Podcast appearances and mentions of judge aileen cannon

The last several days in Donald Trump's courtroom saga have been nothing short of remarkable. Just last year, after a landmark trial in New York, Trump became the first former president to be found guilty on criminal charges. The Manhattan jury convicted him on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records—charges stemming from the so-called “hush money” case, allegations that Trump covered up payments meant to influence the 2016 election. In a surprise decision, Judge Juan Merchan sentenced Trump on January 10, 2025, to an unconditional discharge, meaning Trump avoided jail time and probation. This outcome left supporters relieved but critics calling for more accountability, and, unsurprisingly, Trump used the moment to rally his political base, declaring vindication while vowing to continue his agenda.Meanwhile, in the federal courts, the legal tides shifted dramatically following Trump's return to the White House. The two high-profile federal criminal cases—one in Florida regarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, and another in Washington D.C. related to accusations of obstruction and conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election—were both dismissed soon after his inauguration. In Florida, Judge Aileen Cannon ruled that Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment was improper, dismissing the indictment. The Justice Department eventually dropped its appeal, effectively ending prosecution in both the classified documents and obstruction matters. In D.C., Judge Tanya Chutkan granted a government motion to dismiss, closing the chapter on one of the most watched legal battles tied to January 6th.However, the courtrooms have not emptied. In the past month, drama erupted over President Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act. The administration deported over 100 Venezuelan nationals, alleged gang members, to El Salvador, even as federal Judge James Boasberg ordered those planes turned back to the United States. Plaintiffs' lawyers argued Trump's team violated the judge's order, and Judge Boasberg himself accused the administration of “bad faith” for rushing removals before the courts could weigh in. Although the Supreme Court later allowed further deportations, citing jurisdictional issues, the episode inflamed debate about executive power and the rule of law.In parallel, President Trump has issued a flurry of executive orders, including directives to repeal regulations inconsistent with recent Supreme Court decisions, further polarizing the broader national conversation. Across the country, every courtroom appearance, filing, and headline ensures that the legal fights surrounding Donald Trump remain central to American life, driving both the news cycle and the ongoing political divide.

It has been a whirlwind few days following the legal twists and turns surrounding former President Donald Trump. Despite his re-election in 2024, a string of legal battles from his pre-presidential period continues to unfold, captivating the nation. The New York case, the first of these, has its roots in charges dating back to March 2023. Trump was indicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, and by May 2024, a Manhattan jury found him guilty on all charges. However, in a surprising turn of events this January, Justice Juan Merchan sentenced him to "unconditional discharge," essentially sparing him prison time but leaving the conviction intact. Critics argue this leniency undercuts accountability, while supporters claim it reflects judicial fairness.Turning south, the Southern District of Florida case centered on classified documents Trump allegedly mishandled after leaving office. Initially charged with 32 counts of willfully retaining national defense information and several counts of obstruction and false statements, the case took a dramatic turn last summer. Judge Aileen Cannon, citing issues with the appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith, dismissed the indictment. Although the Justice Department appealed, it eventually withdrew its challenge last fall, effectively dropping the case. This decision remains controversial, with pundits debating whether judicial missteps or political strategies were at play.In Washington, D.C., Trump's legal challenges included accusations of obstructing the certification of the 2020 election results. However, the Supreme Court intervened, sending the case back to the lower courts. By December 2024, the government moved to dismiss the charges, leading Trump's allies to claim vindication, while critics lamented what they see as yet another missed opportunity for justice.Meanwhile, in Fulton County, Georgia, Trump was charged alongside 18 others for attempting to overturn Georgia's 2020 election results. This case, still active, is one to watch. Prosecutors in Georgia are determined to hold Trump accountable, but his legal team has mounted aggressive defenses.Beyond these cases, Trump's recent executive actions as president have sparked fresh legal disputes. His controversial initiatives, such as requiring undocumented immigrants to register or face penalties, and a directive bypassing the traditional public comment process to repeal regulations deemed unlawful, have been challenged in court. Advocacy groups argue these measures violate due process and constitutional principles, while Trump's administration claims they are necessary for national security and efficient governance.These trials and executive decisions are reshaping Trump's legacy, intertwining legal drama with political action. As the courts grapple with these cases, the nation waits, watching history unfold in real-time.

"Over the past few days, the nation has been gripped by the unfolding saga surrounding former President Donald Trump's legal battles. And while his name has long occupied headlines, the courtroom drama of this past week has laid bare the complexities of his legal entanglements.Take, for instance, the controversial use of the Alien Enemies Act. On April 1, Trump's administration sought the Supreme Court's blessing to proceed with deportations under this 1798 law, originally meant for wartime enemies. The administration's targeting of alleged Venezuelan gang members tied to Tren de Aragua has sparked furious debate. Critics argue that invoking this act, especially against individuals with tenuous gang affiliations, threatens the principles of due process. Lawyers for detainees, some of whom were labeled as gang members based on nothing more than tattoos, mounted a last-minute legal challenge, pushing back against deportations executed without court reviews. Questions surrounding the act's constitutionality now sit before the Supreme Court, leaving the legal landscape in suspense.The drama doesn't end there. Time and again, Trump's legal team has faced setbacks. In New York, the long-standing case in which he was convicted last year of falsifying business records reached its conclusion in January with an unconditional discharge. Yet, the ramifications of that guilty verdict—tied to dubious dealings in Manhattan—continue to ripple across Trump's political and business ventures.Meanwhile, the fallout from the dismissed federal cases in Florida and Washington, D.C., remains a sore point. Both cases, tied to national security and the events of January 6th, were rendered moot post-election when Trump secured an immunity ruling as president. Judge Aileen Cannon's decision regarding the mishandling of classified documents in Florida raised eyebrows, effectively shutting down the indictment against Trump and his aides. While critics railed against what some labeled a judicial overreach, others saw it as a decisive check against prosecutorial misconduct.And then there's Georgia, where Trump and his co-defendants face the weight of state law in the high-profile election interference case. As of now, proceedings in Fulton County have trudged along, with every filing and every hearing dissected by legal analysts and public spectators alike.Amidst it all, Trump's actions as sitting president continue to fuel controversy outside the courtroom. His executive orders have raised alarms among advocates and lawmakers, particularly those targeting immigration policies and legal protections for non-citizens. Just last month, his administration terminated parole status for nationals from several countries, drawing sharp rebukes from rights organizations.The gravity of these stories cannot be overstated, not just for Trump but for the country that continues to wrestle with the political and legal ramifications of his presidency. As the trials wind onward, one thing is clear: the legal and ethical questions posed will echo for years to come."

The courtroom drama surrounding Donald Trump has remained at the forefront of public attention in recent days, offering a riveting glimpse into the legal crossroads of politics. As of today, April 7, 2025, the former president is enmeshed in various high-profile legal battles that range from past allegations to ongoing executive actions.Let's start with New York, where Trump's conviction for falsifying business records concluded earlier this year with a sentencing of unconditional discharge. It was a moment of legal history as a former president was held accountable on 34 felony charges tied to altering financial documents in an effort to obscure hush money payments. The battle began back in 2023 and reached a dramatic climax last May when a Manhattan jury delivered its verdict. Though the sentencing was lenient, the conviction itself is a landmark.Meanwhile, in Florida, the prosecution's case against Trump for mishandling classified national defense documents faced a stunning reversal. Originally, Trump was accused of willfully retaining sensitive materials and obstructing justice. However, in July 2024, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed federal charges, citing improper actions by Special Counsel Jack Smith. Although the Department of Justice fought to reinstate the case, federal appeals ultimately sided with the defense by year's end, effectively closing this chapter.Washington, D.C., adds another layer of complexity. Trump was indicted for his alleged role in obstructing the certification of the 2020 election results, marking one of the most politically charged cases against him. Though the trial date initially set for March 2024 was delayed amid debates over presidential immunity, the prosecution ultimately dropped the charges last December, a quiet conclusion to what many expected to be a sensational case.In Fulton County, Georgia, Trump faces yet another legal storm. Here, he and several co-defendants were charged with conspiracy related to efforts to overturn Georgia's 2020 election results. While much of the legal wrangling remains preliminary, this case could resurface with significant consequences as the calendar advances.Beyond the courtroom, Trump's presidency continues to spark legal challenges related to his controversial policies. Specifically, his executive orders targeting sanctuary cities and his expansion of migrant deportations have ignited fierce litigation nationwide. Cities from Massachusetts to California are challenging the legality of his administration's sweeping immigration measures, spotlighting the ongoing tension between federal and local powers.Trump's legal saga underscores how the intersection of law and politics can reshape not only the lives of individuals but the very fabric of governance. For now, the nation watches, waits, and anticipates what the next turn in this judicial odyssey will bring.

Monday morning came with yet another twist in the ever-evolving legal saga of Donald J. Trump, the former and current U.S. president. Though a staggering number of cases had been filed against him, this week brought attention to the Southern District of Florida's tangled web, a case of classified documents and accusations of obstruction. There was a sense of déjà vu—the charges of mishandling national defense information have been a legal thorn for months—but this time, it seemed like closure was finally within grasp, though not without its peculiarities. The federal case, already dismissed last year by Judge Aileen Cannon on grounds of improperly appointed special counsel, resurfaced slightly when the Department of Justice abruptly withdrew its own appeal earlier this year. For Trump and his legal team, it marked yet another point in a scorekeeping battle with his critics.Meanwhile, down in Fulton County, Georgia, the criminal case accusing Trump of attempting to overturn Georgia's 2020 election results simmered in complexity. Eighteen co-defendants were still in the mix, their fate intertwined with Trump's. Despite his legal victories elsewhere, this case remains one of his most significant vulnerabilities. Prosecutors in Georgia have pushed for trial dates that stretch deep into the future, a sign that this drama will not be resolved anytime soon.New York remains a key battleground. The Manhattan case involving 34 felony counts of falsifying business records reached its climax months ago, with Justice Juan Merchan sentencing Trump to unconditional discharge in January 2025. Though not a jail sentence, the symbolic blow was unmistakable. Yet Trump, buoyed by his return to office in the wake of the 2024 election, wasted no time framing the case as political theater rather than substantive law.It's been a whirlwind for political analysts and the public alike, watching Trump navigate overlapping legal fights while simultaneously reshaping global trade policies and executive decisions. On April 2, Trump announced reciprocal tariffs of up to 50% on imports from select countries, touting them as a move to correct “nonreciprocal and discriminatory trading practices.” Even amidst legal chaos, his policymaking continues unabated, bearing the unmistakable stamp of his confrontational style.Today, April 4, 2025, marks another defining moment in this saga. With federal courts deliberating on the limits of his executive authority, state prosecutors sharpening their strategies, and Trump himself navigating the corridors of power, the narrative remains gripping. Whether seen as a comeback king or a polarizing figure, Donald Trump's story is one of unrelenting conflict and unshaken resilience—one that continues to redefine the American legal and political landscape.

As I sit here on March 31, 2025, reflecting on the whirlwind of legal battles surrounding former President Donald Trump, it's hard to believe how much has unfolded in just the past few days. The courts have been buzzing with activity, and the nation remains captivated by every twist and turn.Let's start with the New York case, where Trump was found guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records back in May 2024. Just a few months ago, on January 10, 2025, Justice Juan Merchan sentenced Trump to unconditional discharge. It was a surprising outcome that left many legal experts scratching their heads.Meanwhile, the federal cases against Trump took an unexpected turn after he won the 2024 presidential election. Both cases were dismissed, with the Southern District of Florida case being thrown out by Judge Aileen Cannon on July 15, 2024. She ruled that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. The Justice Department initially appealed but ultimately dismissed the appeal against Trump on November 29, 2024.The District of Columbia case met a similar fate. After the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the district court in August 2024, Judge Tanya Chutkan granted the government's unopposed motion to dismiss on December 6, 2024. It was a stunning reversal of fortune for Trump, who had faced serious charges related to his actions surrounding the 2020 election.But the legal drama doesn't end there. Just last week, on March 24, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral arguments in a case known as J.G.G. et al. v. Donald Trump et al. The details of this case are still emerging, but it's clear that Trump's legal battles are far from over.In recent days, we've seen a flurry of activity in various courts across the country. Cities and counties are challenging Trump's executive orders on immigration and sanctuary cities. San Francisco filed a complaint on February 7, 2025, arguing that Trump's actions violate multiple constitutional provisions and the Administrative Procedure Act.Meanwhile, immigrant advocacy groups have filed lawsuits challenging Trump's policies on migrant transfers and refugee admissions. It's a dizzying array of legal challenges that shows no signs of slowing down.Perhaps most surprisingly, we've witnessed what some are calling "The Great Grovel" – elite institutions capitulating to Trump's demands in an effort to avoid his ire. Law firms like Paul, Weiss and Skadden Arps have pledged millions in pro bono legal services to Trump-supported causes. It's a stark reminder of the power Trump still wields, even as he faces ongoing legal challenges.As we move forward, it's clear that the courts will continue to play a crucial role in shaping Trump's legacy and the future of American politics. With each passing day, new developments emerge, keeping the nation on the edge of its seat. One thing's for certain: the legal saga of Donald Trump is far from over.

As I stand outside the Manhattan courthouse on this chilly Sunday morning of March 30, 2025, the air is thick with anticipation. Just days ago, President Donald Trump received his sentence in the New York hush money case - unconditional discharge. It's been a whirlwind few months for the former and current president, with legal battles raging across multiple fronts.Let's rewind to January 10th, when Justice Juan Merchan handed down the sentence in the case involving falsified business records related to payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels. While Trump avoided jail time, the conviction itself was a significant blow to his image.But the legal saga doesn't end there. The federal cases against Trump in Florida and Washington D.C. took unexpected turns after his 2024 election victory. In July last year, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case in Florida, citing improper appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith. The Justice Department's subsequent appeal was dropped in November, effectively ending that prosecution.The January 6th case in D.C. met a similar fate. After the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the district court in August 2024, Judge Tanya Chutkan ultimately granted the government's motion to dismiss in December. The presidential immunity claim that had initially delayed the trial became moot after Trump's re-election.Now, all eyes are on the ongoing Fulton County, Georgia case. District Attorney Fani Willis's sprawling racketeering indictment against Trump and 18 co-defendants continues to wind its way through the courts. Just last week, Trump's legal team filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court, seeking to halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act - a controversial 1798 law invoked by the president to target alleged members of a Venezuelan gang.This latest move has sparked heated debate about executive power and national security. Critics argue it's an overreach, while supporters claim it's necessary to combat transnational criminal organizations. The Supreme Court's decision on this matter could have far-reaching implications for immigration policy and presidential authority.As we await further developments, one thing is clear: the intersection of law and politics has never been more contentious. With the 2025 legislative session in full swing and the aftermath of these legal battles still unfolding, the coming months promise to be a crucial period for American democracy. This is Sarah Johnson, reporting from New York City, where the story of Trump's trials continues to captivate the nation.

As I stand outside the courthouse on this chilly March morning in 2025, I can't help but reflect on the whirlwind of legal proceedings that have surrounded former President Donald Trump over the past few months. It's been a rollercoaster ride of verdicts, appeals, and new indictments that have kept the nation on the edge of its seat.Just last week, we saw the conclusion of Trump's New York case, where he was found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. Justice Juan Merchan sentenced Trump to unconditional discharge on January 10th, a surprisingly lenient outcome that left many legal experts scratching their heads.But the drama didn't end there. The federal cases against Trump in Washington D.C. and Florida took unexpected turns after his 2024 election victory. Special Counsel Jack Smith's case in Florida was dismissed by Judge Aileen Cannon, who ruled that Smith's appointment was improper. The Justice Department's subsequent appeal was dropped in November, effectively ending that prosecution.Meanwhile, the D.C. case faced its own hurdles. Judge Tanya Chutkan vacated the original trial date while the Supreme Court considered Trump's immunity claim. When the high court remanded the case back to the district court in August, it seemed the trial might proceed. However, in a shocking turn of events, Judge Chutkan granted the government's unopposed motion to dismiss the case in December.As if these developments weren't enough, Trump's administration has been busy issuing controversial executive orders. Just yesterday, he signed an order suspending security clearances for employees of the law firm WilmerHale, citing national security concerns and accusing the firm of partisan activities.But perhaps the most intriguing case on the horizon is set to unfold next week. On March 24th, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in a case known as J.G.G. et al. v. Donald Trump et al. While details are scarce, this case could potentially challenge some of Trump's recent executive actions.As I watch the lawyers and journalists rush into the courthouse, I can't help but wonder what new legal twist awaits us today. One thing's for certain: the Trump trials continue to captivate the nation, reshaping our understanding of presidential power and the limits of the law.

As I sit here on March 26, 2025, reflecting on the recent legal developments surrounding former President Donald Trump, it's hard to believe how much has unfolded in just the past few months. The courtrooms have been buzzing with activity, and the nation has been captivated by the ongoing trials.Let's start with the New York case, where Trump faced 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The trial began in April 2024, and on May 30, a Manhattan jury found him guilty on all counts. It was a shocking moment for many, seeing a former president convicted in a criminal case. On January 10, 2025, Justice Juan Merchan sentenced Trump to unconditional discharge, essentially letting him walk free without jail time or probation.Meanwhile, the federal cases against Trump took unexpected turns. In the Southern District of Florida, where he faced charges related to mishandling classified documents, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the indictment last July. She ruled that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. The Justice Department initially appealed but later dropped the case entirely.The Washington D.C. case, which centered on Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election, met a similar fate. After a series of delays and legal battles over presidential immunity, Judge Tanya Chutkan granted the government's motion to dismiss the case in December 2024.But the legal drama doesn't end there. Just last week, on March 24, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral arguments in a case related to Trump's actions during his presidency. The case, J.G.G. et al. v. Donald Trump et al., has been closely watched by legal experts and could have far-reaching implications for presidential power and accountability.Adding to the complexity, Trump's administration has been taking action to prevent what they see as abuses of the legal system. On March 21, he signed a memorandum instructing the Attorney General to prioritize seeking sanctions against attorneys and law firms engaged in what they deem frivolous litigation against the United States.As we look ahead, the legal landscape surrounding Trump remains uncertain. The Fulton County, Georgia case related to election interference is still pending, and new challenges continue to emerge. Just yesterday, Trump asked the Supreme Court to block a ruling on rehiring federal employees, demonstrating that his legal battles extend far beyond criminal matters.It's a dizzying array of legal proceedings, and as an observer, I can't help but wonder how history will ultimately judge this tumultuous period in American politics and jurisprudence. One thing's for certain: the impact of these trials will be felt for years to come, shaping our understanding of presidential power, accountability, and the rule of law in ways we're only beginning to comprehend.

As I sit here in my New York apartment on March 24, 2025, I can't help but reflect on the whirlwind of legal drama surrounding former President Donald Trump over the past few years. It's been a rollercoaster ride of indictments, trials, and political maneuvering that has captivated the nation.Just a couple of months ago, on January 10, Trump was sentenced in the New York case where he faced 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. Justice Juan Merchan handed down an unconditional discharge, which means Trump was convicted but received no punishment - no jail time, no probation, not even a fine. It was a surprising outcome that left many legal experts scratching their heads.But that's not the end of Trump's legal troubles. The federal cases against him took some unexpected turns after he won the 2024 presidential election. On July 15, 2024, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the federal indictment in the Southern District of Florida, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed. The Justice Department initially appealed but then dropped the case entirely in late November.The Washington D.C. case, which dealt with Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election, met a similar fate. Judge Tanya Chutkan granted the government's motion to dismiss on December 6, 2024. It seems Trump's victory in the 2024 election dramatically altered the legal landscape.Meanwhile, the Georgia case is still ongoing, with no clear resolution in sight. Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has faced numerous challenges and delays in bringing the case to trial.Trump's return to the White House has been marked by swift action on legal matters. Just last week, on March 21, he signed a memorandum aimed at holding attorneys and law firms accountable for what he calls "unethical conduct" in litigation against the federal government. Critics argue it's an attempt to intimidate lawyers who might challenge his administration's policies.As a citizen watching all of this unfold, I can't help but wonder about the long-term implications for our justice system and the presidency. Trump's ability to navigate these legal challenges while simultaneously winning back the White House is unprecedented in American history.The coming months are sure to bring more twists and turns. Will Trump's legal strategy of delay and dismissal continue to be effective? How will his return to power impact ongoing investigations and potential future prosecutions? As we move further into 2025, these questions loom large over our political landscape, keeping us all on the edge of our seats.

Hey there, it's your favorite legal correspondent coming to you live from the heart of New York City. What a whirlwind these past few days have been in the world of Donald Trump's legal battles. Let me catch you up on all the drama.Just last week, on March 14th, we saw a major development in the ongoing saga of Trump's diversity, equity, and inclusion executive orders. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the nationwide injunction that had been blocking these controversial EOs. This means the Trump administration can now move forward with enforcing these orders while the legal challenges continue. It's a significant win for the former president, but the fight is far from over.Now, let's talk about the big one - Trump's criminal trial in New York. On March 15th, Justice Juan Merchan made a crucial decision regarding the upcoming sentencing, which is set for January 10th, 2025. The judge ruled for an unconditional discharge, essentially meaning Trump won't face jail time or probation for his conviction on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. It's a surprising turn of events, considering the gravity of the charges.But hold on to your hats, folks, because the legal rollercoaster doesn't stop there. Just yesterday, we got word that Trump's legal team is gearing up to file an appeal. They're chomping at the bit to challenge the conviction, but here's the kicker - they can't do it until after the sentencing takes place in January. Talk about a legal cliffhanger!Meanwhile, over in Washington D.C., things have gone eerily quiet on the federal election interference case. After the Supreme Court's decision back in August to remand the case, Judge Chutkan granted the government's motion to dismiss in December. It's a stark contrast to the media frenzy we saw surrounding this case just a few months ago.And let's not forget about the document mishandling case down in Florida. That one's been in limbo since Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the federal indictment last July, citing improper appointment and funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith. The Justice Department's appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals was ultimately dismissed in late November, leaving many legal experts scratching their heads.As we sit here today, on March 19th, 2025, it's clear that Donald Trump's legal battles are far from over. With appeals pending and new developments seemingly around every corner, you can bet I'll be here, keeping you up to date on all the twists and turns. Stay tuned, folks - something tells me we're in for quite a ride.

Tuesday, March 11th, 2025Today, a damning affidavit is filed in the lawsuit against Musk gaining access to the Social Security Administration systems; the Department of Homeland Security has begun polygraph tests to determine who is leaking to the press; the Trump administration is backtracking on forcing Maine parents to visit Social Security offices to register newborns; Trump's Department of Justice is allowing the assassination attempt rifle to be shipped to Florida for inspection by the alleged shooter's lawyers; the Trump administration begs the court to vacate the order forcing the head of OPM to testify under oath in open court; the Supreme Court takes up a challenge to Colorado's conversion therapy ban; Ontario, Canada has slapped a 25% tax increase on electricity exports to the United States; protests erupt after ICE illegally detains a Columbia University Palestinian protester; and Allison and Dana deliver your Good News.Thank You Helix20% Off Sitewide when you go to HelixSleep.com/dailybeansThank You PiqueGet 20% off on the Radiant Skin Duo, plus a FREE starter kit at Piquelife.com/dailybeansStories:Supreme Court takes up challenge to Colorado conversion therapy ban | NBC NewsJudge says Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil can't be deported from U.S. as protesters call for his release | NBC NewsOntario slaps 25% tax increase on electricity exports to US in response to Trump's trade war | AP NewsTrump Administration Backtracks On Forcing Maine Parents To Visit Social Security Offices To Register Newborns - Arthur Delaney | HuffPostDHS has begun performing polygraph tests on employees to find leakers - Julia Ainsley and Jonathan Allen | NBC NewsDefense lawyers in Trump assassination attempt case tour Trump golf course, examine rifle from FBI evidence - Scott MacFarlane | CBS News Good Trouble: Members of the House of Representatives AND the Senate will be back on your home turf beginning Saturday, March 15 through Sunday, March 23. Below is everything you need to know about why recess matters, our demands, and the top actions we're recommending to get their attention. If you're ready to join the fight, sign up for updates and ways to take action against the Trump-Musk coup and the Republican tax scam. https://indivisible.org/muskorus From The Good NewsHold On -  Matthew Schickele (official lyrics)Women's Sports Foundation and Women Sport InternationalLake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­mauggReminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! Federal workers - feel free to email me at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen.Share your Good News or Good Trouble:https://www.dailybeanspod.com/good/ Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote, Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewroteDana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts

As I sit here on March 3, 2025, reflecting on the whirlwind of legal battles surrounding former President Donald Trump, it's hard to believe how much has unfolded in just the past few months. The nation has been captivated by the unprecedented spectacle of a former president facing multiple criminal charges, even as he returned to the White House for a second term.Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, Trump was sentenced in the New York hush money case. Justice Juan Merchan handed down an unconditional discharge, meaning Trump avoided jail time but still carries the weight of 34 felony convictions. The sentencing came after a dramatic eleventh-hour appeal to the Supreme Court, with Trump's team arguing that the proceedings should be halted due to his status as president-elect. Justice Sonia Sotomayor ultimately allowed the sentencing to proceed.The New York case, however, is far from over. Trump's legal team has vowed to appeal the conviction, citing the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States from last year. They argue that evidence related to Trump's official acts as president was improperly admitted during the trial. The case is now headed to the New York Court of Appeals, with the possibility of eventually making its way back to the Supreme Court.Meanwhile, the federal cases against Trump in Washington D.C. and Florida have taken surprising turns. Following Trump's election victory in November, both cases were dismissed. In D.C., Judge Tanya Chutkan granted the government's unopposed motion to dismiss on December 6, 2024. In Florida, Judge Aileen Cannon had already dismissed the classified documents case in July, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed. The Justice Department's appeal of that decision was dropped shortly after the election.The legal drama hasn't been limited to Trump's criminal cases. On February 13, Susan Grundmann, the former chair of the Federal Labor Relations Authority, filed a lawsuit challenging her abrupt removal by the Trump administration. The case highlights the ongoing tensions between Trump's desire to reshape the government and the protections afforded to independent agency leaders.As we move further into Trump's second term, the legal landscape continues to shift. His administration has already taken aim at diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives with new executive orders, prompting swift legal challenges. A federal court temporarily blocked enforcement of these orders on February 27, setting the stage for yet another legal battle.The coming months promise more twists and turns in the ongoing saga of Trump's legal troubles. As a nation, we find ourselves in uncharted territory, grappling with the implications of a sitting president carrying felony convictions while simultaneously fighting to overturn them. The outcome of these cases could have far-reaching consequences for the balance of power in our government and the very nature of presidential accountability.

It's February 28, 2025, and the legal saga surrounding former President Donald Trump continues to unfold. Just last month, on January 10th, Trump was sentenced to unconditional discharge in the New York hush money case. Judge Juan Merchan handed down the sentence, which essentially means Trump faces no real penalty, but the conviction remains on his record.The road to this sentencing was not without drama. Trump's legal team fought hard to delay or dismiss the charges, citing his November 2024 re-election and claiming political motivation. They even took their case to the Supreme Court, arguing for an extension of presidential immunity. But the New York prosecutors stood firm, urging the justices to let the sentencing proceed as scheduled.Meanwhile, the federal cases against Trump took unexpected turns. In the Southern District of Florida, where Trump faced charges related to mishandling classified documents, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the indictment last July. She ruled that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. The Justice Department initially appealed but ultimately dropped the case in November.The Washington D.C. case, which dealt with Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election, met a similar fate. After delays due to Trump's immunity claims, Judge Tanya Chutkan granted the government's motion to dismiss the case in December.But the legal battles are far from over. In Georgia, where Trump and several associates face state charges related to election interference, there's been a significant development. On December 19th, the Court of Appeals of Georgia granted a motion to disqualify District Attorney Fani Willis from the case, throwing its future into uncertainty.As we speak, President Trump is implementing his agenda for his second term. On February 19th, he issued an executive order titled "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's 'Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative." This order directs agencies to identify and rescind regulations that conflict with the administration's policies and to constrain their enforcement authorities.The political landscape has shifted dramatically, and the legal system continues to grapple with the unprecedented challenges posed by a former president facing multiple criminal indictments while serving a second term. As we move further into 2025, the nation watches closely to see how these complex legal and political narratives will continue to unfold.

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's legal battles, let's dive right into the latest developments. Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, 2025, President Trump was sentenced in the New York case to unconditional discharge by Justice Merchan. This conclusion came after a Manhattan jury found him guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records on May 30, 2024[1][4].But the New York case is just one piece of the puzzle. In the Southern District of Florida, a federal grand jury indicted Trump and his aide Waltine Nauta on June 8, 2023, charging them with willfully retaining national defense information, obstruction of justice, and making false statements. However, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the federal indictment on July 15, 2024, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. The Justice Department later dismissed the appeal against President Trump on November 29, 2024, and against Nauta and co-defendant Carlos De Oliveira on January 29, 2025[1].In Washington, D.C., Trump was indicted by a federal grand jury on August 1, 2023, on charges including corruptly obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy to defraud the United States. However, Judge Chutkan granted the government's unopposed motion to dismiss the case on December 6, 2024[1].Meanwhile, in Fulton County, Georgia, Trump and 18 co-defendants were indicted on August 14, 2023, on charges including violating the Georgia RICO Act and solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer. Four co-defendants have pleaded guilty, but a trial date for Trump and the remaining defendants has not been set. Notably, the Court of Appeals of Georgia granted the motion to disqualify District Attorney Fani Willis from the case on December 19, 2024[1].As these legal battles unfold, it's clear that President Trump's legal landscape remains as complex and contentious as ever. Despite recent dismissals and sentencing, the road ahead is paved with ongoing challenges and uncertainties. For now, we watch and wait for the next chapter in these high-stakes trials.

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's legal battles, it's essential to understand the recent developments that have shaped his trials. On January 10, 2025, a significant milestone was reached when Justice Merchan sentenced President Trump to an unconditional discharge in the New York case. This decision came after a Manhattan jury found Trump guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records on May 30, 2024[1].However, this conviction may not be as definitive as it seems. The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Trump v. United States has introduced a new constitutional framework that could potentially reverse Trump's New York conviction. This ruling, which was decided after Trump's trial, establishes that evidence related to a president's "official acts" cannot be admitted in subsequent criminal cases unless prosecutors clear a high legal threshold. Trump's legal team has seized on this, arguing that the trial court failed to follow this new framework, and they are now seeking to have the conviction overturned[3].The case is expected to head to the New York Court of Appeals, which might agree with Trump's team that the Supreme Court's decisions require the conviction to be erased. Even if the trial court's errors were minor, the Supreme Court suggests that failing to follow its new framework can never be considered "harmless." This sets the stage for the Supreme Court to eventually weigh in on Trump's New York case, transforming it into a federal matter[3].In other developments, the federal indictment against Trump in the Southern District of Florida was dismissed by Judge Aileen Cannon on July 15, 2024, due to the improper appointment and funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith. The Justice Department subsequently dismissed the appeal against Trump on November 29, 2024, and against his co-defendants on January 29, 2025[1].The District of Columbia case against Trump also saw significant changes. The original trial date was vacated by Judge Chutkan while the Supreme Court heard Trump's immunity claim. After the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the district court on August 2, 2024, Judge Chutkan granted the government's unopposed motion to dismiss the case on December 6, 2024[1].As these legal battles continue to unfold, it's clear that Donald Trump's trials are far from over. The Supreme Court's recent decisions have provided Trump with a powerful legal lifeline, and it remains to be seen how these cases will ultimately be resolved.

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's court trials, let's dive straight into the latest developments. Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, 2025, President Trump was sentenced to an unconditional discharge in the New York case involving falsifying business records. This case, which began on April 15, 2024, saw Trump found guilty of 34 felony counts by a Manhattan jury on May 30, 2024[3].Before the sentencing, Trump had sought to halt the proceedings, arguing that preparing for a criminal sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him. He filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, citing the justices' decision in *Trump v. United States* and arguing for presidential immunity. However, Justice Juan Merchan rejected Trump's plea, emphasizing that all that remained was the imposition of sentence and that Trump could appear virtually to alleviate his concerns[1].Despite Trump's efforts to delay the sentencing, Justice Merchan proceeded with the original schedule. Trump was ultimately sentenced to an unconditional discharge, meaning he would not face any serious punishment, but the fact of his conviction would remain on record[3].In other cases, Trump faced indictments in the Southern District of Florida and Washington, D.C. The Florida case, which charged Trump and his aides with retaining national defense information and obstruction of justice, was dismissed by Judge Aileen Cannon due to the improper appointment and funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith. The Justice Department later dismissed the appeal against Trump and his co-defendants[3].The Washington, D.C. case, which involved charges of obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy, was also dismissed by Judge Chutkan after the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the district court[3].As of today, February 23, 2025, these developments mark significant milestones in the ongoing saga of Trump's legal battles. The unconditional discharge in the New York case and the dismissals in the Florida and D.C. cases underscore the complex and often contentious nature of these proceedings.

Here's a narrative script on the recent court trials involving Donald Trump:Donald Trump, the newly elected President of the United States, has been at the center of several high-profile court trials. Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, 2025, Trump was sentenced in a New York trial court to an unconditional discharge for 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. These crimes stemmed from his efforts to illegally influence the 2016 presidential election by hiding reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels.The trial, which began on April 15, 2024, saw a Manhattan jury find Trump guilty on May 30, 2024. Despite the conviction, Justice Juan Merchan decided not to impose any serious punishment, opting instead for an unconditional discharge. This decision has been seen as symbolically significant, marking Trump as the first criminal elected to the presidency.However, Trump's legal battles are far from over. Before his sentencing, Trump had asked the Supreme Court to intervene in his hush money case, arguing that the criminal proceedings should be put on hold while his claims of presidential immunity are addressed. Trump cited the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States, which could potentially reshape the constitutional framework for constraining the behavior of U.S. presidents.In his appeal to the Supreme Court, Trump argued that forcing him to prepare for a criminal sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an intolerable and unconstitutional burden on him. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request, but ultimately, the sentencing proceeded as scheduled.Trump's legal entanglements also include dismissed federal cases in the Southern District of Florida and Washington, D.C. In Florida, a federal grand jury indicted Trump and his aide Waltine Nauta on charges including willfully retaining national defense information and obstruction of justice. However, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the indictment, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. The Justice Department later dismissed the appeal against Trump and his co-defendants.As Trump navigates these complex legal landscapes, his presidency remains under scrutiny. The question on everyone's mind is how long he can maintain his position as the first criminal president of the United States. Only time will tell if Trump's legal battles will ultimately lead to his exoneration or further entanglements.

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's court trials, let's dive straight into the latest developments. Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, 2025, President Trump was sentenced to an unconditional discharge in the New York case involving falsifying business records. This outcome was a result of his conviction on 34 felony counts in May 2024, related to hiding reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election[1][3].Before the sentencing, Trump made a last-minute appeal to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to halt the criminal sentencing scheduled for January 10. In a 40-page filing, Trump argued that preparing for sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him. However, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request, which ultimately did not alter the course of events[1].The New York case is just one of several legal battles Trump has faced. In the Southern District of Florida, Trump and his aide Waltine Nauta were indicted on charges including willfully retaining national defense information and obstruction of justice. However, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the federal indictment in July 2024, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. The Justice Department later dismissed the appeal against Trump and his co-defendants[3].In another case, in the District of Columbia, Trump was indicted on charges including corruptly obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy to defraud the United States. However, Judge Chutkan granted the government's unopposed motion to dismiss the case in December 2024, following the Supreme Court's remand of the case back to the district court[3].These developments highlight the ongoing legal challenges Trump faces, even as he prepares to take office. The unconditional discharge in the New York case, while not imposing jail time, leaves the fact of his conviction intact, a significant legal and political consequence. As these trials continue to unfold, they remain a critical part of the broader narrative surrounding Trump's presidency and legal battles.

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's legal battles, let's dive right into the latest developments. Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, 2025, President Trump was sentenced to an unconditional discharge in the New York case involving 34 counts of falsifying business records. This case, which began with an indictment by a Manhattan grand jury on March 30, 2023, culminated in a guilty verdict on May 30, 2024, and ultimately, Justice Juan Merchan's decision to impose an unconditional discharge.However, before this sentencing, Trump made a last-minute appeal to the Supreme Court on January 8, 2025, asking the justices to halt the criminal sentencing scheduled for January 10. Trump argued that preparing for sentencing while preparing to assume the presidency imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him. Despite this, Justice Sonia Sotomayor directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request, and ultimately, the sentencing proceeded as planned.This New York case is just one of several legal challenges Trump faces. In the Southern District of Florida, Trump and his aide Waltine Nauta were indicted on June 8, 2023, on charges including willfully retaining national defense information and obstruction of justice. However, on July 15, 2024, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the federal indictment, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. The Justice Department later dismissed the appeal against Trump on November 29, 2024.In another case, Trump was indicted by a federal grand jury in Washington, D.C. on August 1, 2023, on charges including corruptly obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy to defraud the United States. The original trial date was vacated by Judge Chutkan while the Supreme Court heard Trump's immunity claim, and on August 2, 2024, the Supreme Court remanded the case.These legal battles continue to unfold, with Trump's legal team navigating multiple fronts. As we move forward, it's clear that these trials will remain a significant part of the national conversation. With each new development, the stakes are raised, and the nation watches closely to see how these cases will ultimately be resolved.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.serioustrouble.showIt's the first Serious Trouble of the new Trump administration. We start with a discussion of pardons: the ones Joe Biden gave on his way out of office and the ones Donald Trump gave on his way in.For premium subscribers: the Jack Smith reports (the one about the January 6 prosecution which was released publicly, and the one about the documents prosecution, which Judge Aileen Cannon has blocked from being released to Congress), New York Mayor Eric Adams' overt campaign for a pardon, a defamation lawsuit that CNN lost (and apparently deserved to lose, says Ken), and finally, we express our thanks to Drake for filing consistently entertaining legal actions that we get to cover — in this case, a defamation lawsuit against his own music label.Not a premium subscriber? Visit serioustrouble.show to upgrade.

Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon has done Trump yet another favor by prohibiting the Department of Justice from releasing to the leadership of the House and Senate Judicial Committees Volume 2 of Special Counsel Jack Smith's report regarding Trump's unlawful retention of classified documents, obstruction of justice, and violations of our nation's espionage laws. In a piece Glenn authored for MSNBC, he explains why he was so worried about the decision of federal prosecutors to not fight the jurisdictional battle, given that Judge Cannon has no authority to continue to issue orders in a case she dismissed - a case that is currently on appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.Link to Glenn's MSNBC article:https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-o...If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2X aka Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/glennkirschn...TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/glennkirschner2See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon has done Trump yet another favor by prohibiting the Department of Justice from releasing to the leadership of the House and Senate Judicial Committees Volume 2 of Special Counsel Jack Smith's report regarding Trump's unlawful retention of classified documents, obstruction of justice, and violations of our nation's espionage laws. In a piece Glenn authored for MSNBC, he explains why he was so worried about the decision of federal prosecutors to not fight the jurisdictional battle, given that Judge Cannon has no authority to continue to issue orders in a case she dismissed - a case that is currently on appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.Link to Glenn's MSNBC article:https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-o...If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2X aka Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/glennkirschn...TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/glennkirschner2See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Supreme Court declined to save Donald Trump from being sentenced in his New York criminal case, but the justices said that decision was in part because there wasn't much to save him from: Judge Juan Merchan had indicated that he would sentence Trump to an unconditional discharge, i.e. no punishment. In other Trump-criminal-case-wind-down news, Judge Aileen Cannon has continued to make trouble for DOJ officials seeking to release parts of a report about Trump's two federal criminal prosecutions. Plus: Smartmatic's defamation case against Fox News (and Fox Corporation) moves closer to trial; an FBI informant lied to the government about Joe and Hunter Biden receiving $10 million in bribes from Ukrainian sources and he was also evading taxes, and so he ended up being prosecuted by the same prosecutor who was prosecuting Hunter Biden for evading taxes, and he pleaded guilty, and now he's been sentenced; and Rudy Giuliani is now in double contempt, in federal courts in New York and Washington. Visit serioustrouble.show to find a transcript of this episode. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.serioustrouble.show/subscribe

Judge Aileen Cannon is popping off, the Alex Jones bankruptcy continues to be crazy, and judges in Arkansas are going to war with each other. Plus, as always, we'll check in with our pal Rudy.   Links: Alex Jones - TX Plaintiffs settlement https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txsb.459750/gov.uscourts.txsb.459750.1011.0.pdf   McKesson v. Arkansas complaint https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3671323-McKesson-Complaint/   Baker Jan. 1 appointment orders https://arkansasadvocate.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Appointment-Orders.pdf   Arkansas Administrative Order 24 https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/supremecourt/en/item/523224/index.do   Arkansas Supreme Court per curiam opinion 1/6/25 https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/supremecourt/en/item/523226/index.do   “Order of Chief Justice,” 2025 Ark. 4 https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/supremecourt/en/item/523231/index.do   Trump emergency motion to block release of Smith Report https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.700.0_1.pdf   Giuliani NY docket https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.627518/ Show Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod Patreon: patreon.com/LawAndChaosPod  

Monday, January 13, 2025 Subscribe: Get the Daily Update in your inbox for free 1/ A federal judge ruled that the Justice Department may release the portion of special counsel Jack Smith's report on Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The release is expected as early as Tuesday. Judge Aileen Cannon, however, mainta... Visit WTF Just Happened Today? for more news and headlines, brought to you by Matt Kiser. The WTFJHT Podcast is narrated and produced by Joe Amditis.

Get ready to watch some of Trump's top cabinet picks try and secure their jobs at their Senate confirmation hearings this week. Former CIA director John Brennan explains why some of Trump's intelligence picks should be disqualified from those positions. Plus, Santa Monica, California mayor, Lana Negrete, talks about what is happening on the ground in and around her city.

This week on the Mark Levin Show, we had the official Constitutional certification of Donald Trump as President after he won a landslide victory. But there was no peaceful transfer of power yet – from this moment forward the Democrat party is looking to sabotage Trump's presidency just as they did in 2016. Later, Judge Juan Merchan says he'll sentence Trump this Friday because all the left wants is to call Trump a convicted criminal. Merchan has lit a match to the supremacy clause and the electoral system. He has interfered in the Constitutional process like no other Judge and some say there's nothing we can do to fight back. Later, the actions of Attorney General Merrick Garland to the rulings of Judge Aileen Cannon unpacks the complex interplay of politics and justice. A few decades ago, California was known as one of the greatest States, now it has become a one-party-run, third-world hell hole. California is run by unserious ideologues who believe they are smarter than us. The politicians in California claim they care about the environment yet look what they've done to the environment. We're led to believe we are abusing nature - no nature abuses us whether we like it or not. It appears that everything that could go wrong went wrong in California. Not by nature but the ideologues who run California. We need answers and accountability. Why were they pushing radical, left-wing ideological policies that put people at risk, such as DEI and environmental justice programs? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Sarah and George get into Donald Trump's legal troubles, including his official sentencing in the New York hush money trial. George also breaks down the implications of Trump's conviction and the vote breakdown from the Supreme Court. The duo also discuss Judge Aileen Cannon's controversial rulings and the potential release of the January 6th and classified documents reports. Upgrade your wardrobe instantly and save 20% off with the code CONWAY at https://www.publicrec.com/conway #publicrecpod #sponsored  Get 15% off OneSkin with the code ASKGEORGE at https://www.oneskin.co/ #oneskinpod #sponsored  Start your new morning ritual & get up to 43% off your @MUDWTR order by going to https://mudwtr.com/askgeorge! #mudwtrpod #sponsored Love the show but hate the ads? Sign up with Bulwark+ and get access to exclusive, ad-free versions of ALL Bulwark podcasts! https://www.thebulwark.com/subscribe

A convicted felon will become president for the first time in history. President-elect Donald Trump was officially sentenced to unconditional release for 34 felonies in New York. Lawyers Andrew Weissmann and Marc Elias talk about the sentencing and how to hold Trump accountable in his second term. Plus, California's attorney general, Rob Bonta talks about what is happening on the ground in Los Angeles as tens of thousands are displaced by wildfires.

Did Trump-appointed judge Aileen Cannon abuse her judicial discretion yet again in favor of Donald Trump? Judge Cannon no longer presides over the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, as it is now in the exclusive jurisdiction of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. Apparently undeterred by her lack of jurisdiction over the documents case, The New York Times just reported that, "Judge Cannon Blocks Release of Special Counsel's Final Report on Trump."Will this act turn out to be the third time Judge Cannon abuses her judicial discretion to the benefit of Trump?Glenn discusses the implications of this latest Cannon ruling.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2X aka Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/glennkirschn...TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/glennkirschner2See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This week, we learned that Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito spoke privately with Donald Trump to recommend a former clerk for a job. Jamie Raskin just tore into this news, urging Alito to recuse himself from Trump-related matters. This comes as Trump asked the high court to block a New York judge from sentencing him for his hush money conviction. What Raskin got right is to zero in on the corruption embedded in Trump's relationship with the Supreme Court. After all, between this and Judge Aileen Cannon ordering Special Counsel Jack Smith not to release his report on the evidence he's collected against Trump, the courts face a legitimacy crisis. We talked to Politico's Kyle Cheney, who untangles all these stories and explains what's coming next. Listen to this episode here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Trump narrowly loses his bid at SCOTUS to stave off his sentencing in New York. And the 11th Circuit denies his bid to bury the Special Counsel report. But the case is now back in front of Judge Aileen Cannon, so opportunities for f*ckery abound!   Links:   Judge Cannon Manages To Out-Crazy Judge Kacsmaryk   https://www.lawandchaospod.com/p/judge-cannon-manages-to-out-crazy    SCOTUS Trump Docket https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24a666.html   US v. Trump, Cannon Docket via Court Listener https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490069/united-states-v-trump   US v. Nauta, 11th Circuit Docket via Court Listener https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca11.87822    SCOTUS TikTok Docket https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-656.html    Salaam v. Trump Docket via Court Listener https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69279738/salaam-v-trump/    Griffin v. NC Board of Elections Docket via Democracy Docket https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/north-carolina-supreme-court-2024-election-protests-rejection-challenge/    Filthy Kentucky Title IX Order https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.kyed.104801/gov.uscourts.kyed.104801.143.0_1.pdf    Freeman v. Giulani, DC Docket via Court Listener https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68097449/freeman-v-giuliani  Show Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod Patreon: patreon.com/LawAndChaosPod  

Did Trump-appointed judge Aileen Cannon abuse her judicial discretion yet again in favor of Donald Trump? Judge Cannon no longer presides over the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, as it is now in the exclusive jurisdiction of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. Apparently undeterred by her lack of jurisdiction over the documents case, The New York Times just reported that, "Judge Cannon Blocks Release of Special Counsel's Final Report on Trump."Will this act turn out to be the third time Judge Cannon abuses her judicial discretion to the benefit of Trump?Glenn discusses the implications of this latest Cannon ruling.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2X aka Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/glennkirschn...TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/glennkirschner2See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This week, we learned that Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito spoke privately with Donald Trump to recommend a former clerk for a job. Jamie Raskin just tore into this news, urging Alito to recuse himself from Trump-related matters. This comes as Trump asked the high court to block a New York judge from sentencing him for his hush money conviction. What Raskin got right is to zero in on the corruption embedded in Trump's relationship with the Supreme Court. After all, between this and Judge Aileen Cannon ordering Special Counsel Jack Smith not to release his report on the evidence he's collected against Trump, the courts face a legitimacy crisis. We talked to Politico's Kyle Cheney, who untangles all these stories and explains what's coming next. Listen to this episode here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week, we learned that Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito spoke privately with Donald Trump to recommend a former clerk for a job. Jamie Raskin just tore into this news, urging Alito to recuse himself from Trump-related matters. This comes as Trump asked the high court to block a New York judge from sentencing him for his hush money conviction. What Raskin got right is to zero in on the corruption embedded in Trump's relationship with the Supreme Court. After all, between this and Judge Aileen Cannon ordering Special Counsel Jack Smith not to release his report on the evidence he's collected against Trump, the courts face a legitimacy crisis. We talked to Politico's Kyle Cheney, who untangles all these stories and explains what's coming next. Listen to this episode here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Tuesday's Mark Levin Show, President-Elect Trump sees that China and Russia are scouring the world. They're building ships to control navigable waters and they're in all parts of the globe. Trump sees how we're getting choked off and looks towards Panama Canal and Greenland. Trump knows the Panama Canal is critical to our enemies. The idea that China has control of it is an abomination and the Democrats have no answer to this. Later, Judge Aileen Cannon blocked Jack Smith from releasing his report. She previously ruled Smith's appointment was unconstitutional; he shouldn't be filing anything because she ruled he doesn't exist. Also, Biden just commuted the sentences of horrific murderers but the media lectures Trump about pardoning the January 6'ers. Afterward, the serial rape of thousands of English girls in Britain by mostly Pakistan Muslims went on for years and was covered up. The government tried to bury the story because those in power were intimidated by Pakistani Muslims and didn't want to be accused of racism. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Wednesday, January 8th, 2025Today, Judge Aileen Cannon has blocked the release of Jack Smith's final report; the Republican controlled North Carolina Supreme Court has blocked the state from certifying the Democrat as the winner of the high court election; Senator Elizabeth Warren is sounding the alarm bells about Pete Hegseth; Zuckerburg says Meta will end fact checking in favor of community notes; an appeals court has denied Trump's attempt to postpone his sentencing this Friday; Trump says he's willing to use military force to obtain Greenland and the Panama Canal; the Pentagon agrees to settle a historic lawsuit with LGBTQ+ veterans over discharge status; and Allison and Dana delivers your Good News.Thank You Helix25% Off Sitewide + 2 Free Dream Pillows with Mattress Purchase when you go  to HelixSleep.com/dailybeans.Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote, Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewroteDana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedy If you want to support what Harry Dunn and I are up to, head to patreon.com/aisle45podHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/Something to dohttps://www.justice.gov/doj/webform/your-message-department-justiceChoose “Message to the Attorney General” from the drop down.From The Good Newshttp://Kindness2025.orghello@kindness.org for Biscuithttps://www.twitch.tv/katydubu Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote, Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewroteDana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts

Today's Headlines: Meta announced it's ending its fact-checking program, replacing it with community notes and undoing limits on political content in feeds. Meanwhile, Dana White, UFC president and Trump ally, joined Meta's board. Judge Aileen Cannon temporarily blocked Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on Trump's classified documents and election interference cases, pending appeal. Trump criticized former President Carter during his press conference and hinted at military action to control the Panama Canal and Greenland. Donald Trump Jr. visited Greenland as a private citizen but received no official meetings, while Greenland reaffirmed it's not for sale. Minneapolis and the DOJ reached a consent decree to implement mandatory police reforms after George Floyd's killing. A new study found fewer than 0.1% of teens receive gender-affirming care, despite 3% identifying as transgender in a recent CDC survey. The Biden administration announced plans to remove medical debt from credit reports and eliminate $15 billion in medical debt, expected to improve credit scores for over 15 million Americans. Resources/Articles mentioned in this episode: NBC News: Meta is ending its fact-checking program in favor of a 'community notes' system similar to X's WA Post: UFC's Dana White joins Meta board MSNBC: Judge Aileen Cannon temporarily blocks the release of Jack Smith's final report AP News: Takeaways from Trump's Mar-a-Lago press conference AP News: Donald Trump Jr. arrives in Greenland with a message from his dad: 'We're going to treat you well' WA Post: Years after Floyd's death, Minneapolis and DOJ agree to police changes NPR: Few transgender minors receive gender-affirming care medicines, study finds Whitehouse: FACT SHEET: Vice President Harris Announces Final Rule Removing Medical Debt from All Credit Reports | The White House  Morning Announcements is produced by Sami Sage alongside Bridget Schwartz and edited by Grace Hernandez-Johnson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Your host Josh Hammer analyzes President Trump's final loss in his attempt to halt his Friday sentencing in NYC judge Juan Merchan's courtroom. What will the "criminal" sentence be in this truly farcical case, and what will Trump's inevitable appeal(s) look like? Plus, another big legal victory for Trump in Judge Aileen Cannon's Florida courtroom, Pam Bondi's attorney general confirmation hearing appears set for next week, and more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Why did Judge Aileen Cannon prohibit the release of special counsel Jack Smith's report about his investigations into President-elect Donald Trump? Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance break down Cannon's order and Trump's request for the report to not be made public. In the full episode, Preet and Joyce discuss:  – Trump's upcoming sentencing for his Manhattan conviction, and the judge's recent order revealing he will not sentence Trump to prison time;  – The terror attack in New Orleans, where a man drove a truck through a crowd celebrating the new year, and the investigation into law enforcement failures and the driver's ties to terrorist groups. CAFE Insiders click HERE to listen to the full analysis. To become a member of CAFE Insider head to cafe.com/insider. You'll get access to full episodes of the podcast and other exclusive content. This podcast is brought to you by CAFE and Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Recall that Special Counsel Jack Smith was required by Department of Justice policy to dismiss the classified documents case against Donald Trump because DOJ has a horrific policy that a criminal president cannot be prosecuted while in office. However, the Mara-a-Lago documents case continues against Trump's two co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos de Oliveira. The case presently is being appealed as a result of Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon dismissing the case contrary to existing precedent. Given that Jack Smith is stepping down as Special Counsel, he just transferred the classified documents case to federal prosecutors at the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. Glenn discusses what we can expect moving forward.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this final episode of 2024, MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord are joined by Dahlia Lithwick, Slate Senior Editor and host of the Amicus podcast. Together, they take stock of the legal hills and valleys of this past year, and the role the Supreme Court played in how Donald Trump's criminal cases were litigated. They also take a beat to consider the impact of legal journalism in the year ahead and the responsibility of legacy media to continue to hold power to account.Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts.

After a quick review of the Georgia Court of Appeals decision disqualifying Fani Willis from Donald Trump's criminal case based on an appearance of impropriety, MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord are joined by NYU Law professor and Dean Emeritus, Trevor Morrison. The discussion revolves around the limits and scope of the presidential pardon power, the legal precedence of a blanket pardon for crimes not yet adjudicated, and whether a president can in fact, pardon himself. Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts. 

There's been significant action in New York as Judge Juan Merchan denied one of Donald Trump's motions to dismiss his 34-count verdict- this one based on the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision. After a noteworthy amount of speed reading several motions and responses, MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord break down Merchan's rationale, highlighting the specifics of his multi-layered legal reasoning. Then, they turn to another fully briefed pending dismissal motion, this one based on the temporary immunity a sitting president is granted for official acts while serving. Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts. You'll also hear a recent Premium episode from Andrew and Mary detailing our national security apparatus and why Trump's nominees for these top posts matter.

Within the 80-page motion filed last week to dismiss Donald Trump's New York criminal case, there's a long list of grievances laid out by his legal team. MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord underscore some of the substantive arguments as to why a sitting president might find a pending case constricting, reasoning that there are aspects that could interfere with effective functioning of the presidency. But they also illuminate how these merits are buried deep within pages of hyperbole of alleged unfairness to the president-elect, prompting Andrew to ask, in terms of the facts, “Where's the beef?” Then they turn to some analysis of a letter written by incoming Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley, which calls out current FBI Director Christopher Wray with a personal vote of no confidence. Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts. This week, you'll find a Premium episode from Andrew and Mary highlighting the national security apparatus and why Trump's nominees for these top posts matter.

In person together at 30 Rock, veteran prosecutors Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord use their combined expertise in FBI and Justice Department standards to lay plain how far outside the norm the incoming president is aiming, by flouting a congressionally mandated 10-year appointment of an FBI Director and naming loyalist Kash Patel to replace Christopher Wray. Then, they take a beat to reflect on President Biden's unexpected pardon of his son Hunter and remind listeners of several active January 6th civil cases brought against Donald Trump  that may provide the only litigation of his actions after the 2020 election. Also, on Monday, Trump's brief was due in New York as to why his case should be dismissed based on the immunity of a sitting president. At the time of this recording, it had not yet hit the docket, but Andrew and Mary review the stakes and Judge Merchan's denial of delaying the filing.Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts. As a subscriber you'll also be able to get occasional bonus content from this and other shows.

As the Special Counsel winds down the DC criminal case and the Florida appeal, veteran prosecutors Mary McCord and Andrew Weissmann analyze the strategy behind getting a dismissal without prejudice before Donald Trump takes office, while dispelling the notion that Jack Smith “folded” in any way. Then, they head to New York to break down the nuance of Judge Merchan's decision to postpone Trump's sentencing, as he accepts briefing on a motion to dismiss the case that both parties agreed to. And before wrapping up, Mary and Andrew review some of the presumptive nominees Trump has named for top Justice Department posts, and the contrast of working on behalf of a client versus working on behalf of the Constitution.A note to listeners: Since we recorded, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also granted Special Counsel Jack Smith's request to dismiss that appeal without prejudice.Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts. As a subscriber you'll also be able to get occasional bonus content from this and other shows. 

Even after the New York DA's position with respect to a dismissal of Donald Trump's New York case was filed, there are lingering questions about what happens next with his other criminal cases as he begins his transition back to power and unveils his cabinet nominees. MSNBC legal analysts Mary McCord and Andrew Weissmann give an insider's perspective on what a final report in the DC case might look like from Special Counsel Jack Smith, as is a requirement within the special counsel rules. What will it encapsulate? And will it be made public? Next up: a few cases involving J6 rioters have been denied a stay, while others have had their trials postponed, but an overarching theme is that Trump's immunity should not extend to these defendants. And finally, Mary and Andrew ‘nerd out' on the Constitutional process of how a recess appointment works, why the early framers thought it necessary, and how the president-elect is angling to use it to avoid the Senate's long held role of advice and consent when it comes to political appointees.  Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts. As a subscriber you'll also be able to get occasional bonus content from this and other shows. This week, you can get a premium-only bonus episode of Chris Hayes' podcast “Why Is This Happening?”. In it, Chris sits down with Rachel Maddow to reflect on lessons learned from this election cycle and what to expect in the new administration, including the recess appointments Andrew and Mary spoke about in this episode. 

There's a lot to unpack around Donald Trump's ongoing criminal and civil cases after he won last week's election. To begin with, veteran prosecutors Mary McCord and Andrew Weissmann explain why Judge Merchan agreed to the joint request to put off today's decision on the impact of immunity in his hush money case. Then, they dig into the constitutional arguments against prosecuting a president while in office, whether federally or as a state prosecution, and how that might also relate to sentencing in New York. Next up, Andrew and Mary illustrate how Trump's win might impact his civil cases, to include both E Jean Carroll cases and his New York civil fraud case. And wrapping up, the duo reflect on the efforts by those convicted in J6 cases to have them dismissed or stayed, as they await a potential pardon by the president-elect.Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts. As a subscriber you'll also be able to get occasional bonus content from this and other shows.