Podcasts about panel ii

On Tuesday, July 23, 2024, at 3:15 p.m., in Room 1334 Longworth House Office Building, the Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations and the Committee on Education and the Workforce, Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development will hold a joint oversight hearing titled “Investigating how the Biden Administration Ignored Cries for Help from Students at Haskell Indian Nations University.” Witness List Panel One The Honorable Bryan Newland Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. Mr. Matthew Elliott Assistant Inspector General for Investigations Office of Inspector General Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. Panel Two Dr. Ronald J. Graham Former President Haskell Indian Nations University Lawrence, Kansas Ms. Emily Martin Chief Program Officer National Women's Law Center Washington, D.C. Mr. Clay J. Mayes III Former Head Coach, Track and Field; Cross Country Haskell Athletic Department Haskell Indian Nations University Lawrence, Kansas More Info: https://indianz.com/News/2024/07/22/investigating-how-the-biden-administration-ignored-cries-for-help-from-students-at-haskell-indian-nations-university/

On Tuesday, July 23, 2024, at 10:15 a.m. in Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries will hold a legislative hearing on the following bills: H.R.1304, the Rio San José and Rio Jemez Water Settlements Act of 2023 H.R.3977, the Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project Amendments Act of 2023 H.R.6599, the Technical Corrections to the Northwestern New Mexico Rural Water Projects Act, Taos Pueblo Indian Water Rights Settlement Act, and Aamodt Litigation Settlement Act H.R.7240, the Fort Belknap Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Act of 2024 H.R.8685, the Ohkay Owingeh Rio Chama Water Rights Settlement Act of 2024 H.R.8791, the Fort Belknap Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Act of 2024 H.R.8920, the Tule River Tribe Reserved Water Rights Settlement Act of 2024 H.R.8940, the Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement Act of 2024 H.R.8945, the Navajo Nation Rio San José Stream System Water Rights Settlement Act of 2024 H.R.8949, the Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2024 H.R.8951, the Zuni Indian Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2024 H.R.8953, the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2024 Witness List Panel I Members of Congress TBD Panel II – (H.R.7240, H.R.8685, H.R.8791, H.R.8920, H.R.8951, and H.R.8953) The Hon. Bryan Newland (all bills) Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs Department of the Interior Washington, DC The Hon. Jeffery Stiffram (H.R.8791) President Fort Belknap Indian Community Harlem, Montana The Hon. Frank White Clay (H.R.8953) Chairman Crow Tribe of Indians Crow Agency, Montana The Hon. Lester Shine Nieto (H.R.8920) Vice Chairman Tule River Indian Tribe of California Porterville, California The Hon. Larry Phillips, Jr. (H.R.8685) [Minority Witness] Governor Ohkay Owingeh Pueblo Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico The Hon. Arden Kucate (H.R.8951) [Minority Witness] Governor Pueblo of Zuni Zuni, New Mexico Mr. Marko Manoukian (H.R.7240) Co-Chair St. Mary Rehabilitation Working Group Malta, Montana Panel III – (H.R.1304, H.R.3977, H.R.6599, H.R.8940, H.R.8945, and H.R.8949) Mr. David Palumbo (all bills) Deputy Commissioner of Operations Bureau of Reclamation Department of the Interior, Washington, DC The Hon. Craig Andrews (H.R.8940) Vice Chairman Hopi Tribe Kykotsmovi, Arizona The Hon. Tanya Lewis (H.R.8949) Chairwoman Yavapai-Apache Nation Upper Verde Valley, Arizona The Hon. Buu Nygren (H.R.3977, H.R.6599, H.R.8940, and H.R.8945) [Minority Witness] President Navajo Nation Window Rock, Arizona The Hon. Fred Romero (H.R.6599) [Minority Witness] Governor Pueblo of Taos Taos, New Mexico The Hon. Randall Vicente (H.R.1304) [Minority Witness] Governor, Pueblo of Acoma Acoma, New Mexico Committee Notice: https://naturalresources.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=416293

Cato's annual Constitution Day symposium marks the day in 1787 that the Constitutional Convention finished drafting the U.S. Constitution. We celebrate that event each year with the release of the new issue of the Cato Supreme Court Review and with a day‐​long symposium featuring noted scholars discussing the recently concluded Supreme Court term and the important cases coming up. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

With conflict rising across the globe and a presidential election this year, the United States is positioned to reevaluate its foreign policy approach to current and future challenges. This panel will examine the role the US should play in global affairs. What should American engagement look like today? This discussion will explore whether the US should recalibrate its grand strategy to effectively address emerging conflicts, technological advancements, and global threats.By evaluating past strategies and envisioning future directions, the panel aims to offer insights and opinions on the future of US foreign policy in the 21st century.Featuring: Lt. General (Ret.) Keith Kellogg, Co-Chair, Center for American SecurityDr. Kori Schake, Director of Foreign and Defense Policy Studies, American Enterprise InstituteMatthew R. A. Heiman, Chief Legal & Administrative Officer, Waystar Health

Many critics of modern administrative law want a world where Congress does more things, and the executive does less—which would lead to relative stability across administrations. Simultaneously, many also want their vote in presidential elections to have meaningful policy consequences. Between these two competing intuitions lies a tension at the heart of much contemporary political strife, which, of course, has a great deal to do with who controls Congress and who controls the White House.Featuring:Prof. Julian Davis Mortenson, James G. Phillipp Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law SchoolEli Nachmany, Associate, Covington & Burling LLPProf. Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Professor of Law and Joseph Lipsett Scholar, Boston University School of LawProf. Christopher J. Walker, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law SchoolModerator: Hon. Jennifer Walker Elrod, Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Federal Lands Legislative Hearing on Discussion Draft of H.R. ___ (Rep. Westerman),To expedite under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and improve forest management activities on National Forest System lands, on public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, and on Tribal lands to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands, and for other purposes | Federal Lands Subcommittee Wednesday, April 17, 2024 | 10:00 AM On Wednesday, April 17, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Subcommittee on Federal Lands will hold a legislative hearing on the following bill: Discussion Draft of H.R. ___ (Rep. Westerman), To expedite under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and improve forest management activities on National Forest System lands, on public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, and on Tribal lands to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands, and for other purposes. Witnesses Panel I (Administration Officials): Mr. Chris French Deputy Chief of the National Forest System U.S. Forest Service Washington, D.C. Panel II (Outside Experts): Mr. Cody Desautel President Intertribal Timber Council, & Executive Director Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation Nespelem, Washington Ms. Hannah Downey Policy Director Property and Environment Research Center Bozeman, Montana Mr. Jim Parma Eastern Fiber Manager Bell Lumber and Pole New Brighton, Minnesota Dr. Kimiko Barrett Wildfire Research and Policy Lead Headwaters Economics Bozeman, Montana [Minority Witness] Committee Notice: https://naturalresources.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=415848

The citizen-initiative process allows the People of Florida to propose amendments to the state constitution, subject to Supreme Court review. But what is the appropriate scope of judicial review of such ballot initiatives? Does the single-subject rule enable outcome-driven judicial decision-making? This panel will discuss these questions and others in the context of the Adult Personal Use of Marijuana and the Amendment to Limit Government Interference with Abortion initiatives.Featuring:Daniel Bell, Chief Deputy Solicitor General, Office of Florida Attorney GeneralAnastasia Boden, Director, Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies, Cato InstituteHon. Alan Lawson, Shareholder, Lawson Huck Gonzalez PLLCProf. Jonathan Marshfield, Associate Professor of Law, University of Florida Levin College of LawModerator: Hon. Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe, Judge, Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida

No one maintains that the Court has always and forever been originalist in its orientation. By any definition of "originalism," there is a vast body of case law that does not conform to it.How do and should modern originalists - and here one might specifically include lower-court judges who consider themselves originalist - handle this case law? Do non-originalist precedents count for nothing, no matter the expectations built upon them? If they count, how much do they count? Given the interconnectedness of the Constitution's provisions and structure, does it make sense to be "originalist" in some respects and some contexts but not others? Does originalism itself provide means to answer, or even address, these questions or does one necessarily have to step outside originalism to establish its relationship to precedent?Featuring:Prof. Tara Leigh Grove, Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law, University of Texas at Austin School of LawProf. Randy Kozel, Fritz Duda Family Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame Law SchoolProf. Gary Lawson, William Fairfield Warren Distinguished Professor, Boston University School of LawProf. John O. McGinnis, George C. Dix Professor in Constitutional Law, Northwestern University Pritzker School of LawModerator: Hon. William H. Pryor Jr., United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh CircuitOverflow: Chinese Room

House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Securing Our Border, Saving Our National Parks Wednesday, October 18, 2023 | 3:00 PM NOTE: POSTPONED UNTIL 3:00 PM on October 18, 2023 On Wednesday, October 18, 2023, at 2:00 p.m., in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will hold an oversight hearing titled "Securing Our Border, Saving Our National Parks." Witnesses and Testimony PANEL I Mr. Michael Reynolds Deputy Director National Park Service DOI Washington, DC Mr. Chris French Deputy Chief National Forest System USDA Forest Service Washington, DC PANEL II • Ms. Julie Axelrod Director of Litigation Center for Immigration Studies Alexandria, Virginia Lt. John Nores Jr. (ret.) Special Operations Marijuana Enforcement Team California Department of Fish and Wildlife Morgan Hill, California The Hon. Verlon M. Jose Chairman Tohono O'odham Nation Sells, Arizona [Minority witness] Committee Notice: https://naturalresources.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=414953

House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Securing Our Border, Saving Our National Parks Wednesday, October 18, 2023 | 3:00 PM NOTE: POSTPONED UNTIL 3:00 PM on October 18, 2023 On Wednesday, October 18, 2023, at 2:00 p.m., in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will hold an oversight hearing titled "Securing Our Border, Saving Our National Parks." Witnesses and Testimony PANEL I Mr. Michael Reynolds Deputy Director National Park Service DOI Washington, DC Mr. Chris French Deputy Chief National Forest System USDA Forest Service Washington, DC PANEL II • Ms. Julie Axelrod Director of Litigation Center for Immigration Studies Alexandria, Virginia Lt. John Nores Jr. (ret.) Special Operations Marijuana Enforcement Team California Department of Fish and Wildlife Morgan Hill, California The Hon. Verlon M. Jose Chairman Tohono O'odham Nation Sells, Arizona [Minority witness] Committee Notice: https://naturalresources.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=414953

Convened by Ahmad Greene-Hayes, Assistant Professor of African American Religious Studies at HDS, this colloquium bridged connections between the critical study of Black religion and studies of race, gender, and sexuality in critical theory and philosophy, among many other fields. The aim of this gathering was to support research and sustained dialogue about the ways in which religion and race are co-constitutive and function as governing categories of analysis at the helm of both religious studies and Black studies, respectively. This panel discussion featured Joy James (Williams College), Keri Day (Princeton Theological Seminary), and Paul Anthony Daniels (Fordham University). This event took place on October 5, 2023. For more information: https://hds.harvard.edu/ Transcript forthcoming.

Featuring:Zack Smith, Legal Fellow and Manager, Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy Program, Meese Center, The Heritage FoundationHenry Whitaker, Solicitor General, FloridaModerator, Hon. Raag Singhal, Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Reinventing Destiny - Panel II by Institute of Policy Studies

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds a legislative hearing on S.1003, the. Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement Amendments of 2005 The hearing took place on July 21, 2005, during the 109th Congress. WITNESS LIST Panel I MR. CHRISTOPHER J. BAVASI, Executive Director, The Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, Flagstaff, Arizona MR. WILLIAM P. RAGSDALE, Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Panel II THE HONORABLE WAYNE TAYLOR, JR., Tribal Chairman, The Hopi Tribe, Kykotsmovi, Arizona THE HONORABLE JOE SHIRLEY, JR., President, The Navajo Nation, Window Rock, Arizona MR. ROMAN BITSUIE, Executive Director, The Navajo-Hopi Land Commission Office, Window Rock, Arizona More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2005/07/21/senate_hearing_8.asp

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds an oversight hearing on the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The hearing took place on July 28, 2005, during the 109th Congress. Witness List: Panel I MR. PAUL HOFFMAN, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Panel II MR. PAUL BENDER, Professor of Law, Arizona State University College of Law, Tempe, Arizona MR. WALTER R. ECHO-HAWK, SR., Senior Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, Colorado MS. PATRICIA M. LAMBERT, American Association of Physical Anthropologist, Utah State University, Logan, Utah MS. PAULA BARRAN, Attorney, Barran and Leibman, LLP, Portland, Oregon Accompanied by: MR. ALAN L. SCHNEIDER, Director, Friends of America's Past, Portland, Oregon PROFESSOR KEITH W. KINTIGH, Society for American Archaeology, Tempe, Arizona MR. VAN HORN DIAMOND, Honolulu, Hawaii

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds an oversight hearing on the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The hearing took place on July 28, 2005, during the 109th Congress. Witness List: Panel I MR. PAUL HOFFMAN, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Panel II MR. PAUL BENDER, Professor of Law, Arizona State University College of Law, Tempe, Arizona MR. WALTER R. ECHO-HAWK, SR., Senior Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, Colorado MS. PATRICIA M. LAMBERT, American Association of Physical Anthropologist, Utah State University, Logan, Utah MS. PAULA BARRAN, Attorney, Barran and Leibman, LLP, Portland, Oregon Accompanied by: MR. ALAN L. SCHNEIDER, Director, Friends of America's Past, Portland, Oregon PROFESSOR KEITH W. KINTIGH, Society for American Archaeology, Tempe, Arizona MR. VAN HORN DIAMOND, Honolulu, Hawaii

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds an oversight hearing on Lands eligible for gaming pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act The hearing took place on July 27, 2005, during the 109th Congress. WITNESS LIST Sen. George V. Voinovich (R-lllinois) Sen. David Vitter (R-Louisiana) Panel I George Skibine, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Policy and Economic Development for Indian Affairs Penny Coleman, Acting General Counsel, National Indian Gaming Commission Panel II Walter Gray, Tribal Administrator, Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians, Talmage, California Christine Norris, Principal Chief, Jena Band of Choctaw Indians, Jena, Louisiana John Barnett, Chairman, Cowlitz Indian Tribe, Longview, Washington Charles D. Enyart, Chief, Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, Seneca, Missouri More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2005/07/27/listening_loung_9.asp

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds an oversight hearing on Lands eligible for gaming pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act The hearing took place on July 27, 2005, during the 109th Congress. WITNESS LIST Sen. George V. Voinovich (R-lllinois) Sen. David Vitter (R-Louisiana) Panel I George Skibine, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Policy and Economic Development for Indian Affairs Penny Coleman, Acting General Counsel, National Indian Gaming Commission Panel II Walter Gray, Tribal Administrator, Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians, Talmage, California Christine Norris, Principal Chief, Jena Band of Choctaw Indians, Jena, Louisiana John Barnett, Chairman, Cowlitz Indian Tribe, Longview, Washington Charles D. Enyart, Chief, Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, Seneca, Missouri More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2005/07/27/listening_loung_9.asp

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds an oversight hearing on Legislation to Resolve Cobell v. Norton. The Cobell lawsuit was filed by the late Elouise Cobell, of the Blackfeet Nation, to hold the U.S. government accountable for the billions of dollars held in trust for individual Indian landowners. The hearing took place on July 26, 2005, during the 109th Congress. WITNESS LIST Panel I MR. JIM CASON, Associate Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Accompanied by: MR. ROSS SWIMMER, Special Trustee for American Indians, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Panel II - (witnesses may not be testifying in the order listed on this panel) THE HONORABLE TEX HALL, President, National Congress of American Indians, Washington, DC CHIEF JIM GRAY, Chairman, Board of Directors, Inter-Tribal Monitoring Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico MR. ERNEST L.STENSGAR, President, Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, Portland, Oregon MR. JAMES T. MARTIN, Executive Director, United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc., Nashville, Tennessee MS. ELOUISE P. COBELL, Blackfeet Reservation Development Fund, Browning, Montana More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2005/07/26/witness_list_fo_7.asp

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds an oversight hearing on Legislation to Resolve Cobell v. Norton. The Cobell lawsuit was filed by the late Elouise Cobell, of the Blackfeet Nation, to hold the U.S. government accountable for the billions of dollars held in trust for individual Indian landowners. The hearing took place on July 26, 2005, during the 109th Congress. WITNESS LIST Panel I MR. JIM CASON, Associate Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Accompanied by: MR. ROSS SWIMMER, Special Trustee for American Indians, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Panel II - (witnesses may not be testifying in the order listed on this panel) THE HONORABLE TEX HALL, President, National Congress of American Indians, Washington, DC CHIEF JIM GRAY, Chairman, Board of Directors, Inter-Tribal Monitoring Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico MR. ERNEST L.STENSGAR, President, Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, Portland, Oregon MR. JAMES T. MARTIN, Executive Director, United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc., Nashville, Tennessee MS. ELOUISE P. COBELL, Blackfeet Reservation Development Fund, Browning, Montana More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2005/07/26/witness_list_fo_7.asp

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds an oversight hearing on Legislation to Resolve Cobell v. Norton. The Cobell lawsuit was filed by the late Elouise Cobell, of the Blackfeet Nation, to hold the U.S. government accountable for the billions of dollars held in trust for individual Indian landowners. The hearing took place on July 26, 2005, during the 109th Congress. WITNESS LIST Panel I MR. JIM CASON, Associate Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Accompanied by: MR. ROSS SWIMMER, Special Trustee for American Indians, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Panel II - (witnesses may not be testifying in the order listed on this panel) THE HONORABLE TEX HALL, President, National Congress of American Indians, Washington, DC CHIEF JIM GRAY, Chairman, Board of Directors, Inter-Tribal Monitoring Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico MR. ERNEST L.STENSGAR, President, Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, Portland, Oregon MR. JAMES T. MARTIN, Executive Director, United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc., Nashville, Tennessee MS. ELOUISE P. COBELL, Blackfeet Reservation Development Fund, Browning, Montana More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2005/07/26/witness_list_fo_7.asp

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds an oversight hearing on Legislation to Resolve Cobell v. Norton. The Cobell lawsuit was filed by the late Elouise Cobell, of the Blackfeet Nation, to hold the U.S. government accountable for the billions of dollars held in trust for individual Indian landowners. The hearing took place on July 26, 2005, during the 109th Congress. WITNESS LIST Panel I MR. JIM CASON, Associate Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Accompanied by: MR. ROSS SWIMMER, Special Trustee for American Indians, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Panel II - (witnesses may not be testifying in the order listed on this panel) THE HONORABLE TEX HALL, President, National Congress of American Indians, Washington, DC CHIEF JIM GRAY, Chairman, Board of Directors, Inter-Tribal Monitoring Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico MR. ERNEST L.STENSGAR, President, Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, Portland, Oregon MR. JAMES T. MARTIN, Executive Director, United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc., Nashville, Tennessee MS. ELOUISE P. COBELL, Blackfeet Reservation Development Fund, Browning, Montana More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2005/07/26/witness_list_fo_7.asp

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds an oversight hearing on Legislation to Resolve Cobell v. Norton. The Cobell lawsuit was filed by the late Elouise Cobell, of the Blackfeet Nation, to hold the U.S. government accountable for the billions of dollars held in trust for individual Indian landowners. The hearing took place on July 26, 2005, during the 109th Congress. WITNESS LIST Panel I MR. JIM CASON, Associate Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Accompanied by: MR. ROSS SWIMMER, Special Trustee for American Indians, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Panel II - (witnesses may not be testifying in the order listed on this panel) THE HONORABLE TEX HALL, President, National Congress of American Indians, Washington, DC CHIEF JIM GRAY, Chairman, Board of Directors, Inter-Tribal Monitoring Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico MR. ERNEST L.STENSGAR, President, Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, Portland, Oregon MR. JAMES T. MARTIN, Executive Director, United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc., Nashville, Tennessee MS. ELOUISE P. COBELL, Blackfeet Reservation Development Fund, Browning, Montana More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2005/07/26/witness_list_fo_7.asp

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds a legislative hearing on S.1003, the. Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement Amendments of 2005 The hearing took place on July 21, 2005, during the 109th Congress. WITNESS LIST Panel I MR. CHRISTOPHER J. BAVASI, Executive Director, The Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, Flagstaff, Arizona MR. WILLIAM P. RAGSDALE, Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Panel II THE HONORABLE WAYNE TAYLOR, JR., Tribal Chairman, The Hopi Tribe, Kykotsmovi, Arizona THE HONORABLE JOE SHIRLEY, JR., President, The Navajo Nation, Window Rock, Arizona MR. ROMAN BITSUIE, Executive Director, The Navajo-Hopi Land Commission Office, Window Rock, Arizona More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2005/07/21/senate_hearing_8.asp

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds an oversight hearing on tribal lobbying matters. The hearing focused on a lobbying scandal involving Jack Abramoff and his tribal clients. The hearing was one in a series of hearings on the matter. The hearing took place on June 22, 2005, during the 109th Congress. WITNESS LIST PANEL 1 Mr. Charlie Benn Director of Administration, Office of the Chief Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, Choctaw, MS Mr. Donald Kilgore, Esq. Attorney General Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, Choctaw, MS Ms. Nell Rogers Planner Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, Choctaw, MS PANEL 2 Mr. Kevin Ring Former Abramoff Associate Mr. Shawn Vasell Former Abramoff Associate PANEL 3 Mrs. Amy Ridenour President National Center for Public Policy Research, Washington DC Ms. Gail Halpern Former Tax Preparer / Advisor to Jack Abramoff Mr. Brian Mann Former Director American International Center Mr. David Grosh Former Director American International Center Mr. Aaron Stetter Former Associate Capitol Campaign Strategies, Washington, DC More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2005/06/22/update_on_senat.asp

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds a legislative hearing on S.J. Res. 15, the Acknowledgment and Apology Resolution. The hearing took place on May 22, 2005, during the 109th Congress. WITNESS LIST PANEL 1 The Honorable Sam Brownback Senator United States Senate, Washington, DC PANEL 2 The Honorable Tex Hall President National Congress of American Indian, Washington, DC The Honorable Edward K. Thomas President Central Council Tlingit & Haida Tribes of Alaska, Juneau, AK Dr. Negiel Bigpond, Sr. President More on Indianz.Com: https://indianz.com/News/2005/05/25/listening_loung_7.asp

Policymaker interest in alternatives to traditional public schools has sharply increased post-pandemic, with some states considering and adopting proposals to provide educator regulatory relief; increase access to charter schools; offer additional vouchers and tax credit programs; and create education savings account options to increase choice in education. Optics on professions in education have been challenging. Many of these proposals address the number of religious schools in school choice programs, which has led to both new legislation and litigation. Panelists will survey relevant proposals and developments in the midwest while considering the perspective of stakeholders in the field. Featuring: Séamus Boyce, Partner, Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP Leslie Davis Hiner, Vice President of Legal Affairs & Director of Legal Defense & Education Center, EdChoice Daniel Suhr, Senior Fellow, National Opportunity Project Moderator: Hon. Sarah Pitlyk, Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri

House Committee on Natural Resources Indian and Insular Affairs Subcommittee Legislative Hearing on H.R. 630, H.R. 1240, H.R. 1722, H.R. 2461, H.R. 2839 and H.R. 3371 Wednesday, June 7, 2023 10:00 AM On Wednesday, June 7, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Indian and Insular Affairs will hold a legislative hearing on the following bills: H.R. 630 (Rep. Grijalva), “Urban Indian Health Confer Act”; H.R. 1240 (Rep. Feenstra), “Winnebago Land Transfer Act of 2023”; H.R. 1722 (Rep. Salinas), “Grand Ronde Reservation Act Amendment of 2023”; H.R. 2461 (Rep. Crane), “San Juan Southern Paiute Tribal Homelands Act of 2023”; H.R. 2839 (Rep. Hoyle), To amend the Siletz Reservation Act to address the hunting, fishing, trapping, and animal gathering rights of the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians, and for other purposes; and H.R. 3371 (Rep. Johnson of SD), “Wounded Knee Massacre Memorial and Sacred Site Act”. Witnesses and Testimony Panel I: The Hon. Bryan Newland Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs U.S. Department of the Interior Washington D.C. [H.R. 1240, H.R. 1722, H.R. 2461, H.R. 2839, and H.R. 3371] The Hon. Melanie Anne Egorin, Ph.D. Assistant Secretary for Legislation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Washington D.C. [H.R. 630] Panel II: The Hon. Victoria Kitcheyan Chairwoman Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska Winnebago, NE [H.R. 1240] The Hon. Johnny Lehi Jr. President San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe Tuba City, AZ [H.R. 2461] The Hon. Ryman LeBeau Chairman Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Eagle Butte, SD [H.R. 3371] The Hon. Frank Star Comes Out President Oglala Sioux Tribe Pine Ridge, SD [H.R. 3371] The Hon. Alfred “Bud” Lane III Vice-Chairman Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Siletz, OR [H.R. 2839] [Minority Witness] Ms. Francys Crevier CEO National Council of Urban Indian Health Washington, D.C. [H.R. 630] [Minority Witness] The Hon. Michael Langley Tribal Council Secretary Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Grand Ronde, OR [H.R. 1722] [Minority Witness] Committee Notice: https://naturalresources.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=413376

Panelists will offer their diverse perspectives on the current state of the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the issues it is facing, its potential docket, and emerging legal controversies that may affect the court's future work. They will explore issues such as the role of the court in shaping public policy, the importance of judicial independence, and challenges that the court will face as it adapts to a rapidly changing legal landscape.Featuring:Jeffrey A. Mandell, Partner, Stafford Rosenbaum LLPRyan J. Walsh, Partner, Eimer Stahl LLPProf. Robert Yablon, Associate Professor of Law, University of Wisconsin-MadisonModerator: Hon. Shelley A. Grogan, Judge, District II, Wisconsin Court of Appeals

House Committee on Natural Resources Federal Lands Subcommittee Legislative Hearing on H.R. 188, H.R. 932, “Treating Tribes and Counties as Good Neighbors Act", “Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2023”, “FIRESHEDS Act”, “Direct Hire to Fight Fires", “Emergency Wildfire Fighting Technology Act of 2023”, “Fire Department Repayment Act of 2023” and “Forest Service Flexible Housing Partnerships Act of 2023” | Tuesday, May 23, 2023 | 2:00 PM On Tuesday, May 23, 2023, at 2:00 p.m., in Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Subcommittee on Federal Lands will hold a legislative hearing on the following bills: H.R. 188 (Rep. McClintock), “Proven Forest Management Act of 2022”; H.R. 934 (Rep. McClintock), To require the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out activities to suppress wildfires, and for other purposes; H.R. 1450 (Rep. Fulcher), “Treating Tribes and Counties as Good Neighbors Act”; H.R. 1726 (Rep. Tokuda), “Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2023”; H.R. _____ (Rep. Moore of Utah), “FIRESHEDS Act”; H.R. _____ (Rep. Issa), “Direct Hire to Fight Fires”; H.R. _____ (Rep. Valadao), “Emergency Wildfire Fighting Technology Act of 2023”; H.R. _____ (Rep. Harder), “Fire Department Repayment Act of 2023”; and H.R. _____ (Rep. Neguse), “Forest Service Flexible Housing Partnerships Act of 2023” Legislative Hearing on H.R. 188, H.R. 932, “Treating Tribes and Counties as Good Neighbors Act", “Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2023”, “FIRESHEDS Act”, “Direct Hire to Fight Fires", “Emergency Wildfire Fighting Technology Act of 2023”, “Fire Department Repayment Act of 2023” and “Forest Service Flexible Housing Partnerships Act of 2023” | Federal Lands Subcommittee Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Print this Page Share by Email Tuesday, May 23, 2023 | 2:00 PM Tags: Federal Lands On Tuesday, May 23, 2023, at 2:00 p.m., in Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Subcommittee on Federal Lands will hold a legislative hearing on the following bills: H.R. 188 (Rep. McClintock), “Proven Forest Management Act of 2022”; H.R. 934 (Rep. McClintock), To require the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out activities to suppress wildfires, and for other purposes; H.R. 1450 (Rep. Fulcher), “Treating Tribes and Counties as Good Neighbors Act”; H.R. 1726 (Rep. Tokuda), “Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2023”; H.R. _____ (Rep. Moore of Utah), “FIRESHEDS Act”; H.R. _____ (Rep. Issa), “Direct Hire to Fight Fires”; H.R. _____ (Rep. Valadao), “Emergency Wildfire Fighting Technology Act of 2023”; H.R. _____ (Rep. Harder), “Fire Department Repayment Act of 2023”; and H.R. _____ (Rep. Neguse), “Forest Service Flexible Housing Partnerships Act of 2023” Witnesses and Testimony Panel I: To Be Announced Panel II [Forest Management Bills]: Mr. Troy Heithecker Associate Deputy Chief U.S. Forest Service Washington, D.C. [All bills] Mr. Robert Dugan Chairman Placer County Water Agency Auburn, CA [H.R. 188] Mr. Cody Desautel President Intertribal Timber Council Portland, OR [H.R. 1450] Mr. Jamie Johansson President California Farm Bureau Sacramento, CA [H.R. 3522] Panel III [Fire Suppression Bills]: Ms. Riva Duncan Fire Chief Umpqua National Forest U.S. Forest Service (Retired) Vice President, Grassroots Wildland Firefighters Asheville, NC [H.R. 3499] Mr. Rick Goddard Managing Director Caylym Technologies International Fresno, CA [H.R.3389] Mr. Laurence Crabtree U.S. Forest Service (Retired) Bieber, California [H.R. 934] Mr. Jonathan Godes President of Colorado Association of Ski Towns (CAST) Glenwood Springs City Councilor, Glenwood Springs, CO [H.R. ___(Neguse), “Forest Service Flexible Housing Partnerships Act of 2023”] [Minority Witness]

Democracy begins with elections. But the process for voting in our elections has been increasingly a matter of political contestation. This panel will consider these process issues, including the Voting Rights Act, campaign finance reform, early and mail in- balloting, and eligibility to vote, including that of felons and aliens. The panel will also consider the question of how the decision-making over these issues should be divided, between the courts and democratic legislatures as well as between the states and the federal government.Featuring:Moderator: Hon. Timothy M. Tymkovich, The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth CircuitAudrey Perry Martin, Partner, Gober GroupLee E. Goodman, Partner, WileyProf. Derek T. Muller, Ben V. Willie Professorship in Excellence, University of Iowa College of LawProf. Richard Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law, New York University School of Law

This is the final episode in conjunction with the Irish Society for Women in Economics (ISWE). This episode features a panel discussion on gender diversity in the Irish Economics Profession. I am joined by Dr. Margaret Samahita, Assistant Professor at UCD; Dr. Kevin Devereux, Assistant Professor at Peking University; and Míde Griffin, now based at the European University Institute in Florence but who was a research assistant with the ESRI at the time of recording. The conversation revolves around some research being carried out by Marageret and Kevin on gender diversity in Irish economics, with some additional insight offered by Míde. I hope you enjoy the conversation. The papers discussed can be found here: Are economics conferences gender-neutral? Evidence from Ireland: https://www.ucd.ie/economics/t4media/WP22_25.pdf Gender, Productivity, and Promotion in the Irish Economics Profession: https://www.ucd.ie/economics/t4media/WP22_16.pdf Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Law schools are the gatekeepers of the legal profession and thus wield substantial influence on the law’s future shape. In recent times, law schools have increasingly viewed themselves less as charged with training lawyers to serve their clients’ needs and more as engines of social justice. Is that an appropriate role for law schools? How compatible are the two missions? Does the highly and increasingly ideologically homogeneous character of law school faculties, as shown in many studies, exacerbate the tension between those missions?Featuring:Dean Mark Alexander, Arthur J. Kania Dean and Professor of Law, Charles Widger School of Law, Villanova UniversityProf. Joshua Kleinfeld, Professor of Law, Northwestern University Pritzker School of LawProf. Paul G. Mahoney, David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of LawDean Dayna Matthew, Dean and Harold H. Greene Professor of Law, The George Washington University Law SchoolModerator: Hon. Neomi Rao, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Welcome to Koach Panel Part II! If you're wondering.. What is coaching? How is it different than therapy? Can I use it with my patients right now? Can I start a business as a coach and an APN? Do I need to get certified? Then you're in the right place, and I want to answer ALL OF THE QUESTIONS!So, I went ahead and asked some of my APN & Coach clients to join me for a zoom session where you're going to learn.. How they got started How they make money with coaching The best next step for getting started Listen in.. it might just change EVERYTHING. Ready to stop feeling overwhelmed and start feeling empowered to create your version of the good life? Then you're going to want to check out Nurses Living the Good Life. And in the words of Taylor Swift, "don't say I didn't warn ya."

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Panel II: IKS in 21st Century Education SrijanTalks

House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States Date: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 Time: 11:00 AM Location: Longworth House Office Building 1324 Presiding: The Honorable Teresa Leger Fernández, Chair On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. ET, in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building and via Cisco WebEx, the Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States (SCIP) will hold an oversight hearing entitled “Examining Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta: The Implications of the Supreme Court's Ruling on Tribal Sovereignty.” Witness List Panel I: Administration Panel Hon. Bryan Newland Assistant Secretary – Indian Affairs U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. Panel II: Tribal Leader Panel Hon. Jonodev Chaudhuri Ambassador Muscogee Creek Nation Okmulgee, Oklahoma Hon. Kevin Killer President Oglala Sioux Tribe Pine Ridge, South Dakota Hon. Cheryl Andrews-Maltais Chairwoman Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head Aquinnah Aquinnah, Massachusetts Hon. Whitney Gravelle President Bay Mills Indian Community Brimley, Michigan Hon. Teri Gobin Chair Tulalip Tribes Tulalip, Washington Hon. Sara Hill Attorney General Cherokee Nation Tahlequah, Oklahoma Panel III: Legal Panel Ms. Mary Kathryn Nagle Counsel National Indigenous Women's Resource Center Washington, D.C. Ms. Bethany Berger Wallace Stevens Professor of Law University of Connecticut School of Law Hartford, Connecticut Ms. Carole Goldberg Jonathan D. Varat Distinguished Professor of Law Emerita University of California School of Law Los Angeles, California Hon. Matthew J. Ballard District Attorney Oklahoma District 12 Claremore, Oklahoma Mr. Mithun Mansinghani Partner Lehotsky Keller LLP Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Committee Notice: https://naturalresources.house.gov/hearings/hybrid-scip-oversight-hearing_september-20-2022

House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United StatesDate: Wednesday, September 14, 2022 Time: 01:00 PM Location: Longworth House Office Building 1324 Presiding: The Honorable Teresa Leger Fernández, Chair On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. ET, in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building and via Cisco WebEx, the Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States (SCIP) will hold a hybrid legislative hearing on the following bills: H.R. 6032 (Rep. Jared Huffman, D-CA), To take certain Federal lands located in Siskiyou County, California, and Humboldt County, California, into trust for the benefit of the Karuk Tribe, and for other purposes. Katimiîn and Ameekyáaraam Sacred Lands Act. H.R. 6964 (Rep. Marilyn Strickland, D-WA), To authorize leases of up to 99 years for lands held in trust for the Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation. H.R. 7581 [Discussion Draft ANS to H.R. 7581 - attached] (Rep. Jared Huffman, D-CA), To recognize tribal cooperation in the environmental review of proposed actions affecting the revised Yurok Reservation, and for other purposes. Yurok Lands Act of 2022. H.R. 8115 (Rep. Doug LaMalfa, R-CA), To amend the Recreation and Public Purposes Act to authorize sales and leases of certain Federal land to federally recognized Indian Tribes, and for other purposes. Recreation and Public Purposes Tribal Parity Act. H.R. 8286 (Rep. Derek Kilmer, D-WA), To take certain Federal land in the State of Washington into trust for the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, and for other purposes. H.R. 8380 (Rep. Jesús G. “Chuy” García, D-IL), To provide for the settlement of claims relating to the Shab-eh-nay Band Reservation in Illinois, and for other purposes. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Shab-eh-nay Band Reservation Settlement Act of 2022. H.R. 8387 (Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-WA), To amend the Indian Law Enforcement Reform Act to provide for advancements in public safety services to Indian communities, and for other purposes. Parity for Tribal Law Enforcement Act. This hearing will be streamed on YouTube. For hearing materials and schedules, please visit U.S. House of Representatives, Committee Repository at https://docs.house.gov Witness List Panel I Rep. Jesus G. “Chuy” Garcia Illinois, 4th District Rep. Derek Kilmer Washington, 6th District Rep. Jared Huffman California, 2nd District Rep. Marilyn Strickland Washington, 10th District Rep. Dan Newhouse Washington, 4th District Panel II Hon. Wizipan Garriott Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. Panel III Hon. Russell Attebery (H.R. 6032) Chairman Karuk Tribe Happy Camp, CA Hon. Joe James (H.R. 7581) Chairman Yurok Tribe Klamath, CA Hon. Frances Charles (H.R. 8286) Chairwoman Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Angeles, WA Hon. Joseph Rupnick (H.R. 8380) Chairman Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Mayetta, KS Hon. Harry Pickernell, Sr. (H.R. 6964) Chairman Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation Oakville, WA Hon. Arain Hart (H.R. 8115) Chairman Susanville Indian Rancheria Susanville, CA Hon. Jarred-Michael Erickson (H.R. 8387) Chairman Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation Nespelem, WA Committee Notice: https://naturalresources.house.gov/hearings/hybrid-scip-legislative-hearing_september-14-2022--

House Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Legislative Hearing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 Time: 10:00 AM Presiding: The Honorable Joe Neguse, Chair On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. (EST), the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands will hold a virtual, fully remote legislative hearing on the following bills: H.R. 1638 (Rep. Dusty Johnson-R-SD) To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer certain National Forest System land to the State of South Dakota, and for other purposes. Gilt Edge Mine Conveyance Act. H.R. 4178 (Rep. Jared Huffman, D-CA) To extend the authority to collect Shasta-Trinity Marina fees through fiscal year 2027.Shasta-Trinity Marina Fee Extension. H.R. 5093 (Rep. Jaime Herrera Butler, R-WA) To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer certain National Forest System land in the State of Washington to Skamania County, Washington. Wind River Administrative Site Conveyance Act. H.R. 5493 (Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez- D-NM) To provide for greater consultation between the Federal Government and the governing bodies and community users of land grant-mercedes in New Mexico, to provide for a process for recognition of the historic-traditional uses of land grant-mercedes, and for other purposes. Land Grant-Mercedes Traditional Use Recognition and Consultation Act. H.R. 6366 (Rep. John Garamendi, D-CA) To modify the boundary of the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument to include certain Federal land in Lake County, California, and for other purposes. Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument Expansion Act. Witness List Panel I Rep. Dusty Johnson (H.R. 1638) South Dakota, At Large Rep. Jared Huffman (H.R. 4178) California, 2nd District Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (H.R. 5093) Washington, 3rd District Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (H.R. 5493) New Mexico, 3rd District Rep. John Garamendi (H.R. 6366) California, 3rd District Panel II Mr. Greg Smith (All Bills) Director of Lands and Realty Management Forest Service Department of Agriculture Mr. Mark Lambrecht (H.R. 5493 & H.R. 6366) Assistant Director National Landscape Conservation System Bureau of Land Management Mr. Anthony Roberts (H.R. 6366) Tribal Chairman Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Panel III Mr. Hunter Roberts (H.R. 1638) Secretary South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Mr. Paul Hauser (H.R. 4178) General Manager Trinity Public Utility District Mr. Tom Lannen (H.R. 5093) District 2 Commissioner Skamania County, Washington Mr. Arturo Archuleta (H.R. 5493) Program Manager New Mexico Land Grant Council Committee Notice: https://naturalresources.house.gov/hearings/npfpl-legislative-hearing_march-1-2022

On April 7-9, 1995, the Federalist Society held its fourteenth annual National Student Symposium at the Northwestern University School of Law in Chicago, Illinois. The subject of the conference was "Originalism, Democracy, and the Constitution." The second panel of the conference covered "Constitutionalism and Originalism."Featuring:Moderator: Steve Chapman, Chicago TribuneProf. Lilian R. BeVier, University of Virginia School of LawProf. Lino A. Graglia, University of Texas School of LawProf. Jonathan R. Macey, Cornell Law SchoolProf. Cass R. Sunstein, Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School***As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

The 2021 National Lawyers Convention took place November 11-13, 2021 at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC. The topic of the conference was "Public and Private Power: Preserving Freedom or Preventing Harm?" The second day of the conference commenced with a showcase panel on "Private Control Over Public Discussion."Online platforms host a growing share of public discussion and debate. As private businesses, they have been free to develop and implement their own content moderation policies, free of First Amendment constraints. But as the amount of speech hosted on a few platforms has grown, the resulting concentration of control over that speech has sparked questions about the power of private companies to stifle lawful expression.As Justice Clarence Thomas recently noted, the Court soon will need to consider how existing legal doctrines apply to these highly concentrated, privately owned, digital platforms. Part of the solution, he suggests, might lie with common law doctrines like common carrier or public accommodation – doctrines that might permit regulation that limits the right of private platforms to exclude.But what of the First Amendment interests of the platforms themselves? Do these corporations have a protected expressive interest in declining to carry speech which is lawful but which they find objectionable? How should we think about the digital platform model – are they more like a communications network distributing information, more like publishers that actively curate content and associate themselves with hosted expression, or do they toggle back and forth?Finally, should the concentration of private power over speech change how we think about public and private threats to free expression? Private businesses are presumptively free to set terms and conditions for the use of their own property. Have digital platforms assumed a degree of control over public discourse, sufficient to alter that presumption? Is some form of regulation appropriate to protect against private threats to liberty? Or is government intrusion into private decision-making still the greater threat?Featuring:Prof. Jane Bambauer, Professor of Law, University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of LawProf. Randy E. Barnett, Patrick Hotung Professor of Constitutional Law, Georgetown University Law CenterProf. Adam Candeub, Professor of Law & Director, Intellectual Property, Information and Communications Law Program, Michigan State University College of LawProf. Eugene Volokh, Gary T. Schwartz Distinguished Professor of Law, UCLA School of LawModerator: Hon. Barbara Lagoa, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Featuring:A. Douglas Melamed, Professor, Stanford Law School, and ex-General Counsel, IntelAaron Schur, Deputy General Counsel, YelpHal Singer, Managing Director, Econ OneDina Srinivasan, Author, The Antitrust Case Against FacebookAlan Sykes, Professor, Stanford Law SchoolModerator: Ted Ullyot, Former General Counsel, FacebookIntroduction: Austin Peters, Stanford Law School '22* * * * * As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

Panel II – Constitutional Liberties: First Amendment, Religion, Race, and Natural LawThe Honorable Allison Jones Rushing, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNicole Stelle Garnett, John P. Murphy Foundation Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame Law SchoolMichael W. McConnell, Richard and Frances Mallery Professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center, Stanford Law School, and a Senior Fellow, Hoover InstitutionElbert Lin, Partner, Hunton Andrews Kurth and former Solicitor General of West VirginiaModerator: Adam Mortara, Lecturer in Law, University of Chicago Law SchoolThe Heritage Foundation and the C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State at Antonin Scalia Law School will co-host a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. Bringing together jurists, legal academics, and practitioners, including many of his former clerks, we will discuss the Justice's jurisprudence and impact on the Court over the past three decades. Join us for this all-day law symposium to reflect on the legacy of Justice Thomas thirty years into his service. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

On February 28-29, 1992, the Federalist Society held its eleventh annual National Student Symposium at the University of Texas School of Law in Austin, Texas. The subject of the conference was "The Legacy of the Federalist Papers." The second day of the symposium began with a panel titled "To Govern and Be Governed: The Federalist's Vision of Representative Democracy."9:15 a.m.Panel II: To Govern and Be Governed: The Federalist's Vision of Representative DemocracyDean Jesse H. Choper, University of California at Berkeley School of LawHon. Frank H. Easterbrook, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh CircuitDavid Epstein, U.S. Department of Defense and Author, The Political Theory of The FederalistProf. Jonathan R. Macey, Cornell Law SchoolModerator: Hon. James L. Ryan, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit*******As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

Legislative: Remote SCIP Legislative Hearing – October 5, 2021 Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 Time: 12:00 PM Presiding: The Honorable Teresa Leger Fernández, Chair On Tuesday, October 5, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. EDT, the Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States (SCIP) will host a virtual, fully remote legislative hearing on the following tribal-related legislation: H.J.Res.55 (Rep. Kahele), To consent to the amendments to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, made by Act 080 of the Session Laws of Hawaii, 2017. Prince Jonah Khiuo Kalaniana‘ole Protecting Family Legacies Act. H.R. 441 (Rep. Don Young), To provide for the conveyance of certain property to the Tanana Tribal Council located in Tanana, Alaska, and for other purposes. H.R. 2402 (Rep. Fortenberry), To transfer administrative jurisdiction of certain Federal lands from the Army Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, to take such lands into trust for the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska, and for other purposes. Winnebago Land Transfer Act of 2021. H.R. 4881 (Rep. Raúl Grijalva), To direct the Secretary of the Interior to take into trust for the Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona certain land in Pima County, Arizona, and for other purposes. Old Pascua Community Land Acquisition Act. H.R. 5221 (Rep. Raúl Grijalva), To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to establish an urban Indian organization confer policy for the Department of Health and Human Services. Urban Indian Health Confer Act. Panel I Representative Raúl Grijalva Arizona, 3rd District Representative Don Young Alaska, At-Large Representative Kaiali'i Kahele Hawaii, 2nd District Representative Jeff Fortenberry Nebraska, 1st District Panel II Mr. P. Benjamin Smith (H.R.441, H.R.5221) Deputy Director for Intergovernmental Affairs, Indian Health Service U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Rockville, MD Mr. Darryl LaCounte (H.J.Res.55, H.R.2402, H.R.4881) Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC Panel III The Honorable Peter Yucupicio (H.R.4881) Chairman Pascua Yaqui Tribe Tucson, Arizona The Honorable William J. Ailã, Jr. (H.J.Res.55) Chairman Hawaiian Homes Commission Department of Hawaiian Home Lands Kapolei, HI The Honorable Julie Roberts-Hyslop (H.R.441) Second Chief Tanana Tribal Council Native Village of Tanana Tanana, Alaska The Honorable Victoria Kitcheyan (H.R. 2402) Chairwoman Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska Winnebago, NE Mr. Walter Murillo (H.R.5221) President National Council of Urban Indian Health Washington, DC This hearing will take place via Cisco WebEx and will be streamed on YouTube. For additional hearing materials and schedules, please visit the U.S. House of Representatives' Committee Repository at http://docs.house.gov/.

See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Lat-Mile Industrial Real Estate Throughout the Pandemic and 2021 Forecast Adir Levitas, Founder & CEO of Faropoint hosts an in-depth discussion with Allison Gauthier, Relationship Manager, and Team Lead, Commercial R/E Finance at Citizens Bank, Nick Murphy, VP at Eastdil Secured, Ohad Porat, CIO at Faropoint, Vadim Greenberg, SVP, Acquisitions at Faropoint.

Tuesday, 30 April 2019 - 9.00am Location: Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, Finley Library All-day workshop: 09:00 - 17:00 hrs Conveners: Eyal Benvenisti, Harold Hongju Koh, and Tomohiro Mikanagi In 2019 three major treaty withdrawals will reach important watersheds. Sometime in spring, the United Kingdom is scheduled to withdraw from the European Union under the withdrawal notice it gave under Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon. On November 4, 2019, the United States (under the administration of Donald Trump) is set to give notice that it will withdraw from the Paris Climate Change Accord one year later. In November 2019 the dispute resolution mechanism of the WTO will terminate effectively unless the US agrees to re-appoint a judge of the Appellate Body. These events may be seen as signaling a decline in leading states’ commitment to multilateralism and a growing preference to bilateralism. The Trump administration has clearly asserted its preference for bilateral deals while dismissing international organisations as taking advantage of US generosity. China also seems to prefer alternative groupings outside existing multilateral organisations. In October 2007, during its ascent to global power, China declared FTAs to be its basic international economic strategy. America’s disengagement from multilateralism did not prompt China to fill the void by reinforcing existing multilateral bodies with global reach. Instead, its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its regional security arrangements are modelled on the “hub and spokes” pattern, an architecture that allows it to tightly control its numerous partners and limit the application of existing standards and mechanisms. Famously, it ignored the UNCLOS arbitral award on the South China Sea in 2016. Perhaps to confront the risk of two superpowers busy dividing and ruling the rest, other countries have sought to preserve the minilateral institutions (eg the CPTPP) and utilise existing multilateral mechanisms (WTO reforms, UNCLOS conciliation and arbitration, OPCW attribution mechanism, etc.). In this workshop we wish to address the uncertain future of multilateralism in light of the prospective withdrawals and resurgence of bilateralism. We wish to discuss motivations, prospects, and implications for domestic and international law. This one day workshop seeks to reflect on the questions. In particular we wish to address the following questions: Panel I: The Domestic and International Legal Issues Surrounding US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord and Revising the WTO Since 2017, the Trump Administration has announced its withdrawal from a host of bilateral and multilateral arrangements, including the Paris Climate Agreement; the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA or Iran Nuclear Deal); the U.N. Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization; the Global Compact on Migration; the U.N. Human Rights Council; the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP); the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations and Consular Relations with Iran; the 1961 Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention for Diplomatic Relations on Dispute Settlement; the Universal Postal Union Treaty; and the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty. This panel will address the following questions, among others – Is the Trump Administration aberrational, or are we witnessing the culmination of a long-term trend of U.S. withdrawal from multilateralist institutions? To what extent has the Trump Administration applied tactics first adopted by prior administrations: e.g., blocking reappointment of members of the WTO Appellate Body? What constraints do U.S. and international law place upon blanket unilateral presidential withdrawal from all disfavored organizations? Panel II: The Domestic and International Legal Issues Surrounding China’s “Hub and Spoke” Strategy This panel will address the following questions, among others – Is China accepting the existing multilateral legal rules and mechanisms in economic and non-economic areas? Is China deviating from international standards (including with respect to ISDS) in its various legal arrangements under BRI? Is China deviating from UNCLOS in the South China Sea, including through bilateral COC negotiation? Panel III: The Future of Rule-Based Global Governance through International Institutions: Limits and Potential What are the prospects for international institutions to reclaim multilateralism through concerted action, or through insistence on multilaterally binding norms? To what extent can the UN Security Council, the International Court of Justice, or other international organisations and tribunals can contribute to maintaining and developing further globally-binding norms? To what extent can international process enhance the rule-based global governance through the clarification of law and facts? The UK and the Changing Legal Landscape: The Way Forward from Here

Tuesday, 30 April 2019 - 9.00am Location: Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, Finley Library All-day workshop: 09:00 - 17:00 hrs Conveners: Eyal Benvenisti, Harold Hongju Koh, and Tomohiro Mikanagi In 2019 three major treaty withdrawals will reach important watersheds. Sometime in spring, the United Kingdom is scheduled to withdraw from the European Union under the withdrawal notice it gave under Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon. On November 4, 2019, the United States (under the administration of Donald Trump) is set to give notice that it will withdraw from the Paris Climate Change Accord one year later. In November 2019 the dispute resolution mechanism of the WTO will terminate effectively unless the US agrees to re-appoint a judge of the Appellate Body. These events may be seen as signaling a decline in leading states’ commitment to multilateralism and a growing preference to bilateralism. The Trump administration has clearly asserted its preference for bilateral deals while dismissing international organisations as taking advantage of US generosity. China also seems to prefer alternative groupings outside existing multilateral organisations. In October 2007, during its ascent to global power, China declared FTAs to be its basic international economic strategy. America’s disengagement from multilateralism did not prompt China to fill the void by reinforcing existing multilateral bodies with global reach. Instead, its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its regional security arrangements are modelled on the “hub and spokes” pattern, an architecture that allows it to tightly control its numerous partners and limit the application of existing standards and mechanisms. Famously, it ignored the UNCLOS arbitral award on the South China Sea in 2016. Perhaps to confront the risk of two superpowers busy dividing and ruling the rest, other countries have sought to preserve the minilateral institutions (eg the CPTPP) and utilise existing multilateral mechanisms (WTO reforms, UNCLOS conciliation and arbitration, OPCW attribution mechanism, etc.). In this workshop we wish to address the uncertain future of multilateralism in light of the prospective withdrawals and resurgence of bilateralism. We wish to discuss motivations, prospects, and implications for domestic and international law. This one day workshop seeks to reflect on the questions. In particular we wish to address the following questions: Panel I: The Domestic and International Legal Issues Surrounding US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord and Revising the WTO Since 2017, the Trump Administration has announced its withdrawal from a host of bilateral and multilateral arrangements, including the Paris Climate Agreement; the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA or Iran Nuclear Deal); the U.N. Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization; the Global Compact on Migration; the U.N. Human Rights Council; the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP); the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations and Consular Relations with Iran; the 1961 Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention for Diplomatic Relations on Dispute Settlement; the Universal Postal Union Treaty; and the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty. This panel will address the following questions, among others – Is the Trump Administration aberrational, or are we witnessing the culmination of a long-term trend of U.S. withdrawal from multilateralist institutions? To what extent has the Trump Administration applied tactics first adopted by prior administrations: e.g., blocking reappointment of members of the WTO Appellate Body? What constraints do U.S. and international law place upon blanket unilateral presidential withdrawal from all disfavored organizations? Panel II: The Domestic and International Legal Issues Surrounding China’s “Hub and Spoke” Strategy This panel will address the following questions, among others – Is China accepting the existing multilateral legal rules and mechanisms in economic and non-economic areas? Is China deviating from international standards (including with respect to ISDS) in its various legal arrangements under BRI? Is China deviating from UNCLOS in the South China Sea, including through bilateral COC negotiation? Panel III: The Future of Rule-Based Global Governance through International Institutions: Limits and Potential What are the prospects for international institutions to reclaim multilateralism through concerted action, or through insistence on multilaterally binding norms? To what extent can the UN Security Council, the International Court of Justice, or other international organisations and tribunals can contribute to maintaining and developing further globally-binding norms? To what extent can international process enhance the rule-based global governance through the clarification of law and facts? The UK and the Changing Legal Landscape: The Way Forward from Here

Tuesday, 30 April 2019 - 9.00am Location: Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, Finley Library All-day workshop: 09:00 - 17:00 hrs Conveners: Eyal Benvenisti, Harold Hongju Koh, and Tomohiro Mikanagi In 2019 three major treaty withdrawals will reach important watersheds. Sometime in spring, the United Kingdom is scheduled to withdraw from the European Union under the withdrawal notice it gave under Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon. On November 4, 2019, the United States (under the administration of Donald Trump) is set to give notice that it will withdraw from the Paris Climate Change Accord one year later. In November 2019 the dispute resolution mechanism of the WTO will terminate effectively unless the US agrees to re-appoint a judge of the Appellate Body. These events may be seen as signaling a decline in leading states’ commitment to multilateralism and a growing preference to bilateralism. The Trump administration has clearly asserted its preference for bilateral deals while dismissing international organisations as taking advantage of US generosity. China also seems to prefer alternative groupings outside existing multilateral organisations. In October 2007, during its ascent to global power, China declared FTAs to be its basic international economic strategy. America’s disengagement from multilateralism did not prompt China to fill the void by reinforcing existing multilateral bodies with global reach. Instead, its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its regional security arrangements are modelled on the “hub and spokes” pattern, an architecture that allows it to tightly control its numerous partners and limit the application of existing standards and mechanisms. Famously, it ignored the UNCLOS arbitral award on the South China Sea in 2016. Perhaps to confront the risk of two superpowers busy dividing and ruling the rest, other countries have sought to preserve the minilateral institutions (eg the CPTPP) and utilise existing multilateral mechanisms (WTO reforms, UNCLOS conciliation and arbitration, OPCW attribution mechanism, etc.). In this workshop we wish to address the uncertain future of multilateralism in light of the prospective withdrawals and resurgence of bilateralism. We wish to discuss motivations, prospects, and implications for domestic and international law. This one day workshop seeks to reflect on the questions. In particular we wish to address the following questions: Panel I: The Domestic and International Legal Issues Surrounding US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord and Revising the WTO Since 2017, the Trump Administration has announced its withdrawal from a host of bilateral and multilateral arrangements, including the Paris Climate Agreement; the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA or Iran Nuclear Deal); the U.N. Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization; the Global Compact on Migration; the U.N. Human Rights Council; the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP); the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations and Consular Relations with Iran; the 1961 Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention for Diplomatic Relations on Dispute Settlement; the Universal Postal Union Treaty; and the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty. This panel will address the following questions, among others – Is the Trump Administration aberrational, or are we witnessing the culmination of a long-term trend of U.S. withdrawal from multilateralist institutions? To what extent has the Trump Administration applied tactics first adopted by prior administrations: e.g., blocking reappointment of members of the WTO Appellate Body? What constraints do U.S. and international law place upon blanket unilateral presidential withdrawal from all disfavored organizations? Panel II: The Domestic and International Legal Issues Surrounding China’s “Hub and Spoke” Strategy This panel will address the following questions, among others – Is China accepting the existing multilateral legal rules and mechanisms in economic and non-economic areas? Is China deviating from international standards (including with respect to ISDS) in its various legal arrangements under BRI? Is China deviating from UNCLOS in the South China Sea, including through bilateral COC negotiation? Panel III: The Future of Rule-Based Global Governance through International Institutions: Limits and Potential What are the prospects for international institutions to reclaim multilateralism through concerted action, or through insistence on multilaterally binding norms? To what extent can the UN Security Council, the International Court of Justice, or other international organisations and tribunals can contribute to maintaining and developing further globally-binding norms? To what extent can international process enhance the rule-based global governance through the clarification of law and facts? The UK and the Changing Legal Landscape: The Way Forward from Here