POPULARITY
31 episodes with second circuit court
34 episodes with second circuit court
26 episodes with second circuit court
5 episodes with second circuit court
3 episodes with second circuit court
2 episodes with second circuit court
3 episodes with second circuit court
2 episodes with second circuit court
2 episodes with second circuit court
Michael Popok is back with Karen Friedman Agnifilo with the Legal AF podcast, the #1 law and politics podcast on this week's YouTube rankings, and they take on: 1) a judge finding that the Trump Administration's "evidence" did not support holding Kilmar Abrego in jail nor prove that he was in the MS13 gang; 2) Trump suing all the federal district judges in Maryland in a blatant example of forum shopping; 3) the ultimate DOJ insider blowing the whistle on the DOJ and its assault on federal judges and its impact on the confirmation hearings of Trump's top lawyer Emil Bove for a lifetime appeals court judge position; 4) the Trump Administration running back to the Supreme Court because a Federal Judge ruled that he still has jurisdiction to stop removals without due process to third world countries; 5) E Jean Carroll winning again for the second time in 2 weeks at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to affirm her almost $100 million in judgments against Trump, and so much more at the intersection of law and politics. One Skin: Get started today at https://OneSkin.co and receive 15% Off using code: LEGALAF Uplift: Elevate your workspace and energize your year with Uplift Desk. Go to https://upliftdesk.com/legalaf for a special offer exclusive to our audience. Mud/Wtr: Start your new morning ritual & get up to 43% OFF your @MUDWTR by going to https://mudwtr.com/LEGALAF #mudwtrpod Honey Love: Get 20% Off your entire order with our exclusive link: https://honeylove.com/LEGALAF Subscribe to the NEW Legal AF Substack: https://substack.com/@legalaf Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
It's been a big week for some of the dumber litigation we follow around here. It's not all dumb — we start with an update on California's litigation over the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles, where the state has gotten relief at the trial court level but faces a tough road in the appeals courts. And we look at a case in Boston where a federal judge has blocked, for now, the cancellation of certain grants the National Institutes of Health have deemed excessively DEI-related.Then we have updates on Mike Lindell, who says the $2.3 million defamation judgment against him is actually a victory; Michael Avenatti, who appealed his sentence and got it reduced very slightly (rare win!); and various Proud Boys, who made the mistake of hiring a felon to be their lawyer; some weird drama at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, where Judge Stephen Menashi is really annoyed his colleagues didn't want to reopen the E. Jean Carroll litigation. And we look at juror drama at the P. Diddy trial. And — most excitingly — Josh makes Ken talk about the Real Housewives.Visit serioustrouble.show to sign up for our newsletter and find a transcript of this episode. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.serioustrouble.show/subscribe
Thursday, June 12th, 2025Today, Trump's new lawyers argue at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to move his 34 felony count appeal to federal court; Trump's DoJ calls Governor Newsom's lawsuit a crass political stunt and irony immediately died; Customs and Border Protection confirms it's flying Predator drones over Los Angeles; a new Quinnipiac poll shows Trump's approval is sliding considerably across all issues; Trump and Kegseth screened military audience members for loyalty and weight prior to his speech at Fort Liberty (i refuse to call it Fort Bragg); Representative LaMonica McIver has been wrongfully indicted by a grand jury; a Manhattan jury found Harvey Weinstein guilty on a sex crimes charge on Wednesday; they've resorted to paying people to attend Trump's stupid birthday parade; and Allison and Dana deliver your Good News.Thank You, IQBARText DAILYBEANS to 64000 to get 20% off all IQBAR products, plus FREE shipping. Message and data rates may apply. Thank You, PacagenFor an extra 25% off your order and a special gift, head to Pacagen.com/DAILYBEANS.MSW Media, Blue Wave California Victory Fund | ActBlueMarines Unleashed In LA! Trump's Authoritarian Crackdown Intensifies with Allison GillCheck out Dana's social media campaign highlighting LGBTQ+ heroes every day during Pride Month - Dana Goldberg (@dgcomedy.bsky.social)Guest: Los Angeles Mayor Karen BassMayor Bass on what's happening on the ground in Los Angeles. Mayor Karen Bass - LACity.govGuest: Adam KlasfeldAll Rise NewsAll Rise News - Bluesky, @klasfeldreports.com - BlueSky, @KlasfeldReports - TwitterTrump's criminal appeal: All Rise News special coverage | All Rise NewsStoriesBragg Soldiers Who Cheered Trump's Political Attacks While in Uniform Were Checked for Allegiance, Appearance | Military.comCBP Confirms It Is Flying Predator Drones Above Los Angeles To Support ICE | 404 MediaRep. LaMonica McIver indicted on federal charges over clash with law enforcement at ICE facility in New Jersey | NBC NewsHarvey Weinstein convicted of sex crime amid contentious jury deliberations | ReutersGood Trouble: FBI — Seeking Information on Assault on a Federal Officers in The Los Angeles AreaProton Mail: free email account with privacy and encryptionFind Upcoming Demonstrations And ActionsSat June 14 10am – 12pm PDT AG is hosting NO KINGS Waterfront Park, San DiegoDonation link - secure.actblue.com/donate/fuelthemovement250th Anniversary of the U.S. Army Grand Military Parade and Celebration50501 MovementJune 14th Nationwide Demonstrations - NoKings.orgIndivisible.orgFederal workers - feel free to email me at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewrote , Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote,Dana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyCheck out other MSW Media podcastsShows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 podSubscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on SubstackThe BreakdownFrom The Good NewsNoKings.orgNo Kings Action GuidelinesThe American Anthropological Association877-447-4487 (GI Rights Hotline) - Courage to ResistDaily Beans Fundraiser - Whistleblower AidCALL ME IZZY - On BroadwayReminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Federal workers - feel free to email me at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen.Share your Good News or Good TroubleMSW Good News and Good Trouble Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewrote , Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote,Dana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts
Good morning, I'm reporting live on the latest developments in the legal saga surrounding former President Donald Trump. It's Friday, May 9th, 2025, and the past few months have seen significant developments in Trump's various legal battles.Earlier this year, on January 10th, Justice Juan Merchan sentenced Donald Trump to unconditional discharge following his conviction on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in Manhattan. This marked the conclusion of the first-ever criminal trial of a former U.S. president, which had captivated the nation since it began on April 15th, 2024, resulting in the jury's guilty verdict last May.Meanwhile, in the classified documents case in Florida, a dramatic turn occurred when Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the federal indictment against Trump last July, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. Though the Justice Department initially appealed to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, they ultimately dropped the appeal against Trump in late November 2024, followed by dismissing appeals against his co-defendants Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira in January of this year.The legal calendar continues to be packed with Trump-related proceedings. Mark Meadows, Trump's former chief of staff, has petitioned the Supreme Court following the 11th Circuit's dismissal of his attempt to move his Georgia criminal case to federal court.In the New York civil fraud case, Trump and his co-defendants have filed appeals against Justice Engoron's decisions from last year. Attorney General Letitia James successfully requested to consolidate these appeals, which are now proceeding with a single record and set of briefs.Just three months ago, in February, a new lawsuit emerged challenging the Trump administration's handling of the refugee processing system. The case, Pacito v. Trump, was filed on February 10th with plaintiffs seeking a preliminary injunction the following day.Trump is also making another attempt to remove Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's state prosecution to federal court. After his second notice of removal was rejected and Judge Hellerstein denied his request for leave, Trump appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.As these cases continue to unfold, the intersection of law and politics remains at the forefront of American discourse, with each development adding new chapters to this unprecedented legal saga surrounding the former president.
In this episode, Jordan discusses a Second Circuit Court of Appeals opinion on statute of limitations, and a Central District of California decision on trade secret identification, and specifically the importance of distinguishing alleged trade secret information from public information included in patents.
Comment on the Show by Sending Mark a Text Message.This episode is part of my initiative to provide access to important court decisions impacting employees in an easy to understand conversational format using AI. The speakers in the episode are AI generated and frankly sound great to listen to. Enjoy!A landmark legal decision has just reshaped our understanding of workplace disability accommodations. On March 25, 2025, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Tudor v. Whitehall Central School District fundamentally changes how we interpret the Americans with Disabilities Act, establishing that employees may qualify for reasonable accommodations even when they can technically perform their job without them.We break down Angel Tudor's journey—a teacher whose request to leave campus during prep periods to manage her PTSD symptoms was denied, despite having previously received this accommodation. The conflict emerged when a new administration implemented a blanket policy against leaving school grounds, prioritizing standardized operations over individual needs. While Tudor could technically teach without these breaks, she maintained they were crucial for managing her disability and maintaining her wellbeing.The fascinating legal battle hinges on interpretation of the ADA's specific language. The initial district court ruled that since Tudor could perform her essential job functions, she wasn't entitled to accommodation. But the Second Circuit emphatically disagreed, focusing on the critical phrase "with or without reasonable accommodation" in the law. Their interpretation opens new possibilities for workplace equity, recognizing that accommodations may address pain and other disability effects even when basic job performance is possible.This case exposes the tension between employers' desire for standardized policies and their obligation to accommodate individual employees with disabilities. It raises profound questions about moving beyond minimal compliance toward creating genuinely inclusive environments where everyone can contribute their best work. Whether you're an employer, employee, or simply interested in workplace rights, this ruling provides a powerful framework for understanding what true accessibility looks like in practice. If you enjoyed this episode of the Employee Survival Guide please like us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. We would really appreciate if you could leave a review of this podcast on your favorite podcast player such as Apple Podcasts. Leaving a review will inform other listeners you found the content on this podcast is important in the area of employment law in the United States. For more information, please contact our employment attorneys at Carey & Associates, P.C. at 203-255-4150, www.capclaw.com.Disclaimer: For educational use only, not intended to be legal advice.
In her reply brief supporting her appeal, Ghislaine Maxwell contended that her prosecution was unjust due to her status as a third-party beneficiary of Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. She argued that this agreement should have precluded her prosecution in the Southern District of New York, asserting that the NPA's protections extended to her and others associated with Epstein. Maxwell's legal team maintained that the government's decision to prosecute her in New York violated the terms of the NPA, thereby infringing upon her rightsAdditionally, Maxwell's brief addressed concerns regarding juror misconduct during her trial. She claimed that a juror's failure to disclose their history of sexual abuse during voir dire compromised the fairness of the proceedings, warranting a new trial. Maxwell's defense emphasized that this omission could have introduced bias, undermining the integrity of the jury's verdict. Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld her conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the United States government submitted a brief urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold her conviction and sentence. The government contended that Maxwell's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that her prosecution was not barred by Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the NPA did not extend immunity to Maxwell for crimes prosecuted in the Southern District of New York, asserting that her conviction was based on substantial evidence demonstrating her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minors.Additionally, the government's brief addressed Maxwell's claims of juror misconduct and alleged procedural errors during the trial. They maintained that the district court had appropriately handled these issues, ensuring Maxwell's right to a fair trial was preserved. The government further argued that the sentence imposed was reasonable and proportionate to the severity of her offenses. Ultimately, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the United States government submitted a brief urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold her conviction and sentence. The government contended that Maxwell's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that her prosecution was not barred by Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the NPA did not extend immunity to Maxwell for crimes prosecuted in the Southern District of New York, asserting that her conviction was based on substantial evidence demonstrating her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minors.Additionally, the government's brief addressed Maxwell's claims of juror misconduct and alleged procedural errors during the trial. They maintained that the district court had appropriately handled these issues, ensuring Maxwell's right to a fair trial was preserved. The government further argued that the sentence imposed was reasonable and proportionate to the severity of her offenses. Ultimately, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the United States government submitted a brief urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold her conviction and sentence. The government contended that Maxwell's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that her prosecution was not barred by Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the NPA did not extend immunity to Maxwell for crimes prosecuted in the Southern District of New York, asserting that her conviction was based on substantial evidence demonstrating her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minors.Additionally, the government's brief addressed Maxwell's claims of juror misconduct and alleged procedural errors during the trial. They maintained that the district court had appropriately handled these issues, ensuring Maxwell's right to a fair trial was preserved. The government further argued that the sentence imposed was reasonable and proportionate to the severity of her offenses. Ultimately, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the United States government submitted a brief urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold her conviction and sentence. The government contended that Maxwell's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that her prosecution was not barred by Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the NPA did not extend immunity to Maxwell for crimes prosecuted in the Southern District of New York, asserting that her conviction was based on substantial evidence demonstrating her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minors.Additionally, the government's brief addressed Maxwell's claims of juror misconduct and alleged procedural errors during the trial. They maintained that the district court had appropriately handled these issues, ensuring Maxwell's right to a fair trial was preserved. The government further argued that the sentence imposed was reasonable and proportionate to the severity of her offenses. Ultimately, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the United States government submitted a brief urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold her conviction and sentence. The government contended that Maxwell's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that her prosecution was not barred by Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the NPA did not extend immunity to Maxwell for crimes prosecuted in the Southern District of New York, asserting that her conviction was based on substantial evidence demonstrating her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minors.Additionally, the government's brief addressed Maxwell's claims of juror misconduct and alleged procedural errors during the trial. They maintained that the district court had appropriately handled these issues, ensuring Maxwell's right to a fair trial was preserved. The government further argued that the sentence imposed was reasonable and proportionate to the severity of her offenses. Ultimately, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the United States government submitted a brief urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold her conviction and sentence. The government contended that Maxwell's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that her prosecution was not barred by Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the NPA did not extend immunity to Maxwell for crimes prosecuted in the Southern District of New York, asserting that her conviction was based on substantial evidence demonstrating her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minors.Additionally, the government's brief addressed Maxwell's claims of juror misconduct and alleged procedural errors during the trial. They maintained that the district court had appropriately handled these issues, ensuring Maxwell's right to a fair trial was preserved. The government further argued that the sentence imposed was reasonable and proportionate to the severity of her offenses. Ultimately, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
In her reply brief supporting her appeal, Ghislaine Maxwell contended that her prosecution was unjust due to her status as a third-party beneficiary of Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. She argued that this agreement should have precluded her prosecution in the Southern District of New York, asserting that the NPA's protections extended to her and others associated with Epstein. Maxwell's legal team maintained that the government's decision to prosecute her in New York violated the terms of the NPA, thereby infringing upon her rightsAdditionally, Maxwell's brief addressed concerns regarding juror misconduct during her trial. She claimed that a juror's failure to disclose their history of sexual abuse during voir dire compromised the fairness of the proceedings, warranting a new trial. Maxwell's defense emphasized that this omission could have introduced bias, undermining the integrity of the jury's verdict. Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld her conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Tuesday, December 31st, 2024Today, President Jimmy Carter has died at the age of 100; the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a $5 million New York civil trial jury verdict that found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll; the US Treasury has been hacked by China; special counsel Jack Smith has handed off the Trump documents appeal to the US Attorney's office in Florida; President Biden has announced a $2.5B Ukraine defense package; Trump has endorsed Mike Johnson for speaker of the House; and Allison and Dana delivers your Good News.Thank You To Stories:Jimmy Carter, 39th president and Nobel Peace Prize winner, dies at 100 (Kevin Sullivan and Edward Walsh, The Washington Post)U.S. Treasury says its computers were hacked by a Chinese 'threat actor' in a 'major incident' (NBC News)Biden announces $2.5 billion in Ukraine defense assistance (Fritz Farrow, Kevin Shalvey | ABC News)Trump endorses Mike Johnson ahead of perilous House speaker vote (Marianna Sotomayor, Mariana Alfaro and Meryl Kornfield | The Washington Post)Guest: Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comCheck out all 11 episodes of Trump's Project 2025https://trumpsproject2025pod.com/Follow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote, Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewroteDana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedy If you want to support what Harry Dunn and I are up to, head to patreon.com/aisle45podHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/From The Good NewsElizabeth Waring – Champions of Civil and Human Rights in South Carolina (digital.library.sc.edu)Aurora Animal Shelter - CO (auroragov.org) Colorado's Electric Vehicle Tax Credits (energyoffice.colorado.gov)About the ACA - Pre-Existing Conditions (hhs.gov) Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote, Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewroteDana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts
In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the United States government submitted a brief urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold her conviction and sentence. The government contended that Maxwell's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that her prosecution was not barred by Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the NPA did not extend immunity to Maxwell for crimes prosecuted in the Southern District of New York, asserting that her conviction was based on substantial evidence demonstrating her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minors.Additionally, the government's brief addressed Maxwell's claims of juror misconduct and alleged procedural errors during the trial. They maintained that the district court had appropriately handled these issues, ensuring Maxwell's right to a fair trial was preserved. The government further argued that the sentence imposed was reasonable and proportionate to the severity of her offenses. Ultimately, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the United States government submitted a brief urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold her conviction and sentence. The government contended that Maxwell's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that her prosecution was not barred by Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the NPA did not extend immunity to Maxwell for crimes prosecuted in the Southern District of New York, asserting that her conviction was based on substantial evidence demonstrating her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minors.Additionally, the government's brief addressed Maxwell's claims of juror misconduct and alleged procedural errors during the trial. They maintained that the district court had appropriately handled these issues, ensuring Maxwell's right to a fair trial was preserved. The government further argued that the sentence imposed was reasonable and proportionate to the severity of her offenses. Ultimately, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the United States government submitted a brief urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold her conviction and sentence. The government contended that Maxwell's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that her prosecution was not barred by Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the NPA did not extend immunity to Maxwell for crimes prosecuted in the Southern District of New York, asserting that her conviction was based on substantial evidence demonstrating her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minors.Additionally, the government's brief addressed Maxwell's claims of juror misconduct and alleged procedural errors during the trial. They maintained that the district court had appropriately handled these issues, ensuring Maxwell's right to a fair trial was preserved. The government further argued that the sentence imposed was reasonable and proportionate to the severity of her offenses. Ultimately, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In her reply brief supporting her appeal, Ghislaine Maxwell contended that her prosecution was unjust due to her status as a third-party beneficiary of Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. She argued that this agreement should have precluded her prosecution in the Southern District of New York, asserting that the NPA's protections extended to her and others associated with Epstein. Maxwell's legal team maintained that the government's decision to prosecute her in New York violated the terms of the NPA, thereby infringing upon her rightsAdditionally, Maxwell's brief addressed concerns regarding juror misconduct during her trial. She claimed that a juror's failure to disclose their history of sexual abuse during voir dire compromised the fairness of the proceedings, warranting a new trial. Maxwell's defense emphasized that this omission could have introduced bias, undermining the integrity of the jury's verdict. Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld her conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Comment on the Show by Sending Mark a Text Message.This episode is part of my initiative to provide access to important court decisions impacting employees in an easy to understand conversational format using AI. The speakers in the episode are AI generated and frankly sound great to listen to. Enjoy! What if a groundbreaking law could redefine how we handle sexual harassment claims in the workplace? Join us as we unravel the gripping case of Olivieri v. Stiefel, a corporate drama wrapped in legal intrigue and power struggles. Patricia Olivieri, a former client services associate, is not just fighting against alleged sexual harassment but is also challenging the constraints of her prior arbitration agreement, thanks to the new Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA). Discover how this pivotal legislation might enable her to bypass arbitration and take her allegations of misconduct and retaliation straight to court, setting a legal precedent that could impact corporate accountability across the nation.In this episode, we dive deep into the allegations against Olivieri's manager, Neil Eiler, whose inappropriate behavior pushed Olivieri to her limits. From graphic discussions to unwanted physical contact, her journey through reporting and retaliation reveals a complex narrative of workplace harassment. As Stiefel's internal investigation unfolds, led by HR's Zach Anderson, we explore the nuances of legal accrual and the implications of the EFAA on Olivieri's case, especially after her return from maternity leave. This episode promises to shed light on how these developments could transform workplace harassment litigation, exposing the tensions and tactics within corporate walls.Click here to read the case decision Olivieri v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. 112 F.4th 74 (2d Cir. 2024)The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Olivieri v. Stifel, rejecting the defendants' motion to compel arbitration. The case centers on whether the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA) applies to the plaintiff's claims of retaliatory hostile work environment. The court determined that the plaintiff's claims, which accrued after the EFAA's enactment due to the continuing violation doctrine, fall under the EFAA's purview, thus rendering the arbitration agreement unenforceable. The court addressed and rejected arguments concerning the EFAA's retroactive application and the definition of "sexual harassment dispute." The ruling confirms the plaintiff's right to pursue her case in federal court. If you enjoyed this episode of the Employee Survival Guide please like us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. We would really appreciate if you could leave a review of this podcast on your favorite podcast player such as Apple Podcasts. Leaving a review will inform other listeners you found the content on this podcast is important in the area of employment law in the United States. For more information, please contact our employment attorneys at Carey & Associates, P.C. at 203-255-4150, www.capclaw.com.Disclaimer: For educational use only, not intended to be legal advice.
Ghislaine Maxwell's recent attempt to overturn her sex trafficking conviction has been denied by a U.S. appeals court. On November 25, 2024, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected her request for an en banc review, where all active judges would reconsider her case. This decision upholds her 2021 conviction for aiding Jeffrey Epstein in sexually abusing teenage girls between 1994 and 2004. Maxwell, now 62, is serving a 20-year sentence at a low-security prison in Tallahassee, Florida, with eligibility for release in July 2037.Maxwell's legal team had argued that her prosecution was barred by a 2007 non-prosecution agreement between Epstein and federal prosecutors in Florida, which they claimed should have granted her immunity. However, the appeals court found that this agreement did not protect her from prosecution in New York. Additionally, the court dismissed her claims of juror misconduct and excessive sentencing, noting her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's abuse. Maxwell's attorneys plan to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, though the Court is not obligated to hear the case.(commercial at 8:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell has bid to appeal her sex trafficking conviction DENIED after her lawyers tried to argue a 'weird' agreement needed to be considered | Daily Mail Online
Ghislaine Maxwell's recent attempt to overturn her sex trafficking conviction has been denied by a U.S. appeals court. On November 25, 2024, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected her request for an en banc review, where all active judges would reconsider her case. This decision upholds her 2021 conviction for aiding Jeffrey Epstein in sexually abusing teenage girls between 1994 and 2004. Maxwell, now 62, is serving a 20-year sentence at a low-security prison in Tallahassee, Florida, with eligibility for release in July 2037.Maxwell's legal team had argued that her prosecution was barred by a 2007 non-prosecution agreement between Epstein and federal prosecutors in Florida, which they claimed should have granted her immunity. However, the appeals court found that this agreement did not protect her from prosecution in New York. Additionally, the court dismissed her claims of juror misconduct and excessive sentencing, noting her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's abuse. Maxwell's attorneys plan to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, though the Court is not obligated to hear the case.(commercial at 8:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell has bid to appeal her sex trafficking conviction DENIED after her lawyers tried to argue a 'weird' agreement needed to be considered | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Ghislaine Maxwell's recent attempt to overturn her sex trafficking conviction has been denied by a U.S. appeals court. On November 25, 2024, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected her request for an en banc review, where all active judges would reconsider her case. This decision upholds her 2021 conviction for aiding Jeffrey Epstein in sexually abusing teenage girls between 1994 and 2004. Maxwell, now 62, is serving a 20-year sentence at a low-security prison in Tallahassee, Florida, with eligibility for release in July 2037.Maxwell's legal team had argued that her prosecution was barred by a 2007 non-prosecution agreement between Epstein and federal prosecutors in Florida, which they claimed should have granted her immunity. However, the appeals court found that this agreement did not protect her from prosecution in New York. Additionally, the court dismissed her claims of juror misconduct and excessive sentencing, noting her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's abuse. Maxwell's attorneys plan to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, though the Court is not obligated to hear the case.(commercial at 8:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell has bid to appeal her sex trafficking conviction DENIED after her lawyers tried to argue a 'weird' agreement needed to be considered | Daily Mail Online
Watch The X22 Report On Video No videos found The economy is breaking down at an accelerated rate, credit rejection rates are spiking. DOGE is the answer to bring accountability and transparency. Ron Paul has now joined the DOGE team, he will go after the [CB] system. Gold purchases accelerate. The [DS] is pushing the last part of the 16 year plan. They are pushing nuclear war. The fake news is already reporting WWIII has started. The senate was very important. Moves and countermoves, Trump is using game theory on the [DS]. The [DS] is continually pushing the notion that they want a smooth transition, which means they do not. They are pushing the narrative that Trump has not signed the Transition agreement. In reality he does not need to, the transition happens on Jan 20. (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:13499335648425062,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-7164-1323"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="//cdn2.customads.co/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs"); Economy https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1859737201078161412 rejections skyrocketed to 45%, a new record since the survey began in 2013. Additionally, mortgage and auto loan rejection rates DOUBLED over the last 3 years to 23% and 14%, respectively. It has rarely been tougher to access credit in the US. Is the debt bubble bursting? https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1859763233114177711 https://twitter.com/WallStreetMav/status/1859944926282453065 https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1859958585415155917 https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1859645031553892708 overseas have not kept up with massive government debt issuance. At the same time, more countries have been increasingly diversifying their currency reserves by adding more gold. Are foreign governments losing confidence in US Treasuries? https://twitter.com/RonPaul/status/1859980691062358463 Political/Rights https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1859652312173773108 https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1859588165184651310 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1859665794801557724 https://twitter.com/ItsJuliansRum/status/1859819470501577141 3151 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f36d89 No.5801868 Mar 20 2019 22:04:25 (EST) Anonymous ID: 69d95e No.5801615 Mar 20 2019 21:55:45 (EST)1478371153525.png 1478378611222.jpg 1478380454361.jpg 1478381287814.jpg >>5801537 ayy >>5801615 Geopolitical/Police State https://twitter.com/DougAMacgregor/status/1859780424312160447 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York: In May 2018, Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald ruled that Trump's Twitter account, being used for official purposes, constituted a public forum under the First Amendment, and therefore, blocking individuals based on their viewpoints was unconstitutional. Second Circuit Court of Appeals: In July 2019, this court upheld the lower court's decision, ruling unanimously that Trump's blocking of Twitter users was a violation of the First Amendment. They argued that the president's account served as a public forum for discussing government business. Trump steps up battle with media by commanding GOP to ‘kill' PRESS Act President-elect Donald Trump is stepping up his long-running war with the media by demanding Republicans nix a reporter shield law working its way through Congress. “REPUBLICANS MUST KILL THIS BILL!” Trump wrote on Truth Social. The bill in question is the Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying Act, which would guarantee protections against government seizure of reporters' records. It unanimously passed in the House earlier this year but may now be imperiled in the Senate with just weeks to go before this session of Congress ends. Source: washingtonexaminer.com
In a new order, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has set an emergency hearing and assigned a new 3 judge panel to decide whether Trump gets to drag his state court criminal conviction to federal court or whether Judge Hellerstein telling Trump to stay on state court was right all along. Michael Popok who practices regularly before the 2nd Circuit breaks down the intersection of state and federal court and appeals and explains what's likely to happen next. Head to https://ProlonLife.com/LEGALAF to get 15% off their 5-day nutrition program. Visit https://meidastouch.com for more! Join the Legal AF Patreon: https://Patreon.com/LegalAF Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/lights-on-with-jessica-denson On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Last Friday's joint filing in the DC election interference case before Judge Chutkan highlighted the deep chasm between Special Counsel Jack Smith and Trump's legal team when it comes to how to proceed after the immunity decision. MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord give their unique perspective on what both sides offered up and which arguments hold merit. Then, they head to New York to detail the second effort by Trump's legal team to remove the hush money case to federal court, weeks before his scheduled sentencing before Judge Merchan.*** A note: Shortly after this episode was recorded, the federal judge denied leave to Mr. Trump to file removal papers after determining that no good cause for the late filing had been shown and removal to federal court was not warranted. Next stop: Trump can appeal that denial to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.Also to listeners: MSNBC Live Democracy 2024 is now sold out. Thank you for everyone who signed up to join us this weekend. And if you didn't manage to grab a ticket, we'll be posting selections of Saturday's conversations as a podcast next week, so keep an eye out for that.
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 7:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 7:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we conclude our look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 8:08)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 8:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 7:49)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 7:33)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 7:47)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 8:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 7:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 10:37)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 8:08)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 8:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 7:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 9:04)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 9:04)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 9:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 8:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 8:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 7:49)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 7:08)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 8:29)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 7:55)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 7:21)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has had his appeal to overturn his 2019 life sentence rejected by a U.S. court. Guzman was convicted on charges including drug trafficking, operating a criminal enterprise, and firearms violations. His legal team argued that his trial was unfair due to jury misconduct and the harsh conditions of his solitary confinement, which they claimed impacted his ability to mount a defense.Despite these arguments, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original verdict, praising the trial judge's management of the high-profile case and rejecting the claims of juror misconduct. The court also dismissed the argument regarding Guzman's solitary confinement, stating it did not infringe on his right to a fair trial.In this episode, we take a look at the DOJ's El Chapo Brief.(commercial at 8:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Chapo-ca2-us-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
