Podcasts about nra

http://Patreon.com/thebpdshow“Thoughts and Prayers of Officials Mean Nothing to God Without Action.” In the wake of the Annunciation Catholic School tragedy in Minneapolis, this sermon confronts the hypocrisy of politicians who offer “thoughts and prayers” while refusing to act against gun violence. Drawing on Isaiah, James, Micah, Amos, and more, Pastor Ben exposes how God rejects empty prayers, condemns faith without works, and holds leaders accountable for blood on their hands. This is a biblical exegesis on gun violence, political idolatry, and the NRA's grip on America. After the sermon, stay tuned for powerful commentary and analysis from the Black Family Channel family: DJ Xclusive, Rebecca Azor, Clickbaity Political Thirsttrap, Georgia Fort, Attorney Augustus Corbett, Dr. Carl Mack, and Pastors Jada and Ben. Timestamps 0:00 – Pastor Ben 3-Minute Sermon: “Thoughts and Prayers Are Meaningless Without Action” 3:15 – Bible Trivia 4:00 – Rebecca Azor 6:06 – Clickbaity Political Thirsttrap 8:13 – Here's the Truth with Georgia Fort 9:13 – Attorney Augustus Corbett (Defiant Lawyers Network) 11:08 – Answer to the Trivia Question 11:48 – Black History with Dr. Carl Mack 14:21 – Pastor Jada Become a patron! h

NRA-ILA Executive Director John Commerford joins Cam to discuss the NRA's newly filed lawsuit challenging Florida's three-day waiting period on gun sales, as well as the latest on several lawsuits seeking to overturn "assault weapon" bans.

We Like Shooting Episode 625 This episode of We Like Shooting is brought to you by: Midwest Industries, Gideon Optics, Die Free Co., Bowers Group, Blue Alpha, and Rost Martin   Welcome to the We Like Shooting Show, episode 625! Our cast tonight is Jeremy Pozderac, Aaron Krieger, Nick Lynch, and me Shawn Herrin, welcome to the show! pew.deals GUEST - Paul Noonan, CEO, FM Products @foxtrotmikeproducts https://www.instagram.com/foxtrotmikeproducts/ https://fm-products.com/products/   Gear Chat Nick - New Bag Plate 2.0 Poor's Bag Plate gen 2 Shawn - Bowers Group SSB Cans Explained Bowers Group SSB cans Shawn - Foxtrot Mike Fun Foxtrot Mike Shawn - Ear Pro Makeover by Warden Studios Warden Studios Ear Pro retrofit Shawn - Holster Talk: Close Quarters Tips Close Quarters Carry Holsters Shawn - Henry's Supreme 223 Rifle Henry Supreme 223 Bullet Points Shawn - Foxtrot Mike Products Unveils New 16" AR-15 Upper for Suppressor Enthusiasts Foxtrot Mike Products has launched a limited-run 16" Suppressor-Optimized AR-15 Barreled Upper, designed specifically for users who primarily shoot with suppressors. This product aims to cater to the growing trend of suppressed shooting ahead of the federal tax stamp changes in 2026, allowing customers to build their firearms with preferred components at an MSRP of $249. The new upper features a suppressor-optimized gas system that reduces recoil and back pressure, potentially appealing to shooters looking for enhanced performance and control. Gun Fights Step right up for "Gun Fights," the high-octane segment hosted by Nick Lynch, where our cast members go head-to-head in a game show-style showdown! Each contestant tries to prove their gun knowledge dominance. It's a wild ride of bids, bluffs, and banter—who will come out on top? Tune in to find out! WLS is Lifestyle Aaron's Alley Going Ballistic NRA Takes Aim at Massachusetts' Overreaching Gun Laws The NRA has filed a lawsuit against Massachusetts over its assault weapons ban, claiming it violates Second Amendment rights. This legal challenge could have significant implications for gun owners in the state, potentially influencing broader gun rights discussions and making waves in the gun control debate. Government Shenanigans: The DOJ's Sneaky Tactics Against Your Rights The Firearms Policy Coalition has raised concerns about what it describes as a deceptive strategy by the Department of Justice regarding the ban on interstate handgun purchases. This situation may lead to increased scrutiny and challenges for the gun community surrounding purchase regulations and interstate transactions. Court Says "No Thanks" to New York's Gun Control Nonsense A District Court has overturned New York's prohibition on non-resident concealed carry permits, marking a significant victory for Second Amendment supporters and challenging restrictive gun control measures. This ruling may encourage broader access to concealed carry rights outside of New York, impacting the national conversation on gun ownership and permitting. Infowars: Where Free Speech Meets Triggered Liberals The sale of Infowars highlights ongoing tensions around free speech and gun control, with implications for the gun community regarding perceived censorship and the legal ramifications tied to high-profile incidents like Sandy Hook. The gun community may see this as a further attempt by gun control advocates to suppress pro-Second Amendment voices in media. Another Win for Freedom: Court Strikes Down New Mexico's Waiting Period Nonsense The Tenth Circuit has ruled that New Mexico's seven-day waiting period for gun purchases is unconstitutional, marking a significant legal victory for the NRA and reinforcing Second Amendment rights. The decision may embolden the gun community and challenge simila...

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various legal challenges and victories related to gun rights with guests including Joseph Greenlee from the NRA and Dr. John Lott. The conversation covers recent court decisions, the impact of administration changes on crime rates, and personal stories highlighting the importance of self-defense. The episode emphasizes the need for continued support for the NRA and other organizations fighting for Second Amendment rights. In this episode, Mark Walters discusses the importance of self-defense stories, particularly those involving firearms, and how they relate to current crime rates in cities like Chicago and Washington, DC. The conversation highlights the deterrent effect of armed citizens, the impact of political leadership on crime, and the necessity of legal support for gun owners. The roundtable discussion also delves into cultural shifts and the role of education in shaping public perceptions of safety and crime prevention. Takeaways The NRA is actively involved in numerous legal challenges across the country. Recent court decisions have shown promise for gun rights advocates. Florida's young adult purchase ban is being challenged by the NRA. The importance of self-defense laws is highlighted through personal stories. Statistical analysis shows a significant drop in crime rates in DC under the current administration. The threat of prosecution is a key deterrent for criminals. The NRA's legal efforts are crucial in the fight against gun control measures. Public support for the NRA is essential for continued advocacy. The conversation emphasizes the need for vigilance in protecting Second Amendment rights. The impact of immigration on crime rates is a pressing issue. Self-defense stories highlight the importance of firearms in personal safety. Crime rates in cities like Chicago and DC are alarming and require attention. The Trump administration is making strides to ease gun carry laws. Community response is crucial in addressing ongoing violence in urban areas. Legal support for gun owners is essential in self-defense situations. Education plays a vital role in preventing crime and promoting safety. Government accountability is necessary for public safety and trust. Cultural shifts can lead to significant political changes. The actions of agencies like the ATF raise concerns about government overreach. Unity among gun owners and advocates is essential to protect rights. Keywords NRA, gun rights, litigation, court cases, self-defense, crime statistics, immigration, legal challenges, Second Amendment, Florida gun laws, self-defense, firearms, crime rates, Chicago, political dynamics, deterrent effect, gun ownership, public safety, legal support, cultural shifts  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various legal challenges and victories related to gun rights with guests including Joseph Greenlee from the NRA and Dr. John Lott. The conversation covers recent court decisions, the impact of administration changes on crime rates, and personal stories highlighting the importance of self-defense. The episode emphasizes the need for continued support for the NRA and other organizations fighting for Second Amendment rights. In this episode, Mark Walters discusses the importance of self-defense stories, particularly those involving firearms, and how they relate to current crime rates in cities like Chicago and Washington, DC. The conversation highlights the deterrent effect of armed citizens, the impact of political leadership on crime, and the necessity of legal support for gun owners. The roundtable discussion also delves into cultural shifts and the role of education in shaping public perceptions of safety and crime prevention. Takeaways The NRA is actively involved in numerous legal challenges across the country. Recent court decisions have shown promise for gun rights advocates. Florida's young adult purchase ban is being challenged by the NRA. The importance of self-defense laws is highlighted through personal stories. Statistical analysis shows a significant drop in crime rates in DC under the current administration. The threat of prosecution is a key deterrent for criminals. The NRA's legal efforts are crucial in the fight against gun control measures. Public support for the NRA is essential for continued advocacy. The conversation emphasizes the need for vigilance in protecting Second Amendment rights. The impact of immigration on crime rates is a pressing issue. Self-defense stories highlight the importance of firearms in personal safety. Crime rates in cities like Chicago and DC are alarming and require attention. The Trump administration is making strides to ease gun carry laws. Community response is crucial in addressing ongoing violence in urban areas. Legal support for gun owners is essential in self-defense situations. Education plays a vital role in preventing crime and promoting safety. Government accountability is necessary for public safety and trust. Cultural shifts can lead to significant political changes. The actions of agencies like the ATF raise concerns about government overreach. Unity among gun owners and advocates is essential to protect rights. Keywords NRA, gun rights, litigation, court cases, self-defense, crime statistics, immigration, legal challenges, Second Amendment, Florida gun laws, self-defense, firearms, crime rates, Chicago, political dynamics, deterrent effect, gun ownership, public safety, legal support, cultural shifts    

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various legal challenges and victories related to gun rights with guests including Joseph Greenlee from the NRA and Dr. John Lott. The conversation covers recent court decisions, the impact of administration changes on crime rates, and personal stories highlighting the importance of self-defense. The episode emphasizes the need for continued support for the NRA and other organizations fighting for Second Amendment rights. In this episode, Mark Walters discusses the importance of self-defense stories, particularly those involving firearms, and how they relate to current crime rates in cities like Chicago and Washington, DC. The conversation highlights the deterrent effect of armed citizens, the impact of political leadership on crime, and the necessity of legal support for gun owners. The roundtable discussion also delves into cultural shifts and the role of education in shaping public perceptions of safety and crime prevention. Takeaways The NRA is actively involved in numerous legal challenges across the country. Recent court decisions have shown promise for gun rights advocates. Florida's young adult purchase ban is being challenged by the NRA. The importance of self-defense laws is highlighted through personal stories. Statistical analysis shows a significant drop in crime rates in DC under the current administration. The threat of prosecution is a key deterrent for criminals. The NRA's legal efforts are crucial in the fight against gun control measures. Public support for the NRA is essential for continued advocacy. The conversation emphasizes the need for vigilance in protecting Second Amendment rights. The impact of immigration on crime rates is a pressing issue. Self-defense stories highlight the importance of firearms in personal safety. Crime rates in cities like Chicago and DC are alarming and require attention. The Trump administration is making strides to ease gun carry laws. Community response is crucial in addressing ongoing violence in urban areas. Legal support for gun owners is essential in self-defense situations. Education plays a vital role in preventing crime and promoting safety. Government accountability is necessary for public safety and trust. Cultural shifts can lead to significant political changes. The actions of agencies like the ATF raise concerns about government overreach. Unity among gun owners and advocates is essential to protect rights. Keywords NRA, gun rights, litigation, court cases, self-defense, crime statistics, immigration, legal challenges, Second Amendment, Florida gun laws, self-defense, firearms, crime rates, Chicago, political dynamics, deterrent effect, gun ownership, public safety, legal support, cultural shifts  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses significant developments in gun rights, particularly focusing on the recent ruling in New Mexico that declared a seven-day waiting period for gun purchases unconstitutional. The conversation delves into the implications of waiting periods, background checks, and the disconnect between gun ownership and legislation. With insights from guest Dave Workman, the discussion highlights the importance of education in understanding gun rights and the current trends in concealed carry permits and gun sales. Takeaways New Mexico's waiting period ruling could influence other states. Waiting periods are seen as infringements on the Second Amendment. Background checks are often ineffective in preventing crime. Gun shows are experiencing low turnout due to waiting periods. The rise in concealed carry permits contrasts with declining gun sales. Democratic lawmakers often view gun ownership as a privilege. Education on gun rights is lacking in today's curriculum. The NRA plays a crucial role in defending gun rights. Legislation often discourages law-abiding citizens from exercising their rights. The disconnect between gun ownership and political action is evident. Keywords gun rights, waiting periods, background checks, Second Amendment, New Mexico, concealed carry, legislation, NRA, gun ownership, education  

While attending the 2025 DSC Summer Expo and DSCF Gala (www.dscf.org) Larry was able to visit with Doug Hamlin, NRA's CEO about the new National Rifle Association and where he sees the organization heading in the future! A frank though inspiring conversation about the NRA (www.NRA.com), as well as how organizations such as the Dallas Safari Club (www.biggame.org) and others can work together to maintain our rights to own firearms and outdoor style way of life we all love! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Summary The conversation covers a range of topics including the Tate Admiak case, frustrations with the ATF, and legislative challenges surrounding gun laws in Florida. The discussion highlights the complexities of gun ownership, legal implications of gun parts, and the potential merging of the ATF and DEA. The speakers express concerns over misleading media narratives regarding gun violence and emphasize the importance of Second Amendment rights. TakeawaysTate Adamiak case raises serious legal concerns about gun ownership. The ATF's actions in the Damiak case are seen as egregious. Frustration exists over the lack of accountability for the ATF. Florida's gun laws are under scrutiny, especially regarding the purchase age. The potential merging of ATF and DEA raises alarms among gun rights advocates. Legislative challenges in Florida reflect broader national issues with gun rights. Misleading media narratives can distort public perception of gun violence. The importance of supporting individuals wrongfully prosecuted for gun-related charges. The conversation emphasizes the need for vigilance in protecting Second Amendment rights. Keywords Tate Damiak, ATF, gun laws, Florida, NRA, gun rights, legislation, Second Amendment  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses significant victories for gun rights, including a historic ruling in California that overturns the one-gun-per-month law. The conversation also covers the streamlining of gun permit processes in Washington D.C., ongoing legal battles for Second Amendment rights, and new lawsuits being filed in various states. Additionally, the episode features a segment on 2A Bourbon, a bourbon brand that supports constitutional causes. The show concludes with a discussion on self-defense success stories and an analysis of gun violence statistics, highlighting the importance of the Second Amendment in protecting individual rights. In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics related to gun rights, legislation, and political dynamics with Arizona State Rep. Kwong Wynn and other guests. The conversation covers the importance of supporting the Second Amendment, the challenges faced by gun owners, and the impact of recent legislative achievements. The discussion also highlights the significance of political engagement and the upcoming events in the gun rights community. Additionally, the roundtable delves into the implications of concealed carry laws in Washington State and Trump's influence on crime in DC, concluding with reflections on the current state of gun violence in America. Takeaways The Second Amendment Foundation secured a major victory in California. Gun rationing laws are now overturned in California. Streamlining gun permit processes is a step in the right direction. Legal battles for Second Amendment rights are ongoing and expanding. The Gun Rights Policy Conference is an important event for activists. 2A Bourbon supports military and constitutional causes. Self-defense stories highlight the effectiveness of armed citizens. Gun violence statistics are often misrepresented by advocacy groups. Community support is crucial for gun rights organizations. The fight for Second Amendment rights continues across the nation. Support Armed American Radio and the Second Amendment. Buds Gun Shop is a reliable partner for firearms needs. Packing heat is essential for personal protection. Political engagement is crucial for gun rights advocacy. Legislative achievements can significantly impact gun rights. The fight for the Second Amendment is ongoing and challenging. Understanding the political landscape is vital for success. Community support is essential for political candidates. Gun violence statistics can be misleading and politicized. The importance of legal protection for gun owners cannot be overstated. Keywords Second Amendment, gun rights, Armed American Radio, legal battles, gun control, self-defense, NRA, 2A Bourbon, gun violence statistics, Gun Rights Policy Conference, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, gun rights, political engagement, Arizona politics, concealed carry, Trump, crime, legislation, legal protection  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses significant victories for gun rights, including a historic ruling in California that overturns the one-gun-per-month law. The conversation also covers the streamlining of gun permit processes in Washington D.C., ongoing legal battles for Second Amendment rights, and new lawsuits being filed in various states. Additionally, the episode features a segment on 2A Bourbon, a bourbon brand that supports constitutional causes. The show concludes with a discussion on self-defense success stories and an analysis of gun violence statistics, highlighting the importance of the Second Amendment in protecting individual rights. In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics related to gun rights, legislation, and political dynamics with Arizona State Rep. Kwong Wynn and other guests. The conversation covers the importance of supporting the Second Amendment, the challenges faced by gun owners, and the impact of recent legislative achievements. The discussion also highlights the significance of political engagement and the upcoming events in the gun rights community. Additionally, the roundtable delves into the implications of concealed carry laws in Washington State and Trump's influence on crime in DC, concluding with reflections on the current state of gun violence in America. Takeaways The Second Amendment Foundation secured a major victory in California. Gun rationing laws are now overturned in California. Streamlining gun permit processes is a step in the right direction. Legal battles for Second Amendment rights are ongoing and expanding. The Gun Rights Policy Conference is an important event for activists. 2A Bourbon supports military and constitutional causes. Self-defense stories highlight the effectiveness of armed citizens. Gun violence statistics are often misrepresented by advocacy groups. Community support is crucial for gun rights organizations. The fight for Second Amendment rights continues across the nation. Support Armed American Radio and the Second Amendment. Buds Gun Shop is a reliable partner for firearms needs. Packing heat is essential for personal protection. Political engagement is crucial for gun rights advocacy. Legislative achievements can significantly impact gun rights. The fight for the Second Amendment is ongoing and challenging. Understanding the political landscape is vital for success. Community support is essential for political candidates. Gun violence statistics can be misleading and politicized. The importance of legal protection for gun owners cannot be overstated. Keywords Second Amendment, gun rights, Armed American Radio, legal battles, gun control, self-defense, NRA, 2A Bourbon, gun violence statistics, Gun Rights Policy Conference, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, gun rights, political engagement, Arizona politics, concealed carry, Trump, crime, legislation, legal protection  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses significant victories for gun rights, including a historic ruling in California that overturns the one-gun-per-month law. The conversation also covers the streamlining of gun permit processes in Washington D.C., ongoing legal battles for Second Amendment rights, and new lawsuits being filed in various states. Additionally, the episode features a segment on 2A Bourbon, a bourbon brand that supports constitutional causes. The show concludes with a discussion on self-defense success stories and an analysis of gun violence statistics, highlighting the importance of the Second Amendment in protecting individual rights. In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics related to gun rights, legislation, and political dynamics with Arizona State Rep. Kwong Wynn and other guests. The conversation covers the importance of supporting the Second Amendment, the challenges faced by gun owners, and the impact of recent legislative achievements. The discussion also highlights the significance of political engagement and the upcoming events in the gun rights community. Additionally, the roundtable delves into the implications of concealed carry laws in Washington State and Trump's influence on crime in DC, concluding with reflections on the current state of gun violence in America. Takeaways The Second Amendment Foundation secured a major victory in California. Gun rationing laws are now overturned in California. Streamlining gun permit processes is a step in the right direction. Legal battles for Second Amendment rights are ongoing and expanding. The Gun Rights Policy Conference is an important event for activists. 2A Bourbon supports military and constitutional causes. Self-defense stories highlight the effectiveness of armed citizens. Gun violence statistics are often misrepresented by advocacy groups. Community support is crucial for gun rights organizations. The fight for Second Amendment rights continues across the nation. Support Armed American Radio and the Second Amendment. Buds Gun Shop is a reliable partner for firearms needs. Packing heat is essential for personal protection. Political engagement is crucial for gun rights advocacy. Legislative achievements can significantly impact gun rights. The fight for the Second Amendment is ongoing and challenging. Understanding the political landscape is vital for success. Community support is essential for political candidates. Gun violence statistics can be misleading and politicized. The importance of legal protection for gun owners cannot be overstated. Keywords Second Amendment, gun rights, Armed American Radio, legal battles, gun control, self-defense, NRA, 2A Bourbon, gun violence statistics, Gun Rights Policy Conference, Armed American Radio, Second Amendment, gun rights, political engagement, Arizona politics, concealed carry, Trump, crime, legislation, legal protection  

Last time we spoke about the fall of Shanghai. In October 1937 a small battalion led by Colonel Xie Jinyuan transformed the Sihang Warehouse into a fortress against the advancing Japanese army. These men, known as the "800 Heroes," became symbols of hope, rallying local citizens who provided vital support. Despite heavy casualties, they held out against overwhelming odds until a strategic retreat was ordered on November 1. As Japanese forces intensified their assaults, they breached the Chinese defenses and captured strategic positions along Suzhou Creek. The fighting was fierce, marked by desperate counterattacks from the besieged Chinese soldiers, who faced an unyielding enemy. By November 9, the Chinese faced a full retreat, their organized defenses collapsing into chaos as they fled the city. Desperate civilians sought refuge in the International Settlement but were met with hostility, exacerbating the terror of the moment. Amidst the turmoil, remaining forces continued to resist in pockets, holding out as long as possible. By November 11, Japanese troops raised their flag in the last stronghold, marking a grim victory.   #163 Crossing Nanjing's Rubicon Welcome to the Fall and Rise of China Podcast, I am your dutiful host Craig Watson. But, before we start I want to also remind you this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Perhaps you want to learn more about the history of Asia? Kings and Generals have an assortment of episodes on history of asia and much more  so go give them a look over on Youtube. So please subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry for some more history related content, over on my channel, the Pacific War Channel where I cover the history of China and Japan from the 19th century until the end of the Pacific War. As the Japanese were mopping up Shanghai, Chiang Kai-Shek wrote in his diary on November 11th “I fear that they could threaten Nanjing”. Over In Shanghai, General Matsui Iwane was dealing with foreign correspondents, eager to learn what Japan's next move would be and to this he simply stated “For future developments, you had better ask Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek”. The correspondents were surprised by this response and pressed him further. He replied . “Chiang Kai-shek was reported to have predicted a five-year war, well, it might be that long. We don't know whether we will go to Nanjing or not. It all depends on Chiang.” At this point Shanghai was falling under Japanese control and now Matsui and his fellow field commanders were thinking, what's next? Nanjing was certainly the next objective. It was a common understanding amongst the Japanese leadership, that if the four main eastern cities of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Nanjing were lost, Chiang Kai-Shek's government would collapse. Three of these cities had been taken, Nanjing was dangling like fresh fruit. Matsui's staff believed the Chinese units departing Shanghai would mount a stand immediately west of the city, probably a defensive line running from Jiading to Huangduzhen. On the night of November 11th, Matsui issued a command to all units in the Shanghai area to advance west along the railway towards Nanjing. Their first objective would be a line extending from Taicang to Kunshan. Chiang Kai-Shek was not only reeling from military defeats, but also the gradual loss of his German allies. The Germans were increasingly aligning with the Japanese. Chiang Kai-Shek was looking for new external help, so he turned to the Soviets. It was a marriage of convenience, Chiang Kai-Shek signed a non-aggression pact with the USSR that year and wasted no time pleading for aircraft and pilots. Moscow began sending them before the ink touched the paper. 200 aircraft and pilots in return for some essential minerals, wolfram and tungsten. The Sino-Soviet friendship even drew in an unlikely source of support, Sir Winston Churchill. The Soviet envoy to the UK described how during a meeting with Churchill “he greatly praised our tactics in the Far East: maintenance of neutrality and simultaneous aid to China in weaponry.” Soviet pilots found themselves dispatched to Nanjing where they were briefed by Yakov Vladimirovich Smushkevich, the deputy commander of the Soviet Air Force. “The Japanese armed forces are technically superior to the Chinese. The Chinese Air Force is a particular concern. Soviet pilots who have rushed to China's aid are currently in Nanjing. They are fighting valiantly.” Meanwhile back at Shanghai discipline and order that had characterized previous Chinese withdrawal had collapsed. Simply put, there were hundreds of thousands of men trying to retreat across the lower Yangtze region, it was a shitstorm. Many units had to disengage during combat with the enemy and scramble to pull out. Huang Qixiang, the deputy commander of the Chinese right flank in Shanghai, executed a strategic withdrawal moments before his command post succumbed to the advancing enemy forces. Just fifteen minutes after his departure, the area was overrun by Japanese troops. In a desperate bid to avoid capture, another general had to cross a creek, nearly drowning in the process. Rescued while barely clinging to life and drenched in icy water, he was welcomed by a peasant family who aided in his recovery before he resumed his arduous journey westward. The scale of this withdrawal, occurring both day and night, could hardly escape the enemy's notice, and its complexity made the operation increasingly difficult. The execution of the withdrawal exacerbated the situation significantly. Orders to abandon their positions started to trickle down immediately after the upper command made the decision. However, these orders reached the units in a disorganized manner. Many telephone lines had been sabotaged, and when soldiers were sent to relay the orders in person, they faced severe disruptions in the transportation network. Consequently, many units only became aware of the withdrawal when they witnessed the mass movements of their comrades heading westward. Upon realizing what was happening, many soldiers fled in a state of panic. There were no comprehensive plans outlining the retreat, no designated routes for the various units, nor any established timetables. The outcome was a chaotic scramble for survival. Soldiers who had fought side by side for three months suddenly found themselves competing against one another in a desperate race to escape. At bridges and other chokepoints, weary soldiers exhausted their last reserves of strength, brawling with their fellow troops to be the first to cross. Meanwhile, officers traveling in chauffeur-driven cars attempted to assert their rank to gain priority access to the roads, adding to the growing disorder that ensued. The massive army was hindered by its sheer size, resulting in miles of congested roads filled with men unable to move in any direction. This made them easy targets for Japanese aircraft, leading to a bloody cycle of repeated attacks. Planes adorned with the red Rising Sun insignia would emerge from the horizon, swooping down to strike at these vulnerable formations. As commander Chen Yiding recalled “The lack of organization and the gridlocked roads resulted in far more casualties than could have been avoided,”.  On November 12th, the newspaper Zhaongyang Ribao, published an editorial addressing the citizens of Nanjing, to remind them that tough times lay ahead now that Shanghai had fallen. The article stipulated they needed to prepare the city for the upcoming battle,  “Now, all the citizenry of the capital must fulfill their duty in a way that can serve as a model for the entire nation.” Nanjing in 1937 was a city touched by the war, but not enough to change the social fabric just yet. Cinema's remained open, the shopping arcade was crowded as usual, traffic was heavy along Zhongshan Road, order remained. Telephones remained on, except during air raids. Connections to the outside world functioned as they should, given this was the capital. The region had seen a good harvest in 1937, no one was going hungry. However as the front 200 miles away drew closer, bombing raids more frequent, fear of the enemy increased. Contact with the outside world gradually declined. By mid November the train link from Nanjing to Shanghai was severed.  While the fear amongst the populace increased, so did a newfound sense of common purpose against a common enemy. Poster calling for the Chinese to unite against the Japanese invaders were found throughout Nanjing. Residents were conscripted for various fortification efforts, with some receiving basic military training to help defend the city. Those who refused to cooperate faced severe penalties as “traitors,” while the majority willingly participated. Both military and civilian police were deployed throughout the city, diligently checking identities in an ongoing effort to root out spies and traitors. The authorities enforced a strict prohibition against discussing military matters in restaurants and other public venues. Then all the high ranking military officials and politicians families gradually began departing the city in secrecy. This was followed by said politicians and military officials. Twas not a good look. Nanjing soon saw its population decline from 1 million to half a million. Those who stayed behind were mainly the poor, or those anchored, like shopkeepers. Every day saw a steady stream of Nanjing citizens leaving the city over her main roads, fleeing into the countryside with carts full of belongings. On November 12th at 10am orders were issued for the Japanese to advance west. What had been a war of attrition, where inches of land were claimed with blood, suddenly it was a war of movement. As one Japanese soldier recalled “In the course of 50 days, I had moved only two miles. Now suddenly we were experiencing rapid advance”. As the Japanese came across small towns, they found large posters plastered on all the walls. These were all anti-japanese with some nationalist propaganda. The Japanese soldiers would tear them down and paint up their own messages “down with Chiang Kai-Shek!”.  Towns and cities west of Shanghai fell rapidly one after another, each succumbing to a grim pattern: swift conquest followed by widespread devastation. Jiading, a county seat with a population of approximately 30,000, succumbed to a prolonged siege. When the 10st division captured Jiading on November 13, after relentless shelling had leveled a third of the city, they began a massacre, indiscriminately killing nearly everyone in their path, men, women, and children alike. The battle and its aftermath resulted in over 8,000 casualties among the city's residents and surrounding countryside. One Japanese soldier referred to Jiading as “A city of death, in a mysteriously silent world in which the only sound was the tap of our own footsteps”.  On November 14, soldiers from the 9th Division reached Taicang, an ancient walled city designed to withstand lengthy sieges. As they crossed the 70-foot moat amid heavy fire, the Japanese troops confronted the formidable 20-foot-high city wall. After breaching the wall, their infantry swiftly entered the city and seized control. The destruction persisted long after the fighting ceased, with half of the city being devastated, including significant cultural institutions like the library, and salt and grain reserves were looted. It was as if the Japanese aimed to obliterate not just the material existence of the people but their spiritual foundation as well.  Casual cruelty marked the nature of warfare along the entire front, with few prisoners being taken. Ishii Seitaro, a soldier in the 13th Division's 26th Brigade, encountered a mass execution while marching alongside the Yangtze River. Several headless corpses floated nearby, yet three Chinese prisoners remained alive. A Japanese officer, personally overseeing the execution, wore a simple uniform, but the two ornate swords at his belt indicated his wealthy background. Approaching one prisoner, the officer dramatically drew one of the swords and brandished it through the air with exaggerated flair. In an almost theatrical display, he held it aloft, the blade trembling as if he were nervous. The prisoner, in stark contrast, exhibited an unnerving calmness as he knelt, awaiting his inevitable fate. The officer swung the sword down but failed to deliver a clean strike. Although he inflicted a deep gash to the prisoner's skull, it was not fatal. The prisoner collapsed, thrashing and emitting a prolonged scream that sent chills through those present. The officer, seemingly exhilarated by the anguish he caused, began wildly slashing at the figure until the screams subsided. Ishii turned away in horror, his mind swirling with confusion. Why were the Chinese being executed? Had they not surrendered?  Three months into the war's expansion to the Yangtze region, air raids had become an all too frequent menace in Nanjing. The first major raid came on August 15th and increased each week. On the night of August 27, approximately 30 bombs were dropped on Purple Mountain, specifically targeting the Memorial Park for Sun Yat-sen, aiming to hurt the morale of Nanjing's residents. As days melted into weeks and weeks stretched into months, the landscape of Nanjing transformed under the weight of war. Residents began constructing dugouts in courtyards, gardens, public squares, and even on streets. Foreigners painted their national flags on top of buildings and vehicles, attempting to avoid the risk of being machine-gunned by strafing aircraft. Each raid followed a predictable routine: sirens wailed loudly 20 to 30 minutes before the attack, signaling pedestrians to seek shelter and drivers to stop their engines. By the time a shorter warning sounded, the streets had to be cleared, leaving nothing to do but await the arrival of Japanese planes. Initially, the part-US-trained Chinese Air Force posed a considerable threat to Japanese bombers. The 4th and 5th Chinese Squadrons, stationed near Nanjing to defend the capital, achieved early success, reportedly downing six bombers during the first air raid on Nanjing. Much of the credit for these aerial victories belonged to Claire Chennault, a retired American Army Air Corps captain who had become an advisor to the Chinese Air Force, overseeing Nanjing's air defense. Chennault taught his pilots tactics he had developed in the US but had never fully implemented. His strategy was straightforward: three fighters would focus on one enemy bomber at a time. One would attack from above, another from below, while a third would hover in reserve to deliver the final blow if necessary. He instructed the Chinese pilots to target the engines rather than the fuselage, reasoning that any missed shots could hit the gas tanks located in the wing roots. This approach proved successful, leading to the loss of 54 Japanese planes within three days. For Chennault, it validated his belief that air superiority required a diverse range of aircraft, not just bombers. Nighttime raids, however, posed a greater challenge. Chennault, along with other commanders, sought solutions. Chinese General C.C. Wong, a German-trained artillery officer overseeing the country's anti-aircraft defenses, ensured that dozens of large Sperry searchlights were positioned throughout Nanjing in a grid pattern. This setup had a dual purpose: it would dazzle the Japanese bomber crews and highlight their planes in silhouette for Chinese fighters above to target. The bravery of the most skilled Chinese pilots occasionally gained media attention, making them local celebrities amidst an otherwise grim war environment. However, this bright moment faded quickly when the Japanese command decided to provide escorts for their bombers. Consequently, the elite of China's air force, its finest pilots and aircraft, were lost within weeks that fall. All air raids were brutal, but the worst assaults occurred at the end of September. As a radio broadcaster reported on September 25th “Gallons of civilian blood flowed today as Nanking endured three ferocious air raids”. In total, 96 Japanese sorties were launched on that day. Witnesses observed around a dozen Chinese aircraft retreating north across the Yangtze, initially believing they were fleeing, but some returned to confront the enemy. When Chinese fighters managed to down a Japanese bomber, the streets erupted in cheers as civilians momentarily forgot their fear. The primary aim of the September 25 attack appeared to be spreading terror among the civilian population. Chiang Kai-Shek wrote in his diary that day  “The repeated Japanese air raids over the past several days have had no impact on our military installations. Instead, civilian property has sustained significant damage.” Around 20 bombs struck the Central Hospital, one of Nanjing's largest medical facilities, causing extensive destruction and prompting the evacuation of its staff. Two 1,000-pound bombs exploded nearby, leaving large craters. Had these bombs landed slightly closer, they could have resulted in mass casualties among the hospital's 100 patients, including a Japanese pilot who had been shot down earlier that month. The air raids at the end of September prompted protests from the Americans, British, and French governments to Japan. In response, Tokyo issued a statement on September 30, asserting that while they were not intentionally targeting non-combatants, it was “unavoidable” for achieving military objectives that military airfields and installations in and around Nanjing be bombed.   The battle for Jiashan was among the fiercest in the southern Yangtze delta campaign in November 1937. Although Jiashan was a moderately sized town straddling a crucial railway connecting Shanghai to Hangzhou, the capital of Zhejiang province. For the Japanese, seizing Jiashan was imperative for their westward advance; without it, their military progress would be severely hampered. Jiashan had endured three days of relentless bombing by the Japanese Air Force, driving most residents to flee into the surrounding countryside. Only about 100 remained, those who were too old or too sick to escape, abandoned by family or friends who lacked the means to assist them. The Japanese troops brutally bayoneted nearly all of these individuals and buried them in a mass grave just outside the town's northern gate. Jiashan was captured by the 10th Army, a division fresh from victories and eager to engage in combat, unlike the weary forces of the Shanghai Expeditionary Force further north. With less than a week of combat experience, the 10th Army's soldiers were hungry for a fight. The martial spirit of the 10th Army was exemplified by its commander, Yanagawa Heisuke. Born near Nagasaki in 1879, he was among a group of retired officers called back to active service as the war in China escalated unexpectedly. Having served in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905 and taught at the Beijing Army College in 1918, Yanagawa had considerable experience in military affairs. However, his past exposure to China did not cultivate any empathy for the enemy. He was determined to push all the way to Nanjing, and once there, he intended to blanket the city in mustard gas and incendiaries until it capitulated. While Japanese commanders debated the value of capturing Nanjing, the Chinese were equally preoccupied with whether it was worth defending. Most military professionals viewed the situation as a lost cause from the start. After the fall of Shanghai, Chiang Kai-shek summoned one of his top commanders, Chen Cheng, to Nanjing for discussions. “How can Nanjing be held?” Chen Cheng shot back “Are you ordering me to hold Nanjing?” Chiang replied “I am not”. Chen Cheng stated frankly, “I believe Nanjing should not be held at all.” By mid-November, Bai Chongxi, one of China's most respected generals, advocated for declaring Nanjing an open city. He argued that defending it was not only unnecessary but also impossible. All available forces had been deployed to Shanghai and were now exhausted. Furthermore, no reinforcements would be forthcoming if they made a stand in Nanjing. Instead of stubbornly clinging to fixed positions, he preferred a more flexible defensive strategy. Zhang Qun, Chiang's secretary, supported Bai's stance, believing that while Nanjing should ultimately be abandoned, political considerations were paramount. If the Chinese simply withdrew and allowed the Japanese to occupy the city, it would undermine China's position in any future negotiations. The Japanese would not be able to present themselves as victors who had triumphed in battle. Similarly, Chiang's chief military advisor, General Alexander von Falkenhausen, was against attempting to hold Nanjing. He deemed it “useless from a military perspective, suggesting it would be madness.” He warned that if Chiang forced his army into a decisive battle with their backs to the Yangtze River, “a disaster would probably be unavoidable.” Chiang's head of the operations bureau Liu Fei argued Nanjing could not be abandoned without a fight as it would crush the NRA's morale. He believed that defending the city could be managed with as few as 12 regiments, although 18 would be feasible. Most at the meeting agreed and Chiang understood Nanjing's international recognition necessitated some form of defense, doomed or not. A second meeting was formed whereupon, Tang Shengzhi, a general staff officer whose loyalties were, lets be honest very flip floppy. During the warlord era, he routinely switched sides, especially against Chiang Kai-Shek. At the meeting Tang stated in regards to Nanjing's international prominence and being the final resting place of Dr Sun Yat-Sen “How can we face the spirit of the former president in heaven? We have no choice but to defend the capital to the death.” Chiang's commanders were all well aware of his intentions. The generalissimo was eager for a dramatic last stand in Nanjing to serve propaganda purposes, aiming to rally the nation and convey to the world that China was resolute in its fight against Japan. His commanders also recognized the rationale behind fighting for Nanjing; however, very few were inclined to embark on what seemed a likely suicide mission. The third meeting occurred the day after the second. Chiang opened by asking, as many anticipated, “Who is willing to shoulder the burden of defending Nanjing?” An awkward silence followed. Then Tang Shengzhi stepped forward. “Chairman, if no one else is willing, I will. I'm prepared to defend Nanjing and to hold it to the death.” Without hesitation, Chiang accepted his offer. “Good, the responsibility is yours.”A little refresher on Tang, he had played a role in Chiang Kai-shek's efforts to unify China by force in the 1920s, when the nation was a patchwork of fiefdoms. However, their relationship had soured on two occasions, forcing Tang into temporary exile, first to Japan and then to Hong Kong. The Japanese invasion of northeastern China in 1931 prompted a loose reconciliation, and since then, Tang had held several important positions, notably organizing war games simulating a Japanese assault on Nanjing. However Tang had often suffered from illness, and crucially, he had not led troops in the field against the Japanese since the onset of full-scale war that summer. Hailing from Hunan province, he was a typical provincial soldier and would likely face challenges commanding respect among elite divisions loyal solely to the central government in Nanjing. He was definitely not the first choice for such a significant task.  Amazingly, while tens of thousands of Chinese and Japanese were killing each other, while Japanese planes relentlessly bombarded Chinese cities including the capital, and while Japanese soldiers committed heinous atrocities against Chinese civilians, the two nations maintained diplomatic relations. China had a fully operational embassy in Tokyo, led by Xu Shiying, a 65-year-old diplomat. This surreal arrangement persisted because neither side was willing to officially declare war. In the fall of 1937, as Japanese armies were heavily engaged on two fronts within mainland China, Xu met with Japanese Foreign Minister Hirota Koki to propose a non-aggression treaty. The proposal was swiftly rejected in Nanjing. By November 1937, Xu was no longer at the forefront of events, and foreign observers shifted their focus from the capitals of the warring nations to Belgium. While large-scale battles raged along the lower Yangtze, representatives from 19 countries convened in Brussels to search for a way to end hostilities. Although China participated in the conference, Japan did not. Japan had received two invitations to join the talks, with its response to the second arriving in Brussels on November 12: a firm rejection. Japan asserted that it preferred direct bilateral negotiations with China, dismissing the Brussels conference held under the auspices of the Nine-Power Treaty, a pact signed in 1922 aimed at ensuring China's national sovereignty and territorial integrity. Japan argued that intervention by a collective body like the conference “would merely stir national sentiments in both countries and complicate efforts to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution.” The League of Nations had called for a Nine-Power conference a month earlier, which ultimately became a 19-power conference as other nations with interests in East Asia joined. From the outset, Japan opposed the assembly and was absent when the first plenary meeting commenced in Brussels on November 3. Japanese leaders feared that China might attempt to leverage the conference against Western powers, recalling how, in 1895, Japan had been denied its spoils following its first modern war with China due to the intervention of Russia, France, and Germany, who blocked Japan from claiming the strategic Liaodong Peninsula adjacent to Korea. China also exhibited a lukewarm attitude toward the conference. While Japan feared the potential outcomes, China was concerned about the lack of significant results. The proposal to transition discussions from the League of Nations, perceived as ineffective, to the even less authoritative Nine Powers, which lacked formal organization. Nonetheless, the Chinese chose to participate in Brussels, maintaining the pretense that something meaningful could be accomplished. Shortly after Japan's second rejection of the invitation, Wellington Koo made an impassioned plea in Brussels, stating, “Now that the door to conciliation and mediation has been slammed in your face by the latest reply of the Japanese Government, will you not decide to withhold supplies of war materials and credit to Japan and extend aid to China?” In reality, Koo understood that significant Western aid to China was highly unlikely, aside from token gestures. Previous international discussions had momentarily halted Japanese advances in the past; for instance, in 1932, Japanese troops had paused their movements in the Shanghai area just hours before the League of Nations General Assembly commenced. However, that was nearly six years earlier, and circumstances had changed dramatically since then. Rogue states had grown bolder, while democracies seemed increasingly timid. Thus, the Chinese agenda in Brussels was not primarily driven by hopes for substantial Western concessions. Instead, the delegates had been tasked by Nanjing to anticipate the post-conference landscape and to actively seek ways to encourage Europe and America to support Soviet military action against Japan.   China, long reliant on Germany as a diplomatic partner, increasingly felt betrayed, not just by Germany, but also by its fascist ally, Italy. Consequently, it began looking more favorably upon the Soviet Union, Japan's archrival in Northeast Asia, as its main source of international support. The Soviet Union exhibited a firmer stance than the Western democracies at the Brussels conference, joining China in advocating for collective security in Europe and Asia. On November 15th, a small group of officers from the 10th Army gathered for late-night discussions in an abandoned building north of Hangzhou Bay, where they would effectively decide the fate of China. Yanagawa Heisuke, the commander of the 10th Army, presided over the discussions. Fresh from the battlefield since the beginning of the month, he was eager to escalate the fight, a sentiment echoed among the others. It was an unusual meeting, where officers as low in rank as major were making decisions typically reserved for the highest echelons of political power. The agenda included a pivotal question: Should they adhere to Order No. 600 received from Tokyo a week prior, which instructed them to halt their advance along a line from Suzhou to Jiaxing? Or, should they disregard these explicit orders and push forward to seize Nanjing? While the Japanese Army had failed to completely annihilate the Chinese forces around Shanghai, there was a consensus that their adversary was now reeling from recent setbacks, presenting an opportune moment to strike decisively and secure a swift victory. The only remaining question was how aggressively to pursue this goal. Colonel Terada Masao, a senior staff officer within the 10th Army, spoke first. “The Chinese Army is currently retreating toward the capital. We should cross that line and pursue the enemy straight to Nanjing.” Major Iketani Hanjiro, a staff officer recently attached to the fast-moving 6th Division, then offered his input “From a tactical perspective, I completely agree with Terada that we should cross the line, but the decision to attack Nanjing should be considered not just tactically, but also politically. It's not that field commanders can't create a fait accompli to pressure our superiors in Tokyo. However, we must proceed with great caution”. A staff officer raised this question  “What if Tokyo orders us to pull back those smaller units?” Iketani responded “In that case, we will, of course, withdraw them to this side of the line”. Ultimately, Iketani's cautions were set aside, and Terada's aggressive approach prevailed. The majority agreed that the tactical circumstances presented a rare opportunity. Japanese troops in the Shanghai area were poised to advance west, not through small, individual skirmishes but with a substantial deployment of their forces. Officers estimated that if a decisive push was made immediately, Nanjing could fall into Japanese hands within 20 days. However Colonel Kawabe Torashiro, the newly appointed chief of the Army General Staff's Operations Section suddenly arrived at the theater. He was sent on a mission to assess whether the Central China Area Army should be granted greater operational freedom. It was well known in Tokyo that field officers were eager to capitalize on the momentum created by the collapse of Chinese defenses around Shanghai. Kawabe's task was to explore the possibility of allowing forces to cross the line from Suzhou to Jiaxing and move westward in pursuit of the retreating enemy. However, Kawabe was staunchly opposed to further military adventures in China. Kawabe was part of the dwindling faction of "China doves" within the Japanese military. As early as the summer of 1937, he had become alarmed by a letter from a civilian Japanese visitor to the Chinese mainland, warning that Japanese officers were attempting to engineer an “incident” with China to provoke open conflict. This would provide Japan with a pretext to expand its influence in northern China. Kawabe had attempted to alert his superiors, but his warnings fell on deaf ears. They had been lulled into a false sense of security by reports from China that dismissed all talk of war-mongering as baseless and alarmist. When he arrived to the front he stated “I am here to inspect conditions on the ground so that a final decision can be made on where to establish the operational restriction line”. Alongside him came General Akira Muto, recently appointed the commander of the Central China Area Army. He also happened to be one of the architects of the Marco Polo Bridge Incident. Muto responded promptly: “The line currently stretches from Suzhou to Jiaxing, but we should consider crossing it. This will help us achieve our overall objectives in the theater.” Muto continued, arguing that the 10th Army should be permitted to advance to Huzhou, south of Lake Tai, effectively cutting off communications between Nanjing and the strategic city of Hangzhou. He further claimed that the Shanghai Expeditionary Force should be allowed to capture the vital city of Jiangyin, suggesting, perhaps overly optimistically, that its loss could lead to the fall of Chiang Kai-shek. Ultimately, Muto insisted, Nanjing should also be seized, which he asserted would bring an end to the war. Kawabe listened patiently, a practice he would repeat in the following days as other field officers echoed similar sentiments, eagerly expressing their desire to advance all the way to Nanjing. Yanagawa and his 10th Army exemplified this aggressive mindset. Nevertheless, just as the hawks within the Japanese military and the nation's political leadership appeared to be prevailing in the struggle over China policy, they faced unexpected challenges from a different direction. Germany, a power with ambiguous sympathies in East Asia, was quietly engaged in negotiations aimed at bringing peace. Oskar Trautmann, Germany's ambassador to China, had maintained an objective and neutral stance when he met with Chiang Kai-shek in early November to relay Japan's conditions for initiating peace talks. These conditions included extensive concessions in northern China, such as the withdrawal of all Chinese troops to a line south of Beijing and the establishment of a pro-Japanese regime in Inner Mongolia, bordering the Soviet-controlled Mongolian People's Republic. Chiang dismissed these demands outright, but Trautmann and his superiors in Beijing continued their top-secret efforts. Germany's motivation for seeking an end to the Sino-Japanese War was not rooted in a genuine love for peace, but rather in their embarrassment over witnessing their old Asian ally, China, fighting against their new partner, Japan. Herman Göring, president of the Reichstag and a leading figure in the Nazi party, told a Chinese visitor, “China and Japan are both friends of Germany. The Sino-Japanese War has put Germany between Scylla and Charybdis. That's why Germany is ready to seize the chance to become a mediator.” Germany also feared that a prolonged conflict in China could jeopardize its commercial interests in East Asia and weaken Japan's capacity to confront the Soviet Union, potentially freeing Moscow to allocate more resources to a fight in Europe. In essence, continued hostilities could significantly harm Germany. Japanese field commanders were frustrated by Germany's mediation efforts.  When news of Trautmann's mission leaked, the German diplomat faced severe criticism in the Chinese media, which deemed any negotiation with the "Japanese devils" unacceptable. Additionally, there was the matter of China's ties with the Soviet Union; employing a German mediator raised the possibility of cooperation among China, Japan, and Germany, potentially expanding the anti-Soviet bloc, which would, in turn, pressure Moscow to increase its support for China. By mid-November, however, the complexities of this diplomatic game started unraveling and then Japan took action. At 7:00 am on November 19, Yanagawa issued instructions to his troops in the field. “The enemy's command system is in disarray, and a mood of defeat has descended over their entire army. They have lost the will to fight. The main Chinese forces were retreating west of the line stretching from Suzhou to Jiaxing, and this withdrawal was soon likely to spiral into a full-scale retreat. We must not miss the opportunity to pursue the enemy to Nanjing.” I would like to take this time to remind you all that this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Please go subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry after that, give my personal channel a look over at The Pacific War Channel at Youtube, it would mean a lot to me. Shanghai had fallen, and the Japanese forces pursued their fleeing enemy further west. However they had orders to halt, but would they? Officers from top down deliberating on the issue, with the vast majority pushing for a drive to Nanjing. They thought it represented the end objective of the conflict. They would all be very wrong. 

“No tax on tips” is a provision in President Trump’s new tax-and-spending bill that promises a tax break for tipped workers. But nearly 40% of these workers don’t earn enough to pay federal income tax and won’t directly benefit from the policy. In his latest piece for the New Yorker, contributing writer Eyal Press explains how the “no tax on tips” proposal originally came from the National Restaurant Association — known to some labor advocates as “the other NRA” — a powerful industry lobby that has long fought against raising wages. Press spoke with Apple News In Conversation host Shumita Basu about how the association has shaped labor laws behind the scenes, and why a policy that looks like a win for workers might actually serve their bosses instead.

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various aspects of the firearms industry, including concerns about its health, market dynamics, and the demographics of gun buyers. He engages with Lee the Gunwriter Williams on topics such as Washington State's gun legislation and the potential impact of Supreme Court decisions on gun rights. The conversation emphasizes the importance of supporting gun rights organizations and staying informed about legislative changes. Takeaways The firearms industry is currently experiencing a slowdown in sales, but it is not in crisis. Consumer behavior is influenced by political climate and fears of future legislation. Demographics of gun buyers are changing, with more women and minorities entering the market. Many new gun buyers may not become repeat customers due to their initial motivations for purchasing firearms. Washington State's gun laws are under scrutiny, with ongoing legal battles over magazine capacity restrictions. The Supreme Court's decisions will significantly impact gun rights and legislation across the country. Gun rights organizations are becoming more unified in their efforts to protect the Second Amendment. The market will eventually stabilize, leading to lower prices for consumers. Innovation in the firearms industry is crucial for survival during economic downturns. Support for gun rights organizations is essential for maintaining freedoms. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, firearms industry, market dynamics, gun buyers, Washington State, Supreme Court, Second Amendment, legislation, NRA  

Truth Be Told with Booker Scott – New York Attorney General Letitia “Big Tish” James faces intense scrutiny as a grand jury probes her actions against Donald Trump. Subpoenas link her to alleged mortgage fraud and investigations into the NRA. Critics point to political motives, highlighting contradictions between her sworn statements and accusations she makes against others in high-profile legal battles...

Riding Shotgun With Charlie #235 Evered Douglas, Yasuke Fett Black Powder Podcast   At SHOT Show 2025, I met Evered in passing. I was doing a show, someone slipped his card into my pocket, and said reach out to this man. We started following each other on the socials. At NRA AM, we had a chance to film a show.    Evered didn't get into firearms until he was a father and going through a divorce. He realized that the layout of his place wasn't necessarily the safest. There was potential for some he said/she said going on. So it was time to pursue getting a carry permit in Georgia.    His first purchase was a Mossberg 88 shotgun. Maybe not the best choice, but we all start somewhere. We've all been “tactically frugal.” He said he went all “Amazon tactical” buying things like a scope and a light to put on the gun. He admits “this is why you got to research and study.” His first trip to the range with the Mossy was a bit embarrassing. He wasn't sure how to hold it so he ended up putting it under his armpit.    This is how he started down the rabbit hole to see that rights are being taken away from us. His taste in gear has also matured since then, too. He moved to a Canick and a Ruger handguns.   One of the goals that Evered has is to become an instructor. After his divorce, things were tough. His daughter was only 6 months old when that happened. He wasn't getting enough time with her.  But  he's looking into getting certified by either the NRA, the USCCA, or by NAAGA. He has been helping some friends get into firearms and helping them along their journey.  Taking other courses as a student has helped him get through the hard times that affect divorced people.    Georgia is a permitless carry state, but they still issue permits. Back when Evered was getting started on his firearm journey, he still needed to get a permit and there was a learning curve for that, too.    The Black Powder Podcast is mainly focused on black society and firearms. He takes the name from a cartridge. The fans are the powder. The bullet is the message he's putting out. He ignites the fans to get the message out. He dropped his first episode on Sept 11, 2020 as a reminder of how we all came together as a country.  It was a good year for new beginnings with all that was going on. And thus, a good time to get the new gun owners from 2020 into the fold and learn about firearms, safety, and how and when to use them. Since SHOT Show, he's gone from just an audio podcast to adding video, which he drops on Mondays.    Before Black Powder Podcast, he was doing Warbound Radio. It was more towards video gaming. But he plans on rebranding that and bringing it back as a men's positivity podcast. Going through his divorce, he became much more aware how the family court system leans toward the mothers and not the fathers.    This past year was Evered's first year at SHOT. A friend helped him get in. He's working on a lot of things and I think he's really getting his message out. He's got the Black Powder Podcast and YouTube channel. He's working to become an instructor. And he's working to reach more people in the community.  Favorite quotes: “You realize how many rights and how much stuff they're doing to take stuff away from you.” “If you can't walk it and talk it or line it up and shoot it, why are you even doing it in the first place.” “It was getting me active again, getting all that stupid depression crap off my back.” “The primer is hit, the power is lit.” “Any time you act out of fear, it doesn't end well.”   Black Powder Podcast https://blackpowderpodcast.com/   Facebook https://www.facebook.com/blackpowderpodcast/   YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@blackpowderpodcast   Instagram https://www.instagram.com/blackpowderpodcast Second Amendment Foundation https://secure.anedot.com/saf/donate?sc=RidingShotgun    Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms https://www.ccrkba.org/     Please support the Riding Shotgun With Charlie sponsors and supporters.    Self Defense Radio Network http://sdrn.us/   US Law Shield Legal Defense for Self Defense. Use "RSWC" as the discount code and get 2 months for free! https://www.uslawshield.com/   Patriot Mobile Use this link and get one month for free! https://patriotmobile.com/partners/rswc   Or listen on: iTunes/Apple podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/riding-shotgun-with-charlie/id1275691565

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, Mark Walters discusses various topics including the challenges of producing a radio show, the implications of recent discussions about extraterrestrial probes, and the flawed logic surrounding gun control in light of recent violent incidents. The conversation also touches on the role of the NRA in advocating for gun rights, the crime rates in Democrat-run cities, and the NFL's new stance on security measures. The episode concludes with reflections on the current state of the firearms industry and the importance of community support for gun rights. Takeaways The production of a radio show involves significant behind-the-scenes work. Recent discussions suggest the possibility of intelligent extraterrestrial probes. The flawed logic of gun control is highlighted by incidents involving knives. A good guy with a gun can effectively stop a violent attack. The NRA plays a crucial role in advocating for gun rights. Crime rates in Democrat-run cities continue to rise despite gun control measures. The NFL is now recognizing the need for armed security at events. Community support is essential for the health of the firearms industry. The narrative around gun violence often ignores the role of the individual perpetrator. There is a growing awareness of the need for self-defense among citizens. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, NRA, extraterrestrial, knife violence, crime rates, NFL, gun control, Andy Hoosier, Mark Walters  

After Congress slashed the National Firearms Act (NFA) tax on silencers and short-barreled firearms, nearly every gun-rights group in the country promised to sue in an effort to overturn those sections of the law outright. Now, a few weeks later, those groups have nearly all sorted into two coalitions, and they've both filed suit. One coalition, led by Gun Owners of America (GOA), filed in the Fifth Circuit. Another, led by the National Rifle Association (NRA), filed in the Eighth Circuit. To analyze the arguments of each case, we've got independent gun-rights lawyer Matt Larosiere on the show. He's brought both tax power and Second Amendment challenges against the NFA before. So, he has direct experience with the claims at issue in both cases. Larosiere said he is on board with the logic behind the GOA and NRA lawsuits, but he argued they face a difficult climb to achieve their goals. He said tax challenges are more complex than most people imagine, and it can be difficult for Second Amendment attorneys to navigate the waters of a successful pleading. He said the Second Amendment claim in the NRA case may have an easier path, but noted it wasn't a new tactic and has failed in the past. Special Guest: Matt Larosiere.

Alastair is joined by historian and co-host of Goalhanger's Journey Through Time, Sarah Churchwell, to discuss their new series on the History of The National Rifle Association.  How did The National Rifle Association go from a sportsman's organisation set up to improve marksmanship following the civil war to a for-profit group fighting gun regulation?  Why did a convicted killer become one of the most influential figures in modern gun politics? How did the NRA gain so much control over the American President and the Supreme Court? Listen to David Olusoga and Sarah Churchwell on Journey Through Time to get the full story.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

John Commerford, Executive Director of the NRA-ILA and Chairman of the NRA Political Victory Fund, joins the show to break down two critical Second Amendment battles the NRA is currently fighting. From courtroom showdowns to legislative standoffs, Commerford explains what's at stake for gun owners across America and why now is the time to stand firm.

Send us a textJoin host Jeff Dowdle in this explosive episode of Live to Shoot - Defending the 2nd Amendment as we dive into the groundbreaking lawsuit challenging the National Firearms Act (NFA) and its suppressor registration requirements. With the $200 tax stamp eliminated thanks to the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," gun owners are still burdened by ATF red tape. We break down the history of the NFA, introduce the key players like the NRA, ASA, and GOA, and explore the main legal arguments aiming to strike down registration entirely. Tune in for a passionate defense of your Second Amendment rights and learn how you can join the fight!saf.orgsubscribe to my newsletterFollow this link and get $25 in ammo.Fountain Podcast AppFollow me on FountainFollow twitter @JeffDowdleFollow me on Truth Social - @JeffDowdleConvention of States ProjectPresearch search engine sign up.Brave BrowserFind our Representativeemail me at jeff@livetoshoot.comSupport the showSupport the show

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics related to gun rights, including the role of the ATF in gun trafficking, the implications of background checks at gun shows, concerns surrounding the SIG P320 firearm, and the current initiatives of the NRA. The conversation also touches on the advocacy of Manuel Oliver, a father of a Parkland shooting victim, and the broader implications of gun control discussions. Takeaways Mark Walters emphasizes the importance of the NRA in defending gun rights. The ATF's recent actions against gun trafficking are discussed, highlighting their effectiveness. Concerns are raised about the legality and ethics of background checks at gun shows. The SIG P320's safety issues are a major concern for gun owners. The NRA is currently more active in legal battles than in previous years. Manuel Oliver's advocacy for gun control is met with criticism from gun rights supporters. The importance of personal responsibility in gun ownership is emphasized. The conversation highlights the need for open dialogue about gun rights and safety. Mark Walters encourages listeners to support organizations that defend their rights. The episode underscores the emotional weight of gun violence and its impact on families. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, ATF, gun shows, background checks, SIG P320, NRA, Manuel Oliver, gun control  

Ryan Wrecker and Kim welcome Mark Walters, host of Armed American Radio and a Talkers Heavy 100 honoree, to discuss a landmark lawsuit challenging the 1934 National Firearms Act. Mark breaks down how recent legislative changes stripping the $200 tax stamp render the NFA unconstitutional, sparking a legal battle led by gun rights groups. The trio dive into the ongoing debate about the ATF's role, expressing skepticism about its future and concerns over its power under different administrations. The conversation touches on gun culture shifts, social media's impact, and the absurdity of gun-related restrictions, all with a light-hearted tone sprinkled with ideas like gun vending machines and claw machines. The segment closes with a shoutout to the NRA and Mark's radio show.

Summary The conversation covers various aspects of gun control, including legal challenges to existing laws, corruption in gun buyback programs, and the importance of the Second Amendment. The speakers discuss recent lawsuits, notable incidents involving firearms, and the societal implications of gun control measures. They emphasize the need for vigilance and the role of the NRA in advocating for gun rights. In this conversation, Mark Walters and his guests discuss the complexities of gun control, urban safety, and the consequences of liberal policies on crime rates. They explore the illusion of safety in urban environments, the need for accountability in government, and the nature of evil in relation to gun violence. The discussion emphasizes the importance of self-defense and the rights of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves against tyranny. Takeaways Gun control laws do not necessarily lead to increased safety. Corruption can undermine public trust in law enforcement and gun buyback programs. Legal challenges to gun control are gaining momentum in various states. The Second Amendment is crucial for protecting individual freedoms. Public perception of gun ownership is often influenced by media and government messaging. The NRA is actively working with other organizations to restore gun rights. Corruption in police departments can lead to tragic outcomes involving firearms. The importance of being prepared for potential threats is emphasized. Programming and societal beliefs can create a false sense of security regarding gun laws. The people must remain vigilant to protect their rights against government overreach. The perception of safety in urban areas often relies on the presence of law enforcement, which may be inadequate. Liberal policies can lead to increased crime rates and a lack of accountability for criminal behavior. Government should be held accountable for failing to protect citizens and for policies that enable crime. Evil will always exist, and laws cannot prevent it; personal responsibility is key. Self-defense is a fundamental right that should not be infringed upon by government regulations. The left often ignores the reality of evil and its implications for public safety. Citizens must be empowered to defend themselves against threats, including from their own government. The Second Amendment is designed to ensure that citizens can resist tyranny. Political discourse around gun control often fails to address the root causes of violence. The future of gun rights in America hinges on the ability to hold politicians accountable for their actions. Keywords gun control, Second Amendment, legal challenges, corruption, gun buyback, Philadelphia, Mark McCloskey, Denzel Perryman, programming, perception, gun control, urban safety, liberal policies, accountability, self-defense, crime rates, New York City, mental health, Second Amendment, political discourse  

Summary The conversation covers various aspects of gun control, including legal challenges to existing laws, corruption in gun buyback programs, and the importance of the Second Amendment. The speakers discuss recent lawsuits, notable incidents involving firearms, and the societal implications of gun control measures. They emphasize the need for vigilance and the role of the NRA in advocating for gun rights. In this conversation, Mark Walters and his guests discuss the complexities of gun control, urban safety, and the consequences of liberal policies on crime rates. They explore the illusion of safety in urban environments, the need for accountability in government, and the nature of evil in relation to gun violence. The discussion emphasizes the importance of self-defense and the rights of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves against tyranny. Takeaways Gun control laws do not necessarily lead to increased safety. Corruption can undermine public trust in law enforcement and gun buyback programs. Legal challenges to gun control are gaining momentum in various states. The Second Amendment is crucial for protecting individual freedoms. Public perception of gun ownership is often influenced by media and government messaging. The NRA is actively working with other organizations to restore gun rights. Corruption in police departments can lead to tragic outcomes involving firearms. The importance of being prepared for potential threats is emphasized. Programming and societal beliefs can create a false sense of security regarding gun laws. The people must remain vigilant to protect their rights against government overreach. The perception of safety in urban areas often relies on the presence of law enforcement, which may be inadequate. Liberal policies can lead to increased crime rates and a lack of accountability for criminal behavior. Government should be held accountable for failing to protect citizens and for policies that enable crime. Evil will always exist, and laws cannot prevent it; personal responsibility is key. Self-defense is a fundamental right that should not be infringed upon by government regulations. The left often ignores the reality of evil and its implications for public safety. Citizens must be empowered to defend themselves against threats, including from their own government. The Second Amendment is designed to ensure that citizens can resist tyranny. Political discourse around gun control often fails to address the root causes of violence. The future of gun rights in America hinges on the ability to hold politicians accountable for their actions. Keywords gun control, Second Amendment, legal challenges, corruption, gun buyback, Philadelphia, Mark McCloskey, Denzel Perryman, programming, perception, gun control, urban safety, liberal policies, accountability, self-defense, crime rates, New York City, mental health, Second Amendment, political discourse  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses a variety of topics including UFOs, political maneuvering in Texas, and the role of the NRA in gun rights. The conversation highlights the current political dynamics, the importance of government transparency, and the future of gun rights in America. Mark emphasizes the need for unity among conservatives and the significance of supporting organizations like the NRA to protect Second Amendment rights. Takeaways Mark Walters emphasizes the importance of freedom and the fight against those who oppose it. The discussion on UFOs reveals a growing interest in government transparency regarding unidentified aerial phenomena. Political maneuvering in Texas showcases the lengths to which Democrats will go to avoid accountability. The NRA plays a crucial role in advocating for gun rights and needs support from its members. The current political landscape shows a significant shift towards conservative values, especially in Texas. Mark believes that the Democrats are losing their grip on power due to their extreme leftward shift. The importance of unity among conservatives is highlighted as essential for future victories. The conversation touches on the historical significance of the current pro-gun administration. Mark expresses optimism about the future of gun rights in America. The transition from information to transparency is crucial for holding politicians accountable. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, UFOs, Texas politics, NRA, political dynamics, government transparency, conservative voice, Mark Walters, Andy Hoosier  

Summary The conversation covers various aspects of gun control, including legal challenges to existing laws, corruption in gun buyback programs, and the importance of the Second Amendment. The speakers discuss recent lawsuits, notable incidents involving firearms, and the societal implications of gun control measures. They emphasize the need for vigilance and the role of the NRA in advocating for gun rights. In this conversation, Mark Walters and his guests discuss the complexities of gun control, urban safety, and the consequences of liberal policies on crime rates. They explore the illusion of safety in urban environments, the need for accountability in government, and the nature of evil in relation to gun violence. The discussion emphasizes the importance of self-defense and the rights of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves against tyranny. Takeaways Gun control laws do not necessarily lead to increased safety. Corruption can undermine public trust in law enforcement and gun buyback programs. Legal challenges to gun control are gaining momentum in various states. The Second Amendment is crucial for protecting individual freedoms. Public perception of gun ownership is often influenced by media and government messaging. The NRA is actively working with other organizations to restore gun rights. Corruption in police departments can lead to tragic outcomes involving firearms. The importance of being prepared for potential threats is emphasized. Programming and societal beliefs can create a false sense of security regarding gun laws. The people must remain vigilant to protect their rights against government overreach. The perception of safety in urban areas often relies on the presence of law enforcement, which may be inadequate. Liberal policies can lead to increased crime rates and a lack of accountability for criminal behavior. Government should be held accountable for failing to protect citizens and for policies that enable crime. Evil will always exist, and laws cannot prevent it; personal responsibility is key. Self-defense is a fundamental right that should not be infringed upon by government regulations. The left often ignores the reality of evil and its implications for public safety. Citizens must be empowered to defend themselves against threats, including from their own government. The Second Amendment is designed to ensure that citizens can resist tyranny. Political discourse around gun control often fails to address the root causes of violence. The future of gun rights in America hinges on the ability to hold politicians accountable for their actions. Keywords gun control, Second Amendment, legal challenges, corruption, gun buyback, Philadelphia, Mark McCloskey, Denzel Perryman, programming, perception, gun control, urban safety, liberal policies, accountability, self-defense, crime rates, New York City, mental health, Second Amendment, political discourse  

Last time we spoke about the battle along the Wusong Creek. The situation was dire for the Chinese defenders, who faced overwhelming odds. Among them was Ogishima, a Japanese soldier who experienced the brutal reality of war firsthand. Amidst the chaos, battles erupted along the Wusong Creek, where both sides suffered heavy casualties. Chinese forces, despite being greatly outnumbered in terms of tactical superiority, demonstrated extraordinary resilience, fighting bravely even when retreat was necessary. As the battle raged on, tactics evolved; Chinese troops fortified defenses and implemented guerrilla warfare strategies. The soldiers transformed the landscape into a fortification, turning abandoned buildings into strongholds. October brought a fresh wave of violence. The Japanese pressed their attack, unleashing superior firepower that gradually saw them conquer Dachang.    #161 The Battle of Shanghai #6: the 800 heroes who defended the Sihang Warehouse Welcome to the Fall and Rise of China Podcast, I am your dutiful host Craig Watson. But, before we start I want to also remind you this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Perhaps you want to learn more about the history of Asia? Kings and Generals have an assortment of episodes on history of asia and much more  so go give them a look over on Youtube. So please subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry for some more history related content, over on my channel, the Pacific War Channel where I cover the history of China and Japan from the 19th century until the end of the Pacific War. Before the fall of Dachang, despite the threat of court-martial for anyone abandoning their posts, a general withdrawal of all Chinese forces in the Jiangwan salient was already in progress. As early as the night between October 24 and 25, the divisions within the salient had been ordered to move their baggage trains and support services back southwest across Suzhou Creek, utilizing the Zhongshan Bridge and Jessfield Railway Bridge. As the fighting intensified north of Zhabei in the subsequent days, the flow of soldiers, vehicles, and pack animals continued. By the night between October 26 and 27, the Chinese completely vacated metropolitan Shanghai north of Suzhou Creek. A foreign journalist wrot “The enormous Chinese army simply melted away and at dawn the Japanese found themselves facing empty positions. The two armies were no longer in contact.” During their retreat from Zhabei, the Chinese systematically set fire to thousands of shops and homes, implementing a scorched earth policy. At 7:00 am on October 27, eight narrow columns of smoke cut across the horizon from one end of Zhabei to the other. Two hours later, these columns had transformed into “huge black pillars stretching towards the azure sky.” By afternoon, a massive wall of smoke stretched four miles long, rising thousands of feet into the air. In the words of a German advisor, it was a fire “of unimaginable extent” that raged out of control for several days, repeatedly threatening to spill into the International Settlement. Refugees who had left Zhabei weeks or months earlier, hoping to return now that the fighting seemed to be over, were devastated to see their homes consumed by an immense sea of flames. The Japanese Army, or more specifically the doctrine guiding it in the field, failed in two significant ways by allowing some of China's best divisions to escape the trap they had set for them. First, on the evening of October 26, after taking Dachang, the Japanese columns could have advanced across Zhabei right to the edge of the International Settlement. Instead, they followed orders and ceased their advance at the line they had reached at sunset. German advisor Borchardt wrote “The only explanation for this is the lack of independent thinking among junior Japanese commanders and their fear of deviating even slightly from a meticulously detailed attack plan.  Since the Japanese focused on rallying and reorganizing their forces after the fall of Dachang, they missed an opportunity for a victory so decisive that the Chinese would have been forced to give up their continued resistance in Shanghai.” If the Japanese made their first mistake by leaving a door open for the enemy to escape, they committed a second error by failing to notice that the enemy was using that door. Although Japanese reconnaissance planes monitored the two main bridges utilized by the Chinese to retreat and even deployed parachute flares to detect movements at night, they inexplicably failed to observe the Chinese withdrawal. The retreat was executed precisely as planned, with every piece of artillery withdrawn. This allowed the Chinese to occupy prepared positions south of Suzhou Creek and around Nanxiang, enabling them to continue the fight another day. Despite their missteps, the Japanese initially celebrated their conquest of Zhabei as a victory, placing thousands of small Rising Sun flags throughout the district's ruins. Amid this sea of white and red, the only relatively intact structure, the Four Banks' Warehouse, starkly reminded them that the Chinese still maintained a foothold north of Suzhou Creek. Rumors began to circulate that the soldiers inside had vowed to fight to the death. The Japanese came to realize that their triumph in Zhabei would be perceived as flawed and would even resemble a defeat as long as the warehouse remained in Chinese hands. It was back on October 26, Chiang Kai-shek ordered all forces in Shanghai to withdraw to the western rural region. To facilitate a safe retreat, a rearguard was necessary, as is standard in military withdrawals. Chiang issued orders to General Gu Zhutong, the acting commander of the 3rd Military Region, to leave the 88th Division behind, not only to buy time for the retreating forces but also to stage a final grand stand in front of the Shanghai International Settlement. This was a last-ditch effort to gain international support, as the nine Great Powers were set to convene on November 6. However, General Gu Zhutong was personally attached to the 88th Division, and thus reluctant to abandon them. It's worth noting that he was acting commander in this position because his next post was to lead the 88th Division. Therefore, he telegrammed the divisional commander at the time, General Sun Yuanliang, who also opposed the plan to leave the 88th Division behind. While neither Gu Zhutong nor Sun Yuanliang were willing to disobey orders from the Generalissimo, Sun proposed a solution: They could leave a portion of the troops behind, just not the entire 88th Division. In his words, “How many people we sacrifice would not make a difference; it would achieve the same purpose.” Sun suggested leaving behind a single regiment from the 88th Division to defend one or two heavily fortified positions. Gu Zhutong agreed to this plan, and at that time, the 88th Divisional Headquarters was located at the Sihang Warehouse. The Sihang Warehouse is a six-story concrete building situated in the Zhabei district, just north of Suzhou Creek, at the northwestern edge of the New Lese Bridge. The warehouse was constructed collaboratively by four banks, hence the name "Sihang," which translates to "four banks." Directly across Suzhou Creek lies the Shanghai International Settlement, a neutral territory where Western foreigners resided. The fighting would occur literally just across the creek, forcing Western observers to witness the heroic last stand that China would make in Shanghai up close. For those who might not be aware, there is an outstanding film titled “The Eight Hundred.” I even reviewed the movie on my channel, the Pacific War Channel, on YouTube. The film excellently captures the remarkable situation, depicting an extravagant city on one side of a river, filled with entertainment, casinos, bars, and restaurants. The international community enjoys their vibrant lives, full of colors and lights, while on the other side lies a literal warzone. The Sihang Warehouse stands there, bullet-ridden, as the Japanese continuously attempt to storm it against the Chinese defenders. It's a compelling film worth checking out, feel free to take a look at my review as well! Returning to the story, Sun Yuanliang reconsidered and believed that leaving an entire regiment was excessive. Instead, he opted to leave behind an over-strength battalion. The 1st Battalion of the 524th Regiment was chosen for this task. A young colonel, Xie Jinyuan, who was also new to the 88th Division, volunteered to lead the battalion. No one who had met Xie Jinyuan could doubt that he was the ideal choice to lead the battalion that would stay behind, holed up inside the Sihang Warehouse in a corner of Zhabei, demonstrating to both the domestic and international audience that China remained resolute in its resistance against Japanese aggression. The 32-year-old graduate of the elite Central Military Academy, who had been stationed in Shanghai with the 88th Division since hostilities began in August, was a soldier to the core. He stood as straight as a bayonet, and according to a foreign correspondent who met him, even while wearing a mask, he was unmistakably a military man. In the correspondent's words, he represented “modern China stripped for action.” Upon receiving his assignment on the night of October 26, Xie Jinyuan went directly to the warehouse and was pleased with what he found. It resembled a virtual fortress. Each of its walls was pockmarked with numerous rifle slots, ensuring that attacking infantry would face a barrage of fire from the building's well-defended positions. It was evident that once the Japanese arrived, they would surround the structure on three sides; however, a link remained to the International Settlement to the south across Lese Bridge. British forward positions were as close as 40 feet away, and with careful maneuvering and a bit of luck, it was likely that the injured could be evacuated under the cover of darkness. From a tactical standpoint, it was an ideal location.   Still, improvements were possible, and Xie ordered the soldiers already present to work through the night to enhance their defenses. They had an ample supply of large bags filled with wheat and corn at their disposal, which served as excellent substitutes for sandbags. Xie Jinyuan's first challenge was to rally the soldiers of the 524th Regiment's 1st Battalion to occupy the warehouse positions. This was a complex task, given the short notice, as the companies and platoons were scattered throughout Zhabei, and some had unknowingly begun moving west with the rest of the Chinese Army, unaware of the orders their battalion had received. Throughout the night, Xie and his second-in-command, Yang Ruifu, dispatched orderlies through the blazing streets in search of their men amidst the throng of retreating soldiers. Eventually, their efforts bore fruit. By 9:00 a.m. on October 27, the last remaining soldiers of the battalion arrived at the warehouse. By then, Xie Jinyuan's force consisted of just over 400 officers and soldiers. This was a minuscule number compared to the might of the Japanese military, and they were immediately put to the test. Xie was unfamiliar with the men under his command, effectively being thrown into the deep end, so to speak. The location chosen for their stand was, of course, the Sihang Warehouse. The 1st Battalion originally comprised eight hundred men, but casualties incurred during the Battle of Shanghai had reduced their numbers to just 452 soldiers before the defense of the Sihang Warehouse began. Each soldier was armed with either a Hanyang 88 or Chiang Kai-shek rifle, an 8mm Mauser, grenades, a German M1935 Stahlhelm, a gas mask, and they also had some Czech ZB vz.26 light machine guns, along with four Type 24 Maxim guns. They would face off against the forces of the 3rd IJA Division, commanded by General Iwane Matsui, as well as the 10th Battalion, 8th, and 9th Companies of the Shanghai Special Naval Landing Force under Captain Okochi Denshichi. The Japanese forces were further bolstered by approximately 260 sailors from the Yokosuka 2nd Independent SNLF Company and another 200 sailors from the Kure 1st SNLF 2nd Company. Additionally, the 8th and 9th Companies of the Shanghai SNLF, originally attached to the 4th Artillery Battalion, would provide support with howitzers and mountain guns. In total, around 980 infantrymen from the reinforced 10th Battalion of the Shanghai SNLF, along with another 200 artillerymen from the 8th and 9th Companies, were involved in the Japanese assault on the Sihang Warehouse. Xie Jinyuan consolidated his battalion's defenses inside the Sihang Warehouse, believing it would provide his men the highest chance of holding out for as long as possible. He correctly assessed that the Imperial Japanese Army would be unable to use their heaviest artillery, aerial bombardment, gas attacks, or naval guns for fear of accidentally striking the International Settlement. It's important to remember that this was 1937, and the Empire of Japan was not willing to risk open warfare with Western nations until 1941. What the Japanese did have access to were armored vehicles, such as the Type 94 tankettes. The Japanese infantry were equipped with various weapons, including the Arisaka Type 38 rifle, Type 11 and Type 96 light machine guns, the Nambu Type 14 pistol, Type 92 heavy machine gun, Type 97 grenade, Type 89 grenade discharger, and the Type 93 flamethrower. On October 27, various companies of the battalion reached the Sihang Warehouse after a fighting withdrawal. By this point, they numbered 414 men, who essentially volunteered for a suicide mission and were later acknowledged by Chiang Kai-shek for their “exemplary soldierly conduct.” The 1st Battalion was commanded by Army Major Yang Ruifu, and their forces included the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Companies, as well as a Machine Gun Company, totaling 452 men once the remaining soldiers arrived. Due to two months of intense fighting in Shanghai, many of the German-trained elite troops had been killed or wounded, leaving the majority of the reinforcements at the Sihang Warehouse to be garrison troops from the surrounding provinces. Many of these soldiers came from the 5th Regiment of the Hubei Province Garrison, which meant that many were also inexperienced recruits. On October 27, news began to circulate throughout Shanghai that Chinese forces were still resisting the Japanese in the Zhabei district at the Sihang Warehouse. At 4 a.m., a Girl Guide named Yang Huimin approached a British guard at a post at the Chinese end of the New Lese Bridge, where she noticed a British soldier tossing a pack of cigarettes into the warehouse. Yang asked the soldier what he was doing, and he informed her that there was a battalion of Chinese soldiers inside. She then wrote a message and requested that the soldier place it inside a cigarette box and toss it over. Soon, the Chinese tossed back the cigarette box with a message indicating they needed food, ammunition, and lubricant for their weapons. Yang then left the bridge and began pleading for help at the Shanghai Chamber of Commerce, but no one believed her story. Xie Jinyuan deployed the 1st Company, led by Captain Tao Xingchun, on the right side of the warehouse along Tibet Road. The 3rd Company, led by Shi Meihao, was stationed on the left across from the Bank of Communications building, while the 2nd Company, commanded by Deng Ying, held the other sides. Two heavy Type 24 Maxim machine guns were mounted on the roof of the Sihang Warehouse, with additional machine guns distributed among each company. A forward platoon from each company was sent out to provide early warning of any enemy attack. Furthermore, Xie ordered his combat engineers to place remote-detonated charges in front of the warehouse. His units were strategically dispersed with rifles and machine guns throughout the warehouse and on the rooftop. They reinforced the building with bags of sand, corn, and beans, and razed surrounding structures to create a deadly killing field. At 7:30 am an advance outpost reported seeing Japanese marines near the North Train Station, and 45 minutes later, it confirmed that the enemy's flag was flying over that building. The Chinese soldiers were ordered to engage the advancing IJA 3rd division, and over the next two hours, they executed a fighting retreat back toward the warehouse. A brief pause ensued, during which the Chinese defenders prepared themselves, with some taking up positions on the various floors of the warehouse and others crouching behind an outer wall surrounding the building. At 1:00 pm a Japanese column approached the warehouse, confidently marching down the middle of the road behind a large Rising Sun banner. It appeared more like a victory parade than a tactical maneuver. Once they were in range, the Chinese officers ordered their men to fire. Five Japanese soldiers fell, causing the rest of the column to scramble for cover. Within an hour, the Japanese had amassed enough troops to attempt a storming assault on the warehouse. A sizable force surrounded the building, unleashing so much firepower that the Chinese were forced to abandon the outer wall and retreat to the warehouse itself. Although the defenses remained solid, the crisis was far from over, and the attackers appeared to have gained dangerous momentum The first bloodshed occurred when ten IJA soldiers were killed while attempting to secure fortifications around the warehouse that had been rigged with explosives. At 2 p.m., a National Revolutionary Army  platoon led by Yin Qiucheng exchanged fire with approximately fifty IJA troops. By 3 pm, an IJA company consisting of around 194 men launched an attack on the warehouse from the west. During this engagement, the 3rd Company commander, Shi Meihao, was shot in the face but continued to lead the defense until he was shot again in the leg. Meanwhile, about seventy IJA soldiers took cover in a blind spot just southwest of the warehouse. In response, the NRA climbed to the rooftop and threw grenades at the IJA, killing seven and wounding twenty. The initial assault by the IJA was a failure, prompting them to set fire to the northwestern section of the warehouse, where fuel and lumber were stored. By 5 pm., firefighter efforts had extinguished the blaze, as the IJA were preoccupied with looting the Zhabei area. At this point, Yang Ruifu, the second-in-command, commanded a dozen soldiers to rush to the roof and lob hand grenades at the Japanese forces below. This counterattack halted the Japanese advance. As the Japanese withdrew, they left behind seven dead. Much of the fighting was closely watched by excited Chinese on the other side of the 60-yard Suzhou Creek. Each time news spread of another Japanese soldier being killed, a triumphant cheer erupted from the crowd. At 9 pm, battalion commander Yang Ruifu assessed that there would likely be no further IJA attacks that day and ordered the NRA to repair their fortifications and eat their meals. However, no one slept that night. The NRA suffered two deaths and four wounded, while the IJA reported seventeen dead and twenty wounded. Foreign correspondents witnessed the battle from the safety of Suzhou Creek, enjoying a front-row seat to the harsh reality of urban combat. One reporter observed a small group of Japanese soldiers cautiously approaching the warehouse, navigating through the broken masonry and twisted metal. Crawling from cover to cover, it took them 50 minutes to traverse just 50 yards. The Chinese defenders, watching from concealed vantage points, had been monitoring their movements all along. Once the Japanese party was close enough, the defenders unleashed a barrage of hand grenades. After the dust settled, they used their rifles to finish off anyone still able to move. Several Japanese attempting to rescue their wounded comrades were also killed. It was a war without mercy. Even after darkness fell over the warehouse, there was no time for sleep. The soldiers worked tirelessly to repair damages and reinforce their positions.  The next morning, Xie Jinyuan contacted the Shanghai Chamber of Commerce for assistance, having received their phone number from Yang Huimin. At 7 am on October 28, Japanese bombers began to circle the warehouse but refrained from dropping any bombs for fear of hitting the International Settlement. Surrounding the rooftops of nearby buildings was a sea of Rising Sun flags, serving to intimidate the NRA and signal that they were encircled. By 8 am, Xie delivered a pep talk to the defenders and noticed an IJA squad advancing along the Suzhou Creek. According to Yang Ruifu's memoirs, Xie picked up a rifle and shot one of the IJA soldiers from over a kilometer away, halting the squad's advance. At 3 pm, it began to rain as the IJA launched a major attack on the west side of the warehouse, taking control of the Bank of Communications building. From there, they deployed machine guns and cannons to bombard the north face of the warehouse. However, the cannons were unable to significantly damage the six-foot-thick walls, and the Japanese troops in the bank building were easily suppressed by the defenders on the warehouse roof, who enjoyed a superior vantage point. After two hours of fighting, the Japanese gave up on the attack but managed to cut electricity and water to the warehouse. Yang Ruifu ordered strict rationing, with each company placing its water reserves under guard and collecting urine in large barrels for firefighting purposes if necessary. Witnessing the fierce Chinese resistance, the Shanghai Chamber of Commerce was invigorated, and news of the stand quickly spread via radio. Crowds of 30,000 people gathered along the southern bank of the Suzhou Creek, cheering the defenders on. In response, ten truckloads of aid were donated by Shanghai citizens, making their way over the bridge to the warehouse throughout the night. The defenders received food, fruit, clothing, utensils, and letters of support from the citizens. A few journalists attempted to visit, but due to the commanding officers being busy, they only managed to meet with Lei Xiong, the Machine Gun Company commander. Xie Jinyuan also utilized the same trucks to transport ten wounded men into the International Settlement. During these truck transit actions, three NRA soldiers were killed by Japanese sharpshooters. Yang Huimin courageously ran to the warehouse to personally deliver the Republic of China flag to Xie Jinyuan. Upon receiving the flag, Xie was asked by a reporter about his plans, to which he simply replied, “Defend to the death.” Yang Huimin then requested a list of the soldiers' names to announce to the entire country. However, Xie was reluctant to provide this information, fearing it would reveal his actual numbers and prompt the Japanese to storm the warehouse. Instead, he wrote down 800 names from the original 524th Regiment's roster. Thus, the legend of the “800 Heroes” was born. The next morning, the Republic of China flag was hoisted on a thirteen-foot pole atop the Sihang Warehouse. Since Yang Huimin had only delivered the flag without a pole, the defenders constructed a makeshift pole using two bamboo culms tied together, holding a flag-raising ceremony. Crowds gathered in the International Settlement, reaching up to thirty thousand in number, shouting “Zhōnghuá Mínguó wànsu!” (Long live the Republic of China). Japanese aircraft attempted to destroy the flag with strafing fire but were unsuccessful and were forced to retreat due to anti-aircraft fire. At noon, the IJA launched their largest offensive to date, attacking the warehouse from all directions with Type 94 tankettes and cannons. The 3rd NRA Company was pushed out of their defensive lines to the base of the warehouse and then further into the warehouse itself. The IJA's cannon fire chipped away at the warehouse structure, creating new firing ports on the windowless west wall. The Japanese attempted to scale the walls to the second floor using ladders. Xie Jinyuan was positioned near a window when two IJA soldiers managed to climb into the second floor beside him. He choked the first soldier to death and shot the other while kicking over the ladder they had used. The situation became dire as a platoon of IJA soldiers began placing explosives to breach the west wall. As the battle raged on, the IJA platoon continued planting explosives at the base of the west wall in an effort to breach it. When the Chinese defenders noticed what they were doing, 21-year-old Private Chen Shusheng, armed with a grenade vest, jumped from a second-story window onto the IJA platoon that was planting the explosives. His suicide attack killed himself and twenty Japanese soldiers below. The fighting continued until darkness fell, with waves of IJA soldiers storming the warehouse using armored vehicles. Ultimately, the IJA had to abandon their assault and began digging a tunnel towards the warehouse with an excavator. In response, posters emerged in the International Settlement, showcasing the movement of the IJA to the NRA. At 7 am, on October 30, the IJA recommenced their attacks, this time employing heavy artillery, firing approximately one shell per second throughout the day. The NRA responded by reinforcing the warehouse with additional sandbags. As night approached, the IJA utilized floodlights to illuminate the warehouse, allowing their artillery fire to continue unabated. Despite the overwhelming firepower, the defenders still managed to destroy some of the IJA's armored vehicles. The International Settlement exerted pressure on the IJA to cease the artillery fire, as it was dangerously close to their area. They informed the IJA that they would attempt to persuade the NRA to end their defense. A petition was sent to Chiang Kai-shek to stop the fighting for humanitarian reasons. By this point, the defense of the Sihang Warehouse had accomplished all its objectives. The NRA forces in Shanghai had successfully redeployed to more favorable positions in the rural west. Moreover, the defense of the warehouse had garnered significant attention from the Western world. Consequently, Chiang Kai-shek authorized a retreat. Chiang Kai-shek ordered the battalion to retreat into the foreign concession and to rejoin the 88th Division, which was now fighting in western Shanghai. A meeting was arranged with British General Telfer-Smollet and Yan Hu of the Shanghai Auxiliary Police to facilitate the retreat. The 524th Regiment would retreat to the International Settlement by crossing the New Lese Bridge. The 3rd IJA Division commander, Matsui Iwane, was notified of this plan and agreed, promising to allow the defenders to retreat unharmed, although he would ultimately not fulfill this promise. At midnight on November 1, Xie Jinyuan led the retreat of 376 men out of the warehouse and across the New Lese Bridge into the International Settlement. Ten NRA soldiers had been killed, and twenty-seven were too wounded to move; those soldiers volunteered to stay behind and man the machine guns on the rooftop to provide cover for the retreat. During the crossing, ten additional NRA soldiers were wounded by IJA sharpshooter fire. By 2 a.m. on November 1, the retreat was complete, marking the end of the defense of the Sihang Warehouse. After the battle, Xie Jinyuan reported that more than 100 Japanese troops had been killed by the defenders. General Sun Yuanliang stated, “Enemy corpses in the vicinity of Sihang Warehouse totaled approximately two hundred.” Xie Jimin claimed, “More than 200 enemy troops were killed and countless others were wounded. Two enemy tanks were also destroyed, and two more were damaged. The number of enemies was based on the daily counts obtained by observation posts.” The NRA suffered ten deaths and thirty-seven wounded, while the IJA incurred an estimated two hundred killed, along with several others wounded. However, a Japanese report indicated that after the SNLF 10th Battalion stormed the Sihang Warehouse, they found only 80 Chinese corpses. As of 2022, historians now estimate that 377 Chinese soldiers managed to retreat, suggesting that the actual death toll for the Chinese was likely around 33. The Battle of Shanghai was arguably unwinnable for the Chinese from the outset. It was only a matter of time before the Japanese would gain the upper hand due to their material and technological advantages. As the fighting dragged on, with the Japanese capturing stronghold after stronghold in the countryside surrounding the city, the immense toll exacted on the defenders led a growing number of Chinese generals to question the wisdom of clinging to a city that was ultimately destined to fall. They pushed for a more comprehensive withdrawal rather than the tactical retreat from Zhabei and Jiangwan that had already taken place. Otherwise, thousands more soldiers would die in vain. Moreover, there were serious concerns about morale taking a devastating hit, which could compromise China's ability to continue the fight. This was becoming a pressing issue. Chinese troops, who had initially entered the battle with an upbeat and patriotic spirit, gradually lost their fervor as casualties mounted in a seemingly hopeless battle. Once a division was reduced to one-third of its original strength, it was sent to the rear for reorganization and replenishment before being returned to the frontline. Most soldiers perceived the odds of survival as heavily stacked against them. Despite regular visits to the front, Chiang Kai-shek remained largely unaware of these grim realities. Officers who understood the true conditions in the trenches were also familiar with the supreme commander's stubborn nature and his determination to defend Shanghai to the bitter end. Given the circumstances, they felt it unwise to reveal the full truth to him. This charade could not continue indefinitely. In some units, the situation was deteriorating so rapidly that it became increasingly likely soldiers would simply abandon their positions. With mutiny looming as a possibility, senior commanders sought to persuade Chiang Kai-shek that a complete withdrawal of all Chinese troops from the Shanghai area to a fortified line stretching from Suzhou to Jiaxing, a city about 35 miles to the south, was the only viable option. In early November, General Bai Chongxi informed Chiang that the officers at the front could no longer control their men and that a pullback would serve as a face-saving measure, forestalling potential rebellion within the ranks. However, nothing they said seemed to impress Chiang Kai-shek. General Li Zongren, another officer who had previously attempted to advocate for a retreat, realized that arguing with the man at the top was futile. “War plans were decided by him personally, and no one else was allowed to say anything,” Li noted in his memoirs. Despite this, there were moments when Chiang appeared tantalizingly close to being swayed by the views of his lieutenants. As early as the first days of October, he seemed to favor a withdrawal from the front, only to reverse his decision later. A similar situation arose late in the month when Chiang called a meeting with his frontline commanders in a train carriage at Songjiang Railway Station, southwest of Shanghai. Before his arrival, the generals discussed the battle and concluded they could do little against the enemy's superior firepower. Upon Chiang's arrival, Zhang Fakui, the commander of the troops in Pudong, suggested moving ten divisions to prepared positions further in the rear, where defense would be easier than in Shanghai. The majority agreed with this proposal. At this point, Madame Chiang Kai-shek made her entrance, dressed in an expensive fur coat and fresh from a visit to the Shanghai front. “If we can hold Shanghai for ten more days,” she declared, “China will win international sympathy.” She was vague about the specifics but seemed to be referring to the upcoming Brussels conference. This declaration galvanized Chiang. “Shanghai must be held at all costs,” he asserted with firm conviction, as if that had been his sentiment all along. I would like to take this time to remind you all that this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Please go subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry after that, give my personal channel a look over at The Pacific War Channel at Youtube, it would mean a lot to me. As Chinese troops retreated across Suzhou Creek, a small battalion under Colonel Xie Jinyuan held their ground, transforming the warehouse into a fortress. Despite fierce attacks, including artillery and tank assaults, they showcased unparalleled bravery. Reinforced by messages of support from locals, spirits soared. Amidst mounting casualties, they persisted until a strategic retreat was ordered. As dawn broke on November 1, Xie led the remaining troops to safety, leaving behind a legacy of valor that inspired future generations. Thus, the "800 Heroes" legend was born.

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses the ongoing controversy surrounding the SIG P320 pistol, including its safety concerns and the public's perception of the firearm. Joined by Paul Markle, they analyze SIG's responses to recent incidents involving the P320, the implications for military and law enforcement use, and the broader impact on gun rights and safety. The conversation emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in the firearms industry, as well as the need for responsible gun ownership and training. Takeaways The SIG P320 controversy has been ongoing for years. Public perception can significantly impact gun sales and usage. Negligent discharges often lead to blame being placed on the firearm. The military's use of the P320 is under scrutiny after a tragic incident. Transparency from manufacturers is crucial for consumer trust. Gun safety training is essential for all firearm owners. The role of law enforcement in handling firearm incidents is complex. Fan loyalty to gun brands can cloud judgment on safety issues. The importance of rigorous testing for military-grade firearms cannot be overstated. Public discussions about gun safety should be open and fair. Keywords Armed American Radio, SIG P320, gun safety, military, law enforcement, public perception, negligent discharge, gun rights, NRA, Paul Markle  

Kelly and Lillian discuss an article by Eyal Press about tip credit/tipped wage policies and the power of the NRA (restaurant one)

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses the recent Cincinnati incident, exploring the implications of social media on public behavior during violent events. The conversation delves into the legal aspects of self-defense, particularly the concept of disparity of force, and emphasizes the importance of community leadership and civic engagement in addressing public safety issues. The episode also highlights the evolving conversation around gun rights and the role of organizations like the NRA in advocating for responsible gun ownership. Takeaways The Cincinnati incident highlights the impact of social media on public behavior. Social media can lead to bystander apathy in violent situations. Legal definitions of force can complicate intervention in violent incidents. Disparity of force is a critical factor in justifying self-defense actions. Community leadership and local politics significantly influence public safety. Gun rights organizations play a vital role in advocating for responsible gun ownership. The media's portrayal of violence can skew public perception and response. Understanding the law is essential for responsible gun owners. Civic engagement is crucial for influencing local governance and policies. The conversation around gun rights is evolving with changing societal attitudes. Keywords Armed American Radio, Cincinnati incident, social media violence, use of force, disparity of force, gun rights, NRA, legal implications, community safety, political commentary  

Reload Reporter Ben Owen and I explain the changes the National Rifle Association wants to see to the Department of Justice's proposed rights restoration process. We also discuss a federal court giving the green light to Buffalo mass shooting victims' suit against a gun accessory maker. And we look at how the NRA is using a recent DOJ brief to boost its lawsuit against New Jersey's silencer ban.

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various aspects of gun control, the Second Amendment, and the role of armed citizens in preventing crime. The conversation includes commentary on statements made by political figures like Kathy Hochul, analysis from Dr. John Lott on the effectiveness of gun laws, and real-life examples of how armed citizens have intervened in violent situations. The episode emphasizes the importance of understanding firearms, the media's role in shaping public perception, and the ongoing debate surrounding gun rights in America. Takeaways Mark Walters introduces the show and emphasizes the importance of gun rights. Discussion on the significance of the NRA and its role in gun advocacy. Kathy Hochul's comments on gun laws are critiqued for their inaccuracies. John Lott provides insights into the effectiveness of gun control measures. The challenges faced by security personnel in active shooter situations are highlighted. Misconceptions about firearms terminology are addressed. The role of concealed carry permits in public safety is discussed. Real-life examples illustrate the effectiveness of armed citizens in preventing crime. The importance of media responsibility in reporting on gun-related incidents is emphasized. The conversation concludes with a call to action for listeners to engage in the gun rights debate. Keywords gun control, Second Amendment, concealed carry, self-defense, media bias, political commentary, crime prevention, firearms education, public safety, armed citizens  

Summary In this episode, Mark Walters discusses the failures of New York's gun control laws with guest Lee Williams. They explore the complexities of obtaining a gun permit in New York City, the political responses to gun violence, and the implications for public safety. The conversation also touches on the media's portrayal of gun incidents and the ongoing fight for Second Amendment rights. Takeaways New York's gun control laws are complex and restrictive. Governor Kathy Hockle's comments reflect a misunderstanding of gun laws. The only armed individuals in New York City are law enforcement and criminals. Public safety is compromised by strict gun laws. The media often fails to report on the positive role of armed citizens. Gun violence is often politicized by lawmakers. The fight for Second Amendment rights is ongoing and crucial. Community engagement is essential in the fight for gun rights. The left's agenda aims to disarm law-abiding citizens. Support for local and national gun rights organizations is vital. Keywords gun control, New York City, Kathy Hochul, Second Amendment, gun laws, public safety, law enforcement, media coverage, gun violence, NRA  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics related to gun rights, the National Rifle Association, and the latest updates from the Ninth Circuit Court. The show features a conversation with Tim Roberts from Patriots Relief, where they explore the benefits of CBD products for pain relief and overall wellness. The episode also highlights the importance of gun rights and the ongoing legal battles surrounding them, including insights from Charlie Kirk's campus discussions. Takeaways Mark Walters emphasizes the importance of gun rights and the role of the NRA. Tim Roberts discusses the effectiveness of CBD products for pain relief. The Ninth Circuit Court is showing positive rulings for gun rights advocates. Mark expresses frustration with the slow progress in Washington regarding gun legislation. The conversation touches on the recent losses in the music industry and their cultural impact. Tim shares personal experiences with Patriots Relief products and their benefits. Mark highlights the significance of supporting organizations that fight for gun rights. The episode discusses the challenges faced by gun owners in California. Mark and Mike from Arms Room Radio debate the nature of gun ownership as a right versus a privilege. The show encourages listeners to stay informed and engaged in the fight for their rights. Keywords gun rights, Patriots Relief, NRA, Charlie Kirk, Ninth Circuit, CBD products, self-defense, talk radio, conservative voice, firearms  

The new trend in Second Amendment issues is that women are buying up guns in record numbers, even more so than men in some cases. And so, too, are minorities seeing a surge. What's going on? Even Democrats are buying guns — and this is odd, given a) Democrats traditionally hate private gun ownership and b) Democrats are the ones creating the conditions that require individuals to purchase guns in the first place. Who feels safe in communities controlled by leftists, right? Josh Savani, with the NRA, has the latest facts and data about Second Amendment freedoms in America — one of the core keys that keep intact the concept of God-given rights and liberties.

Riding Shotgun With Charlie #234 Lynn Webb Eagle Eye Personal Defense   On the way home from NRA's Annual Meeting in Atlanta, I did a “swing by” in Memphis then went to Mississippi for a couple shows. Talking with Meekos Beech, I let him know I was going to Oxford, Miss. to interview Lynn Webb. He said “Cornbread”! I guess they knew each other. I love that my Olympic Ring is expanding into their rings.    Lynn always wanted to be in law enforcement, even when there weren't a lot of women officers. She did an internship with the sheriff's department and was involved in their reserve program. Then she worked in the jail and university police department. (We were right in Oxford, Miss, so I'm assuming she's talking about Old Miss.) After a decade there, she was a lieutenant and the officer in charge of the motorcycle division. One of the local sheriffs heard she was looking for a job, and he hired her as the first female deputy in their history in 2007. She also spent some years as a school resource officer.    One of the other deputies asked her if she wanted to do some IDPA pistol shooting. About half way through the match, she regretted not shooting. Once she got the IDPA bug, she got more involved and went up in her rankings She's competed in several local and national matches.There were times when she even branched out to USPSA and Steel Challenge, too. In 2015, she became an NRA and USCCA certified instructor. When her 25 years on the department were up, the plan was to be a part time firearm instructor.    During retirement, she's mostly focusing on training women. She has worked with both The Armed Women of America and A Girl & A Gun. Both are great groups that guide women through gun ownership and training. The real focus of her company, Eagle Eye Personal Defense, was to put female shooters on the correct path and help them learn to shoot and defend themselves and their loved ones. Since she has retirement hours, her schedule for training is flexible.    One of the fun things about my “road show” is that I get to learn about licensing in other states. Mississippi is a permitless carry state, but the state does issue permits. Often it's for reciprocity for those who want to travel and carry. They do consider it an enhanced permit so you can carry in more places than if you didn't have a permit. For the enhanced permit, there is additional training, which includes live fire, use of force, and concealed carry statute. Much of what she does is from the USCCA curriculum.    The live fire portion is up to the instructor. What Lynn does is start with a big IDPA target to make sure they're hitting the target. Then another target with 3 in.circles and numbers in the circles to make sure they're looking at their sights. Once they're hitting those, they move to a smaller NRA target. Ultimately, the state did not decide on what needs to be fired. The firearms she clients use are often what they own and, even though some want to shoot larger calibers, she will let someone use a .22 if that's what they have.    What I find really great around the country is that there are local ranges where people can rent range time and rent guns, too. In Massachusetts, the ranges are private and you have to be a member to shoot there. But all around the country, there's ranges all over the place. She mentioned about five or six just in her country.    I really enjoyed hanging out with Lynn. She's a great woman doing wonderful things in Mississippi. Training women, keeping kids safe in schools, and enjoying her retirement. She gave me a short tour of Oxford and its surroundings. She also brought me some Crittenden Distillery single barrel bourbon whiskey.  Favorite quotes: “Half way through watching, I regretted not shooting.” “I wanted to make sure the people coming to me had the best tools that they could get…to protect themselves and to be proficient with their firearm.” “If a .22 is all they got and that's what they carry, they should be able to shoot a .22.”  “Shooting people call me Cornbread.”   Eagle Eye Personal Defense LLC https://www.facebook.com/EEPDT15/   USCCA link to EEPD https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/firearms-training/instructors/mississippi-instructors/eagle-eye-personal-defense-llc-551030/   A Girl & A Gun https://www.agirlandagun.org/   Armed Women of America https://armedwomen.org/ Second Amendment Foundation https://secure.anedot.com/saf/donate?sc=RidingShotgun    Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms https://www.ccrkba.org/     Please support the Riding Shotgun With Charlie sponsors and supporters.    Self Defense Radio Network http://sdrn.us/   US Law Shield Legal Defense for Self Defense. Use "RSWC" as the discount code and get 2 months for free! https://www.uslawshield.com/   Patriot Mobile Use this link and get one month for free! https://patriotmobile.com/partners/rswc   Or listen on: iTunes/Apple podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/riding-shotgun-with-charlie/id1275691565

Summary The conversation covers a range of topics related to gun rights in America, including the implications of Gavin Newsom's statements on gun rights, ongoing lawsuits against restrictive gun laws, and the collaboration between various gun rights organizations. The discussion also highlights the DOJ's proposed rule to restore firearm rights to certain individuals and the growing momentum for gun rights in states like New Jersey. AWR Hawkins joins the conversation to discuss the impact of gun control on youth violence, and the segment concludes with a focus on self-defense success stories and the potential for new gun safety legislation introduced by Democrats. The conversation delves into various aspects of crime, self-defense, and the implications of political narratives surrounding the Second Amendment. Dr. John Lott shares insights from his recent trip to Argentina, highlighting the stark differences in crime rates and law enforcement effectiveness compared to the U.S. The discussion also critiques the media's portrayal of gun rights and illegal immigration, emphasizing the need for responsible gun ownership and the importance of understanding historical contexts in current political debates. Takeaways Gavin Newsom's comments on gun rights are seen as manipulative. The Second Amendment Foundation is actively fighting multiple lawsuits in California. A joint lawsuit has been filed against New Jersey's suppressor ban. The DOJ is proposing a rule to restore firearm rights to certain individuals. Gun rights organizations are collaborating more than ever before. There is growing momentum for gun rights in New Jersey despite its blue status. AWR Hawkins discusses the impact of gun control on adolescent firearm deaths. A homeowner successfully defended against a burglary, highlighting self-defense rights. The Trump administration is taking a more favorable stance on gun rights compared to the previous administration. Democrats are introducing legislation that could lead to future gun control measures. Support for the Second Amendment is crucial for self-defense. Crime rates in Argentina are significantly higher than in the U.S. Making crime risky for criminals can reduce crime rates. The media often misrepresents the relationship between illegal immigration and crime. Permitless carry laws do not increase crime among prohibited persons. Understanding historical contexts is essential in political discussions. The Second Amendment serves as a safeguard against tyranny. Political elites may undermine their own nations out of guilt or ideology. The importance of having legal representation for gun owners cannot be overstated. Public perception of crime is often influenced by media narratives. Keywords gun rights, Second Amendment, NRA, Gavin Newsom, New Jersey, DOJ, firearm safety, AWR Hawkins, legislation, self-defense, Second Amendment, crime prevention, illegal immigration, national security, media critique, permitless carry, self-defense, gun rights, political narratives, crime statistics  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics including the importance of the NRA, the impact of social media on society, and the current political landscape under the Trump administration. The conversation also delves into the issues surrounding gun violence in Kentucky, the role of lawmakers, and the necessity of legal representation for gun owners. Throughout the episode, Walters emphasizes the need for active participation in gun rights advocacy and the dangers of media manipulation and gaslighting. Takeaways The NRA offers valuable membership benefits for gun owners. Trump's administration has faced significant media scrutiny. The Epstein case highlights issues of human trafficking and government accountability. Democrats are expected to struggle in the coming years due to internal conflicts. Social media has a detrimental effect on public perception and behavior. Gaslighting by the media is increasingly prevalent. Kentucky lawmakers have a history of inaction on gun violence. The NRA plays a crucial role in advocating for gun rights. Legal representation is essential for gun owners facing legal challenges. Active participation in gun rights advocacy is necessary for preserving freedoms. Keywords Armed American Radio, NRA, gun rights, Trump administration, Epstein, human trafficking, Democrats, social media, gaslighting, Kentucky gun laws  

Summary The conversation covers a range of topics related to gun rights in America, including the implications of Gavin Newsom's statements on gun rights, ongoing lawsuits against restrictive gun laws, and the collaboration between various gun rights organizations. The discussion also highlights the DOJ's proposed rule to restore firearm rights to certain individuals and the growing momentum for gun rights in states like New Jersey. AWR Hawkins joins the conversation to discuss the impact of gun control on youth violence, and the segment concludes with a focus on self-defense success stories and the potential for new gun safety legislation introduced by Democrats. The conversation delves into various aspects of crime, self-defense, and the implications of political narratives surrounding the Second Amendment. Dr. John Lott shares insights from his recent trip to Argentina, highlighting the stark differences in crime rates and law enforcement effectiveness compared to the U.S. The discussion also critiques the media's portrayal of gun rights and illegal immigration, emphasizing the need for responsible gun ownership and the importance of understanding historical contexts in current political debates. Takeaways Gavin Newsom's comments on gun rights are seen as manipulative. The Second Amendment Foundation is actively fighting multiple lawsuits in California. A joint lawsuit has been filed against New Jersey's suppressor ban. The DOJ is proposing a rule to restore firearm rights to certain individuals. Gun rights organizations are collaborating more than ever before. There is growing momentum for gun rights in New Jersey despite its blue status. AWR Hawkins discusses the impact of gun control on adolescent firearm deaths. A homeowner successfully defended against a burglary, highlighting self-defense rights. The Trump administration is taking a more favorable stance on gun rights compared to the previous administration. Democrats are introducing legislation that could lead to future gun control measures. Support for the Second Amendment is crucial for self-defense. Crime rates in Argentina are significantly higher than in the U.S. Making crime risky for criminals can reduce crime rates. The media often misrepresents the relationship between illegal immigration and crime. Permitless carry laws do not increase crime among prohibited persons. Understanding historical contexts is essential in political discussions. The Second Amendment serves as a safeguard against tyranny. Political elites may undermine their own nations out of guilt or ideology. The importance of having legal representation for gun owners cannot be overstated. Public perception of crime is often influenced by media narratives. Keywords gun rights, Second Amendment, NRA, Gavin Newsom, New Jersey, DOJ, firearm safety, AWR Hawkins, legislation, self-defense, Second Amendment, crime prevention, illegal immigration, national security, media critique, permitless carry, self-defense, gun rights, political narratives, crime statistics  

Summary The conversation covers a range of topics related to gun rights in America, including the implications of Gavin Newsom's statements on gun rights, ongoing lawsuits against restrictive gun laws, and the collaboration between various gun rights organizations. The discussion also highlights the DOJ's proposed rule to restore firearm rights to certain individuals and the growing momentum for gun rights in states like New Jersey. AWR Hawkins joins the conversation to discuss the impact of gun control on youth violence, and the segment concludes with a focus on self-defense success stories and the potential for new gun safety legislation introduced by Democrats. The conversation delves into various aspects of crime, self-defense, and the implications of political narratives surrounding the Second Amendment. Dr. John Lott shares insights from his recent trip to Argentina, highlighting the stark differences in crime rates and law enforcement effectiveness compared to the U.S. The discussion also critiques the media's portrayal of gun rights and illegal immigration, emphasizing the need for responsible gun ownership and the importance of understanding historical contexts in current political debates. Takeaways Gavin Newsom's comments on gun rights are seen as manipulative. The Second Amendment Foundation is actively fighting multiple lawsuits in California. A joint lawsuit has been filed against New Jersey's suppressor ban. The DOJ is proposing a rule to restore firearm rights to certain individuals. Gun rights organizations are collaborating more than ever before. There is growing momentum for gun rights in New Jersey despite its blue status. AWR Hawkins discusses the impact of gun control on adolescent firearm deaths. A homeowner successfully defended against a burglary, highlighting self-defense rights. The Trump administration is taking a more favorable stance on gun rights compared to the previous administration. Democrats are introducing legislation that could lead to future gun control measures. Support for the Second Amendment is crucial for self-defense. Crime rates in Argentina are significantly higher than in the U.S. Making crime risky for criminals can reduce crime rates. The media often misrepresents the relationship between illegal immigration and crime. Permitless carry laws do not increase crime among prohibited persons. Understanding historical contexts is essential in political discussions. The Second Amendment serves as a safeguard against tyranny. Political elites may undermine their own nations out of guilt or ideology. The importance of having legal representation for gun owners cannot be overstated. Public perception of crime is often influenced by media narratives. Keywords gun rights, Second Amendment, NRA, Gavin Newsom, New Jersey, DOJ, firearm safety, AWR Hawkins, legislation, self-defense, Second Amendment, crime prevention, illegal immigration, national security, media critique, permitless carry, self-defense, gun rights, political narratives, crime statistics  

There has been a ton of gun news over the past week. So, we figured it would be a good time to have another Q&A podcast. I think we judged that correctly because we had enough great questions on enough interesting topics sent in by Reload Members to fill up one of our longest podcasts of the year. We discussed everything from the impacts of the National Firearms Act tax cut to the future of the NRA and the Department of Justice's strategy in Second Amendment cases. Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I dive into the details on each question. We cover a huge variety of topics across every genre of gun coverage.

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses the ongoing fight for Second Amendment rights, focusing on the increasing involvement of medical professionals and associations in gun control debates. The conversation highlights personal experiences with doctors regarding firearms, the financial implications of gun violence, and recent changes in Florida's gun laws. The episode emphasizes the importance of being informed about one's rights and the political landscape surrounding gun ownership. Takeaways The fight for Second Amendment rights is ongoing and multifaceted. Medical associations are increasingly involved in gun control discussions. Personal experiences with doctors can vary significantly regarding firearms. Financial motivations may underlie some medical professionals' anti-gun rhetoric. Florida has made significant changes to its gun laws recently. It's essential to know your doctor's stance on firearms. The NRA plays a crucial role in advocating for gun rights. Legislation can have a direct impact on gun ownership and rights. Understanding the data behind gun violence is critical for informed discussions. Engagement in political processes is necessary to protect Second Amendment rights. Keywords Second Amendment, gun rights, Armed American Radio, medical associations, Florida gun laws, gun violence, NRA, conservative politics, firearms, legislation  

Summary The conversation on Armed American Radio covers a range of topics related to gun rights, including Gavin Newsom's controversial statements on gun control, the ongoing gun violence crisis in Chicago, and the grassroots activism efforts in New Jersey. The show highlights the importance of impact litigation in challenging restrictive gun laws and celebrates the milestones achieved by the program over its 17-year history. The discussion also emphasizes the role of the NRA and other organizations in supporting Second Amendment rights and the need for legal support in self-defense cases. In this episode of Armed American Radio, Mark Walters discusses a variety of topics including culinary delights, the importance of legal representation for self-defense, and the political maneuvering of Gavin Newsom regarding gun rights. The conversation also delves into legal insights on firearm lawsuits and the implications of the Epstein files in politics. The episode emphasizes the need for awareness and preparedness in the context of self-defense and gun rights advocacy. Takeaways Armed American Radio is a platform for discussing gun rights and Second Amendment issues. Gavin Newsom's statements on gun control are controversial and often criticized. Chicago continues to struggle with high rates of gun violence despite strict gun laws. The importance of grassroots activism in states like New Jersey is highlighted. Impact litigation is a strategy used to challenge restrictive gun laws. The NRA plays a significant role in supporting gun rights advocacy. Milestones in the show's history reflect its growth and influence in conservative talk radio. The conversation emphasizes the need for legal support in self-defense cases. Statistics on gun violence in Chicago illustrate the ongoing crisis. The New Jersey Firearms Owners Syndicate is actively working to protect Second Amendment rights. Culinary experiences can be a delightful topic of conversation. Legal representation is crucial for gun owners in self-defense situations. Gavin Newsom's political stance on gun rights is complex and often contradictory. The importance of staying informed about firearm laws and legal challenges. Self-defense incidents can happen unexpectedly, highlighting the need for preparedness. The role of media in shaping public perception of political figures. Understanding the implications of legal cases related to firearms is essential for advocates. The Epstein files continue to spark controversy and speculation in political discourse. Engaging in discussions about gun rights can reveal differing perspectives. The need for ongoing support for organizations advocating for Second Amendment rights. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, Second Amendment, Gavin Newsom, Chicago gun violence, New Jersey firearms, impact litigation, self-defense, NRA, grassroots activism, Armed American Radio, gun rights, self-defense, legal representation, Gavin Newsom, firearm laws, Epstein files, political commentary  

Summary The conversation on Armed American Radio covers a range of topics related to gun rights, including Gavin Newsom's controversial statements on gun control, the ongoing gun violence crisis in Chicago, and the grassroots activism efforts in New Jersey. The show highlights the importance of impact litigation in challenging restrictive gun laws and celebrates the milestones achieved by the program over its 17-year history. The discussion also emphasizes the role of the NRA and other organizations in supporting Second Amendment rights and the need for legal support in self-defense cases. In this episode of Armed American Radio, Mark Walters discusses a variety of topics including culinary delights, the importance of legal representation for self-defense, and the political maneuvering of Gavin Newsom regarding gun rights. The conversation also delves into legal insights on firearm lawsuits and the implications of the Epstein files in politics. The episode emphasizes the need for awareness and preparedness in the context of self-defense and gun rights advocacy. Takeaways Armed American Radio is a platform for discussing gun rights and Second Amendment issues. Gavin Newsom's statements on gun control are controversial and often criticized. Chicago continues to struggle with high rates of gun violence despite strict gun laws. The importance of grassroots activism in states like New Jersey is highlighted. Impact litigation is a strategy used to challenge restrictive gun laws. The NRA plays a significant role in supporting gun rights advocacy. Milestones in the show's history reflect its growth and influence in conservative talk radio. The conversation emphasizes the need for legal support in self-defense cases. Statistics on gun violence in Chicago illustrate the ongoing crisis. The New Jersey Firearms Owners Syndicate is actively working to protect Second Amendment rights. Culinary experiences can be a delightful topic of conversation. Legal representation is crucial for gun owners in self-defense situations. Gavin Newsom's political stance on gun rights is complex and often contradictory. The importance of staying informed about firearm laws and legal challenges. Self-defense incidents can happen unexpectedly, highlighting the need for preparedness. The role of media in shaping public perception of political figures. Understanding the implications of legal cases related to firearms is essential for advocates. The Epstein files continue to spark controversy and speculation in political discourse. Engaging in discussions about gun rights can reveal differing perspectives. The need for ongoing support for organizations advocating for Second Amendment rights. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, Second Amendment, Gavin Newsom, Chicago gun violence, New Jersey firearms, impact litigation, self-defense, NRA, grassroots activism, Armed American Radio, gun rights, self-defense, legal representation, Gavin Newsom, firearm laws, Epstein files, political commentary  

Summary The conversation on Armed American Radio covers a range of topics related to gun rights, including Gavin Newsom's controversial statements on gun control, the ongoing gun violence crisis in Chicago, and the grassroots activism efforts in New Jersey. The show highlights the importance of impact litigation in challenging restrictive gun laws and celebrates the milestones achieved by the program over its 17-year history. The discussion also emphasizes the role of the NRA and other organizations in supporting Second Amendment rights and the need for legal support in self-defense cases. In this episode of Armed American Radio, Mark Walters discusses a variety of topics including culinary delights, the importance of legal representation for self-defense, and the political maneuvering of Gavin Newsom regarding gun rights. The conversation also delves into legal insights on firearm lawsuits and the implications of the Epstein files in politics. The episode emphasizes the need for awareness and preparedness in the context of self-defense and gun rights advocacy. Takeaways Armed American Radio is a platform for discussing gun rights and Second Amendment issues. Gavin Newsom's statements on gun control are controversial and often criticized. Chicago continues to struggle with high rates of gun violence despite strict gun laws. The importance of grassroots activism in states like New Jersey is highlighted. Impact litigation is a strategy used to challenge restrictive gun laws. The NRA plays a significant role in supporting gun rights advocacy. Milestones in the show's history reflect its growth and influence in conservative talk radio. The conversation emphasizes the need for legal support in self-defense cases. Statistics on gun violence in Chicago illustrate the ongoing crisis. The New Jersey Firearms Owners Syndicate is actively working to protect Second Amendment rights. Culinary experiences can be a delightful topic of conversation. Legal representation is crucial for gun owners in self-defense situations. Gavin Newsom's political stance on gun rights is complex and often contradictory. The importance of staying informed about firearm laws and legal challenges. Self-defense incidents can happen unexpectedly, highlighting the need for preparedness. The role of media in shaping public perception of political figures. Understanding the implications of legal cases related to firearms is essential for advocates. The Epstein files continue to spark controversy and speculation in political discourse. Engaging in discussions about gun rights can reveal differing perspectives. The need for ongoing support for organizations advocating for Second Amendment rights. Keywords Armed American Radio, gun rights, Second Amendment, Gavin Newsom, Chicago gun violence, New Jersey firearms, impact litigation, self-defense, NRA, grassroots activism, Armed American Radio, gun rights, self-defense, legal representation, Gavin Newsom, firearm laws, Epstein files, political commentary  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics including the recent Kansas State Rifle Association meeting, Supreme Court rulings affecting education and gun rights, and the implications of AOC's controversial statements regarding Trump. The conversation also touches on the importance of self-defense and the need for legal protection in today's society. Takeaways Mark Walters introduces the show and sets the tone for the discussion. The Kansas State Rifle Association meeting was a significant event with nearly 200 attendees. Supreme Court rulings are impacting the education system and gun rights. AOC's statements about Trump could lead to legal consequences. The importance of carrying firearms for self-defense is emphasized. Mark shares personal anecdotes about firearms and their reliability. The need for insurance and legal protection for gun owners is discussed. The conversation highlights the ongoing political battles surrounding gun rights. Mark reflects on the challenges of being a public figure in legal matters. The episode concludes with a call to action for listeners to stay informed and engaged. Keywords Armed American Radio, Mark Walters, Second Amendment, Supreme Court, AOC, political commentary, Kansas State Rifle Association, gun rights, NRA, legal issues  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses a variety of topics including self-defense, legal challenges, and current political events. The conversation features insights on the legal system, the importance of understanding one's rights, and the implications of media perception. Additionally, the episode touches on personal anecdotes related to bourbon and community engagement, emphasizing the significance of being prepared and informed in today's society. Takeaways Mark Walters emphasizes the importance of understanding self-defense laws. The presumption of guilt can complicate self-defense cases. Public perception can influence legal outcomes in self-defense situations. Bourbon is a topic of personal pride and cultural significance. Engaging with the community is vital for gun rights advocacy. The legal system can be slow and burdensome for those involved in self-defense cases. It's crucial to have legal representation in self-defense situations. The 911 call can be used as evidence in court. Mark encourages listeners to take their children to the shooting range. Community events play a significant role in promoting gun rights. Keywords Armed American Radio, self-defense, legal advice, political commentary, gun rights, NRA, current events, bourbon, media perception, law enforcement  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various themes surrounding gun rights, political landscapes, and the impact of gun violence, particularly during the Fourth of July weekend. The conversation includes insights from guests about the current state of gun legislation, the role of the NRA, and the challenges faced in advocating for gun rights amidst rising crime rates in major cities. The episode emphasizes the need for a proactive approach to gun rights and the importance of community engagement in addressing these issues. Takeaways Mark Walters expresses his exhaustion and the challenges of hosting a live show. The discussion highlights the alarming gun violence incidents during Independence Day celebrations. Rob Pinkus shares insights on firearms training and the importance of education in gun rights advocacy. The conversation shifts to the political landscape and the current administration's impact on gun rights. The NRA's evolving role in gun rights advocacy is emphasized, showcasing its collaboration with other organizations. The discussion touches on the implications of taxation on gun regulation and the need for legislative action. Court cases are seen as a critical avenue for advancing gun rights in the current political climate. The importance of community engagement and proactive measures in addressing gun violence is highlighted. The episode reflects on the Fourth of July and its significance in the context of gun rights and freedom. The conversation concludes with a focus on the ongoing challenges and the need for continued advocacy in the face of rising crime rates. Keywords gun rights, NRA, political landscape, gun violence, taxation, court cases, firearms training, Independence Day, advocacy, crime rates