Podcast appearances and mentions of john delatorre

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Dr. John Delatorre explores the complexities of the Richard Allen case, where Allen is accused of a horrific crime without any clear prior indicators of violent behavior. The conversation delves into the lack of a digital footprint or past behaviors that typically signal a predisposition to such acts, which raises questions about Allen's sudden alleged involvement. Dr. Delatorre compares Allen's situation to other notorious criminals like Dennis Rader (BTK) and Bryan Kohberger, suggesting that if Allen were guilty, there should have been warning signs or a history of similar behaviors. The discussion also addresses the challenge prosecutors face in presenting a motive, especially when there seems to be no evident pattern of deviant behavior in Allen's past. The episode emphasizes the importance of evidence, such as internet search histories or other digital traces, that could offer insight into Allen's mindset, which so far appear to be absent. This absence complicates the case and leaves many questions unanswered, with the upcoming trial expected to reveal more details. ### Main Points - Richard Allen is accused of a crime without a clear prior history or digital footprint that would typically indicate a predisposition to such acts. - Dr. Delatorre discusses the improbability of Allen suddenly committing such a crime without prior indicators, comparing him to other criminals like Dennis Rader and Bryan Kohberger. - The conversation raises questions about whether Allen might have a hidden history or if the accusations are unfounded. - The prosecution may struggle to establish a motive, as there seems to be no clear pattern of deviant behavior in Allen's past. - The absence of a digital footprint or any suspicious behavior in Allen's history complicates the case. - The lack of evidence, such as internet search histories, leaves the case shrouded in uncertainty. - The upcoming trial is expected to reveal more details, potentially shedding light on Allen's involvement. ### Hashtags #RichardAllen #JohnDelatorre #BryanKohberger #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Dr. John Delatorre explores the complexities of the Richard Allen case, where Allen is accused of a horrific crime without any clear prior indicators of violent behavior. The conversation delves into the lack of a digital footprint or past behaviors that typically signal a predisposition to such acts, which raises questions about Allen's sudden alleged involvement. Dr. Delatorre compares Allen's situation to other notorious criminals like Dennis Rader (BTK) and Bryan Kohberger, suggesting that if Allen were guilty, there should have been warning signs or a history of similar behaviors. The discussion also addresses the challenge prosecutors face in presenting a motive, especially when there seems to be no evident pattern of deviant behavior in Allen's past. The episode emphasizes the importance of evidence, such as internet search histories or other digital traces, that could offer insight into Allen's mindset, which so far appear to be absent. This absence complicates the case and leaves many questions unanswered, with the upcoming trial expected to reveal more details. ### Main Points - Richard Allen is accused of a crime without a clear prior history or digital footprint that would typically indicate a predisposition to such acts. - Dr. Delatorre discusses the improbability of Allen suddenly committing such a crime without prior indicators, comparing him to other criminals like Dennis Rader and Bryan Kohberger. - The conversation raises questions about whether Allen might have a hidden history or if the accusations are unfounded. - The prosecution may struggle to establish a motive, as there seems to be no clear pattern of deviant behavior in Allen's past. - The absence of a digital footprint or any suspicious behavior in Allen's history complicates the case. - The lack of evidence, such as internet search histories, leaves the case shrouded in uncertainty. - The upcoming trial is expected to reveal more details, potentially shedding light on Allen's involvement. ### Hashtags #RichardAllen #JohnDelatorre #BryanKohberger #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Dr. John Delatorre explores the complexities of the Richard Allen case, where Allen is accused of a horrific crime without any clear prior indicators of violent behavior. The conversation delves into the lack of a digital footprint or past behaviors that typically signal a predisposition to such acts, which raises questions about Allen's sudden alleged involvement. Dr. Delatorre compares Allen's situation to other notorious criminals like Dennis Rader (BTK) and Bryan Kohberger, suggesting that if Allen were guilty, there should have been warning signs or a history of similar behaviors. The discussion also addresses the challenge prosecutors face in presenting a motive, especially when there seems to be no evident pattern of deviant behavior in Allen's past. The episode emphasizes the importance of evidence, such as internet search histories or other digital traces, that could offer insight into Allen's mindset, which so far appear to be absent. This absence complicates the case and leaves many questions unanswered, with the upcoming trial expected to reveal more details. ### Main Points - Richard Allen is accused of a crime without a clear prior history or digital footprint that would typically indicate a predisposition to such acts. - Dr. Delatorre discusses the improbability of Allen suddenly committing such a crime without prior indicators, comparing him to other criminals like Dennis Rader and Bryan Kohberger. - The conversation raises questions about whether Allen might have a hidden history or if the accusations are unfounded. - The prosecution may struggle to establish a motive, as there seems to be no clear pattern of deviant behavior in Allen's past. - The absence of a digital footprint or any suspicious behavior in Allen's history complicates the case. - The lack of evidence, such as internet search histories, leaves the case shrouded in uncertainty. - The upcoming trial is expected to reveal more details, potentially shedding light on Allen's involvement. ### Hashtags #RichardAllen #JohnDelatorre #BryanKohberger #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Dr. John Delatorre discusses the perplexing case of Richard Allen, who, after being placed in solitary confinement, confessed to killing two young girls over 60 times. The conversation explores the psychological impact of solitary confinement, which can lead to severe mental deterioration and bizarre behaviors, such as Allen's confessions. Dr. Delatorre explains that while such extreme conditions can push someone to confess, it doesn't necessarily mean the confessions are true. The case is further complicated by the lack of digital evidence or prior history that would suggest Allen had violent tendencies, making his sudden transformation from a family man to a supposed killer hard to reconcile. Dr. Delatorre debunks the idea that people "snap" without warning, suggesting that any violent act would have been preceded by deep-rooted fantasies that eventually led to real-world actions. The discussion raises questions about the true nature of Allen's involvement and whether his actions were genuinely impulsive or the result of a long-standing psychological build-up. ### Main Points - Richard Allen's 60 confessions during solitary confinement raise concerns about the psychological effects of such conditions. - Solitary confinement can lead to severe mental breakdowns, resulting in abnormal behaviors and confessions. - There is no clear digital evidence or history suggesting Allen had violent tendencies, making his sudden transformation puzzling. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that people do not "snap" without warning; violent acts are typically preceded by long standing fantasies. - The case's complexity lies in determining whether Allen's confessions are genuine or a product of psychological distress. - The lack of evidence and the theatrical nature of the case suggest it could be dramatized in future true crime media. - The conversation highlights the importance of examining the psychological factors behind confessions made under duress. ### Hashtags #RichardAllen #JohnDelatorre #PsychologicalImpact #SolitaryConfinement #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Dr. John Delatorre discusses the perplexing case of Richard Allen, who, after being placed in solitary confinement, confessed to killing two young girls over 60 times. The conversation explores the psychological impact of solitary confinement, which can lead to severe mental deterioration and bizarre behaviors, such as Allen's confessions. Dr. Delatorre explains that while such extreme conditions can push someone to confess, it doesn't necessarily mean the confessions are true. The case is further complicated by the lack of digital evidence or prior history that would suggest Allen had violent tendencies, making his sudden transformation from a family man to a supposed killer hard to reconcile. Dr. Delatorre debunks the idea that people "snap" without warning, suggesting that any violent act would have been preceded by deep-rooted fantasies that eventually led to real-world actions. The discussion raises questions about the true nature of Allen's involvement and whether his actions were genuinely impulsive or the result of a long-standing psychological build-up. ### Main Points - Richard Allen's 60 confessions during solitary confinement raise concerns about the psychological effects of such conditions. - Solitary confinement can lead to severe mental breakdowns, resulting in abnormal behaviors and confessions. - There is no clear digital evidence or history suggesting Allen had violent tendencies, making his sudden transformation puzzling. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that people do not "snap" without warning; violent acts are typically preceded by long standing fantasies. - The case's complexity lies in determining whether Allen's confessions are genuine or a product of psychological distress. - The lack of evidence and the theatrical nature of the case suggest it could be dramatized in future true crime media. - The conversation highlights the importance of examining the psychological factors behind confessions made under duress. ### Hashtags #RichardAllen #JohnDelatorre #PsychologicalImpact #SolitaryConfinement #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Dr. John Delatorre discusses the perplexing case of Richard Allen, who, after being placed in solitary confinement, confessed to killing two young girls over 60 times. The conversation explores the psychological impact of solitary confinement, which can lead to severe mental deterioration and bizarre behaviors, such as Allen's confessions. Dr. Delatorre explains that while such extreme conditions can push someone to confess, it doesn't necessarily mean the confessions are true. The case is further complicated by the lack of digital evidence or prior history that would suggest Allen had violent tendencies, making his sudden transformation from a family man to a supposed killer hard to reconcile. Dr. Delatorre debunks the idea that people "snap" without warning, suggesting that any violent act would have been preceded by deep-rooted fantasies that eventually led to real-world actions. The discussion raises questions about the true nature of Allen's involvement and whether his actions were genuinely impulsive or the result of a long-standing psychological build-up. ### Main Points - Richard Allen's 60 confessions during solitary confinement raise concerns about the psychological effects of such conditions. - Solitary confinement can lead to severe mental breakdowns, resulting in abnormal behaviors and confessions. - There is no clear digital evidence or history suggesting Allen had violent tendencies, making his sudden transformation puzzling. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that people do not "snap" without warning; violent acts are typically preceded by long standing fantasies. - The case's complexity lies in determining whether Allen's confessions are genuine or a product of psychological distress. - The lack of evidence and the theatrical nature of the case suggest it could be dramatized in future true crime media. - The conversation highlights the importance of examining the psychological factors behind confessions made under duress. ### Hashtags #RichardAllen #JohnDelatorre #PsychologicalImpact #SolitaryConfinement #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," Dr. John Delatorre discusses the perplexing case of Richard Allen, who, after being placed in solitary confinement, confessed to killing two young girls over 60 times. The conversation explores the psychological impact of solitary confinement, which can lead to severe mental deterioration and bizarre behaviors, such as Allen's confessions. Dr. Delatorre explains that while such extreme conditions can push someone to confess, it doesn't necessarily mean the confessions are true. The case is further complicated by the lack of digital evidence or prior history that would suggest Allen had violent tendencies, making his sudden transformation from a family man to a supposed killer hard to reconcile. Dr. Delatorre debunks the idea that people "snap" without warning, suggesting that any violent act would have been preceded by deep-rooted fantasies that eventually led to real-world actions. The discussion raises questions about the true nature of Allen's involvement and whether his actions were genuinely impulsive or the result of a long-standing psychological build-up. ### Main Points - Richard Allen's 60 confessions during solitary confinement raise concerns about the psychological effects of such conditions. - Solitary confinement can lead to severe mental breakdowns, resulting in abnormal behaviors and confessions. - There is no clear digital evidence or history suggesting Allen had violent tendencies, making his sudden transformation puzzling. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that people do not "snap" without warning; violent acts are typically preceded by long standing fantasies. - The case's complexity lies in determining whether Allen's confessions are genuine or a product of psychological distress. - The lack of evidence and the theatrical nature of the case suggest it could be dramatized in future true crime media. - The conversation highlights the importance of examining the psychological factors behind confessions made under duress. ### Hashtags #RichardAllen #JohnDelatorre #PsychologicalImpact #SolitaryConfinement #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the complexities of the Karen Read case, where a hung jury has left questions of justice unresolved. The conversation delves into the polarized beliefs surrounding the case, with both sides entrenched in their views on what happened. Dr. Delatorre explores the psychological dynamics that may have influenced Read's statements, including the potential effects of intoxication and the legal standards for proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He highlights the possibility that Read, while intoxicated, might have confessed to something she didn't actually do, emphasizing that strong emotions and external influences can cloud one's perception of events. The discussion underscores the difficulty in achieving justice in such emotionally charged cases, where the lines between guilt and innocence become increasingly blurred. ### Main Points - The Karen Read case has left the public deeply divided, with strong, opposing beliefs about her guilt or innocence. - Read's initial statements and confessions may have been influenced by intoxication, leading to uncertainty about what actually occurred. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes the challenge of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, especially in emotionally charged cases. - The conversation touches on the possibility of false confessions and the impact of external influences on a person's perception of events. - The legal system requires more than just a confession to convict someone, highlighting the complexities of the case. - Achieving justice in this case is complicated by the strong emotional reactions and entrenched positions of those involved. - The discussion reflects broader issues in the legal system, where perceptions of guilt and innocence are often influenced by factors beyond the evidence. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #JohnDelatorre #JusticeSystem #FalseConfessions #IntoxicationImpact #LegalComplexities Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the complexities of the Karen Read case, where a hung jury has left questions of justice unresolved. The conversation delves into the polarized beliefs surrounding the case, with both sides entrenched in their views on what happened. Dr. Delatorre explores the psychological dynamics that may have influenced Read's statements, including the potential effects of intoxication and the legal standards for proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He highlights the possibility that Read, while intoxicated, might have confessed to something she didn't actually do, emphasizing that strong emotions and external influences can cloud one's perception of events. The discussion underscores the difficulty in achieving justice in such emotionally charged cases, where the lines between guilt and innocence become increasingly blurred. ### Main Points - The Karen Read case has left the public deeply divided, with strong, opposing beliefs about her guilt or innocence. - Read's initial statements and confessions may have been influenced by intoxication, leading to uncertainty about what actually occurred. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes the challenge of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, especially in emotionally charged cases. - The conversation touches on the possibility of false confessions and the impact of external influences on a person's perception of events. - The legal system requires more than just a confession to convict someone, highlighting the complexities of the case. - Achieving justice in this case is complicated by the strong emotional reactions and entrenched positions of those involved. - The discussion reflects broader issues in the legal system, where perceptions of guilt and innocence are often influenced by factors beyond the evidence. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #JohnDelatorre #JusticeSystem #FalseConfessions #IntoxicationImpact #LegalComplexities Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the complexities of the Karen Read case, where a hung jury has left questions of justice unresolved. The conversation delves into the polarized beliefs surrounding the case, with both sides entrenched in their views on what happened. Dr. Delatorre explores the psychological dynamics that may have influenced Read's statements, including the potential effects of intoxication and the legal standards for proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He highlights the possibility that Read, while intoxicated, might have confessed to something she didn't actually do, emphasizing that strong emotions and external influences can cloud one's perception of events. The discussion underscores the difficulty in achieving justice in such emotionally charged cases, where the lines between guilt and innocence become increasingly blurred. ### Main Points - The Karen Read case has left the public deeply divided, with strong, opposing beliefs about her guilt or innocence. - Read's initial statements and confessions may have been influenced by intoxication, leading to uncertainty about what actually occurred. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes the challenge of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, especially in emotionally charged cases. - The conversation touches on the possibility of false confessions and the impact of external influences on a person's perception of events. - The legal system requires more than just a confession to convict someone, highlighting the complexities of the case. - Achieving justice in this case is complicated by the strong emotional reactions and entrenched positions of those involved. - The discussion reflects broader issues in the legal system, where perceptions of guilt and innocence are often influenced by factors beyond the evidence. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #JohnDelatorre #JusticeSystem #FalseConfessions #IntoxicationImpact #LegalComplexities Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the complexities of the Karen Read case, where a hung jury has left questions of justice unresolved. The conversation delves into the polarized beliefs surrounding the case, with both sides entrenched in their views on what happened. Dr. Delatorre explores the psychological dynamics that may have influenced Read's statements, including the potential effects of intoxication and the legal standards for proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He highlights the possibility that Read, while intoxicated, might have confessed to something she didn't actually do, emphasizing that strong emotions and external influences can cloud one's perception of events. The discussion underscores the difficulty in achieving justice in such emotionally charged cases, where the lines between guilt and innocence become increasingly blurred. ### Main Points - The Karen Read case has left the public deeply divided, with strong, opposing beliefs about her guilt or innocence. - Read's initial statements and confessions may have been influenced by intoxication, leading to uncertainty about what actually occurred. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes the challenge of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, especially in emotionally charged cases. - The conversation touches on the possibility of false confessions and the impact of external influences on a person's perception of events. - The legal system requires more than just a confession to convict someone, highlighting the complexities of the case. - Achieving justice in this case is complicated by the strong emotional reactions and entrenched positions of those involved. - The discussion reflects broader issues in the legal system, where perceptions of guilt and innocence are often influenced by factors beyond the evidence. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #JohnDelatorre #JusticeSystem #FalseConfessions #IntoxicationImpact #LegalComplexities Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre examines the intense polarization surrounding the Karen Read case and how it reflects a broader societal issue. The conversation delves into the factors that have driven people to passionately align with one side, despite Karen Read being relatively unknown before the trial. Dr. Delatorre attributes this to a larger problem of growing societal division over the past decade, fueled by misinformation, distrust, and the rise of AI-generated content. He discusses how these elements have blurred the lines between truth and fiction, making it difficult for people to discern reality. The episode highlights how individuals often retreat into ideological silos, where they are more susceptible to manipulation by those who capitalize on their emotions. The discussion also touches on the dangers of AI in shaping public perception, especially in an era where distinguishing between real and fabricated content is increasingly challenging. Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that the true danger lies not in the tools themselves but in those who wield them for nefarious purposes. ### Main Points - The Karen Read case has sparked intense polarization, which is symptomatic of a larger societal issue. - The rise of misinformation, distrust, and AI-generated content has blurred the lines between truth and fiction. - People are increasingly retreating into ideological silos, making them more vulnerable to manipulation. - The difficulty in discerning reality from AI-generated content poses significant challenges to public perception. - The conversation highlights the role of emotional manipulation in driving societal division. - Dr. Delatorre stresses that the true danger is not the AI tools themselves, but how they are used by those with harmful intentions. - The episode underscores the importance of critical thinking and resisting the urge to accept information at face value. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #Misinformation #AIDangers #SocietalDivision #EmotionalManipulation #Polarization Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre examines the intense polarization surrounding the Karen Read case and how it reflects a broader societal issue. The conversation delves into the factors that have driven people to passionately align with one side, despite Karen Read being relatively unknown before the trial. Dr. Delatorre attributes this to a larger problem of growing societal division over the past decade, fueled by misinformation, distrust, and the rise of AI-generated content. He discusses how these elements have blurred the lines between truth and fiction, making it difficult for people to discern reality. The episode highlights how individuals often retreat into ideological silos, where they are more susceptible to manipulation by those who capitalize on their emotions. The discussion also touches on the dangers of AI in shaping public perception, especially in an era where distinguishing between real and fabricated content is increasingly challenging. Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that the true danger lies not in the tools themselves but in those who wield them for nefarious purposes. ### Main Points - The Karen Read case has sparked intense polarization, which is symptomatic of a larger societal issue. - The rise of misinformation, distrust, and AI-generated content has blurred the lines between truth and fiction. - People are increasingly retreating into ideological silos, making them more vulnerable to manipulation. - The difficulty in discerning reality from AI-generated content poses significant challenges to public perception. - The conversation highlights the role of emotional manipulation in driving societal division. - Dr. Delatorre stresses that the true danger is not the AI tools themselves, but how they are used by those with harmful intentions. - The episode underscores the importance of critical thinking and resisting the urge to accept information at face value. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #Misinformation #AIDangers #SocietalDivision #EmotionalManipulation #Polarization Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre examines the intense polarization surrounding the Karen Read case and how it reflects a broader societal issue. The conversation delves into the factors that have driven people to passionately align with one side, despite Karen Read being relatively unknown before the trial. Dr. Delatorre attributes this to a larger problem of growing societal division over the past decade, fueled by misinformation, distrust, and the rise of AI-generated content. He discusses how these elements have blurred the lines between truth and fiction, making it difficult for people to discern reality. The episode highlights how individuals often retreat into ideological silos, where they are more susceptible to manipulation by those who capitalize on their emotions. The discussion also touches on the dangers of AI in shaping public perception, especially in an era where distinguishing between real and fabricated content is increasingly challenging. Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that the true danger lies not in the tools themselves but in those who wield them for nefarious purposes. ### Main Points - The Karen Read case has sparked intense polarization, which is symptomatic of a larger societal issue. - The rise of misinformation, distrust, and AI-generated content has blurred the lines between truth and fiction. - People are increasingly retreating into ideological silos, making them more vulnerable to manipulation. - The difficulty in discerning reality from AI-generated content poses significant challenges to public perception. - The conversation highlights the role of emotional manipulation in driving societal division. - Dr. Delatorre stresses that the true danger is not the AI tools themselves, but how they are used by those with harmful intentions. - The episode underscores the importance of critical thinking and resisting the urge to accept information at face value. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #Misinformation #AIDangers #SocietalDivision #EmotionalManipulation #Polarization Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre examines the intense polarization surrounding the Karen Read case and how it reflects a broader societal issue. The conversation delves into the factors that have driven people to passionately align with one side, despite Karen Read being relatively unknown before the trial. Dr. Delatorre attributes this to a larger problem of growing societal division over the past decade, fueled by misinformation, distrust, and the rise of AI-generated content. He discusses how these elements have blurred the lines between truth and fiction, making it difficult for people to discern reality. The episode highlights how individuals often retreat into ideological silos, where they are more susceptible to manipulation by those who capitalize on their emotions. The discussion also touches on the dangers of AI in shaping public perception, especially in an era where distinguishing between real and fabricated content is increasingly challenging. Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that the true danger lies not in the tools themselves but in those who wield them for nefarious purposes. ### Main Points - The Karen Read case has sparked intense polarization, which is symptomatic of a larger societal issue. - The rise of misinformation, distrust, and AI-generated content has blurred the lines between truth and fiction. - People are increasingly retreating into ideological silos, making them more vulnerable to manipulation. - The difficulty in discerning reality from AI-generated content poses significant challenges to public perception. - The conversation highlights the role of emotional manipulation in driving societal division. - Dr. Delatorre stresses that the true danger is not the AI tools themselves, but how they are used by those with harmful intentions. - The episode underscores the importance of critical thinking and resisting the urge to accept information at face value. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #Misinformation #AIDangers #SocietalDivision #EmotionalManipulation #Polarization Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the challenges surrounding the Karen Read trial, particularly the intense media scrutiny and public polarization. The conversation touches on the possibility of moving the trial out of its current jurisdiction to ensure a fair trial, given the highly charged atmosphere in the community. Dr. Delatorre acknowledges that while it may be difficult to achieve an unbiased jury, he still believes in the possibility of a fair trial. However, he emphasizes that justice must rise above the divisiveness within the community. The discussion also addresses the concerning behavior from both sides of the debate, especially the "Free Karen Read" camp, and questions whether ending the trial with a hung jury might be the best solution to reduce the growing animosity. Ultimately, Dr. Delatorre underscores the importance of basing the trial on evidence and the need for justice to transcend societal divisions. ### Main Points - The Karen Read trial has attracted intense media attention and public polarization, leading to concerns about the possibility of a fair trial. - There is discussion about moving the trial out of its current jurisdiction to avoid the biases of the local community. - Dr. Delatorre believes a fair trial is still possible but acknowledges the challenges due to the community's entrenched positions. - The conversation highlights the aggressive behavior from both sides, particularly the "Free Karen Read" camp. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that justice should rise above community divisions and be based on evidence, not public opinion. - The discussion suggests that ending the trial with a hung jury might help to reduce the growing hostility between opposing groups. - Justice must prioritize fairness and evidence over societal entrenchment and polarization. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #JohnOKeefe #JusticeSystem #FairTrial #MediaScrutiny #CommunityDivision Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the challenges surrounding the Karen Read trial, particularly the intense media scrutiny and public polarization. The conversation touches on the possibility of moving the trial out of its current jurisdiction to ensure a fair trial, given the highly charged atmosphere in the community. Dr. Delatorre acknowledges that while it may be difficult to achieve an unbiased jury, he still believes in the possibility of a fair trial. However, he emphasizes that justice must rise above the divisiveness within the community. The discussion also addresses the concerning behavior from both sides of the debate, especially the "Free Karen Read" camp, and questions whether ending the trial with a hung jury might be the best solution to reduce the growing animosity. Ultimately, Dr. Delatorre underscores the importance of basing the trial on evidence and the need for justice to transcend societal divisions. ### Main Points - The Karen Read trial has attracted intense media attention and public polarization, leading to concerns about the possibility of a fair trial. - There is discussion about moving the trial out of its current jurisdiction to avoid the biases of the local community. - Dr. Delatorre believes a fair trial is still possible but acknowledges the challenges due to the community's entrenched positions. - The conversation highlights the aggressive behavior from both sides, particularly the "Free Karen Read" camp. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that justice should rise above community divisions and be based on evidence, not public opinion. - The discussion suggests that ending the trial with a hung jury might help to reduce the growing hostility between opposing groups. - Justice must prioritize fairness and evidence over societal entrenchment and polarization. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #JohnOKeefe #JusticeSystem #FairTrial #MediaScrutiny #CommunityDivision Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the challenges surrounding the Karen Read trial, particularly the intense media scrutiny and public polarization. The conversation touches on the possibility of moving the trial out of its current jurisdiction to ensure a fair trial, given the highly charged atmosphere in the community. Dr. Delatorre acknowledges that while it may be difficult to achieve an unbiased jury, he still believes in the possibility of a fair trial. However, he emphasizes that justice must rise above the divisiveness within the community. The discussion also addresses the concerning behavior from both sides of the debate, especially the "Free Karen Read" camp, and questions whether ending the trial with a hung jury might be the best solution to reduce the growing animosity. Ultimately, Dr. Delatorre underscores the importance of basing the trial on evidence and the need for justice to transcend societal divisions. ### Main Points - The Karen Read trial has attracted intense media attention and public polarization, leading to concerns about the possibility of a fair trial. - There is discussion about moving the trial out of its current jurisdiction to avoid the biases of the local community. - Dr. Delatorre believes a fair trial is still possible but acknowledges the challenges due to the community's entrenched positions. - The conversation highlights the aggressive behavior from both sides, particularly the "Free Karen Read" camp. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that justice should rise above community divisions and be based on evidence, not public opinion. - The discussion suggests that ending the trial with a hung jury might help to reduce the growing hostility between opposing groups. - Justice must prioritize fairness and evidence over societal entrenchment and polarization. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #JohnOKeefe #JusticeSystem #FairTrial #MediaScrutiny #CommunityDivision Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the challenges surrounding the Karen Read trial, particularly the intense media scrutiny and public polarization. The conversation touches on the possibility of moving the trial out of its current jurisdiction to ensure a fair trial, given the highly charged atmosphere in the community. Dr. Delatorre acknowledges that while it may be difficult to achieve an unbiased jury, he still believes in the possibility of a fair trial. However, he emphasizes that justice must rise above the divisiveness within the community. The discussion also addresses the concerning behavior from both sides of the debate, especially the "Free Karen Read" camp, and questions whether ending the trial with a hung jury might be the best solution to reduce the growing animosity. Ultimately, Dr. Delatorre underscores the importance of basing the trial on evidence and the need for justice to transcend societal divisions. ### Main Points - The Karen Read trial has attracted intense media attention and public polarization, leading to concerns about the possibility of a fair trial. - There is discussion about moving the trial out of its current jurisdiction to avoid the biases of the local community. - Dr. Delatorre believes a fair trial is still possible but acknowledges the challenges due to the community's entrenched positions. - The conversation highlights the aggressive behavior from both sides, particularly the "Free Karen Read" camp. - Dr. Delatorre emphasizes that justice should rise above community divisions and be based on evidence, not public opinion. - The discussion suggests that ending the trial with a hung jury might help to reduce the growing hostility between opposing groups. - Justice must prioritize fairness and evidence over societal entrenchment and polarization. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #JohnOKeefe #JusticeSystem #FairTrial #MediaScrutiny #CommunityDivision Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In today's episode of Psych Talk I chat with Dr. John Delatorre, PsyD, a licensed psychologist who practices forensic psychology and primarily does work for criminal courts including competency, insanity, violence and sexual violence risk, and threat assessment. Additionally, Dr. Delatorre is a psychological analyst for television news and court shows. In this episode we discuss two of his areas of expertise: forensic psychology and disaster psychology. Dr. John discusses what forensic psychology is and his journey into specializing in forensic psychology. He discusses various assessments used in forensic psychology and a psychologist's role when it comes to crime/criminals. Dr. John shares about his roles as a psychological analyst for television news and court shows and psychological consultant to Project Absentis. Further, Dr. John discusses what disaster psychology is and the role of a psychologist on a disaster site. Further, Dr. John offers words of advice for anyone interested in going into either forensic psychology or disaster psychology. Connect with Dr. John: Website: www.resolutionfcs.com IG: @drjohndelatorre Project Absentis Connect with Me: Follow me on IG ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@jessicaleighphd⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow the podcast on IG ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@psych.talk.podcast⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow me on TikTok ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@jessicaleighphd⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow me on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Youtube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  Follow me on Threads ⁠⁠⁠⁠@jessicaleighphd⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Welcome to Group Therapy Podcast⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Join my Facebook community: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Grow Through What You Go Through⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Ways to Work With Me: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Mind Over Matter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LGBTQ+ Affirming Masterclass⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Be a guest on my podcast⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Resources: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Anti-Racism Resources⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LGBTQ+ Affirming Resources⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Helping Professional's Guide to Boundary Setting⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Intro/Outro Music ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Life of Riley⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ by Kevin MacLeod ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Music License⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Forensic psychologist Dr. John Delatorre and attorney Blake Newberry join attorney and host Todd Marquardt and co-host Kirk Harrison to talk about the psychology of video games on this edition of Talk Law Radio! Dr. Delatorre also provides psychological analysis for the Law and Crime Trial Network and Court TV. The mission of Talk Law Radio is to help you discover your legal issue blind spots by listening to me talk about the law on the radio. The state bar of Texas is the state agency that governs attorney law licenses. The State Bar wants attorneys to inform the public about the law but does not want us to attempt to solve your individual legal problems upon the basis of general information. Instead, contact an attorney like Todd A. Marquardt at Marquardt Law Firm, P.C. to discuss your specific facts and circumstances of your unique situation. www.TalkLawRadio.com Join Todd Marquardt every week for exciting law talk on Talk Law Radio!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre examines the disturbing and bizarre elements of Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow's relationship, particularly through the lens of their text exchanges. Brueski plays a clip of Daybell's romantic and explicit messages to Vallow, which reveal his manipulative tactics. Delatorre explains that these messages serve as a form of grooming and love bombing, exploiting Vallow's vulnerabilities and need for attention. The conversation highlights how Daybell's manipulative behavior fulfilled Vallow's emotional needs, making her susceptible to his influence. Delatorre also discusses the psychological traits likely present in Daybell, such as narcissism and antisocial tendencies, which enable him to believe his own deceptions and manipulate others. The episode underscores the dangerous dynamic between Daybell and Vallow and the escalating extremity of their beliefs and actions. Main Points - Chad Daybell's romantic and explicit text messages to Lori Vallow reveal his manipulative tactics. - Dr. John Delatorre identifies these messages as forms of grooming and love bombing, preying on Vallow's vulnerabilities. - Daybell's behavior fulfilled Vallow's need for attention and acceptance, making her more susceptible to his influence. - Delatorre highlights the common psychological traits in Daybell, such as narcissism and antisocial tendencies. - Daybell's ability to believe his own lies and dismiss contrary evidence is discussed. - The dangerous dynamic between Daybell and Vallow led to the escalation of their extreme beliefs and actions. - The episode suggests that Daybell exploited Vallow's vulnerabilities for his own control and power. #ChadDaybell #LoriVallow #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #Grooming #Narcissism #LoveBombing Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre examines the disturbing and bizarre elements of Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow's relationship, particularly through the lens of their text exchanges. Brueski plays a clip of Daybell's romantic and explicit messages to Vallow, which reveal his manipulative tactics. Delatorre explains that these messages serve as a form of grooming and love bombing, exploiting Vallow's vulnerabilities and need for attention. The conversation highlights how Daybell's manipulative behavior fulfilled Vallow's emotional needs, making her susceptible to his influence. Delatorre also discusses the psychological traits likely present in Daybell, such as narcissism and antisocial tendencies, which enable him to believe his own deceptions and manipulate others. The episode underscores the dangerous dynamic between Daybell and Vallow and the escalating extremity of their beliefs and actions. Main Points - Chad Daybell's romantic and explicit text messages to Lori Vallow reveal his manipulative tactics. - Dr. John Delatorre identifies these messages as forms of grooming and love bombing, preying on Vallow's vulnerabilities. - Daybell's behavior fulfilled Vallow's need for attention and acceptance, making her more susceptible to his influence. - Delatorre highlights the common psychological traits in Daybell, such as narcissism and antisocial tendencies. - Daybell's ability to believe his own lies and dismiss contrary evidence is discussed. - The dangerous dynamic between Daybell and Vallow led to the escalation of their extreme beliefs and actions. - The episode suggests that Daybell exploited Vallow's vulnerabilities for his own control and power. #ChadDaybell #LoriVallow #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #Grooming #Narcissism #LoveBombing Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre examines the disturbing and bizarre elements of Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow's relationship, particularly through the lens of their text exchanges. Brueski plays a clip of Daybell's romantic and explicit messages to Vallow, which reveal his manipulative tactics. Delatorre explains that these messages serve as a form of grooming and love bombing, exploiting Vallow's vulnerabilities and need for attention. The conversation highlights how Daybell's manipulative behavior fulfilled Vallow's emotional needs, making her susceptible to his influence. Delatorre also discusses the psychological traits likely present in Daybell, such as narcissism and antisocial tendencies, which enable him to believe his own deceptions and manipulate others. The episode underscores the dangerous dynamic between Daybell and Vallow and the escalating extremity of their beliefs and actions. Main Points - Chad Daybell's romantic and explicit text messages to Lori Vallow reveal his manipulative tactics. - Dr. John Delatorre identifies these messages as forms of grooming and love bombing, preying on Vallow's vulnerabilities. - Daybell's behavior fulfilled Vallow's need for attention and acceptance, making her more susceptible to his influence. - Delatorre highlights the common psychological traits in Daybell, such as narcissism and antisocial tendencies. - Daybell's ability to believe his own lies and dismiss contrary evidence is discussed. - The dangerous dynamic between Daybell and Vallow led to the escalation of their extreme beliefs and actions. - The episode suggests that Daybell exploited Vallow's vulnerabilities for his own control and power. #ChadDaybell #LoriVallow #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #Grooming #Narcissism #LoveBombing Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the complexities of the Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow case. Brueski and Delatorre explore the dynamic between Daybell and Vallow, with Delatorre asserting that Chad Daybell was the manipulative con artist behind their extreme religious beliefs, while Lori Vallow became a true believer. Delatorre suggests that Daybell enjoyed the control and attention his manipulations brought him, leading both to escalate their delusional behavior. The conversation examines how Daybell's and Vallow's mutual reinforcement of their beliefs led to drastic actions, including the murders. Delatorre points out that anyone can be susceptible to scams under the right conditions, and Vallow's deepening involvement in Daybell's cult-like ideology was a result of her vulnerabilities. The discussion also touches on how quickly the situation escalated, deviating from typical cult behavior by moving rapidly from belief to deadly actions. Delatorre highlights the dangers of such manipulative relationships and the psychological grooming that can lead individuals to commit heinous acts. Main Points - Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow's case involves extreme religious beliefs and manipulative dynamics. - Dr. John Delatorre views Chad Daybell as a con artist who manipulated Lori Vallow, the true believer. - Daybell enjoyed the control and attention from his manipulations, escalating their delusional behavior. - Both Daybell and Vallow reinforced each other's beliefs, leading to drastic actions, including murders. - Delatorre emphasizes that anyone can fall victim to scams under the right conditions. - Vallow's susceptibility to Daybell's ideology stemmed from underlying vulnerabilities and issues. - The case deviated from typical cult behavior by quickly escalating to deadly actions. #ChadDaybell #LoriVallow #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #PsychologicalManipulation #ReligiousExtremism #CultBehavior Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the complexities of the Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow case. Brueski and Delatorre explore the dynamic between Daybell and Vallow, with Delatorre asserting that Chad Daybell was the manipulative con artist behind their extreme religious beliefs, while Lori Vallow became a true believer. Delatorre suggests that Daybell enjoyed the control and attention his manipulations brought him, leading both to escalate their delusional behavior. The conversation examines how Daybell's and Vallow's mutual reinforcement of their beliefs led to drastic actions, including the murders. Delatorre points out that anyone can be susceptible to scams under the right conditions, and Vallow's deepening involvement in Daybell's cult-like ideology was a result of her vulnerabilities. The discussion also touches on how quickly the situation escalated, deviating from typical cult behavior by moving rapidly from belief to deadly actions. Delatorre highlights the dangers of such manipulative relationships and the psychological grooming that can lead individuals to commit heinous acts. Main Points - Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow's case involves extreme religious beliefs and manipulative dynamics. - Dr. John Delatorre views Chad Daybell as a con artist who manipulated Lori Vallow, the true believer. - Daybell enjoyed the control and attention from his manipulations, escalating their delusional behavior. - Both Daybell and Vallow reinforced each other's beliefs, leading to drastic actions, including murders. - Delatorre emphasizes that anyone can fall victim to scams under the right conditions. - Vallow's susceptibility to Daybell's ideology stemmed from underlying vulnerabilities and issues. - The case deviated from typical cult behavior by quickly escalating to deadly actions. #ChadDaybell #LoriVallow #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #PsychologicalManipulation #ReligiousExtremism #CultBehavior Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the complexities of the Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow case. Brueski and Delatorre explore the dynamic between Daybell and Vallow, with Delatorre asserting that Chad Daybell was the manipulative con artist behind their extreme religious beliefs, while Lori Vallow became a true believer. Delatorre suggests that Daybell enjoyed the control and attention his manipulations brought him, leading both to escalate their delusional behavior. The conversation examines how Daybell's and Vallow's mutual reinforcement of their beliefs led to drastic actions, including the murders. Delatorre points out that anyone can be susceptible to scams under the right conditions, and Vallow's deepening involvement in Daybell's cult-like ideology was a result of her vulnerabilities. The discussion also touches on how quickly the situation escalated, deviating from typical cult behavior by moving rapidly from belief to deadly actions. Delatorre highlights the dangers of such manipulative relationships and the psychological grooming that can lead individuals to commit heinous acts. Main Points - Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow's case involves extreme religious beliefs and manipulative dynamics. - Dr. John Delatorre views Chad Daybell as a con artist who manipulated Lori Vallow, the true believer. - Daybell enjoyed the control and attention from his manipulations, escalating their delusional behavior. - Both Daybell and Vallow reinforced each other's beliefs, leading to drastic actions, including murders. - Delatorre emphasizes that anyone can fall victim to scams under the right conditions. - Vallow's susceptibility to Daybell's ideology stemmed from underlying vulnerabilities and issues. - The case deviated from typical cult behavior by quickly escalating to deadly actions. #ChadDaybell #LoriVallow #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #PsychologicalManipulation #ReligiousExtremism #CultBehavior Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the ongoing trial of Karen Read, focusing on the defense's strategy and its effectiveness in swaying the jury. The defense has accused various individuals, including the Alberts, of involvement in the events surrounding the incident. They have presented multiple "gotcha" moments in court, attempting to discredit witnesses by highlighting inconsistencies and suggesting a conspiracy. However, Dr. Delatorre and Brueski note that these moments lack significant impact, as the witnesses appear genuine and the testimonies do not convincingly support the conspiracy theory. Delatorre suggests that the defense's approach, which emphasizes a complex conspiracy, may be misguided. He believes that a simpler narrative of panic and cover-up following an accidental death would have been more plausible. The conversation highlights the challenges the defense faces in convincing the jury, especially given the straightforward nature of the witnesses and the unconvincing evidence for a grand conspiracy. Main Points - The defense of Karen Read is making accusations against multiple individuals, including the Alberts, suggesting their involvement. - The defense's strategy involves "gotcha" moments to discredit witnesses, but these moments lack significant impact. - Witnesses appear genuine, and their testimonies do not convincingly support the defense's conspiracy theory. - Dr. John Delatorre believes the defense's focus on a complex conspiracy is misguided. - A simpler narrative of panic and cover-up following an accidental death would have been more plausible. - The straightforward nature of the witnesses makes it difficult for the defense to convince the jury of a grand conspiracy. - The defense's approach may not bode well for Karen Read, as the jury is unlikely to be swayed by the conspiracy theory. #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #TrialDefense #ConspiracyTheory #LegalStrategy #WitnessTestimony Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the ongoing trial of Karen Read, focusing on the defense's strategy and its effectiveness in swaying the jury. The defense has accused various individuals, including the Alberts, of involvement in the events surrounding the incident. They have presented multiple "gotcha" moments in court, attempting to discredit witnesses by highlighting inconsistencies and suggesting a conspiracy. However, Dr. Delatorre and Brueski note that these moments lack significant impact, as the witnesses appear genuine and the testimonies do not convincingly support the conspiracy theory. Delatorre suggests that the defense's approach, which emphasizes a complex conspiracy, may be misguided. He believes that a simpler narrative of panic and cover-up following an accidental death would have been more plausible. The conversation highlights the challenges the defense faces in convincing the jury, especially given the straightforward nature of the witnesses and the unconvincing evidence for a grand conspiracy. Main Points - The defense of Karen Read is making accusations against multiple individuals, including the Alberts, suggesting their involvement. - The defense's strategy involves "gotcha" moments to discredit witnesses, but these moments lack significant impact. - Witnesses appear genuine, and their testimonies do not convincingly support the defense's conspiracy theory. - Dr. John Delatorre believes the defense's focus on a complex conspiracy is misguided. - A simpler narrative of panic and cover-up following an accidental death would have been more plausible. - The straightforward nature of the witnesses makes it difficult for the defense to convince the jury of a grand conspiracy. - The defense's approach may not bode well for Karen Read, as the jury is unlikely to be swayed by the conspiracy theory. #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #TrialDefense #ConspiracyTheory #LegalStrategy #WitnessTestimony Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre delves into the intricate details of the Karen Read trial, focusing on key witness testimonies and their impact on the case. The defense has suggested alternative suspects and has presented various testimonies attempting to cast doubt on the prosecution's narrative. One significant testimony comes from Brian Albert Jr., who observed a black SUV near the crime scene, potentially linking Read's vehicle to the incident. Another crucial witness, Juliana Nagel, described seeing a black blob near a flagpole, which might have been the victim. Dr. Delatorre discusses the challenges of eyewitness testimony, the difficulties of proving intent, and the overall messiness of the case, particularly given the weather conditions and the state of the parties involved. He emphasizes that while the prosecution's witnesses are credible and straightforward, the defense's conspiracy theory lacks substantial evidence and might not resonate with the jury. Dr. Delatorre suggests that a narrative focusing on panic and accidental cover-up could have been more effective for the defense. Main Points - The defense of Karen Read is pointing to alternative suspects, including Brian Albert Jr., and challenging the prosecution's narrative. - Brian Albert Jr. testified about seeing a black SUV near the crime scene, potentially linking it to Karen Read. - Julianna Nagel testified about seeing a black blob near the flagpole, which might have been the victim, but she did not initially recognize it as a body. - Dr. John Delatorre discusses the complexities of eyewitness testimony and memory, especially under stressful and unclear conditions. - The prosecution's witnesses are seen as credible and straightforward, but their testimonies do not conclusively prove Karen Read's intent. - The defense's conspiracy theory is seen as weak and unconvincing to the jury. - A narrative focusing on panic and accidental cover-up could have been a more effective strategy for the defense. #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #BrianAlbertJr #TrialDefense #WitnessTestimony Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre delves into the intricate details of the Karen Read trial, focusing on key witness testimonies and their impact on the case. The defense has suggested alternative suspects and has presented various testimonies attempting to cast doubt on the prosecution's narrative. One significant testimony comes from Brian Albert Jr., who observed a black SUV near the crime scene, potentially linking Read's vehicle to the incident. Another crucial witness, Juliana Nagel, described seeing a black blob near a flagpole, which might have been the victim. Dr. Delatorre discusses the challenges of eyewitness testimony, the difficulties of proving intent, and the overall messiness of the case, particularly given the weather conditions and the state of the parties involved. He emphasizes that while the prosecution's witnesses are credible and straightforward, the defense's conspiracy theory lacks substantial evidence and might not resonate with the jury. Dr. Delatorre suggests that a narrative focusing on panic and accidental cover-up could have been more effective for the defense. Main Points - The defense of Karen Read is pointing to alternative suspects, including Brian Albert Jr., and challenging the prosecution's narrative. - Brian Albert Jr. testified about seeing a black SUV near the crime scene, potentially linking it to Karen Read. - Julianna Nagel testified about seeing a black blob near the flagpole, which might have been the victim, but she did not initially recognize it as a body. - Dr. John Delatorre discusses the complexities of eyewitness testimony and memory, especially under stressful and unclear conditions. - The prosecution's witnesses are seen as credible and straightforward, but their testimonies do not conclusively prove Karen Read's intent. - The defense's conspiracy theory is seen as weak and unconvincing to the jury. - A narrative focusing on panic and accidental cover-up could have been a more effective strategy for the defense. #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #BrianAlbertJr #TrialDefense #WitnessTestimony Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the perplexing trial of Karen Read. The case revolves around the alleged murder of a person in a confusing incident involving Read, who reportedly stated, "I hit him," shortly after the event. Delatorre emphasizes the chaotic nature of the case, marked by conflicting testimonies and a lack of clear evidence. He suggests that the situation might be a tragic accident rather than a deliberate crime, questioning the state's ability to prove intent. Delatorre highlights the challenges of piecing together the night's events, especially given Read's intoxicated state, which impairs her memory. The discussion delves into the broader implications of how messy relationships, emotional turmoil, and the involvement of alcohol contribute to the case's complexity. Delatorre also touches on the societal tendency to seek retribution when someone in a position of authority dies, often targeting those closest to the victim. The conversation underscores the ongoing confusion and uncertainty surrounding the trial, suggesting that a definitive truth may remain elusive even after the case is resolved. Main Points - The Karen Read trial is highly confusing with new revelations and conflicting testimonies. - Dr. John Delatorre finds the case perplexing and potentially indicative of an accident rather than intentional murder. - The initial allegations were complicated by the emotional and chaotic nature of the events. - Read's statement, "I hit him," is ambiguous and could be interpreted in multiple ways. - Read was reportedly blackout drunk, further complicating her ability to recall events. - Testimonies vary widely, with some witnesses supporting and others contradicting the claim that Read admitted guilt. - The case is characterized by messy relationships and circumstances, making the truth hard to ascertain. - Societal expectations often lead to someone being held accountable when a person in authority dies. - The trial's outcome may still leave questions unanswered due to the inherent messiness and conflicting evidence. #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #TrialConfusion #AccidentalDeath #LegalInsights #ConflictingTestimonies Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of 'Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski', psychologist Dr. John Delatorre discusses the perplexing trial of Karen Read. The case revolves around the alleged murder of a person in a confusing incident involving Read, who reportedly stated, "I hit him," shortly after the event. Delatorre emphasizes the chaotic nature of the case, marked by conflicting testimonies and a lack of clear evidence. He suggests that the situation might be a tragic accident rather than a deliberate crime, questioning the state's ability to prove intent. Delatorre highlights the challenges of piecing together the night's events, especially given Read's intoxicated state, which impairs her memory. The discussion delves into the broader implications of how messy relationships, emotional turmoil, and the involvement of alcohol contribute to the case's complexity. Delatorre also touches on the societal tendency to seek retribution when someone in a position of authority dies, often targeting those closest to the victim. The conversation underscores the ongoing confusion and uncertainty surrounding the trial, suggesting that a definitive truth may remain elusive even after the case is resolved. Main Points - The Karen Read trial is highly confusing with new revelations and conflicting testimonies. - Dr. John Delatorre finds the case perplexing and potentially indicative of an accident rather than intentional murder. - The initial allegations were complicated by the emotional and chaotic nature of the events. - Read's statement, "I hit him," is ambiguous and could be interpreted in multiple ways. - Read was reportedly blackout drunk, further complicating her ability to recall events. - Testimonies vary widely, with some witnesses supporting and others contradicting the claim that Read admitted guilt. - The case is characterized by messy relationships and circumstances, making the truth hard to ascertain. - Societal expectations often lead to someone being held accountable when a person in authority dies. - The trial's outcome may still leave questions unanswered due to the inherent messiness and conflicting evidence. #KarenRead #JohnDelatorre #HiddenKillers #TrialConfusion #AccidentalDeath #LegalInsights #ConflictingTestimonies Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As technology has advanced, so has the ability to harness images without consent – this is where deep fakes and AI generated images enter the picture.   On this week's episode of Get Naked, Dr. John Delatorre joins Dr. Kate to break down WHY image-based sexual violence is so damaging, how it appears in our culture today, and the small but meaningful ways we, as individuals, can intervene.   Together, they unpack:   • The implications of distinguishing the real from the fake via AI image • What may compel someone to engage in creating deep fakes • The dehumanization of celebrity as an object for consumption • The Taylor Swift AI lawsuit and controversy that followed • The role of fear and anger in deep fake perpetrators   and so much more!    John Delatorre, Psy.D. is a licensed psychologist in Texas, Arizona and New York State. He provides therapy and assessment for a variety of concerns, including providing interventions to the severely mentally ill, individuals with significant trauma histories, and crisis interventions/de-escalation. A special thank you to this week's sponsor, LUME Deodorant! Control Body Odor ANYWHERE with @lumedeodorant and get 15% off with promo code GET NAKED at LumeDeodorant.com! #lumepod Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

5:30 p.m. April 2: Cudahy Police respond to reports of human remains found along Lake Michigan. At Warnimont Park, cops recover a severed human leg. Three days later, Milwaukee police find another unspecified human body part at a playground 11 miles away. A third set of unidentified human remains are recovered from a park just blocks from the previous discovery.    In the meantime, Sade Carleena Robinson, 19, is reported ‘critically missing' by Milwaukee Police on April 1 when she fails to show up for a shift at Pizza Shuttle. Robinson's mother, Sheena Scarbrough, says Robinson texted her that afternoon to ask for money, which Scarbrough says is very unusual for Robinson. The next morning, police respond to reports of a car fire near 30th Street and Lisbon, 2 miles from Robinson's home. Fire investigators determined no one was inside the car, but family members identified the car as belonging to Sade.      Sade Robinson's family joins the searches near the playground over the weekend. While police find unidentified human remains, Robinson's family discovers a blanket belonging to Sade. The distinct pink blanket pictures Sade with her beloved dog, Coco Chanel, who passed away. As more human remains are discovered, the family is losing hope Sade will be found alive.   Authorities descend on a home 8 miles away in West Milwaukee. Investigators spend more than 24 hours searching the upper unit of the duplex, reportedly discovering blood in the stairwell and on a comforter. The homeowner is detained in connection with the remains found.  Milwaukee Sheriffs reveal Maxwell Anderson remains in custody as a person of interest connected to the remains found along Lake Michigan. Anderson has not yet been criminally charged but does have a rap sheet. Anderson has several convictions including disorderly conduct, domestic abuse, and DUI over the last 10 years. In two incidents, Anderson became violent with relatives, and in a third, beat a stranger who intervened in an argument between Anderson and a woman. Anderson is said to work as a bartender for several establishments in the Milwaukee area.    Joining Nancy Grace Today: Matthew Mangino – Attorney, Former District Attorney (Lawrence County); Author: “The Executioner's Toll: The Crimes, Arrests, Trials, Appeals, Last Meals, Final Words and Executions of 46 Persons in the United States” Bill Daly – Former FBI Investigator and Forensic Photography, Security Expert  Dr. John Delatorre –  Licensed Psychologist and Mediator (specializing in forensic psychology); Psychological Consultant to Project Absentis: a nonprofit organization that searches for missing persons; Twitter, IG, and TikTok – @drjohndelatorre Dr. Eric Eason – Board-certified Forensic Pathologist, Consultant; Instagram: @eric_a_eason, Facebook: Eric August Eason, LinkedIn: Eric Eason, MD  Alexis Tereszcuk – CrimeOnline.com Investigative Reporter, Writer/Fact Checker for Lead Stories; X: @swimmie2009 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In a revealing discussion on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski and psychologist John Delatorre delve into the complexities surrounding the use of a 'taint team' in the case against Shanna Gardner. Gardner's defense has called for the dismissal of her indictment, challenging the handling of evidence by the taint team—a group of prosecutors or agents tasked with reviewing evidence to distinguish between what is protected by attorney-client privilege and what can be used in court. Delatorre explains that while taint teams are more commonly associated with white-collar crimes and often referred to as a 'special master', the controversy in Gardner's case revolves around the alleged mishandling of privileged information. The defense claims that non-qualified personnel allowed attorney-client privileged communications to be accessed by prosecutors, a move that could potentially violate legal protocols. The conversation further explores the intricacies of attorney-client privilege and the conditions under which it can be waived. Delatorre points out that if Gardner voluntarily handed over her phone to investigators, she might have inadvertently waived her privilege, assuming she understood the implications of her actions. This raises questions about the strategic wisdom behind such a decision, especially when contrasted with the protections afforded by obtaining a court-ordered warrant, which would have clearly delineated the scope of the search. Delatorre's insights shed light on the critical importance of understanding one's rights and the potential pitfalls of cooperating with law enforcement without adequate legal advice. He underscores the protective power of the Constitution and the strategic imperative for defendants to remain silent and demand every effort by prosecutors to prove their case without assistance from the defense. This discussion highlights the delicate balance between cooperation and self-incrimination, emphasizing the necessity for defendants to navigate the legal system with caution and informed counsel. The case against Gardner serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of legal evidence handling and the paramount importance of attorney-client privilege in safeguarding the rights of the accused. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a revealing discussion on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski and psychologist John Delatorre delve into the complexities surrounding the use of a 'taint team' in the case against Shanna Gardner. Gardner's defense has called for the dismissal of her indictment, challenging the handling of evidence by the taint team—a group of prosecutors or agents tasked with reviewing evidence to distinguish between what is protected by attorney-client privilege and what can be used in court. Delatorre explains that while taint teams are more commonly associated with white-collar crimes and often referred to as a 'special master', the controversy in Gardner's case revolves around the alleged mishandling of privileged information. The defense claims that non-qualified personnel allowed attorney-client privileged communications to be accessed by prosecutors, a move that could potentially violate legal protocols. The conversation further explores the intricacies of attorney-client privilege and the conditions under which it can be waived. Delatorre points out that if Gardner voluntarily handed over her phone to investigators, she might have inadvertently waived her privilege, assuming she understood the implications of her actions. This raises questions about the strategic wisdom behind such a decision, especially when contrasted with the protections afforded by obtaining a court-ordered warrant, which would have clearly delineated the scope of the search. Delatorre's insights shed light on the critical importance of understanding one's rights and the potential pitfalls of cooperating with law enforcement without adequate legal advice. He underscores the protective power of the Constitution and the strategic imperative for defendants to remain silent and demand every effort by prosecutors to prove their case without assistance from the defense. This discussion highlights the delicate balance between cooperation and self-incrimination, emphasizing the necessity for defendants to navigate the legal system with caution and informed counsel. The case against Gardner serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of legal evidence handling and the paramount importance of attorney-client privilege in safeguarding the rights of the accused. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Friday March 3rd, Pamela Turner waits for her stepson to get off the school bus. When Justin Turner doesn't, the stepmom calls the school.  Staff  tells her that Justin was marked absent that day. The sheriff's office is called and deputies come to the Turner home.   5-year-old Justin Turner has been missing for hours. The search for Justin Turner includes multiple agencies and volunteers from the area. For two days WCBD News video cameras follow the searches. Video show volunteers side-by-side with police and sheriff's deputies, walking nearly shoulder to shoulder through fields, checking under back decks and sheds. The channel 2 camerman is filming as Victor Turner goes into a camper on their property, and quickly comes back out saying  "my son's in there." The body of Justin Turner is found hidden inside a cabinet in the pickup truck camper, parked close to the family home. An autopsy and forensic analysis is done on the 5-year-old, Investigators determine that the boy had been placed inside the camper shortly after his strangulation death. A forensic pathologist report indicates the boy died a short time after eating his last meal.  The Berkeley County Sheriff at the time, M.C. Cannon says accidental death is ruled out. The coroner's  autopsy report reveals the boy was sexually assaulted  with some kind of cylindrical object and strangled to death. The case is officially ruled a homicide. Joining Nancy Grace Today: Amy Parsons - Cousin of Justin Turner, FB: Justice for Justin Lee Turner  James Shelnutt- Attorney in Alabama, 27 years Atlanta Metro Area Major Case Detective, Former S.W.A.T. officer, The Shelnutt Law Firm, P.C., Fmr judge and municipal prosecutor ShelnuttLawFirm.com, Twitter: @ShelnuttLawFirm  Dr. John Delatorre - licensed psychologist and mediator, specializing in forensic psychology, psychological consultant to Project Absentis: a nonprofit organization that searches for missing persons, resolutionfcs.com, Twitter, IG, and TikTok - @drjohndelatorre   Dr Kenneth Kinsey - Forensic expert, Fmr. Orangeburg county chief deputy, Owner and operator of Kenny Kinsey & Associates LLC, Former SLED special agent   Dr. Michelle DuPre -Forensic Pathologist, Medical Examiner and Detective: Lexington County Sheriff's Department, Author: “Money, Mischief, and Murder…the Murdaugh Saga. The rest of the story” available now on Amazon. “Homicide Investigation Field Guide" & "Investigating Child Abuse Field Guide", Forensic Consultant, DMichelleDupreMD.com  Nick Reagan -  WCSC Journalist and morning breaking news anchor Twitter: @NickReagan  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The trial of Brian Koberger, charged in the tragic case involving the deaths of Kaylee Gonsalves and Zena Kernoodle, faces scrutiny for its protracted pace, with a potential start not until spring of 2025. Families of the victims express their frustration and plea for justice, urging the judicial system to expedite the process to allow them to start healing from the unimaginable loss. In a discussion with psychologist John Delatorre on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, the psychological toll on the victims' families due to the slow-moving trial is explored. Trials, inherently focused on determining the defendant's guilt or innocence, inadvertently prolong the families' agony, a situation that Delatorre acknowledges is a hard reality of the legal process. He emphasizes that the judicial system's pace, while seemingly slow, is moving as swiftly as possible given the complexity of the case. Delatorre points out that the right to a speedy trial primarily protects the defendant, ensuring they are not unjustly detained without a verdict. He argues that the intricacies of the case, involving multiple victims and extensive evidence, necessitate thorough examination, making the timeline understandable yet painfully slow for those seeking closure. The conversation also delves into the defense's strategy and the length of time taken to process evidence and potentially present an alibi. Delatorre suggests that establishing reasonable doubt is a significant factor in the defense's approach, which can be time-consuming, especially when attempting to identify weaknesses in the prosecution's case. Speculation around the delay in presenting an alibi witness is raised, with Delatorre hinting at possible credibility issues that might need resolution before such a witness is brought forward. This careful preparation reflects the defense's need to ensure any alibi is watertight and capable of withstanding prosecutorial scrutiny. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The trial of Brian Koberger, charged in the tragic case involving the deaths of Kaylee Gonsalves and Zena Kernoodle, faces scrutiny for its protracted pace, with a potential start not until spring of 2025. Families of the victims express their frustration and plea for justice, urging the judicial system to expedite the process to allow them to start healing from the unimaginable loss. In a discussion with psychologist John Delatorre on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, the psychological toll on the victims' families due to the slow-moving trial is explored. Trials, inherently focused on determining the defendant's guilt or innocence, inadvertently prolong the families' agony, a situation that Delatorre acknowledges is a hard reality of the legal process. He emphasizes that the judicial system's pace, while seemingly slow, is moving as swiftly as possible given the complexity of the case. Delatorre points out that the right to a speedy trial primarily protects the defendant, ensuring they are not unjustly detained without a verdict. He argues that the intricacies of the case, involving multiple victims and extensive evidence, necessitate thorough examination, making the timeline understandable yet painfully slow for those seeking closure. The conversation also delves into the defense's strategy and the length of time taken to process evidence and potentially present an alibi. Delatorre suggests that establishing reasonable doubt is a significant factor in the defense's approach, which can be time-consuming, especially when attempting to identify weaknesses in the prosecution's case. Speculation around the delay in presenting an alibi witness is raised, with Delatorre hinting at possible credibility issues that might need resolution before such a witness is brought forward. This careful preparation reflects the defense's need to ensure any alibi is watertight and capable of withstanding prosecutorial scrutiny. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski and psychologist John Delatorre examine the tragic disappearance and subsequent murder of 13-year-old Maddie Soto, focusing on the inconsistencies in her mother Jennifer Soto's account of the events leading up to Maddie's disappearance. Jennifer's varying statements about her last interaction with Maddie and the circumstances of dropping her off at school have raised questions about her involvement and awareness of the situation. Delatorre suggests that Jennifer Soto's conflicting accounts could indicate an attempt to fabricate a story rather than confusion stemming from trauma. He implies that Jennifer might be trying to sell a narrative possibly fed to her, highlighting a potential recognition of her complicity in her daughter's tragic end. The discussion points toward a deliberate manipulation of details to mislead or deflect from the truth, with Delatorre questioning the plausibility of Jennifer's claims given the evidence contradicting her timeline of events. Further scrutiny is given to the tactics used by investigators, including misleading suspects about surveillance footage to elicit reactions or confessions. Delatorre comments on the psychological aspect of such techniques, noting the challenge of maintaining a lie when it must contain elements of truth to be believable. The psychologists' analysis extends to Jennifer Soto's public pleas for her daughter's safe return, critiquing her apparent lack of genuine emotion as "bad acting." Delatorre observes a stark difference in her demeanor between interviews conducted with and without the presence of her boyfriend in the background. The latter, he notes, showcased a more composed narrative, suggesting a concerted effort to align their stories under his influence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski and psychologist John Delatorre examine the tragic disappearance and subsequent murder of 13-year-old Maddie Soto, focusing on the inconsistencies in her mother Jennifer Soto's account of the events leading up to Maddie's disappearance. Jennifer's varying statements about her last interaction with Maddie and the circumstances of dropping her off at school have raised questions about her involvement and awareness of the situation. Delatorre suggests that Jennifer Soto's conflicting accounts could indicate an attempt to fabricate a story rather than confusion stemming from trauma. He implies that Jennifer might be trying to sell a narrative possibly fed to her, highlighting a potential recognition of her complicity in her daughter's tragic end. The discussion points toward a deliberate manipulation of details to mislead or deflect from the truth, with Delatorre questioning the plausibility of Jennifer's claims given the evidence contradicting her timeline of events. Further scrutiny is given to the tactics used by investigators, including misleading suspects about surveillance footage to elicit reactions or confessions. Delatorre comments on the psychological aspect of such techniques, noting the challenge of maintaining a lie when it must contain elements of truth to be believable. The psychologists' analysis extends to Jennifer Soto's public pleas for her daughter's safe return, critiquing her apparent lack of genuine emotion as "bad acting." Delatorre observes a stark difference in her demeanor between interviews conducted with and without the presence of her boyfriend in the background. The latter, he notes, showcased a more composed narrative, suggesting a concerted effort to align their stories under his influence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

 In a revealing episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski and psychologist John Delatorre delve into the tragic case of 13-year-old Madeline "Maddie" Soto, whose murder has shocked the community. The focus falls on Stephen Stearns, the boyfriend of Maddie's mother, Jen Soto, who lived with them and is now a person of interest in the case. While not charged with Maddie's murder at the time of the podcast, Stearns faces allegations of possessing child pornography and material documenting the sexual abuse of Maddie, captured in their shared home. The discussion raises critical questions about Jen Soto's awareness of the abuse happening under her roof. Delatorre suggests it's unlikely Jen was unaware, speculating that if she knew, her failure to act might indicate she too was a victim of abuse by Stearns. This perspective challenges listeners to consider the complex dynamics at play in households where abuse occurs, including the possibility of denial or forced ignorance by victims due to fear or manipulation. Furthermore, Maddie's desire to "live in the woods," as told to her friends before her disappearance, is interpreted as a desperate plea for escape from her abusive environment. This detail adds a poignant layer to Maddie's story, highlighting her search for safety and peace away from home. The podcast also critiques Jen Soto's public pleas for Maddie's safe return, noting a lack of empathy and inconsistencies in her story. The presence of Stearns in the background of an interview is dissected as a potential attempt to control the narrative, revealing a pattern of domineering behavior that might have kept his abusive actions hidden. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In a revealing episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski and psychologist John Delatorre delve into the tragic case of 13-year-old Madeline "Maddie" Soto, whose murder has shocked the community. The focus falls on Stephen Stearns, the boyfriend of Maddie's mother, Jen Soto, who lived with them and is now a person of interest in the case. While not charged with Maddie's murder at the time of the podcast, Stearns faces allegations of possessing child pornography and material documenting the sexual abuse of Maddie, captured in their shared home. The discussion raises critical questions about Jen Soto's awareness of the abuse happening under her roof. Delatorre suggests it's unlikely Jen was unaware, speculating that if she knew, her failure to act might indicate she too was a victim of abuse by Stearns. This perspective challenges listeners to consider the complex dynamics at play in households where abuse occurs, including the possibility of denial or forced ignorance by victims due to fear or manipulation. Furthermore, Maddie's desire to "live in the woods," as told to her friends before her disappearance, is interpreted as a desperate plea for escape from her abusive environment. This detail adds a poignant layer to Maddie's story, highlighting her search for safety and peace away from home. The podcast also critiques Jen Soto's public pleas for Maddie's safe return, noting a lack of empathy and inconsistencies in her story. The presence of Stearns in the background of an interview is dissected as a potential attempt to control the narrative, revealing a pattern of domineering behavior that might have kept his abusive actions hidden. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the wake of Jennifer Crumbley's conviction for involuntary manslaughter related to her son Ethan's tragic school shooting at Oxford High School in 2021, the nation is forced to confront a pressing question: Could this be a watershed moment for parental responsibility in America? Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, delved into this complex issue with psychologist John Delatorre, exploring the implications of a verdict that might just reshape the legal and moral landscape surrounding the actions of parents and guardians. The conversation between Brueski and Delatorre, both insightful and probing, shed light on the nuances of a case that has gripped the nation's conscience. Delatorre remarked on the verdict, expressing a lack of surprise but highlighting the potential anxieties it could spark among parents nationwide. "Some parents may take this to mean that they have to raise their children to act a certain way, or else they themselves, the parents, will be found guilty of whatever crime their child has committed," he explained, suggesting a shift towards a more vigilant form of parenting. The dialogue ventured into the territory of what this precedent-setting case means for both past and future instances of similar tragedies. While Delatorre doubted the feasibility of revisiting past cases due to statutes of limitations, he acknowledged the profound importance of parental involvement. "The only thing that you should be taking from this as a parent is that you need to be thinking through. You're not your job is not to be a friend," he emphasized, advocating for a proactive approach to addressing children's mental health and behavioral issues. Brueski and Delatorre discussed the practical challenges many parents face in accessing mental health resources for their children. Delatorre pointed to systemic barriers, such as socioeconomic disparities and systemic racism, that hinder families' ability to secure the necessary support. He argued that community involvement and political advocacy are essential for bringing about change, urging parents to seek help from schools and community mental health agencies and to support political candidates who prioritize mental health access. However, the conversation also touched on the immediacy of mental health crises and the limitations of existing resources. Delatorre proposed that explaining economic hardships and other realities to children in developmentally appropriate ways could foster understanding and strengthen familial bonds, potentially mitigating the risk of tragic outcomes. Yet, Brueski expressed concern over the capacity of some parents to navigate these discussions effectively, highlighting the gap between the ideal of proactive parenting and the reality faced by many families. The discussion culminated in an exploration of broader societal changes needed to support parents and prevent future tragedies. Delatorre underscored the importance of policies that increase wealth equity and ensure the funding of mental health services, pointing to political decisions as a critical factor in the availability of community support. As the conversation concluded, Brueski and Delatorre left readers with a thought-provoking question: In a society grappling with the aftermath of a school shooting and its implications for parental responsibility, what steps must be taken to ensure that all parents have the resources and knowledge to foster healthy, safe environments for their children? The Crumbley case may have set a legal precedent, but it also serves as a clarion call for a more supportive and proactive approach to mental health and parenting in America. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the aftermath of a harrowing school shooting at Oxford High School in Michigan, the nation finds itself grappling with a profound question: How far does parental responsibility extend? This question gained tangible form as Jennifer Crumbley, the mother of the shooter Ethan Crumbley, faced the judiciary, resulting in a conviction of involuntary manslaughter. The verdict signals a monumental shift in the legal landscape, prompting a nationwide introspection on the role of parents in averting such tragedies. Tony Brueski, the host of "Hidden Killers," sat down with psychologist John Delatorre to dissect the implications of this pivotal case. "The repercussions of this verdict are going to be very far-reaching," Brueski remarked, setting the stage for a discussion that ventures deep into the nuances of parental influence and societal expectations. Delatorre's reaction to the verdict was one of unsurprised acceptance. "I'm not surprised," he stated, articulating a sentiment that many parents might find alarming. The verdict suggests a new legal and moral precedent: parents cannot afford ambivalence in their child-rearing practices. Delatorre elaborated on the jury's perception, suggesting that Jennifer Crumbley's moments of parental disengagement—when she prioritized her needs over Ethan's—played a crucial role in her conviction. This, Delatorre argues, underscores a stark message: "You have to always be the parent." The conversation then turned to the broader societal implications of the case. Brueski and Delatorre pondered the practical challenges many parents face, especially those constrained by economic hardships and systemic barriers to accessing mental health resources for their children. Delatorre emphasized the systemic racism and oppression that further complicate these challenges, highlighting the disparities in resource allocation and access to care. Delatorre proposed that the solution lies not solely in individual action but in collective advocacy for better resources and policy changes. He stressed the importance of engaging with schools and community mental health agencies and using the power of the vote to effect change at the governmental level. Yet, he acknowledged the immediacy of the problem for parents dealing with crises here and now, suggesting that hospital intervention could be a last resort for immediate issues, albeit with its own set of complications. The discussion underscored the notion that crises often stem from a lack of preparedness. Delatorre advocated for a proactive approach to parenting and mental health, urging parents to think ahead and secure resources before crises arise. He argued that explaining the realities of economic hardship to children in developmentally appropriate ways could foster understanding and strengthen familial bonds, potentially mitigating the risk of tragic outcomes. Yet, as Brueski pointed out, not all parents possess the awareness or ability to navigate these complex conversations with their children. The debate thus circled back to the essence of the Crumbley verdict's message: the imperative for constant parental involvement and the societal obligation to provide the necessary supports for parents to fulfill this role effectively. As the article draws to a close, it leaves readers with a pivotal question to ponder: In a world where systemic barriers and personal hardships collide, how can society better equip parents to prevent tragedies like the Oxford High School shooting? The Crumbley case may set a legal precedent, but it also opens a broader dialogue on the need for a more supportive and proactive approach to mental health and parenting in America. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can a verdict alter the course of how society views parental responsibility in preventing tragedy? This question stands at the heart of the recent conviction of Jennifer Crumbley, whose son, Ethan Crumbley, perpetrated a fatal school shooting at Oxford High School in Michigan in 2021. The groundbreaking case, which concluded with Crumbley found guilty of involuntary manslaughter, ignites a debate on the breadth of parental accountability and the systemic barriers to accessing mental health resources. In an enlightening conversation on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and psychologist John Delatorre delve into the implications of this verdict and the broader societal challenges it underscores. "It's a case that likely is going to have repercussions for quite some time on other cases, maybe even past cases," Brueski introduces, setting the stage for a discussion that traverses the complexities of mental health advocacy, systemic oppression, and the path forward for parents and communities. Delatorre, offering his expertise, points out the stark realities faced by parents striving to secure mental health care for their children. "There's always a way to get the resources," he asserts, while simultaneously acknowledging the hurdles erected by governmental and societal structures that hinder access to necessary support. This acknowledgment sheds light on the multifaceted nature of the problem—where the lack of immediate and accessible mental health resources for children becomes entangled with broader issues of systemic inequality and policy failures. The dialogue between Brueski and Delatorre navigates the delicate balance between legislating parental responsibility and empowering parents with the tools they need to effectively support their children. The Crumbley case, with its tragic outcomes and legal ramifications, serves as a poignant reminder of the gaps in our social fabric—gaps that allow children in crisis to slip through unnoticed until it's too late. Delatorre emphasizes the importance of proactive rather than reactive measures in addressing the mental health needs of the youth. "Crisis only happens because we come unprepared," he remarks, challenging listeners to consider the societal and individual changes necessary to prevent such tragedies. This proactive approach, he argues, involves not just individual parents but the entire community—from school officials to policymakers—coming together to advocate for and implement more robust mental health resources and support systems. As the conversation unfolds, Brueski and Delatorre touch upon the critical moments leading up to the Oxford High School shooting, underscoring the missed opportunities for intervention. The discussion highlights the crucial role of vigilance and situational awareness, both on the part of parents and institutions, in identifying and addressing potential threats before they escalate into violence. However, as Delatorre rightly points out, the onus of prevention cannot rest solely on the shoulders of individual parents, especially those navigating the complexities of raising children in an increasingly challenging world. The conversation thus pivots to the collective responsibility of society to foster environments where children feel seen, heard, and supported in their struggles. As the podcast episode draws to a close, Brueski and Delatorre leave listeners with a critical question: How do we, as a society, move forward from the Crumbley verdict to create a future where tragedies like the Oxford High School shooting are not just prevented through punitive measures but through a foundational shift towards greater empathy, understanding, and systemic support for mental health? The verdict in the Crumbley case may indeed set a precedent, but it also opens a door to deeper reflections on our societal values, our commitment to the well-being of our youth, and the urgent need for comprehensive reforms in how we address mental health. The path ahead is undoubtedly fraught with challenges, but it is a journey we must undertake with collective resolve if we are to safeguard our children and build a more compassionate and proactive society.   Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the unsettling shadows of a family tragedy, the case of Harmony Montgomery has emerged as a poignant symbol of systemic failure and the devastating impact of addiction on families. As jury selection begins for Adam Montgomery, charged with the murder of his five-year-old daughter who vanished without a trace for nearly three years, the nation watches closely, grappling with a mix of sorrow and outrage. Harmony's story is not just a narrative of loss; it's a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities in our child welfare system and the dark potential of human behavior under the influence of drugs. Dr. John Delatorre, a psychologist, joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect the layers of this complex case. The initial decision to deem Adam Montgomery—a man whose subsequent actions would horrify any observer—a more suitable guardian than Harmony's addicted mother, or the alternative of a foster care system, raises unsettling questions about the criteria used to judge parental fitness. "It's an interesting case in that I do think that there... this little girl, her case kind of fell through the cracks a little bit," Delatorre stated, acknowledging a shared responsibility for Harmony's fate. While not criminally liable, the child welfare agency's oversight—or lack thereof—played a role in the tragedy that unfolded, suggesting potential civil liabilities for failing to keep a protective watch over Harmony. The heart of the discussion revolves around the nature of addiction and violence. Delatorre proposes a nuanced perspective, arguing that while drugs do not inherently incite violence, they lower inhibitions, allowing pre-existing violent tendencies to surface. In Adam Montgomery's case, this meant escalating abuse, culminating in Harmony's death and the grotesque concealment of her body, an act so devoid of humanity that it defies comprehension. As the trial progresses, Brueski and Delatorre ponder the broader implications of Harmony's disappearance. The disturbing ease with which a child can fall off the radar of social services points to a systemic overload and underfunding, leaving countless children at risk of abuse or worse. Delatorre emphasizes the need for constant monitoring of at-risk families, especially when making the difficult decision to keep them intact under less-than-ideal conditions. The conversation then shifts to a more alarming trend: the significant number of children who never returned to school post-COVID-19 lockdowns. This phenomenon highlights a glaring gap in our child welfare system's capacity to follow up on the well-being of these missing children, underscoring the urgent need for more resources and attention to child welfare. Yet, as Delatorre notes, the solution is not as straightforward as allocating more funds. The real challenge lies in providing support without strings attached, allowing parents the freedom to raise their children as they see fit while still offering a safety net for those in crisis. Until society can strike a balance between freedom and support, children like Harmony Montgomery will continue to slip through the cracks. The case of Harmony Montgomery is a tragic testament to the consequences of systemic neglect and the horrifying depths of addiction-fueled violence. As Dr. John Delatorre and Tony Brueski dissect the intertwined failures of child welfare and the personal demons of addiction, they invite listeners to reflect on how society can better protect its most vulnerable members. The lingering question remains: How many more children must suffer before meaningful change is enacted? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the grim tapestry of crime and justice, few cases stir as much public and psychological intrigue as the murder of Jared Bridegan. Charged with this chilling act are Shanna Gardner and Mario Saldana, Bridegan's ex-wife and her new partner, respectively. But beneath the surface of these allegations lies a web of complexity that begs the question: Is the narrative as straightforward as it appears? Tony Brueski, delving deep into this conundrum on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, is joined by psychologist John Delatorre. Together, they explore the psychological underpinnings and relational dynamics that may have contributed to this tragic outcome. The recent release of police interviews with Gardner and Saldana offers a rare glimpse into their perspectives, painting a picture of a deeply fractured family unit. The interviews suggest a contentious relationship not only between Gardner and Bridegan but also hint at broader family dynamics at play. "From all accounts...didn't necessarily seem to want to hurt each other," Brueski reflects on the affidavits. Yet, the narrative of Jared Bridegan as a difficult personality emerges, complicating the straightforward villainy often ascribed to the accused. Delatorre cautions against accepting these portrayals at face value, emphasizing the inherent biases in such accounts. "We only know that he wasn't a good guy because of what other people are saying about him," Delatorre points out, underscoring the complexity of discerning truth in high-conflict situations. The case's intricacies are further compounded by the relationship dynamics between Jared and Shanna. Their whirlwind marriage, questioned motives due to Gardner's wealth, and subsequent swift collapse suggest a pattern of impulsive relationship decisions marred by underlying mental health issues. Delatorre suggests that "there might be some ulterior motives as to why people would enter into such serious relationships," hinting at deeper psychological factors at play. Amidst these revelations, the role of an alleged hitman—who claims Gardner and Saldana hired him—adds a layer of damning evidence against them. Yet, Delatorre and Brueski speculate on the potential for other influences, drawing parallels to cases where family patriarchs or matriarchs take drastic actions to resolve perceived problems. Could there have been a vigilante within their midst, motivated by a misguided sense of justice or a desire to protect the children from a contentious custody battle? Despite these speculative avenues, the hitman's testimony remains a critical pillar of the prosecution's case. Delatorre raises a crucial point: "I have no insight into the professional ethics of a hitman, but I have to imagine that if he says that these are the people that paid him, then I would have to believe that those are the people that paid him." This assertion cuts through the speculative fog, anchoring the case in the stark reality of the accused's alleged actions. As the conversation unfolds, Brueski and Delatorre navigate the murky waters of human psychology, relational dynamics, and the sometimes inscrutable motives behind criminal acts. The case of Jared Bridegan's murder, with its blend of familial conflict, mental health considerations, and the cold calculus of hired violence, serves as a grim reminder of the complexities inherent in the human psyche. In closing, this discussion leaves us pondering the depths of human relationships and the darkness they can harbor. As the legal proceedings against Gardner and Saldana progress, the broader questions of motive, influence, and psychology linger. What drives individuals to the brink of such irreversible actions? And in the pursuit of justice, how do we navigate the intricate web of human emotions, relationships, and the shadowy recesses of the mind? As Brueski and Delatorre conclude their exploration, the case of Jared Bridegan remains a somber study of the tragic outcomes that can emerge from the confluence of high-conflict relationships, mental health issues, and the extreme measures some may take in the name of resolution or revenge. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Maintenance workers at a Houston apartment complex, get a service call for a non-working dishwasher.  As they make repairs,  a child can be heard crying, unconsolably, in another room.  The workers investigate and find a toddler, lying on the living room floor under a blanket. Lifting the blanket, the 2-year-old child's limbs are duct-taped together. The workers take photos and videos, leave the apartment and call Houston police. Police take the girl to the hospital, where doctors say she might not have survived through the night, had she not been brought in for care. KPRC reports the child was determined to be non-verbal and suffering from physical abuse as well as psychological abuse and neglect.  Doctors discovered she also suffered a brain bleed caused by head trauma, anemia and kidney failure as a result of the abuse. Even though she is two-years-old , the victim is so malnourished, her weight it equivalent to that of an average one-year-old.  Child Protective Services meets with the adults and five other children living in the apartment. The biological mother of the 2-year-old girl lives in another state and left her daughter in the care of the child's 27-year-old cousin, Toniesha Deshae Perkins. Perkins claims the other children living in the apartment often tie up the toddler and themselves. Houston Police interview the other children in the home.  They say the girl sleeps on the floor and regularly removes the tape from her arms, legs, and mouth. The children say the toddler "gets popped" when she does, and a lock has been put on the refrigerator to prevent the little one from accessing food.   The three adults living in the apartment,  Toniesha Deshae Perkins,  Perkins boyfriend, 23-year-old Kenry Fluker, and the toddler's 17-year-old aunt, Mya Jhari Breaux-McGruder, are now charged with injury to a child and unlawful restraint of a person under 17.  Joining Nancy Grace Today:  James Shelnutt - Attorney in Alabama, 27 years Atlanta Metro Area Major Case Detective, Former S.W.A.T. officer, The Shelnutt Law Firm, P.C., Fmr judge and municipal prosecutor ShelnuttLawFirm.com, Twitter: @ShelnuttLawFirm   Dr. John Delatorre - licensed psychologist and mediator, specializing in forensic psychology, psychological consultant to Project Absentis: a nonprofit organization that searches for missing persons, resolutionfcs.com, Twitter, IG, and TikTok - @drjohndelatorre  Jason Jensen - Salt Lake City, UT Private Investigator, and owner of Jensen Private Investigations Co-founder: "Cold Case Coalition”, JensenPrivateInvestigations.com, Twitter: @JasonJPI, Facebook/Instagram: "Jensen Investigations"   Gelasia Croom - Chief Communications Officer for Prevent Child Abuse America, www.preventchildabuse.org, X & IG: @ @pcaamerica, FB: Prevent Child Abuse America   Dr. Harvey Castro - Board-certified Emergency Care Physician & Healthcare Consultant, CEO of medical intelligence ops;, and creator of the Text Sherlock Holmes Crime AI. Engage with me on Twitter: @HarveycastroMD and delve deeper at thegptpodcast.com and harveycastromd.info  Nicole Partin  - CrimeOnline.com Investigative Reporter, Twitter: @nicolepartin  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.