Podcasts about ild

In this episode of the Oncology Brothers podcast, we are joined by Dr. Komal Jhaveri, a breast medical oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering, to discuss the evolving landscape of metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer, particularly focusing on low and ultra-low HER2 expression. Key topics include: • The significance of the DESTINY Breast-04 and DESTINY Breast-06 studies and their impact on treatment options. • The definition and implications of low and ultra-low HER2 expression in clinical practice. • The importance of HER2 testing and the dynamic nature of HER2 expression in tumors. • Treatment sequencing strategies, including the use of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) like trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXd) and sasituzumab govitecan. • Management of treatment-related toxicities, including ILD, nausea, and alopecia. Join us for an insightful discussion that aims to keep healthcare professionals updated on the latest advancements in cancer care. Follow us on social media: •⁠  ⁠X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers •⁠  ⁠Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oncbrothers •⁠  Website: https://oncbrothers.com/ Don't forget to subscribe for more episodes and insights!

Welcome back to the Oncology Brothers podcast! In this episode, we continue the CME series on HER2-positive GEJ and gastric cancer, shifting focus to the essential topic of treatment toxicity management. We're joined by two leading experts: Dr. Geoffrey Ku from Memorial Sloan Kettering and Dr. Shruti Patel from Stanford University. Building on their previous discussion of upper GI treatment algorithm with Dr. Rutika Mehta, this episode delves into the practical realities of managing patients on complex regimens. Drs. Ku & Patel break down the side effect profiles across the treatment continuum—from frontline trastuzumab-based combinations to emerging therapies like zanidatamab—and provide actionable strategies for community oncologists. Episode Highlights: • Practical management of frontline side effects with FOLFOX/XELOX chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and pembrolizumab • Reality check on trastuzumab cardiotoxicity: incidence rates and monitoring protocols in gastric vs. breast cancer • Immune-related adverse events with checkpoint inhibitors: what's common vs. rare in GI cancers • Critical insights on zanidatamab's synergistic diarrhea toxicity and mandatory prophylaxis strategies • TDXd (Enhertu) in second-line: moving beyond ILD fears to address frequent cytopenias and marrow management • Expert consensus on infusion reaction management for novel biologics • The importance of managing baseline symptoms in patients with dysphagia and nausea This episode bridges the gap between trial data and clinical practice, offering real-world wisdom on keeping patients on effective therapies through proactive toxicity management. Follow us on social media: •⁠  ⁠X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers •⁠  ⁠Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oncbrothers •⁠  Website: https://oncbrothers.com/ Don't forget to subscribe for our complete CME series covering treatment algorithms, FDA approvals, and practical management strategies! Accreditation/Credit Designation Physicians' Education Resource®, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Physicians' Education Resource®, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Acknowledgment of Commercial Support This activity is supported by an educational grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Link to gain CME credits from this activity: https://www.gotoper.com/courses/navigating-the-adverse-event-landscape-in-her2-gea-therapy

There was some learning to be done this year, there was some traveling to be done this year -- and there was some celebrating to do this year as well! Jen Wescoe of the Wescoe Foundation for Pulmonary Fibrosis joins Crockett to discuss all the wonderful events of 2025, and some of the exciting and revolutionary things she learned about on the road of battling IPF and ILD! It's the 'Pulmonary Fibrosis' podcast! Brought to you by the Wescoe Foundation for Pulmonary Fibrosis -- visit Wescoe.org for more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the Oncology Brothers podcast, we dived deep into the world of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We welcomed Dr. Jacob Sands from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute to discuss the latest ADCs approved for NSCLC, including Trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXd), Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd), and Telisotuzumab Vedotin (Teliso-V). We explored the side effect profiles of these therapies, focusing on critical toxicities such as interstitial lung disease (ILD), mucositis, and peripheral neuropathy. Dr. Sands shared valuable clinical pearls on managing these adverse events, emphasized the importance of proactive monitoring and patient education. Key topics covered in this episode: • Overview of ADCs and their role in NSCLC treatment • TDXd: alopecia, ILD, fatigue, nausea/vomiting • Dato-DXd:  cytopenias, mucositis, dry eyes • Teliso-V: peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, peripheral edema • The evolving landscape of ADCs and future directions in lung cancer treatment Whether you're a healthcare professional or someone interested in oncology, this episode provides essential insights into the management of side effects associated with these innovative therapies. Tune in for practical advice and expert opinions that can enhance patient care in the community setting. Follow us on social media: •⁠  ⁠X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers •⁠  ⁠Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oncbrothers •⁠  Website: https://oncbrothers.com/ Don't forget to like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell for more episodes on practice-changing discussions in oncology! #ADC #NSCLC #TDXd #DatoDXD #TelisoV #ToxicityManagement #OncologyBrothers

Drs. Jack Cush and Artie Kavanaugh preview the upcoming RNL 2026 meeting in Dallas, TX on February 7 & 8, 2026. Register at RheumNow.Live Below is the program: Saturday, February 7, 2026, 7:50 - 8:00 am Welcome & Introductions Drs. Cush and Kavanaugh 8:00 - 10:00 am POD I - Rheumatoid Arthritis: Achieving Better Outcomes 8:00 – 8:30 am Mortality in RA: A Story of Decline, Delay, or Plateau? Elena Myasoedova, MD 8:30 – 9:00 am The Mucosal Hypothesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis Kristen Demoruelle, MD 9:00 – 9:30 am ILD in RA – Recent Advances Jeffrey Sparks, MD 9:30 – 10:00 am Rheumatoid arthritis Faculty Q&A 10:00 - 10:15 am STEP 1: Placebos in Rheumatology Andreas Kerschbaumer, MD 10:15 -10:30 am STEP 2: Disease Modification in Osteoarthritis Tuhina Neogi, MD PhD 10:30 – 11:05 Break 11:05 - 12:10 pm POD II – Advancing Practice 11:05 – 11:30 am Obesity & Inflammation: Weight Management in Rheumatology Uzma Haque, MD 11:30 - 11:55 am Mitigating risk in Rheum Pts undergoing surgery Susan Goodman, MD 11:55 -12:10 pm Practice Panel Faculty Q&A 12:10 – 1:00pm Lunch 1:00 – 3:00 pm POD III – Decisions in Psoriatic Arthritis 1:00 - 1:30 pm Paradoxical Psoriasis and Strange Reactions Joseph Merola, MD 1:30 - 2:00 pm Why Do Plain X rays in Psoriatic Arthritis Arthur Kavanaugh, MD 2:00 - 2:30 pm IL-23 vs IL-17 inhibitors in PsA Andre Ribero, MD 2:30 - 3:00 pm Past, Present & Future of Gout Robert Terkeltaub, MD 3:00 - 3:30 pm Psoriatic Faculty Q&A 3:30 - 4:05 pm Break 4:05 - 4:20 pm STEP 3: Helicobacter Pylori update Byron Cryer, MD 4:20 - 4:35 pm STEP 4: History of Gout Robert Terkeltaub, MD 4:35 – 5:15 pm Keynote Address: 50 Years of Osteoporosis Michael McClung, MD 5:30 – 7:00 pm Reception Sunday, February 8, 2026 Day TOPIC Speaker 7:50-8:00 am Welcome & Introductions Drs. Cush and Kavanaugh 8:00 - 10:00 am POD IV – Staying Ahead of Spondyloarthritis 8:00 – 8:30 am Diagnosing Axial Spondyloarthritis in 2026 Denis Poddubnyy, MD 8:30 – 9:00 am Spondyloarthritis Complications Jessica Walsh, MD 9:00 – 9:30 am 2026 Advances in Spondyloarthritis Catherine Bakewell, MD 9:30 – 10:00 am Spondyloarthritis Faculty Q&A 10:00 – 10:15 am STEP 5: Asymptomatic Elevation of CK Rojit Agarwal, MD MS 10:15 – 10:30 am STEP 6: Update on Myositis Antibodies Rojit Agarwal, MD MS 10:30 – 11:05 am Break 11:05 – 12:10 am POD V – Highlights in Autoimmune Disease 11:05 - 11:35 am SMILE Study – Hydroxychloroquine in ANA+ Arthralgia Nancy Olsen, MD 11:35 – 12:05 am Sjogren's Treatment Landscape in 2026 Matthew Baker, MD 12:05 - 12:20 pm Autoimmune Faculty Q&A 12:20 – 1:25 pm POD VI - Large & Small Vessel Vasculitis 12:20 – 12:45 pm Embracing Relapses in PMR and GCA Michael Putman, MD 12:45 - 1:10 pm Small vessel vasculitis Clay Cockerell, MD 1:10 - 1:25 pm Vasculitis Faculty Q&A 1:30 pm Adjourn

Jennifer Keeley and Mary Whittenhall, experienced nurse practitioners in the field of pulmonary hypertension, discuss the management of cough in patients receiving inhaled therapies for pulmonary hypertension and interstitial lung disease. #GossamerBioPartner #sponsored This Special Edition episode is sponsored by Gossamer Bio. Jennifer Keeley, DPN: My name's Jennifer Keeley. I'm a nurse practitioner and I practice in a large academic institution in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Allegheny Health Network, specifically Allegheny General Hospital. I am a nurse practitioner there and have been in the clinic over 10 years, and in the PH space as a nurse practitioner for over 15 years, as a registered nurse for almost 20 years. So, I have a lot of experience and I'm really excited to be here today to talk about inhaled therapies and cough. Mary Whittenhall, MSN: My name is Mary Whittenhall. I'm also a nurse practitioner. I am currently an advanced practice provider at Pulmonary and Sleep Associates in East Providence, Rhode Island. I've been in pulmonary hypertension for about 11 years now. In that time, I have worked in a variety of settings, both inpatient and outpatient, managing patients with pulmonary vascular disease, and have also touched upon patients with interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension.  I get very excited when I hear about new opportunities for our PH patients. I think a lot about even when I started in pulmonary hypertension and the therapies that were available to our patients. Many of these therapies had been around for a little bit of time. But also something that I think is extremely exciting is that there's just been a rapid progression in development of therapies. And now, with the focus of looking at these therapies as potentially disease modifying, not necessarily slowing the progression of disease. With the advent of all of these new therapies, there become more options for our patients, as well. Often, patients can't tolerate some of the medications that we have due to side effects and despite lots of work to manage these side effects, the patients are not always successful. One of the great things being involved in an academic center is that we have the ability to help link patients to cutting edge research, particularly looking at a new drug that is an inhaled therapy that has shown significant promise in improving the lives of patients with pulmonary hypertension. As a part of the PH community, we all do quite a bit of networking with each other, as well as with our patients and other colleagues in the space. In that time, we did network regarding the study and have participated in some activities where we're looking at the data from the Phase 2 part of this trial and then also looking at some of the side effect management related to the medication, which seemingly is well tolerated. However, for some patients it may not come extremely easy. I think that's where the role of the nurse or the advanced practice provider really comes in this space is that we have a real strong dedication to helping educate patients about ways to manage these side effects. We want patients to be able to continue with therapies. We don't want them to say, "Well, this isn't working for me, it's time to move on." I think that we have a lot of strategies and a lot of experience with trying to help patients really figure out the best way to manage these things and to be confident that they can continue on with obviously the biggest benefit of improving their pulmonary vascular disease. Jennifer Keeley, DPN: We actually met at an advisory board last year. It was an advisory board consistent of registered nurses and nurse practitioners who, just like Mary and myself, have vast experience with patients and therapies, not just in the inhaled space, but more conventional pulmonary vasodilator medications that have been used in our patients for many, many years. As Mary had suggested before, when we start to think about newer agents, many, many of them are not the conventional pulmonary vasodilator medications, but disease modifying agents. Now, we've acquired an armamentarium of medications. So, inhaled delivery is just a really great option to avoid systemic side effects on top of each other. Our PH patients today, many of them are on more than three therapies, many of them are on four or even more therapies, so the delivery of the medication is just one aspect. When we talk about cough and side effects, I like to think about it and explain to my patient when we talk about side effects, particularly cough, to imagine a Venn diagram with cough being in the middle and what affects cough. You see this outward circle, how we deliver it, what kind of device we deliver it in. The drug, how small, large are the particle size? Is it easy enough to use for our patients? The formulation, is it dry powdered versus inhaled aerosolized? And then finally, just the patient themselves. What's their background? What type of PAH do they have? So, we can talk a little bit more about this, but just to get us started, this is how this developed and we had a lovely advisory board meeting with seralutinib and Gossamer Bio, and this was the outcome of it. We produced a lovely poster. This is a conversation if you will, that Mary and I are going to have based on what we talked about and the poster production, that came out of that wonderful advisory board. Mary Whittenhall, MSN: Inhaled therapies are unique in a way in that they actually have direct access to the lungs. So, when you think of an oral medication, an oral medication needs to be digested in the gut and sometimes that systemic digestion takes a while. Additionally, it's also often that we see patients that have more systemic side effects when we're using an oral formulation. Intravenous or subcutaneous formulations of these medications tend to cause pretty strong systemic side effects for patients, and there tends to be a lot of management that we need to do to help make these side effects more tolerable. For most of our patients, I say to them, "You're going to think I'm cruel because I don't really want these side effects to go away." In a way, we look at them almost as if you have a cup and your cup is full of water and after the top of the water hits the rim of the cup, then the water starts to spill over onto the sides of the cup. I think of other medications that we typically prescribe for patients in that way that when we get that spill over, so to speak, it's an indication that we've actually targeted all of those receptors that we want to help with vasodilation. Now that we're looking at other medications that don't really necessarily look at vasodilation, we're looking more at treating the blood vessels in a different way or affecting the process for which those blood vessels become diseased. I think that the side effects become different and I think they become less. In working with inhaled therapies, as you can imagine, the number one side effect that most patients will complain of is cough. Sometimes we have patients who have an underlying cough already, and that's usually not related to PAH, but in PH-ILD where we now have an FDA indication to use another inhaled therapy, we've seen in treating these patients that baseline cough is something that is extremely problematic for them before they even start therapies. So, trying to find ways to improve that baseline cough, treat any underlying symptoms, things like acid reflux as well, that may cause that, treating seasonal allergies, et cetera, and then, obviously, managing any additional overlapping side effects that may occur because of the new therapy that they're on. Jennifer Keeley, DPN: I think that's a really important part, is to talk with the patient, educate the patient on these inhaled therapies. First and foremost, that cough is almost an expected side effect. These are patients particularly with our interstitial lung disease patients that have PAH, cough is a part of their daily life. It's important to document and ascertain what these patients' baseline cough is. In many, many clinics, particularly pulmonary PAH clinics, and I'm sure much like Mary's, many of my colleagues have recommended using validated cough questionnaires so that we can get a really, really good baseline of what that patient's baseline cough is. Are you coughing at night? Do you have mucus? How long have you been coughing? Does it interfere with the quality of your life? Do you cough at night? Does it keep you up? Does it interrupt your sleep? Those kinds of things that help differentiate acute cough versus chronic cough. Many of these patients cough every day. They also have other inhaled therapies such as our ILD patients that are also on corticosteroids, many of them on inhaled corticosteroid therapy that can thin the oral pharynx, the posterior pharynx, and really affect the degree of nerve innervation in the posterior pharynx in the mouth. So, just really understanding what the patient's baseline cough is and educating them on the fact that cough is likely going to be a side effect with the use of this inhaled therapy. Certainly, as we continue to use the therapy, we would hope that the cough can be mitigated either through some lifestyle modifications, some natural remedies, and even some medical remedies such as bronchodilators. But really teaching the patient about the medication and inherently that this is likely going to induce a cough, but that we have mitigation strategies to help dissipate the cough. I always like to tell my patients also in the clinical trials, particularly the Phase 2 clinical trials that are out there that patients had a lot of cough. The patients on drug that were in most of the Phase 2 clinical trials for seralutinib and even for treprostinil inhaled, 30 to 40% of them experienced cough. But at the same token, the placebo-based patients that did not receive drug in these Phase 2 clinical trials also had a lot of cough. So, what that's telling you is yes, you're going to get probably some more cough, but it's likely not going to be that much or more far advanced than the cough that you're already experiencing. I also think it's important to tell these patients, many, many patients that experienced cough did not stop the medication. Actually, in these Phase 2 clinical trials, very few stop the medication. So, that gives you a really good big picture that we are pretty good at educating our patients how to mitigate cough, and if we aren't, then we should learn how to do so. Mary Whittenhall, MSN: I think it's important for us to set some expectations for patients when we're talking about cough. We've already discussed a bit that cough can happen for people from other things outside of their lung disease, but it's important to also look at what may be causing the cough when we are giving a patient an inhaled therapy. So, any type of inhaled therapy, whether that be a dry powder, a mist, whether that's nebulized or through in actuated inhaler, there are particles inside of that medication as it's going in and those little particles, when your lungs inhale that medication, those particles are penetrating your lungs and your lungs are not accustomed to them being there. It's almost as if your lungs are saying, "I don't recognize this. I don't know why this is here," and it may feel like it's an irritant, so you may start coughing as a result of that, but the cough is not necessarily a bad thing. Those particles are there, and the job is to essentially help deliver the medicine to penetrate that lung tissue and then for your body then to absorb the medicine. Your airways and your blood vessels inside of your lungs are extremely close to each other. So, when you inhale that medication, those little blood vessels are also right next to where those airways are, and then that is how those blood vessels then absorb that medication, because they're so close to the site at which those particles come into your lungs. Jennifer Keeley, DPN: I think this is an important concept to understand. They choose the form of delivery based on the goal of delivering the most medication efficiently to the distal bronchioles. That's where the disease is. It's in the distal arteries. So, trying to formulate how we get these very powerful, oftentimes disease modifying agents into the periphery of the lungs can be very challenging. Dry powdered inhaler is one form that the variability of delivery is not as dispersed as an aerosolized. So, it's more efficient delivery to the place where the medication needs to work the best, and that's in the distal periphery of the lungs. Unfortunately, one thing you have to deal with is that oftentimes these medications, dry powdered medications, not just in the PH space, but there's a lot of other dry powdered inhalers in the COPD space, as well. Oftentimes, what happens is these powdered particles get dispersed extra thoracically. So, they get dispersed in the oral mucosa, in the posterior pharynx, on the way down into the stomach. That's wherein we have to deal with mitigating side effects. The biggest side effect of these particles, even though they're very small, is cough. So, technique comes into play. Mitigating things to coat the posterior pharynx come into play. Re-education comes into play. Show me again how you're doing this inhalation, because I don't think that you're holding this okay. In one instance, I had a patient that was inhaling dry powdered inhaler with the medication right out of the refrigerator. So, the medication was cold. It was clumping at the back of her throat. All of these things really take into consideration how we most efficiently get the medicine to these pulmonary arterial hypertension patients where their disease is oftentimes very difficult to get to, and other forms of medications that are systemic, orals, parenterals that have first pass metabolism, and so you're going to get more side effects from those medications. So, I always teach my patients, "Hey, we're a couple steps ahead because we're bypassing the type of metabolism that you get with orals and even parenterals." Mary Whittenhall, MSN: There are so many challenges that these patients face. Oftentimes, patients have never been sick before they develop this, and now we're putting them on multiple therapies, multiple modalities, telling them that there's going to be side effects and they need to learn how to manage them. It's certainly a lot to handle. But I think one of the best things that we have in our PH community is that we really work so hard to partner with the patients and their loved ones and forming this relationship, fostering that relationship as time goes on, I believe that these patients really do trust us and that what we're telling them is things are going to be okay. We are going to be there by your side. We're not going to give you this medicine and then say, "See you in six months. Hope everything goes well." We're really going to be working with them. In some cases in my specialty clinic, we have nurses, we have a pharmacist, a pharmacy tech, and then our advanced practice providers that check in with these patients quite regularly. We are actually taking the initiative to reach out to them versus the patient who may be having trouble advocating for themselves or feeling like, "Really, I don't want to be a pain, but this is challenging for me." We are really in touch with them, and that connection also helps to keep patients on therapy. So, what are some of the specific techniques to manage or mitigate cough? This is something that was a real hot topic at our last advisory meeting. We put together a bunch of folks in the room who deal with other inhaled therapies and patients that have cough and said, "Well, what do you tell patients to do?" First and foremost is to look at any other potentially underlying conditions that may be causing cough and ensure that treatment of those underlying conditions is optimized. I think cough is actually the number one referral for any type of pulmonary practice, but it is a really, really broad differential when it comes down to it. We obviously look first at things like environmental factors. If this could be seasonal allergies, then we try treating patients with antihistamines. Perhaps some of those are intranasal, as well, that may help with some things like rhinorrhea or post nasal drip. Acid reflux is actually a huge, huge reason for cough. Many patients say, 'Well, I don't get acid reflux. I don't feel that burning in my chest after I eat," but come to find out that it can actually be a silent trigger. So, treating patients with medicines that help to reduce acid or suppress acid will oftentimes help with that cough. On top of that, when we're dealing with patients that are on inhalers and now we're adding another inhaled therapy. I find that for some patients that are on actual inhalers that sometimes they do better with nebulized treatments. The nebulized treatments are slower, and may have a bit of a better penetration into the lungs and the patients tend to like it. It is one of those things that you do need to be compliant with in order to really see the benefits to it. I will say that oftentimes, again, partnering with the patient, giving them specific instructions about how to do all of this, we can really see some improvement to those symptoms. Then, there's just basic over-the counter measures and precautions, things like making sure that when you're eating that you're not laying down at least for 60 minutes after you've been eating. If you do have acid reflux, trying to sleep with two pillows or a wedge pillow, that can help to keep the head of your bed elevated. Some of our patients have those really fancy adjustable beds that are also quite helpful for that. I think that sometimes things like basic cough drops actually can be quite wonderful and helpful. Drinking very cold or very warm water or tea, adding some honey to that if a patient isn't diabetic, things like that tend to really help with cough. We reinforce these measures when we start therapies like this. Jennifer Keeley, DPN: In terms of mitigation, I think it's really important on technique. This is why, as Mary had alluded to, it's so important to follow up closely with these patients, particularly our elderly patients who sometimes don't, if they have connective tissue disease or scleroderma, have a lot of good fine motor coordination. A couple of things that I wanted to touch on with regards to that… One, these inhalers are typically high resistance, low flow. So, these are not the type of patients that need to be taking in very forceful inhalations with these inhalers and thank goodness, because we're talking about patients that have inflammatory interstitial lung disease, as well as pulmonary vascular disease. So their degree of inspiratory effort is actually minimal to disperse that medication to the distal pulmonary bronchials. It's equivalent to them taking a deep breath in when you ask them to auscultate their lungs. So it's not a big forceful breath. The other thing is too, a lot of times, sometimes more variability in the disbursement of the drug is better in compliance with some patients. Dry-powdered inhalers, again, do not take a very big forceful effort, but some of them, because they are powder, some of the medication will actually hit the back of the throat as it goes down and can cause some irritation, whereas the nebulized form does have a variability in disbursement and can be more easily tolerated in some. The other issue is the technique itself. Oftentimes, we ask them in some of the inhaled therapies to lower the device itself so that the tongue doesn't protrude and get in the way, because if medication gets on the tongue, the next swallow that they take, that medication is going to hit their posterior pharynx, and they're going to probably cough pretty aggressively. I always start off by telling my patients, "Cough is not a bad thing. It's actually a protective reflex and it's involuntary. So, if you cough, don't actually negate it. Don't think it's a bad thing." It's actually a very protective mechanism that avoids irritation in most of our patients probably already irritated mucosa. So, that's how I like to start the conversation. There's so many good techniques that we can share with them over time, and I might add that each patient is different. Each patient needs to have a personalized plan. When we talk about giving patients warm tea, typically chamomile, chamomile tea in itself is anti-inflammatory. Then, when you add something like honey, which is also a soothing, anti-inflammatory natural remedy, you have to really think to yourself, "They're getting honey. If they're diabetic, we don't want to give them too much honey." But, you have to make sure that their swallowing technique is good. There's no aspiration there, particularly if we give them cough drops. Then, just simple things that actually numb or anesthetize the back of the throat are very, very helpful for elderly patients who do have very friable tissue and mucosa from previous therapies like inhaled corticosteroids, as I had talked about before. Dairy products, I tend to ask my patients to avoid those. They can produce a lot of mucus, which these coughs that we see in our inhaled therapy patients are typically tend to be dry coughs, but some patients that have concomitant asthma, COPD, along with their ILD that are using these inhaled therapies can actually have more of a congested mucoid cough. So, avoiding dairy before and after use is always very smart. Avoiding alcohol, avoiding acidic drinks like orange juice, also very, very helpful. Mary Whittenhall, MSN: The part about technique I think is so, so important here. Oftentimes, when patients start these therapies, when they are approved in that space, the specialty pharmacy has a nurse educator that will come out to the patient's home and provide education not only about the medication, but about the administration of that medication. In many cases, the patients will take their first dose while the nurse is present so that the nurse can then critique whether or not the patient took it appropriately and how they tolerated it. I'm going to give a shout out to our nurse educators from the specialty pharmacies, because they are also a really crucial set of eyes and ears for us out in the community. They do provide education to the patients in the home. We have had situations where the patient has done well while the nurse is there, and then two weeks later we get a call from the patient saying, "I can't do this. This isn't working for me." And I'll say, "Okay. Well, you have a couple options. We can have you come in to the clinic and I want you to bring your device with you, and I would like to watch you do a treatment, or I can have the nurse come out and see you again and go over that." And they'll say, "I already know what I'm doing. I don't need that." But in many instances, we have found that they have adjusted their technique. They might've gotten into some bad habit since the nurse has left them. So, really reinforcing that is important. The other thing that I wanted to bring up is that some of our patients with connective tissue disease also have thickness in their tongues. So, their tongues become thicker and more sclerotome as their connective tissue disease progresses. For some of those patients, it is actually hard for them to get their tongue flat enough so that they can get the medication down into their lungs. So, working with those patients to find strategies to help rectify that. I will say that it is not impossible, it just takes maybe a little extra work. Jennifer Keeley, DPN: Inhaled therapies in themselves are pretty portable. Mary had alluded to a little bit earlier, our patients with pulmonary vascular disease, PAH, that are on parenteral therapies, delivering the conventional pulmonary vasodilator therapies. As we get into the new disease modifying agents such as seralutinib, which are anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, anti-prolific medications, these are portable therapies that are actually modifying the disease. So they're portable. They're easy to use. They're easy to use for our patients, again, that are elderly or are younger and are still working, they have a professional life, they don't have to wear a pump that's 24/7 oftentimes. They can use these inhaled therapies first to see if they can avoid parenteral therapy with prostacyclins. Their quality of life is improved immensely. When you can take an inhaled therapy two to four times a day and really improve quality of life, decrease cough, decrease dyspnea, or shortness of breath on exertion. Sometimes, these patients that do very, very well can actually reduce their supplemental oxygen needs. Just improving their walk distances without having to stop or have excessive dyspnea, improves their quality of life. More time spent with loved ones and more time spent in social environments rather than sitting at home. These wonderful inhaled portable therapies have significantly changed our patients' lives and improved their quality of lives. Mary Whittenhall, MSN: This community I think is phenomenal. It's made up of so many great people. There are many patients who have been a part of this space for a long time who really want to help other patients who may be newer to the journey than them. I'm a big advocate for support groups. We've had an extremely active support group in our area for a long time, and I often partner some of my patients that have been with me for quite some time with some of the new patients that may need a bit more help. I can tell them things and my colleagues can tell them things. Oftentimes, the same message doesn't resonate. It resonates differently, I think when it comes from a peer, a patient who may have experienced the same thing as them. One of the things that I really try to drive home with our patients is just that sense of empowerment. Connect with these other folks in the community. They want to help you. They remember what it feels like being newly diagnosed or starting a new therapy or transitioning from another therapy. What that change is like. One of the other things I tell my patients is that we all sit at the same table. I'm not better than you. Maybe I have this information, but this information is for you. It's for you to take and to improve your life. If that information doesn't work for you, then you come back to me with some feedback and we come up with something else that's going to be more helpful to you. I really think having an equal playing field with them and having a very open and honest dialogue is what is going to help our patients do the best. If patients don't feel comfortable reaching out to other local patients or connecting with an in-person support group, there are tons of online resources through the PHA, through phaware®, Team Phenomenal Hope, lots of great groups out there that do things virtually. I think in some ways for some patients, anonymity is important, so being able to protect that is an option for them, but to be able to still get what they need so they can become the best advocate for themselves that they can. Jennifer Keeley, DPN: I stress so importantly to my patients, we are here today in this great environment and we have the armamentarium of medications to treat because of patients just like you that have contributed to the science of the disease and implemented themselves and engaged in these clinical trials. Right now we have an ongoing clinical trial for seralutinib called PROSERA, that's enrolling as we speak. Patients are the best advocates, not only for themselves, but for other patients, and they talk. There's a lot of social media out there where patients communicate amongst themselves and they say, "Through the help of my provider and through the help of my family, I was hesitant to start this additional therapy." They do have, at this juncture, and I don't think it's such a bad thing, they do have a little bit of a pharmacy burden now. Again, these aren't our patients that are on one or two therapies. They're on four or more oftentimes. When you take in our ILD patients, they're also on disease modifying agents, as well, for their interstitial lung disease. So again, I think it's really important for patients to communicate amongst themselves and share their ups and downs in the disease, but also share the rewards that come with surviving and living with PAH. I think one thing that we really do have to understand though is like many other chronic diseases, PH is a personalized disease. You need to have a personalized approach for your patients. That's why it's so very important to do a really good history of your patients and understand not only what their baseline cough is, but who they are, what their personal history is. Are they working? Who's helping to care for them? Who's helping to make that chamomile tea with honey? Who's going to the store to get that? A personalized approach is so important for these patients, I can't stress that enough. Mary Whittenhall, MSN: Special thanks to everybody involved in this project. This was extremely exciting. To my co-podcaster, Jennifer Keeley, who is amazing, and all of us in the PH community are extremely lucky to have her. We are all aware that you are all rare, and we are grateful to be able to help you in this journey. Jennifer Keeley, DPN: Thank you so much, Mary, and what a pleasure it's been to speak with you about cough and inhaled therapies, and thank you to Gossamer Bio for this opportunity and for the opportunity that led to this podcast, which was a significant advisory board amongst specialists in our field, advanced practice providers and registered nurses who were able to convene in a great open space and talk about this. I think this moves our science forward. It helps us to talk about the disease and take better care of our patients. Again, my name is Jennifer Keeley. It's been such a pleasure to deal with my good friend Mary Whittenhall today, and we're aware that our patients are very rare. Learn more about pulmonary hypertension trials at www.phaware.global/clinicaltrials. Follow us on instagram, facebook and x.com @phaware. Engage for a cure: www.phaware.global/donate #phaware Share your story: info@phaware.com Like, Subscribe and Follow us: www.phawarepodcast.com. #phawareMD #PHILD @GossamerBio @AHNtoday

#66. Interstitiell lungesykdom (ILD) ved revmatoid artritt (RA) med tre eksperter fra Rikshospitalet: Natasha Moe (toraksradiolog), Phuong Phuong Diep (lungelege) og Asad Chaudhary (revmatolog). Spilt inn live under Norsk revmatologisk forenings julekurs i Drammen, november 2025.Tredje sesong av podkasten er muliggjort gjennom et stipend fra Norsk revmatologisk forening. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Welcome to the emDOCs.net podcast! Join us as we review our high-yield posts from our website emDOCs.net.Today on the emDOCs cast with Brit Long (@long_brit), we cover management of AE-ILD exacerbations. For more on evaluation, take a listen to Part 1. To continue to make this a worthwhile podcast for you to listen to, we appreciate any feedback and comments you may have for us. Please let us know!Subscribe to the podcast on one of the many platforms below:Apple iTunesSpotifyGoogle Play

The Derm on RheumNow podcast is a collection of Citations and Content curated for dermatologists – addressing Psoriasis, PsA, CLE, vasculitis, HS, other CTD skin disorders. dermatology drugs, biiologics, JAKs - their use, efficacy and side effects.  Features Dr. Jack Cush, Editor at RheumNow.com.  SHOW NOTES 1. Retrospective study of 39 pts w/ MDA5 + DM-ILD Rx w baricitinib. 31 (79.5%) had improvement in Gottron's, heliotrope, dyspnea, HRCT score, ferritin, LDH, steroid dose & 6 mo survival (87% vs. 70%, p = 0.047). https://t.co/RCTbBsCkeV 2. Pulse Steroids and Mycophenolate in Juvenile Dermatomyositis JAMA Dermatology has published a pilot study demonstrating the safety and efficacy of intermittent intravenous methylprednisolone pulse (IVMP) therapy plus mycophenolate in 28 patients with JDM. https://t.co/i2HBycbWY9 3. Myelodysplastic & chr myelomonocytic leukemia pts rarely get lupus. Review of 19 w/ SLE & 5 w/ CLE; these were older (65 yrs), more male (15M/9F), w/ less renal [10%] & articular [36%] Dz w/ less dsDNA [32%]. Thought to be clonal inflammatory, & not autoinflammatory, process. https://t.co/EAvkJm6GQs 4. Serious infections w/ adalimumab. Marketscan MarketScan claims study (1/17-12/20) of ADA Rx in Hidradenitis Supprativa (n 1650) or psoriasis(8699). Risk of SIE & hospitalization greater w/ HS (HR 1.53); esp for sepsis & GU infxnhttps://t.co/2qa7O2v6fm 5. No risk of MACE seen w/ initiation of IL-17(R)A inhib. French study of 34 241 ipts Rx IL-17(R)Ai and 381 MACEs. MACE risk was not elevated (OR, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.75-2.08] vs TNF-α inhibitors. https://t.co/WcjgRhr8mj 6. Genetic Risks and Severe Cutaneous Reactions to Allopurinol A matched cohort study shows that HLA-B*58:01 and HLA-A*34:02 are strongly associated with allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), these alleles were absent in more than one-third of those https://t.co/NLpHVhr9Ww 7. Western Australia study of 1854 SLE pts (median 40 yrs old). Interstitial lung disease was seen in in 3.8% of SLE, 26 fold more than controls. Risk factors for ILD included older age, smoking and serositis. SLE-ILD pts had higher mortality rates (MR 52.0, CI 37.0–71.1). 8. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels and Lupus Outcomes Lupus patients entering a prospective cohort study with low vitamin D levels faced doubled all-cause mortality risk and tripled risk for major cardiovascular events during follow-up averaging 6 years, researchers said. https://t.co/CYwVy7ls7y 9. ACR2025 Non-Renal Lupus Guidelines – from ACR Convergence 2025 10. 900,000 vs 9 It takes about 900,000 minutes to become a board-certified dermatologist. At that point, you might be very skilled and well-informed. It takes less than nine minutes to make your patient feel seen, understood and reassured. If you skip the 9 minutes, you wasted the 900,000  https://t.co/o7BaWjS4HB

Welcome to the emDOCs.net podcast! Join us as we review our high-yield posts from our website emDOCs.net.Today on the emDOCs cast with Brit Long (@long_brit), we cover interstitial lung disease and exacerbations. In Part 1, we discuss some background, presentation, and the ED evaluation. Part 2 will cover management. To continue to make this a worthwhile podcast for you to listen to, we appreciate any feedback and comments you may have for us. Please let us know!Subscribe to the podcast on one of the many platforms below:Apple iTunesSpotifyGoogle Play 

Listen to JCO's Art of Oncology article, "The Man at the Bow" by Dr. Alexis Drutchas, who is a palliative care physician at Dana Farber Cancer Institute. The article is followed by an interview with Drutchas and host Dr. Mikkael Sekeres. Dr. Drutchas shares the deep connection she had with a patient, a former barge captain, who often sailed the same route that her family's shipping container did when they moved overseas many times while she was growing up. She reflects on the nature of loss and dignity, and how oncologists might hold patients' humanity with more tenderness and care, especially at the end of life. TRANSCRIPT Narrator: The Man at the Bow, by Alexis Drutchas, MD  It was the kind of day that almost seemed made up—a clear, cerulean sky with sunlight bouncing off the gold dome of the State House. The contrast between this view and the drab hospital walls as I walked into my patient's room was jarring. My patient, whom I will call Suresh, sat in a recliner by the window. His lymphoma had relapsed, and palliative care was consulted to help with symptom management. The first thing I remember is that despite the havoc cancer had wreaked—sunken temples and a hospital gown slipping off his chest—Suresh had a warm, peaceful quality about him. Our conversation began with a discussion about his pain. Suresh told me how his bones ached and how his fatigue left him feeling hollow—a fraction of his former self. The way this drastic change in his physicality affected his sense of identity was palpable. There was loss, even if it was unspoken. After establishing a plan to help with his symptoms, I pivoted and asked Suresh how he used to spend his days. His face immediately lit up. He had been a barge captain—a dangerous and thrilling profession that took him across international waters to transport goods. Suresh's eyes glistened as he described his joy at sea. I was completely enraptured. He shared stories about mornings when he stood alone on the bow, feeling the salted breeze as the barge moved through Atlantic waves. He spoke of calm nights on the deck, looking at the stars through stunning darkness. He traveled all over the globe and witnessed Earth's topography from a perspective most of us will never see. The freedom Suresh exuded was profound. He loved these voyages so much that one summer, despite the hazards, he brought his wife and son to experience the journey with him. Having spent many years of my childhood living in Japan and Hong Kong, my family's entire home—every bed, sheet, towel, and kitchen utensil—was packed up and crossed the Atlantic on cargo ships four times. Maybe Suresh had captained one, I thought. Every winter, we hosted US Navy sailors docked in Hong Kong for the holidays. I have such fond memories of everyone going around the table and sharing stories of their adventures—who saw or ate what and where. I loved those times: the wild abandon of travel, the freedom of being somewhere new, and the way identity can shift and expand as experiences grow. When Suresh shared stories of the ocean, I was back there too, holding the multitude of my identity alongside him. I asked Suresh to tell me more about his voyages: what was it like to be out in severe weather, to ride over enormous swells? Did he ever get seasick, and did his crew always get along? But Suresh did not want to swim into these perilous stories with me. Although he worked a difficult and physically taxing job, this is not what he wanted to focus on. Instead, he always came back to the beauty and vitality he felt at sea—what it was like to stare out at the vastness of the open ocean. He often closed his eyes and motioned with his hands as he spoke as if he was not confined to these hospital walls. Instead, he was swaying on the water feeling the lightness of physical freedom, and the way a body can move with such ease that it is barely perceptible, like water flowing over sand. The resonances of Suresh's stories contained both the power and challenges laden in this work. Although I sat at his bedside, healthy, my body too contained memories of freedom that in all likelihood will one day dissipate with age or illness. The question of how I will be seen, compared to how I hoped to be seen, lingered in my mind. Years ago, before going to medical school, I moved to Vail, Colorado. I worked four different jobs just to make ends meet, but making it work meant that on my days off, I was only a chairlift ride away from Vail's backcountry. I have a picture of this vigor in my mind—my snowboard carving into fresh powder, the utter silence of the wilderness at that altitude, and the way it felt to graze the powdery snow against my glove. My face was windburned, and my body was sore, but my heart had never felt so buoyant. While talking with Suresh, I could so vividly picture him as the robust man he once was, standing tall on the bow of his ship. I could feel the freedom and joy he described—it echoed in my own body. In that moment, the full weight of what Suresh had lost hit me as forcefully as a cresting wave—not just the physical decline, but the profound shift in his identity. What is more, we all live, myself included, so precariously at this threshold. In this work, it is impossible not to wonder: what will it be like when it is me? Will I be seen as someone who has lived a full life, who explored and adventured, or will my personhood be whittled down to my illness? How can I hold these questions and not be swallowed by them? "I know who you are now is not the person you've been," I said to Suresh. With that, he reached out for my hand and started to cry. We looked at each other with a new understanding. I saw Suresh—not just as a frail patient but as someone who lived a full life. As someone strong enough to cross the Atlantic for decades. In that moment, I was reminded of the Polish poet, Wislawa Szymborska's words, "As far as you've come, can't be undone." This, I believe, is what it means to honor the dignity of our patients, to reflect back the person they are despite or alongside their illness…all of their parts that can't be undone. Sometimes, this occurs because we see our own personhood reflected in theirs and theirs in ours. Sometimes, to protect ourselves, we shield ourselves from this echo. Other times, this resonance becomes the most beautiful and meaningful part of our work. It has been years now since I took care of Suresh. When the weather is nice, my wife and I like to take our young son to the harbor in South Boston to watch the planes take off and the barges leave the shore, loaded with colorful metal containers. We usually pack a picnic and sit in the trunk as enormous planes fly overhead and tugboats work to bring large ships out to the open water. Once, as a container ship was leaving the port, we waved so furiously at those working on board that they all started to wave back, and the captain honked the ships booming horn. Every single time we are there, I think of Suresh, and I picture him sailing out on thewaves—as free as he will ever be. Mikkael Sekeres: Welcome back to JCO's Cancer Stories: The Art of Oncology. This ASCO podcast features intimate narratives and perspectives from authors exploring their experiences in oncology. I'm your host, Mikkael Sekeres. I'm Professor of Medicine and Chief of the Division of Hematology at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami. What a treat we have today. We're joined by Dr. Alexis Drutchas, a Palliative Care Physician and the Director of the Core Communication Program at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School to discuss her article, "The Man at the Bow." Alexis, thank you so much for contributing to Journal of Clinical Oncology and for joining us to discuss your article. Dr. Alexis Drutchas: Thank you. I'm thrilled and excited to be here. Mikkael Sekeres: I wonder if we can start by asking you about yourself. Where are you from, and can you walk us a bit through your career? Dr. Alexis Drutchas: The easiest way to say it would be that I'm from the Detroit area. My dad worked in automotive car parts and so we moved around a lot when I was growing up. I was born in Michigan, then we moved to Japan, then back to Michigan, then to Hong Kong, then back to Michigan. Then I spent my undergrad years in Wisconsin and moved out to Colorado to teach snowboarding before medical school, and then ended up back in Michigan for that, and then on the east coast at Brown for my family medicine training, and then in Boston for work and training. So, I definitely have a more global experience in my background, but also very Midwestern at heart as well. In terms of my professional career trajectory, I trained in family medicine because I really loved taking care of the whole person. I love taking care of kids and adults, and I loved OB, and at the time I felt like it was impossible to choose which one I wanted to pursue the most, and so family medicine was a great fit. And at the core of that, there's just so much advocacy and social justice work, especially in the community health centers where many family medicine residents train. During that time, I got very interested in LGBTQ healthcare and founded the Rhode Island Trans Health Conference, which led me to work as a PCP at Fenway Health in Boston after that. And so I worked there for many years. And then through a course of being a hospitalist at BI during that work, I worked with many patients with serious illness, making decisions about discontinuing dialysis, about pursuing hospice care in the setting of ILD. I also had a significant amount of family illness and started to recognize this underlying interest I had always had in palliative care, but I think was a bit scared to pursue. But those really kind of tipped me over to say I really wanted to access a different level of communication skills and be able to really go into depth with patients in a way I just didn't feel like I had the language for. And so I applied to the Harvard Palliative Care Fellowship and luckily and with so much gratitude got in years ago, and so trained in palliative care and stayed at MGH after that. So my Dana-Farber position is newer for me and I'm very excited about it. Mikkael Sekeres: Sounds like you've had an amazing career already and you're just getting started on it. I grew up in tiny little Rhode Island and, you know, we would joke you have to pack an overnight bag if you travel more than 45 minutes. So, our boundaries were much tighter than yours. What was it like growing up where you're going from the Midwest to Asia, back to the Midwest, you wind up settling on the east coast? You must have an incredible worldly view on how people live and how they view their health. Dr. Alexis Drutchas: I think you just named much of the sides of it. I think I realize now, in looking back, that in many ways it was living two lives, because at the time it was rare from where we lived in the Detroit area in terms of the other kids around us to move overseas. And so it really did feel like that part of me and my family that during the summers we would have home leave tickets and my parents would often turn them in to just travel since we didn't really have a home base to come back to. And so it did give me an incredible global perspective and a sense of all the ways in which people develop community, access healthcare, and live. And then coming back to the Midwest, not to say that it's not cosmopolitan or diverse in its own way, but it was very different, especially in the 80s and 90s to come back to the Midwest. So it did feel like I carried these two lenses in the world, and it's been incredibly meaningful over time to meet other friends and adults and patients who have lived these other lives as well. I think for me those are some of my most connecting friendships and experiences with patients for people who have had a similar experience in living with sort of a duality in their everyday lives with that. Mikkael Sekeres: You know, you write about the main character of your essay, Suresh, who's a barge captain, and you mention in the essay that your family crossed the Atlantic on cargo ships four times when you were growing up. What was that experience like? How much of it do you remember? Dr. Alexis Drutchas: Our house, like our things, crossed the Atlantic four times on barge ships such as his. We didn't, I mean we crossed on airplanes. Mikkael Sekeres: Oh, okay, okay. Dr. Alexis Drutchas: We flew over many times, but every single thing we owned got packed up into containers on large trucks in our house and were brought over to ports to be sent over. So, I'm not sure how they do it now, but at the time that's sort of how we moved, and we would often go live in a hotel or a furnished apartment for the month's wait of all of our house to get there, which felt also like a surreal experience in that, you know, you're in a totally different country and then have these creature comforts of your bedroom back in Metro Detroit. And I remember thinking a lot about who was crossing over with all of that stuff and where was it going, and who else was moving, and that was pretty incredible. And when I met Suresh, just thinking about the fact that at some point our home could have been on his ship was a really fun connection in my mind to make, just given where he always traveled in his work. Mikkael Sekeres: It's really neat. I remember when we moved from the east coast also to the Midwest, I was in Cleveland for 18 years. The very first thing we did was mark which of the boxes had the kids' toys in it, because that of course was the first one we let them close it up and then we let them open it as soon as we arrived. Did your family do something like that as well so that you can, you know, immediately feel an attachment to your stuff when they arrived? Dr. Alexis Drutchas: Yeah, I remember what felt most important to our mom was our bedrooms. I don't remember the toys. I remember sort of our comforters and our pillowcases and things like that, yeah, being opened and it feeling really settling to think, "Okay, you know, we're in a completely different place and country away from most everything we know, but our bedroom is the same." That always felt like a really important point that she made to make home feel like home again in a new place. Mikkael Sekeres: Yeah, yeah. One of the sentences you wrote in your essay really caught my eye. You wrote about when you were younger and say, "I loved those times, the wild abandon of travel, the freedom of being somewhere new, the way identity can shift and expand as experiences grow." It's a lovely sentiment. Do you think those are emotions that we experience only as children, or can they continue through adulthood? And if they can, how do we make that happen, that sense of excitement and experience? Dr. Alexis Drutchas: I think that's such a good question and one I honestly think about a lot. I think that we can access those all the time. There's something about the newness of travel and moving, you know, I have a 3-year-old right now, and so I think many parents would connect to that sense that there is wonderment around being with someone experiencing something for the first time. Even watching my son, Oliver, see a plane take off for the first time felt joyous in a completely new way, that even makes me smile a lot now. But I think what is such a great connection here is when something is new, our eyes are so open to it. You know, we're constantly witnessing and observing and are excited about that. And I think the connection that I've realized is important for me in my work and also in just life in general to hold on to that wonderment is that idea of sort of witnessing or having a writer's eye, many would call it, in that you're keeping your eye open for the small beautiful things. Often with travel, you might be eating ramen. It might not be the first time you're eating it, but you're eating it for the first time in Tokyo, and it's the first time you've had this particular ingredient on it, and then you remember that. But there's something that we're attuned to in those moments, like the difference or the taste, that makes it special and we hold on to it. And I think about that a lot as a writer, but also in patient care and having my son with my wife, it's what are the special small moments to hold on to and allowing them to be new and beautiful, even if they're not as large as moving across the country or flying to Rome or whichever. I think there are ways that that excitement can still be alive if we attune ourselves to some of the more beautiful small moments around us. Mikkael Sekeres: And how do we do that as doctors? We're trained to go into a room and there's almost a formula for how we approach patients. But how do you open your mind in that way to that sense of wonderment and discovery with the person you're sitting across from, and it doesn't necessarily have to be medical? One of the true treats of what we do is we get to meet people from all backgrounds and all walks of life, and we have the opportunity to explore their lives as part of our interaction. Dr. Alexis Drutchas: Yeah, I think that is such a great question. And I would love to hear your thoughts on this too. I think for me in that sentence that you mentioned, sitting at that table with sort of people in the Navy from all over the world, I was that person to them in the room, too. There was some identity there that I brought to the table that was different than just being a kid in school or something like that. To answer your question, I wonder if so much of the challenge is actually allowing ourselves to bring ourselves into the room, because so much of the formula is, you know, we have these white coats on, we have learners, we want to do it right, we want to give excellent care. There's there's so many sort of guards I think that we put up to make sure that we're asking the right questions, we don't want to miss anything, we don't want to say the wrong thing, and all of that is true. And at the same time, I find that when I actually allow myself into the room, that is when it is the most special. And that doesn't mean that there's complete countertransference or it's so permeable that it's not in service of the patient. It just means that I think when we allow bits of our own selves to come in, it really does allow for new connections to form, and then we are able to learn about our patients more, too. With every patient, I think often we're called in for goals of care or symptom management, and of course I prioritize that, but when I can, I usually just try to ask a more open-ended question, like, "Tell me about life before you came to the hospital or before you were diagnosed. What do you love to do? What did you do for work?" Or if it's someone's family member who is ill, I'll ask the kids or family in the room, "Like, what kind of mom was she? You know, what special memory you had?" Just, I get really curious when there's time to really understand the person. And I know that that's not at all new language. Of course, we're always trying to understand the person, but I just often think understanding them is couched within their illness. And I'm often very curious about how we can just get to know them as people, and how humanizing ourselves to them helps humanize them to us, and that back and forth I think is like really lovely and wonderful and allows things to come up that were totally unexpected, and those are usually the special moments that you come home with and want to tell your family about or want to process and think about. What about you? How do you think about that question? Mikkael Sekeres: Well, it's interesting you ask. I like to do projects around the house. I hate to say this out loud because of course one day I'll do something terrible and everyone will remember this podcast, but I fancy myself an amateur electrician and plumber and carpenter and do these sorts of projects. So I go into interactions with patients wanting to learn about their lives and how they live their lives to see what I can pick up on as well, how I can take something out of that interaction and actually use it practically. My father-in-law has this phrase he always says to me when a worker comes to your house, he goes, he says to me, "Remember to steal with your eyes." Right? Watch what they do, learn how they fix something so you can fix it yourself and you don't have to call them next time. So, for me it's kind of fun to hear how people have lived their lives both within their professions, and when I practiced medicine in Cleveland, there were a lot of farmers and factory workers I saw. So I learned a lot about how things are made. But also about how they interact with their families, and I've learned a lot from people I've seen who were just terrific dads and terrific moms or siblings or spouses. And I've tried to take those nuggets away from those interactions. But I think you can only do it if you open yourself up and also allow yourself to see that person's humanity. And I wonder if I can quote you to you again from your essay. There's another part that I just loved, and it's about how you write about how a person's identity changes when they become a patient. You write, "And in that moment the full weight of what he had lost hit me as forcefully as a cresting wave. Not just the physical decline, but the profound shift in identity. What is more, we all live, me included, so precariously at this threshold. In this work, it's impossible not to wonder, what will it be like when it's me? Will I be seen as someone who's lived many lives, or whittled down only to someone who's sick?" Can you talk a little bit more about that? Have you been a patient whose identity has changed without asking you to reveal too much? Or what about your identity as a doctor? Is that something we have to undo a little bit when we walk in the room with the stethoscope or wearing a white coat? Dr. Alexis Drutchas: That was really powerful to hear you read that back to me. So, thank you. Yeah, I think my answer here can't be separated from the illness I faced with my family. And I think this unanimously filters into the way in which I see every patient because I really do think about the patient's dignity and the way medicine generally, not always, really does strip them of that and makes them the patient. Even the way we write about "the patient said this," "the patient said that," "the patient refused." So I generally very much try to have a one-liner like, "Suresh is a X-year-old man who's a barge captain from X, Y, and Z and is a loving father with a," you know, "period. He comes to the hospital with X, Y, and Z." So I always try to do that and humanize patients. I always try to write their name rather than just "patient." I can't separate that out from my experience with my family. My sister six years ago now went into sudden heart failure after having a spontaneous coronary artery dissection, and so immediately within minutes she was in the cath lab at 35 years old, coding three times and came out sort of with an Impella and intubated, and very much, you know, all of a sudden went from my sister who had just been traveling in Mexico to a patient in the CCU. And I remember desperately wanting her team to see who she was, like see the person that we loved, that was fighting for her life, see how much her life meant to us. And that's not to say that they weren't giving her great care, but there was something so important to me in wanting them to see how much we wanted her to live, you know, and who she was. It felt like there's some important core to me there. We brought pictures in, we talked about what she was living for. It felt really important. And I can't separate that out from the way in which I see patients now or I feel in my own way in a certain way what it is to lose yourself, to lose the ability to be a Captain of the ship, to lose the ability to do electric work around the house. So much of our identity is wrapped up in our professions and our craft. And I think for me that has really become forefront in the work of palliative care and in and in the teaching I do and in the writing I do is how to really bring them forefront and not feel like in doing that we're losing our ability to remain objective or solid in our own professional identities as clinicians and physicians. Mikkael Sekeres: Well, I think that's a beautiful place to end here. I can only imagine what an outstanding physician and caregiver you are also based on your writing and how you speak about it. You just genuinely come across as caring about your patients and your family and the people you have interactions with and getting to know them as people. It has been again such a treat to have Dr. Alexis Drutchas here. She is Director of the Core Communication Program at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School to discuss her article, "The Man at the Bow." Alexis, thank you so much for joining us. Dr. Alexis Drutchas: Thank you. This has been a real joy. Mikkael Sekeres: If you've enjoyed this episode, consider sharing it with a friend or colleague, or leave us a review. Your feedback and support helps us continue to save these important conversations. If you're looking for more episodes and context, follow our show on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you listen, and explore more from ASCO at ASCO.org/podcasts. Until next time, this has been Mikkael Sekeres for the ASCO podcast Cancer Stories: The Art of Oncology. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement. Show notes: Like, share and subscribe so you never miss an episode and leave a rating or review. Guest Bio: Dr. Alexis Drutchas is a palliative care physician at Dana Farber Cancer Institute.

ILD in Patients with Connective Tissue Disease  Fiber and Methotrexate  RA ILD Prediction: simple as a dipstick?  "Leftover Pain in Inflammatory Arthritis" 

Ild og røyk.

Kenny Kasnett, a seasoned executive and entrepreneur whose life took an unexpected turn with a diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) joins the podcast for a powerful episode. What began as a persistent cough during a round of golf soon unraveled into a life-threatening condition that would ultimately require a lung transplant. Kenny opens up about the diagnostic journey, the emotional toll of living with ILD, and the difficult road leading up to transplant surgery. He shares a behind-the-scenes look at the complexities of preparing for and receiving a lung transplant, from waiting on the national registry to the moment he received the life-changing call. But Kenny's story is more than medical, it's about resilience, gratitude, and the extraordinary gift of a second chance at life. He speaks candidly about the pain, fear, and vulnerability he faced along the way, and how he leaned on the unwavering support of family, friends, and a stellar medical team. We also explore the long-term realities of transplant recovery, from managing medications and monitoring for rejection to navigating new physical limitations with hope and strength. Kenny's insights offer a beacon of light for others navigating lung disease and chronic illness. Topics Covered: Early signs and diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) Understanding ILD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) Emotional and physical impact of progressive lung failure Choosing a lung transplant center and navigating evaluations The day of the transplant: fears, preparations, and gratitude Recovery and rehab: from ICU to walking again Long-term care, medications, and monitoring for rejection How this journey reshaped Kenny's perspective on life Advice for newly diagnosed patients and caregivers The importance of organ donation and honoring the donor Guest Bio: Kenny Kasnett is an accomplished business leader with decades of experience in finance, homebuilding, and real estate. Beyond his professional roles, Kenny is a lung transplant recipient and fierce advocate for those living with interstitial lung disease. Through his story, Kenny offers hope, encouragement, and critical insights into navigating serious illness with courage and grace. Resources & Links: Learn more about Interstitial Lung Disease (American Lung Association) National Jewish Health - Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Program Organ Donor Registration – Donate Life During the interview, Beth referenced a previous episode of It Happened To Me where the inspiring Zach Ship shared about his experience of getting a kidney transplant, this was Episode #44. The following episode (#45) Zach joined us again to talk about his other medical challenge, experiencing blindness before the age of 30.    Stay tuned for the next new episode of “It Happened To Me”! In the meantime, you can listen to our previous episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, streaming on the website, or any other podcast player by searching, “It Happened To Me”.    “It Happened To Me” is created and hosted by Cathy Gildenhorn and Beth Glassman. DNA Today's Kira Dineen is our executive producer and marketing lead. Amanda Andreoli is our associate producer. Ashlyn Enokian is our graphic designer.   See what else we are up to on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube and our website, ItHappenedToMePod.com. Questions/inquiries can be sent to ItHappenedToMePod@gmail.com. 

Our final webinar in this month's Rheum to Breathe: ILD campaign brings together ILD experts to discuss best practices in diagnosis, screening, and monitoring, covering: tools, labs, and imaging; timing and frequency of screening; ILD screening in RA; and, referral strategies. Panelists: Shane Shapera, MD Elana Bernstein, MD Bryant England, MD Moderator: Jack Cush, MD

QD clinics on ILD - lessons from the Clinic; brought to during the "Rheum to Breathe" ILD campaign ILD QD Clinic #4 ILD QD Clinics - Worsening Breathlessness in SSc ILD: The Pressure Is On  ILD QD clinics on ILD #1 - Be Careful What you Look For 

In this episode, our guests Dr. Sabrina Hoa and Dr. Marie Hudson explore new insights into late-onset interstitial lung disease (ILD) in scleroderma. Using data from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group, they discuss how ILD can still develop years after diagnosis, challenging traditional screening timelines. They cover key findings, clinical implications, treatment patterns, and the need for more inclusive trials. The conversation also touches on mentorship and what's next in scleroderma research. 

Rheum to Breathe Rx Update ILD Treatment and Guidelines Part 4: Rheum + Pulm Collaborations in ILD including The Rheumatologist and Pulmonologist: Different approaches to the same patient (Dr. Paul Dellaripa and Dr Rachel Putman).

QD clinics on ILD - lessons from the Clinic; brought to during the "Rheum to Breathe" ILD campaign ILD QD Clinic #3 ILD QD Clinic: Application of the ACR CHEST Guidelines to Two Cases   ILD QD Clinic: Progressive RA-ILD Management  ILD QD Clinic: Beyond the Numbers in Newly Diagnosed ILD 

In this journal club, we will discuss two pivotal studies in ILD, the FIBRONEER study and the RECITAL study: Nerandomilast in Patients with Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis, Maher, T.M. et al. NEJM. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1056 Rituximab versus intravenous cyclophosphamide in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease in the UK (RECITAL): a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial, Maher T.M., et al. Lancet 2023 Jan;11(1). doi: 10.1016 Panelists: Toby Maher, MD Shervin Assassi, MD Jack Cush, Moderator

"QD clinics on ILD - lessons from the Clinic; brought to during the "Rheum to Breathe" ILD campaign. Here are the individual video titles and links: ILD QD Clinic: Stick or twist (when not to change treatment)  https://youtu.be/sdGPsvcfyzQ ILD QD Clinic: Interstitial Lung Disease with Positive SSA and Rash  https://youtu.be/1H10_VR8t_0 ILD QD Clinic Video: RA and Bronchiectasis  https://youtu.be/-StSi3v8ew8  

Dr. Jack Cush reviews the news and journal reports from the past week on RheumNow.com. Are their benefits to Diet/vegan diets?  Whats the effect of menopause on CTD?  Ro52 makes a big entrance with all our ILD coverage this month.

Featuring an interview with Dr Jacob Sands, including the following topics: Management of Adverse Events of Special Interest Associated with Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) (0:00) Heist RS et al. Clinical management, monitoring, and prophylaxis of adverse events of special interest associated with datopotamab deruxtecan. Cancer Treat Rev 2024;125:102720. Abstract  Sands J et al. Analysis of drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients (pts) treated with datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd). ASCO 2024;Abstract 8623. Intracranial Efficacy of Dato-DXd for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Actionable Genomic Alterations in the TROPION-Lung05 Study (7:23) Lisberg A et al. Intracranial efficacy of datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in patients (pts) with previously treated advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (a/m NSCLC) with actionable genomic alterations (AGA): Results from TROPION-Lung05. ASCO 2024;Abstract 8593.  Clinical Evidence Supporting the Combination of Dato-DXd with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Advanced NSCLC (12:12) Bessede A et al. TROP2 is associated with primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2024;30(4):779-85. Abstract Levy BP et al. TROPION-Lung02: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) with or without platinum chemotherapy (Pt-CT) as first-line (1L) therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). ASCO 2025;Abstract 8501. Waqar SN et al. First-line (1L) datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) + rilvegostomig in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC): Results from TROPION-Lung04 (cohort 5). ASCO 2025;Abstract 8521. Current and Future Development of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in the Treatment of Lung Cancer (17:11) Tawfiq RK et al. Targeting lung cancer with precision: The ADC therapeutic revolution. Curr Oncol Rep 2025;27(6):669-86. Abstract CME information and select publications

This webinar will review the ACR and EULAR guidelines on interstitial lung disease, with a focus on ‘where are we now and where are we going?' in regards to treatment strategies and emerging therapies in ILD care. Panelists: Sindhu Johnson, MD Shane Shapera, MD Scott Matson, MD Jack Cush, MD - Moderator https://youtube.com/live/Viexwyv0sxs?feature=share

"QD clinics on ILD - lessons from the Clinic; brought to during the "Rheum to Breathe" ILD campaign

Dr. Jack Cush reviews the news and journal reports from RheumNow. This week - unemployment, diagnosing Sjogrens and alot of ILD.

We break down pneumothorax: risks, diagnosis, and management pearls. Hosts: Christopher Pham, MD Brian Gilberti, MD https://media.blubrry.com/coreem/content.blubrry.com/coreem/Pneumothorax.mp3 Download Leave a Comment Tags: Chest Trauma, Pulmonary, Trauma Show Notes Risk Factors for Pneumothorax Secondary pneumothorax Trauma: rib fractures, blunt chest trauma (as in the case). Iatrogenic: central line placement, thoracentesis, pleural procedures. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax Young, tall, thin males (10–30 years). Connective tissue disorders: Marfan, Ehlers-Danlos. Underlying lung disease: COPD with bullae, interstitial lung disease, CF, TB, malignancy. Technically, anyone is at risk. Symptoms & Differential Diagnosis Typical PTX presentation: Dyspnea, chest pain, pleuritic discomfort. Exam clues: unilateral decreased breath sounds, focal tenderness/crepitus. Red flags (suggest tension PTX): JVD Tracheal deviation Hypotension, shock physiology Severe tachycardia, hypoxia Differential diagnoses: Pulmonary: asthma, COPD, pneumonia, pulmonary edema (SCAPE), ILD, infections. Cardiac: ACS, CHF, pericarditis. PE and other acute causes of dyspnea. Diagnostics Bloodwork: limited role, except type & screen if intervention likely. EKG: reasonable given chest pain/shortness of breath.

In this episode, host Saranya Ravindran is joined by Toby Maher to explore the often-overlooked world of interstitial lung diseases. From clarifying common misconceptions to highlighting AI innovations and personalised treatments, the series dives deep into what clinicians need to know about these serious lung conditions. Whether you're new to interstitial lung diseases or experienced in respiratory care, this series offers timely insights and expert takeaways. Timestamps: 00:00: Introduction 00:41: Challenges in early diagnosis 03:22: ILD biomarkers 05:49: The overlap with autoimmune diseases 09:16: AI in ILD detection

In this episode, host Saranya Ravindran is joined by Toby Maher to explore the often-overlooked world of interstitial lung diseases. From clarifying common misconceptions to highlighting AI innovations and personalised treatments, the series dives deep into what clinicians need to know about these serious lung conditions. Whether you're new to interstitial lung diseases or experienced in respiratory care, this series offers timely insights and expert takeaways. Timestamps: 00:00: Introduction 00:40: Mainstays of treatment 04:42: Limitations of current antifibrotics 07:50: The future of ILD personalised care 13:40: Are we close to the reversal of fibrosis? 15:52: A message for clinicians

Why is palliative care so important in ILD, especially in early diagnosis? How would you define palliative care, especially in the context of ILD? Dr. Gillian Love of the Division of Palliative Care with Jefferson Health joins Crockett to discuss these questions and more in the 'Pulmonary Fibrosis' podcast! Brought to you by the Wescoe Foundation for Pulmonary Fibrosis -- and the PAIPF Support Network -- visit PAIPFsupportnetwork.org!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, host Saranya Ravindran is joined by Toby Maher to explore the often-overlooked world of interstitial lung diseases. From clarifying common misconceptions to highlighting AI innovations and personalised treatments, the series dives deep into what clinicians need to know about these serious lung conditions. Whether you're new to interstitial lung diseases or experienced in respiratory care, this series offers timely insights and expert takeaways. Timestamps: 00:00: Introduction 02:00: ILD landscape: UK versus USA 04:33: What falls under the ILD umbrella? 06:38: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 07:58: Understanding different patient profiles 09:28: Early clinical signs of ILD

In this episode of the Oncology Brothers podcast, Drs. Rohit & Rahul Gosain welcome Dr. Jacob Sands, a thoracic medical oncologist from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, to discuss the recent FDA approval of Dato-DXD (datopotamab deruxtecan) for previously treated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Key Topics: •⁠  ⁠Overview of Dato-DXd and its FDA approval •⁠  ⁠Mechanism of action and study design of the TROPION Lung trials •⁠  ⁠Efficacy and safety profile of Dato-DXd •⁠  ⁠Management of side effects and clinical pearls •⁠  ⁠Treatment sequencing for EGFR-mutated NSCLC Join us as we dive into the details of the TROPION Lung trials that led to this significant approval, the mechanism of action of Dato-DXd, and the implications for patients with various EGFR mutations.  Dr. Sands shared insights on the study design, efficacy, and tolerability of this new antibody-drug conjugate, as well as important clinical pearls for managing side effects such as stomatitis, dry eyes, and interstitial lung disease (ILD). We also explored the current treatment landscape for EGFR-mutated NSCLC, including the sequencing of therapies and the potential role of Dato-DXd in clinical practice. Tune in for an informative discussion that highlights the exciting advancements in oncology and the hope they bring to patients. Follow us on social media: •⁠  ⁠X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers •⁠  ⁠Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oncbrothers •⁠  Website: https://oncbrothers.com/ Don't forget to like, subscribe, and check out our other episodes for more insights into the world of oncology!

In a discussion with CancerNetwork®, Jacob Sands, MD, assistant professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, thoracic oncologist at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and investigator of the phase 2 TROPION-Lung05 trial (NCT04484142) and phase 3 TROPION-Lung01 trial (NCT04656652), which supported the accelerated approval of datopotamab deruxtecan-dlnk (dato-DXd; Datroway) in pretreated EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC in June 2025, discussed safety and efficacy considerations for the agent's use.1-3 He began by outlining a combined cohort of the TROPION-Lung05 and TROPION-Lung01 trials, which collectively showed an efficacy benefit with dato-DXd in patients with EGFR-mutant disease vs docetaxel. In the combined cohort, the median progression-free survival with dato-DXd reached 5.8 months, and the median overall survival was 15.6 months. Additional efficacy data revealed an objective response rate of 45% (95% CI, 35%-54%) and a median duration of response of 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.4).  Furthermore, Sands highlighted the most common toxicities observed with dato-DXd in this population, which included stomatitis, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and ocular toxicities. He also reviewed management strategies to mitigate their incidence and severity. Specifically, remedies include prophylaxis, oral hygiene, and dose reductions for stomatitis; using preservative-free eye drops and ophthalmology visits for ocular toxicity management and prevention; and monitoring for any incidence of high-grade ILD. He then touched upon next steps for research in this disease state, including the phase 2 ORCHARD trial (NCT03944772) evaluating dato-DXd with osimertinib (Tagrisso) in the second-line setting after progression on osimertinib and the phase 3 TROPION-Lung15 trial (NCT06417814), which is evaluating chemotherapy vs dato-DXd alone or with osimertinib.4,5 Sands concluded by discussing the implications for toxicity management in patients who experience responses that exceed median outcomes, suggesting that the toxicity profile may be more severe for this group. Emphasizing the broadness of outcomes with any drug, he expressed that patients with experiences that deviate from the observed median outcome are an important consideration for clinical practice. References Sands J, Ahn MJ, Lisberg A, et al. Datopotamab deruxtecan in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with actionable genomic alterations: results from the phase II TROPION-Lung05 study. J Clin Oncol. Published online January 6, 2025. doi:10.1200/JCO-24-01349 Ahn MJ, Tanaka K, Paz-Ares L, et al. Datopotamab deruxtecan versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: the randomized, open-label phase III TROPION-Lung01 study. J Clin Oncol. Published online September 9, 2024. doi:10.1200/JCO-24-01544  FDA grants accelerated approval to datopotamab deruxtecan-dlnk for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. News release. FDA. June 23, 2025. Accessed July 29, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/mtay7ab9 Yu HA, Goldberg SB, Le X, et al. Biomarker-directed phase II platform study in patients with EGFR sensitizing mutation-positive advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer whose disease has progressed on first-line osimertinib therapy (ORCHARD). Clin Lung Cancer. 2021;22(6):601-606. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2021.06.006 A study to investigate the efficacy and safety of dato-DXd with or without osimertinib compared with platinum based doublet chemotherapy in participants with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (TROPION-Lung15). ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated July 16, 2025. Accessed July 29, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/56z3dmsp

Please visit answersincme.com/ZXA860 to participate, download slides and supporting materials, complete the post test, and obtain credit. In this activity, experts in interstitial lung disease (ILD) discuss the latest information, including post-congress insights, on advancing patient-centered ILD care with antifibrotics, treatment innovations, and multidisciplinary approaches. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess recommended antifibrotic treatment for patients with ILDs; Review the rationale for novel therapy for fibrosing ILDs; and Outline multidisciplinary, patient-centered strategies to enhance care for individuals with ILDs.

Please visit answersincme.com/ZXA860 to participate, download slides and supporting materials, complete the post test, and obtain credit. In this activity, experts in interstitial lung disease (ILD) discuss the latest information, including post-congress insights, on advancing patient-centered ILD care with antifibrotics, treatment innovations, and multidisciplinary approaches. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess recommended antifibrotic treatment for patients with ILDs; Review the rationale for novel therapy for fibrosing ILDs; and Outline multidisciplinary, patient-centered strategies to enhance care for individuals with ILDs.

Drs. Yuan and Callahan discuss data presented at ASCO 2025 about DESTINY-Breast06, SHR-A1811, and TQB2101, along with real-world data on rechallenging patients with T-DXd post grade 1 ILD.

Drs. Zaman and Podolanczuk discuss data for new and emerging therapies for ILD presented at ATS 2025, including nerandomilast, inhaled therapies for IPF and ILD, TNIK inhibitors, as well as new biomarkers and imaging for diagnosing ILDs.

In this episode of ACR Journals on Air, host Dr. Vicki Shanmugam returns to the mic and dives into the CLASS Project—an ambitious international study on anti-synthetase syndrome recently published in Arthritis & Rheumatology. Joined by Drs. Sara Faghihi-Kashani, Akira Yoshida, and Giovanni Zanframundo, she explores the clinical characteristics, antibody profiles, and skin and lung manifestations of this complex autoimmune condition. The conversation covers everything from global collaboration challenges to nuanced antibody testing and rare clinical features like hikers' feet. With insightful perspectives from each guest, this episode sheds light on the evolving understanding of anti-synthetase syndrome and the future directions of the CLASS initiative. 

Sharon Samjitsingh is an asthma patient and developer of the ADAMM wearable device and Nightingale emergency respiratory care services. She has suffered with asthma her entire life and as a child, fear surrounded her and her family never knowing when the next attack would occur. As an adult she decided to do something to help others monitoring their breathing rhythms, heart rate and symptoms by developing a wearable technology that is taped under the torso and data relayed to a smartphone or computer via wifi that send alerts of an upcoming attack far in advance of its presentation. Her team of on call respiratory therapists then coach the patient with breathing education and behavior modification to reduce likelihood of presentation of an attack. Her results have changed the life of an asthma, COPD, ILD, and Cystic Fibrosis patient from a life caged by fear to one of empowering freedom and self-control. For review of the studies, visit healthcareoriginals.com

Dr. John Sweetenham and Dr. Erika Hamilton highlight key abstracts that were presented at ASCO25, including advances in breast and pancreatic cancers as well as remarkable data from the use of structured exercise programs in cancer care. Transcript Dr. Sweetenham: Hello, and welcome to the ASCO Daily News Podcast. I'm your host, Dr. John Sweetenham. Today, we'll be discussing some of the key advances and novel approaches in cancer care that were presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting. I'm delighted to be joined again by the chair of the Meeting's Scientific Program, Dr. Erika Hamilton. She is a medical oncologist and director of breast cancer and gynecologic cancer research at the Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville, Tennessee.  Our full disclosures are available in the transcript of this episode. Dr. Hamilton, congratulations on a fantastic meeting. From the practice-changing science to the world-renowned speakers at this year's Meeting, ASCO25 really reflected the amazing progress we're seeing in oncology today and the enormous opportunities that lie ahead of us. And thanks for coming back on to the podcast today to discuss some of these advances. Dr. Hamilton: Thanks, Dr. Sweetenham. I'm happy to join you today. It really was an impactful ASCO Annual Meeting. I probably am biased, but some great research was presented this year, and I heard lots of great conversations happening while we were there. Dr. Sweetenham: Yeah, absolutely. There was a lot of buzz, as well as a lot of media buzz around the meeting this year, and I think that's probably a good place to start. So I'd like to dive into abstract number LBA3510. This was the CHALLENGE trial, which created a lot of buzz at the meeting and subsequently in the media. This is the study that was led by the NCI Canada Clinical Trials Group, which was the first randomized phase 3 trial in patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer, which demonstrated that a post-treatment structured exercise program is both feasible and effective in improving disease-free survival in this patient group. The study was performed over a long period of time and in many respects is quite remarkable. So, I wonder if you could give us your thoughts about this study and whether you think that this means that our futures are going to be full of structured exercise programs for those patients who may benefit. Dr. Hamilton: It's a fantastic question. I think that this abstract did create a lot of buzz. We were very excited when we read it. It was highlighted in one of the Clinical Science Symposium sessions. But briefly, this was a phase 3 randomized trial. It was conducted at 55 centers, so really a broad experience, and patients that had resected colon cancer who completed adjuvant therapy were allowed to participate. There were essentially 2 groups: a structured exercise program, called ‘the exercise group,' or health education materials alone, so that was called just ‘the health education group.' And this was a 3-year intervention, so very high quality. The primary end point, as you mentioned, was disease-free survival. This actually accrued from 2009 to 2024, so quite a lift, and almost 900 patients underwent randomization to the exercise group or the health education group. And at almost 8 years of follow-up, we saw that the disease-free survival was significantly longer in the exercise group than the health education group. This was essentially 80.3% of patients were disease-free in exercise and 73.9% in the health education group. So a difference of over 6 percentage points, which, you know, at least in the breast cancer world, we make decisions about whether to do chemotherapy or not based on these kind of data. We also looked at overall survival in the exercise group and health education group, and the 8-year overall survival was 90.3% in the exercise group and 83.2% in the health education group. So this was a difference of 7.1%. Still statistically significant. I think this was really a fantastic effort over more than a decade at over 50 institutions with almost 900 patients, really done in a very systematic, high-intervention way that showed a fantastic result. Absolutely generalizable for patients with colon cancer. We have hints in other cancers that this is beneficial, and frankly, for our patients for other comorbidities, such as cardiovascular, etc., I really think that this is an abstract that deserved the press that it received. Dr. Sweetenham: Yeah, absolutely, and it is going to be very interesting, I think, over the next 2 or 3 years to see how much impact this particular study might have on programs across the country and across the world actually, in terms of what they do in this kind of adjuvant setting for structured exercise. Dr. Hamilton: Absolutely.  So let's move on to Abstract 3006. This was an NCI-led effort comparing genomic testing using ctDNA and tissue from patients with less common cancers who were enrolled in but not eligible for a treatment arm of the NCI-MATCH trial. Tell us about your takeaways from this study. Dr. Sweetenham: Yeah, so I thought this was a really interesting study based, as you said, on NCI-MATCH. And many of the listeners will probably remember that the original NCI-MATCH study screened almost 6,000 patients to assess eligibility for those who had an actionable mutation. And it turned out that about 60% of the patients who went on to the study had less common tumors, which were defined as anything other than colon, rectum, breast, non–small cell lung cancer, or prostate cancer. And most of those patients lacked an eligible mutation of interest and so didn't get onto a trial therapy. But with a great deal of foresight, the study group had actually collected plasma samples from these patients so that they would have the opportunity to look at circulating tumor DNA profiles with the potential being that this might be another way for testing for clinically relevant mutations in some of these less common cancer types. So initially, they tested more than 2,000 patients, and to make a somewhat complicated story short, there was a subset of five histologies with a larger representation in terms of sample size. And these were cholangiocarcinoma, small cell lung cancer, esophageal cancer, pancreatic, and salivary gland cancer. And in those particular tumors, when they compared the ctDNA sequencing with the original tumor, there was a concordance there of around 84%, 85%. And in the presentation, the investigators go on to list the specific mutated genes that were identified in each of those tumors. But I think that the other compelling part of this study from my perspective was not just that concordance, which suggests that there's an opportunity there for the use of ctDNA instead of tumor biopsies in some of these situations, but what was also interesting was the fact that there were several clinically relevant mutations which were detected only in the circulating tumor DNA. And a couple of examples of those included IDH1 for cholangiocarcinoma, BRAF and p53 in several histologies, and microsatellite instability was most prevalent in small cell lung cancer in the ctDNA. So I think that what this demonstrates is that liquid biopsy is certainly a viable screening option for patients who are being assessed for matching for targeted therapies in clinical trials. The fact that some of these mutations were only seen in the ctDNA and not in the primary tumor specimen certainly suggests that there's some tumor heterogeneity. But I think that for me, the most compelling part of this study was the fact that many of these mutations were only picked up in the plasma. And so, as the authors concluded, they believe that a comprehensive gene profiling with circulating tumor DNA probably should be included as a primary screening modality in future trials of targeted therapy of this type. Dr. Hamilton: Yeah, I think that that's really interesting and mirrors a lot of data that we've been seeing. At least in breast cancer, you know, we still do a biopsy up front to make sure that our markers, we're still treating the right disease that we think we are. But it really speaks to the utility of using ctDNA for serial monitoring and the emergence of mutations. Dr. Sweetenham: Absolutely. And you mentioned breast cancer, and so I'd like to dwell on that for a moment here because obviously, there was a huge amount of exciting breast cancer data presented at the meeting this year. And in particular, I'd like to ask you about LBA1008, the DESTINY-Breast09 clinical trial, which I think has the potential to establish a new first-line standard of care for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. And that's an area where we haven't seen a whole lot of innovation for around a decade now. So can you give us some of the highlights of this trial and what your thinking is, having seen the results? Dr. Hamilton: Yeah, absolutely. So this was a trial in the first-line metastatic HER2 setting. So this was looking at trastuzumab deruxtecan. We certainly have had no shortage of reports around this drug, initially approved for later lines. DESTINY-Breast03 brought it into our second-line setting for HER2+ disease and we're now looking at DESTINY-Breast09 in first-line. So this actually was a 3-arm trial where patients were randomized 1:1:1 against standard taxane/trastuzumab/pertuzumab in one arm; trastuzumab deruxtecan with pertuzumab in another arm; and then a third arm, trastuzumab deruxtecan alone. And what we did not see reported was that trastuzumab deruxtecan-alone arm. But we did have reports from the trastuzumab deruxtecan plus pertuzumab versus the chemo/trastuzumab/pertuzumab. And what we saw was a statistically significant improvement in median progression-free survival, 26.9 months up to 40.7, so an improvement of 13.8 months, over a year in PFS. Not to mention that we're now in the 40-month range for PFS in first-line disease. Really, across all subgroups, we really weren't able to pick out a subset of patients that did not benefit. We did see about a 12% ILD rate with trastuzumab deruxtecan. That really is on par with what we've seen in other studies, around 10%-15%. I think that this is going to become a new standard of care in the first-line. I think it did leave some unanswered questions. We saw some data from the PATINA trial this past San Antonio Breast, looking at the addition of endocrine therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, for those patients that also have ER+ disease, after taxane has dropped out in the first-line setting. So how we're going to kind of merge all this together is, I suspect that there are going to be patients that we or they just don't have the appetite to continue 3 to 4 years of trastuzumab deruxtecan. And so we're probably going to be looking at a maintenance-type strategy for them, maybe integrating the PATINA data there. But how we really put this into practice in the first-line setting and if or when we think about de-escalating down from trastuzumab deruxtecan to antibody therapy are some lingering questions. Dr. Sweetenham: Okay, so certainly is going to influence practice, but watch this space for a little bit longer, it sounds as though that's what you're saying. Dr. Hamilton: Absolutely.  So let's move on to GI cancer. Abstract 4006 reported preliminary results from the randomized phase 2 study of elraglusib in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus the chemo gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Can you tell us more about this study? Dr. Sweetenham: Yeah, absolutely. As you mentioned, elraglusib is actually a first-in-class inhibitor of GSK3-beta, which has multiple potential actions in pancreatic cancer. But the drug itself may be involved in mediating drug resistance as well as in some tumor immune response modulation. Some of that's not clearly understood, I believe, right now. But certainly, preclinical data suggests that the drug may be effective in preclinical models and may also be effective in combination with chemotherapy and potentially with immune-modulating agents as well. So this particular study, as you said, was an open-label, randomized phase 2 study in which patients with pancreatic cancer were randomized 2:1 in favor of the elraglusib plus GMP—gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel—versus the chemotherapy alone. And upon completion of the study, which is not right now, median overall survival was the primary end point, but there are a number of other end points which I'll talk about in just a moment. But the sample size was planned to be around 207 patients. The primary analysis included 155 patients in the combination arm versus 78 patients in the gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel arm. Overall, the 1-year overall survival rate was 44.1% for the patients in the elraglusib-containing arm versus 23.0% in the patients receiving gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel only. When they look at the median overall survival, it was 9.3 months for the experimental arm versus 7.2 months for chemotherapy alone. So put another way, there's around a 37% reduction in the risk of death with the use of this combination arm. The treatment was overall well-tolerated. There were some issues with grade 1 to 2 transient visual impairment in a large proportion of the patients. The most common treatment-related adverse effects with the elraglusib/GMP combination was transient visual impairment, which affected around 60% of the patients. Most of the more serious treatment-related adverse events included neutropenia, anemia, and fatigue in 50%, 25%, and 16% of the patients, respectively. So the early results from this study show a significant benefit for 1-year overall survival and for median overall survival with, as I mentioned above, a significant reduction in the risk of death. The authors went on to mention that the median overall survival for the control arm in this study is somewhat lower than in other comparable trials, but they think that this may be related to a more advanced disease burden in this particular study. Of interest to me was that right now: there is no apparent difference in progression-free survival between the 2 arms of this study. The authors described this as potentially indicating that this may be related in some way to immune modulation and immune effects on the tumor, which, if I'm completely honest, I don't totally understand. And so, the improvement in overall survival, as far as I can see at the moment, is not matched by an improvement in progression-free survival. So I think we probably need to wait for more time to elapse to see what happens with the study. And so, I think it certainly is an interesting study, and the results are intriguing, but I think it's probably a little early for it to actually shift the treatment paradigm in this disease. Dr. Hamilton: Fantastic. I think we've been waiting for advances in pancreatic cancer for a long time, but this, not unlike others, we learn more and then learn more we don't realize, so. Dr. Sweetenham: Right. Let's shift gears at this point and talk about a couple of other abstracts in kind of a very different space. Let's start out with symptom management for older adults with cancer. We know that undertreated symptoms are common among the older patient population, and Abstract 11002 reported on a randomized trial that demonstrated the effects of remote monitoring for older patients with cancer in terms of kind of symptoms and so on. Can you tell us a little bit about this study and whether you think this approach will potentially improve care for older patients? Dr. Hamilton: Yeah, I really liked this abstract. It was conducted through the Veterans Affairs, and it was based in California, which I'm telling you that because it's going to have a little bit of an implication later on. But essentially, adults that were 75 years or older who were Medicare Advantage beneficiaries were eligible to participate. Forty-three clinics in Southern California and Arizona, and patients were randomized either into a control group of usual clinic care alone, or an intervention group, which was usual care plus a lay health worker-led proactive telephone-based weekly symptom assessment, and this was for 12 months using the validated Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. So, there was a planned enrollment of at least 200 patients in each group. They successfully met that. And this lay health worker reviewed assessments with a physician assistant, who conducted follow-up for symptoms that changed by 2 points from a prior assessment or were rated 4 or greater. So almost a triage system to figure out who needed to be reached out to and to kind of work on symptoms. What I thought was fantastic about this was it was very representative of where it enrolled. There were actually about 50% of patients enrolled here that were Hispanic or Latinos. So some of our underserved populations and really across a wide variety of tumor types. They found that the intervention group had 53% lower odds of emergency room use, 68% lower odds of hospital use than the control group. And when they translated this to actual total cost of care, this was a savings of about $12,000 U.S. per participant and 75% lower odds of a death in an acute care facility. So I thought this was really interesting for a variety of reasons. One, certainly health care utilization and cost, but even more so, I think any of our patients would want to prevent hospitalizations and ER visits. Normally, that's not a fantastic experience having to feel poorly enough that you're in the emergency room or the hospital. And really showing in kind of concrete metrics that we were able to decrease this with this intervention. In terms of sustainability and scalability, I think the question is really the workforce to do this. Obviously, you know, this is going to take dedicated employees to have the ability to reach out to these patients, etc., but I think in value-based care, there's definitely a possibility of having reimbursement and having the funds to institute a program like this. So, definitely thought-provoking, and I hope it leads to more interventions. Dr. Sweetenham: Yeah, we've seen, over several years now, many of these studies which have looked at remote symptom monitoring and so on in this patient population, and many of them do show benefits for that in kinds of end points, not the least in this study being hospitalization and emergency room avoidance. But I think the scalability and personnel issue is a huge one, and I do wonder at some level whether we may see some AI-based platforms coming along that could actually help with this and provide interactions with these patients outside of actual real people, or at least in combination with real people. Dr. Hamilton: Yeah, that's a fantastic point.  So let's talk a little bit about clinical trials. So eligibility assessment for oncology clinical trials, or prescreening, really relies on manual review of unstructured clinical notes. It's time-consuming, it's prone to errors, and Abstract 1508 reported on the final analysis of a randomized trial that looked at the effect of human-AI teams prescreening for clinical trial eligibility versus human-only or AI-only prescreening. So give us more good news about AI. What did the study find? Dr. Sweetenham: Yeah, this is a really, a really interesting study. And of course, any of us who have ever been involved in clinical trials will know that accrual is always a problem. And I think most centers have attempted, and some quite successfully managed to develop prescreening programs so that patients are screened by a health care provider or health care worker prior to being seen in the clinic, and the clinical investigator will then already know whether they're going to be eligible for a trial or not. But as you've already said, it's a slow process. It's typically somewhat inefficient and requires a lot of time on the part of the health care workers to actually do this in a successful way. And so, this was a study from Emory University where they took three models of ways in which they could assess the accuracy of the prescreening of charts for patients who are going to be considered for clinical trials. One of these was essentially the regular way of having two research coordinators physically abstract the charts. The second one was an AI platform which would extract longitudinal EHR data. And then the third one was a combination of the two. So the AI would be augmented by the research coordinator or the other way around. As a gold standard, they had three independent oncology reviewers who went through all of these charts to provide what they regarded as being the benchmark for accuracy. In a way, it's not a surprise to me because I think that a number of other systems which have used this combination of human verification of AI-based tools, it actually ultimately concluded that the combination of the two in terms of chart accuracy was for the most part better than either one individually, either the research coordinator or the AI alone. So I'll give you just a few examples of where specifically that mattered. The human plus AI platform was more accurate in terms of tumor staging, in terms of identifying biomarker testing and biomarker results, as well as biomarker interpretation, and was also superior in terms of listing medications. There are one or two other areas where either the AI alone was somewhat more accurate, but the significant differences were very much in favor of a combination of human + AI screening of these patient charts. So, in full disclosure, this didn't save time, but what the authors reported was that there were definite efficiency gains, and presumably this would actually become even more improved once the research coordinators were somewhat more comfortable and at home with the AI tool. So, I thought it was an interesting way of trying to enhance clinical trial accrual up front by this combination of humans and technology, and I think it's going to be interesting to see if this gets adopted at other centers in the future. Dr. Hamilton: Yeah, I think it's really fascinating, all the different places that we can be using AI, and I love the takeaway that AI and humans together are better than either individually. Dr. Sweetenham: Absolutely.  Thanks once again, Dr. Hamilton, for sharing your insights with us today and for all of the incredible work you did to build a robust program. And also, congratulations on what was, I think, a really remarkable ASCO this year, one of the most exciting for some time, I think. So thank you again for that. Dr. Hamilton: Thanks so much. It was really a pleasure to work on ASCO 2025 this year. Dr. Sweetenham: And thank you to our listeners for joining us today. You'll find links to all the abstracts we discussed today in the transcript of this episode. Be sure to catch up on all of our coverage from the Annual Meeting. You can catch up on my daily reports that were published each day of the Annual Meeting, featuring the key science and innovations presented. And we'll have wrap-up episodes publishing in June, covering the full spectrum of malignancies from ASCO25. If you value the insights you hear on the ASCO Daily News Podcast, please remember to rate, review, and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Disclaimer: The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.   More on today's speakers: Dr. John Sweetenham   Dr. Erika Hamilton @erikahamilton9   Follow ASCO on social media:  @ASCO on Twitter  ASCO on Bluesky  ASCO on Facebook   ASCO on LinkedIn     Disclosures:     Dr. John Sweetenham:     No relationships to disclose    Dr. Erika Hamilton: Consulting or Advisory Role (Inst): Pfizer, Genentech/Roche, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Mersana, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Ellipses Pharma, Olema Pharmaceuticals, Stemline Therapeutics, Tubulis, Verascity Science, Theratechnologies, Accutar Biotechnology, Entos, Fosun Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Medical Pharma Services, Hosun Pharma, Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Jefferies, Tempus Labs, Arvinas, Circle Pharma, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson   Research Funding (Inst): AstraZeneca, Hutchison MediPharma, OncoMed, MedImmune, Stem CentRx, Genentech/Roche, Curis, Verastem, Zymeworks, Syndax, Lycera, Rgenix, Novartis, Millenium, TapImmune, Inc., Lilly, Pfizer, Lilly, Pfizer, Tesaro, Boehringer Ingelheim, H3 Biomedicine, Radius Health, Acerta Pharma, Macrogenics, Abbvie, Immunomedics, Fujifilm, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Merus, Nucana, Regeneron, Leap Therapeutics, Taiho Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono, Daiichi Sankyo, ArQule, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Clovis Oncology, CytomX Therapeutics, InventisBio, Deciphera, Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Zenith Epigentics, Arvinas, Harpoon, Black Diamond, Orinove, Molecular Templates, Seattle Genetics, Compugen, GI Therapeutics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Dana-Farber Cancer Hospital, Shattuck Labs, PharmaMar, Olema Pharmaceuticals, Immunogen, Plexxikon, Amgen, Akesobio Australia, ADC Therapeutics, AtlasMedx, Aravive, Ellipses Pharma, Incyte, MabSpace Biosciences, ORIC Pharmaceuticals, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Pionyr, Repetoire Immune Medicines, Treadwell Therapeutics, Accutar Biotech, Artios, Bliss Biopharmaceutical, Cascadian Therapeutics, Dantari, Duality Biologics, Elucida Oncology, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Relay Therapeutics, Tolmar, Torque, BeiGene, Context Therapeutics, K-Group Beta, Kind Pharmaceuticals, Loxo Oncology, Oncothyreon, Orum Therapeutics, Prelude Therapeutics, Profound Bio, Cullinan Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squib, Eisai, Fochon Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Inspirna, Myriad Genetics, Silverback Therapeutics, Stemline Therapeutics

On this accredited episode of NP Pulse: The Voice of the Nurse Practitioner®️, join expert nurse practitioners (NPs) Jessica Glennie and Corinne Young for an insightful discussion on fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) — a complex and often underrecognized condition. Learn how to identify early signs, navigate the diagnostic pathway and support patients with emerging therapies and holistic care strategies. This essential program equips NPs with the tools to improve outcomes for patients living with ILD. A participation code will be provided at the end of the podcast — make sure to write this code down. Once you have listened to the podcast and have the participation code, return to this activity in the AANP CE Center. Click on the "Next Steps" button of the activity and: Enter the participation code that was provided. Complete the posttest. Complete the activity evaluation. This will award your continuing education (CE) credit and certificate of completion. 1.2 CE, 0.4 RX, will be available through June 30, 2026. This activity is supported by an independent medical educational grant from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  

Dr. Rodolfo Estrada, is a seasoned pulmonologists currently at UT Health San Antonio with significant experience in the management of patients with different forms of pulmonary hypertension. In this episode, Dr. Estrada will discuss the technology and clinical development behind YUTREPIA™ (treprostinil) inhalation powder and why it might be a good option for some PAH and PH-ILD patients. This Special Edition episode is sponsored by Liquidia. Please see the Important Safety Information following this podcast. The Prescribing Information and Instructions for Use for YUTREPIA (treprostinil) inhalation powder are available at YUTREPIA.com.  YUTREPIA is approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH; WHO Group 1) and pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD; WHO Group 3) to improve the ability to exercise. Please see the Important Safety Information in the show notes. The Prescribing Information and Instructions for Use for YUTREPIA are available at YUTREPIA.com. Learn more about the INSPIRE study. Learn more about pulmonary hypertension trials at www.phaware.global/clinicaltrials. Engage for a cure: www.phaware.global/donate #phaware Share your story: info@phaware.com Like, Subscribe and Follow us: www.phawarepodcast.com. #phawareMD #PHILD @Liquidia_Corp @REstradaMD @UTHealthSA IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION Before you take YUTREPIA, tell your healthcare provider about all of your medical conditions, including if you: Have low blood pressure Have or have had bleeding problems Have asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Are pregnant or plan to become pregnant. It is not known if this product will harm your unborn baby Are breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed. It is not known if this product passes into your breast milk. Talk to your healthcare provider about the best way to feed your baby during treatment Tell your healthcare provider about all of the medicines you take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and herbal supplements. YUTREPIA and other medicines may affect each other. Especially tell your healthcare provider if you take: Medicines used to treat high blood pressure or heart disease Medicines that decrease blood clotting (anticoagulants) Water pills (diuretics) Gemfibrozil (Lopid®) or rifampin (Rimactane®, Rifadin®, Rifamate®, Rifater®) What are the possible side effects of YUTREPIA? This product can cause serious side effects, including: Low blood pressure (symptomatic hypotension). If you have low blood pressure, this product may lower your blood pressure more. Bleeding problems. This product may increase the risk of bleeding, especially in people who take blood thinners (anticoagulants). The most common side effects of YUTREPIA are cough, headache, throat irritation and pain, nausea, reddening of the face and neck (flushing), fainting or loss of consciousness, dizziness, diarrhea, and shortness of breath. Like other inhaled prostaglandins, you may have trouble breathing after taking YUTREPIA because it may cause the muscles around your airway to tighten (bronchospasm). These are not all the possible side effects. Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects or if you have trouble breathing. You may report side effects to the FDA at www.fda.gov/MedWatch or call 1–800-FDA-1088. The risk information provided here is not comprehensive. To learn more about YUTREPIA, talk with your healthcare provider. Please see Full Prescribing Information for YUTREPIA and Instructions for Use. For additional information, call 1–888–393–5732.

Decoding Pulmonary Hypertension: Echo and Cath Insights for Pulmonologists. Dr. Marc Simon shares his expertise on diagnosing pulmonary hypertension, emphasizing echocardiographic markers, right heart catheterization pitfalls, and risk stratification with the H2FPEF score. His insights help clinicians refine their diagnostic approach for better patient outcomes. This Special Edition episode is sponsored by Liquidia. View PDF Slides here.  Learn more about pulmonary hypertension trials at www.phaware.global/clinicaltrials. Engage for a cure: www.phaware.global/donate #phaware Share your story: info@phaware.com Like, Subscribe and Follow us: www.phawarepodcast.com. #phawareMD #PHILD @Liquidia_Corp @UCSFCardiology @MarcSimonMD @CalThoracic

Dr. Jean Elwing, a leading expert in pulmonary hypertension, discusses groundbreaking advancements in treating pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). For years, patients with this condition had limited treatment options beyond oxygen therapy and symptom management. However, recent studies have introduced new hope, showing improved patient outcomes and quality of life. Dr. Elwing emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis, ongoing research, and clinical trial participation in pushing the field forward. This Special Edition episode is sponsored by Gossamer Bio and Pulmovant. Learn more about pulmonary hypertension trials at www.phaware.global/clinicaltrials. Engage for a cure: www.phaware.global/donate #phaware Share your story: info@phaware.com Like, Subscribe and Follow us: www.phawarepodcast.com. #phawareMD #PHILD  @uc_health @ElwingJean @GossamerBio #Pulmovant @accpchest  #PHOCUSstudy #PROSERAstudy

Seth Hall, MBA, RRT, takes listeners on a journey through the past, present, and future of inhaled therapies. Discover how these treatments have evolved, the life-changing benefits they offer, and the revolutionary technologies that could redefine outcomes for PAH and PH-ILD patients. This Special Edition episode is sponsored by Liquidia. Learn more about pulmonary hypertension trials at www.phaware.global/clinicaltrials. Engage for a cure: www.phaware.global/donate #phaware Share your story: info@phaware.com Like, Subscribe and Follow us: www.phawarepodcast.com. #phawareMD #PHILD @Liquidia_Corp #PRINTTechnology 

Dr. Richard Channick, dives into the evolving world within pulmonary hypertension -- interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). He sheds light on why early diagnosis matters and how new therapies are transforming care. Learn about the latest FDA-approved treatment and what's on the horizon. This Special Edition episode is sponsored by Gossamer Bio and Pulmovant. Learn more about pulmonary hypertension trials at www.phaware.global/clinicaltrials. Engage for a cure: www.phaware.global/donate #phaware Share your story: info@phaware.com Like, Subscribe and Follow us: www.phawarepodcast.com. #phawareMD #PHILD @UCLAHealth @GossamerBio #Pulmovant @accpchest  #PHOCUSstudy #PROSERAStudy      

This is the second episode of a two-part series on the HER2 diagnostic and treatment landscape in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), hosted by the Oncology Brothers, Drs Rohit and Rahul Gosain.      In this episode, Dr Isabel Preeshagul and Dr Eric Singhi provide the benefit of their experience when discussing how to approach different treatment scenarios in HER2-mutant NSCLC.   The conversation unfolds to cover: • Ways to distinguish HER2 alterations from other alterations on biomarker reports  • The latest efficacy and safety data of currently approved and emerging treatments for HER2-altered NSCLC   • The potential CNS activity of these treatments in patients with HER2-mutated NSCLC  • How the treatment pathway may look in the near future      Clinical takeaways • In NSCLC, HER2-positivity includes mutations, amplifications and overexpression. It's important to distinguish HER2 alterations from EGFR mutations, particularly exon 20 insertions, when interpreting next-generation sequencing (NGS) results  • Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) is currently the only approved targeted agent for HER2-altered NSCLC in the 2nd-line setting. It shows promising efficacy, especially in HER2-mutant cases, but has limited brain penetration and is associated with notable side effects, including pneumonitis, which requires close monitoring  • Emerging TKIs, such as zongertinib, BAY 2927088 (sevabertinib), and NVL-330, target HER2-mutations and have shown high response rates and CNS activity in early studies, without ILD/pneumonitis. These treatments come with unique side effects like diarrhoea and rash, which can be managed with supportive care  • CNS metastases are common, with up to 30% of HER2-altered NSCLC patients presenting with or quickly developing CNS metastases. Current large molecule therapies (like T-DXd) have limited brain penetration, making small-molecule TKIs, like zongertinib, BAY 2927088 (sevabertinib), and NVL-330, promising for their potential CNS activity • Current standard 1st-line care for HER2-mutant NSCLC remains platinum-based chemotherapy ± immunotherapy. Targeted agents (like T-DXd) are generally reserved for 2nd-line use, but ongoing trials are evaluating the move toward frontline therapy Follow us on social media: •⁠  ⁠X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers •⁠  ⁠Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oncbrothers •⁠  Website: https://oncbrothers.com/ Don't forget to subscribe for the next episode

Dr. Ioana Preston explores the emerging field of pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). She discusses the growing recognition of PH-ILD, especially after the introduction of inhaled treprostinil as a treatment, and highlights the importance of early screening and diagnosis. Dr. Preston also delves into the challenges of treating rare diseases, the evolution of research, and the hope for future therapies that could significantly improve patients' lives. This insightful conversation sheds light on a critical yet often overlooked aspect of pulmonary care, urging clinicians to stay vigilant and informed about PH-ILD's complexities.  This Special Edition episode is sponsored by Liquidia. Learn more about pulmonary hypertension trials at www.phaware.global/clinicaltrials. Engage for a cure: www.phaware.global/donate #phaware Share your story: info@phaware.com Like, Subscribe and Follow us: www.phawarepodcast.com. #phawareMD #PHILD @Liquidia_Corp @LaheyHospital  

Dr. Raj Parikh from Hartford Hospital discusses the development of the PH-ILD Detection tool, a screening tool designed to help detect pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) at an early stage. Early detection is critical, as there is often a significant delay in diagnosis of PH in ILD patients, leading to worsened outcomes. This Special Edition episode is sponsored by Liquidia. Learn more about pulmonary hypertension trials at www.phaware.global/clinicaltrials. Engage for a cure: www.phaware.global/donate #phaware Share your story: info@phaware.com Like, Subscribe and Follow us: www.phawarepodcast.com. #phawareMD @HartfordHealthC @Liquidia_Corp @teamphhope #PHILD