Podcast appearances and mentions of Adam Winkler

Co-hosts Jared Yates Sexton and Nick Hauselman discuss the details of the Supreme Court decision granting the US President absolute immunity from illegal acts he commits in the White House under the guise of "official duties" whatever those might be. They then bring on UCLA Constitutional law professor Adam Winkler to discuss in even more detail what the ramifications are for this decision and how it will affect democracy going forward. To gain access to a bonus episode every Friday, as well as exclusive live episodes and electoral analysis, head over to Patreon and become a patron. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Gun violence has become deeply ingrained in the historical fabric of the United States, intertwined with the principles outlined in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which grants individuals the right to keep and bear arms. This amendment is frequently invoked in debates surrounding the implementation of stricter gun control measures.In this week's episode, then & now presents a compelling discussion hosted by the Department of History at UCLA under the Why History Matters series, focusing on the historical trajectory of America's relationship with firearms. Panelists Brian DeLay, Adam Winkler, and Jennifer Wagman provide nuanced insights into various facets of gun culture in America.The conversation delves into the evolution of gun legislation, tracing its origins back to the founding era and drawing parallels with contemporary times. The discussion also addresses the challenges of interpreting laws formulated in a different historical context and their application in the present day, alongside the often overlooked public health implications of gun violence.Moreover, the episode examines the repercussions of lenient gun laws in the United States on neighboring nations, as well as the country's role as a major arms exporter. Each speaker brings their unique expertise, providing a comprehensive overview of this complex and multifaceted issue.

New gun safety laws are taking effect in a handful of states in the new year. While the country ended 2023 with more mass shootings than days in the year, new laws in California, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota and Washington are aimed at preventing gun violence. Geoff Bennett discussed more with Adam Winkler, an expert tracking these new laws. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

Second Amendment expert Adam Winkler, a professor at UCLA Law School, discusses the Supreme Court oral arguments on the federal gun ban for people subject to domestic violence restraining orders. Immigration law expert Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland & Knight, discusses the first state push to hire undocumented students. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Second Amendment expert Adam Winkler, a professor at UCLA Law School, discusses the Supreme Court oral arguments on the federal gun ban for people subject to domestic violence restraining orders. Immigration law expert Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland & Knight, discusses the first state push to hire undocumented students. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In August, the Illinois Supreme Court upheld the assault weapons ban, which took effect earlier this year. Residents who owned these weapons prior to the ban now must register them by January 1. Reset checks in with Chicago Sun-Times reporter Mary Norkol and Adam Winkler, author of the book Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America. Did you know Reset also has a daily newsletter? Each edition features a breakdown of one big topic in news or culture, fun activities to try in the Chicago area and a chance to weigh in. Sign up at wbez.org/resetnews.

Rejection of Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness plan suggests Supreme Court conservatives are going to be more comfortable with second-guessing federal agency determinations even when they fall within a federal statute. UCLA law professor Adam Winkler joins Cases and Controversies to discuss what he's calling the "supersized" Major Questions Doctrine, the high court-made principle that's risen in recent terms and was the reasoning behind the 6-3 ruling in Biden v. Nebraska. Podcast hosts Kimberly Robinson and Lydia Wheeler take listeners beyond the headlines of the biggest opinions of the term. They also look ahead to the one starting in October which Winkler says is shaping up as another with blockbuster potential on guns and the SEC to start with. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

The boys smoke the Cohiba Nicaragua and learn about float tank therapy with Adam Winkler of True Rest! But wait there's more...as always check out The Cigar of the Week, Cigar News and events in the cigar world. If you love cigars, we've got your fix! Please check out our sponsor links below, as our shameless plugs have left our throats dry and bloody! Get ready to get your fix because this is …⁠ The Cigar Junkies Podcast⁠! http://cigarsforwarriors.org /https://cigarrights.org/ https://www.etsy.com/shop/ThomsPenWorx https://thegalaxyboutique.com/ ... use code junkies for shipping sitewide!

Tonight on The Last Word: Jim Jordan suffers a setback in his clash with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. Also, Chief Justice Roberts is asked to testify to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Supreme Court ethics amid new revelations about Justice Clarence Thomas. Plus, right-wing Republicans criticize President Biden's Ukraine policy. And the Missouri House passes a bill allowing guns in churches and buses. Barbara McQuade, Harry Litman, Timothy Snyder and Adam Winkler join Lawrence O'Donnell.

Fox said in a statement: "We acknowledge the court's rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false." But new reporting tonight shows that an apology to Dominion was not included in the agreement. Geoff Bennett, Katie Phang, Jeremy Peters, Max Rose, Mark McKinnon, Adam Winkler, and Brad Stone join.

In the latest episode of TAG, we're joined by UCLA's Adam Winkler – one of the most cited law professors in judicial opinions today – to discuss what he deems “a revolution in American gun policy” since the Supreme Court's Bruen decision came down in June. The “Gun Fight'' author and Second Amendment expert breaks down the new Bruen constitutionality test and its consequences. He reveals how the “centerpieces of modern gun policy just don't have any history in the 17 and 1800s,” so they are “on thin ice.” He explains how gun rights organizations have been empowered to challenge every regulation, the possible path to the 5th Circuit decision on domestic abusers being overturned, and what he thinks the gun safety movement should prioritize when the courts are a “minefield.” And on the latest edition of Siegel's Scope, Dr. Siegel explores the lessons learned from public health's approach to tobacco and how they might be applied to gun violence.Host: Mathew LittmanGuest: Professor Adam WinklerProducer: Ernesto ChavezvaldiviaExecutive Producer: Adria MárquezEditor: Stephanie Genuardi Cunnane

Earlier this month, in United States v. Rahimi, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit struck down as unconstitutional a decades-old law barring people subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms. The ruling comes on the heels of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen last term, which held that the Second Amendment protects the right to carry guns outside the home. Bruen also created a new history-and-tradition test for determining whether gun-control regulations are constitutional, which has led some lower courts to now rule differently on challenges to gun laws—including the Fifth Circuit. In this episode, two scholars and experts on the Second Amendment— Amy Swearer of the Heritage Foundation and Adam Winkler of UCLA School of Law—join to break down the Rahimi decision, which the U.S. Supreme Court may review in a future term, and explore the new landscape of Second Amendment law after Bruen. Host Jeffrey Rosen moderates.   Resources   United States v. Rahimi (5th Cir. 2023) NY State Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. Bruen (2022) “Senate hears about legal fallout from Supreme Court gun decision,” RollCall (Mar. 2023) “The Essential Second Amendment,” Heritage Foundation ebook  Adam Winkler, Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America (2013)  Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.    Continue today's conversation on Facebook and Twitter using @ConstitutionCtr.    Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly.    You can find transcripts for each episode on the podcast pages in our Media Library. 

Over the course of eight days in California, at least 25 people were killed in four separate mass shootings. Less than one month into 2023, the US has already seen 39 mass shootings. We'll discuss why politicians, mostly Republicans, refuse to support basic gun control.

Judy Chu - Elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in July 2009. She represents the 28th Congressional District, which includes Pasadena and the west San Gabriel Valley of southern California. Adam Winkler - Connell Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law and a specialist in American constitutional law, the Supreme Court, and gun policy. Both will join Tavis to discuss an unrelenting gun violence epidemic (which some view as an emerging public health crisis) following this past weekend's mass shooting (Hour 2)

The tragedy in Monterey Park was the second mass shooting in California in just under a week. To discuss the laws in that state and the challenges of stopping shootings given the wide availability of guns, Geoff Bennett spoke with Adam Winkler, a professor at the UCLA School of Law where he focuses on constitutional law and gun policy. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

How has the NRA impacted insurance? And why are insurers being asked to regulate the gun industry? Welcome to the Insurance vs History Podcast! In this episode, I try and tackle the NRA's impact on the insurance industry, as well as discuss a new wrinkle in the discussion of gun safety: asking the insurance industry to take a regulatory role. Sources and Links: Note: This is only a selection. There was a LOT here, and I read a lot of stuff from “both sides of the aisle” so to speak. I tried to include articles with the most facts and not as many opinions or with more insurance explanations. The books were the best of what I read; the book by Adam Winkler was probably the most opinion neutral. Opposing Firearm Industry Immunity (americanbar.org) https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/06/17/gun-insurance-reform-uvalde-liability/ 4 Insurers, 5 Policies to Pay $73M Sandy Hook Settlement Against Gunmaker Remington (insurancejournal.com) A Guide to the Gun Industry's Unique Legal Protections (thetrace.org) The American Terror Industry | The New Republic Insurers Put Pressure on Gun Industry (washingtonpost.com) Any Weapon to Hand? An Essay on Gun Regulation and the Limits of Insurance (degruyter.com) San Jose gun owners must have liability insurance, city says; law is first in US to incentivize safety - The Washington Post Books: Suing the Gun Industry: A Battle at the Crossroads of Gun Control and Mass Torts (Law, Meaning, and Violence): Lytton, Timothy: 9780472115105: Amazon.com: Books Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America: Winkler, Adam: 9780393345834: Amazon.com: Books com: Gunfight: My Battle Against the Industry That Radicalized America (Audible Audio Edition): Ryan Busse, Ryan Busse, PublicAffairs: Audible Books & Originals com: Misfire: Inside the Downfall of the NRA (Audible Audio Edition): Tim Mak, Feodor Chin, Penguin Audio: Books Music Credits: Boulangerie by Jeremy Sherman, courtesy of NeoSounds: Boulangerie, LynneMusic | NeoSounds music library Contact Me: Website: https://insurancevshistory.libsyn.com Contact me!  Email: insurancevshistory@gmail.com Twitter: @insurancevshist Instagram: @ insurancevshistory Facebook:  Insurance vs History | Facebook

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 1.7.2023        Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 12.31.2022          Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 12.24.2022              Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 12.17.2022             Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 12.10.2022            Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 12.3.2022                Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 11.26.2022               Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 11.19.2022              Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 11.12.2022             Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 11.5.2022            Support the show

  Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 10.29.2022           Support the show

In today's issue, Adam Winkler, UCLA professor of law and author of We the Corporations (Liveright, 2018) and Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America (W. W. Norton & Company, 2011), delves into the impact of so-called "dark money" on our democracy.

Over a decade since the Supreme Court ruled that corporate political contributions constitute free speech, what has it meant for democracy? On Today's Show:Adam Winkler, UCLA professor of law and author of We the Corporations (Liveright, 2018) and Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America (W. W. Norton & Company, 2011), delves into the impact of so-called "dark money" on our democracy.

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 10.22.2022          Support the show

  Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 10.15.2022         Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 10.8.2022        Support the show

  Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 10.1.2022       Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 9.24.2022      Support the show

  Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 9.17.2022     Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 9.10.2022    Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 9.3.2022   Support the show

 Catch up with Crowder College and learn more about them as Adam Winkler talks to different Crowder personnel each week. Airdate 8.27.2022  Support the show

It was August 2011 when Mitt Romney famously told a crowd at the Iowa State Fair, "corporations are people, my friend." Corporations have had what you could call a civil rights history of their own, which has gone on in parallel to all other civil rights movements. But with so much knowledge in this field publicly available to us, how could this entire history be so poorly understood?This is highlighted in Adam Winker's work, and most recently his book, “We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil Right.” Professor Adam Winkler is a specialist in American constitutional law, the Supreme Court, and gun policy, as well as the Connell Professor of law at the UCLA School of Law. He is also the author of “Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America.” Greg and Adam discuss this question among others, while also analyzing landmark cases in the flights of Corporations including Citizens United v. FEC, Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, and Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. Episode Quotes:The Supreme Court case that shaped our view on corporationsIn the Dartmouth College case, the Supreme Court firmly sided with the idea that a corporation was more like a person, an individual than it was like the government. The court, in that case, could have allowed the state of New Hampshire to take over Dartmouth College and said that a corporation is really just another state agency in some form or some mild form of a state agency or government actor. But instead, the court said that the corporation was on the private side, more like the individual, and had rights against the government. And so that decision was really essential in sort of changing how we started to think about corporations and they became less and less about achieving public purposes and more and more about achieving private purposes. That is to say, making money for investors.Corporations have racial identities"…we don't think of corporations necessarily as being black or white or whatnot, but the law treats them in such a way. We have laws that provide, for instance, various kinds of preferences, affirmative action, if you will, for minority business enterprises. Well, what is a minority business enterprise, other than a corporation that has been deemed to have a racial identity."Why focus on corporate issuesCorporations have not all of the same rights as you and me, but nearly all the same rights as you and me. And pretty much all of the rights that a corporation or a business person could want the corporation to have. And so, I realized that this was a story that hadn't been well told, and as I dug into it, I found that it was a much more interesting, unexpected, surprising, and fascinating history than I could have ever imagined.Show Links:Recommended Resources:BlackstoneCitizens United v. FEC Dartmouth College v. Woodward - WikipediaCharles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge - WikipediaBank of the United States v. Deveaux - WikipediaBurwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. - WikipediaPeoples Pleasure Park Co. v. Rohleder, 109 Va. 439 (1909) | Caselaw Access ProjectRoscoe Conkling - WikipediaSanta Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. - WikipediaDaniel Webster - WikipediaLochner era - WikipediaMasterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission - WikipediaUnited States v. Carolene Products Co. - WikipediaBrown v. Board of Education - WikipediaGuest Profile:Faculty Profile at UCLA LawProfessional Profile at The Federalist SocietyAdam Winkler on LinkedInAdam Winkler on TwitterAdam Winkler on InstagramAdam Winkler on PBS NewsHourHis Work:We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil RightsGunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America

UCLA law professor Adam Winkler says the recent SCOTUS ruling on handgun licensing wasn't just a gun rights case, it was the first step in a big shift toward taking more and more power away from the States to do anything to stem the tide of gun violence. In the Spiel, we play “Names In The News,” including telescopes, former Clinton Officials, and the successfully fled. And, how hard is it to plan a coup anyway? Produced by Joel Patterson and Corey Wara Email us at thegist@mikepesca.com To advertise on the show, visit: https://advertisecast.com/TheGist Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

June Grasso speaks to Second Amendment experts Adam Winkler, a Professor at UCLA Law School, and Joseph Blocher, a Professor at Duke Law School, about the repercussions of the Supreme Court's decision to strike down a New York law that limited who could carry a handgun in public. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the wake of more horrific mass shootings in Buffalo and Uvalde, the United States finds itself yet again engaged in a morbid ritual of horror and grief, thoughts and prayers, and renewed calls for gun control. Last week, the National Rifle Association held its annual convention, during which it steadfastly opposed calls to limit access to guns. But it has not always been that way.  The NRA, in earlier decades, supported restrictions on access to guns.  What happened?  How has the Second Amendment been re-interpreted?  What has prompted states to enshrine new protections on guns and access to them?  Adam Winkler, renowned national author of Gunfight​ and the Connell Professor of Law at UCLA, joins Then & Now to address these questions.

As the nation continues to reel after the massacre at Uvalde, we are joined by Professor Adam Winkler, the leading expert on gun policy and gun laws, who takes us through the range of the possible when it comes to gun legislation.  What might Congress do, what are the limitations, political and constitutional, and what is the significance of the upcoming Supreme Court decision in Bruen?  Professor Winkler also offers a primer of sorts on the terminology and landscape of this highly contentious, highly fraught area of law and policy and a crucial time.

Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson, Bloomberg Law Supreme Court Reporter, discusses how the Supreme Court is heading into the homestretch of the term with more than half its work incomplete, as the justices and their law clerks deal with an investigation into the leak of a draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade. Second Amendment expert Adam Winkler, a professor at UCLA Law School, discusses the upcoming Supreme Court opinion on New York's gun law and the state of gun control legislation across the country. June Grasso hosts.   See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Adam Winkler, a professor at UCLA Law School, discusses the unprecedented leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion that overturns the constitutional right to abortion. Harry Nelson, the founder of Nelson Hardiman, discusses San Francisco's landmark trial against the opioid industry. June Grasso hosts. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Adam Winkler, a professor at UCLA Law School, discusses the confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, to be the first Black woman to sit on the Supreme Court. Mark Rifkin, a partner at Wolf Haldenstein, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments over whether an Iowa fast-food worker must arbitrate her overtime claims against a Taco Bell franchise, rather than press them in federal court. June Grasso hosts. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Adam Winkler is a Law Professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. Winkler is a specialist in American constitutional law, the Supreme Court, and gun policy. His latest book which came out in 2018 is called “We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil Rights”. Prof. Winkler joins Mike to discuss the Sandy Hook families reaching a settlement of $73 million with Remington. What law would’ve prevented the kid who committed the mass shooting at Sandy Hook years ago? Is there a fixation on the inanimate object when it comes to mass shootings or tragic events such as the Waukesha Christmas parade massacre? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the landmark ruling District of Columbia v. Heller, Justices Antonin Scalia and John Paul Stevens wrote dueling originalist opinions examining the right to keep and bear arms. They both looked to the Second Amendment's text, history, and tradition to reach … opposite conclusions about its original meaning.Thanks to our guests Paul Clement, David Lat, Clark Neily, and Adam Winkler.Follow us on Twitter @ehslattery @anastasia_esq @pacificlegal #DissedPod See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Howdy everyone, and thanks again for tuning in to The Jeffersonian Tradition. In today's episode, I discuss the problem with too much corporate power with UCLA Professor of Law and author, Adam Winkler. If you want me to cover a topic or elaborate further on any given episode, then reach out to me through the show's private MeWe group, or by contacting me at the show email address, which is mrjeffersonian@outlook.com. If you find value in the podcast, please consider becoming a supporting listener. One-time contributions can be sent to the show's cash app, http://cash.app/$MrJeffersonian. Recurring contributions can be made through the Anchor supporting listener link. Thanks again for tuning in to The Jeffersonian Tradition! Sign up for MeWe today: https://mewe.com. Fuel the Jeffersonian Revolution today and buy your goldbacks here: Defy the Grid. Use coupon code LibertyBlock from now through January 1 and enjoy a 1% discount! Be sure to check out Professor Winkler's book, We the Corporations --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/mr-jeffersonian/support

Second Amendment law expert Adam Winkler, a professor at UCLA Law School, discusses the Supreme Court's conservative justices signaling that they are ready to strike down New York's gun control law and rule that most people have a right to carry a handgun outside the home. Mary Ziegler, a professor at Florida State University College of Law and author of "Abortion and the Law in America, A Legal History, Roe v. Wade to the Present," discusses key justices raising the prospect they might act to halt Texas' far-reaching abortion ban. June Grasso hosts. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com