Podcasts about Multiple myeloma

spain emory university salamanca cme university hospital multiple myeloma refractory relapsed winship cancer institute ash annual meeting

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 16, 2026 61:06

Dr Sagar Lonial from Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, and Dr María-Victoria Mateos from the University Hospital of Salamanca in Salamanca, Spain, discuss cases of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and recentresearch findings from the 2025 ASH Annual Meeting. CME information and select publications here.

Sagar Lonial, MD, FACP - Many Roads to Myeloma Remission: Making Sequential Choices With BCMA and Non-BCMA Immunotherapies

PeerView Clinical Pharmacology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 13, 2026 82:01

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/EBAH/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/JGX865. CME/MOC/EBAH/AAPA credit will be available until January 4, 2027.Many Roads to Myeloma Remission: Making Sequential Choices With BCMA and Non-BCMA Immunotherapies In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and HealthTree Foundation for Multiple Myeloma. PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis educational activity is supported by independent medical educational grants from Arcellx, Inc. and Kite, a Gilead Company; GSK; Johnson & Johnson; and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.

patients choices roads disclosure kite johnson johnson medical education immunotherapy remission gsk sagar sequential multiple myeloma myeloma accreditation council regeneron pharmaceuticals bcma pvi continuing medical education accme pharmacy education acpe practice aids peerview institute healthtree foundation

2025 Medical Breakthroughs: Gene Therapy for Baby KJ, Huntington's Disease Treatment, CAR-T Myeloma Success, and mRNA Vaccines Boosting Cancer Immunotherapy

Ask Doctor Dawn

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 9, 2026 53:03

Broadcast from KSQD, Santa Cruz on 1-01-2025: An emailer asks about omega-3 supplementation for memory at age 72. Dr. Dawn advises checking that fish oil capsules contain adequate DHA—at least 1,000 mg—since many omega-3 products have low DHA levels. She notes Medicare covers the same testing at standard labs as proprietary labs like OmegaQuant that charge patients directly. Beyond omega-3s, she emphasizes glucose control (hemoglobin A1c below 5.6) since the enzyme that breaks down insulin also clears beta-amyloid, and weight training to raise brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which promotes new synapse formation essential for memory. Dr. Dawn reviews Popular Science's top 2025 health innovation: eye drops from Lens Therapeutics containing aceclidine that correct age-related farsightedness for 10 hours. The drops shrink the pupil to increase depth of field, improving near vision by three or more lines on eye charts within 30 minutes without affecting distance vision. Side effects include eye irritation, dimmed night vision, and headache. She describes Duke University's breakthrough allowing heart transplants from circulatory death donors using an on-table reanimation technique. This could expand the pediatric donor pool by 20%—critical since up to 20% of children die waiting for transplants. Dr. Dawn celebrates CAR-T immunotherapy for multiple myeloma, which saved her husband's life. Of 97 heavily pretreated patients, 38% achieved complete remission still present at five years, with over 50% total survival. The therapy removes T-cells, uses CRISPR to add receptors targeting cancer cell antigens, then reinfuses the modified cells. She highlights a UC Davis study showing remote blood pressure monitoring with home technology, education, and coaching dropped patients' average blood pressure from 150/80 to 125/74 in months—low-tech with high impact. Dr. Dawn explains the Nano Knife for prostate cancer, which uses localized electrical pulses delivered through thin wires to destroy tumors while sparing surrounding nerves. This minimally invasive approach could reduce erectile dysfunction and incontinence common with traditional surgery. She describes Gilead's Sunlenca, a twice-yearly injection for HIV prevention that's 99% effective. At $14,000 per injection in the US, proceeds help fund access in resource-limited countries where it can be distributed like a vaccination. Dr. Dawn discusses Journavx (suzetrigine), a new non-opioid pain medication working on sodium channels to block pain signals before reaching the brain. At $30 for 50 pills on GoodRx, it offers an alternative for surgical pain in patients with addiction history or genetic vulnerability to opioid dependence. She details the landmark case of Baby KJ, the first person to receive personalized CRISPR gene therapy. Born with a CPS1 enzyme deficiency causing toxic ammonia buildup, KJ was too small for liver transplant. Scientists identified his specific mutation and used CRISPR base editing delivered via lipid nanoparticles to correct a single DNA letter—changing an A to G—in his liver cells which restored enough function to be discharged home. Dr. Dawn reports surprising findings that COVID mRNA vaccines amplify cancer immunotherapy. Lung cancer patients who received COVID vaccination within 100 days of checkpoint inhibitor treatment had 56% three-year survival versus 31% for unvaccinated patients. The mechanism is unknown but may involve mRNA generally alerting the immune system. She revisits research showing Zostavax shingles vaccination reduced dementia risk by 20% over seven years. A natural experiment in Wales—where an age cutoff created comparable vaccinated and unvaccinated groups—provided strong evidence that preventing herpes zoster inflammation protects brain health. Dr. Dawn concludes with Huntington's disease breakthrough: microRNA therapy delivered by virus directly into the brain slowed disease progression by 75% over three years. The microRNA binds to Huntington protein mRNA, preventing ribosome translation and toxic protein production. Some patients returned to work; others expected to need wheelchairs are still walking.

S14 Ep75: FDA Approval Insights: BVd for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: With Surbhi Sidana, MD

ASCO Guidelines Podcast Series

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 9, 2026 9:07

In today's episode, the discussion features Surbhi Sidana, MD, an associate professor of medicine (blood and marrow transplantation and cellular therapy) and leader of the Myeloma CAR-T/Immunotherapy Program at Stanford University/Stanford Medicine, as well as a member of the Stanford Cancer Institute, who provided clinical and regulatory perspectives on the FDA approval of belantamab mafodotin-blmf (Blenrep) in combination with bortezomib (Velcade) and dexamethasone (BVd) for adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least 2 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent. The approval was supported by findings from the phase 3 DREAMM-7 trial (NCT04246047).

md fda fda approval multiple myeloma refractory relapsed surbhi bvd velcade

Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: ASCO-OH (CCO) Living Guideline

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 6, 2026 22:18

Dr. Lisa Hicks and Dr. Joseph Mikhael discuss the updated guideline from ASCO and Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) on the treatment of multiple myeloma. They cover recommendations for therapeutic options across smoldering multiple myeloma, transplant eligible multiple myeloma, transplant ineligible multiple myeloma, and relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. They highlight the importance of shared decision making and patient-centric care. They comment on the explosion of new treatment options in this space and the impetus for this guideline becoming a living guideline, which will be updated on an ongoing, regular basis. Read the full guideline, "Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: ASCO-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Living Guideline" at www.asco.org/hematologic-malignancies-guidelines. TRANSCRIPT This guideline, clinical tools and resources are available at www.asco.org/hematologic-malignancies-guidelines. Read the full text of the guideline and review authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO-25-02587 Brittany Harvey: Hello and welcome to the ASCO Guidelines podcast, one of ASCO's podcasts delivering timely information to keep you up to date on the latest changes, challenges, and advances in oncology. You can find all the shows, including this one, at asco.org/podcasts. My name is Brittany Harvey, and today I am interviewing Dr. Lisa Hicks from St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, and Dr. Joseph Mikhael from the Translational Genomics Research Institute, an affiliate of City of Hope Cancer Center, co-chairs on "Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: American Society of Clinical Oncology-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Living Guideline." Thank you for being here today, Dr. Hicks and Dr. Mikhael. Dr. Lisa Hicks: Thanks so much. Dr. Joseph Mikhael: It is a pleasure to be with you, Brittany. Thank you. Brittany Harvey: Before we discuss this guideline, I would like to note that ASCO takes great care in the development of its guidelines and ensuring that the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy is followed for each guideline. The disclosures of potential conflicts of interest for the guideline panel, including Dr. Hicks and Dr. Mikhael who have joined us here today, are available online with the publication of the guideline in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, which is linked in the show notes. So then to dive into what we are here today to talk about, Dr. Mikhael, I would like to start by recognizing that this guideline updates the 2019 ASCO-CCO Guideline on the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. So what prompted this update and what is the scope of this updated guideline? Dr. Joseph Mikhael: It is amazing when we think back in myeloma years, 2019 actually seems a very, very long time ago because really so much has changed in myeloma over these last six to seven years. Indeed, there have been over 150 randomized controlled trials that we didn't have at the prior guideline that we reviewed for this. Myeloma is a disease that has really changed so dramatically over these last several years. Multiple new agents have been introduced. We now have CAR-T cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, and multiple other agents that were not available at the time. Furthermore, with this growing complexity, it is becoming more important than ever to be able to provide practical advice and guidelines to the oncology community. For most oncologists, they have less than 5% of their time dedicated to multiple myeloma. It is important to bring a clarity to them that allows them to care for their patients. And the scope of these guidelines, furthermore, really cover the whole spectrum of myeloma. They go further than our prior guideline where now we have included smoldering multiple myeloma along with frontline therapy and relapsed multiple myeloma. So, we have really tried to provide the full spectrum to our colleagues in oncology to ensure that they have the tools they need to provide the best care possible for their patients. Dr. Lisa Hicks: That is a really terrific summary. And maybe one thing I will just add is it is really unique to have this much literature. I can't think of another guideline that I have ever been involved with that has seen a field move so quickly and develop so many advancements in a period of just over four or five years. Brittany Harvey: Certainly, there is a large volume of evidence that you all had to review for this guideline update. I think to your point probably one of the greater volumes of literature for a guideline update that you both mentioned. Based on that, I would like to review the key recommendations that are updated in this guideline. So Dr. Hicks, that new patient population that Dr. Mikhael mentioned earlier, what are the key recommendations for patients with smoldering multiple myeloma? Dr. Lisa Hicks: So this is the first time that an ASCO guideline is addressing this branch of multiple myeloma care. It is an area where I think some guidance is needed, and smoldering myeloma is not an active cancer. And so one thing that I really want to highlight is that the panel felt very strongly that to recommend any therapy in this space we needed a higher level of evidentiary certainty, of evidentiary confidence, to make recommendations for active therapy. The panel really made two very important recommendations. First of all, the panel did not recommend treatment for low or intermediate risk smoldering myeloma. That is important. And then the area where I think for the first time we have recommended consideration of treatment is patients with high risk smoldering myeloma. And for patients with high risk smoldering myeloma, the panel recommended that it was appropriate to consider either treatment with daratumumab or careful observation. Dr. Joseph Mikhael: And I think that move forward as you have mentioned, Dr. Hicks, is particularly important because it is an area to some degree still of equipoise and many trials are going on in the area. But we do now have a strong phase III trial that supports the use of daratumumab monotherapy for three years when compared to close observation. But of course, that is not for everyone. And one of the key themes of all of our recommendations are going to be now that more and more choices are available, that we have discussions with our patients to ensure that we match the right treatment with the preference of the patient. And I think that is particularly important here in smoldering myeloma. Dr. Lisa Hicks: Multiple myeloma care and the multiple myeloma evidence is really so nuanced, and one of the nuances that readers will appreciate if they read the guideline is that how smoldering myeloma is risk stratified has been different across different trials. And that really adds to the complexity of this recommendation and is one of the reasons that the panel felt that it was appropriate to recommend either observation or treatment. Brittany Harvey: It is great to have these new recommendations for this unique patient population. And as you both mentioned, that individualized patient care is really important across this entire guideline. So then following those recommendations, Dr. Mikhael, what is recommended for initial therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, post transplant therapy, and measurement of response for patients with transplant eligible multiple myeloma? Dr. Joseph Mikhael: Well, that is an area that has really considerably also grown since the last guideline. Obviously one would have to consult the guidelines to get every last detail, but in essence, we want to assess whether or not patients are transplant eligible or ineligible. And that assessment is not based on age or renal function alone, but indeed on a careful assessment of that patient. When that assessment is made and deemed that a patient is transplant eligible, our recommendation is that a patient typically would receive a quadruplet. That is to say, a monoclonal antibody directed against CD38, a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and dexamethasone to be given for approximately four to six cycles followed by the stem cell transplant, followed by potentially another two cycles of consolidation, and then maintenance therapy. A couple of important caveats. One, we do have two different CD38 antibodies that can be used, either daratumumab or isatuximab. Although typically bortezomib is the preferred proteasome inhibitor, consideration can be given to carfilzomib by virtue of the potential toxicity from bortezomib. And then lastly in the maintenance setting, we are typically recommending at least lenalidomide alone, but consideration can be given to dual maintenance therapy as the data is emerging to either add to that daratumumab or carfilzomib. All the while using the IMWG criteria for response. The goal of course is to achieve the deepest response possible and to maintain that response until such time as patients would relapse. Finally, the length of maintenance therapy continues to be an area of equipoise and study in multiple myeloma. And so at minimum, patients would receive two to three years of maintenance therapy, and based on risk status and depth of response it can be considered that patients would potentially come off maintenance therapy, of course always with the caveat that toxicity would influence length of therapy as well. Brittany Harvey: Yes, as you mentioned, evaluating which patients are eligible is extremely important for considering what is recommended in the guideline for both transplant eligible and transplant ineligible patients. So then Dr. Hicks, following those recommendations for transplant eligible multiple myeloma, what are the recommended treatments, goals of therapy, and measurement of response for patients with transplant ineligible multiple myeloma? Dr. Lisa Hicks: You know, I really can't emphasize enough how important an individualized patient assessment is. When we are thinking about the range of patients that are included in this category of transplant ineligible patients, it is a huge range. You may have fairly fit patients in their late 70s all the way to patients in their 90s. And we really want to see that treatments are tailored both to the fitness of the patient, their individual circumstances, and their preferences. And it is a wonderful thing to have lots of options for patients in this circumstance. What the guidelines have recommended for most patients who are transplant ineligible but fit enough for a stronger therapy is quadruplet therapy. So actually therapy that is very similar to what is being recommended in the transplant eligible population but for a longer period of time. And then for those patients who for whatever reason, be it their fitness or their preference, are not appropriate for that quadruplet therapy, the recommendation is for triplet therapy with a combination of lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone, or very often, more often in most cases, an antibody based approach with an anti-CD38 plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. Dr. Joseph Mikhael: The only thing I would add to that, I think we have to also, as we do mention in our recommendations, be particularly cautious with the dosing of these medications. Because even though we think of them as a single agent or a particular class, there can be quite a variation within the dosing regimen that can affect a patient's side effects and their quality of life. And so being very careful with dose modifications, and particularly in the transplant ineligible patient, is an important part of the recommendation as well. Dr. Lisa Hicks: Yeah, this is a podcast so no one can see me nodding vigorously that dose modification is so important particularly with those older and frailer patients, and with particular attention to trying to reduce dexamethasone doses and favoring weekly administration of bortezomib when that drug is used. Brittany Harvey: Absolutely. Considering the risks and benefits and patient preferences is really key to selecting therapy for these patients. So then Dr. Mikhael, for the final overarching patient population addressed in this guideline, for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, what treatment options are recommended? Dr. Joseph Mikhael: This of course is, if you will, the biggest part of the guideline because there has been so much done in the relapse setting. And I think we start the guideline by saying a decision has to be made as to when to institute therapy. That there may be some patients with slow biochemical relapse that may be monitored for a period of time. But when the decision is made to initiate treatment, instead of a simple algorithm, the guideline emphasizes the fact that there are multiple choices that can be given to a patient that are going to match what comorbidities the patient has, what they have been treated with before, and of course what their preferences are. I think we highlight two particular areas. That now that CAR-T cell therapy is available as early as first relapse, it should be a consideration by virtue of the fact that it has resulted in such deep and durable responses. But that triplets should also be considered in that earlier relapse setting because we do have multiple classes of agents that can be used. We know that in later relapse options exist including bispecific antibodies for which we have four different choices. And that in general, patients will ultimately receive either a triplet or CAR-T cell therapy in earlier relapse, but there are some patients who may be eligible only for a doublet by virtue of their comorbidities and of their prior therapies. Lastly, it really does emphasize the point as we have mentioned a few times in this podcast, and I am so glad it keeps coming up, is that as I often say we don't treat myeloma, we treat people. And engaging the patient in that conversation to ensure that the right treatment gets matched to the right patients is particularly important because with all the new classes that we have with antibody drug conjugates, with XPO1 inhibitors, the traditional three classes of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, along with as we have already mentioned CAR-T and bispecific antibodies, it really is an incredible laundry list of choice. And making that choice specific to the patient becomes absolutely critical. I should also lastly note that there are patients who may defer their initial transplant. There may be patients who may be eligible for a second transplant. So autologous stem cell transplant, although primarily used in the frontline setting, may still be a consideration for a smaller subset of patients in the relapse setting. Dr. Lisa Hicks: I think maybe one thing that I would add is an overarching principle which is actually similar to a principle in the first guideline, and that is that in the relapsed or refractory setting, there are many different treatment options. And in fact, the number of treatment options feels like it is evolving every day. But an overarching principle for clinicians to consider is to try and choose combinations of drugs that the patient has either not been exposed to in the past or certainly that they are not refractory to. We really want to be pulling new options out of the toolbox as much as we can. Dr. Joseph Mikhael: Very often we do see where someone may be on a triplet and they are progressing on it and someone just changes out one drug. We have suggested not to take that approach but to take the approach of completely introducing a new therapy when someone is progressing on their current therapy. I think that point is particularly important and the consensus panel was very clear. Brittany Harvey: Understood. That is very helpful when thinking about what options to offer to patients in the relapsed and refractory setting. And as you mentioned earlier, the figures in this guideline provide an outline of options and then the tables really go into some of the details and outcomes of the trials, and those are very helpful for clinicians to refer to. So then Dr. Hicks, we have talked a little bit about some of the nuances of the guideline, but what should clinicians know as they implement these new and updated recommendations? Dr. Lisa Hicks: I think they should feel comfortable that these are trustworthy guidelines. So these are evidence-based guidelines that have been rigorously developed after a very thorough evidence review and put together by a panel of experts who were extremely thoughtful in their review of the evidence. And so all of this contributes to the trustworthiness of the guidance. And then I would also encourage people to take a deep look at the guidelines because of the importance of nuance that is addressed in them, and then to also explore some of the tools that ASCO is developing that helps with implementation including the flow charts that are contained within the guidelines and some additional tools that are available online. Brittany Harvey: Absolutely. The tools and resources for this guideline are available online with the publication and we will provide links to that in the show notes of the episode. So then following that, Dr. Mikhael, how does this guideline update affect patients with multiple myeloma? Dr. Joseph Mikhael: As we sort of intimated earlier, I like to say I don't treat myeloma, I treat people. I think we should always be patient-centric and patient-focused. And I think in the discussion we always were. We always wanted to ensure that multiple factors go into a decision-making process. We are not just looking at the biology of the disease, we are looking at patient factors. Those patient factors include their frailty as we commented in a frailty assessment, their preferences, their comorbidities. And I think, in a day where we have so many choices, we emphasize in the guideline the importance of that conversation with the patient. That, if you will, shared decision-making model where options are laid out and based on the patient factors and the treatment factors they can then be meshed together in the best way so that patients can make the right choice. And of course in conjunction with the guidelines, we have patient friendly summaries of them. And we involved, of course, patients in the development of these guidelines. And I think that is one of the greatest strengths of the ASCO guidelines is that there is a patient with us at the table who is giving their perspective on the guideline as we go forward. So I am very thankful that we have created a product that is, if you will, not only for the providers, the practitioners that are prescribing these agents and that are directly giving the care, but indeed for the very patients who of course have the most at stake here. Dr. Lisa Hicks: Yeah Joe, I am so glad you called out the participation of patient partners in the guideline. It is such an important part and they were really- the patient partner was such an important part of this panel in helping us understand the patient perspective as we developed this guidance. Brittany Harvey: Definitely. It is a hugely important role for the panel and for all of the panel including the patient partners and the experts in the disease to review the evidence and come up with comprehensive recommendations. And yes, as you mentioned, the individualized treatment and the shared decision-making is really paramount to this guideline. Finally, Dr. Hicks, you alluded to earlier the vast number of treatment options that is really exploding in multiple myeloma. And so this guideline is becoming a living guideline continuously updated by ASCO. So what are the outstanding questions regarding this topic and what evidence is the panel looking forward to for future updates? Dr. Lisa Hicks: I am really excited about this. This is one of the first guidelines that will be a living guideline for ASCO and it is such a good fit. You have heard Joe and I say a few times how quickly this field is moving, how complex the field is. I think everyone on the panel knew that no matter how quickly we did it and how deeply we reviewed the evidence, it was inevitable that more evidence would be generated as we were putting out the guideline. In a field like that, it is really important that we find a way to provide evidence-based guidelines quickly to the community. You know, waiting another five years, letting another 150 trials accrue before we do another guideline is not what the community needs. And so ASCO has really risen to this challenge and is committed to living guidelines. And so a living guideline is a guideline that commits to reviewing the evolving evidence on an ongoing basis, watching for practice changing trials, and having a standing panel that will review evidence and update recommendations on a regularly scheduled basis. So that is what a living guideline is, and that is what this guideline is becoming. That is just the first thing in terms of what a living guideline is. And then what are we watching? Well, honestly what aren't we watching? There is so much happening in multiple myeloma. We knew as we put the guideline out that there were trials in process, some trials that had been released at conferences but not yet published. We will be waiting for those and if they are practice changing they will be addressed in upcoming updates. There is new evidence just recently presented around combined anti-CD38 and bispecific antibodies. I don't know yet whether that will be addressed but I wouldn't be surprised if it was. There are so many things coming down the pipeline and it is just wonderful that there is going to be a way to try and address them in a robust fashion. Dr. Joseph Mikhael: Yeah I agree with you, Lisa. I can't think of another disease that would be more relevant for a living guideline. I mean we had difficulty because new data kept coming in as we were making recommendations. And so at some point we had to draw a line and say this is where we will stop and produce this guideline and have it ongoing. And I really look forward to seeing the updates because we know as you mentioned that there are so many things that are on the verge of approval and on the verge of changing the way we manage this terrible disease. And before I close, I would love to remind all of our listeners that as we commented from the start, patient engagement is critical at ASCO and in our guidelines process. Unfortunately we lost a very dear patient during the guidelines process, and that is Jack Aiello. Jack Aiello had been a patient and a patient advocate for many, many years in the myeloma community. And indeed we have actually dedicated these guidelines to his honor. And so I thought it would be valuable for us to mention that today. And we miss you Jack, but we are very grateful that we have been able to dedicate this excellent body of work to your memory. Brittany Harvey: Absolutely. This guideline and your dedication to him is an honor to his memory and we really recognize him in thinking about this guideline. We will look forward to those future trial results that you mentioned, Dr. Hicks, to update this guideline and continue to provide options for patients with multiple myeloma and improve upon those options and shared decision-making with patients. So I want to thank you both for all of your work to develop this guideline and for your time today, Dr. Hicks and Dr. Mikhael. Dr. Lisa Hicks: You are so welcome. Thanks for featuring this guideline. Dr. Joseph Mikhael: Thank you so much, Brittany. It has been a privilege. Brittany Harvey: Finally, thank you to all of our listeners for tuning in to the ASCO Guidelines podcast. To read the full guideline, go to www.asco.org/hematologic-malignancies-guidelines. You can also find many of our guidelines and interactive resources in the free ASCO Guidelines App, which is available in the Apple App Store or the Google Play Store. If you have enjoyed what you have heard today, please rate and review the podcast and be sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.

university toronto hospitals journal treatments guidelines cart hicks apple app store google play store asco multiple myeloma clinical oncology myeloma mikhael jco cd38 hope cancer center asco guidelines

Episode 143: Myeloma Series, Pt. 4 - Myeloma Pharmacology (2025)

The Fellow on Call

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 30, 2025

We bring back our prior pharmacology discussion because it's so incredibly important for the conversations that are on the horizon over the next few weeks. In this continuation of our myeloma series, we begin our discussion about treatment options for multiple myeloma, focusing first on pharmacology. We are so thrilled to have a special guest, Kathryn Maples, PharmD, BCOP who is a clinical pharmacy specialist in Multiple Myeloma at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory Healthcare in Atlanta, Georgia!Content:- What are common drugs we use in "triplet regimens"? "quadruple therapy"? - What considerations must we take into account when prescribing commonly used medications in myeloma? - How should we counsel our patients? - What about supportive care?- How and when do we make dose adjustments? - This episode is SO eye-opening about the "behind the scenes" of myeloma care that physicians do not seeWant to review the show notes for this episode and others? Check out our website: https://www.thefellowoncall.com/our-episodesLove what you hear? Tell a friend and leave a review on our podcast streaming platforms!Twitter: @TheFellowOnCallInstagram: @TheFellowOnCallListen in on: Apple Podcast, Spotify, and Google Podcast

spotify apple podcast google podcasts pharmd pharmacology multiple myeloma myeloma emory healthcare winship cancer institute bcop

Experts Discuss CELMoD Agents for Treating Multiple Myeloma

CCO Oncology Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 30, 2025 17:30

In this podcast episode, Jesus Berdeja, MD; Amrita Krishnan, MD, FACP; and Niels van de Donk, MD, PhD, address key questions on CELMoD agent therapy for multiple myeloma, including:Combination strategiesAdverse event managementWhere CELMoD agents may best fit within current and future treatment strategies Presenters: Jesus Berdeja, MDDirector of Multiple Myeloma ResearchGreco-Hainsworth Centers for ResearchTennessee OncologyNashville, TennesseeAmrita Krishnan, MD, FACPDirector, Judy and Bernard Center for Myeloma, City of HopeNason Hollingsworth Family Chair MyelomaExecutive Director, Hematology, City of Hope Orange CountyProfessor Hematology/HCTIrvine, California Niels van de Donk, MD, PhDProfessor of HematologyDepartment of HematologyAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdam, NetherlandsContent based on an online CME program supported by an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb.Link to full program:https://bit.ly/4qvRwQM Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

phd md treating niels simplecast cme successors hematology bristol myers squibb multiple myeloma donk myeloma neutropenia excaliber phdprofessor mddirector

MORNING PRAYERS (Praise to God; Leukemia, Lymphomas, Multiple Myeloma; Salvation)

Follow Him Ministries Daily Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 28, 2025 3:35

Send us a textMORNING PRAYERS (Praise to God; Leukemia, Lymphomas, Multiple Myeloma; Salvation) #prayer #morningprayer #pray #jesus #god #holyspirit #aimingforjesus #healing #peace #love #bible #praise #praisegod #leukemia #lymphoma #hodgkinslymphomaawareness #nonhodgkinslymphoma #multiplemyeloma #salvation #bornagain Thank you for listening, our heart's prayer is for you and I to walk daily with Jesus, our joy and peace aimingforjesus.com YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/@aimingforjesus5346 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/aiming_for_jesus/ Threads https://www.threads.com/@aiming_for_jesus X https://x.com/AimingForJesus Tik Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@aiming.for.jesus

god jesus christ salvation praise threads leukemia lymphoma multiple myeloma morning prayers

Episode 143: Myeloma Series, Pt.4 - Myeloma Pharmacology (2025)

The Fellow on Call

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 24, 2025

spotify apple podcast google podcasts pharmd pharmacology multiple myeloma myeloma emory healthcare winship cancer institute bcop

PulseCast: Highlights in Multiple Myeloma From the 2025 ASH Annual Meeting

CCO Oncology Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 23, 2025 15:45

In this episode, Shaji K. Kumar, MD, reviews key highlights from ASH 2025 in multiple myeloma (MM), focusing on emerging data for bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapies across earlier and later lines of treatment. The discussion covers the following:MajesTEC-3: Results from the phase III study of teclistamab + daratumumab in R/R MM RedirecTT-1: Updated efficacy and safety of talquetamab + teclistamab in R/R MM and extramedullary diseaseCARTITUDE-4: Results following treatment with cilta-cel in patients with standard-risk cytogeneticsSTEM: Preliminary safety and efficacy data from the phase II study of cevostamab consolidation following BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapyCAMMA1: Biomarker analyses from Arm B following cevostamab + pomalidomide and dexamethasone treatment in patients with R/R MMPresenter:Shaji K. Kumar, MDMark and Judy Mullins Professor of Hematological MalignanciesConsultant, Division of HematologyProfessor of MedicineResearch Chair, Division of HematologyMayo ClinicRochester, MinnesotaLink to full program: https://bit.ly/4995nFA Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

md results ash cart mm kumar annual meetings simplecast immunotherapy crs mrd multiple myeloma emd bcma ash annual meeting

S14 Ep67: Microbiome Profiling Highlights Impact of Butyrate Loss on Post-Transplant Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma: With Pooja M. Phull, MD

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 18, 2025 7:24

In today's episode, we had the pleasure of speaking with Pooja M. Phull, MD, a hematologist/oncologist at the John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center in New Jersey, about emerging insights into the gut microbiome and its clinical relevance in multiple myeloma. Dr Phull discussed how microbial composition—particularly the presence of butyrate-producing bacteria—may influence therapeutic responsiveness, sustained minimal residual disease negativity, and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. In our exclusive interview, Dr Phull reviewed findings from a translational study that longitudinally profiled the fecal microbiome of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, highlighting the significant post-transplant depletion of beneficial short-chain, fatty acid–producing organisms and its association with inferior progression-free survival. She also outlined supportive laboratory and in vivo data demonstrating the antitumor effects of butyrate and discussed how microbiome profiling may serve as both a predictive biomarker and a potential therapeutic target. Additionally, Dr Phull explored how dietary patterns, lifestyle factors, and antibiotic stewardship may contribute to preserving gut microbial health, and she emphasized the growing need for prospective studies to clarify how these interventions could enhance treatment outcomes for patients with active myeloma and precursor conditions such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering myeloma.

loss new jersey md outcomes transplants microbiome profiling pooja multiple myeloma butyrate hackensack university medical center john theurer cancer center

S2 Episode 6: What Is the Future of Multiple Myeloma?

love spotify management apple podcast multiple myeloma smm smoldering primum

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 18, 2025 24:47

Drs Joseph Mikhael and Shaji Kumar discuss the future of multiple myeloma, including enhanced diagnostics for detecting myeloma, frontline therapy, and durable responses. Relevant disclosures can be found with the episode show notes on Medscape https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/1002718. The topics and discussions are planned, produced, and reviewed independently of advertisers. This podcast is intended only for US healthcare professionals. Resources Multiple Myeloma https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/204369-overview Updated Diagnostic Criteria and Staging System for Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27249749/ Mass Spectrometry for the Evaluation of Monoclonal Proteins in Multiple Myeloma and Related Disorders: An International Myeloma Working Group Mass Spectrometry Committee Report https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33563895/ Multiple Myeloma Imaging https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/391742-overview Next-Generation Biomarkers in Multiple Myeloma: Understanding the Molecular Basis for Potential Use in Diagnosis and Prognosis https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34299097/ Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507880/ Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia: Consensus Definition by the International Myeloma Working Group According to Peripheral Blood Plasma Cell Percentage https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857730/ Advancing MRD Detection in Multiple Myeloma: Technologies, Applications, and Future Perspectives https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40214184/ Genomic Landscape of Multiple Myeloma and Its Precursor Conditions https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40399554/ Quadruplet Regimens for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39348665/ Subcutaneous Daratumumab (Dara) + Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone (VRd) With Dara + Lenalidomide (DR) Maintenance in Transplant-Eligible (TE) Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Analysis of Sustained Minimal Residual Disease Negativity in the Phase 3 PERSEUS Trial https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.7501 Isatuximab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Induction in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma: Analysis of the MIDAS Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39841461/ Comparing Combinations of Drugs to Treat Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) When a Stem Cell Transplant Is Not a Medically Suitable Treatment https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05561387 Cytokine Release Syndrome and Associated Neurotoxicity in Cancer Immunotherapy https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34002066/ The Role of CELMoD Agents in Multiple Myeloma https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12399888/ Phase 2 Study of Talquetamab + Teclistamab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Extramedullary Disease: REDIRECTT-1 https://library.ehaweb.org/eha/2025/eha2025-congress/4173809/shaji.kumar.phase.2.study.of.talquetamab.2B.teclistamab.in.patients.with.html Discovery of a Novel Class NSD2 Inhibitor for Multiple Myeloma With t(4;14) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40949769/ Long-Term (≥5 Year) Remission and Survival After Treatment With Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (Cilta-Cel) in CARTITUDE-1 Patients (Pts) With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.7507

study drugs discovery phase long term diagnosis relevant applications evaluation 2b meta analysis prognosis multiple myeloma medscape cancer immunotherapy mass spectrometry jco molecular basis carfilzomib isatuximab

Episode 142: Myeloma Series, Pt.3 - Management of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (2025)

The Fellow on Call

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 17, 2025

The way that we think about smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) has continued to see evolution in the plasma cell dyscrasia space. If this diagnosis portends a higher risk of developing multiple myeloma, how should we manage patients to prevent possible end-organ damage? Is it a one-size-fits-all approach or are there some patients who are higher risk for progression than others? We cover this and so much more in this new episode! This episode is brought to you by PrimumContent:- What is smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM)?- What are higher risk features of SMM? - What are landmark studies in SMM? - To treat or not to treat? ** This episode is brought to you by Primum: http://primum.co/fellows** Want to review the show notes for this episode and others? Check out our website. Love what you hear? Tell a friend and leave a review on our podcast streaming platforms!Twitter: @TheFellowOnCallInstagram: @TheFellowOnCallListen in on: Apple Podcast, Spotify, and Youtube

FDA Approvals and Global Biotech Innovations

Pharma and BioTech Daily

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 17, 2025 10:06

Good morning from Pharma Daily: the podcast that brings you the most important developments in the pharmaceutical and biotech world. Today, we delve into a series of significant updates that are shaping the future of healthcare, patient care, and drug development.The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been particularly active recently, granting Johnson & Johnson a National Priority Review Voucher for its multiple myeloma drug combination. This move highlights the importance of J&J's treatment in addressing unmet needs within oncology, a field continuously striving for innovative solutions. These vouchers expedite the review process, reflecting a broader commitment to accelerating the availability of critical therapies for patients who need them most.Continuing with regulatory advancements, AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo's Enhertu, in combination with Roche's Perjeta, has gained FDA approval as a first-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. This breakthrough is supported by late-stage study results demonstrating a 44% reduction in disease progression or death compared to standard care. The approval signifies not only progress in breast cancer therapeutics but also underscores the potential benefits of strategic collaborations in drug development. Such partnerships are increasingly vital as they aim to optimize therapeutic efficacy through shared expertise and resources.In contrast to these advancements, Pfizer is facing financial recalibrations with projected revenues for 2026 estimated to decline due to diminishing COVID-19 vaccine sales and patent expirations. This situation reflects broader industry challenges as companies navigate post-pandemic market dynamics and patent cliffs, forcing reevaluations of long-term strategies.On another front, Gilead Sciences continues to push boundaries in HIV treatment with a promising single-tablet regimen combining bictegravir and lenacapavir. This innovation targets underserved segments within the HIV market, offering streamlined treatment options that could enhance patient adherence and outcomes significantly.Shifting focus to obesity management, Novo Nordisk's oral semaglutide is emerging as a highly anticipated medication among primary care providers. This trend highlights a growing preference for oral GLP-1 therapies as convenient alternatives to injectable formulations, marking a shift in how obesity—a major public health concern—is managed.The importance of regulatory compliance remains evident as Novo Nordisk received an FDA warning letter concerning manufacturing issues at an Indiana site previously owned by Catalent. This incident underscores the necessity for rigorous quality control in pharmaceutical manufacturing, which can have far-reaching implications on operational dynamics and supply chains.The FDA is also pioneering efforts to incorporate real-world evidence into medical device submissions by opening pathways for extensive deidentified datasets from sources like national cancer registries and electronic health records. This policy shift aims to integrate diverse data sources into the evidentiary foundation for medical device evaluations, potentially fostering innovation within this sector.In line with collaborative efforts, Genentech has partnered with Caris Life Sciences in a multi-year agreement valued at up to $1.1 billion, emphasizing the strategic importance of integrating diagnostic advancements with therapeutic developments to achieve precision medicine goals.Meanwhile, Yarrow Bioscience has acquired an autoimmune thyroid disease drug from China's Gensci, exemplifying a growing trend of cross-border collaborations aimed at leveraging global innovation ecosystems to address diverse therapeutic areas. This acquisition is part of a $1.37 billion deal, reinforcing the globalization of biotech partnerships as companies seek access to novel therapeutics andSupport the show

S1 Ep192: ASH 2025: Key Discussions in Multiple Myeloma, Lymphoma, and Leukemia

Oncology Peer Review On-The-Go

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 15, 2025 10:10

At the 2025 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition (ASH), CancerNetwork® sat down with a variety of researchers and clinicians to discuss potential advancements across hematologic oncology care. These experts shared their findings related to investigational therapeutic regimens and strategies that may prove impactful across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations. First, Krina K. Patel, MD, MSc, highlighted findings from the phase 2 iMMagine-1 study (NCT05396885) assessing treatment with anitocabtagene autoleucel (anito-cel) among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. According to Patel, an associate professor in the Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma in the Division of Cancer Medicine at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, the novel cellular therapy elicited an overall response rate (ORR) of 96% and a stringent complete response or CR rate of 74% among the evaluable patients. She also discussed how anito-cel's unique mechanism of action may show efficiency compared with other cellular therapy products while reducing the risk of cytokine release syndrome and other delayed toxicities. Next, Manali Kamdar, MD, spoke about data from a long-term follow-up phase 2/3 study (NCT03435796) based on the phase 3 TRANSFORM trial (NCT03575351) evaluating lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel; Breyanzi) vs standard-of-care therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Long-term follow-up showed that liso-cel continued to elicit improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival across this population. Kamdar, the clinical director of Lymphoma Services at the University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, touched upon the patient subpopulations who are most suitable to receive liso-cel while emphasizing the agent's curative potential in the second-line setting. Finally, Wei Ying Jen, BM BCh, MA, MMed, MRCP, FRCPath, detailed results from the phase 1/2 SAVE trial (NCT05360160), which showed responses with an all-oral combination of revumenib (Revuforj), decitabine/cedazuridine (Inqovi), and venetoclax (Venclexta) for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Jen, an assistant professor in the Department of Leukemia in the Division of Cancer Medicine at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, noted how an all-oral regimen may offer an “advantage” compared with standard intensive chemotherapy, which requires patients to travel to the hospital to undergo an infusion. References Patel K, Dhakal B, Kaur G, et al. Phase 2 registrational study of anitocabtagene autoleucel for the treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: updated results from iMMagine-1. Blood. 2025;146(suppl 1):256. doi:10.1182/blood-2025-256 Kamdar M, Solomon S, Arnason J, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) versus standard of care (SOC) for second-line relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL): First Results from long-term follow-up of TRANSFORM. Blood. 2025;146(suppl 1):3710. doi.10.1182/blood-2025-3710 Jen WY, DiNardo CD, Short NJ, et al. Phase II study of the all-oral combination of revumenib (SNDX-5613) with decitabine/cedazuridine (ASTX727) and venetoclax (SAVE) in newly diagnosed AML. Blood. 2025;146(suppl 1):47. doi:10.1182/blood-2025-47

S1 Ep190: Evolutions Across NSCLC, Multiple Myeloma, and AML at Georgia Cancer Center

Oncology Peer Review On-The-Go

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 1, 2025 13:07

As part of a visit to Georgia Cancer Center in Augusta, Georgia, CancerNetwork spoke with a variety of experts and faculty members regarding ongoing research and future initiatives dedicated to improving outcomes across different patient populations. These conversations touched upon potential developments in diseases including non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), multiple myeloma, and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). First, Girindra Raval, MD, an associate professor in the Department of Medicine: Hematology and Oncology of the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, discussed current studies at his institution that may help optimize treatment for patients with lung cancer. This research ranged from retrospective trials analyzing how demographic features may influence outcomes to biomarker-based assessments intended to augment the efficacy of immunotherapy. Looking towards the future, Raval stated that determining how to sequence and de-escalate treatment amidst several available therapeutic options will be a key concern in the field. Additionally, Amany Keruakous, MD, director of Myeloma Research at Georgia Cancer Center and assistant professor in the Department of Medicine: Hematology and Oncology at the Medical College of Georgia of Augusta University, detailed strategies for mitigating current challenges in multiple myeloma care. She emphasized fostering collaborative relationships between colleagues in community settings and academic institutions to help reduce barriers to treatment access among patients. Furthermore, she noted the importance of conducting additional clinical trials at community centers. Finally, Daniel Peters, MD, an assistant professor at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University and bone marrow transplant & cellular therapy faculty member at Georgia Cancer Center, focused on key developments across the AML space. At his institution, Peters and colleagues are evaluating potential drivers of immune dysfunction, which may inform less intensive cellular therapy approaches or determine who is suitable to receive autologous types of treatment. Peters also discussed how additional research set for presentation at meetings like the 2025 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition (ASH) may affirm a shift away from 7+3 intensive chemotherapy for patients who are younger and fit with newly diagnosed AML.

evolution md peters american society oncology aml medical college cancer centers multiple myeloma raval nsclc augusta university daniel peters

S14 Ep57: Cevostamab-Based Regimens Usher In the Next Wave of Bispecific Antibody Strategies in R/R Myeloma: With Joshua Richter, MD

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 28, 2025 6:12

Welcome to OncLive On Air®! OncLive On Air is a podcast from OncLive®, which provides oncology professionals with the resources and information they need to provide the best patient care. In both digital and print formats, OncLive covers every angle of oncology practice, from new technology to treatment advances to important regulatory decisions. In today's episode, we had the pleasure of speaking with Joshua Richter, MD, about the rationale and implications for the phase 1 CAMMA 1 study (NCT04910568), which is investigating the bispecific antibody cevostamab (RG6160; BFCR4350A) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Dr Richter is an associate professor of medicine at The Tisch Cancer Institute and director of Multiple Myeloma at the Blavatnik Family Chelsea Medical Center at Mount Sinai in New York, New York. In our exclusive interview, Dr Richter discussed the rationale for targeting FcRH5 in the development of therapies for multiple myeloma, the evaluation of cevostamab-based combination strategies in patients with relapsed/refractory disease, and what the future may hold in this research arena.

new york strategy md usher richter mount sinai antibodies next wave multiple myeloma myeloma onclive camma

S2 Episode 5: Is It Time to Screen for Multiple Myeloma?

Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 20, 2025 23:10

Drs Joseph Mikhael and Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson discuss whether it is time to screen for multiple myeloma and what we can learn from the iStopMM study. Relevant disclosures can be found with the episode show notes on Medscape https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/1002717. The topics and discussions are planned, produced, and reviewed independently of advertisers. This podcast is intended only for US healthcare professionals. Resources Multiple Myeloma https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/204369-overview Screening in Multiple Myeloma and Its Precursors: Are We There Yet? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38175579/ Iceland Screens, Treats, or Prevents Multiple Myeloma (iStopMM): A Population-Based Screening Study for Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and Randomized Controlled Trial of Follow-Up Strategies https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34001889/ Identifying Associations Between Race and Gender in the Incidence and Mortality of Patients With Multiple Myeloma https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e20052 Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the Genomic Age: A Review of Screening Criteria Over the Past 40 Years https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18438522/ International Myeloma Foundation https://www.myeloma.org/ Prevalence of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16571879/ Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507880/ Prevalence and Risk of Progression of Light-Chain Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20472173/ Mode of Progression in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A Study of 406 Patients https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38228628/ Observation or Treatment for Smoldering Multiple Myeloma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40419473/

Long-Term Remission After Cilta-cel in Patients With RRMM

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 13, 2025 27:31

Guest Dr. Sundar Jagannath and host Dr. Davide Soldato discuss JCO article "Long-Term (≥5-Year) Remission and Survival After Treatment With Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma," and the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM (relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma). TRANSCRIPT Dr. Davide Soldato: Hello and welcome to JCO After Hours, the podcast where we sit down with authors from some of the latest articles published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. I am your host, Dr. Davide Soldato, medical oncologist at Ospedale San Martino in Genoa, Italy. Today, we are joined by JCO author, Professor Sundar Jagannath, Professor of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the Tisch Cancer Institute. He also serves as Network Director for the Center of Excellence for Multiple Myeloma, and he is an internationally recognized expert in the field of multiple myeloma. Today, we will be discussing the article titled, "Long-Term Remission and Survival After Treatment With Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma." Thank you for speaking with us, Professor Jagannath. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: Thank you for having me, Dr. Davide Soldato. It is a pleasure to be here. JCO is a highly recognized journal among the oncologists, so I am very happy and privileged to be here today. Dr. Davide Soldato: Thank you so much for being with us. So, I wanted to start a little bit with the rationale of the study and the population that was included in the study. So, the trial that we are discussing, CARTITUDE-1, was already published before, and we observed very good results with a single infusion of cilta-cel. So we had previously reported a median progression-free survival of 30 months, and median overall survival was not reached. So, I just wanted to ask you if you could guide us a little bit into the population that was included in the study and also explain a little bit to our listeners what is the drug that we are discussing, cilta-cel. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: It is a CAR T-cell. This is a patient's own lymphocytes, which goes through apheresis and is sent to the company, where they modify it and introduce the B cell receptor. In this case, you know, there is a heavy chain gene receptor for the BCMA, and in cilta-cel, there are actually two receptor sites on each molecule, or there are two binding domains on each receptor molecule. So, it is considered to be quite efficacious. As you reported, the earlier results that the patients who participated, 97% of the patient responded. Now, you asked about the patients who participated in the clinical trial. This clinical trial was conducted between July of 2018 and October of 2019. At that time, this was a phase 1b/phase 2 trial, and the whole idea was to take patients who had relapsed all the available treatment regimen so that these patients were considered to have, in the unmet medical need situation. So, what does that entail? That means the patient should have been exposed to a proteasome inhibitor, to an immunomodulatory molecule, and to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody and should have received at least three or more prior lines of therapy and should be actually progressing on their last line of therapy. So with that requirement, if you look at it, the median number of prior therapy on the patients who participated was actually six. So patients were heavily pretreated. They had exhausted all available treatment options. So, they can participate in this clinical trial. And if not, there have been real-world evidence, such as LocoMMotion, which had reported what is the outcome for such a patient if they were treated outside of this clinical trial, if they were treated with the then available regimen. Their median progression free survival would have been only 3 months, and most patients would have lost their life within a year. So, this was truly an unmet medical need with patients in a very difficult clinical situation. Let's put it that way. So, those were the patients who participated in this particular trial. Dr. Davide Soldato: Thank you very much. And as we mentioned before, the results that were obtained in this clinical trial were really very interesting. And now, in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, you are reporting data with a longer follow up. So we are actually at more than 5 years of follow up for the patients included in this trial. So, I just wanted a little bit of insight into why you decided to report these long-term outcomes and what type of information do you think you could provide with this study to the medical community? Dr. Sundar Jagannath: This is very important because this was a clinical trial that was done in patients who were, as I said, in unmet medical need. Most of the patients had prior stem cell transplantation, had gone through a proteasome inhibitor. Many of them have had both Velcade and carfilzomib treatment. Most of them had been exposed to lenalidomide and pomalidomide. And as required, all of the patients had to have had prior exposure to anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody or daratumumab. So, the patients were heavily pretreated. Typically, TIL CAR T-cells came into the field at this particular moment, until then, we were developing small molecules, and they usually would have a PFS of 3 months and median life expectancy of a year, the overall response rate of 30%, and that is how, if you look back, that is how carfilzomib was approved, that is how pomalidomide was approved. So, the drugs which were approved, including daratumumab, you know, the response rate was in the same ballpark. So you would see that most agents, single agents, would have had a response rate in the neighborhood of 30%, the progression-free survival would have been between 3 to 5 months or 6 months at the most, and the life expectancy was short. And here comes a drug, and when I was following the patients at Mount Sinai, I found that there were a subset of patients, they got one-time treatment and they were in complete remission, no trace of cancer with annual evaluation with PET CT and bone marrow evaluation for MRD. So, I said this is remarkable, and this needs to be reported. And I went to the Janssen and company, and they agreed to review the entire experience. This is remarkable that 32 of the 97 patients, or one third of the patients, were alive and progression-free. This is unheard of for any clinical trial until now, that the patient will be progression-free, one third of the patients on a clinical trial will be progression-free, in the late stage of their disease. So that is the most important impact. And that is why this 5-year follow-up results were presented. Dr. Davide Soldato: Thank you very much. That was very clear. And as you said, we are speaking about a population that was heavily pretreated, that had exhausted all type of treatment options outside of a clinical trial. And as you said, one third of the patients was alive and progression-free after 5 years from being included and infused inside of the study. So, considering this population that, as we said, had received all treatment options, I was wondering if you observed any kind of differences in terms of disease characteristics when looking at these patients that had exceptional response, so, alive and progression-free at 5 years, and the patients that sadly had developed a progression after the infusion in the study. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: This is very important because we wanted to see who are the patients who are having this exceptional outcome. And we looked at all the 97 patients. If we look at all the patients, we saw that there were initially, out of the 97, 17 patients died earlier in the disease course due to treatment related complications, etc. But there were about 46 patients who had progression of disease and 32 patients, or one third, were alive without progression of disease. Then we looked at the 46 patients who had progression of disease. Of them, we found that 30 had disease progression and its complication, and there were actually 13 patients who were still alive even after progression of disease. So we decided to compare these 46 patients who had progression of disease versus 32 patients who had no progression of disease to see what is the difference. To our surprise, the age was similar, male, female distribution was similar. High-risk cytogenetics, which we would have thought, you know, that is why we say high-risk disease, the term, high-risk cytogenetics was equally distributed. That was really a surprise. Number of lines of prior therapy, number of exposure to drugs, all of that was the same. So that was also interesting. But a theme did emerge. Patients, in general, tend to have lower burden of disease who had the exceptional outcome. But there is one which we considered as bad, the extramedullary disease. Multiple myeloma being a blood cancer, it is usually in the bone marrow. When it starts growing outside of the bone marrow, the extramedullary disease, usually it portends poor prognosis. But we were surprised that actually there were an equal number of extramedullary disease patients even in the long-term survivor as those who had progressed of disease. So the most important takeaway was patients who had lower burden of disease, they had less number of myeloma cells in their bone marrow, percentage wise, and the soluble BCMA level was lower. Soluble BCMA is an indirect measure of the amount of plasma cells in the patient's body. It is like a tumor burden. So they were low. So, this was an important finding because it has future ramification, as you can understand. If this treatment is made available earlier in the disease course of the patients, where we are able to control the disease better, then more patients are likely to have such wonderful outcomes as one third of the patient experience in the late stage of the disease. Dr. Davide Soldato: So, you already mentioned soluble BCMA as a marker of potentially better prognosis as being correlated to a lower volume of disease. I was wondering if you could give us some more information about the biomarkers that you evaluated in the study. For example, you evaluated a little bit the CAR T expansion kinetics and also some others that I think could be interesting and could point to some population that experienced such important benefit. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: That is a very important point because CAR T-cell, it is a live cell and its efficacy depends upon how well the CAR T-cell is going to function. And then, you know, the patient undergoes apheresis. This is a patient's own lymphocyte. So first and foremost is who would generate good CAR T-cell. Those who have plenty of lymphocytes at the time they are coming for apheresis. This is likely to happen earlier in the course of the disease than in patients who have gone through numerous lines of therapy and exhausted. So, in this particular trial, of course this was in late stage of the disease, and so we were able to show patients who had lower number of T cell in circulation, and the way to measure is if they had more neutrophils and less lymphocytes. So that is what is called as a higher T cell over neutrophil, they did better. If they have more neutrophil than T cells, then they did not do well. So, procurement. The second one is also whether the T cells are more naive, you know, not exhausted T cells. So more naive T cells, if you are able to procure from the patient, they did very well. Now, after the CAR T-cell manufacture, then the expansion, when you put it back into the patient, if the T cells expand very well, so that the effector, that is the CAR T-cells to the tumor ratio is good, so there are more effector cells, the CAR T was able to expand and the amount of tumor was less, then the efficacy was very, very good. As I said, the patients in this group, those who had a lower burden of disease, they did better, and that is because of the CAR T-cell expansion, so the effector to the target ratio was favorable. So that is another important. And then there are also the type of CAR T-cells, having CD4 T cells with central memory phenotype at the peak expansion also makes a difference. So all of that matters. But this is important because the efficacy of the CAR T-cell, it is persistent, long persistent and keeping the cancer down. Its ability to get rid of the cancer completely at the first go around because usually we are not able to detect the CAR T-cells beyond 6 months in the majority of patients and very rarely after a year or two. So it is very uncommon to find the CAR T-cells in circulation or even in the regular bone marrow evaluation. So, efficacy, the expansion, having naive T cells, having good effector to target ratio and more central memory kind of T cell, because if it is all effector T cell, they will get quickly utilized and get exhausted, whereas the central memory cells can expand more and give more effective CAR T-cells. Dr. Davide Soldato: Thank you very much. I was wondering if you could guide us a little bit into what is your opinion regarding the positioning of CAR T-cells given all of these logistics that is necessary compared, for example, with bispecific antibodies against BCMA, which have the same target, but they do not have all of these logistics before being administered to the patient. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: That is a very important question, how to sequence these treatments now that we have two BCMA-directed CAR T-cells available. We have three BCMA-directed bispecific and one GPRC5D-directed bispecific antibodies are available. And so the question comes in for at least the currently approved CAR T-cell therapy, there is an obligatory time. You have to go through apheresis and you have to ship to the company, and there is a manufacturing time, roughly about 2 months before they can receive it. During that time, you want to make sure the patient's disease is under control. So that is a given. There are several ways to look at it when we evaluate the patient and talk to the patient. One good thing is now the two CAR T-cells which are approved, one is cilta-cel we talked about, and the other one is ide-cel. Ide-cel is approved in earlier line of therapy, two or more prior lines of therapy, and cilta-cel is approved in patients who have failed one line of therapy and who are lenalidomide refractory. So, the treatment of CAR T-cell is available earlier. And as I said, when you administer CAR T-cell earlier, you are able to keep the disease burden down, and it is a one and done deal. There is a better quality of life for the patient, and you are able to produce long, durable remission and potentially a cure. Now coming to the bispecific, they are currently available in later lines of therapy. So if you look at it from a patient's perspective, you can use the CAR T-cell earlier and then go through the bispecific therapy. But if the patient comes with relapsed refractory myeloma and has not used the CAR T-cell therapy and has not used the bispecific therapy, then the physicians have to decide which one they want to use. If somebody's disease is rapidly progressing and they need immediate tumor reduction and they have already exhausted all available therapy, then going through BCMA bispecific therapy is quite appropriate. And secondly, CAR T-cell therapy is generally given to somewhat physically more fit patients, whereas bispecific therapy, because you are giving antibody at step-wise dosing in this patient, and you have the ability to stop at any particular dose and then come back and redose, whereas CAR T is, you just give it to them one time, you have a lot more control. So intermediate frail or even frail patients can go through bispecific therapy, whereas it would not be in the best interest of the patient to go through a CAR T-cell therapy when they are frail. So that is another important point. But from the information available, when the patient goes on a BCMA bispecific therapy and they start progressing on treatment, usually it is their T cells are exhausted or the BCMA is no longer expressed on the tumor cells. So coming with CAR T-cell later on is usually not effective, whereas giving CAR T-cell earlier, if the patient relapses later, they have good T-cell function and most of the time the BCMA is still expressed. So you are able to give the BCMA to the maximum benefit by using the CAR T first and BCMA later. So if somebody asked me how to sequence this, just off the bat, you will say CAR T first, BCMA bispecific second. But as I said, there are unique situations. Then there is another potential that is happening. You can change the target. You can use a BCMA against GPRC5D to reduce the tumor, and then go ahead and consolidate it with a CAR T-cell therapy. That is also possible. You are changing the target from GPRC5D to BCMA, the tumor is already down, so the patient is likely to benefit. So these are all newer treatment options which have become available to the physician. So they will have to look at individual patients and decide what is the best course of action for that patient. Dr. Davide Soldato: So, I just wanted to close a little bit with your opinion about how these results translate into clinical practice. So considering this outstanding 5-year data that we have seen, one third of the patients who are alive and progression-free after a single infusion of cilta-cel, do you think that we could start to think about functional cure even in patients who have a diagnosis of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma? Dr. Sundar Jagannath: My feeling is this is important because in this particular study which is published, 12 patients who were followed at Mount Sinai out of the 32 patients who are alive and progression-free, 12 were followed at Mount Sinai. And they were evaluated every year with bone marrow MRD testing by clonoSEQ in 11 of the 12 patients, and one was by multiparametric flow cytometry. So most of them were 10 to the minus 6, not even one in a million cancer cells, and all of them had functional imaging, which is called PET CT every year. So these were patients who had no evidence of disease that we could detect with the technology available today, serologically, in the bone marrow, or anywhere else in the body with a PET CT. They were found to be disease free after a single infusion of cilta-cel. So, that would be almost to the definition of a cure because if you look at cure as a definition for any cancer, cure is defined as a state of complete remission with no trace of cancer that persists over a period of 5 years or longer without maintenance. And that will be applicable for breast cancer, lymphoma, leukemia. So it is a general statement. And if we use that in myeloma too, then I could say that these 12 patients from my center, we proved that they are cured of their myeloma. They are not functionally cured. You've got to remember, there is only cure. That was the definition across all diseases. So there is nothing like a functional cure. They are cured of myeloma. So is myeloma curable? This is the first time we are looking at that. We do know, every physician treating myeloma that there are patients out there, 10 year and beyond, without evidence of disease. This has been published by University of Arkansas, Bart Barlogie's group, who has been saying that myeloma is a curable disease for a long time. And many others have shown long-term follow up. But this one in a late stage disease, we were able to show that they were one treatment with no maintenance. All other studies have been in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Nobody has shown in late relapse patients on a clinical trial a third of the patient will be progression-free. And 12 of them who were studied were actually disease free. So they were cured of the disease. So if we accept that, then the next question is, first step towards cure is achieving complete remission. They should have no monoclonal protein by any technology you want to use, no measurable residual disease using next gen sequencing or clonoSEQ, and functional imaging whole body PET CT or whole body MRI. So that is important, definition of the complete remission. And then it has to be sustained. That is something the IMWG and IMS, International Myeloma Society, they will have to come together for a consensus. How many years should they be followed and should be in this kind of status with no trace of cancer? Is it, 3 years are enough? 4 years enough? 5 years is enough? For me, I said in this paper, 5 years is a good definition for achieving a potential cure. Then you use the term 'functionally cured'. I have a problem with functionally cured and operationally cured or whatever. Functionally cured was originally put out by Paiva from Spain. There were 8% of newly diagnosed myeloma patients who have, after they go get treated, they will have an MGUS like phenomenon, a small amount of paraprotein detectable, and they are only 8%. And he said that these patients could be off treatment and the disease does not progress. But the problem is when you are giving treatment like maintenance therapy continuously until progression, you do not know exactly who is in the MGUS situation. So you have to have done sophisticated flow cytometry like Paiva did, and it is not quite clinically applicable. So functionally cured applies only for 8% of the people, so it should go out of the vocabulary. Then you can say 'operationally cured'. These are the patients traditionally Bart Barlogie and others showed that they have a large number of patients who have been followed for 10 years with no recurrence of disease, not on treatment. But in those days, they did not have MRD PET CT and all of them done systematically. So that is why they had to come up with a situation where they said they were operationally cured. So yes, myeloma patients have been cured since auto transplant was introduced. I completely agree. It is not new to the CAR T-cell therapy. But the beauty of the CAR T-cell therapy was it was in relapsed refractory myeloma, unmet medical need, number one. Number two, they were studied systematically. It was a clinical trial adjudicated by FDA and EMA for drug approval, cilta-cel was approved. So these patients were carefully followed, and it was a multi-center study. And in that group of patients, we were able to show patients- So, I think this would indicate cure is a reality in myeloma, and as these kind of treatments, immunologic treatment, either it is a CAR T-cell therapy or BCMA bispecific or whatever, there is a chance more patients are likely to be cured, and these treatments have to move forward and so that we are looking towards a cure. That is the beauty of it, and I just thank you for asking and also throwing in this so-called functionally cured, which people like to use casually, and I say it is time to talk more cure and not stuck with functionally cured because that does not allow the field to progress. Dr. Davide Soldato: Thank you very much. That was very interesting. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: And provocative. Dr. Davide Soldato: A little bit, but I think that we needed to close the podcast with this kind of reflection coming from someone who is an expert in the field, as you are. So, I really wanted to thank you for joining us today and for sharing more on your article, which is titled, "Long-Term Remission and Survival After Treatment With Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma." If you enjoy our show, please leave us a rating and a review and be sure to come back for another episode. You can find all ASCO shows at asco.org/podcasts. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: Thank you. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.

From Caregiver to Patient - What It's Like to Experience Both with Renee Coolbaugh

The Many Faces of Cancer

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 11, 2025 42:13

Today's guest is Renee Coshin Coolbaugh, lifelong northeastern US resider, currently calling Baltimore her home, cat lover (did you know a group of cats is called a clowder?), caregiver to her husband Peter through is journey with Multiple Myeloma, and endometrial and ovarian cancer survivor. To say she's a multitasker is an understatement.We spend a lot of time talking about the caregiver and patient experience and what it has been like to be in both roles. We also talk about genetic testing, gratitude, synchronous cancers, self-care, and so much more.Resources:Renee's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rcc_renee/Follow:Follow me: https://www.instagram.com/melissagrosboll/My website: https://melissagrosboll.comEmail me: drmelissagrosboll@gmail.com

patients baltimore caregivers multiple myeloma

Advancing Clinical Expertise in CELMoDs: Transforming Multiple Myeloma Treatment

ReachMD CME

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 10, 2025 42:00

CME credits: 1.00 Valid until: 10-11-2026 Claim your CME credit at https://reachmd.com/programs/cme/advancing-clinical-expertise-in-celmods-transforming-multiple-myeloma-treatment/35631/ This activity will cultivate familiarity with the emerging CELMoD treatment class poised to transform the management of newly-diagnosed and R/R MM. With a higher affinity for cereblon than their predecessors, CELMoDs represent a new, distinct generation of immunomodulatory drugs with the potential to bridge longstanding treatment gaps for patients exhibiting inadequate responses to the conventional medications. This activity will help providers differentiate CELMoDs from newer, alternative agents used in MM, examine the latest clinical trial data supporting the adoption of these drugs, and readily identify the clinical circumstances in which their use would be warranted in clinical practice. By participating, clinicians can additionally examine the utility of emerging combination strategies that maximize the therapeutic synergies of CELMoDs with other newer treatment classes, such as EZH2 inhibitors. In doing so, community hematologist-oncologists can substantially extend patient survival and improve the patient experience through each phase of the MM care continuum.=

treatments transforming expertise clinical advancing mm cme rmd multiple myeloma clinical pharmacology reachmd cme/ce oncology and hematology rare and orphan diseases

Foundations | Pathology | Multiple Myeloma

The Orthobullets Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 8, 2025 14:42

Welcome to Season 2 of the Orthobullets Podcast.Today's show is Foundations, where we review foundational knowledge for frontline MSK providers such as junior orthopaedic residents, ER physicians, and primary care providers. This episode will cover the topic of⁠ ⁠⁠Multiple Myeloma ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠from our Pathology section at Orthobullets.com.Follow ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Orthobullets⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on Social Media:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube

social media er foundations pathologies msk multiple myeloma orthobullets

S14 Ep42: Dynamic Frailty Assessment Underscores Need for Ongoing Evaluation in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: With Hira Mian, MD, MSc, FRCPC

dynamic evaluation ongoing transplants frailty multiple myeloma hira mian underscores frcpc

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 6, 2025 4:53

Dr Mian discussed why frailty should be understood as a dynamic, evolving clinical state rather than a fixed baseline characteristic

Colin Hawkins on his diagnosis of multiple myeloma, his journey with mental health and how important sport is to him | Movember

OTB Football

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 31, 2025 16:43

Shane Hannon was joined by former professional footballer and four time League Of Ireland winner, Colin Hawkins to discuss his cancer diagnosis, his journey with depression and counselling, and how important sport and the sporting community is in his recovery. Off The Ball in association with Movember, Grow a Moustache, Move for Movember, Host a Moment or Mo Your Own Way. The Moustache is Calling. Raise Funds, Save Lives – sign up now at Movember.com/register

mental health diagnosis hawkins movember save lives moustaches multiple myeloma raise funds

Colin Hawkins on his diagnosis of multiple myeloma, his journey with mental health and how important sport is to him | Movember

Highlights from Off The Ball

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 31, 2025 16:43

mental health diagnosis hawkins movember save lives moustaches multiple myeloma raise funds

Breakthroughs in Multiple Myeloma Treatment and Von Willebrand Disease Mechanisms

Blood Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 23, 2025 24:11

In this week's episode of the Blood Podcast, Associate Editor Dr. James Griffin interviews Drs. Binod Dhakal and Ruben Bierings about their respective papers published in this week's issue of Blood. Dr. Dhakal presents his study on using talquetamab, a bispecific antibody, as a bridging therapy before BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma patients, showing promising results with high response rates and manageable toxicities. Next, Dr. Bierings identified patients with genetic variants in the guanine exchange factor MAP kinase–activating death domain (MADD) that impair VWF secretion from endothelial cells and possibly cause VWD type 1. Featured ArticlesA novel cause of type 1 von Willebrand disease: impaired exocytosis of Weibel-Palade bodies due to biallelic MADD variantsSophie Hordijk, Stijn A. Groten, Petra E. Bürgisser, Sebastiaan N. J. Laan, Georg Christoph Korenke, Tomáš Honzík, Diane Beysen, Frank W. G. Leebeek, Paul A. Skehel, Maartje van den Biggelaar, Tom Carter, Ruben BieringsSequential targeting in multiple myeloma: talquetamab, a GPRC5D bispecific antibody, as a bridge to BCMA CAR-T therapyBinod Dhakal, Othman S. Akhtar, David Fandrei, Alexandria Jensen, Rahul Banerjee, Darren Pan, Shambavi Richard, Reed Friend, Matthew Rees, Patrick Costello, Mariola Vazquez Martinez, Oren Pasvolsky, Charlotte Wagner, James A. Davis, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Ran Reshef, Aimaz Afrough, Danai Dima, Manisha Bhutani, Omar Nadeem, Ricardo Parrondo, Ciara Freeman, Lekha Mikkilineni, Shahzad Raza, Larry D. Anderson Jr, Prashant Kapoor, Hitomi Hosoya, Saurabh Chhabra, Ariel Grajales-Cruz, Mahmoud Gaballa, Shonali Midha, Melissa Alsina, Douglas Sborov, Krina Patel, Yi Lin, Christopher Ferreri, Nico Gagelmann, Anupama Kumar, Doris Hansen, Andrew Cowan, Luciano J. Costa, Maximilian Merz, Surbhi Sidana

blood medical treatments map drs cart breakthroughs oncology leukemia mechanisms lymphoma medical research hematology madd akhtar multiple myeloma laan maartje tom carter bcma james griffin blood podcast willebrand patrick costello von willebrand disease vwd vwf rahul banerjee biggelaar luciano j costa

S2 Episode 4: Should You Treat Smoldering Multiple Myeloma?

medical cart properties conditioning probe transplants oncology leukemia eligible dimensional spatial lymphoma hodgkin medical research hematology multiple myeloma bone marrow newly diagnosed vrd

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 22, 2025 24:51

Drs Joseph Mikhael and Peter Voorhees discuss considerations for treating smoldering multiple myeloma, including recent studies and shared decision-making. Relevant disclosures can be found with the episode show notes on Medscape https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/1002716. The topics and discussions are planned, produced, and reviewed independently of advertisers. This podcast is intended only for US healthcare professionals. Resources Observation or Treatment for Smoldering Multiple Myeloma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40419473/ Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507880/ From Criteria to Clinic: How Updated Slim CRAB Criteria Influence Multiple Myeloma Diagnostic Activity https://ascopubs.org/doi/pdf/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7556 International Myeloma Working Group Risk Stratification Model for Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33067414/ Daratumumab or Active Monitoring for High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39652675/ Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Versus Observation in High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma After 12 Years of Median Follow-Up Time: A Randomized, Open-Label Study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36067617/ Long-Term Outcome With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23648667/ CD38-Directed Therapies for Management of Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34235096/ Fixed Duration Therapy With Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma – Results of the Ascent Trial https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/140/Supplement%201/1830/492739/Fixed-Duration-Therapy-with-Daratumumab Curative Strategy for High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma: Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (Krd) Followed by Transplant, Krd Consolidation, and Rd Maintenance https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39038268/ Early Safety and Efficacy of CAR-T Cell Therapy in Precursor Myeloma: Results of the CAR-PRISM Study Using Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/144/Supplement%201/1027/531466/Early-Safety-and-Efficacy-of-CAR-T-Cell-Therapy-in

management treat treatments relevant transplants supplement efficacy meta analysis systematic review multiple myeloma medscape smoldering dexamethasone car t cell therapy jco carfilzomib

Busulfan-melphalan conditioning in newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible multiple myeloma; and use of spatial transcriptomics to probe the three-dimensional properties of multiple myeloma bone marrow microenvironments

Blood Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 14, 2025 13:13

In this week's episode we'll learn more about a study comparing busulfan-melphalan with melphalan alone as the conditioning protocol for newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible multiple myeloma; then we will discuss data on how three-dimensional transcriptomics can reveal complex interactions between plasma cells and bone marrow microenvironments.Featured ArticlesHigh-dose busulfan-melphalan vs melphalan and reinforced VRD for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a phase 3 GEM trialProfiling the spatial architecture of multiple myeloma in human bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens with spatial transcriptomicsPreclinical advances in glofitamab combinations: a new frontier for non-Hodgkin lymphoma

MGUS Under the Microscope

Dr. Baliga's Internal Medicine Podcasts

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 12, 2025 4:31

dive significance screenings microscopes neuropathy multiple myeloma mgus

Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma — Proceedings from a Session Held During the Society of Hematologic Oncology 2025 Annual Meeting

society arizona tennessee nashville greece athens oncology annual meetings proceedings massachusetts general hospital multiple myeloma refractory relapsed hematologic hope cancer center

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 3, 2025 58:29

Prof Meletios-Athanasios (Thanos) C Dimopoulos from Alexandra Hospital in Athens, Greece, Dr Hans Lee from Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville, Tennessee, Dr Joseph Mikhael from City of Hope Cancer Center in Phoenix, Arizona, and Dr Noopur Raje from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston discuss recent updates on available and novel treatment strategies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.  CE information and select publications here.

Hema Now: Episode 26: Highlights from the 2025 Meeting of the International Myeloma Society

The EMJ Podcast: Insights For Healthcare Professionals

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 3, 2025 29:40

This episode provides timely coverage of the 2025 Meeting of the International Myeloma Society (IMS). Claudio Cerchione highlights the most important developments from the Annual Meeting, offers his reflections on the evolving treatment landscape, and discusses the role of research and collaboration in moving closer to a cure for myeloma. Timestamps  00:00 – Introduction 02:08 – Reflections on his own career 04:20 – Claudio's initial interest in the field 06:46 – Key takeaways from IMS 2025 Meeting 10:09 – Any potential gaps in coverage? 11:50 – How different patient groups are identified 13:30 – Minimal residual disease 16:15 – Impact of medical societies 20:24 – Translating new findings into clinical practice 23:44 – Improving the accessibility of treatments 26:45 – Claudio's key takeaways from IMS 2025 Meeting Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this episode belong to the speakers and do not necessarily represent the opinions of EMJ.

society international impact reflections improving claudio minimal translating annual meetings ims hema multiple myeloma myeloma translational science emj

Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma — Proceedings from a Session Held During the Society of Hematologic Oncology 2025 Annual Meeting

society management therapy oncology annual meetings proceedings multiple myeloma refractory relapsed potential role antibody drug conjugates hematologic

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 2, 2025 58:30

Featuring perspectives from Prof Meletios-Athanasios (Thanos) C Dimopoulos, Dr Hans Lee, and Dr Noopur Raje, moderated by Dr Joseph Mikhael, including the following topics: Introduction (0:00) Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Multiple Myeloma (MM) — Dr Raje (3:17) Integrating Bispecific Antibodies into the Management of R/R MM — Dr Lee (20:38) Potential Role of Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulators in Therapy for MM — Prof Dimopoulos (40:37) CE information and select publications

Epstein-Barr virus genomic variants in human disease states, somatic GATA1 mutations and leukemia in Down syndrome, and new definitions for high-risk multiple myeloma

Blood Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 25, 2025 18:01

In this week's episode, we'll learn more about relationships between Epstein-Barr virus genomic variants and human diseases, including hematological malignancies; the presence and timing of somatic GATA1 mutations and their relationship to a Down syndrome-specific form of leukemia; and new definitions for high-risk multiple myeloma that emphasize the presence of two or more high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities.Featured Articles:Association of Epstein-Barr virus genomic alterations with human pathologiesClinical significance of preleukemic somatic GATA1 mutations in children with Down syndromeBiallelic antigen escape is a mechanism of resistance to anti-CD38 antibodies in multiple myeloma

EP, 1250B - Multiple Myeloma: Latest Research/Statistics/Treatment

YOU The Owners Manual Radio Show

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 23, 2025

Dr. Joseph Mikhael, Chief Medical Officer, discusses the IMF's work and what lies ahead in the fight against myeloma. Dr. Mikhael leads the IMF's M-Power Project, which seeks to improve the care delivered to African Americans, who have double the incidence of white people. He spends about 20% of his time in the developing world, seeking ways to enhance access to myeloma therapies in underprivileged countries.

research african americans treatments statistics chief medical officers imf multiple myeloma mikhael

S2 Episode 3: When Is the Best Time to Use CAR T-Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma?

action study md treatments relevant outcomes patel msc best time ide incidence multiple myeloma medscape car t cell therapy clinical experience car t cell jco

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 23, 2025 24:38

Joseph Mikhael, MD, and Krina K. Patel, MD, MSc, discuss considerations for CAR T-Cell therapy in multiple myeloma, including age, access, and bridging therapy. Relevant disclosures can be found with the episode show notes on Medscape https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/1002715. The topics and discussions are planned, produced, and reviewed independently of advertisers. This podcast is intended only for US healthcare professionals. Resources Multiple Myeloma https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/204369-overview CARTITUDE-1 Final Results: Phase 1b/2 Study of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in Heavily Pretreated Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8009 Cilta-cel or Standard Care in Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37272512/ Plain Language Summary of the KarMMa-3 Study of Ide-cel or Standard of Care Regimens in People With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38651976/ CAR T-Cell Therapy Toxicity https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK592426/ Immunomodulatory Drugs in Multiple Myeloma: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Experience https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28205024/ Incidence and Outcomes of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38838226/ Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Primary Prophylaxis of Early Infection in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35064823/ Revisiting the Role of Alkylating Agents in Multiple Myeloma: Up-to-Date Evidence and Future Perspectives https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37244325/ Bispecific Antibodies for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updates and Future Perspectives https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38660139/ FDA Eliminates REMS for Approved CAR T-Cell Therapies https://www.aabb.org/news-resources/news/article/2025/06/30/fda-eliminates-rems-for-approved-car-t-cell-therapies

Oncology Nursing Update: Multiple Myeloma — An Interview with Dr Beth Faiman on CAR T-Cell Therapy

patients nursing clinical fundamental cart mm minimal oncology differentiating sequencing durability multiple myeloma car t cell therapy neurotoxicity ncpd

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 20, 2025 52:48

Featuring an interview with Dr Beth Faiman, including the following topics: Clinical practice background and historical view of treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) (0:00) Fundamental principles associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (7:19) Sequencing of CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies in the MM treatment landscape (9:00) Patient eligibility to receive CAR T-cell therapy (13:23) Differentiating among approved CAR T-cell therapies for MM (18:18) Durability of responses to CAR T-cell therapy for MM (24:01) Neurotoxicity with CAR T-cell therapies for MM (26:26) Minimal residual disease monitoring in MM (29:39) Support systems for the management of toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy (35:10) Patients with MM experiencing durable responses to CAR T-cell therapy (43:11) NCPD information and select publications

Oncology Nursing Update: Multiple Myeloma — An Interview with Dr Beth Faiman on CAR T-Cell Therapy

ohio cleveland nursing cart oncology multiple myeloma car t cell therapy ncpd

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 19, 2025 53:08

Dr Beth Faiman from Case Comprehensive Cancer Center in Cleveland, Ohio, discusses nursing considerations with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with multiple myeloma. NCPD information and select publications here.

Heme Series: Lymphomas and Multiple Myeloma (with Drs. Andrew Jenzer and Maxwell Lloyd)

Every Day Oral Surgery: Surgeons Talking Shop

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 15, 2025 51:02

In this episode of Everyday Oral Surgery, we continue our Heme Series on all things blood-related by discussing lymphomas and multiple myeloma. Joining Dr. Stucki on the podcast again, to share a wealth of knowledge, are Drs. Andrew Jenzer and Maxwell Lloyd. They delve into a discussion on the basics of lymphomas, dissecting the two categories of Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and get into the diagnosis and presenting symptoms, stages, risk stratification, and treatments of each category. Next, they touch on what Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) is and dive into a broad discussion on multiple myeloma. Dr. Lloyd breaks down the spectrum of this disease, including the signs and symptoms, testing and diagnostics, and explains that there is no cure for the disease. He also expands on the various treatments and management regimens available. To hear more, including thoughts on how to improve communication between collaborating teams, be sure not to miss out on today's episode. Thanks for tuning in!Key Points From This Episode:Introduction to today's topic as we continue our Heme Series.Dr. Lloyd talks us through lymphoma basics.Dr. Jenzer unpacks the presenting symptoms of the Hodgkin lymphoma category.Stages and risk stratification that constantly evolve: Ann Arbor Staging System. Treatment of lymphoma: thinking broadly, as regimens seem to be changing quickly. We discuss the same aspects, but of the non-Hodgkin lymphoma category.Dr. Lloyd dives broadly into the chemotherapy regimen options for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.He explains a double-hit lymphoma and the associated treatment.We discuss Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS).Dr. Jenzer explains what multiple myelomas are. Dr. Lloyd further unpacks the spectrum of this disease (multiple myeloma).Signs and symptoms of multiple myeloma.An explanation for the lack of a cure for multiple myeloma.Testing and diagnostics of multiple myelomaDr. Lloyd broadly delves into the different types of medications and treatments used in managing multiple myeloma.He touches on some of the side effects of the medications.Big takeaway points from today's discussion.Dr. Lloyd's thoughts on how we can improve communication between collaborating teams.Final thoughts and recommendations to listeners.Links Mentioned in Today's Episode:Dr. Andrew Jenzer Email — andrew.jenzer@duke.edu Dr. Maxwell Lloyd — https://connects.catalyst.harvard.edu/Profiles/display/Person/192727 AAOMS — https://aaoms.org/education-meetings/meetings/ NCCN Guidelines — https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 Ann Arbor Staging System — https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK65726.23/table/CDR0000062933__557/?report=objectonly St. Louis Course — https://stlomfsreview.com/ Everyday Oral Surgery Website — https://www.everydayoralsurgery.com/ Everyday Oral Surgery on Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/everydayoralsurgery/ Everyday Oral Surgery on Facebook — https://www.facebook.com/EverydayOralSurgery/Dr. Grant Stucki Email — grantstucki@gmail.comDr. Grant Stucki Phone — 720-441-6059

signs testing treatments stages drs profiles lymphoma hodgkin comdr multiple myeloma heme nccn guidelines aaoms

Ocular Toxicities Associated with ADCs and Other Cancer Therapies: Part 1 — Inside the Issue of Adverse Event Management

breast cancer toxicity cme adverse event management ocular multiple myeloma cancer therapies adcs antibody drug conjugates

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 15, 2025 57:48

Featuring perspectives from Prof Rebecca A Dent, Dr Hans Lee, Dr Neel Pasricha and Dr Tiffany A Richards, including the following topics: Introduction: The Patient Experience (0:00) Managing Ocular Toxicities Associated with Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Other Cancer Therapies — Dr Pasricha (10:28) Ocular Toxicities in Multiple Myeloma (45:33) Ocular Toxicities in Breast Cancer (50:34) CME information and select publications

Oncology Nursing Update: Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma — An Interview with Ms Charise Gleason on Optimizing Patient Care

building progress patients emerging nursing optimizing mm oncology patient care tailoring gleason multiple myeloma newly diagnosed charise cd38 ncpd

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 6, 2025 54:33

Featuring an interview with Ms Charise Gleason, including the following topics: Progress and change in the management of multiple myeloma (MM) (0:00) Patient- and disease-specific factors guiding therapeutic decision-making for newly diagnosed MM (5:11) Role of anti-CD38 antibodies in the management of MM (12:14) Emerging treatment options for smoldering myeloma (23:08) Optimizing long-term outcomes for patients with MM (25:38) Tailoring therapy for older adults and patients with preexisting comorbidities (29:59) Case: A woman in her early 80s with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible MM who experienced a complete response with first-line daratumumab/lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (34:34) Case: A man in his early 60s with progressive back pain from standard-risk MM who experienced a complete response with daratumumab with lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (42:05) Building therapeutic relationships and integrating holistic care in oncology practice (47:13) NCPD information and select publications

Oncology Nursing Update: Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma — An Interview with Ms Charise Gleason

nursing oncology gleason multiple myeloma newly diagnosed emory healthcare charise ncpd

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 6, 2025 54:17

Ms Charise Gleason from Emory Healthcare in Atlanta, Georgia, discusses the evolution of first-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma. NCPD information and select publications here.

Oncology Nursing Update: Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma — An Interview with Prof Xavier Leleu

prof treatments nursing contemporary mm oncology routes prognosis multiple myeloma newly diagnosed mechanistic cd38 leleu ncpd

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 5, 2025 53:08

Featuring an interview with Prof Xavier Leleu including the following topics: Introduction: Historical treatment advances in multiple myeloma (MM) (0:00) Contemporary treatment for patients with newly diagnosed MM who are eligible for transplant (13:18) Prognosis and life expectancy for patients with MM (19:39) Mechanistic differences among anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (27:05) Routes of administration of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (30:21) Background and treatment of smoldering myeloma (41:05) Treatment for older patients with newly diagnosed MM who are not eligible for transplant (46:41) NCPD information and select publications

Oncology Nursing Update: Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma — An Interview with Prof Xavier Leleu

france prof nursing oncology poitiers multiple myeloma newly diagnosed leleu ncpd

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 5, 2025 53:08

Prof Xavier Leleu from Poitiers University Hospital in Poitiers, France, discusses nursing considerations in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. NCPD information and select publications here.

Living Fully with Multiple Myeloma: A Conversation with Joe on Hope, Risk, and Meaning

Dying to Tell You

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 4, 2025 81:56

“There's something so precious about every day and every moment and living this beautiful gift.” What does it mean to truly live when tomorrow is not guaranteed? In this moving episode, Joe shares his journey through the unexpected diagnosis of multiple myeloma, the challenges of treatment, and the profound lessons learned along the way. With honesty, humor, and deep faith, Joe invites us to consider what matters most—embracing each day, loving fiercely, and finding hope even in uncertainty. Whether you're facing your own crossroads or supporting someone you love, Joe's story is a powerful reminder to seize the moment and live with purpose.

conversations risk meaning living fully multiple myeloma

Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma — Oncology Q&A: Discussing Common Questions Posed by Patients

patients farmers clinical trials oncology cme common questions treatment options neuropathy posed multiple myeloma alternative therapies refractory myeloma relapsed antibody drug conjugates

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 29, 2025 59:21

Featuring perspectives from Dr Natalie S Callander and Dr Sagar Lonial, including the following topics: Introduction (0:00) A Farmer with Myeloma; Is Myeloma the New Chronic Myeloid Leukemia? (2:06) Clinical Trials (12:34) Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy (16:11) Bispecific Antibodies (21:38) Antibody-Drug Conjugates; a Patient on Belantamab Mafodotin for 3 Years (30:45) Treatment Options for Relapsed Disease (40:46) Neuropathy (44:43) Alternative Therapies (48:36) 164 Questions (53:20) CME information and select publications

Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma — Oncology Q&A: Discussing Common Questions Posed by Patients