Application of science to criminal and civil laws
POPULARITY
Categories
217 episodes with forensic
184 episodes with forensic
59 episodes with forensic
74 episodes with forensic
39 episodes with forensic
99 episodes with forensic
44 episodes with forensic
97 episodes with forensic
46 episodes with forensic
37 episodes with forensic
59 episodes with forensic
25 episodes with forensic
43 episodes with forensic
98 episodes with forensic
14 episodes with forensic
31 episodes with forensic
20 episodes with forensic
22 episodes with forensic
34 episodes with forensic
23 episodes with forensic
14 episodes with forensic
8 episodes with forensic
10 episodes with forensic
14 episodes with forensic
9 episodes with forensic
12 episodes with forensic
17 episodes with forensic
12 episodes with forensic
11 episodes with forensic
9 episodes with forensic
15 episodes with forensic
10 episodes with forensic
8 episodes with forensic
212 episodes with forensic
14 episodes with forensic
11 episodes with forensic
9 episodes with forensic
12 episodes with forensic
8 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
18 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
8 episodes with forensic
12 episodes with forensic
5 episodes with forensic
8 episodes with forensic
14 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
8 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
22 episodes with forensic
7 episodes with forensic
10 episodes with forensic
7 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
13 episodes with forensic
7 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
9 episodes with forensic
7 episodes with forensic
10 episodes with forensic
7 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
10 episodes with forensic
13 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
10 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
98 episodes with forensic
11 episodes with forensic
10 episodes with forensic
2 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
2 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
5 episodes with forensic
7 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
7 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
12 episodes with forensic
11 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
2 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
2 episodes with forensic
6 episodes with forensic
10 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
5 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
2 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
2 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
10 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
9 episodes with forensic
2 episodes with forensic
2 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
2 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
4 episodes with forensic
3 episodes with forensic
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Bryan Kohberger's defense attorney Anne Taylor told Judge Hippler in a sealed filing that her client couldn't rationally understand the Idaho murder case against him. She described Kohberger as struggling to comprehend adverse rulings and unable to make consequential decisions about his own defense. The judge denied her request for more time on June 26, 2025.Six days later, Kohberger pleaded guilty to all four counts of first-degree murder — the November 2022 killings of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. At the plea hearing, Hippler asked Taylor whether she'd had enough time to discuss the case with her client, and she said yes.That sealed filing is now public. Kohberger has filed a post-conviction petition arguing the plea should be thrown out. He claims his attorneys hid critical evidence, including hair evidence he says would have pointed to an unidentified attacker.His own defense expert, Ruth Ballard, analyzed that hair and concluded it physically matched Ethan Chapin's own hair. Her report was completed a month before the plea deal was signed.Taylor's defense team never determined Kohberger was incompetent. They explicitly denied reaching that conclusion and said they needed more time. Forensic criminologist Brent Turvey, a former member of the defense team, has said Taylor and her co-counsel will have to answer “very difficult questions.”The court hears arguments October 15 on whether Hippler should step aside. An amended petition follows in November. The evidentiary hearing, if it proceeds in June 2027, puts Anne Taylor on the stand.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #AnneTaylor #HiddenKillers #IdahoMurders #KohbergerCase #GuiltyPlea #TrueCrime #UniversityOfIdaho #PostConviction #TrueCrimePodcast
Forensic psychiatrist, violence expert and President of the World Mental Health Coalition, Dr. Bandy Lee joins Thom Hartmann for an in depth talk about the increasing danger of Trump's ill health. Her latest book is “The Psychology of Trump Contagion: An Existential Threat to American Democracy and All Humankind."See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Tonight on Police Off the Cuff, former NYC Medical Examiner's Office Chief of Staff Barbara Butcher joins us to break down what investigators may be searching for in the Eugene Horsch case.We'll look at the house, possible forensic evidence, missing women, witness information, and how evidence recovery can make or break a homicide investigation.From crime scene processing to human remains, this livestream asks the key question: can investigators find the evidence needed to finally bring charges? Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
President Cyril Ramaphosa has announced a four-point plan to effectively deal with the scourge of gender-based violence and femicide in the country. This follows a nationwide outcry after the killing of twelve women in some parts of Ekurhuleni east of Johannesburg in the past two months. Addressing the nation at the Union Buildings last night, Ramaphosa instructed law enforcement agencies to focus on unresolved GBVF cases, reduce forensic backlogs and that municipalities must identify high risk areas to ensure safety of women when they walk and jog among others. Our Politics Reporter Ntebo Mokobo has more.
See Joyce's work at joyce-lin.com
A potential investigation into Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn could focus on the network of companies, trusts and accounts that formed the financial backbone of Jeffrey Epstein's operation, with investigators tracing where money came from, how it moved between entities and where it ultimately ended up. Indyke, Epstein's longtime attorney, and Kahn, his accountant and financial administrator, would be central to that effort because both men held positions that placed them close to Epstein's banking, corporate and estate structures. Investigators could subpoena bank records, tax returns, wire transfers, invoices, corporate formation documents, emails and accounting ledgers, then reconstruct Epstein's finances transaction by transaction. Particular attention would likely fall on entities such as Southern Trust Company and other Epstein-linked corporations that were previously scrutinized in Virgin Islands litigation, with investigators examining whether those businesses performed legitimate services, how they were funded and why money was repeatedly transferred among related entities.Such an investigation would go far beyond simply identifying Epstein's wealth. Forensic accountants could follow incoming payments from wealthy clients, trace outgoing wires to employees and associates, examine intercompany loans, analyze foreign transactions and compare financial records with tax filings and corporate representations. Indyke's authority over certain financial transactions and Kahn's role in accounting and tax administration would make their records especially important in determining who knew what about specific transfers and how those transfers were characterized. None of that, by itself, establishes criminal wrongdoing, but it explains why both men would be unavoidable figures in a serious examination of Epstein's money machine. If investigators truly follow the financial trail without artificial limits, the result could be the most detailed reconstruction yet of how Epstein's network operated financially and whether the complicated web of shell companies and accounts served purposes beyond ordinary wealth management.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
A potential investigation into Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn could focus on the network of companies, trusts and accounts that formed the financial backbone of Jeffrey Epstein's operation, with investigators tracing where money came from, how it moved between entities and where it ultimately ended up. Indyke, Epstein's longtime attorney, and Kahn, his accountant and financial administrator, would be central to that effort because both men held positions that placed them close to Epstein's banking, corporate and estate structures. Investigators could subpoena bank records, tax returns, wire transfers, invoices, corporate formation documents, emails and accounting ledgers, then reconstruct Epstein's finances transaction by transaction. Particular attention would likely fall on entities such as Southern Trust Company and other Epstein-linked corporations that were previously scrutinized in Virgin Islands litigation, with investigators examining whether those businesses performed legitimate services, how they were funded and why money was repeatedly transferred among related entities.Such an investigation would go far beyond simply identifying Epstein's wealth. Forensic accountants could follow incoming payments from wealthy clients, trace outgoing wires to employees and associates, examine intercompany loans, analyze foreign transactions and compare financial records with tax filings and corporate representations. Indyke's authority over certain financial transactions and Kahn's role in accounting and tax administration would make their records especially important in determining who knew what about specific transfers and how those transfers were characterized. None of that, by itself, establishes criminal wrongdoing, but it explains why both men would be unavoidable figures in a serious examination of Epstein's money machine. If investigators truly follow the financial trail without artificial limits, the result could be the most detailed reconstruction yet of how Epstein's network operated financially and whether the complicated web of shell companies and accounts served purposes beyond ordinary wealth management.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
We want our listeners to know that today's episode discusses sensitive topics. This conversation is intended for education and awareness and focuses on the compassionate care provided by the Hamilton Medical Center Forensic Unit. This episode is intended for mature audiences. Listener discretion is advised.Ashley Cloer is a registered nurse, sexual assault nurse examiner, and the Forensic Nurse Coordinator at Hamilton Medical Center Forensic Unit in Dalton, GA.
A potential investigation into Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn could focus on the network of companies, trusts and accounts that formed the financial backbone of Jeffrey Epstein's operation, with investigators tracing where money came from, how it moved between entities and where it ultimately ended up. Indyke, Epstein's longtime attorney, and Kahn, his accountant and financial administrator, would be central to that effort because both men held positions that placed them close to Epstein's banking, corporate and estate structures. Investigators could subpoena bank records, tax returns, wire transfers, invoices, corporate formation documents, emails and accounting ledgers, then reconstruct Epstein's finances transaction by transaction. Particular attention would likely fall on entities such as Southern Trust Company and other Epstein-linked corporations that were previously scrutinized in Virgin Islands litigation, with investigators examining whether those businesses performed legitimate services, how they were funded and why money was repeatedly transferred among related entities.Such an investigation would go far beyond simply identifying Epstein's wealth. Forensic accountants could follow incoming payments from wealthy clients, trace outgoing wires to employees and associates, examine intercompany loans, analyze foreign transactions and compare financial records with tax filings and corporate representations. Indyke's authority over certain financial transactions and Kahn's role in accounting and tax administration would make their records especially important in determining who knew what about specific transfers and how those transfers were characterized. None of that, by itself, establishes criminal wrongdoing, but it explains why both men would be unavoidable figures in a serious examination of Epstein's money machine. If investigators truly follow the financial trail without artificial limits, the result could be the most detailed reconstruction yet of how Epstein's network operated financially and whether the complicated web of shell companies and accounts served purposes beyond ordinary wealth management.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
A potential investigation into Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn could focus on the network of companies, trusts and accounts that formed the financial backbone of Jeffrey Epstein's operation, with investigators tracing where money came from, how it moved between entities and where it ultimately ended up. Indyke, Epstein's longtime attorney, and Kahn, his accountant and financial administrator, would be central to that effort because both men held positions that placed them close to Epstein's banking, corporate and estate structures. Investigators could subpoena bank records, tax returns, wire transfers, invoices, corporate formation documents, emails and accounting ledgers, then reconstruct Epstein's finances transaction by transaction. Particular attention would likely fall on entities such as Southern Trust Company and other Epstein-linked corporations that were previously scrutinized in Virgin Islands litigation, with investigators examining whether those businesses performed legitimate services, how they were funded and why money was repeatedly transferred among related entities.Such an investigation would go far beyond simply identifying Epstein's wealth. Forensic accountants could follow incoming payments from wealthy clients, trace outgoing wires to employees and associates, examine intercompany loans, analyze foreign transactions and compare financial records with tax filings and corporate representations. Indyke's authority over certain financial transactions and Kahn's role in accounting and tax administration would make their records especially important in determining who knew what about specific transfers and how those transfers were characterized. None of that, by itself, establishes criminal wrongdoing, but it explains why both men would be unavoidable figures in a serious examination of Epstein's money machine. If investigators truly follow the financial trail without artificial limits, the result could be the most detailed reconstruction yet of how Epstein's network operated financially and whether the complicated web of shell companies and accounts served purposes beyond ordinary wealth management.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Staff of the Saint Lucia Forensic Science Laboratory and justice sector partners have completed specialized expert witness testimony training. The annual course equips forensic analysts with the practical skills needed to present and defend evidence effectively during legal proceedings.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A potential investigation into Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn could focus on the network of companies, trusts and accounts that formed the financial backbone of Jeffrey Epstein's operation, with investigators tracing where money came from, how it moved between entities and where it ultimately ended up. Indyke, Epstein's longtime attorney, and Kahn, his accountant and financial administrator, would be central to that effort because both men held positions that placed them close to Epstein's banking, corporate and estate structures. Investigators could subpoena bank records, tax returns, wire transfers, invoices, corporate formation documents, emails and accounting ledgers, then reconstruct Epstein's finances transaction by transaction. Particular attention would likely fall on entities such as Southern Trust Company and other Epstein-linked corporations that were previously scrutinized in Virgin Islands litigation, with investigators examining whether those businesses performed legitimate services, how they were funded and why money was repeatedly transferred among related entities.Such an investigation would go far beyond simply identifying Epstein's wealth. Forensic accountants could follow incoming payments from wealthy clients, trace outgoing wires to employees and associates, examine intercompany loans, analyze foreign transactions and compare financial records with tax filings and corporate representations. Indyke's authority over certain financial transactions and Kahn's role in accounting and tax administration would make their records especially important in determining who knew what about specific transfers and how those transfers were characterized. None of that, by itself, establishes criminal wrongdoing, but it explains why both men would be unavoidable figures in a serious examination of Epstein's money machine. If investigators truly follow the financial trail without artificial limits, the result could be the most detailed reconstruction yet of how Epstein's network operated financially and whether the complicated web of shell companies and accounts served purposes beyond ordinary wealth management.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A potential investigation into Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn could focus on the network of companies, trusts and accounts that formed the financial backbone of Jeffrey Epstein's operation, with investigators tracing where money came from, how it moved between entities and where it ultimately ended up. Indyke, Epstein's longtime attorney, and Kahn, his accountant and financial administrator, would be central to that effort because both men held positions that placed them close to Epstein's banking, corporate and estate structures. Investigators could subpoena bank records, tax returns, wire transfers, invoices, corporate formation documents, emails and accounting ledgers, then reconstruct Epstein's finances transaction by transaction. Particular attention would likely fall on entities such as Southern Trust Company and other Epstein-linked corporations that were previously scrutinized in Virgin Islands litigation, with investigators examining whether those businesses performed legitimate services, how they were funded and why money was repeatedly transferred among related entities.Such an investigation would go far beyond simply identifying Epstein's wealth. Forensic accountants could follow incoming payments from wealthy clients, trace outgoing wires to employees and associates, examine intercompany loans, analyze foreign transactions and compare financial records with tax filings and corporate representations. Indyke's authority over certain financial transactions and Kahn's role in accounting and tax administration would make their records especially important in determining who knew what about specific transfers and how those transfers were characterized. None of that, by itself, establishes criminal wrongdoing, but it explains why both men would be unavoidable figures in a serious examination of Epstein's money machine. If investigators truly follow the financial trail without artificial limits, the result could be the most detailed reconstruction yet of how Epstein's network operated financially and whether the complicated web of shell companies and accounts served purposes beyond ordinary wealth management.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The legal team for the family of Nolan Wells, the 18 year-old found dead on Horn Island after going missing on July 4th following a boat trip, holds a press conference to present the results of the forensic analysis of Wells' cellphone and Donald John is forced to restore access to the White House to some media outlets after a judge's order.
Their date was going great until she started talking about what she does for a living. Does her job give off the ick?
What does a podiatrist do as an expert witness, and how on earth do you become one? In this episode of the Podiatry Legends Podcast, I'm joined by UK podiatrist Chelsea Tritschler, owner of Derriford Therapies, whose career has taken some fascinating turns.Chelsea originally started training as a nurse before discovering podiatry and changing direction. After graduating, she spent years carrying out home visits and working in care homes, as well as providing podiatry services inside three prisons in Devon.Chelsea completed a Master's degree in forensic podiatry, where she studied areas including footprints, footwear, wear patterns and forensic evidence. When opportunities in criminal forensic podiatry weren't readily available where she lived, she found another way to use that knowledge and became an expert witness.Today, alongside running and growing her own podiatry practice, Chelsea provides independent podiatry opinions in civil legal cases.We talk about what expert-witness work actually involves, why an expert's duty is to the court rather than the person paying them, and the pressure that can sometimes come with preparing reports.Chelsea also shares one lesson every podiatrist should pay attention to: your clinical notes matter.She regularly reviews cases where the podiatrist may have provided perfectly good treatment, but poor documentation makes it difficult to demonstrate exactly what happened and why particular clinical decisions were made.We also discuss opening a podiatry business without much business experience, getting help from a business coach, becoming an employer, and finding different interests within podiatry that keep your career fresh.Chelsea's story reminds us that your podiatry degree doesn't have to take you down one predictable road. Sometimes the interesting stuff happens when you take a turn you weren't expecting.For additional show notes, please visit the Podiatry Legends Podcast WebsiteBecome an Episode Sponsor - Are you looking for another way to get noticed by podiatrists?Consider sponsoring the Podiatry Legends Podcast; many sponsorship opportunities are available. Please email me or visit the Podiatry Legends Website to learn more. Connect With MeIf you'd like to learn more about being a guest on the show, my best email address is tyson@podiatrylegends.com.Leave a Review - If you've enjoyed this episode, I'd really appreciate it if you left a review on your favourite podcast platform. Reviews help other podiatrists discover the podcast and let me know you're enjoying what I'm putting together each week.Have you read my book? It's No Secret There's Money in Podiatry AI designed for Podiatrists: visit Preve.co
Forensic testimony took center stage in the Caleb Flynn trial as crime scene technician Holly Ryszek and forensic pathologist Dr. Bryan Casto addressed different pieces of the evidence. Ryszek described testing and collection inside the Flynn home. Casto explained findings from Ashley Flynn's autopsy. Ryszek testified that swabs from the sink drain and shower drain in the master suite did not test positive for blood. She said suspected blood collected from light switches was blood. She also described collecting DNA swabs from numerous locations in the bedroom and master bathroom and from Caleb Flynn's truck. One of Ryszek's observations went directly to the disputed burglary account. She testified that the garage door appeared inconsistent with forced entry. Prosecutors allege the scene was staged to look like a home invasion. The defense says an intruder killed Ashley and argues investigators settled on Caleb too quickly. Casto testified that Ashley had two gunshot wounds to the head that were very close together. Toxicology showed Prozac in her system and an elevated level of melatonin. Casto said the melatonin result meant Ashley had taken melatonin at some point. The defense used cross-examination to establish limits in the autopsy findings. Casto said the two bullet tracks overlapped and that the firing range was indeterminate. That left jurors with a documented wound pattern, but no specific distance between the firearm and Ashley when the shots were fired. Caleb Flynn has pleaded not guilty in the death of his wife, Ashley Flynn. Ryszek's testimony showed where investigators searched for blood and DNA and gave her assessment of the garage entry. Casto documented the wounds and toxicology while acknowledging that the autopsy could not determine firing range. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #CalebFlynnTrial #AshleyFlynn #TrueCrimeToday #HollyRyszek #BryanCasto #OhioBCI #AutopsyTestimony #ForensicEvidence #MurderTrial #TrialCoverage
Dr. Monique M. Chouraeshkenazi is a clinical neuropsychometrician, psychology resident, researcher, professor, forensic neuropsychopathology expert, and two-time international bestselling author. She is the founder of The Chouraeshkenazi Group, a multidisciplinary practice focused on mental healthcare, medical services, research, consulting, and education. A U.S. Air Force Global War on Terrorism combat veteran, she served for 13 years in roles related to cybersecurity, intelligence, antiterrorism, and national security operations. Dr. Chouraeshkenazi is the author of the bestselling three-volume series, Forensic Neuropsychopathology: Clinical and Medical Insights into Brain-Behavior, Mental Disorders, and the Legal System.Dr. Chouraeshkenazi is credited with developing and formally defining the field of forensic neuropsychopathology, an interdisciplinary discipline that integrates neuroscience, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, psychology, psychiatry, and the legal system to better understand the neurobiological and psychological underpinnings of criminal behavior.In this episode:The Chouraeshkenazi GroupForensic Neuropsychopathology: Clinical and Medical Insights into Brain-Behavior, Mental Disorders, and the Legal System.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-trauma-therapist--5739761/support.---Thank you to our Sponsors: Jane App - use code GUY1MO at https://janesoftware.partnerlinks.io/ngvcwcxqt2jx-4afv8i (https://jane.app/book_a_demo)Beducated - Complete the quiz for one month free https://beduc.at/pd2640-traumatherapist
Forensic psychiatrist Dr Bandy Lee joins Anthony Davis to continue her assessment of Donald Trump's mental unfitness for office, including his recent lies about 9/11, holding FEMA money to ransom for votes, and why Republicans in Congress won't step in to save America from a tyrant - only on The Weekend Show. Visit www.bandylee.com Paid Partnership For free and unbiased Medicare help, dial (334) 441-3570 to speak with my trusted partner, Chapter, or go to http://www.askchapter.org/weekend Chapter and its affiliates are not connected with or endorsed by any government entity or the federal Medicare program. Chapter Advisory, LLC represents Medicare Advantage HMO, PPO, and PFFS organizations and stand alone prescription drug plans that have a Medicare contract. Enrollment depends on the plan's contract renewal. While we have a database of every Medicare plan nationwide and can help you to search among all plans, we have contracts with many but not all plans. As a result, we do not offer every plan available in your area. Currently we represent 50 organizations which offer 18,160 products nationwide. We search and recommend all plans, even those we don't directly offer. You can contact a licensed Chapter agent to find out the number of products available in your specific area. Please contact Medicare.gov (http://medicare.gov/), 1-800-Medicare, or your local State Health Insurance Program (SHIP) to get information on all of your options. Independent media has never been more important. Please support this channel by subscribing here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkbwLFZhawBqK2b9gW08z3g?sub_confirmation=1 Join this channel with a membership for exclusive early access and bonus content: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkbwLFZhawBqK2b9gW08z3g/join Five Minute News is a MeidasTouch Podcast, covering politics, inequality, health and climate - delivering independent, unbiased and essential news for the US and across the world. Follow us on Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/fiveminutenews.bsky.social Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/fiveminnews Support us on Patreon http://www.patreon.com/fiveminutenews Support Anthony on Substack https://theanthonydavis.substack.com You can subscribe to Five Minute News with your preferred podcast app, ask your smart speaker, or enable Five Minute News as your Amazon Alexa Flash Briefing skill. CONTENT DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed on this channel are those of the guests and authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The MeidasTouch Network, Anthony Davis or Five Minute News LLC. Any content provided by our hosts, guests or authors are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual or anyone or anything, in line with the First Amendment right to free and protected speech.
When 19-year-old Stephen Smith was found dead on a South Carolina road in 2015, investigators initially attributed his death to a vehicle strike — a conclusion that didn't hold up over time. This episode looks at what happened when his body was exhumed eight years later, and what forensic pathologists can and can't still determine after that much time underground. We examine how the second autopsy and surrounding physical evidence forced a re-reading of the case, and what it reveals about the limits and possibilities of forensic science in cold and contested cases. It's a window into how physical evidence continues to shape — and complicate — our understanding of a death long after the fact.
Dr. Judy Wood, a materials engineering scientist and former professor, about her forensic investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Center on 11 September 2001. Wood argues that the towers were not destroyed by fire, kinetic impact or controlled demolition, but were 'dustified' — turned almost entirely to fine dust — by a directed energy technology she links to the Hutchison effect and to weather phenomena such as Hurricane Erin, which she says was sitting off New York that day and went unreported. She describes compiling over 40,000 images, seismic records and physical samples for her book 'Where Did the Towers Go?', and recounts her 2007 whistleblower (qui tam) lawsuit against NIST contractors, which was dismissed.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/total-disclosure-podcast--5975113/support.CONTACT TDP DIRECTLY For Collaboration, Use of Segments/clips, or any other media produced by “TDP” —TY.TotalDisclosure@gmail.comSpecial Thank you to all of our PODCAST/YouTube Channel Members for your continued support, and dedication to seeking the truth, together. We can't do this WITHOUT YOU!-COPYRIGHT-2020-Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Total Disclosure Podcast Copyright 2020 and … segments, early access to interviews, and a yearly gift autographed by yours truly!thank you in advance now, Let's explore the unknown together!
In 2015, 19-year-old Stephen Smith was found dead on a rural South Carolina road, his death initially ruled a hit-and-run. Eight years later, his body was exhumed and re-examined as investigators began questioning that original conclusion. This episode traces what the second autopsy uncovered, and how it reshaped one of South Carolina's most debated death investigations. We dig into the physical evidence at the center of the case and what it means for how the story is understood today.
Today's phone-in: What is the right mix of technology in our children's classrooms? Also featured: a forensic DNA expert on identifying cremated remains in NS, and researchers have developed a new way to measure the risk of homelessness.
Through the lens of forensic psychology, this case illustrates how pathological jealousy and an obsessive need for control can drive an intimate partner toward violent, calculated homicide. Émile Gourbin demonstrated the traits of an organized offender, weaponizing social manipulation and cognitive bias by tampering with a clock to exploit his friends' alcohol-impaired perception of time. Ultimately, his intellectualized alibi unraveled when confronted with undeniable physical proof, exposing the fatal gap between a killer's calculated arrogance and the uncontrollable reality of his actions.
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The audience has been calling JP Miller a narcissist since Mica Miller's death in April 2024. This episode argues the evidence points past narcissism into territory the published research gives different names. Miller is under federal indictment for allegedly cyberstalking Mica for seventeen months — tracking devices, fifty-plus calls in a day, a nude photo posted without consent, tire damage, financial interference. He has pleaded not guilty. Mica's death was ruled a suicide and he has not been charged in connection with it. But federal prosecutors aren't the only ones alleging a pattern. Two Jane Does have filed civil suits alleging Miller assaulted them as minors at his family's church and school. His first wife Alison Williams swore he admitted to sexual contact with underage congregants. His father Reginald Wayne Miller pled guilty to exploiting international students through a sham Bible college. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott and retired FBI analyst Robin Dreeke have publicly applied terms like calculated targeting, spiritual enmeshment, and ambient terror to the documented JP Miller pattern. Forensic psychologist Joni Johnston published a case analysis mapping grooming indicators and institutional cover. This episode lays out the behavioral evidence cluster by cluster — the control, the weaponized diagnosis, the DARVO response cycle, the multi-generational institutional pattern — and asks what the research says about how dangerous a person with this profile becomes when the institution that protected them collapses. Miller's church closed. The property sold. His trial is set for October 2026. The research says that's the moment that matters most.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #SolidRockChurch #CoerciveControl #TrueCrime #Netflix #MicasLaw #HiddenKillers #JusticeForMica
Forensic psychologist Dr. Jeffrey Smalldon has spent decades studying the criminal mind, coming face-to-face with some of America's most notorious killers. In Part One of his conversation with Chanley, Dr. Smalldon reveals how an early fascination with crime led him to correspond with Charles Manson and Ted Bundy and recounts his chilling encounters with John Wayne Gacy and serial killer Donald Harvey. He shares what those interactions taught him about manipulation, violence, and the unsettling reality of the people behind some of the country's most infamous crimes. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Forensic psychiatrist Dr Bandy Lee returns to The Weekend Show to continue her series on ‘the nuclear threat of Donald Trump' warning of his unfitness for the presidency and indeed for any job. Providing analysis of his unhinged Texas RNC speech, and erratic behavior afterwards, Dr Lee explains the manipulative mindset of this deeply compromised patient. Visit www.bandylee.com Paid Partnership For free and unbiased Medicare help, dial (334) 441-3570 to speak with my trusted partner, Chapter, or go to http://www.askchapter.org/weekend Chapter and its affiliates are not connected with or endorsed by any government entity or the federal Medicare program. Chapter Advisory, LLC represents Medicare Advantage HMO, PPO, and PFFS organizations and stand alone prescription drug plans that have a Medicare contract. Enrollment depends on the plan's contract renewal. While we have a database of every Medicare plan nationwide and can help you to search among all plans, we have contracts with many but not all plans. As a result, we do not offer every plan available in your area. Currently we represent 50 organizations which offer 18,160 products nationwide. We search and recommend all plans, even those we don't directly offer. You can contact a licensed Chapter agent to find out the number of products available in your specific area. Please contact Medicare.gov (http://medicare.gov/), 1-800-Medicare, or your local State Health Insurance Program (SHIP) to get information on all of your options. SUPPORT THE SHOW! Visit us online at http://www.fiveminute.news Follow us on Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/fiveminutene... Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/fiveminnews Support us on Patreon http://www.patreon.com/fiveminutenews Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meida... Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-p... Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-i... The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-w... The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-ha... Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/major... On Democracy with FP Wellman:
Christian Council of Ghana is calling on the government to expedite the forensic audit of the National Cathedral project and share its findings with Christian leaders
In this twenty-third installment of our Jack Ruby miniseries, we revisit Jack Ruby's infamous summer 1959 trip to Cuba and unravel the paper trail that shatters sixty years of official cover stories. For decades, the Warren Commission portrayed Ruby's presence in Havana as an innocent, week-long vacation, backed by a single postcard sent to his girlfriend Alice Nichols from the FOCSA building. However, official Cuban immigration tourist cards and federal archives expose a massive physical contradiction: while his immigration card registered a continuous 34-day stay from August 8 to September 11, 1959, Dallas bank deposit logs and FBI contact reports place him physically in Texas on three separate dates during that exact window. Forensic handwriting analysis confirmed Ruby personally signed these tourist cards, proving he was not taking a simple holiday, but executing a series of rapid, clandestine flights back and forth across the Straits of Florida.We examine the covert mechanics of Ruby's Cuban operations, beginning with the sworn account of car rental agent Elaine Minier. Minier revealed that before her own trip to Havana, Ruby met her in Dallas and instructed her to deliver a written, coded message to casino boss Lewis McWillie on the Tropicana floor, declaring that "Sparky from Chicago is coming." We reconstruct the findings of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, which established at least three separate trips in August and September 1959—including a 24-hour turnaround flight between Miami, Havana, and New Orleans—and trace eyewitness testimonies from Chicago tourists who met Ruby at the Tropicana over Labor Day weekend. Furthermore, we investigate the ten-day overlap when Ruby was in Havana while mob boss Santo Trafficante Jr. was held at the minimum-security Trescornia detention camp, examining British journalist John Wilson Hudson's report that Ruby visited Trafficante with food and supplies, alongside McWillie's evasive, shifting under-oath admissions about visiting the camp with Ruby.Finally, we confront Ruby's mysterious arms trafficking ventures and his repeated visits to Ray's Hardware in Dallas. We detail the uninvestigated claims of Texas gunrunner Robert Ray McKeown, who testified that Ruby visited his Houston drive-in seeking a letter of introduction to Fidel Castro in exchange for surplus Jeeps in Shreveport and slot machines in New Mexico, while offering thousands in cash to secure the release of detained associates in Cuba. We trace Ruby's history of acquiring firearms—from his failed attempt to ship a .38 Smith & Wesson Centennial revolver COD to McWillie in Las Vegas to his January 1960 purchase at Ray's Hardware, where he walked in alongside a Dallas police officer and a prizefighter to buy the blue steel .38 Colt Cobra snub nose (serial number 2744LW). This very weapon, bought in the company of Dallas law enforcement, would ultimately become the instrument used to execute Lee Harvey Oswald in the City Hall basement.
Investigators collected an enormous amount of biological evidence from 1122 King Road because the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin left behind an exceptionally complicated crime scene. The most consequential DNA evidence was recovered from the tan leather knife sheath found on the bed beside Mogen and Goncalves. A swab from the sheath's button snap produced a single-source male DNA profile that investigators ultimately matched directly to Bryan Kohberger after his arrest. Before that direct comparison, the FBI used investigative genetic genealogy to develop Kohberger as a lead, and investigators later compared the sheath profile with DNA recovered from trash outside his parents' Pennsylvania home. Additional testing of the sheath produced mixtures involving multiple people, including DNA from Goncalves and Mogen in blood found on the sheath, while several other areas contained DNA in quantities too small for meaningful comparison.The house also contained DNA that did not belong to Kohberger or the four victims, and that evidence became an important subject for the defense. Investigators found an unidentified male blood profile on a handrail inside the house and another unidentified male blood sample on a glove discovered outside the residence. Earlier defense filings referred more broadly to unidentified male DNA recovered from the crime scene and argued that investigators had not subjected those profiles to the same type of genetic-genealogy investigation used on the sheath DNA. Prosecutors responded that the unidentified samples did not meet the FBI's criteria for entry into CODIS and maintained that none of them undermined the evidence linking Kohberger to the sheath. The DNA picture at King Road was therefore much more complicated than the shorthand description of “Kohberger's DNA at the scene”: investigators processed a house saturated with victim blood, mixed profiles, trace material and unidentified DNA, but the prosecution's central forensic claim remained that Kohberger's DNA was found on the snap of a knife sheath lying beside two of the murdered women.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
A new ABC documentary revisits Jeffrey Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and gives substantial attention to people who reject or question the official ruling of suicide by hanging. Epstein lawyer David Schoen said Epstein had denied trying to kill himself during the earlier July 2019 incident that landed him on suicide watch, claiming instead that a cellmate had put a rope around his neck and pulled it. Schoen also said Epstein remained determined to fight the federal sex-trafficking case against him and argued that his state of mind shortly before his death did not fit someone preparing to commit suicide. The documentary also returns to the extraordinary failures inside MCC that night: Epstein was left alone despite the earlier incident, officers failed to perform required checks for hours and later falsified records, and surveillance problems complicated efforts to reconstruct exactly what happened. Those failures were documented by the Justice Department inspector general, although the OIG said it found no evidence contradicting the FBI's conclusion that Epstein's death was not the result of criminal activity.Forensic pathologist Michael Baden, who observed Epstein's autopsy on behalf of Epstein's brother, again focused on the physical evidence he believes makes the suicide ruling questionable. Baden pointed to what he described as a horizontal ligature mark and three fractures in Epstein's neck, including two fractures of the thyroid cartilage and one of the hyoid bone, injuries he said were more consistent in his experience with homicidal strangulation than suicidal hanging. Other forensic experts have disputed the significance of those findings and noted that such fractures can occur in hangings, particularly in older individuals, so Baden's interpretation does not establish that Epstein was murdered. Epstein's brother Mark nevertheless told the documentary that he believes Jeffrey was killed and that a more serious investigation could determine what happened. The documentary therefore does not overturn the official finding of suicide, but it assembles the medical questions, Epstein's reported statements before his death and the spectacular breakdown of jail procedures into a renewed challenge to an explanation that has never satisfied a large portion of the public.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:The evidence Epstein did NOT kill himself: Lawyer and pathologist reveal details they claim indicate the paedophile WAS murdered in jail in new documentary | Daily Mail Online
A month before the killings, Lindsay Clancy's handwriting stopped looking like handwriting. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington showed the jury her journal entries from December 2022 and called them chicken scratches — proof, he argued, that her mind was already unraveling before anyone outside her house noticed. Reddington built his case around a chart too: lorazepam, sertraline, hydroxyzine, buspirone, trazodone, prescription after prescription piled onto a new mother by providers who never once compared notes. The defense's final witness, forensic psychiatrist Phillip Resnick — who evaluated Andrea Yates in her own case decades ago — told this Plymouth County jury Lindsay Clancy was clearly psychotic when she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. The prosecution's own experts complicated their case. Forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun told jurors this was a serious suicide attempt accompanied by killing her children out of love, because Clancy couldn't bear to leave them behind. Forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, under defense questioning, agreed the prosecution's opening statement had minimized what Clancy was actually experiencing — and flagged what he called significant inconsistencies in how she described the voice that told her to kill them. ADA Jennifer Sprague's closing argued something colder: that Clancy made a rational choice, that her children were the only thing keeping her from her own death, and that she left them in the basement and went upstairs to finish what she'd started. The jury spent three and a half hours deliberating on their first day and went home without a verdict. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sit down with Tony Brueski to pick apart a prosecution case that may have undercut itself. Links & Disclaimer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments
Forensic psychiatrist Dr Bandy Lee returns for a new series of conversations entitled ‘The Nuclear Threat of Donald Trump' and explains how the president's dangerous psychopathy is a threat to the U.S. and entire world - only on The Weekend Show. Independent media has never been more important. Please support this channel by subscribing here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkbwLFZhawBqK2b9gW08z3g?sub_confirmation=1 Join this channel with a membership for exclusive early access and bonus content: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkbwLFZhawBqK2b9gW08z3g/join Five Minute News is a MeidasTouch Podcast, covering politics, inequality, health and climate - delivering independent, unbiased and essential news for the US and across the world. Visit us online at http://www.fiveminute.news Follow us on Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/fiveminutenews.bsky.social Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/fiveminnews Support us on Patreon http://www.patreon.com/fiveminutenews You can subscribe to Five Minute News with your preferred podcast app, ask your smart speaker, or enable Five Minute News as your Amazon Alexa Flash Briefing skill. CONTENT DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed on this channel are those of the guests and authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Anthony Davis or Five Minute News LLC. Any content provided by our hosts, guests or authors are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual or anyone or anything, in line with the First Amendment right to free and protected speech.
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Prosecutors called Kirk Heilbrun to help prove Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible for killing her three children. Instead, the forensic psychologist told jurors this was a serious suicide attempt accompanied by killing her children out of love, because Clancy couldn't bear to leave them behind — testimony that sounds a lot more like a defense argument than a prosecution one. He wasn't the only one. Forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, another prosecution witness, agreed under defense questioning that the state's own opening statement had minimized what Clancy was actually experiencing. He also flagged what he called significant inconsistencies in her account of the voice she says ordered her to kill Cora, Dawson, and Callan — a voice that appeared once, lasted roughly eighteen minutes, and stopped the moment the children were dead. The defense used the opening the state's witnesses gave them. Attorney Kevin Reddington showed jurors a chart of Clancy's prescriptions — lorazepam, sertraline, hydroxyzine, buspirone, trazodone — stacked up by providers who never coordinated her care, alongside a December 2022 journal entry he said had deteriorated into chicken scratches a month before the killings. His final witness, forensic psychiatrist Phillip Resnick, who evaluated Andrea Yates decades earlier, told the jury Clancy was clearly psychotic. ADA Jennifer Sprague's closing argued something entirely different: that Clancy made a rational choice, that her children were the only thing keeping her alive, and that she left them in the basement and went upstairs to finish what she'd started for herself. The jury deliberated three and a half hours on their first day with no verdict. Bob Motta and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer break it down with Tony Brueski — and they don't agree on who won the day. Links & Disclaimer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments
Five drugs, one chart, zero coordination. That's how defense attorney Kevin Reddington framed Lindsay Clancy's psychiatric care for a Plymouth County jury — lorazepam, sertraline, hydroxyzine, buspirone, trazodone, stacked on a new mother by providers who never once talked to each other. He paired it with her handwritten journal from December 2022, a month before the killings, pages he said had collapsed into chicken scratches because her mind was already gone. The defense closed with forensic psychiatrist Phillip Resnick, who evaluated Andrea Yates decades earlier and told this jury Clancy was clearly psychotic when she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. Then there's what the prosecution's own witnesses said. Forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun told jurors this was a serious suicide attempt accompanied by killing her children out of love, because she couldn't bear to leave them behind. Forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, pressed by the defense, agreed the state's own opening statement had minimized what Clancy was going through, while also flagging inconsistencies in her account of the voice she says ordered the killings. ADA Jennifer Sprague's closing pushed back hard: Clancy made a rational choice, her children were the only thing keeping her from taking her own life, and she left them in the basement and went upstairs to finish what she'd planned for herself. Nine women and three men deliberated three and a half hours on their first day and went home without a verdict. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and defense attorney Bob Motta join Tony Brueski to argue over whether the state's own witnesses ended up handing the defense its case. Links & Disclaimer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments
A new ABC documentary revisits Jeffrey Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and gives substantial attention to people who reject or question the official ruling of suicide by hanging. Epstein lawyer David Schoen said Epstein had denied trying to kill himself during the earlier July 2019 incident that landed him on suicide watch, claiming instead that a cellmate had put a rope around his neck and pulled it. Schoen also said Epstein remained determined to fight the federal sex-trafficking case against him and argued that his state of mind shortly before his death did not fit someone preparing to commit suicide. The documentary also returns to the extraordinary failures inside MCC that night: Epstein was left alone despite the earlier incident, officers failed to perform required checks for hours and later falsified records, and surveillance problems complicated efforts to reconstruct exactly what happened. Those failures were documented by the Justice Department inspector general, although the OIG said it found no evidence contradicting the FBI's conclusion that Epstein's death was not the result of criminal activity.Forensic pathologist Michael Baden, who observed Epstein's autopsy on behalf of Epstein's brother, again focused on the physical evidence he believes makes the suicide ruling questionable. Baden pointed to what he described as a horizontal ligature mark and three fractures in Epstein's neck, including two fractures of the thyroid cartilage and one of the hyoid bone, injuries he said were more consistent in his experience with homicidal strangulation than suicidal hanging. Other forensic experts have disputed the significance of those findings and noted that such fractures can occur in hangings, particularly in older individuals, so Baden's interpretation does not establish that Epstein was murdered. Epstein's brother Mark nevertheless told the documentary that he believes Jeffrey was killed and that a more serious investigation could determine what happened. The documentary therefore does not overturn the official finding of suicide, but it assembles the medical questions, Epstein's reported statements before his death and the spectacular breakdown of jail procedures into a renewed challenge to an explanation that has never satisfied a large portion of the public.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:The evidence Epstein did NOT kill himself: Lawyer and pathologist reveal details they claim indicate the paedophile WAS murdered in jail in new documentary | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Jana Monroe, the first female FBI agent in the Behavioral Science Unit, spent her career applying crime-scene analysis and victimology to roughly 850 homicide cases — work she describes as systematic suspect-pool reduction, not psychic access to a killer's inner life. This episode unpacks that distinction and why it matters, since decades of television have trained the public to expect a kind of certainty profiling was never designed to deliver. It's a grounded look at the actual methodology behind forensic behavioral analysis, straight from someone who built a career practicing it.
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
On August 28, Kouri Richins learned the price tag on what she did. A judge set restitution at $1,369,581 — split between Auto Owner's Insurance and TruStage, the two companies that paid out on the life insurance policies she cashed in after poisoning her husband Eric with fentanyl. Her lawyer accepted the figure without argument. The stay request was denied.Forensic accountant Brooke Karrington mapped the path of that money at trial. Kouri took in $1.35 million. Ninety days later, it was gone. She owed $7.5 million. Four payday lenders were pulling $2,100 from her daily. Her real estate company's revenue couldn't cover a third of its monthly obligations. By September 2022, her balance was $800.The court already declared her indigent. Her defense was taxpayer-funded. Her appeal is taxpayer-funded. At Utah's top prison wage of $1.75 an hour, clearing the restitution would require 376 years of work.And restitution is just the first line on the ledger. Twenty-six felony fraud charges remain active in a separate Summit County case — five mortgage fraud counts, seven money laundering counts, forgery, bad checks, and a pattern-of-unlawful-activity charge connecting the financial crimes to the killing itself. October 9 brings the scheduling conference that sets the second trial in motion.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Restitution #MurderConviction #SummitCountyUtah #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeForEric #LifeWithoutParole
Forensic psychologist Katherine Ramsland said Bryan Kohberger may have been pursuing what she described as a “thrill kill” when the four University of Idaho students were murdered in Moscow. Ramsland, who had taught Kohberger at DeSales University, discussed the possibility in the context of offenders who commit murder for the excitement, power or psychological gratification of the act itself rather than for a more conventional motive such as money, revenge or personal conflict. She emphasized that such offenders can become highly focused on the experience of killing and may fantasize about it beforehand, though she did not claim to know Kohberger's actual motive or state of mind. At the time, the case was still developing and prosecutors had not publicly established a definitive motive.Ramsland's comments drew additional attention because of her prior academic connection to Kohberger and her extensive work studying violent offenders and serial killers. Her analysis suggested that, if the murders were indeed driven by thrill-seeking, the attack could have been less about the individual victims and more about the offender's desire to experience domination, fear and the act of killing itself. Still, she cautioned against treating that theory as fact without more evidence, particularly because many details about Kohberger's behavior, planning and relationship to the victims had not yet been fully established. The “thrill kill” theory therefore remained one possible psychological explanation rather than a proven motive in the Idaho murders.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Marc Cox opens the final hour highlighting Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway's $167,000 public service announcement regarding abortion clinic safety standards before previewing forensic psychologist Dr. Leslie Dobson's insights on the deadlocked Lindsay Clancy murder trial in Massachusetts. Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway joins the show to defend her office's use of consumer protection funds for health safety awareness and updates listeners on state redistricting arguments before the Missouri Supreme Court. Forensic psychologist Dr. Leslie Dobson analyzes postpartum psychosis, jury dynamics, and the legal insanity defense in the Clancy case. Finally, Keith Hausher, President of the Patriot Training Foundation, previews the massive Flags of Valor memorial display on Art Hill in Forest Park, where volunteers are placing nearly 7,800 American flags and dog tags to honor 9/11 victims and fallen service members.Listen to The Marc Cox Morning Show live on 97.1 FM Talk in St. Louis or stream worldwide on the free Audacy App! #971FMTalk #StLouis #STLNews #CatherineHanaway #LeslieDobson #KeithHausher
A jury can't decide what to do about a woman who killed her three kids, so the women of TikTok have solved it for them: it was the husband, because husbands don't go to CVS. And given the Pluto placement that day, no Leo would have done this. It defies the science of all astrology.Also in this one: Trump renames Lake Ontario to Lake America and somebody's getting rich printing the new maps. The Venezuela oil deal broken down as what it really is — a headline with no article attached — including the $80/barrel break-even, the $100 billion buildout, and the five-to-seven years before any of it reaches the market, set against the $150 billion already spent on Iran. The Supreme Court greenlights the ballroom without ruling on whether it was legal, because the wrong person asked. Massie's second attempt at the Epstein files. A Fauci email that was supposed to be deleted twice. And a full Tales From The Flock: felony charges over a fake camera, drones over the Flock convention, Hawley's investigation, and the Officer of the Year whose award didn't survive his ex-girlfriend.Live porch shows: porchstore.comMerch: robbernsteinmerch.comPaywalled after-show, $5/mo: robbernsteincomedy.com
In Artifactual: Forensic and Documentary Knowing (Duke University Press, 2023), Elizabeth Anne Davis explores how Cypriot researchers, scientists, activists, and artists process and reckon with civil and state violence that led to the enduring division of the island, using forensic and documentary materials to retell and recontextualize conflicts between and within the Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot communities. Davis follows forensic archaeologists and anthropologists who attempt to locate, identify, and return to relatives the remains of Cypriots killed in those conflicts. She turns to filmmakers who use archival photographs and footage to come to terms with political violence and its legacies. In both forensic science and documentary filmmaking, the dynamics of secrecy and revelation shape how material remains such as bones and archival images are given meaning. Throughout, Davis demonstrates how Cypriots navigate the tension between an ethics of knowledge, which valorizes truth as a prerequisite for recovery and reconciliation, and the politics of knowledge, which renders evidence as irremediably partial and perpetually falsifiable. Elizabeth Anne Davis is Professor of Anthropology at Princeton University. * This episode is part of a special collaboration between the New Books Network and the Society for the Anthropology of Europe, a section of the American Anthropological Association. Together, we're highlighting exciting new work in Europeanist anthropology—featuring authors from across the field, including winners of the William A. Douglass Book Prize and contributors to the European Anthropology in Translation series published by Berghahn Books. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun took the stand for the prosecution to prove Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible for killing her three children. He told the jury it was a serious suicide attempt accompanied by killing the children out of love. He said Clancy retained moral awareness — but his own language characterized the motive as love, not deliberate cruelty.A second prosecution expert, forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, agreed on the stand that the prosecution's own opening statement minimized what Clancy had endured. Saathoff also pointed to inconsistencies in Clancy's account of the command hallucination she described — including that the voice appeared for the first time on the day of the killings and stopped the moment the children were dead.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski as the jury deliberates. They see this case very differently and get into where the prosecution landed after four weeks of testimony and closing arguments.Sprague told the jury Clancy planned it, calculated the window, and made a rational choice. She called the children broken toys left on the basement floor.The jury — nine women and three men — deliberated for three and a half hours on day one with no verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #MurderTrial #MaternalMentalHealth
Mental health conditions are now the leading killer of new mothers in the United States. The CDC puts the number at nearly twenty-three percent of all pregnancy-related deaths, ahead of hemorrhage, ahead of heart failure. Over eighty percent were preventable. One in five mothers gets screened for depression after delivery.Those numbers sit behind the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy at Plymouth Superior Court. Clancy, a former labor and delivery nurse, killed her three young children at their Duxbury, Massachusetts, home in January 2023, less than three weeks after being released from a psychiatric facility. Prosecutors and her defense team agree she was mentally ill. The jury is weighing whether she was too ill to understand her actions.Her defense rests on postpartum psychosis, a psychiatric emergency affecting roughly one to two mothers per thousand births. Despite the name, clinicians describe it as a mood disorder that arrives fast and disguises itself as ordinary postpartum fatigue. Bipolar history and prior episodes are the clearest warning signs, both screenable before delivery. With early treatment the acute crisis resolves in weeks.Forensic psychiatrist Phillip Resnick testified for Clancy's defense. He also testified for Andrea Yates, who drowned her five children in 2001 and was ultimately found not guilty by reason of insanity. Meghan Cliffel, a postpartum psychosis survivor from 2015, questions why the system waits for dead children before it pays attention.END_LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #MaternalMentalHealth #PostpartumDepression #TrueCrime #MentalHealthAwareness #LindsayClancyVerdict #PlymouthSuperiorCourt
The prosecution's own forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun told the jury Lindsay Clancy killed her children out of love — a serious suicide attempt where she could not bear to leave them behind. Heilbrun said she was criminally responsible, but his characterization of the motive cut against the prosecution's theory of premeditated cruelty.Forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, also testifying for the prosecution, agreed under questioning that the state's opening statement minimized what Clancy had been going through. Saathoff found what he called significant inconsistencies in Clancy's account of the voice she says commanded the killings.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into whether the prosecution can convict when its own experts softened the case on the stand.Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague told the jury Clancy planned it — mapped the distance to the restaurant, added the CVS stop, calculated the window. Sprague called the children protective factors Clancy removed so she could end her own life.Nine women and three men have five verdict options. They deliberated three and a half hours on day one.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #HKLive #MaternalMentalHealth
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Nolan Wells died on Horn Island, Mississippi on July 4, and the sheriff's office ruled out foul play within two days, before the state autopsy was finished, before anyone official had opened his phone. Seven weeks later, that phone still hasn't been forensically examined. The device left the island with Nolan's friends. His mother retrieved it from them in the first days and, before any forensic protocol existed, went through it herself with her sister. Both of his Snapchat accounts were completely empty. On July 15, the family's lawyers and District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath agreed to a joint forensic exam at the Digital Forensics Lab at Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College, with both sides' experts and possibly the FBI in the room. No date was ever scheduled. Nearly a month passed before the DA's office sent a letter giving the family 48 hours to hand the phone over, while Nolan's parents were out of state. The three friends who were with Nolan that weekend handed their own phones directly to federal agents, no subpoena needed. The family still has Nolan's phone and says it's ready to go the moment there's a real chain-of-custody protocol in writing. Forensic examiners say deleted data can often be recovered from a device like this one, but platforms purge their own servers over time, and every week of delay narrows that window. No charges have been filed. The friends deny any tampering. The family has already subpoenaed Snapchat, Meta, TikTok, WhatsApp, and Life360 for the server-side records the phone itself can't hold. Tony Brueski breaks down how a sheriff's office reached a conclusion about Nolan Wells' death before the evidence that could confirm or contradict it was ever examined, and why that order of operations should bother everyone paying attention. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #NolanWells #HornIslandSheriff #HiddenKillers #HornIsland #Mississippi #DigitalForensics #FoulPlay #JusticeForNolan #TrueCrime #GrandJury
Episode: 1622 Fingerprints, crime detection, and identification. Today, I ask, "Who are you?"
Where is Nancy Guthrie now, over 200 days into this investigation? Do the investigators have a clear direction? What evidence that is Forensic, biological might give answers? Until we have a clear cut answer to these questions the case will remain open. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Day 19 of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial in Plymouth Superior Court, and the prosecution's rebuttal case fell apart in slow motion. Forensic psychologist Dr. Kirk Heilbrun called the postpartum psychosis defense "convenient," offered the clearest alternate theory yet, and then said the words "isn't suicide a mortal sin" in front of the jury. Kevin Reddington moved for a mistrial. Judge William Sullivan denied it and then reprimanded the prosecution anyway. The jury went home early. Closing arguments are Wednesday.But the story nobody is covering is the firm. Both of the Commonwealth's rebuttal experts were retained through Park Dietz and Associates, named for the psychiatrist whose false Law & Order testimony got Andrea Yates' conviction overturned in 2005. The defense's star witness on Friday was Dr. Phillip Resnick, who was the Yates defense expert. This trial is a rematch, and the two prosecution experts cannot even agree on what is wrong with Lindsay Clancy.IN THIS EPISODEReddington takes apart Dr. Avram Mack on the DSM's four week postpartum window, the WHO's different standard, and the proposed six week revision. "Postpartum is not a disease, doctor." Mack admits it is roughly the third time in his career he has testified on criminal responsibility, and that he has treated about ten women with postpartum psychosis since 2001. On cross he concedes that blood work and thyroid testing should have been done, and as far as he can tell were not.Then the firm. Park Dietz and Associates, the Andrea Yates conviction reversal, the joint evaluation at Tewksbury, and why "two independent experts" is doing a lot of work in that sentence.Then Heilbrun. His testing found no malingering and a slight tendency to underreport symptoms. He diagnosed bipolar II, which splits the Commonwealth's own two experts. He offered "suicide combined with altruistic filicide" as the alternate theory, a theory in which love is the motive. He attacked the 18 minute voice on three fronts. And he used the word "convenient."Then the mistrial. "Intentional misconduct," Sullivan's instruction from the bench, and the second time religion has entered this trial through the prosecution's door.SOURCESBoston Globe, CBS Boston, ABC News, Boston 25 News, CNN, Fox News Digital, Court TV, and archival reporting from the Washington Post, NBC News and Psychiatric News on the 2005 Andrea Yates reversal.IF YOU NEED ITNational Maternal Mental Health Hotline: call or text 1-833-TLC-MAMA. Free, confidential, 24/7.988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: call or text 988.Keywords: Lindsay Clancy trial, Duxbury Massachusetts, Plymouth Superior Court, postpartum psychosis, insanity defense, Kirk Heilbrun, Avram Mack, Kevin Reddington, Judge William Sullivan, Park Dietz, Andrea Yates, altruistic filicide, true crime podcast, trial coverageBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/we-saw-the-devil-unfiltered-political-analysis--4433638/support.Website: http://www.wesawthedevil.comPatreon: http://www.patreon.com/wesawthedevilRobin's Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/robin_wstdTwitter: http://www.twitter.com/WeSawtheDevilInstagram: http://www.instagram.com/wesawthedevilpodcast.TikTok: tiktok.com/@wesawthedevilpolitics
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
