Podcasts about dtsa

This Day in Legal History: The End of Roosevelt's Hundred DaysOn this day in 1933, Franklin Roosevelt signed three pieces of legislation that closed out what the country has been calling the Hundred Days ever since: the Banking Act of 1933, the National Industrial Recovery Act, and the Farm Credit Act, with the Home Owners' Loan Act having been signed three days earlier. The Banking Act of 1933 is the one most lawyers know, because the popular name attached to it — Glass-Steagall — has been doing rhetorical work in financial-regulation debates for ninety-three years.Carter Glass of Virginia and Henry Steagall of Alabama, the Senate Banking chair and the House Banking chair respectively, built the statute around two structural propositions: that commercial banks should be separated from investment banking and the speculative securities business that had helped pull the country into the Great Depression, and that depositors at member banks should be protected by a federal deposit insurance scheme so that a panic at one bank did not become a panic everywhere.The deposit insurance piece became the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The separation piece was the part that got partially repealed by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999 and then revisited in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. The National Industrial Recovery Act, signed the same day, set up the National Recovery Administration and the Public Works Administration and was meant to coordinate industry-wide codes of fair competition; the Supreme Court struck the centerpiece codes provision down two years later in A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States in 1935 on nondelegation and Commerce Clause grounds, an opinion that nearly killed the early New Deal and prompted Roosevelt's court-packing plan two years after that. The Farm Credit Act consolidated and refinanced the agricultural lending system that the Great Depression had taken to the brink.The legal point worth remembering is that this last day of the Hundred Days was, in retrospect, the moment the federal regulatory state of the twentieth century stopped being a collection of post-Civil-War commissions and started being the integrated structure of agencies, deposit-insurance funds, securities oversight, labor regulation, and welfare administration that the country has lived inside ever since. The fact that the Schechter Court was waiting in the wings to strike down the most ambitious piece of that day's work is part of the lesson. The constitutional question of how much economic ordering a Congress and a President can do at once was not answered on June 16, 1933 — it was framed.The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up E.D. v. Noblesville School District, a free-speech challenge brought by the parents of an Indiana high-school student whose school district had refused to let her post flyers for her student-run anti-abortion club on classroom and hallway walls. The student, identified in court papers by initials because she was a minor when the case was filed, had been the founder of Noblesville High School's Students for Life chapter. The flyers she wanted posted featured images of demonstrators holding “Defund Planned Parenthood” signs. Noblesville Schools removed the flyers under a district policy giving administrators content-based authority over student materials displayed on school property, and the parents sued under the First Amendment.The Southern District of Indiana sided with the district in 2024, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed in 2025, both applying Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, the 1988 case that lets public schools regulate the content of school-sponsored expressive activities if the regulation is reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns. The cert denial leaves Hazelwood intact in the Seventh Circuit and everywhere else.The piece worth flagging is Justice Alito's dissent from denial, joined by Justice Thomas, which urged the Court to grant review and use the case to revisit Hazelwood's framework. The dissent argues that Hazelwood was wrongly decided to the extent that it lets schools draw viewpoint-based lines under the cover of pedagogical-concern review, and that the doctrinal distinction Hazelwood draws between school-sponsored speech and Tinker-style independent student speech has become unworkable in the age of student clubs, distributed school messaging, and post-Mahanoy off-campus speech. Two votes are not five votes. But two votes naming a case as the vehicle they wanted are how the next decade of student-speech cases gets queued up. The Court has now told litigants what kind of vehicle it might be looking for. Expect a steady drumbeat of cert petitions teeing up the Hazelwood revisit over the next several terms.US Supreme Court turns away free speech claim by anti-abortion student | Reuters via Maryland Daily RecordThe Supreme Court also turned away on Monday the National Shooting Sports Foundation's challenge to New York's General Business Law § 898, the public-nuisance statute the New York legislature passed in 2021 to let the state and certain private plaintiffs sue firearms manufacturers, distributors, and dealers for endangering the public through the marketing and distribution of their products.The challenge was supported by Smith & Wesson, Sturm, Ruger, Beretta, Glock, and Sig Sauer, and went up on appeal from a 2024 Second Circuit decision that held the New York statute is not preempted by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, the 2005 federal statute that broadly immunizes the gun industry from civil liability arising from the criminal misuse of firearms.The Second Circuit reasoned that the PLCAA's “predicate exception” — which preserves state-law claims when the firearms industry has violated a state or federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of firearms — covers a state public-nuisance statute that, by its terms, regulates the sale and marketing of firearms. The cert denial leaves the Second Circuit's reading in place, leaves New York's statute on the books and enforceable, and leaves the industry with a litigation exposure it had hoped to neutralize.The strategic part of the case is going to be the copycat statutes. California, New Jersey, Washington, Delaware, Illinois, and Hawaii have all enacted versions of the New York approach since 2021, and other states have similar bills in committee. Each of those statutes is going to invite its own PLCAA-preemption fight in its own circuit, and the cumulative jurisprudence is going to get built case by case until either Congress amends PLCAA or the Court decides one of these cases is the right vehicle to step in. Today's denial was not that vehicle.SCOTUS Upholds NY Law Allowing Lawsuits Against Gunmakers | The Daily SignalThe third notable cert denial on Monday was the end of the road for Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. in its long-running trade-secret fight with DXC Technology — the successor in interest to Computer Sciences Corporation. TCS had asked the Court to review a Fifth Circuit decision that affirmed a $168 million judgment against it for misappropriating CSC's life-insurance-administration software trade secrets and using them to build TCS's own BaNCS platform, which TCS then used to win a $2.6 billion contract with the insurer Transamerica.The Northern District of Texas verdict, returned in 2022, had been $56 million in compensatory damages and $112 million in punitives, and the Fifth Circuit upheld the punitives ratio in 2025 over TCS's BMW v. Gore and State Farm v. Campbell challenge to the proportionality of the punitive award and over its Defend Trade Secrets Act extraterritoriality arguments. The cert petition pressed both points and pressed a circuit split on the standard for proving misappropriation by an independent contractor that had been given access to source code under a nondisclosure agreement, but the Court declined.The practical immediate effect is that TCS will recognize a roughly $70 million one-time exceptional charge in Q1 of its 2027 fiscal year and the total exposure on the matter — combining the affirmed judgment with previously taken provisions — settles in around $220 million. The broader effect is doctrinal stability. The Fifth Circuit's analysis on cross-border trade-secret damages and on the extraterritoriality limits of the DTSA stand. Both questions are going to recur, and the next vehicle that brings them up may catch the Court in a different mood, but for now the law is what the Fifth Circuit said it was.US Supreme Court rejects TCS challenge in $168 million trade secrets case | Business Standard This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Guest - Jon Scholes - CEO of the Downtown Seattle - DTSA Candidate Scorecard // A Western Washington guide to the Aug. 5 primary election // Poll: Gov. Ferguson’s first approval rating lowest in over 30 years // Poll: Washington voters are ‘pretty pessimistic’ about the future // Will Seattle reelect its conservative City Attorney? // Trump Said Gifted Qatari Jet Was ‘Free’—But Renovation Cost Could Reportedly Near $1 Billion // Puyallup Tribe receives noteworthy gift: A Tacoma arts complex

In this episode, Jordan discusses a Seventh Circuit decision in a case of first impression over whether the DTSA applies outside the United States.

The Varsity is here! Erick Yung, Blake Jones, Eddy Rotten, Gucci Mar, Pretty Papes and Brian To Earth join us to talk about their supergroup, The Varsity! They talk about their upcoming video release party and plans for the future. Shoutout to Frosty, Rocky Angelini, Los.Wav and Daniel Jamezzz, the other members of the group that couldn't be in studio. Come through August 25th, 2023 at El Rincon Mexicano in DTSA. We also talk about It's A Summer Time Thang Vol. 4 happening Saturday Sept 2nd in Fullerton. https://www.eventbrite.com/e/its-a-summer-time-thang-tickets-703845660317?utm-campaign=social&utm-content=attendeeshare&utm-medium=discovery&utm-term=listing&utm-source=cp&aff=ebdsshcopyurl   All that plus, local events and a new Mandoh Mix.    @erick.yung @therodriguezshow @mvndoh @iamcesarrod @rodriguezpodcasts Book Mandoh: Mandoh@rodriguezshow.com https://linktr.ee/therodriguezshow

This week the guys get a visit from Sacramento rapper, Chav' she talks about releasing her first album in 2022, her experience making music and performs two tracks! Plus The Innnovator, Blake Jones returns to talk about his new album “My Father's Son” and his release party in DTSA. Also, Travis Scott announces Utopia, Drake disses Childish Gambino and Danny Brown + JPEG Mafia drop new music! All that and local events, top tracks and a new Mandoh Mix!   @innnovator @chav_916   @therodriguezshow @mvndoh @iamcesarrod @rodriguezpodcasts Book Mandoh: Mandoh@rodriguezshow.com https://linktr.ee/therodriguezshow

This week we recap Mandoh's set at The Yost in DTSA and Day Trip in Long Beach! Plus YBG & Cozy Cloud stop by to talk about That 7 Show and what it takes to put on a great event. And the return of Mia Zoe! She talks about her plan to release singles all year including her newest track "You"!   @miazoemagana @ybg714 @cozycloudmusic @therodriguezshow @mvndoh @iamcesarrod @rodriguezpodcasts Book Mandoh: Mandoh@rodriguezshow.com https://linktr.ee/therodriguezshow

I always love to welcome guests back to the show - I think it's good to see the ups and downs of the industry. This world moves very fast, and a lot can change for guests of this show. This is why it was so important to get Kevin Hammons and Curtis Sheetz back to update the world on their wildly popular burger concept, Hammer Burger. Built better since 2020, these smashed-so-good-they-are-flat patties have stolen the hearts and tastebuds of countless people, and, like many others, change was inevitbale for the team. However, this is a very good, and welcome change as they have ditched life on the road and are set to open their own brick and mortar in DTSA! They sit down to discuss transitions to the new space, new menu items, and more!“An unofficial guide to living well, and often, The Best Ceats brings unprecedented access to every aspect of the Orange County and greater Southern California hospitality industry. Showcasing the best stories and the people behind them with every piece of content, The Best Ceats is the definitive destination for all the tasty tidbits of news you need to know about!“The Best Ceats Podcast brings unprecedented access to the Orange County hospitality industry each and every episode. Bringing you the best stories, and the people behind them with every interview, The Best Ceats Podcast showcases the very best of Southern California's bars, restaurants, and beyond.You can find more information at https://thebestceats.comFollow Host Crawford McCarthy at https://www.instagram.com/thebestceats/To support content like The Best Ceats Podcast, as well as gain access to the exclusive bonus episodes, and more, please consider supporting The Best Ceats, at: https://patreon.com/thebestceats To learn more about Ali Coyle, as well as her debut track “Trust Me,” please see her official website: https://alicoylemusic.com To find out more about our sponsors for this episode, please visit the following:https://www.heirloompotager.comhttps://www.lawinefest.com

In 2016, Congress passed the Defend Trade Secrets Act (the “DTSA”). The vote was unanimous in the Senate and 410:2 in the House. President Obama signed it on May 11, 2016. Codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1836, et seq., the DTSA created a federal private right of action for trade secret owners to sue for the … Continue reading →

Within the U.S., trade secrets generally encompass a company's proprietary information that is not generally known to its competitors, and which provides the company with a competitive advantage. Although trade secrets law evolved under state common law, prior to 1974, the question of whether patent law preempted state trade secrets law had been unanswered. In 1974, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark decision, Kewanee Oil Company v Bicron Corporation, which resolved the question in favor of allowing the states to freely develop their own trade secret laws. State law. In 1979, several U.S. states adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), which was further amended in 1985, with approximately 47 states having adopted some variation of it as the basis for trade secret law. Another significant development is the Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996 (18 U.S.C. §§ 1831–1839), which makes the theft or misappropriation of a trade secret a federal crime. This law contains two provisions criminalizing two sorts of activity. 18 U.S.C. § 1831(a), criminalizes the theft of trade secrets to benefit foreign powers. 18 U.S.C. § 1832, criminalizes their theft for commercial or economic purposes. The statutory penalties are different for the two offenses. The EEA was extended in 2016 to allow companies to file civil suits in federal court. Federal law. On May 11, 2016, President Obama signed the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1839, which for the first time created a federal cause of action for misappropriation of trade secrets. The DTSA provides for both a private right of action for damages and injunction and a civil action for injunction brought by the Attorney General. The statute followed state laws on liability in significant part, defining trade secrets in the same way as the Uniform Trade Secrets Act as, "all forms and types of financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineering information, including patterns, plans, compilations, program devices, formulas, designs, prototypes, methods, techniques, processes, procedures, programs, or codes, whether tangible or intangible, and whether or how stored, compiled, or memorialized physically, electronically, graphically, photographically, or in writing if (A) the owner thereof has taken reasonable measures to keep such information secret; and (B) the information derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through proper means by, another person who can obtain economic value from the disclosure or use of the information." However, the law contains several important differences from prior law. Because it is a federal law, trade secret cases can be prosecuted in federal courts with concomitant procedural advantages. It provides for the unusual remedy of preliminary seizure of "property necessary to prevent the propagation or dissemination of the trade secret," 18 U.S.C. §1836. It provides for remedies to include royalties in appropriate cases and exemplary damages up to two times the actual damages in cases of "willful and malicious" appropriation, 18 U.S.C. §1836(b)(3). The DTSA also clarifies that a United States resident (including a company) can be liable for misappropriation that takes place outside the United States, and any person can be liable as long as an act in furtherance of the misappropriation takes place in the United States, 18 U.S.C. §1837. The DTSA provides the courts with broad injunctive powers. 18 U.S.C. §1836(b)(3). The DTSA does not preempt or supplant state laws, but provides an additional cause of action. Because states vary significantly in their approach to the "inevitable disclosure" doctrine, its use has limited, if any, application under the DTSA, 18 U.S.C.§1836(b)(3)(A). --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

This week we have the homie Frosty and her friend Kundan from Talk2Me2sday, a new community event happening in DTSA. Then it's the return of Mutt + Archer, they give all the details on their new single HomeLife. Plus Lil Yachty drops a trippy new album, Lil Jon sues Lovers and Friends, local events and a new Mandoh Mix! Instagram: @talk2me2sday @tustinarcher @mutt._oc https://linktr.ee/therodriguezshow

Season 3 is here and what better way to start than hearing from professionals how they plan to reach their next level! Celeste records live from the YNL Consulting Professional Mixer hosted at Perla DTSA where she talked to guests and asked them what they were going to do to reach their next level. Celeste interviewed: Lionel Parrales Rodrigo Castellanos Noelia Cuevas Ramon Sotelo Brittany and Elijah Rodriguez Jaime Raygoza Miguel Silvestre & Christine Silvestre

Every "Perla" has its story. In today's episode, Celeste has an engaging and heartfelt conversation with Ana Padilla, an incredible business woman and entrepreneur. Ana shares her story from her early struggles to finding the peral of Down Town Santa Ana.

This week on The Rodriguez Show: Mandoh and Cesar talk about Kendrick's new album and tour info, Freddie Gibbs VS Benny The Butcher, Pins and Patches in DTSA and more! Plus a new mix by Mandoh and a new What's Poppin'? And OC artist Villiami comes though to talk about his creative evolution, his upcoming project and perform a new verse! And finally it's the return of  Face and Barlos along with Shneaky! They talk about their upcoming performance and perform a track!   Instagram: @villiamiii @barlosgotbars @facevsit @officialshneaky   Links to Youtube, TikTok, Patreon and more: https://linktr.ee/therodriguezshow

Join Troutman Pepper White Collar and Litigation Partner Cal Stein for a special podcast series, discussing the legal landscape surrounding the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).In this fourth installment, Cal welcomes Troutman Pepper Partner William Taylor and Associate Jaclyn Essinger to discuss the intersection between trade secrets law and RICO, with a particular focus on the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), including:Overview of DTSA (3:58);Ingredients of a Typical DTSA RICO Case (8:45);What DTSA Violations Are “Racketeering Activity” (14:35);DTSA RICO “Enterprises” (21:48); andThe Future of DTSA RICO Litigation (28:06).Be on the lookout for our next episode of this podcast series.

“Global Reach: Extraterritoriality and DTSA Enforcement Beyond the U.S.” is episode three of BakerHostetler's six-part series, "The Emerging New Era for Noncompetes and Trade Secrets.” Questions & Comments: jsiegal@bakerlaw.com, jacox@bakerlaw.com, lsigmond@bakerlaw.com, and tmiao@bakerlaw.com

The guys talk about Kanye West's Donda, Biz Markie passing and Tyler the Creator's short film. The Gucci Mar returns with Daniel Jamezzz to talk and perform their new single Jello. Plus Oscar Osorio talks about how he got into DJ'ing and the creation of his event in DTSA, Tropicaza! Instagram: @guccimar @danieljamezzz @oscarosorio_dj @tropicaza_oc Videos for the episode at: https://www.youtube.com/c/therodriguezshow Support the show at https://www.patreon.com/TheRodriguezShow.  $1 a month gets you an exclusive segment and more! Listen to The Rodriguez Show every Friday 10AM (PST) on your favorite podcast app (iTunes, Google Play, etc.) and visit rodriguezshow.com for videos, pictures and more!  Follow the guys: Instagram Cesar Rodriguez= @iamcesarrod Mandoh= @mvndoh Yael= @yvelisdead Twitter: @rodriguezshowoc Instagram: @therodriguezshow Facebook.com/officialrodriguezshow Assistant Producer: Yael Flowers Content Creator: Alondra Valdivia Executive Patreon Tier Supporter: Efrain Martinez rodriguezshow.com hits101radio.com

In this episode, we welcome you to Season 3 of the podcast, and discuss preemption under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, the increasingly important issue of compilations as a trade secret, and the Ninth Circuit’s decision on an issue of first impression – whether pre-enactment disclosures are actionable under the Defend Trade Secrets Act.

The guys talk about Kendrick's upcoming album?, Ty $'s new album, New Nx Worries album and Kanye's new single. Aaron from Keep Runnin' Santa Ana joins us to talk about the running club he started in DTSA during quarantine. Plus a march announcement for our Kill 'Em At The Polls Livestream.  Follow our guest instagram: @keeprunninsantaana Videos for the episode at: https://www.youtube.com/c/therodriguezshow Support the show at https://www.patreon.com/TheRodriguezShow.  $1 a month gets you an exclusive segment and more! Listen to The Rodriguez Show every Friday 10AM (PST) on your favorite podcast app (iTunes, Google Play, etc.) and visit rodriguezshow.com for videos, pictures and more!  Follow the guys: Instagram Cesar Rodriguez= @iamcesarrod Carlos Rodriguez= @cvrlos_trs or @fotosbycvrlos_ Mandoh= @mvndoh Reyes= @reyezxbryan Twitter: @rodriguezshowoc Instagram: @therodriguezshow Facebook.com/officialrodriguezshow Assistant Producer: Yael Flowers Content Creator: Alondra Valdivia rodriguezshow.com hits101radio.com

Exclusive interview by DTSA's very own Mic Tyson‼️

For the last nine years Playground DTLA has been the very personal expression of Proprietor and Chef Jason Quinn. Sadly COVID 19 has decimated their business. Chef Jason has announced that the entire Playground complex will conclude at the end … Continue reading → The post Show 389, September 5, 2020: Chef / Proprietor Jason Quinn, Playground DTSA, Santa Ana appeared first on SoCal Restaurant Show.

In this episode, we discuss the effect of a trade secret subsumed within a parent, the viability of claims under the Defend Trade Secrets Act for misappropriation before its enactment, and the application of the economic loss rule to trade secret cases.

In this episode, we discuss preemption of claims based on trade secret theft, how to establish likelihood of success to obtain injunctive relief following an unauthorized mass download of company information, the Defend Trade Secrets Act’s subject matter jurisdiction requirement, and DTSA violations that began before DTSA’s enactment.  This podcast is eligible for CA self-study CLE credit. Certificates of Attendance will not be issued. CA attorneys are responsible for self-reporting the amount of time they listened. For all other jurisdictions, please contact your state’s MCLE Board or Committee for guidance on their rules and regulations as it relates to self-study credit.

* Use coupon code PODCAST25 for 25% off this webcast * Webcast URL: https://www.theknowledgegroup.org/webcasts/defend-trade-secrets-act-in-the-2019-landscape/ Join us for this Knowledge Group Online CLE Trade Secret Webinar. The enactment of the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) in 2016 has provided federal jurisdiction for trade secrets claims, which allowed owners with misappropriated trade secrets to file complaints in the federal court. Since its passage, a notable rise of trade secrets claims has been reported with 1, 134 cases in 2017 from the average number of 900 cases filed in the previous years. It is possible that this might upsurge in the unpredictable future; thus, businesses must keep abreast of the recent developments in the DTSA. They must proactively review their procedures and safeguard their sensitive documents by ensuring intellectual property protection to avoid trade secrets liabilities. Join a panel of key thought leaders and professionals assembled by The Knowledge Group as they bring the audience to a road beyond the basics of Defend Trade Secrets Act in the 2019 landscape. Speakers will provide an in-depth analysis of the DTSA litigation trends and developments. They will also present risk issues and share best strategies in managing trade secrets to prevent pitfalls. For anymore information please click on the webcast url at the top of this description.

Hosts Greenberg Traurig Shareholder Jordan Grotzinger and Associate Jena MacCabe welcome you to the podcast! Link to disclosure statement here. Show notes: A trade secret is comprised of information that (1) is not generally known, (2) has independent economic value from its secrecy, and (3) is subject to reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy. Misappropriation is (1) acquisition a trade secret by improper means, or (2) disclosure or use of the trade secret without the owner’s consent by someone who (i) acquired it by improper means, or (ii) knew that it was acquired by improper means or under circumstances giving rise to a duty to maintain its secrecy or limit its use. Remedies for trade secret misappropriation are (1) actual damages or unjust enrichment, (2) reasonable royalties if actual damages and unjust enrichment are not provable, and (3) injunctive relief.  In addition, for willful misappropriation, punitive damages and attorneys’ fees and costs may also be available.  Under the DTSA, ex parte seizure is an additional remedy. This podcast is eligible for CA self-study CLE credit. Certificates of Attendance will not be issued. CA attorneys are responsible for self-reporting the amount of time they listened. For all other jurisdictions, please contact your state’s MCLE Board or Committee for guidance on their rules and regulations as it relates to self-study credit.

* Use coupon code PODCAST25 for 25% off this webcast * Webcast URL: https://www.theknowledgegroup.org/webcasts/defend-trade-secrets-act-2018/ Since the passage of the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) in 2016, there has been a significant increase in trade secret litigation. An overlap between lawsuits involving trade secret claims and other claims, particularly those that include breach of contract or business tort, has been observed. However, although the DTSA is an effective tool for employers when resolving trade secret disputes, they must be aware of its limitations. The DTSA does not relieve employers from the courts' scrutiny of the steps they implemented to prevent trade secret misappropriation. As case law with respect to the DTSA develops, companies must remain vigilant in protecting their trade secrets. Join a panel of key thought leaders assembled by The Knowledge Group as they bring the audience to a road beyond the basics of trade secrets and as they delve into the rising DTSA developments and trends. Speakers will also provide the audience with practical defense strategies in light of the recent updates. Key topics include: - The DTSA: Overview - Emerging Developments and Trends - Notable Case Rulings - The DTSA as an Effective Tool - Litigation Risks and Pitfalls - Practical Strategies for Employers For anymore information please click on the webcast url at the top of this description.

This week, Staff Correspondent Mike Rivera speaks with Conor Tucker, a litigation associate at Irell & Manella in Los Angeles. This year, IPLJ published Conor’s article regarding the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016. Conor explains the ways in which the DTSA was inspired by the Economic Espionage Act of 1996, and the massive, unexpected jurisdictional issues that were created by this newly expanded federal protection of trade secrets. To read Conor's article, click here. Conor's bio can be found on the Irell & Manella website. Our theme song is Roller Blades by Otis McDonald. Subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts and leave us a review! Website: www.fordhamiplj.org Twitter: @FordhamIPLJ Facebook: www.facebook.com/FordhamIPLJ Patreon: www.patreon.com/fordhamiplj

Welcome to episode ten of OC Speakly. On this week's show we discuss gentrification, specifically in SanTana (or DTSA if you are bringing the "renaissance" to the area). Gabriel San Román talks with Sarah Rafael García about her new zines SanTana's Fairy Tales. They also discuss the loss of the historic El Carousel and what can be done about the loss of community as new businesses and residents move in. We also review Pizzeria Ortica in Costa Mesa. Enjoy!   Show notes: Downtown Santa Ana Gets "Great Neighborhood" Award—And Protests! Protest signs (image) Santa Ana Gentrifiers to Rename Former Fiesta Marketplace "East End Promenade"--HA! Interview with Sarah Rafael García Website SanTana's Fairy Tales Zoraida & Marisol available now, profits support Transgeneros en Accion Grand Central Art Center LibroMobile Raspa Press Food review - Pizzeria Ortica Website Best craft cocktails in OC 2016 Murderers Row of bartenders (Joel Caruso, Aristotle Alstaetter, Justin Van Billiard) -- Leave a message on our Hate Hotline: 714-550-5984 letters@ocweekly.com Web Site Facebook Twitter Instagram

On May 11, 2016, President Obama enacted a new federal trade secret protection law known as the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA). The DTSA makes federal protection against the misappropriation of trade secrets available to private parties. Before the DTSA, private parties who sought to protect their trade secrets from misappropriation were limited […]

Understanding the New Federal Trade Secret Law On May 11, 2016, President Obama enacted a new federal trade secret protection law as part of an update to the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA). The new trade secret law, known as the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA), makes federal protection against the misappropriation […]

Beth McCormick shared her unparalleled knowledge of the needs and means to protect this vital aspect of the nation's security and strategic posture. Hudson Senior Fellow Arthur Herman moderated the event.

Beth McCormick shared her unparalleled knowledge of the needs and means to protect this vital aspect of the nation's security and strategic posture. Hudson Senior Fellow Arthur Herman moderated the event.