Podcasts about Verb

What if refuge was something you practiced?In this conversation, John Ortberg talks with therapist and trauma specialist Lisa Cuss about anxiety, church hurt, attachment theory, the nervous system, and Psalm 31.Lisa shares how reading the Psalms through the lens of the nervous system helped her understand David's prayers in a completely new way. His cries of fear, confusion, and desperation suddenly felt deeply human and surprisingly familiar.This episode explores:- Trauma and attachment theory- Church hurt and emotional healing- Psalm 31 and the image of refuge- Why God is called a fortress- Right-sizing reality through prayer- Making refuge an active spiritual practiceFeaturing reflections on:- David's prayers- The nervous system- Martin Luther- A Mighty Fortress Is Our God#Psalm31 #JohnOrtberg #LisaCuss #Prayer #Trauma #AttachmentTheory #SpiritualFormation #ChristianFaith #Anxiety #Psalms

This week, Rebecca Hinds, the brilliant mind behind what is officially my new favorite book, Your Best Meeting Ever, is with us at Allyship in Action. I'll be honest—I listened to this one on Audible, and hearing Rebecca's voice felt like she was sitting right there with me, narrating every meeting catastrophe I've ever lived through! We've all been there: trapped in a conference room (or a Zoom square) while someone reads slides at us, doing the mental math of just how much this hour is costing the company. But as I always say in my leadership training, a meeting is a snapshot of your culture. If we want to build inclusive, equitable workplaces, we have to start by fixing the way we talk to one another. Rebecca reminds us that leading a great meeting—or saving a bad one—is a leadership superpower. Key Themes from the Conversation The Origins of Meeting Sabotage The modern, dysfunctional meeting actually mirrors tactics found in the WWII-era Simple Sabotage Field Manual, which advised citizens in enemy territory to disrupt progress through long-winded, frequent meetings. "It's ironic, it's frustrating, it's a little bit humorous that we use the same tactic that was once advised as a weapon of sabotage as business as usual." The 4D CEO Test for Meeting Necessity To combat meeting volume, organizations should use a two-part filter to decide if a live gathering is actually necessary or if it can be handled asynchronously. "A meeting should only happen if the purpose is to debate, decide, discuss, or develop yourself or your team. The content either needs to be complex or emotionally intense." Meeting Doomsday and the  Power of the Reset Instead of a simple audit, a meeting doomsday involves a 48-hour calendar reset that clears all recurring meetings to break the status quo and alleviate social guilt. "I've come to believe we need that type of drastic measure because meetings become so ingrained on the calendar and we have an immense social guilt, often, associated with canceling them." Designing for Delight and Human Connection Effective meetings should engage the senses and include moments of delight—a combination of joy and surprise—to create positive associations and boost memory. "Leaving people with one moment of delight is another pretty concrete way to ensure that they're leaving the meeting remembering that experience and having a positive association." AI as a Tool, Not a Replacement While AI can automate administrative drudgery, sending a digital twin to a meeting in your place can signal that your time is more valuable than your colleagues'. "If you have a broken meeting culture, you know, AI is not going to fix that. Sending a digital twin is a pretty good sign you, as the organizer, haven't thought as carefully as you should about meeting design." Actionable Takeaway Audit your next agenda using the Verb and Noun rule. Instead of a vague heading like Budget Discussion, label the item Align on the Q3 Budget. This provides clarity on the objective, tells the group exactly when they have been successful, and prevents the first item from eating up the entire hour. Get the book and follow Rebecca at https://www.rebeccahinds.com/.

The Sixers hired their newest President of Basketball Operations, Mike Gansey (on the 8th anniversary of Burnergate). We talked about the hire and what it means for the team going forward. Then we give grades to Joel Embiid and Tyrese Maxey for the 25-26 season. Then Yahoo's Kevin O'Connor joins us to talk about Gansey, and explain and discuss the NBA's Lottery reform measures. Subscribe to the Kevin O'Connor Show here: https://sports.yahoo.com/videos/shows/kevin-o-connor-show/Read the Burnergate story from Ben Detrick here: https://www.theringer.com/2018/05/29/nba/bryan-colangelo-philadelphia-76ers-twitter-joel-embiid-anonymous-markelle-fultzRead the Burnergate retrospective from Sixers Adam here: https://www.rightstorickysanchez.com/p/outtogetmeThe Rights To Ricky Sanchez is presented by Draft Kings SportsbookGet 20% off Verb Energy bars with code RTRS and the VERB starter pack at https://verbenergy.com/rickyKornblau Law is the official law firm of the processSurfside Iced Tea and Vodka is the official canned cocktail of The RickyGambling Problem? Call one eight hundred GAMBLER or one eight hundred MY RESET. New York: call eight seven seven eight HOPENY or text HOPENY. Connecticut: call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. On behalf of Boot Hill Casino in Kansas. Wager tax pass-through may apply in Illinois. Twenty one plus in most states. Void in Ontario. Restrictions apply. Bonus bets expire seven days after issuance. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see d k n g dot co slash audio. Limited time offer.

TPCCafe Radio Presents Classic Westerns, Have Gun Will Travel: Shanghails A Verb

You probably already know that volere means "to want", but there are still a few secrets hiding in this everyday verb. In this episode, Francesca shares five interesting things to know about volere, from the tricky 'gl' sound and using it as a noun to choosing between ho voluto and volevo in the past. How many of them are new to you?➡️ Click here to watch the video version of this episode.➡️ Want more tips like these delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for our free newsletter: https://coffeebreaklanguages.kit.com/newsletter Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Bob Myers is either hiring the new President of Basketball Operations, doing the job, or both. We know Bob Myers ran the Warriors, but there's so much more to know. Joining us for this podcast as we go deeper into Myers are two people who have covered Myers for years. Host of the Light Years podcast, Saam Esfandiari, and Ethan Sherwood-Strauss, now of House of Strauss, formerly of The Athletic and ESPN.Subscribe to Light Years here: https://www.bluewirepods.com/podcast/light-years-a-golden-state-warriors-podSubscribe to House of Strauss: https://www.houseofstrauss.com/The Rights To Ricky Sanchez is presented by Draft Kings SportsbookAdam Ksebe is the official realtor of The Ricky at 302-864-8643 or https://www.buyindelaware.com/Get 20% off Verb Energy bars with code RTRS and the VERB starter pack at https://verbenergy.com/rickySurfside Iced Tea and Vodka is the official canned cocktail of The RickyGambling Problem? Call one eight hundred GAMBLER or one eight hundred MY RESET. New York: call eight seven seven eight HOPENY or text HOPENY. Connecticut: call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. On behalf of Boot Hill Casino in Kansas. Wager tax pass-through may apply in Illinois. Twenty one plus in most states. Void in Ontario. Restrictions apply. Bonus bets expire seven days after issuance. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see d k n g dot co slash audio. Limited time offer.

Mehr Infos zum CharLingua Sprachclub findest du hier:

Arx Robotics ist von drei ehemaligen Bundeswehr-Offizieren gegründet worden – und gehört heute zu den erfolgreichsten Defense-Startups. Marc Wietfeld, CEO und Mitgründer, erklärt, wie Arx Robotics heute die „weltgrößte vernetzte militärische Robotikflotte" im Einsatz hat: Mehrere hundert Bodendrohnen vom Typ „Gereon" kämpfen täglich auf Seiten der ukrainischen Armee. [11:34]Friedrich Merz ist zu Gast in der SPD-Fraktion gewesen – ein Wohlfühltermin. Konflikte sind hinter den verschlossenen Türen nicht ausgetragen worden. Es ging ganz offensichtlich darum, die Stimmung zu verbessern. Denn in den kommenden Wochen müssen Union und SPD beweisen, dass sie große Reformprojekte gemeinsam auf den Weg bringen können. [06:05]Das Infrastruktur-Zukunftsgesetz kommt doch in die zweite und dritte Lesung im Bundestag. SPD-Umweltpolitiker hatten es wochenlang blockiert – nun zeigen sie sich bereit, dem Gesetz zuzustimmen. Für große Infrastrukturprojekte soll „ein überragendes öffentliches Interesse" gelten. Damit sollen Klagemöglichkeiten von NGOs und Verbänden eingeschränkt werden. Mit anderen Worten: Projekte sollen deutlich beschleunigt werden. [01:39]Table.Briefings - For better informed decisions. Sie entscheiden besser, weil Sie besser informiert sind – das ist das Ziel von Table.Briefings. Wir verschaffen Ihnen mit jedem Professional Briefing, mit jeder Analyse und mit jedem Hintergrundstück einen Informationsvorsprung, am besten sogar einen Wettbewerbsvorteil. Table.Briefings bietet „Deep Journalism“, wir verbinden den Qualitätsanspruch von Leitmedien mit der Tiefenschärfe von Fachinformationen. Professional Briefings kostenlos kennenlernen: table.media/testenHier geht es zu unseren Werbepartnern Hol dir deine persönlichen Daten mit Incogni zurück und hol dir 60 % Rabatt auf ein Jahresabo: https://incogni.com/tabletodayImpressum: https://table.media/impressumDatenschutz: https://table.media/datenschutzerklaerungBei Interesse an Audio-Werbung in diesem Podcast melden Sie sich gerne bei Laurence Donath: laurence.donath@table.media Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

► Hier gehts zur nächsten Episode (Meine Geschichte): ⁠⁠https://linkly.link/2WkUE⁠⁠  ► kostenloses Startgespräch buchen: ⁠⁠https://linkly.link/24kPi⁠⁠ ► Download Champion Cheatsheet: https://linkly.link/2jTsN► Kickscale Extended Free Version: ⁠⁠https://2ly.link/1zdl4⁠Champion Building im Software Sales: Wie du erkennst, testest und aufbaust, wer intern fuer dich kämpft - wenn du nicht im Raum bist. 60 Prozent aller internen Meetings über deine Lösung passieren ohne dich. Und wenn du keinen echten Champion beim Kunden hast, verlierst du genau dann, wenn die Entscheidung fällt.  So kann ich dir im Sales helfen:zur Software Sales Formula: ⁠https://www.softwaresalesformula.com⁠zum Sales Gym: ⁠https://www.sales-gym.io⁠Kickscale:Extended Free Version: ⁠https://2ly.link/1zdl4⁠Timestamps:Infos:⁠jiri@softwaresalesformula.com⁠ ⁠https://www.softwaresalesformula.com⁠  ⁠https://www.sales.gym.io⁠ (0:00) Warum Champions ueber deinen Deal entscheiden(1:00) Der Diplomat-Vergleich: Was das Mittelalter mit Sales zu tun hat(4:00) Das groesste Champion-Missverstaendnis im Software Sales(5:00) Die 3 MEDDICC-Kriterien für echte Champions(8:00) Champion Thinking - Wer kämpft intern für dich?(9:00) Die 4 Champion-Tests mit konkreten Fragen(17:00) Coach vs. Influencer vs. Champion - der genaue Unterschied(19:00) Champions werden aufgebaut, nicht gefunden(21:00) 3 Whys Framework - Why Anything, Why Us, Why Now

Kaltakquise gehört zu den anspruchsvollsten Disziplinen im Vertrieb, und zu den wichtigsten. In dieser Episode sprechen Claudia und Sabine über die häufigsten Hürden im Erstkontakt und zeigen, wie du souverän damit umgehst. Das erwartet dich: • Warum der klassische Gesprächseinstieg ("Wir haben tolle Produkte...") nicht funktioniert und was stattdessen wirkt • Wie eine klare, nutzenorientierte Gesprächsstruktur die Terminabschlussquote auf bis zu 75 % steigern kann • Konkrete Antworten auf die typischen Blocker: "Wir haben schon einen Lieferanten", "Kein Interesse", "Schicken Sie Unterlagen", "Dafür bin ich nicht zuständig" • Wie du die Zentrale oder das Sekretariat als Verbündete gewinnst, statt an ihnen zu scheitern • Warum LinkedIn-Recherche vor dem Anruf einen echten Unterschied macht Das Zitat der Episode: "Es findet immer ein Verkauf statt. Entweder verkaufen Sie dem Kunden ihr Produkt – oder der Kunde verkauft Ihnen sein Nein.", David Ogilvy Ihre Informationsquelle zu aktuellen Themen im Vertrieb: https://mercuri.de Hat Ihnen die Episode gefallen? Dann geben Sie uns doch bitte eine 5-Sterne-Bewertung und abonnieren Sie den Vertriebs-Podcast von Mercuri International. Über detailliertes Feedback freuen wir uns genauso. Schreiben Sie einfach an: info@mercuri.de So können wir unseren Podcast weiter verbessern und die für Sie und Ihr Unternehmen relevanten Inhalte präsentieren.

In dieser Folge des The Nuremberg Times-Podcasts spricht Moderatorin Anna Eberl mit Milena Krüger vom städtischen Veranstaltungsdienst Erlangen über das Awareness-Konzept der Bergkirchweih. Krüger erläutert die Arbeit des Safe Space in der Bayreuther Straße 11, die Eskalationskette von Security bis Polizei, das neue Frauentaxi und die klare Botschaft „Nein heißt Nein". Mit persönlicher Erfahrung der Moderatorin als Ausgangspunkt entsteht ein konkreter Leitfaden für Betroffene und Verbündete.Noch mehr Podasts auf www.nbtimes.de

Grieving without getting stuck is possible. But most people don't know what that actually looks like from the inside. In this personal episode, Dr. Aimie shares seven principles she is living right now — attachment grief, heart shock, body holding, and toxic positivity. Not the theory of grief. The actual practice from inside it. If you have ever wondered how to grieve without shutting down — or why grief and the nervous system are inseparable — this episode is the most personal answer Dr. Aimie has given. ➡️ Full show notes: https://www.biologyoftrauma.com/post/episode-174-7-principles-for-feeling-grief-in-your-body-after-loss In This Episode You'll Learn: 04:45 — What is the difference between grief and heart shock?  07:40 — Principle 1: Why does your grieving style depend on your attachment style? 15:00 — Principle 2: What does it mean to let your body be held during grief?  21:50 — Principle 3: How do you anchor to life when the shock wears off?  27:36 — Principle 4: What is the difference between feeling grief and feeding grief? 36:00 — Principle 5: Why does choosing not to numb matter in grief?  39:40 — Principle 6: How do you move from your thoughts into your body during grief? 45:40 — Principle 7: Why does riding the biggest waves require the right person?  Resources/Guides: Read The Biology of Trauma, Chapter 5: The Whole-Body Experience of Overwhelm. Goes deeper into the vagus nerve, diaphragm, breath, and gut shutdown referenced in this episode. This is the biology underneath every principle Dr. Aimie shares. ➡️ Full show notes with links and resources: https://www.biologyoftrauma.com/post/episode-174-7-principles-for-feeling-grief-in-your-body-after-loss

Die Entscheidung des Pentagon, die Rotation amerikanischer Truppen nach Polen auszusetzen, dominiert die polnischen Medien. Wie verlässlich ist Amerika noch als Verbündeter? Wer trägt die politische Verantwortung in Warschau? Ist der Ball noch im Spiel? Und welche Optionen hat Warschau jetzt? Außerdem besucht der neue ungarische Premierminister Peter Magyar Polen. Es ist Magyars erste Auslansreise – kein Wunder, dass Experten von einer „neuen Ära“ sprechen.

What happens when the version of you that worked so hard in the morning of life no longer fits the afternoon? When the criticism becomes too heavy, the certainty starts to crack, and your body quietly tells you it's time to listen differently? For David Cook, a beloved teacher, longtime columnist, and founder of Food as a Verb — the answer began with silence, humility, and the courage to turn over his own stones. In this deeply honest conversation, Dr. Beth sits down with David Cook to explore burnout, self-righteousness, shadow work, parenting through fear, the inner work of masculinity, and how contentment quietly outlasts every metric of success. David shares the moment he realized he had been "blinded by the log in his own eye," what teenagers are really aching for today, and how he rebuilt a life — and a media company — around food, story, and presence. What You'll Learn Why fear (not failure) is the hidden root of most parenting and teaching mistakes — and what to do about it How shadow work and "turning over your own stones" leads to deeper relationships and clearer purpose What David means by descending "below the neck" — and why so many men have never been invited to do it How to redefine success as contentment, generational healing, and a freer version of who you are Why trust, safety, and powerful questions transform a classroom (and a home) more than control ever could The "rhino in the room" practice — learning to name what no one else is willing to say out loud About the Guest David Cook is a writer, former English teacher at McCallie School, GPS, and Saint Margaret's, and the founder of Food as a Verb — a Chattanooga-based media company telling rich, soul-level stories about food, farming, chefs, and the land. His work invites readers to slow down, exhale, and remember what it means to be human at the table. Connect with David Cook Email: david@foodasaverb.com Website: foodasaverb.com Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/foodasaverb/ If you've ever felt the quiet pull of midlife asking you to choose again, or wondered whether the rules you've been playing by still fit who you're becoming, this episode is for you. Press play, take a breath, and let David's words remind you that freedom, meaning, and a truer version of yourself are still waiting on the other side of your honesty.  If this conversation moves you, share it with someone who needs to hear it — and visit neverperfect.org for more conversations that celebrate growth, faith, and the beautiful imperfection of being human. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hannebohn, Yannic www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Zeitfragen

Nach einem der längsten und tödlichsten Großangriffe Russlands auf die ukrainische Hauptstadt mit mindestens 24 Toten, zahlreichen Verletzten und Vermissten beleuchtet Kai Küstner mit Rebecca Barth die Lage in Kiew und an der Front. Man habe zu viel Optimismus an diese sogenannte Feuerpause vom Wochenende davor geknüpft, befindet Rebecca. Die Andeutungen des russischen Machthabers Putin, der Krieg neige sich dem Ende zu, hält die ARD-Korrespondentin für reine "Rhetorik", ohne dass dies die Lage entscheidend verändere. Doch jenseits dessen nimmt Rebecca wahr, dass die Ukraine zuletzt durchaus selbstbewusster auftrete. Was sie auf Erfolge der Rüstungsindustrie bei Drohnen und weitreichenden Waffen zurückführt. Die Ukrainer hätten auch wegen der zurückgefahrenen US-Unterstützung verstanden, dass sie sich selbst helfen müssten. Und auch die Lage an den Frontlinien stelle sich deutlich positiver dar als noch vor wenigen Monaten befürchtet.Mit seiner langjährigen Erfahrung als China- und USA-Korrespondent analysiert Stefan Niemann den Besuch von Donald Trump in Peking. So demonstrativ ihm seine Gastgeber den Roten Teppich ausgerollt hatten: der US-Präsident wirkte deutlich schwächer als der mächtige Xi Jinping. Im Staatsfernsehen der Volksrepublik laufen die symbolträchtigen Bilder vom Staatsbesuch wie Belege einer Wachablösung: die Tage der Supermacht Amerika seien gezählt, die Zukunft gehöre China. Zwar hat Xi Jinping Donald Trump wohl signalisiert, mäßigend auf das iranische Regime einwirken zu wollen, um die Straße von Hormus wieder frei (auch gebührenfrei!) zu bekommen, aber ob Chinas kommunistische Führung die Mullahs als Verbündete fallen lässt, bleibt ungewiss. Unmissverständlich war Xi nur beim Thema Taiwan: unverhohlen drohte Chinas Staats- und Parteichef Donald Trump mit einem heftigen Konflikt, sollten sich die USA in Sachen Taiwan "falsch verhalten". Gemeint sind vor allem die versprochenen amerikanischen Waffenlieferungen, die Peking als Provokation und Einmischung in "innere Angelegenheiten" versteht. Ob Taiwans de facto Schutzmacht USA die demokratisch regierte Insel tatsächlich "aufgeben", um China in anderen kontroversen Fragen milde zu stimmen, wird sich noch zeigen.Lob und Kritik, alles bitte per Mail an streitkraefte@ndr.de Russischer Zerstörer vor Fehmarnhttps://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/europa/russland-zerstoerer-ostseekueste-100.htmlPodcast-Tipp: 11KM live: Deutsche Geheimdienste - bald größer und gefährlicher?https://www.ardsounds.de/episode/urn:ard:episode:49a4dd917eded8b8/Alle Folgen von “Streitkräfte und Strategien” https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/info/podcast2998.html

Die Initiative will, dass die ständige Wohnbevölkerung der Schweiz nicht über 10 Millionen steigt. Damit werde die Zuwanderung laut dem Initiativkomitee auf ein vernünftiges Mass beschränkt. Die Gegenseite warnt: Die Initiative gefährde den Wohlstand der Schweiz. Am 14. Juni kommt die Initiative «Keine 10-Millionen-Schweiz» zur Abstimmung. Sie verlangt, dass die ständige Wohnbevölkerung der Schweiz bis 2050 nicht über 10 Millionen steigt. Überschreitet die ständige Wohnbevölkerung vor 2050 9,5 Millionen Menschen, müssten Bundesrat und Parlament im Asylbereich und insbesondere beim Familiennachzug im Rahmen der Personenfreizügigkeit Massnahmen ergreifen. Ausserdem müsste die Schweiz bei internationalen Abkommen, die zum Bevölkerungswachstum beitragen, Ausnahmebestimmungen und Schutzklauseln anrufen oder neu verhandeln. Wird die 10-Millionen-Grenze überschritten, müsste der Bundesrat entsprechende internationale Übereinkommen auf den nächstmöglichen Termin kündigen – nach zwei Jahren auch das Abkommen mit der EU über die Personenfreizügigkeit. «Keine 10-Millionen-Schweiz»: Entlastung oder Bedrohung? Die Befürworter der Initiative – darunter hauptsächlich die SVP sowie die EDU – halten die Zuwanderung heute für massiv zu hoch. Die Vorlage beschränke die Zuwanderung und wirke so unter anderem der Wohnungsnot, Stau und überfüllten Zügen, steigender Kriminalität und dem stark beanspruchten Gesundheitssystem entgegen. Ausserdem beuge sie der Zubetonierung der Schweiz sowie einem Kultur- und Identitätsverlust vor. Die Gegenseite – darunter FDP, Mitte, GLP, SP, Grüne sowie zahlreiche Verbände – warnt vor einem Chaos: Die Initiative verschärfe den Arbeitskräftemangel etwa in der Pflege, der Gastronomie und der Landwirtschaft, bremse das Wirtschaftswachstum, gefährde die Renten und die innere Sicherheit. Zudem sieht das Nein-Lager den bilateralen Weg mit der EU in Gefahr, wie auch die humanitäre Tradition der Schweiz. Welche Folgen hätte die Initiative «Keine 10-Millionen-Schweiz» für die Bevölkerung der Schweiz? Sichert sie den Wohlstand der Schweiz – oder gefährdet sie ihn gar? Zu diesen Fragen begrüsst Sandro Brotz am 13. Mai 2026 in der «Abstimmungs-Arena» als Befürworterinnen und Befürworter der Vorlage: – Marcel Dettling, Präsident SVP; – Esther Friedli, Ständerätin SVP/SG; und – Pascal Schmid, Nationalrat SVP/TG. Gegen die Vorlage treten an: – Beat Jans, Bundesrat und Vorsteher EJPD; – Christian Wasserfallen, Nationalrat FDP/BE; und – Yvonne Bürgin, Fraktionspräsidentin Die Mitte.

I've been married for a little over twenty-five years. I'm so thankful for that. And yet, if you're married and listening today, you know that marriage takes work. Imagine if you only told your spouse you loved them once a month, or worse yet, never. Would that lead to a healthy relationship? Or what if you ONLY “said” you loved your spouse, but you never did anything to support those words? That wouldn't work either. You'll learn today that love is a VERB…it's action…it's DOING. Today, Pastor Dan says that God expects us to obey Him as a response to His love for us.

If you have ever walked out of a town hall thinking “we were crystal clear” only to hear your team say “we still don't get it,” you're not dealing with a motivation problem. You're dealing with a communication and trust problem. Mick Spiers sits down with Alejandra Ramirez, internal communication strategist and founder of Ready Cultures, to show why leadership communication shapes organizational culture, and why culture is not a noun you describe but a verb you practice.We dig into what makes internal communication actually work inside modern, multicultural workplaces: listening as a leadership responsibility, closing the feedback loop, and responding to dissent in a way that builds trust even when people disagree with the decision. Alejandra explains how employees become your brand ambassadors, why ignoring feedback makes it fester, and how leaders can create clarity without pretending change is easy. We also talk about the messy middle of change management, where fear of loss, fear of the unknown, and even identity threats show up when new tools, AI, or new systems roll out.You'll get a practical framework you can use immediately: Head, Heart, and Hands. What do people need to know, why should they care, and what do they need to do next? We also unpack the illusion of transparency, the need for repetition across multiple touchpoints, and how manager toolkits, FAQs, and smart check-ins help strategy messages finally land.Subscribe for more conversations on leadership, internal communications, employee engagement, and building high-trust cultures, then share this with one person who needs clearer communication at work and leave a review so more leaders can find the show.

Die Salamischeiben und ihre neuen, unerwarteten Verbündeten von der Bierschinkentruppe kehren für eine Lagebesprechung zurück zum Baumhaus. Dann aber tut sich etwas Gruseliges in Frau Bramftls Garten – und das ist noch lange nicht die seltsamste Wendung.Du hörst die Kerkerkumpels, das Pen & Paper Hörspiel. Die Geschichte, die du hörst, ist live improvisiert. Ob unseren Charakteren eine Aktion gelingt, entscheiden die Würfel!Intro/Outro:Sprecherin: Carolin SabathSound- & Musikquellen:"8bit Dungeon Level" by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ "Neon Drive" by tabletopaudio.com"Sentient Eye" by tabletopaudio.com"Weirder Things" by tabletopaudio.com"Weirder Things 2" by tabletopaudio.com"Thieves' Guild" by tabletopaudio.comAll sounds from tabletopaudio.com are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).Mehr Infos zu unseren Aktionen und Werbepartnern findest du auf https://kerkerkumpels.de/links/aktionen/Unsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://art19.com/privacy. Die Datenschutzrichtlinien für Kalifornien sind unter https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info abrufbar.

The Sixers were swept by the Knicks on Mother's Day. Mike didn't handle it well. Thank you for sticking with us for yet another season. The Rights To Ricky Sanchez is presented by Draft Kings SportsbookGet 20% off Verb Energy bars with code RTRS and the VERB starter pack at https://verbenergy.com/rickyBecome a MortgageCS Ricky VIP at mortgagecs.com/rickySurfside Iced Tea and Vodka is the official canned cocktail of The Ricky.

Max walks you through five essential uses of "prendre", one of the most flexible verbs in French. You'll see why French uses "prendre" for ordering food and drinks, for catching transport, for illness ("j'ai pris froid"), for the very French structure "prendre quelqu'un pour quelqu'un", and for talking about duration. Which meaning surprised you the most?➡️ Click here to watch the video version of this episode.➡️ Want more tips like these delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for our free newsletter: https://coffeebreaklanguages.kit.com/newsletter Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

How can upgrading your verbs transform flat writing into vivid, page-turning prose? Why do so many writing problems turn out to be verb problems — and how can you fix yours? Sarah Kaufman explores the art of the verb and shares practical tips for making your writing stronger, clearer, and more alive. In the intro, writing as a caregiver and grief [Stark Reflections; The Creative Penn episode]; Beyond Bookshops — Bulk Sales, Gifting and Alternative Distribution [Self-Publishing Advice]; list of money books; London walk along SouthBank; Bones of the Deep: AI-Assisted Artisan Author webinars. Today's show is sponsored by ProWritingAid, writing and editing software that goes way beyond just grammar and typo checking. With its detailed reports on how to improve your writing and integration with writing software, ProWritingAid will help you improve your book before you send it to an editor, agent or publisher. Check it out for free or get 15% off the premium edition at www.ProWritingAid.com/joanna This show is also supported by my Patrons. Join my Community at Patreon.com/thecreativepenn Sarah Kaufman is a Pulitzer Prize–winning critic, an award-winning author, and a writing teacher. Her latest book is Verb Your Enthusiasm: How to Master the Art of the Verb and Transform Your Writing. You can listen above or on your favorite podcast app or read the notes and links below. Here are the highlights and the full transcript is below. Show Notes Why verbs are the most versatile and underrated tool in a writer's toolkit How to replace flat, explanatory sentences with vivid, action-driven prose The power of physical and metaphorical verbs to show emotion instead of telling it When passive voice works, and when it's hiding something Balancing beautiful language with the demands of storytelling and deadlines How to broaden your writing expertise into a sustainable portfolio career You can find Sarah at SarahLKaufman.com. Transcript of the interview with Sarah Kaufman Jo: Sarah Kaufman is a Pulitzer Prize–winning critic, an award-winning author, and a writing teacher. Her latest book is Verb Your Enthusiasm: How to Master the Art of the Verb and Transform Your Writing. Welcome to the show, Sarah. Sarah: Thank you so much. I'm delighted to be with you. Jo: This is such a great topic, but first up— Tell us a bit more about you and how you got into writing. Sarah: I got into writing in a backwards way, I guess. The romantic, wonderful thing about writing is the freedom that it gives you, right? That's what we all think about—this freedom to address the world. Then the practical, wonderful thing about writing is developing a focal point, which I had to do in order to write in the first place. I'll explain a little bit about that. I became a dance critic, which is what I did at the Washington Post for 27 years, to have something to write about. That was necessary because, though I've always known that I wanted to be a writer ever since earliest childhood, I just didn't really find things to write about when it came time to actually try to make a living at it. As I was approaching leaving college as an English major, I was getting very anxious about what I was actually going to do, and I didn't have this burning desire to write about any certain thing. I happened to be working as a full-time secretary at a ballet school because I had been a ballet nerd all through my youth. I knew quite a bit about doing ballet, about the steps and about the lingo, so I was a suitable candidate to work at a ballet school. I was learning so much from the teachers there—who had all been professional dancers—about the aesthetics of ballet and how you shape the steps into art and into a performance. I was getting more and more interested in dance. One day the director took me out to lunch and she said, “You should write about dance.” I had seriously never considered that before, but she knew that I was an English major, that I wanted to write. She said, “Look, you know so much,” and she really encouraged me. So I said, “Well, okay, I'll give it a go,” because I had been reading dance criticism. I just started picking it apart and seeing how critics put their reviews together, called up a local paper, took on some freelance assignments, and did a lot of freelancing for years and eventually landed at the Washington Post. So the point I want to make is that I had that thing to write about. Now I had a focal point, and my books grew out of that. The first book I wrote is The Art of Grace: On Moving Well Through Life. That was an exploration of aspects of grace stemming from physical grace, which I knew about from dancers, and looking at connections there with social grace and spiritual grace. Then this verbs book likewise grew out of my work as a dance writer because my goal in writing about dance was to capture the experience of it. I didn't want to be a scholarly type of critic, though I do love that kind of criticism and I read it and learn so much from it, but I knew that was not going to be my style. I wanted more to primarily recreate the experience for the reader, as well as then coming in with analysis of it. I was just so fascinated by the look and the feel of what I was seeing on the stage. I wanted to be able to share that with the reader. So I had to lean on verbs to capture the action, and people occasionally would say, “Oh, you're so good with verbs, Sarah,” which I thought was kind of interesting. It's like, oh, so this is a strength I had developed. I didn't really realise it. Then that, coupled with my teaching experience, is what led me to think I have some things to talk about regarding verbs. I'd like to share with the world because, as a teacher, I often see that writing issues my students have are actually verb issues. They get into a corner with a lot of explanation or clauses on top of clauses, and they get lost. Where is the point that you want to make here? What is the meaning? What is it you want me to take away from your work? Well, if we pare that back and look at the verbs and try to get some direction in the sentences, that often brings clarity. Suddenly the student will say, “I was thinking more about adjectives and nouns. I didn't realise that verbs were really something to focus on.” I thought that would be an interesting challenge to bring that out. Jo: It's so fascinating. I love how your career has emerged and that you've leaned into different things. It has a kind of dance to it itself. We're going to come back to your career, but let's start with that, because you mentioned that with many of your students you are reading their work and you think, “Oh, we can fix this with some verbs.” Let's get into that because you talk about weeding and this verb-first editing process. Most of the listeners will have some kind of writing already—either they've got a lot of books or they've got a draft in progress. This is the kind of thing we struggle with: how do we make our work stronger? Talk about why you are so obsessed with verbs some tips for making our work stronger. Sarah: Yes, I am obsessed with verbs. I will cop to that. They're so interesting and I felt like they were a little underrated as a writing tool. Verbs, as we learned in school, drive your sentence forward. They're the engine. Really, I feel like they are the secret soul of language, because they're so versatile, they're so essential. First of all, they hold it all together. They're the only part of speech that in itself is a full sentence. You can have a full sentence that's a verb. “Watch.” “Look.” “Continue.” You could go on and on. That is a full grammatical sentence. You can't do that with any other part of speech. They're so essential. The word “verb” itself comes from the Latin verbum, which means “a word.” So verbs became that name for all words. Our literary ancestors understood this—that they're really the beginning and the end as far as words go. They can add to your work when you start thinking about verbs in this way, and you start thinking about how can I elevate my writing—well, verbs are very efficient and very evocative. They can add not only clarity to your work, but a kind of elegance. They can say so much in such a little amount of space. For example, say you have something like this: “The cook was facing the dinner rush, and so she decided to put together something quick and easy so no one would know how nervous and unprepared she was.” In that sentence, I'm doing a lot of explaining and describing. I'm just explaining to you the situation, but I haven't really brought it to life much. A better way to do it might be something like this—and you can see it comes a little bit more active: “The dinner rush pressed upon her. To hide her nerves, she whisked eggs and milk into omelettes, shredded parsley with her bare hands and flung it all onto plates like Jackson Pollock splashing his canvas.” I show you what her nerves and the pressure resulted in. I show that manifesting. Or you could even shorten it and just say: “Dinner rush loomed. She whisked and whipped, chopped and dripped and masked her nerves with glistening omelettes.” There are stylistic differences there, but it's just to give an example of how you can take something that, on the face of it, sure, it makes sense—it's perfectly fine as a sentence—but it just lies there. It's flat. Maybe it's not very exciting. It doesn't really move the story forward. You can bring it to life by showing us. You show us with the action. Jo: You haven't really specifically said what a verb is in that sentence you just had around “whisked” and all of those things. Those sentences were actually quite different in a lot of the different words you used. You didn't just swap out for stronger verbs. Could you just point out what the verbs were, in case people are confused about which words are which? Sarah: Right. Great. In the first, inferior example I have: “The cook was facing the dinner rush.” So then I amended it to: “The dinner rush pressed upon her.” I'm giving the dinner rush itself a verb—”press.” It weighed on her, it pressed on her. Also, in the third example—”the dinner rush loomed”—so that's even shorter. “Loom” is a wonderful verb. I love it because it conveys a sense of threat. That's what I mean by verbs being so efficient and evocative in one word. “A storm loomed.” “The dinner rush loomed.” You convey the emotion around the whole event. “To hide her nerves, she whisked eggs and milk into omelettes, shredded parsley.” So “hide”—she's hiding her nerves rather than just saying she felt nervous. You give it a little bit more action, you give her a little bit more character by saying she's doing this to hide her nerves. Then whisking the eggs, shredding the parsley, flinging it onto plates—that shows how she's being creative and surmounting this problem, right? Instead of simply describing—”So she decided to use her expertise and create a nice dinner”—you show that in motion with things like whisking and shredding and flinging it onto plates. That's an example of how you can slide in upgraded verbs to lend a sense of energy and life. Jo: I think this idea of motion is so great, and you tie this in a lot to your work. You've written a lot about physical action, and in the book there is a chapter on physical action. I think this is so important because many authors will say, “Use the word ‘said'” without thinking about dialogue within a pattern of action. Your chef there could say something as she flung the parsley on the plate, rather than “the chef said this.” Get moving as she flung the stuff onto the plate. The action verbs are so important. Could you talk a bit more about [action verbs] and the physical action side of it? Sarah: Yes, and that's so right. When you have a scene really rolling, you don't need to do so much explaining about the way a person says something with those dialogue tags. It's very interesting. I feel like words are alive—they're living, breathing things—and the more that we let them come to life on the page, the more you can draw your reader into the story. The reader gets a sense of that life and wants to come into the story with you. You've really created a scene that your reader feels immersed in. And that's so exciting as a reader to discover. Writing about movement is part of that. Of course writing is very vast—it's hard to say, “Well, you should always write about movement.” That would be silly. If we think about movement and action and action verbs as being effective not only for the actions that we see around us, but for inner actions—the subtle feelings, thinking, non-action, but internally what's going on—that's also space for effective verbs. For churning emotions, for metaphors about fright and what that feels like in the body. Or despair. Or regret. I have a lot of examples of that in the book. It's another beautiful use of verbs where, instead of explaining what someone is feeling, you can show it through metaphorical verbs and actual physical changes—things roiling inside the body. Jo: For example, someone in their draft has “she was afraid”— How could they make that much stronger and use a lot of those things you were just talking about? Sarah: That's an excellent question. Instead of “she was afraid,” you might say something like: “She felt her chest fill with ice, freezing her lungs and choking her breath, and her heart bashed around as if to tear itself from her body.” We could get very dramatic about it, but you can play with that. What I like to encourage readers to do is open their minds and open their imaginations. When you have a pretty standard phrase like “she was afraid” or “she felt too frightened to move”—well, put yourself in that position. What does that feel like? What does that really feel like inside when you're too frightened to move? Is it an icy feeling or is it a burning? Is it a numbness? And what verbs might help with that? Is it thrashing? Is it raging? Is it paralysing? How can that type of expressiveness fill in the picture and make it palpable to the reader—what it's like to be in the room with this person? Jo: Do you recommend using a thesaurus? I try to do this myself, and I often use Power Thesaurus, which I just find so useful, because as writers, when we are writing novels or books in a similar genre, we often reach for the same words. Are you a big thesaurus user? Sarah: I am a huge thesaurus user. I have a stack of actual book-type thesauri, but I do like, as you mentioned, Power Thesaurus. I like OneLook, which is an interesting resource. I think it's OneLook.com and you can go in the other way—you can use it as a thesaurus, but you can also use it to find one verb that combines a couple of words. Like “walk clumsily,” for example. You could put that into OneLook and it would come up with lists and lists. And among them might be “hobble” and “limp” and other words to say what a weak verb plus an adverb can say. Online resources are wonderful. I like Merriam-Webster.com—that's what I rely on a lot. Cambridge too. A thesaurus is wonderful. Now, the caution with the thesaurus, however, is that I would like to urge people to be mindful about just swapping in one word for another, or one verb for another, because even though they may appear in the same groupings, there are going to be subtle differences among them. I find it fascinating to really investigate the subtle difference between, say, “limp” and “hobble” and “stumble.” Those all mean slightly different things. So the finishing tip is just to make sure the word you choose is going to be right for the context. Jo: And also perhaps the audience. I mean, you are a Pulitzer Prize–winning critic, which is amazing, and you were writing for an audience who wanted dance pieces. The audience for dancing in terms of the words you would use—I'm not really into it myself, but I would know the word “pirouette.” I imagine there's a ton of words that you would know and use in your writing that wouldn't be so relevant for a wider audience. So we have to think about the audience as well. Sarah: Yes, absolutely. We want to be very thoughtful in our choice of words. If you distilled my book down to one single message, it is to think carefully. Not in the first draft, perhaps, and certainly not when we're speaking, because we speak so spontaneously. But in writing, where you put your thoughts down and then—hopefully, if you're not under too much deadline pressure—you can come back, give it another look, shape it, refine it, and really make sure that you've chosen your words with care. I feel like that's really what writing is all about—communicating one mind to another through this magnificent medium of language. Language is intentional, and having that intention in mind about what you want to share and what you want to communicate and how you want your readers to approach your work—well, that's up to you. That's the freedom I hope to be able to present to people who check out my book: here are some ways, here are some suggestions, here are some techniques and tips for issues that can arise. Really, once you've taken these in, I hope to fire your imagination and inspire you with being able to communicate what it is that you really have inside that you want to share. Jo: I think it is a book for falling in love with the joy of words again. You did mention deadlines, though, and the pressure. Especially for those of us who write genre fiction series, which is a lot of people listening, sometimes we might feel that we don't have the time for that. Do our readers appreciate it, or do they want story first? Sometimes is it too much? Where do you come down on balancing getting story over words? How long can we spend on finding beautiful words when we are writing another 70,000-word book? Sarah: I think that's an excellent point. I think story comes first. That's probably what first drives you to your desk—telling a story. Although it may not. The realities of writing are so vast and unlimited that it's very hard to come out with rules, and I don't write about rules. I really want to give suggestions and examples and insights, but I do think that story is absolutely tops. And that's the power of verbs, in fact. They can help us tell the stories with clarity and with efficiency. I do want to make sure that I'm being clear. I'm not advocating that before you ever sit down and write, or you write one sentence, you then go back and check every single word, because that wouldn't make any sense at all. The idea is to free yourself, free your imagination. These are ways to open your imagination up that maybe you haven't thought about before. But storytelling is primary, and the way that you tell it is going to be individual to every writer. It's useful to bear in mind that there are a lot of avenues one can take in terms of creating a scene or building a character and even evoking the landscape and the atmosphere, and we can look at verbs to help us do that. Jo: One of the biggest problems, I think, especially for new writers, is the passive voice versus more active voice. Can you give some examples of passive voice? Often in editing we're told to get rid of passive voice, but of course you do need it sometimes. Sarah: Yes. There's understandably a lot of confusion about passive voice. Just to have a tiny tidbit of grammar nerdery here: the voice of a verb refers to a very specific construction. It doesn't simply mean that the writer is expressing something in a boring way or taking on a dull subject. The voice of the verb tells you how it relates to the subject of the sentence. When the subject does the action—when it's doing the verb—then you have a verb in the active voice. But when the subject of the sentence is receiving the action, then it needs a verb in the passive voice. Here's an example. If I said, “Hey, Jo, guess what? My grandmother walked on the moon.” That's active voice. “My grandmother walked on the moon”—it's interesting, right? But if I said, “Hey, Jo, guess what? The moon was walked on.” You might be left thinking, “What? What am I supposed to take away from that? Is there more to the story?” “The moon was walked on”—well, that's the passive voice construction. There's no subject who did the walking. I haven't told you, and yet the subject was actually pretty important. My grandmother was the one who walked on the moon. So that's the frustration that often comes when we read the passive voice. We don't know the full story, and we might suspect: are they hiding something? Do they not really know who did the thing? It brings up a lot of questions. Especially in official situations. The classic example is “mistakes were made.” Officials love to say that because it puts nobody on the hook. Nobody is responsible. “Mistakes were made.” Well, who were they made by? They're not telling us. I heard this just recently, by one of the representatives here. This phrase is still being used: “Mistakes were made.” I think most people understand there's a bit of obfuscation. There is something being hidden. Now, there are times when the passive voice is perfectly fine. It's not necessary to say who did the action. If you say, “Joe Blow was arrested and charged with murder,” you pretty much have the full thing there. You don't need to say, “The police arrested him. The prosecutor filed the paperwork.” It's kind of assumed. If you just want to get to the point—he was arrested and charged with murder—that's sufficient. Maybe further down in the story you'll explain the circumstances, but you don't need them right there. Or say, “Fires are still being reported throughout the region.” In a news story, that's perfectly fine. We just need to know that fires are still happening. We don't necessarily need to know who's reporting it. More details may come later in the story, but right then it's perfectly fine. In news reports, in historical situations when we're giving a history, in scientific data and scientific reports, you often see the passive voice. It can be a perfectly good and oftentimes even more efficient way to tell something, but you don't want to lean into it and overuse it because it becomes very dull. When you don't have someone doing an action, it becomes very dull. Jo: As you've mentioned the legal side of things, and I'm reading a lot of academic papers at the moment. I'm doing another master's degree, and goodness me, I feel like sometimes it's designed to turn you off. Sarah: You are exactly right. I've come to that feeling too, and especially in seeing student work, where I feel like there is so much of that in academic writing, which students are reading and digesting. It naturally comes out of them, and it's a kind of cycle that's hard to break. Jo: Do you think it's a form of hedging? “Mistakes were made”—or anything legal—you are hedging it so it can be ambiguous. Whereas a strong verb—and you mentioned “your grandmother walked on the moon”—you are really making it very clear. If you want to hedge things, then using passive voice might be more appropriate. If you want to make it stronger, the activeness is important. Sarah: Yes. And it makes such a difference. I discovered this in my own work. I would read other critics, for example, and I would think, “I feel like the piece I've just written is kind of flat. It doesn't really have the effect I want, doesn't have any zip.” I would go and read other critics—not just dance critics, but other critics. It's so useful to just read other people in any type of writing that you're doing. I advocate doing a lot of reading. I would see that the pieces that really touched me, that really inspired me, had a lot of active voice constructions. They're not turning things around passively, which I think, as a young critic, I may have been doing because I was a little bit afraid to take a stand. Jo: Mm. Sarah: I think I see that in student work, that sometimes we don't want to take a stand, and so we hedge. But writing is intentional, and readers can pick up on that hedging. If you don't intend to hedge—in many cases it can be perfectly appropriate to be fuzzy for an effect that you want, or something like that in the context—but if you are hedging and you're trying to get away with it, like you don't want anyone to notice that you don't really want to give an opinion on this matter, it's going to be very clear. So it's better to address something directly. Jo: And make it stronger. I also wanted to ask you more about the writing career, because I, perhaps like many people listening, was like, I didn't even know you could make a career as a dance critic. Now I know you are not at the Washington Post any more, and it's possible that that role no longer exists—like a lot of writing roles. How has your writing career changed over the years? Do you have these various aspects of a portfolio career? We often talk about multiple streams of income on this show and how, as writers, we can't necessarily rely on one thing. Sarah: Yes, exactly. It's true, there is no longer a dance critic at the Washington Post. The position was eliminated. It's a shame, and it's happening to critics in all fields, in all media organisations, sadly. That's where, for me at least, having that focal point was very key. A thing that I became comfortable writing about, that I could then spiral out and use the eyes and the brain that I had developed from writing about this certain focus for a while. Where can I take that? Oh, athletes. They also move. I began writing stories and pieces and essays about athletes that moved beautifully, beyond racking up statistics about winning. They were just gorgeous to look at, just so pleasurable to watch. I started writing about the body language of political candidates in debate situations and so forth. Using my focal point to then widen my lens, to mix a metaphor, I guess. Having that subject matter and then broadening it out beyond the limits of the actual subject matter, broadening it out imaginatively into where I could find other places to use this perspective. That was really key for me. Say you are writing historical fiction or you're writing thrillers. I would imagine that you would develop a kind of expertise in things that I would find very difficult. Suspense, maybe, or political or police procedure, or what exactly was the weaponry in seventeenth-century France. How can you take that expertise and use it either in an aesthetic way or an actual factual way to address other topics? I think there are so many people that would be interested in what writers who have knowledge and expertise in anything can then use to show us something that we've overlooked. Something we always thought we knew, but that really, when you look at it this way, is reminiscent of how the scabbard was used in seventeenth-century France—or whatever it is, in whatever way. People are craving a new perspective on something they've overlooked or taken for granted. And that's where writers who have a body of work, or are interested in pursuing a certain topic. That's the promise that they have. They can work towards being able to enlighten us on so many other things that maybe only have a tangential connection, but they can make that connection for us. Jo: Fantastic. Where can people find you and your books online? Sarah: I am at SarahLKaufman.com. That's my website. My books are available on any website or bookshop that you want to order them from. Verb Your Enthusiasm comes out April 28th. I am not much on social media at the moment, but I do enjoy hearing feedback from readers, and there are ways to do that on my website. Jo: Well, thanks so much for your time, Sarah. That was great. Sarah: Thank you very much. I've enjoyed it.The post Verb Your Enthusiasm: Transform Your Writing With Stronger Verbs With Sarah Kaufman first appeared on The Creative Penn.

On today's episode, Carol McLeod talks with Shellie Rushing Tomlinson about cultivating a vibrant prayer life. Drawing from her book Don't Try to Pray Like Her, Shellie addresses the pressure many believers feel to pray a certain way and how that can create distance rather than intimacy with God. She shares encouragement to approach prayer with honesty, simplicity, and confidence in God's grace instead of striving for perfection. Tune in and be encouraged to grow in a more natural, personal, and deeply connected prayer life with God. Connect with Shellie and order her book at https://belleofallthingssouthern.com/ Order Today is a Verb at https://www.carolmcleodministries.com/shop/p/todayisaverb Have a prayer request or feedback?Email Carol at: carol@carolmcleodministries.comShe and her team would love to pray for you. Stay Connected:Subscribe to the Significant Women Podcast and share this episode with a friend who needs to be reminded of her worth today.Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carolmcleodministriesInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/carolmcleodministriesYoutube: https://www.youtube.com/@CarolMcLeodMinistries The Significant Women Podcast with Carol McLeod is edited and produced by WileyCraft Productions. Visit https://wileycraftproductions.com/ to learn more.

Diesmal mit Susanne Schwarz und Tabea Kirchner vom Insta-Kanal @klima.taz. Seit drei Jahren gibt es das Deutschlandticket. Mit der Fahrkarte kann man den öffentlichen Nahverkehr in ganz Deutschland nutzen. Der Preis ist allerdings immer weiter gestiegen. Hat das Ticket bisher was fürs Klima gebracht? Regelmäßig hört man jetzt: Wenn die Sonne scheint und der Wind weht, gibt es jetzt oft so viel Strom, dass die Preise im Großhandel negativ werden. Sprich: Wer den Strom abnimmt, bekommt sogar Geld statt zu zahlen. Außerdem lassen die Netzbetreiber Windräder und Solaranlagen regelmäßig zwangsabschalten, damit die Stromnetze nicht überlastet sind. Die Regierung bremst deshalb bei der Förderung der erneuerbaren Energien. Gibt es denn wirklich zu viel davon? Die Bundesregierung will das Heizungsgesetz der Ampel abschaffen, das ein weitgehendes Ende fossiler Heizungen besiegelt hat. Darüber wird seit Monaten gestritten. Jetzt ist ein Referentenentwurf da, zu dem Verbände und Interessengruppen Stellung nehmen sollen. Ist es fürs Klima so schlimm wie erwartet? -- Das klima update° wird jede Woche von Spender:innen unterstützt. Wenn auch du dazu beitragen willst, geht das HIER https://www.verein-klimawissen.de/spenden. Wir danken hier und jetzt - aber auch noch mal namentlich im Podcast (natürlich nur, wenn ihr zustimmt).

If you're ready for my direct support for improving your Italian, here are different ways to take the next step with me:

Episode: 3372 Rhetoric, Objectivity, and Gaslighting.  Today, we flip the switch on “gaslight.”

Eva Maria Michelmann berichtete über das Wiedererstarken des IS, als sie dort am 18. Januar mit ihrem Kollegen Ahmet Polad von extremistischen Stammesmilizen in Kooperation mit der syrischen Übergangsregierung angegriffen und entführt wurde. Dies geschah in der Stadt Raqqa im Rahmen der syrischen Eroberung der autonomen kurdischen Selbstverwaltung von Nord- und Ostsyrien, auch als RojavaWeiterlesen

Die bayerische Sozialministerin Ulrike Scharf verteidigt Pläne für Kürzungen in der Eingliederungshilfe. Dagegen sieht Bayerns Behinderten-Beauftragter Holger Kiesel damit langfristig noch mehr Kosten auf die gesamte Gesellschaft zukommen.

Where did these Sixers come from? Sixers win, Game 7 is on Saturday. Are they gonna win? They have to. The Rights To Ricky Sanchez is presented by Draft Kings SportsbookGet 20% off Verb Energy bars with code RTRS and the VERB starter pack at https://verbenergy.com/rickySurfside Iced Tea and Vodka is the official canned cocktail of The Ricky.

Host Stefan Kaltenbrunner begrüßt Reinhold Gmeinbauer, früherer Geschäftsführer der Tageszeitung „Die Presse“, heute Agentur‑ und Medienunternehmer („Daumen hoch“): Gmeinbauer schildert, wie er vom "Campus Tivoli" (Parteiakademie ÖVP) angesprochen wurde, ein Papier zur Medienförderung zu erarbeiten, betont aber, dass er das Papier unentgeltlich und in vollständiger inhaltlicher Unabhängigkeit verfasst hat. Er versteht sein Papier nicht als „Gegenpapier“ zur vom Medienministerium beauftragten Kaltenbrunner‑Studie, sondern als anderen Zugang mit Systemwechsel‑Anspruch: Weg vom historisch gewachsenen Flickwerk aus Presse‑, Digital‑ und Vertriebsförderungen hin zu einem einheitlichen Modell für alle privaten Medien. Herzstück ist der vorgeschlagene Medienleistungsfonds von 350 Millionen Euro, der öffentliche Medienförderung und staatliche Kommunikationsausgaben (Regierungsinserate, Spots etc.) bündeln und als Gegenleistungsfonds organisiert werden soll, bei dem geförderte Medien im Gegenzug definierten Werberaum für staatliche Kommunikation bereitstellen. Die zentrale Idee beruht auf zwei Parametern: „Marktakzeptanz“ (gesamter Umsatz eines Medienunternehmens als Ausdruck seiner wirtschaftlichen Relevanz) und „journalistische Dichte“ (Anteil dieses Umsatzes, der nachweislich in journalistische Arbeit und redaktionelle Infrastruktur fließt). Aus den Branchen‑Grundgrößen – Gesamtumsatz aller privaten Medien und Gesamtzahl der dort beschäftigten Journalist:innen – wird eine Basiskennzahl berechnet, anhand derer jedes Medium über eine Formel automatisch seine Fördersumme ermittelt; zusätzlich gibt es einen Förderdeckel von 10 Prozent der Gesamtsumme, um Überförderung einzelner Platzhirsche wie der „Kronen Zeitung“ zu verhindern und Mittel für Start‑ups und Innovation freizuspielen. Der Fonds ersetzt alle bisherigen Förderschienen, soll über die RTR/KommAustria technisch abgewickelt werden und setzt auf Transparenz, Zahlenlogik und möglichst geringe politische Eingriffsmöglichkeiten, anstatt auf eine Qualitätskommission, wie sie im Kaltenbrunner‑Modell vorgesehen ist. Zugangsvoraussetzungen wären unter anderem eine eigenständige Redaktion mit Redaktionsstatut, klare Trennung von Werbung und Redaktion, journalistischer Kernauftrag, Beschäftigung qualifizierter Journalist:innen (inklusive Kollektivvertrag), Offenlegung von Eigentumsverhältnissen, Umsätzen und Strukturen sowie Einhaltung medienrechtlicher und journalistischer Standards; parteinahe Medien und politische Organe wären ausgeschlossen. Problematische oder unsorgfältige Medien könnten bei groben Verstößen gegen journalistische Sorgfaltspflicht bis hin zum Förderentzug sanktioniert werden, wobei Gmeinbauer eher an eine Rolle der RTR (gegebenenfalls ergänzt um ein Schiedsgericht) als an den Presserat denkt. Im Unterschied zur Kaltenbrunner‑Studie, die Qualitätsmechanismen und unabhängige Kommissionen stärker betont, will Gmeinbauer Qualitätsfragen nicht in ein „Qualitätsministerium“ auslagern, sondern sie indirekt über Marktakzeptanz und Höhe der Investitionen in Journalismus abbilden; er argumentiert, dass Leser:innen, Hörer:innen und Werbekunden letztlich die Qualität entscheiden. Ein weiterer wichtiger Punkt ist die von ihm empfundene Schieflage zwischen ORF‑Finanzierung (über 700 Millionen Euro Haushaltsabgabe) und derzeitiger Unterstützung privater Medien (rund 100–140 Millionen Euro), die er mit einem deutlich höheren, etwa halb so großen Volumen für den privaten Sektor korrigieren will. Für journalistische Start‑ups und Innovationen sollen 30 bis 40 Millionen Euro innerhalb des Fonds reserviert werden, während reine Ein‑Personen‑Projekte ohne redaktionelle Struktur – etwa einzelne Podcasts – keinen Anspruch hätten, um professionelle Strukturen zu stärken. Gmeinbauer versteht seinen Vorschlag als Beitrag zur Absicherung unabhängigen Journalismus als „kritische Infrastruktur“ einer liberalen Demokratie und hofft, dass Politik, Verbände und Branche sein Modell ernsthaft in die weitere Debatte über eine zukunftsfähige Medienförderung einbeziehen. Links zur Folge: Download ÖVP-Papier Wir würden uns sehr freuen, wenn Du "Ganz offen gesagt" auf einem der folgenden Wege unterstützt:Werde Unterstützer:in auf SteadyKaufe ein Premium-Abo auf AppleKaufe Artikel in unserem FanshopSchalte Werbung in unserem PodcastFeedback bitte an redaktion@ganzoffengesagt.atTranskripte und Fotos zu den Folgen findest Du auf podcastradio.at

Der 104. Deutsche Katholikentag findet vom 13. bis 17. Mai 2026 in Würzburg statt. Auch das Bistum Passau ist wieder mit einem Stand vor Ort. (Bereit für den Katholikentag: Thomas Huber, Geschäftsführer des Diözesanrats der Katholiken in Passau und Ramona Würdinger, Abteilung Räte und Verbände)

Francesca goes beyond the textbook meaning of "dovere" and explores five nuances of this everyday Italian verb. You'll look at double conjugations, two different auxiliaries in the past tense, the less familiar meaning of "to owe", and the noun "il dovere". How many of these did you already know?➡️ Click here to watch the video version of this episode.➡️ Love learning in short bursts? Our free weekly newsletter is packed with tips just like these: https://coffeebreaklanguages.kit.com/newsletter Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Pistorius setzt auf eine Bundeswehr, die mehr können muss als bisher. Er stellt in Berlin seine Militärstrategie vor. Mindestens 460.000 Soldaten sollen sich mit Verbündeten einer Aggression Russlands entgegenstellen können.

We're not embarrassed! VJ Edgecombe balled out, the Sixers stepped up, and Andre Drummond hit a three. We talk about all of it and say who we're rooting for in the rest of the playoffs. Donate to Spike's Walk For Paws fundraiser for the BVSPCA here: https://secure.qgiv.com/event/2026walkforpaws/account/2277596/The Rights To Ricky Sanchez is presented by Draft Kings SportsbookGet 20% off Verb Energy bars with code RTRS and the VERB starter pack at https://verbenergy.com/rickySurfside Iced Tea and Vodka is the official canned cocktail of The Ricky.Gambling Problem? Call one eight hundred GAMBLER or one eight hundred MY RESET. New York: call eight seven seven eight HOPENY or text HOPENY. Connecticut: call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. On behalf of Boot Hill Casino in Kansas. Wager tax pass-through may apply in Illinois. Twenty one plus in most states. Void in Ontario. Restrictions apply. Bet must win to receive Bonus Bets which expire in 7 days. Minimum odds required. NBA Bet Boost restrictions apply and vary when offered. Boost only applies to winnings. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see sportsbook dot draftkings dot com slash promos. Limited time offer.

Es ist ein historischer Schritt: Israel und Libanon haben sich auf einen Waffenstillstand geeinigt. Allerdings ist unklar, ob der lang hält und wie sich die Terrormiliz Hisbollah verhalten wird. Über die aktuellen Entwicklungen im Nahen Osten berichtet in dieser Ausgabe von “Streitkräfte und Strategien” Kai Küstner. Im Fokus steht ein mögliches Abkommen mit dem Iran – vor allem über sein Atomprogramm – und die Straße von Hormus. Iran hat mittlerweile angekündigt, die Meerenge wieder zu öffnen und Handelsschiffen die Durchfahrt während der derzeit geltenden Waffenruhe zu erlauben. Die USA halten aber an der Blockade für Schiffe, die iranische Häfen verlassen oder anlaufen wollen, fest. Die Diskussion über die Sicherung der Straße von Hormus geht in Europa weiter. Dabei konkretisiert sich nicht nur, wie eine deutsche Beteiligung aussehen könnte, sondern es treten einmal mehr Differenzen zwischen Deutschland und Frankreich bei der Frage nach der Einbindung der USA zu Tage. Der Angriffskrieg gegen die Ukraine hinterlässt in Russland immer tiefere wirtschaftliche Spuren. Auch muss der Kreml damit leben, dass er nach der Abwahl des ungarischen Regierungschefs Orbán einen wichtigen Verbündeten verloren hat, der weitere Hilfe für die Ukraine blockiert bzw. neue Sanktionen gegen Russland verhindert hat. Trotzdem, so Kai, gibt es bislang kein Anzeichen, dass Putin diesen grausamen Abnutzungskrieg zu beenden gedenkt. Anna Engelke spricht im Interview mit der Topmanagerin im Rüstungsbereich, Susanne Wiegand, über die bemerkenswerte Entwicklung der ukrainischen Verteidigungsindustrie. Die Aufsichtsrätin bei u.a. dem Drohnenhersteller Quantum Systems erklärt, was in der Ukraine unter dem Eindruck des andauernden russischen Angriffskrieges anders läuft als in Deutschland. Das Land produziere mehr als es brauche. Diese Fähigkeit habe der Westen in 30 Jahren Friedensdividende verloren. Wiegand analysiert, warum die Beschaffung neuer Rüstungsgüter trotz des Sondervermögens eher langsam vorangeht und welche Probleme damit einhergehen. Sie beleuchtet das Vorgehen der Politik, aber auch der Industrie, die ebenfalls eine Verantwortung trägt. Man müsse aus alten Verhaltensmustern rauskommen, rät die Managerin. Lob und Kritik, alles bitte per Mail an streitkraefte@ndr.de Interview mit Susanne Wiegand: https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/info/audio-3229316.html USA wollen Ölsanktionen gegen Russland wieder in Kraft setzen: https://kyivindependent.com/moscow-walks-away-with-billions-as-trumps-russian-oil-waiver-expires/ Alle Folgen von “Streitkräfte und Strategien” https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/info/podcast2998.html Podcast-Tipp: Being The Beatles – Staffel 2 https://www.ardsounds.de/sendung/urn:ard:show:5d933a937bf865a2/

Der Schweizer Eishockeyverband trennt sich per sofort von Nationaltrainer Patrick Fischer. Vor zwei Tagen wurde bekannt, dass Fischer 2022 mit einem gefälschten Covid-Zertifikat an die Olympischen Spiele in Peking gereist war. Weitere Themen: · Israel will seine Militär-Offensive gegen die Hisbollah-Miliz im Libanon fortsetzen. · Gegenwärtig laufen die Beratungen zum neuen elektronischen Patientendossier. Es gibt aber gewichtigen Widerstand: Die wichtigsten Verbände im Gesundheitswesen fordern in einem Brief an Parlamentarierinnen und Parlamentarier einen Marschhalt.

Russland ist auf der Suche nach neuen Verbündeten in Afrika fündig geworden. Kremlchef Wladimir Putin pflegt ein enges Verhältnis mit der Militärregierung in Madagaskar - und bietet ihr einen simplen Deal an. Text und Moderation: Kevin Schulte Sie haben Fragen? Schreiben Sie eine E-Mail an podcasts@ntv.de Sie möchten "Wieder was gelernt" unterstützen? Dann bewerten Sie den Podcast gerne bei Apple Podcasts oder Spotify. Dieser Podcast wird vermarktet von Julep Media: sales@julep.de Wir verarbeiten im Zusammenhang mit dem Angebot unserer Podcasts Daten. Wenn Sie der automatischen Übermittlung der Daten widersprechen wollen, melden Sie sich hier: datenschutz@julep.de

Recently, the Bush Center held the ninth Forum on Leadership focused on the theme The Heart of America.  Forum on Leadership is a landmark gathering which develops, recognizes, and celebrates leadership by bringing together notable voices for in-depth discussions on today's pressing issues.  In his welcoming remarks, Shilo Brooks, President and CEO of the George W. Bush Center, explored what is at the center of the heart of America.  In this conversation, New York Times opinion columnist David French and the Bush Institute's Anne Wicks discussed freedom of expression and how robust protection for all viewpoints is essential for a free society.  Related:  Watch the 2026 Forum on Leadership: The Heart of America Read the Bush Institute series, Democracy is a Verb

Learn how to use dovere in Italian to say what you “have to”, “must” or “should” do, with common phrases and real-life situations you'll come across in Italy. Learn about our Online Italian School and get a free mini lesson every week: https://joyoflanguages.online/italian-school Subscribe to our new YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@joyoflanguages.italian?sub_confirmation=1 Get the bonus materials for this episode: https://italian.joyoflanguages.com/podcast/dovere-in-italian Deve cambiare treno = You (formal) have to change train Dobbiamo comprare i biglietti per Napoli = We have to buy the tickets for Naples Devo pagare qui? = Do I have to pay here? Devi prenotare online = You have to book online Devo fare molte cose = I have to do lots of things

When you look at the top restaurants around the world, no matter what cuisine they may focus on, there's one commonality they all share, and that's deep relationships with those who grow and raise the very best ingredients. It's the same in beer—you can't be the best at what you do without the meaningful, personal, financial, and long-standing relationships that ensure the brewery has access to the very best quality ingredients. These relationships don't materialize overnight, but for Firestone Walker, they're the product of 30 years of work. In this series, we highlight a number of these crucial growers, brokers, and processors who have played a role in the world-class beer that Firestone Walker makes. *Episode 1: Quality is a Verb * You don't get great hops by accident, and the work doesn't start with selecting them from brokers' lots. The work starts with breeding the right hop varieties with the perfect mix of aroma and flavor compounds as well as the functional things that make them viable to grow as a commercial crop—disease resistance, robust hop-cone production, lower water and fertilizer needs, and more. Since its inception, Firestone Walker has been involved with the Hop Quality Group—an industry group of craft brewers who work cooperatively to help guide how the growers grow and process hops. In this episode, Firestone Walker Propagator brewer Sam Tierney and friend Patrick Chavanelle, head of R&D for Allagash Brewing, outline the work of this important group in developing new, modern hops that any grower can grow. Intro music: VintageGroove / Pond5

Discover all of the podcasts in our network, search for specific episodes, get the Optimal Living Daily workbook, and learn more at: OLDPodcast.com. Episode 3524: Kathy Robinson reframes retirement as an active, purpose-driven phase of life rather than a passive endpoint, urging readers to focus on meaning beyond career identity. By shifting attention to what we can influence and taking intentional action, even small acts of service, fulfillment, connection, and well-being naturally follow. Read along with the original article(s) here: https://athenawellness.com/blog/2022/7/1/retirement-is-a-verb Quotes to ponder: "When we focus on The Circle of Concern, it can feel futile and result in reactivity and negativity." "Happiness and meaning are not found on bucket lists. Rather, they are the result of living a purposeful, healthy lifestyle." "Here's the key, the more we focus on what we can influence, the more change we can elicit." Episode references: The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: https://www.amazon.com/7-Habits-Highly-Effective-People/dp/1982137274 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Discover all of the podcasts in our network, search for specific episodes, get the Optimal Living Daily workbook, and learn more at: OLDPodcast.com. Episode 3524: Kathy Robinson reframes retirement as an active, purpose-driven phase of life rather than a passive endpoint, urging readers to focus on meaning beyond career identity. By shifting attention to what we can influence and taking intentional action, even small acts of service, fulfillment, connection, and well-being naturally follow. Read along with the original article(s) here: https://athenawellness.com/blog/2022/7/1/retirement-is-a-verb Quotes to ponder: "When we focus on The Circle of Concern, it can feel futile and result in reactivity and negativity." "Happiness and meaning are not found on bucket lists. Rather, they are the result of living a purposeful, healthy lifestyle." "Here's the key, the more we focus on what we can influence, the more change we can elicit." Episode references: The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: https://www.amazon.com/7-Habits-Highly-Effective-People/dp/1982137274 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Want to know your English level? Take our free English-level quiz here to find out what your current English level is.  Do you love All Ears English?  Try our other podcasts here: Business English Podcast: Improve your Business English with 3 episodes per week, featuring Lindsay, Michelle, and Aubrey IELTS Energy Podcast: Learn IELTS from a former Examiner and achieve your Band 7 or higher, featuring Lindsay McMahon and Aubrey Carter with Jessica Beck in previous episodes Visit our website here or https://lnk.to/website-sn If you love this podcast, hit the follow button now so that you don't miss five fresh and fun episodes every single week.  Don't forget to leave us a review wherever you listen to the show. Send your English question or episode topic idea to support@allearsenglish.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Seit Wochen führen die USA und Iran Krieg, jetzt gilt eine brüchige Waffenruhe. Donald Trump droht Teheran mit der Auslöschung „einer ganzen Zivilisation“, spielt mit Angriffen auf Brücken und Kraftwerke – und verkündet kurz vor Ablauf seines Ultimatums eine zweiwöchige Feuerpause. Dazwischen: ein wüster Ostern-Post mit „Praise be to Allah“, Zickzack-Botschaften an Teheran und die eigenen Leute, schwankende Märkte und Verbündete, die sich fragen, wie verlässlich dieser Präsident noch ist. Wir zeichnen diesen Zickzack-Kurs nach: Welche Entscheidungen sind im Weißen Haus gefallen, wer hat Trump gebremst, wer hat ihn befeuert? Wie wird die Waffenruhe in Washington und in Teheran erzählt – und wer geht am Ende gestärkt aus dieser Episode hervor? Außerdem schauen wir auf Trumps Stil und seine politische Verfassung: Ist das noch kalkulierte „Madman“-Strategie oder gefährliche Unberechenbarkeit an der Spitze einer Nuklearmacht? Und: Wie reagiert seine eigene MAGA-Bewegung: bröckelt der Personenkult, und wer bringt sich schon als möglicher Nachfolger in Stellung? Der Apofika-Presseklub mit Klaus Brinkbäumer (Autor und langjähriger US-Chronist), Juliane Schäuble (US-Korrespondentin der ZEIT in Washington) und Marina Kormbaki (SPIEGEL), und natürlich unser Host Markus Feldenkirchen (SPIEGEL). Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte: https://linktr.ee/presseklub Du möchtest Werbung in diesem Podcast schalten? Dann erfahre hier mehr über die Werbemöglichkeiten bei Seven.One Audio: https://www.seven.one/portfolio/sevenone-audio

Let's learn how to use Ir to mean "going to". This is how we can put any verb in the future, simply by using our conjugations of Ir along with an infinitive. Practice all of today's Spanish for free at LCSPodcast.com/43

This week's scripture:Psalm 118v14-17,22-24John 20v1-18On Easter Sunday, Adam digs into the difference between belief in Jesus being a noun and a verb. How, if at all, is thinking about faith as a noun and a verb helpful to you? What if faith is ongoing?

Bei der Parlamentswahl in Ungarn geht es auch ums politische Überleben von Ministerpräsident Viktor Orban. Dieser hat sich von internationalen Verbündeten Unterstützung geholt. Unter anderem wird am Abend US-Vizepräsident JD Vance an einer Wahlkampfveranstaltung in Budapest auftreten. Alle Themen: (00:00) Intro und Schlagzeilen (01:46) Prominente Unterstützung für Ungarns Ministerpräsidenten Orban (06:01) Nachrichtenübersicht (10:52) Angriffe auf Russlands Erdölindustrie: was bezweckt die Ukraine? (18:00) Steigende Öl- und Gaspreise als mögliche Chance für Energiewende (22:30) To Lam ist der mächtigste Mann Vietnams (25:42) Italienischer Botschafter in die Schweiz zurückgekehrt (28:47) Junge sind im Parlament von Riehen überrepräsentiert: wie's kommt (33:58) Über die Anfänge der Landfrauenbewegung in der Schweiz

Lego had its best year ever, launching 2 new sets every day… Thanks to a lesson from sports.Nvidia's Jensen Huang wrote his first blog post in 6 years… to explain AI is like a 5-layer cake.China's Nio is out-innovating Tesla… because it doesn't charge batteries, it swaps ‘em.Plus, it's the End of Athleisure… denim is eating LuluFYI, here's Nvidia blog post: https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/ai-5-layer-cake/ $NIO $MAT $HAS $LULU $NVDABuy tickets to The IPO Tour (our In-Person Offering) TODAYArlington, VA (3/11): https://www.arlingtondrafthouse.com/shows/341317 New York, NY (4/8): https://www.ticketmaster.com/event/0000637AE43ED0C2Los Angeles, CA (6/3): SOLD OUTGet your TBOY Yeti Doll gift here: https://tboypod.com/shop/product/economic-support-yeti-doll NEWSLETTER:https://tboypod.com/newsletter OUR 2ND SHOW:Want more business storytelling from us? Check our weekly deepdive show, The Best Idea Yet: The untold origin story of the products you're obsessed with. Listen for free to The Best Idea Yet: https://wondery.com/links/the-best-idea-yet/NEW LISTENERSFill out our 2 minute survey: https://qualtricsxm88y5r986q.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_dp1FDYiJgt6lHy6GET ON THE POD: Submit a shoutout or fact: https://tboypod.com/shoutouts SOCIALS:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tboypod TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tboypodYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@tboypod Linkedin (Nick): https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolas-martell/Linkedin (Jack): https://www.linkedin.com/in/jack-crivici-kramer/Anything else: https://tboypod.com/ About Us: The daily pop-biz news show making today's top stories your business. Formerly known as Robinhood Snacks, The Best One Yet is hosted by Jack Crivici-Kramer & Nick Martell. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.