Podcasts about nra

On Today's Episode –Retired Col. Rob Maness is back to talk about the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk, and its lasting ramifications. Tune in for all the Funhttps://x.com/RobManesshttps://www.stripes.com/opinion/2025-08-12/keep-artificial-intelligence-out-government-18742200.htmlhttps://gatorpac.com/ Retired Colonel Rob Maness has a lifelong record of providing dedicated service to the nation. He made the decision as a 17-year-old high school senior to enlist in the United States Air Force and serve in uniform as the country faced multiple crises around the world.Having worked his way up from the enlisted ranks to full colonel, he retired from active duty in 2011, ending his military service of more than 32 years. Following military retirement Rob returned to Louisiana to work as an executive in a Fortune 500 energy corporation. He is currently founder and the owner of Iron Liberty Group and resides in Gulfport, Mississippi.Rob has proven his competence at the local, state, and federal levels of government with his demonstrated leadership and effectiveness as a steward of our citizen's tax dollars. He has broad experience working at the Louisiana State Legislature, in the national budget process, national emergency response decision-making, law enforcement, successful community relations with governments at all levels, and working directly with citizens to meet today's challenges. He has provided direct, executive oversight to local schools in coordination with elected school boards, working to make them secure and more effective to meet the needs of America's military children. His leadership and combat experiences give him a unique perspective when considering how national action impacts our American families.During his military service, Colonel Maness led numerous combat operations, including as a bomber squadron commander in Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. Colonel Maness served as an enlisted bomb disposal technician in three assignments countering terrorism before being commissioned and selected for flight training. As a Joint Chiefs of Staff operations officer he was on duty in the National Military Command Center located within the Pentagon during the September 11, 2001 attack. In the ensuing months, he directly assisted the United States national security team with creating, synchronizing, and executing the campaign plan for the global war on terrorism. Colonel Maness authored the first theater nuclear war plan and designed decision-making tools for the Presidential nuclear decision handbook strengthening U.S. extended strategic deterrence policy in European and Pacific regions. Colonel Maness served as the Vice Commander of America's largest Airborne Intelligence Wing conducting strategic and battlefield intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations against America's enemies. He went on to command Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, NM, the sixth largest U.S. Air Force Base encompassing 53,000 acres and 22,000 employees, housing our nation's most critical assets.After running for the U.S. Senate on this America First Platform, Rob founded GatorPAC and its Veterans Leadership Fund, a Federal political action committee. The PAC educates grass roots political activists on the most effective ways to influence their elected officials, get a candidate elected, or to fight for a cause. It advocates for policies that protect your liberty, fight for limited government, and ensure prosperity. He has also served as a board member at Military Veterans Advocacy, Inc., a veteran's advocacy group fighting for veteran toxic exposure benefits, committed to preventing veteran suicides, and ensuring military families have equal access to benefits. He has served as a non-voting board member of the Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce and Hispano Chamber of Commerce in his role as Commander of Kirtland AFB. As president of his local chapter of the Military Officers Association of America, he led a team that created an annual scholarship fund for graduating high school students. Rob is a Life Member of the NRA, Veterans of Foreign Wars, the American Legion, Disabled American Veterans, and the Military Officers Association of America. He is also a member of the Louisiana Military Order of Foreign Wars and the Society of the Sons of the Revolution. Active in the community, Rob served as an elected member of the Republican Party Executive Committee representing St. Tammany Parish Council District 1 for two terms and served on the board of the only Republican Men's Club in Louisiana. He Currently serves on the Harrison County and Gulfport Mississippi GOP Executive committees.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics related to gun rights, misinformation about firearms, political commentary, and the ongoing challenges faced by the firearms industry. He addresses rumors about CZ firearms, shares personal experiences related to political violence, and highlights the importance of the NRA in supporting gun rights. The conversation also touches on recent lawsuits against the firearms industry and the implications of political actions on gun rights. Takeaways CZ is not confiscating firearms in Canada. Misinformation spreads rapidly online, especially about firearms. Political commentary often intersects with personal experiences. Gun control advocates are increasingly supporting violence. Lawsuits against the firearms industry are on the rise. The NRA plays a crucial role in defending gun rights. Industry events like the SHOT Show are significant for networking. The left's efforts to undermine gun rights will continue. Public figures often make irresponsible statements about violence. Personal anecdotes can illustrate broader political issues. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, CZ firearms, political commentary, misinformation, gun control, lawsuits, NRA, firearms industry, personal experiences  

Last time we spoke about the Nanjing Massacre. Japanese forces breached Nanjing as Chinese defenders retreated under heavy bombardment, and the city fell on December 13. In the following weeks, civilians and disarmed soldiers endured systematic slaughter, mass executions, rapes, looting, and arson, with casualties mounting rapidly. Among the most brutal episodes were hundreds of executions near the Safety Zone, mass shootings along the Yangtze River, and killings at improvised sites and “killing fields.” The massacre involved tens of thousands of prisoners, with estimates up to 300,000 victims. Women and children were subjected to widespread rape, mutilation, and terror intended to crush morale and resistance. Although the Safety Zone saved many lives, it could not shield all refugees from harm, and looting and arson devastated large parts of the city. Foreign witnesses, missionaries, and diary entries documented the extensive brutality and the apparent premeditated nature of many acts, noting the collapse of discipline among troops and orders that shaped the violence.    #169 Nanjing has Fallen, the War is not Over Welcome to the Fall and Rise of China Podcast, I am your dutiful host Craig Watson. But, before we start I want to also remind you this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Perhaps you want to learn more about the history of Asia? Kings and Generals have an assortment of episodes on history of asia and much more  so go give them a look over on Youtube. So please subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry for some more history related content, over on my channel, the Pacific War Channel where I cover the history of China and Japan from the 19th century until the end of the Pacific War. Directly after the fall of Nanjing, rumors circulated among the city's foreigners that Tang Shengzhi had been executed for his inability to hold the city against the Japanese onslaught. In fact, unlike many of his subordinates who fought in the defense, he survived. On December 12, he slipped through Yijiang Gate, where bullets from the 36th Division had claimed numerous victims, and sailed across the Yangtze to safety. Chiang Kai-shek protected him from bearing direct consequences for Nanjing's collapse. Tang was not unscathed, however. After the conquest of Nanjing, a dejected Tang met General Li Zongren at Xuzhou Railway Station. In a brief 20-minute conversation, Tang lamented, “Sir, Nanjing's fall has been unexpectedly rapid. How can I face the world?” Li, who had previously taunted Tang for over-eagerness, offered sympathy. “Don't be discouraged. Victory or defeat comes every day for the soldier. Our war of resistance is a long-term proposition. The loss of one city is not decisive.” By December 1937, the outlook for Chiang Kai-shek's regime remained bleak. Despite his public pledges, he had failed to defend the capital. Its sturdy walls, which had withstood earlier sieges, were breached in less than 100 hours. Foreign observers remained pessimistic about the prospects of continuing the fight against Japan. The New York Times wrote “The capture of Nanking was the most overwhelming defeat suffered by the Chinese and one of the most tragic military debacles in modern warfare. In defending Nanking, the Chinese allowed themselves to be surrounded and then slaughtered… The graveyard of tens of thousands of Chinese soldiers may also be the graveyard of all Chinese hopes of resisting conquest by Japan.” Foreign diplomats doubted Chiang's ability to sustain the war, shrinking the question to whether he would stubbornly continue a losing fight or seek peace. US Ambassador Nelson Johnson wrote in a letter to Admiral Yarnell, then commander of the US Asicatic Fleet “There is little left now for the Chinese to do except to carry on a desultory warfare in the country, or to negotiate for the best terms they can get”.  The Japanese, too, acted as if Chiang Kai-shek had already lost the war. They assumed the generalissimo was a spent force in Chinese politics as well, and that a gentle push would suffice to topple his regime like a house of cards. On December 14, Prime Minister Konoe announced that Chiang's losses of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, and now Nanjing, had created a new situation. “The National Government has become but a shadow of its former self. If a new Chinese regime emerged to replace Chiang's government, Japan would deal with it, provided it is a regime headed in the right direction.” Konoe spoke the same day as a Liaison Conference in Tokyo, where civilian and military leaders debated how to treat China now that it had been thoroughly beaten on the battlefield. Japanese demands had grown significantly: beyond recognizing Manchukuo, Japan pressed for the creation of pro-Japanese regimes in Inner Mongolia and the north China area. The same day, a puppet government was established in Japanese-occupied Beijing. While these demands aimed to end China as a unitary state, Japanese policy was moving toward the same goal. The transmissions of these demands via German diplomatic channels caused shock and consternation in Chinese government circles, and the Chinese engaged in what many regarded as stalling tactics. Even at this late stage, there was division among Japan's top decision makers. Tada, deputy chief of the Army General Staff, feared a protracted war in China and urged keeping negotiations alive. He faced strong opposition from the cabinet, including the foreign minister and the ministers of the army and navy, and ultimately he relented. Tada stated “In this state of emergency, it is necessary to avoid any political upheaval that might arise from a struggle between the Cabinet and the Army General Staff.” Although he disagreed, he no longer challenged the uncompromising stance toward China. On January 16, 1938, Japan publicly stated that it would “cease henceforth to deal with” Chiang Kai-shek. This was a line that could not be uncrossed. War was the only option. Germany, the mediator between China and Japan, also considered Chiang a losing bet. In late January 1938, von Dirksen, the German ambassador in Tokyo, urged a fundamental shift in German diplomacy and advocated abandoning China in favor of Japan. He warned that this was a matter of urgency, since Japan harbored grudges against Germany for its half-hearted peace efforts. In a report, von Dirksen wrote that Japan, “in her deep ill humor, will confront us with unpleasant decisions at an inopportune moment.” Von Dirksen's view carried the day in Berlin. Nazi Germany and Hirohito's Japan were on a trajectory that, within three years, would forge the Axis and place Berlin and Tokyo in the same camp in a conflict that would eventually span the globe. Rabe, who returned to Germany in 1938, found that his account of Japanese atrocities in Nanjing largely fell on deaf ears. He was even visited by the Gestapo, which apparently pressed him to keep quiet about what he had seen. Ambassador von Dirksen also argued in his January 1938 report that China should be abandoned because of its increasingly friendly ties with the Soviet Union. There was some merit to this claim. Soviet aid to China was substantial: by the end of 1937, 450 Soviet aviators were serving in China. Without them, Japan likely would have enjoyed air superiority. Chiang Kai-shek, it seemed, did not fully understand the Russians' motives. They were supplying aircraft and pilots to keep China in the war while keeping themselves out. After Nanjing's fall, Chiang nevertheless reached out to Joseph Stalin, inviting direct Soviet participation in the war. Stalin politely declined, noting that if the Soviet Union joined the conflict, “the world would say the Soviet Union was an aggressor, and sympathy for Japan around the world would immediately increase.” In a rare moment of candor a few months later, the Soviet deputy commissar for foreign affairs spoke with the French ambassador, describing the situation in China as “splendid.” He expected China to continue fighting for several more years, after which Japan would be too weakened to undertake major operations against the Soviet Union. It was clear that China was being used. Whatever the motive, China was receiving vital help from Stalin's Russia while the rest of the world stood on the sidelines, reluctant to upset Japan. Until Operation Barbarossa, when the Soviet Union was forced to the brink by the German Army and could no longer sustain extensive overseas aid, it supplied China with 904 planes, 1,516 trucks, 1,140 artillery pieces, 9,720 machine guns, 50,000 rifles, 31,600 bombs, and more. Despite all of this, all in all, China's position proved less disastrous than many observers had feared. Chinese officials later argued that the battle of Nanjing was not the unmitigated fiasco it appeared to be. Tang Shengzhi had this to say in his memoirs“I think the main purpose of defending Nanjing was to buy time, to allow troops that had just been pulled out of battle to rest and regroup. It wasn't simply because it was the capital or the site of Sun Yat-sen's mausoleum.” Tan Daoping, an officer in Nanjing, described the battle “as a moderate success because it drew the Japanese in land”. This of course was a strategy anticipated by interwar military thinker Jiang Baili. It also allowed dozens of Chinese divisions to escape Shanghai, since the Japanese forces that could have pursued them were tied down with the task of taking Nanjing. Tan Daoping wrote after the war “They erred in believing they could wage a quick war and decide victory immediately. Instead, their dream was shattered; parts of their forces were worn out, and they were hindered from achieving a swift end”. Even so, it was a steep price was paid in Chinese lives. As in Shanghai, the commanders in Nanjing thought they could fight on the basis of sheer willpower. Chinese officer Qin Guo Qi wrote in his memoirs “In modern war, you can't just rely on the spirit of the troops. You can't merely rely on physical courage and stamina. The battle of Nanjing explains that better than anything”. As for the Brigade commander of the 87th division, Chen Yiding, who emerged from Nanjing with only a few hundred survivors, was enraged. “During the five days of the battle for Nanjing, my superiors didn't see me even once. They didn't do their duty. They also did not explain the overall deployments in the Nanjing area. What's worse, they didn't give us any order to retreat. And afterwards I didn't hear of any commander being disciplined for failing to do his job.” Now back in November of 1937, Chiang Kai-shek had moved his command to the great trinity of Wuhan. For the Nationalists, Wuhan was a symbolically potent stronghold: three municipalities in one, Hankou, Wuchang, and Hanyang. They had all grown prosperous as gateways between coastal China and the interior. But the autumn disasters of 1937 thrust Wuhan into new prominence, and, a decade after it had ceased to be the temporary capital, it again became the seat of military command and resistance. Leading Nationalist politicians had been seen in the city in the months before the war, fueling suspicions that Wuhan would play a major role in any imminent conflict. By the end of the year, the generals and their staffs, along with most of the foreign embassies, had moved upriver. Yet as 1937 slipped into 1938, the Japanese advance seemed practically unstoppable. From the destruction of Shanghai, to the massacre in Nanjing, to the growing vulnerability of Wuhan, the NRA government appeared powerless against the onslaught.  Now the Japanese government faced several options: expanding the scope of the war to force China into submission, which would risk further depletion of Japan's military and economic resources; establishing an alternative regime in China as a bridge for reconciliation, thereby bypassing the Nationalist government for negotiations; and engaging in indirect or direct peace negotiations with the Nationalist Government, despite the failure of previous attempts, while still seeking new opportunities for negotiation. However, the Nanjing massacre did not compel the Chinese government and its people to submit. On January 2, Chiang Kai-shek wrote in his diary, “The conditions proposed by Japan are equivalent to the conquest and extinction of our country. Rather than submitting and perishing, it is better to perish in defeat,” choosing to refuse negotiations and continue resistance.  In January 1938 there was a new escalation of hostilities. Up to that point, Japan had not officially declared war, even during the Shanghai campaign and the Nanjing massacre. However on January 11, an Imperial Conference was held in Tokyo in the presence of Emperor Hirohito. Prime Minister Konoe outlined a “Fundamental Policy to deal with the China Incident.”The Imperial Conference was attended by Prime Minister Fumimaro Konoe, Army Chief of Staff Prince Kan'in, Navy Minister Admiral Fushimi, and others to reassess its policy toward China. Citing the Nationalist Government's delay and lack of sincerity, the Japanese leadership decided to terminate Trautmann's mediation. At the conference, Japan articulated a dual strategy: if the Nationalist Government did not seek peace, Japan would no longer regard it as a viable negotiating partner, instead supporting emerging regimes, seeking to resolve issues through incidents, and aiming either to eliminate or incorporate the existing central government; if the Nationalist Government sought reconciliation, it would be required to cease resistance, cooperate with Japan against communism, and pursue economic cooperation, including officially recognizing Manchukuo and allowing Japanese troops in Inner Mongolia, North China, Central China, and co-governance of Shanghai. The Konoe cabinet relayed this proposal to the German ambassador in Japan on December 22, 1937: It called for: diplomatic recognition of Manchukuo; autonomy for Inner Mongolia; cessation of all anti-Japanese and anti-Manchukuo policies; cooperation between Japan, Manchukuo, and China against communism; war reparations; demilitarized zones in North China and Inner Mongolia; and a trade agreement among Japan, Manchukuo, and China.  Its terms were too severe, including reparations payable to Japan and new political arrangements that would formalize the separation of north China under Japanese control. Chiang's government would have seventy-two hours to accept; if they refused, Tokyo would no longer recognize the Nationalist government and would seek to destroy it.  On January 13, 1938, the Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Chonghui informed Germany that China needed a fuller understanding of the additional conditions for peace talks to make a decision. The January 15 deadline for accepting Japan's terms elapsed without Chinese acceptance. Six days after the deadline for a Chinese government reply, an Imperial Conference “Gozen Kaigi” was convened in Tokyo to consider how to handle Trautmann's mediation. The navy, seeing the war as essentially an army matter, offered no strong position; the army pressed for ending the war through diplomatic means, arguing that they faced a far more formidable Far Eastern Soviet threat at the northern Manchukuo border and wished to avoid protracted attrition warfare. Foreign Minister Kōki Hirota, however, strongly disagreed with the army, insisting there was no viable path to Trautmann's mediation given the vast gap between Chinese and Japanese positions. A second conference followed on January 15, 1938, attended by the empire's principal cabinet members and military leaders, but without the emperor's presence. The debate grew heated over whether to continue Trautmann's mediation. Hayao Tada, Deputy Chief of Army General Staff, argued for continuation, while Konoe, Hirota, Navy Minister Mitsumasa Yonai, and War Minister Hajime Sugiyama opposed him. Ultimately, Tada acceded to the position of Konoe and Hirota. On the same day, Konoe conveyed the cabinet's conclusion, termination of Trautmann's mediation, to the emperor. The Japanese government then issued a statement on January 16 declaring that it would no longer treat the Nationalist Government as a bargaining partner, signaling the establishment of a new Chinese regime that would cooperate with Japan and a realignment of bilateral relations. This became known as the first Konoe statement, through which Tokyo formally ended Trautmann's mediation attempt. The Chinese government was still weighing its response when, at noon on January 16, Konoe publicly declared, “Hereafter, the Imperial Government will not deal with the National Government.” In Japanese, this became the infamous aite ni sezu (“absolutely no dealing”). Over the following days, the Japanese government made it clear that this was a formal breach of relations, “stronger even than a declaration of war,” in the words of Foreign Minister Hirota Kōki. The Chinese ambassador to Japan, who had been in Tokyo for six months since hostilities began, was finally recalled. At the end of January, Chiang summoned a military conference and declared that the top strategic priority would be to defend the east-central Chinese city of Xuzhou, about 500 kilometers north of Wuhan. This decision, like the mobilization near Lugouqiao, was heavily influenced by the railway: Xuzhou sat at the midpoint of the Tianjin–Pukou Jinpu line, and its seizure would grant the Japanese mastery over north–south travel in central China. The Jinpu line also crossed the Longhai line, China's main cross-country artery from Lanzhou to the port of Lianyungang, north of Shanghai. The Japanese military command marked the Jinpu line as a target in spring 1938. Control over Xuzhou and the rail lines threading through it were thus seen as vital to the defense of Wuhan, which lay to the city's south. Chiang's defense strategy fit into a larger plan evolving since the 1920s, when the military thinker Jiang Baili had first proposed a long war against Japan; Jiang's foresight earned him a position as an adviser to Chiang in 1938. Jiang had previously run the Baoding military academy, a predecessor of the Whampoa academy, which had trained many of China's finest young officers in the early republic 1912–1922. Now, many of the generals who had trained under Jiang gathered in Wuhan and would play crucial roles in defending the city: Chen Cheng, Bai Chongxi, Tang Shengzhi, and Xue Yue. They remained loyal to Chiang but sought to avoid his tendency to micromanage every aspect of strategy.  Nobody could say with certainty whether Wuhan would endure the Japanese onslaught, and outsiders' predictions were gloomy. As Wuhan's inhabitants tasted their unexpected new freedoms, the Japanese pressed on with their conquest of central China. After taking Nanjing, the IJA 13th Division crossed the Yangtze River to the north and advanced to the Outang and Mingguang lines on the east bank of the Chihe River in Anhui Province, while the 2nd Army of the North China Front crossed the Yellow River to the south between Qingcheng and Jiyang in Shandong, occupied Jinan, and pressed toward Jining, Mengyin, and Qingdao. To open the Jinpu Railway and connect the northern and southern battlefields, the Japanese headquarters mobilized eight divisions, three brigades, and two detachments , totaling about 240,000 men. They were commanded by General Hata Shunroku, commander of the Central China Expeditionary Army, and Terauchi Hisaichi, commander of the North China Front Army. Their plan was a north–south advance: first seize Xuzhou, a strategic city in east China; then take Zhengzhou in the west along the Longhai Railway connecting Lanzhou and Lianyungang; and finally push toward Wuhan in the south along the Pinghan Railway connecting Beijing and Hankou. At the beginning of 1938, Japan's domestic mobilization and military reorganization had not yet been completed, and there was a shortage of troops to expand the front. At the Emperor's Imperial Conference on February 16, 1938, the General Staff Headquarters argued against launching operations before the summer of 1938, preferring to consolidate the front in 1938 and undertake a large-scale battle in 1939. Although the Northern China Expeditionary Force and the Central China Expeditionary Force proposed a plan to open the Jinpu Line to connect the northern and southern battlefields, the proposal was not approved by the domestic General Staff Headquarters. The Chinese army, commanded by Li Zongren, commander-in-chief of the Fifth War Zone, mobilized about 64 divisions and three brigades, totaling roughly 600,000 men. The main force was positioned north of Xuzhou to resist the southern Japanese advance, with a portion deployed along the southern Jinpu Railway to block the southern push and secure Xuzhou. Early in the campaign, Chiang Kai-shek redeployed the heavy artillery brigade originally promised to Han Fuju to Tang Enbo's forces. To preserve his strength, Shandong Provincial Governor Han Fuju abandoned the longstanding Yellow River defenses in Shandong, allowing the Japanese to capture the Shandong capital of Jinan in early March 1938. This defection opened the Jinpu Railway to attack. The Japanese 10th Division, under Rensuke Isogai, seized Tai'an, Jining, and Dawenkou, ultimately placing northern Shandong under Japanese control. The aim was to crush the Chinese between the two halves of a pincer movement. At Yixian and Huaiyuan, north of Xuzhou, both sides fought to the death: the Chinese could not drive back the Japanese, but the Japanese could not scatter the defenders either. At Linyi, about 50 kilometers northeast of Xuzhou, Zhang Zizhong, who had previously disgraced himself by abandoning an earlier battlefield—became a national hero for his determined efforts to stop the Japanese troops led by Itagaki Seishirō, the conqueror of Manchuria. The Japanese hoped that they could pour in as many as 400,000 troops to destroy the Chinese forces holding eastern and central China. Chiang Kai-shek was determined that this should not happen, recognizing that the fall of Xuzhou would place Wuhan in extreme danger. On April 1, 1938, he addressed Nationalist Party delegates, linking the defense of Wuhan to the fate of the party itself. He noted that although the Japanese had invaded seven provinces, they had only captured provincial capitals and main transport routes, while villages and towns off those routes remained unconquered. The Japanese, he argued, might muster more than half a million soldiers, but after eight or nine months of hard fighting they had become bogged down. Chiang asserted that as long as Guangzhou (Canton) remained in Chinese hands, it would be of little significance if the Japanese invaded Wuhan, since Guangzhou would keep China's sea links open and Guangdong, Sun Yat-sen's homeland, would serve as a revolutionary base area. If the “woren” Japanese “dwarfs” attacked Wuhan and Guangzhou, it would cost them dearly and threaten their control over the occupied zones. He reiterated his plan: “the base area for our war will not be in the zones east of the Beiping–Wuhan or Wuhan–Guangdong railway lines, but to their west.” For this reason he authorized withdrawing Chinese troops behind the railway lines. Chiang's speech mixed defiance with an explanation of why regrouping was necessary; it was a bold public posture in the face of a developing military disaster, yet it reflected the impossible balance he faced between signaling resolve and avoiding overcommitment of a city that might still fall. Holding Xuzhou as the first priority required Chiang Kai-shek to place a great deal of trust in one of his rivals: the southwestern general Li Zongren. The relationship between Chiang and Li would become one of the most ambivalent in wartime China. Li hailed from Guangxi, a province in southwestern China long regarded by the eastern heartland as half civilized. Its people had rarely felt fully part of the empire ruled from Beijing or even Nanjing, and early in the republic there was a strong push for regional autonomy. Li was part of a cohort of young officers trained in regional academies who sought to bring Guangxi under national control; he joined the Nationalist Party in 1923, the year Sun Yat-sen announced his alliance with the Soviets. Li was not a Baoding Academy graduate but had trained at Yunnan's equivalent institution, which shared similar views on military professionalism. He enthusiastically took part in the Northern Expedition (1926–1928) and played a crucial role in the National Revolutionary Army's ascent to control over much of north China. Yet after the Nanjing government took power, Li grew wary of Chiang's bid to centralize authority in his own person. In 1930 Li's so‑called “Guangxi clique” participated in the Central Plains War, the failed effort by militarist leaders to topple Chiang; although the plot failed, Li retreated to his southwest base, ready to challenge Chiang again. The occupation of Manchuria in 1931 reinforced Li's belief that a Japanese threat posed a greater danger than Chiang's centralization. The tension between the two men was evident from the outset of the war. On October 10, 1937, Chiang appointed Li commander of the Fifth War Zone; Li agreed on the condition that Chiang refrain from issuing shouling—personal commands—to Li's subordinates. Chiang complied, a sign of the value he placed on Li's leadership and the caution with which he treated Li and his Guangxi ally Bai Chongxi. As Chiang sought any possible victory amid retreat and destruction, he needed Li to deliver results. As part of the public-relations front, journalists were given access to commanders on the Xuzhou front. Li and his circle sought to shape their image as capable leaders to visiting reporters, with Du Zhongyuan among the most active observers. Du praised the “formidable southwestern general, Li Zongren,” calling him “elegant and refined” and “vastly magnanimous.” In language echoing the era's soldiers' public presentation, Du suggested that Li's forces operated under strict, even disciplined, orders “The most important point in the people's war is that . . . troops do not harass the people of the country. If the people are the water, the soldiers are the fish, and if you have fish with no water, inevitably they're going to choke; worse still is to use our water to nurture the enemy's fish — that really is incomparably stupid”.  Within the southern front, on January 26, 1938, the Japanese 13th Division attacked Fengyang and Bengbu in Anhui Province, while Li Pinxian, Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the 5th War Zone, directed operations south of Xuzhou. The defending 31st Corps of the 11th Group Army, after resisting on the west bank of the Chi River, retreated to the west of Dingyuan and Fengyang. By February 3, the Japanese had captured Linhuai Pass and Bengbu. From the 9th to the 10th, the main force of the 13th Division forced a crossing of the Huai River at Bengbu and Linhuai Pass respectively, and began an offensive against the north bank. The 51st Corps, reorganized from the Central Plains Northeast Army and led by Commander Yu Xuezhong, engaged in fierce combat with the Japanese. Positions on both sides of the Huai shifted repeatedly, producing a riverine bloodbath through intense hand-to-hand fighting. After ten days of engagement, the Fifth War Zone, under Zhang Zizhong, commander of the 59th Army, rushed to the Guzhen area to reinforce the 51st Army, and the two forces stubbornly resisted the Japanese on the north bank of the Huai River. Meanwhile, on the south bank, the 48th Army of the 21st Group Army held the Luqiao area, while the 7th Army, in coordination with the 31st Army, executed a flanking attack on the flanks and rear of the Japanese forces in Dingyuan, compelling the main body of the 13th Division to redeploy to the north bank for support. Seizing the initiative, the 59th and 51st Armies launched a counteroffensive, reclaiming all positions north of the Huai River by early March. The 31st Army then moved from the south bank to the north, and the two sides faced across the river. Subsequently, the 51st and 59th Armies were ordered to reinforce the northern front, while the 31st Army continued to hold the Huai River to ensure that all Chinese forces covering the Battle of Xuzhou were safely withdrawn. Within the northern front, in late February, the Japanese Second Army began its southward push along multiple routes. The eastern axis saw the 5th Division moving south from Weixian present-day Weifang, in Shandong, capturing Yishui, Juxian, and Rizhao before pressing directly toward Linyi, as units of the Nationalist Third Corps' 40th Army and others mounted strenuous resistance. The 59th Army was ordered to reinforce and arrived on March 12 at the west bank of the Yi River in the northern suburbs of Linyi, joining the 40th Army in a counterattack that, after five days and nights of ferocious fighting, inflicted heavy losses on the Japanese and forced them to retreat toward Juxian. On the western route, the Seya Detachment (roughly a brigade) of the Japanese 10th Division crossed the Grand Canal from Jining and attacked Jiaxiang, meeting stiff resistance from the Third Army and being thwarted, while continuing to advance south along the Jinpu Railway. The Isogai Division, advancing on the northern route without awaiting help from the southeast and east, moved southward from Liangxiadian, south of Zouxian, on March 14, with the plan to strike Tengxian, present-day Tengzhou on March 15 and push south toward Xuzhou. The defending 22nd Army and the 41st Corps fought bravely and suffered heavy casualties in a hard battle that lasted until March 17, during which Wang Mingzhang, commander of the 122nd Division defending Teng County, was killed in action. Meanwhile, a separate Japanese thrust under Itagaki Seishirō landed on the Jiaodong Peninsula and occupied Qingdao, advancing along the Jiaoji Line to strike Linyi, a key military town in southern Shandong. Pang Bingxun's 40th Army engaged the invaders in fierce combat, and later, elements of Zhang Zizhong's 333rd Brigade of the 111th Division, reinforced by the 57th Army, joined Pang Bingxun's forces to launch a double-sided pincer that temporarily repelled the Japanese attack on Linyi. By late March 1938 a frightening reality loomed: the Japanese were close to prevailing on the Xuzhou front. The North China Area Army, commanded by Itagaki Seishirō, Nishio Toshizō, and Isogai Rensuke, was poised to link up with the Central China Expeditionary Force under Hata Shunroku in a united drive toward central China. Li Zongren, together with his senior lieutenants Bai Chongxi and Tang Enbo, decided to confront the invaders at Taierzhuang, the traditional stone-walled city that would become a focal point of their defense. I would like to take this time to remind you all that this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Please go subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry after that, give my personal channel a look over at The Pacific War Channel at Youtube, it would mean a lot to me. Nanjing falls after one of humanities worst atrocities. Chiang Kai-Shek's war command has been pushed to Wuhan, but the Japanese are not stopping their advance. Trautmann's mediation is over and now Japan has its sights on Xuzhou and its critical railway junctions. Japan does not realize it yet, but she is now entering a long war of attrition.

Happy Saturday! Guest Michael Blankenship, Derby School District, joins to discuss school year policy changes this year. Discussion of cell phone bans, latest investigation on teacher within district, and more. Discussion of upcoming school board elections, and focus on student success, and changes on testing and assessment.  Guest Travis Couture-Lovelady, NRA Liason for KS and the Chair for the Kansas State Rifle Association, joins to discuss investigation into a professor at Ft. Hays State University regarding social media comments made after Charlie Kirks assassination, and accusing white men to be the most "violent animals on earth". Discussion of hunter safety courses through NRA and next generation of gun owners.  Guest Shawn Vrendenburg, Kingman County GOP, joins to discuss creating local activism within the community. Discussion of Democrat city leaders, big government spending, and how to create a movement at the local level. 

One of the most painful lessons of the Kirk assassination is that conservatives are running rings around progressives in political mobilization - especially of young Americans. So how to make the left relevant in America again? For the philosopher Michael Brownstein, co-author of Somebody Should Do Something, progressives need to learn to lose both cleverly and loudly. And they can learn from NRA on this. Despite holding positions unpopular with most Americans, Brownstein acknowledges that the NRA created a powerful social identity around gun ownership and leveraged it for decades of legislative victories through masterful political strategy and organization. Drawing from social science research on collective action, Brownstein argues that highly theatrical defeats—like the recent Texas Democrats' walkout or John Lewis' bloody fate on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in 1965—can catalyze change by forcing opponents into untenable positions. The key isn't winning every battle, but making individual actions visible enough to shift social norms and inspire others, especially the young, to join the cause. So lose often and lose loudly, Brownstein says. It's a winning strategy. 1. Individual Actions Are Social Signals, Not Just Drops in the Bucket When you install solar panels or drive an electric car, the impact isn't just environmental—it's social. Research shows your neighbors are far more likely to adopt these behaviors after seeing you do it. Stop calculating carbon molecules; start thinking about social influence.2. The “Do-Gooder's Dilemma” Is a Corporate Invention From “jaywalking” (coined by 1920s car companies) to “personal carbon footprints” (popularized by BP), industries have systematically shifted responsibility for systemic problems onto individuals. Recognizing this manipulation is the first step to effective collective action.3. Losing Loudly Can Be More Powerful Than Winning Quietly The Texas Democrats knew they'd lose their walkout fight. John Lewis knew he'd be beaten at Selma. But theatrical defeats that force opponents to reveal their brutality or absurdity can shift public opinion more effectively than quiet procedural victories.4. Study Your Enemies' Playbook The NRA succeeded for decades despite holding unpopular positions by creating a powerful social identity around gun ownership. Progressives should learn from these organizing tactics rather than dismissing them.5. Beware the “Anti-Incrementalism Bias” Revolutionary change like Prohibition often fails because it lacks public buy-in. Lasting progress—like Social Security—comes from incremental victories that build over time. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.Keen On America is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit keenon.substack.com/subscribe

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses significant developments in gun rights, including a recent court ruling that affirms the right to carry firearms in post offices. He emphasizes the importance of joining organizations like the NRA and SAF to support these rights. The conversation also touches on the evolution of gun laws, community responsibility, and the contrast between gun owners and those who oppose them. David Codrea joins the discussion, providing insights into current events and legislative updates affecting gun ownership. Takeaways The recent court ruling allows firearms in post offices for members of SAF and FPC. Joining gun rights organizations is crucial for advocacy and support. Gun owners are often the most peaceable members of society. The left often initiates violence while blaming gun owners. Community engagement is essential for responsible gun ownership. Historical perspectives show that gun rights have evolved significantly. Legislative changes are happening, and gun owners must stay informed. Support for gun rights is a collective effort that requires unity. The importance of understanding the criteria for restoring gun rights is paramount. Current events in Canada reflect trends that could affect U.S. gun rights. Keywords Second Amendment, gun rights, Armed American Radio, Mark Walters, David Codrea, NRA, firearms policy, community engagement, gun ownership, legislation  

Stay safe out there guys! Summary In this conversation, Mark Walters discusses various themes surrounding gun rights, personal responsibility, and the implications of leftist aggression. He shares personal anecdotes, particularly about a confrontation his daughter faced at a Chipotle restaurant, highlighting the dangers of political hostility. The discussion also touches on the state of gun laws in Florida, the importance of being prepared for potential threats, and the role of organizations like the NRA in advocating for gun rights. The conversation emphasizes the need for vigilance and self-defense in today's society. Takeaways These people are very, very dangerous. Preparation, avoidance, and awareness are crucial. Confrontations can escalate quickly; be prepared. The left's aggression is a growing concern. Gun rights are essential for personal safety. Open carry laws in Florida are a hot topic. Personal experiences shape our views on gun rights. Family dynamics play a role in understanding responsibility. The NRA is a key player in defending gun rights. Stay vigilant and aware of your surroundings. Keywords gun rights, personal responsibility, leftist aggression, Florida gun laws, family dynamics, confrontation, self-defense, NRA, open carry, conservative values    

Summary The conversation covers the recent Gun Rights Policy Conference, highlighting key insights from speakers like Alan Gottlieb and AWR Hawkins. The discussion shifts to the tragic shooting incident in Michigan, analyzing the implications for gun rights and the media's role in reporting such events. John Lott joins to discuss the importance of understanding the motivations behind mass shootings and the need for armed security in vulnerable locations. In this conversation, Mark Walters and his guests discuss the ongoing issues of gun violence, the importance of the Second Amendment, and the need for personal responsibility in ensuring safety, particularly in places of worship. They explore the societal implications of recent shootings, the role of faith in combating evil, and the necessity for communities to prepare for potential threats. The dialogue emphasizes the urgency of addressing these challenges and the call to action for individuals to take a stand for their rights and beliefs. Takeaways Gun violence continues to be a pressing issue in society. The Second Amendment is crucial for personal and public safety. Individuals must take personal responsibility for their safety. Recent shootings have shifted public perception on gun rights. Churches need to implement security measures to protect congregants. Evil exists in society and must be acknowledged. Faith plays a significant role in combating societal evils. There is a perceived war on Christianity in America. Communities must prepare for potential threats to safety. The time for action is now; complacency is not an option. Keywords Gun Rights, Policy Conference, Second Amendment, Alan Gottlieb, AWR Hawkins, Michigan Shooting, John Lott, NRA, Armed American Radio, Gun Control, gun violence, Second Amendment, personal responsibility, public safety, church security, evil in society, faith, Christianity, self-defense, preparedness  

Summary The conversation covers the recent Gun Rights Policy Conference, highlighting key insights from speakers like Alan Gottlieb and AWR Hawkins. The discussion shifts to the tragic shooting incident in Michigan, analyzing the implications for gun rights and the media's role in reporting such events. John Lott joins to discuss the importance of understanding the motivations behind mass shootings and the need for armed security in vulnerable locations. In this conversation, Mark Walters and his guests discuss the ongoing issues of gun violence, the importance of the Second Amendment, and the need for personal responsibility in ensuring safety, particularly in places of worship. They explore the societal implications of recent shootings, the role of faith in combating evil, and the necessity for communities to prepare for potential threats. The dialogue emphasizes the urgency of addressing these challenges and the call to action for individuals to take a stand for their rights and beliefs. Takeaways Gun violence continues to be a pressing issue in society. The Second Amendment is crucial for personal and public safety. Individuals must take personal responsibility for their safety. Recent shootings have shifted public perception on gun rights. Churches need to implement security measures to protect congregants. Evil exists in society and must be acknowledged. Faith plays a significant role in combating societal evils. There is a perceived war on Christianity in America. Communities must prepare for potential threats to safety. The time for action is now; complacency is not an option. Keywords Gun Rights, Policy Conference, Second Amendment, Alan Gottlieb, AWR Hawkins, Michigan Shooting, John Lott, NRA, Armed American Radio, Gun Control, gun violence, Second Amendment, personal responsibility, public safety, church security, evil in society, faith, Christianity, self-defense, preparedness  

Summary The conversation covers the recent Gun Rights Policy Conference, highlighting key insights from speakers like Alan Gottlieb and AWR Hawkins. The discussion shifts to the tragic shooting incident in Michigan, analyzing the implications for gun rights and the media's role in reporting such events. John Lott joins to discuss the importance of understanding the motivations behind mass shootings and the need for armed security in vulnerable locations. In this conversation, Mark Walters and his guests discuss the ongoing issues of gun violence, the importance of the Second Amendment, and the need for personal responsibility in ensuring safety, particularly in places of worship. They explore the societal implications of recent shootings, the role of faith in combating evil, and the necessity for communities to prepare for potential threats. The dialogue emphasizes the urgency of addressing these challenges and the call to action for individuals to take a stand for their rights and beliefs. Takeaways Gun violence continues to be a pressing issue in society. The Second Amendment is crucial for personal and public safety. Individuals must take personal responsibility for their safety. Recent shootings have shifted public perception on gun rights. Churches need to implement security measures to protect congregants. Evil exists in society and must be acknowledged. Faith plays a significant role in combating societal evils. There is a perceived war on Christianity in America. Communities must prepare for potential threats to safety. The time for action is now; complacency is not an option. Keywords Gun Rights, Policy Conference, Second Amendment, Alan Gottlieb, AWR Hawkins, Michigan Shooting, John Lott, NRA, Armed American Radio, Gun Control, gun violence, Second Amendment, personal responsibility, public safety, church security, evil in society, faith, Christianity, self-defense, preparedness  

Second Amendment advocate Mark Overstreet, the former Senior Research Coordinator of the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action, says President Donald Trump should direct the BATFE to withdraw its 1989 and 1998 interpretations of federal law that allows for bans on many foreign-produced rifles and shotguns in favor of an interpretation that recognizes the Second Amendment's fundamental importance of serving as a check on tyranny.

In This Hour:-- Randy Luth was instrumental in making the public aware that the AR-15 was a great hunting rifle.  Now he's running for the board of directors of the NRA.--  The AR-15 platform turns 70 next year, making it an older design.--  Tom chases down a problem with his hunting rifle.Gun Talk 09.28.25 Hour 2Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/gun-talk--6185159/support.

In this episode, Genevieve Lakier of the University of Chicago Law School and Eugene Volokh of the UCLA School of Law join to discuss the recent suspension of Jimmy Kimmel by ABC and the broader history and constitutionality of jawboning, the practice of government officials pressuring private actors to stifle speech.    Resources National Rifle Association v. Vullo (2024)  Murthy v. Missouri (2024)  Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan (1963)  Rust v. Sullivan (1991)  Genevieve Lakier, “Enforcing the First Amendment in an Era of Jawboning,” University of Chicago Law Review, Forthcoming 2026  Eugene Volokh, “Jimmy Kimmel, the NRA, and the First Amendment,” Volokh Conspiracy, September 18, 2025   In our new podcast, Pursuit: The Founders' to Guide to Happiness Jeffrey Rosen explores the founders' lives with the historians who know them best. Plus, filmmaker Ken Burns shares his daily practice of self-reflection.  Listen to episodes of Pursuit on Apple Podcast and Spotify.  Stay Connected and Learn More Questions or comments about the show? Email us at ⁠podcast@constitutioncenter.org⁠ ⁠Continue the conversation by following us on social media @ConstitutionCtr ⁠ Explore the⁠America at 250 Civic Toolkit⁠ ⁠Sign up⁠ to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate Follow, rate, and review wherever you listen Join us for an upcoming⁠ ⁠⁠live program⁠ or watch recordings on⁠ ⁠⁠YouTube⁠ Support our important work:  ⁠Donate  

Contributing writer Jake Fogleman and I discuss a recent ruling out of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals that upheld New York's "sensitive places" restrictions for licensed gun carriers. We also cover a Ninth Circuit ruling that sided with a Montana gun owner fighting against a charge for carrying a shotgun in a school zone. Finally, we talk about a new letter campaign from a coalition of gun rights groups seeking a commitment from major banks that they will no longer discriminate against the firearms industry.

David Cole is a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University, a regular contributor to the New York Review of Books, a former national legal director of the ACLU and author of the popular book on social change in the US, Engines of Liberty. This book, a must-read for anyone interested in social movements, is the focus of our discussion today.We spoke about the importance of local organising for political momentum, why incremental progress has seemed to work for other issues, the role of in-person community in social movements, and other lessons from the US marriage equality and gun rights movements.Chapters:The book in a nutshell (00:03:45)Why incrementalism was crucial for marriage equality (00:09:36)What can we learn from the NRA and gun rights? (00:17:19)Why socialising & identity formation are key for movements (00:23:32)Symbolic vs high-impact campaigns (00:32:11)Messaging strategies in the NRA vs marriage equality (00:36:58)Dave & James debrief and key takeaways (00:40:30)Resources: Engines of Liberty – David Cole The Engagement – Sasha IssenbergWith thanks to Tom Felbar (Ambedo Media) for amazing video and audio editing! If you enjoy the show, please leave a rating and review us - we would really appreciate it! Likewise, feel free to share it with anyone who you think might enjoy it. You can send us feedback and guest recommendations via Twitter or email us at hello@howilearnedtoloveshrimp.com. Enjoy!

Mmmm that cactus juice is mighty tasty. Say, when did you grow a second head and three extra arms? This week on the podcast Theo and Will ramble about their obsession with a wild west pinball machine, discuss European Cheeses of the NRA, and talk through some of the worst Shark Tank pitches of all time. Will has a deep dive on the tale of the Batavia, surely one of the worst outcomes of a shipwreck in history. Email us at segmentcitypodcast@gmail.com iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/segment-city/id1469462393 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7g8dQmJdnROidQM5dvHpW3?si=5W3qBWO1SIirNnhwjvcd0Q Google Play: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Iqoulwsmzp4fbyuunf4acoeylwi Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/segment-city Podbean: https://segmentcity.podbean.com/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtOxbiSIX1NlSrNMLSqzFqQ

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses the evolving landscape of gun control politics, particularly focusing on comments made by Senator Chris Murphy that suggest a shift in the Democratic Party's approach to gun rights. The conversation highlights the importance of the NRA and the Second Amendment in current political discourse, as well as the implications of recent election results that favor pro-gun candidates. AWR Hawkins joins the discussion to provide insights on recent events, including the assassination of Charlie Kirk and its impact on the conservative movement. Sheriff Kurt Hoffman shares his perspective on new gun laws in Florida, emphasizing the need for responsible gun ownership and the importance of public safety. In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses the recent changes in Florida's gun laws, particularly the legalization of open carry. The conversation delves into the implications for past convictions, the importance of self-defense laws, and the cultural shifts surrounding gun ownership. Sheriff Kurt Hoffman provides insights into law enforcement's response to these changes, while the panel reflects on personal experiences with firearms. The discussion also touches on the evolving political landscape, with Democrats reconsidering their stance on gun control in light of changing voter demographics and the assassination of a conservative figure. Keywords gun control, Chris Murphy, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, elections, NRA, AWR Hawkins, Sheriff Kurt Hoffman, Florida gun laws, public safety, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, Open Carry, Florida Gun Laws, Self-Defense, Legal Representation, Gun Ownership, Political Commentary, Gun Control, Law Enforcement Takeaways Chris Murphy's recent comments indicate a shift in the Democratic Party's stance on gun control. The NRA continues to advocate for Second Amendment rights amidst changing political landscapes. Polling shows strong support for the Second Amendment even in traditionally blue states. The recent election results suggest a growing acceptance of pro-gun candidates. Public sentiment is shifting towards more freedom in gun ownership and carry laws. The importance of staying engaged in the fight for gun rights is emphasized. Sheriff Kurt Hoffman discusses the implications of new gun laws in Florida. The media's portrayal of gun owners often misrepresents the reality of responsible ownership. AWR Hawkins highlights the need for accountability in political discourse regarding gun control. The conversation reflects a broader cultural shift towards valuing personal freedom and responsibility. [object Object]        

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses the evolving landscape of gun control politics, particularly focusing on comments made by Senator Chris Murphy that suggest a shift in the Democratic Party's approach to gun rights. The conversation highlights the importance of the NRA and the Second Amendment in current political discourse, as well as the implications of recent election results that favor pro-gun candidates. AWR Hawkins joins the discussion to provide insights on recent events, including the assassination of Charlie Kirk and its impact on the conservative movement. Sheriff Kurt Hoffman shares his perspective on new gun laws in Florida, emphasizing the need for responsible gun ownership and the importance of public safety. In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses the recent changes in Florida's gun laws, particularly the legalization of open carry. The conversation delves into the implications for past convictions, the importance of self-defense laws, and the cultural shifts surrounding gun ownership. Sheriff Kurt Hoffman provides insights into law enforcement's response to these changes, while the panel reflects on personal experiences with firearms. The discussion also touches on the evolving political landscape, with Democrats reconsidering their stance on gun control in light of changing voter demographics and the assassination of a conservative figure. Takeaways Chris Murphy's recent comments indicate a shift in the Democratic Party's stance on gun control. The NRA continues to advocate for Second Amendment rights amidst changing political landscapes. Polling shows strong support for the Second Amendment even in traditionally blue states. The recent election results suggest a growing acceptance of pro-gun candidates. Public sentiment is shifting towards more freedom in gun ownership and carry laws. The importance of staying engaged in the fight for gun rights is emphasized. Sheriff Kurt Hoffman discusses the implications of new gun laws in Florida. The media's portrayal of gun owners often misrepresents the reality of responsible ownership. AWR Hawkins highlights the need for accountability in political discourse regarding gun control. The conversation reflects a broader cultural shift towards valuing personal freedom and responsibility. [object Object] Keywords gun control, Chris Murphy, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, elections, NRA, AWR Hawkins, Sheriff Kurt Hoffman, Florida gun laws, public safety, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, Open Carry, Florida Gun Laws, Self-Defense, Legal Representation, Gun Ownership, Political Commentary, Gun Control, Law Enforcement      

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses the evolving landscape of gun control politics, particularly focusing on comments made by Senator Chris Murphy that suggest a shift in the Democratic Party's approach to gun rights. The conversation highlights the importance of the NRA and the Second Amendment in current political discourse, as well as the implications of recent election results that favor pro-gun candidates. AWR Hawkins joins the discussion to provide insights on recent events, including the assassination of Charlie Kirk and its impact on the conservative movement. Sheriff Kurt Hoffman shares his perspective on new gun laws in Florida, emphasizing the need for responsible gun ownership and the importance of public safety. In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses the recent changes in Florida's gun laws, particularly the legalization of open carry. The conversation delves into the implications for past convictions, the importance of self-defense laws, and the cultural shifts surrounding gun ownership. Sheriff Kurt Hoffman provides insights into law enforcement's response to these changes, while the panel reflects on personal experiences with firearms. The discussion also touches on the evolving political landscape, with Democrats reconsidering their stance on gun control in light of changing voter demographics and the assassination of a conservative figure. Takeaways Chris Murphy's recent comments indicate a shift in the Democratic Party's stance on gun control. The NRA continues to advocate for Second Amendment rights amidst changing political landscapes. Polling shows strong support for the Second Amendment even in traditionally blue states. The recent election results suggest a growing acceptance of pro-gun candidates. Public sentiment is shifting towards more freedom in gun ownership and carry laws. The importance of staying engaged in the fight for gun rights is emphasized. Sheriff Kurt Hoffman discusses the implications of new gun laws in Florida. The media's portrayal of gun owners often misrepresents the reality of responsible ownership. AWR Hawkins highlights the need for accountability in political discourse regarding gun control. The conversation reflects a broader cultural shift towards valuing personal freedom and responsibility. Keywords gun control, Chris Murphy, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, elections, NRA, AWR Hawkins, Sheriff Kurt Hoffman, Florida gun laws, public safety, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, Open Carry, Florida Gun Laws, Self-Defense, Legal Representation, Gun Ownership, Political Commentary, Gun Control, Law Enforcement

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses the current political landscape, focusing on the rise of conservatism and the challenges faced by the Democratic Party. The conversation delves into the implications of recent events, including the assassination of Charlie Kirk and its impact on gun rights and political affiliations. The episode also covers legal confusion surrounding open carry laws in Florida and the ongoing battle for gun rights in the U.S. Takeaways The rise of conservatism is unprecedented in recent history. Democrats are losing registered voters at an alarming rate. Chris Murphy's comments reflect a desperate attempt to regain support. The assassination of Charlie Kirk has significant political ramifications. Gun rights are a central issue in American politics today. Legal confusion exists around open carry laws in Florida. The need for a strong political platform is critical for Democrats. The anti-gun movement is facing significant challenges. Conservative youth engagement is on the rise. The importance of joining organizations like the NRA is emphasized. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, conservatism, Democrats, open carry, legal confusion, political commentary  

Wayne LaPierre spent decades at the helm of the National Rifle Association, transforming it into one of the most powerful lobbying groups in America. But behind his carefully crafted image as a gun-toting cowboy was a man who barely knew how to fire a weapon. LaPierre's true loyalty was never to guns—or even to the NRA—but to himself. He raised millions from devoted members, then siphoned off the organization's funds to bankroll his own life of luxury.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

There's some strange things afoot at the Circle K, amongst them some sideways situations for American firearm owners and Second Amendment supporters (which means everyone, in a fashion).  What's going on with the unintended acceleration from M18s?  Did Sig Sauer make a mistake or is this something worse?  What's better for our fighters to carry - an M18 or an M14?  Did we have these problems when US warfighters carried their 1911s cocked and locked?  Do all off-roaders carry a sidearm?  How about a frontarm?  Meanwhile, what's afoot and ahand with the underlying argument about craziness in the transmission crowd, and how American gun dealers are unintentionally making the case against dudes in the girls' locker room (ie: You can't blame the hammer for crooked nails.).  Meanwhile, let's all watch how the NRA negotiates this one (and how long is their game - Go Doug, go!). Here's talking at you: an F-35 conference call, polymath versus psycho, Leo Gordon, Bruce Lee Jr., self-defense spatulas, Sam Peckinpaugh, an Excellent Weirdo Sendoff for Graham Greene of "Maverick" and "Longmire", the Spiritual Beggars, Pelican and an Excellent Weirdo Sendoff for Dave Mustaine and his monster, Megadeth.

There's some strange things afoot at the Circle K, amongst them some sideways situations for American firearm owners and Second Amendment supporters (which means everyone, in a fashion).  What's going on with the unintended acceleration from M18s?  Did Sig Sauer make a mistake or is this something worse?  What's better for our fighters to carry - an M18 or an M14?  Did we have these problems when US warfighters carried their 1911s cocked and locked?  Do all off-roaders carry a sidearm?  How about a frontarm?  Meanwhile, what's afoot and ahand with the underlying argument about craziness in the transmission crowd, and how American gun dealers are unintentionally making the case against dudes in the girls' locker room (ie: You can't blame the hammer for crooked nails.).  Meanwhile, let's all watch how the NRA negotiates this one (and how long is their game - Go Doug, go!). Here's talking at you: an F-35 conference call, polymath versus psycho, Leo Gordon, Bruce Lee Jr., self-defense spatulas, Sam Peckinpaugh, an Excellent Weirdo Sendoff for Graham Greene of "Maverick" and "Longmire", the Spiritual Beggars, Pelican and an Excellent Weirdo Sendoff for Dave Mustaine and his monster, Megadeth.

The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) is a gun rights advocacy group based in the United States. Founded in 1871 to advance rifle marksmanship, the modern NRA has become a prominent gun rights lobbying organization while continuing to teach firearm safety and competency. The organization also publishes several magazines and sponsors competitive marksmanship events. The group claimed nearly 5 million members as of December 2018, though that figure has not been independently confirmed.Национальная стрелковая ассоциация США (англ. National Rifle Association of America, or NRA) — некоммерческая ассоциация в США, которая объединяет сторонников права граждан на хранение и ношение огнестрельного оружия. 

Frequent mass shootings are a distinctly American problem, with news of another tragic shooting grabbing our attention every few weeks. Yet policy change is stalled.In this episode, we focus on an important reason for the congressional paralysis—the gun lobby. John Donohue, one of the country's leading experts on the empirical study of law and public policy, and Eric Baldwin, a research fellow at Stanford Law, join us for a discussion about their new research paper, "Another Shooting, Another Contribution From the Gun Lobby." They reveal how both gun rights and gun safety PACs flood competitive districts with donations in the wake of deadly shootings. The result? A high-stakes stalemate that helps preserve the status quo, despite overwhelming public support for measures like universal background checks. With Donohue's decades of scholarship on crime and policy and Baldwin's insights into political science and lobbying, the episode offers a timely look at how money and ideology shape one of the country's most polarizing debates and offers an examination of a grim reality: mass shootings have become more frequent, but meaningful reform rarely follows. Against the backdrop of rising political violence, the conversation probes the sometimes-surprising role of campaign donations and interest-group maneuvering in shaping what legislators do—or fail to do—after mass shooting tragedy.Links:John Donohue >>> Stanford Law pageEric Baldwin >>> Stanford Law pageTakuma Iwasaki >>> Stanford Law page“Financial Firepower: School Shootings and the Strategic Contributions of Pro-Gun Pacs” >>> Stanford Law pageConnect:Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast WebsiteStanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn PageRich Ford >>>  Twitter/XPam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School PageDiego Zambrano >>> Stanford Law School PageStanford Law School >>> Twitter/XStanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/X(00:00) Introductions and The Role of Different Gun Lobby Groups(10:01) Impact of Mass Shootings on Public Discourse (18:01) Political Reactions and Misinformation (25:01) Empirical Findings and Study Insights (30:01) Potential Changes in Public and Political Attitudes Towards Gun Violence Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

This week we're talking about the NRA defending trans gun rights, Matt Snedecor, Alien: Earth, and Beyond The Door III. Show music by HeartBeatHero and OGRE. Support the show! Get up to 2 months free podcasting service with our Libsyn code OZONE

Today Steve's a little sick, Ben just got two vaccinations, and we're recording anyway! We talk sentencing of the Australian Mushroom Murderer, define some culinary terms and McDonald's splits with the NRA (not *that* NRA, but both are bad) over the tipped minimum wage credit.As always, find us here!https://www.speakpipe.com/InTheWeedsWithBenRandallhttps://www.facebook.com/groups/774902433251568https://www.instagram.com/chefbenrandall/ https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/in-the-weeds-with-ben-randall/id869521547intheweedswbr.comhttps://www.redbubble.com/people/enzwell/shopintheweedswbr@gmail.comhttps://www.ipetitions.com/petition/smoquehttps://www.patreon.com/c/InTheWeedsWBR

The news of Texas covered today includes:Our Lone Star story of the day: Why does so much illogic, utter stupidity, and simple blindness to practical reality surround the right to keep and bear arms? Three Second Amendment related stories today: NRA opposes possible DOJ gun ownership ban for transgender people – of course NRA is right but who on the “Right” thought it okay to adopt this Leftist idea of denying basic rights to people for future crimes or similar? Illinois can ban concealed carry on trains, buses: Appeals court. This is so shockingly bad that it is hard to accept that people with functional IQs could come up with it. I explain. What a deadly game of ding-dong ditch says about Texas. Beyond the pale of ridiculous illogic. One man lies in wait and shoots kids equates to a culture wide situation with over 30 million? If he had simply jumped them from the bushes and stabbed them….? Our Lone Star story of the day is sponsored by Allied Compliance Services providing the best service in DOT, business and personal drug and alcohol testing since 1995.Texas 2026 GOP Primary ballot issues released.More DEI and pro-homosexual teaching at Texas A&M exposed..Texas space business news: EchoStar sells spectrum licenses to SpaceX for $17 billion while buying into Starlink Midland-based AST SpaceMobile update on its cellphone to satellite Bluebird constellation Houston companies are betting big on space data – very interesting story that highlight numerous Texas private space companies. Campaign news:  HD71: Hardaway says lifelong calling led him to race. Why no mention of being a Republican, about limited government, lower spending and taxes, or even conservatism? Texas state Rep. James Talarico to launch Democratic campaign for U.S. Senate Betts jumps into GOP race for TX 21 Listen on the radio, or station stream, at 5pm Central. Click for our radio and streaming affiliates.www.PrattonTexas.com

Ep. 387 Ken and Dave discuss a looming recession, the NRA getting one right, illegal Koreans, the deepening Secretary of State field, a strike in the high seas, a Georgia hospital hiring anyone with a pulse in management, denigrating the uniform, and Georgians heading to guard D.C. **Pike County Modernization:** Discussing the new professional live streaming of county meetings, enhancing transparency and public engagement. **Georgia Political Buzz:** An in-depth look at Governor Kemp's controversial endorsement of Derek Douly for Senate over Mike Collins, and the heating up Georgia Secretary of State race featuring Tim Fleming, Kelvin King, and Gabriel Sterling. **Travel Adventures & Culinary Delights:** Recaps from trips to Hilton Head and North Georgia wineries, plus a surprise find in Dublin, Georgia – the highly-rated Saltwater Fishing Company and a unique Jerk Shop. **National News & Controversies:** The Powerball jackpot's massive numbers and the challenges of spending a billion dollars. An American Airlines incident involving an ex-Playboy playmate and influencer. A critical examination of Trump's proposal to ban transgender individuals from owning firearms, and the Second Amendment implications. The ICE raid at the new Hyundai plant in Bryan County, Georgia, and the ensuing political fallout for Governor Kemp. The Trump administration's controversial decision to blow up a drug boat in international waters. **Local & Military Issues:** Concerns over a problematic Chief Nursing Officer hired at Effingham County Hospital. Retired military officers protesting in uniform in Washington D.C., raising questions about UCMJ jurisdiction. Georgia National Guard deployment to Washington D.C. and its impact. **Mule of the Week:** Awarded to Canadian Police Chief Jim Mcween for his controversial advice to homeowners during home invasions. **Economic Outlook:** Analysis of the latest jobs report, the impact of tariffs, and predictions for interest rate cuts and the economy's future.

Shockingly, the “pry it from my cold dead hands” side of the aisle has found someone that would like to pry firearms from - trans individuals. The DOJ is considering banning trans individuals from buying firearms - a move that is so stupid that even the NRA is against it- and they endorsed this guy three times for president. People inside the DOJ have told The Post that some members believe this draconian action can be accomplished as a follow up on Trump's executive order barring military service by transgender people. How would he do this? It's simple. One option has him formally declaring people who identify as transgender as mentally ill, thus barring them from owning a firearm. Politicians are emotional vultures. And this is what Trump is doing right now - preying on people's outrage at a school shooting that claimed the lives of two young children.***Thanks for listening to Overnight Opinions, a recurring news show on topics the mainstream media isn't telling you. Here you'll get current events blended with spicy commentary directed at our elected leaders. You can check out Ladies Love Politics website to read a transcript/references of this episode at www.ladieslovepolitics.com. Be sure to follow the Ladies Love Politics channel on TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Truth Social, Brighteon Social, Threads, and Twitter. Content also available on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you stream podcasts. Background Music Credit:Music: Hang for Days - Silent Partner https://youtu.be/A41A0XeU2ds

  Episode 254- Is A Trans Gun Ban A Good Idea? Also Available On Searchable Podcast Transcript Gun Lawyer -- Episode 254 Transcript SUMMARY KEYWORDS Gun ban, transgender individuals, NRA opposition, Second Amendment, New Jersey gun laws, mental

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters engages in a lively discussion with Paul Markel about various topics including personal updates, the nature of rights and government authority, national reciprocity in gun rights, cultural issues in Michigan, and alarming crime statistics in urban areas. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by conservative voices in today's political landscape and the importance of understanding the historical context of rights and freedoms. Takeaways Mark expresses his love for the audience, emphasizing community. Paul discusses his extensive writing career and the use of AI in writing. The conversation shifts to the implications of government authority on rights. Tim Kaine's comments on rights spark a discussion about government overreach. The importance of national reciprocity in gun rights is highlighted. Cultural issues in Michigan are examined, particularly regarding diversity and assimilation. Crime statistics in Chicago and Baltimore reveal the impact of Democrat policies. The hosts criticize the acceptance of violence in urban areas as a norm. The conversation touches on the historical context of the Democrat Party and its legacy. The episode concludes with a call to action for listeners to engage with the NRA. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, national reciprocity, Tim Kaine, urban violence, Michigan, cultural issues, crime statistics, Second Amendment, conservative commentary  

We begin with Washington's latest effort to combat drug cartels. We have details on Florida's newest immigration detention facility. A proposed gun ban from the DOJ is hitting a sour note with the NRA. How an unsuccessful Navy SEAL mission reportedly led to the deaths of North Korean civilians. Plus, some foreign diplomats could face new restrictions during a UN meeting in New York later this month. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various pressing issues surrounding gun rights, personal safety, and the ongoing crisis of gun violence in Chicago. He reflects on a personal tragedy that highlights the reality of evil in society, shares insights on the case of Tate Adomiak, and emphasizes the importance of community engagement and activism through organizations like the NRA. The conversation also touches on the political landscape and the challenges faced in addressing gun violence effectively. Takeaways Evil can hit close to home, and safety should never be taken for granted. The case of Tate Adomiak exemplifies the flaws in the justice system. Gun violence in Chicago is a persistent crisis that needs urgent attention. Community engagement is crucial for advocating gun rights and safety. The NRA plays a vital role in defending Second Amendment rights. Political leaders often prioritize their agendas over public safety. The importance of personal responsibility in ensuring safety. Activism and awareness can lead to positive change in gun legislation. The need for unity among gun rights advocates is essential. Upcoming events provide opportunities for community involvement and education. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, NRA, Tate Adomiac, Chicago violence, personal safety, community engagement, activism  

Summary The conversation covers various aspects of gun control, focusing on the recent Minneapolis shooting and the subsequent political responses. It discusses the failures of existing gun control measures, the role of the media in shaping public perception, and the cultural issues surrounding mental health and violence. The speakers emphasize the importance of understanding the root causes of violence rather than solely focusing on gun control legislation. They also highlight the upcoming Gun Rights Policy Conference and the need for continued advocacy for Second Amendment rights. Takeaways Gun control measures in Minnesota have failed to prevent violence. The media often misrepresents gun violence statistics. Cultural issues and mental health are significant factors in violence. Political rhetoric often oversimplifies complex issues. The Second Amendment is under constant threat from legislation. Upcoming events like the Gun Rights Policy Conference are crucial for advocacy. Public perception of gun rights is heavily influenced by media coverage. Mental health support is essential in addressing violence. Legislators often ignore the root causes of violence. Advocacy for gun rights must continue despite political challenges. Keywords gun control, Second Amendment, Minneapolis shooting, Supreme Court, gun rights, media coverage, cultural issues, mental health, political rhetoric, NRA  

Summary The conversation covers various aspects of gun control, focusing on the recent Minneapolis shooting and the subsequent political responses. It discusses the failures of existing gun control measures, the role of the media in shaping public perception, and the cultural issues surrounding mental health and violence. The speakers emphasize the importance of understanding the root causes of violence rather than solely focusing on gun control legislation. They also highlight the upcoming Gun Rights Policy Conference and the need for continued advocacy for Second Amendment rights. Takeaways Gun control measures in Minnesota have failed to prevent violence. The media often misrepresents gun violence statistics. Cultural issues and mental health are significant factors in violence. Political rhetoric often oversimplifies complex issues. The Second Amendment is under constant threat from legislation. Upcoming events like the Gun Rights Policy Conference are crucial for advocacy. Public perception of gun rights is heavily influenced by media coverage. Mental health support is essential in addressing violence. Legislators often ignore the root causes of violence. Advocacy for gun rights must continue despite political challenges. Keywords gun control, Second Amendment, Minneapolis shooting, Supreme Court, gun rights, media coverage, cultural issues, mental health, political rhetoric, NRA  

In Episode 350 of #TreysTable, we're unpacking what the "no tax on tips" proposal really means—and who it actually serves. Did you know the subminimum wage for tipped workers has roots in post-Civil War racial exploitation? This isn't just about economics—it's about racial equity and who gets to earn a living wage in America. We break down how the National Restaurant Association (the "other NRA") has spent millions fighting fair wages while pushing for tax changes that benefit corporate interests over workers . Meanwhile, tipped workers—disproportionately women of color—face the highest rates of sexual harassment and economic instability in any industry . But there's hope! Across the country, movements like #OneFairWage are fighting back. Cities like Portland are leading the charge to eliminate the subminimum wage entirely , and workers are demanding dignity and equitable pay.

http://Patreon.com/thebpdshow“Thoughts and Prayers of Officials Mean Nothing to God Without Action.” In the wake of the Annunciation Catholic School tragedy in Minneapolis, this sermon confronts the hypocrisy of politicians who offer “thoughts and prayers” while refusing to act against gun violence. Drawing on Isaiah, James, Micah, Amos, and more, Pastor Ben exposes how God rejects empty prayers, condemns faith without works, and holds leaders accountable for blood on their hands. This is a biblical exegesis on gun violence, political idolatry, and the NRA's grip on America. After the sermon, stay tuned for powerful commentary and analysis from the Black Family Channel family: DJ Xclusive, Rebecca Azor, Clickbaity Political Thirsttrap, Georgia Fort, Attorney Augustus Corbett, Dr. Carl Mack, and Pastors Jada and Ben. Timestamps 0:00 – Pastor Ben 3-Minute Sermon: “Thoughts and Prayers Are Meaningless Without Action” 3:15 – Bible Trivia 4:00 – Rebecca Azor 6:06 – Clickbaity Political Thirsttrap 8:13 – Here's the Truth with Georgia Fort 9:13 – Attorney Augustus Corbett (Defiant Lawyers Network) 11:08 – Answer to the Trivia Question 11:48 – Black History with Dr. Carl Mack 14:21 – Pastor Jada Become a patron! h

NRA-ILA Executive Director John Commerford joins Cam to discuss the NRA's newly filed lawsuit challenging Florida's three-day waiting period on gun sales, as well as the latest on several lawsuits seeking to overturn "assault weapon" bans.

We Like Shooting Episode 625 This episode of We Like Shooting is brought to you by: Midwest Industries, Gideon Optics, Die Free Co., Bowers Group, Blue Alpha, and Rost Martin   Welcome to the We Like Shooting Show, episode 625! Our cast tonight is Jeremy Pozderac, Aaron Krieger, Nick Lynch, and me Shawn Herrin, welcome to the show! pew.deals GUEST - Paul Noonan, CEO, FM Products @foxtrotmikeproducts https://www.instagram.com/foxtrotmikeproducts/ https://fm-products.com/products/   Gear Chat Nick - New Bag Plate 2.0 Poor's Bag Plate gen 2 Shawn - Bowers Group SSB Cans Explained Bowers Group SSB cans Shawn - Foxtrot Mike Fun Foxtrot Mike Shawn - Ear Pro Makeover by Warden Studios Warden Studios Ear Pro retrofit Shawn - Holster Talk: Close Quarters Tips Close Quarters Carry Holsters Shawn - Henry's Supreme 223 Rifle Henry Supreme 223 Bullet Points Shawn - Foxtrot Mike Products Unveils New 16" AR-15 Upper for Suppressor Enthusiasts Foxtrot Mike Products has launched a limited-run 16" Suppressor-Optimized AR-15 Barreled Upper, designed specifically for users who primarily shoot with suppressors. This product aims to cater to the growing trend of suppressed shooting ahead of the federal tax stamp changes in 2026, allowing customers to build their firearms with preferred components at an MSRP of $249. The new upper features a suppressor-optimized gas system that reduces recoil and back pressure, potentially appealing to shooters looking for enhanced performance and control. Gun Fights Step right up for "Gun Fights," the high-octane segment hosted by Nick Lynch, where our cast members go head-to-head in a game show-style showdown! Each contestant tries to prove their gun knowledge dominance. It's a wild ride of bids, bluffs, and banter—who will come out on top? Tune in to find out! WLS is Lifestyle Aaron's Alley Going Ballistic NRA Takes Aim at Massachusetts' Overreaching Gun Laws The NRA has filed a lawsuit against Massachusetts over its assault weapons ban, claiming it violates Second Amendment rights. This legal challenge could have significant implications for gun owners in the state, potentially influencing broader gun rights discussions and making waves in the gun control debate. Government Shenanigans: The DOJ's Sneaky Tactics Against Your Rights The Firearms Policy Coalition has raised concerns about what it describes as a deceptive strategy by the Department of Justice regarding the ban on interstate handgun purchases. This situation may lead to increased scrutiny and challenges for the gun community surrounding purchase regulations and interstate transactions. Court Says "No Thanks" to New York's Gun Control Nonsense A District Court has overturned New York's prohibition on non-resident concealed carry permits, marking a significant victory for Second Amendment supporters and challenging restrictive gun control measures. This ruling may encourage broader access to concealed carry rights outside of New York, impacting the national conversation on gun ownership and permitting. Infowars: Where Free Speech Meets Triggered Liberals The sale of Infowars highlights ongoing tensions around free speech and gun control, with implications for the gun community regarding perceived censorship and the legal ramifications tied to high-profile incidents like Sandy Hook. The gun community may see this as a further attempt by gun control advocates to suppress pro-Second Amendment voices in media. Another Win for Freedom: Court Strikes Down New Mexico's Waiting Period Nonsense The Tenth Circuit has ruled that New Mexico's seven-day waiting period for gun purchases is unconstitutional, marking a significant legal victory for the NRA and reinforcing Second Amendment rights. The decision may embolden the gun community and challenge simila...

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various legal challenges and victories related to gun rights with guests including Joseph Greenlee from the NRA and Dr. John Lott. The conversation covers recent court decisions, the impact of administration changes on crime rates, and personal stories highlighting the importance of self-defense. The episode emphasizes the need for continued support for the NRA and other organizations fighting for Second Amendment rights. In this episode, Mark Walters discusses the importance of self-defense stories, particularly those involving firearms, and how they relate to current crime rates in cities like Chicago and Washington, DC. The conversation highlights the deterrent effect of armed citizens, the impact of political leadership on crime, and the necessity of legal support for gun owners. The roundtable discussion also delves into cultural shifts and the role of education in shaping public perceptions of safety and crime prevention. Takeaways The NRA is actively involved in numerous legal challenges across the country. Recent court decisions have shown promise for gun rights advocates. Florida's young adult purchase ban is being challenged by the NRA. The importance of self-defense laws is highlighted through personal stories. Statistical analysis shows a significant drop in crime rates in DC under the current administration. The threat of prosecution is a key deterrent for criminals. The NRA's legal efforts are crucial in the fight against gun control measures. Public support for the NRA is essential for continued advocacy. The conversation emphasizes the need for vigilance in protecting Second Amendment rights. The impact of immigration on crime rates is a pressing issue. Self-defense stories highlight the importance of firearms in personal safety. Crime rates in cities like Chicago and DC are alarming and require attention. The Trump administration is making strides to ease gun carry laws. Community response is crucial in addressing ongoing violence in urban areas. Legal support for gun owners is essential in self-defense situations. Education plays a vital role in preventing crime and promoting safety. Government accountability is necessary for public safety and trust. Cultural shifts can lead to significant political changes. The actions of agencies like the ATF raise concerns about government overreach. Unity among gun owners and advocates is essential to protect rights. Keywords NRA, gun rights, litigation, court cases, self-defense, crime statistics, immigration, legal challenges, Second Amendment, Florida gun laws, self-defense, firearms, crime rates, Chicago, political dynamics, deterrent effect, gun ownership, public safety, legal support, cultural shifts  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various legal challenges and victories related to gun rights with guests including Joseph Greenlee from the NRA and Dr. John Lott. The conversation covers recent court decisions, the impact of administration changes on crime rates, and personal stories highlighting the importance of self-defense. The episode emphasizes the need for continued support for the NRA and other organizations fighting for Second Amendment rights. In this episode, Mark Walters discusses the importance of self-defense stories, particularly those involving firearms, and how they relate to current crime rates in cities like Chicago and Washington, DC. The conversation highlights the deterrent effect of armed citizens, the impact of political leadership on crime, and the necessity of legal support for gun owners. The roundtable discussion also delves into cultural shifts and the role of education in shaping public perceptions of safety and crime prevention. Takeaways The NRA is actively involved in numerous legal challenges across the country. Recent court decisions have shown promise for gun rights advocates. Florida's young adult purchase ban is being challenged by the NRA. The importance of self-defense laws is highlighted through personal stories. Statistical analysis shows a significant drop in crime rates in DC under the current administration. The threat of prosecution is a key deterrent for criminals. The NRA's legal efforts are crucial in the fight against gun control measures. Public support for the NRA is essential for continued advocacy. The conversation emphasizes the need for vigilance in protecting Second Amendment rights. The impact of immigration on crime rates is a pressing issue. Self-defense stories highlight the importance of firearms in personal safety. Crime rates in cities like Chicago and DC are alarming and require attention. The Trump administration is making strides to ease gun carry laws. Community response is crucial in addressing ongoing violence in urban areas. Legal support for gun owners is essential in self-defense situations. Education plays a vital role in preventing crime and promoting safety. Government accountability is necessary for public safety and trust. Cultural shifts can lead to significant political changes. The actions of agencies like the ATF raise concerns about government overreach. Unity among gun owners and advocates is essential to protect rights. Keywords NRA, gun rights, litigation, court cases, self-defense, crime statistics, immigration, legal challenges, Second Amendment, Florida gun laws, self-defense, firearms, crime rates, Chicago, political dynamics, deterrent effect, gun ownership, public safety, legal support, cultural shifts    

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various legal challenges and victories related to gun rights with guests including Joseph Greenlee from the NRA and Dr. John Lott. The conversation covers recent court decisions, the impact of administration changes on crime rates, and personal stories highlighting the importance of self-defense. The episode emphasizes the need for continued support for the NRA and other organizations fighting for Second Amendment rights. In this episode, Mark Walters discusses the importance of self-defense stories, particularly those involving firearms, and how they relate to current crime rates in cities like Chicago and Washington, DC. The conversation highlights the deterrent effect of armed citizens, the impact of political leadership on crime, and the necessity of legal support for gun owners. The roundtable discussion also delves into cultural shifts and the role of education in shaping public perceptions of safety and crime prevention. Takeaways The NRA is actively involved in numerous legal challenges across the country. Recent court decisions have shown promise for gun rights advocates. Florida's young adult purchase ban is being challenged by the NRA. The importance of self-defense laws is highlighted through personal stories. Statistical analysis shows a significant drop in crime rates in DC under the current administration. The threat of prosecution is a key deterrent for criminals. The NRA's legal efforts are crucial in the fight against gun control measures. Public support for the NRA is essential for continued advocacy. The conversation emphasizes the need for vigilance in protecting Second Amendment rights. The impact of immigration on crime rates is a pressing issue. Self-defense stories highlight the importance of firearms in personal safety. Crime rates in cities like Chicago and DC are alarming and require attention. The Trump administration is making strides to ease gun carry laws. Community response is crucial in addressing ongoing violence in urban areas. Legal support for gun owners is essential in self-defense situations. Education plays a vital role in preventing crime and promoting safety. Government accountability is necessary for public safety and trust. Cultural shifts can lead to significant political changes. The actions of agencies like the ATF raise concerns about government overreach. Unity among gun owners and advocates is essential to protect rights. Keywords NRA, gun rights, litigation, court cases, self-defense, crime statistics, immigration, legal challenges, Second Amendment, Florida gun laws, self-defense, firearms, crime rates, Chicago, political dynamics, deterrent effect, gun ownership, public safety, legal support, cultural shifts  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses significant developments in gun rights, particularly focusing on the recent ruling in New Mexico that declared a seven-day waiting period for gun purchases unconstitutional. The conversation delves into the implications of waiting periods, background checks, and the disconnect between gun ownership and legislation. With insights from guest Dave Workman, the discussion highlights the importance of education in understanding gun rights and the current trends in concealed carry permits and gun sales. Takeaways New Mexico's waiting period ruling could influence other states. Waiting periods are seen as infringements on the Second Amendment. Background checks are often ineffective in preventing crime. Gun shows are experiencing low turnout due to waiting periods. The rise in concealed carry permits contrasts with declining gun sales. Democratic lawmakers often view gun ownership as a privilege. Education on gun rights is lacking in today's curriculum. The NRA plays a crucial role in defending gun rights. Legislation often discourages law-abiding citizens from exercising their rights. The disconnect between gun ownership and political action is evident. Keywords gun rights, waiting periods, background checks, Second Amendment, New Mexico, concealed carry, legislation, NRA, gun ownership, education  

Summary The conversation covers a range of topics including the Tate Admiak case, frustrations with the ATF, and legislative challenges surrounding gun laws in Florida. The discussion highlights the complexities of gun ownership, legal implications of gun parts, and the potential merging of the ATF and DEA. The speakers express concerns over misleading media narratives regarding gun violence and emphasize the importance of Second Amendment rights. TakeawaysTate Adamiak case raises serious legal concerns about gun ownership. The ATF's actions in the Damiak case are seen as egregious. Frustration exists over the lack of accountability for the ATF. Florida's gun laws are under scrutiny, especially regarding the purchase age. The potential merging of ATF and DEA raises alarms among gun rights advocates. Legislative challenges in Florida reflect broader national issues with gun rights. Misleading media narratives can distort public perception of gun violence. The importance of supporting individuals wrongfully prosecuted for gun-related charges. The conversation emphasizes the need for vigilance in protecting Second Amendment rights. Keywords Tate Damiak, ATF, gun laws, Florida, NRA, gun rights, legislation, Second Amendment  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses significant victories for gun rights, including a historic ruling in California that overturns the one-gun-per-month law. The conversation also covers the streamlining of gun permit processes in Washington D.C., ongoing legal battles for Second Amendment rights, and new lawsuits being filed in various states. Additionally, the episode features a segment on 2A Bourbon, a bourbon brand that supports constitutional causes. The show concludes with a discussion on self-defense success stories and an analysis of gun violence statistics, highlighting the importance of the Second Amendment in protecting individual rights. In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics related to gun rights, legislation, and political dynamics with Arizona State Rep. Kwong Wynn and other guests. The conversation covers the importance of supporting the Second Amendment, the challenges faced by gun owners, and the impact of recent legislative achievements. The discussion also highlights the significance of political engagement and the upcoming events in the gun rights community. Additionally, the roundtable delves into the implications of concealed carry laws in Washington State and Trump's influence on crime in DC, concluding with reflections on the current state of gun violence in America. Takeaways The Second Amendment Foundation secured a major victory in California. Gun rationing laws are now overturned in California. Streamlining gun permit processes is a step in the right direction. Legal battles for Second Amendment rights are ongoing and expanding. The Gun Rights Policy Conference is an important event for activists. 2A Bourbon supports military and constitutional causes. Self-defense stories highlight the effectiveness of armed citizens. Gun violence statistics are often misrepresented by advocacy groups. Community support is crucial for gun rights organizations. The fight for Second Amendment rights continues across the nation. Support Armed American Radio and the Second Amendment. Buds Gun Shop is a reliable partner for firearms needs. Packing heat is essential for personal protection. Political engagement is crucial for gun rights advocacy. Legislative achievements can significantly impact gun rights. The fight for the Second Amendment is ongoing and challenging. Understanding the political landscape is vital for success. Community support is essential for political candidates. Gun violence statistics can be misleading and politicized. The importance of legal protection for gun owners cannot be overstated. Keywords Second Amendment, gun rights, Armed American Radio, legal battles, gun control, self-defense, NRA, 2A Bourbon, gun violence statistics, Gun Rights Policy Conference, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, gun rights, political engagement, Arizona politics, concealed carry, Trump, crime, legislation, legal protection  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses significant victories for gun rights, including a historic ruling in California that overturns the one-gun-per-month law. The conversation also covers the streamlining of gun permit processes in Washington D.C., ongoing legal battles for Second Amendment rights, and new lawsuits being filed in various states. Additionally, the episode features a segment on 2A Bourbon, a bourbon brand that supports constitutional causes. The show concludes with a discussion on self-defense success stories and an analysis of gun violence statistics, highlighting the importance of the Second Amendment in protecting individual rights. In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics related to gun rights, legislation, and political dynamics with Arizona State Rep. Kwong Wynn and other guests. The conversation covers the importance of supporting the Second Amendment, the challenges faced by gun owners, and the impact of recent legislative achievements. The discussion also highlights the significance of political engagement and the upcoming events in the gun rights community. Additionally, the roundtable delves into the implications of concealed carry laws in Washington State and Trump's influence on crime in DC, concluding with reflections on the current state of gun violence in America. Takeaways The Second Amendment Foundation secured a major victory in California. Gun rationing laws are now overturned in California. Streamlining gun permit processes is a step in the right direction. Legal battles for Second Amendment rights are ongoing and expanding. The Gun Rights Policy Conference is an important event for activists. 2A Bourbon supports military and constitutional causes. Self-defense stories highlight the effectiveness of armed citizens. Gun violence statistics are often misrepresented by advocacy groups. Community support is crucial for gun rights organizations. The fight for Second Amendment rights continues across the nation. Support Armed American Radio and the Second Amendment. Buds Gun Shop is a reliable partner for firearms needs. Packing heat is essential for personal protection. Political engagement is crucial for gun rights advocacy. Legislative achievements can significantly impact gun rights. The fight for the Second Amendment is ongoing and challenging. Understanding the political landscape is vital for success. Community support is essential for political candidates. Gun violence statistics can be misleading and politicized. The importance of legal protection for gun owners cannot be overstated. Keywords Second Amendment, gun rights, Armed American Radio, legal battles, gun control, self-defense, NRA, 2A Bourbon, gun violence statistics, Gun Rights Policy Conference, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, gun rights, political engagement, Arizona politics, concealed carry, Trump, crime, legislation, legal protection  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses significant victories for gun rights, including a historic ruling in California that overturns the one-gun-per-month law. The conversation also covers the streamlining of gun permit processes in Washington D.C., ongoing legal battles for Second Amendment rights, and new lawsuits being filed in various states. Additionally, the episode features a segment on 2A Bourbon, a bourbon brand that supports constitutional causes. The show concludes with a discussion on self-defense success stories and an analysis of gun violence statistics, highlighting the importance of the Second Amendment in protecting individual rights. In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics related to gun rights, legislation, and political dynamics with Arizona State Rep. Kwong Wynn and other guests. The conversation covers the importance of supporting the Second Amendment, the challenges faced by gun owners, and the impact of recent legislative achievements. The discussion also highlights the significance of political engagement and the upcoming events in the gun rights community. Additionally, the roundtable delves into the implications of concealed carry laws in Washington State and Trump's influence on crime in DC, concluding with reflections on the current state of gun violence in America. Takeaways The Second Amendment Foundation secured a major victory in California. Gun rationing laws are now overturned in California. Streamlining gun permit processes is a step in the right direction. Legal battles for Second Amendment rights are ongoing and expanding. The Gun Rights Policy Conference is an important event for activists. 2A Bourbon supports military and constitutional causes. Self-defense stories highlight the effectiveness of armed citizens. Gun violence statistics are often misrepresented by advocacy groups. Community support is crucial for gun rights organizations. The fight for Second Amendment rights continues across the nation. Support Armed American Radio and the Second Amendment. Buds Gun Shop is a reliable partner for firearms needs. Packing heat is essential for personal protection. Political engagement is crucial for gun rights advocacy. Legislative achievements can significantly impact gun rights. The fight for the Second Amendment is ongoing and challenging. Understanding the political landscape is vital for success. Community support is essential for political candidates. Gun violence statistics can be misleading and politicized. The importance of legal protection for gun owners cannot be overstated. Keywords Second Amendment, gun rights, Armed American Radio, legal battles, gun control, self-defense, NRA, 2A Bourbon, gun violence statistics, Gun Rights Policy Conference, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, gun rights, political engagement, Arizona politics, concealed carry, Trump, crime, legislation, legal protection  

Last time we spoke about the fall of Shanghai. In October 1937 a small battalion led by Colonel Xie Jinyuan transformed the Sihang Warehouse into a fortress against the advancing Japanese army. These men, known as the "800 Heroes," became symbols of hope, rallying local citizens who provided vital support. Despite heavy casualties, they held out against overwhelming odds until a strategic retreat was ordered on November 1. As Japanese forces intensified their assaults, they breached the Chinese defenses and captured strategic positions along Suzhou Creek. The fighting was fierce, marked by desperate counterattacks from the besieged Chinese soldiers, who faced an unyielding enemy. By November 9, the Chinese faced a full retreat, their organized defenses collapsing into chaos as they fled the city. Desperate civilians sought refuge in the International Settlement but were met with hostility, exacerbating the terror of the moment. Amidst the turmoil, remaining forces continued to resist in pockets, holding out as long as possible. By November 11, Japanese troops raised their flag in the last stronghold, marking a grim victory.   #163 Crossing Nanjing's Rubicon Welcome to the Fall and Rise of China Podcast, I am your dutiful host Craig Watson. But, before we start I want to also remind you this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Perhaps you want to learn more about the history of Asia? Kings and Generals have an assortment of episodes on history of asia and much more  so go give them a look over on Youtube. So please subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry for some more history related content, over on my channel, the Pacific War Channel where I cover the history of China and Japan from the 19th century until the end of the Pacific War. As the Japanese were mopping up Shanghai, Chiang Kai-Shek wrote in his diary on November 11th “I fear that they could threaten Nanjing”. Over In Shanghai, General Matsui Iwane was dealing with foreign correspondents, eager to learn what Japan's next move would be and to this he simply stated “For future developments, you had better ask Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek”. The correspondents were surprised by this response and pressed him further. He replied . “Chiang Kai-shek was reported to have predicted a five-year war, well, it might be that long. We don't know whether we will go to Nanjing or not. It all depends on Chiang.” At this point Shanghai was falling under Japanese control and now Matsui and his fellow field commanders were thinking, what's next? Nanjing was certainly the next objective. It was a common understanding amongst the Japanese leadership, that if the four main eastern cities of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Nanjing were lost, Chiang Kai-Shek's government would collapse. Three of these cities had been taken, Nanjing was dangling like fresh fruit. Matsui's staff believed the Chinese units departing Shanghai would mount a stand immediately west of the city, probably a defensive line running from Jiading to Huangduzhen. On the night of November 11th, Matsui issued a command to all units in the Shanghai area to advance west along the railway towards Nanjing. Their first objective would be a line extending from Taicang to Kunshan. Chiang Kai-Shek was not only reeling from military defeats, but also the gradual loss of his German allies. The Germans were increasingly aligning with the Japanese. Chiang Kai-Shek was looking for new external help, so he turned to the Soviets. It was a marriage of convenience, Chiang Kai-Shek signed a non-aggression pact with the USSR that year and wasted no time pleading for aircraft and pilots. Moscow began sending them before the ink touched the paper. 200 aircraft and pilots in return for some essential minerals, wolfram and tungsten. The Sino-Soviet friendship even drew in an unlikely source of support, Sir Winston Churchill. The Soviet envoy to the UK described how during a meeting with Churchill “he greatly praised our tactics in the Far East: maintenance of neutrality and simultaneous aid to China in weaponry.” Soviet pilots found themselves dispatched to Nanjing where they were briefed by Yakov Vladimirovich Smushkevich, the deputy commander of the Soviet Air Force. “The Japanese armed forces are technically superior to the Chinese. The Chinese Air Force is a particular concern. Soviet pilots who have rushed to China's aid are currently in Nanjing. They are fighting valiantly.” Meanwhile back at Shanghai discipline and order that had characterized previous Chinese withdrawal had collapsed. Simply put, there were hundreds of thousands of men trying to retreat across the lower Yangtze region, it was a shitstorm. Many units had to disengage during combat with the enemy and scramble to pull out. Huang Qixiang, the deputy commander of the Chinese right flank in Shanghai, executed a strategic withdrawal moments before his command post succumbed to the advancing enemy forces. Just fifteen minutes after his departure, the area was overrun by Japanese troops. In a desperate bid to avoid capture, another general had to cross a creek, nearly drowning in the process. Rescued while barely clinging to life and drenched in icy water, he was welcomed by a peasant family who aided in his recovery before he resumed his arduous journey westward. The scale of this withdrawal, occurring both day and night, could hardly escape the enemy's notice, and its complexity made the operation increasingly difficult. The execution of the withdrawal exacerbated the situation significantly. Orders to abandon their positions started to trickle down immediately after the upper command made the decision. However, these orders reached the units in a disorganized manner. Many telephone lines had been sabotaged, and when soldiers were sent to relay the orders in person, they faced severe disruptions in the transportation network. Consequently, many units only became aware of the withdrawal when they witnessed the mass movements of their comrades heading westward. Upon realizing what was happening, many soldiers fled in a state of panic. There were no comprehensive plans outlining the retreat, no designated routes for the various units, nor any established timetables. The outcome was a chaotic scramble for survival. Soldiers who had fought side by side for three months suddenly found themselves competing against one another in a desperate race to escape. At bridges and other chokepoints, weary soldiers exhausted their last reserves of strength, brawling with their fellow troops to be the first to cross. Meanwhile, officers traveling in chauffeur-driven cars attempted to assert their rank to gain priority access to the roads, adding to the growing disorder that ensued. The massive army was hindered by its sheer size, resulting in miles of congested roads filled with men unable to move in any direction. This made them easy targets for Japanese aircraft, leading to a bloody cycle of repeated attacks. Planes adorned with the red Rising Sun insignia would emerge from the horizon, swooping down to strike at these vulnerable formations. As commander Chen Yiding recalled “The lack of organization and the gridlocked roads resulted in far more casualties than could have been avoided,”.  On November 12th, the newspaper Zhaongyang Ribao, published an editorial addressing the citizens of Nanjing, to remind them that tough times lay ahead now that Shanghai had fallen. The article stipulated they needed to prepare the city for the upcoming battle,  “Now, all the citizenry of the capital must fulfill their duty in a way that can serve as a model for the entire nation.” Nanjing in 1937 was a city touched by the war, but not enough to change the social fabric just yet. Cinema's remained open, the shopping arcade was crowded as usual, traffic was heavy along Zhongshan Road, order remained. Telephones remained on, except during air raids. Connections to the outside world functioned as they should, given this was the capital. The region had seen a good harvest in 1937, no one was going hungry. However as the front 200 miles away drew closer, bombing raids more frequent, fear of the enemy increased. Contact with the outside world gradually declined. By mid November the train link from Nanjing to Shanghai was severed.  While the fear amongst the populace increased, so did a newfound sense of common purpose against a common enemy. Poster calling for the Chinese to unite against the Japanese invaders were found throughout Nanjing. Residents were conscripted for various fortification efforts, with some receiving basic military training to help defend the city. Those who refused to cooperate faced severe penalties as “traitors,” while the majority willingly participated. Both military and civilian police were deployed throughout the city, diligently checking identities in an ongoing effort to root out spies and traitors. The authorities enforced a strict prohibition against discussing military matters in restaurants and other public venues. Then all the high ranking military officials and politicians families gradually began departing the city in secrecy. This was followed by said politicians and military officials. Twas not a good look. Nanjing soon saw its population decline from 1 million to half a million. Those who stayed behind were mainly the poor, or those anchored, like shopkeepers. Every day saw a steady stream of Nanjing citizens leaving the city over her main roads, fleeing into the countryside with carts full of belongings. On November 12th at 10am orders were issued for the Japanese to advance west. What had been a war of attrition, where inches of land were claimed with blood, suddenly it was a war of movement. As one Japanese soldier recalled “In the course of 50 days, I had moved only two miles. Now suddenly we were experiencing rapid advance”. As the Japanese came across small towns, they found large posters plastered on all the walls. These were all anti-japanese with some nationalist propaganda. The Japanese soldiers would tear them down and paint up their own messages “down with Chiang Kai-Shek!”.  Towns and cities west of Shanghai fell rapidly one after another, each succumbing to a grim pattern: swift conquest followed by widespread devastation. Jiading, a county seat with a population of approximately 30,000, succumbed to a prolonged siege. When the 10st division captured Jiading on November 13, after relentless shelling had leveled a third of the city, they began a massacre, indiscriminately killing nearly everyone in their path, men, women, and children alike. The battle and its aftermath resulted in over 8,000 casualties among the city's residents and surrounding countryside. One Japanese soldier referred to Jiading as “A city of death, in a mysteriously silent world in which the only sound was the tap of our own footsteps”.  On November 14, soldiers from the 9th Division reached Taicang, an ancient walled city designed to withstand lengthy sieges. As they crossed the 70-foot moat amid heavy fire, the Japanese troops confronted the formidable 20-foot-high city wall. After breaching the wall, their infantry swiftly entered the city and seized control. The destruction persisted long after the fighting ceased, with half of the city being devastated, including significant cultural institutions like the library, and salt and grain reserves were looted. It was as if the Japanese aimed to obliterate not just the material existence of the people but their spiritual foundation as well.  Casual cruelty marked the nature of warfare along the entire front, with few prisoners being taken. Ishii Seitaro, a soldier in the 13th Division's 26th Brigade, encountered a mass execution while marching alongside the Yangtze River. Several headless corpses floated nearby, yet three Chinese prisoners remained alive. A Japanese officer, personally overseeing the execution, wore a simple uniform, but the two ornate swords at his belt indicated his wealthy background. Approaching one prisoner, the officer dramatically drew one of the swords and brandished it through the air with exaggerated flair. In an almost theatrical display, he held it aloft, the blade trembling as if he were nervous. The prisoner, in stark contrast, exhibited an unnerving calmness as he knelt, awaiting his inevitable fate. The officer swung the sword down but failed to deliver a clean strike. Although he inflicted a deep gash to the prisoner's skull, it was not fatal. The prisoner collapsed, thrashing and emitting a prolonged scream that sent chills through those present. The officer, seemingly exhilarated by the anguish he caused, began wildly slashing at the figure until the screams subsided. Ishii turned away in horror, his mind swirling with confusion. Why were the Chinese being executed? Had they not surrendered?  Three months into the war's expansion to the Yangtze region, air raids had become an all too frequent menace in Nanjing. The first major raid came on August 15th and increased each week. On the night of August 27, approximately 30 bombs were dropped on Purple Mountain, specifically targeting the Memorial Park for Sun Yat-sen, aiming to hurt the morale of Nanjing's residents. As days melted into weeks and weeks stretched into months, the landscape of Nanjing transformed under the weight of war. Residents began constructing dugouts in courtyards, gardens, public squares, and even on streets. Foreigners painted their national flags on top of buildings and vehicles, attempting to avoid the risk of being machine-gunned by strafing aircraft. Each raid followed a predictable routine: sirens wailed loudly 20 to 30 minutes before the attack, signaling pedestrians to seek shelter and drivers to stop their engines. By the time a shorter warning sounded, the streets had to be cleared, leaving nothing to do but await the arrival of Japanese planes. Initially, the part-US-trained Chinese Air Force posed a considerable threat to Japanese bombers. The 4th and 5th Chinese Squadrons, stationed near Nanjing to defend the capital, achieved early success, reportedly downing six bombers during the first air raid on Nanjing. Much of the credit for these aerial victories belonged to Claire Chennault, a retired American Army Air Corps captain who had become an advisor to the Chinese Air Force, overseeing Nanjing's air defense. Chennault taught his pilots tactics he had developed in the US but had never fully implemented. His strategy was straightforward: three fighters would focus on one enemy bomber at a time. One would attack from above, another from below, while a third would hover in reserve to deliver the final blow if necessary. He instructed the Chinese pilots to target the engines rather than the fuselage, reasoning that any missed shots could hit the gas tanks located in the wing roots. This approach proved successful, leading to the loss of 54 Japanese planes within three days. For Chennault, it validated his belief that air superiority required a diverse range of aircraft, not just bombers. Nighttime raids, however, posed a greater challenge. Chennault, along with other commanders, sought solutions. Chinese General C.C. Wong, a German-trained artillery officer overseeing the country's anti-aircraft defenses, ensured that dozens of large Sperry searchlights were positioned throughout Nanjing in a grid pattern. This setup had a dual purpose: it would dazzle the Japanese bomber crews and highlight their planes in silhouette for Chinese fighters above to target. The bravery of the most skilled Chinese pilots occasionally gained media attention, making them local celebrities amidst an otherwise grim war environment. However, this bright moment faded quickly when the Japanese command decided to provide escorts for their bombers. Consequently, the elite of China's air force, its finest pilots and aircraft, were lost within weeks that fall. All air raids were brutal, but the worst assaults occurred at the end of September. As a radio broadcaster reported on September 25th “Gallons of civilian blood flowed today as Nanking endured three ferocious air raids”. In total, 96 Japanese sorties were launched on that day. Witnesses observed around a dozen Chinese aircraft retreating north across the Yangtze, initially believing they were fleeing, but some returned to confront the enemy. When Chinese fighters managed to down a Japanese bomber, the streets erupted in cheers as civilians momentarily forgot their fear. The primary aim of the September 25 attack appeared to be spreading terror among the civilian population. Chiang Kai-Shek wrote in his diary that day  “The repeated Japanese air raids over the past several days have had no impact on our military installations. Instead, civilian property has sustained significant damage.” Around 20 bombs struck the Central Hospital, one of Nanjing's largest medical facilities, causing extensive destruction and prompting the evacuation of its staff. Two 1,000-pound bombs exploded nearby, leaving large craters. Had these bombs landed slightly closer, they could have resulted in mass casualties among the hospital's 100 patients, including a Japanese pilot who had been shot down earlier that month. The air raids at the end of September prompted protests from the Americans, British, and French governments to Japan. In response, Tokyo issued a statement on September 30, asserting that while they were not intentionally targeting non-combatants, it was “unavoidable” for achieving military objectives that military airfields and installations in and around Nanjing be bombed.   The battle for Jiashan was among the fiercest in the southern Yangtze delta campaign in November 1937. Although Jiashan was a moderately sized town straddling a crucial railway connecting Shanghai to Hangzhou, the capital of Zhejiang province. For the Japanese, seizing Jiashan was imperative for their westward advance; without it, their military progress would be severely hampered. Jiashan had endured three days of relentless bombing by the Japanese Air Force, driving most residents to flee into the surrounding countryside. Only about 100 remained, those who were too old or too sick to escape, abandoned by family or friends who lacked the means to assist them. The Japanese troops brutally bayoneted nearly all of these individuals and buried them in a mass grave just outside the town's northern gate. Jiashan was captured by the 10th Army, a division fresh from victories and eager to engage in combat, unlike the weary forces of the Shanghai Expeditionary Force further north. With less than a week of combat experience, the 10th Army's soldiers were hungry for a fight. The martial spirit of the 10th Army was exemplified by its commander, Yanagawa Heisuke. Born near Nagasaki in 1879, he was among a group of retired officers called back to active service as the war in China escalated unexpectedly. Having served in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905 and taught at the Beijing Army College in 1918, Yanagawa had considerable experience in military affairs. However, his past exposure to China did not cultivate any empathy for the enemy. He was determined to push all the way to Nanjing, and once there, he intended to blanket the city in mustard gas and incendiaries until it capitulated. While Japanese commanders debated the value of capturing Nanjing, the Chinese were equally preoccupied with whether it was worth defending. Most military professionals viewed the situation as a lost cause from the start. After the fall of Shanghai, Chiang Kai-shek summoned one of his top commanders, Chen Cheng, to Nanjing for discussions. “How can Nanjing be held?” Chen Cheng shot back “Are you ordering me to hold Nanjing?” Chiang replied “I am not”. Chen Cheng stated frankly, “I believe Nanjing should not be held at all.” By mid-November, Bai Chongxi, one of China's most respected generals, advocated for declaring Nanjing an open city. He argued that defending it was not only unnecessary but also impossible. All available forces had been deployed to Shanghai and were now exhausted. Furthermore, no reinforcements would be forthcoming if they made a stand in Nanjing. Instead of stubbornly clinging to fixed positions, he preferred a more flexible defensive strategy. Zhang Qun, Chiang's secretary, supported Bai's stance, believing that while Nanjing should ultimately be abandoned, political considerations were paramount. If the Chinese simply withdrew and allowed the Japanese to occupy the city, it would undermine China's position in any future negotiations. The Japanese would not be able to present themselves as victors who had triumphed in battle. Similarly, Chiang's chief military advisor, General Alexander von Falkenhausen, was against attempting to hold Nanjing. He deemed it “useless from a military perspective, suggesting it would be madness.” He warned that if Chiang forced his army into a decisive battle with their backs to the Yangtze River, “a disaster would probably be unavoidable.” Chiang's head of the operations bureau Liu Fei argued Nanjing could not be abandoned without a fight as it would crush the NRA's morale. He believed that defending the city could be managed with as few as 12 regiments, although 18 would be feasible. Most at the meeting agreed and Chiang understood Nanjing's international recognition necessitated some form of defense, doomed or not. A second meeting was formed whereupon, Tang Shengzhi, a general staff officer whose loyalties were, lets be honest very flip floppy. During the warlord era, he routinely switched sides, especially against Chiang Kai-Shek. At the meeting Tang stated in regards to Nanjing's international prominence and being the final resting place of Dr Sun Yat-Sen “How can we face the spirit of the former president in heaven? We have no choice but to defend the capital to the death.” Chiang's commanders were all well aware of his intentions. The generalissimo was eager for a dramatic last stand in Nanjing to serve propaganda purposes, aiming to rally the nation and convey to the world that China was resolute in its fight against Japan. His commanders also recognized the rationale behind fighting for Nanjing; however, very few were inclined to embark on what seemed a likely suicide mission. The third meeting occurred the day after the second. Chiang opened by asking, as many anticipated, “Who is willing to shoulder the burden of defending Nanjing?” An awkward silence followed. Then Tang Shengzhi stepped forward. “Chairman, if no one else is willing, I will. I'm prepared to defend Nanjing and to hold it to the death.” Without hesitation, Chiang accepted his offer. “Good, the responsibility is yours.”A little refresher on Tang, he had played a role in Chiang Kai-shek's efforts to unify China by force in the 1920s, when the nation was a patchwork of fiefdoms. However, their relationship had soured on two occasions, forcing Tang into temporary exile, first to Japan and then to Hong Kong. The Japanese invasion of northeastern China in 1931 prompted a loose reconciliation, and since then, Tang had held several important positions, notably organizing war games simulating a Japanese assault on Nanjing. However Tang had often suffered from illness, and crucially, he had not led troops in the field against the Japanese since the onset of full-scale war that summer. Hailing from Hunan province, he was a typical provincial soldier and would likely face challenges commanding respect among elite divisions loyal solely to the central government in Nanjing. He was definitely not the first choice for such a significant task.  Amazingly, while tens of thousands of Chinese and Japanese were killing each other, while Japanese planes relentlessly bombarded Chinese cities including the capital, and while Japanese soldiers committed heinous atrocities against Chinese civilians, the two nations maintained diplomatic relations. China had a fully operational embassy in Tokyo, led by Xu Shiying, a 65-year-old diplomat. This surreal arrangement persisted because neither side was willing to officially declare war. In the fall of 1937, as Japanese armies were heavily engaged on two fronts within mainland China, Xu met with Japanese Foreign Minister Hirota Koki to propose a non-aggression treaty. The proposal was swiftly rejected in Nanjing. By November 1937, Xu was no longer at the forefront of events, and foreign observers shifted their focus from the capitals of the warring nations to Belgium. While large-scale battles raged along the lower Yangtze, representatives from 19 countries convened in Brussels to search for a way to end hostilities. Although China participated in the conference, Japan did not. Japan had received two invitations to join the talks, with its response to the second arriving in Brussels on November 12: a firm rejection. Japan asserted that it preferred direct bilateral negotiations with China, dismissing the Brussels conference held under the auspices of the Nine-Power Treaty, a pact signed in 1922 aimed at ensuring China's national sovereignty and territorial integrity. Japan argued that intervention by a collective body like the conference “would merely stir national sentiments in both countries and complicate efforts to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution.” The League of Nations had called for a Nine-Power conference a month earlier, which ultimately became a 19-power conference as other nations with interests in East Asia joined. From the outset, Japan opposed the assembly and was absent when the first plenary meeting commenced in Brussels on November 3. Japanese leaders feared that China might attempt to leverage the conference against Western powers, recalling how, in 1895, Japan had been denied its spoils following its first modern war with China due to the intervention of Russia, France, and Germany, who blocked Japan from claiming the strategic Liaodong Peninsula adjacent to Korea. China also exhibited a lukewarm attitude toward the conference. While Japan feared the potential outcomes, China was concerned about the lack of significant results. The proposal to transition discussions from the League of Nations, perceived as ineffective, to the even less authoritative Nine Powers, which lacked formal organization. Nonetheless, the Chinese chose to participate in Brussels, maintaining the pretense that something meaningful could be accomplished. Shortly after Japan's second rejection of the invitation, Wellington Koo made an impassioned plea in Brussels, stating, “Now that the door to conciliation and mediation has been slammed in your face by the latest reply of the Japanese Government, will you not decide to withhold supplies of war materials and credit to Japan and extend aid to China?” In reality, Koo understood that significant Western aid to China was highly unlikely, aside from token gestures. Previous international discussions had momentarily halted Japanese advances in the past; for instance, in 1932, Japanese troops had paused their movements in the Shanghai area just hours before the League of Nations General Assembly commenced. However, that was nearly six years earlier, and circumstances had changed dramatically since then. Rogue states had grown bolder, while democracies seemed increasingly timid. Thus, the Chinese agenda in Brussels was not primarily driven by hopes for substantial Western concessions. Instead, the delegates had been tasked by Nanjing to anticipate the post-conference landscape and to actively seek ways to encourage Europe and America to support Soviet military action against Japan.   China, long reliant on Germany as a diplomatic partner, increasingly felt betrayed, not just by Germany, but also by its fascist ally, Italy. Consequently, it began looking more favorably upon the Soviet Union, Japan's archrival in Northeast Asia, as its main source of international support. The Soviet Union exhibited a firmer stance than the Western democracies at the Brussels conference, joining China in advocating for collective security in Europe and Asia. On November 15th, a small group of officers from the 10th Army gathered for late-night discussions in an abandoned building north of Hangzhou Bay, where they would effectively decide the fate of China. Yanagawa Heisuke, the commander of the 10th Army, presided over the discussions. Fresh from the battlefield since the beginning of the month, he was eager to escalate the fight, a sentiment echoed among the others. It was an unusual meeting, where officers as low in rank as major were making decisions typically reserved for the highest echelons of political power. The agenda included a pivotal question: Should they adhere to Order No. 600 received from Tokyo a week prior, which instructed them to halt their advance along a line from Suzhou to Jiaxing? Or, should they disregard these explicit orders and push forward to seize Nanjing? While the Japanese Army had failed to completely annihilate the Chinese forces around Shanghai, there was a consensus that their adversary was now reeling from recent setbacks, presenting an opportune moment to strike decisively and secure a swift victory. The only remaining question was how aggressively to pursue this goal. Colonel Terada Masao, a senior staff officer within the 10th Army, spoke first. “The Chinese Army is currently retreating toward the capital. We should cross that line and pursue the enemy straight to Nanjing.” Major Iketani Hanjiro, a staff officer recently attached to the fast-moving 6th Division, then offered his input “From a tactical perspective, I completely agree with Terada that we should cross the line, but the decision to attack Nanjing should be considered not just tactically, but also politically. It's not that field commanders can't create a fait accompli to pressure our superiors in Tokyo. However, we must proceed with great caution”. A staff officer raised this question  “What if Tokyo orders us to pull back those smaller units?” Iketani responded “In that case, we will, of course, withdraw them to this side of the line”. Ultimately, Iketani's cautions were set aside, and Terada's aggressive approach prevailed. The majority agreed that the tactical circumstances presented a rare opportunity. Japanese troops in the Shanghai area were poised to advance west, not through small, individual skirmishes but with a substantial deployment of their forces. Officers estimated that if a decisive push was made immediately, Nanjing could fall into Japanese hands within 20 days. However Colonel Kawabe Torashiro, the newly appointed chief of the Army General Staff's Operations Section suddenly arrived at the theater. He was sent on a mission to assess whether the Central China Area Army should be granted greater operational freedom. It was well known in Tokyo that field officers were eager to capitalize on the momentum created by the collapse of Chinese defenses around Shanghai. Kawabe's task was to explore the possibility of allowing forces to cross the line from Suzhou to Jiaxing and move westward in pursuit of the retreating enemy. However, Kawabe was staunchly opposed to further military adventures in China. Kawabe was part of the dwindling faction of "China doves" within the Japanese military. As early as the summer of 1937, he had become alarmed by a letter from a civilian Japanese visitor to the Chinese mainland, warning that Japanese officers were attempting to engineer an “incident” with China to provoke open conflict. This would provide Japan with a pretext to expand its influence in northern China. Kawabe had attempted to alert his superiors, but his warnings fell on deaf ears. They had been lulled into a false sense of security by reports from China that dismissed all talk of war-mongering as baseless and alarmist. When he arrived to the front he stated “I am here to inspect conditions on the ground so that a final decision can be made on where to establish the operational restriction line”. Alongside him came General Akira Muto, recently appointed the commander of the Central China Area Army. He also happened to be one of the architects of the Marco Polo Bridge Incident. Muto responded promptly: “The line currently stretches from Suzhou to Jiaxing, but we should consider crossing it. This will help us achieve our overall objectives in the theater.” Muto continued, arguing that the 10th Army should be permitted to advance to Huzhou, south of Lake Tai, effectively cutting off communications between Nanjing and the strategic city of Hangzhou. He further claimed that the Shanghai Expeditionary Force should be allowed to capture the vital city of Jiangyin, suggesting, perhaps overly optimistically, that its loss could lead to the fall of Chiang Kai-shek. Ultimately, Muto insisted, Nanjing should also be seized, which he asserted would bring an end to the war. Kawabe listened patiently, a practice he would repeat in the following days as other field officers echoed similar sentiments, eagerly expressing their desire to advance all the way to Nanjing. Yanagawa and his 10th Army exemplified this aggressive mindset. Nevertheless, just as the hawks within the Japanese military and the nation's political leadership appeared to be prevailing in the struggle over China policy, they faced unexpected challenges from a different direction. Germany, a power with ambiguous sympathies in East Asia, was quietly engaged in negotiations aimed at bringing peace. Oskar Trautmann, Germany's ambassador to China, had maintained an objective and neutral stance when he met with Chiang Kai-shek in early November to relay Japan's conditions for initiating peace talks. These conditions included extensive concessions in northern China, such as the withdrawal of all Chinese troops to a line south of Beijing and the establishment of a pro-Japanese regime in Inner Mongolia, bordering the Soviet-controlled Mongolian People's Republic. Chiang dismissed these demands outright, but Trautmann and his superiors in Beijing continued their top-secret efforts. Germany's motivation for seeking an end to the Sino-Japanese War was not rooted in a genuine love for peace, but rather in their embarrassment over witnessing their old Asian ally, China, fighting against their new partner, Japan. Herman Göring, president of the Reichstag and a leading figure in the Nazi party, told a Chinese visitor, “China and Japan are both friends of Germany. The Sino-Japanese War has put Germany between Scylla and Charybdis. That's why Germany is ready to seize the chance to become a mediator.” Germany also feared that a prolonged conflict in China could jeopardize its commercial interests in East Asia and weaken Japan's capacity to confront the Soviet Union, potentially freeing Moscow to allocate more resources to a fight in Europe. In essence, continued hostilities could significantly harm Germany. Japanese field commanders were frustrated by Germany's mediation efforts.  When news of Trautmann's mission leaked, the German diplomat faced severe criticism in the Chinese media, which deemed any negotiation with the "Japanese devils" unacceptable. Additionally, there was the matter of China's ties with the Soviet Union; employing a German mediator raised the possibility of cooperation among China, Japan, and Germany, potentially expanding the anti-Soviet bloc, which would, in turn, pressure Moscow to increase its support for China. By mid-November, however, the complexities of this diplomatic game started unraveling and then Japan took action. At 7:00 am on November 19, Yanagawa issued instructions to his troops in the field. “The enemy's command system is in disarray, and a mood of defeat has descended over their entire army. They have lost the will to fight. The main Chinese forces were retreating west of the line stretching from Suzhou to Jiaxing, and this withdrawal was soon likely to spiral into a full-scale retreat. We must not miss the opportunity to pursue the enemy to Nanjing.” I would like to take this time to remind you all that this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Please go subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry after that, give my personal channel a look over at The Pacific War Channel at Youtube, it would mean a lot to me. Shanghai had fallen, and the Japanese forces pursued their fleeing enemy further west. However they had orders to halt, but would they? Officers from top down deliberating on the issue, with the vast majority pushing for a drive to Nanjing. They thought it represented the end objective of the conflict. They would all be very wrong. 

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various aspects of the firearms industry, including concerns about its health, market dynamics, and the demographics of gun buyers. He engages with Lee the Gunwriter Williams on topics such as Washington State's gun legislation and the potential impact of Supreme Court decisions on gun rights. The conversation emphasizes the importance of supporting gun rights organizations and staying informed about legislative changes. Takeaways The firearms industry is currently experiencing a slowdown in sales, but it is not in crisis. Consumer behavior is influenced by political climate and fears of future legislation. Demographics of gun buyers are changing, with more women and minorities entering the market. Many new gun buyers may not become repeat customers due to their initial motivations for purchasing firearms. Washington State's gun laws are under scrutiny, with ongoing legal battles over magazine capacity restrictions. The Supreme Court's decisions will significantly impact gun rights and legislation across the country. Gun rights organizations are becoming more unified in their efforts to protect the Second Amendment. The market will eventually stabilize, leading to lower prices for consumers. Innovation in the firearms industry is crucial for survival during economic downturns. Support for gun rights organizations is essential for maintaining freedoms. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, firearms industry, market dynamics, gun buyers, Washington State, Supreme Court, Second Amendment, legislation, NRA