Podcasts about Memo

Have you ever dealt with a workplace bully who made you feel invisible, undervalued, or out of place?In this episode, we dive into The Memo by Minda Harts—a powerful guide that shines a light on the realities that women, especially women of color, face in the workplace. Harts shares actionable strategies for navigating bias, breaking through barriers, and demanding the seat at the table you deserve. Her work is both a wake-up call and a blueprint for creating workplace equality, making this conversation essential for anyone committed to building a more inclusive professional world.Learn more about Minda Harts:Minda's Website = https://www.mindaharts.com/Minda's Podcast- Secure The Seat = https://www.mindaharts.com/podcastMinda's latest book - Talk To Me Nice = https://www.mindaharts.com/talktomeniceSign up for Jenn Cassetta's newsletter for a boost of badassery to your inbox and never miss an episode: pages.jennifercassetta.com/newsletter

I am joined by power couple Mikey and Sarah on this episode to put myself on the VZ plank!

AIボイスレコーダー「Notta Memo」をヨドバシカメラで発売　5つのマイクで360度集音。　Nottaは、9月4日にAIボイスレコーダー「Notta Memo」を発売した。価格は2万3500円（税込み）で、ヨドバシカメラ全店舗とECサイト「ヨドバシ・ドット・コム」で取り扱う。

Het leek vandaag af en toe wel Marc Soler tegen de rest van UAE Team Emirates. Maar de 31-jarige Spanjaard hield stand en zorgt ervoor dat zijn team nu de helft van alle etappes in deze Vuelta heeft gewonnen. Hoe kon het dat we Soler in de aanval zagen, terwijl er vanochtend duidelijk gecommuniceerd was dat het vanaf nu alle ballen op João Almeida was bij UAE? Had hij de memo gemist? Niek Goedvolk bespreekt het met Roxane Knetemann en Marijn Abbenhuijs. En wat moeten we met die dominantie van UAE? Is er niet een manier om de talenten wat eerlijker over de ploegen te verdelen? Je hoort het in een nieuwe aflevering van In Het Wiel. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Don't Eat The Beans | Memo Delgadillo by Summit Church Podcast

Pokud vám po létě došla literatura, v knihovnách se objevila řada novinek, které stojí za pozornost. V dopoledním rozhovoru je představila knihkupkyně Jana Kožichová.

Pokud vám po létě došla literatura, v knihovnách se objevila řada novinek, které stojí za pozornost. V dopoledním rozhovoru je představila knihkupkyně Jana Kožichová.Všechny díly podcastu Dobré dopoledne můžete pohodlně poslouchat v mobilní aplikaci mujRozhlas pro Android a iOS nebo na webu mujRozhlas.cz.

Are you doing everything right at work, meeting deadlines, showing up, delivering results, and still feeling stuck? This week, we're welcoming back one of our favorite voices on workplace equity, Minda Harts, to dive into a topic that impacts every professional woman: trust. Trust at work isn't just about your manager believing in you. It's the key to feeling valued, getting promoted, and even building long-term wealth.  ✨ Plus, stick around for a special segment with Armoire CEO Ambika Singh, who shares how fashion rental can cut the cost (and the guilt) of getting dressed. Sign up here for up to 60% off your first month of membership + two free bonus items! In this episode, we discuss: What trust really looks like in a healthy workplace How to rebuild it when it's been broken Why women of color face unique challenges with trust at work Scripts and strategies to help you advocate for yourself And how AI, layoffs, and hybrid work are shifting the trust dynamic

On the podcast I talk with Eric about how measurement dysfunction paralyzes growth, why diversifying channels for the sake of diversification actually hurts performance, and the futility of trying to interpret why ads win.Top Takeaways:

The Justice Department has issued new guidance warning that all federally funded programs must comply with antidiscrimination laws. That means no preferences, no proxies, and no exceptions based on intent. The memo outlines legal risks and best practices for avoiding violations, and it's already raising questions for contractors and grantees. To walk us through what's in the guidance and what it means for compliance, I'm joined by Co-Chair of the Employment + Labor Practice at Morrison Foerster, Andrew Turnbull.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Lara Logan and Natalie Winters at the Gathering of the Eagles this Saturday near Wilsonville: tickets at www.thegatheringoftheeagles.com Politics of cancer: John Richardson Jr interview on what's going with the secret effort to get rid of RFKjr. https://rncstore.com/ The secret memo from BIO spending 2M to get rid of RFKjr: https://revolver.news/2025/09/no-its-not-a-coup-against-rfk-jr-its-a-capture/ Rep Ed Diehl on Kotek's false choice for the ODOT tax increase: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1118708892919270 Dem Sen Gorsek had stroke and won't be able to vote to raise your taxes for two weeks: https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2025/09/oregon-democrats-delay-key-vote-on-transportation-package-for-2-weeks-due-to-gresham-senators-health.html Cascade Policy on ODOT's spending problem, not revenue problem: https://oregoncatalyst.com/90418-spending-solutions-odots-spending-problems.html J6 update: Government's star witness against the Proud Boys recants testimony: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09/massive-closet-playwright-doj-lawyer-drafts-motion-dismiss/  

Gallos buscará convencerlo antes del Mundial 2026La pelea entre Canelo y Crawford no será transmitida en televisión abierta

¿Es posible unir “tus hijos, mis hijos y los nuestros” en una sola familia feliz? En este episodio, Nicole y Memo, junto a Gustavo y Dominique, nos cuentan cómo lograron convertir lo que parecía un reto imposible en una familia ejemplar y moderna.Ellos son la versión real de Yours, Mine & Ours: cada uno llegó con sus hijos, aprendieron a integrar nuevas dinámicas, superar egos y priorizar lo más importante: el amor y la crianza en paz. Aquí descubrirás:• Cómo lograron que todos los hijos se sintieran incluidos y amados.• Las reglas que mantienen la armonía en la casa.• Qué pasa cuando la crianza se comparte entre ex y nuevas parejas.• Y cómo demostraron que sí se puede construir una familia linda, unida y sin drama.Un episodio lleno de risas, confesiones y aprendizajes que te hará creer que los nuevos modelos de familia ¡sí funcionan!THE BESTIES CLUB : TikTok   https://www.tiktok.com/@thebestiesclubpod?lang=enInstagram   https://www.instagram.com/thebesties.club/Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/2eYvfAJl3mwmwyVch5SRo3?si=51fc9c0dbf754ab7Web: https://thebestiesclub.com/YAZ: TikTok   https://www.tiktok.com/@yazyeara?lang=enInstagram https://www.instagram.com/yazyeara

Federico y Santiago González comentan la enésima metedura de pata de Fonsi Loaiza y otros tonnntos patrios que están en el podio una temporada más.

In the case Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (No. 22-cv-10904-JSR), JPMorgan Chase Bank filed a reply memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss certain claims brought against it. The motion was partially successful.The court granted JPMorgan's motion to dismiss claims under the Virgin Islands Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and the Virgin Islands Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Counts II, III, and IV of the Second Amended Complaint). These claims were dismissed because they were unchanged from previous versions that the court had already ruled on.However, the court denied JPMorgan's motion to dismiss the claims related to the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA). The court had previously considered JPMorgan's arguments against these claims in an earlier motion and had rejected them. JPMorgan reasserted these arguments mainly to preserve them for appeal.This ruling represents a partial victory for both sides: while some claims were dismissed, others, particularly those related to the TVPA, will proceed in the litigation.(commercial 8:09)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.56.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Chapters00:00 Introduction to the Inverted Market02:49 Understanding Backwardation and Contango05:24 Implications of the Inverted Market for Roasters08:20 Navigating Challenges in Coffee Sourcing10:46 Strategic Planning for Coffee Businesses13:33 Conclusion and Future Considerations  Part of The Exchange Coffee Podcasting Network TAKE OUR LISTENER SURVEY Visit and Explore Covoya!

https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights/memo/the-calculus-of-value

The U.S. Virgin Islands' Memorandum in Support of Excluding Expert Testimony from JP Morgan was a direct strike at the bank's legal strategy of hiding behind highly paid specialists to sanitize its conduct. The filing argued that JP Morgan's proposed experts weren't there to provide neutral, technical insight—they were being deployed to confuse the jury, shift blame, and whitewash the bank's longstanding financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI pointed out that these experts attempted to dress up common sense issues—like due diligence, suspicious transactions, and regulatory compliance—as matters of complex banking science, when in reality the facts spoke plainly: the bank continued to profit off Epstein long after his 2008 conviction and obvious red flags. In essence, the memorandum framed JP Morgan's “experts” as mouthpieces meant to cloud responsibility, not clarify it.By moving to bar this testimony, the USVI was making a broader argument about accountability. If JP Morgan was allowed to weaponize expert witnesses to downplay its failures, the survivors' pursuit of justice would be buried under jargon and pseudo-objectivity. The memorandum emphasized that letting these experts testify would not only mislead the jury but also distort the purpose of the trial, turning it into a battle of résumés rather than a reckoning with the bank's choices. The USVI's position was clear: the facts don't need interpretation from consultants paid millions to protect a financial giant—they need to be weighed on their own merits. This was an attempt to strip away the camouflage JP Morgan hoped to use, forcing the court to confront the bank's role in sustaining Epstein's trafficking operation without distraction or distortion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.289.0_2.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The U.S. Virgin Islands' Memorandum in Support of Excluding Expert Testimony from JP Morgan was a direct strike at the bank's legal strategy of hiding behind highly paid specialists to sanitize its conduct. The filing argued that JP Morgan's proposed experts weren't there to provide neutral, technical insight—they were being deployed to confuse the jury, shift blame, and whitewash the bank's longstanding financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI pointed out that these experts attempted to dress up common sense issues—like due diligence, suspicious transactions, and regulatory compliance—as matters of complex banking science, when in reality the facts spoke plainly: the bank continued to profit off Epstein long after his 2008 conviction and obvious red flags. In essence, the memorandum framed JP Morgan's “experts” as mouthpieces meant to cloud responsibility, not clarify it.By moving to bar this testimony, the USVI was making a broader argument about accountability. If JP Morgan was allowed to weaponize expert witnesses to downplay its failures, the survivors' pursuit of justice would be buried under jargon and pseudo-objectivity. The memorandum emphasized that letting these experts testify would not only mislead the jury but also distort the purpose of the trial, turning it into a battle of résumés rather than a reckoning with the bank's choices. The USVI's position was clear: the facts don't need interpretation from consultants paid millions to protect a financial giant—they need to be weighed on their own merits. This was an attempt to strip away the camouflage JP Morgan hoped to use, forcing the court to confront the bank's role in sustaining Epstein's trafficking operation without distraction or distortion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.289.0_2.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A business owner alleging that District 1 Councilmember Joy Smith Kimbrough asked him for $500,000 in exchange for her support of a project has filed a formal ethics complaint against Kimbrough. City Cast Nashville contributor Nicole Williams joins host Marie Cecile Anderson and executive producer Whitney Pastorek to explain how that works. Plus: The city removed handmade downtown benches; the race for TN-07 has some front-runners; new reporting on the Tesla tunnels puts Mayor O'Connell in the hot seat; and should buses be free? Learn more about the sponsors of this Aug. 29th episode: Overlook Maps Get more from City Cast Nashville when you become a City Cast Nashville Neighbor. You'll enjoy perks like ad-free listening, invitations to members only events and more. Join now at membership.citycast.fm/nashville   Want some more City Cast Nashville news? Then make sure to sign up for our Hey Nashville newsletter.  Follow us @citycastnashville You can also text us or leave a voicemail at: 615-200-6392 Interested in advertising with City Cast? Find more info HERE.

Pardon? Microsoft, dat 49 procent van de aandelen van OpenAI in handen heeft, is zelf ineens aan het uitvinden geslagen. Het wil een eigen variant van ChatGPT hebben, om zo minder afhankelijk te zijn. Op zijn zachts gezegd een opvallend besluit, aangezien ze al 13 miljard dollar hebben uitgegeven aan de ontwikkeling van ChatGPT. Deze aflevering hebben we het over deze apart stap. Of is het juist een slimme tactiek van Microsoft om zelf te investeren in kunstmatige intelligentie?Bitcoin-bedrijf AMBTS komt ook voorbij. Het wil dolgraag naar de Amsterdamse beurs en lijkt een belangrijke horde daarvoor genomen te hebben. Vraag is alleen of beleggers er op zitten te wachten. NovoNordisk én Nike komen voorbij. Beide hebben het lastig, maar het Deense bedrijf maakt het wel heel bont. De groei van NovoNordisk holt zo terug dat het de hele groeiverwachting van de Deense economie naar beneden trekt. Verder hebben we het over de Fed. Minister Eelco Heinen maakt zich inmiddels zorgen over het 'inbeuken' van Trump op de centrale bank. En we gaan je voorbereiden op een periode zonder kwartaalcijfers. Nu het cijferseizoen zo goed als voorbij is, waar moet je nu op letten?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The U.S. Virgin Islands' Memorandum in Support of Excluding Expert Testimony from JP Morgan was a direct strike at the bank's legal strategy of hiding behind highly paid specialists to sanitize its conduct. The filing argued that JP Morgan's proposed experts weren't there to provide neutral, technical insight—they were being deployed to confuse the jury, shift blame, and whitewash the bank's longstanding financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI pointed out that these experts attempted to dress up common sense issues—like due diligence, suspicious transactions, and regulatory compliance—as matters of complex banking science, when in reality the facts spoke plainly: the bank continued to profit off Epstein long after his 2008 conviction and obvious red flags. In essence, the memorandum framed JP Morgan's “experts” as mouthpieces meant to cloud responsibility, not clarify it.By moving to bar this testimony, the USVI was making a broader argument about accountability. If JP Morgan was allowed to weaponize expert witnesses to downplay its failures, the survivors' pursuit of justice would be buried under jargon and pseudo-objectivity. The memorandum emphasized that letting these experts testify would not only mislead the jury but also distort the purpose of the trial, turning it into a battle of résumés rather than a reckoning with the bank's choices. The USVI's position was clear: the facts don't need interpretation from consultants paid millions to protect a financial giant—they need to be weighed on their own merits. This was an attempt to strip away the camouflage JP Morgan hoped to use, forcing the court to confront the bank's role in sustaining Epstein's trafficking operation without distraction or distortion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.289.0_2.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The U.S. Virgin Islands' Memorandum in Support of Excluding Expert Testimony from JP Morgan was a direct strike at the bank's legal strategy of hiding behind highly paid specialists to sanitize its conduct. The filing argued that JP Morgan's proposed experts weren't there to provide neutral, technical insight—they were being deployed to confuse the jury, shift blame, and whitewash the bank's longstanding financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI pointed out that these experts attempted to dress up common sense issues—like due diligence, suspicious transactions, and regulatory compliance—as matters of complex banking science, when in reality the facts spoke plainly: the bank continued to profit off Epstein long after his 2008 conviction and obvious red flags. In essence, the memorandum framed JP Morgan's “experts” as mouthpieces meant to cloud responsibility, not clarify it.By moving to bar this testimony, the USVI was making a broader argument about accountability. If JP Morgan was allowed to weaponize expert witnesses to downplay its failures, the survivors' pursuit of justice would be buried under jargon and pseudo-objectivity. The memorandum emphasized that letting these experts testify would not only mislead the jury but also distort the purpose of the trial, turning it into a battle of résumés rather than a reckoning with the bank's choices. The USVI's position was clear: the facts don't need interpretation from consultants paid millions to protect a financial giant—they need to be weighed on their own merits. This was an attempt to strip away the camouflage JP Morgan hoped to use, forcing the court to confront the bank's role in sustaining Epstein's trafficking operation without distraction or distortion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.289.0_2.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The U.S. Virgin Islands' Memorandum in Support of Excluding Expert Testimony from JP Morgan was a direct strike at the bank's legal strategy of hiding behind highly paid specialists to sanitize its conduct. The filing argued that JP Morgan's proposed experts weren't there to provide neutral, technical insight—they were being deployed to confuse the jury, shift blame, and whitewash the bank's longstanding financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI pointed out that these experts attempted to dress up common sense issues—like due diligence, suspicious transactions, and regulatory compliance—as matters of complex banking science, when in reality the facts spoke plainly: the bank continued to profit off Epstein long after his 2008 conviction and obvious red flags. In essence, the memorandum framed JP Morgan's “experts” as mouthpieces meant to cloud responsibility, not clarify it.By moving to bar this testimony, the USVI was making a broader argument about accountability. If JP Morgan was allowed to weaponize expert witnesses to downplay its failures, the survivors' pursuit of justice would be buried under jargon and pseudo-objectivity. The memorandum emphasized that letting these experts testify would not only mislead the jury but also distort the purpose of the trial, turning it into a battle of résumés rather than a reckoning with the bank's choices. The USVI's position was clear: the facts don't need interpretation from consultants paid millions to protect a financial giant—they need to be weighed on their own merits. This was an attempt to strip away the camouflage JP Morgan hoped to use, forcing the court to confront the bank's role in sustaining Epstein's trafficking operation without distraction or distortion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.289.0_2.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The U.S. Virgin Islands' Memorandum in Support of Excluding Expert Testimony from JP Morgan was a direct strike at the bank's legal strategy of hiding behind highly paid specialists to sanitize its conduct. The filing argued that JP Morgan's proposed experts weren't there to provide neutral, technical insight—they were being deployed to confuse the jury, shift blame, and whitewash the bank's longstanding financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI pointed out that these experts attempted to dress up common sense issues—like due diligence, suspicious transactions, and regulatory compliance—as matters of complex banking science, when in reality the facts spoke plainly: the bank continued to profit off Epstein long after his 2008 conviction and obvious red flags. In essence, the memorandum framed JP Morgan's “experts” as mouthpieces meant to cloud responsibility, not clarify it.By moving to bar this testimony, the USVI was making a broader argument about accountability. If JP Morgan was allowed to weaponize expert witnesses to downplay its failures, the survivors' pursuit of justice would be buried under jargon and pseudo-objectivity. The memorandum emphasized that letting these experts testify would not only mislead the jury but also distort the purpose of the trial, turning it into a battle of résumés rather than a reckoning with the bank's choices. The USVI's position was clear: the facts don't need interpretation from consultants paid millions to protect a financial giant—they need to be weighed on their own merits. This was an attempt to strip away the camouflage JP Morgan hoped to use, forcing the court to confront the bank's role in sustaining Epstein's trafficking operation without distraction or distortion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.289.0_2.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, Defendant Leon Black's reply memorandum emphasizes his argument for imposing sanctions against Wigdor LLP and Jeanne Christensen, alleging that their conduct in pursuing litigation was improper and abusive. Black contends that the lawsuit filed by Wigdor LLP is frivolous and part of a larger campaign to damage his reputation, relying on baseless allegations that lack factual and legal merit. He asserts that the firm and its attorneys acted in bad faith, leveraging the judicial system as a tool for public relations and personal vendettas. Black underscores his position that the actions taken by Wigdor LLP not only violated ethical obligations but also inflicted significant harm on him, warranting the court's intervention through sanctions.The reply memorandum further argues that Wigdor LLP's tactics amount to malicious litigation designed to intimidate and coerce, undermining the integrity of the legal process. Black urges the court to impose sanctions to deter similar misconduct in the future and to preserve judicial resources. He emphasizes the importance of holding attorneys accountable for their professional conduct to maintain fairness and justice within the legal system. Black's filing includes requests for monetary sanctions and other appropriate remedies, signaling the seriousness of his claims against Wigdor LLP and Christensen.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.65.0.pdf

In the case of Doe v. Black (Case No. 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), Defendant Leon Black filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jane Doe's complaint. Black's legal team argues that Doe's allegations are time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations and fail to meet the necessary legal standards for the claims presented. They assert that the complaint lacks specific factual details to substantiate the accusations, rendering the claims insufficient under federal pleading requirements.Additionally, the defense contends that certain claims are legally deficient, as they do not establish essential elements required for such causes of action. Black's attorneys emphasize that the complaint does not provide adequate grounds to proceed and request the court to dismiss the case in its entirety. The reply memorandum serves to reinforce these points, aiming to persuade the court to rule in favor of dismissal.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.70.0.pdf

In the case of Doe v. Black (Case No. 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), Defendant Leon Black filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jane Doe's complaint. Black's legal team argues that Doe's allegations are time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations and fail to meet the necessary legal standards for the claims presented. They assert that the complaint lacks specific factual details to substantiate the accusations, rendering the claims insufficient under federal pleading requirements.Additionally, the defense contends that certain claims are legally deficient, as they do not establish essential elements required for such causes of action. Black's attorneys emphasize that the complaint does not provide adequate grounds to proceed and request the court to dismiss the case in its entirety. The reply memorandum serves to reinforce these points, aiming to persuade the court to rule in favor of dismissal.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.70.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, Defendant Leon Black's reply memorandum emphasizes his argument for imposing sanctions against Wigdor LLP and Jeanne Christensen, alleging that their conduct in pursuing litigation was improper and abusive. Black contends that the lawsuit filed by Wigdor LLP is frivolous and part of a larger campaign to damage his reputation, relying on baseless allegations that lack factual and legal merit. He asserts that the firm and its attorneys acted in bad faith, leveraging the judicial system as a tool for public relations and personal vendettas. Black underscores his position that the actions taken by Wigdor LLP not only violated ethical obligations but also inflicted significant harm on him, warranting the court's intervention through sanctions.The reply memorandum further argues that Wigdor LLP's tactics amount to malicious litigation designed to intimidate and coerce, undermining the integrity of the legal process. Black urges the court to impose sanctions to deter similar misconduct in the future and to preserve judicial resources. He emphasizes the importance of holding attorneys accountable for their professional conduct to maintain fairness and justice within the legal system. Black's filing includes requests for monetary sanctions and other appropriate remedies, signaling the seriousness of his claims against Wigdor LLP and Christensen.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.65.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

AI Overviews are changing search — but not in the way Google wants you to think.In this episode of the Ahrefs Podcast, Tim Soulo sits down with Kevin Indig to discuss the real impact of AI on search behavior, website traffic, and SEO strategy.Kevin analyzed over 5 billion search visits and found that while people are searching more often, they're spending less time per session — and zero-click searches are on the rise.But this isn't just about traffic.Kevin argues that SEO isn't dying — it's just entering a new investment cycle. The smartest companies are already shifting resources toward AI visibility, building tools, and rethinking how they show up in ChatGPT and beyond.In this episode:(00:00) Intro(02:39) How is search changing?(06:20) Revenue vs traffic(10:30) How AI Overviews are changing(13:46) Join Kevin at Ahrefs Evolve(14:23) How to show up in AI Overviews (and is it even useful?)(20:10) AI Overview volatility(26:02) Queries vs prompts(31:11) External validation: the key to ranking on AI Overviews(35:13) Is SEO dead?(42:50) Ranking in AI Overviews vs ChatGPT(49:18) What you should be optimizing with AI(01:05:42) Vibe coding in action(01:07:21) OutroWe hope you enjoyed this episode of the Ahrefs Podcast!Be sure to like, subscribe — and tell a friend.Where to find Kevin:LinkedIn: Kevin IndigX: @Kevin_IndigWebsite: mkt1.coWhere to find Tim:LinkedIn: Tim SouloX: @timsouloWebsite: timsoulo.comReferenced in this episode

In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, Defendant Leon Black's reply memorandum emphasizes his argument for imposing sanctions against Wigdor LLP and Jeanne Christensen, alleging that their conduct in pursuing litigation was improper and abusive. Black contends that the lawsuit filed by Wigdor LLP is frivolous and part of a larger campaign to damage his reputation, relying on baseless allegations that lack factual and legal merit. He asserts that the firm and its attorneys acted in bad faith, leveraging the judicial system as a tool for public relations and personal vendettas. Black underscores his position that the actions taken by Wigdor LLP not only violated ethical obligations but also inflicted significant harm on him, warranting the court's intervention through sanctions.The reply memorandum further argues that Wigdor LLP's tactics amount to malicious litigation designed to intimidate and coerce, undermining the integrity of the legal process. Black urges the court to impose sanctions to deter similar misconduct in the future and to preserve judicial resources. He emphasizes the importance of holding attorneys accountable for their professional conduct to maintain fairness and justice within the legal system. Black's filing includes requests for monetary sanctions and other appropriate remedies, signaling the seriousness of his claims against Wigdor LLP and Christensen.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.65.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case of Doe v. Black (Case No. 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), Defendant Leon Black filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jane Doe's complaint. Black's legal team argues that Doe's allegations are time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations and fail to meet the necessary legal standards for the claims presented. They assert that the complaint lacks specific factual details to substantiate the accusations, rendering the claims insufficient under federal pleading requirements.Additionally, the defense contends that certain claims are legally deficient, as they do not establish essential elements required for such causes of action. Black's attorneys emphasize that the complaint does not provide adequate grounds to proceed and request the court to dismiss the case in its entirety. The reply memorandum serves to reinforce these points, aiming to persuade the court to rule in favor of dismissal.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.70.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

P-Bush, Sean, and Zhu discuss the NFC, including division winners and wildcards!(4:06) NFC South discussion(19:30) The NFC North will be FASCINATING! (43:00) Rest of the Divisions(53:15) Memo to Washington: PAY TERRY!Intro/Outro: Music by DayFox from PixabayLISTEN/WATCH US BELOW:INSTAGRAM:https://www.instagram.com/tysontalks_/SPOTIFY:https://open.spotify.com/show/36vLQowQ6rG6BanA5R9RuzAPPLE PODCASTS:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/tyson-talks-presents-the-pick-and-dimes-podcast/id1540644830TIKTOK:https://www.tiktok.com/@tysontalks_

Tenemos gente querida en casaaaa (Dominique & Memo), una pareja hermosa que entre ellos han colaborado uno con otro en sus carreras, una como productora y el otro como actor y cantante. Vemos en redes como ha sido el trato entre familias y justo de eso ellos nos vienen a contar. Incluso, de como ellos en una semana montaron boda

Thanks for listening to Arc 6! Hear from Jassifer about what's NEXT for Try Not To Die. Fetch is fine btw we got him ice cream on the way home

A new memo from the Office of Personnel Management claims to protect religious expression in the federal workplace, but it explicitly permits proselytizing, allowing federal employees to attempt to convert coworkers. While it insists these efforts "must not be harassing," the practical reality of defining and reporting harassment—especially when your boss is involved—is a bureaucratic nightmare. This performative stance suggests a solution to a non-existent problem, as religious speech was already permitted. The memo's real aim appears to be to champion specific religious overreach, carving out special protections for "religious beliefs" while conveniently ignoring other deeply held "social, political, or economic philosophies." It's a transparent, and frankly, unnecessary move for a progressive, secular audience.News Source:New memo lets government workers push Christianity on colleagues even if they're the bossBy Hemant Mehta for The Friendly AtheistJuly 28, 2025

WMAL GUEST: PETER SCHWEIZER (Author & President of the Government Accountability Institute) WEBSITE: PeterSchweizer.com SOCIAL MEDIA: X.com/PeterSchweizer Where to find more about WMAL's morning show: Follow Podcasts on Apple, Audible and Spotify Follow WMAL's "O'Connor and Company" on X: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor, @JGunlock, @PatricePinkfile, and @HeatherHunterDC Facebook: WMALDC and Larry O'Connor Instagram: WMALDC Website: WMAL.com/OConnor-Company Episode: Monday, August 18, 2025 / 8 AM HourSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Steve Forbes explains why having a strong dollar is crucial for keeping the U.S. the most powerful nation in the world, and warns that those taken in by the siren call of a "weak dollar" are stoking real dangers.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Rebel News podcasts features free audio-only versions of select RebelNews+ content and other Rebel News long-form videos, livestreams, and interviews. Monday to Friday enjoy the audio version of Ezra Levant's daily TV-style show, The Ezra Levant Show, where Ezra gives you his contrarian and conservative take on free speech, politics, and foreign policy through in-depth commentary and interviews. Wednesday evenings you can listen to the audio version of The Gunn Show with Sheila Gunn Reid the Chief Reporter of Rebel News. Sheila brings a western sensibility to Canadian news. With one foot in the oil patch and one foot in agriculture, Sheila challenges mainstream media narratives and stands up for Albertans. If you want to watch the video versions of these podcasts, make sure to begin your free RebelNewsPlus trial by subscribing at http://www.RebelNewsPlus.com

TakeawaysThe coffee market is unpredictable and requires constant scenario planning.Recent cold weather in Brazil had minimal impact on overall crop size.Demand for coffee remains strong despite market fluctuations.Supply and demand dynamics are crucial in determining coffee prices.Tariffs and regulations are reshaping global coffee trade patterns.The EUDR will complicate coffee imports from Africa to Europe.China's increased authorization of Brazilian exporters could shift trade flows.Roasters are currently facing challenges in sourcing coffee.Understanding the global coffee supply chain is essential for businesses.Strategic planning is vital for navigating market uncertainties.   Part of The Exchange Coffee Podcasting Network TAKE OUR LISTENER SURVEY Visit and Explore Covoya!

New guidance from Attorney General Bondi urges federal funding recipients to reassess DEI programs to ensure compliance with anti-discrimination laws. This memo highlights actions deemed “unlawful DEI,” including race-based scholarships, preferential hiring, and misapplied “neutral” criteria. What This Means for Employers: Federal consequences: Noncompliance risks include funding revocation or False Claims Act liability. Beyond federal funding: Private employers should also review DEI policies for legal risks. Focused best practices: Ensure inclusive environments, prioritize skills and qualifications, and eliminate demographic-driven criteria. Epstein Becker Green's Lauri Rasnick unpacks these developments in this week's Employment Law This Week®. Visit our site for this week's Other Highlights and links: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw400 Subscribe to #WorkforceWednesday: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw-subscribe Visit http://www.EmploymentLawThisWeek.com Download our Wage & Hour Guide for Employers app: https://www.ebglaw.com/wage-hour-guide-for-employers-app. This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Story of the Week (DR):Trump Demands Intel CEO's Resignation, Says He's ‘Highly CONFLICTED' AND Eric and Donald Trump Jr. to Own Millions of Shares in New U.S. Manufacturing SPAC MMESG Analyst Tom Cotton: Trump's attack, posted on Truth Social Thursday, came two days after GOP Sen. Tom Cotton flagged Tan's prior investments in Chinese companies and his previous leadership at Cadence Design Systems, which recently pleaded guilty to unlawfully selling its tech to a blacklisted military university in China.Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan (~$70M golden hello in March; max potential $400M) directly addressed employees on Thursday after Donald Trump demanded his resignation over national security concerns, saying he has the full support of the board.Tan set up a venture firm called Walden International based in San Francisco that pumped more than $5 billion into over 600 companies. More than 100 of those investments were made in China, including deals with once-obscure startups such as Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp.—today China's largest chipmaker—where he served on the board for a decade and a half.Today, the executive is still chairman of Walden International. And he's the founding managing partner at Walden Catalyst Ventures, which focuses on investments in the U.S., Europe and Israel. He also serves in that role at another venture fund, Celesta Global Capital.Tan stepped out of the venture world and joined the chip industry full-time when he became interim head of San Jose, California-based Cadence Design Systems Inc. in 2008. The executive, who had previously served on the board, went on to take the permanent CEO job the next year. He stayed in the role until 2021, when he transitioned to executive chairman, and is widely credited with restoring the company's fortunes. In late July of this year, the Department of Justice announced a plea deal that cost Cadence more than $100 million in fines. Employees at Cadence's China unit allegedly hid the name of a customer—the National University of Defense Technology—from internal compliance in order to keep supplying it. That organization had been put on the Department of Commerce's blacklist in 2015. The Chinese university was one of a group of supercomputer operators there that had conducted simulations of nuclear explosions, the DOJ said.Shares of American Eagle surge 20% after Trump calls Sydney Sweeney campaign 'hottest ad out there' AND Epstein victims are a growing political threat to TrumpThe Fall 2025 campaign, titled "Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans," centers on a deliberate pun between "jeans" and "genes.""Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color... My jeans are blue."All the hallmarks of a dick-tatorship:American Eagle gender influence gap is -36%: Jay L. SchottensteinMr. Schottenstein has served as our Chief Executive Officer since December 2015. Prior thereto, he served as our Interim Chief Executive Officer from January 2014 to December 2015. He has served as Chairman of the Board since March 1992. He previously served the Company as Chief Executive Officer from March 1992 until December 2002 and as a Vice President and Director of the Company's predecessors since 1980Creepy nepobaby son: The grown son of an Ohio billionaire is a hooker-loving drug addict who threatened to destroy the renowned Manhattan psychiatrist his parents enlisted to help him, according to bombshell court papers. Dr. Paul Conti, a Stanford-educated psychiatrist from Oregon, alleges in a federal suit that the son also gambled away millions of dollars during trips to Las Vegas while running up credit bills and borrowing money from mobsters.SB360 Capital Partners: owned by Jay and his 3 sons (sorry wife): 13 listed executes: all white menlast time there was a vote on Jay (2023)CEO/Chair control: has been CEO 3 times; chair since 1992; $300k security; 2,011:1 ceo pay ratio; 7% of shares (passive BlackRock/Vanguard/Dimensional/Wellington: 41%; 71% board influenceAudit Committee Chair (which net 20 times last year) and Lead independent Director Noel Spiegel is 77 and over a decade of serviceNominating chair Janice Page is 76 and has served for over 2 decadesCompensation Committee chair has served for nearly 2 decadesUber's Sexual Assault Problem AND Uber beats on revenue, announces $20 billion stock buybackA recent New York Times investigation revealed that Uber has been dealing with a significant sexual assault problem. From 2017 to 2022, the company received over 400,000 reports of sexual assault or misconduct in the United States, which averages to about one incident every eight minutes.The investigation, based on thousands of internal documents, found that while Uber studied the issue and even developed potential safety features like in-car cameras and a feature to match female drivers with female passengers, the company chose not to implement these safeguards because they were concerned about their bottom line and potential lawsuits.Tesla Grants Musk $29 Billion in Stock to Keep ‘Elon's Energies Focused' AND Elon Musk Accused of Stiffing Small Businesses for Millions of Dollars, Causing Some to File for Bankruptcy AND Elon Musk Shares Shockingly Sexist Tweet About Woman Being Property. This one's disgraceful, even for Musk AND "This Will Open the Floodgates": Tesla In Trouble as Jury Orders It to Pay $329 Million After Autopilot Death AND Tesla withheld data, lied, and misdirected police and plaintiffs to avoid blame in Autopilot crash AND Elon Musk Appears to Now Be the Most Hated Person in America, According to New ResearchGoodliest of the Week (MM/DR):DR: Waste from Ben & Jerry's ice cream factories is now powering the Vermont gridNow that the ice cream waste can travel by pipe to become biogas, Ben & Jerry's can also make 600 fewer truck journeys a year, reducing the company's carbon emissions.DR: Gates Foundation is giving $2.5 billion to fund women's health research MM: Musk, Bezos, and Zuck are going full alpha male. America's girlbosses are fed up.When companies won't offer work-from-home policies or the flexibility that working parents need, it can embolden people to become more entrepreneurial and build under their own terms.This is the greatest backlash - if every woman in a “masculine default”, “founder mode” 13 year old man baby culture where “Jamie Dimon says” and John Stankey (see assholiest) says “maybe you don't fit” goes and founds there own firms, I'm giddy to see them wipe the floor with those smug billionaire assholes. Side note - I missed this quote from January FT article in the post-Zuck-on-Rogan “masculine energy” interview, but it would have been assholiest of the decade:“I feel liberated,” said a top banker. “We can say ‘retard' and ‘pussy' without the fear of getting cancelled . . . it's a new dawn.”MM: In that vein - A long-running anti-DEI lawsuit could help companies defend themselves from reverse-racism claims DR MMHello Alice as goodliest of the week - take down that fucknut Stephen Miller and his fake Nazi manboys.Assholiest of the Week (MM):Alex Karp and the men who go to elite universities and say elite universities are bullshit manbabiesPalantir CEO says working at his $430 billion software company is better than a degree from Harvard or Yale: ‘No one cares about the other stuff'Karp went to Haverford, then Stanford for a JD where he met Peter Thiel (who also doesn't like elite education)This past spring, the company also notably established the Meritocracy Fellowship, a four-month, paid internship for high school graduates who may be having second thoughts about higher education. Program admission is solely based on “merit and academic excellence,” but applicants still need Ivy League-level test scores to qualify. This includes at least a 1460 on the SAT or a 33 on the ACT, which are both above their respective 98th percentiles.According to Karp, the internship was created in direct response to the “shortcomings of university admissions.”Here's the problem: there ARE shortcomings to elite colleges, mostly that they exude exclusivism and a commodity - but it's still a pretty rich for a guy who WENT to Stanford where he met his future funder and mentor to talk about how bullshit it wasJohn Stankey and the re-rise of the Jack Welch man-directive manbabies MMIt is incredibly encouraging that 73% of our employees took the time to respond to the survey, with 79% of those respondents feeling committed and engaged with their work at AT&T. While this is reassuring, especially considering the amount of change we've navigated as a company recently, it wasn't a surprise to me that we fell short of our engagement goal.TRANSLATION: I'm not surprised so many of you think we suck, I've been here 5 years as CEO and I'm not awesome at my job… but hold your breath while I tell you how it's your faultThis note may also help you identify areas where your professional expectations might be misaligned with the strategic direction of this company.TRANSLATION: It's your faultI understand that some of you may have started your tour with this company expecting an "employment deal" rooted in loyalty, tenure, and conformance with the associated compensation, work structure, and benefits. We have consciously shifted away from some of these elements and towards a more market-based culture — focused on rewarding capability, contribution, and commitment.TRANSLATION: Fuck your job, this is a meritocracy now. A manly meritocracy.I understand that many may find the demands of your daily lives challenging and difficult. Elder care, job stress, child rearing challenges, economic uncertainty, community unrest, technology anxiety — the list can get long…We run a dynamic, customer-facing business, tackling large-scale, challenging initiatives. If the requirements dictated by this dynamic do not align to your personal desires, you have every right to find a career opportunity that is suitable to your aspirations and needs. That said, if a self-directed, virtual, or hybrid work schedule is essential for you to manage your career aspirations and life challenges, you will have a difficult time aligning your priorities with those of the company and the culture we aim to establish.TRANSLATION: We know your life is hard, but shut the fuck up about it because I don't care.WHERE THE FUCK IS THIS BOARD?Here are the “go hard or go home” board membersBill Kennard, lead "independent" director connected in 13 loops to other directors, been there for 11 years, who got his undergrad in communications from Stanford and worked at the FCC and was an ambassador - proving once again that “communications” isn't a qualification for communicating?Marissa Mayer - maybe this business thing isn't for you? Mike Mcallister, ex Humana CEO, who was investigated for duping elderly into thinking Obamacare's passage would cut Medicare?Scott Ford, who lead the biggest landline company before pivoting to selling coffee, as your bright star into the future of tech?That's where the board is - unqualified for the moment, highly interconnected, with long careers of average performanceLuis von Ahn and the tech bro “sorry, not sorry” we were just “being edgy” no but seriously I know what's best for you secretly manbabiesDuolingo's CEO says he learned a hard lesson about 'edgy posts' and going viralFirst, says Duolingo, the app for learning languages, would be “AI-first”Then says they're not hiring anymore as long as it can be done by AIThen says schools will really just be childcare with AI teachers, and teachers will just “take care of the children” and you need schools for the “childcare”In his apology, he said sorry for being “edgy”Yes, it was the edginess, not the assholeryIf you want to quickly identify a manbaby, it's easy: first they “say” something they really think, then their apology basically is “sorry you didn't get it, I won't say it again”Headliniest of the WeekDR: Shareholders Judge Directors by Their Faces, Study FindsMM: Trump calls for Intel CEO to 'resign immediately'More ESG analysis:Boeing's ex-CFOBlackRock's ex founderThe former CEO at Jack Dorsey's SquareA partner at SequoiaA Princeton professorThe former CEO of HPThe chair who's a VC and has been there since 2009Who Won the Week?DR: Boston Mayor Michelle Wu for calling out the billionaire Kraft family regarding the new stadium proposed for the New England Revolution: “We haven't asked for anything out of the ordinary for any significant development, much less a mega-development like this one … To this day, the Kraft Group has provided the city no meaningful technical information … What we've heard has stayed at a conceptual level that is insufficient for any serious negotiation.Citing the proposed figure of $750,000 that the Kraft Group would pay to Boston as a mitigation fee, Wu said, “It is an unserious proposal … the figure is “just 1.1 percent of the $68 million mitigation package that was paid for the Everett casino project right nearby years ago.”Wu, who as the incumbent is also campaigning against Josh Kraft (son of Revolution owner Robert Kraft) in Boston's mayoral race, didn't miss a chance to land a political dig at her opponent: Referencing the proposed mitigation fee, she said that “$750,000 is just one-and-a-half month's of a billionaire son's allowance. It is nowhere near the scale of what we need to address the plans that have already been laid out by our residents, with our traffic engineers, with the coordination of the entire region.”MM: Jamie Smith at EY for writing the only other 2025 US proxy review that included a whole section on director votesPredictionsDR: Trump tries to fit into a pair of Sydney Sweeney's jeans (re: the OJ glove) to prove he did not know Epstein. The American Eagle stock surgesMM: Duolingo releases a new language choice, “Manbro”, in which it teaches how to apologize, how to be more intense, and why you should bow to your AI overlords

ALGUNA VEZ FUE LA VOZ QUE MARCÓ TU INFANCIA… PERO HOY, ES UN NOMBRE QUE MUCHOS PREFIEREN OLVIDAR. MEMO APONTE LO TENÍA TODO: FAMA, DINERO, Y EL RESPALDO DE DISNEY… HASTA QUE TODO SE VINO ABAJO. UN ESCÁNDALO TRAS OTRO LO ALEJÓ DE LOS ESTUDIOS, LAS CÁMARAS Y SU PROPIA VIDA. ¿QUÉ FUE TAN GRAVE COMO PARA QUE DISNEY LO CANCELARA PARA SIEMPRE? HOY TE CUENTO SU HISTORIA, SOLO AQUÍ

In this jaw-dropping segment, the entire Russia collusion narrative is flipped on its head. Documents meant to be destroyed in FBI burn bags—but miraculously preserved—reveal a truth more shocking than fiction: it was Russia that hacked the Open Society Foundation, not the DNC, and what they found was a confessional memo detailing how Hillary Clinton's campaign fabricated the Trump-Russia hoax from the start. The memo, written by a Soros Foundation official, exposes coordination between the Clinton campaign, the DNC, and FBI-tied cybersecurity firms like CrowdStrike to manufacture a narrative—explicitly due to a “lack of direct evidence.” The hoax was not only approved by Clinton herself, it was planned as a long-term operation to demonize Trump and Putin. Despite subpoenas, this information was hidden from Congress and buried by the intelligence community. Devin Nunes now confirms key emails were withheld from investigators, leaving the public and even the courts in the dark. The consequences? A presidency undermined, lives ruined, and a media still refusing to report the truth.

Steve lays out why Missouri Republican Senator Josh Hawley's proposed legislation to provide every American with a "tariff rebate" check is a terrible idea on several levels. Then, Steve lays out why attempts to replace one racial idolatry with another is doomed to fail. In Hour Two, the team plays a game of Buy, Sell, or Hold. Daniel Horowitz joins the show for his weekly message of woe and lamentation. TODAY'S SPONSORS: JASE MEDICAL: https://jasemedical.com/ and enter code “DEACE” at checkout for a discount on your order PATRIOT MOBILE: https://patriotmobile.com/STEVE or call 972-PATRIOT for your FREE MONTH of service CONSTITUTION WEALTH MANAGEMENT: https://constitutionwealth.com/Blaze Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Podcasting 2.0 July 25th 2025 Episode 228: "Tokenless" Adam & Dave are back from their break and solve all the world's media problems with HLS and L402! ShowNotes We are LIT Freedom! Memo to self - water softener History Timeline | CPB Signed up for PCM August 19th 1:30pm Exclusive episodes on the RSS feed: · Podcastindex-org/podcast-namespace · Discussion #726 · GitHub Freemium HLS Streaming: The Future of Video Podcasts in RSS FUNDING! Fountain pure V4V Fiat Hosting Companies - Funding, LIT , Podroll, PodPing This week in Vibe Coding - TWIV ------------------------------------- MKUltra chat Transcript Search What is Value4Value? - Read all about it at Value4Value.info V4V Stats Last Modified 07/25/2025 14:20:51 by Freedom Controller

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt slams a proposed immigration bill backed by a Republican congresswoman, making clear the White House will not support any form of amnesty. Radical NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani receives a frosty reception in Washington, with some top Democrats avoiding public support amid concerns over antisemitism and far-left policies. Investigative journalist Margot Cleveland unveils a leaked memo exposing anti-Trump bias among top federal judges, including DC Chief Judge James Boasberg.Herald Group: Learn more at https://GuardYourCard.comLean: Visit https://TakeLean.com & use code MK20 for 20% off 

The Trump DOJ and FBI quietly close the Epstein case with no new charges and claiming there never was an Epstein list, contradicting what administration officials have previously said was coming. The death toll rises to 89 in Central Texas flooding, including 27 girls and staff at Camp Mystic, as rescue crews continue searching for the missing. A leaked April 2024 memo shows Biden's senior advisors urging him to debate Trump early, months before his disastrous June performance. Border Czar Tom Homan vows to send ICE into New York City after mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani promises to block federal immigration enforcement.Done with Debt: https://www.DoneWithDebt.comRiverbend Ranch: Visit https://riverbendranch.com/ | Use promo code MEGYN for $20 off your first order.