:37) NCPD information and select publications

Featuring perspectives from Ms Jamie Carroll, Dr Virginia Kaklamani, Dr Joyce O'Shaughnessy and Mr Ronald Stein, including the following topics: Introduction (0:00) ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Localized Breast Cancer — Part 1 (7:12) ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Localized Breast Cancer —Part 2 (26:18) ER-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (37:16) Localized HER2-Positive Breast Cancer (49:27) HER2-Positive and HER2-Low Metastatic Breast Cancer — Part 1 (1:04:09) HER2-Positive and HER2-Low Metastatic Breast Cancer — Part 2 (1:27:00) PARP Inhibitors (1:32:21) Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (1:43:32) CME information and select publications

Year in Review: Clinical Investigator Perspectives on the Most Relevant New Data Sets and Advances in Breast Cancer — Faculty Presentation 2: Metastatic Breast Cancer — Dr Joyce O'Shaughnessy CME information and select publications

Featuring perspectives from Dr Joyce O'Shaughnessy and Prof Peter Schmid, including the following topics: Introduction: POSITIVE Trial — Temporary Interruption of Endocrine Therapy for Pregnancy (0:00) Metastatic Breast Cancer — Dr O'Shaughnessy (7:44) Localized Breast Cancer — Prof Schmid (41:25) CME information and select publications

Proceedings from our Year in Review webinar on the management of breast cancer. Featuring perspectives from Dr Joyce O'Shaughnessy and Prof Peter Schmid, moderated by Dr Neil Love.

Proceedings from a daylong multitumor educational symposium in partnership with the American Oncology Network, featuring perspectives from Drs Harold Burstein and Joyce O'Shaughnessy on recent advances and real-world implications in breast cancer. CME information and select publications

Proceedings from a daylong multitumor educational symposium in partnership with the American Oncology Network, including key clinical presentations and papers in breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphomas, gastrointestinal cancers, genitourinary cancers, lung cancer and multiple myeloma. Featuring perspectives from Drs Neeraj Agarwal, Harold Burstein, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, Rafael Fonseca, Brad Kahl, Rutika Mehta, Craig Moskowitz, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Krina Patel, Philip Philip, Suresh Ramalingam and Sandy Srinvas, moderated by Dr Neil Love.

Proceedings from a daylong multitumor educational symposium in partnership with the American Oncology Network, including key clinical presentations and papers in breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphomas, gastrointestinal cancers, genitourinary cancers, lung cancer and multiple myeloma. Featuring perspectives from Drs Neeraj Agarwal, Harold Burstein, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, Rafael Fonseca, Brad Kahl, Rutika Mehta, Craig Moskowitz, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Krina Patel, Philip Philip, Suresh Ramalingam and Sandy Srinvas, moderated by Dr Neil Love.

Proceedings from a daylong multitumor educational symposium in partnership with the American Oncology Network, including key clinical presentations and papers in breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphomas, gastrointestinal cancers, genitourinary cancers, lung cancer and multiple myeloma. Featuring perspectives from Drs Neeraj Agarwal, Harold Burstein, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, Rafael Fonseca, Brad Kahl, Rutika Mehta, Craig Moskowitz, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Krina Patel, Philip Philip, Suresh Ramalingam and Sandy Srinvas, moderated by Dr Neil Love.

Proceedings from a daylong multitumor educational symposium in partnership with the American Oncology Network, including key clinical presentations and papers in breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphomas, gastrointestinal cancers, genitourinary cancers, lung cancer and multiple myeloma. Featuring perspectives from Drs Neeraj Agarwal, Harold Burstein, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, Rafael Fonseca, Brad Kahl, Rutika Mehta, Craig Moskowitz, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Krina Patel, Philip Philip, Suresh Ramalingam and Sandy Srinvas, moderated by Dr Neil Love.

Proceedings from a daylong multitumor educational symposium in partnership with the American Oncology Network, including key clinical presentations and papers in breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphomas, gastrointestinal cancers, genitourinary cancers, lung cancer and multiple myeloma. Featuring perspectives from Drs Neeraj Agarwal, Harold Burstein, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, Rafael Fonseca, Brad Kahl, Rutika Mehta, Craig Moskowitz, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Krina Patel, Philip Philip, Suresh Ramalingam and Sandy Srinvas, moderated by Dr Neil Love.

Proceedings from a daylong multitumor educational symposium in partnership with the American Oncology Network, including key clinical presentations and papers in breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphomas, gastrointestinal cancers, genitourinary cancers, lung cancer and multiple myeloma. Featuring perspectives from Drs Neeraj Agarwal, Harold Burstein, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, Rafael Fonseca, Brad Kahl, Rutika Mehta, Craig Moskowitz, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Krina Patel, Philip Philip, Suresh Ramalingam and Sandy Srinvas, moderated by Dr Neil Love.

Proceedings from a daylong multitumor educational symposium in partnership with the American Oncology Network, including key clinical presentations and papers in breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphomas, gastrointestinal cancers, genitourinary cancers, lung cancer and multiple myeloma. Featuring perspectives from Drs Neeraj Agarwal, Harold Burstein, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, Rafael Fonseca, Brad Kahl, Rutika Mehta, Craig Moskowitz, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Krina Patel, Philip Philip, Suresh Ramalingam and Sandy Srinvas, moderated by Dr Neil Love.

Proceedings from a daylong multitumor educational symposium in partnership with the American Oncology Network, including key clinical presentations and papers in breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphomas, gastrointestinal cancers, genitourinary cancers, lung cancer and multiple myeloma. Featuring perspectives from Drs Neeraj Agarwal, Harold Burstein, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, Rafael Fonseca, Brad Kahl, Rutika Mehta, Craig Moskowitz, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Krina Patel, Philip Philip, Suresh Ramalingam and Sandy Srinvas, moderated by Dr Neil Love.

On this episode, PrecisCa speaks with Dr. Joyce O'Shaughnessy, a medical oncologist and the Director of Breast Cancer Research Program at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas.    Dr. O'Shaughnessy sits down with us to answer the following questions: Which breast cancer patients are eligible for preoperative pembrolizumab in the curative setting based on the KEYNOTE-522 trial? What about adjuvant pembrolizumab? How is trastuzumab deruxtecan optimally utilized for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer? Which CDK 4/6 inhibitor is recommended for treatment of HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer based on available survival data? Can you discuss the data from the MonarchE Trial that led to FDA approval of abemaciclib in October 2021? Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, M.D. focuses on breast cancer prevention and treatment. She is Co-Chair of Breast Cancer Research and Chair of Breast Cancer Prevention Research at Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center and for The US Oncology Network and is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for US Oncology Research Network. In 2009 D Magazine elected Dr. O'Shaughnessy as one of the best hematology oncologists in Dallas, Texas.    Dr. O'Shaughnessy received her M.D. from Yale University Medical School. Her internship and residency in internal medicine were completed at Massachusetts General Hospital in 1985. She concluded a fellowship in medical oncology at the National Cancer Institute in 1987 and was a Senior Investigator there until 1995. Dr. O'Shaughnessy is a member of American Association for Cancer Research; American Society of Clinical Oncology; American Medical Women's Association; American Medical Association; American College of Physicians; and Women in Cancer Research. Dr. O'Shaughnessy is an Associate Editor, Clinical Breast Cancer Journal; founder, The School of Breast Oncology. Visit www.precisca.com for more resources, content, and access to our entire catalogue of educational content. 

April Samuels, a talented and tenacious drummer, treated her triple negative breast cancer exactly as she would any drum… beat it and don't quit. Thanks to her unwavering determination and her drive to turn a negative into a positive, April is not only cancer-free, but she is using her experiences to help others battling cancer through her non-profit, Breast Cancer Can Stick It!. She credits Dr. Joyce O'Shaughnessy, of Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, as her biggest cheerleader. Learn more about April's journey, Dr. O'Shaughnessy, and the tremendous cancer care team at Texas Oncology.Music Credit: Long Way from Dead written and performed by BULLITTwww.TexasOncology.com/podcasthttps://www.breastcancercanstickit.org/

Drs. Joyce O'Shaughnessy & Ann O'Dea discuss exciting new developments from the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. See our Abstract outlining the value of virtual tumor boards presented at SABCS21 HERE Visit www.precisca.com for more resources, content, and access to our entire catalogue of educational content. There you will have access to our complete library of educational videos. New episodes of the PrecisCa Oncology Podcast are released weekly. Please consider sharing our podcast, subscribing & turning on notifications to be the first to know about new releases. Together, we can raise the level of cancer care from diagnosis to recovery.

Featuring perspectives from Drs. Aditya Bardia, Kevin Kalinsky and Joyce O'Shaughnessy, moderated by Dr. Erika Hamilton, including the following topics: Current Role of Genomic Classifiers to Inform Decision-Making for Patients with ER-Positive Localized Breast Cancer (0:00) Emerging Treatment Strategies for Patients with ER-Positive Localized Breast Cancer (25:32) Selection and Sequencing of Therapy for Patients with ER-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (47:26) Novel Investigational Agents and Strategies (1:14:23) CME information and select publications

In this episode, Dr. Joyce O'Shaughnessy, MD, leads an engaging discussion with Matthew P. Goetz, MD, and Sara Hurvitz, MD, FACP, on leveraging CDK4/6 inhibitors for the treatment of patients with metastatic HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. Topics include:How the experts currently use CDK4/6 inhibitors in clinical practiceClinical implications of key studies on CDK4/6 inhibitors from ASCO 2021Strategies for counseling patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitorsPresenters:Joyce O'Shaughnessy, MDCelebrating Women Chair in Breast Cancer ResearchDirector, Breast Cancer Research ProgramBaylor University Medical CenterTexas OncologyUS Oncology NetworkDallas, TexasMatthew P. Goetz, MDErivan K. Haub Family Professor of Cancer Research Honoring Richard F. Emslander, M.D.Professor of Oncology and PharmacologyDirector, Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer SPORECo-Leader, Women's Cancer Program, Mayo Clinic Cancer CenterCo-Chair, Mayo Breast Disease GroupDepartment of Medical OncologyMayo ClinicRochester, MinnesotaSara Hurvitz, MD, FACPProfessor of MedicineDirector, Breast Oncology ProgramDivision of Hematology-OncologyDepartment of MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos Angeles, CaliforniaLink to the full program:bit.ly/3kaJKeC

Go online to PeerView.com/EKR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive cancer that has historically been associated with particularly poor patient outcomes. Fortunately, the recent validation of immunotherapies in advanced and early disease settings and the continued emergence of new targeted therapy approaches have brought hope to a patient population for whom only limited options existed for many decades. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent web broadcast and produced in partnership with the Tigerlily Foundation, provides the latest research updates and case-driven practical guidance on using novel treatment approaches that have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with TNBC or are showing great promise based on accumulating evidence. Recognizing and mitigating healthcare disparities in breast cancer clinical care and research related to TNBC and breast cancer more broadly is also discussed from the perspectives of both clinicians/researchers and patients/advocates. Upon completion of this accredited CE activity, participants should be better able to: Summarize the underlying disease biology, clinical characteristics, and current therapeutic options for TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted therapies, Cite the most recent safety, efficacy, and biomarker evidence from clinical trials investigating validated and emerging treatments in TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted treatment approaches, Incorporate immunotherapeutic and targeted agents into management plans for patients with TNBC considering the latest data, indications, guidance, disease stage/treatment setting, tumor features, and patient needs/preferences, and integrate optimized and individualized approaches to biomarker testing, treatment selection and sequencing, adverse event monitoring and management, and team-based care.

Go online to PeerView.com/EKR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive cancer that has historically been associated with particularly poor patient outcomes. Fortunately, the recent validation of immunotherapies in advanced and early disease settings and the continued emergence of new targeted therapy approaches have brought hope to a patient population for whom only limited options existed for many decades. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent web broadcast and produced in partnership with the Tigerlily Foundation, provides the latest research updates and case-driven practical guidance on using novel treatment approaches that have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with TNBC or are showing great promise based on accumulating evidence. Recognizing and mitigating healthcare disparities in breast cancer clinical care and research related to TNBC and breast cancer more broadly is also discussed from the perspectives of both clinicians/researchers and patients/advocates. Upon completion of this accredited CE activity, participants should be better able to: Summarize the underlying disease biology, clinical characteristics, and current therapeutic options for TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted therapies, Cite the most recent safety, efficacy, and biomarker evidence from clinical trials investigating validated and emerging treatments in TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted treatment approaches, Incorporate immunotherapeutic and targeted agents into management plans for patients with TNBC considering the latest data, indications, guidance, disease stage/treatment setting, tumor features, and patient needs/preferences, and integrate optimized and individualized approaches to biomarker testing, treatment selection and sequencing, adverse event monitoring and management, and team-based care.

Go online to PeerView.com/EKR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive cancer that has historically been associated with particularly poor patient outcomes. Fortunately, the recent validation of immunotherapies in advanced and early disease settings and the continued emergence of new targeted therapy approaches have brought hope to a patient population for whom only limited options existed for many decades. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent web broadcast and produced in partnership with the Tigerlily Foundation, provides the latest research updates and case-driven practical guidance on using novel treatment approaches that have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with TNBC or are showing great promise based on accumulating evidence. Recognizing and mitigating healthcare disparities in breast cancer clinical care and research related to TNBC and breast cancer more broadly is also discussed from the perspectives of both clinicians/researchers and patients/advocates. Upon completion of this accredited CE activity, participants should be better able to: Summarize the underlying disease biology, clinical characteristics, and current therapeutic options for TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted therapies, Cite the most recent safety, efficacy, and biomarker evidence from clinical trials investigating validated and emerging treatments in TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted treatment approaches, Incorporate immunotherapeutic and targeted agents into management plans for patients with TNBC considering the latest data, indications, guidance, disease stage/treatment setting, tumor features, and patient needs/preferences, and integrate optimized and individualized approaches to biomarker testing, treatment selection and sequencing, adverse event monitoring and management, and team-based care.

Go online to PeerView.com/EKR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive cancer that has historically been associated with particularly poor patient outcomes. Fortunately, the recent validation of immunotherapies in advanced and early disease settings and the continued emergence of new targeted therapy approaches have brought hope to a patient population for whom only limited options existed for many decades. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent web broadcast and produced in partnership with the Tigerlily Foundation, provides the latest research updates and case-driven practical guidance on using novel treatment approaches that have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with TNBC or are showing great promise based on accumulating evidence. Recognizing and mitigating healthcare disparities in breast cancer clinical care and research related to TNBC and breast cancer more broadly is also discussed from the perspectives of both clinicians/researchers and patients/advocates. Upon completion of this accredited CE activity, participants should be better able to: Summarize the underlying disease biology, clinical characteristics, and current therapeutic options for TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted therapies, Cite the most recent safety, efficacy, and biomarker evidence from clinical trials investigating validated and emerging treatments in TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted treatment approaches Incorporate immunotherapeutic and targeted agents into management plans for patients with TNBC considering the latest data, indications, guidance, disease stage/treatment setting, tumor features, and patient needs/preferences, and integrate optimized and individualized approaches to biomarker testing, treatment selection and sequencing, adverse event monitoring and management, and team-based care.

Go online to PeerView.com/EKR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive cancer that has historically been associated with particularly poor patient outcomes. Fortunately, the recent validation of immunotherapies in advanced and early disease settings and the continued emergence of new targeted therapy approaches have brought hope to a patient population for whom only limited options existed for many decades. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent web broadcast and produced in partnership with the Tigerlily Foundation, provides the latest research updates and case-driven practical guidance on using novel treatment approaches that have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with TNBC or are showing great promise based on accumulating evidence. Recognizing and mitigating healthcare disparities in breast cancer clinical care and research related to TNBC and breast cancer more broadly is also discussed from the perspectives of both clinicians/researchers and patients/advocates. Upon completion of this accredited CE activity, participants should be better able to: Summarize the underlying disease biology, clinical characteristics, and current therapeutic options for TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted therapies, Cite the most recent safety, efficacy, and biomarker evidence from clinical trials investigating validated and emerging treatments in TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted treatment approaches Incorporate immunotherapeutic and targeted agents into management plans for patients with TNBC considering the latest data, indications, guidance, disease stage/treatment setting, tumor features, and patient needs/preferences, and integrate optimized and individualized approaches to biomarker testing, treatment selection and sequencing, adverse event monitoring and management, and team-based care.

Go online to PeerView.com/EKR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive cancer that has historically been associated with particularly poor patient outcomes. Fortunately, the recent validation of immunotherapies in advanced and early disease settings and the continued emergence of new targeted therapy approaches have brought hope to a patient population for whom only limited options existed for many decades. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent web broadcast and produced in partnership with the Tigerlily Foundation, provides the latest research updates and case-driven practical guidance on using novel treatment approaches that have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with TNBC or are showing great promise based on accumulating evidence. Recognizing and mitigating healthcare disparities in breast cancer clinical care and research related to TNBC and breast cancer more broadly is also discussed from the perspectives of both clinicians/researchers and patients/advocates. Upon completion of this accredited CE activity, participants should be better able to: Summarize the underlying disease biology, clinical characteristics, and current therapeutic options for TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted therapies, Cite the most recent safety, efficacy, and biomarker evidence from clinical trials investigating validated and emerging treatments in TNBC, including immunotherapies and targeted treatment approaches Incorporate immunotherapeutic and targeted agents into management plans for patients with TNBC considering the latest data, indications, guidance, disease stage/treatment setting, tumor features, and patient needs/preferences, and integrate optimized and individualized approaches to biomarker testing, treatment selection and sequencing, adverse event monitoring and management, and team-based care.

Featuring perspectives from Drs Erika Hamilton, Ian Krop, and Joyce O'Shaughnessy, including the following topics: Introduction (0:00) Role of Immunotherapy in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) (1:34) Case: A woman in her mid-50s with ER-positive, HER2-positive mBC enrolled on a clinical trial of nivolumab/ipilimumab — Reshma Mahtani, DO (1:50) Management of HER2-Positive mBC (9:17) Case: A woman in her early 30s with ER-positive, HER2-positive mBC — Ann Partridge, MD, MPH (13:57) Case: A woman in her early 70s with HER2-positive mBC — Dr Mahtani (17:39) Case: A woman in her late 50s with ER-negative, HER2-positive mBC — Ruth O'Regan, MD (21:11) Case: A woman in her early 50s with ER-positive, HER2-positive mBC — Dr Partridge (27:20) Considerations in the Care of Patients with Localized HER2-Positive Breast Cancer (39:22) Case: A woman in her mid-40s with 5-cm ER-positive, HER2-positive localized breast cancer — Dr Mahtani (44:05) Case: A woman in her early 50s with 4.5-mm ER-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer — Dr O'Regan (49:24) CME information and select publications

Featuring slide presentations and related discussion from Drs Erika Hamilton, Ian Krop, and Joyce O'Shaughnessy, including the following topics: Optimizing the Management of HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer — Joyce O'Shaughnessy, MD (0:00) Treatment of HER2-Positive Brain Metastases — Erika Hamilton, MD (43:37) Considerations in the Care of Patients with Localized HER2-Positive Breast Cancer — Ian E Krop, MD, PhD (1:11:33) CME information and select publications

Featuring perspectives from Dr Joyce O'Shaughnessy on following topics: Introduction (0:00) Case Presentations from Alan B Astrow, MD on Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) A woman in her late 80s with triple-negative lobular carcinoma (1:54) A woman in her mid-60s with triple-negative, node-positive breast cancer (6:30) A woman in her early 30s with triple-negative, node-negative infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) (14:39) San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS®) Review — Immunotherapy for Advanced TNBC (20:25) Case Presentations from Dr Astrow and SABCS Review of Data on Immunotherapy Combinations and PARP Inhibition for TNBC A woman in her early 40s with metastatic TNBC (31:08) A woman in her early 60s with a germline BRCA1 mutation and locally advanced breast cancer (36:14) Case Presentations from Dr Astrow on Triple-Negative Small Cell Carcinoma of the Breast and Triple-Negative IDC; Sacituzumab Govitecan for Patients with TNBC A woman in her mid-40s with triple-negative small cell carcinoma of the breast (48:11) A woman in her late 30s with triple-negative IDC (51:44) CME information and select publications

A special audio program developed from the tenth in a series of 11 integrated webinars held in association with the 2020 ONS Annual Congress. Featuring perspectives from Dr Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Ms Gretchen Santos Fulgencio, Dr Kathleen Moore, Dr Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Dr Michael J Pishvaian and Ms Deborah Wright.

A special audio program developed from the tenth in a series of 11 integrated webinars held in association with the 2020 ONS Annual Congress. Featuring perspectives from Dr Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Ms Gretchen Santos Fulgencio, Dr Kathleen Moore, Dr Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Dr Michael J Pishvaian and Ms Deborah Wright.

Go online to PeerView.com/GVH860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The recent approval of newer JAK inhibitors and new evidence on emerging JAK-targeting strategies have raised additional questions over optimized treatment selection in myelofibrosis (MF) and awareness of clinical factors that can influence therapeutic selection. Additionally, newer dynamic risk-assessment models have allowed for more precise characterization of this disease at diagnosis and during the treatment course. In the wake of these advances, understanding how to effectively personalize therapeutic management based on the modern diagnostic and risk-assessment tools while ensuring safe usage of JAK inhibitors is crucial to maximizing beneficial patient outcomes in MF. In a recent live webcast, our panel of experts used the latest real-world evidence to confirm the core therapeutic role for JAK inhibitor–based strategies in MF, highlighting modern diagnostic and risk-assessment strategies that have informed an individualized treatment approach. During a unique practicum session, the panel offered practice strategies using real-world case scenarios, walking through selection of JAK inhibitor–based options across the MF disease continuum to improve patient outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize clinical and molecular/mutational features that can be used for diagnosis and risk stratification in myelofibrosis, Review the latest efficacy and safety evidence about approved and emerging JAK inhibitors as well as other targeted therapies in the management of myelofibrosis, Design safe, risk-adapted treatment regimens for patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic myelofibrosis, including those refractory to front-line JAK inhibitor therapy.

Go online to PeerView.com/GVH860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The recent approval of newer JAK inhibitors and new evidence on emerging JAK-targeting strategies have raised additional questions over optimized treatment selection in myelofibrosis (MF) and awareness of clinical factors that can influence therapeutic selection. Additionally, newer dynamic risk-assessment models have allowed for more precise characterization of this disease at diagnosis and during the treatment course. In the wake of these advances, understanding how to effectively personalize therapeutic management based on the modern diagnostic and risk-assessment tools while ensuring safe usage of JAK inhibitors is crucial to maximizing beneficial patient outcomes in MF. In a recent live webcast, our panel of experts used the latest real-world evidence to confirm the core therapeutic role for JAK inhibitor–based strategies in MF, highlighting modern diagnostic and risk-assessment strategies that have informed an individualized treatment approach. During a unique practicum session, the panel offered practice strategies using real-world case scenarios, walking through selection of JAK inhibitor–based options across the MF disease continuum to improve patient outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize clinical and molecular/mutational features that can be used for diagnosis and risk stratification in myelofibrosis, Review the latest efficacy and safety evidence about approved and emerging JAK inhibitors as well as other targeted therapies in the management of myelofibrosis, Design safe, risk-adapted treatment regimens for patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic myelofibrosis, including those refractory to front-line JAK inhibitor therapy.

Go online to PeerView.com/GVH860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The recent approval of newer JAK inhibitors and new evidence on emerging JAK-targeting strategies have raised additional questions over optimized treatment selection in myelofibrosis (MF) and awareness of clinical factors that can influence therapeutic selection. Additionally, newer dynamic risk-assessment models have allowed for more precise characterization of this disease at diagnosis and during the treatment course. In the wake of these advances, understanding how to effectively personalize therapeutic management based on the modern diagnostic and risk-assessment tools while ensuring safe usage of JAK inhibitors is crucial to maximizing beneficial patient outcomes in MF. In a recent live webcast, our panel of experts used the latest real-world evidence to confirm the core therapeutic role for JAK inhibitor–based strategies in MF, highlighting modern diagnostic and risk-assessment strategies that have informed an individualized treatment approach. During a unique practicum session, the panel offered practice strategies using real-world case scenarios, walking through selection of JAK inhibitor–based options across the MF disease continuum to improve patient outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize clinical and molecular/mutational features that can be used for diagnosis and risk stratification in myelofibrosis, Review the latest efficacy and safety evidence about approved and emerging JAK inhibitors as well as other targeted therapies in the management of myelofibrosis, Design safe, risk-adapted treatment regimens for patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic myelofibrosis, including those refractory to front-line JAK inhibitor therapy.

Go online to PeerView.com/GVH860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The recent approval of newer JAK inhibitors and new evidence on emerging JAK-targeting strategies have raised additional questions over optimized treatment selection in myelofibrosis (MF) and awareness of clinical factors that can influence therapeutic selection. Additionally, newer dynamic risk-assessment models have allowed for more precise characterization of this disease at diagnosis and during the treatment course. In the wake of these advances, understanding how to effectively personalize therapeutic management based on the modern diagnostic and risk-assessment tools while ensuring safe usage of JAK inhibitors is crucial to maximizing beneficial patient outcomes in MF. In a recent live webcast, our panel of experts used the latest real-world evidence to confirm the core therapeutic role for JAK inhibitor–based strategies in MF, highlighting modern diagnostic and risk-assessment strategies that have informed an individualized treatment approach. During a unique practicum session, the panel offered practice strategies using real-world case scenarios, walking through selection of JAK inhibitor–based options across the MF disease continuum to improve patient outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize clinical and molecular/mutational features that can be used for diagnosis and risk stratification in myelofibrosis, Review the latest efficacy and safety evidence about approved and emerging JAK inhibitors as well as other targeted therapies in the management of myelofibrosis, Design safe, risk-adapted treatment regimens for patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic myelofibrosis, including those refractory to front-line JAK inhibitor therapy.

Go online to PeerView.com/BKK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, breast cancer experts discuss the latest evidence on the use of CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in the management of patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. An essential overview of mechanisms of action of this therapeutic class, similarities/differences among the agents, and latest approvals/indications is provided, along with a summary and analysis of the current state of the science. Practicalities of clinical integration of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors are also explored, with a focus on navigating the current treatment landscape and making individualized clinical decisions. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the rationale for use, mechanism of action, and characteristics (including similarities/differences) of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, Analyze the latest efficacy (including OS), safety, and other key data from clinical trials assessing CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, and relevant implications for clinical practice, Discuss the relevant patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors as well as promising prognostic/predictive biomarkers that could be used to guide selection of patients who would benefit from CDK4 and 6 inhibitors, Incorporate CDK4 and 6 inhibitors alone or in combination into treatment plans for appropriate patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer according to relevant evidence, clinical guidelines, predictive factors, and patient needs and preferences, Manage treatment-related toxicities in patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment with CDK4 and 6 inhibitors to maintain optimal adherence and promote favorable outcomes.

Go online to PeerView.com/BKK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, breast cancer experts discuss the latest evidence on the use of CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in the management of patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. An essential overview of mechanisms of action of this therapeutic class, similarities/differences among the agents, and latest approvals/indications is provided, along with a summary and analysis of the current state of the science. Practicalities of clinical integration of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors are also explored, with a focus on navigating the current treatment landscape and making individualized clinical decisions. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the rationale for use, mechanism of action, and characteristics (including similarities/differences) of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, Analyze the latest efficacy (including OS), safety, and other key data from clinical trials assessing CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, and relevant implications for clinical practice, Discuss the relevant patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors as well as promising prognostic/predictive biomarkers that could be used to guide selection of patients who would benefit from CDK4 and 6 inhibitors, Incorporate CDK4 and 6 inhibitors alone or in combination into treatment plans for appropriate patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer according to relevant evidence, clinical guidelines, predictive factors, and patient needs and preferences, Manage treatment-related toxicities in patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment with CDK4 and 6 inhibitors to maintain optimal adherence and promote favorable outcomes.

Go online to PeerView.com/BKK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, breast cancer experts discuss the latest evidence on the use of CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in the management of patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. An essential overview of mechanisms of action of this therapeutic class, similarities/differences among the agents, and latest approvals/indications is provided, along with a summary and analysis of the current state of the science. Practicalities of clinical integration of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors are also explored, with a focus on navigating the current treatment landscape and making individualized clinical decisions. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the rationale for use, mechanism of action, and characteristics (including similarities/differences) of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, Analyze the latest efficacy (including OS), safety, and other key data from clinical trials assessing CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, and relevant implications for clinical practice, Discuss the relevant patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors as well as promising prognostic/predictive biomarkers that could be used to guide selection of patients who would benefit from CDK4 and 6 inhibitors, Incorporate CDK4 and 6 inhibitors alone or in combination into treatment plans for appropriate patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer according to relevant evidence, clinical guidelines, predictive factors, and patient needs and preferences, Manage treatment-related toxicities in patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment with CDK4 and 6 inhibitors to maintain optimal adherence and promote favorable outcomes.

Go online to PeerView.com/BKK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, breast cancer experts discuss the latest evidence on the use of CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in the management of patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. An essential overview of mechanisms of action of this therapeutic class, similarities/differences among the agents, and latest approvals/indications is provided, along with a summary and analysis of the current state of the science. Practicalities of clinical integration of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors are also explored, with a focus on navigating the current treatment landscape and making individualized clinical decisions. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the rationale for use, mechanism of action, and characteristics (including similarities/differences) of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, Analyze the latest efficacy (including OS), safety, and other key data from clinical trials assessing CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, and relevant implications for clinical practice, Discuss the relevant patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors as well as promising prognostic/predictive biomarkers that could be used to guide selection of patients who would benefit from CDK4 and 6 inhibitors, Incorporate CDK4 and 6 inhibitors alone or in combination into treatment plans for appropriate patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer according to relevant evidence, clinical guidelines, predictive factors, and patient needs and preferences, Manage treatment-related toxicities in patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment with CDK4 and 6 inhibitors to maintain optimal adherence and promote favorable outcomes.

Go online to PeerView.com/BKK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, breast cancer experts discuss the latest evidence on the use of CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in the management of patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. An essential overview of mechanisms of action of this therapeutic class, similarities/differences among the agents, and latest approvals/indications is provided, along with a summary and analysis of the current state of the science. Practicalities of clinical integration of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors are also explored, with a focus on navigating the current treatment landscape and making individualized clinical decisions. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the rationale for use, mechanism of action, and characteristics (including similarities/differences) of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, Analyze the latest efficacy (including OS), safety, and other key data from clinical trials assessing CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, and relevant implications for clinical practice, Discuss the relevant patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors as well as promising prognostic/predictive biomarkers that could be used to guide selection of patients who would benefit from CDK4 and 6 inhibitors, Incorporate CDK4 and 6 inhibitors alone or in combination into treatment plans for appropriate patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer according to relevant evidence, clinical guidelines, predictive factors, and patient needs and preferences, Manage treatment-related toxicities in patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment with CDK4 and 6 inhibitors to maintain optimal adherence and promote favorable outcomes.

Go online to PeerView.com/BKK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, breast cancer experts discuss the latest evidence on the use of CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in the management of patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. An essential overview of mechanisms of action of this therapeutic class, similarities/differences among the agents, and latest approvals/indications is provided, along with a summary and analysis of the current state of the science. Practicalities of clinical integration of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors are also explored, with a focus on navigating the current treatment landscape and making individualized clinical decisions. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the rationale for use, mechanism of action, and characteristics (including similarities/differences) of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, Analyze the latest efficacy (including OS), safety, and other key data from clinical trials assessing CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, and relevant implications for clinical practice, Discuss the relevant patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors as well as promising prognostic/predictive biomarkers that could be used to guide selection of patients who would benefit from CDK4 and 6 inhibitors, Incorporate CDK4 and 6 inhibitors alone or in combination into treatment plans for appropriate patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer according to relevant evidence, clinical guidelines, predictive factors, and patient needs and preferences, Manage treatment-related toxicities in patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment with CDK4 and 6 inhibitors to maintain optimal adherence and promote favorable outcomes.

Go online to PeerView.com/BKK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, breast cancer experts discuss the latest evidence on the use of CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in the management of patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. An essential overview of mechanisms of action of this therapeutic class, similarities/differences among the agents, and latest approvals/indications is provided, along with a summary and analysis of the current state of the science. Practicalities of clinical integration of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors are also explored, with a focus on navigating the current treatment landscape and making individualized clinical decisions. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the rationale for use, mechanism of action, and characteristics (including similarities/differences) of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, Analyze the latest efficacy (including OS), safety, and other key data from clinical trials assessing CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, and relevant implications for clinical practice, Discuss the relevant patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors as well as promising prognostic/predictive biomarkers that could be used to guide selection of patients who would benefit from CDK4 and 6 inhibitors, Incorporate CDK4 and 6 inhibitors alone or in combination into treatment plans for appropriate patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer according to relevant evidence, clinical guidelines, predictive factors, and patient needs and preferences, Manage treatment-related toxicities in patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment with CDK4 and 6 inhibitors to maintain optimal adherence and promote favorable outcomes.

Go online to PeerView.com/BKK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, breast cancer experts discuss the latest evidence on the use of CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in the management of patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. An essential overview of mechanisms of action of this therapeutic class, similarities/differences among the agents, and latest approvals/indications is provided, along with a summary and analysis of the current state of the science. Practicalities of clinical integration of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors are also explored, with a focus on navigating the current treatment landscape and making individualized clinical decisions. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the rationale for use, mechanism of action, and characteristics (including similarities/differences) of the CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, Analyze the latest efficacy (including OS), safety, and other key data from clinical trials assessing CDK4 and 6 inhibitors in breast cancer, and relevant implications for clinical practice, Discuss the relevant patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors as well as promising prognostic/predictive biomarkers that could be used to guide selection of patients who would benefit from CDK4 and 6 inhibitors, Incorporate CDK4 and 6 inhibitors alone or in combination into treatment plans for appropriate patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer according to relevant evidence, clinical guidelines, predictive factors, and patient needs and preferences, Manage treatment-related toxicities in patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment with CDK4 and 6 inhibitors to maintain optimal adherence and promote favorable outcomes.

Proceedings from a satellite symposium during the 41st annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Featuring perspectives from Dr Harold J Burstein, Dr William J Gradishar, Dr Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Dr Hope S Rugo, Prof Peter Schmid and Dr Debu Tripathy. | For more information, visit: http://www.researchtopractice.com/SanAntonioBC18

Interviews with Drs Joyce O'Shaughnessy and Erica L Mayer on the treatment of breast cancer. | For more information, visit: http://www.researchtopractice.com/BCU318/Video

Go online to PeerView.com/HYM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Orally bioavailable CDK4 and 6 inhibitors have become established standard-of-care options in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, and these agents are now expected to have a major impact in early breast cancer (EBC). CDK4 and 6 inhibition has recently shown significant benefit as adjuvant therapy in patients at high risk of early recurrence, but other studies in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings are under way as well. How should these advances be transitioned to the clinic based on the accumulating supportive evidence? How can surgeons and oncologists work together to ensure proper risk assessment and treatment planning to improve outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC? This PeerView Virtual Workshop provides pertinent updates on the most recent research and available evidence on CDK4 and 6 inhibition in HR+/HER2- EBC, as well as practical, case-based guidance on the application of these agents using individualized treatment plans and effective multidisciplinary collaboration. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Discuss the presentation, evaluation, diagnosis, staging, and stratification of early breast cancer (EBC) as well as emerging prognostic and predictive markers and factors that influence the risk of recurrence, Integrate the latest safety, efficacy, predictive/prognostic, and other clinically important data from studies investigating CDK4 & 6 inhibitor therapy and combinations in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including those with high-risk disease, Incorporate up-to-date guidance, multigene assays, risk assessment algorithms, and evidence-based treatment options into personalized management plans that leverage shared decision-making and multidisciplinary and interprofessional team based approaches to optimize care for patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including patients with high-risk disease.

Go online to PeerView.com/HYM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Orally bioavailable CDK4 and 6 inhibitors have become established standard-of-care options in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, and these agents are now expected to have a major impact in early breast cancer (EBC). CDK4 and 6 inhibition has recently shown significant benefit as adjuvant therapy in patients at high risk of early recurrence, but other studies in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings are under way as well. How should these advances be transitioned to the clinic based on the accumulating supportive evidence? How can surgeons and oncologists work together to ensure proper risk assessment and treatment planning to improve outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC? This PeerView Virtual Workshop provides pertinent updates on the most recent research and available evidence on CDK4 and 6 inhibition in HR+/HER2- EBC, as well as practical, case-based guidance on the application of these agents using individualized treatment plans and effective multidisciplinary collaboration. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Discuss the presentation, evaluation, diagnosis, staging, and stratification of early breast cancer (EBC) as well as emerging prognostic and predictive markers and factors that influence the risk of recurrence, Integrate the latest safety, efficacy, predictive/prognostic, and other clinically important data from studies investigating CDK4 & 6 inhibitor therapy and combinations in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including those with high-risk disease, Incorporate up-to-date guidance, multigene assays, risk assessment algorithms, and evidence-based treatment options into personalized management plans that leverage shared decision-making and multidisciplinary and interprofessional team based approaches to optimize care for patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including patients with high-risk disease.

Go online to PeerView.com/HYM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Orally bioavailable CDK4 and 6 inhibitors have become established standard-of-care options in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, and these agents are now expected to have a major impact in early breast cancer (EBC). CDK4 and 6 inhibition has recently shown significant benefit as adjuvant therapy in patients at high risk of early recurrence, but other studies in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings are under way as well. How should these advances be transitioned to the clinic based on the accumulating supportive evidence? How can surgeons and oncologists work together to ensure proper risk assessment and treatment planning to improve outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC? This PeerView Virtual Workshop provides pertinent updates on the most recent research and available evidence on CDK4 and 6 inhibition in HR+/HER2- EBC, as well as practical, case-based guidance on the application of these agents using individualized treatment plans and effective multidisciplinary collaboration. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Discuss the presentation, evaluation, diagnosis, staging, and stratification of early breast cancer (EBC) as well as emerging prognostic and predictive markers and factors that influence the risk of recurrence, Integrate the latest safety, efficacy, predictive/prognostic, and other clinically important data from studies investigating CDK4 & 6 inhibitor therapy and combinations in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including those with high-risk disease, Incorporate up-to-date guidance, multigene assays, risk assessment algorithms, and evidence-based treatment options into personalized management plans that leverage shared decision-making and multidisciplinary and interprofessional team based approaches to optimize care for patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including patients with high-risk disease.

Go online to PeerView.com/HYM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Orally bioavailable CDK4 and 6 inhibitors have become established standard-of-care options in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, and these agents are now expected to have a major impact in early breast cancer (EBC). CDK4 and 6 inhibition has recently shown significant benefit as adjuvant therapy in patients at high risk of early recurrence, but other studies in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings are under way as well. How should these advances be transitioned to the clinic based on the accumulating supportive evidence? How can surgeons and oncologists work together to ensure proper risk assessment and treatment planning to improve outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC? This PeerView Virtual Workshop provides pertinent updates on the most recent research and available evidence on CDK4 and 6 inhibition in HR+/HER2- EBC, as well as practical, case-based guidance on the application of these agents using individualized treatment plans and effective multidisciplinary collaboration. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Discuss the presentation, evaluation, diagnosis, staging, and stratification of early breast cancer (EBC) as well as emerging prognostic and predictive markers and factors that influence the risk of recurrence, Integrate the latest safety, efficacy, predictive/prognostic, and other clinically important data from studies investigating CDK4 & 6 inhibitor therapy and combinations in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including those with high-risk disease, Incorporate up-to-date guidance, multigene assays, risk assessment algorithms, and evidence-based treatment options into personalized management plans that leverage shared decision-making and multidisciplinary and interprofessional team based approaches to optimize care for patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including patients with high-risk disease.

Go online to PeerView.com/HYM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Orally bioavailable CDK4 and 6 inhibitors have become established standard-of-care options in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, and these agents are now expected to have a major impact in early breast cancer (EBC). CDK4 and 6 inhibition has recently shown significant benefit as adjuvant therapy in patients at high risk of early recurrence, but other studies in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings are under way as well. How should these advances be transitioned to the clinic based on the accumulating supportive evidence? How can surgeons and oncologists work together to ensure proper risk assessment and treatment planning to improve outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC? This PeerView Virtual Workshop provides pertinent updates on the most recent research and available evidence on CDK4 and 6 inhibition in HR+/HER2- EBC, as well as practical, case-based guidance on the application of these agents using individualized treatment plans and effective multidisciplinary collaboration. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Discuss the presentation, evaluation, diagnosis, staging, and stratification of early breast cancer (EBC) as well as emerging prognostic and predictive markers and factors that influence the risk of recurrence, Integrate the latest safety, efficacy, predictive/prognostic, and other clinically important data from studies investigating CDK4 & 6 inhibitor therapy and combinations in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including those with high-risk disease, Incorporate up-to-date guidance, multigene assays, risk assessment algorithms, and evidence-based treatment options into personalized management plans that leverage shared decision-making and multidisciplinary and interprofessional team based approaches to optimize care for patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including patients with high-risk disease.

Go online to PeerView.com/HYM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Orally bioavailable CDK4 and 6 inhibitors have become established standard-of-care options in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, and these agents are now expected to have a major impact in early breast cancer (EBC). CDK4 and 6 inhibition has recently shown significant benefit as adjuvant therapy in patients at high risk of early recurrence, but other studies in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings are under way as well. How should these advances be transitioned to the clinic based on the accumulating supportive evidence? How can surgeons and oncologists work together to ensure proper risk assessment and treatment planning to improve outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC? This PeerView Virtual Workshop provides pertinent updates on the most recent research and available evidence on CDK4 and 6 inhibition in HR+/HER2- EBC, as well as practical, case-based guidance on the application of these agents using individualized treatment plans and effective multidisciplinary collaboration. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Discuss the presentation, evaluation, diagnosis, staging, and stratification of early breast cancer (EBC) as well as emerging prognostic and predictive markers and factors that influence the risk of recurrence, Integrate the latest safety, efficacy, predictive/prognostic, and other clinically important data from studies investigating CDK4 & 6 inhibitor therapy and combinations in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including those with high-risk disease, Incorporate up-to-date guidance, multigene assays, risk assessment algorithms, and evidence-based treatment options into personalized management plans that leverage shared decision-making and multidisciplinary and interprofessional team based approaches to optimize care for patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, including patients with high-risk disease.