POPULARITY
Categories
Drs Joseph Mikhael and Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson discuss whether it is time to screen for multiple myeloma and what we can learn from the iStopMM study. Relevant disclosures can be found with the episode show notes on Medscape https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/1002717. The topics and discussions are planned, produced, and reviewed independently of advertisers. This podcast is intended only for US healthcare professionals. Resources Multiple Myeloma https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/204369-overview Screening in Multiple Myeloma and Its Precursors: Are We There Yet? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38175579/ Iceland Screens, Treats, or Prevents Multiple Myeloma (iStopMM): A Population-Based Screening Study for Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and Randomized Controlled Trial of Follow-Up Strategies https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34001889/ Identifying Associations Between Race and Gender in the Incidence and Mortality of Patients With Multiple Myeloma https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e20052 Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the Genomic Age: A Review of Screening Criteria Over the Past 40 Years https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18438522/ International Myeloma Foundation https://www.myeloma.org/ Prevalence of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16571879/ Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507880/ Prevalence and Risk of Progression of Light-Chain Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20472173/ Mode of Progression in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A Study of 406 Patients https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38228628/ Observation or Treatment for Smoldering Multiple Myeloma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40419473/
Guest Dr. Sundar Jagannath and host Dr. Davide Soldato discuss JCO article "Long-Term (≥5-Year) Remission and Survival After Treatment With Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma," and the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM (relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma). TRANSCRIPT Dr. Davide Soldato: Hello and welcome to JCO After Hours, the podcast where we sit down with authors from some of the latest articles published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. I am your host, Dr. Davide Soldato, medical oncologist at Ospedale San Martino in Genoa, Italy. Today, we are joined by JCO author, Professor Sundar Jagannath, Professor of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the Tisch Cancer Institute. He also serves as Network Director for the Center of Excellence for Multiple Myeloma, and he is an internationally recognized expert in the field of multiple myeloma. Today, we will be discussing the article titled, "Long-Term Remission and Survival After Treatment With Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma." Thank you for speaking with us, Professor Jagannath. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: Thank you for having me, Dr. Davide Soldato. It is a pleasure to be here. JCO is a highly recognized journal among the oncologists, so I am very happy and privileged to be here today. Dr. Davide Soldato: Thank you so much for being with us. So, I wanted to start a little bit with the rationale of the study and the population that was included in the study. So, the trial that we are discussing, CARTITUDE-1, was already published before, and we observed very good results with a single infusion of cilta-cel. So we had previously reported a median progression-free survival of 30 months, and median overall survival was not reached. So, I just wanted to ask you if you could guide us a little bit into the population that was included in the study and also explain a little bit to our listeners what is the drug that we are discussing, cilta-cel. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: It is a CAR T-cell. This is a patient's own lymphocytes, which goes through apheresis and is sent to the company, where they modify it and introduce the B cell receptor. In this case, you know, there is a heavy chain gene receptor for the BCMA, and in cilta-cel, there are actually two receptor sites on each molecule, or there are two binding domains on each receptor molecule. So, it is considered to be quite efficacious. As you reported, the earlier results that the patients who participated, 97% of the patient responded. Now, you asked about the patients who participated in the clinical trial. This clinical trial was conducted between July of 2018 and October of 2019. At that time, this was a phase 1b/phase 2 trial, and the whole idea was to take patients who had relapsed all the available treatment regimen so that these patients were considered to have, in the unmet medical need situation. So, what does that entail? That means the patient should have been exposed to a proteasome inhibitor, to an immunomodulatory molecule, and to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody and should have received at least three or more prior lines of therapy and should be actually progressing on their last line of therapy. So with that requirement, if you look at it, the median number of prior therapy on the patients who participated was actually six. So patients were heavily pretreated. They had exhausted all available treatment options. So, they can participate in this clinical trial. And if not, there have been real-world evidence, such as LocoMMotion, which had reported what is the outcome for such a patient if they were treated outside of this clinical trial, if they were treated with the then available regimen. Their median progression free survival would have been only 3 months, and most patients would have lost their life within a year. So, this was truly an unmet medical need with patients in a very difficult clinical situation. Let's put it that way. So, those were the patients who participated in this particular trial. Dr. Davide Soldato: Thank you very much. And as we mentioned before, the results that were obtained in this clinical trial were really very interesting. And now, in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, you are reporting data with a longer follow up. So we are actually at more than 5 years of follow up for the patients included in this trial. So, I just wanted a little bit of insight into why you decided to report these long-term outcomes and what type of information do you think you could provide with this study to the medical community? Dr. Sundar Jagannath: This is very important because this was a clinical trial that was done in patients who were, as I said, in unmet medical need. Most of the patients had prior stem cell transplantation, had gone through a proteasome inhibitor. Many of them have had both Velcade and carfilzomib treatment. Most of them had been exposed to lenalidomide and pomalidomide. And as required, all of the patients had to have had prior exposure to anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody or daratumumab. So, the patients were heavily pretreated. Typically, TIL CAR T-cells came into the field at this particular moment, until then, we were developing small molecules, and they usually would have a PFS of 3 months and median life expectancy of a year, the overall response rate of 30%, and that is how, if you look back, that is how carfilzomib was approved, that is how pomalidomide was approved. So, the drugs which were approved, including daratumumab, you know, the response rate was in the same ballpark. So you would see that most agents, single agents, would have had a response rate in the neighborhood of 30%, the progression-free survival would have been between 3 to 5 months or 6 months at the most, and the life expectancy was short. And here comes a drug, and when I was following the patients at Mount Sinai, I found that there were a subset of patients, they got one-time treatment and they were in complete remission, no trace of cancer with annual evaluation with PET CT and bone marrow evaluation for MRD. So, I said this is remarkable, and this needs to be reported. And I went to the Janssen and company, and they agreed to review the entire experience. This is remarkable that 32 of the 97 patients, or one third of the patients, were alive and progression-free. This is unheard of for any clinical trial until now, that the patient will be progression-free, one third of the patients on a clinical trial will be progression-free, in the late stage of their disease. So that is the most important impact. And that is why this 5-year follow-up results were presented. Dr. Davide Soldato: Thank you very much. That was very clear. And as you said, we are speaking about a population that was heavily pretreated, that had exhausted all type of treatment options outside of a clinical trial. And as you said, one third of the patients was alive and progression-free after 5 years from being included and infused inside of the study. So, considering this population that, as we said, had received all treatment options, I was wondering if you observed any kind of differences in terms of disease characteristics when looking at these patients that had exceptional response, so, alive and progression-free at 5 years, and the patients that sadly had developed a progression after the infusion in the study. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: This is very important because we wanted to see who are the patients who are having this exceptional outcome. And we looked at all the 97 patients. If we look at all the patients, we saw that there were initially, out of the 97, 17 patients died earlier in the disease course due to treatment related complications, etc. But there were about 46 patients who had progression of disease and 32 patients, or one third, were alive without progression of disease. Then we looked at the 46 patients who had progression of disease. Of them, we found that 30 had disease progression and its complication, and there were actually 13 patients who were still alive even after progression of disease. So we decided to compare these 46 patients who had progression of disease versus 32 patients who had no progression of disease to see what is the difference. To our surprise, the age was similar, male, female distribution was similar. High-risk cytogenetics, which we would have thought, you know, that is why we say high-risk disease, the term, high-risk cytogenetics was equally distributed. That was really a surprise. Number of lines of prior therapy, number of exposure to drugs, all of that was the same. So that was also interesting. But a theme did emerge. Patients, in general, tend to have lower burden of disease who had the exceptional outcome. But there is one which we considered as bad, the extramedullary disease. Multiple myeloma being a blood cancer, it is usually in the bone marrow. When it starts growing outside of the bone marrow, the extramedullary disease, usually it portends poor prognosis. But we were surprised that actually there were an equal number of extramedullary disease patients even in the long-term survivor as those who had progressed of disease. So the most important takeaway was patients who had lower burden of disease, they had less number of myeloma cells in their bone marrow, percentage wise, and the soluble BCMA level was lower. Soluble BCMA is an indirect measure of the amount of plasma cells in the patient's body. It is like a tumor burden. So they were low. So, this was an important finding because it has future ramification, as you can understand. If this treatment is made available earlier in the disease course of the patients, where we are able to control the disease better, then more patients are likely to have such wonderful outcomes as one third of the patient experience in the late stage of the disease. Dr. Davide Soldato: So, you already mentioned soluble BCMA as a marker of potentially better prognosis as being correlated to a lower volume of disease. I was wondering if you could give us some more information about the biomarkers that you evaluated in the study. For example, you evaluated a little bit the CAR T expansion kinetics and also some others that I think could be interesting and could point to some population that experienced such important benefit. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: That is a very important point because CAR T-cell, it is a live cell and its efficacy depends upon how well the CAR T-cell is going to function. And then, you know, the patient undergoes apheresis. This is a patient's own lymphocyte. So first and foremost is who would generate good CAR T-cell. Those who have plenty of lymphocytes at the time they are coming for apheresis. This is likely to happen earlier in the course of the disease than in patients who have gone through numerous lines of therapy and exhausted. So, in this particular trial, of course this was in late stage of the disease, and so we were able to show patients who had lower number of T cell in circulation, and the way to measure is if they had more neutrophils and less lymphocytes. So that is what is called as a higher T cell over neutrophil, they did better. If they have more neutrophil than T cells, then they did not do well. So, procurement. The second one is also whether the T cells are more naive, you know, not exhausted T cells. So more naive T cells, if you are able to procure from the patient, they did very well. Now, after the CAR T-cell manufacture, then the expansion, when you put it back into the patient, if the T cells expand very well, so that the effector, that is the CAR T-cells to the tumor ratio is good, so there are more effector cells, the CAR T was able to expand and the amount of tumor was less, then the efficacy was very, very good. As I said, the patients in this group, those who had a lower burden of disease, they did better, and that is because of the CAR T-cell expansion, so the effector to the target ratio was favorable. So that is another important. And then there are also the type of CAR T-cells, having CD4 T cells with central memory phenotype at the peak expansion also makes a difference. So all of that matters. But this is important because the efficacy of the CAR T-cell, it is persistent, long persistent and keeping the cancer down. Its ability to get rid of the cancer completely at the first go around because usually we are not able to detect the CAR T-cells beyond 6 months in the majority of patients and very rarely after a year or two. So it is very uncommon to find the CAR T-cells in circulation or even in the regular bone marrow evaluation. So, efficacy, the expansion, having naive T cells, having good effector to target ratio and more central memory kind of T cell, because if it is all effector T cell, they will get quickly utilized and get exhausted, whereas the central memory cells can expand more and give more effective CAR T-cells. Dr. Davide Soldato: Thank you very much. I was wondering if you could guide us a little bit into what is your opinion regarding the positioning of CAR T-cells given all of these logistics that is necessary compared, for example, with bispecific antibodies against BCMA, which have the same target, but they do not have all of these logistics before being administered to the patient. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: That is a very important question, how to sequence these treatments now that we have two BCMA-directed CAR T-cells available. We have three BCMA-directed bispecific and one GPRC5D-directed bispecific antibodies are available. And so the question comes in for at least the currently approved CAR T-cell therapy, there is an obligatory time. You have to go through apheresis and you have to ship to the company, and there is a manufacturing time, roughly about 2 months before they can receive it. During that time, you want to make sure the patient's disease is under control. So that is a given. There are several ways to look at it when we evaluate the patient and talk to the patient. One good thing is now the two CAR T-cells which are approved, one is cilta-cel we talked about, and the other one is ide-cel. Ide-cel is approved in earlier line of therapy, two or more prior lines of therapy, and cilta-cel is approved in patients who have failed one line of therapy and who are lenalidomide refractory. So, the treatment of CAR T-cell is available earlier. And as I said, when you administer CAR T-cell earlier, you are able to keep the disease burden down, and it is a one and done deal. There is a better quality of life for the patient, and you are able to produce long, durable remission and potentially a cure. Now coming to the bispecific, they are currently available in later lines of therapy. So if you look at it from a patient's perspective, you can use the CAR T-cell earlier and then go through the bispecific therapy. But if the patient comes with relapsed refractory myeloma and has not used the CAR T-cell therapy and has not used the bispecific therapy, then the physicians have to decide which one they want to use. If somebody's disease is rapidly progressing and they need immediate tumor reduction and they have already exhausted all available therapy, then going through BCMA bispecific therapy is quite appropriate. And secondly, CAR T-cell therapy is generally given to somewhat physically more fit patients, whereas bispecific therapy, because you are giving antibody at step-wise dosing in this patient, and you have the ability to stop at any particular dose and then come back and redose, whereas CAR T is, you just give it to them one time, you have a lot more control. So intermediate frail or even frail patients can go through bispecific therapy, whereas it would not be in the best interest of the patient to go through a CAR T-cell therapy when they are frail. So that is another important point. But from the information available, when the patient goes on a BCMA bispecific therapy and they start progressing on treatment, usually it is their T cells are exhausted or the BCMA is no longer expressed on the tumor cells. So coming with CAR T-cell later on is usually not effective, whereas giving CAR T-cell earlier, if the patient relapses later, they have good T-cell function and most of the time the BCMA is still expressed. So you are able to give the BCMA to the maximum benefit by using the CAR T first and BCMA later. So if somebody asked me how to sequence this, just off the bat, you will say CAR T first, BCMA bispecific second. But as I said, there are unique situations. Then there is another potential that is happening. You can change the target. You can use a BCMA against GPRC5D to reduce the tumor, and then go ahead and consolidate it with a CAR T-cell therapy. That is also possible. You are changing the target from GPRC5D to BCMA, the tumor is already down, so the patient is likely to benefit. So these are all newer treatment options which have become available to the physician. So they will have to look at individual patients and decide what is the best course of action for that patient. Dr. Davide Soldato: So, I just wanted to close a little bit with your opinion about how these results translate into clinical practice. So considering this outstanding 5-year data that we have seen, one third of the patients who are alive and progression-free after a single infusion of cilta-cel, do you think that we could start to think about functional cure even in patients who have a diagnosis of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma? Dr. Sundar Jagannath: My feeling is this is important because in this particular study which is published, 12 patients who were followed at Mount Sinai out of the 32 patients who are alive and progression-free, 12 were followed at Mount Sinai. And they were evaluated every year with bone marrow MRD testing by clonoSEQ in 11 of the 12 patients, and one was by multiparametric flow cytometry. So most of them were 10 to the minus 6, not even one in a million cancer cells, and all of them had functional imaging, which is called PET CT every year. So these were patients who had no evidence of disease that we could detect with the technology available today, serologically, in the bone marrow, or anywhere else in the body with a PET CT. They were found to be disease free after a single infusion of cilta-cel. So, that would be almost to the definition of a cure because if you look at cure as a definition for any cancer, cure is defined as a state of complete remission with no trace of cancer that persists over a period of 5 years or longer without maintenance. And that will be applicable for breast cancer, lymphoma, leukemia. So it is a general statement. And if we use that in myeloma too, then I could say that these 12 patients from my center, we proved that they are cured of their myeloma. They are not functionally cured. You've got to remember, there is only cure. That was the definition across all diseases. So there is nothing like a functional cure. They are cured of myeloma. So is myeloma curable? This is the first time we are looking at that. We do know, every physician treating myeloma that there are patients out there, 10 year and beyond, without evidence of disease. This has been published by University of Arkansas, Bart Barlogie's group, who has been saying that myeloma is a curable disease for a long time. And many others have shown long-term follow up. But this one in a late stage disease, we were able to show that they were one treatment with no maintenance. All other studies have been in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Nobody has shown in late relapse patients on a clinical trial a third of the patient will be progression-free. And 12 of them who were studied were actually disease free. So they were cured of the disease. So if we accept that, then the next question is, first step towards cure is achieving complete remission. They should have no monoclonal protein by any technology you want to use, no measurable residual disease using next gen sequencing or clonoSEQ, and functional imaging whole body PET CT or whole body MRI. So that is important, definition of the complete remission. And then it has to be sustained. That is something the IMWG and IMS, International Myeloma Society, they will have to come together for a consensus. How many years should they be followed and should be in this kind of status with no trace of cancer? Is it, 3 years are enough? 4 years enough? 5 years is enough? For me, I said in this paper, 5 years is a good definition for achieving a potential cure. Then you use the term 'functionally cured'. I have a problem with functionally cured and operationally cured or whatever. Functionally cured was originally put out by Paiva from Spain. There were 8% of newly diagnosed myeloma patients who have, after they go get treated, they will have an MGUS like phenomenon, a small amount of paraprotein detectable, and they are only 8%. And he said that these patients could be off treatment and the disease does not progress. But the problem is when you are giving treatment like maintenance therapy continuously until progression, you do not know exactly who is in the MGUS situation. So you have to have done sophisticated flow cytometry like Paiva did, and it is not quite clinically applicable. So functionally cured applies only for 8% of the people, so it should go out of the vocabulary. Then you can say 'operationally cured'. These are the patients traditionally Bart Barlogie and others showed that they have a large number of patients who have been followed for 10 years with no recurrence of disease, not on treatment. But in those days, they did not have MRD PET CT and all of them done systematically. So that is why they had to come up with a situation where they said they were operationally cured. So yes, myeloma patients have been cured since auto transplant was introduced. I completely agree. It is not new to the CAR T-cell therapy. But the beauty of the CAR T-cell therapy was it was in relapsed refractory myeloma, unmet medical need, number one. Number two, they were studied systematically. It was a clinical trial adjudicated by FDA and EMA for drug approval, cilta-cel was approved. So these patients were carefully followed, and it was a multi-center study. And in that group of patients, we were able to show patients- So, I think this would indicate cure is a reality in myeloma, and as these kind of treatments, immunologic treatment, either it is a CAR T-cell therapy or BCMA bispecific or whatever, there is a chance more patients are likely to be cured, and these treatments have to move forward and so that we are looking towards a cure. That is the beauty of it, and I just thank you for asking and also throwing in this so-called functionally cured, which people like to use casually, and I say it is time to talk more cure and not stuck with functionally cured because that does not allow the field to progress. Dr. Davide Soldato: Thank you very much. That was very interesting. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: And provocative. Dr. Davide Soldato: A little bit, but I think that we needed to close the podcast with this kind of reflection coming from someone who is an expert in the field, as you are. So, I really wanted to thank you for joining us today and for sharing more on your article, which is titled, "Long-Term Remission and Survival After Treatment With Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma." If you enjoy our show, please leave us a rating and a review and be sure to come back for another episode. You can find all ASCO shows at asco.org/podcasts. Dr. Sundar Jagannath: Thank you. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.
Professor Simon Harrison discusses the immense relief the new government subsidy will bring to patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Today's guest is Renee Coshin Coolbaugh, lifelong northeastern US resider, currently calling Baltimore her home, cat lover (did you know a group of cats is called a clowder?), caregiver to her husband Peter through is journey with Multiple Myeloma, and endometrial and ovarian cancer survivor. To say she's a multitasker is an understatement.We spend a lot of time talking about the caregiver and patient experience and what it has been like to be in both roles. We also talk about genetic testing, gratitude, synchronous cancers, self-care, and so much more.Resources:Renee's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rcc_renee/Follow:Follow me: https://www.instagram.com/melissagrosboll/My website: https://melissagrosboll.comEmail me: drmelissagrosboll@gmail.com
Welcome to Season 2 of the Orthobullets Podcast.Today's show is Foundations, where we review foundational knowledge for frontline MSK providers such as junior orthopaedic residents, ER physicians, and primary care providers. This episode will cover the topic of Multiple Myeloma from our Pathology section at Orthobullets.com.Follow Orthobullets on Social Media:FacebookInstagram TwitterLinkedInYouTube
Dr Mian discussed why frailty should be understood as a dynamic, evolving clinical state rather than a fixed baseline characteristic
Shane Hannon was joined by former professional footballer and four time League Of Ireland winner, Colin Hawkins to discuss his cancer diagnosis, his journey with depression and counselling, and how important sport and the sporting community is in his recovery. Off The Ball in association with Movember, Grow a Moustache, Move for Movember, Host a Moment or Mo Your Own Way. The Moustache is Calling. Raise Funds, Save Lives – sign up now at Movember.com/register
Shane Hannon was joined by former professional footballer and four time League Of Ireland winner, Colin Hawkins to discuss his cancer diagnosis, his journey with depression and counselling, and how important sport and the sporting community is in his recovery. Off The Ball in association with Movember, Grow a Moustache, Move for Movember, Host a Moment or Mo Your Own Way. The Moustache is Calling. Raise Funds, Save Lives – sign up now at Movember.com/register
I endured months of chemotherapy and a Stem Cell transplant to rid my body of Multiple Myeloma that had spread up my spine and in my hips and ribs. I was too sick, too tired and too vulnerable to germs to go outside, other than to the hospital for frequent appointments, or as an inpatient. It felt like I was living in a cave. I couldn't read books due to 'brain fog', so I listened to audiobooks. I practised the art of mindfulness as I crossed the treacherous mountains and dark emotional valleys, lonely deserts and roaring rivers of life.I was reminded of the Bible stories of Elijah, 1 Kings 19:11-18, and Hagar, Genesis 16 and 21. God whispered to Elijah and gently spoke to Hagar, promising them inner strength and relief.Although cancer-free now, I grapple with the lasting physical damage to my bones, accepting a slower pace of life while seeking inner peace and patience amidst my ongoing journey of recovery. My life has changed in many ways. This new normal of living at a slower pace is challenging. Beverley Joy.Desert MindI sit here quiet with my desert mindWondering why this barren time.My pace is slow, I thirst to knowHow disease became my troubled foe.I endure through life's desert stormI hide in a cave, wondering when, if, tears will rain.I stand in peace, now that I seeAnswers whisper mid mountain tremorElijah, Hagar, promised relief, and strength received.I walk the walk, in contemplative thoughtMountains high, through valleys lowAcross desert sands and rivers deepOasis relief, meditative breeze.I stand in peace, now that I seeAnswers whisper mid mountain tremorElijah, Hagar, promised relief, and strength received.Beverley Joy of Simply Story Poetry © 2025 All Rights ReservedYou can BUY my poems and verses at beverleyjoy.redbubble.comYou can read or listen to my poems on Simply Story Poetry on Instagram, Facebook, Youtube, Pinterest and LinkedIn and simplystorypoetry.com.Thank you for listening.
In this week's episode of the Blood Podcast, Associate Editor Dr. James Griffin interviews Drs. Binod Dhakal and Ruben Bierings about their respective papers published in this week's issue of Blood. Dr. Dhakal presents his study on using talquetamab, a bispecific antibody, as a bridging therapy before BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma patients, showing promising results with high response rates and manageable toxicities. Next, Dr. Bierings identified patients with genetic variants in the guanine exchange factor MAP kinase–activating death domain (MADD) that impair VWF secretion from endothelial cells and possibly cause VWD type 1. Featured ArticlesA novel cause of type 1 von Willebrand disease: impaired exocytosis of Weibel-Palade bodies due to biallelic MADD variantsSophie Hordijk, Stijn A. Groten, Petra E. Bürgisser, Sebastiaan N. J. Laan, Georg Christoph Korenke, Tomáš Honzík, Diane Beysen, Frank W. G. Leebeek, Paul A. Skehel, Maartje van den Biggelaar, Tom Carter, Ruben BieringsSequential targeting in multiple myeloma: talquetamab, a GPRC5D bispecific antibody, as a bridge to BCMA CAR-T therapyBinod Dhakal, Othman S. Akhtar, David Fandrei, Alexandria Jensen, Rahul Banerjee, Darren Pan, Shambavi Richard, Reed Friend, Matthew Rees, Patrick Costello, Mariola Vazquez Martinez, Oren Pasvolsky, Charlotte Wagner, James A. Davis, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Ran Reshef, Aimaz Afrough, Danai Dima, Manisha Bhutani, Omar Nadeem, Ricardo Parrondo, Ciara Freeman, Lekha Mikkilineni, Shahzad Raza, Larry D. Anderson Jr, Prashant Kapoor, Hitomi Hosoya, Saurabh Chhabra, Ariel Grajales-Cruz, Mahmoud Gaballa, Shonali Midha, Melissa Alsina, Douglas Sborov, Krina Patel, Yi Lin, Christopher Ferreri, Nico Gagelmann, Anupama Kumar, Doris Hansen, Andrew Cowan, Luciano J. Costa, Maximilian Merz, Surbhi Sidana
Patient and Physician Perspectives on Multiple Myeloma Data Presented at ASCO and EHA 2025: A Podcast In this plain language podcast, highlights from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting 2025 are discussed, supplemented with additional reflections from the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2025 Congress. These insights come from the perspective of an expert patient and physician, both of whom have experience and expertise in the field of multiple myeloma (MM). This podcast is intended to broaden the reach of complex data on MM from these scientific meetings to a broader audience, including nonspecialists, helping enable better informed treatment decisions between patients and healthcare professionals. This podcast is published open access in Oncology and Therapy and is fully citeable. You can access the original published podcast article through the Oncology and Therapy website and by using this link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40487-025-00389-5. All conflicts of interest can be found online. This podcast is intended for medical professionals. Open Access This podcast is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The material in this podcast is included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Drs Joseph Mikhael and Peter Voorhees discuss considerations for treating smoldering multiple myeloma, including recent studies and shared decision-making. Relevant disclosures can be found with the episode show notes on Medscape https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/1002716. The topics and discussions are planned, produced, and reviewed independently of advertisers. This podcast is intended only for US healthcare professionals. Resources Observation or Treatment for Smoldering Multiple Myeloma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40419473/ Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507880/ From Criteria to Clinic: How Updated Slim CRAB Criteria Influence Multiple Myeloma Diagnostic Activity https://ascopubs.org/doi/pdf/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7556 International Myeloma Working Group Risk Stratification Model for Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33067414/ Daratumumab or Active Monitoring for High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39652675/ Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Versus Observation in High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma After 12 Years of Median Follow-Up Time: A Randomized, Open-Label Study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36067617/ Long-Term Outcome With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23648667/ CD38-Directed Therapies for Management of Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34235096/ Fixed Duration Therapy With Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma – Results of the Ascent Trial https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/140/Supplement%201/1830/492739/Fixed-Duration-Therapy-with-Daratumumab Curative Strategy for High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma: Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (Krd) Followed by Transplant, Krd Consolidation, and Rd Maintenance https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39038268/ Early Safety and Efficacy of CAR-T Cell Therapy in Precursor Myeloma: Results of the CAR-PRISM Study Using Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/144/Supplement%201/1027/531466/Early-Safety-and-Efficacy-of-CAR-T-Cell-Therapy-in
In this episode our expert panel discuss multiple myeloma, exploring some of the challenges of the disease and progress being made to help patients in the UK. Our host Dr Ellie Cannon is joined by Dr Sophie Castell, CEO at Myeloma UK, and Colm Doody, Oncology Medical Director at Pfizer UK. PP-UNP-GBR-13445 / October 2025 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
In this week's episode we'll learn more about a study comparing busulfan-melphalan with melphalan alone as the conditioning protocol for newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible multiple myeloma; then we will discuss data on how three-dimensional transcriptomics can reveal complex interactions between plasma cells and bone marrow microenvironments.Featured ArticlesHigh-dose busulfan-melphalan vs melphalan and reinforced VRD for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a phase 3 GEM trialProfiling the spatial architecture of multiple myeloma in human bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens with spatial transcriptomicsPreclinical advances in glofitamab combinations: a new frontier for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Prof Meletios-Athanasios (Thanos) C Dimopoulos from Alexandra Hospital in Athens, Greece, Dr Hans Lee from Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville, Tennessee, Dr Joseph Mikhael from City of Hope Cancer Center in Phoenix, Arizona, and Dr Noopur Raje from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston discuss recent updates on available and novel treatment strategies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. CE information and select publications here.
This episode provides timely coverage of the 2025 Meeting of the International Myeloma Society (IMS). Claudio Cerchione highlights the most important developments from the Annual Meeting, offers his reflections on the evolving treatment landscape, and discusses the role of research and collaboration in moving closer to a cure for myeloma. Timestamps 00:00 – Introduction 02:08 – Reflections on his own career 04:20 – Claudio's initial interest in the field 06:46 – Key takeaways from IMS 2025 Meeting 10:09 – Any potential gaps in coverage? 11:50 – How different patient groups are identified 13:30 – Minimal residual disease 16:15 – Impact of medical societies 20:24 – Translating new findings into clinical practice 23:44 – Improving the accessibility of treatments 26:45 – Claudio's key takeaways from IMS 2025 Meeting Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this episode belong to the speakers and do not necessarily represent the opinions of EMJ.
Featuring perspectives from Prof Meletios-Athanasios (Thanos) C Dimopoulos, Dr Hans Lee, and Dr Noopur Raje, moderated by Dr Joseph Mikhael, including the following topics: Introduction (0:00) Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Multiple Myeloma (MM) — Dr Raje (3:17) Integrating Bispecific Antibodies into the Management of R/R MM — Dr Lee (20:38) Potential Role of Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulators in Therapy for MM — Prof Dimopoulos (40:37) CE information and select publications
In this week's episode, we'll learn more about relationships between Epstein-Barr virus genomic variants and human diseases, including hematological malignancies; the presence and timing of somatic GATA1 mutations and their relationship to a Down syndrome-specific form of leukemia; and new definitions for high-risk multiple myeloma that emphasize the presence of two or more high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities.Featured Articles:Association of Epstein-Barr virus genomic alterations with human pathologiesClinical significance of preleukemic somatic GATA1 mutations in children with Down syndromeBiallelic antigen escape is a mechanism of resistance to anti-CD38 antibodies in multiple myeloma
Dr. Joseph Mikhael, Chief Medical Officer, discusses the IMF's work and what lies ahead in the fight against myeloma. Dr. Mikhael leads the IMF's M-Power Project, which seeks to improve the care delivered to African Americans, who have double the incidence of white people. He spends about 20% of his time in the developing world, seeking ways to enhance access to myeloma therapies in underprivileged countries.
Joseph Mikhael, MD, and Krina K. Patel, MD, MSc, discuss considerations for CAR T-Cell therapy in multiple myeloma, including age, access, and bridging therapy. Relevant disclosures can be found with the episode show notes on Medscape https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/1002715. The topics and discussions are planned, produced, and reviewed independently of advertisers. This podcast is intended only for US healthcare professionals. Resources Multiple Myeloma https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/204369-overview CARTITUDE-1 Final Results: Phase 1b/2 Study of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in Heavily Pretreated Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8009 Cilta-cel or Standard Care in Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37272512/ Plain Language Summary of the KarMMa-3 Study of Ide-cel or Standard of Care Regimens in People With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38651976/ CAR T-Cell Therapy Toxicity https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK592426/ Immunomodulatory Drugs in Multiple Myeloma: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Experience https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28205024/ Incidence and Outcomes of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38838226/ Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Primary Prophylaxis of Early Infection in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35064823/ Revisiting the Role of Alkylating Agents in Multiple Myeloma: Up-to-Date Evidence and Future Perspectives https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37244325/ Bispecific Antibodies for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updates and Future Perspectives https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38660139/ FDA Eliminates REMS for Approved CAR T-Cell Therapies https://www.aabb.org/news-resources/news/article/2025/06/30/fda-eliminates-rems-for-approved-car-t-cell-therapies
Featuring an interview with Dr Beth Faiman, including the following topics: Clinical practice background and historical view of treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) (0:00) Fundamental principles associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (7:19) Sequencing of CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies in the MM treatment landscape (9:00) Patient eligibility to receive CAR T-cell therapy (13:23) Differentiating among approved CAR T-cell therapies for MM (18:18) Durability of responses to CAR T-cell therapy for MM (24:01) Neurotoxicity with CAR T-cell therapies for MM (26:26) Minimal residual disease monitoring in MM (29:39) Support systems for the management of toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy (35:10) Patients with MM experiencing durable responses to CAR T-cell therapy (43:11) NCPD information and select publications
Dr Beth Faiman from Case Comprehensive Cancer Center in Cleveland, Ohio, discusses nursing considerations with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with multiple myeloma. NCPD information and select publications here.
In this episode of Everyday Oral Surgery, we continue our Heme Series on all things blood-related by discussing lymphomas and multiple myeloma. Joining Dr. Stucki on the podcast again, to share a wealth of knowledge, are Drs. Andrew Jenzer and Maxwell Lloyd. They delve into a discussion on the basics of lymphomas, dissecting the two categories of Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and get into the diagnosis and presenting symptoms, stages, risk stratification, and treatments of each category. Next, they touch on what Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) is and dive into a broad discussion on multiple myeloma. Dr. Lloyd breaks down the spectrum of this disease, including the signs and symptoms, testing and diagnostics, and explains that there is no cure for the disease. He also expands on the various treatments and management regimens available. To hear more, including thoughts on how to improve communication between collaborating teams, be sure not to miss out on today's episode. Thanks for tuning in!Key Points From This Episode:Introduction to today's topic as we continue our Heme Series.Dr. Lloyd talks us through lymphoma basics.Dr. Jenzer unpacks the presenting symptoms of the Hodgkin lymphoma category.Stages and risk stratification that constantly evolve: Ann Arbor Staging System. Treatment of lymphoma: thinking broadly, as regimens seem to be changing quickly. We discuss the same aspects, but of the non-Hodgkin lymphoma category.Dr. Lloyd dives broadly into the chemotherapy regimen options for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.He explains a double-hit lymphoma and the associated treatment.We discuss Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS).Dr. Jenzer explains what multiple myelomas are. Dr. Lloyd further unpacks the spectrum of this disease (multiple myeloma).Signs and symptoms of multiple myeloma.An explanation for the lack of a cure for multiple myeloma.Testing and diagnostics of multiple myelomaDr. Lloyd broadly delves into the different types of medications and treatments used in managing multiple myeloma.He touches on some of the side effects of the medications.Big takeaway points from today's discussion.Dr. Lloyd's thoughts on how we can improve communication between collaborating teams.Final thoughts and recommendations to listeners.Links Mentioned in Today's Episode:Dr. Andrew Jenzer Email — andrew.jenzer@duke.edu Dr. Maxwell Lloyd — https://connects.catalyst.harvard.edu/Profiles/display/Person/192727 AAOMS — https://aaoms.org/education-meetings/meetings/ NCCN Guidelines — https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 Ann Arbor Staging System — https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK65726.23/table/CDR0000062933__557/?report=objectonly St. Louis Course — https://stlomfsreview.com/ Everyday Oral Surgery Website — https://www.everydayoralsurgery.com/ Everyday Oral Surgery on Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/everydayoralsurgery/ Everyday Oral Surgery on Facebook — https://www.facebook.com/EverydayOralSurgery/Dr. Grant Stucki Email — grantstucki@gmail.comDr. Grant Stucki Phone — 720-441-6059
Featuring perspectives from Prof Rebecca A Dent, Dr Hans Lee, Dr Neel Pasricha and Dr Tiffany A Richards, including the following topics: Introduction: The Patient Experience (0:00) Managing Ocular Toxicities Associated with Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Other Cancer Therapies — Dr Pasricha (10:28) Ocular Toxicities in Multiple Myeloma (45:33) Ocular Toxicities in Breast Cancer (50:34) CME information and select publications
Featuring an interview with Ms Charise Gleason, including the following topics: Progress and change in the management of multiple myeloma (MM) (0:00) Patient- and disease-specific factors guiding therapeutic decision-making for newly diagnosed MM (5:11) Role of anti-CD38 antibodies in the management of MM (12:14) Emerging treatment options for smoldering myeloma (23:08) Optimizing long-term outcomes for patients with MM (25:38) Tailoring therapy for older adults and patients with preexisting comorbidities (29:59) Case: A woman in her early 80s with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible MM who experienced a complete response with first-line daratumumab/lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (34:34) Case: A man in his early 60s with progressive back pain from standard-risk MM who experienced a complete response with daratumumab with lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (42:05) Building therapeutic relationships and integrating holistic care in oncology practice (47:13) NCPD information and select publications
Ms Charise Gleason from Emory Healthcare in Atlanta, Georgia, discusses the evolution of first-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma. NCPD information and select publications here.
Featuring an interview with Prof Xavier Leleu including the following topics: Introduction: Historical treatment advances in multiple myeloma (MM) (0:00) Contemporary treatment for patients with newly diagnosed MM who are eligible for transplant (13:18) Prognosis and life expectancy for patients with MM (19:39) Mechanistic differences among anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (27:05) Routes of administration of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (30:21) Background and treatment of smoldering myeloma (41:05) Treatment for older patients with newly diagnosed MM who are not eligible for transplant (46:41) NCPD information and select publications
Prof Xavier Leleu from Poitiers University Hospital in Poitiers, France, discusses nursing considerations in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. NCPD information and select publications here.
“There's something so precious about every day and every moment and living this beautiful gift.” What does it mean to truly live when tomorrow is not guaranteed? In this moving episode, Joe shares his journey through the unexpected diagnosis of multiple myeloma, the challenges of treatment, and the profound lessons learned along the way. With honesty, humor, and deep faith, Joe invites us to consider what matters most—embracing each day, loving fiercely, and finding hope even in uncertainty. Whether you're facing your own crossroads or supporting someone you love, Joe's story is a powerful reminder to seize the moment and live with purpose.
Transforming your health is more fun with friends! Join Chef AJ's Exclusive Plant-Based Community. Become part of the inner circle and start simplifying plant-based living - with easy recipes and expert health guidance. Find out more by visiting: https://community.chefaj.com/
In this episode, Dr Brad Kahl and Dr Noopur Raje discuss the recent advances and emerging data for CAR T-cell therapy in lymphomas and multiple myeloma including the latest evidence from long-term clinical trial follow-up and real-world data, plus new data with CAR T-cell therapies in new lymphoma settings and novel CAR T-cell therapies currently under development for multiple myeloma.LymphomasDLBCL: Real-world outcomes post axi-cel, CAR T vs autologous HSCTFL: Tisa-cel (ELARA), axi-cel (ZUMA-5)MZL: Liso-cel (TRANSCEND FL)MCL: Real-world outcomes post brexu-celCLL: Liso-cel (TRANSCEND CLL 004)Multiple MyelomaCilta-cel (CARTITUDE-1)Anito-cel (iMMagine-1)GC012FArlo-celBMS-986453TriPRIL Presenters:Brad Kahl, MDProfessor of MedicineWashington University St Louis, MissouriNoopur Raje, MD Director, Center for Multiple MyelomaMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer CenterProfessor of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBoston, Massachusetts Content based on an online CME program supported by an independent educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb.Link to full program: https://bit.ly/3ViR62V
Featuring perspectives from Dr Natalie S Callander and Dr Sagar Lonial, including the following topics: Introduction (0:00) A Farmer with Myeloma; Is Myeloma the New Chronic Myeloid Leukemia? (2:06) Clinical Trials (12:34) Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy (16:11) Bispecific Antibodies (21:38) Antibody-Drug Conjugates; a Patient on Belantamab Mafodotin for 3 Years (30:45) Treatment Options for Relapsed Disease (40:46) Neuropathy (44:43) Alternative Therapies (48:36) 164 Questions (53:20) CME information and select publications
Dr Natalie S Callander and Dr Sagar Lonial provide clinical perspectives on the treatment and disease-management course for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. CME information and select publications here.
#805 Show Notes: https://wetflyswing.com/805 Presented By: Stonefly Nets, Intrepid Camp Gear, Mountain Waters Resort, Patagonia Sponsors: https://wetflyswing.com/sponsors Ever find yourself standing on a river's edge, the line in the water, and somehow everything makes sense, even when nothing should? That's where I landed with Jonathan “Jon” Gluck, a writer, editor, and fly-fishing lifer—or at least, someone whose lifeline came through steelhead-strength treatments and the quiet grace of a swing. Jon was told he had about 18 months to live after a multiple myeloma diagnosis more than two decades ago. Instead of slowing down, he found healing where you'd expect it least—in the gentle arc of a cast, the flash of the fly, the now. There's a lot of power in An Exercise in Uncertainty, his memoir, but even more in the way Jon leans into what fishing gives us: calm, clarity, and a reminder that presence is everything. #805 Show Notes: https://wetflyswing.com/805
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/WMD865. CME credit will be available until August 20, 2026.At the Nexus of Sequential Care in Myeloma: Interprofessional and Patient Perspectives on GPRC5D-Directed Therapies In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and HealthTree Foundation for Multiple Myeloma. PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Johnson & Johnson.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
Last Chance: Multiple Myeloma Task Force Podcast Don't miss your final opportunity to listen to this CME/NCPD-accredited podcast on Multidisciplinary Task Force and Position Statement: Mitigating Disease Burden and Healthcare Disparities in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Last chance to listen and claim credit is September 10, 2025. Hear from Task Force Co-Chairs Dr. Sikander Ailawadhi (Mayo Clinic) and Dr. Rahul Banerjee (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center/University of Washington) as they discuss strategies for improving patient outcomes and addressing healthcare disparities in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Click here to claim your CME/NCPD credit: https://bit.ly/4e25pQP
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/WMD865. CME credit will be available until August 20, 2026.At the Nexus of Sequential Care in Myeloma: Interprofessional and Patient Perspectives on GPRC5D-Directed Therapies In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and HealthTree Foundation for Multiple Myeloma. PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Johnson & Johnson.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/WMD865. CME credit will be available until August 20, 2026.At the Nexus of Sequential Care in Myeloma: Interprofessional and Patient Perspectives on GPRC5D-Directed Therapies In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and HealthTree Foundation for Multiple Myeloma. PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Johnson & Johnson.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
In today's episode, we spoke with Nisha Joseph, MD, and Hans Lee, MD, about the FDA's accelerated approval of linvoseltamab-gcpt (Lynozyfic) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received 4 or more prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Joseph is an associate professor in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology at Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia. Lee is the director of Myeloma Research at the Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville, Tennessee. In our conversation, Drs Lee and Joseph discussed the significance of this approval, key data from the pivotal phase 1/2 LINKER-MM1 trial (NCT03761108), and where linvoseltamab fits into the relapsed/refractory myeloma treatment paradigm alongside other approved agents.
Featuring perspectives from Dr Natalie S Callander and Dr Sagar Lonial, including the following topics: Introduction: Multiple Myeloma — 2005 to 2025 (0:00) Questions from the Beginning (7:53) Choosing Options (13:54) Clinical Trials (18:03) Neuropathy (23:55) Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy (28:40) Bispecific Antibodies (35:18) Antibody-Drug Conjugates (43:08) Interacting with the Oncology Team (51:47) Other Questions (57:30) Educational and presenter information
For this patient-focused webinar, medical oncologist Dr Neil Love is joined by Dr Natalie S Callander from the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center in Madison and Dr Sagar Lonial from the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, to discuss the patient experience associated with the diagnosis and treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Educational and faculty information here.
A multi-site randomized trial found that the suicide-prevention app OTX202 reduced repeat suicide attempts by 58% and sustained lower suicidal ideation through 24 weeks, especially in high-risk patients with prior attempts. A phase 3 trial showed canagliflozin significantly improved glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes, with safety comparable to adults. Finally, the SWIFT-SEG liquid biopsy detected multiple myeloma tumor cells in over 90% of cases, offering a less invasive alternative to bone marrow biopsies for diagnosis, monitoring, and precision treatment.
On this episode, Mary Caffrey, Executive Editor of AJMC and Evidence-Based Oncology (EBO), is joined by Joseph Mikhael, MD, MEd, FRCPC, FACP, FASCO Chief Medical Officer of the International Myeloma Foundation (IMF), was the primary interviewee and source for a recent EBO article. His insights in that piece highlight how the IMF's M-Power initiative builds trust and awareness through its 3-pillar approach: community engagement, primary care education, and improving care for patients. During the discussion, Mikael talks about how IMF's M-Power initiative is expanding with the organization's medical student scholars program, using patient narratives to encourage trial participation among Black patients, and navigating today's political climate around diversity, equity, and inclusion—all while pushing toward a future where lifesaving treatments and cures reach every patient who needs them. Stay tuned for this enlightening discussion on bridging the clinical trial gap.
Nutritionist Leyla Muedin reveals the alarming increase in obesity-associated cancers in the United States over the past two decades. Highlighting findings from a recent study presented at the Endocrine Society's annual meeting, Leyla underscores the significant rise in cancer deaths linked to obesity, particularly among women, older adults, Native Americans, and Black Americans. She also explores the complex causes of obesity, including genetics, lifestyle, and environmental factors, and offers insights into effective weight management strategies. Additionally, Leyla examines the high rates of heart disease in various U.S. states, emphasizing the importance of lifestyle modifications and public health initiatives to combat cardiovascular diseases.
Featuring perspectives from Prof Xavier Leleu and Dr Peter Voorhees, including the following topics: Introduction: Myeloma Time Capsule (0:00) Smoldering Myeloma (7:21) Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) Eligible Patients (13:05) ASCT Ineligible Patients (32:18) Subcutaneous Anti-CD38 Antibodies (47:24) Special Considerations (54:27) CME information and select publications
Prof Xavier Leleu and Dr Peter Voorhees review relevant clinical data regarding first-line treatment decisions for patients with multiple myeloma. CME information and select publications here.
Optimizing the Selection of First-Line Therapy for Patients with Multiple Myeloma | Faculty Presentation — Peter Voorhees, MD CME information and select publications
This week on the Tom Roland podcast, I sit down with John Gluck, the author of 'An Exercise in Uncertainty.' We dive deep into discussions about fishing, life, and John's incredible journey battling Multiple Myeloma—a rare blood cancer. Diagnosed with only 18 months to live, John has now thrived for over 21 years, thanks in part to breakthrough treatments and his passion for fishing. We also explore how fishing became a therapeutic escape for John, the power of mindset in overcoming challenges, and the role of family and career in his ongoing battle. Tune in to hear this inspiring story and learn from John's experiences. You can also buy Jonathan's book, “An Exercise in Uncertainty” wherever books are sold. 00:00 Introduction and Greetings 00:18 Fishing in Idaho and Jackson 00:47 The Glory Days of Fishing 01:16 Challenges of the Salmon Fly Hatch 02:54 Introducing the Book: An Exercise in Uncertainty 03:17 John's Illness and Diagnosis 03:51 Fishing as a Lifeline 04:47 Writing and Fishing Adventures 08:17 Career and Writing Focus 10:23 The Diagnosis Journey 18:26 Coping with Uncertainty 26:02 Purpose and Priorities 29:10 Fishing Dreams and Realities 33:25 Reflections on Health and Life 35:42 Facing Mortality and Embracing Life 36:45 Dealing with Remission and Relapse 39:22 Finding Solace in Fishing 42:36 The Role of Diet and Exercise 44:56 Advice for Cancer Patients 48:08 Writing the Book: A Journey of Reflection 53:53 The Importance of Mindset 01:05:08 Publishing and Promoting the Book 01:13:12 Final Thoughts and Future Plans
Dr. Ben Derman of the University of Chicago Medicine joins the show to unpack major updates in multiple myeloma presented at ASCO and EHA 2025. He discusses the growing role of quadruple therapy across all patient populations and its implications for the future of autologous stem cell transplant, including insights from the MIDAS trial on MRD-guided transplant decisions. Additional highlights include MRD-negativity as a potential off-ramp for maintenance therapy, evolving data from frontline triplet vs. quadruplet studies, real-world referral trends, CARTITUDE-4 subgroup outcomes, and the expanding utility of bispecifics and trispecific antibodies, particularly for extramedullary disease. Check out Chadi's website for all Healthcare Unfiltered episodes and other content. www.chadinabhan.com/ Watch all Healthcare Unfiltered episodes on YouTube. www.youtube.com/channel/UCjiJPTpIJdIiukcq0UaMFsA