Podcast appearances and mentions of judge bork

Banjo Music Courtesy of Banjo HangOut -- used with permission...The admission by Senatorial Candidate Johnson that she's a “gun owner”  is more threat and intimidation than information… It comes under the heading of news I'd rather not have….Memo to ABC News/NYC — If there is such a thing as “truth in advertising….” I most strenuously object to today's Harris/Walz commercial….Camilla Lies (as usual)No president can ban abortions the Supreme Court returned that matter to the states! You know those guys who told the Senate Nominating Committee, “ I won't interfere with a woman's right to choose.”  That is, Except for Judge Bork; he refused to answer that question.FYI/He wasn't confirmedJoin me on Monday for Wizard of iPhone Speaks we conclude our discussion of the role of the Senate of the United States….

Music courtesy of Harpeth Presbyterian Church (a new rendition of an old favorite -- well played)Since the time of Joe Biden's tenure on the Senate, every Supremean nominee has affirmed “I will not interfere with a woman's ‘right' to choose….” Except of course Judge Bork!He would not answer that question citing Judicial impartiality. He wasn't confirmed. No single US President in my lifetime has appointed enough justices to sway the court one way or another.  I can only hope that we continue to dodge the bullet of a “dufus” appointment. 

Opening music courtesy of Stevens Valley Brass -- closing courtesy of Banjo HangOut -- Hello DollyThere are two things which matter — Barrack Obama made more appointments to The SUP-Mean/sic Court than Donald Trump (Blame B.O. for  John Roberts) I have watched most of the recent hearing for Court Appointment, even some of those when you were chairman of The Judiciary Committee..Every appointee has promised “not to do anything to interfere the woman's right to choose….” That is except for Judge Bork, and he refused to answer that question…. And he wasn't confirmed. So trot on back to your arm chair, watch Hollywood Squares and chill out… Continue in your role “as a well-meaning, but diminished capacity adult…” Thank You Special Council Report…

Corporate America Fights Back Against Wokeism- In this episode we interview Robert H. Bork, Jr., son of the legendary legal scholar and U.S. Supreme Court nominee, Judge Robert Bork.  Find out how corporate America is beginning to successfully fight back against leftist investor groups who are trying to use ESG scores to fundamentally transform, if not destroy, the United States free enterprise system.  Also, hear about the must-read reissue of Judge Bork's famous book, The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. Also ... Serving God's People- Dr. Wendy Patrick and co-host Larry Dershem interview Joshua Waller, Director of Operations for HaYovel in Israel.  Find out how an American farming family, that includes 11 adult children, are transforming agriculture in the lands of Judea and Samaria, and producing some of the best award-winning wine the world has ever tasted. In this interview you will find out how you, or someone you know, can become a volunteer and be part of this miracle, working hand in hand with God's people.  It all starts with a visit to ServeIsrael.com. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

My guest in this episode is Dr. Naomi Lamoreaux. She explains how antitrust enforcement has changed since its lax era of the 1980s. She adds that it's not just antitrust, patent law, which is seemingly a highly technical field of law, is also a product of our political system. Dr. Lamoreaux takes us back to John D. Rockefeller, to the days of Standard Oil, to how the term antitrust was adopted and how the scope and enforcement of antitrust has ebbed and flowed over the centuries. This history is replete With colorful characters such as Judge Learned Hand and later Judge Bork, and iconic companies such as General Electric, International Harvester, and United States Steel Corporation, and organizations such as labor unions, NAACP and the Ku Klux Klan. Dr. Lamoreaux is a professor of Economics and History at Yale University's Department of Economics. She is also a Senior Research Scholar at University of Michigan Law School To learn more about Lamoreaux, you can visit her academic homepage. In addition, below are links to two fascinating episodes: S2E40: OPEC, Prices At the Pump & Oil History, Dr. Weaver S2E13: CRISPR Patents, Dr. Zyontz S1E17: History of US Patents, Mr. Pepe & Dr. Brenner I hope you enjoy these episodes. Adel Host of the History Behind News podcast HIGHLIGHTS: get future episode highlights in your inbox. SUPPORT: please click here and join our other supporters in the news peeler community. Thank you.

Banjo Music courtesy of Banjo HangOut -- Under The Double Eagle In a recent TV documentary centering on the loss  USS Scorpion (SSN-589) it was postulated a “hydrogen explosion” from batteries. FYI/Nuclear submarines do not have batteries.  Nuclear reactors produce steam without combustion.The Nation Agonizes Over Roe V Wade It's a crock of crap I have watched virtually every hearing for Supreme Court justices since Bork and every nominee who was approved “promised” to protect “a woman's right to choose.” That is except for Judge Bork who refused to answer that question. As he reminded the committee his personal feelings are what we ask justices “to put aside” & rule on the law of the thingYou may order a copy of the e-book of Spade&Archer a Prequel©(2020) for $6.95 emailOr A PDF copy for $12.95 plus $5.95/S&H & priority mailing ($8.00)These copies contain a further special offer. 

Today on The Doug Collins Podcast, I sit down with Robert Bork Jr., to discuss his Father and his legacy. With the Supreme Court now finally reflecting the view of Originalism that Judge Bork fought so hard for it is a good time to  go back to the beginning and look at the legacy of Judge Bork.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On September 15, 2021, The Federalist Society's Practice Groups hosted a conference titled The Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going. The opening address featured President of the Bork Foundation Robert Bork, Jr. who discussed his efforts to republish his father's famous work, The Antitrust Paradox, so that lawyers, scholars, and interested citizens could bring Judge Bork's work to bear on their own. Judge Douglas Ginsburg, who served as Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division, moderated the conversation.Featuring: Robert Bork, Jr., President, The Bork Foundation; President, Antitrust Education ProjectModerator: Hon. Douglas Ginsburg, Senior Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit; former Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice* * * * * As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

On September 15, 2021, The Federalist Society's Practice Groups hosted a conference titled The Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going. Senator Mike Lee, who penned the introduction to the republished Antitrust Paradox, spoke on Judge Bork's seminal work and its continued relevance.Featuring:Hon. Mike Lee, United States Senator, Utah* * * * * As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

The second of a two-part series on the State of Georgia “Election Integrity Act of 2021” which was signed into law by Governor Brian Kemp on March 25th, 2021. The Act has ignited a discussion about free and fair elections. In Part 2: Newt describes Joe Biden, the legendary smear artist, going all the way back to his smear of Judge Bork in the 1980s. And Biden’s current role in inciting the woke left to think of the new Georgia law as “un-American” and “sick”. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Mrs. Mary Ellen Bork discusses her late husband's Senate hearings and shares her thoughts on Joe Biden, Amy Coney Barrett, and more. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Partner at KO Public Affairs, Beth Levine has a unique resume with 16 years leading communications efforts for U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley and the Senate Judiciary Committee. Levine's career with the Senate Judiciary was capped off with her at the helm of communications surrounding the Gorsuch nomination. Beth has an extraordinary wealth of knowledge and insight that is incredibly relevant today and we're excited to have the opportunity to bring her on today.Join us for a retelling of the Merrick Garland and Justice Gorsuch nomination processes from the perspective of Senate Republicans, and what's to come in the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett. We will be periodically checking in with Beth over the course of the  nomination process. Podcast Music by Dillon O'Brian

United States Supreme Court appointments have became grand political theater. But what does the Constitution say - or not say? Are the rules and processes we are familiar with required? Hearings, filibusters, court packing, and election year appointments are all explained. Where have we been and where are going? Plus the Beatles, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Schoolhouse Rock, and Judge Bork gets Borked. Just in time for the hearing on the nominations of Judge Amy Coney Barrett. Produced by Patriot Week - visit PatriotWeek.org. Also check out the upcoming Patrick Henry Dinner at PatriotWeek.org and Judge Warren's book at www.AmericasSurvivalGuide.com. (Remastered) --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/michael-warren9/support

Don’t be overwhelmed by today’s events in your business, family, or our politics. Seek understanding of the original causes. A tyrannical state, through hysterically emotional courtrooms, ruthlessly ambitious and corrupt prosecutors, and political-wind-sniffing judges, frequently destroys the lives of law-abiding American citizens. Sarah Good and 4 other innocent women were executed in Massachusetts 1692 for being witches! With no conviction ever, Ray Buckey spent 5 years of his life in jail in the McMartin preschool case in Southern California during the 1980s. Members of the Amirault family of Massachusetts spent even longer in jail for crimes they never committed in the shamefully notorious Fells Acres Day Care Center case in the same decade. In 1987, Judge Robert Bork had his career and reputation severely damaged by U.S. senators led by Ted Kennedy preaching sanctimoniously to Judge Bork and denouncing him for imperiling the lives of women.  This, less than 20 years after Kennedy had killed Mary Jo Kopechne. In 1991 Judge Clarence Thomas was subjected to what he called a ‘high tech lynching’ with senators destroying his reputation on the unsubstantiated accusations of one woman.  What happened to Brett Kavanaugh on September 27th, 2018 was not unprecedented.  The trampling of the constitution by very bad people in power has been going on for a very long time.  Whether in business, families, or politics, watch the trend rather than just the event. A Powerful Permanent Principle:  Seek out original causes of today’s disturbing events and above all, reduce the size and power of government. 

Don’t be overwhelmed by today’s events in your business, family, or our politics. Seek understanding of the original causes. A tyrannical state, through hysterically emotional courtrooms, ruthlessly ambitious and corrupt prosecutors, and political-wind-sniffing judges, frequently destroys the lives of law-abiding American citizens. Sarah Good and 4 other innocent women were executed in Massachusetts 1692 for being witches! With no conviction ever, Ray Buckey spent 5 years of his life in jail in the Mc Martin preschool case in Southern California during the 1980s. Members of the Amirault family of Massachusetts spent even longer in jail for crimes they never committed in the shamefully notorious Fells Acres Day Care Center case in the same decade.  In 1987, Judge Robert Bork had his career and reputation severely damaged by U.S. senators led by Ted Kennedy preaching sanctimoniously to Judge Bork and denouncing him for imperiling the lives of women.  This, less than 20 years after Kennedy had killed Mary Jo Kopechne.  In 1991 Judge Clarence Thomas was subjected to what he called a ‘high tech lynching’ with senators destroying his reputation on the unsubstantiated accusations of one woman. What happened to Brett Kavanaugh on September 27th, 2018 was not unprecedented. The trampling of the constitution by very bad people in power has been going on for a very long time. Whether in business, families, or politics, watch the trend rather than just the event. A Powerful Permanent Principle: Seek out original causes of today’s disturbing events and above all, reduce the size and power of government.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This episode of Whistlestop travels back to September 15, 1987 and into the Senate Caucus Room where Associate Justice Designee Robert Bork begins his five days of testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Whistlestop is Slate's podcast about presidential history. Hosted by Political Gabfest host John Dickerson, each installment will revisit memorable moments from America's presidential carnival. Love Slate podcasts? Listen longer with Slate Plus! Members get bonus segments, ad-free versions, exclusive podcasts and more. Start your two-week free trial at slate.com/podcastplus. Email: whistlestop@slate.com.  Podcast production by Jocelyn Frank. Research by Brian Rosenwald with help from Elizabeth Hinson. Engineering by Allen Peng. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This episode of Whistlestop travels back to September 15, 1987 and into the Senate Caucus Room where Associate Justice Designee Robert Bork begins his five days of testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Whistlestop is Slate's podcast about presidential history. Hosted by Political Gabfest host John Dickerson, each installment will revisit memorable moments from America's presidential carnival. Love Slate podcasts? Listen longer with Slate Plus! Members get bonus segments, ad-free versions, exclusive podcasts and more. Start your two-week free trial at slate.com/podcastplus. Email: whistlestop@slate.com.  Podcast production by Jocelyn Frank. Research by Brian Rosenwald with help from Elizabeth Hinson. Engineering by Allen Peng. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In 1978, Judge Robert Bork published the book The Antitrust Paradox. The Antitrust Paradox has become one of the most influential authorities on antitrust policy, changing the landscape of American antitrust law forever. Since its publication, The Antitrust Paradox has been cited by over 100 different United States courts, and its reasoning has often been adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States. Judge Bork argued the original intent of the Sherman Act and other American antitrust laws was to protect competition itself rather than consumers. The result of this flawed approach was certain market practices such as vertical integration and price discrimination, which posed no threat to consumers, were still outlawed in favor of competition, even if this competition lead to an overall harm to the consumer. Instead, Judge Bork advocated for a consumer welfare standard, where violations of antitrust law would be measured solely by their affect on consumers. Jude Bork’s articulation of these principles in The Antitrust Paradox had a lasting impact that can be felt in antitrust law to this day.Featuring: Susan Creighton, Partner, Co-Chair, antitrust practice, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiAndrew Finch, Principal Deputy Attorney General, Antitrust Division, Department of JusticeCharles (Rick) Rule, Co-Chair, Antitrust Group, Paul|WeissHon. Joshua Wright, Executive Director, Global Antitrust Institute, Antonin Scalia Law schoolModerator: Judge Laurence Silberman, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia

In recent years, a new populist movement in antitrust law has been labeled “hipster antitrust,” and its proponents include prominent members of Congress including Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. These would-be antitrust revolutionaries oppose using the consumer welfare standard of Judge Bork as the sole policy interest of antitrust law, and instead argue that antitrust law should be used to solve a myriad of far-reaching issues such as income inequality, redistribution of wealth, and political power. Proponents further contend that an overhaul of antitrust law could be used to curb the power and influence of vast companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Google. Are such companies truly becoming too expansive and powerful? Is an overhaul of antitrust law, or revisiting the consumer welfare standard, a necessary or even desirable step in response to such powerful companies?Featuring: Deb Garza, Partner, Covington & Burling LLPDiana Moss, President, American Antitrust InstituteHon. Noah Phillips, Commissioner, Federal Trade CommissionHon. Joshua Wright, Executive Director, Global Antitrust Institute, Antonin Scalia Law SchoolModerator: Judge Douglas Ginsburg, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia

In 1978, Judge Robert Bork published the book The Antitrust Paradox. The Antitrust Paradox has become one of the most influential authorities on antitrust policy, changing the landscape of American antitrust law forever. Since its publication, The Antitrust Paradox has been cited by over 100 different United States courts, and its reasoning has often been adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States. Judge Bork argued the original intent of the Sherman Act and other American antitrust laws was to protect competition itself rather than consumers. The result of this flawed approach was certain market practices such as vertical integration and price discrimination, which posed no threat to consumers, were still outlawed in favor of competition, even if this competition lead to an overall harm to the consumer. Instead, Judge Bork advocated for a consumer welfare standard, where violations of antitrust law would be measured solely by their affect on consumers. Jude Bork’s articulation of these principles in The Antitrust Paradox had a lasting impact that can be felt in antitrust law to this day.Featuring: Susan Creighton, Partner, Co-Chair, antitrust practice, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiAndrew Finch, Principal Deputy Attorney General, Antitrust Division, Department of JusticeCharles (Rick) Rule, Co-Chair, Antitrust Group, Paul|WeissHon. Joshua Wright, Executive Director, Global Antitrust Institute, Antonin Scalia Law schoolModerator: Judge Laurence Silberman, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia

In recent years, a new populist movement in antitrust law has been labeled “hipster antitrust,” and its proponents include prominent members of Congress including Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. These would-be antitrust revolutionaries oppose using the consumer welfare standard of Judge Bork as the sole policy interest of antitrust law, and instead argue that antitrust law should be used to solve a myriad of far-reaching issues such as income inequality, redistribution of wealth, and political power. Proponents further contend that an overhaul of antitrust law could be used to curb the power and influence of vast companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Google. Are such companies truly becoming too expansive and powerful? Is an overhaul of antitrust law, or revisiting the consumer welfare standard, a necessary or even desirable step in response to such powerful companies?Featuring: Deb Garza, Partner, Covington & Burling LLPDiana Moss, President, American Antitrust InstituteHon. Noah Phillips, Commissioner, Federal Trade CommissionHon. Joshua Wright, Executive Director, Global Antitrust Institute, Antonin Scalia Law SchoolModerator: Judge Douglas Ginsburg, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia

On March 6, 1988, Hon. Robert H. Bork spoke to the Federalist Society's National Student Symposium at the University of Virginia. Judge Bork discussed the campaign against his recently failed Supreme Court nomination and its implications for future judicial nominations, constitutional law, politics, and culture.As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.Featuring:Hon. Robert H. Bork, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. CircuitHon. T. Kenneth Cribb, Jr., Assistant to the President for Domestic AffairsHon. David M. McIntosh, Domestic Policy Council

On March 6, 1988, Hon. Robert H. Bork spoke to the Federalist Society's National Student Symposium at the University of Virginia. Judge Bork discussed the campaign against his recently failed Supreme Court nomination and its implications for future judicial nominations, constitutional law, politics, and culture.As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.Featuring:Hon. Robert H. Bork, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. CircuitHon. T. Kenneth Cribb, Jr., Assistant to the President for Domestic AffairsHon. David M. McIntosh, Domestic Policy Council

An objective, non-partisan look by a government teacher at the judicial nomination process and the Senate "nuclear option". (Minor Correction: at one point while dicussing a bit of history I refer to Judge Bork as "Neil" - his first name is "Robert",  - apologies)

A hero of the Right, a nemesis of the Left, Judge Robert Bork recently passed away. A man of many accomplishments, he was most well-known for what he never was - a Justice of the United States Supreme Court. We'll talk to historian David Greenberg about Judge Bork's still-controversial confirmation hearings, and we'll also talk to United States Attorney Tim Heaphy, who, as a young staffer for then-Senator Joe Biden, personally witnessed history unfold.

This is an archived copy of The Daily Standard podcast. Please note that advertisements, links and other specific references within the content may be out of date.