Podcasts about defend trade secrets act

In this episode of Hiring to Firing, hosts Tracey Diamond and Emily Schifter are joined by their Troutman Pepper Locke partners, Austin Padgett and Rusty Close, who host the No Infringement Intended podcast. Together, they explore the intersection of intellectual property (IP) and employment law through the lens of the movie The Social Network. They discuss works made for hire, the impact of the Defend Trade Secrets Act, and the challenges employers of all sizes face in protecting their innovations and the inventions their employees create on their behalf. Discover the critical lessons learned from real-life IP disputes, the importance of proper documentation, and best practices for protecting your company's ideas.Troutman Pepper Locke's Labor + Employment Practice Group provides comprehensive thought leadership through various channels. We regularly issue advisories that offer timely insights into the evolving employment law landscape, and maintain the HiringToFiring.Law Blog, a resource spotlighting best practices for employers. Our Hiring to Firing Podcast, hosted by Tracey Diamond and new co-host Emily Schifter, delves into pressing labor and employment law topics, drawing unique parallels from pop culture, hit shows, and movies.

In this episode, Jordan discusses a Seventh Circuit decision in a case of first impression over whether the DTSA applies outside the United States.

In this episode, Jordan discusses how to plead (and not to plead) subject matter jurisdiction under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, the requirement of trade secret ownership, and whether injunctive relief is presumed once the plaintiff proves misappropriation.

The Aid Market Podcast, hosted by Mike Shanley, explores USAID growth strategies, including bootstrapping, external investment, and mergers & acquisitions (M&A). Guests Keith Ives, CEO of Causal Design, and Santiago Sedaca, President of Empower International Development, share their experiences and insights. Edward Williams,  partner at Williams LLP, joins the conversation to discuss legal considerations in M&A. The discussion concludes with Christy Hollywood, COO of Konektid, who provides a summary of the key takeaways. Throughout the episode, guests share their experiences and insights on regulatory compliance, due diligence, and the importance of relationships in government contracting. The conversation also emphasizes the value of M&A for career opportunities and impactful development work, highlighting the legal and financial considerations involved. Clear communication, cultural fit, and market understanding are highlighted as crucial factors in ensuring successful acquisitions. IN THIS EPISODE: [01:44] Keith Ives reflects on his educational and business background, culminating in his being a founding partner in Causal Design. [06:24] Keith discusses the importance of relationships and attendance at industry events. He also comments on the importance of independent CPA-reviewed financials.  [15:36] When should a firm start sponsoring events?  [18:23] Santiago Sedaca discusses mergers and acquisitions in the USAID market, and he reflects on the acquisition of his company by Palladium.  [25:20] Santiago describes the process of a merger or acquisition and how to prepare for them.  [36:17] Mike asks if localization plays into acquisitions, and Santiago comments on private equity firms buying up small businesses.  [41:46] Keith comments on not being a small business if acquired and doing a test run with contracts. Santiago points out that culture is a factor.  [46:52] Edward Williams describes what happens when a client wants to merge with or acquire another firm and whether there are additional complications if a non-US firm intends to acquire a US firm.   [55:54] Christy Hollywood shares her takeaways from today's conversation.    KEY TAKEAWAYS:  Building strong relationships with prime contractors and key players in the industry is crucial for success in the USAID market. Attending industry events and networking can open doors and create opportunities for collaboration. In USAID contracting and international development, successful mergers hinge on factors like net income, reputation, and strong market relationships. Cultural fit is vital, and post-acquisition success requires careful integration planning. The sector's low net income margins and minimal involvement of investments or private equity present unique challenges in M&A activities. The importance of understanding the "why" behind mergers and acquisitions, as it can be a mission-driven decision, not just a financial one. This understanding can provide opportunities for career advancement and better development work.   RESOURCES: Aid Market Podcast Mike Shanley - LinkedIn Causal Design - Website Keith Ives - LinkedIn Santiago Sedaca - LinkedIn Williams LLP - Website Edward Williams - LinkedIn Konektid - Website Christy Hollywood - LinkedIn   BIOGRAPHIES Santiago Sedaca Executive experience in thriving organizations (CARANA, Palladium, DT Global, Wise Responder) leading strategy, developing top performing teams, and managing large technical, business development and operations teams (1000+ people), producing market-leading financial results and social impact (managed $100 million+ P&L). Expert innovator in international development and commercial strategies in emerging markets, working across a range of disciplines with a strong track record in public-private partnerships, sustainability, innovative finance, private sector development, improved governance and natural resource management. Business Development track record, selling more than $700 million in new projects in the last ten years, with networks within USAID, FCDO, DFAT, MCC, DFC, multilateral agencies, and corporations, having worked in more than forty countries. Edward Williams is a powerful and efficient advocate for his clients. Since 2015, Super Lawyer has rated him a Rising Star in the area of commercial litigation.An experienced attorney with a long history of success in trial practice and transactional matters, T. Edward Williams is a skilled business attorney who have litigated cases involving in variety of business litigation cases, including partnership and shareholder disputes, employment law, uniform commercial code law, oil and gas law, and securities law. Edward is also skilled in bankruptcy and international arbitration matters.Edward has represented American and foreign companies in matters involving the Defend Trade Secrets Act, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, among others. Keith Ives is a project and policy leader passionate about evidence-based decision-making in development economics and humanitarian response. Before bringing the Causal Design team together, he consulted for The World Bank and worked for Georgetown University's Initiative on Innovation, Development, and Evaluation (gui2de) designing mobile phone-based surveys and managing randomized trials in Kenya and Nigeria. Keith has designed evaluations for the Liberian and Rwandan Ministries of Agriculture, executed a growth diagnostic for the Kurdistan Regional Government, coordinated humanitarian responses in Haiti, Nigeria, and the United States, managed economic development projects in Kenya and Burkina Faso, and led Marines during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Christy Hollywood supports Konektid clients and consultants with skills honed during 20+ years of leadership in international development, professional services, and consulting organizations. She led a successful consulting firm of her own for 11 years. Earlier, she served as Vice President for BD of Cardno (a large USAID and MCC contractor, since acquired) and held pivotal business development roles at KPMG's Emerging Markets Group, RTI International, PATH, as well as Fidelity Investments and Noblis. A recognized expert in business development consulting, she's authored several articles and is five-time invited presenter at international conferences on proposal management, competitive intelligence, and business development.  

In 2016, Congress passed the Defend Trade Secrets Act (the “DTSA”). The vote was unanimous in the Senate and 410:2 in the House. President Obama signed it on May 11, 2016. Codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1836, et seq., the DTSA created a federal private right of action for trade secret owners to sue for the … Continue reading →

Join Troutman Pepper White Collar and Litigation Partner Cal Stein for a special podcast series, discussing the legal landscape surrounding the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).In this fourth installment, Cal welcomes Troutman Pepper Partner William Taylor and Associate Jaclyn Essinger to discuss the intersection between trade secrets law and RICO, with a particular focus on the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), including:Overview of DTSA (3:58);Ingredients of a Typical DTSA RICO Case (8:45);What DTSA Violations Are “Racketeering Activity” (14:35);DTSA RICO “Enterprises” (21:48); andThe Future of DTSA RICO Litigation (28:06).Be on the lookout for our next episode of this podcast series.

The Defend Trade Secrets Act: Five Years After is episode two of BakerHostetler's six-part series, "The Emerging New Era for Noncompetes and Trade Secrets.” Questions & Comments: jsiegal@bakerlaw.com, mtemple@bakerlaw.com, cbusen@bakerlaw.com  

Welcome to In the Breakroom, a podcast series on hot topics related to employment law. On July 9, 2021, President Joe Biden issued the “Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” which, among other things, seeks to limit noncompete agreements. In this episode, Bill Grob and Caren Marlowe address changes to the use of restrictive covenants following the presidential action, including noncompete and nonsolicitation agreements. The speakers also discuss the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act and analogous state laws, including California's and Florida's respective uniform trade secrets acts.

In this episode, we discuss President Biden's July 9, 2021 Executive Order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” and what it means for trade secret protection.  We also unpack the definition of “use” of trade secrets under the Defend Trade Secrets Act.

Join Shareholder Dylan Wiseman, and Attorneys Brandon Carr, and Tiffany Ng, as they discuss a recent, first-of-its kind ruling on March 13, 2021. The Northern District of California granted Mr. Wiseman’s client’s motion to strike and dismiss nine of Plaintiff’s alleged DNA sequencing trade secrets, leaving Plaintiff with only its customer list and vendor list claims to support its allegations under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act. Disclaimer: This communication is not intended to create or constitute, nor does it create or constitute, an attorney-client or any other legal relationship. No statement in this communication constitutes legal advice nor should any communication herein be construed, relied upon, or interpreted as legal advice. This communication is for general information purposes only regarding recent legal developments of interest, and is not a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No listener should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included herein without seeking appropriate legal advice on the particular facts and circumstances affecting that listener. For more information, visit www.buchalter.com.

Ropes & Gray's podcast series Conductive Discussions focuses on legal issues of interest to the semiconductor industry. In this episode, IP litigation partners Mark Rowland, Dave Chun and Matt Rizzolo, and associates Jolene Wang and Mike Morales, discuss recent trends in trade secret litigation. The team explores the large jury verdicts awarded in trade secret cases, and the increased popularity of trade secret litigation in the wake of the 2016 enactment of the Defend Trade Secrets Act. The team analyzes typical parties in trade secret misappropriation cases, trade secret trolls, and the International Trade Commission's recent issuance of remedies in Certain Botulinum Toxin Products, where the misappropriation at issue occurred wholly abroad.

In this episode, we welcome you to Season 3 of the podcast, and discuss preemption under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, the increasingly important issue of compilations as a trade secret, and the Ninth Circuit’s decision on an issue of first impression – whether pre-enactment disclosures are actionable under the Defend Trade Secrets Act.

Episode 21:  Louisville attorney Parker Wornall joins Jim to discuss the work he does for healthcare providers.  His focus includes dental offices, foot and ankle practitioners, APRN practices, chiropractors, mental health practioners, adult day-care practices and others. There are legal aspects to establishing a practice, developing the internal forms and processes, HR-related policies, regulatory compliance issues, planning for growth and eventually a sale or wind-down of the practice.  Parker handles both transactional and litigation matters.  Ideally, he enjoys getting involved in the early stages to protect the healthcare provider and the practice.  He works to help avoid potential legal exposure.  Entity Startup There are both strategic and practical considerations for the entity structure.  This could include PLLCs, LLCs, PSCs and others.  There are issues surrounding non-provider members (e.g. investors, directors, practice business manager).  Due diligence for the proper structuring of shares may also need to be considered. Parker has a network of colleagues in related fields, such as CPAs, who can also add valuable perspectives. Compliance Checks A thorough review of forms, policies and procedures is extremely important.  While COVID has highlighted some of the compliance requirements from governmental agencies, there are always the day-to-day issues related to the Department of Labor, Kentucky wage and hour and/or Federal wage and hour laws, the Fair Labor Standards act and more. There are disparities between some of the Kentucky regulations and the Federal DEA regulations.  Testosterone clinics (nurse practitioner clinics) can run afoul of the various regulations because of the various requirements. Employment Law Issues for Healthcare Providers Your practice will often include individuals who are there to help run/manage the business.  Some may be salaried, while others could be 1099-based.  You may need to perform adequate reviews of credentials.  How you work with your employees and practitioners may also require guidance from your general counsel. Non-compete and other restrictive covenants may come into play in the hiring of employees.  Parker can work to either defend the covenant or to prove why one may be invalid.  This can also include the protection of trade secrets (enforceable under the Kentucky Uniform Trade Secrets Act and Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016).  The 3 common types of restrictive covenants in Kentucky are: Non-Compete Agreements Non-Solicitation Agreements Confidentiality Agreements Having properly drafted and executed contracts in place, before they are tested, is a smart option to reduce your legal expenses should an action need to be filed or defended. Insurance Coverage Issues Parker can help communicate the needs of the practice and its business plan to insurance professionals to ensure the risks are fully considered and adequately quoted.  Often, business specialists tend to look at the issues from a single perspective (e.g. insurance agents, CPAs, etc.).  In the role of general counsel for the healthcare practice, Parker can coordinate with each of the business partners to provide clarity and to maintain a focus on the overall business plan for the practice. Hiring and Firing Parker is very familiar with cases involving the Kentucky Human Rights Commission and the EEOC.  At times, these cases can also end up in litigation.  An interesting issue recently surfaced deals with older employees who were either working from home or off work due to COVID.  If the practice is ready for them to come back to work, but they refuse, you may have exposure to actions under the Age Discrimination and Employment Act, the Federal Civil Rights Act and the Kentucky Civil Rights Act.  Each situation is unique and often complex.  Having proper contract verbiage and documentation can reduce the risk of litigation to the practice.  Workplace Investigations These can involve in-house HR professionals, or out-sourced HR resources.  However, some of instances may require the professional to see the advice of legal counsel to determine the best way to approach or handle a particular investigation.  Again, having well-drafted, comprehensive contracts can shield the practice from potential adverse legal actions.  Medical Licensure Defense Parker has significant experience defending the licenses of healthcare providers.  Most of the licensure issues are handled before the licensing boards.  Parker has successfully defended both doctors and nurses, as well as other medical providers. Certificate of Need Applications Many healthcare providers are required to apply for a Certificate of Need (CON) if they plan to expand a practice or start a practice.  Ambulatory surgical centers, adult day healthcare programs and others are typically required to show a need exists and how their expansion would impact that community need.  Parker can guide the application process.  He will represent the provider at the hearing.  In some cases, existing practices may want to prevent the expansion of a competitive practice.    Sale, Dissolution or Wind-Down of a Practice Healthcare providers may decide it’s time to transition the ownership of the practice.  In some instances, the provider receives an unsolicited offer to purchase.  Parker can help in the due diligence of the sale or purchase of the practice.  These transactions are highly complex and involve much more than often appears on the surface.  There are multiple ways to engage Parker for your healthcare practice.  Fees and billing arrangements can be arranged to best meet the needs of the practitioner or practice at large. If you’d like to contact Parker: Phone: (502) 805-2303 Website: https://www.ccgattorneys.com Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode.  From more information on business-related issues, visit my website at www.JimRayConsultingServices.com. Got Podcast? Finally, if you’re interested in developing and launching a podcast for your business or organization, I’d be happy to help.  I provide this service on a regional basis.  Visit my podcast production services page for more information. Until next time, remember, if you need help with your small business, Let’s Grow For It!  

In this episode, we discuss the effect of a trade secret subsumed within a parent, the viability of claims under the Defend Trade Secrets Act for misappropriation before its enactment, and the application of the economic loss rule to trade secret cases.

In this episode, we discuss a recent District Court interpretation of subject matter jurisdiction under the Defend Trade Secrets Act, pleading misappropriation without establishing that all stolen information constitutes a trade secret, and how to plead “indirect” misappropriation.  This podcast is eligible for CA self-study CLE credit. Certificates of Attendance will not be issued. CA attorneys are responsible for self-reporting the amount of time they listened. For all other jurisdictions, please contact your state’s MCLE Board or Committee for guidance on their rules and regulations as it relates to self-study credit.

In this episode, we discuss preemption of claims based on trade secret theft, how to establish likelihood of success to obtain injunctive relief following an unauthorized mass download of company information, the Defend Trade Secrets Act’s subject matter jurisdiction requirement, and DTSA violations that began before DTSA’s enactment.  This podcast is eligible for CA self-study CLE credit. Certificates of Attendance will not be issued. CA attorneys are responsible for self-reporting the amount of time they listened. For all other jurisdictions, please contact your state’s MCLE Board or Committee for guidance on their rules and regulations as it relates to self-study credit.

* Use coupon code PODCAST25 for 25% off this webcast * Webcast URL: https://www.theknowledgegroup.org/webcasts/defend-trade-secrets-act-in-the-2019-landscape/ Join us for this Knowledge Group Online CLE Trade Secret Webinar. The enactment of the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) in 2016 has provided federal jurisdiction for trade secrets claims, which allowed owners with misappropriated trade secrets to file complaints in the federal court. Since its passage, a notable rise of trade secrets claims has been reported with 1, 134 cases in 2017 from the average number of 900 cases filed in the previous years. It is possible that this might upsurge in the unpredictable future; thus, businesses must keep abreast of the recent developments in the DTSA. They must proactively review their procedures and safeguard their sensitive documents by ensuring intellectual property protection to avoid trade secrets liabilities. Join a panel of key thought leaders and professionals assembled by The Knowledge Group as they bring the audience to a road beyond the basics of Defend Trade Secrets Act in the 2019 landscape. Speakers will provide an in-depth analysis of the DTSA litigation trends and developments. They will also present risk issues and share best strategies in managing trade secrets to prevent pitfalls. For anymore information please click on the webcast url at the top of this description.

* Use coupon code PODCAST25 for 25% off this webcast * Webcast URL: https://www.theknowledgegroup.org/webcasts/defend-trade-secrets-act-2018/ Since the passage of the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) in 2016, there has been a significant increase in trade secret litigation. An overlap between lawsuits involving trade secret claims and other claims, particularly those that include breach of contract or business tort, has been observed. However, although the DTSA is an effective tool for employers when resolving trade secret disputes, they must be aware of its limitations. The DTSA does not relieve employers from the courts' scrutiny of the steps they implemented to prevent trade secret misappropriation. As case law with respect to the DTSA develops, companies must remain vigilant in protecting their trade secrets. Join a panel of key thought leaders assembled by The Knowledge Group as they bring the audience to a road beyond the basics of trade secrets and as they delve into the rising DTSA developments and trends. Speakers will also provide the audience with practical defense strategies in light of the recent updates. Key topics include: - The DTSA: Overview - Emerging Developments and Trends - Notable Case Rulings - The DTSA as an Effective Tool - Litigation Risks and Pitfalls - Practical Strategies for Employers For anymore information please click on the webcast url at the top of this description.

Do you know what to do when a non-compete agreement has been violated? In Amit Bindra's last episode, we talked about protecting trade secrets and confidential information. We continue this conversation today by diving into what happens when you need to take an employee to court when a non-compete agreement has been violated in the workplace. We touch on what the process looks like and the impact of recent laws in Nevada, Utah, and Illinois. Find out more about how to start your own business With us is Amit Bindra from The Prinz Law Firm located in Chicago Illinois. He uses his extensive experience in employment law to run a practice focused on non-compete agreements, non-solicitation agreements, and trade secrets. When a Non-Compete Agreement Has Been Violated - Key Points A non-compete agreement can remain valid whether an employee leaves voluntarily or is terminated. Legal redress for a violation often happens quickly. A preliminary injunction or a TRO decision (temporary restraining order) could be issued. Employees may try to file suit to declare an employer’s action void or invalid. Illinois recently passed the Illinois Freedom to Work Act to protect low wage earners. Utah passed a law that a non-compete agreement that last more than one year is not enforceable. Nevada amended their non-compete law that limits enforcement if a client seeks out a former employee, rather than the employee soliciting the client. Congress recently passed the Defend Trade Secrets Act. Employers use the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to prevent employees from accessing their computer system without permission. When drafting agreements, work with your attorney to protect the company’s interests. Typically, employers include a clause in the agreements to ensure if they win, their attorney fees and expenses will be paid by the employee. We hope you enjoy listening; have a great day! Links and Contact Information The Prinz Law Firm Tales from around the Watercooler Bindra, Recent Trends in Noncompete Laws Across the United States, American Bar Association (February 21,2018) Here are some of our featured free resources. How Can I Organize My Financials? Should I Have A Business Plan? What Steps Should I Take Towards Branding? How Can Marketing Bring In More Clients? The Start-Up Checklist What Type Of Corporation Should I Be? Things To Consider When Scaling A Business

This week, Staff Correspondent Mike Rivera speaks with Conor Tucker, a litigation associate at Irell & Manella in Los Angeles. This year, IPLJ published Conor’s article regarding the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016. Conor explains the ways in which the DTSA was inspired by the Economic Espionage Act of 1996, and the massive, unexpected jurisdictional issues that were created by this newly expanded federal protection of trade secrets. To read Conor's article, click here. Conor's bio can be found on the Irell & Manella website. Our theme song is Roller Blades by Otis McDonald. Subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts and leave us a review! Website: www.fordhamiplj.org Twitter: @FordhamIPLJ Facebook: www.facebook.com/FordhamIPLJ Patreon: www.patreon.com/fordhamiplj

Companies in the U.S own an estimated $5 trillion in trade secerts  and about $3 billion is lost due to theft every year    The federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 went into effect in May While it’s still early to interpret how it will affect trade  secret litigation, some things are clear, especially that federal court  dockets will see an increase in more private trade secrets cases. Chris Ryan, a partner in Baker Botts’ Intellectual Property Group, discusses.

With the passing of the new Defend Trade Secrets Act, it is vitally important for organizations to update their form employee and independent contractor nondisclosure agreements to ensure they comply with the act’s “whistleblowers” requirements. In this podcast, John discusses the new act and its ramifications for nondisclosure agreements.

On May 11, 2016, President Obama enacted a new federal trade secret protection law known as the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA). The DTSA makes federal protection against the misappropriation of trade secrets available to private parties. Before the DTSA, private parties who sought to protect their trade secrets from misappropriation were limited […]

Understanding the New Federal Trade Secret Law On May 11, 2016, President Obama enacted a new federal trade secret protection law as part of an update to the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA). The new trade secret law, known as the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA), makes federal protection against the misappropriation […]

U.S. businesses have been given another legal recourse, in their never-ending battle against trade-secret theft. The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 was signed into law by President Obama in May. It provides companies with a civil cause of action, in addition to the federal criminal statutes that are already on the books. The measure is especially important because it allows business to act more quickly than before, with a successful resolution depending on law enforcement's ability to act before the thieves get away with their ''loot.'' On this episode, we speak with Frank Cullen, executive director for U.S. intellectual property policy with the Global Intellectual Property Center of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. He explains why the law represents a major victory for American business innovators. In addition, he helps us to understand just what constitutes a ''trade secret,'' and reveals some of the findings of a new report by the U.S. Chamber on the global impact of counterfeiting.

In our 116th episode of the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast, Stewart Baker, Michael Vatis, and Roger Warin discuss: Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016; Class-action suit targeting law firm privacy protections; Data breach action against Zappos; FTC schools FCC on privacy protection efforts. In our second half we have an interview with Dmitri Alperovitch, the CTO and co-founder of CrowdStrike. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of the firm.