Podcast appearances and mentions of brady rule

The Brady Rule is a legal principle that requires prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense in criminal cases. The rule is named after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Brady v. Maryland (1963), which held that the prosecution has a constitutional obligation under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment.The Brady Rule applies to all evidence that is favorable to the defendant, including evidence that tends to impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness. The rule also requires the prosecution to disclose any evidence that is known to the government, whether or not the prosecution intends to use the evidence at trial. This includes evidence that is in the possession of law enforcement agencies, as well as evidence that is in the possession of other government agencies, such as intelligence agencies.In this episode, we discuss the new information and how it may come into play during the trial.(commercial at 6:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho prosecutors disclosing info about 'internal affairs investigation' related to officer on Kohberger case | Fox NewsSource:Giglio Information Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On the morning of December 9th, 1984, 19-year-old Christopher Turner woke up to the police breaking into his bedroom with guns drawn. He was arrested for the murder of Catherine Fuller, who was assaulted, robbed, and killed on the evening of October 1st, 1984. Based on testimonies delivered under coercion, Christopher was convicted of first degree murder, along with 8 other defendants, and sentenced to life in prison. It was later revealed that the prosecution withheld vital information, including several eyewitness testimonies implicating a different suspect, thus violating the Brady Rule. Turner remained hard-working, resilient, and optimistic despite the adversity he endured. He was released on parole in 2011 and continues to engage in prisoner advocacy work. Send emails of support for the pardon petition to: 8thandH@exonerate.org The Soul Searchers - We The People: https://youtu.be/Ehx2HfA3Dc0?si=pQcRTUnCKQQh6Axc Wrongful Conviction is a production of Lava for Good™ Podcasts in association with Signal Co. No1.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Brady Rule is a legal principle that requires prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense in criminal cases. The rule is named after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Brady v. Maryland (1963), which held that the prosecution has a constitutional obligation under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment.The Brady Rule applies to all evidence that is favorable to the defendant, including evidence that tends to impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness. The rule also requires the prosecution to disclose any evidence that is known to the government, whether or not the prosecution intends to use the evidence at trial. This includes evidence that is in the possession of law enforcement agencies, as well as evidence that is in the possession of other government agencies, such as intelligence agencies.In this episode, we discuss the new information and how it may come into play during the trial.(commercial at 6:52)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho prosecutors disclosing info about 'internal affairs investigation' related to officer on Kohberger case | Fox NewsSource:Giglio Information Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

The Brady Rule is a legal principle that requires prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense in criminal cases. The rule is named after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Brady v. Maryland (1963), which held that the prosecution has a constitutional obligation under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment.The Brady Rule applies to all evidence that is favorable to the defendant, including evidence that tends to impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness. The rule also requires the prosecution to disclose any evidence that is known to the government, whether or not the prosecution intends to use the evidence at trial. This includes evidence that is in the possession of law enforcement agencies, as well as evidence that is in the possession of other government agencies, such as intelligence agencies.In this episode, we discuss the new information and how it may come into play during the trial.(commercial at 8:17)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho prosecutors disclosing info about 'internal affairs investigation' related to officer on Kohberger case | Fox NewsSource:Giglio Information Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A new Tom Brady rule, unretired numbers and Jalen Hurts wants control full 491 Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:35:02 +0000 iS3On9YfotHYKeY2fE1OzALBkuabP51w #nfl,society & culture Cody & Gold #nfl,society & culture A new Tom Brady rule, unretired numbers and Jalen Hurts wants control Hosts Cody Tapp & Alex Gold team up for 610 Sports Radio's newest mid-day show "Cody & Gold."  Two born & raised Kansas Citians, Cody & Gold have been through all the highs and lows as a KC sports fan and they know the passion Kansas City has for their sports teams."Cody & Gold" will be a show focused on smart, sports conversation with the best voices from KC and around the country. It will also feature our listeners with your calls, texts & tweets as we want you to be a part of the show, not just a listener.  Cody & Gold, weekdays 10a-2p on 610 Sports Radio.  2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc.

Rudy Giuliani discovers that getting out of bankruptcy court is harder than falling on your keyster at the RNC. And New Mexico prosecutors discover one weird trick to blow up a criminal case. (It is the Brady rule!) Plus Patreons get an update on the Louisiana ten commandments mandate. Links: NMSA 30-2-3 https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/ NMSA 30-7-4 https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/chapter-30/article-7/section-30-7-4/ Alec Baldwin docket https://caselookup.nmcourts.gov/caselookup/app?component=cnLink&page=SearchResults&service=direct&session=T&sp=SD-101-CR-202400013 Baldwin MTD Failure to state an offense https://nmcourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/May-6-2024-Defendant-Alex-Baldwin-Motion-to-Dismiss-the-Indictment-for-Failure-to-Allege-a-Criminal-Offense-10-53-pm.pdf Baldwin MTD Destruction of evidence https://nmcourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/May-6-2024-Defendant-Alex-Baldwin-Motion-to-Dismiss-the-Indictment-with-Prejudice-Based-on-the-State-Destruction-of-Evidence-10-32-pm.pdf Baldwin Addendum re destruction of evidence https://nmcourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/June-17-2024-Addendum-to-Defendants-Motion-to-Dismiss-based-on-the-Destruction-of-Evidence-456p.pdf Baldwin June 24 MTD Brady https://nmcourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/June-24-2024-Defendants-Motion-for-Relief-for-States-Brady-and-State-Law-Disclosure-Violations-Related-to-Non-Firearm-Discovery-240p.pdf Baldwin July 11 MTD Brady https://nmcourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/July-11-2024-Defendants-Motion-for-Dismissal-and-Sanctions-under-Brady-Giglio-and-Rule-5-501-752p.pdf Roake v. Brumley - Louisiana Ten Commandments - Status update https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lamd.64943/gov.uscourts.lamd.64943.31.0.pdf Show Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod Patreon: patreon.com/LawAndChaosPod  

The New York Times announced Dr. Ruth's death.  As America's sex doctor, what did her career teach us that we should all learn?  Michael explains.Alec Baldwin's criminal charges for involuntary manslaughter are dismissed.  Michael believes Baldwin was guilty, but also agrees with the judge that the prosecutors violated the Brady Rule and the charges should have been dismissed.  It's a law school class in criminal procedure and due process.

The Brady Rule is a legal principle that requires prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense in criminal cases. The rule is named after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Brady v. Maryland (1963), which held that the prosecution has a constitutional obligation under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment.The Brady Rule applies to all evidence that is favorable to the defendant, including evidence that tends to impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness. The rule also requires the prosecution to disclose any evidence that is known to the government, whether or not the prosecution intends to use the evidence at trial. This includes evidence that is in the possession of law enforcement agencies, as well as evidence that is in the possession of other government agencies, such as intelligence agencies.In this episode, we discuss the new information and how it may come into play during the trial.(commercial at 8:31)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho prosecutors disclosing info about 'internal affairs investigation' related to officer on Kohberger case | Fox NewsThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

The Brady Rule is a legal principle that requires prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense in criminal cases. The rule is named after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Brady v. Maryland (1963), which held that the prosecution has a constitutional obligation under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment.The Brady Rule applies to all evidence that is favorable to the defendant, including evidence that tends to impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness. The rule also requires the prosecution to disclose any evidence that is known to the government, whether or not the prosecution intends to use the evidence at trial. This includes evidence that is in the possession of law enforcement agencies, as well as evidence that is in the possession of other government agencies, such as intelligence agencies.In this episode, we discuss the new information and how it may come into play during the trial.(commercial at 6:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho prosecutors disclosing info about 'internal affairs investigation' related to officer on Kohberger case | Fox NewsThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

Content Warning:  This episode contains brief descriptions of violence, including sexual violence involved in the 1984 Catherine Fuller case. Check out the video of this interview here! “What's at stake when prosecutors conceal evidence—and what we can do about it.”  - From the description of the book When Innocence Is Not Enough: Hidden Evidence and the Failed Promise of the Brady Rule, written by today's guest, Thomas L. Dybdahl. Through stories of real criminal cases in which justice wasn't served, Tom's book and the discussions in this interview may outrage you.  I hope it does. Let's take our anger and our outrage and use it together to change our broken justice system. Links mentioned in this episode: As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Thank you for supporting Fierce Conversations with Toby through your purchases of what we feature on the podcast! Thomas L. Dybdahl: Book ____________________________________ Toby Dorr: Books and Audiobook Website   Patreon YouTube Instagram Facebook Or head to https://linktr.ee/fierceconversations for all things Fierce Conversations with Toby. Credits: Created by Toby Dorr. Produced by Number Three Productions, a division of GracePoint Publishing. Theme song: Lisa Plasse: Composer, arranger, and flutist Caroline Parody: Piano Tony Ventura: Bass For more information on these fabulous musicians, please go to https://tobydorr.com/theme-song/

The Brady Rule is a legal principle that requires prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense in criminal cases. The rule is named after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Brady v. Maryland (1963), which held that the prosecution has a constitutional obligation under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment.The Brady Rule applies to all evidence that is favorable to the defendant, including evidence that tends to impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness. The rule also requires the prosecution to disclose any evidence that is known to the government, whether or not the prosecution intends to use the evidence at trial. This includes evidence that is in the possession of law enforcement agencies, as well as evidence that is in the possession of other government agencies, such as intelligence agencies.In this episode, we discuss the new information and how it may come into play during the trial. (commercial at 6:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho prosecutors disclosing info about 'internal affairs investigation' related to officer on Kohberger case | Fox NewsSource:Giglio Information Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

The Brady Rule is a legal principle that requires prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense in criminal cases. The rule is named after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Brady v. Maryland (1963), which held that the prosecution has a constitutional obligation under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment.The Brady Rule applies to all evidence that is favorable to the defendant, including evidence that tends to impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness. The rule also requires the prosecution to disclose any evidence that is known to the government, whether or not the prosecution intends to use the evidence at trial. This includes evidence that is in the possession of law enforcement agencies, as well as evidence that is in the possession of other government agencies, such as intelligence agencies.In this episode, we discuss the new information and how it may come into play during the trial. (commercial at 6:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho prosecutors disclosing info about 'internal affairs investigation' related to officer on Kohberger case | Fox NewsSource:Giglio Information Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

Former Spectrum journalist, Adventist pastor, and then defense attorney, Thomas L. Dybdahl talks about his life and his new book. Published by The New Press, When Innocence Is Not Enough: Hidden Evidence and the Failed Promise of the Brady Rule tells several gripping tales of crime and the wrongs done to the falsely accused when prosecutors don't share evidence.

In this episode of Guaranteed Money Ryan Doyle and millennial entrepreneur Anthony Varell look at why a professional fighting league is under fire from bettors, Tom Brady's latest NFT deal, and how F1 deserves every penny they are asking for. That and more on Guaranteed Money! __________________________________________________________About Channel:We are a business news platform that provides the latest and best insight on the stories making headlines around the world. We give Institutional and retail investors an inside edge in the competitive world of investing and profile companies that are making waves in their ever-growing industries.We are The Dales Report.Check out our website: https://thedalesreport.com/​​Subscribe to our channel at https://article.thedalesreport.com/yo...Twitter: Ryan Doyle: https://twitter.com/ryandoyleshowAnthony Varrell: https://twitter.com/V_arrell_________________________________________________The Dales Report Inc. disclosure policy applies to this audio: https://thedalesreport.com/disclosure/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This program will continue to discuss the response to the events surrounding the mostly peaceful demonstration that occurred at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 in which citizens protested the fraudulent 2020 election. I am continuing to do this because the treatment of these demonstrators vividly illustrates the destruction of our Constitutional Republic. Numerous citizens who exercised their First Amendment rights of freedom of speech, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to petition for a redress of grievances because of the blatant fraud that occurred during the 2020 election have been vilified by the treasonous Bible-mocking media and by deceitful, self-serving politicians. Many of those who peacefully demonstrated on January 6 have been incarcerated and tortured without a trial, thus violating the Fifth Amendment (deprived of liberty without due process), Sixth Amendment (deprived of a right to a speedy trial), and Eighth Amendment (deprived of reasonable bail and subject to cruel and unusual punishment). As stated in Article VI of the US Constitution, the US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, so the fact that various levels of government are blatantly violating the clearly stated rights codified in the Bill of Rights makes this exceptionally execrable. This outrageous criminal action by our government against law-abiding citizens is indicative of what the ruling class wants to do to any who question them or obstruct them in any way and is a message from our Deep State rulers to us to cower us into submission by giving us vivid examples of how cruel, sadistic, and criminal their behavior can be towards those who oppose them. As I said in a previous program, you are guaranteed to have friendly relations with liberals if you hand over your possessions, hand over your children, hand over your liberty, and keep your mouth shut. I intend to do none of these. Specifically, in this program, I will be reading, and commenting on, the death of Steven Anderson of St Augustine, Florida, who was identified as one of eight people from North Florida involved in the January 6, 2021, protests at the US Capitol. He had been indicted in March on charges that included civil disorder and assaulting or resisting officers. Mr. Anderson claimed that he never assaulted anyone; that he collapsed after being sprayed and was assisted by Capitol Police officers. Prosecuting attorneys had suppressed the video that would have corroborated Mr. Anderson's account; by failing to provide exculpatory evidence to Mr. Anderson and his attorney, the prosecutors in Mr. Anderson's case appear to have violated the Brady Rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), which requires prosecutors to disclose materially exculpatory evidence in the government's possession to the defense. It seems obvious to me that the incarceration of those involved in the mostly peaceful demonstration at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 is meant to provide the rationale for the demonization and persecution of those who oppose the current regime in Washington, DC. Five people died during the January 6, 2021 demonstration at the US Capitol, but the only death by violence was that of Ashli Babbitt, callously shot by a Capitol Police Officer. Never forget Ashli Babbitt. My email address is freedom@libertyandposterity.com. © Copyright 2021 Liberty and Posterity

Antioch police officials suspected one of their veteran detectives of leaking operational details as far back as 2010. But they didn't fire Santiago Castillo for another seven years. During that time, he investigated hundreds of cases including several homicides, and his testimony helped put dozens of people behind bars.

Antioch police officials suspected one of their veteran detectives of leaking operational details as far back as 2010. But they didn't fire Santiago Castillo for another seven years. During that time, he investigated hundreds of cases including several homicides, and his testimony helped put dozens of people behind bars.

Our colleagues at KQED and NPR have spent countless hours analyzing the world of police discipline, thanks to a police transparency law that unsealed thousands of files.  And over the past few weeks, they've been sharing that work in the form of On Our Watch, a limited-run podcast that brings you into the rooms where officers are interrogated and witnesses are questioned, to find out who this shadow system of police accountability really serves, and who it protects. Many episodes of On Our Watch also focus on Bay Area police departments. And today, we wanted to share an episode that focuses on Antioch — and what happened when a veteran detective spent years leaking operational secrets. Subscribe to On Our Watch here. 

Fellow officers long suspected a veteran detective in Antioch, Calif., was leaking operational police secrets to a drug dealer. For years, the department didn't act on their concerns. Even after the detective was finally fired in 2017, his record remained secret. In episode six of On Our Watch we look at the incentives departments have to investigate dishonest cops and what the secrecy around police misconduct means for criminal defendants who are prosecuted on their testimony.

Fellow officers long suspected a veteran detective in Antioch, Calif., was leaking operational police secrets to a drug dealer. For years, the department didn't act on their concerns. Even after the detective was finally fired in 2017, his record remained secret. In episode six of On Our Watch we look at the incentives departments have to investigate dishonest cops and what the secrecy around police misconduct means for criminal defendants who are prosecuted on their testimony.

2nd welfare check in Texas ends in fatal police shooting; Georgia cop sentenced to 5-yrs in prison for fatal shooting, will only serve 1-year; Police Departments & Prosecutors ignore “Brady Rule” mandate plus other trending news Support the show via Cash App - https://cash.app/$sgtdorseyspeaks Sgt Dorsey’s Autobiography available ~ http://bit.ly/2AGhYmQ This podcast is sponsored by the book "SURVIVING THE ORAL INTERVIEW: BOOT CAMP FOR THE MIND" authored by Zimmie Williams retired L.A.P.D. sergeant, and former member of the United States Navy. We are also pleased to add Ursula Image Consulting as our second sponsor. Contact Ursula for an appointment now at 626 4940355 or on Instagram @ursulaimageconsulting. Mention SDS and receive 15% of your 1st salon visit at Headtrip Salon 16 East Bellevue Drive Pasadena CA For over two decades, Retired Los Angeles Police Department(LAPD) Sergeant Cheryl Dorsey worked exclusively in patrol and specialized units in all four Bureaus within the City of Los Angeles; South, Central, West and Valley. In addition to various patrol division assignments, Sgt. Dorsey was assigned to the infamous gang unit in Operations South Bureau; known as Community Resources Against Street Hoodlums (C.R.A.S.H.) under the command of Police Chief Daryl F. Gates Sgt. Dorsey is a highly sought police expert on significant criminal justice issues making national headlines. She has been a frequent commentator on CNN, Fox News, OWN, CNN International, HLNTV, Law and Crime Network, Inside Edition, MSNBC as well as appearing on KPCC, Democracy Now, Tom Joyner Morning Show and KABC Talk Radio. Sgt. Dorsey has been seen on Brazilian TVGlobo, Tavis Smiley, Dr. Drew, Dr. Phil and TD Jakes Shows, BET Network’s docu-series “Finding Justice” as well as TV Crime Series; “It Takes A Killer”, “Corrupt Crimes” and “Dead Files”. Cheryl Dorsey has written an autobiography entitled, “Black and Blue, The Creation of A Social Advocate" which chronicles her 20- year LAPD journey. “Black and Blue, The Creation of A Social Advocate" is available on Amazon.com https://www.amazon.com/Black-Blue-Creation-Social-Advocate/dp/1725511819

2nd welfare check in Texas ends in fatal police shooting; Georgia cop sentenced to 5-yrs in prison for fatal shooting, will only serve 1-year; Police Departments & Prosecutors ignore “Brady Rule” mandate plus other trending newsSupport the show via Cash App - https://cash.app/$sgtdorseyspeaksSgt Dorsey’s Autobiography available ~ http://bit.ly/2AGhYmQ This podcast is sponsored by the book "SURVIVING THE ORAL INTERVIEW: BOOT CAMP FOR THE MIND" authored by Zimmie Williams retired L.A.P.D. sergeant, and former member of the United States Navy.We are also pleased to add Ursula Image Consulting as our second sponsor. Contact Ursula for an appointment now at 626 4940355 or on Instagram @ursulaimageconsulting. Mention SDS and receive 15% of your 1st salon visit at Headtrip Salon 16 East Bellevue Drive Pasadena CAFor over two decades, Retired Los Angeles Police Department(LAPD) Sergeant Cheryl Dorsey worked exclusively in patrol and specialized units in all four Bureaus within the City of Los Angeles; South, Central, West and Valley. In addition to various patrol division assignments, Sgt. Dorsey was assigned to the infamous gang unit in Operations South Bureau; known as Community Resources Against Street Hoodlums (C.R.A.S.H.) under the command of Police Chief Daryl F. GatesSgt. Dorsey is a highly sought police expert on significant criminal justice issues making national headlines. She has been a frequent commentator on CNN, Fox News, OWN, CNN International, HLNTV, Law and Crime Network, Inside Edition, MSNBC as well as appearing on KPCC, Democracy Now, Tom Joyner Morning Show and KABC Talk Radio. Sgt. Dorsey has been seen on Brazilian TVGlobo, Tavis Smiley, Dr. Drew, Dr. Phil and TD Jakes Shows, BET Network’s docu-series “Finding Justice” as well as TV Crime Series; “It Takes A Killer”, “Corrupt Crimes” and “Dead Files”.Cheryl Dorsey has written an autobiography entitled, “Black and Blue, The Creation of A Social Advocate" which chronicles her 20- year LAPD journey.“Black and Blue, The Creation of A Social Advocate" is available on Amazon.com https://www.amazon.com/Black-Blue-Creation-Social-Advocate/dp/1725511819

When police showed up to question John Thompson, he was worried that it was because he had sold drugs to an undercover cop.  When he realized they were investigating a murder, he could only laugh: “Shit, for real? Murder?”Thompson was insistent on his innocence, but New Orleans prosecutors wanted a conviction for a high-profile murder, and they were not scrupulous about how they got it. Thompson quickly found himself on death row. Eighteen years later, just weeks before Thompson was due to be executed, his lawyers discovered that a prosecutor had hidden exculpatory evidence from the defense. Thompson had been set up. This was a violation of the Brady Rule, established by the Supreme Court, in 1963, to ensure fair trials. Ultimately, he was exonerated of both crimes, but his attempts to get a settlement from the district attorney’s office—compensation for his time in prison—were thwarted. Though an appeals court had upheld a fourteen-million-dollar settlement, the Supreme Court reversed the decision, declining to punish the D.A. for violating the Court's own ruling. Thompson’s case revealed fundamental imbalances that undermine the very notion of a fair trial.  Under the Brady Rule, prosecutors must share with the defense any evidence that could be favorable to the defendant.  But there is essentially no practical enforcement of this rule. In most states, prosecutors are the ones who hold the evidence and choose what to share, and disclosing exculpatory evidence makes their cases harder to win. We have absolutely no idea how many criminal trials are flawed by these violations.The staff writer Andrew Marantz, his wife, Sarah Lustbader, of the Fair Punishment Project, and the producer Katherine Wells reported on John Thompson’s story and its implications. They spoke with the late John Thompson (who died in 2017), with his lawyers, and with Harry Connick, Sr., the retired New Orleans D.A. who, despite having tried very hard to have Thompson killed, remains unrepentant. This episode contains explicit language and may not be suitable for children.

Brady v Maryland is the case that set the precedent of the well-known "Brady Rule". In this episode, we explore the crime of John L Brady, his trial, and the precedent set in the Supreme Court trial. Music by Kai Engel Supreme Court audio provided by oyez.org.