Podcasts about neurolaw

در این قسمت از پادکست هوشیوار، همراه با جناب آقای دکترآرین پتفت متخصص حقوق عصب شناسی و جناب آقای عباس سیدین فعال علمی و فرهنگی و مترجم کتاب پروفسور ساپولسکی به نام  ؛محتوم؛، به بررسی چند موضوع مهم علمی، حقوقی و فلسفی می‌پردازیم: حقوق عصب شناختی (Neurolaw), اراده آزاد (Free Will) و مسئولیت اخلاقی (Moral Responsibility).آیا ما واقعاً اراده آزاد داریم؟ این پرسش که قرن‌هاست ذهن فیلسوفان، دانشمندان علوم اعصاب و روانشناسان را به خود مشغول کرده، پیامدهای عمیقی در اخلاق، مسئولیت فردی و اجتماعی، و درک ما از عدالت دارد. چرا که درک ما از اراده آزاد بر نظام‌های حقوقی، مجازات‌ها، قضاوت‌های اخلاقی و حتی نگرش ما نسبت به موفقیت و شکست افراد تأثیر می‌گذارد. اگر یافته‌های علمی، به‌ویژه در علوم اعصاب و ژنتیک، نشان دهند که انتخاب‌های ما بیشتر از آنچه تصور می‌کنیم، نتیجه‌ی فرآیندهای عصبی و زیستی هستند، آیا باید در نگاه خود به مجازات، عدالت اجتماعی، و حتی قضاوت‌های روزمره تغییر ایجاد کنیم؟در این گفت‌وگوها، مباحث کلیدی زیر بررسی می شوند:

This episode features Dr. Francis Shen, a leader in the emerging field of “neurolaw,” which seeks to bring the insights of neuroscience and law together in ways that can be mutually beneficial to both disciplines. Dr. Shen shares his insights into some of the areas in which neurolaw shows great promise, including law and mental health, aging brains, brain injury, lie detection, and more. We discuss the need to train lawyers and judges on how to assess neuroscience findings and the different ethical requirements lawyers and scientists operate under, and end with Dr. Shen's thoughts about neurolaw's future.

Can there be biomarkers for criminal activity? Is AI going send you to jail? In this episode, we continue our discussion about the fascinating field of neurolaw, including the controversial use of neuroscience in the courtroom. We are joined by Dr. Jennifer Chandler, Full Professor of Law, holder of the Bertram Loeb Research Chair, and cross-appointed to the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Ottawa. Dr. Chandler studies the legal and ethical aspects of biomedical science and technology, with a focus on the intersection of the brain sciences, law and ethics. She also works on legal policy related to organ donation and transplantation, and mental health law and policy. She coordinates the Hybrid Minds project (www.hybridminds.org), which brings together researchers from Switzerland, Germany and Canada to examine the implications of incorporating artificial intelligence in neuroprosthetics. She was elected to the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences in 2022. She is the Vice-Dean of Research for the Faculty of Law and leads the neuroethics pillar of the University of Ottawa Brain Mind Research Institute. She is active in Canadian health law and policy, having recently sat on two-government appointed independent expert advisory panels on medical assistance in dying in the context of mental illness, and served as co-chair of the legal and ethics group working on the development of a new Canadian clinical practice guideline on the definition and determination of death. Don't forget to let us know what you think about the brain in our anonymous form below. Brain Awareness Survey: https://forms.gle/nzEa4UXZgGz6sTXF6 Email: thinktwicepodcast@outlook.com Instagram: @thinktwice_podcast Disclaimer: Think Twice is a podcast for general information and entertainment purposes only. The content discussed in the episodes does not reflect the views of the podcast committee members or any institution they are affiliated with. The use of the information presented in this podcast is at the user's own risk and is not intended to replace professional healthcare services.

Is there a brain test for psychopathy? Can neuroimaging methods be used as lie detectors? Is free will a myth? In this episode, we discuss the fascinating field of neurolaw, including the controversial use of neuroscience in the courtroom. We are joined by Dr. Jennifer Chandler, Full Professor of Law, holder of the Bertram Loeb Research Chair, and cross-appointed to the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Ottawa. Dr. Chandler studies the legal and ethical aspects of biomedical science and technology, with a focus on the intersection of the brain sciences, law and ethics. She also works on legal policy related to organ donation and transplantation, and mental health law and policy. She coordinates the Hybrid Minds project (www.hybridminds.org), which brings together researchers from Switzerland, Germany and Canada to examine the implications of incorporating artificial intelligence in neuroprosthetics. She was elected to the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences in 2022. She is the Vice-Dean of Research for the Faculty of Law and leads the neuroethics pillar of the University of Ottawa Brain Mind Research Institute. She is active in Canadian health law and policy, having recently sat on two-government appointed independent expert advisory panels on medical assistance in dying in the context of mental illness, and served as co-chair of the legal and ethics group working on the development of a new Canadian clinical practice guideline on the definition and determination of death. Don't forget to let us know what you think about the brain in our anonymous form below. Brain Awareness Survey: https://forms.gle/nzEa4UXZgGz6sTXF6 Email: thinktwicepodcast@outlook.com Instagram: @thinktwice_podcast Disclaimer: Think Twice is a podcast for general information and entertainment purposes only. The content discussed in the episodes does not reflect the views of the podcast committee members or any institution they are affiliated with. The use of the information presented in this podcast is at the user's own risk and is not intended to replace professional healthcare services.

In this episode Jacob speaks with Philosopher Martin Roth. They speak on his book Philosophical Foundation in Neurolaw. The speak on Free will, Determinism, and Compatibilism. They speak on if Determinism is true, can we be held morally responsible for our actions? They also speak on whether Determinism is compatible with Free will.   Link to Dr Roth's book and email:   Here martin.roth@drake.edu   Where to find me Email: reasonthrough2@gmail.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/reasonthrough

Bruce H. Stern is a shareholder and member of the Personal Injury Group of Stark & Stark. He concentrates his practice in the area of trucking and construction litigation, brain and spinal cord injuries, and wrongful death. He graduated cum laude from Duke University in 1977 and from Rutgers School of Law-Camden in 1981. Mr. Stern is a founding member and past chair of the Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group of AAJ. He also has served as chair of AAJ's Motor Vehicle Collision, Highway & Premises Liability Section. He serves as Treasurer of the International Brain Injury Association and the North American Brain Injury Society. In 2009, he was elected president of the Belli Society. Mr. Stern was selected for induction into the International Society of Barristers and the International Academy of Trial Lawyers. Mr. Stern is the author of numerous articles and a frequent lecturer on the subject of traumatic brain injury litigation, evidence and trial techniques. He also co-authored a book entitled Litigating Brain Injuries which is published by Thomson Reuters and a chapter entitled "Brain Injuries" which is included in Association of Trial Lawyers of America's (ATLA) Litigating Tort Case Series, published by AAJ Press. Mr. Stern is certified as a Certified Civil Trial Attorney by both the New Jersey Supreme Court and the National Board of Trial Advocacy. www.braininjurylawblog.com   Episode brought to you by Integrate Brain Centers Support this podcast for just $5 a month via Patreon.

Hi listeners! Kali ini @wrtmhendra dan @natasyalifiaa akan ngobrolin soal riset mereka tentang Neurolaw. Bidang tersebut adalah interseksi antara dua disiplin ilmu, yaitu ilmu hukum dan sistem syaraf. Banyak negara-negara di dunia sedang gencar bergerak dari dasar hukum retributif ke dasar hukum restoratif, yang mengutamakan pemulihan keadlian melainkan asas balas dendam. Namun bagaimana pengertian tentang ilmu syaraf dan otak bisa mewujudkan tujuan tersebut? mari kita dengarkan pembicaraan mereka.

Neurolaw is based on an in-depth filmed conversation between Howard Burton and Nita Farahany, Robert O. Everett Distinguished Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy at Duke University. Nita Farahany is a leading scholar on the ethical, legal, and social implications of emerging technologies. This wide-ranging conversation examines the growing impact of modern neuroscience on the law, deepening our understanding of a wide range of issues, from legal responsibility to the American Constitution's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Howard Burton is the founder of the Ideas Roadshow, Ideas on Film and host of the Ideas Roadshow Podcast. He can be reached at howard@ideasroadshow.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Neurolaw is based on an in-depth filmed conversation between Howard Burton and Nita Farahany, Robert O. Everett Distinguished Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy at Duke University. Nita Farahany is a leading scholar on the ethical, legal, and social implications of emerging technologies. This wide-ranging conversation examines the growing impact of modern neuroscience on the law, deepening our understanding of a wide range of issues, from legal responsibility to the American Constitution's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Howard Burton is the founder of the Ideas Roadshow, Ideas on Film and host of the Ideas Roadshow Podcast. He can be reached at howard@ideasroadshow.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/neuroscience

Neurolaw is based on an in-depth filmed conversation between Howard Burton and Nita Farahany, Robert O. Everett Distinguished Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy at Duke University. Nita Farahany is a leading scholar on the ethical, legal, and social implications of emerging technologies. This wide-ranging conversation examines the growing impact of modern neuroscience on the law, deepening our understanding of a wide range of issues, from legal responsibility to the American Constitution's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Howard Burton is the founder of the Ideas Roadshow, Ideas on Film and host of the Ideas Roadshow Podcast. He can be reached at howard@ideasroadshow.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science-technology-and-society

Neurolaw is based on an in-depth filmed conversation between Howard Burton and Nita Farahany, Robert O. Everett Distinguished Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy at Duke University. Nita Farahany is a leading scholar on the ethical, legal, and social implications of emerging technologies. This wide-ranging conversation examines the growing impact of modern neuroscience on the law, deepening our understanding of a wide range of issues, from legal responsibility to the American Constitution's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Howard Burton is the founder of the Ideas Roadshow, Ideas on Film and host of the Ideas Roadshow Podcast. He can be reached at howard@ideasroadshow.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Neurolaw is based on an in-depth filmed conversation between Howard Burton and Nita Farahany, Robert O. Everett Distinguished Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy at Duke University. Nita Farahany is a leading scholar on the ethical, legal, and social implications of emerging technologies. This wide-ranging conversation examines the growing impact of modern neuroscience on the law, deepening our understanding of a wide range of issues, from legal responsibility to the American Constitution's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Howard Burton is the founder of the Ideas Roadshow, Ideas on Film and host of the Ideas Roadshow Podcast. He can be reached at howard@ideasroadshow.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law

Neurolaw is based on an in-depth filmed conversation between Howard Burton and Nita Farahany, Robert O. Everett Distinguished Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy at Duke University. Nita Farahany is a leading scholar on the ethical, legal, and social implications of emerging technologies. This wide-ranging conversation examines the growing impact of modern neuroscience on the law, deepening our understanding of a wide range of issues, from legal responsibility to the American Constitution's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Howard Burton is the founder of the Ideas Roadshow, Ideas on Film and host of the Ideas Roadshow Podcast. He can be reached at howard@ideasroadshow.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/psychology

Chat Buffet with Asha Makam and Joe Rosado is a weekly podcast talking about basically everything (or nothing) depending on how you want to look at it. They question the everyday things, share thoughts and opinions in a fun, light hearted way that might even make you laugh. Go ahead and share these "water-cooler" topics or better yet, share the Chat Buffet podcast with your friends and family! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/chatbuffet/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/chatbuffet/support

In this episode, Therese Markow and Dr. Francis Shen discuss the interaction between neuroscience and the law. While we do need to be cautious about bringing biology and neurobiology into the law space, there are instances where brain function does interact with the law. There have been questions about the insanity defense, how memory plays a role in criminal justice, how jurors’ perception might influence their decisions, and more. The questions are becoming more common as well when you begin asking questions regarding the aging brain and privacy protections. Neuroscience and law do not happen in a vacuum - current issues, such as the current racial injustice issues in the US and around the world, are also important to this topic and how they are relevant to different communities and groups of people.   Key Takeaways: We don’t know what a lie is - it is not currently possible to reliably distinguish between false statements and true statements with polygraphs.  There has been some reform around memory in the courtroom over the last decade informed by psychological and neuroscience.  Decision-making capacity and competency are not quite the same things. Courts determine competency. Decision-making capacity is routinely made by clinicians.   "Memory is foundational to the administration of Criminal Justice and the limitations evolve, and understandable and appropriate limitations of memory, pose real problems for the criminal justice system." —  Dr. Francis Shen   Connect with Dr. Francis Shen: Website: fxshen.com   Reference: The Punisher’s Brain by Morris B. Hoffman   Connect with Therese: Website:   www.criticallyspeaking.net Twitter: @CritiSpeak Email: theresemarkow@criticallyspeaking.net   Referral: The Jordan Harbinger Show   Audio production by Turnkey Podcast Productions. You're the expert. Your podcast will prove it.  

On this week's The Sci-Files, your hosts Chelsie and Danny interview Dhaval Gandhi. Dhaval is an undergraduate student at MSU in the departments of Neuroscience (College of Natural Science) and History Philosophy & Sociology of Science (Lyman Briggs College). He examines how neuroscience has slowly crept its way into various fields like marketing, philosophy, and law. Chiefly, Dhaval focused his research efforts on the ways neuroscience has begun to influence the legal system, creating a new niche field dubbed by others as 'neurolaw.' Historically, phrenology, an early tool to observe the brain's ability by examining the natural surface of an individual's head, was prevalent in the legal setting in the mid-1800s. Fortunately, American judges were quick to dismiss phrenological evidence as it lacked scientific evidence. In the last century, neuroscience has been slowing reintegrating back into the American legal system with polygraphs and MRI technology. Polygraphs were used as a measure of an individual or a witness was being fully honest. Moderately, the scientific basis of polygraphs has been questioned. Now, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) technology is being used for lie detection. This is unsettling as the machines used are unreliable, the results can be misleading, and the current legal system has inconsistencies that can make the matter more complicated. For these reasons, it's crucial that society separates the two fields of neuroscience and American law once again, as we did with phrenology until there is more scientific grounding for neuroscience-based legal evidence. Through his research and reasoning, he argues against the use of 'neurolaw' until better technologies and practices are developed.If you're interested in talking about your MSU research on the radio or nominating a student, please email Chelsie and Danny at scifiles@impact89fm.org. You can ask questions about future episodes here. Check The Sci-Files out on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube!

In part two we are continuing our amazing conversation with Dr. Octavio Choi, a forensic psychiatrist and the director of forensic evaluations at the Oregon State Hospital. In the continuation of our conversation we talk about what's happening in the brain during punishment, empathy, brain circuits, the psychopathic brain, neurodiversity, psychiatric medications, TMS, ECT, and the future of psychology.To apply to work with us, or more information on Being UnNormal check out our website at www.beingunnormal.comFollow us on social media!Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/beingunnormalInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/beingunnormalpodcastSupport the show (http://www.pateron.com/beingunnormal)

In this episode we are joined by Dr. Octavio Choi, director of forensic evaluations at the Oregon State Hospital. He is a forensic psychiatrist, and specializes in neurolaw. In this episode we chat about a ton of really cool topics including medication studies, neuroplasticity, memory recall and consolidation, trauma, optigentics.......and so much more! To apply to work with us, or more information on Being UnNormal check out our website at www.beingunnormal.comFollow us on social media!Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/beingunnormalInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/beingunnormalpodcastSupport the show (http://www.pateron.com/beingunnormal)

I talk with Chris Butler, who is a soon to be law student, currently finishing his undergrad at Kent State in Political Science, about neurolaw. Our starting topic is "stand your ground" and the recent shooting. We talk about culpability for crimes and what that means in the court room; who is more responsible for their crimes, someone predisposed to crime or someone not, and should we punish one more than the other?

The latest findings in neuroscience are increasingly affecting the justice system in America. Owen Jones, professor of law and biology at Vanderbilt University, explores where neurolaw is making its mark and where the discipline is heading.One significant finding from MRI scanners is that the adolescent brain continues to develop right into the early- and mid-twenties. The fact that we are not ‘adults' at age 18 is having big repercussions in the legal system.In San Francisco, the entire way that young offenders of crimes such as armed robbery up to the age of 25 are treated is adapting to the brain data.More and more, neuroscientists are testifying in courts, often to mitigate sentences including the death penalty in juveniles. Other times, they highlight rare brain abnormalities that cause violent and antisocial behaviour, which helps justify a lighter sentence.However, young brains are still malleable. In Wisconsin, brain imaging of juvenile prisoners can detect psychopathic markers. Once identified, staff can employ techniques to de-programme those antisocial traits and rehabilitate prisoners to ready them for, they hope, a crime-free life outside. And this is simply the first generation of neurolaw – where to next?(Photo: Human head scan, coloured magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of healthy brain. Credit: Getty Images)

Hello everyone and welcome back. In this episode Patrick talks with Dr. Berit Brogaard. Dr. Brogaard is a Professor and the Director of the Brogaard Lab for Multisensory Research at the University of Miami. Her work has been featured in various public media, including Nightline, ABC News, The Huffington Post, Fox News and MSNBC.  Dr. Brogaard has also done research in the criminal justice field regarding Neurolaw - which is an interdisciplinary study which links the brain and the law to understand why certain people act the way they do.  In her recent book The Superhuman Mind: Free the Genius in Your Brain she talks about a brave new world in which we can expect to see new drugs and technology that will help the harness our extraordinary abilities. Prepare for the age of the super-brain. Youd can find Dr. Brogaard here: https://www.psychologytoday.com/experts/berit-brogaard-dmsci-phd https://www.52-insights.com/berit-brogaard-berit-brogaard-are-we-ready-for-the-superhuman-mind-interview/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/beritbrogaard/ Find her recent book: The Superhuman Mind: Free the Genius in Your Brain here: https://www.amazon.com/Superhuman-Mind-Free-Genius-Brain/dp/1594633681/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1506721476&sr=8-2&keywords=Berit+Brogaard   Find this and other episode at www.cjevolution.net   Patrick        

Pig Cop http://nypost.com/2017/03/07/nypd-patrol-pig-hams-it-up-downtown/   AI that knows if you're guilty or not (Criminal Mind Reading Robot) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4301796/Mind-reading-AI-knows-guilty-innocent.html   Intel buys MobileEyes, moves to Israel, Driverless Cars http://www.reuters.com/article/us-intel-mobileye-idUSKBN16K0ZP https://techcrunch.com/2017/03/13/reports-intel-buying-mobileye-for-up-to-16b-to-expand-in-self-driving-tech/   Pope so Hip, Driving Electric Car http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/pope-francis-electric-car_us_58bd82fbe4b0d2821b4f9826   Boaty McBoatFace to explore AntArctica https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/13/boaty-mcboatface-to-go-on-first-antarctic-mission?CMP=fb_gu   Time Crystals Created https://www.rt.com/viral/380171-time-crystal-matter-atoms/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

This week's guest, Professor Jeanette Kennett from the Department of Philosophy, is a pioneer of neurolaw - a new interdisciplinary field that investigates the relationship between neuroscience and law. In her interview with Ben Mckelvey she discusses the implications of this on moral agency, criminality and culpability, the establishment of the neurolaw database, and how she was drawn to questions of justice.

Conventional thinking about brains, and blame, can be useless in a court of law.

Stephen Morse explores the state of play between law and neuroscience, where neurolaw is headed and what it means for personal responsibility. Experts Stephen Morse Ferdinand Wakeman Hubbell Professor of Law; Professor of Psychology and Law in Psychiatry; Associate Director, Center for Neuroscience & Society Host Steven Barnes Host, Editor-in-Chief, Case in Point

Stephen Morse explores the state of play between law and neuroscience, where neurolaw is headed and what it means for personal responsibility. Experts Stephen Morse Ferdinand Wakeman Hubbell Professor of Law; Professor of Psychology and Law in Psychiatry; Associate Director, Center for Neuroscience & Society Host Steven Barnes Host, Editor-in-Chief, Case in Point

Stephen Morse explores the state of play between law and neuroscience, where neurolaw is headed and what it means for personal responsibility.

Conventional thinking about brains and blame can be useless in a court of law.

--{ Not Allowed--Defiance to Neuroscience: "As Your Nerves get Frayed, Almost Raw, Reality's to Be Re-Defined via Neurolaw, Pre-Crime Predictions, Psychoactive Drugs Will Be Prescribed to Potential Young Thugs, You See, None of You are What You Think, Run by Chemicals, Synapses, Makes You Blink, You're the End Product of Competing Cells, Electrical Transmitters, Neuroscience Tells You've No Free Will, Behaviour Predictable, You're All Capable of Doing the Unthinkable, But Hail Genetics, Neuroscience the Saviour By Selecting Genes They'll Perfect Nature, Removing "Wrong Genes", In Vitro Fertilization, Move Over God, Science Will Save Civilization" © Alan Watt }-- Simplistic Propaganda - US Drone Strikes - H.G. Wells and Elitist Socialists - DC Comics Pushes Transgender Superheroes - Politicized Science - Psychiatry and Diagnosis of Mental Disorders - Mental Health Screening of Children - Philanthropists Guiding the World - Neuroscience and Neurolaw, Brain Scanning, Acquittals in Murder Trials - Kinsey Report - New York Mayoral Race and Corruption - Newtown-Sandy Hook Community Foundation - Anthony Weiner - Not Criminally Responsible Reform Act - Big Pharma Lobbying and Vaccinations - Androgyny Promotion, Elimination of Gender Differences. (See http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com for article links.) *Title/Poem and Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - April 11, 2013 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)